Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Alexander Gillapsie, for his invaluable assistance in editing this draft of the
work, spending countless nights on a number of grammatical rectifications,
spelling corrections, and phraseological optimizations.
INTRODUCTORY FOREWORD
The beginning is probably the best place from whence one should always
start, seeing as it is, per its name sake, the earliest of our days, whoever you
might be -- as truistically trite as that all may seem.
I'm going to be clear with you. My early childhood was a sham, wherein my
mother was pressured by a bureaucrat in the employ of the state healthcare
bureaucracy, a so-innocuously-called 'health worker' whose intents were to
set me on a path most contrary thereto, to chase a psychiatric diagnosis for
what was really the product of childhood abuse that, although she had, in
this, no active participation, was all too complacently ascented by her.
This was in the early 1990s, when an expansionist agenda of state education
bureaucrats had been partially fuelled by radical feminist academics that had
intersected the fields of psychiatry and education, to revive a long-stagnant
diagnosis that was frankly rare in the past. It's usually current statistic trends
that inform the morally judgemental mores suceessive thereto which govern
our sense of what's aberrant and typical. I'm not convinced, therefore, that
there was a solid precedental basis with high predictability for the largely
manufactured, and I'd go on to verge upon saying, deliberately imagined
"epidemic".
It is for this reason that, whatever my mother may ramble maniacally in her
protestations of its legitimacy, I can't find, resultant to my relative
normalization outwith her influence in recent years, it in me to suspend
disbelief.
I've been a lamentable victim of the system even in its most benign of
pretences as an aider and remediator. Behind this veneer, has been nothing
but the heartbreak of indifference for deeper answers, beneath their
neurofeminine of
neuromasculine of
legitimately be at
manifestations, ala
psychopath himself.
Remarks itself, so the Queer only defines itself by its insanity in so tacit a
self-admission.
THE REAL NATURE
ELUCIDATED
OF
MATRIARCHAL
PERSECUTION
It has been well-observed that any victimization of women is largely selfbeckoned, self-induced and generally just 'brought on themselves', for want
of less need for continuous emphasization of what should be plaintively
obvious. Routine Activity Theory, developed by Californian sociological
crimonologists, postulates in a relationship where the occurence of crime is
the product of three opportune conditions, namely a lack of appropriate
guardianship presiding over the potential criminal perpetrator, a suitable
perpetrator, and commensurately so a target, with the additional factor of
temporal-spatial relationship opportunisticness, so it can be assumed that the
targeted individual, for want of a better word in fearing its unwarranted
appropriation from more legitimate uses like in gang-stalked individuals (a
frankly more serious crime than matriarchal persecution-fetish histrionics
e.g. the misnomously named 'rape culture'), largely has the choice in
victimhood, by virtue of the volition to its avail in placing themselves within
those mostly open opportunities of circumstance i.e. locii of crime.
Essentially, women can choose to be victims at whim and will, and most
often times likely deliberately forge themselves such a niche for the
convenient social leverage afforded to them by this.
This self-victimization thus constitutes an inverse power relationship, a
covert switching between victim and offender, where, it can be observed, the
buoyancy of victimhood as its accorded legal protections affords them as
'protected groups', so they become the new power-group, wielding their
victimhood as a weaponized up-stratifying apparatus of power. It is hence
that matriarchal power is born; from the histrionics of perceived, yet nonexistent, persecution by 'patriarchal power', which is accordingly
scapegoated, legitimating and justifying a reaction rooted in "rectification"
in the form of an oligarchy, where one must adorn the most sincere
symptomic expressions in order to be recognized by the rank-and-file,
clearly lining out the objective: 'Ascension' to post-operative status. The
terminology of 'Ascension', religious unto itself by its intrinsic nature,
cannot be read innocuously in the context: one must mutilate themselves, a
very harrowing and emotionally difficult process to endure, in order to
purloin political credentials, underlining the egregiousness of the act itself.
Nonetheless, unlike any other disorder, it is enabled in its treatment, rather
than disabled using apparatuses that masquerade as treatment, for example,
anti-psychotics and anti-depressants. The condition is encouraged a
degeneration from what can be regarded conventional socio/psycho-sexual
sanity. Keeping in mind that the real meaning of 'sanity' is 'sanitation', so we
cannot possibly conceive the unclean act of deliberately deceiving the public
as to one's gender expression 'sane' either morally or psychologically.
An overwhelming targeting of this phenomenon towards sexually inadequate
males, too, whether that be physiologically (effete) or psychologically (too
artsy, effeminate, hyper-social or at least unexpectedly so for the
circumstances in the case of the few spergs permitted), shows an inherently
matriarchal manaicism in allowing the inner-Oedipal demon to come thither
forth, a perverse delight in the domination of perceived 'aberrant'
masculinity as reflected through the inevitable castratant procedures.
Yet it is presumed that when the paradigms of societally-created pseudomedicinal disorder and psychiatrically constructed socially-agitating
apparatus (transgenderism and autism respectively) intersectionalize,
particularly when observed under an ideological prism of NHS medicalist
doctrinarianism, doesn't it just, the mental acrobatics deployed to rationalize
their mutual exclusion, stratospherically escalate?
Gibberish Guardian screeds and other second-wave feminist inspired
pseudo-intellectual journalist junk-theorists have concocted reason after
another to delegitimate this intersectionalization when it fits inconveniently
with the sexual-essentialist narrative, perhaps due to a certain heretic traitor
to the Jewish community operating a certain Autism Research Centre in
Cambridge. May YHWH accurse that bastard to perpetual hellfire in having
confined the souls of so many of that ilk to self-immolation, a term I loosely
apply, in that their own descension to hell was largely inadvertant. But is it
out of legitimate medical concern, or a true desire to uphold ethical
masculine characteristics, but that would appear too inconsistent with the
oft-paradoxical presentation of such weakness and passivity so ubiquitously
prevalent in the latest waves of contingent diagnosees. Rather it is merely a
misdirection in the reasoning that, seeing the condition's fluidity in
definition over the three theoretical paradigms that it has seen undergone
already (schizophrenogenic/psychodynamic, behaviouralist, and now
neurologically sex-essentialist, over the last 30 years each within their
respective periods), there need be nothing but ambiguity in the constitution
of the condition's precepts, to be perpetually metamorphized a convenient
tool in the marginalization of whomever the diagnostic (really, being
pseudo-medicinal, stratificational) apparatus is perpetrated against by the
medicalist establishment in disparagement. The targets don't actually have to
be essentialistically neuromasculine in the most genuine or slightest in the
initial for it'll be forged -- neurological degradation manifested by social
conditioning -- by the isolating processes of the strata-categorization.
To speak of the status of those medical structures and the real reason for
such an act running contrarily to Hippocratic oath, we must look at the
political context of this societal pseudo-medicinalization or rather, social
engineering under a thin veneer of medical authority, and the political whys
and wherefores behind the movements involved.
The single-parent socialist matriarchy is probably the first starting point at
which the Aspergian is attacked, in the same way that identification with the
single-parent socialist matriarchy is a boon for the aberrogender degenerate
to rekindle its etheric sense of intrinsic power. Destruction and undermining
of the authoritarian essence and rational impartment of father leaves the
Aspergian in disarray and the unusual cruelty of mother unchecked, such
that the latter is free with impunity to psychodynamically reject the
undesirable offspring of the brood.
What never transpires to the light of its deserved attention is the matriarchy's
abusiveness as a causative factor in the social degeneration of the now
psychodynamically rejected brood, whether that manifests itself physically,
socially or psychologically. Various physical provocations will be
perpetrated by either the family as surrounding the unchecked and
maliciously over-aggrandized authority of mother, or by the bitch herself,
which, being unprosecutable as well as unassumed even on 'scientific
inspection' (due to deliberate methodological manipulation per the political
distortion of the tools involved both at the level of their creation and
been expediently granted for the needless sacrifice of our own during the
Great War, then we'd have still the capacity to make the greatest sacrifice
we've ever needed to in our modern era as has been more greatly
necessitated than ever, to enter the realm as 20 million human bullets (such
that comprise our numbers worldwide) and charge forth in piercing the chest
of the demonic shekinah, the Satanic avatar of G-d such that radical
feminism represents.
For she is the one who has deemed our fate worthy of descension into the
social vicissitude of welfare-dependency, bureaucratization in predatorial
"health-and-social-care" surveillance services, and a general litany of
mutually assured destruction: hoping for the final push in the creation of
many an Elliot Rodger or Adam Lanza who could possibly bring out the
worst pre-conceptions in the public eye that, by deception of democracy,
create a 'demand' for what such an elite want for our furthered enslavement
anyway.
Aspergian ideological enslavement into the constricting prism of democratic
hypocrisy has come to metamorphize itself a disease afflicting its own bodypolitik. With the arising of the contrived "neurodiversity" movement,
founded by Trotskyist Kinsey-institute Sexual Bolshevist subversive Donna
Williams (chaser of the diagnosis for her own purposes), to later recruit
other names like Grandin and Roberts (the latter of AFF fame), has the autist
been spoon-fed the gibbering bathos-laden drivel of insipid pretenses to a
need, and induced demand, for 'acceptance', not only in the eye of an
unsuspecting public who might be deceived that this indicates genuine
freedom and autonomy, but unto oneself, of its worst characteristics: the
customary, psychiatrically diagnostic rote, degenerating one into a roteautomaton robota, in the original Croatian sense of the word: slave.
For this sort of acceptance could never constitute its own becoming but
rather a complacency alone. It is to adorn a falsified hubris, that is to reduce
the dissonance that self-awareness could bring between mainstream
scientifically regarded convention, what one ought to avoid to ensure a
semblance of recovery in eudemonia, and the induction of "pride" to instil
the "take" into the autist of their worst archetypically embodied selves, but
shell-like, imprisoned beasts, devoid of souls.
Does the Trotksyist usurpationalist of the Wrongplanet opiate-peddling
stalls, replete with the fare of their feel-good, euphoriant snake-oil, issue you
the dissassociative of "integration" into that treacherous fabric of neosocialist historical disfaith, robbing you of the true essence of worthwhile
livelihood sweated with the toil of one's most soulful endeavours, have they,
then, all but obliterated one's personhood, defined by the extension of their
independent creativity.
Incompatible with the movement's goals is this sense of independence, for it
demands collectivism in which to predicate their mobilization, and a
disbandonment of self-awareness, and thus consciousness, a pre-requisite to
creativity, for one to accept the given precepts of their movement:
acceptance of neurotypical social hypocrisy as part of the "diverse"
pantheon, ignorance of difference, and characteristic assimilation, by
simultaneously the most insipid of "self-actualizing" the most negative traits
in one's contingent, whilst expressing the natural indifference that comes
with an unindigenously imposed ideological paradigm.
In embracing difference, by reality, does not mean suppressing oneself for
the purpose of assimilation, whether that is in becoming a caricature of the
diagnostic criteria, or endorsing the ideological hypocrisies responsible for
one's enslavement. All of those things merely imply one act: deracination
and genetic suicide.
In disbandoning independence by fostering desires for integration, so the
neurodiversitarian pressure-group has managed to make the autist renege on
its former expectations, foisting upon them complacency and indifference to
their subsumation under an unworthiness-of-life upon which the
neurohomogenistically-provided faux-charitability of welfare is depended, in
large part, as well as feminist down-stratificational tactics and in conjunction
therewith, being the reason for decimated Aspergian function from its past
attained baselines.
As well as the political power having seen shift in a nexus of divine
femininity, so has the economic, for their provisions are typically made
under a payee or apointeeship (the choice of word depending on jurisdiction)
for which no accountability is expected, to be utimately siphoned from the
namesake of whose claim it has been made. Cruel motherhood and
inefficiency can alone be enough to break Aspergian psyche with the added
sadistic element of financial cuckery.
In such miserably moribund destitution as would entail this greatest of
The welfare system is one such way that the world governments keep
the masses under large scale control - the bread and circuses of the
Roman days has become the Sonic and anime of today. This paternal
headship thus keeps the enslaved very much so like children to the
fatherly government, who is in fact a disgusting tyrant. To become
masters and creators of our own destiny, we must therefore leave our
false parent, the government, and become adults in the sense of
autonomy and agency. Only then, will the dream of Aspergia be made
a reality. If we are to succeed in creating the Lemuria and Atlantis of
the future, we will need to radicalize and fraternize for our collective
good."
-- Introductory Foreword by Negi Springfield, Aspergian Socialism is
a Science, authored by myself
Many misgivings were committed by me in my naivete. Firstly, the
axiomatic presumptions which have now seen their bombardment at the
hands of a much-necessitated disentangling of the ill-fated Cohenitic
doctrinarianism were given a certain gullibility of credulous credence, to use
the strongest words for my former conviction in the essentiality of
hypermasculinity, something that, in retrospect, has me wretch in disgust.
Many themes are rightfully evoked: transcendence, kinship, solidarity, intergroup networking and mobilization, fraternal friendship, a sense of
belonging, an Aesop-esque sense of role reversal from subjugated to
subjugator, independence, self-determination, self-actualization, the list goes
on and is far from exhaustive. A sense of becoming unto ourselves a group
of distinction, and the individualized sense, at least on a collective level
(rather than endorsing the new 'individuality' of destructive atomism), of a
renewed cultural identity, therein defined by self-reliantly and independently
developed values, mores, motive forces, and institutions arising from the
aforementioned.
One fundamental problem marrs the entire work, as has been also previously
mentioned: the author's yet-tackled traumas, just having emerged from
institutionalization at the time of writing, had resulted in the presumption
that there was nothing intrinsically wrong with the largely assumed
ascription of 'hypermale' identity. As much as disentangling a spiritual and
ethno-biological identity rooted in such a concept, from the much more
primitive conception of itself as a disordered morass rooted in extreme
neurosexual manifestation (itself a politically contrived concept), was
aggressive
agenda
in
the
intermarriage
of
scientific
TRANSSEXUAL
the full realization thereof), and accepting at face value that transgenders
have something quintessentially feminine at the cellular level of their neurostructure, this'll of course mean a somewhat masculinized female brain,
however it is looked at.
Sociopathy, conclusively, is thus an inevitable manifestation of transgender
neuropathology.
There have been criticisms raised which I'll duly address. A lack of
explanation is often perceived and duly rebuked, lent to the nebulous nature
of sex-specific hormonal effects and its implications herein.
Whys and wherefores are sort of difficult beyond correlative relations.
However, there exists a wealth of data that females score higher prepsychopathic scores on the Hare checklist, despite having lower overall
psychopath cutoff scores (the lower variation and matriarchal bias will be
accordingly addressed as reasons for this statistical phenomenon in due
course, for it so happens to be another criticism). Still, it is in the nature of
the feminine style of 'empathy' to be overly cognitive and devoid of feeling
(cognitive-affective empathetic bifurcations are covered in previous works
of mine; generally speaking, most men have weaknesses in the latter and
strengths in the former), by the implication of which item-for-item trait
correlates most strongly to sex.
Differing testosterone receptor sensitivities are key here, so by default,
women are getting a bigger hit from testosterone than men at the equivalent
dose. Returning to my argument, a defining factor of gender-incongruence
could be at the receptor level, transgender women having higher testosterone
sensitivity despite lower overall amniotic concentration.
More specific targeting of the hormone will change its distribution of the
brain such that it'll shape it differently. A female psychopath's brain, such
that I'm solidly convinced the transwoman's is, would hypothetically be far
structurally different from a male psychopath, normative male or normative
female. Would we know how exactly? We don't need to, because
neurodescriptivity isn't a concern in the definition of behavioural causes.
(Psychiatry doesn't appear to think so, anyway, unless it concerns bullshit
like autism.)
I don't think sociopaths to be particularly clever, contrary to the remonitions
idea will always refer to the role of women in motherhood, without realizing
this predates humans, as itself a predatory defense mechanism (the
swallowing of the mother-nest's offspring by that from whence one came),
one whose persistence into the present day simply suffocate offspring ala.
the arising of matriarchal socialism's welfare-state enabling of single-parent
micro-monarchical structures.
Patriarchal misdirection abound, it must be realized this mischaracterization
of cause only affirms the enabling of matriarchal predation inherent to
chivalry slavery, and the idea it is chivalry slavery, not patriarchal
emanation, that had elevated on a pedestal matriarchal might. One disease of
the kind of heterosexual male sexuality possessed by the neurologically
inadequate neurofeminine usurpers (17% of the male population, a much
larger contingent than the more malicious "extremely-masculine-for-afemale" "transgender" psychopath), such as would've had to have been the
only ones able to ascend the revised autistopathic curriculal gatekeeping of
neo-academia, its parameters modified to suit the superficial, verbally slick,
and mnemonically disposed, is its surreptitious tendency towards
domination by those feted in sickly eurotophillic lust, a form of worship of
the anatomically pungent and subjugation thereto.
Whilst the neuromasculine heterosexual male merely wishes to see itself
emerge on top, the neurofeminine heterosexual male wishes to 'go down' and
consume every last piquantly wretched drop of malfeasant discharge, thus
extending itself to the very last of each societal favour extended by them,
qua the matriarchy's mandate for neo-patriarchal, inadequate-male "feminine
pad" submission, such that comprise the new power-base on its face.
Because, once again, of the clandestine and discrete nature of these
relationships and especially in their more sexological manifestations, that
sometimes disgustingly go beyond analogy, it is presumed that this
patriarchy of the present is representative in nature with that of the past, a
forgivable mistake considering the well-concencealed manner with which
these superficial displays, from the Judeomasonic court, to the Privy Council
Parliamentary chambers of the 33rd degree, express themselves. Even
heteronormativity isn't immune to Hegelian transformation of the most
insidiously egregious sort.
In the clearly explicated matri-patriarchal connection, so is transgenderism
thus neo-matriarchal in its origins and structure, merely an extension of the
exchange of power in its passover from the neuromasculine dominion of the
THE
INTELLECTUAL-
I have described with invariable refusal to lend whimsy to capriciousness -a solidity not characterized by those whom I'm about to discuss -- the traits
exemplifying our female forebares, whose privilege, it has been established,
entirely predicates itself upon their status as brood-progenators, the
preciousness therein contained in a macabre, Gnostic, menstraul
worshipping ritual of a barely modernized sort, with which we shall bare in
mind when examining the matriarchy's contribution to its hijacking of the
scientific establishment, with a brutality barely lagging -- that is in no
insufficiency -- of any commiseration with those attempts similarly
perpetrated upon other institutions of their targeted import.
[To be completed].
EXPERIENCES
WITH
A
BIASED,
MATRIARCHALLYDOMINATED
APPARATUS
OF
STATE-CENTRALIZED
HEALTHCARE AND STATE-SYMPATHETIC, POLITICALLY
ROGUE RENEGADES OF THE LEFT (INTERLACED WITH THE
ODD FLASHBACK OF CHILDHOOD SEXUAL CONFUSION)
I shall list in an approximately chronologically notarized order the
autobiographical events of my livelihood most scathingly impressing
themselves upon me as inspirers unto myself the notion of betrayal, by way
of its assortment most egregiously typified, at the matriarchy's hand:
I was given birth on the day an outrageously tumultuous blizzard had struck
like a flash my locale, and knowing the oft-secretly withheld knowledge
from public regard, of the absolute self-control the female is afforded to
highly expendable avail her contractions, she, by whom I refer and is as all I
shall the curish wench from whence I came thither forth, deliberately
induced them on such a day, as to inflict the greatest harm on her offspring
out of demonically-motivated spite. Nay, no happenstance of misfortune by
the divine had this been, except if we are to speak of that divinity in terms of
an emanation from the underworld. Veritably, we can ascribe this an act most
etherically motivated in disposition by a Satanically convicted force of
inspiration. Hexatious as it was vexatious, a silent understanding of that
"punishment" which must, so as it was seen to, be inflicted on the
sacrificially rejectable brood.
A punishment of planned complicative induction to jarr murderously the
birth and ensure its failure, expertly calculated with every kinesthetic jerk
for it is in the infinite cerebellar capacity of the femalewhore, a genius of the
physical movement, to muscularly scathe and thwart the safe passage of her
offspring through the various convolutions of the canal.
And in doing so, implicating murderous intention to ensure passing of, and
despite, that passage, prematurely. Even though I had been delayed by a
good two weeks of gestiative timing, with an apparent slowness of
maturation -- only commensurate with the advancement of such an organism
as I -- to follow thereafter. A testament to the racial superiority of such a
Slavonic mistress, and although her beauty therein had exuded itself, solely
genetically, it would end with this physicality, to be manifest most
oppositely, speaking emotionally.
Though subconscious murder was attempted, and in reflection, most
contrarily to that former ascription of an underwordly Satanic apparition of
spiritually possessed intention, of what was to follow from that point
onward, this might have, in fact, been principled by merciful sparing,
knowing an existential plot, to ensure from the origin a complexly
interneicene process of purposely plotted psychodynamically traumatic
disruptions to the conscientousness, pre-emptively formulating the
conspiratorial climate for so-called "autism's" induction that would make
racuous cackling of any so acculturated in the sensitivities beyond the
insipid doggerels of penny-terribly published academic conventionalities in
the scientific demagougicals usually ascribed its cause, knowing it was a
more widely planned and desired outcome.
It is the proverbial equivalent of seeing your baby sexually violated anally
by the medical doctors, and this was as well to be a more honest expression
of the same more figurative brutality. (Note the analogous nature of this
statement; a literal interpretation of imagery is not advised lest you spare
yourself all comfort and visual safety.)
Following me from the beginning of time have been these matriarchal
Archons, whose natal crimes as perpetrated against me range from
purposeful suffocation, likely fueled by fetishistic orgiasticness, in an
experimental entertainment that the autistic stratificational "diagnostic"
heffer-branding was merely just a mark of the hatred underlining
simultaneously this lust, sustained 7 minutes and probably to no chagrin of
their own anatomically orgasmic vibrations, gynaecologically speaking, to
calorific deprivation torture, the "kiss-", or to extend an expression even
more violently, salivatingly frothing snog of the "Angels of Death", had
motivated itself all too pervasively in this quasi-paedophilic fascination for
the morbid impaling of barely post-foetal infants endemic to all NHS staff,
with no limitation to its maternity wards.
My mother was not to know any the wiser, lest she be wizened to, these
gravely bellicose iniquities. Separated, albeit no more permanently than until
discharge, shortly after birth, the professionals' way with me had nothing to
be accounted for from that point onwards. No witness could possibly be held
to the A Serbian Film style atrocities that could most conceivably have
potentially taken place. Before that is taken to be indicative of my cinematic
tastes, I'd only ever heard acquaintances reference this peurile "work",
refusing to indulge on a matter of the historical edginess exhibited by one of
them in particular (one Robert Campbell, a Glaswegian member of a trolling
orgnization I'd long ago established and disbandoned after our
disassociation), a known degenerate edge-lord who had a morbid fascination
for gore, even when, as in this (so he states), it involves man-on-infant rape.
I have but his account to go by, and don't want to entertain it further than
metaphor (even though it's already seeping to the abyss of my disgust
successfully), once again.
Within the confines of a much initially enthusiastic foray into a literarily
unknown territory, Incipient Conceptions, the short-lived successor to the
Autphag literary project, a partially-fictional, partially-quasibiographical,
and again, partially-philosophical treatise into the esoteric nature of not only
the racially transcendental, but in a highly encoded and subliminal way, the
trans-feminine, in the ultimate fusion between an Overman individualism ala