Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Department of
Clinical
Epidemiology and
Biostatistics,
McMaster
University,
Hamilton, ON,
Canada L8N 3Z5
Geoff Norman
professor
Correspondence to:
G Norman
norman@
mcmaster.ca
BMJ 2002;324:15602
Measuring progress
In medicine, indicators of scientific progress might be
measured by objective indicators such as death from
cardiovascular disease. In education such hard
evidence may be lacking for several reasons. Firstly,
paradoxically, real differences in educational strategies
may not be reflected in outcomes, such as licensing
examination performance, simply because students
are highly motivated and are not blinded to the intervention, so will compensate for any defects in the
curriculum.15 Secondly, a curriculum is not like a
drug, which can be given at standard doses, but
instead contains many components, delivered with
variable quality by different teachers. Finally, the time
between learning and important outcomes may be so
long that the effects of the curriculum are obscured
although not always.6
Summary points
Research in medical education has contributed
substantially to understanding the learning
process
The educational community is becoming aware of
the importance of evidence in educational
decision making
Areas of major development include basic
research on the nature of medical expertise,
problem based learning, performance assessment,
and continuing education and assessment of
practising physicians
29 JUNE 2002
bmj.com
Performance assessment
TOPHAM PICTUREPOINT
Learning in practice
Continuing education
Improved reliable methods for performance
assessment in practice
Systematic approaches to relicensure
29 JUNE 2002
bmj.com
Useful websites
Queens University, Ontario, Canada (http://meds.queensu.ca/medicine/
pbl/pblhome.htm)problem based learning home page from Queens
Universitys School of Medicine
Clerkship Directors in Internal Medicine Task Force Subgroup Report
(http://www.im.org/cdim/5educate/eval/clinical.html)evaluation of
clinical competence
National Board of Medical Examiners (http://www.nbme.org/about/
itemwriting.asp)constructing written test questions for the basic and
clinical sciences
Useful publications
Norman GR, Schmidt HG. The psychological basis of problem-based
learning: a review of evidence. Acad Med 1992;67:557-65.
Norman GR, van der Vleuten CPM, Newble DI. International Handbook of
Research in Medical Education. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 2002.
Swanson DB, Norman GR, Linn RL. Performance based assessment:
lessons from the health professions. Educ Res 1995;24:5-11.
1561
Learning in practice
is a growing body of knowledge about the process and
outcome of medical education.
In my view there has been insufficient attention to
the interface between our understanding of clinical
expertise and the application of this knowledge to
improve instruction and assessment. Studies at the curriculum level of complex treatments like problem
based learning are unlikely to reveal a deeper
understanding of the interface between instruction
and learning. Real improvement in education, just like
real improvements in medical treatments, will only
result when we combine better the understanding of
basic science with the experimental interventions.
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
18
19
20
21
22
Barrows HS, Norman GR, Neufeld VR, Feightner JW. The clinical
reasoning process of randomly selected physicians in general medical
practice. Clin Invest Med 1982;5:49-56.
Evans D, Patel VL, eds. Cognitive science in medicine. Cambridge, MA: MIT
Press, 1989.
Schmidt HG, Norman GR, Boshuizen HPA. A cognitive perspective on
medical expertise: theory and implications. Acad Med 1990;65:611-21.
Norman GR, Brooks LR, Colle CL, Hatala RM. The benefit of diagnostic
hypotheses in clinical reasoning: experimental study of an instructional
intervention for forward and backward reasoning. Cogn Instruct
2000;17:433-48.
Norman GR, Schmidt HG. Effectiveness of problem based learning:
theory, practice and paper darts. Med Educ 2000;34:721-8.
Ten Cate O. What happens to the student? The neglected variable in educational outcome research. Adv Health Sci Educ 2001;6:81-8.
Van der Vleuten CPM, Swanson DB. Assessment of clinical skills with
standardized patients: the state of the art. Teach Lrn Med 1990;2:58-76.
Harden RG, Gleeson P. Assessment of clinical competence using an
objective structured clinical examination. Med Educ 1979;13:41-54.
Reznick RK, Blackmore D, Dauphinee WD, Rothman AI, Smee S. Largescale high-stakes testing with an OSCE: report from the Medical Council
of Canada. Acad Med 1996;71:19-21S.
Fowell SL, Bligh J. Assessment of undergraduate medical education in the
UK: time to ditch motherhood and apple pie. Med Educ 2001;35:1006-7.
Oxman AD, Thomson MA, Davis DA, Haynes RB. No magic bullets: a
systematic review of 102 trials of interventions to improve professional
practice. CMAJ 1995;15:1423-31.
Woodward CA, McConvey GA, Neufeld V, Norman GR, Walsh A.
Measurement of physician performance by standardized patients. Refining techniques for undetected entry in physicians offices. Med Care
1985;23:1019-27.
Rethans JJ, Sturmans F, Drop R, van der Vleuten C. Assessment of the
performance of general practitioners by the use of standardized
(simulated) patients. Br J Gen Pract 1991;41:97-9.
Page GG, Bates J, Dyer SM, Vincent DR, Bordage G, Jacques A, et al.
Physician-assessment and physician-enhancement programs in Canada.
CMAJ 1995;15:1723-8.
Jolly B, McAvoy P, Southgate L. GMCs proposals for revalidation. Effective revalidation system looks at how doctors practise and quality of
patients experience. BMJ 2001;322:358-9.
1562
29 JUNE 2002
bmj.com