Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Mirror therapy for phantom limb pain: Brain changes and the
role of body representation
J. Foell1,2*, R. Bekrater-Bodmann1*, M. Diers1, H. Flor1
1 Department of Cognitive and Clinical Neuroscience, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University,
Mannheim, Germany
2 Department of Psychology, Florida State University, Tallahassee, USA
Correspondence
Herta Flor
E-mail: herta.or@zi-mannheim.de
Funding sources
This work was supported by the PHANTOM
MIND project (Phantom phenomena: a
window to the mind and the brain), which
receives research funding from the European
Communitys Seventh Framework Programme
(FP7/20072013)/ERC Grant Agreement No.
230249, and by a subproject of the
Collaborative Research Project Bionic-Hand
funded by the Bundesministerium fr Bildung
und Forschung (V4UKF02). This manuscript
reects only the authors views, and the
Community is not liable for any use that may
be made of the information contained
therein. The authors have no other relevant
afliations or nancial involvement with any
organization or entity with a nancial interest
in or nancial conict with the subject matter
or materials discussed in the manuscript
apart from those disclosed. No writing
assistance was utilized in the production of
this manuscript.
Conicts of interest
None declared.
Abstract
Background: Phantom limb pain (PLP) is a common consequence of
amputation and is difficult to treat. Mirror therapy (MT), a procedure
utilizing the visual recreation of movement of a lost limb by moving the
intact limb in front of a mirror, has been shown to be effective in reducing
PLP. However, the neural correlates of this effect are not known.
Methods: We investigated the effects of daily mirror training over 4
weeks in 13 chronic PLP patients after unilateral arm amputation. Eleven
participants performed hand and lip movements during a functional
magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) measurement before and after MT.
The location of neural activity in primary somatosensory cortex during
these tasks was used to assess brain changes related to treatment.
Results: The treatment caused a significant reduction of PLP (average
decrease of 27%). Treatment effects were predicted by a telescopic
distortion of the phantom, with those patients who experienced a
telescope profiting less from treatment. fMRI data analyses revealed a
relationship between change in pain after MT and a reversal of
dysfunctional cortical reorganization in primary somatosensory cortex.
Pain reduction after mirror training was also related to a decrease of
activity in the inferior parietal cortex (IPC).
Conclusions: Experienced body appearance seems to be an important
predictor of mirror treatment effectiveness. Maladaptive changes in
cortical organization are reversed during mirror treatment, which also
alters activity in the IPC, a region involved in painful perceptions and in
the perceived relatedness to an observed limb.
1. Introduction
After the amputation of a limb, most patients report
awareness of a phantom (Giummarra et al., 2007), i.e.,
the continuing perception of the missing limb, with or
2013 The Authors. European Journal of Pain published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Pain Federation - EFIC. Eur J Pain 18 (2014) 729739 729
This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium,
provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
J. Foell et al.
730 Eur J Pain 18 (2014) 729739 2013 The Authors. European Journal of Pain published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Pain Federation - EFIC
J. Foell et al.
2.2 Design
Each patient gave daily reports of pain (using VAS) for a total
of 8 weeks, commencing 2 weeks prior to therapy (prephase) to assess the baseline level of PLP, followed by a
4-week training phase with daily mirror exercises and concluding with 2 weeks without any treatment (but with daily
pain ratings; post-phase) to evaluate possible long-term
effects of the therapy. On the day before the first training
unit as well as after the last one, the patients brain activation
was assessed: Patients performed (1) mirrored hand movements and (2) a lip-pursing task during fMRI measurement
(cf. Lotze et al., 2001; MacIver et al., 2008). During the same
visit, patients were asked about the frequency, intensity and
relieving factors for current and past PLP as well as current
and past non-painful phantom sensations (including telescoping) using a structured interview (Winter et al., 2001).
For everyday of the study (pre-phase, training phase and
post-phase), patients were asked about any pain medication
they were using.
2013 The Authors. European Journal of Pain published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Pain Federation - EFIC Eur J Pain 18 (2014) 729739
731
J. Foell et al.
732 Eur J Pain 18 (2014) 729739 2013 The Authors. European Journal of Pain published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Pain Federation - EFIC
J. Foell et al.
3. Results
3.1 Mirror training performance
The patients did not report any problems in performing the mirrored movements or with the duration of
3.2 Pain
The patients reported stable pain ratings 2 weeks
before the training, with a decline after the first week
of daily training. The average pain rating in the week
after the training was significantly lower than that
from the week before start of the training (week 1:
M = 28.21, SD = 11.52; week 2: M = 28.26,
SD = 16.27; week 7: M = 20.60, SD = 12.80; week 8:
M = 23.44, SD = 13.04; week 2 vs. week 7: t12 = 1.78,
p = 0.05). Cohens d was 0.52, indicating a mediumsized effect of treatment on pain scores. Individual
pain ratings before and after the mirror treatment are
given in Supporting Information Table S2 and illustrated in Fig. 1A; Fig. 1B shows the average pain
ratings before, during and after the mirror treatment.
2013 The Authors. European Journal of Pain published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Pain Federation - EFIC Eur J Pain 18 (2014) 729739
733
J. Foell et al.
Pre-training
Post-training
Subject #
B
Training phase
Post-phase
Pre-phase
Pre
Post
Week
Figure 1 (A) Individual pre- and post-training pain ratings, ordered from
most to least benet. Triangles denote individual patients without a telescopic distortion of the phantom. (B) Daily pain ratings averaged over
weeks and over all participants. Error bars depict standard error.
B
Pre-training
Post-training
Figure 2 (A) Neuronal activity in somatosensory cortex during lippursing task before (red) and after (blue) mirror therapy. (B) Amount of
dysfunctional shift for individual patients before (red) and after (blue)
training, ordered from most to least benet.
734 Eur J Pain 18 (2014) 729739 2013 The Authors. European Journal of Pain published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Pain Federation - EFIC
J. Foell et al.
Pre-phase
Treatment phase
Post-phase
Week
2013 The Authors. European Journal of Pain published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Pain Federation - EFIC Eur J Pain 18 (2014) 729739
735
4. Discussion
One aim was to determine whether MT is effective in
chronic PLP patients. Overall, treatment led to a pain
reduction of 27%, a medium-sized effect. This extends
earlier findings in acute amputees (Chan et al., 2007)
to chronic PLP. However, our results also suggest that
only some patients profit from MT, and that individual
differences determine treatment effectiveness.
Treatment effects were connected to cortical reorganization: As PLP decreased, the representation in the
somatosensory cortices of both hemispheres became
more similar, partially recreating their presumed
normal state. For motor cortex, no connection was
found. MacIver et al. (2008) investigated the effects of
mental imagery on PLP and found similar changes,
including more concise activation after treatment.
Makin et al. (2013) recently hypothesized that preserved hand function rather than dysfunctional reorganization (Flor et al., 1995) in S1 is positively
associated with PLP, suggesting that an effective PLP
treatment should be accompanied by reduced activity
in the hand representation in S1 rather than a relocation of cortical lip representation. However, we found
no significant alterations in S1 activity representing the
hand after training, and no significant correlation
between activation changes in the hand region and the
treatment effect. Instead, we found the already
reported shift in cortical lip localization. Makin et al.
had patients perform lip movements comparable with
the ones in this study and found no connection
between PLP and neural activation. Their finding of
continuing activation in the region previously representing the now-amputated hand seems to contradict
the model of maladaptive cortical reorganization.
However, a combination of conceptual and methodological factors suggests that these viewpoints are
complementary rather than contradictory (Flor et al.,
2013). Makin et al. (2013) used the intensity of activation, whereas cortical reorganization mainly relates to
its location. Furthermore, the direction of this shift can
vary between persons, diminishing the reliability of an
averaged approach: In their analysis, activation during
movement in PLP patients was weaker and less spread
out, consistent with averaged heterogeneous activa-
J. Foell et al.
736 Eur J Pain 18 (2014) 729739 2013 The Authors. European Journal of Pain published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Pain Federation - EFIC
J. Foell et al.
Author contributions
All authors of this paper were involved in the conception and
design of this study as well as the analysis and interpretation
of data. Further, all authors revised the manuscript for
important intellectual content and gave final approval of the
version to be published. Results were discussed among all
authors, and all authors commented on the manuscript.
2013 The Authors. European Journal of Pain published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Pain Federation - EFIC Eur J Pain 18 (2014) 729739
737
References
Bach, F., Cakmak, H., Maass, H., Bekrater-Bodmann, R., Foell, J., Diers,
M., Trojan, J., Fuchs, X., Flor, H. (2012). Illusory hand ownership
induced by an MRI compatible immersive virtual reality device. Biomed
Tech (Berl) 57, 718720.
Bekrater-Bodmann, R., Foell, J., Diers, M., Flor, H. (2012). The perceptual
and neuronal stability of the rubber hand illusion across contexts and
over time. Brain Res 1452, 130139.
Birbaumer, N., Lutzenberger, W., Montoya, P., Larbig, W., Unertl, K.,
Topfner, S., Grodd, W., Taub, E., Flor, H. (1997). Effects of regional
anesthesia on phantom limb pain are mirrored in changes in cortical
reorganization. J Neurosci 17, 55035508.
Brodie, E.E., Whyte, A., Waller, B. (2003). Increased motor control of a
phantom leg in humans results from the visual feedback of a virtual leg.
Neurosci Lett 341, 167169.
Cauda, F., DAgata, F., Sacco, K., Duca, S., Cocito, D., Paolasso, I., Isoardo,
G., Geminiani, G. (2009). Altered resting state attentional networks in
diabetic neuropathic pain. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 81, 806811.
Chan, B.L., Witt, R., Charrow, A.P., Magee, A., Howard, R., Pasquina, P.F.,
Heilman, K.M., Tsao, J.W. (2007). Mirror therapy for phantom limb
pain. N Engl J Med 357, 22062207.
Darnall, B.D., Li, H. (2012). Home-based self-delivered mirror therapy for
phantom pain: A pilot-study. J Rehabil Med 44, 254260.
Diers, M., Christmann, C., Koeppe, C., Ruf, M., Flor, H. (2010). Mirrored,
imagined and executed movements differentially activate sensorimotor
cortex in amputees with and without phantom limb pain. Pain 149,
296304.
Dunckley, P., Wise, R.G., Aziz, Q., Painter, D., Brooks, J., Tracey, I.,
Chang, L. (2005). Cortical processing of visceral and somatic stimulation: Differentiating pain intensity from unpleasantness. Neuroscience
133, 533542.
Elbert, T., Flor, H., Birbaumer, N., Knecht, S., Hampson, S., Larbig, W.,
Taub, E. (1994). Extensive reorganization of the somatosensory cortex
in adult humans after nervous system injury. Neuroreport 5, 25932597.
Farrer, C., Franck, N., Georgieff, N., Frith, C.D., Decety, J., Jeannerod, M.
(2003). Modulating the experience of agency: A positron emission
tomography study. Neuroimage 18, 324333.
Flor, H., Denke, C., Schaefer, M., Grusser, S. (2001). Effect of sensory
discrimination training on cortical reorganisation and phantom limb
pain. Lancet 357, 17631764.
Flor, H., Diers, M., Andoh, J. (2013). The neural basis of phantom limb
pain. Trends Cogn Sci 17, 307308.
Flor, H., Elbert, T., Knecht, S., Wienbruch, C., Pantev, C., Birbaumer, N.,
Larbig, W., Taub, E. (1995). Phantom-limb pain as a perceptual correlate of cortical reorganization following arm amputation. Nature 375,
482484.
Flor, H., Nikolajsen, L., Staehelin Jensen, T. (2006). Phantom limb pain: A
case of maladaptive CNS plasticity? Nat Rev Neurosci 7, 873881.
Flor, H., Rudy, T.E., Birbaumer, N., Streit, B., Schugens, M.M. (1990).
[The applicability of the West Haven-Yale multidimensional pain inventory in German-speaking countries. Data on the reliability and validity
of the MPI-D.]. Schmerz 4, 8287.
Foell, J., Bekrater-Bodmann, R., Flor, H., Cole, J. (2011). Phantom limb
pain after lower limb trauma: Origins and treatments. Int J Low Extrem
Wounds 10, 224235.
Foell, J., Bekrater-Bodmann, R., McCabe, C., Flor, H. (2013). Sensorimotor incongruence and body perception: An experimental investigation.
Front Hum Neurosci 7, 310. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00310.
Giummarra, M.J., Gibson, S.J., Georgiou-Karistianis, N., Bradshaw, J.L.
(2007). Central mechanisms in phantom limb perception: The past,
present and future. Brain Res Rev 54, 219232.
Hanley, M.A., Ehde, D.M., Jensen, M., Czerniecki, J., Smith, D.G.,
Robinson, L.R. (2009). Chronic pain associated with upper-limb loss.
Am J Phys Med Rehabil 88, 742751.
Hunter, J.P., Katz, J., Davis, K.D. (2003). The effect of tactile and visual
sensory inputs on phantom limb awareness. Brain 126, 579589.
Jensen, T.S., Krebs, B., Nielsen, J., Rasmussen, P. (1983). Phantom limb,
phantom pain and stump pain in amputees during the first 6 months
following limb amputation. Pain 17, 243256.
J. Foell et al.
Karl, A., Birbaumer, N., Lutzenberger, W., Cohen, L.G., Flor, H. (2001).
Reorganization of motor and somatosensory cortex in upper extremity
amputees with phantom limb pain. J Neurosci 21, 36093618.
Kerns, R.D., Turk, D.C., Rudy, T.E. (1985). The West Haven-Yale Multidimensional Pain Inventory (WHYMPI). Pain 23, 345356.
Koppelstaetter, F., Siedentopf, C.M., Rhomberg, P., Lechner-Steinleitner,
S., Mottaghy, F.M., Eisner, W., Golaszewski, S.M. (2007). [Functional
magnetic resonance imaging before motor cortex stimulation for
phantom limb pain]. Nervenarzt 78, 14351439.
Lloyd, D.M. (2007). Spatial limits on referred touch to an alien limb may
reflect boundaries of visuo-tactile peripersonal space surrounding the
hand. Brain Cogn 64, 104109.
Lotze, M., Flor, H., Grodd, W., Larbig, W., Birbaumer, N. (2001). Phantom
movements and pain. An fMRI study in upper limb amputees. Brain
124, 22682277.
MacIver, K., Lloyd, D.M., Kelly, S., Roberts, N., Nurmikko, T. (2008).
Phantom limb pain, cortical reorganization and the therapeutic effect of
mental imagery. Brain 131, 21812191.
Mackert, B.M., Sappok, T., Grsser, S., Flor, H., Curio, G. (2003). The
eloquence of silent cortex: Analysis of afferent input to deafferented
cortex in arm amputees. Neuroreport 14, 409412.
Makin, T.R., Scholz, J., Filippini, N., Henderson Slater, D., Tracey, I.,
Johansen-Berg, H. (2013). Phantom pain is associated with preserved
structure and function in the former hand area. Nat Commun 4, 1570.
doi: 10.1038/ncomms2571.
Maldjian, J.A., Laurienti, P.J., Kraft, R.A., Burdette, J.H. (2003). An automated method for neuroanatomic and cytoarchitectonic atlas-based
interrogation of fMRI data sets. Neuroimage 19, 12331239.
Mercier, C., Sirigu, A. (2009). Training with virtual visual feedback to
alleviate phantom limb pain. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 23, 587594.
Moseley, G.L., Gallace, A., Spence, C. (2012). Bodily illusions in health
and disease: Physiological and clinical perspectives and the concept of a
cortical body matrix. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 36, 3446.
Ramachandran, V.S., Rogers-Ramachandran, D.C. (1996). Synaesthesia in
phantom limbs induced with mirrors. Proc Biol Sci 263, 377386.
Schley, M.T., Wilms, P., Toepfner, S., Schaller, H.P., Schmelz, M., Konrad,
C.J., Birbaumer, N. (2008). Painful and nonpainful phantom and stump
sensations in acute traumatic amputees. J Trauma 65, 858864.
Schmalzl, L., Thomke, E., Ragn, C., Nilseryd, M., Stockselius, A.,
Ehrsson, H.H. (2011). Pulling telescoped phantoms out of the stump:
Manipulating the perceived position of phantom limbs using a full-body
illusion. Front Hum Neurosci 5, 121.
Spitzer, M. (1997). Noise-driven neuroplasticity in self-organizing feature
maps: A neurocomputational model of phantom limbs. MD Comput 14,
192199.
Trojan, J., Diers, M., Fuchs, X., Bach, F., Bekrater-Bodmann, R., Foell, J.,
Kamping, S., Rance, M., Maass, H., Flor, H. (in press). An augmented
reality home-training system based on the mirror and imagery treatment approach. Behav Res Methods.
Tsakiris, M. (2010). My body in the brain: A neurocognitive model of
body-ownership. Neuropsychologia 48, 703712.
Uematsu, H., Shibata, M., Miyauchi, S., Mashimo, T. (2011). Brain
imaging of mechanically induced muscle versus cutaneous pain. Neurosci Res 70, 7884.
Weeks, S.R., Anderson-Barnes, V.C., Tsao, J.W. (2010). Phantom limb
pain: Theories and therapies. Neurologist 16, 277286.
Whitfield-Gabrieli, S. (2009). Region of Interest Extraction (REX) Toolbox
(Boston, MA: MIT Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences).
Winter, C., Fritsche, K., Karl, A., Huse, E., Labig, W., Grusser, S.M., Flor,
H. (2001). [The phantom and stump phenomena interview (PSPI)].
Schmerz 15, 172178.
Yomogida, Y., Sugiura, M., Sassa, Y., Wakusawa, K., Sekiguchi, A.,
Fukushima, A., Takeuchi, H., Horie, K., Sato, S., Kawashima, R. (2010).
The neural basis of agency: An fMRI study. Neuroimage 50, 198207.
Supporting Information
Additional Supporting Information may be found in the
online version of this article at the publishers web-site:
738 Eur J Pain 18 (2014) 729739 2013 The Authors. European Journal of Pain published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Pain Federation - EFIC
J. Foell et al.
Table S1.
Table S2.
functional
Table S3.
Table S4.
Details of participants.
Individual scores for phantom limb pain and dyscortical shift before and after treatment.
Activation during lip movement.
Activation during hand movement.
2013 The Authors. European Journal of Pain published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Pain Federation - EFIC Eur J Pain 18 (2014) 729739
739