Sie sind auf Seite 1von 90
MEET CRB’S NEW LEADERSHIP TEAM
MEET CRB’S NEW LEADERSHIP TEAM

MEET CRB’S NEW

LEADERSHIP

TEAM

Metarex ® 4% * Snail and Slug Bait

Protect Citrus Quality and Grade with

Metarex 4% Snail and Slug Bait Protect Citrus Quality and Grade with • Highest pellet count

Highest pellet count per pound for superior coverage, lower cost per baiting point (acre), and maximum control.

Maximum weatherability—holds up to moisture

and rehardens for longer-lasting control / fewer applications.

Superior palatability and attraction

promotes early feeding and faster control.

Snail damage to orange Learn More Outlasts and outperforms. The Power is in the Pellet! 2
Snail damage to orange
Learn More
Outlasts and outperforms.
The Power is in the Pellet!
2
Citrograph Vol. 7, No. 1
|
Winter 2016
Residual control that goes the distance. Labeled for use on citrus, pome fruits, stone fruits, grapes,
Residual control that goes the distance. Labeled for use on citrus, pome fruits, stone fruits, grapes,

Residual control that goes the distance.

Residual control that goes the distance. Labeled for use on citrus, pome fruits, stone fruits, grapes,

Labeled for use on citrus, pome fruits, stone fruits, grapes, tree nuts and olives.

Alion ® pre-emergence herbicide:

• Delivers powerful control of grass and broadleaf weeds, including resistant species, to protect your high-value crops

• Offers up to 6 months of residual control, reducing the number of in-season sprays

• Allows you to focus less on weeds and more on profi tability

Cleaner. Longer. Alion.

Residual control that goes the distance. Labeled for use on citrus, pome fruits, stone fruits, grapes,

Not all uses are registered in all states. Check local recommendations.

Bayer CropScience LP, 2 TW Alexander Drive, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709. Always read and follow label instructions. Bayer, the Bayer Cross, and Alion are registered trademarks of Bayer. Alion is not registered in all states. For additional product information, call toll-free 1-866-99-BAYER (1-866-992-2937) or visit our website at www.BayerCropScience.us.

CR0614ALIONNA074V00R0

www.CitrusResearch.org | Citrograph Magazine

3

PUBLICATION OFFICE

PUBLICATION OFFICE Citrus Research Board P.O. Box 230 Visalia, CA 93279 P: (559) 738-0246 F: (559)

Citrus Research Board P.O. Box 230 Visalia, CA 93279 P: (559) 738-0246 F: (559) 738-0607 www.citrusresearch.org

EDITORIAL STAFF Ed Civerolo, Ph.D., Interim Executive Editor Ivy Leventhal, Managing Editor Mojtaba Mohammadi, Ph.D., Associate Science Editor Chad Collin, Associate Editor

PUBLISHING & PRODUCTION Co-Publisher / Creative Director/

Graphic Designer

PUBLICATION OFFICE Citrus Research Board P.O. Box 230 Visalia, CA 93279 P: (559) 738-0246 F: (559)
12
12
Eric Cribbs www.cribbsproject.com graphics@citrographmag.com (559) 308-6277 Co-Publisher / Project Manager
Eric Cribbs
www.cribbsproject.com
graphics@citrographmag.com
(559) 308-6277
Co-Publisher / Project Manager

Carolina M. Evangelo

www.evangelocommunications.com cevangelo@citrographmag.com (209) 777-8995

ADVERTISING Theresa Machado-Waymire

tmwaymire@citrographmag.com (209) 761-4444

Carolina M. Evangelo

cevangelo@citrographmag.com (209) 777-8995

Advertising, business and production inquiries - call, email or write us at:

Cribbsproject 121 E. Main Street, Suite #204 Visalia, Calif. 93291 Phone: (559) 308-6277 Fax: (866) 936-4303 graphics@citrographmag.com

Editorial inquiries - call, email or write us at:

Citrus Research Board P.O. Box 230 Visalia, CA 93279 P: (559) 738-0246 F: (559) 738-0607 info@citrusresearch.org www.citrusresearch.org

SUBSCRIPTIONS

United States

Single Copies: $4.00

1-Year Subscription: $15.00 2-Year Subscription: $28.00

Canada & Foreign

1-Year Subscription: $30.00

2-Year Subscription: $56.00

Send subscription requests to:

Citrus Research Board P.O. Box 230, Visalia, CA 93279

Citrograph is published quarterly by the Citrus Research Board, 217 N. Encina, Visalia, CA 93291. If you are currently receiving multiple copies, or would like to make a change in your Citrograph subscription, please contact the publication office (above). Every effort is made to ensure accuracy in articles published by Citrograph; however, the publishers assume no responsibility for losses sustained, allegedly resulting from following recommendations in this magazine. Consult your local authorities. The Citrus Research Board has not tested any of the products advertised in this publication, nor has it verified any of the statements made in any of the advertisements. The Board does not warrant, expressly or implicitly, the fitness of any product advertised or the suitability of any advice or statements contained herein.

Reproduction or reuse of any photos and/ or written material contained within this

  • 4 Citrograph Vol. 7, No. 1

magazine is prohibited without the expressed

| Winter 2016

written consent of the publisher.

18
18
24
24

IN

THIS

ISSUE

WINTER 2016

|

VOLUME 7 • NUMBER 1

THE OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF THE CITRUS RESEARCH BOARD

40
40
  • 8 CHAIRMAN’S VIEW

RICHARD BENNETT

  • 12 BOARD SELECTS NEW EXECUTIVE LEADERSHIP TEAM

RICHARD BENNETT

  • 14 INDUSTRY VIEWS – “WHAT PROGRESS ARE WE MAKING

ON HLB?”

MOJTABA MOHAMMADI, PH.D.

  • 18 WHERE 2016 CRB-FUNDED RESEARCH IS HEADED

MOJTABA MOHAMMADI, PH.D.

  • 22 MEET YOUR BOARD MEMBERS

IVY LEVENTHAL

  • 24 HLB DETECTIONS IN SAN GABRIEL

VICTORIA HORNBAKER AND LUCITA KUMAGAI

  • 30 HLB IMPACT ON CITRUS ROOT HEALTH AND INTERACTION

WITH PHYTOPHTHORA

JAMES GRAHAM, PH.D.

On The Cover: TEAM MEET CRB’S NEW LEADERSHIP
On The Cover:
TEAM
MEET CRB’S NEW
LEADERSHIP

This autumn, Richard Bennett (left) was elected chairman of the Citrus Research Board (CRB), and Gary Schulz was hired as the CRB’s new president. Also elected to the Executive Board were Dan Dreyer as vice-president and Toby Maitland-Lewis as secretary-treasurer. For more information on the new executive leadership team, see “Chairman’s View” on page 8.

  • 34 MONITORING FOR ACP RESISTANCE TO PESTICIDES

JOSEPH MORSE, PH.D, ET AL.

  • 40 MATURE CITRUS PROPAGATION IN RITA ® BIOREACTORS

YOSVANIS ACANDA AND JANICE ZALE, PH.D.

  • 46 NOT ALL PSYLLIDS ARE CREATED EQUAL

MICHELLE CILIA, PH.D., ET AL.

  • 52 COMPLEX CITRUS LURES TO TRAP AND CONTROL ACP

XAVIER MARTINI, PH.D., ET AL.

  • 56 FOUNDER LINES FOR IMPROVED CITRUS BIOTECHNOLOGY

MARIA OLIVEIRA, PH.D., ET AL.

  • 60 CITRUS DISEASE RESPONSE TO HLB INFECTION

JESSICA FRANCO, ET AL.

  • 64 DEVELOPMENT OF LOW-SEEDED CITRUS BY MUTATION

BREEDING

MIKEAL ROOSE, PH.D., ET AL.

  • 72 NOVEL THERAPY OF HIGH-PRIORITY CITRUS DISEASES

HAU NGUYEN, PH.D., ET AL.

  • 76 FIGHTING HLB WITH A CITRUS TRISTEZA VIRUS-BASED

VECTOR

JAMES NG, PH.D., ET AL.

  • 82 DEVELOPMENT OF AN ACP MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR

ORGANIC CITRUS

JAWWAD A. QURESHI, PH.D., AND PHILIP A STANSLY, PH.D.

THE MISSION OF THE CITRUS RESEARCH BOARD: ENSURE A SUSTAINABLE CALIFORNIA CITRUS INDUSTRY FOR THE BENEFIT

THE MISSION OF THE CITRUS RESEARCH BOARD:

ENSURE A SUSTAINABLE CALIFORNIA CITRUS INDUSTRY FOR THE BENEFIT OF GROWERS BY PRIORITIZING, INVESTING IN AND PROMOTING SOUND SCIENCE.

CITRUS RESEARCH BOARD MEMBER LIST

BY DISTRICT 2015-2016

(TERMS EXPIRE JULY 31)

District 1 – Northern California

Member

Expires

Member

Expires

Toby Maitland-Lewis

2016

Kevin Olsen

2017

Jack Williams

2016

Etienne Rabe

2018

Donald Roark

2016

John Konda

2018

Dan Dreyer

2016

Keith Watkins

2018

Jim Gorden

2017

Jeff Steen

2018

Greg Galloway

2017

Richard Bennett

2018

Joe Stewart

2017

Justin Brown

2018

Franco Bernardi

2017

District 2 – Southern California – Coastal

Member

Expires

Member

Expires

John Gless III

2017

Alan Washburn

2018

Mike Perricone

2017

District 3 – California Desert

 

Member

Expires

Member

Expires

Mark McBroom

2016

Craig Armstrong

2016

Public Member

 

Member

Expires

Vacant

2018

CALENDAR OF EVENTS 2016

January 13

CPDPP Board Meeting, Visalia/Exeter, California. For more information, contact CDFA at (916) 403-6652.

January 27

Annual UC Riverside Citrus Day,

Riverside, California. Up-to-date research information, field tours and variety tasting.

January 28

CRB Board Meeting, Riverside, California. For more information, contact the CRB at (559) 738-0246.

February 9-11

World Ag Expo, International Agri-Center,

Tulare, California. For more information, visit www.worldagexpo.com.

March 3

California Citrus Mutual Citrus Showcase,

Visalia Convention Center, Visalia, California. For more information, contact California Citrus Mutual at (559) 592-3790.

March 9

CPDPP Board Meeting, Riverside / San Bernardino, California. For more information, contact CDFA at (916) 403-6652.

Citrus Research Board | 217 N. Encina St., Visalia, CA 93291 | PO Box 230, Visalia, CA 93279 (559) 738-0246 | FAX (559) 738-0607 | E-Mail Info@citrusresearch.org | www.citrusresearch.org

  • 6 Citrograph Vol. 7, No. 1

| Winter 2016

7
7
7
7

7

CHAIRMAN’S VIEW BY RICHARD BENNETT OUR #1 GOAL: CONTROLLING HLB The Ultimate and Only Objective The

CHAIRMAN’S VIEW

BY RICHARD BENNETT

OUR #1 GOAL:

CONTROLLING HLB

The Ultimate and Only Objective

The huanglongbing (HLB) threat to the California citrus industry is very real. If your tree becomes infected, the fruit will become unmarketable and the tree will die. That’s the bottom line. This disease is the ultimate threat to our survival.

  • 8 Citrograph Vol. 7, No. 1

| Winter 2016

Richard Bennett

Trees with dropped fruit, showing symptoms of HLB.

EXISTING THREE-PRONGED STRATEGY

The current three-pronged strategy to fight HLB – (a) keeping nursery stock clean, (b) suppressing Asian citrus psyllid (ACP) populations and (c) removing diseased trees upon regulatory confirmation of the presence of ‘Candidatus Liberibacter’ species (‘Ca. L. asiaticus’ or CLas) – has clearly failed to stem the spread and progression of the disease in Florida, Texas and California, according to the recent research of David Bartels, Ph.D., an entomologist at the USDA APHIS PPQ Mission Laboratory in Texas. Citrus quality in those states is declining, and production in many groves has fallen by more than an astounding 50 percent. Florida’s 2015-16 orange crop is expected to be the smallest in half a century. The heavy use of insecticides to suppress the ACP vector populations is not fully effective, which means psyllids are feeding on an increasingly greater number of likely CLas-infected, yet asymptomatic, trees.

California has adopted this three-prong strategy and, like Florida, relies on regulatory agency data collection, analysis and diagnostic efforts. However, the effectiveness of these approaches is restricted by tight protocols and limited resources. Our industry also has invested heavily in scientific research to assist us in extending our existence long enough to find a solution. California needs to immediately support the high-throughput investment of early detection technology devices.

REALIZING THE THREAT

The most current research indicates that the use of antimicrobials and other treatment regimens (such as thermal therapy) to extend the productive life of infected trees is commercially impractical, at best palliative, and at worst only serves to keep infected trees in the ground longer. Some progress has been made in developing cost-effective early detection technologies, but there has been little industry discussion about implementation specifics. After more than 15 years and nearly a quarter of a billion dollars of research, marginal progress has been made in developing a long-term cure for HLB or an HLB-resistant rootstock.

Ignoring the costs associated with the destruction of grower balance sheets, the cost to manage the spread of ACP in California – assuming 200,000 acres and at least an additional two to five dedicated pesticide sprays per year – could reach $50-120 million annually or more ($250-600 per acre) within the next five years. This equates to $.30-.70 per carton on an 850-carton per acre grove. Then, there is enhanced nutrition. From what we know to date, the best programs are costing more than $500 per acre per year. Again, assuming 200,000 acres, the additional cost to our growers is at least $100 million per annum. Therefore, the total cost to the California citrus industry could be $220 million annually. The cost to the

state’s growers could total $750-1,100 per acre per year, or about $1.30 per carton on 850 cartons per acre production. Even then, such expenditures will not stop the spread of HLB in our orchards. It may slow the destruction of diseased trees, but any fresh fruit infected with HLB that is sold marks the beginning of the end for us in the marketplace.

It should be evident that sticking with the current strategy and facing the unintended, but likely, consequences of encouraging growers to hunker down, rely primarily on bug containment, remove only regulatory-confirmed and/or symptomatic trees and wait for the commercialization of a magic bullet will only shackle growers with increasingly higher farming costs and lead to the inexorable collapse of California’s productive citrus capacity.

This devastating disease already has manifested itself in Southern California. Collectively, we must formulate an immediate strategy.

HLB SUMMIT

On December 1, the industry brought key forces together for an annual HLB Summit here in California. It differed from the meeting held at the University of California-Davis this past autumn in that it added in the research and experiences of Florida to develop a comprehensive grower action plan. The morning session clearly demonstrated the urgent and immediate need for investment in Early Detection Technologies.

In September, the Citrus Research Board (CRB) developed a format to assemble leading scientists and industry leaders from Florida together with us to develop a blueprint to combat HLB right now. The best and most experienced minds currently battling this disease in Florida presented their thoughts on developing short-, medium- and long-term strategies to move forward. Scientists who can predict infection movement and detect the bacteria in a pre-symptomatic stage shared research findings.

This one-day session encouraged attendance from a representative cross-section of industry stakeholders (nurseries, growers, marketers and packers/shippers), as well as researchers at the forefront of observation/modeling, diagnosis and treatment of vector populations and the disease.

THE HLB SUMMIT HAD THREE MAIN OBJECTIVES:

  • 1. Raise key stakeholder awareness of the urgency, scope and magnitude of the threat.
    2. Provide a forum for open, robust discussion of (a) disease progression and the effectiveness of current HLB strategies in Florida, Texas and Brazil, (b) the current state of HLB-related research and (c) the limitations of existing disease diagnostics, treatments and strategies.
    3. Achieve consensus on the need for a non-regulatory, industry-driven approach that includes institutionalized

predictive processes and organizational capabilities to combat the disease along with broad, but achievable, strategic directives with two over-arching goals:

a. Extend the economic life viability of existing trees in the ground. b. Shorten the time to development and commercialization of a cure and/or protectant.

FOUR KEY COMPONENTS EMERGED AS A RESULT OF THE SUMMIT:

  • 1. Institutionalized Process – a transparent and highly interactive, managed process that goes beyond simply coordinating sample collection/analysis efforts and recommending psyllid control action plans. It incorporates regular review and possibly in-field testing and deployment of early detection technologies, HLB-infected tree removal and broad industry outreach.
    2. “War Room” – an interdisciplinary panel of researchers, industry players and regulatory representatives that meets after each data collection/analysis cycle to do a situation assessment and create and amend ACP/HLB remediation action plans within the context of the latest research and organizational capabilities.
    3. HLB Task Force – a small accountable organization tasked with managing the process.
    4. Infrastructure – includes CDFA, other regulatory and non-regulatory resources and capabilities.

Our whole industry needs to unite to develop this working plan. California Citrus Mutual and other industy leaders initiated bringing growers together to create a battle strategy to attack these devastating bacteria.

HLB will obliterate our industry unless we control our fate on a unified basis. Every grower and every orchard owner must understand this has to be a combined effort. Each tree that is infected with this bacterium must be eliminated immediately. The bacterium has to be controlled at the earliest stage of infection. This is not a disease we can attack tomorrow when we know a tree is infected today. Our industry must stand together and move forward aggressively.

Florida has the capability of chemically altering orange juice to mask the HLB flavor change. However, the California industry sells a single piece of unaltered fruit to each consumer. With fresh fruit, we cannot mask the flavor change. When we, as growers, start delivering HLB-affected fruit to consumers, California will lose its industry. The flavor change that the HLB-infected tree imparts to the fruit is dramatic, and neither your family nor our consumers will accept it.

If we allow the HLB bacteria to infect our trees, consumers will abandon California oranges, mandarins, grapefruit and lemons, and our citrus industry will be lost.

state’s growers could total $750-1,100 per acre per year, or about $1.30 per carton on 850

Richard

Bennett

is

the

chairman of the Citrus Research

Board.

  • 10 Citrograph Vol. 7, No. 1

| Winter 2016

From left to right, CRB Secretary/Treasurer Toby Maitland-Lewis, Chairman Richard Bennett, President Gary Schulz and Vice-Chairman Dan Dreyer.

BOARD SELECTS NEW EXECUTIVE LEADERSHIP TEAM

Richard Bennett

T his past September, the Citrus Research Board (CRB) instituted some key leadership changes. First,

after a lengthy and thorough search, we hired a new president for the organization. Shortly thereafter,

at the Board’s annual meeting, new executive officers were elected.

We are pleased to introduce Gary Schulz as the CRB’s president. Gary has an impressive resumé that seems tailor-made for his new responsibilities of leading the agency through the challenging period we now face. He is a senior executive with an extensive, focused background in member-driven non- profit and quasi-governmental agricultural business organizations. Having demonstrated his ability to

  • 12 Citrograph Vol. 7, No. 1

| Winter 2016

lead strategic planning in order to solve industry issues, Gary also has proven to be a tremendous team builder. These are all skills that will serve him well as our new president.

Gary’s most recent post was as president and CEO of the California Association of Pest Control Advisers and California Certified Crop Advisors, a trade association of 3,000 members and eight staff with a 21-member board of directors. Before that, he served for a number of years as the president and general manager of the Raisin Administrative Committee and CEO of the California Raisin Marketing Board. Among other prior positions, our new president also was general manager of International Agri-Center and World Ag Expo for 15 years.

We know that Gary will be a welcome addition to our

organization,

and

we

are

very

happy

to

have

such

a

knowledgeable agriculture industry veteran at the helm.

In addition to Gary, we have new executive officers in place on the Board following annual elections. I am serving as your chairman of the Board, Dan Dreyer is your new vice-chairman and Toby Maitland-Lewis is your secretary/treasurer.

Dan, a third generation California family farmer, is the Northern Tulare County grower liaison for the CPDPC in addition to being the manager of Agriculture Services in Exeter. As a member of the CRB Board, he is dedicated to outreach and communicating research outcomes to the industry.

Toby, the chief financial officer of Sun Pacific in Exeter, has worked in citrus for a decade. He has served on the CRB Board since 2013 and is primarily interested in the CRB’s fiduciary responsibility and promoting the long-term sustainability of California’s citrus industry.

I am the owner of Bennett Farms in Exeter and am a citrus industry veteran. Right now, I am committed to leading an effort dedicated to finding a solution for HLB (see accompanying article). I know I also speak for Gary, Dan and Toby in sharing with you that we look forward to working hard on your behalf by strategically focusing your funding on research that will enable your businesses to survive and thrive.

lead strategic planning in order to solve industry issues, Gary also has proven to be a

Richard

Bennett

is

the

chairman of the Citrus Research

Board.

W∂ nderful trees start with W∂ nderful roots. • Large selection of scion/rootstock • Insect-excluding state-of-the-art
W∂ nderful
trees
start with
W∂ nderful
roots.
• Large selection
of scion/rootstock
• Insect-excluding
state-of-the-art nursery
• USDA/CDFA certifi ed
and inspected
For more information: email jose.lima@wonderful.com or call 559.707.1387
36205 Rd. 172, Visalia, CA 93292
©2015 Wonderful Citrus LLC. All Rights Reserved. WONDERFUL, WONDERFUL CITRUS and the accompanying logos are trademarks of Wonderful Citrus LLC or its affi liates. PC13955

INDUSTRY VIEWS

MOJTABA MOHAMMADI

WHAT PROGRESS ARE WE MAKING ON HLB?

During the HLB Research Summit held at the University of California, Davis, September 9-10, 2015, several well-known research experts were asked their thoughts on “What progress are we making on huanglongbing (HLB)?”

  • 14 Citrograph Vol. 7, No. 1

| Winter 2016

Greg McCollum, Ph.D.

Research Plant Physiologist,

USDA-ARS, Fort Pierce, Florida

Greg McCollum, Ph.D. Research Plant Physiologist, USDA-ARS, Fort Pierce, Florida The confirmation of ‘Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus’

The confirmation of ‘Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus’ (CLas) in the state has been a real wake- up call. HLB has been found in two different locations in California. There is evidence that the problem is spreading, which means that action needs to be taken sooner rather than later.

HLB is an enemy, but once the enemy has been identified, you can begin the battle. A lot of novel, very interesting work is being done on detection technologies that are alternatives to PCR. They hold great promise if we can get closer to whole tree detection, rather than a very small fraction of tree detection. To prevent or slow the development of an HLB epidemic, it is essential to confirm infections as early as possible and take action immediately. Because trees can be infected with CLas for a lengthy time prior to the appearance of HLB symptoms, detection of the pathogen is challenging. Although PCR is very reliable in detecting CLas, if trees are not symptomatic, it is difficult to determine where to collect diagnostic samples. Early detection means that infections can be found prior to trees developing visible symptoms. That is crucial if HLB is to be controlled in California.

In Florida, the situation got out of control because symptoms were not apparent. As soon as a single tree was found and testing for CLas began, we found the pathogen was everywhere. California is ahead of the curve on that and hopefully can stay that way. I wish there was a significant breakthrough in therapeutics or control in general, but we are not there yet. Currently, the standard three-pronged approach (controlling psyllids, removing infected trees and only planting clean nursery stock) is still the most important management strategy.

DISEASE CONTROL STRATEGIES

Breeding and transgenic (introduction of DNA from another source) approaches really are going to be the ultimate

solutions. I lean more toward transgenics than conventional breeding simply because of the time factor. We know it is feasible with transgenics to develop trees that will likely be resistant to a host of different diseases. Conventional breeding is attractive. We’ve had a breeding program at the ARS for more than 100 years, and new varieties have come out of that program. It is a very slow process that takes about 30 years from hybridization to a variety being released. A rootstock is a bit faster proposition. The advantage is that you maintain the same scion, but impart resistance through the rootstock, which would be a great benefit. Some rootstocks that have been evaluated in Florida appear to have a less rapid rate of decline than others, which holds some promise.

FLORIDA EXPERIENCE

The number one lesson is be vigilant; you must constantly seek symptoms and constantly assay as many samples as possible. It is really a numbers game. The public must be educated. It is amazing that with the extent of HLB in Florida, I have seen people who have lived there their whole lives who are not even aware of the problem. The outreach efforts I have seen here in this meeting are really important, especially with the huge number of residential trees in California. Ensuring that the public is aware of this problem, educating them as to what they can do to help solve it and encouraging them to do so will go a long way.

BIOLOGICAL CONTROL

In Florida, before HLB, pests were managed almost exclusively through biocontrol. Minimal use of insecticides and the interactions among various pests resulted in good biocontrol. If you do not have enough of the pest that you are trying to control, the population of biocontrol organisms will decline, so there is a cyclic nature. With residential trees, people will be much more amenable to releasing wasps in their backyard than commercial insecticide spraying.

FUNDING RESEARCH AREAS

New detection technologies could provide a real advantage over PCR, though none have been validated. Therapeutics of any kind would be of tremendous value, however, we do not have any promising ones at the moment.

Matt Daugherty, Ph.D.

Extension Specialist, Department of Entomology, University of California, Riverside, California

Matt Daugherty, Ph.D. Extension Specialist, Department of Entomology, University of California, Riverside, California One of the

One of the main challenges with HLB management has been that it takes citrus trees a long time to show disease symptoms after they become infected. If not removed, the infected trees serve as new sources of inoculum for disease spread in the following years.

There have been significant

areas of progress on HLB in recent years; one of which is developing a range of early detection technologies that we hope will soon be available for regulators and growers to begin folding into monitoring programs. Earlier detection of infected trees is critical to narrowing the potential for pathogen acquisition and spread during the asymptomatic phase.

BIOLOGICAL CONTROL

Disease in urban neighborhoods in Southern California is incredibly challenging to manage effectively, let alone to try to eradicate. We absolutely are relying on biocontrol as an important strategy in these areas. We’re learning more about how to increase its chances of successfully slowing disease spread. This will likely involve coordinating with homeowner education programs, emphasizing the need to manage a variety of species, including Argentine ants, to maximize the effectiveness of biocontrol agents.

FLORIDA EXPERIENCE

We’ve learned a lot from the HLB situation in Florida. One of the most important lessons for us early on was the role of human transportation in the spread of psyllids and disease. This lesson led directly to steps being taken in California, including the establishment of quarantines, to ensure that people are not moving around infested or infected plant material. Similarly, regulations were put in place in California to make sure that nursery plants are not sources of HLB spread. I am fairly confident that these measures (although they’ve proven burdensome for certain people and industries) are at least part of the reason that the pace of the ACP and HLB situation in California has to date been very different from Florida.

Another area of progress is that we are getting a much better handle on how the vector and the HLB-associated Liberibacter spread in the landscape, what drives their movement and what aspects of local landscape and environmental conditions influence whether the psyllid is likely to be there. This information feeds into risk modeling that provides a better picture of where to look for not only the ACP, but also the disease. By refining how we identify early cases of disease, we can hopefully mitigate some impacts. That process has been going on for years, but it is becoming more defined.

PUBLIC AWARENESS

As an extension specialist, another area of progress I should note is increased awareness of this problem. There are so many people in California affected one way or another by the psyllid or the disease. We’re lucky to have a very large network of people at UC, in industry and at state and federal agencies tackling different aspects of increasing public and stakeholder education. Such education programs are critical to promoting early disease and insect finds and widespread adoption of control measures. For areas like the Central Valley, hopefully by the time HLB does arrive, growers and the general public will be in a much better position to adopt coordinated and aggressive control measures during the early phase when eradication is most feasible.

Manjunath Keremane, Ph.D.

Research Plant Pathologist, USDA-ARS, National Clonal Germplasm Repository for Citrus and Dates, Riverside, California

Matt Daugherty, Ph.D. Extension Specialist, Department of Entomology, University of California, Riverside, California One of the

The California citrus industry is concerned about recent finds of HLB-positive citrus trees reported in some residential areas of Los Angeles County. At this time, containment and eradication are our main goals in Southern California. Early detection of ‘Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus’ (CLas)

in psyllids and affected trees, in addition to effective eradication of compromised citrus trees, can help prevent this devastating disease from spreading in California.

  • 16 Citrograph Vol. 7, No. 1

| Winter 2016

EARLY DETECTION TECHNOLOGIES

In order to achieve this goal, the Citrus Research Board is currently funding research projects on early detection technologies. With funding from the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture, our group is trying to develop technologies that can facilitate detection of HLB through encouraging field-testing by growers, extension agents and any public members interested in monitoring the disease. The rationale is that if a single laboratory is expected to conduct all the required tests, the task will be onerous. Involving the public sector in this process will enable the state to focus its resources on high-risk areas. Large-scale testing by many will facilitate early detection leading to exclusion and eventual suppression of the disease.

DISEASE CONTROL STRATEGIES

A long-term solution to control HLB is to develop cultivars with resistance to the disease. Currently, two approaches are being pursued – transgenic and conventional breeding. We have chosen a non-transgenic approach because of the ease associated with field-testing and the release of promising disease-resistant cultivars to the citrus community. Approval by the FDA and EPA will not be needed since the hybrids are a result of natural breeding. Even though the approach is time consuming initially, the advantages associated with conventional breeding are appealing.

FLORIDA EXPERIENCE

The lessons learned from Florida’s HLB experience have been useful in defining the regulatory process required for HLB suppression. Since 2005, we have been developing methodologies to conduct psyllid testing for the presence of CLas. This is now used as an early indicator for the existence of HLB. Testing the psyllid vector would give us a lead-time of two to four years prior to the appearance of HLB symptoms in the plants.

Big box retail stores in Florida marketing ornamental citrus trees contributed to the quick spread of HLB throughout the state. California has regulations in place to avoid such incidences. In Florida, it was demonstrated that trucks transporting citrus acted as carriers of disease-spreading psyllids. Groves along the highway were the first to be affected by HLB. At present, California has strict regulations for trucks transporting processed or unprocessed citrus. Numerous guidelines were established based on Florida’s HLB experiences. This has helped slow the spread of HLB in California. Additionally, our outreach program seems to be working efficiently in disseminating information and educating the public regarding HLB-related issues.

EARLY DETECTION TECHNOLOGIES In order to achieve this goal, the Citrus Research Board is currently funding

Mojtaba Mohammadi, Ph.D., is an associate scientist with the Citrus Research Board in Visalia, California, where he also serves as the associate science editor of Citrograph.

Call The Agri - Business Insurance Specialists Farms - Ranches Crops Packing Houses Nursery Land Developers
Call The
Agri - Business
Insurance Specialists
Farms - Ranches
Crops
Packing Houses
Nursery
Land Developers
Produce Brokers
Tree Trimmers
Chemical Applicators
Pump & Well
559 - 594 - 5500
nielseninsurance.net
502 - A North Kaweah (Hwy 65)
Exeter CA 93221 Lic # 0705090

WHERE 2016 CRB-FUNDED RESEARCH IS HEADED

Mojtaba Mohammadi

F unding research to solve problems associated with commercial citrus production in California

is the principal mission of the Citrus Research Board

(CRB). Science and technology have been helping and will continue to assist California citrus growers in achieving their long-term goals of productivity, efficiency, competitiveness and sustainability.

Among diseases threatening the California citrus industry today, huanglongbing (HLB or citrus

  • 18 Citrograph Vol. 7, No. 1

| Winter 2016

greening) is considered the number one enemy, followed by those caused by viruses, pre- and post- harvest fungi and root pathogens. HLB is a destructive, century-old citrus disease that has just spread in the U.S. within the past decade. It is associated with a phloem-limited bacterium, “Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus” (CLas), which is transmitted from an infected plant to a healthy one primarily by the Asian citrus psyllid (ACP or Diaphorina citri Kuwayama) and via contaminated budwood propagation. In Florida,

the HLB onslaught has caused serious economic losses to the citrus industry, which is valued at

the HLB onslaught has caused serious economic losses to the citrus industry, which is valued at $9 billion in annual revenues.

Since it takes months or even years for the disease symptoms to appear, researchers have been working hard to come up with novel ideas and technologies to detect HLB infection in pre-symptomatic citrus tissues, so the infected plants can be removed immediately to prevent further disease spread. Early detection methods based on citrus biomarkers will continue to be used in a systems approach to pinpoint hot spots where the disease might be originating. Citrus transcriptomics (small and micro RNAs), metabolomics (volatile organic compounds [VOCs] and metabolites), and proteomics (proteins) currently are being evaluated to diagnose early HLB infection in pre- symptomatic tissues in California, Florida and Texas where the disease has been reported. These promising technologies need to be fine-tuned, coordinated and validated by other more sensitive, accurate and specific techniques such as real- time quantitative PCR (qPCR) and digital droplet PCR (ddPCR).

One of the biggest challenges facing plant pathologists today is to isolate and culture “Candidatus Liberibacter” species on an artificial nutrient medium in vitro. Culturing the HLB bacterium will:

  • (a) pave the way for better detection and identification of the

bacterium and hence the disease;

  • (b) facilitate studies on the epidemiology of HLB, which

consequently will foster better disease management

strategies; and

  • (c) ease high-precision, whole-genome sequencing, leading

the way to better understanding the molecular biology of

host/pathogen/vector interactions that might identify genes of interest for disease management.

The first and most important line of defense against HLB is constant monitoring of ACP vector movement and the HLB-associated Liberibacter spread based on data collected from trapping and diagnostic analyses of samples using early detection technologies. Second is taking sanitary and preventive measures that include elimination of diseased plants and regular spraying for psyllids in the Central Valley and the release of parasitic wasps (Tamarixia radiata and Diaphorencyrtus aligarhensis) to parasitize and kill ACP nymphal instars on newly-developed leaf flush in Southern California urban areas. This is accompanied with the use of pathogen-free nursery stocks, enforcing quarantine measures and educating the public through effective out-reach programs. These coordinated actions already have begun in California and will continue into the future as long as HLB poses a threat.

Short-term approaches to counteract the debilitating effects of HLB on the California citrus industry include soil fertigation, microbial enrichment and effective use of therapeutics including antimicrobial compounds, thermotherapy, etc. Long-term approaches taken by research scientists on the plant side to mitigate the HLB malady include breeding for disease tolerance or resistance, use of gene silencing technology (e.g., RNA interference) and development of transgenic lines with enhanced resistance to HLB infection. Some of these approaches are still at the infancy stage. Others are being evaluated in the greenhouse and even in field trials before being commercialized.

The complete list of 2015-16 approved projects may be found in Table 1 on the next two pages.

the HLB onslaught has caused serious economic losses to the citrus industry, which is valued at

Mojtaba Mohammadi, Ph.D., is an associate scientist with the Citrus Research Board in Visalia, California, where he also serves as the associate science editor of Citrograph.

$ 100,864

$ 106,974

$ 101,114

2,504

$ 5,000

$ 115,106

$ 146,406

18,114

21,000

22,290

42,500

67,500

$ 627,307

$ 116,437

$ 110,469

$ 108,059

86,276

$ 129,202

$ 103,712

$ 146,275

6,535

$ 151,653

$ 183,713

$ 22,872

$ 94,365

73,333

NCE*

APPROVED

BUDGET

BOARD

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

UC Riverside UC Davis USDA-­‐ARS Boyce Thompson InsHtute University of Florida UC Riverside UC Davis UC Davis Boyce Thompson InsHtute UC Riverside & UC Davis USDA USDA-­‐ARS

AFFILIATION

USDA-­‐ARS USDA-­‐ARS Texas A&M University of Florida UC Riverside University of Florida UC Riverside UC Riverside

UC Riverside

UC Riverside

UC Riverside

Los Alamos

UC Davis

UC Davis

UC Davis

INVESTIGATOR

Rolshausen/Leveau

PRINCIPAL

Ramadugu

Kandelous

McCollum

Pagliaccia

Thomson

Thomson

Thomson

Vidalakis

Vidalakis

Louzada

Godfrey

Guinard

Slupsky

Stansly

Coaker

Leveau

Moore

Roose

Gupta

5300-­‐151 A phage/prophage-­‐based PCR system for sensiHve and specific detecHon of “ Candidatus Liberibacter asiaHcus” and Spiroplasma citri Chen

Cilia

Cilia

Zale

Ma

Ng

Jin

5300-­‐155 Using mass spectrometry technologies to develop novel management strategies for citrus insect vector-­‐borne pathogens

5300-­‐168 Use of digital PCR for improved early detecHon of Candidatus Liberibacter asiaHcus infecHon in citrus and ACP

5300-­‐150 Biomarkers for detecHon of Liberibacter infecHon in citrus trees through 1H-­‐NMR based metabolomics

5200-­‐144 Development of consumer-­‐friendly transgenic citrus plants with potenHal broad spectrum resistance

5200-­‐150 OpHmizing sensory quality and consumer acceptance of citrus fruit through horHcultural pracHces

5200-­‐147 EvaluaHon of hybrids of citrus and citrus relaHves for huanglongbing (HLB) tolerance/resistance

5200-­‐149 Streamlining the introducHon of licensed citrus varieHes into California: A case study -­‐ Florida

5100-­‐152 IdenHficaHon of key components in HLB using effectors as probes (co-­‐sponsor with CRDF)

5300-­‐163 Not all psyllids are created equal: Why do some transmit Liberibacter and others do not?

5100-­‐153 Real Time PCR co-­‐detecHon of Candidatus Liberibacter species and Spiroplasma citri

5300-­‐158 ConstrucHon of the cloned infecHous cDNA of Citrus tristeza virus (California isolate)

5300-­‐161 Infrastructure support for research on detecHon and management of HLB and ACP

5300-­‐160 IdenHfying and characterizing citrus targets from Candidatus Liberibacter asiaHcus

5300-­‐131 IdenHficaHon and characterizaHon of HLB-­‐induced small RNAs and mRNAs

5100-­‐155 Citrus rhizobiomes and tree producHvity in response to soil manipulaHons

5200-­‐148 MicropropagaHon of mature citrus in temporary immersion bioreactors

5200-­‐142 UHlizaHon of founder lines for improved citrus biotechnology via RMCE

5100-­‐150 OpHmizaHon of water and nitrate applicaHon efficiency for citrus trees

5200-­‐141 The development of novel Blood and Cara cara like citrus varieHes

5300-­‐165 Development of mature budwood transformaHon technology

5200-­‐201 CORE: integrated citrus breeding and evaluaHon for California

5100-­‐154 Citrus dwarfing of commercial varieHes using TsnRNAs

5300-­‐164 A microbiota-­‐based approach to citrus tree health

5100-­‐146 Novel therapy of high-­‐priority citrus diseases

5300-­‐156 The citrus greening bibliographical database

5200-­‐146 Rapid cycling plant breeding in citrus

NUMBER TITLE

  • 5300 Con0nuing Projects

  • 5200 Con0nuing Projects

  • 5100 Con0nuing Projects

Table 1: 2015-2016 Research Projects

  • 20 Citrograph Vol. 7, No. 1

| Winter 2016

 
   

85,000

72,424

$ 117,128

56,428

$ 214,737

$ 94,950

$ 254,619

$ 113,000

 

$ 180,601

55,773

20,000

   

61,000

$ 53,000

$ 134,000

40,576

73,557

 

$ 444,235

   

$ 116,660

66,565

$ 206,407

$ 231,358

NCE*

69,642

$ 100,740

$ 420,155

 

30,000

 

$ 181,745

$ 250,000

$ 248,404

TOTAL $ 6,702,284

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

UC Davis USDA-­‐ARS University of Florida USDA-­‐ARS, FDWSRU UC Davis USDA-­‐ARS CRB USDA-­‐ARS

USDA-­‐ARS

UC Davis

Fruitmentor

UC Riverside

UC Riverside

UC Riverside

USDA-­‐ARS

USDA-­‐ARS

USDA-­‐ARS

UC Riverside University of Florida UC Riverside UC Riverside UC Riverside University of Florida University of Florida UC Riverside

USDA-­‐ARS

UC Riverside

TBD

Stouthamer & Hoddle UC Riverside

Falk

Schneider

Sumerlin

Godfrey

Lin

5300-­‐170 Develop a novel target-­‐basis of anH-­‐virulence strategy for controlling HLB 5300-­‐171 Photosynthate-­‐responsive polymeric nano-­‐carriers for phloem-­‐specific delivery in the treatment of HLB 5300-­‐172 Development of PCR-­‐based diagnosHc tools for detecHon and differenHaHon of citrus leprosis-­‐associated viruses 5300-­‐173 Effect of mixed infecHons of plant pathogens on detecHon of HLB using two early detecHon methods

McCollum

LeVesque

Yokomi

Gomwald

Slupsky

Willey

5300-­‐154 Risk-­‐based decision making in the management of huanglongbing (CPDPP) 5300-­‐162 DetecHon of Candidatus Liberibacter in citrus in Hacienda Heights and other areas of California (CPDPP) 5050-­‐041 Using the internet to train citrus hobbyists to order budwood from CCPP and not to spread HLB (CPDPP)

Adaskaveg

5400-­‐103 EvaluaHon of new post-­‐harvest treatments to reduce post-­‐harvest decays in packinghouse operaHons

Adaskaveg

Adaskaveg

Walse

Xiao

Walse

Morse

Qureshi

Hoddle

Hoddle

5500-­‐194 Release and monitoring of Tamarixia radiata and phenology of Asian citrus psyllid in Southern California

Stouthamer

Qureshi

5500-­‐205 Toxicity of syntheHc and organic insecHcides to Tamarixia radiata, ecto-­‐parasitoid of Asian citrus psyllid

Stelinski

Grapon-­‐Cardwell

Vargas

Stouthamer

TBD

6320/6321 Development of mass-­‐rearing methods for the parasitoid, Tamarixia radiata, to support classical biological control

NCE* represents a No Cost Extension where funds for project comple:on were approved in the previous fiscal year.

 

New Proposals

5300-­‐169 ArHficial microRNA-­‐based targeHng of the Asian citrus psyllid for HLB management

5300-­‐174 Establish a system to infect and maintain Nico:ana benthamiana and citrus with the recombinant CTV 5300-­‐175 EDT experiment 5300-­‐176 Flush & Nypmh experiment

Sub-­‐Awards

 

-­‐ Non-­‐Vectored and Post-­‐harvest Diseases

Con0nuing Projects

 

5400-­‐119 Disease forecasHng and management of Septoria spot of citrus

5400-­‐148 Epidemiology and management of Phytophthora diseases of citrus in California

5400-­‐149 Breaking criHcal pest-­‐related trade barriers for California citrus exports

5400-­‐150 Control of post-­‐harvest diseases of citrus

Sub-­‐Award

5050-­‐010 Breaking criHcal pest-­‐related trade barriers for California citrus exports (TASC)

-­‐ Pest Management

Con0nuing Projects

5500-­‐189 OpHmizing chemical control of Asian citrus psyllid in California

5500-­‐189E Development of an Asian citrus psyllid (ACP) management plan for organic citrus

5500-­‐191 Host specificity tesHng of Diaphorencyrtus aligarhensis

5500-­‐197 Impact of resident predator species on control of Asian citrus psyllid populaHons

5500-­‐206 Development of new trapping and control methods for ACP based on complex citrus lure blends

5500-­‐501 CORE: IPM program

New Proposals

5500-­‐208 Effects of ACP cover sprays against fruit flies (TephriHdae) and their natural enemies

Sub-­‐Awards

5500-­‐196 Biological control of Asian citrus psyllid in California (CPDPP)

Contract rearing of Tamarixia

 

5400

5500

6310

MEET YOUR BOARD MEMBERS

Ivy Leventhal

The Citrus Research Board (CRB) is governed by 21 dedicated volunteers from a wide variety of backgrounds and geographical areas of the California citrus industry. Fifteen of the Board members represent northern California; three are from southern and coastal California; two represent the desert area; and there is one public member.

Periodically, we will introduce you to several of your representatives so that you can learn more about these hard- working Board members who volunteer significant portions of their time for the betterment of the citrus community. In this issue, you’ll meet three of the most recent appointees.

MEET YOUR BOARD MEMBERS Ivy Leventhal The Citrus Research Board (CRB) is governed by 21 dedicated

Greg Galloway has served on the Board since 2014 and represents District One. During the past year, he has served on a number of committees – Communications, Production Efficiency, Research Development and Implementation, Pest Management and Non- Vectored Disease and Post-Harvest.

“My experience on the Board so far has been interesting, amusing, confusing and at times overwhelming,” Galloway said. “I have come to realize how little I know and how truly open I am to new ideas and concepts. Our industry has many exceptionally bright people working on a tremendous number of research projects. These scientists are compassionate about their work, while patient with those of less intelligence. I feel blessed to be allowed into their sand box.

“Our industry is being bombarded with many challenges,” he continued. “Trade partners are placing quality demands that require significant production and processing adjustments. Neighboring growing regions are experiencing the wrath of a crippling, perhaps apocalyptic disease. We are on high alert regarding the invasive nature of this disease and have spread a very wide research net.

  • 22 Citrograph Vol. 7, No. 1

| Winter 2016

Our research dollars are prioritized toward preserving our industry, which is a tall order. The CRB is blessed with a strong, seasoned Board willing to face industry challenges without reservation. They are strengthening and raising the bar on management to meet the requirements of executing the necessary directives. I have no agenda other than gratitude for the opportunity to serve the industry that has provided for the livelihood of my family.”

A veteran of more than four decades in the citrus industry, Galloway lives in Porterville, where he is the general manager of Sierra Crest Agriculture, which has acreage in Tulare and Fresno counties. His work involves the cultural aspects of citrus and table grape production.

In his free time, the married father of two sons enjoys reading, his RV and visits to the beach.

MEET YOUR BOARD MEMBERS Ivy Leventhal The Citrus Research Board (CRB) is governed by 21 dedicated

The most recent representative who was elected to District Two in 2014 is Mike Perricone. His areas of interest are new varieties and pest management, and he has been serving on the CRB’s New Varieties and Non-vectored Diseases and Post-harvest Committees during his first year.

“I think the greatest issue for all of us in the citrus industry is the threat of HLB,” Perricone said. “It’s not going to be an easy fight, but I think we will be able to beat this thing out if we all work together.”

The San Juan Capistrano native who now lives in Temecula is a relative newcomer to the California citrus industry. For the past several years, he has served as the operations manager for Pauma Ranches in Pauma Valley, responsible for citrus and avocado acreage and staff.

Perricone and his wife have one son. When not working or fulfilling his CRB Board duties, the D.A.R.E. America volunteer enjoys the fast sport of roller hockey and spending time with his family.

“I think the greatest issue for all of us in the citrus industry is the threat

The newest over-all Board member, representing District One and elected in 2015, is Keith Watkins. As Vice President of Farming and Field Operations for Bee Sweet Citrus in Fowler, he is charged with overseeing approximately 10,000 acres and is responsible for land acquisition, investor relations

and financial oversight. His son, Matthew, works with him on Bee Sweet’s farming operations, which has allowed Watkins the time to serve as a vice president of the Cawelo Water District and a past president of the Tulare County Farm Bureau, as well as volunteer on the CRB Board.

In this latter capacity, the Visalia native is a member of the Pest Control Committee, which dovetails with his interest in addressing the current major threats facing the industry. “HLB and ACP are dark clouds hanging over us,” Watkins said. “I want to help concentrate the CRB in a direction that will focus all of the research currently being conducted to come up with answers to those two problems. We need to ensure that the scientists are talking to each other and building on each other’s work.”

A veteran of

more than two decades in the California citrus

industry and an alumnus of the California Agricultural Leadership Foundation, Watkins stated, “We should be focusing on the CRB’s financial responsibility by utilizing the growers’ money to invest in areas that will provide good returns to the growers.”

When not at work or volunteering in his industry and community, the married father of three enjoys traveling and family time.

“I think the greatest issue for all of us in the citrus industry is the threat

Ivy Leventhal is the managing editor of Citrograph.

TREES NOT PERFORMING LIKE THEY SHOULD? Small Size? Low Yield? Poor Packouts? • Proprietary Foliar Sprays
TREES NOT
PERFORMING LIKE
THEY SHOULD?
Small Size?
Low Yield?
Poor Packouts?
• Proprietary Foliar Sprays
• Custom Blended Fertilizer
• All Lines of Crop Protection
• Organic Products
• PhD Citrus Agronomist on Staff
LLL L
LLL L
EEE E
.
.
WWW W
C
C
N
N
I I
GGG G
.
.
O
O
C
C
NNN N
S S
III I
E E
FFF F
L L
A
A
Providing Quality
S
S
FFF F
G
G
EEE E
A
A
LLL L

Service to Growers

Since 1920

Ivanhoe - Lindsay - Terra Bella

559.562.4946

www.leffingwellag.com

HLB DETECTIONS IN SAN GABRIEL

Where are we now?

Victoria Hornbaker and Lucita Kumagai

  • 24 Citrograph Vol. 7, No. 1

| Winter 2016

CDFA crew removing HLB-positive lime tree in the San Gabriel area.

  • I n April 2012, the first California detection of huanglongbing (HLB), also known as citrus greening, was confirmed in a tree in Hacienda Heights. It wasn’t until July 2015 that the second confirmed California detection of HLB was found in the San Gabriel area of Los Angeles County, about 15 miles from Hacienda Heights. Both finds were residential citrus trees. Prior to the second incident, it appeared that no news was good news and that the 2012 find was isolated. However, the 2015 San Gabriel detection has led to nine additional HLB-positive plant samples. Those detections resulted in the first and (as of November 2015) only “cluster” of the disease in California. Now that the dust has settled, here’s the sequence of events that occurred in San Gabriel in the continuing battle against this devastating citrus disease.

SAN GABRIEL HLB TIMELINE

TREE 1 (JULY 9, 2015)

The initial HLB-positive tree, a kumquat, was found as a result of the California Department of Food and Agriculture (CDFA) Risk-Based HLB Survey and the diligence of the CDFA team. Asian citrus psyllid (ACP) collected from the find site tested in the HLB-inconclusive range which triggered a CDFA protocol to revisit the site, collect plant tissue and additional ACP, if available. The kumquat tree was chlorotic but the leaves did not present the classic asymmetrical mottling typical of HLB.

DNA extracted from the plant tissue tested positive for ‘Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus’, the bacterium associated with HLB, by real- time PCR, conventional PCR and DNA sequencing. The tissue was sent to USDA for confirmation, which was received on July 9. With the homeowner’s permission, the tree was first treated with a foliar insecticide and then removed on July 10. CDFA also surveyed and took samples of ACP and plant tissue on all adjacent properties and applied foliar and systemic treatments (with homeowner permission). The state agency announced the HLB detection to the public later that day.

As a result of the first find, CDFA began activities to place a quarantine for HLB in the San Gabriel area, consisting of a five-mile radius around the find site, totaling 87 square miles. CDFA then began survey and treatment activities on all HLB host plants within 800 meters of the find site. By taking those essential steps, the critical reservoir of disease and its vectors (ACP) were in the process of being removed.

On July 13, CDFA Pest Exclusion staff began survey activities of production and retail nurseries in the proposed quarantine area, placing all host plants on hold.

2015 Huanglongbing (HLB) Quarantine Map
2015 Huanglongbing (HLB)
Quarantine Map

HLB quarantine map in Southern California, including the single 2012 Hacienda Heights detection and the 10 San Gabriel finds in the summer of 2015.

TREE 2 (JULY 15, 2015)

Days later, a lime tree on a neighboring property was confirmed positive for HLB. Similar to the initial tree, the lime tree tested positive by PCR and DNA sequencing. The tree was removed with homeowner permission on July 16. CDFA’s lab ran samples to determine if the disease had spread to other citrus trees in the area.

To inform the public and particularly the neighborhood, a public meeting was held the evening of July 16 and was very well attended. Assemblyman Ed Chau was in attendance, as was Kurt Floren, the Los Angeles County Agricultural Commissioner.

noting that HLB host material was found at 30 of the entities, and 8,040 plants were placed on hold. All were voluntarily destroyed except for the 123 plants at one entity, which opted to construct an insect-resistant screenhouse for the plants.

TREES 5-9 (AUGUST 6, 2015)

Five additional trees were confirmed HLB-positive at three locations within a block and a half of the previous finds. One location had three trees, and two locations each had one infected tree. On August 7, CDFA removed the three trees on the one property with homeowner consent. By the next day, CDFA removed the two remaining trees on separate properties, also with homeowner consent.

Following the neighboring finds, notices were delivered to residents to notify them that insecticide treatments would begin on July 20.

TREES 3-4 (JULY 22, 2015)

CDFA confirmed two additional HLB-positive trees, a Mandarin and a calamondin, on the same street as the initial tree. Both trees were treated and removed, with homeowner permission on July 22.

CDFA Pest Exclusion staff continued working with the USDA to survey approximately 90 nurseries and garden centers,

As a result of the new find locations, the treatment area was expanded. A public meeting for the expanded area was held on August 11. CDFA continued to treat properties where no contact with the owner could be made, as well as refusal properties under abatement authority.

TREE 10 (AUGUST 18, 2015)

An additional tree was confirmed HLB-positive less than half a mile from the initial positive tree, and it was removed with homeowner consent. Survey and treatment areas were expanded yet again, adding 900 properties, and an additional public meeting was held on September 3.

  • 26 Citrograph Vol. 7, No. 1

| Winter 2016

With the strategy set by the citrus industry and immediate response by CDFA survey and treatment crews, no other San Gabriel samples have been confirmed for HLB at the time of this printing.

CONTINUING THE FIGHT

IN THE GROVE

This is a wake-up call for all growers, particularly those in Southern California. Growers should be participating in an area-wide management program to control ACP populations in commercial groves. With HLB in California, ACP management becomes even more crucial. Review the best management practices at www. citrusinsider.org/resources, and employ them in your groves. Also, see the flyer on page 28. The Citrus Pest and Disease Prevention Program (CPDPP) and CDFA encourage growers to regularly survey their own groves for signs of ACP and HLB. CPDPP will continue to trap for ACP in commercial groves throughout the state.

IN THE BACKYARD

Through CPDPP’s support, CDFA survey and treatment crews will remain vigilant in looking for HLB and treating for the Asian citrus psyllid in residential areas. CDFA – in partnership with the USDA, local agricultural commissioners and the citrus industry – continues to pursue a strategy of controlling the spread of Asian citrus psyllids while the Citrus Research Board and other researchers work to find a cure for the disease.

With the strategy set by the citrus industry and immediate response by CDFA survey and treatment

BY THE NUMBERS

Total ACP samples collected from San Gabriel, including expansion areas: 1,504

Total plant samples collected from San Gabriel, including expansion areas: 6,735

Confirmed positive ACP samples: 4

Confirmed positive plant samples: 10

References:

www.citrusinsider.org/resources

http://www.cdfa.ca.gov/phpps/acp

Victoria Hornbaker is with the Citrus Pest and Disease Prevention Program, where she serves as citrus program manager. Lucita Kumagai is with the Plant Pest Diagnostics Branch at the California Department of Food and Agriculture, where she serves as senior plant pathologist.

REDUCE YOUR ENERGY COSTS Operate your business with a fixed energy cost from the solar power
REDUCE YOUR
ENERGY COSTS
Operate your business with a
fixed energy cost from the solar
power produced on site. On
average, agribusinesses that
use solar can reduce energy
costs by 84 percent a year.
Villa Park Orchards Association 1.15MW DC
Visalia Citrus Packing Group 813.6 kW DC
LoBue Citrus 492.2 kW DC
Contact us today for a
free solar feasibility study
Power Ahead
1-888-705-5055
www.ColdwellSolar.com
Established in 1986, CA Lic# 969149
Source: Coldwell Solar, Inc. solar power system partners
Young Asian citrus psyllids are yellow and produce a white, waxy substance. Asian citrus psyllids are

Young Asian citrus psyllids are yellow and produce a white, waxy substance.

Young Asian citrus psyllids are yellow and produce a white, waxy substance. Asian citrus psyllids are

Asian citrus psyllids are brown, aphid- like insects that feed on the leaves and stems of citrus trees.

Young Asian citrus psyllids are yellow and produce a white, waxy substance. Asian citrus psyllids are

HLB-infected trees will die.

Growers, your help is needed to protect California citrus from HLB!

Huanglongbing, or HLB, could be a death sentence for our industry if it is allowed to take hold. We must work together to suppress, and where possible, eradicate populations of the Asian citrus psyllid to protect our industry from the devastation caused by HLB.

Here are a few ways you can help:

Talk to your employees and contractors – The Asian citrus psyllid is known for its ability to “hitch hike” on plant material so it is critical that no leaves or plant material leave or enter a field in order to keep the pest from spreading. Ask your employees, contractors, and pest control advisors to follow best practices in the field to minimize the movement of plant material from field to field.

Know your Liaison – Every citrus producing region in California has a Grower Liaison dedicat- ed to keeping you informed about psyllid finds and proper treatment protocol. Know who your Grower Liaison is and contact them with any questions about how best to protect your citrus from ACP and HLB.

Sample and Treat – Follow UC recommended guidelines for sampling and treating for the Asian citrus psyllid.

Work with your neighbors – Area-wide management of the Asian citrus psyllid is a strategy where growers in a specific area coordinate management efforts to maximize the impact on psyllid populations. Psyllid Management Areas (PMA) are being formed now so if the time comes to implement an area-wide strategy, growers in the region are ready.

Stay Informed – The Citrus Insider website is your resource for all information pertaining to the Asian citrus psyllid and HLB. Visit www.citrusinsider.org for more information about psyllid finds in your area, best practices, treatment recommendations, area-wide treatment protocol, maps, and more. You can also sign up to have regional alerts sent to your email address.

We must all do our part to protect our trees, our industry, and our way of life.

Young Asian citrus psyllids are yellow and produce a white, waxy substance. Asian citrus psyllids are
Young Asian citrus psyllids are yellow and produce a white, waxy substance. Asian citrus psyllids are
  • 28 Citrograph Vol. 7, No. 1

|

Winter 2016

CitrusInsider.org

Figure 1A

HLB IMPACT ON CITRUS ROOT HEALTH AND INTERACTION WITH PHYTOPHTHORA

James Graham

H uanglongbing (HLB), which translates from Chinese as Yellow Shoot Disease (also referred to as greening),

is the most devastating known disease of citrus. After the establishment of HLB in a citrus production area, at least three highly predictable events occur:

1) The citrus industry remains profitable only when the psyllid vector, Diaphorina citri, and the HLB-associated bacterium, ‘Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus’ (CLas), are stringently controlled with insecticide sprays and removal of symptomatic trees, respectively.

2) Every country in the Americas adjacent to a CLas-positive nation detects HLB within five years or less (e.g., Texas and California proximal to Mexico, and Argentina proximal to Brazil).

3) In areas where HLB is well established, the disease causes unprecedented increases in production costs, crop loss and reduction of internal and external fruit quality.

While leaf symptoms may resemble nutritional stress or deficiencies (e.g., zinc and iron), these symptoms actually are due to disruption of carbohydrate metabolism and

  • 30 Citrograph Vol. 7, No. 1

| Winter 2016

Figure 1B

Figure 1. HLB infection symptoms: (A) Leaf mottling symptom on a Hamlin orange leaf indicative of carbohydrate disruption; (B) HLB-induced fruit drop in eight-year old Hamlin orange trees on Swingle citrumelo rootstock trees in October 2015.

focused on the belowground impact of systemic CLas infection. What we have learned about bacterial infection, movement and root loss has profound implications for how diseased trees are managed. Initially in field surveys, we measured 30-50 percent loss of fibrous root density before any sign of aboveground symptoms. Dr. Johnson’s detailed investigation of the early events in bacterial infection revealed that CLas moves downward to the fibrous roots soon after transmission in the shoots, is unrestricted in the root system and multiplies to damaging levels within months of infection. The fibrous root loss is distributed throughout the root system because the bacterium does not induce phloem plugging and, at least initially, does not produce carbohydrate starvation of fibrous roots. Root loss is followed by the first expression of canopy symptoms in foliage, premature fruit drop and a proportional yield loss of 30 percent based on crop loss estimates in Brazil and Florida. Without management intervention, root turnover accelerates, and the canopy continues to thin as a result of 70- 80 percent fibrous root loss.

Paradoxically, root growth is stimulated on HLB-affected trees – even those in advanced decline – a sign that HLB trees are in a survival mode. What these findings tell us is that the priority is to grow new roots as the tree declines and that root replacement is expensive, reducing fruit production and retention. Hence, stimulating extra root growth is not likely to help and may increase root production at the expense of fruit. A better approach is to promote regular growth cycles of roots, increase root lifespan (i.e. reduce root turnover) and, as much as possible sustain root functioning in water and nutrient uptake.

allocation as a result of plugging and necrosis of phloem, the plant’s sugar conducting system. Because of carbohydrate disruption, there is significant loss of fibrous roots, mottling and yellowing of leaves (Figure 1A) and shoots, defoliation, dieback, tree decline and excessive fruit drop (Figure 1B). Fruit are small and misshapen with aborted seeds, are abnormally colored and contain off-flavored juice low in brix. In the 10

years following the detection of HLB, Florida citrus production has dropped 50 percent with no sign that the rate of crop loss is slowing (http://www.nass.usda.gov/Statistics_by_State/

Florida/Publications/Citrus/cit/2015-16/cit1015.pdf).

At the University of Florida’s Citrus Research and Education Center (CREC), my research program in collaboration with Research Assistant Scientist Evan Johnson, Ph.D., has mainly

Our findings have shifted the focus of HLB management belowground to practices that increase root health. In the Florida production system, this begins by minimizing stress in the micro-sprinkler wetted zone where 80 percent of the fibrous roots are concentrated. More frequent irrigation cycles of shorter duration and weekly to bi-weekly fertigation are recommended to maximize efficiency of water and nutrient uptake by the reduced fibrous root system.

Monitoring of water quality, as well as quantity, also has been discovered to be of critical importance. The majority of Florida groves draw irrigation water from deep wells located in limestone aquifers. Well-water often has a pH in excess of 7.5 and bicarbonates above 100 ppm. Our surveys established that bicarbonates reduce fibrous root density and tree yields where well-water pH exceeds 6.5 and soil pH exceeds 6.2, especially in groves on Swingle citrumelo and Carrizo citrange, the rootstocks most sensitive to bicarbonate stress.

Figure 2A
Figure 2A
Figure 2B
Figure 2B

Figure 2. A. Average propagules of Phytophthora nicotianae in rhizosphere soil samples collected in Florida groves between January 2008 and October 2015 (YTD). B. Average dry weight of fibrous roots in soil samples collected between January 2013 and October 2015 (YTD) (data courtesy of J. B. Taylor, Syngenta Crop Protection).

Importantly, the combination of CLas infection and bicarbonate stress increases susceptibility to root pests and pathogens including Phytophthora species. The causal species of Phytophthora diseases in Florida citrus are Phytophthora nicotianae (parasitica), the most common cause of foot rot (gummosis) and root rot, and P. palmivora, which most often is the cause of brown rot of fruit and root rot in poorly drained soils with high water tables. Wet conditions favor root infection cycles of Phytophthora species.

Susceptibility of fibrous roots is highest during very wet to very dry cycles (spring and fall). Extreme wetting and drying promotes root exudation (release of organic chemicals), which attracts zoospores. CLas-infected roots exude more sugars than healthy roots, which increases zoospore infection. Evidence for greater incidence of this interaction comes from both greenhouse trials and grove surveys. Phytophthora nicotianae populations initially increased in potting soil at two, eight and 14 months post-inoculation in HLB-infected trees compared to un-infected controls. This was followed by a decline after a major loss of fibrous roots mainly due to CLas infection.

Survey data from Florida groves suggest a resistance-breaking interaction of CLas with Phytophthora species. Syngenta Crop Protection has conducted a statewide survey of Phytophthora species that has spanned over two decades, covers all production areas and is largely driven by grower requests. The survey results serve as an indicator of emerging root disease trends. Comparison of the survey data for seasons since HLB became widespread in Florida groves shows a strong trend toward higher incidence of damaging Phytophthora populations coincident with the rise in HLB disease incidence from 2008-2011 (Figure 2A). Since then, there has been a strong downturn in 2013 and recovery of the populations in 2014 associated with biennial fluctuations of fibrous root density as HLB trees continue to decline (Figure 2B). The survey results have served to heighten grower concern for the

root health of HLB-affected trees and attention to reduction of root stresses.

Past research experiences and current Phytophthora data trends indicate a need for more comprehensive management of HLB-affected trees. Health of fibrous roots is fundamental to sustain soil, water and nutrient uptake in marginal soils. This is to resist fluctuations in soil moisture, root pests and other adverse conditions. Symptoms of stress intolerance include off-colored foliage and excessive leaf and fruit drop in HLB-affected trees, even when trees are managed under intensive nutrition programs for several seasons. Preliminary data indicate that the CLas interaction also reduces the tree’s response to fungicides for prevention of root loss, because the bacterial infection is the major contributor to damage of co- infected roots.

Currently, our recommendations are to first manage soil and water stresses with a balanced application of irrigation and nutrients to the root system (spoon feeding) and to reduce soil pH/bicarbonate stress to sustain root function in nutrient uptake and root longevity. To assess bicarbonate stress, growers test well-water for pH, bicarbonates, salinity, cations and anions and periodically check soil pH in the wetted zone. If bicarbonate stress is indicated, the recommendation is water conditioning by injection of either sulfuric acid (40 percent) or N-furic acid (urea plus sulfuric acid) to reduce irrigation water below 100 ppm bicarbonate, or soil conditioning by broadcasting sulfur in the wetted zone to reduce soil pH to 6.2 or below. Thus far, acidification has produced a more balanced leaf nutrient status, especially for calcium (Ca), magnesium (Mg) and iron (Fe), and improvement in health, vigor and productivity of HLB trees (Figure 3).

After correcting water and soil stresses, the next priority is to manage root pest and pathogens. Phytophthora species, nematodes and weevils should be treated more aggressively (i.e., use of the full label rates and frequency of applications)

  • 32 Citrograph Vol. 7, No. 1

| Winter 2016

A
A
B
B

Figure 3. Valencia orange trees on Carrizo citrange rootstock trees before (A) and after (B) 2.5 years of water acidification in a grove irrigated with water high in bicarbonates. Note more fully expanded leaves and absence of dead twigs in top of the tree canopy after acidification.

to sustain root health of HLB trees. Details for management are found in the Florida Citrus Pest Management Guide (www. crec.ifas.ufl.edu/extension/pest/). Assessment of Phytophthora disease is based on a soil propagule assay that measures population density in the rhizosphere in the wetted zone. If counts exceed 10-20 propagules per cm 3 of soil volume, the following rotation of fungicides may be recommended:

fosethyl-al or phosphite after spring shoot flush, mefenoxam after spring-early summer rains begin, fosethyl-al or phosphite after midsummer shoot flush, and mefenoxam after fall shoot flushes. The timing of soil application is for protection of root flushes that follow shoot flushes in the tree life cycle (phenology).

A B Figure 3. Valencia orange trees on Carrizo citrange rootstock trees before (A) and after

James Graham, Ph.D., is a professor of soil microbiology at the Citrus Research and Education Center (CREC), University of Florida, Lake Alfred, Florida.

The author thanks Davis Citrus Management and Syngenta Crop Protection for generously sharing data cited in the article and the Citrus Research and Development Foundation (CRDF) for grant support.

References

Graham, J.H., Johnson, E.G., Gottwald, T.R., and Irey, M.S. 2013. Presymptomatic fibrous root decline in citrus trees caused by huanglongbing and potential interaction with Phytophthora spp. Plant Dis. 97:1195-1199.

Johnson, E.G., Wu, J., Bright, D.B. and Graham, J.H. 2014. Association of ‘Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus’ root infection, but not plugging with root loss on huanglongbing- affected trees prior to appearance of foliar symptoms. Plant Pathol. 63:290-298.

Glossary

Root exudation: Roots of higher plants release organic compounds (sugars, amino acids, lipids,

vitamins, etc.) that may serve as chemical attractants or repellents to a particular microbial community in rhizosphere.

Propagule: Fungal spores or bacterial cells that transmit a disease.

Rhizosphere: Zone (few mm in thickness) surrounding the plant root system where plant, microorganisms and soil come together influencing root chemistry and biology.

Tree phenology: Plant life cycle events that are influenced by seasonal variations in climate and elevation.

CRB-FUNDED RESEARCH PROGRESS REPORT Figure 1. Adult ACP on a curry plant in a cage provided

CRB-FUNDED RESEARCH PROGRESS REPORT

Figure 1. Adult ACP on a curry plant in a cage provided by the UCR Tamarixia radiata program.

MONITORING FOR ACP RESISTANCE TO PESTICIDES

Baseline Levels Established for 12 Pesticides

Joseph Morse, Beth Grafton-Cardwell, Frank Byrne and James Bethke

Many research projects are in progress in Florida, California and elsewhere looking for long-term solutions to huanglongbing (also known as citrus greening or HLB). In the interim, area-wide, coordinated chemical control of the Asian citrus psyllid (ACP) is critical to slowing the spread of HLB in California.

One danger of aggressive ACP chemical control, however, is that resistance can develop in the psyllids to some of the more effective and persistent classes of chemistries such as neonicotinoids and pyrethroids (Tiwari et al. 2011, 2012, 2013). We are reporting here on baseline ACP resistance monitoring designed to determine the susceptibility of a California ACP population with minimal past exposure to 12 pesticides that will be used for control in future years.

  • 34 Citrograph Vol. 7, No. 1

| Winter 2016

High ACP field populations soon after a treatment are not always due to resistance - several factors can be at play. In some cases, high populations of adults are present and re- invade a treated area soon after treatment, especially if a substantial amount of attractive flush is present. In other cases, spray timing, choice of chemical or application method is not ideal. In some situations, natural enemy levels are low in the treated grove due to past treatment history and thus do not contribute to pest management. Baseline resistance levels established in the current study can be used in the future to differentiate pesticide resistance from other factors leading to less than expected field control.

The University of California (UC) Riverside ACP colony used in these trials was initiated from psyllids collected from a curry leaf tree (Murraya koenigii) in Azusa, California, on three dates by David Morgan and the staff of the California Department of Food and Agriculture (CDFA) Biocontrol Program during February 24-27, 2012.

ACP was first discovered in California in 2008, and it is assumed that this population migrated north from Mexico after having moved originally into southeastern Mexico from Florida

High ACP field populations soon after a treatment are not always due to resistance - several

Figure 2. Lindsay Robinson aspirates about 20 adult ACP into each vial just before a baseline resistance micro-applicator test.

and then westward into northwestern Mexico. We assume these psyllids had little exposure to pesticides in California, although it is possible that past generations were treated to some degree in Florida and/or Mexico. Psyllids were reared under CDFA permit, mostly on curry leaf plants (some citrus was added to rearing cages) in the UC Riverside Insectary by the Richard Stouthamer laboratory (CRB Project 5500-196) and were used mostly for the Tamarixia radiata biocontrol- rearing program. In addition, Project 5500-196 provided ACP nymphs and adults to other research projects, such as for this baseline resistance-monitoring project.

In conducting this work, we used six- to seven-day-old adult ACP, which were provided to us on a curry plant inside a cage (Figure 1). A small hand-held mouth aspirator was used to collect about 20 adults into a small plastic vial (Figure 2). Then, a small drop of molten agar was poured onto the bottom of an 8.5 cm diameter Petri dish; once it solidified, a piece of grapefruit leaf from the UC Riverside Biocontrol Grove was dipped into the agar at one end to ensure it would remain fresh during the entire study. The leaf served as a food source for the psyllids to feed on (Figure 3). For each trial, we included three replicates of each pesticide rate, with 20 ACP adults in

High ACP field populations soon after a treatment are not always due to resistance - several

Figure 3. A small drop of liquid agar is poured on the bottom of a Petri dish and allowed to solidify prior to placing part of a clean citrus leaf.

Figure 4. Three Petri dishes were set up per treatment; these are the acetone controls prior

Figure 4. Three Petri dishes were set up per treatment; these are the acetone controls prior to introduction of about 20 micro-applicator-treated ACP from each collection vial.

each replicate per dish (Figure 4). Prior to pesticide exposure, adult ACP were knocked out by exposure to carbon dioxide for 60 seconds (Figure 5). With practice, so that treatments could be applied quickly, the adults remained unconscious long enough to apply a pesticide dose to each psyllid.

The intent of our studies was to use methods similar to those used by Tiwari et al. (2011) in Florida so that California and Florida psyllid insecticide resistance data could be compared. A Burkard Auto Micro-applicator was used to apply small droplets of technical grade insecticide dissolved in 100 percent acetone to the dorsal (back) surface of individual adult ACP. The foot pedal activating droplet discharge out of the micro-applicator syringe made it possible for one person to hold the 20 ACP on a piece of filter paper, apply a droplet to each psyllid and then remove them from the syringe tip with a small paint brush (Figure 6).

In three preliminary trials on June 12, 20 and 28, 2012, we evaluated the Tiwari et al. (2011) method. Whereas they applied a 0.2 µl droplet to each psyllid, we decided to use 0.8 µl, so that we were sure each psyllid received a consistent exposure before the acetone in the droplet evaporated. In these preliminary trials, we also (1) evaluated the minimum exposure to carbon dioxide that was needed and settled on

  • 60 seconds; (2) confirmed that using 100 percent acetone

resulted in acceptable control (acetone only) mortality; and (3) compared holding treated psyllids for 24 vs. 48 hours before mortality was assessed, settling on 48 hours (Tiwari et al. 2011 used 24 hours). Live adult ACP with their characteristic feeding posture at 45° off the leaf were easy to tell from dead

ACP (Figure 7). If there was any question, a small clean paint

  • 36 Citrograph Vol. 7, No. 1

| Winter 2016

Figure 4. Three Petri dishes were set up per treatment; these are the acetone controls prior

Figure 5. Adults in a vial are knocked out with carbon dioxide.

brush was used to prod the psyllid to confirm whether it was dead or alive.

We conducted a total of 59 micro-applicator bioassays from July 2, 2012, to August 27, 2014 (details listed in Table 1). Technical grade insecticides (except formetanate) used in these trials included abamectin (92 percent active ingredient

Figure 6. A 0.8 µl droplet of pesticide in acetone is applied to each ACP adult

Figure 6. A 0.8 µl droplet of pesticide in acetone is applied to each ACP adult with a micro-applicator while they are still knocked out with carbon dioxide. The ACP adult is removed from the micro-applicator syringe tip with a small paint brush.

Figure 6. A 0.8 µl droplet of pesticide in acetone is applied to each ACP adult

Figure 7. Dead ACP adults on the leaf in a Petri dish when the bioassay is evaluated 24 hours after micro-applicator treatment.

[AI]; trade name Agri-Mek), chlorpyrifos (97 percent; Lorsban), cyantraniliprole (97.1 percent; Exirel), fenpropathrin (91.7 percent; Danitol), flupradifurone (99 percent; Sivanto), formetanate hydrochloride (92 percent; Carzol SP), imidacloprid (98.8 percent; Admire Pro), spinetoram (84.4 percent; Delegate), sulfoxaflor (97.9 percent; Sequoia), thiamethoxam (98-100 percent, assumed 98 percent in AI

calculations; Actara), tolfenpyrad (99.5 percent; Bexar),and zeta-cypermethrin (93.6 percent; Mustang).

Each pesticide (except Sivanto) was tested twice – first, in Round 1 tests and, second, in Round 2. Sivanto prime was received late enough so that only Round 2 testing was done. Each material was tested on one to six bioassay dates

per round until consistent data were obtained resulting in a good log pesticide dose – probit mortality regression (a Chi- square statistic greater than p=0.05, see Table 1). A total of 33 bioassays were needed for the 11 pesticides tested in Round 1,

and this work was completed from July 2, 2012, to January 8,

  • 2014. Data from six bioassays during Round 1 were discarded

due to high control mortality (14 percent or higher). In the

remaining 27 Round 1 trials, control mortality ranged from

  • 0 - 11.5 percent, averaging 3.6 percent. Round 2 bioassays of

all 12 pesticides were done from July 17, 2013, to August 27,

  • 2014. During Round 2, we discarded data from two bioassays

with high control mortality (16 percent or higher). Data from

  • 24 Round 2 bioassays were used in probit regressions, and

control mortality ranged from 0 - 7.8 percent, with a mean of

3.2 percent.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Probit regressions were done separately for Round 1 and Round

  • 2 bioassays using SAS/STAT software v9.3 (SAS Institute, Cary,

North Carolina). Data are shown in Table 1 with pesticides

listed according to their class of chemistry. LD95 is the Lethal Dose estimated from the micro-applicator data needed to kill

  • 95 percent of the tested ACP population. Table 1 also lists the

estimated LD95 values as a fraction of the normal ACP field use rate. This is a somewhat arbitrary comparison as the pesticide concentration for the LC95 is based on applying technical grade material in acetone in a 0.8 µl droplet to the back of each psyllid, whereas the field pesticide use rate is based on speed sprayer application assuming 200 gallons of water per acre. Some of the older materials, e.g., organophosphates (Lorsban) and carbamates (Carzol), are used at significantly higher per acre use rates than many of the newer pesticides.

In general, the estimated LD50 and LD95 values were similar in Round 1 and Round 2 bioassays. In seven of 11 cases (Actara, Exirel, Delegate, Admire Pro, Bexar, Sequoia, Carzol), the LD50 values in Round 1 bioassays were considered the same as in Round 2 bioassays based on overlap of the 95 percent confidence intervals (CIs in Table 1).

In the four remaining cases (Agri-Mek, Mustang, Danitol, Lorsban), the Round 2 LD50 was slightly higher than that observed in Round 1. In 10 of 11 cases, the Round 1 and Round 2 LD95 estimates were the same. This was not true only with Admire Pro. In this case, the Round 2 LD95 was somewhat lower than that seen in the Round 1 bioassay. Overall, we view LD values as being similar in Round 1 and Round 2 bioassays, but for the purpose of future resistance monitoring efforts, suggest that Round 1 results be used for comparison as these tests were done relatively soon after the ACP population was collected from the field. Round 1 tests were done an average of 14.1 months after field collection (range of five [Bexar] -21 [Sequoia] months; 16 months with Carzol) and Round 2 tests 23.7 months after collection.

In

10

of

11

cases, the

Round 2 regression line slope was

steeper than that of

the

Round

1

slope. The slope

of the

regression line is considered an indication of how diverse or uniform the tested population is, with a steeper slope being indicative of a population with less diversity. For the 10 cases where Round 2 slopes were steeper than Round 1, the average slope during Round 1 tests was 3.24, whereas Round 2 slopes averaged 4.60, an increase of 1.37. For these 10 cases, Round 2 bioassays were started an average of nine months after Round 1 bioassays ended (range of three months with Delegate to 17 months with Mustang). This increase of slopes with increased time in culture was not unexpected. It is well known that insect populations become less diverse the longer they are reared in lab cultures.

We designed this study so that data we generated might be compared to data developed on Florida ACP populations by Tiwari et al (2011). Their work was done on a lab population of ACP that had been in culture since 2000, and testing was done on that colony and on five field populations during 2009 and 2010. Tiwari et al (2011) studied six of the same pesticides we examined, and they generated a total of 33 probit regressions (six bioassays with each of Actara, Admire Pro, Agri-Mek, Danitol and Lorsban; only the lab colony and two field populations were examined with Delegate). Comparing their data with our Round 1 data, 30/33 Florida bioassays gave LC95 values that agreed with California levels (the exceptions were one Florida field population treated with Actara and two treated with Danitol that gave lower LC95s).

We hope that these data will be useful in the future to evaluate the possible appearance of pesticide resistance in ACP field populations. We know that many of the pesticides used for psyllid control are quite persistent and hope that growers will rotate between different classes of chemistry. Should a suspected case of resistance appear, we now have a method of determining whether or not the resistance is real and how severe it is. Initially, field resistance bioassays might be done by choosing several discriminating doses, perhaps at the LD50 and LC95, and testing adult ACP with a micro-applicator directly after field collection.

per round until consistent data were obtained resulting in a good log pesticide dose – probit

Joseph G. Morse, Ph.D., is a professor of entomology, Beth Grafton-Cardwell, Ph.D., is an extension specialist and Frank Byrne, Ph.D., is an associate researcher, all in the Department of Entomology at UC Riverside. James Bethke is the UC Cooperative Extension Floriculture and Nursery Farm Advisor for San Diego and Riverside counties.

CRB Project No. 5500-189

Acknowledgements

We thank the Citrus Research Board for funding this research in part and also the chemical companies who provided technical product for testing. We thank Jan Hare, Lisa Forster and others in the Richard Stouthamer laboratory, who provided ACP for testing under CRB Project No. 5500-196. We also thank Alan Urena, Lindsay Robinson and Janine Almanzor for technical assistance.

38

Citrograph Vol. 7, No. 1

|

Winter 2016

Table 1. Baseline susceptibility of Asian citrus psyllid adults to 12 insecticides listed by class of chemistry.

Table 1. Baseline susceptibility of Asian citrus psyllid adults to 12 insecticides listed by class of chemistry.

   
 

Ratio of

 
 

Pesticide

ACP Field

1,000*

Pesticide

trade

LD 50

Chi-

LD 95

Typical

use rate

LD 95 to

IRAC

common

(ng AI/

square

name

(ng AI/

ACP field

converted to

field use

Class a name

Bioassay test dates

Slope ± SE

(company)

statistic

insect) c

N b

95% Ci d

insect) c

95% Ci d

use rate

mg AI/liter e

rate f

 

Class 1A (carbamates)

5-8-13; 6-5-13; 7-5-

6.0917 ± 0.4096

Carzol 92 SP

0.1716

570

32.2114 a 30.4832-33.9718

59.9828 a

55.2013-66.4935 1.25 lb/a

689.1

87.0

formetanate

13

 

(Gowan) formetanate, Round 2

4.9094 ± 0.3857

4-8-14; 5-13-14

0.4607

420

34.7369 a 32.2420-37.4984

75.1332 a

66.0530-88.8990

Class 1B (organophosphates)

 
 

10-2-13; 11-13-13;

Lorsban Advanced

4.2610 ± 0.4286

0.1973

354

10.3481 a 9.3399-11.5586

25.1703 a

20.8504-32.9151 6 pts/a

1,687.5

14.9

chlorpyrifos

11-20-13

3.755 EC

(Dow)

chlorpyrifos, Round 2

4-24-14; 5-12-14; 6 11-14; 7-8-14; 7-9- 14; 7-23-14

5.0234 ± 0.2744

0.8716

932

15.0516 b 14.2124-15.9941

31.9907 a

28.8779-36.1855

 

Class 3A (pyrethroids)

10-24-12; 1-9-13

2.1990 ± 0.2313

Danitol 2.4 EC

fenpropathrin

4.1845 a

0.7529

251

3.3012-5.5469

23.4234 a

15.1553-44.1153 16 fl oz/a

179.8

130.3

(Valent) fenpropathrin, Round 2

4.5397 ± 0.4456

7.6217 b

0.4637

8-7-13

302

6.8886-8.4483

17.5543 a

14.8621-22.1481

zeta-cypermethrin Mustang 1.4 EC (FMC)

2-27-13; 3-13-13

1.8723 ± 0.2000

0.5044 a

0.2889

394

0.3688-0.6429

3.8133 a

2.8392-5.7455

4.3 oz/a

30.2

126.3

zeta-cypermethrin, Round 2

8-12-14; 8-28-14

2.8376 ± 0.2071

1.0716 b

0.2302

609

0.9764-1.1777

4.0709 a

3.3606-5.2209

 

Class 4A (Neonicotinoids)

Admire Pro 4.6 EC 8-15-12; 9-26-12;

2.5470 ± 0.2165

imidacloprid

10-10-12

0.6181 a

0.1067

565

0.5449-0.7086

2.7342 b

2.0953-3.9257

7 fl oz/a

150.7

18.1

(Bayer) imidacloprid, Round 2

5.6308 ± 0.6922

0.7270 a

7-17-13

0.7033

245

0.6555-0.8053

1.4244 a

1.2169-1.8093

1-16-13; 1-30-13

Actara 25% WDG

4.6172 ± 0.4255

thiamethoxam

0.4234 a

0.2905

443

0.3899-0.4612

0.9616 a

0.8252-1.1880

5.5 oz/a

51.5

18.7

(Syngenta) thiamethoxam, Round 2

5.9113 ± 0.6075

0.3382 a

7-24-13

0.6549

242

0.3504-0.4145

0.7248 a

0.6403-0.8624

Class 4C (nicotinic acetylcholine receptor agonists)

 
 

9-18-13; 10-9-13;

4.1400 ± 0.2826

Sequoia 2 EC

sulfoxaflor

11-25-13

3.1617 a

0.2212

623

2.8722-3.4624

7.8919 a

6.9625-9.2009

5.75 fl oz/a

53.8

146.6

(Dow)

sulfoxaflor, Round 2

5.8523 ± 0.6248

3.4192 a

4-15-14

0.8370

262

3.1254-3.7240

6.5312 a

5.7362-7.8553

 

Class 4D (butenolide)

8-7-14; 8-14-14; 8-

2.8398 ± 0.1763

Sivanto 1.67 EC

flupyradifurone g

15.1775

0.3959

27-14

782

13.7792-16.6333

57.6000

49.4197-69.5275 14 fl oz/a

131.1

439.4

(Bayer)

 

Class 5 (spinosyns)

9-11-13; 9-24-13; 1

Delegate 25% WG

3.5879 ± 0.3157

spinetoram

0.8561 a

0.9544

8-14

372

0.7556-0.9799

2.4603 a

1.9863-3.2843

6 oz/a

56.2

43.8

 

(Dow) spinetoram, Round 2

3.7880 ± 0.2726

4-18-14; 5-7-14

0.9720 a

0.2280

602

0.9025-1.0504

2.6416 a

2.2712-3.2108

Class 6 (avermectins, milbemycins)

 
 

2.7986 ± 0.2262

Agri-Mek 0.7 SC (Syngenta)

4-3-13; 4-7-13

abamectin

0.6157 a

0.1377

462

0.5352-0.7049

2.3830 a

1.9248-3.1477

4.25 fl oz/a

13.9

171.1

abamectin, Round 2

4.1526 ± 0.6214

1.4750 b

0.7538

9-4-13

313

1.2979-1.7861

3.6720 a

2.7200-6.2713

Class 21 (mitochondrial complex I electron transport inhibitors)

 
 

4.0289 ± 0.3676

7-2-12; 8-1-12

Bexar 1.31 EC (Nichino)

tolfenpyrad

2.6759 a

0.1102

306

2.3916-2.9824

6.8508 a

5.7954-8.5838

27 fl oz/a

165.6

41.4

7-31-13; 7-30-14; 8

5.4498 ± 0.4475

2.5559 a

0.1640

414

2.3747-2.7364

5.1211 a

4.6137-5.8671

tolfenpyrad, Round 2

6-14

Class 28 (ryanodine receptor modulators)

 
 

5-22-13; 8-14-13

2.3040 ± 0.2815

cyantraniliprole

Exirel 0.83 EC

0.3602 a

0.2577

336

0.2857-0.4282

1.8642 a

0.1303-2.7977

4.5 fl oz/a

17.5

106.6

(DuPont) cyantraniliprole, Round 2

2.8436 ± 0.3081

0.3294 a

0.2684

4-1-14

314

0.2808-0.3781

1.2478 a

0.9919-1.7434

a Insecticide Resistance Action Committee class (www.irac-online.org); pesticides in the same class have similar modes of action and thus, cross resistance within the class is likely. b N = total number of insects tested at various bioassay rates, excluding control insects. c LD 50 or LD 90 values for a particular pesticide followed by the same letter are not signficantly different in Round 1 vs. Round 2 tests based on overlap of 95% CI values. d 95% Confidence Interval (fiducial limits). e To convert the listed Typical ACP field use rate to mg AI/liter, we assumed field use of 200 GPA spray volume. f Data in this column are the ratio of 1,000 * LD 95 in ng AI applied to each insect (in the 0.8 µl droplet) to the field pesticide use rate in units of mg AI per liter assuming application at 200 GPA. g Technical material received late so no Round 1 test was done with Sivanto; field use rate ratio is based on the Round 2 LC 95 .

 

Literature

Grafton-Cardwell, E.E., L.L Stelinski and P.A. Stansly. 2013. Biology and management of Asian citrus psyllid, vector of huanglongbing pathogens. Annual Review of Entomology 58:

413-432.

Lee, J.A., S.E. Halbert, W.O. Dawson, C.J. Robertson, J.E. Keesling and B.H. Singer. 2015. Asymptomatic spread of huanglongbing

and

implications

to

disease

control.

Proceedings

of

the

National Academy of Sciences, 112(24): 7605-7610. Available at:

www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1508253112.

Tiwari, S., R.S. Mann, M.E. Rogers and L.L. Stelinski. 2011. Insecticide resistance in field populations of Asian citrus psyllid in Florida. Pest Management Science 67: 1258-1268.

Tiwari, S., L.L. Stelinski and M.E. Rogers. 2012. Biochemical basis of organophosphate and carbamate resistance in Asian citrus psyllid. Journal of Economic Entomology 105(2): 540-548.

Tiwari, S., N. Killiny and L.L. Stelinski. 2013. Dynamic insecticide susceptibility changes in Florida populations of Diaphorina citri (Hemiptera: Psyllidae). Journal of Economic Entomology 106(1): 393-399.

CRB-FUNDED RESEARCH PROGRESS REPORT An experiment with 18 RITA© bioreactors to propagate mature Valencia and Carrizo

CRB-FUNDED RESEARCH PROGRESS REPORT

CRB-FUNDED RESEARCH PROGRESS REPORT An experiment with 18 RITA© bioreactors to propagate mature Valencia and Carrizo

An experiment with 18 RITA© bioreactors to propagate mature Valencia and Carrizo plants.

MATURE CITRUS PROPAGATION IN RITA ® BIOREACTORS

Yosvanis Acanda and Janice Zale

SUMMARY

This project seeks to find a way to propagate mature citrus rapidly, as an alternative to budding or tissue culture on solid media, while maintaining maturity traits for early flowering and fruit production. We are utilizing RITA® (Récipient à Immersion Temporaire Automatique) bioreactors to propagate mature citrus, and altering the composition of the nutrient media and plant growth regulators to generate shoots and roots. Afterwards the propagated plants will be analyzed at the molecular level and with biotechnological instrumentation to ensure the maintenance of maturity and genetic integrity.

  • 40 Citrograph Vol. 7, No. 1

| Winter 2016

Figure 1. A temporary immersion RITA® bioreactor for plant propagation. Sometimes age is an advantage. In

Figure 1. A temporary immersion RITA® bioreactor for plant propagation.

Sometimes age is an advantage. In citrus, juvenility is marked by thorns and barrenness, while maturity brings fragrant flowers and delicious fruit. The Mature Citrus Facility at the University of Florida produces disease-tolerant, mature scion and rootstock as a service to American scientists, growers and industry partners.

Due to the current crises in the citrus industries across the country because of huanglongbing (HLB), it is necessary to develop tools that will speed the propagation of disease- tolerant, mature citrus that maintain maturity traits. Propagation using certain types of tissue culture techniques might induce juvenility, which will delay flowering and fruit production. Furthermore, propagation on solid tissue culture media or through traditional budding is relatively unproductive, time-consuming and labor intensive. The goals of this project are to develop protocols for the mass propagation of mature Valencia scion and Carrizo rootstock by culturing cuttings in liquid media in temporary immersion bioreactors for shoot proliferation and multiplication. Some plant tissue culture systems induce undesirable genetic mutations, so the plantlets must be examined with molecular techniques to determine whether the genetic fidelity and maturity traits of the plants are maintained.

Bioreactors have been used as a cost-effective alternative for the mass propagation of plants (e.g. bananas, cedar, coffee and pineapple). The RITA® bioreactor is a very simple system widely used for commercial propagation of plants (Figure 1).

Figure 1. A temporary immersion RITA® bioreactor for plant propagation. Sometimes age is an advantage. In

Figure 2. The initial steps of mature citrus propagation in bioreactors. A) Budstick was surface-sterilized, cut into pieces and plated onto solid media in Petri dishes. B) Valencia shoots initiated from stem cuttings.

A B Figure 3. Mature citrus shoot growth after excision from stem cuttings. A) Failure of
A
B
Figure 3. Mature citrus shoot growth after excision from stem cuttings. A) Failure of shoot growth in solid medium after excision from the stem cuttings.
Activated charcoal is added to the medium to absorb inhibitory compounds. B) Excised shoots thrive on a carrot nurse tissue culture.

The bioreactor is similar to a hydroponics system in that both use liquid media. However, unlike hydroponics, the bioreactor is sterile; the plant material has been surface-sterilized; and entire plantlets, embryos or plant tissues are temporarily immersed in the liquid culture medium for short time periods every few hours. RITA® has been shown to reduce the time for propagation, reduce expenses and improve the quality of the propagules. It was used to propagate cedar, and yields were increased four- to six-fold in half the time compared to plant propagation in tissue culture on solid media. In addition, plants produced with the RITA® system were hardier and better acclimated.

To be commercially viable, mass propagation of citrus should ensure the genetic fidelity of the mature
To be commercially viable, mass propagation of citrus should ensure the genetic fidelity of the mature donor plant. We are
testing and optimizing certain parameters, such as types and sizes of citrus cuttings, the nutrient and growth regulator
composition of the liquid media and the duration and frequency of plant immersion in liquid media.
A
B

Figure 4. Bioreactor-grown Carrizo shoots. A) Carrizo shoots in the bioreactor. B) Primary Carrizo shoots with developing axillary shoots.

Our protocol consists of surface sterilization of mature stems (or budsticks), aseptic cutting of the stems into pieces and plating them on solid nutrient media composed of different plant growth regulators conducive to shoot production (Figures 2A and 2B). It is relatively easy to generate shoots of mature citrus directly from the stem cuttings, but it is difficult to grow after excision from the stem cutting. Mature shoots appear to produce a high level of ethylene, a gaseous plant growth regulator involved in plant senescence and fruit ripening, which might cause shoot death. Activated charcoal is used in tissue culture in an attempt to absorb inhibitory compounds (Figure 3A). Therefore, mature citrus tissue culture is not conducive to plant production in vitro, because the excised shoots fail to grow and root in culture. In our standard protocol, shoots must be micro-grafted onto citrus rootstock to survive, which is not always successful. To understand why the shoots die when excised from stem cuttings, we micro-grafted them onto carrot nurse tissue where they appear more green and vigorous (Figure 3B). Therefore, it appears that the citrus shoots feed directly from the primary stem cutting and not from the culture medium, or perhaps some growth regulators are produced in the primary stem cuttings necessary for shoot survival. This research will improve the composition of the basal culture medium for mature citrus propagation.

Our preliminary results in bioreactors suggest that shoot size and quality are increased compared to growth on solid medium (Figure 4A and 4B). Currently, we are testing different basal media and growth regulators to optimize shoot growth and multiplication from axillary buds. The data collected from these experiments will be the percentage of cuttings with shoots, the

  • 42 Citrograph Vol. 7, No. 1

| Winter 2016

number of shoots per cutting, the size of the shoots and the weight of the total biomass in each bioreactor.

We also have tested different plant growth regulators to promote rooting with promising preliminary results in Carrizo and Valencia (Figure 5). In the past, rooting scion has been problematic. If the majority of regenerated shoots prove recalcitrant to rooting, scions will be micro-grafted onto rootstock similar to nursery practices.

In summary, our results thus far suggest that the RITA® bioreactors are promising systems for mature citrus propagation. It seems that the continual changes to the atmosphere in the bioreactor might decrease ethylene gas and its adverse effects on shoot growth, enhancing growth and development. However, it remains to be determined whether the shoots can survive in the bioreactors after excision from stem cuttings. After optimizations of the plant propagation in bioreactors, the genetic stability and maturity of the propagules will be determined using biotechnological instrumentation and techniques, respectively.

number of shoots per cutting, the size of the shoots and the weight of the total
number of shoots per cutting, the size of the shoots and the weight of the total

Figure 5. Rooting mature scion and rootstock. Rooted Valencia (left) and Carrizo (right) after the application of growth regulators in the medium.

Yosvanis Acanda of Vigo, Spain, is a Ph.D. candidate and a senior biologist at the University of Florida, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences (IFAS), Citrus Research and Education Center (CREC). Janice Zale Ph.D. is the Mature Citrus Facility Coordinator at the University of Florida, IFAS, CREC.

Farm Sales Specialists for California’s Central Valley
Farm Sales Specialists for California’s Central Valley

Farm Sales Specialists for California’s Central Valley

 
www.citrusboys.com

www.citrusboys.com

3.69± acs Navel Oranges, Orosi (Price Reduced)

.....................

$120,000

29.32± acs Ivanhoe Ranch

$788,700

4.76± acs Lake Success Citrus

$120,000

$450,000

$1,250,000

30.66± acs Navel Oranges (In Escrow

$770,000

6.79± acs Navels in Lindsay

 

$200,000

31.85± acs Alta Area Citrus & Olives

SOLD

 

$375,000

38.36± acs Seville Area Olives

$525,000

13.02± acs Open Land, Woodlake

 

$250,000

38.46± acs Lindsay Ranch

SOLD

18.54± acs Terra Bella Land

 

SOLD

39.09± acs Orosi Citrus Ranch

$1,100,000

18.85±acs Lindmore ID Farmland (In Escrow)

$282,750

47.80± acs Avocado Ranch

$625,000

19.36± acs Tulare County Mandarins

 

SOLD

$1,275,000

19.55± acs Teapot Dome Navels

$625,000

69.64± acs Lewis Creek Olives (In Escrow)

$1,250,000

20± acs Navel Oranges

 

$410,000

264.78± acs High Quality Citrus

$8,700,000

 

$225,000

$2,150,000

For Brochure Contact: Roy Pennebaker #0845764 (559)737-0084

or

Matt McEwen #01246750 (559)280-0015

  • 44 Citrograph Vol. 7, No. 1

|

Winter 2016

 
CRB-FUNDED RESEARCH PROGRESS REPORT
CRB-FUNDED RESEARCH PROGRESS REPORT

Figure 1. This project is centered on coupling genetics to proteomics to reveal how the HLB biological players interact at the molecular level during ‘Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus’ (CLas) transmission by the Asian citrus psyllid (ACP), Diaphorina citri. The ACP is the CLas vector, and it harbors other bacteria, called symbionts, that are beneficial to it. The two primary ACP symbionts include ‘Candidatus Carsonella rudii’ DC, a putative nutritional symbiont, and ‘Candidatus Profftella armature,’ a putative defensive symbiont. Profftella is an ACP-specific symbiont and not found in any other insect species studied to date. This feature makes the interaction between the ACP and Profftella a prime target for ACP control, because the risks for harm to beneficial insects would be minimal or none.

Our preliminary data show that Profftella cells inside the ACP respond to CLas acquisition by the insect vector. CLas infects citrus trees, and the ACP vector carries the bacterium from tree to tree. CLas harbors a virus called phage, and the roles of the phage in transmission are unknown. The host plants also have an effect on transmission in ways that are just beginning to be understood.

NOT ALL PSYLLIDS ARE CREATED EQUAL

Combining genetics and proteomics to understand the basis of ACP vector competency

Michelle Cilia, John Ramsey, Angela Kruse, Richard Johnson, Michael MacCoss, Robert Shatters and David Hall

  • 46 Citrograph Vol. 7, No. 1

| Winter 2016

PROJECT SUMMARY

The Asian citrus psyllid (ACP), Diaphorina citri Kuwayama, is an economically important pest of citrus and a vector of ‘Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus’ (CLas). 1 CLas is a phloem-limited, gram-negative, fastidious bacterium that is implicated in causing the most serious disease of citrus, huanglongbing (also known as HLB or citrus greening disease). ACP and HLB have spread to most citrus growing regions worldwide. The disease threatens the future of Florida’s annual $9 billion industry 1 .

The need for novel and effective HLB management strategies is urgent, as the HLB-associated Liberibacter and vector are spreading beyond Florida. The urgent need for control strategies was affirmed in July 2015 with the discovery of 10 infected trees in San Gabriel, California, marking the first confirmed report of HLB in the state since a single infected tree was discovered in Hacienda Heights in 2012. HLB management options currently are limited to ineffective strategies to control ACP vectors and early disease detection, and the disease is a death sentence for an infected citrus tree. Control of CLas transmission by the ACP represents a promising new control strategy.

Our new project is focused on comparing populations of the ACP that vary in their ability to transmit CLas. This will enable us to understand the molecular interactions that occur during CLas transmission. These interactions are challenging to study because there are many organisms interacting with one another (Figure 1).

In this article, we briefly describe each of the biological players and our overall experimental approach. Finally, we explain how our results may be used to help the growers in California and elsewhere to better manage the disease. Our team is well poised to achieve our objectives and to translate knowledge into novel management strategies for the citrus industry. Our preliminary data already have led to the identification of potential targets for ACP control using para-transgenic and ribonucleic acid (RNA) interference technologies being developed in other laboratories.

THE BIOLOGICAL PLAYERS

ACP. CLas interactions with ACP tissues determine whether or not the bacterium will be transmitted to a new tree. Insect tissues that interact with CLas include the gut, the hemolymph (insect blood) and the salivary tissues, among others. Studies have shown that CLas acquisition and transmission are developmentally regulated. CLas is acquired at higher rates by ACP nymphs than by adults. 2 Transmission barriers to CLas in adults are thus stronger than in nymphs. Among infected adults, CLas is less commonly associated with salivary glands than with the alimentary canal, suggesting that CLas more easily penetrates the alimentary canal wall than the salivary gland wall. 3 Among ACP with CLas-infected salivary glands, the titer of CLas is higher in the glands than anywhere else in the body, suggesting that the pathogen is able to replicate in the salivary glands once it overcomes barriers to entry into these organs. 3 In addition to a salivary gland infection/entrance barrier to CLas, there appears to be a salivary gland escape/exit barrier, 3 where the bacterium can escape the insect tissues to infect a new host plant as a component of saliva injected into the phloem.

Vector competence also may be related to the ability of CLas to survive in the insect hemolymph, either by evading insect immune defenses or by manipulating the ACP immune system to be more permissive for CLas. Genome sequencing results have shown that the ACP lacks a complete insect immune system. The ACP symbionts, described below, may aid in the ACP immune response to CLas.

Bacterial Symbionts. ACP harbors beneficial bacteria, called symbionts, in a specialized, interspecies organ called the bacteriome. The bacteriome depicted in Figure 1 is an interpretative, not-to-scale schematic of interactions among ACP, CLas, bacteriophage and endosymbionts based on a figure published in a paper from Nakabachi and colleagues 4 . The two primary ACP symbionts are ‘Candidatus Carsonella rudii DC,’ a putative nutritional symbiont, and ‘Candidatus Profftella armature,’ a putative defensive symbiont. Profftella is an ACP-specific symbiont. They have been found in every ACP population studied to date. Carsonella cells are located within the cells on the border of the bacteriocytes. Profftella cells are located in the center. A secondary symbiont, called Wolbachia, is also found in the ACP – this symbiont has been found in a range of insect tissues in addition to the bacteriome.

Collectively, the bacterial symbionts of the ACP are referred to as the insect microbiota. The role of the microbiota in ACP- CLas interactions is not known. The universal presence of the symbionts in all ACP populations studied thus far, the long history of co-evolution with the ACP and the existence of a specialized organ (the bacteriome, where the symbionts are found) all suggest that these microorganisms play an essential role in psyllid biology. The microbiota may exert some effects on the ability of the ACP to transmit Liberibacter; high titers of Wolbachia symbionts in ACP populations are associated with increased transmission competence of CLas. 5

The pea aphid, Acyrthosiphon pisum, was the first hemipteran genome to be sequenced. Annotation of predicted genes revealed a striking reduction in immune-related genes 6 . Analysis of additional hemipteran genomes, including that of a related psyllid, revealed a similar pattern of a predicted reduction in immune-related genes compared to insects of other Orders. 7,8 The need to maintain high numbers of symbiotic bacteria in their bodies may have led to the reduction in immune function in hemipterans, and evolution of immune-permissive environments in hemipterans may have occurred due to the increased fitness of insects capable of harboring a range of beneficial bacterial partners. It is possible that plant disease-associated bacteria, such as CLas that are acquired by hemipterans, are capable of exploiting an immune-suppressed insect to increase their own chances of transmission during feeding. Many hemipterans are among the insect world’s most prolific vectors of plant pathogens.

Collectively, the bacterial symbionts of the ACP are referred to as the insect microbiota. The role

Bacteriophage. At least some isolates of CLas harbor bacteria- infecting viruses called bacteriophages. Although they are presumed to remain inactive in the ACP, bacteriophage may increase the virulence of CLas or may even be used as a suicide switch to kill CLas.

Host plants of the ACP and CLas. The host plants are also other players. Some plants in the Rutaceae are hosts of both CLas and the ACP, while others are hosts for the ACP only. In HLB-susceptible citrus varieties, the ACP can efficiently acquire CLas. In infected Murraya spp., a citrus relative, CLas titers are much lower than in citrus; and the ACP acquires four orders of magnitude less CLas from infected Murraya than from CLas-infected citrus. 9 Understanding how each of the players interacts with the others is a critical part of learning how to efficiently manage the disease and to prevent CLas transmission. The molecular approach our team is utilizing will enable us to understand novel ways to prevent CLas from using the ACP to go commit its next crime.

EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH

Genetics. A genetic component regulating acquisition and transmission of CLas by ACP may exist. There is already some evidence that individual ACPs vary with respect to vector efficiency. Normally, relatively low percentages (1.3 to 12.2 percent) of adult ACP actually transmit CLas, although a much higher proportion of ACP can be infected with CLas, based on PCR assays. 10, 11 Among psyllids infected with CLas, many may not be capable of transmitting the HLB-associated CLas, because the bacterium fails to infect the salivary glands. 3 This may be attributed to barriers that block the bacterium

from passing through the wall of the digestive tract into the

hemocoel and/or from the hemocoel into the salivary glands.

Such barriers may be controlled genetically.

Thus, it should be possible to select for a population of

psyllids that is either extremely effective or ineffective in

acquiring and/or transmitting CLas. Differences could exist

in vector efficiency among individuals infesting a given

host plant species within a given geographic area or among

populations infesting different host plant species within a

given geographic area. Citrus is a major host plant of ACP in

Florida, but there are other host plant species grown in Florida

that can be heavily infested by ACP. One prominently-grown

alternate host plant in the urban landscape is orange jasmine

(Murraya exotica); pertinent is whether ACP adults associated

with orange jasmine have the same vector efficiency as those associated with citrus. Interestingly, CLas is rarely found in association with either orange jasmine or ACP developing on jasmine. 9,12

There also could be genetic variability in vector efficiency among geographically isolated ACP populations. For example, in extreme south Florida where citrus is not grown

commercially, ACP populations associated with orange

jasmine might be less efficient at acquiring and transmitting

CLas than ACP associated with citrus in central Florida.

  • 48 Citrograph Vol. 7, No. 1

| Winter 2016

Figure 2. Excised leaf assay for C Las transmission studies. (A) Polypropylene tube for caging psyllids

Figure 2. Excised leaf assay for CLas transmission studies. (A) Polypropylene tube for caging psyllids with excised citrus leaf (el). The petiole is inserted into a microcentrifuge tube (mt) full of water, with Parafilm wrapped around the top of this tube. The caging tube is covered with a piece of fine-mesh screen cloth under the screw cap, with the flip-top part of the cap removed for ventilation. (B) Caging tubes in a tube-rack (from Ammar et al. 2013).

Discovering a natural population of psyllids incapable of acquiring or transmitting the pathogen could lead to new strategies aimed at managing HLB. To the best of our knowledge, the CLas acquisition and transmission efficiencies of ACP from California also are unknown.

Our team has started to work on examining these differences in ACP populations from Florida. Colonies of potentially good or poor CLas vectors have been established using individual adult female ACP paired with single males. The ACP pairs were collected in the wild, introduced onto a potted orange jasmine plant in a cage maintained in a greenhouse, and allowed to reproduce. Five such CLas-free iso-female lines have already been established from individual ACP collected from orange jasmine in St. Lucie County, Florida. We are using detached leaf transmission assays (Figure 2), a technique developed by members of the David Hall lab, for screening various CLas transmission and acquisition parameters. We expect to find variability among ACP lines in their ability to acquire and transmit CLas, perhaps variation that exists in CLas-ACP- symbiont interactions. If an ACP line is found that is superior at transmitting CLas, it could be used to improve transmission studies aimed at challenging germplasm against HLB.

Proteomics. Mass spectrometry is the discovery tool that our team brings to bear on this problem. We use mass spectrometry to measure proteins, which are peptide molecules that are

critical to all life on Earth, including all the biological players described above involved in the HLB pathosystem. Prior to mass spectrometry analysis, we break proteins down into smaller fragments, called peptides. Then, we use mass spectrometry to break those peptides down even further into smaller fragments that are unique signatures. From these signatures, we learn many things about proteins, including their identities, modifications, abundance, and even how they come together to form interactions with one another.

Proteomics is the large-scale study of proteins using mass spectrometry. Our team is using an approach called “discovery proteomics” to peer deep inside the ACP and to characterize exactly what proteins are different in infected and healthy insects, and among the ACP colonies that we are developing with variable transmission efficiencies. Discovery proteomics enables researchers to ask, “What proteins are in my sample?” Although this discovery technique is by no means comprehensive, it is a powerful approach that will enable us to discover ACP, endosymbiont and CLas proteins that are expressed at different levels upon CLas acquisition and among the different iso-female lines. Proteins that are expressed at different levels in these different treatment groups inform us of the molecular interactions that are important during the acquisition and transmission of CLas by the ACP.

RESULTS AND APPLICATIONS

At the International Research Conference on HLB in Orlando, Florida, in February 2015, our team presented proteomics data comparing healthy ACP with those harboring CLas. Our data show that once the ACP acquires CLas, interactions with the symbionts, in particular Profftella, are drastically changed. The data also indicate that CLas may be a pathogen of the ACP as well, and that Profftella may be helping to defend the ACP against CLas infection.

We are further exploring these results by measuring small RNA molecules produced by the ACP. These small RNA molecules will give us additional clues into CLas pathogenicity in the ACP. This idea, which is supported by our data, represents a totally novel means for insect control: if we understood the molecular interactions occurring among the ACP, CLas and Profftella, we could specifically increase CLas virulence in the ACP and not the tree. In other words, we hypothesize that we can infect the insect with CLas to the point where it kills the ACP. The success of this approach is based on our ability to understand how the ACP defends itself against CLas and to develop a method to block that defense mechanism. Ultimately, our research could lead to a solution to the HLB problem. More details on this research can be found in a recently published PLOS ONE article: http://journals.plos.org/

plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0140826

  • 3. Ammar,E-D., R.G. Shatters Jr., and D.G. Hall. 2011. Localization

of Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus, associated with citrus huanglongbing disease, in its psyllid vector using fluorescence in situ hybridization. J. Phytopathol. 159: 726-734.

  • 4. Nakabachi, A., R. Ueoka, K. Oshima, R. Teta, A. Mangoni, M.

Gurgui, N.J. Oldham, G. van Echten-Deckert, K. Okamura, K. Yamamoto, H. Inoue, M. Ohkuma, Y. Hongoh, S.Y. Miyagishima,

  • M. Hattori, J. Piel, and T. Fukatsu. 2013. Defensive bacteriome

symbiont with a drastically reduced genome. Curr. Biol.

23(15):1478-84.

  • 5. Fagen, J.R., A. Giongo, C.T. Brown, A.G. Davis-Richardson, K.A.

Gano, and E.W. Triplett. 2012. Characterization of the relative abundance of the citrus pathogen ‘Ca. Liberibacter asiaticus’ in the microbiome of its insect vector, Diaphorina citri, using high throughput 16S rRNA sequencing. Open Microbiol. J.

6:29-33.

  • 6. Gerardo, N.M., B. Altincicek, C. Anselme, H. Atamian, S.M.

Barribeau, M. de Vos, E.J. Duncan, J.D. Evans, T. Gabaldon,

  • M. Ghanim, A. Heddi, I. Kaloshian, A. Latorre, A. Moya,

  • A. Nakabachi, B.J. Parker, V. Perez-Brocal, M. Pignatelli, Y.

Rahbe, J.S. Ramsey, C.J. Spragg, J. Tamames, D. Tamarit, C.

Tamborindeguy, C. Vincent-Monegat, and A. Vilcinskas. 2010. Immunity and other defenses in pea aphids, Acyrthosiphon

pisum. Genome Biol. 11(2): R21.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Jackie Mahoney (Cilia Lab, Boyce Thompson Institute) for technical assistance and are grateful to the Citrus Research Board for funding.

About the authors

Michelle Cilia, Ph.D., Robert Shatters, Ph.D., and David Hall, Ph.D., are scientists in the USDA Agricultural Research Service. John Ramsey, Ph.D., is a postdoctoral associate in the Cilia lab. Angela Kruse is a Ph.D. plant pathology student at Cornell University conducting her thesis research in the Cilia lab. Michael MacCoss, Ph.D., is a professor in the Department of Genome Sciences at the University of Washington. Richard Johnson, Ph.D., is a research chemist working in the MacCoss lab.

References

1. Hall, D.G., M.L. Richardson, E-D. Ammar, and S.E. Halbert. 2012. Asian citrus psyllid, Diaphorina citri, vector of citrus huanglongbing disease. Entomol. Exp. Appl., 146:207-223.

2. Inoue, H., J. Ohnishi, T. Ito, K. Tomimura, S. Miyata, T. Iwanami, and W. Ashihara. 2009. Enhanced proliferation and efficient transmission of Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus by adult Diaphorina citri after acquisition feeding in the nymphal stage. Annal. Appl. Biol. 155(1):29-36.

  • 7. Zhang, C.R., S. Zhang, J. Xia, F.F. Li, W.Q. Xia, S.S. Liu, and X.W.

Wang. 2014. The immune strategy and stress response of the

Mediterranean species of the Bemisia tabaci complex to an orally delivered bacterial pathogen. PLOS One, 9(4): e94477.

  • 8. Nachappa, P., J. Levy, and C. Tamborindeguy. 2012.

Transcriptome analyses of Bactericera cockerelli adults in

response to ‘Candidatus Liberibacter solanacearum’ infection. Mol. Genet. Genomics. 287(10):803-817.

  • 9. Walter, A.J., Y. Duan, and D.G. Hall. 2012. Titers of ‘Candidatus

Liberibacter asiaticus’ in Murraya paniculata and Murraya- reared Diaphorina citri are much lower than in Citrus and Citrus-reared psyllids. HortScience 47:1-4.

  • 10. Ammar, E-D., R.G. Shatters, Jr., and D.G. Hall. 2011. Detection

and relative titer of ‘Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus’ in the salivary glands and alimentary canal of Diaphorina citri (Hemiptera: Psyllidae) vector of citrus huanglongbing disease. Annal. Entomol. Soc. Amer. 104:526-533.

  • 11. Pelz-Stelinski, K.S., R.H. Brlansky, T.A. Ebert, and M.E. Rogers.

2010. Transmission parameters for ‘Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus’ by Asian citrus psyllid (Hemiptera: Psyllidae). J. Econ. Entomol. 103:1531-1541.

  • 12. Walter, A.J., D.G. Hall, and Y. Duan, 2012. Low Incidence of

‘Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus’ in Diaphorina citri and its host plant Murraya paniculata. Plant Dis. 96:827-832.

  • 50 Citrograph Vol. 7, No. 1

| Winter 2016

www.CitrusResearch.org | Citrograph Magazine 51
www.CitrusResearch.org | Citrograph Magazine
51
CRB-FUNDED RESEARCH PROGRESS REPORT COMPLEX CITRUS LURES TO TRAP AND CONTROL ACP Unbaited yellow traps are

CRB-FUNDED RESEARCH PROGRESS REPORT

COMPLEX CITRUS LURES TO TRAP AND CONTROL ACP

Unbaited yellow traps are widely used in California.

Xavier Martini, Alexander A. Aksenov, Cristina E. Davis and Lukasz L. Stelinski