Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Abstract
For decades, many upper-tier collegiate sports, such as football and basketball,
have had schools who delved into the athletics taboo of offering athletes incentives
to play for their school, otherwise known as illegal recruiting. This exclusively
included, but wasnt limited to, straight-up cash, buying athletes cars, houses, and
plane tickets for family members to come in town. Although there are many
violations associated with doing this, there are some instances where players need
to be paid. Some players hardly have enough money to eat and provide for their
family, and to add tuition on top of that for them to pay is almost impossible. So
when a booster comes knocking, offering those players tens of thousands of dollars
to play, it would be crazy if they didnt take the money. Its reasons and situations
like these that players should be paid.
Introduction
Its pretty well known by now that professional football players make a lot of
money by playing football and endorsing energy drinks that they never drink. In
fact, most professional athletes rake in a lot of cash, and the mega franchises that
buy these players support this practice with a satisfied grin and a pocket full of
green bills. The NCAA however frowns upon this ideal; no, they strictly prohibit it,
with many universities in the past paying dearly for crossing the NCAAs invisible
line in the sand by giving players incentives. Im looking at you SMU and USC. The
NCAA believes that maintaining amateurism is crucial to preserving an academic
environment in which acquiring a quality education is the first priority. But is it
really a crime to pay collegiate athletes, athletes that need the money to survive, to
feed their family, to feed themselves? What about the athletes that will never make
it to the professional level? Shouldnt these unspoken workers of the university have
a voice? The price for universities to pay doesnt even have to be extensive;
nevertheless there are points to be made and answers to have pulled into the light.
Point 1: Athletes need the Money
Just like us normal human beings, college athletes have to pay for everyday
items to survive in society: food, clothing, housing, family, school. To compete at the
collegiate level in any sport, the mind of any athlete must be focused, trained, and
have as little distractions as possible. Competing in rigorous sports while detailing
the extent of a limited budget for food and housing down to the last penny, while on
top of that having up to 4 hours of class per day, not including the time spent
studying and doing work, is a strenuous task to say the least. For student athletes of
at
all,
where the love of the sport is really all that can keep one moving ahead. Swimmers
can be defined as the epitome of this ideal. Professional swimmers are only paid
sparsely by being top 15 in the world every year, and compared to NBA salary that
washes players in lavish lump sums of hourly earnings, swimming earnings are
barely enough to put food on the table. To put it into perspective, only a handful of
swimmers have made big money off of swimming (I assume you all know of at least
one swimmer who has). Its athletes like these that help scream at the fault in the
NCAA policy, voices that scream for change, change in an archaic law of school and
sports, change for the better of all student athletes.
Conclusion
References
Berkes, P. (2013, August 28). Johnny Manziel briefly suspended, ending
NCAA autographs investigation. Retrieved October 23, 2015.
Fox, M. (2015, March 24). College athletes should be paid: Former UCLA
star. Retrieved October 23, 2015.
Strachan, M. (2015, March 23). Ed O'Bannon Takes Even Stronger Stance
On NCAA Player Compensation. Retrieved November 6, 2015.
Strachan, M. (2015, March 27). NCAA Schools Can Absolutely Afford To Pay
College Athletes, Economists