Sie sind auf Seite 1von 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE
EASTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )


)
Plaintiff,)
)
v.
) Case No. CIV 96-196 B
CITY OF STILWELL, OKLAHOMA, )
ET AL., )
)
Defendants.)
)

AMENDMENT TO PRETRIAL ORDER

On February 5, 1998, the United States filed the agreed Pretrial Order. The

deposition designations from the depositions of William Langley and Hugh

Zimmermen were inadvertently dropped from Section VIII of the Pretrial Order as

part of the plaintiff’s trial exhibit list. Attached is a list of the deposition

designations, which should be inserted after plaintiff’s Exhibit No. 51, on page 25 of

the Pretrial Order. Counsel for defendants has no objection to the amendment.

Respectfully submitted,

________________________________
JOHN R. READ
MICHELE B. CANO
MICHAEL D. BILLIEL
Attorneys
United States Department of Justice
Antitrust Division
325 Seventh Street, N.W., Suite 500
Washington, D.C. 20530
(202) 307-0468
February 6, 1998
VIII. ALL TRIAL EXHIBITS, INCLUDING DEPOSITIONS, FOR EACH PARTY,
INCLDING ANY ADMISSIONS OR OBJECTIONS TO ADMISSIBILITY
THERETO, ARE AS FOLLOWS:

Plaintiff’s Deposition Designations:

Deposition of Hugh Zimmerman:


Page 15 line 19 to page 16 line 18;
Page 24 lines 7-21;
Page 33 lines 12-25; and
Page 56 line 10 to page 57 line 1.

Deposition of William Langley:


Page 23 line 22 to page 25 line 7;
Page 33 line 21 to page 34 line 11;
Page 35 lines 6-8;
Page 36 lines 16-21;
Page 39 lines 1-6;
Page 41 line 1 to page 42 line 6;
Page 43 lines 3-17;
Page 52 line 17 to page 53 line 21;
Page 54 line 18 to page 55 line 7;
Page 55 line 20 to page 56 line 14;
Page 57 line 6 to page 58 line 14;
Page 61 line 14 to page 62 line 20;
Page 63 lines 2-8;
Page 64 line 3 to page 66 line 8;
Page 67 line 24 to page 68 line 12;
Page 72 line 22 to page 80 line 6;
Page 119 line 1 to page 120 line 11;
Page 121 lines 11-14; and
Page 130 line 19 to page 131 line 6.

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen