0 Bewertungen0% fanden dieses Dokument nützlich (0 Abstimmungen)
20 Ansichten1 Seite
Assessment Feedback Summative Student Name Programme Project Title Unit Title Project Leader Contextual Studies 2 Foundation Degree (science) Broadcast Media Technology Student ID Level Project Value Unit Code Unit Leader BMT202 / fdc202. Summative grades are subject to ratification by the examination board.
Assessment Feedback Summative Student Name Programme Project Title Unit Title Project Leader Contextual Studies 2 Foundation Degree (science) Broadcast Media Technology Student ID Level Project Value Unit Code Unit Leader BMT202 / fdc202. Summative grades are subject to ratification by the examination board.
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Verfügbare Formate
Als DOC, PDF, TXT herunterladen oder online auf Scribd lesen
Assessment Feedback Summative Student Name Programme Project Title Unit Title Project Leader Contextual Studies 2 Foundation Degree (science) Broadcast Media Technology Student ID Level Project Value Unit Code Unit Leader BMT202 / fdc202. Summative grades are subject to ratification by the examination board.
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Verfügbare Formate
Als DOC, PDF, TXT herunterladen oder online auf Scribd lesen
Foundation Degree (Science) Broadcast Programme Level 2 Media Technology Project Title Project Value Unit Title Contextual Studies 2 Unit Code BMT202/FDC202 Project Leader Unit Leader
Assessment Criteria Indicative Grading
Excellent V Good Good Satisfactory Basic Fail N/A Presentation 1 The degree to which they have displayed knowledge and understanding of their chosen topic; (LO1) 2 Reflection on new areas and how they how they are related to practical work based knowledge; (LO2) 3 Organisation of ideas and the ability to relate them verbally to a group using appropriate supporting visual/audio materials. (LO5) Independent Project 4 Their ability to articulate their findings and conclusions in a structured and well-argued report; (LO5) 5 Their ability to demonstrate a sound understanding of the salient issues involved in the chosen area of study; (LO1, LO2) 6 Their ability to relate academic knowledge to the work based application of practical skills; (LO6) 7 Their ability to relate their personal practice to the area chosen for independent study; (LO3) 8 Evidence of the development of a plan and the ability to deliver work within a timeframe. (LO4) Note 1 - Unless specified in the Project Brief it is assumed that all assessment criteria are equally weighted
Overall comment including strengths and areas for improvement
Grade Banding Brief Grade Descriptor
A+ 90-100 High Excellent all round work or outstanding A 80-89 Medium performance Grade (where appropriate) A- 70-79 Low B+ 67-69 High High level achievement or very good level of B 64-66 Medium performance B- 60-63 Low C+ 57-59 High Good level of achievement or proficient C 54-56 Medium performance C- 50-53 Low D+ 47-49 High Satisfactory level of achievement or competent D 44-46 Medium performance D- 40-43 Low E 35-39 Marginal Elementary achievement or basic level of Note 2 - All summative grades are subject to ratification by the Examination Board Pass performance F+ 30-34 Marginal Does not achieve the learning outcomes but Fail may be some element of understanding or Please contact your Unit Leader about retrieval competence arrangements (where appropriate) Assessor(s) F < 30 Name: Fail No evidence of achievement or competence F- > 10 Poor Fail 0 0 no submission or special circumstances