Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Subject: Math
Grade Level: Kindergarten
School: Dunbar Primary School
Cooperating Teacher: Mary Ellis
University Supervisor: B. Korn
Number Tested: 18
Date of Pre-Test: March 9, 2015
Date Post- Test: March 27, 2015
Average Pre-Test: 48.9%
Average Post Test: 93.9%
Overall Gain: 45%
math groups every day so that we each could see all four groups in a week.
During both the math workstations and the math groups, students worked on
subtraction activities as a form of independent and guided practice.
Unit Objectives:
Link to Standards:
M.K.OA.1
M.K.OA.2
M.K.OA.5
Each problem on the test was provided with objects that can be used to cross
out to help the students find the answer, as a form of take away. The pretest determined which students could compute subtraction problems and
which could not.
guided math groups. The guided math groups for subtraction are as followed
with group A being the highest and group D being the group that needed the
most intervention.
Group A
Group B
Group C
Group D
Student 5
Student 6
Student 10
Student 11
Student 13
Student 16
Student 18
Student 3
Student 7
Student 8
Student 14
Student 17
Student 4
Student 9
Student 12
Student 15
Student 1
Student 2
1) Magic Zero Whole Group Lesson: This lesson is one of the first
whole group instructions. Many students missed the equations dealing
with zero. This lesson goes over the 0 rule and offers a chance of
guided practice. (M.K.OA.5 & M.K.OA.2)
2) Cookie Jar and Cookie Manipulatives: Guided math activity where
students place cookies on the jar and take away some to find the sum.
( M.K.OA.2)
3) Pete the Cat Ten Frame: Ten frame subtraction using buttons.
(M.K.OA.2)
4) Frogs on a Log: Paper frogs to fold over a log to compute subtraction
problems. (M.K.OA.2)
5) Ten Finger Subtraction: Paper hands to fold over fingers to compute
subtraction problems. (M.K.OA.2)
6) Egg Hunt: students use a magnifying glass to find the math problems
hidden in the eggs. They write the problems that they found on a
basket and find the sum. (M.K.OA.5)
7) Who Took the Cookies from the Cookie Jar: each student was
given a paper with a jar on it. They make up a subtraction problem and
illustrate it by drawing cookies in the jar. (M.K.OA.2)
8) Five Little Birdies: Five Little Birdies is a story where students fill in
numbers and do subtraction problems. The story goes Five little
birdies flying around the door. One flew away and now there are ___.
(M.K.OA.5)
9) Basic subtraction worksheets were students were able to mark out
pictures to help them subtract. (M.K.OA.5 & M.K.OA.2)
10)
Smart Board Games: these games including activities with
manipulatives such as objects to take away and ten frames. There
were also games subtraction word problems. (M.K.OA.2 & M.K.OA.5)
I was
I was
overly pleased with how well all of my students performed on their posttests.
Even though
some students score a 100% on both pre-test and post-test, they too showed
gain by accelerating the expectations and subtracting within 20 instead of
just 10. I found ways to make sure that they too took away from this unit.
After I had finally gathered all of my data, I disaggregated it into two
ways. First, I disaggregated the scores of my female students with my male
students.
females and males had the same average pre-test score. However, females
scored 5.6% higher on their post-test and had a 5.6% higher overall gain
than males. I was very proud of my females and my males of their interest
in subtraction and the hard work that they put in.
Second, I disaggregated the scores of students who may be identified
as exceptional learners, those who are receiving additional services and
interventions. There are two students who were retained in kindergarten last
year, as a means for intervention. One of these students now has an IEP and
received special educational services. There are also two students who go to
Title I for Math Interventions and an ESL student. Their disaggregated data
shows that their pre-test average was a 26%. I was so pleased to see that
their post-test score was 88% and that they have overall gains of 62%!
Post-Test
Raw Score
(Out of 10)
Pre-Test
Percent
Post-Test
Percent
Overall
Gain
0%
90%
90%
0%
90%
90%
40%
90%
50%
10
0%
100%
100%
10
10
100%
100%
0%
10
90%
100%
10%
10
40%
100%
60%
10
30%
100%
70%
0%
90%
90%
10
10
10
100
100%
0%
11
10
90%
100%
10%
12
10
20%
100%
80%
13
10
90%
100%
10%
14
30%
60 %
30%
15
10
10%
100%
90%
16
10
10
100%
100%
0%
17
40%
70%
30%
18
10
10
100%
100%
0%
Class
Avg
4.9
9.4
48.9%
93.9%
45%
10
Student
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
10
Post-Test
Raw Score
(Out of 10)
Pre-Test
Percent
Post-Test
Percent
Overall
Gain
0%
90%
90%
40%
90%
50%
10
0%
100%
100%
0%
90%
90%
10
10
10
100
100%
0%
11
10
90%
100%
10%
12
10
20%
100%
80%
13
10
90%
100%
10%
18
Class
Avg
10
10
100%
100%
0%
4.89
9.67
48.9%
96.7%
47.8%
Post-Test
Raw Score
(Out of 10)
Pre-Test
Percent
Post-Test
Percent
Overall
Gain
0%
90%
90%
10
10
100%
100%
0%
10
90%
100%
10%
10
40%
100%
60%
10
30%
100%
70%
14
30%
60 %
30%
15
10
10%
100%
90%
16
10
10
100%
100%
0%
17
Class
Avg
40%
70%
30%
4.89
9.11
48.9%
91.1%
42.2%
Female
Male
Average
Pre-Test
Raw Score
(Out of 10)
Post-Test
Raw Score
(Out of 10)
Pre-Test
Percent
Post-Test
Percent
Overall
Gain
0%
90%
90%
0
9
9
10
0%
90%
90%
100%
90%
10%
0%
90%
90%
40%
70%
30%
2.6
8.8
26%
88%
62%
Pre-Test Score
Number Correct
5
4
3
2
1
0
Post-Test Score
From
14
Pre-Test
Raw Score
(Out of 10)
3
Post-Test
Raw Score
(Out of 10)
6
17
Studen
t
Pre-Test
Percent
Post-Test
Percent
Overall
Gain
30%
60 %
30%
40%
70%
30%
Student 14 scored a 3/10 on his pre-test and only had 30% gain on his
post-test.
work with him more one on one in order to raise his post-test score to
Student
Pre-Test
Raw Score
Post-Test
Raw Score
Pre-Test
Percent
Post-Test
Percent
Overall
Gain
5
10
16
subtraction activities for the math rotations for them to participate in. I
would give them subtraction within 20 and the option of whether or not
they want to use their manipulatives or not, since many of them just
used mental math to solve the problems on their post-test.