0 Bewertungen0% fanden dieses Dokument nützlich (0 Abstimmungen)
144 Ansichten21 Seiten
This piece of discourse will examine the interrogation tapes of Morgan Geyser and Anissa Weier. The two girls tried to kill their friend, payton, all in the name of the fictitious character, Slender Man. Howell and hunke: this topic is worth analyzing due to the mediated era that we are all a part of.
This piece of discourse will examine the interrogation tapes of Morgan Geyser and Anissa Weier. The two girls tried to kill their friend, payton, all in the name of the fictitious character, Slender Man. Howell and hunke: this topic is worth analyzing due to the mediated era that we are all a part of.
This piece of discourse will examine the interrogation tapes of Morgan Geyser and Anissa Weier. The two girls tried to kill their friend, payton, all in the name of the fictitious character, Slender Man. Howell and hunke: this topic is worth analyzing due to the mediated era that we are all a part of.
Abstract: Within this piece of analytical discourse, we shall examine the interrogation tapes of Morgan Geyser and Anissa Weier, the two girls who tried to kill their friend for Slender Man, a character that resides in creepy-pastas, online chat rooms, and dark YouTube videos. We shall examine the transcripts and utilize an approach to analyze the text (conversation analysis), we shall utilize coding to group together certain elements of the transcripts (emotionless, vengefulness, and intelligence), we shall examine the transcripts with two theories (the Cultivation Analysis Theory and the Identity Negotiation Theory), and we shall flush out two big, prominent issues (gaining power/control and shifting blame). With all of this, we shall analyze the repercussions of media consumption, the process of identity transformation, and how they are connected.
Howell and Hunke 3
INTRO: While taking a walk somewhere, have you ever had that feeling that you were being watched? The back of your neck begins to tingle, every sound becomes a threatening screech of terror, and, off in the distance, you can, almost, make out a lone figure peering into your soul. It is this adrenaline-fueled narrative that has become quite popular over the internet. Slender Man has become a hit media sensation over the past few years, and it has captured many peoples imaginations. Two such victims are Morgan Geyser and Anissa Weier. Slender Man is a creature of myth who, purely, resides on the internet, and he has been known to abduct children. This piece of discourse will examine the Slender Man Stabbing case in which Morgan Geyser and Anissa Weier attacked their friend, Payton, all in the name of the fictitious character known as Slender Man. We have chosen to analyze the interrogation tapes due to our interest in analyzing the effects that media can have upon an individual, and the transformative process of shifting identities that could be a result. This topic is worth analyzing due to the mediated era that we are all a part of. As we are exposed to more and more media, we become influenced by this media, and these effects need to be studied and brought to our attention. In this paper, we shall utilize the conversation analysis methodology and give three examples of coding (emotionless, vengefulness, and intelligence), we shall incorporate two theories, Cultivation Theory and Identity Negotiation Theory, and we shall flush out two issues, power/control and shifting blame. With these, we shall conclude with a discussion regarding how the actions of the two girls were a result of the media they consumed and how, throughout the event, they were striving for a changed identity at the original behest of the media. BODY: REVIEW OF LITERATURE: For this analytical piece, we pulled the transcripts from multiple video sites. Chong, Siew, Skoric, and Tengs article in 2012 contributed their views about video games and their effects upon the people. George Gerbner wrote a book in 1998 that talked about how powerful television can be. Huangs article in 2011 talked about Stella Ting-Toomeys work on Identity Negotiation and gave an example of a study regarding identity negotiation in real life with international tour guides in China. Stella Ting-Toomey
Howell and Hunke 4
wrote a section of a book in 2005 that defined Identity in more detail as well as what it meant to negotiate an identity. Levinson wrote in 1999 about Conversation Analysis and how each member takes a turn in conversing with another. An article from communicationtheory.org in 2010 talked about the Conversation Analysis methodology in greater detail, and it played off of Jefferson, Sacks, and Schegloffs article in 1974 on Conversation Analysis and the original study of turn-taking in observing conversations. Millers article in 2015 gave us some insight as to the background story of Morgan and Anissa. The Control Issues article from 2007 gave us greater insight into the power issue, and the article by Simon in 2009 helped us understand the concept of shifting blame. METHODOLOGY AND CODING: The approach that we decided to use to analyze this transcript was Conversation Analysis. We chose this approach because we wanted to examine what the two girls said, how they said it, and analyze how the media might play into their manner of speaking. Harvey Sacks created the Conversation Analysis approach. He defined Conversation Analysis as a systematic analysis of talk that is produced as a result of normal everyday interactions (Conversation Analysis, 2010: P.2). Sacks and his colleagues wished to analyze natural recordings of turn-taking conversation. Thus, they examined the ways that a conversation was organized and analyzed it for meaning (Jefferson, Sacks, & Schegloff, 1974: P. 697). This approach looks to uncover the hidden implications, meanings, or structures of a typical conversation. The primary aim is to describe how people come to understand and respond to one another. According to the Conversation Analysis article, anyone attempting to use this approach should have a desire to understand why people do what they do and a curiosity to comprehend human behavior (Conversation Analysis, 2010: P.2). Conversation Analysis is a Structuralist approach, so the words and their formatting are examined (Levinson, 1999: P1). This not only looks at what was said, but how it was said. The nonverbal cues and inflections are just as important as the spoken word. Along with this methodology, some different codes have manifested. Coding is the grouping or segmenting of sentences or aspects together and giving these groupings a name. Coding makes the
Howell and Hunke 5
analysts job easier when deciphering a large quantity of information. One code that we found is called Unremorseful, emotionless, or cold. Morgan: It was necessary. This was said in reference to why she did the act. Morgan: Kill her. I might as well just say it. We were trying to kill her. This was her response to being asked what the intentions were. Morgan: It was weird that I didnt feel remorse (Dooley, Effron, Robinson, & Whipp, 2015). From these responses, Morgan can be seen as cold, analytical, emotionless, and completely devoid of remorse. For both of us, remorse does not just mean shedding a tear, but remorse is displayed when a person shows physical symptoms of sadness of some sort in reference to the negative act: an emotional outburst, signs of a wracked conscious, an apology, etc. With each statement, Morgan sat still, talked flat without emotion, and remained matter-of-factly. With this cold appearance, the concept of remorse does not even apply to Morgan. This code is indicative of the coming full circle of Morgans new identity. As she strove to become a servant to Slender Man, she embraced a darker persona. As a result, she became darker altogether, and this unremorseful characteristic came as second nature to Morgan. This code can, also, be linked to the effects of the media. Granted, before the attack, these two girls had some darker preferences and tendencies, but nothing came of it. It was only when exposed to Slender on the internet that they took action, behaviors were modified, and a darker side to the two girls manifested. A second coding would be labeled Vengeful, hateful, or spiteful. In multiple instances, Morgan and Anissa made reference to those nonbelievers of Slender Man who made fun of them in the past. They did this to prove themselves right and prove the nonbelievers wrong. Morgan went so far as to claim a desire to hurt those who mocked her. Anissa: I was excited because I wanted proof that he existed because there were a bunch of skeptics out there saying he didnt exist (Dooley, Effron, Robinson, & Whipp, 2015). Morgan: I have wanted to hurt people before, but theyre not nice to me. So they deserve it (TODAYS TMJ4, 2015: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LNXzdRxrptw). Morgan and Anissa did not recognize anyone in particular. It seemed to be them versus the world, and they seemed as if they wanted to do this act, not only to change their identity and gain power and control,
Howell and Hunke 6
but to prove to those who mocked them that they were not crazy. Morgans statement about desiring to hurt others reinforced her emotionless and cold form of speaking. Once again, this is highly indicative of that colder, darker identity that has manifested from the depths of the internet that produced Slender Man. In addition, this might indicate another motive for committing the act, not just to disprove the nonbelievers, but for revenge. If revenge was a motive, that might seal the deal for Morgan and Anissa by making them seem less as victims of the media and more as homicidal, premeditated murderers. Finally, the coding of Intelligence was another that we picked up. Morgan: He is this tall faceless man who preys on children (Dooley, Effron, Robinson, & Whipp, 2015). Anissa: He can be anywhere from six feet to fourteen feet tall. He doesnt have a face. His skin is white and at his own will he can exploit these tendrils from his back and um like strangle his victims (Dooley, Effron, Robinson, & Whipp, 2015). The vocabulary that these twelve year olds utilized is what needs to be scrutinized in this instance. For such young children, they have an extensive, advanced vocabulary. How did they pick this up? Was their schooling that effective, or was this another additional passenger that came with the media effects? Morgan: We said we were going to go bird watching. People who trust you become very gullible. And it was sort of sad (Interrogation tapes released 2015). Not only was a big word used by such a young child, but the concept of deception and the ability to express herself so easily was eerie. This plays into her cold, sadistic side as well. We believe that her exposure to media had allowed her to become influenced by the people on the web. Thus, her knowledge base and vocabulary would naturally expand. This is a negative piece of knowledge, and Morgan and Anissa were delving into some scary, depressing, and negative content on the media. Their vocabulary and knowledge indicated that they were intelligent girls, and intelligence means rational thinking. This intelligence is a part of the identity that the two girls possessed. Granted, they were intelligent before the exposure to Slender Man, but the darker nature of their transforming identity expanded upon their intelligence base. This new, evil identity made them seem much more intelligent. Did Morgan and Anissa learn these dark tendencies from the creepy pastas, from horrific stories, or from scary videos? The
Howell and Hunke 7
emotionlessness of Morgan, the vengefulness of the girls, and the intelligence that they each displayed are important to keep in mind when utilizing the conversation analysis methodology. We shall take a few interactions from the transcript and break it down to analyze further. Anissa: The whole time Payton was screaming in agony. Saying stuff like, I hate you guys. Ill never forgive you, And I trusted you. And umI am sorry. *crying* (Dooley, Effron, Robinson, & Whipp, 2015). She utilized a pause here when she burst into tears, displaying an expressive, emotional appeal. Unlike Morgan who coldly retold the events of the day, Anissa put much more damaging descriptive words to use. Screaming in agony was a pretty powerful sentence that hit hard for the audience. She retold the last words that Payton said to her, and they related to things that Anissa might regret now. The image of Payton screaming for her life, and those last words of defeat and betrayal, have been etched into her mind, forever, and this might lead to the revelation of her true remorse. She used pauses to display tears and the emotion of sadness. Given the circumstances, some might say that the tears were genuinely remorseful, but it was, also, a sign of something else. This quote from Anissa is an expression of her own identity. Over the course of this event, the two girls were going through a transformation of identities due to the influence of the media. However, Morgan seemed content with painting Anissa in the same damaging light as her. In reality, Anissa was being controlled once again, and she might have been of two minds. This independent identity can be seen emerging through quotes like this. Morgan: We took turns singing songs to each other. We were surprisingly calm actually. It was like we hadnt just killed someone. Interrogator: You guys were walking or you were running? Morgan: We were walking because we didnt want to look suspicious. We were already covered in blood (Dooley, Effron, Robinson, & Whipp, 2015). In saying, We took turns, Morgan was passing the blame to Anissa as well as conveying a simple story. The fact that they were singing despite what had just happened indicated that they were both morbid and possessed evil tendencies, despite the fact that Anissa, during the interrogation, showed a different persona. The words, Surprisingly calm, displayed the fact that Morgan knew what they did was wrong, and she knew that they should be worried/concerned. Thus, they seemed to be completely conscious, aware, and to their senses about the ordeal. Also, Morgan continued to say we, but was that how Anissa
Howell and Hunke 8
really felt? It seemed that Morgan was assuming much, and this revealed how Morgan possessed more power of the two. By calling Payton a someone, Morgans cold nature emerged once again. This revealed that Morgan had severed the connection to Payton, and from her old identity. These lines reveal that dark and overpowering identity that Morgan had so dominantly displayed. She took the power and control away from Anissa when the act began. Anissa: Morgan and I were gonna be like lionesses chasing down a zebra. I was going to tackle her and Morgan was gonna do the stabbing (Dooley, Effron, Robinson, & Whipp, 2015). The image of the lioness chasing a zebra was, clearly, depicted in the minds of the audience, and this revealed their wild imagination and their sadistic tendencies. The fact that they referred to themselves as lionesses indicated that they were the hunters, and Slender Man was the Lion, or the alpha male of the group. The male lion does not do the hunting, nor much of anything. All it does is protect the rest. The lionesses hunt and get the food. Thus, the Proxies, or servants, of Slender Man would be the lionesses and Slender Man would be the male lion. Anissa compared Payton to a Zebra due to the stripes. Payton was not like other kids, and Payton was their friend for a while, so she stood out amongst the others. In a similar fashion, zebras and their stripes stand out amidst the barren landscape of the grassy landscape. By claiming that Anissa would tackle and Morgan would stab, Anissa was depicting who the worst of the two really was. This quote was interesting because it pertained to the old and new identities of the two girls. Not only was it proof of the wild imagination that the two girls had always possessed (old identity), but it revealed the darker identity that they had acquired through depicting such a gruesome hunting scene (new identity). We shall look at two statements, one made by Anissa and one made by Morgan, as they, both, tried to retell the story. Anissa: And then Morgan jumped on top of Bella (Payton) and started stabbing her repeatedly and that is when I turned around because I couldnt stand to see that. Morgan: And then she jumpedon Bella and sheheld her to the floor (TODAYS TMJ4, 2015: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rATMg2Hhu4s).
Howell and Hunke 9
From these two assertions, we can look at the varying degree of how it was said. First of all, both were trying to pass the blame by saying that the other took action and pinned Payton. However, Anissa spoke continuously, without pauses or breaks, and she was fighting back tears the whole time. However Morgan, in retelling her version, was pausing left and right. Was an emotional wave fighting its way through? Or was Morgan reconstructing her own version on the spot? There are many other examples that we have analyzed, but these are few of the best ones with some hidden meanings. THEORETICAL FRAMEWORKS: In analyzing these interrogation tapes, we have uncovered two communication theories that play an active part. The first theory, the Cultivation Analysis Theory, was founded by George Gerbner in the mid-1960s. Gerbner was assisted, later, by Larry Gross in 1976, and together, they put forth a strong claim that television influenced the behaviors and perceptions of heavy consumers (Chong, Siew, Skoric, & Teng, 2012: P.953). The Cultivation Theory states that heavy viewers of television, or heavy consumers of media in general, will have a conception of reality that closely resembles their views of television, or their views of the media that they consume. This theory is named as such because heavy viewers of media are cultivating attitudes that begin to perceive the mediated reality as resembling the physical reality. This cultivating effect has two levels. The first order effects are the general beliefs about the real world, and the second order effects are the values, beliefs, and attitudes formed by the subject (Cultivation Theory, n.d.). Gerbner and Gross saw television as being a vital element to our everyday lives, and each program carried a meaning that crafted an identity for the viewers (Gerbner, 1998: P. 180). Gerbner and Gross went on to craft the Mean World Syndrome. The Mean World Syndrome says that someone who is a heavy viewer of television, or media, will begin to see the world around them as suspicious and the people untrustworthy. Thus, the heavy consumers will begin to look out, only, for themselves. In a nutshell, the world will become a much darker place to them (Chong, Siew, Skoric, & Teng, 2012: P.954). Morgan and Anissa are prime examples of the Mean World Syndrome, having come to embrace a darker reality. Gerbner and Grosss studies, and much of the early work of Cultivation Theory, revolved around television, but Chong, Siew, Skoric, and Tong conducted a study in 2012 that proved that video games,
Howell and Hunke 10
another form of media, could be just as deadly in altering the perceptions of the participants. The experimental group was exposed to Grand Theft Auto IV, a brutal video game. After the study, the experimental group was more likely to rate the cause of death due to a car injury or drug overdose as higher than the control group (Chong, Siew, Skoric, & Teng, 2012). The experiment proved that prolonged media consumption, not just television, could produce altered perceptions and behavioral output. Thus, with this experiment in mind, we decided to apply this theory to the analysis of the interrogation tapes of Morgan and Anissa. The analysis of the interrogation tapes in regards to the Cultivation theory can be found in the Findings and Discussions section. The second theory that we focused on with this piece of discourse is the Identity Negotiation Theory. Ying Huang wrote an article in 2011 that regarded international tour guides and how they balance their multiple identities when dealing with people that come from all over the world. Within the confines of the article, Huang talked about Stella Ting-Toomey, the pioneer for the Identity Negotiation Theory, and he gave her original definition of identity. Identity is the reflective self-conception or self-image that people derive from their cultural, ethnic, and gender socialization processes (Huang, 2011: P.219). Basically, we acquire our identity through interacting with other people, and a persons identity is, largely, reflective of their culture. The term, negotiate refers to how people delineate who they are by pinning themselves in a battle against their surroundings. The end result will be who they are (Ting-Toomey, 2005: P.217). Ting-Toomey claimed there are two types of identities, and they are the Primary and the Situational identities. The Primary consists of a persons cultural, ethnic, gender, and personal identity traits, and the Situational consists of the face work, relational, role, and symbolic interaction identity. Primary is Micro in relation to the person, and Situational is Macro in relation to the context in which that person may find themselves. The study conducted in Huangs article found that the tour guides ethnic identity was the most important in dealing with tourists from different cultures/countries (Huang, 2011: P.220). The analysis of the interrogation tapes in regards to the Identity Negotiation theory can be found in the Findings and Discussions section. FINDINGS:
Howell and Hunke 11
The Cultivation Analysis theory applies to Morgan and Anissa because their decision to follow Slender Man manifested out of the media that the consumed. Morgan and Anissa were two girls ruled by their imaginations. From the start of the relationship between these two and Payton, they would act out their fantasies in reality. Morgans imagination was so rampant that she thought characters of Harry Potter were real, and she referred to the villain, Voldemort, as being real. She, also, brought characters like Spock and Data from Star Trek to life through her role-playing (Miller, 2015: P.1). However, just weeks before the dreadful event, Morgan was introduced to Slender Man on the internet, and her imagination went wild. She began to believe him to exist, and she later claimed to see him in her dreams. Interrogator: Whats he like? Morgan: Um, a man. Interrogator: Have you ever met him? Morgan: No, we have never seen him. Interrogator: Who tells you about him? Morgan: He is everywhere (Dooley, Effron, Robinson, & Whipp, 2015). This exposure to Slender Man lasted multiple weeks, so the exposure was long enough to create a lasting impression, as the Cultivation Theory dictates. With her wild imagination and her dark fantasies, Slender Man, easily, caught her attention, and Anissa quickly jumped on board. Over time, Morgan and Anissa sought to become Proxies to this character. A proxy is one who is a servant of Slender Man, but they would be in charge of kidnapping and killing whoever Slender Man wanted. They began to believe that Slender Man lived in a forest three hundred miles away, they believed that he was in a mansion in the forest, and they believed that if they did not go through with the act and kill Payton, then their entire families would be killed. Morgan: Because I was afraid of what would happen if I didnt. Anissa: I was really scared knowing that Slender can easily kill my whole family in three seconds (Dooley, Effron, Robinson, & Whipp, 2015). Thus, Morgan and Anissa began to plot how to murder Payton and get away with it. One can see how the media began this trend of darkness and evil, and some specific quotes from the transcript can prove Cultivation Theory at work. Morgan: We tried to find Slender Man. Interrogator: Tried to find who?
Howell and Hunke 12
Morgan: Slender. Interrogator: Who is Slender Man? Morgan: Hes um, hes this tall, faceless man who preys on children (Dooley, Effron, Robinson, & Whipp, 2015). Just from this brief exchange, anyone can see that the Interrogator, upon hearing this for the first time, was confused; he was not familiar with a fake character from the internet. Morgan explained who this fake character was with little more than a pause. She even used the shortened form Slender to display familiarity and comfort with the character. She, then, went into a description of this character. Morgans lack of hesitation when describing Slender Man shows her familiarity and belief in him. Another example from the transcript proceeds as follows, Morgan: And he has tendrils that are very sharp. Interrogator: Do you see him in your dreams? Morgan: Oh, I see him in my dreams (Cooper, 2015). Her description of this fake character continued to get more extensive, and when the interrogator asked if Slender Man plagued her dreams, she responded, yes, in a way similar to how a kid would say, You have no idea! Morgan said she saw Slender Man in her dreams, and the way she said it told the investigator that she saw him often and in great detail. They say you dream about the last thing you think about before drifting into sleep, and this proves ever more that Morgan had come to fully embrace the reality of a fictitious character created by the internet. Anissa had a similar experience with the interrogator in revealing how she viewed this creature. Anissa: He can be anywhere from six feet to fourteen feet tall. He doesnt have a face. His skin is white and at his own will he can exploit these tendrils from his back and um like strangle his victim (Dooley, Effron, Robinson, & Whipp, 2015). The second theory, the Identity Negotiation theory, can be connected with our piece of discourse due to the battle of Identity with Morgan and Anissa. Both girls had an identity before the attack, and both would have a different identity after. Before, Morgan and Anissa were not pleased with who they were. By interacting with their friends and family, they found that they were the odd ducks. Their abundant imagination made them the subject of mockery and ridicule by their peers as school, and their teachers would phone home to the parents to say they were concerned (Miller, 2015: P.1). With the culture they
Howell and Hunke 13
were in, an American elementary system, Morgans obsession with Harry Potter and gothic themes was not widely accepted. Anissa was picked on as well, and the way in which she met Morgan was by standing up to bullies to defend her. Not only that, but Morgans mother was unemployed and never around, and her father was schizophrenic and loved gothic-flavored items. In addition, Anissas parents were divorced, and she suffered heavily from depression. Thus, these two girls were not happy with their identities, and when they happened upon Slender Man, they began to believe that following him could make their lives better, and they embraced the chance whole-heartedly. Committing the murder would transform them from picked on, helpless victims to Proxies of Slender Man. While still under his authority, this new position of Proxy would give them more power, and they would be set free form the binds of the dreary life they lived. The attack failed, and Payton came out alive. However, the identities of the two children changed all the same. They were no longer innocent, young girls with a flamboyant imagination. They became cold blooded murderers, awaiting a trial, possibly to be tried as adults. Their new identities dictated a desire for power and, after they were caught, a desire to cause even more damage by shifting blame to another. One excerpt from the transcript regarded Morgan reflecting on her old identity. Morgan: She was my only friend for a long time. She was my best friend since fourth grade (Dooley, Effron, Robinson, & Whipp, 2015). Morgan, speaking about Payton, said this without a hint of emotion. In saying it so casually and with no remorse, this statement indicated that Payton was considered a relic of the past. In other words, Morgan no longer viewed Payton as a friend, and she was as good as dead to her, despite the fact that Payton had survived the attack. Morgan had fully embraced Slender Man and his teachings, despite failing his order. This second excerpt reveals Morgan and Anissas changed identity. Morgan: And then we played on the slide for a little bit. We went into the bathroom. And then we were singing songs (TODAYS TMJ4, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rATMg2Hhu4s 2015). Morgan and Anissa were playing and singing minutes before the attack. This revealed that they had committed themselves fully to the murder, they did not regret or double-think their decision, and they
Howell and Hunke 14
knew what they were going to do. They had committed themselves to the new identity of Slender Mans proxies. A last excerpt proceeds as follows, Morgan: We knew it was going to be at my birthday sleepover. You have no idea how difficult it was not to tell anyone (Bohr, 2015). The way Morgan said this said much about her new identity. Morgan began to retell the events of that day quickly, almost similar to the way a child would speak when telling their parents a story to make them proud of the child. Morgan was growing more frantic and excited as she retold the events. For us, this statement showed that Morgan, desperately, wanted to become a proxy to Slender Man, and even at the point of the interrogation, her only regret was that they were caught. Through the transcript, one can see how Morgan and Anissa wanted a change in their identities, and whether it happened the way they wanted it to or not, they got what they wanted: a changed identity. In addition, this desire for a changed identity came about due to the initial exposure to Slender Man on line. Without that initial exposure, none of this would have happened. There are several issues present within the interrogation transcripts that need to be flushed out, but we shall focus on two of them. Both issues relate to the theories described. The first issue of power and control displays itself through the content of what is said. According to the article titled, Control Issues, written in 2007 for goodtherapy.org, control is defined as exerting influence over ones environment or the actions or behaviors of another person (Controlling Issues, 2007). People who fear what they cannot control, or what is unclear to them, feel the need to exert as much power and control as possible in order to gain control of the situation. The fear of losing this sense of control drives for the possession of control. People who have suffered a history of abuse, traumatic experiences, anxiety, fear of abandonment, low self-esteem, or failure are the ones who strive for the most control (Controlling Issues, 2007). From this list of criteria, it makes sense that Morgan and Anissa would strive for power considering how traumatized, abused, and degraded they had been in regards to their old identity. The issue of power and the theory of Identity Negotiation go hand in hand because as the girls sought more
Howell and Hunke 15
power, it came along with a new identity. The new identity they sought was more powerful, and the allure of power was too powerful not to grasp. Morgan and Anissa both suffered from a nontraditional family setting, abuse and ridicule from their peers, and thus, low self-esteem. This all played into the identity that they were not pleased with. It would make sense that Morgan and Anissa would want to reclaim some semblance of power/control in their lives. In being mocked by reality, they turned to media for support. In being at the bottom of the social ladder, they found a way to climb the ladder of power, and this was to become Proxies to Slender Man. As Proxies, they could hunt and kill, do whatever they pleased, and live with a creature that valued their services. In deciding to commit this act to change their identities and gain more power, Morgan took control. Having the most disturbing history (mental health disorder, absent family, dark imagination, etc.), it would make sense that Morgan would step in. Morgan decided to murder Payton on her birthday at her house. Morgan came up with the plan in the first place. Morgan brought her knife from home to the park to kill Payton. Her actions, alone, indicated that she was in charge and holding the power. In effect, Morgan stole the power from Anissa once the act commenced, and thus, Anissa was once again dominated by another. However, Anissa seemed content with following the directives of Morgan. Anissa, in retelling of the events to the investigator, made a statement that indicated who seemed to be in charge. Anissa: We are going to do it today at the park. Thats what Morgan said (Dooley, Effron, Robinson, & Whipp, 2015). Thus, it can be seen how this sense of power that the two girls wished to obtain derived from their old identity that they were not pleased with, as discussed with the Identity Negotiation Theory. Power also connects with the Cultivation Theory because Morgan and Anissa saw a way to gain power through the media they consumed. The internet was their crutch and support, and Slender Man became their savior because they could become his powerful tools. This form of power shares some semblance to, but is not entirely, hegemonic. Slender Man never exerted any power, himself. Rather, Morgan and Anissa sought the power. The two girls were exposed to the media (power) gradually, as hegemony would dictate. However, since they sought it out from a fictitious character, it is not quite hegemonic. While both sought
Howell and Hunke 16
power in their lives as part of their new identity, when caught, they saw fit to shift responsibility to another, and this leads into the next issue, which ties closely with this one. The second issue is the shifting of blame. When a person blames someone else, they are revealing their inability to want to change the problematic attitudes and behaviors. Oftentimes they will blame some other person or circumstance, and they will say that it was beyond their control, or that something else made them do it. This concept can also be called Projecting the blame. People have mental defense mechanisms that they use, consciously or not, to blame, or project, intentions, desires, or actions that they possess onto others. Disordered characters are aware of this; these disordered people know full well, and may even be comfortable with their actions, but they know that, in the eyes of others, it would be considered wrong, and thus, they project the blame elsewhere. In projecting, these people make it seem that the option of choice is withheld, and responsibilities are avoided. Someone who continues to do this and refuses to acknowledge their shortcomings will never change their ways (Simon, 2009). Thus, a character who consistently shifts blame indicates a lack of remorse. This issue connects with the Identity Negotiation Theory because shifting blame is a negative quality, and the identity that the girls strove for was one of evil and negativity. To be an effective servant to Slender Man, one needs to be without remorse. It connects to the Cultivation Theory because of the fact that the media was the point of origin for this negativity to manifest. The issue of shifting blame connects with power, identity, and media effects. Morgan and Anissa, in committing this act, acquired some additional power, but when they were caught by the authorities, they seemed to want to blame the other. Morgan: I think Anissa stabbed her first, and then I continued. And then Anissa said, Morgan, make sure she doesnt escape! Morgan: She sort of just shoved it into my handsand there is was! And then I didnt know what I did. It sort of just happened. It didnt feel like anything. It felt like air (Cooper, 2015). From these two examples, one can see how Morgan tried to paint the picture as if Anissa was the one who was controlling Morgan and influencing her to do it. Morgan tried to make it seem like she was unaware of her actions, control was momentarily lost, and that Anissa was the instigator. Anissa took charge with
Howell and Hunke 17
the first blow, and that made it ok for Morgan to follow. Morgan did not try and refute the fact that she played a big part in it, almost as if she were bragging about her role, but she painted Anissa as the leader. Morgan: Anissa told me we had to. Interrogator: Why? Morgan: Because she said that he would kill our families. Throughout the interrogation, Morgan and Anissa both claimed that the other started the whole thing. In shifting blame continually, this reveals that they were not remorseful in any way. A person who truly feels remorse will admit to the fault and take their share of the responsibility. Anissa and Morgan did not have to take the fall for two, but in admitting that they each came up with the idea and shared in the plotting and initiating, it would have revealed some remorse. The fact that Morgans entire testimony was given without the slightest hint of sadness exemplifies this as well. While Morgan made Anissa look like the bad guy, Anissa was doing a bit of her own manipulation. Her entire testimony revolved around Morgan being the instigator. She would, constantly, say that Morgan told her to do things. Anissa: And then Morgan jumped on top of Bella and started stabbing her repeatedly and that is when I turned around because I couldnt stand to see that (TODAYS TMJ4, 2015: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rATMg2Hhu4s With this one statement, Anissa painted a vivid picture to the investigators. Not only did Morgan seem like the more deranged and evil person, but Morgan seemed like a likely candidate to initiate this evil plot, and Anissa made it seem like she was not as evil as initially thought. She made it seem like violence, blood, and gore disturbed her, and Anissa made herself look remorseful by sobbing during the exchange. Both girls had their strategies of making the other seem like the bad guy and the leader. This issue can be connected to the Identity Negotiation Theory due to the emerging, dark identities. Both Morgan and Anissa wished to become someone else, someone that would be happy at Slenders side. To be a companion of Slender Man, one would have to be pretty dark and corrupt. Thus, this shifting blame behavior fits right in with their new identities. It is, also, connected with the Cultivation Theory because it is from the media that these girls derived this mentality in the first place. It was only through media that the two girls became as corrupt as they were (Harry Potter, Star Trek, Slender Man). Without the media, they might have had a chance to be innocent, normal girls.
Howell and Hunke 18
DISCUSSIONS: From what has been discussed, it can be seen how our methodology of conversation analysis, our three codes of emotionlessness, vengefulness, and intelligence, the Cultivation Theory, the Identity Negotiation Theory, and the issues of power and shifting blame are all connected. The Cultivation Theory analyzes the point of origin with the exposure to this dark form of media (internet), and this exposure led these girls to take action to transform who they were to become someone they could be pleased with, and this is where the Identity Negotiation Theory comes into play. The issue of acquiring power goes hand in hand with the new identity they were striving for because the primary motivator for both was the access to more power. Then, once the act was initiated, Morgan displayed her dark, corrupt identity in stealing the power away from Anissa and manipulating her once again. With the new identities being of a darker nature, the element of blame shifting can be seen as second nature. Finally, the three codes of emotionless, vengefulness, and intelligence all play into that new identity that they acquired from the spark of the media. This Slender Man stabbing case is highly indicative that the media can have profound impacts upon a persons behavior. Whereas previous studies focused, largely, on the effects of television, we stress that all forms of media are just as potent, and future studies need to analyze the various forms of media and their effects. We live in a mediated world, and there are many different types of media. As our world delves deeper into media, we construct our lives around it as well. Social media rules our personal lives, television rules our relaxation time, and video games rule our entertainment time. In addition, future studies should not only analyze media effects, but the additional effect of peer pressure. Morgan and Anissa fueled each other, and they convinced each other to go through with the plan when one felt hesitation. Thus, peer pressure to do something this atrocious is a significant area to analyze. CONCLUSION: The interrogation tapes of Morgan Geyser and Anissa Weier have been analyzed with a certain methodology, three examples of coding, two theories, and two prominent issues. How could two children so young do something so awful? The media can be very persuasive, and the struggle to find the truth about oneself can be derived from the media due to less appealing physical circumstances. The next time
Howell and Hunke 19
you go out for a walk, imagine yourself in the shoes of Morgan and Anissa. Imagine seeing a tall, slender figure in the distance, watching your every move. Now, imagine what it must have been like to be Payton, betrayed by your closest friends for a cause that held no foundation. Payton is lucky to be alive, and when you think about Payton, remember that the media can be very persuasive. Make your own reality from reality.
Howell and Hunke 20
Works Cited Bohr, N. (2015 Feb 19). Interrogation tapes in Slender Man stabbing released. Retrieved from: http://www.wisn.com/news/interrogation-tapes-in-slender-man-stabbing-released/31367720 Chong, Y.M.G., Siew, S.C.A., Skoric, M.M., & Teng, K.Z.S. (2012). Cultivation effects of video games: A longer-term experimental test of First- and Second-Order effects. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 31, 952-971. Cooper, A. (2015 Feb 20). Chilling Slenderman interrogation tapes released. Retrieved from http://www.cnn.com/videos/us/2015/02/20/ac-dnt-kaye-slenderman-interrogation-tapes.cnn Dooley, S, Effron, L, Robinson, K, & Whipp, E. (2015 Feb 21). Slender Man' interrogation tapes reveal shocking new details about alleged stabbing plot. Retrieved from: http://abcnews.go.com/US/slender-man-interrogation-tapes-reveal-shocking-detailsalleged/story?id=29117234 Gerbner, G. (1998). Cultivation analysis: An overview. Mass Communication and Society, 1, 175-194. Doi: 10.1080/15205436.1998.9677855 Huang, Y. (2011 March). Identity negotiation in relation to context of communication. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 1, 219-225. Doi: 10.4304/tpls.1.3.219-225 Jefferson, G., Sacks, H., & Schegloff, E. (Dec. 1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turntaking for conversation. Language, 50, 696-735. Doi: 10.2307/412243 Levinson. (1999). Handout 5: Conversation analysis. Retrieved from: http://www.mathcs.duq.edu/~packer/IR/Handout5.html Miller, L. (2015 Aug 25). If these girls knew that Slender Man was a fantasy, why did they want to kill their friend for him? Retrieved from: http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2015/08/slender-manstabbing.html# Simon, G. (2009, March 16). Playing the blame game as a manipulation tactic. Retrieved from: http://counsellingresource.com/features/2009/02/27/blame-game/ Ting-Toomey, S. (2005). Identity negotiation theory: Crossing cultural boundaries. Theorizing About Intercultural Communication, 211-218. Retrieved from: https://books.google.com/books? hl=en&lr=&id=E12VSljBmvAC&oi=fnd&pg=PA211&dq=Identity+Negotiation+Theory+stella+ ting+toomey&ots=FwSJTJuUWj&sig=AwpTTvPvtKiyABMXLxvx_GcrJUU#v=onepage&q=Ide ntity%20Negotiation%20Theory%20stella%20ting%20toomey&f=false TODAYS TMJ4. (2015, Feb 20). Waukesha police releases Slender Man stabbing suspects interrogation video [Video File]. Retrieved from: https://www.youtube.com/watch? v=LNXzdRxrptw TODAYS TMJ4. (2015, Feb 20). Waukesha police releases Slender Man stabbing suspects' interrogation video [Video File]. Retrieved from: https://www.youtube.com/watch? v=rATMg2Hhu4s (n.d.). Cultivation theory. Retrieved from: http://masscommtheory.com/theory-overviews/cultivationtheory/ (2007). Control issues. Retrieved from: http://www.goodtherapy.org/therapy-for-control-issues.html
Howell and Hunke 21
(2010). Conversation analysis in psychology, behavioral, and social science. Retrieved from: http://communicationtheory.org/conversation-analysis/ (2015 Feb 20). Interrogation tapes released in Slenderman case. Retrieved from: http://www.cnn.com/videos/us/2015/02/20/lv-slenderman-interrogation-tape.cnn
Raising Mentally Strong Kids: How to Combine the Power of Neuroscience with Love and Logic to Grow Confident, Kind, Responsible, and Resilient Children and Young Adults
Dark Psychology & Manipulation: Discover How To Analyze People and Master Human Behaviour Using Emotional Influence Techniques, Body Language Secrets, Covert NLP, Speed Reading, and Hypnosis.
Dark Psychology: Learn To Influence Anyone Using Mind Control, Manipulation And Deception With Secret Techniques Of Dark Persuasion, Undetected Mind Control, Mind Games, Hypnotism And Brainwashing