0 Bewertungen0% fanden dieses Dokument nützlich (0 Abstimmungen)
76 Ansichten1 Seite
Elizabeth greene: "oft-quoted passage" by Kenneth Burke describes how arguments are never resolved. She says we may put things down on paper, but the writing is never really finished. Greene: framing is a way to connect with the reader, and to get them to feel the same way.
Elizabeth greene: "oft-quoted passage" by Kenneth Burke describes how arguments are never resolved. She says we may put things down on paper, but the writing is never really finished. Greene: framing is a way to connect with the reader, and to get them to feel the same way.
Elizabeth greene: "oft-quoted passage" by Kenneth Burke describes how arguments are never resolved. She says we may put things down on paper, but the writing is never really finished. Greene: framing is a way to connect with the reader, and to get them to feel the same way.
Greene quotes the oft-quoted passage by Kenneth Burke again,
because it clearly describes how arguments are never truly resolved, and forces the reader to see how writing can be the same way. The quote includes a metaphor about a person showing up late and then joining in a conversation after they have heard enough to form an opinion and take a stance on what they believe to be correct; although, they cannot be completely sure because they were not present when the argument began nor were the others. Much like today when people argue and debate about climate change or deforestation, even though none of them were there when it started; therefore, no one can bring the argument to a close or come up with a satisfying answer for everyone. I think she uses this metaphor as one to describe writing as an argument. We may put things down on paper, but the writing is never really finished. We may write research papers arguing for our own opinion, but that doesnt make others arguing against us disappear or their opinions any less valid than our own. The metaphor is that writing will never have a true ending point, because no matter what we say someone else will always have something different to say in response. Q #3: Greene describes framing as a way to connect with the reader, and to get them to feel the same way as the writer. Its really about describing some thing in such a way that the writer is able to make his or her audience understand or develop the same feelings they have. Last semester I had a class that was called Language Where can it take us? At first I thought it was going to be a class about languages throughout different cultures, but that wasnt the case. The class went far beyond what I ever imagined language or linguistics was. The professors framed several different aspects of what language really meant. We studied locutionary, illocutionary, and perlocutionary acts; it amazed me that we preform all of these everyday and had no idea. The professors were so passionate about what they were teaching and framed it all so well that I couldnt help but be interested. We learned that our brain narrates everything we do constantly in our heads even when we arent meaning to do it, and that a lot of the things we think are actually things we have heard or seen before, and we are simply just riffing off it. Its interesting because framing was also one of the subjects we studied in that class; they defined it as saying or writing something in such a way as to make the reader lose what they had previously connected with it and develop a new meaning or understanding based off of what you said.