_Axtheeve rice depanment Print| Logout Help CLEAR Aiiew incident Home» Admnnistative Hvestgatons (AONPRAx View Incident | | MEW FACE SHEET Log No: 1006636 Type:CR Reporting Party Information role Name 2" Emp UNI positon Sex Race Adcross Phone NON- Reporting : NON. Revoring | ae MALE BLACK PY CHCACO. 1. row(s) 1-1 of Incident Address IncdentFrom DateTime Adéross OFincdont Boat SHICLO! Location code L26800% Zan0R.2006 2190-22 200 3STHST. gag og M2-GTA, —SSTHSTREET REDLINE weaaeoon a eracncor eos Mareom — BLAEORnt row(s) 1-1 of Accused Members Role Name Star EMP Unit position Status Allegations No. No. No. ‘The complainant, who stated that he is bi-polar and ‘on mecietion, aloged that he was "beaten without po. on Accused Unknown « foesor" and fey areted. The compara. Employee Duty fer tte that ho was handed and shocked teotarty. row(s) 1-1 0f1 Other Involved Parties ‘There are no Other Involved Parties fr this Log No. Initial Incident Category List Initial Incident Category Primary?¥ (058 - EXCESSIVE FORCE / ON DUTY - NO INJURY Yes Assignment History as Assigned aesigned Team investigator Assignment pasigned By Reason Domestic cosey, ROBERT STOUTENGOROUGH, en VIOLENCE {PRIMARY INV) 20-JUN-2008 1718 ANDREA Domestic STOUTENBOROUGH, STOUTENEOROUGH, a VIOLENCE ANDREA (SUPERVISOR) 20NUN-2008 17:18 ANDREA http://chris.chicagopolice. org/pls/clear/f2p=15280:5:4178660953277199: VIEW:NO::F152... 4/23/2015STOUTENBOROUGH, Domestic cosey, ROBERT a VIOLENCE (PRIMARY INV) 20-JUN-2008 17:11 ANDREA comestic STOUTENBOROUGH, STOUTENBOROUGH, tates VIOLENCE ANDREA (SUPERVISOR) 20-JUN-2008 17:11 ANDREA comestic MESSENGER, VERONICA Ra DOMESTIC wee 16-0CT-2007 16:22 DUFFY, MICHAEL Dowestic COSEY, ROBERT STOUTENBOROUSH, ree VIOLENCE (PRIMARY INV) ‘18-JUN-2007 1937 ANDREA Dowestic STOUTENBOROUGH, ra pOMESTIC STOUTENGOOU Hy 1BJUN-2007 11.02 FAKUADE, JOSEPH + vera DOMESTIC 18.J0N-2007 1102 FAKUADE, JOSEPH - INDEPENDENT PRA POLICEREVIEW 1€:JUN-2007 1696 GOODWIN, JEANNE - AUTHORITY row(s) 1-9 of 8 Status History : @TIP Every employee included in the Status History is subject to be called for legal or administrative proceedings, Assigned! Resulting Statue Status Date/Time. Croated By Position Brtalec comments nit CLOSED ATIP.RA, PENOING ASSIGN INVESTIGATOR PENDING ASSIGN TEAM PENDING ‘SUPERVISOR REVIEW PRELIMINARY PENDING ‘SUPERVISOR REVIEW PENDING ‘SUPERVISOR REVIEW per 27 § 24-JUN-2008 13:58 PRITZA, MARILYN, 418-JUN-2007 11:02 FAKUADE, JOSEPH sewnvzne7 1921 STOUTENBOROUGH, STOUTENBOROUGH, 16-JUN.2007 18.20 SLOUTE" STOUTENBOROUGH, 16-JUN-2007 18:08 SNOrEa 18-JUN-2007 16:36 GOODWIN, JEANNE 16-JUN-2007 16:38 GOODWIN, JEANNE POLICE OFFICER 005/543 - coor OPERATIONS IPRA. SUPERVISING INV IPRA SUPERVISING INV 445). IPRA Ble + sie + SUPERVISING INV 443). edits IPRA INVESTIGATOR 2 445), IPRA INVESTIGATOR 2 445). IPRA row(s) 1-7 of 7 a Toprign © 200% Auge vaca hittp://chris.chicagopolice.org/pls/elear/f?p=15280:5:4178660953277199: VIEW:NO::F152... 4/23/2015pe persia CLEAR Avennosee My Reporting Category ‘ietnvottendor ‘Waspon Weapon Weapon. pecassed? cata sutenwgon se rig ge Os8 EXCESSVEFORCE/ON CLOSED MAND STRKE QUANG Su tone aes Bas ; : . coms) t= oft Log No: 1000020 Type:c ‘Accused Members ae vane Aesased Overall Recommended Naot Duane comptimeniny me - Finding Penalty Days Serv ‘History 59 BENE. cxoseorina unFOUNDED wa DYE" cxoseomnat unrounoeD na ry ED ARES cosenvminat unFouNDeD row(s) 1-308 Attachments Net Retaed rw iin Entered giatuy — ABBIONE ApDrove No. Type Peron pagan NO ine entre BY Botatime S48 Sentent?tneusion? uN D1 Face sHeer NA = Gooovan, JEANNE. 2007 See 826 wuNse. conrucr i TOUTENBOROUGH, DB ron MA + SBR By a suLo2 CD Erion NA ~ casey. nosenT 2207, ql : June. GD + FevoRToTIER = WA yes cosey,RoweRT 7006” APPROVED- YES fen wUN-19- GED s snaesrneroRt NA 5 = NO COREY, ROBERT 2903 APPROVED ves ‘ee Net DD 5 PHOTOGRAPH wa 4 No cosey,RowERT 2000” APPROVED- YES, ‘ous June D7 PHOTOGRAPH NA 2 No cosey, ROBERT 2008” APPROVED- YES. ‘ous - tyes. eam «FESTA AEOPONSE yz ves coser.nowenr Zi pmoven. es ‘eve TACTICAL RESPONSE ae ems one nee NA 2 yes cosey, RoBeRT 2008" APPROVED- YES. ‘oer aaa aust GD 0 Fence TERY WA 2 YES COSEY.ROBERT 2008 APPROVED YES Sea uw eam 11 ATS RESPONSE uy ves cose, oer ih” aronoven. ve 6 June 4/23/2015com «2 officers earrery 2008 pp ve em » Sr NA 2 yes cosey,rosent 2008, approve. es Juno. GD is RepoRTOMIER) «NA tt «|= COSEY,ROBERT —200E” APPROVED: ves fez wuneie GERD 4 rePoRTOTHER) «WA t+ ——(NO«COSEY,ROBERT 3006” APPROVED. YES Yae ee June. GD we NTERVENVAEPORTNG yy; yes cosev.powenT 20s!” APPROVED. YES 0 i: Net SD tc ORS ocNanT NA YES COSEY, ROBERT 2008” APPROVED - ves uns. (BD 17 PHOTOWWENTIFICATION SA += ~~ COSEY,ROBERT 2008 APPROVED YES fa unre. (GED 6 REPORT(OTHER) ©=—«NA 1 = ~=—=YESGOSEY,ROBERT 2008 APPROVED- YES fra dunets- ED 10 REPORT (OTHER) = NA YES COSEY,ROBERT 2008 APPROVED ves ita aunts. ED 2m REPORT (OER, = NA NNO COSEY,ROBERT 2008" APPROVED. YES. fr unre. ED z REPORT(OTHER, «NA No cosey,Rowent ine” APPROVED. YES fra uN ESD 2 REQUEST FOR PHOTOS NA 2 NO COSEY.ROBERT 706 APPROVED. YES. ims Aunts. GSD ® ePORTICTHER) «NA tN COSEY, ROBERT 2i08"” APPROVED. «YES. fr (CONSENT BY PATIENT Juness- 9 % TODIcLosuRE OF NA No COSEY, ROBERT 20s” APPROVED. YES. INFORMATION irae Jun. BND 25 REPORT (OTHER) «= NA Yes coseY,Rosert GQ” APPROVED. YaB June. GD 2 REPORT (OTHER) «NA 1 YES COSEY, ROBERT 2008 APPROVED «YES i725 JUN-s8- GD 2 veoCN RECORDS «NA 27. NO COSEY, ROBERT 2006." APPROVED. YES svar JUN-20- ED 2 PHOTOGRAM NA 4. YES. COSEY, ROBERT 2008 APPROVED. = YES O35 Jun-20- ED 28: PHOTOGRAPH NA 1 = YES. COSEY,ROBERT 2008 APPROVED. YES Oar JuN-20- OD 20 PHOTOGRAPH NA 1 + YES COSEY,ROSERT 2005 APPROVED-YES. Oa JN. GD 1 PHOTOGRAPH NA 4 YES COSEY,ROBERT 2006" APPROVED-. «YES O49 Juno. 2008 oBs0 JUN BD 5) PHOTOGRAPH NA 4 + YES COSEY,ROBERT 008” APPROVED. YES. ao N20. BD & PHoTOsRAPH NA 4 YES COSEY.ROBERT 7008 APPROVED-. «YES Oss Jun20- 2008 feat JUN-20- BD 56 PHOTOGRAPH NA 4 = YES COSEY, ROBERT 2008" APPROVED ves oa BD 22 PHOTOGRAPH NA 4 Yes COSEY, ROBERT APPROVED. YES. 2D 55 PHOTOGRAPH NA 4 Yes cosey, ROBERT APPROVED» YES. .chicagopolice.org/pls/clear/?p=15280:10:4178660953277199: VIEW:NO:F15... 4/23/2015Juno. ED 21 poroomn At ves cosey,nosest th” arpnoven. YES om ances. ED ss piotoomen WA ves cosey.novent ith” aPmmoweo. ves Se Juno (259 29 PHOTOGRAPH WA 4 . YES COSEY,ROBERT 2008 APPROVED - Yes: Ss suns 29 «0 rHovoste =A 1. ES cosey.Ronent uh” apmmoven- ves 8% ute. GD +1 morose WA 1. ves cosey,nonenr ise" aPmmoveo. VES so sao (€2ED 42 REPORT (OTHER) IRAE NO COSEY,ROBERT 2008 APPROVED ves om ow oF fae a SHMCESLESATONS yyy. Ye cooEyROBERT ub” APPROVED YES (STATUTORY) cee! twanen oF una. ep EnELacouesrro wa 1 YES. cosey,RoweRT uo” APPROVED. YES Seedne counoet ‘eae Juno. (ED 45 REPORT (OTHER) WA 4 NO GOSEY, ROBERT 2008 APPROVED - Yes: ies una. (GD « REPORT (OTHER) WA 1 YES COSEY,ROBERT 2008 APPROVED - YES: iS duno. €ED +7 REPORT (OTHER) NAY No cosey, ROBERT 2008" APPROVED YES None oF nao. re SINGESLEOATONS xy Yes COSEN. ROBERT. ZRH” APPROVED. YES israroron ite waver oF suman. (€2ED 49 COUNSELIREQUESTTO NA 4 . YES COSEY,ROBERT 2008 APPROVED - yes Secme couNse ey can GD 0 reronromen NA+ NO COREN.ROweRT Hh” AnpRoWED- ves te dunco. BD 51 REPORT (OTHER) NAT YES COSEY,ROBERT 2008 APPROVED - ves be uno. E50 62 REPORT (OTHER) NAY . NO COSEY,ROBERT 2008 APPROVED - YES: itor Non oF fees ED 53 MROESILEGATIONS yyy. ves comer, RoneRT eb” APPROVED. Ves statutory WaNeR OF JuN20- ee BOE reavesrto we 1 ves cosey,nonent ins” appnoven. YES SSedne counsel seo Jones. (ED 55 REPORT (OTHER) NA 1 . NO COSEY, ROBERT — 2008 APPROVED ~ YES: ca duno. EDD 56 REPORT (OTHER) NA 1 . YES COSEY,ROBERT 2008 APPROVED yes ie duno ED 57 RYETIOATORCASE yy 5. yes cosey;Ronent at” appmoveD. ves wee sno. (GED 58 REPORT (OTHER) NA 3 YES COSEY,ROBERT ©2008» APPROVED yes ‘ea smo ee. SUNYATYREPORT ux. no. SIQUERNOOROUOH.ZS” anpmoven. Yes roms) = 68 of 8 /ichtis.chicagopolice.org/pls/cleat/f2p=15280:10:4178660953277199:VIEWNO:F15... 4/23/2015internal Use Only [No intorral Use Ony atachments avaiable, Print Accused Appeal Forms [No Accuses Appeal foxms available for this Lag No, Related Incidents @TIP Related inedonts sted below are for reference ony. These may be viewed using the related appicaton search sewers [No Related incdonts associated with this Log No Status History ‘TIP Every employee inctuded in he Statue Hittory is subject o be called for legal or administrative precoedings Resulting Status cLoseorrinal PENDING IMPLEMENT ACTION PENDING COMMAND CHANNEL REVIEW ‘PENDING COMMAND CHANNEL REVIEW PENDING COMMAND CHANNEL REVIEW PENDING COMMAND CHANNEL REVIEW PENDING COMMAND CHANNEL REVIEW. PENDING COMMAND CHANNEL REVIEW. CLOSED ATLARA PENDING REVEEW INGIOENT (@AD/OSTRICT USE) PENDING INVESTIGATIVE REVIEW PENDING INVESTIGATION PENDING INVESTIOATIVE REVIEW PENDING INVESTIGATION PENDING INVESTIGATIVE REVIEW PENDING INVESTIGATION PENDING ASSIGN INVESTIGATOR PENDING ASSIGN TEAM PENDING SUPERVISOR REVIEW PRELIMINARY PENDING SUPERVISOR REVIEW PENDING SUPERVISOR REVIEW Status DaterTine Croat ” 1@AUG-7009 16:17 ORDOWER, JOSEPH 19-SEP-2008 20:19 RIVERA JUAN 5-SEP-2008 16:10 MARTINEZ, LUCIO 1410-2008 1548 SODIM, RONALD Of JUL-2008 15.87 WILLIAMS, TERENCE ‘25 JUN-2008 16:61 WILLIAMS, EUGENE 25 JUN;-2006 11:17 KUERMETH, MICHAEL 24-JUN2008 404 PRITZA, MARILYN 24-JUN-2008 19.58 PRITZA, MARILYN zo.sun 00s 1730 STOUTENBOROUON, 20-JUN-2008 1739 COSEY, ROBERT rng STOUTENBOROUGH, ‘o-sun-2008 718 SOUTE 20.JUN-2008 1114 COSEY, ROBERT sein STOUTENBOROUGH, zo.yune-agoa 17-1 STOUTEN 20.JUN 208 1656 COSEY, ROBERT se un.2007 1937 STOUTENBOROUGH, ‘6-JUN-2007 14:02 FAKUADE, JOSEPH ‘i 7 so:21 STOUTENBOROUGH, ‘eyun-2o07 21 STOUTER sago STOUTENBOROUGH, seyune2oor se20 STOUTEN ‘STOUTENBOROUGH, seuune2oo7 vee STOUTE 1¢JUN-2007 16:36 GOODWIN, JEANNE 16,JUN.2007 1696 GOODWIN, JEANNE. Command Channal Reviewers Sequence Accused Name Reviowor Ne, (MARINO, STEVE 1 KUEMMETH, MICHAEL (uaRINO, STEVE 2 WRLLIAMS, EUGENE YVAN DYKE, JASON 1 WMLLIAMS, TERENCE \VAN DYKE, JASON 2 soot, RONALO ARCILLAS, MARK MARTINEZ, LUGIO hittp://chris.chieagopolice.org/pls/cleat/f?p=15280:10:4178660953277199:VIEW:Nt Postion Enotoves ‘suPERMSING INV (PRA ‘COMMANDER ‘COMMANDER cevcucr comme DEP CHIEF [i ae | POLICE OFFICER POLICE OFFICER ‘SUPERVISING INV PRA INvEsmoATORS IPRA need SUPERVISING IY ia aa INvEsTIoATORS Pra = ‘SUPERVISING KY an inyeevonrors Bie a= SUPERVISING INV Pra {COR OPERATIONS. era -7= SUPERVISING INY tera = SUPERVISING INY Tra ‘SUPERVISING INV Tera INVESTIGATOR 2 ent an INVESTIGATOR 2 PRA —_ ae One m3) 9401218 os wes sr sai7e wet. 0s 1543 a ‘comments 008 1549. ar sare sar se 8. n8r sar nar 97. nar 19/- 113/- 1194. rows) 4 15. tts 220122 4/23/2015[ARCILLAS, HARK 2 RIVERA JUAN, tows) 1-6 of httpy/chris.chicagopolice.org/pls/clear/f?p=15280:10:4178660953277199:VIEW:NO::F15... 4/23/2015SUMMARY REPORT DIGEST- ATE OF REPORT AYO. COMPLAINT REGISTER INVESTIGATION NO: 1008638 (GHICAGO POLICE DEPARTMENT. 14 June 2008 "Tobe voad nal canes Gat ae © be canted an olor EXONERATED, UNFOUNDED, NOT 6USTAINED cases where ‘Be Ducpnary Recommendation oes ol exoaed FIVE (6) OAYS SUSPENSION. yur onaeua 30 3 ngs sar 10 wun at Aa ESE, Steet Gent BS 7 ESAS & AS Anas to wae Ont A USED. TO! SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE ATTENTION” ij ADMINISTRATOR IN CHARGE. INDEPENDENT POLICE REVIEW AUTHORITY [) ASSISTANT DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT, INTERNAL AFFAIRS DIVISION 22 APR 08 ~ 2160 hours as rcasa5 a aii | aly Te a CO FSATET jos_| 13 PROB Hoa ewe” tiem [eae ORI ATO HTT sa 78_| 25JUNOt Ee Stein 03 | eran RT ROT SURSTTONTORT 8G ATTACIED SHEET FOR ADOXTEMAL CUSED, COMAWUNTE, VRS, WES, ‘On 18 June 2007, at 1698 hours, the comple known ae the Independent Police Review Authority, ‘ahd registered this complaint with inv. Jeanne Goodwin, #297. Glover alleged that on 22 April 2006, at approximately 2150 hours, at200 W. 38" Street, Eicieaame Officer Jason Van Dyke, #9465, Unit 283 and Officer Steve Marino, #4718, Unit 283: 1) Punct handeutfed and 2) Kicked (EIB he wes handoutied. J, telephoned the Office of Professional Standards (‘OPS", now Unito14, he wa cru st30 1.8)Beat grates pe nenotonsesorayou sora wa agatoray taken whether witnesses oF edoncn SUDO O GO Rae In iivalned cabee ONLY, copes ofthe aooeted member's Summary of Previous Dlsdpinary Aatons and Record of Previous Complimentary History wt be inadad as atachents, ‘This case involves allegations of physical abuse during the course of an arrsat, The investigation was conducted in the folowing manner. The face sheet for this complaint indicates thet complainant QAM cou'd not remember if he was injured. (Att. 1) In an interview with OPS, complainant (QMIMMEEEPer releted thet he was at the Chicago Whke Sox game when he received ‘phone cal from his giifriend, He went tothe nearby CTA station to meet her. While he was welling fr her, he was a by two male/whites in plalgglathes. Nelther of the men Identified themselves as police officers. One of te men rubbed right front pocket. Wh tured around to see whet was golng on, one of the men grabbed him in a“headiock”. The wo ‘man forced him tothe ground a ‘on his wrists and shackles on his ankles. Both men then punched him on the face and kicked him on the body. stained a black eye, a cutto hia ip and a bruised knee. He got reatment at the Cook ‘County Department of Corrections whe he was in custody there, (At 16) (RRABF&*26 pRoI0grapns of Dopertmont members but was unable fo ianiy the accused. (At. 19) Evidence Technician ("ET") photographs off@Iagi§ depict no injury. (Att. 38-41) Medical records from Cermak Health Services indicate that the only Injuries observed were old scars on his head. The head ‘roumahisory reas thagpoplaine fbn “slompadontie hex, bul hres note ference staff that he was schizoph 1d bipolar end that he was tree pression inthe past. There Is no 8 medically cleared and admitted for psychologk res ‘complained about any physical abuse at the time of hi ‘evaiuation. (Att. 27) See page 3 Fovac eas ances Thevesraxtie prone, Seta |sesrereowrn vara ‘sbprontng AccuneD MOEN) Sramrcrcy naxwers 6-12, 20, 21, 20-41, 46, 51, ie Cs ‘Sumartzn the ndings and recommendations. Rule vlatons wil be ced by number only. Ono overall recommendation for Disktnary Acton wl bo ‘mode by ive nvestgator. The recommendaton wil be fo AL uslained tadngs recommandetons wl NOT be made or wach suatsied slogaton, Ezompis: 1 Vile nolod no ecnueary aclon weaned, 2. That accvsed ertoer bs rpraranded. 3. Thal fhe accused member be suspended for dayn (not eroned Says) FINDINGS: Accused 1: Officer Mark Arcilas, #7319, Unit 014 ‘Allogations 1-2: Unfounded ‘Accused 2: Officer Jason Van Dyke, #9465, Unit 253, Allegations 1-2: Unfounded ‘Accused 3: Officer Steve Merino, #4718, Unit 263 ‘Allegations 1-2: Unfounded Approved: si 7 Report prepared by IPRA. RECEIVED FOR INVISTIATION) pee ‘de nal fe 16 JUN O7 14JUN 08 banked Tani a a Be CTS aT Raver ETTORE by ompotns tients SeconINDEPENDENT POLICE REVIEW AUTHORITY Page 3 Log # 1006636 Additional Accused: 3. MARINO, Steve; PO; #4716: Emp. MED nit 253; MW; DOMEMIMEEFS; DOA 29 OCT 01; On-Duty; Swom; Physical Condition Code 03 Investigation (continued): The related Department reports indicate that he was charged with Aggravated Battery and Resisting/Obstructing a Police Officer. Officers Steve Marino, Jason Van Dyke and Mark Arcillas saw@IUNIRBering at the CTA Red Line station and approached him to condugt.a field interview. The officers announced their office and displayed thelr badges, but @BBMaid “Fuck you, you ain't the police. bowed Officer Marino on the mouth and punched Officer Van Dyke on the shoulder and chest. The officers used ‘emergency handouffing, open hand strikes, arm bars, wrist locks and pressure to sensitive areas to tako! ito custody. The lockup keeper's section of the arrest report indicated that ‘no visible injuries, The CB photographs depict no injury. All of the officers submitted Tactical Response Reports etn n assailant and documenting their use of force. Officers Marino and Van Dyke also completed Officer's Battery Reports. Officer Marino sustained redness ‘and swelling to his face and 8 laceration to his wrist. Officer Van Dyke sustained redness and swelling to his chest and arm and a laceration to his hanc refused to make a statement to the watch commander and detectives. (Att. 5, 6, 7, 8,9, 10, 11, 12, 20, 21) ET photographs of Officer Van Dyke depict abrasions on his left wrist and right hand. ET Photographs of Officer Marino depict abrasions on his left arm and right hand (Att, 29-38) In a report, accused Officer Arcilas provided an account of the incident that corroborates the related Department reports, Officer Arcillas denied the allegations against him and the other officers and stated that he observ trike Officer Marino with his elbow and punch Officer Van Dyke on the chest and shoulder. Officer Arcilas ran to assist his partners and used emergency handcuffing to help them place (EP In custody. (Att, 46) in a report, accused Officer Van Dyke provided an account of the incident that corroborates the related Department reports and that of Officer Arcilias. Officer Van Dyke denied the allegations against him. He added that he did not altempt to arrest MD until ecame an assailant and struck the officers. @jga¥ was verbally abusive, refused to follow commands, stiffened, pulled away and attacked the officers in an effort to defeat his arrest. Officar Van Dyke further stated that while the officers used force in order to take EEF into custody; was not struck after he was handcuffed and shackled, (Att. 51) In a report, accused Officer Marino provided an account of the Incident that corroborates the related Department reports and those of Officers Arcillas and Van Dy Officer Marino denied the allegations against him and stated that no officer struck’ ‘once he was handcuffed. (Att. 56)INDEPENDENT POLICE REVIEW AUTHORITY Pages Log # 1008636 Conclusion: The Investigation revealed that the incident did not occur as alléged. GEFiled this complaint more than a year after the Incident and related at that time that he could not recall if he sustained any injury. When he provided his statement to OPS, however, he complained of injuries that are not supported by the photographs taken immediately after the incident or his medical records. Additionally, .d many opportunities to make a complaint while he was at the police station, but he refused to speak to the watch commander and the Investigating detectives, There Is also no indication that complained of police misconduct when he was treated at Cermak Health Services. Tho accused officers properly documented thelr use of force on an arrestee who was described a8 an assailant. Due to his failure to make this complaint in a timely manner and the lack of supporting evidence, the Reporting Investigator recommends a finding of Unfounded for all allegations against Officer Arcitlas, Officer Van Dyke and Officer Marino in connection to this case.