0 Bewertungen0% fanden dieses Dokument nützlich (0 Abstimmungen)
32 Ansichten2 Seiten
This piece appeared on Harvard University's Center for International Development web site. I wrote it after participating in the International Conference on Biotechnology at Harvard in 1999.
This piece appeared on Harvard University's Center for International Development web site. I wrote it after participating in the International Conference on Biotechnology at Harvard in 1999.
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Verfügbare Formate
Als DOCX, PDF herunterladen oder online auf Scribd lesen
This piece appeared on Harvard University's Center for International Development web site. I wrote it after participating in the International Conference on Biotechnology at Harvard in 1999.
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Verfügbare Formate
Als DOCX, PDF herunterladen oder online auf Scribd lesen
Comments Page 1 of 2
Center for International Development
at Harvard University (CID)
A global conversation on biotechnology
Dr. Gerald Graham, geraldgraham@attcanada.net
International Environmental Consultant
Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Europe with OM ood. All ofthis as ren in asthe past few yeas
ifany of thse ts were even he pa eon a mee dead go
‘Wath est response fo oli eer this ss of confer
Stu Ths compromise live i awed in that the publi exc rom the
‘worried about the cost of Terminator techelogy tthe chrysamhemam growers
‘Kenys concerned that x GM version ofpretvum,a natural insecticide (Coll,
1996), might some dy leave them high nd ry fom the medicine men of Ai
tnvious thei secrets wll esol’ by unserapalous bioprospacos tthe vezan a
Reading England wondering whether th tomatoes she buys Tor he family conan
the genes of flounder
shih they sea 8 tetor of high echnology jos swell an engine of row in
the new economy’ They exo the vitues a re and open ade Trae apreemen
appeat to have taken precedence over environmental ones in fernional for. The
publi, ment, fe Becoming increasingly sepia of biotechnology st nthe
hups/évww.cid harvard edu/eidbiotech/comments32,htm 230999Comments 32
Page 2 of 2
‘egulatos, pacity in Buope, is crumbling.
Even the conservative Economist views meaningfl constaton 3s away of
‘estoring the balance: “Public confidence would? be boosed by giving consumers
‘learer sense of paricipaton inthe replat proces, otha! they donot el ha
‘Sch product are Being fisted on them by authors who are cosir withthe
instr than with shoppers” (me 1th, 1989, . 18) Mandatory abling is
other obvious option, and one which is gradually ging international suppor,
Ano, more lob appch o this muddle would bef create anew Bruna
‘Syl commision to engage ina glbal dialogue on the enviroment ethical and
‘Svial ns and themes relate to botecheloay whch should concern us al,
‘These might sefily include risk assessment andthe longterm impacts of|
botectnology. As ates ave pointed out before me, consumer are current the
nds’ guinea pigs for longterm lets
‘Numerous commentators have pointed out that unless urgent measures are taken to
nt public confidence the beach ist sks gong the way ofthe cleat
Indust. Half a century of exaggerate and unfilled promises fom the nuclear
‘lobby, as well as lx environmental enforcement, have le that sector ina state of
paras and decline. The public was old miclear power was sae nd i was lt
flown, Sirs peopl kno ha tere so prtnant oltn Wo spose ot his
level alr waste; underground disposal jst sloushs the problem off fire
seneratons.
At the end ofthe day, itis people who decide whether an industry rises rfl. The
scaled word ade agenda should ot be allowed to raw out imate biotech
‘oncems. Biotechnology, global sue ever there Was ane, no doub has |
bilan future ahead of, but for this happen, people fom around te world
need 1 be consulted before the hard choices are ade
-nup//ww:cid harvard edu/cidbiotech/comments32.htm 23/09/99