Timestamp

Username

Read the articles written Task 2

What is the largest bunk What is the largest bunk

PROS
Concrete:
-great comfort and quit
-Less repair and maintenance
-healthier indoor environment
Steel
-ease of repair
-quality of construction
-ductility
Wood
-durable
-fast and efficient to build with
-helps tackle climate changes
CONS
Concrete
-seems good
Wood
-warp,twist,expand ,contract
-termites
-may mold
Steel
-general cost
-maintenance
1/29/2015 9:31:16 1315048634@psusd.us -fireproofing
The pros for wood are that it helps tackle climate if
The pros for steel are that it is high in strength and
1/29/2015 11:52:13 1315046527@psusd.us The pros for concrete are that it is the strongest m

434

435

Concrete Pros:sturdy,not flamable

Concrete Cons:floodable,and heavy
Steel Pros:light and sturdy
Steel Cons:gets ot during summer,cold during the
Wood Pros:light,and easy to build with
1/29/2015 11:55:46 1315042220@psusd.us Wood Cons:flamable,wood get wet and shrinks

435

Timestamp

Username

Read the articles written Task 2

What is the largest bunk What is the largest bunk

Wood cons: Easily Destructible

Wood pros: Cheap, Produce less carbon dioxide
Steel cons: Gets rusty after a period of time, Price
Steel pros: High durability, Strong, Ductile, Energy
Concrete cons: Heavy,
1/29/2015 12:04:31 1315049273@psusd.us Concrete pros: Reduces noise, uses less energy,

434.91

concrete pros energy cost savings, and reduced n

concrete cons concrete is very expensive at the a
steel pros easy of repair, ductility
steel cons not fire proof
wood pros very cheap at the price of 5.75, the righ
1/29/2015 12:09:26 1315047727@psusd.us wood cons may mold, turmites
Cons concrete: heaviness, time (about a day to dr
Pros concrete: Need less heat by 44% and 32% le
Cons steel:heaviness, heats in hot temperatures t
Pros steel: durable made for earthquakes, tall buil
Cons wood: it burns easily it is targeted for termite
#CALL OF DUTY ZOMBIES
1/29/2015 12:21:15 1315054496@psusd.us Pros wood: cost $5.75 very easy & quick to build 434.91 in feet

434

Timestamp

Username

Read the articles written Task 2

What is the largest bunk What is the largest bunk

Concrete pros:
-reduced noise
-lower energy bills
-takes less repair and maintenance
Concrete cons:
-expense
Steel pros:
-long span bridges
-high rise buildings
-high quality construction
Steel cons:
-cost
-may cause a fire
-corrosion
Wood pros:
-costs less
-right wood helps climate change
-stores carbon
Wood cons:
-fire hazard
-gives opportunity to break the wood easily
1/29/2015 12:21:28 1315046468@psusd.us -can cause splinters

400

Timestamp

Username

Read the articles written Task 2

What is the largest bunk What is the largest bunk

Concrete Pros.
-reduced noise
-healthier indoor environment
-fire resistant
-lower energy bills
Concrete Cons.
-expensive
Steel Pros.
-repetitive use
-easy to repair
-quality of construction
-high strength/weight ratio
Steel Cons.
-expensive
-corrosion
-can cause fire
Wood Pros.
-right wood helps tackle climate change
-produces less carbon dioxide
-wood is beautiful
-wood provide local green job
Wood Cons.
1/29/2015 12:23:54 1315047653@psusd.us -can cause splinter

400

1/29/2015 12:27:32 1315042461@psusd.us hgffj

concrete + takes less energy to cool and heat

concrete - the cost is to high
steel + in has good protection
steel -in warm weather can be very hot
wood + comfortable living space
1/29/2015 12:34:09 1315063714@psusd.us wood -can be burned down

434.9

Timestamp

Username

Read the articles written Task 2

Concrete pros:
-house has more even temperatures
-protects from extreme outdoor weather
- reduces from noises
Concrete cons:
-quite expensive
Steel pros:
-repaired easily
-good fatigue strength
Steel cons:
-can cause fire
Wood pros:
-uses less energy
-helps tackle climate change
Wood cons:
1/29/2015 12:41:23 1315046042@psusd.us -causes splinters

What is the largest bunk What is the largest bunk

400

Concrete Pro: The concrete bunker takes 44% les

Concrete Con: The concrete is really heavy to pick
Steel Pro: The steel bunker is easy to rebuild.
Steel Con: The steel bunker is attracts lighting.
Wood Pro: The wood bunker is easy to build in fas
1/29/2015 12:52:19 1315045589@psusd.us Wood Con: The wood bunker can get burned dow

500

concrete pros: It saves energy and it reduces nois

concrete cons: The concrete takes so slow to mak
steel pros: steel is good because of it"s strength a
steel cons: when you touch the steel it may burn y
wood pros: it is a beautiful and it is a good resourc
1/29/2015 12:52:42 1315037604@psusd.us wood cons: Sometimes the wood would will burn a
1/29/2015 12:56:50 1315042441@psusd.us

$435
500

Timestamp

Username

Read the articles written Task 2

What is the largest bunk What is the largest bunk

Concrete
Pros: Costs less to heat and cool, Won't support g
Cons: Rather expensive, Weak against cold
Steel
Pros: Can survive earthquakes, Buildings with ste
Cons: Rather expensive, Becomes less strong wh
Wood
Pros: Leaves less of a carbon footprint, Produces l
1/29/2015 12:59:25 1315073112@psusd.us Cons: Vulnerable to fire, Can be damaged by term 75.63 square feet

Timestamp

Username

Read the articles written Task 2

What is the largest bunk What is the largest bunk

Pros and Cons

Pros of concrete:
1.Lower energy bills
2.Healthier indoor environment
3.Less repair and maintenance
4.Fire resistent
Cons of concrete:
1.Labor intensive
2.Can have cracks
3.Very expensive
Pros of metal:
1.Easy to repair
2.Good fatigue strength
3.Speed of erection
4.strong structure
Cons of metal:
1.hot in the summer
2.Expensive
3.less energy efficient than wood
Pros of wood:
1.good isolation when cold in winter
2.cheap
3.renewable resource
4.easy to work with
Cons of wood:
1.termites love to eat it
2. can have mold problems
1/29/2015 13:03:56 1315055925@psusd.us 3.stretch and get bent out of shape in harsh weath

434

Timestamp

Username

Read the articles written Task 2

What is the largest bunk What is the largest bunk

concrete pros: no bugs, no high winds, fire resista

concrete cons: heavy, it costs $15.25 per foot
steel pros: high strength to weight ratio, easy repai
steel cons: general cost is high, not fireproof, can r
wood pros: wood is cheap, fast to build, naturally
1/29/2015 13:08:13 1315048233@psusd.us wood cons: wood can be cut through, bullets can 75.63 per square foot

Pros: fire resistat

concrete:
Cons: too heavy
Pros: high strength
Steel:
Cons: cost more $
Pros: Renewable
Wood:
1/29/2015 13:09:26 1315037176@psusd.us Cons: Can cause fire
concret: is reale hard to brack.
concret is not smooth it is lumpe
steel:is smooth
steel:if water gets wet it bracs down
wood:is nice
1/29/2015 13:13:11 1315044423@psusd.us wood:can esile bracs
Concrete Pros:fire prove,hurricane prove, zombies
Concrete Cons:heavy, expensive, slow to build.
Steel Pros:Tough, fast too build.
Steel Cons:Corrosive, fire conductor,dentable.
Wood Pros:Light, easy to find, fast too build.
1/29/2015 13:13:59 1315055848@psusd.us Wood Cons:Fire hazard, weak, non-zombie prove. 434 square feet

500

$5.75

Timestamp

Username

Read the articles written Task 2

What is the largest bunk What is the largest bunk

Wood pros:cheap,durable,renewable
Wood cons:weak
Concrete pros:fire resistant,pest proof,low energy
Concrete cons:heavy,hard to move
Steel pros:high strength,ductility,ease of repair
1/29/2015 13:14:58 1315044368@psusd.us Steel cons:cost,fireproofing,maintanece

concrete pros: has air infiltration

concrete cons: explosive worthy
steel pros: high strength
steel cons: conducts heat quickly
wood pros: a renewable resource
1/29/2015 14:30:26 1315056618@psusd.us wood cons: can easily be damage

18

Timestamp

Username

Read the articles written Task 2

What is the largest bunk What is the largest bunk

Wood
Pros:Less energy
Pros:Beautiful place
Pros:Wont cost much
Cons:Not fire proof
Cons:Splinter
Steel
Pros:High strength
Pros:Safer place
Cons:Cost a lot
Cons:Heavy
Concrete
Pros: No one can come in
Pros:You can live in their for 6 years
Cons:Take forever to build
Cons:Really heavy
1/29/2015 14:49:27 1315046312@psusd.us Cons:Cost a whole

434

Concrete Pros : Lower energy bills,ICF wall, very

Concrete Cons : Very expensive
Steel pros : high strength, high rise buildings , Stru
Steel Cons : may be more costly than other struct
Wood Pros : Renewable,durable,versatile,Cheape
1/29/2015 14:53:02 1315036564@psusd.us Wood Cons : Not fire proof, used large amounts of

464

Timestamp

Username

Read the articles written Task 2

What is the largest bunk What is the largest bunk

ICF Pro: ICF walls require about 44% less energy

ICF Pro: ICF walls are equally effective at keeping
ICF Con: ICF walls and concrete walls are an una
ICF Con: ICF walls contain no organic material, so
ICF Con: ICF won't add fuel to a fire because they
Steel Pro: Steel has a high strength/weight ratio.
Steel Pro: Steel structures in general can be repai
Steel Pro: Steel can be reused after a structure is
Steel Pro: Steel structures have relatively good fat
Steel Con: Steel structures may be more costly th
Wood Pro: Responsibly sourced wood is renewabl
Wood Pro: Wood is a durable material for both ho
Wood Pro: Wood itself is a natural insulator due to
1/30/2015 13:43:26 1315046382@psusd.us Wood Pro: Wood construction is fast and efficient.

434.91

Pros Concrete:lower energy bills

Cons Concrete:
Pros Steel:Long-span bridges
Cons Steel:
Pros Wood: wood helps tackle climate
1/30/2015 13:45:03 1315059891@psusd.us Cons Wood:

steel bunker:
tthe pros are dead weight of steel structure is rela
concrete:
the pros are lower energy bills. greater comfort an
wood:
1/30/2015 13:55:00 1315047605@psusd.us the benefits are the right wood stores carbon, the r 438.39 ft
1/30/2015 13:58:20 1315048240@psusd.us i would use Concrete to build the bunkers becaus 200 ft

434

Timestamp

Username

Read the articles written Task 2

What is the largest bunk What is the largest bunk

1. The concrete ICF bunker is more fire resistant t

2. The wood and steel bunker are easy to build.
3. Concrete, Steel, and Wood are very protective
4. Concrete is less to prepare than Steel and Woo
1/30/2015 13:58:27 1315048013@psusd.us 5. Concrete bunkers have lower energy bills to pa 434 feet
1/30/2015 14:21:13 1315049979@psusd.us durability,livability,corrosion,residential,wale,conve

$6.00

1/30/2015 14:22:14 1315043286@psusd.us Steel is very strong. it has high strength and weigh The largest could be 433 pieces of wood of my bu
That PCA are is the less energy has the high rise
That pros and con that are come bad to bad ting t
It will change to the level of the time that fail.
That something can be payoff that can be real fas
The steel can easily t make it into steel.
It will be high because it will be into steel mass.
it will be into a steel after they will a turn into retu
it will be use to a new bay or into a steel.
1/30/2015 14:23:27 1315043061@psusd.us it will be into a or reused steel to bill.

2500

1/30/2015 14:23:28 1315051056@psusd.us The pros of each bunker is that it is really strong a

$5.75

1/30/2015 14:25:36 1315037146@psusd.us one use steel and the other one is concrete that it they are better than the others.
The pro is that you can sleep. Two people can sle
1/30/2015 14:31:54 1315046475@psusd.us The con is that you need wood to be able to it .

250

1/30/2015 14:32:15 1315036532@psusd.us The pros and cons for each type of bunker is Con carbon footprint Wood
1/30/2015 14:35:32 1315047617@psusd.us They 44% less energy for heat and 32% less ener My budget left would be $434.91.
1/30/2015 14:36:12 1315062280@psusd.us The pros for concrete bunker styles are that it has 400 ft
The pros and cons of the steel. First i am going to
The pros and cons of wood.First i am going to star
Pros and cons of cement.First I will start off with th
1/30/2015 14:36:12 1315047859@psusd.us microorganisms.One con is that that there are no
1/30/2015 14:36:12 1315040924@psusd.us Steel structures can be built with high quality and

434.913043
$3,000

Steel: My pros on steel is its weight and strength. Also I like how steel makes high buildings and brid
Concrete: My pros on the concrete is the comfort and quiet mostly but, I like everything about it. The
1/30/2015 14:36:14 1315047665@psusd.us Wood: My pros on the wood is how it makes your building look beautiful and phenomenal. I also like
1/30/2015 14:36:15 1315047157@psusd.us The poem is not real but its about zombies and ot

33

1/30/2015 14:36:11 1315048446@psusd.us The pros of having a wood bunker is it don't cost as much money as the concrete and steal bunkers.
1/30/2015 14:36:15 1315042298@psusd.us A good thing from concrete walls is that it requires about 44% less energy to heat and 32% less energ

Timestamp

Username

Read the articles written Task 2

What is the largest bunk What is the largest bunk

Concrete:Pros:energy cost savings,reduced noise,and healthier Environments,great comfort,peace a

Steel:high strength/weight ratio,can be prepared quickly and easily,Cons:conducts heat,cost the most
1/30/2015 14:36:18 1315048752@psusd.us Wood:beautiful building material,uses less energy,it is renewable,wood is cheap Cons:no cons.
The pros for the concrete bunker are that there are so many nice things in a concrete home. The cons
walls require 44% less heating energy and about 32% less cooling energy
in concrete walls.
1/30/2015 14:36:23 1315041082@psusd.us The pros for the steel bunker are
1/30/2015 14:36:23 1315043274@psusd.us Wood has a nice look and is very natural but wood can be broken and can be lighted with fire. Cemen
1/30/2015 14:36:24 1315042451@psusd.us

Timestamp

Username

Read the articles written Task 2

Eliza
ELA

What is the largest bunk What is the largest bunk

1-29-15
Performance Task

Task 1:Pros and Cons

Concrete Pros:
Energy Savings
Homes built with ICF walls require about 44% to heat.
32% less energy to cool.
Greater comfort and quiet
cold draft absence
unwanted noise
energy saving benefits
Healthy indoor environment
No pest
Does Not have organic material
Safe Haven from High Winds
Fire resistance
Less maintenance and repair
Steel Pros:
High rise buildings
Long span bridges
Shows elastic behavior up
usually well-defined stress level
High quality built
Easy to repair
Repetitive use
Steel can be reused
Expanding existing structures
Fire-proof
Steel Cons:
Failure or Collapse
Considerable materials may have to be used to improve buckling resistance of slender steel.

1/30/2015 14:36:24 1315046478@psusd.us

Wood Pros:
Renewable
Beautiful building material
helps tackle climate change
The right wood helps tackle climate change.
The right wood stores carbon
50% of the dry weight of wood is carbon.
The right wood is renewable.
Forests will regrow
Wood is durable
It can last a hundred years.
Wood is very structurally strong

ERROR: Infinite table loop

What is the largest bunk What is the rate unit of t A pound of steel costs .9 Task 3

A)

B)

9 subtract 15-6

x+y=24

163 $/Ft

127

164 $/Ft

20

3 yards

x divided by y = total yar

$20.00 $/Ft

$5.00

3 yards

x divided by y = total yar

164 $/Ft

19.66

3 yards / 9 feet

X divided by Y equals th

163 Ft/price

49.15

x-y is the smallest becau x+x-y+y+x-2+x-4

Ft/$

$19.66

163.93 $/Ft

176.24 in feet

x-y=6/x=15/y=9/15-9=6

X(X=15)X+Y(Y=9)=6

19.66

24 yards

15+J=24=19+G+17+9=8

163.93 $/Ft

19.66

24 yards.

15+j=24=19+l+17+9=84

163.89 Ft/price

19.66

the shortest in length is

15+13+11+9+6=54

163.93 $/Ft

19.66

24 yards

15+s=24+b+19+17+9=b

166 $/Ft

19.66

$20 $/Ft

$5.00

166 $/Ft

19.66

163.73 square feet

$/Ft

19.60 per foot

101 Ft/price
165.25 per square foot

$/Ft

3 yards

x divide by y = total yard

9 (x-4)+(x-2)+(y)+(x-y)+(x)

The shortest side is the (x-4)+(x-y)+(x-2)+(y)+(x)

19.66

19.60 per square foot

166 $/Ft

9 (x-4)+(x)+(x-y)+(y)+(x-2)

19.66

The smallest number is (x-4)+(x)+(x-y)+(y)+(x-2)

(5-3)

(x-4)+x+(x-y)+y+(x-2)

i know because it shows you that y=9 and x=15 so

$2500.75.

Ft/price

two weeks

i subtrated 15 9 =6

163 square feet

Ft/price

19660 cents

Six, I know because 15- (x-2)+(x-4)+(y)+(x-y)+(x)

19 $/Ft

$49.15
x and y

101 $/Ft

19.66

16 $/Ft

9.5

163.98 Ft/price

19.66

101 $/Ft

19.66

164.18 ft

$/Ft

$19.66

80 ft

Ft/$

$9.50

163 feet

Ft/price

$19.66

$15.25 Ft/price

$49.15

They can make one of 1 $/Ft

196600 cents.

56.8

61.05

x=15 and y = 35

6 yards

(X-2) + (X-4) + (X-Y) + X

130

60

6 yd because 15-9=6

(x-4)+(x-2)+(x-y)+(x+y)=

15-9 yrds

15-4 + 15 + 15-9 + 9 + 1

6 is the shortest of the fe x+x-y+y+x-2+x-4

48 x:15 y:9
24 yards for the shortest x =8 y=7 =15

What is the largest bunk What is the rate unit of t A pound of steel costs .9 Task 3
28 Ft/$

250

$1 $/Ft

19

it is more then 80% stick Ft/$

19.63

300 Ft/price
wood-frame

Oz/Ft

A)

B)

260 travel

264 travel

the shortest side is x-y

48 + 5= 53 or x+ y =p

they both are not the sa x is 4 and y is 2.

$80

$15.25

$40.25

19,460

135

My budget left would be $/Ft

The cost would be $19.66.

Yes, because

x-5 and y-9

100 ft

9 yards

x=15 y=9

Steel structures can be

$3000 $3000 17.98

15yd-9yd

x+y

Ft/price
163.983607 Ft/$

19.66

$3,000 Ft/$

$17.98

$/Ft

49.15

85 $/Ft

$ 19. 60

$187.60

9.8
$19.66
a family house

Ft/price
15.25 Ft/$

1.9

1,500 $/Ft

$19.66

5 Ft/price

0.1005

15.25 $/Ft

$196.60

2500 $/Ft

19.66

Ft/$

15 +9=29

(15+9)=29

x=15 x-2=12 12+15= 27 x+y

6 x+x=y+y-x-2+x-4
x-y = 15-9 = 6

163.98 $/Ft

19.66

1.64 $/Ft

$19.66

38136.43 Oz/Ft
38138.43 $/Ft

6 x+x-y+y+x-2+x-4

19.66
3 19.6660

x-4+x-y+x+2+y
6
6 x+(x+y)+y+(x-2)+(x-4)

X-Y

X+X-Y+Y+X-2+X-4
28 [x-2=x-4]x-y[x=y]

What is the largest bunk What is the rate unit of t A pound of steel costs .9 Task 3

A)

Biggest pusles

y is the shortest yard be 11+11+15+15+13+9=61

Ft/$

1,103
$196

$/Ft

A foot of steel cost $19.66.

B)

C)

Task 1

Who is your teacher?

What is your name?

Mrs. Bellamy

Anissa Alexander

I think that concrete wou Yes

Mrs. Bellamy

Leonardo Esparza

I chose to use steel bec Yes

x is the smallestof them all because it has a small Mrs. Bellamy

Alex

My solution for my const Yes

x is the smallest of them all

Mrs. Bellamy

Kelso Herron

I chose to build a bunker Yes

the smallest possible perimeter is x-y.

Mrs. Bellamy

izabella perezchica

I think the best thing to b Yes

54
x is the smallest

If they travel another 2 h

Dear Client,
After checking all of th
x-y=6 (y=9) (x=15)

Mrs. Bellamy

Denzel Garcia

Yes
Dear Client,
The package I chose,to
This is a highly protectiv

84 yards

Mrs. Bellamy

Julianna Guzman

P.S. Have fun trying to fi Yes

Dear Client,
I propose that you use th

84 yards.

Mrs. Bellamy

Joselyn

Yes
i purpose that they should use wood because zom

18 yards is the smallest perimeter

Mrs. Bellamy

Daniel Yousef

In my opinion you shoul Yes

Dear client,
I propose that for the bu

84 yards

Mrs. Bellamy

Sasha Sifuentes

Mrs. Bellamy

Devin Richardson

I would like to present th Yes

Mrs. Bellamy

Alejandro Lupercio

I would have build a tree Yes

Mrs. Bellamy

David Buenrostro

I would like to show you Yes

54 is the smallest possible perimeter. I know this b Mrs. Bellamy

Rebecca Hoffing

The package I choose to Yes

54 yards

Eden

Even though the high co Yes

84
x is the smallest of themfall
84

Mrs. Bellamy

Yes

C)

Task 1

Who is your teacher?

What is your name?

If they travel another 2 h

78 you just multiply 15 by 4 then multiply 9 by 2 th Mrs. Bellamy

Kennedy Gear

I choose concrete. Conc Yes

Mrs. Bellamy

Monica Olguin

I would like to show you Yes

Mrs. Bellamy

rylie krachman

High strength/weight rati

Long-span bridges Struc Yes

Mrs. Bellamy

Erik Bearman

I believe we should use Yes

Mrs. Bellamy

Victor Gutierrez

I am going to give you fi Yes

-20

Mrs. Bellamy

Anisa Terrell

43.09

Mrs. Bellamy

Fatima Escobar

I think you should use st

It's safer place becaus Yes

Mrs. Bellamy

Karen Salama

I've come to the observa Yes

54

Ms. Hoelscher

Michael

If I were to choose from t Yes

14

Mrs. Bellamy

Kaitlyn Atilano

54 because (15-4)+(15-2)+(15-9)+(15+9)=54

Ms. Hoelscher

Mark Austrian

I choose the cement pac No

it is 9

Ms. Hoelscher

lizmarie

i would choose Concrete Yes

The smallest possible perimeter is x-y or 6

Ms. Hoelscher

Katie Kate

I picked the Concrete IC No

x and y

Mr. Gordon

zachariah

steel because its strong No

the smallest one in yards has to be 24 because x= Mr. Gordon

Eduardo Alvarez

I would pick the package Yes

408 travel

joan

I know that cons is the b Yes

the smallest perimeter is 53 because that is the an Ms. Hoelscher

litzi

I think i should choose th Yes

w and y because it has tha smaller one.

Mr. Gordon

Izac martinez

That I pick 3 because it

Mr. Gordon

angel longoria

The pro and con are so Yes

Ms. Hoelscher

Heaven Valdez

I will choose Steel becau No

x=5 and y=10

Ms. Hoelscher

$5.75
X,Y because they are both small

Yes

Yes

No

The smallest perimeter because in the picture side Mr. Gordon

Gabriela

No

x-4 because thats 15-4

Mr. Gordon

Julia

Yes

Mr. Gordon

Arieon Capler

No

Im safe because it says that im still 408 miles awa Mr. Gordon

JordanKlasen

Mr. Gordon

Vivian

Mr. Gordon

Avanis

Mr. Gordon

Ashton

Mr. Gordon

Allan

Mr. Gordon

Hezekiah Jones

wood,because wood str Yes

No

C)

Task 1

Who is your teacher?

What is your name?

Mr. Gordon

Victoria Blaney

Mr. Gordon

Zeus Godinez

Mr. Gordon

yessenia

Mr. Gordon

Eliza

Mr. Gordon

Ryan Rosete

Mr. Gordon

Ignacio

Mr. Gordon

Kayla

Ms. Hoelscher

Ezekiel Ogeda

I will use wood.Because Yes

Ms. Hoelscher

Jaime Rios

I would choose the hous Yes

-4 is the smallest one because it is the farther then Ms. Hoelscher

ezequiel torres

i would pick concreat be No

x-y

Ms. Hoelscher

Andrei Coloma

I choose wood because i No

Ms. Hoelscher

Jonathan

I chose brick because it i Yes

Ms. Hoelscher

Pharoah

I would choose the conc Yes

6 because, x-y is 15-9 that equal 6

54

54
The smallest possible perimeter is 54
54

If they travel another 2 h

Yes

Yes

Yes

54

Ms. Hoelscher

Ashley

I pick concrete , becaus Yes

It would be the side that is 15-9 which equals 6

Ms. Hoelscher

Isabel

For the bunker I picked t No

it woud be x-y

Ms. Hoelscher

Aj Coladonato

I would pick the concert Yes

y is still the smallest because of the perimeter and Ms. Hoelscher

Task 3 was kinda easy b Yes

Mr. Gordon

Zeus Godinez

Mr. Gordon

Gabriela

Why? Explain your answ The zombies traveled 26 Task 1

You would be safe because if you divide 4 into 260 then you would get 65 and if you multiply 65 times 2 then you would get 130 and if you add 130 plus 260 you
They traveled 390 miles in 4 hrs.They will travle 180 in 2hrs.they will catch up to us in 5 hrs.
If you figure out how many mile they travel in 1 hour they your done.Once your done figuring that out you then multiply.The answer is 65 mile traveled in 1 hour.S
If the zombies travel 260 miles in 4 hours they will go 180 miles in 2 hours. It would take them 5 hours to reach you.
You are safe because i divided 260 into 4 and got 65. So there for they travel 65 in one hour. If we have 6 hours for them to travel 408 we would be able to make
260 4=65 miles per hour at a constant speed
65 x 2=130 miles in 2 hours at a constant speed
130 < 408
Yes, you will be safe from the zombies,because they travel 65 mph and if they travel another two hours that will equal to 390 miles,but you are 408 miles away yo
Yes, you will be safe from the zombies because they travel 65 miles per hour and if they travel two more hours that will be 390 miles and you are 408 miles away
yes we will be safe the zombies will only go 390 miles
Yes, you will be safe from the zombies because each hour they travel 65 miles per hour and if the zombies travel 2 more hours they would be at 390 miles and yo
I did 4 divided by 260 and I got 65 so if you multiply by 4 you get 260, but if you multiple 65 to 6 you get 390 because you get 6 for 4 hours and it said to add anot
They travel 390 because first you divide 4 in to 260. Then you multiply 65 to 6 and you get 390.
I got my answer by doing 260 divided by 4 and I got 65 and then I multiplied 65 by 6 and got 390 so that means that I would be safe.
The zombies travel 65 miles per hour. If they were to travel 2 hours at a constant speed, I would be safe because in 2 hours at that speed they would only travel 1
Yes they will be safe. The zombies have traveled only 390 miles. Therefore they still need to travel 18 more miles, and they will keep there brains... For now
Zombies travel at 65 miles per hour if you multiply by 4 you get 260 but if you multiply by 6 you get 390 so if you are 408 miles away you will be safe. The zombie

i divied then motiply then aid

c
The zombies travel 65 miles per hour. 65+65=130. 260+130=390. So I'm safe as long as they don't travel another 18 miles.
You will be safe because once you finish they will have only traveled 65 miles.
First I divided 260 by 4 and got 65, I divided by 4 because I know there was 4 segments. Then I multiplied 65 2 times (65 + 65) and it came out to 130. Finally I ad
Yes, you would because you already had 4 hours and plus the other 2 hours it would be 6 hours and you would already have finished your house. Even though y
You are safe because since the zombies travel 260 miles in 4 hours.So that means if you multiply 260 x 2 you get 520 and the zombies need another 4 hours to tr
The zombies will travel 390 miles so they will be 28 miles away from you after 6 hours so you will be safe.
Yes, im safe because it takes them 260 miles in 4 hours. They will travel 130 in in 2 hours.
no because 2x260=520 and i'm only 408 miles away.
we are safe because they will be going 65 miles per hour so it will take longer for them to get near the bunkers so if it takes travel 260 miles in 4 hours and you ar
I think You're not safe from the zombies, because I multiplied 260 x 6 and it equaled to 1.560 miles.

Why? Explain your answ The zombies traveled 26 Task 1

well because 260 miles divided by 4 hours equals=65miles
you are safe because they travel 260 miles in 4 hours so they cant do 408 miles in 2 hours.
They can travel 260 and 4 hours that can go far away run more to attack.They will go 260 four more they will travel 264 because the zombies 4 and that equal
yes because i am traveling 408 miles and since they travel 60 miles per hour it means that in 2 hours they will be traveling 380 miles.
That they would be right there.
You are like 300 miles away from the zombie.
The amount of miles the zombies will travel is about 816. Why??? because
if you multiply 408 X 2 = 816 . Then it will tell you the miles the zombie will
get there.
No, because the zombies will be traveling 420 miles.
Yes because in 4 hours the zombies travel at 260 miles, but in 2 miles you would have traveled 130 miles.
Im safe because it says that im still 408 miles away they are about to travel another 260 miles. That is not 408 miles therefore im safe.

because 2 hours and yor away 408 miles and the zombies have to travel like 2 hours because they have to walk but they are in the same speed but im 408 miles

yes,because you are 408 miles and they are 390

Because,2 divide by 260 equal 130 miles in two hour.So if 4 is 260 that 2 130.130 times 6 equal 780 and the first speed of the zombies is 260 add that to 408 bec
The zombie will travel 390 miles, so the zombie will still have to travel 18 miles to get us.
they move to fast so when you get there you will only have like 5mins so thats why i dont think your going to be safe
first i need to know what the unit rate was so I divided 260 by 4 = 65 then i first multiplied 65 times 4 if i got it right and it = 240 witch means i'm right then i added
because 260 - 408 there close but not close enough.
They won't reach me because they will only go 390 miles, and I am 408.

Why? Explain your answ The zombies traveled 26 Task 1

The zombie will travel 130 miles is 2 hours . You will be 305 miles away .
No because if you times 2 hours by 260 miles you will get 520 and that is more than 408 miles.So they would be traveling at 520 miles in 2 hours
so if the zombies are coming at 260 miles per 4 hours they will be safe because you / 2 and 260 then + the answer to 260 to get 390 miles.
You would drive safe because your traveling 2 more hours and 65 times 2 equals 130 subtracted by 408 equals 278.