Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
10/21/13- 10/27/13
Cookbook Lab Revamp
I.
ii.
Bases work differently dont break it down
iii.
How the pH scale works, its significance, relate it to objects seen
in their everyday lives
iv.
II.
III.
ii. If too easy, though I plan on introducing new liquids, I could also
introduce new materials for them to test the differing liquids on,
and allow them to try using cold instead of heat and see if
temperature effects results as well.
Lesson Activities
a. Materials
i. Lemon Juice
ii. Apple Juice
iii. Milk
iv. Water
v. Milk of magnesia
vi. Copy paper
vii. Hair dryer or bunsen burner or light bulb
viii. Q-tips
b. Procedure
i. Engage:
1. Write in lemon juice on a piece of paper Hello
2. Let it dry prior to class
3. At the start of class, show the secret message to the class by
heating it over the light (this should prompt curiosity as to
why it happened)
4. Ask them What is happening? What do you see or
observe? Why do you think my writing is showing up?
5. K in the KLEW chart (about acids and bases, heat and
bonds)
6. W in the KLEW chart, see what there questions are and add
in the ones in number 4 if they are not answered
adequately, maybe put in one or two variations if their
responses arent specific enough and require more thought
ii. Explore:
1. Give each grouped table a light, paper for each student, a
small bowl of lemon juice and a q-tip
2. Let them do the lab with ONLY the lemon juice
3. Have them heat the note over the light so they can see that
this acidic liquid does in fact work as invisible ink
iii. Explain:
1. Class discussion about why they think it worked
2. Write their answers on the board
3. Expand and use one of the ideas about (possibly, paper
being weaker or lemon being acid etc) as a launch point or
segway in order to begin giving some facts about acids,
acids only (because bases will be introduced through the
milk of magnesia not creating text on paper)
4. Explain the breaking of paper bonds when using acids
which when it wets the paper begins to weaken and think it
out
Reflection:
This lab was very clearly intended for a young class because it is incredibly
straightforward and step-by-step. I do think that some direct instruction is important and
for this lab did keep some of it, but in an effort to teach with inquiry I added to the end of
the lab. My goal in doing this was so that once they understand the goals and concepts of
the assignment they were free to have open inquiry (National Research Council, 2000)
and explore with whatever materials I present later. This is important so that I am certain
they have all achieved or had access too the concepts I wished for them to have exposure
too, later expanding to allow for exploration. I plan on teaching younger classes and
would like this to be an early in the year experience so as our book Inquiry and the
National Science Education Standards depicts on page 29, there are many different levels
of inquiry. This one in particular would probably be aimed to be a partial inquiry based
lab in which it begins with the idea of engaging (which is the initial step in the 5E Model
of inquiry) as National Research Council states on page 34, I am providing a perplexing
situation for the students. This is followed by a set test (of lemon juice and heat), having
pillars of the inquiry ideology, I feel, allows for the children to be excited about their
work, thinking that their findings are all their own when in reality they have been subtly
guided to the correct answers.
I also would like to make sure that the essential questions I have come up with not
only get put into the KLEW chart, but are also interwoven and frequently brought to the
forefront of the lesson. As our other book Understanding By Design mentions, in
reference to Essential Questions, on page 106, their aim is to stimulate thought, to
provoke inquiry, and to spark more questions- including thoughtful student questions- not
just pat answers. In asking my questions, I feel that I can guide them to create new
questions to further expand the classs knowledge, the questions being central to the unit
to engender probing inquiry and eventual transfer (Wiggins, McTighe. 2005.p.106).
Using my broad and thought provoking questions, and giving them the set lab as a start
up, they will know what they are doing, what questions to ask, and how to properly
answer these questions when I allow them to explore on their own in attempt to prepare
them for the ability to do open inquiry (National Research Council, 2000). I feel that I
have successfully achieved an age appropriate inquiry revamp of the invisible ink
experiment and through my end additions, which allow for exploration as well as lots of
time for discussion and questions. I am very proud of this lesson plan and feel that it was
very helpful in allowing me to practice creating this type of experiment.
Resources:
- National Research Council. (2000). Inquiry and the national science education
standards: A guide for teaching and learning. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
- Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by design. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.