T and T

IVSV:
Interpretation; Violation; Standard; Voter
Standards:
Time Skew; Education; Depth>Breadth; Ground; Brightline;
Predictability; Reasonability; Limits

Voters:
Education; Fairness; Potential abuse;
Reasonability frames how you should view the impacts of
education/fairness.
Competing Interpretation: An alternative interpretation is
brought up by the accused team; generally some form of a
compromise.

Important parts of T:
Preparation/Research is Key: Research terms of art. Technical
phrase specifically pertinent to the topic/field of study related
to the topic.
Examples are super important; things that different
interpretations justify.
C/I; W/M; C/S; Impact Framing.
Prioritize impacts in the block
Highlight the parts youre winning. IE regional overview
List of bad affirmatives that are justified W/ their
Interpretations.

Tips and Tricks

Examples in Both directions; why limits/interpretations and
stuff. Come up with topical versions of the AFF. Destroys
Education and stuff; solves DAs of interpretations.
Interpretations justify bad/evil affs. MAKE JOKES. Vague shit is
bad shit.