Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
BRUNSWICK SQUARE
Project co-funded by
Accelerating Paediatric Formulation Development
through Smart Design and Predictive Science.
Project co-funded by
Most drugs have bitter taste which poses a challenge for development of oral
pharmaceutical dosage forms.
The most common taste assessment method is human taste panel but it has
several drawbacks such as; (I) individuals taste perception variability, (II) ethical
and safety and (III) it is difficult for children to give reliable taste perception
statement (adults only).
Electronic tongues.
2. Release/dissolution tests.
Other in vitro methods: Cell based assays.
In vivo
1. Animal behavioural model: mainly rodents
Two bottles preference test
Brief access taste aversion test (BATA)
2. Electrophysiological methods
Other models: Drosophilia and Zebra fish
Electronic tongue
BATA
Electrophysiological
Two
bottles
Astree
Insent
1
2
1
1
1
1
5
3
5
3
5
3
4
0
4
3
5
3
5
3
5
5
5
4
3
5
4
4
0
3
5
1
3
0
3
5
4
0
1
1
5
4
0
2
1
2
4
46
1
1
26
2
4
33
2
2
39
2
3
42
Soto, J., Sheng, Y., Standing, J., Orlu Gul, M. & Tuleu, C. Development of a model for robust and exploratory analysis of
the rodent brief-access taste aversion data. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. (2015)
Conclusion
The most common in vitro taste evaluation method is electronic taste
sensor mainly either
(i) SA402B/ TS-5000z (Insent Inc)
(ii) -Astree e-sensor (Alpha M.O.S).
Project co-funded by
Accelerating Paediatric Formulation Development
through Smart Design and Predictive Science.
Afzal Mohammed
Craig Russell
Excised tissue
Eg: bovine tongue
Eukaryotes
Prokaryotes
Eg: amoeba
Primary cells
Eg: rodents, human
cells
Bioengineered cells
Eg: human
embryonic kidney
cells (HEK 293)
Epithelial
Cells
Outer Taste
Pore
Microvill
i
Bovine tongue
Support Cells (Type I, dark
cells (50%))
Sensory Cells (Type II and III,
light cells (25%))
Basal Cells
(Type IV)
Synapse
Nerve
2:21
following
first media
Day 1:14
hours after
seeding
7 24
change.
Confocal Imaging for the Identification of TRC markers Gustducin and PLC-B2
1.25
1.2
1.3
1.05
1.15
Calcium Response
1.1
1.05
Calcium
1.00
1
0.95
0.95
0.9
0.85
0.8
0
100
200
300
Field Time (s)
400
500
0.90
0
100
200
300
Field Time (s)
400
500
Conclusions