Sie sind auf Seite 1von 53

CTU in Prague

ADVANCED DESIGN OF GLASS


STRUCTURES
Lecture L1_ME
Design of glass beams
Martina Eliov
European Erasmus Mundus Master Course

Sustainable Constructions
under Natural Hazards and Catastrophic Events
520121-1-2011-1-CZ-ERA MUNDUS-EMMC

Objectives of the lecture

CTU in Prague

Objectives

Introduction

Experimental research

Elements
subjected to
bending

Elements subjected to bendings

Lateral torsional
buckling

Lateral torsional buckling

Design methods

Introduction
Experimental
research

Design methods

Practical examples

CTU in Prague

Objectives
Introduction
Experimental
research
Elements
subjected to
bending
Lateral torsional
buckling
Design methods

Museum of glass - Kingwindford, United Kingdom

structure of extension: length 11,0 m


distance 1,1 m
height of column 3,5 m, depth 200 mm
span of beam 5,7 m, depth 300 mm

columns, beams laminated


glass
snow load 0,75kN/m2
roof, walls: insulated glass
units
Composition of insulated units:
outer layer 10 mm float colourless
solar-control glass
cavity between the panels 10 mm
inner layer: 2 x 6 mm of toughened
safety glass with striped pattern of
baked-on ceramic ink
3

Practical examples
Objectives
Introduction
Experimental
research
Elements
subjected to
bending

CTU in Prague

Connection between beam and


column

three layered glass 3 x 10 mm

bonded on site with casting resin


total thickness 32mm

Lateral torsional
buckling
Design methods

Practical examples

CTU in Prague

Objectives
Introduction
Experimental
research
Elements
subjected to
bending
Lateral torsional
buckling
Design methods

Backdoor to the family


house - Germany

Eating room family house in


London, UK

Practical examples
Objectives
Introduction

CTU in Prague

Canopies Nijmegen, Netherlands 1999

Experimental
research
Elements
subjected to
bending
Lateral torsional
buckling
Design methods

Cross section
1 clamped steel column HEB300
2 horizontal steel beam HEA300
3 continuous glass beam 3x
10mm, float glass
4 glass roof panels 2x 10mm,
float glass
5 vertical glass panel in gutter
6

Practical examples
Objectives
Introduction

CTU in Prague

Glass canopy at the underground station Tokyo, Japan


1996

Experimental
research
Elements
subjected to
bending
Lateral torsional
buckling
Design methods

built-up beam
size 10,6 x 4,8 m
height 4,8 m
length of cantilever 9 m
beam composed from
triangular fins

Practical examples
Objectives
Introduction
Experimental
research
Elements
subjected to
bending
Lateral torsional
buckling
Design methods

CTU in Prague

Glass canopy at the underground station Tokyo, Japan


1996

panes with length 1,9 2,5 m


toughened glass 2x 15 mm
triangular fins (laminated glass 2x

19 mm + acryl pane 40mm)


acryl panes sufficient capacity in
case of earthquake
from 1 at top to 4 fins at support
with respect to the bending
moment

bolted connection

Practical examples
Objectives
Introduction

CTU in Prague

Glass roof of interior courtyard, commercial building in


Munich, Germany 2003

secondary
beams

Experimental
research
Elements
subjected to
bending
Lateral torsional
buckling

primary
beams

Design methods

span of main beams 14m in


distance 2,7m; beams
composed of 13 fins with
length 4,5m outer fins 2x
12mm, inner 10+19+10mm

secondary beams in a
distance 2,2m
9

CTU in Prague

ELEMENTS SUBJETED TO BENDING


Objectives
Introduction

Glass roof of interior courtyard, commercial building in


Munich, Germany 2003

Experimental
research
Elements
subjected to
bending
Lateral torsional
buckling
Design methods

secondary beams 2x 10mm, heat


strengthened glass
bolted connection subjected by the
shear and bearing
roof double insulated units (2,7 x
2,3m)
high degree of precision assembly
10

Practical examples
Objectives

CTU in Prague

Glass roof for refectory at the TU Dresden, Germany 2006

Introduction
Experimental
research
Elements
subjected to
bending
Lateral torsional
buckling
Design methods

glass roof above interior


courtyard 24 x 30m
11

Practical examples
Objectives
Introduction

CTU in Prague

Glass roof for refectory at the TU Dresden, 2006

Experimental
research
Elements
subjected to
bending
Lateral torsional
buckling
Design methods

preparation for installing the roof


panels placing the sealant strips

span of the principal beams

5,75m
secondary beams in
distance of 1,45m
beams depth 350mm, 4x
12mm fully tempered glass
installation of secondary beams
12

CTU in Prague

ELEMENTS SUBJECTED TO BENDING


Objectives

Glass roof for refectory at the TU Dresden, 2006

Introduction

TESTS 1:1
position of loads joints,
eccentricity 120mm
load-bearing capacity
residual capacity of beams
cyclic load, long term load
deflection

Experimental
research
Elements
subjected to
bending
Lateral torsional
buckling
Design methods

Maximum breaking load 4,5


times higher than design load

13

Practical examples
Objectives
Introduction

CTU in Prague

Glass roof for university of Glasgow, 2002

Experimental
research
Elements
subjected to
bending
Lateral torsional
buckling
Design methods

triangular shape of glass roof


maximum span 15,5m = 4x 3,9m,
beams distance of 1,5m
tempered glass 2x 19mm, friction grip
connection
14

Practical examples
Objectives

CTU in Prague

Glass roof for dry dock Bristol, 2005

Introduction
Experimental
research
Elements
subjected to
bending
Lateral torsional
buckling
Design methods

historic passenger liner built from iron special dry dock to protect ship hull
plates 2x 10mm heat-strengthened glass with size 4,35 x 1,5m at waterline
area 1000m2, 50mm of water weighing about 50 t illusion of the dock
the ship expand, contract and bend sideways in response to shifts in
temperature junction between the waterline plate and the ship had to
accommodate movements flexible collar

15

Practical examples

CTU in Prague

Glass roof for dry dock Bristol, 2005

beams: 3x 10mm heat-strengthened laminated glass, supported

on steel beams of trapezoidal cross-section, propped by struts


accidental design case dropping of a hammer from 15m, person
failing from deck, occasional foot traffic on the glass for cleaning
16

Experimental research

CTU in Prague

Objectives
Introduction
Experimental
research

LTB
Experiments

Elements
subjected to
bending
Lateral torsional
buckling
Design methods

LTB of 3m laminated beam

Belis, 2005 (UGent)

17

Experimental research

CTU in Prague

Objectives
Introduction
Experimental
research

LTB
Experiments

Elements
subjected to
bending
Lateral torsional
buckling
Design methods

LTB of 3m laminated beam

Belis, 2005 (UGent)

18

Experimental research

CTU in Prague

Objectives
Introduction
Experimental
research

LTB
Experiments

Elements
subjected to
bending
Lateral torsional
buckling
Design methods

LTB of 3m laminated beam

Belis, 2005 (UGent)

19

Experimental research

CTU in Prague

Objectives
Introduction
Experimental
research

LTB
Experiments

Elements
subjected to
bending
Lateral torsional
buckling
Design methods

Belis, 2005 (UGent)

LTB of 3m laminated beam


20

Experimental research

CTU in Prague

Objectives
Introduction
Experimental
research

LTB
Experiments

Elements
subjected to
bending
Lateral torsional
buckling
Design methods

Belis, 2005 (UGent)

LTB of 3m laminated beam


20

CTU in Prague

Elements subjected to bending


Objectives
Introduction
Experimental
research
Elements
subjected to
bending
Lateral torsional
buckling
Design methods

GLASS BEAMS

horizontal elements
simply supported, cantilevering
maximum length:
float glass - 6,0 m
laminated glass - 4,5 m
tempered glass - 3,9 m

GLASS FINS

vertical or sloping beams used to support facades, wind load


simple supported or fully cantilevering
longer than L 8m are usually top-hang shorter are bottom supported

DESIGN METHOD
design according to the elastic stability
finite elements methods
tests 1:1

how the overall structure will behave


how the structure will behave after one or more glass elements
have failed
safety of people at failure - injury by falling glass
21

CTU in Prague

Elements subjected to bending


Objectives
Introduction
Experimental
research
Elements
subjected to
bending

Ultimate limit state


simplified check of lateral and torsional stability based on

M Ed M max

Lateral torsional
buckling

Et 3

6 1

Design methods

Mmax
E
t

maximum unfactored destabilising bending moment


Young's modulus of elasticity
thickness of the glass pane
Poisson's ratio

it is possible to use for checking of buckling for glass fin with free
edges (without intermediate buckling restraint)

22

Lateral torsional buckling

CTU in Prague

Objectives
Introduction
Experimental
research
Elements
subjected to
bending
Lateral torsional
buckling
Design methods

LINEAR THEORY OF ELASTICITY


perfect elastic beam without any imperfections with rectangular crosssection is subjected to an increasing load bending moment M
instability (combination of lateral deflection and twisting) occurs
suddenly when a critical load is reached M = MCR, where critical
torsional buckling moment is

MCR

EI y GIt
L

simplified formula without


warping torsion - conservative

for rectangular cross-section including warping torsion

MCR

EI y GI t
L

2 EIw
1 2

L GI t

simply supported beam loaded


by constant bending moment

23

Lateral torsional buckling

CTU in Prague

Objectives
Introduction
Experimental
research
Elements
subjected to
bending
Lateral torsional
buckling
Design methods

LINEAR THEORY OF ELASTICITY


perfect elastic beam without any imperfections with rectangular crosssection is subjected to an increasing load bending moment M
instability (combination of lateral deflection and twisting) occurs
suddenly when a critical load is reached M = MCR, where critical
torsional buckling moment is

MCR

EI y GIt
L

bending stiffness

simplified formula without


warping torsion - conservative

for rectangular cross-section including warping torsion

MCR

EI y GI t
L

2 EIw
1 2

L GI t

simply supported beam loaded


by constant bending moment

23

Lateral torsional buckling

CTU in Prague

Objectives
Introduction
Experimental
research
Elements
subjected to
bending
Lateral torsional
buckling
Design methods

LINEAR THEORY OF ELASTICITY


perfect elastic beam without any imperfections with rectangular crosssection is subjected to an increasing load bending moment M
instability (combination of lateral deflection and twisting) occurs
suddenly when a critical load is reached M = MCR, where critical
torsional buckling moment is

MCR

EI y GIt
L

torsional stiffness

simplified formula without


warping torsion - conservative

for rectangular cross-section including warping torsion

MCR

EI y GI t
L

2 EIw
1 2

L GI t

simply supported beam loaded


by constant bending moment

23

Lateral torsional buckling

CTU in Prague

Objectives
Introduction
Experimental
research
Elements
subjected to
bending
Lateral torsional
buckling
Design methods

LINEAR THEORY OF ELASTICITY


perfect elastic beam without any imperfections with rectangular crosssection is subjected to an increasing load bending moment M
instability (combination of lateral deflection and twisting) occurs
suddenly when a critical load is reached M = MCR, where critical
torsional buckling moment is

MCR

EI y GIt
L

simplified formula without


warping torsion - conservative

for rectangular cross-section including warping torsion

MCR

EI y GI t
L

2 EIw
1 2

L GI t

simply supported beam loaded


by constant bending moment

critical length

23

Lateral torsional buckling

CTU in Prague

Objectives
Introduction
Experimental
research
Elements
subjected to
bending
Lateral torsional
buckling
Design methods

Critical torsional buckling moment depends on:


different moment distribution over the beam
boundary conditions
distance between the centre of gravity and the point where the
load is applied

Influence of following aspects on behaviour of glass


beams must be taken into account:
glass thickness
initial deformation float x tempered glass
laminated glass: shear modulus of PVB foil temperature
load duration
damage of glass surface
tensile strength of glass
24

Lateral torsional buckling

CTU in Prague

Objectives
Introduction
Experimental
research
Elements
subjected to
bending
Lateral torsional
buckling
Design methods

RESEARCH BASED ON EXPERIMENTAL TESTS


EPFL, Lausanne, Switzerland

simple supported beam, concentrated load at mid-span


stress distribution is nonlinear over the beam height
lateral torsional buckling resistance is not limited by the critical
torsional buckling moment
tensile strength of glass is determinant for the buckling resistance
influence of elastic interlayer (PVB foil) on the buckling strength
temperature, load duration, thickness of the glass as well as
thickness of the interlayer

25

Lateral torsional buckling


Objectives

CTU in Prague

A) Monolithic glass Analytical model

Introduction
Experimental
research
Elements
subjected to
bending
Lateral torsional
buckling
Design methods

Critical LTB
GI
L
EI z
2
t
C2 z a 2
C1
C2 z a Moment
2
L
EI z

M CR

Ci, za take into account different boundary conditions, different bending


moment, distance between the centre of gravity and the load point

LTB formulas for steel are valid, e.g. EC3


26

Lateral torsional buckling


Objectives
Introduction
Experimental
research
Elements
subjected to
bending

CTU in Prague

B) Laminated glass Analytical model

No homogene, isotropic material

Shear deformation due to lateral


bending & torsion

Lateral torsional
buckling
Design methods

Critical LTB
Moment

M CR

Belis, 2005 (UGent)

2 E g I z eff

GI

L
t eff
2
C2 z a 2
C1
C2 z a
2
L
E g I z eff

27

Lateral torsional buckling


Objectives
Introduction
Experimental
research
Elements
subjected to
bending

CTU in Prague

B) Laminated glass Analytical model

No homogene, isotropic material

Shear deformation due to lateral


bending & torsion

Lateral torsional
buckling
Design methods

Critical LTB
Moment

M CR

Belis, 2005 (UGent)

2 E g I z eff

GI

L
t eff
2
C2 z a 2
C1
C2 z a
2
L
E g I z eff

27

Lateral torsional buckling


Objectives
Introduction
Experimental
research
Elements
subjected to
bending
Lateral torsional
buckling
Design methods

CTU in Prague

B) Laminated glass Analytical model


it is possible to use same formula for MCR
lateral bending stiffness EIz and the torsional stiffness GIt are replaced by an
equivalent stiffness (EgIz)eff a (GIt)eff (determined by sandwich theory)

Effective bending stiffness (EgIz)eff


Luible

E I

g z eff

2 1

E g I s
2
1

t g1 t g 2
t g 1t g 2
I s 4
tint
h
2
t g1 t g 2

, same formulas as for compression member

Wlfel

E I

g z eff

E g I z ,lower Bs

Eg
Bs
E g t g tint

1 12
2
Gint 2 L

Wt g t g tint

28

Lateral torsional buckling


Objectives
Introduction
Experimental
research
Elements
subjected to
bending

CTU in Prague

B) Laminated glass Analytical model


Effective torsional stiffness (GIt)eff

GI t eff GI t glass1 GI t glass 2 GI t comp

Luible

Glas
PVB

Glas

Lateral torsional
buckling

GI t comp

Design methods
MT

hB

tanh

2
GI s 1
h

x
y
t1

tg1

Scarpino

Gint t g1 t g 2

G tint t g 1t g 2

t PVB t
2
t
int

tg2

GI t eff

GI t f

6t g3 tint
f

Gint
2
W 2 4tint
6t g tint 3t g2
Gg

Gint
2

t 6t g tint
W

G
g

2
g

29

Lateral torsional buckling

CTU in Prague

Objectives
Introduction
Experimental
research
Elements
subjected to
bending

Interlayer shear stiffness - Gint

Influence of the shear modulus GPVB on the critical lateral torsional buckling
load Mcr,LT
The curves ratio Mcr,LT / Mcr,LT, without PVB

Lateral torsional
buckling
Design methods

30

Lateral torsional buckling


Objectives
Introduction
Experimental
research
Elements
subjected to
bending
Lateral torsional
buckling

CTU in Prague

B) Laminated glass Analytical model

Stress problem is not solved analytically

C) Non-linear buckling analysis second order calculation

calculation of structure with initial imperfections


too complicated unsuitable for design of beams

Design methods

31

Lateral torsional buckling


Objectives
Introduction

D) Laminated glass Numerical model

Experimental
research

F/2

Axis of
symmetry

v0

Elements
subjected to
bending
Lateral torsional
buckling

CTU in Prague

x
fork
support

Design methods

u
y

z
glass

x
z

Bonding condition:
u=0, y=z=0

Luible, 2004 (EPFL)


32

Lateral torsional buckling


Objectives
Introduction

D) Laminated glass Numerical model

Experimental
research

F/2

PVB (solid element)


elastic or viscoelastic

Axis of
symmetry

=0 t
PVB

v0

Elements
subjected to
bending
Lateral torsional
buckling

CTU in Prague

x
fork
support

Design methods

=0

t1

u
y
Equal nodes

glass
(shell element)
with offset t/2

glass

x
z

Bonding condition:
u=0, y=z=0

Luible, 2004 (EPFL)


32

CTU in Prague

Lateral torsional buckling


Objectives
Introduction

D) Laminated glass Numerical model

Experimental
research

F/2

=0 t
PVB

v0

Elements
subjected to
bending
Lateral torsional
buckling

PVB (solid element)


elastic or viscoelastic

Axis of
symmetry

=0

x
fork
support

Design methods

u
y
Equal nodes

glass

x
z

Bonding condition:
u=0, y=z=0

glass
(shell element)
with offset t/2
PVB

coupling

11
7

40

y
My

Beam element
Luible, 2004 (EPFL)

t1

t PVB

44

glass

9
5

=0

32

Design methods

CTU in Prague

Objectives
Introduction
Experimental
research
Elements
subjected to
bending
Lateral torsional
buckling
Design methods

Only existing code:


Australian Standard AS 1288: Glass in Buildings selection and
installation
Appendix C: Buckling of glass fins

M cr
M Ed
1,7

Simple approach

Better design approaches:


Non linear numerical model inlculding all imperfections
Buckling curves

33

Design methods

CTU in Prague

Objectives
Introduction
Experimental
research
Elements
subjected to
bending
Lateral torsional
buckling

determination of the lateral and torsional buckling


resistance

1) an appropriate FE model: tensile stress on glass surfaces can be


compared to tensile strength - complicated

2) buckling curves
slenderness ratio depends on tensile strength of the glass

Design methods

p ,t
2 p ,t I y

CR
MCR h
where
p,t - tensile strength of glass,
CR - critical lateral torsional buckling stress,
Mcr - elastic critical moment

34

CTU in Prague

Design methods
Objectives

Design buckling curve

Introduction
Experimental
research

LT

Elements
subjected to
bending

DLT

Slenderness

1.2

p ,t
2 p ,t I y

CR
M CR h

D
LT

1.0

p ,t
cr , D

D y
LT

0.8

p ,t

Lateral torsional
buckling

Reduction factor LTB

Design methods

0.6
0.4

LT f LT

0.2

Bending strength taking into


account LTB

M Rd LT p ,t

2I y
z

LT p ,tW y

0.0
0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

coefficient dlancement
slenderness
au dversement

2.0

2.5

D
LT

Verification

M Rd M Ed
35

CTU in Prague

Design methods
Objectives

Design buckling curve

Introduction
Experimental
research

LT

Elements
subjected to
bending

DLT

Slenderness

1.2

p ,t
2 p ,t I y

CR
M CR h

D
LT

1.0

p ,t
cr , D

D y
LT

0.8

p ,t

Lateral torsional
buckling

Reduction factor LTB

Design methods

0.6
0.4

LT f LT

0.2

Bending strength taking into


account LTB

M Rd LT p ,t

2I y
z

LT p ,tW y

0.0
0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

coefficient dlancement
slenderness
au dversement

2.0

2.5

D
LT

Verification

M Rd M Ed
35

CTU in Prague

Design methods
Objectives

Design buckling curve

Introduction
Experimental
research

LT

Elements
subjected to
bending

DLT

Slenderness

1.2

p ,t
2 p ,t I y

CR
M CR h

D
LT

1.0

p ,t
cr , D

D y
LT

0.8

p ,t

Lateral torsional
buckling

Reduction factor LTB

Design methods

0.6
0.4

LT f LT

0.2

Bending strength taking into


account LTB

M Rd LT p ,t

Verification

M Rd M Ed

2I y
z

LT p ,tW y

0.0
0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

coefficient dlancement
slenderness
au dversement

2.0

2.5

D
LT

LTB buckling curves need to


be established for glass
35

CTU in Prague

Design methods
Objectives

Design buckling curve

Introduction
Experimental
research
Elements
subjected to
bending

for different types of loading, glass geometries, shear modulus of PVB


interlayer and initial deformations it is possible derived different buckling
curves reduction factor

buckling curve (c) from Eurocode may be used as a conservative approach

Lateral torsional
buckling
Design methods

slenderness

LT
36

CTU in Prague

Design methods
Objectives
Introduction
Experimental
research
Elements
subjected to
bending
Lateral torsional
buckling
Design methods

Australian standard AS 1288 - 1994: apendix H


1. Beams with intermediate buckling restraints

0 ,5

M CR 1
EI y GJ

Lay

where

MCR
g1
Lay
(EI)y
GJ
J

critical elastic buckling moment


constant from table
distance between effectively rigid buckling restraints
effective rigidity for bending about the minor axis
effective torsional rigidity
torsional moment of inertia

for rectangular cross-section

db 3
b
J
1 0 ,63
3
d
d, b

depth and breadth of the beam


37

CTU in Prague

Design methods
Objectives
Introduction

side view of beam

Experimental
research

Elements
subjected to
bending

Lateral torsional
buckling

intermediate buckling
restraint

M
z
Lay

y
top view of beam

Design methods

x
Moment parameter
= M1 / M2
1,0
0,5
0,0
-0,5
-1,0

Coefficient g1
free restraint condition fixed restraint condition
6,3
3,1
8,2
4,1
11,1
5,5
14,0
7,3
14,0
8,0
38

CTU in Prague

Design methods
Objectives
Introduction
Experimental
research
Elements
subjected to
bending
Lateral torsional
buckling

Australian standard AS 1288 - 1994: apendix H


2. Beams without intermediate buckling restraint

0 ,5
0 ,5
MCR g 2

EI y GJ 1 g 3 y h / Lay EI y GJ

Lay

Design methods

where

MCR
g2, g3
Lay
(EI)y
GJ
yh

critical elastic buckling moment


constants from table
distance between effectively rigid buckling restrains
(span of beam)
effective rigidity for bending about the minor axis
effective torsional rigidity
height above centroid of the point of load application

39

CTU in Prague

Design methods
Objectives
Introduction

Type of loading

Experimental
research

Bending moment M

wL2ay

Elements
subjected to
bending

Lay

wL2ay

Lateral torsional
buckling

Lay

Design methods

FLay

g2

g3

free

3,6

1,4

fixed

6,1

1,8

free

4,1

4,9

fixed

5,4

5,2

free

4,2

1,7

fixed

6,7

2,6

free

5,3

4,5

fixed

6,5

5,3

free

3,3

1,3

fixed

Lay
F

FLay
8

Lay

Lay

Coefficient

12
F

F/2

Condition of end
restraint against
rotation about y-y

F/2

FLay
8

40

Design methods

CTU in Prague

Objectives
Introduction
Experimental
research

Australian standard AS 1288 - 1994: apendix H


3. Continuously restrained beams on tension side

Elements
subjected to
bending
Lateral torsional
buckling

MCR

Design methods

where

d
2
2
La EI y y 0 GJ
4

2 y0 y h

MCR
Lay
(EI)y
GJ
d
yh
y0

critical elastic buckling moment


distance between points of effective rigid rotational
restraints
effective rigidity for bending about the minor axis
effective torsional rigidity
depth of beam
location above the neutral axis of the loading point,
positive or negative values
distance of the restraints from neutral axis
41

Design methods

CTU in Prague

Objectives
Introduction
Experimental
research
Elements
subjected to
bending
Lateral torsional
buckling

Serviceability limit state


deflection, vibration
simple rule for natural frequency

16
d

5 Hz

Design methods

where

d
f

midspan deflection of beam or tip deflection of cantilever [mm]


first natural frequency [Hz] - foot traffic and wind

Float glass low tension stress levels usually deflection is not


problem
Laminated or tempered glass higher stress levels important
check of deflection

42

References

CTU in Prague

Educational pack of COSTActin TU0905 Structural Glass - Novel design methods and next generation
products
HALDIMANN, Matthias; LUIBLE, Andreas; OVEREND, Mauro.
Structural Use of Glass. Structural Engineering Documents 10 , IABSE, Zrich:2008. ISBN 978-3-85748119-2
THE INSTITUTION OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS
Structural use of glass in buildings, London: The institution of Structural Engineers, 1999.
KASPER, Ruth.
Tragverhalten von Glastrgern, RWTH Aachen, Aachen: Shaker Verlag, 2005.
Australian Standard AS 1288.
Glass in Buildings Selection and installation, Appendix C: Basis for determination of fin design to prevent
buckling, 2006.
AMADIO, Claudio; BEDON, Chiara.
Buckling of laminated glass elements in out-of-plane bending, Engineering Structures 32 (2010), 3780
3788.
BELIS, Jan; MOCIBOB, Danijel; LUIBLE, Andreas; VANDEBROEK, Marc.
On the size and shape of initial out-of-plane curvatures in structural glass components, Construction and
Building Materials 25 (2011), 27002712.
LUIBLE, A.
Stabilitt von Tragelementen aus Glas. Dissertation EPFL thse 3014. Lausanne: 2004.
LINDNER, J.; HOLBERNDT, T.
Zum Nachweis von stabilittsgefhrdeten Glastrgern unter Biegebeanspruchung. Stahlbau 75(6) (2006),
488-498.

43

CTU in Prague

Thank you
for your kind attention

44
53

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen