Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to examine why it is not ethical for children to be prescribed
stimulants. The paper begins with the diagnostic criteria as it is presented in the fifth edition of
the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. It then presents real life situations
about the push from parents and teachers to medicate children. It is followed by a discussion of
pharmaceutical companies influence on stimulant use and its current effect. There is then a
discussion of who is prescribing the medication and the current trend in general physicians
prescribing instead of physicians that have a vast knowledge of mental disorders. It ends with a
final discussion on the side effects of stimulants.
It is not new news that many children in the United States are diagnosed with attention
deficit hyperactive disorder (ADHD). In fact, most of us can name multiple people we know that
are diagnosed with ADHD. The most common treatment for this disorder is the use of stimulants.
In recent years, the numbers of children diagnosed with ADHD has been on the rise and with
that, there has also been a rise in the prescribing and use of stimulants. While I do believe that
some children do need stimulants for treatment of this disorder, I believe that they are overprescribed and that they have side effects that need to be taken into consideration.
Criteria for Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder
The diagnostic criteria as stated in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
fifth edition (2013) has very specific criteria that a person has to meet in order to receive the
diagnosis of attention deficit hyperactive disorder. The criteria are as follows:
A. A persistent pattern of inattention and/or hyperactivity-impulsivity that interferes with
functioning or development, as characterized by (1) and/or (2):
1. Inattention: Six (or more) of the following symptoms have persisted for at least 6
months to a degree that is inconsistent with developmental level and that negatively
impacts directly on social and academic/.occupational activities:
(Zuvekas & Vitiello, 2011). I am not denying that ADHD exists; I just believe the diagnosis is
given to children that do not fully meet the criteria for the diagnosis.
Pharmaceutical Companies Influence and Prescribing Doctors
A huge issue in regard to the diagnosis and the treatment of ADHD has to do with
pharmaceutical companies pushing doctors to prescribe stimulant medication. Also, another issue
arises from doctors who are not well informed on the disorder diagnosing and treating ADHD.
On the news we are constantly reminded of pharmaceutical companies influence on doctors
pushing certain medications. In the medical world this phenomenon is often referred to as big
pharmas influence.
Influence of Pharmaceutical Companies
I have heard reports of the influence of pharmaceutical companies within my own family.
Both my sister and my mother work in medical professions. They have shared with me multiple
occurrences where pharmaceutical companies took them out to lunch or paid for a catered lunch
just to talk about a new medication they wanted the staff to promote to their patients. Even when
I shadowed at a mental health agency, I was present when a pharmaceutical representative
stopped by to talk about a new drug.
Pharmaceutical companies send their representatives to medical offices to sell their
product and promise the doctors and staff rewards for pushing their product. In one study Adair
and Holmgren (2005) found doctors were more likely to prescribe a medication if they had
samples of the same medication in their office. By simply being exposed to a medication,
especially when it was well advertised, physicians were more likely to prescribe that particular
medication to their patients.
make these exaggerated and false claims about the effect of the medication (Schwarz, 2013).
Shire pharmaceutical company agreed to pay 57.5 million dollars in fines to resolve the
allegations against the improper sales and false advertising of certain medications including the
stimulants Adderall XR and Daytrana (Schwarz, 2013).
Recently pharmaceutical companies have switched their focus when it comes to
advertising about ADHD. Instead of advertising to parents about their child having this disorder,
they have changed their focus on the parent or adult themselves. Lately there has been a
campaign for adults to check and see if they meet the criteria for the disorder (Schwarz, 2013).
Pharmaceutical companies have a huge influence on doctors to diagnose and prescribe their
medication for the disorder. It bothers me how much influence they have. They are now targeting
people who may have been functioning well on their own without medication for years. Now
these adults are being bombarded with advertisements saying that they also need medication to
maximize their full potential.
Prescribing Doctors
In order to get treatment for ADHD, patients have to speak to their doctor about their
symptoms. These days, it seems that all a person has to say is that he/she has difficulty staying
on task and a prescription for Adderall or some other stimulant is easily and quickly given. I have
heard from friends that even though they did not have symptoms of ADHD, their general
practitioner tried to prescribe them a stimulant. I had one person tell me they went to their
general physician to get treatment for poor sleep and he still prescribed her a stimulant.
Prescribing her a stimulant is the complete opposite of what she needed, it just made her more
awake.
suppressed appetite and sleep difficulties. The results on one study by Sonuga-Barke and
colleagues (2009) support that stimulants may not cause the symptoms of loss of appetite and
sleep difficulties. They instead believe it may be due to ADHD itself and the symptoms are just
exacerbated by the stimulant medication (Sonuga-Barke, Coghill, Wigal, DeBacker, &Swanson,
2009).
A big concern is the stimulants effect on overall cardiovascular health. In one study by
Vietello and colleges (2012), they found that although stimulant use did not increase the risk for
hypertension or tachycardia, they were more likely to have a higher heart rate. In another study
looking at the cardiovascular health of stimulant users, they found that although cardiovascular
events were rare, they were twice as likely in people taking stimulants than not (Dalsgaard,
Kvist, Leckman, Nielson, & Simonsen, 2014). They also found a time-dependent dose-response
relationship interrelationship between cardiovascular adverse effects (Dalsgaard et al., 2014).
Based on the above research it is critically important that physicians let their patients know the
potential side effects including the fact that they are twice as more likely than non-stimulant
users to have cardiovascular problems in the future.
Conclusion
Attention deficit hyperactive disorder is a growing diagnosis with more and more
children and adults diagnosed with it every year. It is important that patients and the society in
general knows all of the different factors that influence this growing diagnosis. A big push comes
from pharmaceutical companies directly. Billions of dollars are spent trying to sway doctors to
sell their product and convince the public to buy their product. Also, many of the physicians that
are diagnosing and prescribing treatments for ADHD do not have a good knowledge base in
mental health disorders. To get effective care, it is important that individuals seek out a mental
health professional for testing to ensure the diagnosis is correct. The patients should be well
informed of the possible side effects associated with their treatment. Overall, it is important for
patients and their families to acquire a full understanding of the disorder, along with the criteria,
possible treatments, and potential side effects.
References
Adair, R., & Holmgren, L. (n.d). Do drug samples influence resident prescribing behavior? A
randomized trial. American Journal of Medicine, 118(8), 881-884.
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of
mental disorders (5th ed.).
Charach, A., Yeung, E., Volpe, T., Goodle, T., dosReis, S. (2014). Exploring stimulant treatment
in ADHD: narratives of young adolescents and their parents. BMC Psychiatry. 14(1), 120.
Chong, B.S. (2009). FDAs Division of Drug Marketing, Advertising, and Communications
[PowerPoint slides]. Retrieved from
http://www.fda.gov/downloads/drugs/newsevents/ucm182603.pdf
Dalsgaard, S.,Kvist, A.P., Leckman, J.F., Nielson, H.S., & Simonsen, M. (2014). Cardiovascular
safety of stimulants in children with attention-deficit/hyperactive disorder: A nationwide
prospective cohort study. Journal Of Child And Adolescent Psychopharmacology, 24(6),
302-310.
Kazdin, A.E. (2000). Attention deficit hyperactive disorder. In Encyclopedia of Psychology (Vol.
8).Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Merlkangas, K.R., He, J., Burstien, M., Swanson, S.A., Avenevoli, S., Cui, L., Benject,
C.,Georgiades, K., Swedsen, J. Lifetime prevalence of mental disorders in U.S.
adolescents: Results from the National Comorbidity Study-Adolescent Supplement
(NCS-A). J Am Acad Child Adlesc Psychiatry. 2010 Oct; 49(10): 980-989.
Rebala, P. & Wilson, C. (2014). How Much Money Does Your Doctor Get From Medical
Companies? Time Magazine. October 2, 2014.
Shwarz, A. (2013).The Selling of Attention Deficit Disorder. The New York Times. December 15,
2013 pp. A1
Sonuga-Barke, E. S., Coghill, D., Wigal, T., DeBacker, M., & Swanson, J. (2009). Adverse
reactions to methylphenidate treatment for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder:
Structure and associations with clinical characteristics and symptom control. Journal Of
Child And Adolescent Psychopharmacology, 19(6), 683-690. doi:10.1089/cap.2009.0024
Vitiello, B., Ellio, G.R., Swanson, J.M., Arnold, L.E., Hechtman, L.,Abikoss,H.&Gibbons,R.
(2012). Blood pressure and heart rate over 10 years in the multimodal treatment study of
children with ADHD. The American Journal Of Psychiatry, 169(2), 167-177.
Zuvekas, S.H. & Vitiello, B. (2012). Stimulant medication use in children: A 12-year perspective.
The American Journal Of Psychiatry, 169(2), 160-166.