0 Bewertungen0% fanden dieses Dokument nützlich (0 Abstimmungen)
22 Ansichten1 Seite
Beth Temporada was accused of illegally recruiting five individuals for overseas employment by promising jobs and collecting placement fees totaling over P282,000 pesos. However, she failed to deploy the recruits and did not reimburse their expenses. The Supreme Court ruled that illegal recruitment in large scale requires: (1) the offender to not have a valid license for recruitment; (2) undertaking recruitment activities as defined by law; and (3) committing these acts against three or more persons. In this case, Beth Temporada met all three elements and was convicted of large scale illegal recruitment.
Beth Temporada was accused of illegally recruiting five individuals for overseas employment by promising jobs and collecting placement fees totaling over P282,000 pesos. However, she failed to deploy the recruits and did not reimburse their expenses. The Supreme Court ruled that illegal recruitment in large scale requires: (1) the offender to not have a valid license for recruitment; (2) undertaking recruitment activities as defined by law; and (3) committing these acts against three or more persons. In this case, Beth Temporada met all three elements and was convicted of large scale illegal recruitment.
Beth Temporada was accused of illegally recruiting five individuals for overseas employment by promising jobs and collecting placement fees totaling over P282,000 pesos. However, she failed to deploy the recruits and did not reimburse their expenses. The Supreme Court ruled that illegal recruitment in large scale requires: (1) the offender to not have a valid license for recruitment; (2) undertaking recruitment activities as defined by law; and (3) committing these acts against three or more persons. In this case, Beth Temporada met all three elements and was convicted of large scale illegal recruitment.
G.R. No. 173473, December 17, 2008People of the Philippines
vs. Beth Temporada Facts: Beth Temporada is an accused for the crime of Large Scale Illegal Recruitment in whichthe prosecution alleged that the accused recruited and promised overseas employment, for a fee, to complainants Rogelio Legaspi, Jr. as technician in Singapore, and Soledad Atle,Luz Minkay, Evelyn Estacio and Dennis Dimaano as factory workers in Hongkong.After collecting the alleged placement fees amounting to P282,160, it was also noted thatsuch placement fees are in excess of or greater than that specified in the scheduled of allowable fees prescribed of the POEA and without reasons and without fault of the saidcomplainants, failed to actually deploy them and failed to reimburse them the expensesthey incurred in connection with the documentation and processing of their papers for purposes of their deployment. The accused-apellant now contends that the prosecutionfailed to establish all the elements of the offense that were charged to them. Issue: What constitutes the crime of Illegal Recruitment? Held Article 13(b) of the Labor Code defines recruitment and placement thusly:ART. 13. Definitions. x x x(b) "Recruitment and placement" refers to any act of canvassing, enlisting, contracting,transporting, utilizing, hiring or procuring workers, and includes referrals, contractservices, promising or advertising for employment, locally or abroad, whether for profitor not: Provided, That any person or entity which, in any manner, offers or promises for afee, employment to two or more persons shall be deemed engaged in recruitment and placement.It was held that to constitute illegal recruitment in large scale, three (3) elements mustconcur: (a) the offender has no valid license or authority required by law to enable him tolawfully engage in recruitment and placement of workers; (b) the offender undertakes anyof the activities within the meaning of "recruitment and placement" under Article 13(b) of the Labor Code, or any of the prohibited practices enumerated under Article 34 of thesaid Code (now Section 6 of R.A. No. 8042); and, (c) the offender committed the sameagainst three (3) or more persons, individually or as a group.In the case at bar, all the elements were present thus the SC convicted the accused for thecrime of Large Scale Illegal Recruitment