Max Iwaniec

Noyce
English 9/2B
4/14/15
What role, if any, should vavs play in America foveign military?
U.S. military is always looking for the next greatest weapon or device
to get the upper or grader defiance agents other countries. And one of the
most advanced weapon or device is a drone. Drones are small flying devices
or huge remount control un-manned air planes. With these drones the U.S.
can now fly an air plane or a jet into battle and not lose any military sloggers.
U.S. drones should only be used for defending the country. And U.S. drones
should not be used for attacking enemies of the U.S. in a populated area that
has innocent bystanders.
The good use of using U.S. drones for military purposes. There are
good uses of using U.S. drones for military purposes. In the essay How
Drones changed the game in Pakistan the author Nadim Hussaim explains,
Most of the people in Pakistani army whom I interviewed on the subject were
positive about the drone strikes and their direct correlation with decrease in
terrorist attacks in Pakistan(fourth essay, 7th paragraph) as evidence that
there is good use in U.S. drones. In the essay Unmanned aerial vehicles
effectively fight terrorism the author Kels Charles G. says, Drones, are an

effective tool in the fight against terrorism(second essay, 1st paragraph) and
this show again that U.S. drones can be used for good purposes. In
conclusion drones can good for military use.
The bad results for using U.S. drones for military purposes have
accorded more than good. In good there is also bad. In the essay Alienating
Allies the author Mothana Ibrahim is saying in his essay, The first known
drones strike in Yemen to be authorized by Obama, in late 2009, left 14
women and 21 children dead in the southern town of al-Majala( first page,
7th paragraph). This shows that U.S. drones do bad as well as good and are
deadly. Also in the essay Using drones to fight terrorism has been harmful
and ineffective the author Thakur Ramesh wrote in his essay, U.S. drone
strikes have killed between 2,000-3,000 people. We live in an age of
technological warfare coexisting uneasily alongside the use of machetes on
an industrial scale in Rwanda in 1994 and commercial aircraft as lethally
effective delivery systems on Sept. 11, 2001( fifth page, last 2 paragraphs).
This show that a U.S. drone is very dangers and in an electrical device and
not a living creature that can feel emotions. In conclusion U.S. drones are
dangers and should be only us for self-defense if necessary.
U.S. drones are good and bad for attacking and defending agents
enemies of the U.S.A... There are both good and bad evidence, Most of the
people in the Pakistani army whom I interviewed on the subject were positive
about the drone strikes and their direct correlation with a decrease in

terrorist attacks in Pakistan( fourth essay, 7th paragraph) and , The first
known drone strike in Yemen to be authorized by Obama, in late 2009, left 14
women and 21 children dead in the strike in the southern town of al-Majala
( first page, 7th paragraph).
But in it all U.S. drones are very useful and very dangers. But it is the
U.S. government to decide if the U.S. should or should not use drones to fight
our battles in faraway places, like Yemen, agents terrorists. In conclusion
U.S. drones are both good and bad and should and should not be used for
military use.

Works Cited
Kels, Charles G. Unmanned Aerial Vehicles Effectively Fight Terroris.
Robotic Technology. Ed.

Louise Gerdes. Farmington Hills, MI:

Greenhaven Press, 2014. Opposing Viewpoints.

Rpt. from Drones Kill

Transnational Terrorists. Washington Times 31 July 2012.

Opposing Viewpoints in context. Web. 3 Feb.2015.
Mothana, Ibrahim. Drones Promote Terrorism. Drones. Ed. Lousie Gerdes.
Detroit:

Greenhaven Press, 2014. At Issue. Rpt. from How

Drones Help Al Qaeda. New

York Times 13 June 2012. Opposing

Viewpoints in Context. Web. 3 Feb. 2015.

Nadim, Hussain. How Drones Changed the Game in Pakistan. The National
Interest (3 Auf.

2012). Rpt. In Drones. Ed. Louise Gerdes. Detroit:

Greenhaven Press, 2014. At Issue.

Web. 3 Feb. 2015.

Opposing Viewpointsin Context.

Thakur, Ramesh. Using Drones to Fight Terrorism Has Been Harmful and
Ineffective. Drones.

Ed. Louise Gerdes. Detroit: Greenhaven Press, 2014.

At Issue. Rpt. from Drones Harm

More Than Help. Japan Times 11

Oct. 2012. Opposing Viewpoints in Context. Web. 3

Feb. 2015.