EDUCI/EDCE 699.107 World Languages Methods Observation Guide Sheet Observation of (teacher) SACO Price. School: MONery Charter flew Campus Name Lauro Art. Date: JA/MALIS 1, What were the objectives of the lesson? Were they cleat? ‘Yes v Comments: ASS wit Otto peg IE TrRY tren QI Oded CAC otvner's WOK 2. Did the teacher and students speak primarily in the target language? Yes. NO Ren Suen Yan, TH RPO A SQN. Te ve did ON ne Go AAS ky Wee “Asked 3. Did the lesson include the various modes of communications? Did it address one or more of the standards? Which ones? How? 40 10.020. “an ONS Yes. C ieodwi and Sear raN aa 4, Did the teacher speak clearly and distinctly? Did the teacher maintain eye contact with the class throughout the lesson? cng) rch ey? aa boequa) ‘Yes. Commen «oa, vor Searg es RRR as! 5. Was the classroom arrangement conducive to language learning? a ihe was ane w ‘a ‘Yes. Comments: S{ dems vid tre SS ero OF a nce Lois yorabuvary was 6. Did the teacher use any technical aids? Which ones? Yes. VN Comments: Test 40S played cn wait Miao ase beoken Thomasina 1 White Fall 2015 GSE/TPA own to me ‘een 7. Did the students respond to the teacher? Yes rer Ce ) ine NW AOLQet Dat a Me OU OE AUN mele QUIQON ney Vier wored University of rE eyEDUC/EDCE 699.107 World Languages Methods 8. Were the explanations clear, especially for | Yes__ VV No structural elements? Comments-We est woh exprained vy he) ISHUCUIAS ONC reer OXPReCHONS were found Wy te Weaeher. Duceerans For qr PAWG ines work w0s Very Cea. 9. Was there a good beginning, middle and | Yes / No end to this lesson? Comments: GeO) ATINO: OKA DOC merle xe Noreen ay Ver es tn of. ne ened SOC SO Haniyo | Wu NC AG, A vo! 10. Was this a learner-centered classroom? Yes No Comments: SHUAeUS WOLe TAPonswor CANSWRKING Wet Cacsmare’s ONS WRG aygont 8 ¥ May Onty the 11. Did the teacher vary the class structure, doing several different tasks? Was there group work? ‘Yes N Comments N wi ORS Tay WOS WEI CYPLMeA: They Wen AVIRWA HE HAT ONE OxOLaueued 12. Do you feel that the students were ‘Yes, motivated to want to learn more in this ‘Comments: ¥¢5 were ver" language? Why or why not? Eniusiaste Qoout responding 40 He Questions Additional comments; ‘Guents ware veld GeeowNIGN FOR thelr qeHOWS and HH was \uvOWRD HOt IF Amey made Q minions, Wey Wey were ‘Thomasina I, White Fall 2015 GSE/TFA ad 40 opel Wad wev(uOeA Teacher did wile exptOinvivg And re students ye ane HEV) oles FCViCW {VE Mokena Nee AD wnrommever University of PennsylvaniaEDUC/EDCE 699.107 World Languages Methods Verification of Observation This is to certify that avve La has observed my classes. eacrer_ MUMULL Pyfee senoot:_ Masry (Vey ev Pied (warps Classes observed: WAVW NS AZAANNS Date:_ (Df isAs_ signature of Teacher: Md be Cs ‘Thomasina J. White Fall 2015 GSE/TFA University of Pennsylvania