0 Bewertungen0% fanden dieses Dokument nützlich (0 Abstimmungen)
24 Ansichten37 Seiten
P2P is a relational dynamic, not a technological term. P2P systems are only revolutionary when not driven by shareholder profit. A Commons Transition extrapolates existing initiatives and projects them as a viable systemic direction.
P2P is a relational dynamic, not a technological term. P2P systems are only revolutionary when not driven by shareholder profit. A Commons Transition extrapolates existing initiatives and projects them as a viable systemic direction.
P2P is a relational dynamic, not a technological term. P2P systems are only revolutionary when not driven by shareholder profit. A Commons Transition extrapolates existing initiatives and projects them as a viable systemic direction.
systems clearly reflect our common values? What are the Commons, what is P2P? What happens after The End of History"? Are all P2P initiatives created equal? What is a Commons Transition and can we achieve it or is it utopian?
Part 1: The P2P/Commons Movement
The The Commons are a resource, the community Commons are a resource, the community around it and the built around built it and the systems that systems sustaining both sustain both
Peer to Peer (P2P) is a relational
dynamic, not a technological term P2P and the Commons are interdependent
Part 2: Capitalism vs Normality
Growth is disastrous for the planet and obfuscates the issue of redistribution Cognitive Capitalism: immaterial abstract value protected through the use of patents and IP The scarcity vs abundance confusion Neoliberalism is losing all its emotional and intellectual credibility
P2P Value Systems
Profit oriented
Community Oriented
Centralised
Distributed
Global
Glocal
Part 3: The P2P Jungle
P2P systems are growing exponentially but they have different architectures based on underlying value systems Netarchical Capitalism has a for-profit, centralised, global orientation The Sharing Economy mutualises physical goods but centralises the platform and profits Distributed Capitalism has a for-profit, de-centralised, global orientation
Part 4: The Open Source Circular Economy
P2P systems are only revolutionary when not driven by shareholder profit Local initiatives should have a global outlook to effect systemic change A globally oriented, for benefit, distributed economy deals with local material realities and global needs P2P economics and P2P politics are interdependent. They prioritise the real needs of people and planet
Part 5: A Commons Transition
Scaling up of P2P dynamics in all life spheres would represent a 3rd way for social and economic relations A Commons Transition extrapolates existing initiatives and projects them as a viable systemic direction A new hegemony won't be articulated from a set of blueprints, but we can increase the likelihood of its emergence