Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
In your letter you also mentioned the actions taken by the States of Montana, North Dakota, and
South Dakota to delay implementation. However, it is Minnesotas right to follow its own
course of action. We have decided to take steps to protect the health of Minnesotans and the
environment they cherish. In recent weeks, Minnesotans who have attended outreach meetings
in St. Cloud, Bemidji, Duluth and Marshall have expressed their appreciation for our efforts to
address the impacts of climate change and fully describe the impact of the Clean Power Plan.
With or without the EPAs rule, we are committed to developing a plan for clean, affordable
energy for Minnesotas future, and to get as much input as we can along the way.
Minnesota is doing what Governor Mark Dayton has declared to be the best action: Stay the
course. Regardless of the court ruling, one thing is certain: the movement toward lower carbon
emissions in Minnesotas energy sector will continue. It is consistent and driven by goals set
forth in state law and is growing jobs in Minnesota more than 15,000 to date. Power
companies in this country are making moves toward cleaner energy, including Minnesota Power,
Xcel Energy, and Great River Energy, because cleaner energy makes the most sense for their
businesses. And moving to clean energy is the right thing for Minnesotas public health and
environment. Slowing our work now, while litigators argue, goes against our commitment to
work for a better, healthier Minnesota.
This letter will be posted on our website, as you requested, along with your letter. Feel free to
forward this letter to your fellow legislators.
Sincerely,