Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
SCIENCE III
Physiology laboratory report
(week-1)
2012
Objectives
Experiment 1
the
results
of
Experiment 2
Experiment 3
Experiment 1
The first part of the experiment is done to measure the oral
temperature of a student using a maximum thermometer. At first, a
maximum
thermometer
is
taken
and
cleaned
using
either
or closed his nose to avoid breathing from it. After doing this, the
student placed the thermometer under his mouth for another six
minutes. After these six minutes, the student observed the reading
on the thermometer and recorded it.
The third part of the experiment was done to determine the effect of
rinsing the students mouth with ice water on the oral temperature
of the student. Like the previous parts, the maximum thermometer
was cleaned and wiped with tissue dipped in alcohol. To lower the
mercury meniscus to lower than 35C, the thermometer was swung
forcefully for several times. Once this was done, the experiment
could begin. The same student as the ones in part one and two of
the experiment rinsed his mouth with ice water several times. He
then places the reservoir of the thermometer under his tongue and
closed his mouth for six minutes. The temperature reading on the
thermometer was then observed and recorded.
Experiment 2
For the second experiment, another student volunteers for his
temperature to be recoded. In the first part of the experiment, the
main objective is to compare the temperatures of the axilla with the
one in the antecubital space. At first, the maximum thermometer
was wiped with tissue dipped in alcohol. The mercury meniscus of
the thermometer was also lowered to a height below the 35C level
by swinging it forcefully for several times. The student then ensured
that his axilla was dry and that it was wiped with tissue. The student
then placed the thermometer on his axilla firmly for six minutes.
After six minutes, the student noted the temperature and recorded
it. Step one was then repeated by the student, which was cleaning
the thermometer using alcohol and lowering the mercury meniscus
by swinging the thermometer forcefully. He then ensured that his
antecubital space was wiped with tissue and dried of any moisture.
4
Experiment 3
The third experiments object is to calculate the relative humidity of
the air. This was done by observing the reading that was there on
the wet and dry thermometer. After the readings were taken, they
were plotted to a psychometric graph to calculate the relative
humidity.
Results
Experiment 1
a. Measurement of mouth temperature
Trial 1
Trial 2
(C)
36.5
36.9
Time (sec)
180
180
Temperature
37.5
120
36.3
360
Experiment 2
a. Measurement of axilla and antecubital temperature
Antecubital
Axilla
space
36.6
360
36.3
360
Temperature
(C)
Time (sec)
Axilla
Axilla
(Normal)
stationary run)
36.8
360
36.5
360
(After
Temperature
(C)
Time (sec)
Experiment 3
a. Measurement of relative humidity
Wet
(C)
22
Level (%)
78
Discussion
After having obtained the following results, it could be easily
compared within different trials of the experiments. Although these
results have came up, there are several factors that may affect the
data, in which such affects could be the heat production mechanism
created by the body, as well as heat loss mechanism. The heat loss
mechanism took place as soon as the skin has detected heat, in
7
mentioned
previously
that
have
taken
place.
2a
was
done
by
comparing
temperature
10
Conclusion
While doing the experiment, several inaccuracies have taken
place due to the body mechanism itself and due to human errors as
well. While the first experiment was done, the mouth may not be
fully closed allowing heat to be released and mouth wasnt
completely rinsed with ice water of quite a low temperature. The
second experiment inaccuracies mainly caused by the production of
sweat that was actually a cooling mechanism and affected the
thermometer. Thus the result could be inaccurate. The last
experiment shows a high humidity level that could be caused by the
presence of many students in the room. As the student interacted
with one another, it releases water vapor that could increase the
humidity level. The experiment itself requests several students to do
it. This may cause an inaccuracy since each student wouldnt be the
same. Some could be prone to more sweating than the others. Some
may be more adaptable to cooler temperature and some were more
adaptable to hotter temperature. Eventually this could change the
result. The problem with the results obtained was that the gap
between the temperatures was too less that might result in an
inaccuracy while doing the experiment. If the result would have
shown a higher difference of at least 1C, the experiment could be
examined much better.
11
References
i.
ii.
12