0 Bewertungen0% fanden dieses Dokument nützlich (0 Abstimmungen)
9K Ansichten2 Seiten
If we consider Hobbs, people are nothing more than mere mechanical construction. In that case, moral is just artificial product of political laws, camouflage for selfishness, greed, envy and private interests. Descartes is suspicious about everything outside the nous, so the things like morality, love and honesty cannot be some artificial creations.
If we consider Hobbs, people are nothing more than mere mechanical construction. In that case, moral is just artificial product of political laws, camouflage for selfishness, greed, envy and private interests. Descartes is suspicious about everything outside the nous, so the things like morality, love and honesty cannot be some artificial creations.
If we consider Hobbs, people are nothing more than mere mechanical construction. In that case, moral is just artificial product of political laws, camouflage for selfishness, greed, envy and private interests. Descartes is suspicious about everything outside the nous, so the things like morality, love and honesty cannot be some artificial creations.
Did law of nature ever existed? In a pure way, separately from
human actions, social contracts, and divine will? On the one hand, if we consider Hobbs, people are nothing more than mere mechanical construction, endowed with reason and selfpreservative urge, deprived from empathy and solidarity.They fight for their own lifes, trying to survive and protect their property.In that state of nature laws (known as State of nature) , without social contracts, people are very similiar to animals.In that case, moral is just artificial product of political laws, camouflage for selfishness, greed, envy and private interests.Although, this theory is overwhelming for human's feelings of superiority and domination over other beings, we cannot easily reject this view.Consider the everyday situation: your honesty doesn't allow you to steal piece of meat from a market store, but does allow you to eat that same piece of dead animal.It allows you to kill an animal, but it doesn't allow you to kill a man, because that is forbidden by the juristical law and you get punished for that.While, in the animal kingdom it is not forbidden to kill people, which is one more proof that the law of nature exists in a state released from social contracts, which lead us to the conclusion that the moral doesn't exist in a pure way, for its own sake. On the other hand, Lock said that the pre-political state is state of morality, in which people are equal and free.So, the core of morality is freedom, not social contract.But, Hobbs and Locke both agree about existence of State of nature and universe law.Pivotal role in occurance of those very influential theories, had scientifical discoveries, which explained motion of inanimate world by laws of nature, gravity for instance. As opposed to this empirical expositions, stand rational theories, with their best-known proponent-Descartes.He is suspicious about everything outside the nous, so the things like morality, love and honesty cannot be some artificial creations, but only productof our nous.According to him, there is God that makes us able to distinguish just from unjust and sensual deceiving from truth.The God must be the source of idea of perfection in our minds, which
lead us to the correct, moral behaviour.So, if God is creating laws,
the pure nature law just cannot exist apart from divine will. Can we make those two theories, in some way, reconcilable?Can we say both the man, with all his features is product of the God (as a symbol of morality and perfection) and the God is product of a man? What seemed to be appear first?This chain of affects and causes reminds me on infamous impasse when you need an experience to get a job, but you also need a job to get an experience. To reconcile those two theories, we must go back in the past and think about Socrates.According to him, there are two condition to be a moral person: first, you must realize your obligation to abide the republic's law ( by your nous, knowledge and pure morality) and then, act accordingly-obey the social laws, that helped us to overcome the State of nature. So, only in harmony and balance of those two contrary, we can find real hapinness and justice, which inevitably lead us to the ancient theory of moderation, basis for all human's virtues.