Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Unacceptable
Design needs attention and portfolio shows
limited organization. Inappropriate color,
format, font, photos and links do not work
Acceptable
Design is creative and professional with
all required elements present and
obvious.
Appropriate, color, format, font, photos
and workable links
There are NO mechanical errors
evident.
Autobiography
Resume
Resume is present
Training/Session/Seminar Plan
Training/Session/Seminar Plan is
present
Circle One
Acceptable
Unacceptable
Acceptable
Unacceptable
Acceptable
Unacceptable
Acceptable
Unacceptable
Present
Not Present
Present
Not Present
Comments:
HP Standards and HPE KSD Criteria
UNACCEPTABLE
Personal Reflections are brief and fail to indicate entry level proficiency.
Alignment to the KSD and the HP Standard is weak with little explanation.
Work sample(s) is briefly described and shows some relationship to a future career as a health promotion specialist.
ACCEPTABLE
Personal Reflections of work samples related to Four (4) and only 4 HP standards are complete and indicate entry level proficiency.
Alignment to Four (4) and only 4 HP standards and primary KSDs are explained and justified. Secondary KSDs are listed as supporting evidence. Work sample(s) are
completely described and relevant to the standard and a career in HP (Two work samples must be from level I internship)
Standard 1
Advocacy:
Comments:
Acceptable
Unacceptable
__Reflection
__Alignment
__Work Sample
Comments:
Acceptable
Unacceptable
__Reflection
__Alignment
__Work Sample
Comments:
Acceptable
Unacceptable
__Reflection
__Alignment
__Work Sample
Comments:
Acceptable
Unacceptable
__Reflection
__Alignment
__Work Sample
Comments:
Acceptable
Unacceptable
__Reflection
_ Alignment
__Work Sample
Comments:
Acceptable
Unacceptable
__Reflection
__Alignment
__Work Sample
Standard 2
Collaboration:
Standard 3
Professional Knowledge:
The health
promoter understands the central concepts, tools of inquiry,
and structures of health promotion and creates learning
experiences that make specific aspects of health promotion
meaningful to the client.
Standard 4
Standard 5
Leadership:
Standard 6
Communication:
Comments:
Acceptable
Unacceptable
__Reflection
__Alignment
__Work Sample
Comments:
Acceptable
Unacceptable
__Reflection
__Alignment
__Work Sample
Comments
Comments
Comments
Acceptable
Unacceptable
Acceptable
Unacceptable
Present
Not Present
Standard 7
Reflection:
Standard 8
Assessment:
If candidate receives any unacceptable rating or not present items, the candidate has not met minimum standards required for Admission to
Level II.
Date of Initial Review__________
__________Approved
________Not Approved
1st Evaluators Name __________________Renee ______
2nd Evaluators Name __________________________________
If portfolio does not meet minimal requirements, the deficiencies are noted in the comments section above and the revisions and a second review must be completed and
resubmitted and approved prior to Level II registration.
_________ Approved
_________Not Approved