Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Taxonomy for the 21st Century students and teachers, was changing the 6 major categories from nouns to
verbs. The other revisions to the Taxonomy by Andersons team, which were changing Knowledge to
Remembering and Comprehension & Synthesis to Understanding & Creating. For me, these
revisions indicate it was recognized that students learn best by doing.
There are a number of ways in which I would use the theory of the Blooms revised Taxonomy in daily
teaching:
ask open ended questions & wait for answers rather than answer questions for students or move
on to the next student for an answer
have students partner with their peers or in a small heterogeneous group to collaborate to find
answers
provide an abundance of resources (via Learning Centres and online access) to enable students to
find answers / information
lesson plan to appeal to the multiple intelligences and interests in the classroom
self - and peer - evaluation
large group discussions, opportunities to edit, revise and refine their work or product
provide opportunities to reflect on their thinking
goal setting and conferences with individual students to review their work with them and set new
goals or revise current goals
Overall, students need to be aware of the standards, criteria and/or the big idea in the lesson, class,
unit, course / subject. When they know better, they do better. The way students learn is by doing and
if we are to effectively lesson plan and strategically teach, Blooms Revised Taxonomy is an effective
tool to aid us to be focused on the goal of collaborating with students to help them become
independent learners:
Remembering
Understanding
Applying
Analyzing
Evaluating
Creating
In practical terms, I would use the Revised Blooms Taxonomy, for the Grade 5 Social Studies
Curriculum created in Module V to help them move from Lower Order Thinking Skills to Higher Order
Thinking Skills (LOTS > remembering, understanding, applying, analysing, evaluating, creating >
HOTS) and also address the Thinking expectations of the Achievement Chart by planning, implementing
the following strategies and methods to teach the lessons / unit:
Curiously, I found myself re-creating the lesson plans / unit and looking to the Revised Taxonomy and the
Achievement Chart to ensure I was addressing the Achievement Charts Thinking expectations as well as
progressing through Blooms Revised Taxonomy. When a teacher plans using UDL Principles and
addresses Multiple Intelligences in planning and strategies the expectations are often instinctively met and
the progression from Lower Order Thinking Skills to Higher Order Thinking Skills inevitable.
I noted each of the Achievement Chart expectations can overlap in lessons and units as well as a number
of the categories of Blooms Revised Taxonomy. Of course, before moving on to higher order thinking,
there must be a base of knowledge, but after the base of knowledge is learned, recalled, retrieved and
recognized, then the other classifications / achievement expectations can overlap as student
understanding, applying, analyzing, evaluating and creating does not happen chronologically. It will
overlap, occur simultaneously, be reversed and reviewed as students skills and abilities are varied.