Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
By February 1 of each year, every school in California is required by state law to publish a School Accountability Report Card (SARC).The SARC contains information about
the condition and performance of each California public school. Under the Local Control Funding Formula (LCFF) all local educational agencies (LEAs) are required to
prepare a Local Control Accountability Plan (LCAP), w hich describes how they intend to meet annual school-specific goals for all pupils, w ith specific activities to address
state and local priorities. Additionally, data reported in an LCAP is to be consistent w ith data reported in the SARC.
For more information about SARC requirements, see the California Department of Education (CDE) SARC W eb page at http://w w w .cde.ca.gov/ta/ac/sa/.
For more information about the LCFF or LCAP, see the CDE LCFF W eb page at http://w w w .cde.ca.gov/fg/aa/lc/.
For additional information about the school, parents/guardians, and community members should contact the school principal or the district office.
DataQuest
DataQuest is an online data tool located on the CDE DataQuest W eb page that contains additional information about this school and comparisons of the school to
the district, the county, and the state. Specifically, DataQuest is a dynamic system that provides reports for accountability (e.g., test data, enrollment, high
school graduates, dropouts, course enrollments, staffing, and data regarding English learners.
Internet Access
Internet access is available at public libraries and other locations that are publicly accessible (e.g., the California State Library). Access to the Internet at libraries
and public locations is generally provided on a first-come, first-served basis. Other use restrictions may include the hours of operation, the length of time that a
w orkstation may be used (depending on availability), the types of softw are programs available on a w orkstation, and the ability to print documents.
Francine Baird
Principal, Weston Ranch High
Contact
W eston Ranch High
4606 McCuen Ave.
Stockton, CA 95206-6388
Phone: 209-938-6245
E-mail: fbaird@musd.net
District Name
Manteca Unified
School Name
Phone Number
(209) 825-3200
Street
Superintendent
Jason Messer
E-mail Address
jmesser@musd.net
Phone Number
209-938-6245
Web Site
w w w .mantecausd.net
Principal
Francine Baird
E-mail Address
fbaird@musd.net
Web Site
w w w .mantecausd.net
County-District39685930101576
School (CDS) Code
The mission of W eston Ranch High School is: W eston Ranch High School, in cooperation with our diverse community, is dedicated to providing all students with a
high quality education. Through high academic expectations, technology, and standards-aligned curriculum, W eston Ranch offers college preparatory, vocational,
and extra-curricular opportunities. W e strive to maintain a safe environment where cooperation, responsibility, good citizenship, critical thinking, and respect are
stressed in order to prepare all students to be successful in a rapidly changing global society.
The vision of W eston Ranch High School is: we value positive, active community participation, school pride, recognition and celebration of achievement, respect,
good character and tolerance. W e advocate high levels of education and inquiry, vertical alignment and long term career plans. W e expect safety, cooperation,
and an environment conducive to education.
Page 2 of 23
Number of Students
Grade 9
339
Grade 10
340
350
300
Grade 11
270
Grade 12
259
Total Enrollment
1208
250
200
150
100
50
0
Grade 9
Grade 10
Grade 11
Grade 12
24.3 %
0.1 %
Asian
13.3 %
Filipino
11.8 %
Hispanic or Latino
41.5 %
1.2 %
11% 2%
9%
24%
13%
11%
69%
41%
W hite
7.0 %
Tw o or More Races
0.7 %
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged
69.0 %
English Learners
9.5 %
11.3 %
Foster Youth
2.0 %
7%1%
Page 3 of 23
A. Conditions of Learning
Teacher Credentials
Teachers
School
District
201314
201415
201516
201516
49
53
50
947
57
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
2013-14
2014-15
2015-16
201415
201516
Indicator
8
Misassignments of Teachers of English Learners
Total Teacher Misassignments
7
0
2013-14
2014-15
2015-16
Note: Misassignments refers to the number of positions filled by teachers w ho lack legal authorization to teach that grade level, subject area, student group, etc.
* Total Teacher Misassignments includes the number of Misassignments of Teachers of English learners.
Page 4 of 23
Core Academic Classes Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers (School Year 2014-15)
Percent of Classes In Core Academic Subjects Taught by
Highly Qualified Teachers
This School
96.0%
4.0%
96.0%
4.0%
High-Poverty Schools
in District
96.0%
4.0%
100.0%
0.0%
Location of Classes
Note: High-poverty schools are defined as those schools w ith student eligibility of approximately 40 percent or more in the free and reduced price meals program. Low poverty schools are those w ith student eligibility of approximately 39 percent or less in the free and reduced price meals program.
Quality, Currency, Availability of Textbooks and Instructional Materials - Most Recent Year
Year and month in w hich data w ere collected: December 2015
Subject
Reading/Language Arts
Yes
0.0 %
Yes
0.0 %
Yes
0.0 %
Special Education
English 1 & 2 Study Sync McGraw -Hill (Adopted 2015)
English 3 & 4 Study Sync McGraw -Hill (Adopted 2015)
Mathematics
Algebra 1, A, B - Common Core Curriculum, Big Ideas Learning (Adopted
2015)
Geometry - Common Core Curriculum, Big Ideas Learning (Adopted 2015)
Accel Alg 2 - Common Core Curriculum, Big Ideas Learning (Adopted
2015)
Algebra 2 - Common Core Curriculum, Big Ideas Learning (Adopted 2015)
Pre Calculus w ith Limits, Brooks Cole (Adopted 2014)
AP Calculus - Calculus of a Single Variable, Brooks/Cole (Adopted 2014)
Statistics - Elementary Statistics, Pearson Educatino (Adopted 2004)
AP Statistics - The Practice of Statistics, W .H. Freeman (Adopted 2015)
Business Math - Math w ith Business Applications, Glencoe McGraw Hill
(Adapted 2007)
Special Education
Pre-Algebre- ALEKS Math, McGraw -Hill (Adopted 2015)
Functional Math 1 - ALEKS McGraw -Hill (Adopted 2015)
Functional Math 2 - ALEKS McGraw -Hill (Adopted 2015)
Functional Personal Financial Leteracy, Pearson- Prentice Hall (Adopted
2010)
Pacemaker Algebra, Globe Fearon (Adopted 2003)
Pacemaker Geometry, AGS (Adopted 2003)
Science
Anatomy/Physiology- Essentials of Human Anatomy & Physiology, Pearson
Page 5 of 23
Special Education
Life Science - Pacemaker General Science, AGS (Adopted 2001)
Earth Science - Earth Science, AGS (Adopted 2012)
History-Social Science
Yes
0.0 %
Special Education
W orld History - Pacemaker W orld History, Pearson Learning (Adopted
2008)
U.S. History - Pacemaker United States History, Pearson Learning
(Adopted 2008)
Page 6 of 23
Foreign Language
Yes
0.0 %
Yes
0.0 %
Yes
0.0 %
Health
Health- Glencoe Health, Glencoe (Adopted 2007)
0.0 %
Page 7 of 23
System Inspected
Rating
Good
Good
Good
Electrical: Electrical
Good
Restrooms/Fountains: Restrooms,
Sinks/Fountains
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Page 8 of 23
B. Pupil Outcomes
California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress Results for All Students (School Year 2014-15)
Percent of Students Meeting or Exceeding the State Standards
Subject
School
District
State
50.0%
34.0%
44.0%
21.0%
24.0%
33.0%
Note: Percentages are not calculated w hen the number of students tested is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for
statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy. Double dashes (--) appear in the table w hen the number of students tested is ten or less.
Page 9 of 23
ELA - Grade 11
Total
Enrollment
Number
Tested
Percent
Tested
Percent
Achievement
Level 1*
Percent
Achievement
Level 2*
Percent
Achievement
Level 3*
Percent
Achievement
Level 4*
All Students
259
252
97.3%
22.0%
27.0%
37.0%
13.0%
Male
259
124
47.9%
24.0%
31.0%
32.0%
10.0%
Female
259
128
49.4%
20.0%
23.0%
41.0%
16.0%
259
50
19.3%
32.0%
32.0%
28.0%
8.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
Asian
259
41
15.8%
17.0%
24.0%
37.0%
22.0%
Filipino
259
30
11.6%
7.0%
30.0%
33.0%
27.0%
Hispanic or Latino
259
110
42.5%
24.0%
25.0%
39.0%
11.0%
259
0.4%
--
--
--
--
W hite
259
20
7.7%
20.0%
30.0%
50.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged
259
173
66.8%
24.0%
28.0%
37.0%
10.0%
English Learners
259
16
6.2%
75.0%
19.0%
6.0%
0.0%
259
28
10.8%
79.0%
14.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
Foster Youth
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
Student Group
Tw o or More Races
Double dashes (--) appear in the table w hen the number of students is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical
accuracy or to protect student privacy.
Note: The number of students tested includes students that did not receive a score; how ever the number of students tested is not the number that w as used to
calculate the achievement level percentages. The achievement level percentages are calculated using students w ith scores.
* Level 1 = Standard not met
Level 2 = Standard nearly met
Level 3 = Standard met
Level 4 = Standard exceeded
Page 10 of 23
Mathematics - Grade 11
Total
Enrollment
Number
Tested
Percent
Tested
Percent
Achievement
Level 1*
Percent
Achievement
Level 2*
Percent
Achievement
Level 3*
Percent
Achievement
Level 4*
All Students
259
252
97.3%
51.0%
27.0%
15.0%
5.0%
Male
259
124
47.9%
51.0%
26.0%
16.0%
5.0%
Female
259
128
49.4%
51.0%
28.0%
15.0%
5.0%
259
49
18.9%
67.0%
14.0%
8.0%
4.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
Asian
259
42
16.2%
36.0%
31.0%
21.0%
12.0%
Filipino
259
30
11.6%
37.0%
30.0%
20.0%
13.0%
Hispanic or Latino
259
110
42.5%
52.0%
31.0%
15.0%
2.0%
259
0.4%
--
--
--
--
W hite
259
20
7.7%
60.0%
20.0%
20.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged
259
175
67.6%
54.0%
26.0%
15.0%
3.0%
English Learners
259
18
6.9%
89.0%
11.0%
0.0%
0.0%
259
28
10.8%
86.0%
4.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
Foster Youth
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
Student Group
Tw o or More Races
Double dashes (--) appear in the table w hen the number of students is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical
accuracy or to protect student privacy.
Note: The number of students tested includes students that did not receive a score; how ever the number of students tested is not the number that w as used to
calculate the achievement level percentages. The achievement level percentages are calculated using students w ith scores.
* Level 1 = Standard not met
Level 2 = Standard nearly met
Level 3 = Standard met
Level 4 = Standard exceeded
Page 11 of 23
District
State
2012-13
2013-14
2014-15
2012-13
2013-14
2014-15
2012-13
2013-14
2014-15
48.0%
43.0%
52.0%
48.0%
47.0%
44.0%
59.0%
60.0%
56.0%
Note: Scores are not show n w hen the number of students tested is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical
accuracy or to protect student privacy. Double dashes (--) appear in the table w hen the number of students tested is ten or less.
California Standards Tests Results by Student Group in Science (School Year 2014-15)
Student Group
44.0%
52.0%
Male
54.0%
Female
50.0%
32.0%
--
Asian
67.0%
Filipino
63.0%
Hispanic or Latino
56.0%
-63.0%
--
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged
50.0%
English Learners
13.0%
12.0%
--
Foster Youth
--
Note: Scores are not show n w hen the number of students tested is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical
accuracy or to protect student privacy. Double dashes (--) appear in the table w hen the number of students tested is ten or less.
Page 12 of 23
Percent of Pupils Completing a CTE Program and Earning a High School Diploma
93.0%
Percent of CTE Courses Sequenced or Articulated Betw een the School and Institutions of Postsecondary Education
100.0%
Percent
95.8%
28.2%
Page 13 of 23
California High School Exit Examination Results For Grade Ten Students Three-Year Comparison (if applicable)
Percent of Students Scoring at Proficient or Advanced
School
Subject
District
State
2012-13
2013-14
2014-15
2012-13
2013-14
2014-15
2012-13
2013-14
2014-15
54.0%
45.0%
48.0%
54.0%
37.0%
40.0%
57.0%
56.0%
58.0%
Mathematics
57.0%
54.0%
48.0%
56.0%
42.0%
42.0%
60.0%
62.0%
59.0%
Note: Percentages are not calculated w hen the number of students tested is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for
statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy. Double dashes (--) appear in the table w hen the number of students tested is ten or less.
English Language Arts Percent of Students Scoring at Proficient or
Advanced
60
50
50
40
40
30
30
20
20
10
10
0
2012-13
0
2012-13
2013-14
2013-14
2014-15
2014-15
Page 14 of 23
California High School Exit Examination Grade Ten Results by Student Group (School Year 2014-15) (if
applicable)
English Language Arts
Mathematics
Percent Not
Proficient
Percent
Proficient
Percent
Advanced
Percent Not
Proficient
Percent
Proficient
Percent
Advanced
49.0%
26.0%
25.0%
47.0%
39.0%
14.0%
52.0%
26.0%
22.0%
52.0%
35.0%
13.0%
Male
60.0%
21.0%
20.0%
53.0%
34.0%
13.0%
Female
42.0%
34.0%
24.0%
51.0%
37.0%
13.0%
73.0%
16.0%
10.0%
70.0%
27.0%
2.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
Asian
43.0%
23.0%
33.0%
40.0%
33.0%
27.0%
Filipino
34.0%
39.0%
27.0%
37.0%
46.0%
17.0%
Hispanic or Latino
50.0%
26.0%
24.0%
50.0%
37.0%
13.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
W hite
32.0%
45.0%
23.0%
50.0%
32.0%
18.0%
Tw o or More Races
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged
54.0%
26.0%
21.0%
50.0%
37.0%
12.0%
English Learners
100.0%
0.0%
0.0%
92.0%
8.0%
0.0%
93.0%
7.0%
0.0%
97.0%
0.0%
3.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
Foster Youth
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
Student Group
Note: Percentages are not calculated w hen the number of students tested is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for
statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy. Double dashes (--) appear in the table w hen the number of students tested is ten or less.
32.6%
20.6%
31.9%
Note: Percentages are not calculated w hen the number of students tested is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for
statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy.
Page 15 of 23
C. Engagement
Manteca Unified School District strives to coordinate and communicate w ith the community including police, fire and other governmental agencies, new s media,
medical agencies and other community organizations. Community agency programs include fire prevention, w ater safety, parks and recreation activities, the
community gymnasium, bike safety, and our Stockton Unified School District Police School Resource Officer.
District
State
2011-12
2012-13
2013-14
2011-12
2012-13
2013-14
2011-12
2012-13
2013-14
Dropout Rate
5.6%
4.0%
3.1%
6.7%
5.2%
4.4%
13.1%
11.4%
11.5%
Graduation Rate
92.80
95.20
95.30
89.40
92.00
92.90
78.87
80.44
80.95
60
40
20
0
2011-12
2012-13
2013-14
Page 16 of 23
Page 17 of 23
School
District
State
All Students
99
93
84
94
88
76
118
100
78
Asian
100
94
92
Filipino
107
97
96
Hispanic or Latino
92
93
81
73
91
83
W hite
93
95
89
Tw o or More Races
88
79
82
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged
100
101
81
English Learners
94
69
50
97
70
61
Foster Youth
--
--
--
Page 18 of 23
District
State
2012-13
2013-14
2014-15
2012-13
2013-14
2014-15
2012-13
2013-14
2014-15
Suspensions
16.9
15.1
20.1
8.1
7.3
9.7
5.1
4.4
3.8
Expulsions
0.1
0.3
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.1
Suspensions
Expulsions
25
0.35
School Suspensions
District Suspensions
State Suspensions
School Expulsions
District Expulsions
0.30
State Expulsions
20
0.25
15
0.20
0.15
10
0.10
5
0.05
0.00
2012-13
2013-14
2014-15
2012-13
2013-14
2014-15
Page 19 of 23
School
District
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Yes
Yes
State
School
District
Not in PI
In PI
2007-2008
Year 3
N/A
N/A
40.0%
Page 20 of 23
2013-14
Number of Classes *
Subject
2014-15
Number of Classes *
Number of Classes *
1-22
23-32
33+
1-22
23-32
33+
1-22
23-32
33+
English
22.0
24
23
10
22.0
20
30
22.0
25
18
14
Mathematics
24.0
16
14
17
24.0
12
24
25.0
14
20
11
Science
28.0
17
11
29.0
13
15
27.0
14
11
Social Science
26.0
18
11
25.0
22
26.0
14
16
* Number of classes indicates how many classrooms fall into each size category (a range of total students per classroom). At the secondary school level, this information is
reported by subject area rather than grade level.
Academic Counselor
0.0
0.0
4.0
N/A
0.0
N/A
1.0
N/A
Psychologist
0.7
N/A
Social W orker
0.0
N/A
Nurse
0.0
N/A
Speech/Language/Hearing Specialist
0.3
N/A
0.9
N/A
Other
4.6
N/A
Expenditures Per Pupil and School Site Teacher Salaries (Fiscal Year 2013-14)
Total Expenditures Per
Pupil
Expenditures Per
Pupil
(Basic/Unrestricted)
Average Teacher
Salary
$4109.7
$925.5
$3184.2
$65879.0
District
N/A
N/A
$3002.7
$70209.0
N/A
N/A
5.9%
-6.4%
State
N/A
N/A
$5348.0
$72971.0
N/A
N/A
-50.7%
-10.2%
Level
School Site
Page 21 of 23
In addition to its support from the local general fund, each school in the Manteca Unified School District receives yearly allocations from various state and federal
categorical programs. The purposes of these categorical programs range from improving the quality of the total instructional program for all students to addressing
the unique needs of special groups of students such as limited-English proficient, academically deficient, and students at risk of dropping out of school.
District Amount
$46,534
$43,165
$66,446
$68,574
$86,152
$89,146
$133,405
$111,129
--
$116,569
$141,475
$127,448
Superintendent Salary
$196,548
$234,382
37.0%
38.0%
5.0%
5.0%
For detailed information on salaries, see the CDE Certificated Salaries & Benefits W eb page at http://w w w .cde.ca.gov/ds/fd/cs/ .
Teacher Salary Chart
100000
150000
125000
80000
100000
60000
75000
40000
50000
25000
20000
0
Beginning Teacher Salary
0
Average Principal Salary
(Elementary)
Page 22 of 23
Computer Science
N/A
English
N/A
N/A
Foreign Language
N/A
Mathematics
N/A
Science
N/A
Social Science
N/A
All Courses
14
0.8%
As w ith all training in the district, the focus w ill be on creating a student centered approach in teaching that is geared tow ard providing students w ith the skills
and content necessary for College and/or Career readiness in the 21st Century. The major emphasis of professional development w ill be to train teachers to meet
the California State Content Standards through a focus on Math, ELA/ELD, NGSS,and Technology. Teacher training opportunities are being provided through
district office and site offerings, 24/7 access to an on-line digital platform, and during three Manteca Unified School District staff development days. The district
has other opportunities for teacher training including the Teacher Induction Program, CCSS Implementation W alk-through Training, K-12 Professional Learning
Communities (PLC), 9-12 Quality Instruction for Student Achievement (QISA) and high school teacher curricular committees, Structures and Strategies training,
and a variety of other subject-training.
Page 23 of 23