Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Velasquez
Professor
Noh
English
114A
16
November
2015
Evaluating
Sources
1)
"Social
Media:
Good
or
Bad?."
Daily
Tribune,
(2013):
.
This article does not agree with the quality of use of the Internet and social media.
The
article
claims
the
Internet
and
social
media
has
so
much
potential,
teenagers
usually
spend
hours
surfing
the
web
watching
junk,
when
the
network
can
be
used
for
educational
purposes
like
watching
live
stream
of
lectures
and
conferences
from
top
universities,
a
much
more
effective
and
useful
method
of
media.
The
article
also
claims
that
there
should
be
a
balance
between
Internet
usage,
physical
activity,
and
social
interactions.
Internet
usage
is
a
main
factor
young
children
are
not
developing
real
world
relations
ships
and
keeps
children
from
developing
emotionally
intelligent.
2)
Perego,
Martha.
"Social
media:
the
good,
bad,
and
uncharted:
hard
to
describe
or
define
in
advance."
Public
Management
96.9
(2014):
2+.
Expanded
Academic
ASAP.
Web.
18
Nov.
2015.
Martha
claims
that
there
is
a
fine
between
whether
social
media
should
be
on
a
personal
or
professional
level.
Local
and
federal
government
use
social
media
to
announce
news
or
get
a
message
across
and
so
do
politicians
during
elections.
Martha
also
claims
the
Internet
is
a
perfect
place
for
discussions
about
social
issues.
Someone
who
is
on
Facebook
and
has
family
and
friends
should
be
able
to
voice
their
opinion
about
a
current
event
and
not
get
ridiculed
for
because
it
is
a
form
of
freedom
of
speech.
I
felt
this
article
to
be
bias
because
the
author
failed
to
mention
counter
arguments
and
how
social
media
can
effectively
be
used
to
improve
the
knowledge
of
current
events
and
can
used
for
other
reasons
than
just
a
outlet
for
someones
thoughts.
3)
How
Social
Media
has
changed
us:
The
good
the
bad
http://returnonnow.com/2014/09/how-social-media-has-changed-us-the-good-and-the-
bad/
This article effectively states all the pros and cons of social media and how things
have
changes
since
the
explosion
of
social
media.
The
pros
are
better
access
to
information,
connectivity
and
community,
globalized
voices
but
the
cons
are
political
trades,
hiding
behind
anonymity,
all
talk
no
action,
and
amplified
ignorance.
Tommy
Landry
does
a
good
job
of
exploring
both
sides
of
social
media
with
credibility
with
good
background
knowledge
of
what
he
is
talking
about.