Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA
10
11
12
ALEKSANDAR POPOVIC, an
individual,
Plaintiff,
13
14
15
16
17
No.
VERIFIED COMPLAINT
(Breach of Contract)
v.
CHRISTOPHER MARK, individually
and on behalf of CHRISTOPHER MARK
AND HEATHER MARK, husband and
wife,
18
Defendant.
19
20
21
22
23
1.
24
2.
25
information and belief, Mark is married to Heather Mark, and at all relevant time
26
described in this Verified Complaint was acting for the benefit of the marital community.
3.
from which this matter arose. The acts and events giving rise to Plaintiffs claims are
based primarily upon conduct that occurred in Maricopa County, Arizona. Accordingly,
this Court has jurisdiction over this matter pursuant to A.R.S. 12123 and venue is
6
7
4.
These parties know each other well. Indeed, after serving together in the
Marine Corps, Defendant Christopher Mark (Mark) was hired to be the Chief
Intelligence Officer for Greyside Group, Inc. (Greyside), a company that was founded
10
and run by Plaintiff Aleksandar Popovic. As the CIO, Mark had constant access to
11
Greysides email accounts and servers before and during his employment with Greyside
12
Group.
13
5.
Soon after Mark joined Greyside, a dispute erupted between Popovic and a
14
minority investor. Mark quickly sided with the investor, and Popovic was locked out of
15
the servers and his work email account. Popovic and Greyside were forced to file suit
16
against Mark and several others at the company for their actions in attempting to seize
17
control of Greyside through its servers and bank accounts with the intent of completing a
18
19
6.
After several months of litigation, the parties reached a written settlement and
20
agreed, among other things, to not disparage one another. Popovic has followed the
21
22
7.
But Mark cannot seem to move on. Mark has resorted to harassing and
23
troublesome actions, attempting to hound Popovic with claims of stolen valor intended
24
to keep Popovic from earning a living. Mark has set up links on his personal blog that
25
disparage Popovic and paint Popovic in a bad light, directly affecting Popovics business
26
as a real estate agent. Ironically, much of the negative information attributed to Popovic
was actually created by Mark while he was working at Greyside, after which Mark
hacked Popovics email account and then disseminated the contrived information to the
8.
Popovic merely wants to move on with his life and earn a living, but Mark
cannot seem to leave Popovic alone. This lawsuit is to stop Marks offensive behavior
and to compensate Popovic for the damage Mark has done to Popovics reputation and
business to date.
GENERAL ALLEGATIONS
9.
10
Marine and Marine Scout/Sniper. He was twice discharged honorably and was recalled to
11
active duty after 9-11, with combat experience. Popovic is also a service-connected
12
13
Owned Business.)
14
10.
Mark also served in the United States Marine Corps. From 1995 until 1998, he
15
and Popovic served together in 3rd Force Reconnaissance Company and became well-
16
acquainted.
17
11. After leaving the Marine Corps, Mark became an officer in the US Navy and
18
failed to finish SEAL training or BUD/s; he left soon thereafter and pursued roles in
19
20
12. Popovic, on the other hand, pursued various jobs after leaving the Marine
21
22
officer in Las Vegas, bought and sold restaurant franchises in Nevada, and worked as a
23
consultant for the United States Government holding some of the highest security
24
clearances.
25
26
13. But after sustaining a serious injury as a result of instability in Iraq, Popovic
market. To do this, in 2003, Popovic formed Greyside out of his home in Arizona.
The Greyside Litigation
4
5
14. From 2003 to 2012, Popovic was the majority owner of Greyside. Starting
from nothing, Greyside grew into an international company that provided high-risk
had a world-wide scope, but the company continued to run primarily out of Arizona,
10
15. Greyside was not a financial success immediately, and for several years
11
Popovic was unable to pay himself. The company survived only because of Popovics
12
commitment to building the company through hard work and his knowledge of
13
14
16. Eventually, Greyside began growing as it built a client base with shippers like
15
16
meet their demands for security teams, Greyside needed capital. So in 2010, Popovic met
17
18
19
minority position in Greyside for two million dollars in April 2011. Prior to the
20
investment, Popovic was thoroughly vetted over several months by the investor and his
21
22
18. Shortly thereafter, Popovic hired Mark to be the Chief Intelligence Officer of
23
Greyside. Mark lived in Utah throughout his employment but was well aware that
24
Popovic and Greyside conducted business primarily from its Arizona location.
25
26
19. In fact, Mark visited Popovics Arizona residence several times to install
modems and set up the company intranet and encrypted email services. As CIO, Mark
was granted unfettered access to the entire companys email, including Popovics.
20. But Popovics relationship with his investors soured. A few months after Mark
joined Greyside, the minority investor attempted a hostile takeover of Greyside and its
affiliated entities.
21. Mark helped facilitate the hostile takeover, providing both technical and
informational assistance to the investor.
22. As Chief Intelligence Officer of the company, Mark had access to Greysides
10
and Popovics internet hosting company. When the dispute began in November 2011,
11
12
the companys server, website, and emails, and denying the same to Popovic and the
13
14
23. Marks actions in locking Popovic and the companys loyal executives out of
15
the servers and email had the direct result of stranding numerous company employees
16
(i.e., ex-military personnel) in High Risk Areas throughout the world, with no support
17
18
24. Unbeknownst to Popovic, Mark had engaged in similar conduct in the past
19
with a prior company, The Aegenis Group, Inc. (Aegenis). Marks wrongful conduct in
20
that case resulted in a judgment against Mark and his wife in the amount of $183,334.80
21
in the State of Utah, which was entered just months before Mark began assisting in the
22
attempted ouster of Popovic from Greyside. See Judgment and Order Requiring Payment
23
24
25. In the Judgment, the court found that Mark had dissipated the corporate assets
25
of Aegenis without authorization, and had acted in an overly aggressive manner and in
26
bad faith towards Aegeniss other owner. See Judgment, Ex. A., at 20-22.
26. Mark never disclosed the Judgment to Popovic or Greyside, but upon
information and belief, it was this Judgment that prompted Mark to attempt to oust
27. On November 13, 2011, Popovic filed a lawsuit in the United States District
Court for the District of Arizona against Mark, the minority investor and others for
(among many other acts) Marks unlawful actions in hijacking the companys servers,
28. During the lawsuit, a chief contention of Mark and his co-defendants was that
10
Popovic had misrepresented his military experience in a bio prepared for the Greyside
11
website.
12
13
29. But this contention is patently false. In fact Greyside never listed any
biographical information for any of its officers or employees on the Greyside website.
14
30. On or about January 23, 2012, Popovic, Mark and others entered into a non-
15
16
hereto as Exhibit B.
17
18
31. By its terms, the Agreement is interpreted, enforced and governed by Delaware
law. See Agreement, Ex. B, at pg. 8, Section 18.
19
32. The parties to the Agreement, including Mark, also agreed to ongoing personal
20
jurisdiction in Arizona (and, to the extent possible, subject matter jurisdiction in the
21
United States District Court for the District of Arizona). See Agreement, Ex. B, at pg. 5,
22
Section 7.
23
33. Pursuant to Section 8 of the Agreement, Popovic and Mark agreed that they
24
would not disseminate or publish via website (including metadata and meta-tagging),
25
blog post, Facebook, Twitter, newsletter, billboard, press release, or similar broadly and
26
name, initials or regularly used nicknames including Pop and BJ) the other
34. Months after the Agreement was signed, Popovic learned more information
about how his inaccurate bio came to light in the litigation: upon information and belief,
Markor someone authorized by Mark via Popovics emailhad sent the bio to the
minority investor by improperly accessing Popovics email and causing the bio to be
35. Upon information and belief, Mark did this in order to convince Greysides
10
11
36. Significantly, the email attaching the false bio was sent after Popovic had
12
already been thoroughly vetted by the investor and his attorneys through a complete
13
military and criminal background check and after the investor agreed to invest up to $2
14
15
37.
Less than ninety days after this email was sent, the minority investorwith
16
Marks significant assistancelocked Popovic out of the companys server, email and
17
bank accounts, leading to the fracture within the company and the litigation.
18
38.
The litigation ultimately led to the demise of Greyside, as the company was
19
unable to recover from the expense and negative publicity caused by the struggle for
20
21
22
23
After Greyside
39. In 2013, as Greysides business wound down, Popovic decided to change
careers and become a real estate agent in the Phoenix metropolitan area.
24
40. Because of his experiences in the Marine Corps, Popovic has focused his real
25
estate practice on serving the military and veteran community in Maricopa County,
26
1
2
3
41. In 2013-14, Popovic was the listing agent for a number of homes, including
three multimillion-dollar condos located in Tempe.
42. But Popovics business has not been an overwhelming success. Many
prospective clients have ultimately decided to use other agents.
43. Popovic believes that ongoing negative publicity about him has tarnished his
reputation in both the Phoenix real estate and veteran communities. Despite the
prohibitions in the Agreement, Mark is the source of a large portion of that negative
publicity.
44. Mark and his wife, Dr. Heather Mark, manage and operate a blog called
10
11
www.globalriskinfo.com.
12
45. Mark is clearly still hung up on his dispute with Popovic because the
13
14
of links, including a link to GSG Settles with Mark, which links to the redacted
15
Agreement.
16
17
46. Directly below GSG Settles with Mark is a link to a webpage titled Alex
Popovic Subway sandwich shop commando at www.thisainthell.us/blog/?p=30376.
18
47. The article on this webpage, Alex Popovic Subway sandwich shop
19
commando, has many negative comments about Popovic within it, and the webpage has
20
21
48. Marks link is dated June 13, 2012 and names and disparages Popovic again,
22
this time claiming Popovic falsified his military credentialwhich came to light
23
miraculously only five months after Defendants settled with Popovic and Greyside.
24
49. The post on Marks link is filed under the category Phony soldiers.
25
26
50. The webpage on Marks blog has been shared on Facebook over 100 times and
contains over 500 user comments. The user comments are frequently harassing and
51. Popovic has been the target of harassment arising from the allegations of
stolen valor, many of which originate from Marks publicizing of the Subway Shop
Commando link.
her personal website about Popovic, and frequent phone calls at all times of the day and
night. She also received numerous inquiries about Popovics character, specifically
10
inquiring about Popovics military experience and stating that Popovic had lied about his
11
service record.
12
13
53. Four months later, as a result of the ongoing harassment and continuous
problems this caused in the office, Popovic was advised to find a new brokerage.
14
54. Although Popovic quickly did so, the harassment continued. In April 2014,
15
Popovic was the listing agent for three properties located at 140 E. Rio Salado Parkway,
16
17
18
pulled Popovic as the listing agent on the three Tempe properties, which were then some
19
of the most exclusive penthouses in Maricopa County. This led directly to the loss of the
20
sales commission on the property, which would have been 3% of the asking price of
21
$7,568,000, or $227,040.
22
23
24
25
56. Popovic was forced to leave the second brokerage in November 2014 and
joined his current brokerage.
57. The allegations of stolen valor continue to this day, spurred on by Marks
blog and the link on his homepage.
26
58. Indeed, as soon as Popovic joined a new brokerage, the brokerages contact
page received a publically posted comment that directly referenced the Subway Shop
Commando link. It stated, Popovic the conman Clown. Pretend war hero and joke of a
person. Ask him about all his combat missions. Or just Google Subway commando.
Who how many people he's ripped off. (Emphasis added.) In addition, this posting came
9
10
11
12
13
14
59. And when the brokerage created a new website, it immediately received
another
public
posting
stating,
Alex
is
liar.
See
60. Popovic has also lost valuable roles on political campaigns, which would have
enhanced the visibility of his businesses, because of the links on Marks blog.
61. Until Mark removes the links from his blog, Popovic will continue to be
harmed by false allegations of stolen valor, in violation of the parties Agreement.
COUNT I
16
(Breach of Contract)
18
and
http://www.uniqueluxuryestates.com/#!contact-us/csxp.
15
17
fraud
62. Plaintiff realleges and incorporates by reference all the foregoing allegations as
though set forth fully here.
19
63. On or about January 23, 2012, Plaintiff and Mark entered into the Agreement.
20
64. Mark has materially breached the Agreement by, among other things, posting
21
disparaging and negative statements about Popovic on his blog and directing users of his
22
23
65. As a direct approximate cause thereof, Popovic has sustained and will continue
24
to sustain damages in the form of reduced business and commissions, plus accrued and
25
26
10
66. Because this matter arises out of contract, Plaintiff is entitled to his reasonable
costs and attorneys fees, with interest on all such fees and costs at the rate of ten percent
(10%) per annum pursuant to A.R.S. 44-1204(a), from the date of judgment until paid
5
6
For damages in an amount to be proven at trial, but not less than $227,040.00,
plus accrued and accruing interest thereon at the maximum rate allowed by law or
10
B.
For an order that Defendant Mark specifically perform under the Agreement
11
and remove any links on his blog (and all other public media under Marks control) to
12
13
C.
For all costs and attorneys fees, plus pre- and post-judgment interest thereon
14
at the maximum rate permitted by law from the earliest date allowed by law until paid in
15
full, pursuant to the parties agreements, A.R.S. 12-341 and 12-341.01; and,
16
For such other and further relief as the Court may deem necessary, just and
17
appropriate, including but not limited to post-judgment attorneys fees and costs for
18
collection procedures.
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
By:
Geoffrey S. Kercsmar
Julia A. Guinane
7150 East Camelback Road, Suite 285
Scottsdale, Arizona 85251
Attorneys for Plaintiff
11
DECLARATION
I have read the foregoing Verified Complaint, and know the contents thereof; that
the matters and things set forth therein are true to the best of my knowledge, except as to
those matters set forth upon information and belief and, as to those, I believe them to be
true.
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
_______________________
Aleksandar Popovic
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
12