Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
OVERVIEW/ RATIONALE
This lesson serves as the first lesson in the unit on the years leading up to the American Revolutionary War (1733-1776). The
lessons in this unit will detail and explain marquee events leading up to the American Revolution (examples: the Molasses
Act, the Stamp Act, the Quartering Act, the Boston Tea Party, etc.), providing the students with a context that will help them
understand the causes for Americas secession from Great Britain.
This particular lesson will focus on one of the key events that preceded the American Revolution: the Molasses Act, which
will serve to introduce students to the concept of trading.
Students will begin the period by being introduced to a new class concept: journals. Each student will receive a journal where
they, for the rest of the year, will complete their Do-Now, non-note writing, reflections, and an Exit Ticket. These journals
will serve as a way to gauge class understanding, interests, and help with attendance.
After the introduction of journals, students will be given five minutes to complete a student inventory that will help me with
their names, goals for the class, and help me better get to know them. After this, students will complete their Journal Prompt.
Students will then be given information about the Molasses act, molasses, and colonial geography. The rest of the class will
be devoted to a trading game, then an exit-slip.
ENDURING UNDERSTANDINGS
GOALS/OBJECTIVES
Students will know what the Molasses Act did and how it affected New England Colonists.
Students will understand the relationship between the importation of Molasses, how it was used to make rum and
other goods, and how the Molasses Act hurt business.
Students will be able to locate where in the world molasses came from and which colonies imported it.
Students will be able to simulate trading and understand how trade affects different countries.
STANDARDS
MATERIALS
Journals
Computer
Projector
SmartBoard
Slips of paper
PROCEDURES
As an exit-ticket, students will be asked the following question: If you were a New England Colonist,
would you have wanted to lose money because of the Molasses Act? Why or why not?
ACCOMODATIONS
o I do not anticipate the lesson being too challenging for students. However, I will provide a copy of the
notes on the Molasses Act to students to reinforce their learning (but will not tell them, first) and will go
over the information in a pre-test review at the end of the unit.
ASSESSMENT/EVALUATION
o I will know if my students have absorbed the materials by observing the following behaviors:
Students will copy the notes on the Molasses Act and ask questions if they are confused.
Students will engage with the interactive portion of the molasses lesson by coming to the board
to engage with the molasses trade.
Students will participate in the simulation and, after modeling of how the simulation works, will
be able to sustain their own student trade for a few minutes.
Students will have thoughtful responses in their exit-tickets.
Reflective Narrative
Reviewing this lesson enabled me to engage with my planning process and seek out ways that I could improve further lesson
plans and overall unit designs. Though this was my first lesson and I will admit that I was happy with my outcomes, my students
engagement, and their success in demonstrating the knowledge that I put in the assessment section. Yet, I have come to realize that
my design was did not fully adhere to UbD principles and the areas that I did not adhere to it were areas that, with improvement,
could help further stimulate student learning. I also came to realize that I could be more explicit with explaining my activities and the
resources that I use.
The first point that I put a great deal of reflective thought into was the fact that I did not make accurate and efficient use of the
Enduring Understandings section. I put 4 enduring understandings in this lesson (and in subsequent lessons as I modeled other
lesson plans off of this first lesson plan). Not a single one of these understandings was one that I imagined as an overall unit enduring
understanding, moreover, I did not sit down to plan enduring understandings for the entire unit before I planned my lesson (something
that is called for in a UbD template). I went into my lesson planning, then, without a goal for what I wanted my students to walk
away from at the end of the unit. I instead created daily enduring understandings that really should have been classified, I think, as
learning goals and objectives or another lesson understanding category. As I made the enduring understandings for this lesson, I
did ask myself what I wanted my students to walk away remembering at a basic level. I reminded myself that it should be a fact with
staying power that would enable them to make connections to further learning and understand the tone and context of that moment in
history. Yet, my definition of enduring understanding was, upon reflection, muddled.
This makes me want to change the format of future LPs (something I may do) and reminds me that I need to be intentional
with the construction of enduring understandings for the entire unit, and then base my assessments and lessons off of them.
I also did not plan any assessments before I made this lesson. Assessments (demonstrations of knowledge) need to be
planned before a lesson is planned. This allows us to decide what is an authentic way to demonstrate knowledge based on what we
are teaching. By designing it lesson by lesson (and in particular in my first lesson), I did not really have a clear sense of what
authentic demonstration of knowledge was. I think that I did create a decent set of what I called assessments with this lesson
(which I think were really observations of retention and comprehension) and I was pleased with the work that my students did, but I
did not fit it in a UbD framework that could have helped me differentiate authentic assessment and observations of learning and
comprehension. This differentiation would enable me to intentionally give my students multiple ways to demonstrate knowledge.
That is not to say that I did not consider my assessments authentic during planning or even after the lesson itself. As I
planned, I thought that I had a clear sense of what would qualify as demonstrations of knowledge and engagement. Nothing that I put
on the list was a throwaway, but the result of a careful reflection on what I wanted my students to learn. So, while it was not to the
full letter and spirit of UbD, I really think that I gave sufficient thought to what would count as evidence of understanding, and I was
pleased when I saw that most of my students demonstrated most if not all of this evidence of understanding.
Aside from not properly utilizing UbD in the lesson planning process, there were certain other elements of my LP that I
should have made more explicit, particularly the journals and materials needed. Though lesson plans do not have to be exhaustive, as I
wrote the plan, I had an assumption that my mentor, CM, and future individuals reading my LP would know what I meant by
journals and survey and the list of materials, yet, these things could have been explained in a few sentence with a rationale that
described how it fit into my framework (or, in the case of the survey, what kind of research and theory motivated my questions and
use of a class survey). I think that this assumed ignorance is a good practice for future lesson plans and in instruction, as the
assumption of prior knowledge could do a disservice to my students and not make my thought processes very clear (which research
shows is necessary to help model good learning practices for students).
I suppose if I had to put a summary on my internal thoughts during lesson planning, I would say that I was focused on the
there and then, and not long term objective. I decided what I wanted to teach that day based on time constraints that I artificially
created for the unit on the Road to the Revolution. Based on those constraints, I put a cap on the number of topics I wanted to discuss.
I did not consult lesson planning research or the work of other teachers, but relied on how I thought I could communicate best: a
small amount of lecturing, something interactive, journals, and a simulation. The lesson was designed to engage students and to
provide them an opportunity to learn through experience, but I was not deliberate in considering ways to incorporate
accommodations, scaffolding, and other research-based curriculum that could have been beneficial for my students and for me.
I will improve on this in the future, as my lesson and conversation with my CM taught me that, despite my limited focus
during my lesson plan, my natural inclination to be social, animated, and engaging provides me with a boost. My students really did
understand what I was trying to teach them. They were very involved with the simulation, politely took notes, engaged with
discussion topics, wrote thoughtful journal entries, and did well on questions about this lesson on the unit exam. My students
succeeded in meeting my assessments and the objectives were thoroughly gone over. I do not have to fret over my presentation as a
teacher or how I will deal with students not engaging or students misbehaving, because social capital is the strongest part of my
repertoire. What I need to focus on is intentionality with lesson planning and research-based solutions. My students can benefit from
me being a little more intentional with planning and a little more organized, and going over my thought processes deliberately (to
model good learning practices).