Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
BHUMI MORABIYA
DPGD/JL13/1804
FINANCE
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
With Immense pleasure I would like to present this report on MERGERS AND
ACQUISITIONS INDIAN SCENARIO 2010 ONWARDS.
I would like to thank Welingkar Institute of Management for providing me the
opportunity to present this project.
Acknowledgements are due to my parents, family members, friends and all those people
who have helped me directly or indirectly in the successful completion of the project.
BHUMI MORABIYA
UNDERTAKING BY CANDIDATE
I declare that project work entitled MERGERS AND ACQUISITIONS INDIAN SCENARIO
2010 ONWARDS is my own work conducted as part of my syllabus.
I further declare that project work presented has been prepared personally by me and it is not
sourced from any outside agency. I understand that, any such malpractice will have very serious
consequence and my admission to the program will be cancelled without any refund of fees.
I am also aware that, I may face legal action, if I follow such malpractice.
BHUMI MORABIYA
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Particulars
Page no.
1. Title page
2. Acknowledgement
3. Undertaking by candidate
4. Table of contents
5. Table of figure
6. Executive summary
A INTRODUCTION
7. Introduction to merger & acquisition
8. Merger
10
9. Classifications of mergers
12
10. Acquisition
16
11. Takeover
17
17
18
18
B HISTORY
15. History of merger & acquisition
20
C GENERAL
16. Importance of mergers and acquisitions
23
24
29
32
35
37
41
41
42
43
47
48
53
58
61
66
72
79
E CONCLUSION
80
F BIBLIOGRAPHY
81
TABLE OF FIGURE
Particulars
Page no.
1. Classifications of mergers
12
39
Executive summary
Industrial maps across the world have been constantly redrawn over the years through
various forms of corporate restructuring. The most common method of such restructuring is
Mergers and Acquisitions (M&A). The term "mergers & acquisitions (M&As)" encompasses a
widening range of activities, including joint ventures, licensing and synergising of energies.
Industries facing excess capacity problems witness merger as means for consolidation.
Industries with growth opportunities also experience M&A deals as growth strategies. There are
stories of successes and failures in mergers and acquisitions. Such stories only confirm the
popularity of this vehicle.
Merger is a tool used by companies for the purpose of expanding their operations often
aiming at an increase of their long term profitability. There are 15 different types of actions that
a company can take when deciding to move forward using M&A. Usually mergers occur in a
consensual (occurring by mutual consent) setting where executives from the target company
help those from the purchaser in a due diligence process to ensure that the deal is beneficial to
both parties. Acquisitions can also happen through a hostile takeover by purchasing the majority
of outstanding shares of a company in the open market against the wishes of the target's board.
In the United States, business laws vary from state to state whereby some companies have
limited protection against hostile takeovers. One form of protection against a hostile takeover is
the shareholder rights plan, otherwise known as the "poison pill".
Mergers and acquisitions (M&A) have emerged as an important tool for growth for Indian
corporates in the last five years, with companies looking at acquiring companies not only in
India but also abroad.
feeling of insecurity
surging over our businessmen, it is not surprising when we hear about the immense numbers
of corporate restructurings taking place, especially in the last couple of years. Several
companies have been taken over and several have undergone internal restructuring, whereas
certain companies in the same field of business have found it beneficial to merge together
into one company.
The phrase mergers and acquisitions (abbreviated M&A) refers to the aspect of
corporate strategy, corporate finance and management dealing with the buying, selling and
combining of different companies that can aid, finance, or help a growing company in a given
industry grow rapidly without having to create another business entity.
Thus important issues both for business decision and public policy formulation have
been raised. No firm is regarded safe from a takeover possibility. On the more positive side
Mergers & Acquisitions may be critical for the healthy expansion and growth of the firm.
Successful entry into new product and geographical markets may require Mergers &
Acquisitions at some stage in the firm's development.
Merger
Merger is also defined as amalgamation. Merger is the fusion of two or more existing
companies. All assets, liabilities and the stock of one company stand transferred to transferee
Company in consideration of payment in the form of:
A merger can resemble a takeover but result in a new company name (often combining
the names of the original companies) and in new branding; in some cases, terming the
combination a "merger" rather than an acquisition is done purely for political or marketing
reasons.
business laws in US vary across states and hence the companies have limited options to
protect themselves from hostile takeovers. One way a company can protect itself from hostile
takeovers is by planning shareholders rights, which is alternatively known as poison pill.
If we trace back to history, it is observed that very few mergers have actually added to
the share value of the acquiring company and corporate mergers may promote monopolistic
practices by reducing costs, taxes etc.
Managers are concerned with improving operations of the company, managing the affairs
of the company effectively for all round gains and growth of the company which will provide
them better deals in raising their status, perks and fringe benefits.
11
Classifications of mergers
Mergers are generally classified into 5 broad categories. The basis of this classification is
the business in which the companies are usually involved. Different motives can also be
attached to these mergers. The categories are:
12
Horizontal Merger
It is a merger of two or more competing companies, implying that they are
firms in the same business or industry, which are at the same stage of industrial
process. This also includes some group companies trying to restructure their
operations by acquiring some of the activities of other group companies.
The main motives behind this are to obtain economies of scale in
production by eliminating duplication of facilities and operations, elimination of
competition, increase in market segments and exercise better control over the
market.
There is little evidence to dispute the claim that properly executed horizontal
mergers lead to significant reduction in costs. A horizontal merger brings about
all the benefits that accrue with an increase in the scale of operations. Apart from
cost reduction it also helps firms in industries like pharmaceuticals, cars, etc.
where huge amounts are spent on R & D to achieve critical mass and reduce unit
development costs.
Vertical Merger
It is a merger of one company with another, which is involved, in a different
stage of production and/ or distribution process thus enabling backward integration
to assimilate the sources of supply and / or forward integration towards market
outlets.
The main motives are to ensure ready take off of the materials, gain control
over product specifications, increase profitability by gaining the margins of the
previous supplier/distributor, gain control over scarce raw materials supplies and in
some case to avoid sales tax .
13
Conglomerate Mergers
It is an amalgamation of 2 companies engaged in the unrelated industries.
The motive is to ensure better utilization of financial resources, enlarge debt
capacity and to reduce risk by diversification.
Even if one agrees that diversification results in risk reduction, the question
that arises is at what level should the diversification take place, i.e. in order to
reduce risk should the company diversify or should the investor diversify his
portfolio? Some feel that diversification by the investor is more cost effective and
will not hamper the companys core competence.
Concentric Mergers
Consolidation Mergers
It involves a merger of a subsidiary company with its parent. Reasons behind
such a merger are to stabilize cash flows and to make funds available for the
subsidiary.
Market-Extension Merger
Two companies that sell the same products in different markets.
Product-Extension Merger
Two companies selling different but related products in the same market.
15
Acquisition
Acquisitions or takeovers occur between the bidding and the target company. There may
be either hostile or friendly takeovers. Acquisition in general sense is acquiring the
ownership in the property. In the context of business combinations, an acquisition is the
purchase by one company of a controlling interest in the share capital of another existing
company.
Takeover
A takeover is acquisition and both the terms are used interchangeably. Takeover
differs from merger in approach to business combinations i.e. the process of takeover,
transaction involved in takeover, determination of share exchange or cash price and the
16
fulfillment of goals of combination all are different in takeovers than in mergers. For
example, process of takeover is unilateral and the offered company decides about the
maximum price. Time taken in completion of transaction is less in takeover than in
mergers, top management of the offered company being more co-operative.
Types of Acquisitions
ii. Hostile takeover: A hostile takeover allows a suitor to take over a target
company's management unwilling to agree to a merger or takeover. A
takeover is considered "hostile" if the target company's board rejects the
offer, but the bidder continues to pursue it, or the bidder makes the
offer without informing the target company's board beforehand.
iii.
iv.
17
Methods of Acquisitions
An acquisition may be affected by:
Although they are often uttered in the same breath and used as though they were
synonymous, the terms merger and acquisition mean slightly different things:-
When one company takes over another and clearly established itself as the new
owner, the purchase is called an acquisition. From a legal point of view, the
18
target company ceases to exist, the buyer "swallows" the business and the
buyer's stock continues to be traded.
In the pure sense of the term, a merger happens when two firms, often of
about the same size, agree to go forward as a single new company rather
than remain separately owned and operated. This kind of action is more
precisely referred to as a "merger of equals." Both companies' stocks are
surrendered and new company stock is issued in its place. For example,
both Daimler-Benz and Chrysler ceased to exist when the two firms merged,
and a new company, DaimlerChrysler, was created.
In practice, however, actual mergers of equals don't happen very often.
Usually, one company will buy another and, as part of the deal's terms,
simply allow the acquired firm to proclaim that the action is a merger of
equals, even if it's technically an acquisition. Being bought out often carries
negative connotations, therefore, by describing the deal as a merger, deal
makers and top managers try to make the takeover more palatable.
A purchase deal will also be called a merger when both CEOs agree that
joining together is in the best interest of both of their companies. But when
the deal is unfriendly - that is, when the target company does not want to be
purchased - it is always regarded as an a c q u i s i t i o n .
Whether a purchase is considered a merger or an acquisition really
depends on whether the purchase is friendly or hostile and how it is
announced. In other words, the real difference lies in how the purchase is
communicated to and received by the target company's board of directors,
employees and shareholders.
19
The government policy encouraged firms to work in unison. This policy was
implemented in the l920s. The 2nd wave mergers that took place were mainly horizontal or
conglomerate in nature. The industries that went for merger during this phase were producers
of primary metals, food products, petroleum products, transportation equipments and
chemicals. The investments banks played a pivotal role in facilitating the mergers and
acquisitions.
21
22
The 1980s produced approximately 55,000 mergers and acquisitions in the United States
alone. The value of the acquisitions during this decade was approximately $1.3 trillion as
impressive as these figures are; they are small in comparison to the merger wave that began in
the earlier 1990s approximately in 1993. The number and value of mergers and acquisitions
have grown each year since 1993. For example in 1997 there were approximately 22,000
mergers and acquisitions roughly 40% of the total acquisitions during the whole decade of the
1980s. Perhaps more significant, the value of these mergers in 1997 was $1.6 trillion. In other
words, the acquisitions completed in 1997 were valued at $300 billion more than the value of
acquisitions during the 1980s. Interestingly 1980s was often referred to as the decade of Merger
Madness. The year 1998 was no different, as noted by the huge Merger and Acquisitions
transactions listed earlier; it was predicted to be another record year. Interestingly the 6,311
domestic mergers and acquisitions announced in 1993 had a total value of $234.5 billion for an
average $37.2 million, whereas the mergers and acquisitions announced in 1998 had an average
value of $168.2 million for an increase of 352% over those of 1993. Approximately $2.5 trillion
in mergers were announced in 1999, continuing the upward trend.
The merger and acquisitions in the 1990s represent the fifth merger wave of the twentieth
century and their size and numbers suggest that the decade of 1990s might be remembered for
the megamerger mania. With five merger waves throughout the twentieth century, we must
conclude that mergers and acquisitions are an important, if not dominant. Strategy for twenty
first century organizations.
23
One or more features would generally be available in each merger where shareholders
may have attraction and favor merger.
Mergers where all these things are the guaranteed outcome get support from the
managers. At the same time, where managers have fear of displacement at the hands of new
management in amalgamated company and also resultant depreciation from the merger then
support from them becomes difficult.
3. Promoters Gains
Mergers do offer to company promoters the advantage of increasing the size of their
company and the financial structure and strength. They can convert a closely held and private
limited company into a public company without contributing much wealth and without losing
control.
Impact of mergers on general public could be viewed as aspect of benefits and costs to:
(a)
(b)
(c)
a) Consumer
The economic gains realized from mergers are passed on to consumers in the form of
lower prices and better quality of the product which directly raise their standard of living and
quality of life.
The balance of benefits in favor of consumers will depend upon the fact whether or not
the mergers increase or decrease competitive economic and productive activity which
directly affects the degree of welfare of the consumers through changes in price level,
quality of products, after sales service, etc.
b) Workers community
The merger or acquisition of a company by a conglomerate or other acquiring
company may have the effect on both the sides of increasing the welfare in the form of
purchasing power and other miseries of life. Two sides of the impact as discussed by the
researchers and academicians are:
l. Mergers with cash payment to shareholders provide opportunities for them to invest this
money in other companies which will generate further employment and growth to uplift of the
economy in general.
2. Any restrictions placed on such mergers will decrease the growth and investment activity with
corresponding decrease in employment. Both workers and communities will suffer on
lessening job opportunities, preventing the distribution of benefits resulting from
26
c) General public
Mergers result into centralized concentration of power. Economic power is to be
understood as the ability to control prices and industries output as monopolists. Such
monopolists affect social and political environment to tilt everything in their favour to
maintain their power ad expand their business empire. These advances result into economic
exploitation. But in a free economy a monopolist does not stay for a longer period as other
companies enter into the field to reap the benefits of higher prices set in by the monopolist.
This enforces competition in the market as consumers are free to substitute the alternative
products.
Therefore, it is difficult to generalize that mergers affect the welfare of general public
adversely or favorably. Every merger of two or more companies has to be viewed from
different angles in the business practices which protects the interest of the shareholders in the
merging company and also serves the national purpose to add to the welfare of the
employees, consumers and does not create hindrance in administration of the Government
policies.
27
5. For Example Kerry Group an Irish milk processor and dairy cooperative has become a
global player after a string of acquisitions in the food and ingredients business.
6. Create or gain access to distribution channels: 7. A lack of distribution has been one of the main hindrances to growth of the wine
companies. They are overcoming this by a string of acquisitions for example Fosters.
8. Gain access to new products and technologies: 9. Pooling resources helps pharmaceutical companies to speed up research and development
of new drugs and also to share the risks and place a number of bets on emerging
technologies. In the 1990s 23 pharmaceutical merger to form the top ten players.
10. Enhance or increase products and/or services: 11. Mergers between large banks specializing in different sectors for example when Allianz
AG acquired Dresdner Bank.
12. Increase market share or access to new markets: 13. Car manufacturers turn to mergers and acquisition for this reason. For example when
Daimler Benz and Chrysler Group merged, when Ford acquired Jaguar.
14. Diversification
15. To offset threatened loss of market
16. To increase the rate of growth
17. To improve cyclical and seasonal stability
18. To improve effectiveness of the marketing effort
19. To employ excess capital
20. To change from a holding company to an operating company
28
The purpose for an offeror company for acquiring another company shall be reflected
in the corporate objectives. It has to decide the specific objectives to be achieved through
acquisition. The basic purpose of merger or business combination is to achieve faster
growth of the corporate business. Faster growth may be had through product improvement
and competitive position.
Other possible purposes for acquisition are short listed below: -
a) Procurement of supplies
Services
To obtain improved production technology and know-how from the offeree company
To reduce cost, improve quality and produce competitive products to retain and
To reduce advertising cost and improve public image of the offeree company
d) Financial Strength
To dispose of surplus and outdated assets for cash out of combined enterprise
To enhance gearing capacity, borrow on better strength and the greater assets backing
e) General gains
To improve its own image and attract superior managerial talents to manage its affairs
g) Strategic purpose
The Acquirer Company view the merger to achieve
31
Company Description
Management & Organization Structure
Market & Competitors
Products & Services
Marketing & Sales Plan
Financial Information
Joint Ventures
Strategic Alliances
Financial
Risk Profile
Intangible Assets
Significant Issues
32
33
Human Resources
Tangible Resources
Intangible Assets
Business Processes
Post-Closing Audit
34
Stages of a Mergers
Pre-mergers are characteristics by the: -
1. Courtship: The respective management teams discuss the possibility of a merger and
develop a shared vision and set of objectives. This can be achieved through a rapid
series of meetings over a few weeks, or through several months of talks and informal
meetings
2. Evaluation and negotiation: Once some form of understanding has been reached the purchasing company
conducts due diligence a detailed analysis of the target company assets,
liabilities and operations. This leads to a formal announcement of the merger and
an intense round of negotiations, often involving financial intermediaries.
Permission is also sought from trade regulators. The new management team is
agreed at this point, as well as the board structure of the new business.
This phase typically lasts three or four months, but it can take as long as a year
if regulators decide to launch an investigation into the deal. Closure is a
commonly referred term to describe the point at which the legal transfer of
ownership is completed.
3. Planning: More and more companies use this time before completing a merger to
assemble a senior team to oversee the merger integration and to begin planning the
new management and operational structure.
35
1. The immediate transition: This typically lasts three to six months and often involves intense activity.
Employees receive information about whether and how the merger will affect their
employment terms and conditions. Restructuring begins and may include site
closures, redundancy announcements, divestment of subsidiaries (sometimes required
by trade regulators), new appointments a n d job transfers. Communications and
human resources strategies are implemented. Various teams work on detailed plans
for integration.
2. The transition period : This lasts anywhere between six months to two years. The new organizational
structure is in place and the emphasis is now on fine tuning the business and
ensuring that the envisaged benefits of the mergers are realized. Companies often
consider cultural integration at this point and may embark on a series of
workshops exploring the values, philosophy and work styles of the merged business.
36
Naturally, both sides of an M&A deal will have different ideas about the worth of
a target company: its seller will tend to value the company at as high of a price as
possible, while the buyer will try to get the lowest price that he can. There are,
however, many legitimate ways to value companies. The most common method is
to look at comparable companies in an industry, but deal makers employ a variety
of other methods and tools when assessing a target company. Here are just a few of
them:
Comparative Ratios - The following are two examples of the many comparative
metrics on which acquiring companies may base their offers:
Price-Earnings Ratio (P/E Ratio) - With the use of this ratio, an acquiring
company makes an offer that is a multiple of the earnings of the target company.
Looking at the P/E for all the stocks within the same industry group will give the
acquiring company good guidance for what the target's P/E multiple should be.
37
Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) - A key valuation tool in M&A, discounted cash
flow analysis determines a company's current value according to its estimated
future cash flows. Forecasted free cash flows (operating profit + depreciation +
amortization of goodwill capital e x p e n d i t u r e s cash taxes - change in
working capital) are discounted to a present value using the company's weighted
average costs of capital (WACC). Admittedly, DCF is tricky to get right, but few
tools can rival this valuation method.
unity of purpose. Basically everyone understands the purpose and logic of the deal.
The integration process can ensure that the ideas and the creativity can are not
dissipated but are fed into the emergent strategy of the organization this is achieved
through the day to day job of the encouraging and motivating people and also
creating forums where people can think the impossible. The chart below
demonstrates the relationship between designed and emergent strategy and merger
integration. It suggests how merging organizations can
38
become
learning
39
Some merger failures can be explained by this model. For example, serious
problems arise when a company relies too heavily on designed strategy. If the
management team is not getting high quality feedback and information from the
rest of the organization, it runs the risk of becoming cut off. Employees may
perceive their leaders as being out of touch with reality of the merger, leading to a
gradual loss of confidence in senior managements ability to chart the future of the
new entity. Similarly, the leadership team may not receive timely information
about external threats, brought about perhaps by the predatory actions of
competitors or dissatisfies customers with the result that performance suffers and
the new management is criticized for failing to get grips with the complexities of the
changeover.
However, too much reliance on emergent strategy can lead to the sense of a
leadership vacuum within the combining organizations. The management team may
seem to lack direction or to be moving too slow. This often leads political infighting
and territory building and the departure of many talented people.
Therefore it is very important that a careful balance is struck between
designed and emergent strategy for integration after the merger between two
companies is done.
40
Process and organizational change issues every organization has its own culture
and
business processes
41
42
Companies can also adopt strategies and take precautionary actions to avoid
hostile takeover. This is very necessary in present day industrial rivalry where a
small lack in precaution can result in huge loss to the stakeholders of the firm. Some
of the defence strategies against takeover a r e :
Poison Pill
To avoid hostile takeovers, lawyers created this contractual mechanics that
strengthen Target Company. One usual poison pill inside a Corporation Statement
is the clause which triggers shareholders rights to buy more company stocks in
case of attack. Such action can make severe differences for the raider. If
shareholders do really buy more stocks of company with advantaged price, it will be
harder to acquire the company control for sure.
a bid offer with a compatible price, at that moment which is higher than usual for
shareholders, with conditions to be accepted by stockholders.
Shark Repellent
Among shark repellent instruments there are: golden parachute, poison pills,
greenmail, white knight, etc.
White Knight
Another fortune way to handle a hostile takeover is through White Knight
bidders. Usually players of some specific market know each ones history, strategy,
strength, advantages, clients, bankers and legal supporters. Meaning beyond
similarities or not, there're communities around these companies. In this a strategic
partner merges with the target company to add value and increase market
capitalization. Such a merger can not only deter the raider, but can also benefit
shareholders in the short term, if the terms are favorable, as well as in the long term
if the merger is a good strategic fit.
White Squire
To avoid takeovers bids, some shareholder may detain a large stake of one
company shares. A white squire is similar to a white knight, except that it only
exercises a significant minority stake, as opposed to a majority stake. A white squire
doesn't have the intention, but rather serves as a figurehead in defense of a hostile
takeover.
The white squire may often also get special voting rights for their equity stake.
With friendly players holding relevant positions of shares, the protected company
may feel more comfortable to face an unsolicited offer. A White Squire is a
shareholder than it can make a tender offer. Otherwise it has so much relevance
over the company stock composition that can make raiders takeover more difficult
or somewhat expensive. Real White Squire does not take over the target company,
44
Golden Parachute
A golden parachute is an agreement between a company and an employee
(usually upper executive) specifying that the employee will receive certain
significant benefits if employment is terminated. . Without it, officers have no
stability, and it may represent inaccurate defense strategy in case of bidders pressure.
It can further accelerate drastic and unnecessary m e a s u r e s .
From an overall analysis, cost of golden parachutes is relatively low, compared
with disadvantages of its absence. Officers can have minimum guarantees after
takeover is accomplished. Otherwise inappropriate attitudes can be taken just to
keep officers standings in the market an inside the corporation. Golden parachutes
try to make these challenges for the corporation and over officers, as natural as
possible. Studies show that these benefits can keep chiefs working without excess
pressure and drama, defending the corporation against all, till the end, but with
responsibility.
Poison Put
In stocks trading, the rights assigned to common stock holders that sharply
escalates the price of their stockholding, or allows them to purchase the company's
shares at a very attractive fixed price, in case of a hostile takeover attempt.
Super-majority amendment
Super-majority amendment is a defensive tactic requiring that a substantial
majority, usually 67% and sometimes as much as 90%, of the voting interest of
outstanding capital stock to approve a merger. This amendment makes a hostile
takeover much more difficult to perform. In most existing cases, however, the
supermajority provisions have a board-out clause that provides the board with the
45
power to determine when and if the supermajority provisions will be in effect. Pure
supermajority provisions would seriously limit management's flexibility in
takeover negotiations.
Fair Price Amendment
A provision in the bylaws of some publicly-traded companies stating that a
company seeking to acquire it must pay a fair price to targeted shareholders.
Additionally, the fair price provision mandates that the acquiring company must
pay all shareholders the same amount per share in multi-tiered shares. The fair
price provision exists both to protect shareholders and to discourage hostile
acquisitions by making them more expensive.
Classified Board
A staggered board of directors or classified board is a practice governing the board
o f directors of a company, corporation, or other organization in which only a
fraction (often one third) of the members of the board of directors is elected each
time instead of en masse. In this a structure for a board of directors in which a
portion of the directors serve for different term lengths, depending on their particular
classification. Under a classified system, directors serve terms usually lasting between
one and eight years; longer terms are often awarded to more senior board positions.
In publicly held companies, staggered boards have the effect of making hostile
takeover attempts more difficult. When a board is staggered, hostile bidders must
win more than one proxy fight at successive shareholder meetings in order to
exercise control of the target firm.
control contest. Thus, this device is a defense takeover bid, although historically it
was used to provide the board of directors with flexibility in financing under
changing economic conditions. Creation of a poison pill security could be included
in his category but generally it's excluded from and treated as a different
defensive device.
In India, the concept of mergers and acquisitions was initiated by the government bodies.
Some well-known financial organizations also took the necessary initiatives to restructure the
corporate sector of India by adopting the mergers and acquisitions policies.
The Indian economic reform since l99l has opened up a whole lot of challenges both in
the domestic and international spheres. The increased competition in the global market has
prompted the Indian companies to go for mergers and acquisitions as an important strategic
choice.
The trends of mergers and acquisitions in India have changed over the years. The
immediate effects of the mergers and acquisitions have also been diverse across the various
sectors of the Indian economy.
India has emerged as one of the top countries with respect to merger and acquisition
deals. In 2007, the first two months alone accounted for merger and acquisition deals
worth $40 billion in India.
47
48
49
Jindal Steel Works acquired 41% stake at Rs 2,157 cr in Ispat Industries to make it the largest
steel producer in the country. This move would also help Ispat return to profitability with time.
51
52
approval on two oil blocks still remains pending, this still makes it one of the biggest FDI deals
to come through in India Inc in 2011-12-31.
53
54
55
56
57
facilitates users to create private social networks so employees within the same company can
keep tabs on what colleagues are working on.
Presently, Yammer counts more than 80 percent of Fortune 500 companies as clients.
SafeNet
of Cryptocard
Acknowledging the significance of Cloud capabilities for business expansion, SafeNet has
announced its acquisition over Cryptocard, a privately held leader of Cloud based authentication
solutions
With the acquisition of Cryptocard, SafeNet is likely to enhance its market leading authentication
portfolio, providing both enterprises and service providers with one of the most advanced
authentication-as-a- service (Auth-as-a-Service) offerings in the marketplace. Cryptocards
58
platform will provide a unique opportunity for mobile and telecom service providers, as well as
IT system integrators and service providers, to rapidly introduce Auth-as-a-Service and market
leading authentication solutions to their end users, sources informed.
59
The deal will be via a slump sale, in which one or more undertakings are transferred for a lump
sum, without values being assigned to individual assets and liabilities.
Airtel will get Loops 3 million subscribers, about 400 telecom towers, optic fibre connecting the
towers, and electronic equipment on which the Loops network currently runs.
For Airtel the deal is very profitable as its subscriber base will increase which makes it no.1 in
the list followed by Vodafone.
In case of Loop mobile the employees fear of losing their job. The risk is more for lower level
employees as Airtel wasnt keen to take on board a large number of employees as it already has
workforce in the Mumbai circle, it could retain a few key senior functionaries, although
temporarily.
Opportunity to combine high quality assets in vaccines and consumer healthcare are scarce. With
this transaction they will substantially strengthen two of their core businesses and create
significant new options to increase value for shareholders.
62
The company has stated that it made a profit of Rs 190 crore from sale of stake in Biba. It had
22.9 per cent stake in AND Designs and 25.8 per cent stake in BIBA Apparels. They had first
acquired a 6.5 per cent stake in Biba in 2007, which was gradually increased to 25.8 per cent in
2011.
63
In a way it was a fair deal for the smart phone maker blackberry. It was going through a bad time
as its smart phone market was taken over by other players like Samsung, Nokia and Apple which
are among the top 5 ranking companies in the market. This had also leaded to possible new
routes for blackberry to revive. Even if its share prices went down the deal was for blackberrys
overall benefit.
64
65
signed a
paints
66
TCS- CMC
Tata Consultancy Services (TCS), the $13 billion flagship software unit of the Tata Group, has
announced a merger with the listed CMC with itself as part of the groups renewed efforts to
consolidate its IT businesses under a single entity.
67
At present, CMC employs over 6,000 people and has annual revenues worth Rs 2,000 crores.
The deal was inked a few days back. TCS already held a 51% stake in CMC.
Aditya
Aditya Birla Nuvo Ltd (ABNL) owned ABNL IT & ITeS Ltd. was sold to a Canadian based
technology outsourcing firm marking Aditya Birlas exit for the IT industry.
The deal was chalked out with a group of investors led by Capital Square Partners (CSP) and CX
Partners (CXP) for $260 million (approximately Rs. 1,600 crore).
69
Yahoo- Bookpad
The search engine giant, Yahoo, acquired the one year old Bangalore based startup Bookpad for
a little under $15 million, though the exact amount has not been disclosed by either of the two
parties concerned. While the deal value is relatively small, this was the first acquisition made by
Yahoo, and was much talked about and hence finds a mention in our list.
70
71
73
74
75
76
With the FDI policies becoming more liberalized, Mergers and Acquisitions talks are
heating up in India and are growing with an ever increasing cadence. They are now not limited to
one particular type of business. The past mergers cover every size and variety of business.
Mergers and Acquisitions are on the increase over the whole marketplace, providing platforms
for the small companies being acquired by bigger ones.
Indian markets have witnessed an increasing trend in mergers which may be due to
business consolidation by large industries, consolidation of business by multinationals operating
in India, increasing competition against imports and acquisition activities. Therefore, it is ripe
time for business houses and corporates to watch the Indian market, and grab the opportunity.
Conclusions
The following conclusions have been drawn from the study:
1. Post- liberalization, most Indian business houses are undergoing major structural
changes, the level of restructuring activity is increasing rapidly and the
consolidations through M&A have reached every corporate boardroom.
2. Most of the mergers that took place in India during the last decade seemed to have
followed the consequence of mergers in India corroborate the conclusions of research
work in U.S. with most of the M&A are taking place in India to improve the size to
withstand international competition which they have been exposed to in the Postliberalization regime.
78
3. The M&A activity is undertaken with the objective of financial restructuring and to
avail of the benefits of financial restructuring. Nowadays, before financial
restructuring, it has become a pre-requisite that companies need to merge or acquire.
Moreover, financial restructuring becomes easier because of M&A. the small
companies cannot approach international markets without becoming big i.e. without
merging or acquiring.
Bibliography
Books
79
6) Financial services 3
-M.Y.khan
rd
edition
Websites
www.investopedia.com
www.wallstreetjournal.com
www.ny-times.com
www.economictimes.com
www.google.com
www.wikipedia.com
www.mergersindia.com
www.mergerdigest.com
80