Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
There is a need to increase the urea price by at least 15 per cent. The current
selling price of urea which is highly subsidised is almost one-fourth
the world price. There is a potential over the next four years to increase urea
price every year gradually so that the subsidy levels are reduced.
Further due to the product being very cheap, there is excessive use of urea
and this affects the soil. By increasing the price this can lead to more
balanced fertilization and lower subsidy outgo.
The Fertiliser industry is the best candidate for direct benefit transfer
(DBT). Currently, the subsidy is paid through the fertiliser companies.
This is totally unnecessary. If the farmers are given subsidy directly,
this will not only stop leakage but will also avoid unnecessary paper
work and red-tapism.
Single Super Phosphate (SSP) is the appropriate fertiliser for the small and
marginal farmers. The current system of subsidy is not conducive to promotion of
SSP usage. Countries like Brazil have used this cheaper alternative with some
support rather than depend on imported di-ammonium phosphate (DAP). The
whole policy towards SSP needs to be relooked. At least 3 million tons of SSP can
be used in addition to the current usage. This will bring down imports of DAP by
at least 2 million tons annually.