Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
2007
758
5565
4760
11935
28603
7523
19160
9443
43917
29260
3264
2676
1654
218
2008
716
5776
5343
12928
31392
8314
20327
11065
48163
31790
3519
2960
1841
246
2009
2245
5497
5384
13922
32293
8220
19264
13029
46839
31445
3601
3031
3198
280
2010
1648
6226
5838
14405
34995
9588
20790
14205
52620
34927
4296
3860
2408
334
2011
813
6757
6254
14706
37349
11117
21716
15633
59490
39399
5041
4497
2787
396
Forecast
Growth Rate in Sales
Dollar Amounts
Cash
Receivables
Inventory
Other Current Assets
Total Current Assets
Net Fixed Assets
Total Assets
Total Current Liabilities
Total Long-Term Liabilities
Total Liabilities
Total Stockholder Equity
Sales
Cost of Sales
EBIT
Pretax Income
Net Income (Loss)
Dividend Expense
Dividend Payout Ratio
Percent of Sales
Cash
Receivables
Inventory
Other Current Assets
Total Current Assets
Net Fixed Assets
Total Assets
Total Current Liabilities
Total Long-Term Liabilities
Total Liabilities
Total Stockholder Equity
Sales
Cost of Sales
EBIT
Pretax Income
Net Income (Loss)
Dividend/Cash Expense
2.00%
2007
758
5565
4760
852
11935
16668
28603
7523
11637
19160
9443
43917
29260
3264
2676
1654
218
13.18%
2008
716
5776
5343
1093
12928
18464
31392
8314
12013
20327
11065
48163
31790
3519
2960
1841
246
13.36%
2009
2245
5497
5384
796
13922
18371
32293
8220
11044
19264
13029
46839
31445
3601
3031
3198
280
8.76%
2010
1648
6226
5838
693
14405
20590
34995
9588
11202
20790
14205
52620
34927
4296
3860
2408
334
13.87%
2011
813
6757
6254
882
14706
22643
37349
11117
10599
21716
15633
59490
39399
5041
4497
2787
396 Average
14.21%
12.68%
A2RE
2011 Average
2007
2008
2009
2010
12.67%
10.84%
1.94%
11.99%
11.09%
2.27%
11.74%
11.49%
1.70%
11.83%
11.09%
1.32%
11.36%
10.51%
1.48%
11.92%
11.01%
1.74%
37.95%
38.34%
39.22%
39.13%
38.06%
38.54%
17.13%
26.50%
17.26%
24.94%
17.55%
23.58%
18.22%
21.29%
18.69%
17.82%
17.77%
22.82%
100.00%
66.63%
7.43%
6.09%
3.77%
0.50%
100.00%
66.01%
7.31%
6.15%
3.82%
0.51%
100.00%
67.13%
7.69%
6.47%
6.83%
0.60%
100.00%
66.38%
8.16%
7.34%
4.58%
0.63%
100.00%
66.23%
8.47%
7.56%
4.68%
0.67%
100.00%
66.47%
7.81%
6.72%
4.74%
0.58%
2012
2338.34
7231.87
6254.00
1056.85
16881.06
22643.00
39524.06
10782.81
10599.00
21381.81
18142.24
60679.80
40336.14
4740.86
4078.30
2873.47
364.22
2013
4947.65
7376.50
6254.00
1077.99
19656.14
22643.00
42299.14
10998.47
10599.00
21597.47
20701.67
61893.40
41142.86
4835.68
4159.86
2930.94
371.51
2014
7609.15
7524.03
6254.00
1099.55
22486.73
22643.00
45129.73
11218.44
10599.00
21817.44
23312.29
63131.26
41965.72
4932.39
4243.06
2989.56
378.94
2015
10323.87
7674.52
6254.00
1121.54
25373.93
22643.00
48016.93
11442.81
10599.00
22041.81
25975.12
64393.89
42805.04
5031.04
4327.92
3049.35
386.52
2016
13092.89
7828.01
6254.00
1143.97
28318.87
22643.00
50961.87
11671.67
10599.00
22270.67
28691.20
65681.77
43661.14
5131.66
4414.48
3110.33
394.25
2509.24
2559.43
2610.62
2662.83
2716.09
Valuation
Now
Dividend Expense (in millions)
Dividend per Share
2012
364.22
0.54
2013
371.51
0.56
2014
378.94
0.57
2015
386.52
0.58
P 2015
0.51
0.48
r
g
# of Shares (in millions)
7.00%
2.50%
669.3
PRICE
11.88
0.46
13.09
10.43
2016
394.25
0.59
2017
2018
0.60
0.62
2019 etc.
etc.
0.63 etc.
2007
1.5865
7.8916
45.6179
6.1471
58.5646
0.0377
1.5354
2008
1.5550
8.3385
43.1734
5.9498
60.5058
0.0382
1.5342
2009
1.6937
8.5208
42.2494
5.8405
61.6391
0.0683
1.4504
2010
1.5024
8.4517
42.5952
5.9827
60.1735
0.0458
1.5036
2011
1.3228
8.8042
40.8896
6.2998
57.1446
0.0468
1.5928
2012
1.5656
8.3906
42.9051
6.4497
55.8169
0.0474
1.5353
2013
1.7872
8.3906
42.9051
6.5786
54.7225
0.0474
1.4632
2014
2.0044
8.3906
42.9051
6.7102
53.6495
0.0474
1.3989
Current
Ratio:
L ooking
at
the
c urrent
ratio
across
the
historical
data,
Target
appears
to
be
getting
worse
in
terms
of
its
preparedness
to
p ay
its
debt
c oming
due
soon
with
c ash
from
i ts
most
l iquid
assets.
However,
looking
at
the
forecasting
data
across
time,
Target
appears to
be
improving
in
terms
of
its
preparedness
to
pay
i ts
debt
c oming
due
soon
with
c ash
from
i ts
most
l iquid
assets.
When
l ooking
at
both
the
historical
data
and
the
forecasting
data
across
time
for
Target,
there
is
an
overall
i mprovement
i n
the company's
preparedness
to
pay
i ts
debt
c oming
due
soon
with
c ash
from
i ts
most
l iquid
assets.
Accounts
Receivable
Turnover: Looking
at
the
account
receivables
turnover
ratio
across
the
historical
data,
Target
appears
to
be
getting
better
in
terms
of
the
amount
of
times
per
year
that
the
c ompany
c ollects
an
entire
balance
of
account
receivables,
on
average.
However,
l ooking
at
the
forecasting
data,
Target
appears
to
stay
steady
with
the
amount
of
times
per
year
that
i t
c ollects
money
from
c ustomers.
When
l ooking
at
both
the
historical
data
and
the
forecasting
data
across
time
for
Target,
there
is
an
overall
i mprovement
i n
the amount
of
times
per
year
that
the
c ompany
c ollects
an
entire
balance
of
account
receivables,
on
average.
Average
Collection
Period:
L ooking
at
the
average
c ollection
period
across
the
historical
data,
Target
appears
to
take
less
amount
of
days
to
c ollect
an
entire
balance
of
account
receivables
once.
However,
l ooking
at
the
forecast
data,
Target
appears
to
stay
steady
in
the
amount
of
days
i t
takes
to
c ollect
an
account
receivables
balance.
When
l ooking
at
both
the
historical
data
and
the
forecasting
data
across
time
for
Target,
there
is
an
overall
decrease
in
the amount
of
days
it
takes
Target
to
c ollect
an
entire
balance
of
account
receivables
once,
therefore
indicating
an
i mprovement
i n
their
c ollection
system
across
time.
Inventory
Turnover
Ratio:
Looking
at
the
i nventory
turnover
ratio
across
the
historical
data,
Target
first
appears
to
be
doing
worse,
then
appears
to
be
getting
better,
i n
terms
of
the
amount
of
times
per
year
that
the
company
turns
over
an
entire
balance
of
i nventory,
on average.
However,
forecasting
data
also
shows
that
Target
appears
to
be
getting
better
i n
terms
of
turning
over
i nventory
balances
on
average
throughout
the
year.
When
l ooking
at
both
the
historical
data
and
the
forecasting
data
across
time
for
Target,
there
is
an
overall
i mprovement
i n
the amount
of
times
per
year
that
Target
turns
over
an
entire
balance
of
inventory,
on
average.
Days
to
Sell
Inventory:
L ooking
at
the
amount
of
days
to
sell
inventory
across
the
historical
data,
Target
i ncreases
then
decreases
the
amount
of
days
it
needs
to
turn
over
an
entire
balance
of
inventory
once,
on
average.
However,
l ooking
at
the
forecasting
data,
Target
appears
to
be
decreasing
in
the
amount
of
days
it
takes
to
turn
over
a
balance
of
inventory.
When
l ooking
at
both
the
historical
data
and
the
forecasting
data
across
time
for
Target,
there
is
an
overall
i mprovement
i n
the amount
of
days
Target
needs
to
turn
over
an
entire
balance
of
i nventory
once,
on
average,
because
they
take
less
amount
of
time
to
do
so.
Net
Profit
M argin:
Looking
at
the
net
profit
margin,
Target
appears
to
be
i ncreasing
and
then
decreasing
i n
i ts
effectiveness
of
managing
all
their
expenses
while
generating
sales.
However,
looking
at
the
forecasting
data,
they
appear
to
be
steady
in
their
management
of
expenses
while
selling
their
products.
When
l ooking
at
both
the
historical
data
and
the
forecasting
data
across
time
for
Target,
there
is
an
overall
i mprovement
i n
Target's
effectiveness
of
managing
all
their
expenses
when
generating
sales.
Total
Asset
Turnover:
L ooking
at
the
total
asset
turnover,
Target
appears
to
stay
steady
in
their
ability
to
use
all
of
i ts
assists
to
generate
sales.
However,
looking
at
the
forecasting
data,
Target
seems
to
be
doing
worse
i n
this
regard.
When
l ooking
at
both
the
historical
data
and
the
forecasting
data
across
time
for
Target,
there
is
an
overall
decrease
in
Target's
ability
to
use
all
of
2015
2.2175
8.3906
42.9051
6.8444
52.5975
0.0474
1.3411
2016
2.4263
8.3906
42.9051
6.9813
51.5662
0.0474
1.2888