0 Bewertungen0% fanden dieses Dokument nützlich (0 Abstimmungen)
46 Ansichten1 Seite
Archeology is not a field that can study the past directly, says Andi Reynolds. It is a field wholly dependent upon inference to the past from things found in the contemporary world. This quote will help me have a better understanding of why people want to be archeologists.
Archeology is not a field that can study the past directly, says Andi Reynolds. It is a field wholly dependent upon inference to the past from things found in the contemporary world. This quote will help me have a better understanding of why people want to be archeologists.
Archeology is not a field that can study the past directly, says Andi Reynolds. It is a field wholly dependent upon inference to the past from things found in the contemporary world. This quote will help me have a better understanding of why people want to be archeologists.
I decided on a quote in chapter 1 pg. 13 of the Down To Earth Archaeology textbook,
(by: Lewis R. Binford) that says, Archeology is not a field that can study the past directly, nor can it be the one that merely involves discovery, as the man on the bus suggested. On the contrary, it is a field wholly dependent upon inference to the past from things found in the contemporary world. I chose this quote because I too, like the old man on the bus in his article, assumed that archeology was mostly about the things you find from the past, but reading his statement made me have a different idea on the subject. I think that this quote will help me have a better understanding of why people want to be archeologists and made me think that they arent just digging around looking for items of the past, but more a full understanding of the culture and meanings in the time era instead.