Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Introduction
Recently, technology is used by a lot of people and effects all over the world.
When technology becomes more and more prosperous and useful in last few
decades, computers start to replace some traditional teaching methods and
even teachers places and importance. However, there are also many people
who oppose using computers to teach and learn. Is it really essential for
students and teachers to have computers in schools? Will computers help
them to their studying and teaching? This annotated bibliography will discuss
five different academic articles that argue for and against computers in the
school. To begin with, we will look at articles that argue that computers can
replace traditional teaching methods and then discuss the articles which say
they are only a tool. We will show that they cannot replace teachers place
and also cannot teach students basic skills.
1 Copy per group. Return to the teacher. Do not take it out of ELAB
Some good results have been produced by learning system for small-income
students in remedial programs. It will supply abundant returns if the money is
invested on education. With the spread of technology in America since 1990,
Americans life changed dramatically.
The first thing we have to know is that technology is an investment. Schools
should not only be sure in their commitment and be fair in their distribution but
be adjustable in their implementation. They need to adjust to every change,
not be inflexible with just one way of doing things because they cant respond
to new differences.
The students learning, teachers teaching techniques and the school system
can be improved by technologys help. New technology has already changed
the traditional education.
Critique:
In this article, Computer Education is vital for Student of the Future Riley, R
(1995) argues that technologies should be available for the classroom.
Riley is the secretary of the U.S. Department of Education. Although it was
written in 1995, the material and the points are still valid. The language is not
easy to understand and some of the words are technical.
This article is not very impartial because the author is the secretary in the U.S.
He is sometimes partial to his own country. The arguments do not seem to
support the main point completely. But the article is well organised because of
the clear sub-headings before each paragraphs.
Actually, the article was quite useful to answer the research question, should
computers replace textbooks, whiteboards and other traditional teaching
methods in every subject? In my opinion, I would like to answer yes after
reading this article. Nevertheless, I still have to search for other articles to
support and give other ideas about this argument.
1 Copy per group. Return to the teacher. Do not take it out of ELAB
1 Copy per group. Return to the teacher. Do not take it out of ELAB
This article shows how the education changed by technology and a new
model of education did. But this article is not helpful to answer the research
question, should computers replace textbooks, whiteboards and other
traditional teaching methods in every subject? My answer is no after reading
this article. I have to search more other articles.
1 Copy per group. Return to the teacher. Do not take it out of ELAB
The students will find it sometimes exciting and frustrated, others even angry
and difficult, but in them doing this will become more aware of how technology
is there to help them, not to hinder them and in long term to increase their
retention and performance on standard tests that they will have in the future.
In summing up it will be hard for some teaching methods to change, by
incorporating technology into their programs, but it is for the best in the long
term for the students it wont happen over night but it will happen. It might take
3-5 years for the teacher to up the right curriculum which includes technology
and the way that students learn from it.
Critique:
In this article, Technology Support Centered Principles Boe K (n.d.) argues
the importance of updating the techniques of the teachers by using computers
as a tool that allow tem to teach according to the needs of new students
generation.
Boe is a math and Science teacher at San Diego Unified School District, so
this source can be considered reliable.
Even when the principle Learner- Centered that is analyzed in this article
was designed in 1997, the author emphasizes that it have been designed to
support teaching standards and assessment which allow it to be useful in
actual days.
The article is short and some technical words are used in it, however it is easy
to understand the objective that the author is mentioning and transmitting to
the reader.
The author shows clearly the importance of the integration of the technology
as a support of the Learner Centered Principles which is by the original author
Barbara L.
1 Copy per group. Return to the teacher. Do not take it out of ELAB
The article contains enough shirt but enough evidence to support the main
points discussed by the author and helps to answer the researched question
should computers replaces textbooks, white boars and another traditional
teaching methods in every subject?.
In my opinion after reading this article, I think that computers should be a tool
to helps teachers to develop their methods and allow the students to learn in
active and dynamic class using their creative and critical thinking.
1 Copy per group. Return to the teacher. Do not take it out of ELAB
The third and last condition mentions the importance of the students need for
contact with teacher to increase their learning, not forgetting that computer
brings some benefits into the classroom but same time have some
disadvantages.
Critique:
In this article, Computers cannot teach Children basic skills, the author
discusses some advantages and disadvantages of computers in the schools.
And he mentions that computers are not used in the right way.
David Gelernter is a professor of computer science at Yale University so, this
source is reliable. It was written in 1994, but still related and helpful. The
language is not easy to understand and it uses some old fashion expression.
The article has clear titles but still was very not easy to understand .The
information appears well and there is enough evidence for the arguments.
This article shows some benefits of computers but also shows some worries
about computers in education system. This article is helpful to answer the
research question, should computers replace textbooks, whiteboards and
other traditional teaching methods in every subject? My answer is no after
reading, I still need to search other articles to support this argument.
Article 5: Criss, K. (2006). Disadvantages of Computers in the Classroom.
Summary:
Computers can not only help us to learn but also be used in wrong ways. This
article discusses the disadvantages of having computers in the classrooms.
Lots of software holds the childrens attention but they do not educate them.
Its more likely for entertainment rather than education. Its not easy for
teachers to pay no heed to each student when they are using the Internet at
one time. Computers are not available to each individual student. Teachers
1 Copy per group. Return to the teacher. Do not take it out of ELAB
who spend time on interacting with students comment that there are many
difficulties to teach with computers. Computers are appealing to students.
Spending too much time on computers will injure bodies. Many teachers have
no ideas about a computer. Internet which computers have is easy to enter, so
it wont protect children from child predators and inappropriate content.
To sum up, computers in the classroom may not give the appropriate
education to students and not be available to each student. When students
are on screen, it is hard for them to pay attention to teachers. It will waste time
and cause problems for an inexperienced teacher using computers. Most
schools may have difficulties if they would not like to have a technician.
Overusing computers is harmful to childrens health. The most scary thing is
that some children can be targeted by child predators when they browse the
web without filtering.
Critique:
In this article, Disadvantages of Computers in the Classroom Criss, K (2006)
argues that computers in the school will cause many problems.
Katie Criss is a graduate with a dual degree in Early Childhood Elementary
Education, so the source can be considered reliable. The language is not
used too technical. The material is not out-of-date so it can be believed.
The article is quite easy to read and well organised. It repeats the
disadvantages at the end of the article. It makes the main ideas clearer. There
are enough evidences to support the main point and the author proves the
point successfully. The information is well-researched and still valid. But it
doesnt mention about the advantages of computers in classroom so the
author hasnt presented the other side.
The article was not hard to understand the disadvantages of computers in the
classroom. It can help me to answer the research question, should computers
replace textbooks, whiteboards and other traditional teaching methods in
every subject? In my opinion, after reading this article, Id like to answer yes.
1 Copy per group. Return to the teacher. Do not take it out of ELAB
Conclusion:
To sum up, technology is making dramatic changes in peoples lifestyle in
many countries. Computers are becoming to take an important place in
classrooms as a useful tool to support teachers methods in order to bring
better learning to the students. Connecting students learning with classrooms
to home can encourage them to study especially for students who live in
remote area. It can help more and more people to have chances to learn.
On the other hand, learning by using computers will reduce reading skills.
Students have different ways of learning that are from books to multimedia
approach. In addition, we believe that the most important influence for
students is that overuse computers will affect childrens health. Sitting in front
of computers for a long time will hurt their bodies. Computers cant teach
children like teachers that they can face to face with students.
In brief, computers have significant effect in our lives, but we still need
teachers in our schools to give students basic skills. That is to say, computers
cannot take the place of teachers.
Reference List
1 Copy per group. Return to the teacher. Do not take it out of ELAB
1 Copy per group. Return to the teacher. Do not take it out of ELAB