Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
2
Climate
change.
A
catch
phrase
that
came
and
went
in
our
minds
in
many
ways,
yet
it
is
foolish
to
think
that
it
isnt
pertinent
today.
Although
climate
change
affects
our
public
health,
our
weather
conditions,
and
even
our
economic
stability,
it
has
fallen
by
the
wayside
time
and
time
again
as
we
tackle
problems
that
seem
to
be
more
urgent.
Climate
change
poses
the
greatest
future
threat
than
any
other
issue
in
our
world
today,
yet
we
dont
even
make
the
small-scale
changes
to
combat
it.
There
has
never
been
a
better
time
to
discuss
it
than
now,
with
ten
of
the
warmest
years
that
our
earth
has
faced
have
occurred
in
the
past
twelve
years.
We
hear
statistics
about
climate
change
such
as
this
one,
yet
we
still
feel
invincible,
and
show
this
by
continuing
to
extract
more
and
more
of
the
earths
nonrenewable
materials.
According
to
a
recent
Gallup
Poll,
almost
60
percent
of
Americans
say
that
humans
are
at
fault
for
the
rising
of
the
earths
temperature,
yet
there
has
never
been
a
true
large-scale
change
in
our
actions.
ideological
shift.
I
believe
that
the
reason
this
shift
has
yet
to
occur
is
because
we
dont
truly
understand
that
climate
change
is
something
that
isnt
affecting
us
now.
Even
when
we
witness
the
droughts
in
California
or
the
floods
along
the
east
and
south
coast,
we
still
live
as
though
were
invincible.
To
be
frank,
I
find
it
difficult
to
believe
that
this
will
truly
happen
within
the
next
five
to
ten
years.
That
is
why
we
must
begin
teaching
the
next
generation
about
the
impact
we
have
on
the
climate
and
allow
them
develop
a
passion
for
protecting
our
only
home.
Currently, our science standards are outdated about twenty years, and the most recent
revision
was
made
in
the
year
2000.
Climate
change
is
hardly
taught
in
schools,
and
when
it
is,
teachers
often
speak
about
what
they
believe
to
be
true
concerning
the
topic.
The
New
York
Times
asked
students
ages
thirteen
and
up
how
much
they
knew
about
global
warming,
and
many
said
that
they
learned
bits
and
pieces
throughout
high
school,
but
it
never
hit
home.
I
am
a
testament
to
this
same
trends
occurrence
in
Indiana
schools.
I
remember
hearing
that
the
earths
climate
was
changing
in
high
school,
but
never
was
taught
to
the
point
that
I
cared
to
change
my
actions
beyond
tossing
my
Coke
bottle
in
the
recycling
bin
at
school.
It is essential that American schools teach all sides of climate change in our primary and
secondary
schools,
because
people
in
this
age
range
are
developing
their
interests
and
passions.
If
educators
teach
them
about
the
climate
in
a
new
and
exciting
way,
there
will
be
a
much
higher
number
of
students
graduating
with
a
passion
to
help
the
environment
in
a
wide-
ranging
way.
There
exists
a
science
curriculum
that
discusses
issues
such
as
climate
change
and
the
impact
that
we
as
humans
have
on
our
environment
called
Next
Generation
Science
Standards.
The
organization
I
advocate
for
(the
American
Association
for
the
Advancement
of
Science)
has
partnered
up
with
Achieve,
The
National
Research
Council
(NRC),
and
the
National
Science
Teachers
Association
to
create
a
two-step
process
to
develop
these
standards.
It
was
first
started
in
2011
and
was
released
for
adoption
in
2013
after
much
drafting,
preparing,
and
consulting.
These science standards are implemented at the state level, and although all American
schools
should
implement
these
standards,
Indiana
must
join
the
twelve
other
states
to
implement
these
standards
so
that
we
can
lead
our
country
to
be
more
mindful
of
the
one
planet
weve
got.
If
they
are
taught
the
truth
of
the
state
of
the
Earth,
and
how
human
actions
have
led
to
its
current
state,
they
could
develop
a
passion
for
climate
protection
and
lead
Indiana
to
be
a
more
environmentally
conscious
state.
Although
it
is
clear
that
this
is
a
small
change,
I
believe
that
doing
this
is
a
way
to
make
the
first
steps
toward
this
ideological
shift
we
are
in
need
of.
With
more
knowledge
about
human
impact
on
the
climate,
the
younger
generation,
or
future
workers
of
our
country,
will
be
inspired
to
change
the
pace
at
which
our
world
is
going
and
combat
climate
change
in
an
effective
way.
Some might suggest other ways to combat climate change, but hear me out. I agree that
there
are
many
actions
that
can
be
taken
to
create
an
emotional
desire
in
Hoosier
to
protect
the
planet,
but
I
see
this
change
as
one
that
will
create
a
larger
and
more
exponential
future
impact
on
the
health
of
our
planet.
I
also
understand
that
there
are
many
people
that
would
say
we
dont
affect
the
earths
climate
in
the
way
we
might
think
we
do,
but
this
has
been
deemed
untrue
from
many
credible
sources.
The process for implementing NGSS will look different for each state, but ultimately, it
Hoosiers must get involved to ensure that the Next Generation Science Standards
(NGSS)
are
added
to
our
schools
K-12
curriculum.
Please,
let
your
voice
be
heard,
because
the
stakes
are
far
too
high,
and
if
we
create
the
mind
shift
now,
our
future
workers
and
decision-
makers
will
be
equipped
to
look
at
our
world
from
a
different
lens,
and
see
the
status
of
our
earths
climate
with
a
more
sober
mind.
If
by
implementing
the
NGSS
we
can
create
an
ideological
change
in
the
workers
of
our
next
generation
about
a
topic
that
is
undoubtedly
the
most
serious
threat
that
their
generation
has
faced,
change
will
be
made
and
the
earth
will
be
protected.
6
Works
Cited
"A
Steady
57%
in
U.S.
Blame
Humans
for
Global
Warming."
Gallup
Poll.
Gallup,
6
Mar.
2014.
"How
Much
Does
Human
Activity
Affect
Climate
Change?
|
NCSE."
How
Much
Does
Human
"Next
Generation
Science
Standards."
Next
Generation
Science
Standards.
The
National
Research Council, National Science Teachers Association, The American Association for
Schulten,
Katherine.
"What
Have
You
Been
Taught
About
Global
Warming?"
The
New
York
Mark
Nagles
comment:
Gretchen,
Well
done
here!
I
definitely
think
you
could
revise
this
argument
and
publish
it
somewhere
if
you're
interested--if
not
as
an
op-ed
then
perhaps
as
an
opinion
letter
to
the
star
or
certainly
as
a
piece
for
the
IDS.
If
you're
interested,
I'd
be
happy
to
help
with
feedback.
Regardless,
I
hope
you
keep
advocating
for
change
in
Indiana's
science
curriculum!
All
the
best,
Mark