Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Abstract
Voltage Controlled Crystal Oscillators (VCXOs) are widely used and well
known frequency control products. VCXOs are typically characterized by
having wide frequency pulling ranges (greater than 50ppm). These
oscillators are also uncompensated for temperature performance. This
means temperature performance of 20ppm or more is typical over the
industrial range of -40 to 85 C. Trim effect is a skewing of the frequency
versus temperature performance of a crystal oscillator as the frequency is
pulled (trimmed) away from the oscillator's nominal frequency. Even
though unwanted, the degradation of performance from trim effect is
something generally accepted as a characteristic of VCXOs. This paper
focuses on a method of compensating crystal oscillator temperature and
trim effect using a multi-dimensional segmented polynomial array. The
inherent trim effect has been reduced from approximately 11ppm down to
0.5ppm. This is a 22-fold improvement over the inherent performance. The
theory of this compensation method will be discussed, and data showing the
results of temperature and trim effect compensation on actual oscillators
will be presented.
where v is the EFC voltage, and for every order of (2), a unique temperaturedependent function, h(T) of the form (3) is included as an additional
coefficient of (2),
where T is temperature. Note: The order of n for equation (3) does not
necessarily have to match the order of n for equation (2), it only has to be of
sufficient order to provide an adequate fit of the data.
The user defined criteria was initially chosen to be 20ppb. This returned a
single segment solution comprising 58 storage elements with a predicted
error of 14 ppb. With 4 segments a solution was achieved using 232
elements which yielded a predicted error of less than 1 ppb. The actual
measured performance resulting from the implementation of the solution is
shown in Figure 4, where the initial peak to peak deviation of 21.08 ppm was
reduced to 0.992 ppm, representing a more than 20X improvement in trim
effect performance.
Frequency vs EFC Voltage vs Temperature
After Compensation for Trim Effect
M-SAC IMPLEMENTATION
A block diagram of the hardware configuration used on the M-SAC
prototype is shown in Figure 6 below. The Osc can be any voltage
controlled oscillator, but as previously stated, a 20 MHz, off-the-shelf, wide
pull VCXO was used for the work outlined in this document.
Functionally, the microprocessor calculates a digital correction value
which is converted to a DC voltage by the DAC and applied to the EFC input of
the VCXO. New correction values are calculated and implemented at a rate of
about 14 Hz and are derived using real-time measurements of temperature
and ADC sampling of the user-supplied EFC voltage. Although not employed
on this prototype, software and/or hardware filtering can minimize the phase
noise degradation resulting from the application of EFC voltage updates.
The external Memory contains the M-SAC solutions and the program to
implement them. It also has sufficient capacity to hold up to 2000 unique
storage elements for the M-SAC solutions. Looking forward, the planned
reduction to the physical size of the microprocessor and memory needed to
support miniaturization will limit the number of storage elements to 500.
However, one can see that this is more than adequate, as only 100 elements
were needed to achieve the performance presented here where both
temperature stability and trim effect were compensated.
EFC=0.000V
EFC=0.165V
EFC=0.330V
1.0
EFC=0.495V
0.8
EFC=0.660V
EFC=0.825V
0.6
EFC=0.990V
0.4
EFC=1.155V
EFC=1.320V
0.2
dF (ppm)
EFC=1.485V
EFC=1.650V
0.0
EFC=1.815V
-0.2
EFC=1.980
EFC=2.145V
-0.4
EFC=2.310V
EFC=2.475V
-0.6
EFC=2.640V
-0.8
EFC=2.805V
EFC=2.970V
-1.0
-55
-40
-25
-10
20
35
50
65
Temp C
EFC=3.135V
EFC=3.300V
Deterministic Solutions:
User-specified curve fit error tolerance
INTRODUCTION
95
7.5
5.0
EFC=0.00V
EFC=0.33V
2.5
EFC=0.66V
0.0
EFC=0.99V
EFC=1.65V
-5.0
EFC=1.98V
EFC=2.31V
-7.5
VCXO
EFC=2.64V
-10.0
EFC=2.97V
EFC=3.30V
-12.5
-15.0
-55
-40
-25
-10
20
35
50
65
80
95
Temp C
REFERENCES
[1] Raymond L. Filler et al., Specification and Measurement of the Frequency Versus
Temperature Characteristics of Crystal Oscillators, 43rd Annual Symposium on Frequency
Control, 1989
EFC=1.32V
-2.5
Temp
Sensor
10.0
dF (ppm)
80
CONCLUSIONS
[2] Esterline, J.C.; , "Trim Effect Compensation using an Artificial Neural Network, European
Frequency and Time Forum & International Frequency Control Symposium (EFTF/IFC), 2013
Joint, Prague, 2013, pp. 963-966.
[3] Ward, K.R.; , "A novel approach to improving the stability of TCVCXO temperature
performance," Frequency Control Symposium and PDA Exhibition Jointly with the 17th
European Frequency and Time Forum, 2003. Proceedings of the 2003 IEEE International , vol.,
no., pp. 473- 477, 4-8 May 2003