Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
PARK
SHP1-10
MAY 2016
QUALITY MANAGEMENT
ISSUE/REVISION
FIRST ISSUE
REVISION 1
REVISION 2
Remarks
Draft Issue
Final
Date
28/04/2016
05/05/2016
19/05/2016
Prepared by
C. Thwaites
C. Thwaites
C. Thwaites
G. Bansal
G. Bansal
E.Isnenghi
E.Isnenghi
E.Isnenghi
E.Isnenghi
70009799
70009799
70009799
Report number
001
001
001
File reference
L:\70009799 - Manston
Airport\C
Documents\Reports\Flood
Risk Assessment
L:\70009799 - Manston
Airport\C
Documents\Reports\Flood
Risk Assessment
L:\70009799 - Manston
Airport\C
Documents\Reports\Flood
Risk Assessment
nd
Signature
Checked by
Signature
Authorised by
Signature
Project number
REVISION
3
ii
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1
INTRODUCTION ...........................................................................3
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT......................................................7
10
CONCLUSIONS..........................................................................26
iii
TABLES
TABLE 3-1 GEOLOGICAL DESCRIPTION ......................................................................... 4
TABLE 7-1 - SUDS TREATMENT TRAINS ......................................................................... 15
TABLE 7-2 - AREA 1 DRAINAGE AREAS ........................................................................... 17
TABLE 7-3 - AREA 2 DRAINAGE AREAS ........................................................................... 17
TABLE 7-4 AREA 3 DRAINAGE AREAS .......................................................................... 17
TABLE 7-5 - AREA 4 DRAINAGE AREAS ........................................................................... 18
TABLE 7-6 - PROPOSED DISCHARGE RATES................................................................. 18
TABLE 7-7 DISCHARGE RATE SUMMARY .................................................................... 18
TABLE 7-8 - PROPOSED ATTENUATION REQUIREMENTS ........................................... 19
TABLE 7-9 DRAINAGE MAINTENANCE STRATEGY ..................................................... 21
APPENDICES
A P P E N D I X
SITE LOCATION
A P P E N D I X
A P P E N D I X
DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS
A P P E N D I X
A P P E N D I X
A P P E N D I X
A P P E N D I X
IDB CONSULTATION
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1.1.1
WSP | Parsons Brinckerhoff (WSP|PB) has undertaken this Flood Risk Assessment and Outline
Drainage Strategy (FRA & ODS) on behalf of Stone Hill Park Ltd to support the hybrid planning
application for a comprehensive redevelopment of the former Manston Airport.
1.1.2
The Site extends to approximately 305 hectares (ha) and is located to the west of Ramsgate,
Margate and Broadstairs in the District of Thanet at National Grid Reference TR 33540 65991. It
is bound by the A299 Hengist Way to the south, B2190 Spitfire Way to the west, arable farmland
to the north and Manston Court Road and further farmland to the east. The Site is bisected by
the B2050 Manston Road which connects Spitfire Way and Birchington in the west with the
A256 and Ramsgate in the east.
1.1.3
1.1.4
This FRA investigates flood risk in the area and outlines the mitigation measures proposed to
ensure the sustainable and safe development of the site in line with the requirements of the
National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF), the Flood Risk and Coastal Change Planning
Practice Guidance (PPG) and the Environment Agencys (EA) Standing Advice.
1.1.5
The site is located in Flood Zone 1 where the probability of river or sea flooding is less than 0.1%
(1 in 1000) chance in any given year. Meaning that the probability of tidal or fluvial flooding can
therefore be assessed as low.
1.1.6
Available baseline information indicates that within the site there are areas which are at risk of
surface water flooding. However, a surface water drainage strategy designed to cater for the
1:100 year + 20% climate change rainfall event has been prepared as part of this report. In line
with the most recent EA Climate Change Guidance the drainage strategy has also considered
and managed the impact that a 40% climate change allowance would cause to surface water
runoff management: the solutions proposed ensure that for the 100 year plus 40% climate change
allowance event, surface water will be accommodated within the site and therefore prevent
potential exceedance flows off site.
1.1.7
Other potential sources of flooding have been investigated, and have been deemed to be
negligible.
1.1.8
It is proposed that the sites surface water drainage network will utilise the existing private surface
water sewer from the site which discharges to Pegwell Bay; it is proposed that discharge rates
match those of the existing site therefore avoiding negative impacts on the existing surface water
sewer.
1.1.9
The outline drainage design incorporates sustainable drainage systems (SuDS) features in the
form of attenuation basins, swales and permeable pavements in line with the sustainable
drainage principles and best practice. The SuDS are also used as pre-treatment devices prior to
discharging to Pegwell Bay.
2
1.1.10
Consultation with Kent County Council (KCC) (who are the Lead Local Flood Authority) has been
carried out throughout the preparation of this FRA, in order to ensure they were aware of the
proposals and able to advise on site constraints and the proposed surface water drainage
strategy. Flood risk constraints and drainage options were also discussed with the EA and
Southern Water (SW); Thanet District Council (TDC) has been kept informed.
1.1.11
SW have confirmed that foul development flows cannot be accommodated within the public
drainage network and have stated that off site improvement works will be necessary.
INTRODUCTION
2.1
2.1.1
Under an appointment in December 2015 between WSP|PB and Stone Hill Park Ltd, WSP was
employed as Consultant to provide a FRA to support the hybrid planning application for a
comprehensive redevelopment of the former Manston Airport; this report relates solely to the
above site.
2.1.2
This report is intended for the sole benefit of the parties named above and shall not be capable of
assignment, WSP|PB shall not be liable for any use of the report for any reasons other than that
for which the report was originally prepared and provided.
2.1.3
Although this report was prepared using the degree of skill and care ordinarily exercised by
engineers practicing under similar circumstances please note that WSP|PB cannot take
responsibility for errors in the information provided by third parties.
2.2
OBJECTIVE OF STUDY
2.2.1
This FRA investigates flood risk in the vicinity of the site and establishes the mitigation measures
required to ensure the sustainability and safety of the scheme over its lifetime.
2.2.2
The FRA has been produced in line with the requirements of the NPPF and the EA Standing
Advise as well as through consultation with the EA, SW, KCC, Internal Drainage Board (IDB) and
TDC.
2.3
STUDY METHODOLOGY
2.3.1
The appraisal process consisted of a site visit (undertaken in November 2015), desk study, data
research and consultation with regulatory bodies and third parties.
2.3.2
The EA, SW, KCC and TDC provided background information to inform the production of this FRA
following consultation during 2015 and 2016.
2.3.3
It was confirmed by the Association of Drainage Authorities that the site does not fall within an
area covered by an IDB, see Appendix I.
2.3.4
The report has also been informed by and makes reference, where appropriate, to the following
documents:
2.3.5
In undertaking the study we have also considered local policies as discussed in Section 4.4.
2.3.6
This FRA makes use of third party information and contains Environment Agency information
Environment Agency.
EXISTING SITE
3.1
SITE LOCATION
3.1.1
The Site is located to the west of Ramsgate, Margate and Broadstairs in the District of Thanet at
the approximate National Grid Reference TR 33540 65991. It is bound by the A299 Hengist Way
to the south, B2190 Spitfire Way to the west, arable farmland to the north and Manston Court
Road and further farmland to the east. The Site is bisected by the B2050 Manston Road
which connects Spitfire Way and Birchington in the west with the A256 and Ramsgate in the
east.
3.2
SITE DESCRIPTION
The Site extends to approximately 305 ha and is a previously developed site located in open
countryside close to Ramsgate, wholly within the administrative area of TDC in Kent. The Site has
most recently been used as an airport (alongside ancillary employment type uses). The
commercial aviation function has now ceased however, a range of employment-type activities
remain. It accommodates numerous existing buildings and extensive areas of hard-standing
(including a runway).
3.3
3.3.1
The 1:50,000 British Geological Survey (BGS) Map (Sheet 274 Ramsgate) and BGS Geology of
Britain online viewer have been reviewed. No superficial deposits are mapped for majority of the
Site, however Head Brickearth deposits are mapped as being present in limited areas across the
Site. The Site is entirely underlain by Upper Chalk bedrock, which is anticipated to be present at
shallow depths across the Site. A summary of the anticipated geology at the Site is presented
below in Table 3-1.
Table 3-1 Geological Description
GEOLOGICAL UNIT
DISTRIBUTION
AQUIFER
DESIGNATION*
The Upper Chalk beneath the site is classified as a Principal aquifer meaning that there are layers
of rock deposits with high permeability meaning that they have a high level of water storage and
may therefore support water supply.
3.3.3
Based on EA source protection zone mapping, the site has large areas which are shown to be
located in Zones 1, 2 and 3 Source Protection Zones. See Figure 3-1 below. This is confirmed by
Figure 6 of TDCs SFRA.
3.3.4
Figure 3 of TDCs SFRA shows the site to be in an area where groundwater can be found
between 5m to 10m below ground level.
3.3.5
Information provided by the Environment Agency (EA) indicates that a chalk adit is present
beneath the Site, beginning at the Lord of the Manor groundwater abstraction well running parallel
with and/or beneath the runway. The Lord of the Manor abstraction well is operated by Southern
Water and located 350m southeast of the Site. Information subsequently provided by Southern
Water indicates the adit to be approximately 3km in length and present at a depth of
approximately 2.7m AOD, meaning that the adit is approximately 47m below ground level. The
adit is anticipated to be approximately 1.5-2m in height and 0.5-1m wide. The EA reported that
the location of the adit has been interpolated from historic mining records by BGS and therefore
its actual depth, length, dimensions and location are uncertain, those uncertainties have been
confirmed by Southern Water. According to SW, the Lord of the Manor abstraction well has been
inactive since 2006 due to high levels of nitrates which was normally treated at a denitrification
plant. However, SW hope to bring the well back into service in the near future.
3.3.6
Based on the EAs online Groundwater Vulnerability Zones mapping and Figure 5 of TDCs
SFRA, the site is located within a Major Aquifer Intermediate Groundwater Vulnerability Zone
(GWVZ). This designation is based on the ability for the Aquifer to ultimately diffuse pollution, the
intermediate classification indicates the soils have moderate leaching potential or it is possible
that non-adsorbed diffuse source pollutants and liquid discharges could penetrate the soil layer.
3.4
EXISTING WATERCOURSES
3.4.1
A small balancing pond is located on the Site to the north of the north-eastern edge of the runway.
It was constructed below ground level (slightly sunken) and is covered by a grate.
3.4.2
The closest surface water feature to the site is a small private reservoir located approximately
300m to the south of the site, adjacent to the southbound carriageway of Hengist Way (A299).
3.4.3
According to the EA Online River Basin District maps the southern end of the site falls within the
Monkton and Minster Marshes catchment, with the nearest ditch being approximately 1km south
of the site. The River Stour is approximately 3km to the south of the site, both the River Stour and
Monkton and Minster Marshes are classed as main rivers and are managed by the EA.
6
3.5
Apart from the above, the closest surface waterbody to the Site is Pegwell Bay, located
approximately 900m to the south-east of the site.
3.6
3.6.1
Based on SW Asset Records, attached in Appendix D, there are a number of combined sewers
running through the residential areas to the east of the site, no public surface water sewers are
shown on SW records.
3.6.2
Existing records of the present on site drainage (Appendix I) have been provided by the current
landowner. Based on these records, the majority of the sites surface water appears to drain via
gullies, channel drains and pipework to the western side of the B2050 Manston Road. At this
point, the surface water is stored in an attenuation tank before being pumped around the
perimeter of the site and discharging to a 1050mm diameter sewer to the south east boundary.
This sewer eventually discharges to Pegwell Bay and is privately owned.
3.7
ARTIFICIAL WATERCOURSES
3.7.1
As noted above, A small balancing pond is located on the Site to the north of the northeastern
edge of the runway. It was constructed below ground level (slightly sunken) and is covered by a
grate.
3.7.2
The closest surface water feature to the site is a small private reservoir located approximately
300m to the south of the site, adjacent to the southbound carriageway of Hengist Way (A299).
3.8
3.8.1
Based on the product 4 response from the EA and their online maps, the site is in Flood Zone 1
where the probability of river or sea flooding is less than 0.1% (1 in 1000) chance in any given
year. The EA in their correspondence indicated that there are no main rivers so there are no
defences that the EA are aware of; however due the location within Flood Zone 1 existing flood
defences or other structures are not deemed relevant to the site.
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
4.1
DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS
4.1.1
The Proposed Development (including both outline and detailed elements) for which planning
permission is being sought comprises:
Comprehensive redevelopment of the Site involving the demolition of existing buildings and
structures and removal of hardstanding and associated infrastructure, and provision of mixed use
development. Application submitted in hybrid form (part-outline and part-detailed) as follows:
The outline element of the planning application (with all matters except Access reserved for
future determination) for the provision of:
Car parking
Development of Phase 1 comprising four industrial units (Use Class B1c/B2/B8) with
ancillary car parking and associated infrastructure.
4.1.2
4.2
VULNERABILITY CLASSIFICATION
4.2.1
Considering the scale of the site and based on Table 2 in the PPG, the Proposed Development
will have uses which range between low vulnerable and more vulnerable.
4.3
4.3.1
As stated in the NPPF, a sequential risk-based approach to determine the suitability of land for
development in flood risk areas should be applied at all stages of the planning process giving
precedence to low flood risk areas wherever possible.
8
4.3.2
Since the site is in Flood Zone 1 the development is considered appropriate and automatically
meets the requirements of the sequential test.
4.4
4.4.1
The KCC Drainage and Planning Policy Statement sets out a number of Drainage Policies and
Wider Environment Policies which they have defined as being SuDS Policies. These are outlined
below and have been considered in developing the drainage strategy for the site;
SuDS Policy 1 Follow the Drainage Hierarchy
SuDS Policy 2 Manage Flood Risk through Design
SuDS Policy 3 Mimic Natural Flows and Drainage Flow Paths
SuDS Policy 4 Seek to Reduce Existing Flood Risk
SuDS Policy 5 Maximise Resilience
SuDS Policy 6 Design to be Maintainable
SuDS Policy 7 Safetyguard Water Quality
SuDS Policy 8 Design for Amenity and Multi-Functionality
SuDS Policy 9 Enhance Biodiversity
SuDS Policy 10 Link to Wider Landscape Objectives
4.4.2
As well as the policies listed above the Water/People/Places (Masterplanning for SuDS) has also
been considered in developing the drainage strategy for the site.
4.4.3
TDCs current Local Plan identifies issues and opportunities arising in the area and sets out the
councils views on how they would like development to progress. The only relevant policy in the
plan is Policy EP13 Groundwater Protection Zones which highlights the risk of contamination
to groundwater sources. There are other policies within the plan relating to flood risk and surface
water runoff, these however are noted as not saved and therefore have not been considered as
part of this assessment.
4.4.4
TDC are currently producing a new Local Plan which will cover the district up to 2031, this
however is only in draft format at this stage and therefore has not been considered as part of this
assessment.
5.1
5.1.1
Reference to KCCs and TDCs SFRA, SWMP and the PFRA is made, where appropriate, in the
following sections and relevant maps are included in Appendix E. Please note that the very large
scale of the KCC PFRA limits its relevance for a meaningful assessment of the site.
5.1.2
References to correspondence with the TW, KCC, TDC and EA are made in the following
sections, copies of which are included in Appendix D, Appendix E and Appendix F respectively.
5.1.3
The IDB were consulted (Appendix J), however indicated that the site falls outside their district
and from review of the River Stour IDB mapping this was confirmed.
5.2
5.2.1
The EA have confirmed in their response dated 25 September 2015 that the site is located in
Flood Zone 1 where the probability of river or sea flooding is less than 0.1% (1 in 1000) chance in
any given year.
5.2.2
The sites location within Flood Zone 1 is confirmed by Figure 2 of TDCs SFRA and is consistent
with the local raised topography.
5.2.3
Based on the information available, the probability of fluvial and tidal flooding can be assessed as
low to negligible.
5.3
GROUNDWATER FLOODING
5.3.1
The EA stated in their response that Groundwater flooding should not be an issue here.
5.3.2
According to Figure 6 of KCCs PFRA, the risk of Groundwater flooding at the site is considered to
be negligible. It is stated however in the PFRA that the groundwater data is indicative and has
inherent inaccuracy and that KCC consider Groundwater Flooding to be a countywide risk.
5.3.3
Figure 4 of TDCs SFRA, shows that there have been no recorded groundwater incidents at the
site.
5.3.4
The above is consistent with Figure 3 of the TDCs SFRA which indicates that groundwater sits 510 metres below ground at the site. This is understood to be in reference with geology above the
chalk (made ground and Brickearth)
5.3.5
Based upon information from the EA and SW groundwater within the Upper Chalk is unconfined
and is anticipated to be present at a minimum depth of approximately 4mAOD equivalent to 35m
bgl to 50m bgl (based upon maximum and minimum Site levels). Groundwater flow is anticipated
to be towards Pegwell Bay, southeast of the site.
5.3.6
Based on the information available and the assessment undertaken, the probability of
groundwater flooding impacting the site is assessed as being low.
th
10
5.4
5.4.1
Based on the EA online surface water flooding map, the area along Manston Road at the bottom
of the valley is considered as being at high risk of flooding due to surface water with a potential
flow route generated at the airport and flowing towards north-west and off site. The flooding would
appear to be due to the topography of the site which generally falls towards Manston Road which
runs through the site.
5.4.2
According to Figure 5 of KCCs PFRA it is predicted that, within the macro-area in which the site
is located, between 5-7 dwellings would be flooded per square kilometre for the 1 in 200 year rain
storm event.
5.4.3
According to Figure 20 of TDCs SFRA, the site lies in an area which has medium potential for
surface water runoff generation.
5.4.4
The Surface Water and Critical Infrastructure map from the KCCs SWMP for the Thanet
catchment shows localise surface water flooding greater than 0.3m deep for the 1 in 200 year
return period, this is in line with that shown on the EA online maps.
5.4.5
As part of KCCs consultation response, they refer to KCCs SWMP for the Thanet catchment
which states that Manston Court Road to the north-east of the site has been recorded as a
pathway of flows for surface water. The same has been said of Manston Road which runs through
the site.
5.4.6
Based on the available information surface water flooding within the site cannot be excluded and
the probability of surface water flooding can be considered as medium.
5.5
SEWER FLOODING
5.5.1
According to the Thanet Rural Historic Flooding map from KCCs SWMP there have not been any
recorded sewer flooding incidents on the site. This map incorporates data provided by SW. During
st
the meeting with SW on the 1 of February it was clear that the existing infrastructure is at
capacity, however SW indicated verbally that they were not aware of any specific flooding issues
around the site.
5.5.2
According to Figure 4 of KCCs PFRA there have been no recorded sewer flooding incidents at
the site.
5.5.3
From verbal discussions with the facilities manager on site it has been confirmed that in their time,
there have been no sewer flooding incidents.
5.5.4
Based on the information available the probability of sewer flooding impacting the site can be
assessed as low.
5.6
5.6.1
According to the EA online reservoir flood maps show the site is not shown to be within the
maximum extent of flooding from any reservoir.
5.6.2
No other artificial sources relevant to the site have been noted in the councils documents or as
part of the correspondence undertaken. It is understood that a small holding tank/interceptor tank
is present on site, however it is understood this form part of the existing drainage system and is
relatively small in nature and therefore unlikely to be of significant risk.
5.6.3
Based on the available information, the probability of flooding from artificial sources can be
assessed as low.
11
CLIMATE CHANGE
6.1
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
6.1.1
As explained in the Climate Change Adaptation Sub-Committee Progress Report 2014, increased
flood risk is the greatest threat to the UK from climate change. Models of the climate system
suggest floods of the type experienced in England and Wales in autumn 2000, and between
December 2013 and February 2014, have become more likely as a consequence of increased
concentrations of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere.
6.1.2
More frequent short-duration, high intensity rainfall and more frequent periods of long-duration
rainfall could be expected. Sea levels are also expected to continue to rise.
6.1.3
New EA guidance Flood risk assessments: climate change allowances issued on the 19th
February 2016 provides up to date information on expected changes in rainfall, river flows and
sea level rise as a consequence of climate change.
6.1.4
A key change from the previous guidance is that the climate change allowances for peak river
flows now are shown as variable on a regional basis; allowance are also now based on
percentiles, whereby a percentile is a measure used in statistics to describe the proportion of
possible scenarios that fall below an allowance level (e.g. a 50% percentile means that the
allowance has 50% chances of not being exceeded).
6.1.5
Sea levels allowances reflect the previous guidance and vary on a regional basis and for each
epoch as shown in Table 3 of the EA guidance.
6.1.6
However, as the site is away from any fluvial and tidal floodplain the above comments are not
applicable.
6.1.7
For peak rainfall the EA Guidance provides an upper end and central allowance depending on
epoch; the guidance recommends assessing both the central and upper end allowances to
understand the range of possible impacts. These allowances are detailed in Table 2 (Peak rainfall
intensity allowance in small and urban catchments) of the EA guidance.
6.2
DEVELOPMENT LIFESPAN
6.2.1
6.2.2
Based on this, the contingency allowances for climate change that are potentially applicable to
this Site are, as set out in Table 4 of the EAs Adapting to Climate Change advice are:
6.2.3
When undertaking the drainage strategy and basins design, the attenuation volumes will be
determined using the central estimates but will be modelled with a freeboard that can
accommodate the upper end estimates to prevent potential exceedance flows off site.
12
6.3
6.3.1
The entire site is located within flood zone 1 where the probability of fluvial and tidal flooding is
lower than 0.1% in any year. Fluvial and tidal flooding are therefore not expected to become a
significant issue even when the impact of climate change is taken into account.
6.3.2
Surface water runoff could in theory represent a risk to the site, especially when the effects of
climate change are considered. An outline surface water drainage strategy has been produced as
part of this study which takes into account the potential impact of climate change.
6.3.3
The outline surface water drainage strategy demonstrates that the drainage network at the site is
designed to accommodate run-off during all events up to and including the 100 year plus 20%
climate change allowance. It also shows that for the 100 year plus 40% climate change allowance
surface water will be accommodated within the site and therefore prevents potential exceedance
flows off site in line with best practice.
13
7.1
7.1.1
It is essential for any new development that surface water is managed effectively to limit the risk
off site as well as on site.
7.1.2
Best practise for the management of surface water based on Building Regulations 2010 Part H
states that surface water runoff from a site shall discharge to one of the following in order of
priority:
An adequate soakaway or some other adequate infiltration system
A watercourse
sewer
7.1.3
The potential for infiltration has been discussed with relevant stakeholders (EA, SW, and KCC)
and discounted at this outline stage due to potential for existing ground contamination on site and
the sensitive nature of the site being located in a source protection zone, SW adit and the
Principal Aquifer. As detailed in the Preliminary Risk Assessment (PRA) (Appendix H) which
forms part of the application, there are potentially significant contamination sources on site, such
as; bulk fuel stores, historic petrol interceptors, fire station, substations, former RAF/MOD usage,
and historic fuel spills
7.1.4
However, it has been agreed with the above stakeholders that further investigation would be
required post planning to ascertain in more detail the feasibility and appropriateness of infiltration
at least in part of the site; it is in fact recognised that infiltration would help groundwater recharge
in a known water stressed area and promote water balance.
7.1.5
The existing site discharges via a private surface water network to Pegwell Bay which is
approximately 1.2km to the south east of the site. It is proposed that the new development will
keep utilising this existing private surface water sewer and discharge to Pegwell Bay, refer to
Figure 7-1 below.
14
7.1.6
Although no attenuation is required due to the tidal nature of the recipient Pegwell Bay it is,
proposed that the developed site discharge will not exceed the existing discharge rate therefore
having no effect on the capacity of the existing private surface water sewer.
7.1.7
The drainage strategy largely consists of a series of attenuation basins, permeable paving where
viable (predominantly within commercial land) and swales (for exceedance flows) located
strategically to convey water to the natural low points to the western end of Manston Road which
bisects the site. At this low point, the surface water will be pumped following the approximate
route of the existing rising main around the perimeter of the site before discharging to new
proposed linear swale running parallel to the existing runway and connecting to the existing
private sewer as discussed above. See Appendix G for the drainage plan.
7.1.8
In Table 26.1 of The SuDS Manual (C753) four risk based approaches for water quality
management are discussed; we deem given the nature of the proposals that a Simple Index
Approach can be applied to the site. The approach to water quality for each land use is detailed
below in Table 7-1 this is also graphically indicated in Appendix G. Table 7-1 is based on Table
26.2 of the SuDS Manual (C753) for land use definition.
15
Table 7-1 - SuDS Treatment Trains
LAND USE
POLLUTION
HAZARD LEVEL
Residential Roofs
Other
(commercial)
Roofs
Individual
property
driveways, residential
car parks, low traffic
roads
and
nonresidential car parks
with
infrequent
change.
FIRST
TREATMENT
TRAIN
SECOND
TREATMENT
TRAIN
THIRD
TREATMENT
TRAIN
Very Low
N/A
Basin
Outfall Swale
Low
N/A
Basin
Outfall Swale
Basin
Outfall Swale
Basin
Outfall Swale
Permeable Paving
where viable
Low
Catchpit and
Gullies
Permeable Paving
where viable
Medium
Catchpit and
Gullies
7.1.9
The proposed development includes vast green areas as well as the provision of permeable
pavements within the commercial areas.
7.1.10
Although the surface water drainage strategy will need to be re-assessed and further developed
at the detailed design stage depending on the results of the ground investigation the general
SuDS principles as for the example the use of swales for exceedance flows and basins at the
lower ends of the site would still be applicable. It is also unlikely that infiltration only would be
sufficient to manage surface water runoff from the development and at least part of the site would
still need to discharge into the sea.
7.2
7.2.1
Both the existing and proposed drainage systems have been modelled in Micro-Drainage and
results are available in Appendix G.
7.2.2
When undertaking the modelling for the surface water drainage strategy the following
assumptions were made:
Micro-Drainage software has been used for all hydraulic design;
FEH rainfall data has been used when determining existing and proposed flowrates;
Existing discharge rates have been determined by modelling the existing network, this model
uses the main runs and ignores the channel drains and smaller pipe networks, and therefore
16
provides a worst case scenario. The area to the north is currently pumped to the gravity
system on site, however for the purpose of this model, this area has been simply modelled
assuming it is gravity fed into the wider network, whilst this may not be completely accurate, it
allows for that area to be taken into account as part of the wider model;
Residential areas have been considered to be 80% impermeable;
Commercial areas have been considered to be 95% impermeable;
Road areas have been considered to be 100% impermeable;
The proposed drainage network has been designed for the 1 in 100 year plus 20% climate
change event; and.
Refer to Drawing 70004755-D-SK-001 in Appendix G for the catchment areas considered.
Existing Drainage Network Results
7.2.3
The modelling of the existing drainage network produced the following flowrates for the 2 year, 30
year and 100 year return periods, from the 900mm outfall.
Q2 = 2216.5 l/s
Q30 = 3376.4 l/s
Q100 = 3762.2 l/s
7.2.4
It is therefore proposed that the site will discharge no more than 3762.2 l/s for the proposed 1:100
year + 20% climate change event, ensuring that the lesser events are also not exceeded
compared to the existing scenario.
Proposed Drainage Network Results
7.2.5
Unlike the existing scenario the drainage system will be designed to ensure no flooding for events
up to the 30 year event, and attenuation will be provided to ensure the 1:100 year + 20% climate
change event is catered for onsite
Design Criteria
7.2.6
The proposed development consists of the following areas (refer to Appendix G for plan):
7.2.7
Area 1:
Residential (Zones 3, 4, 5, 6) = 27.5ha
Roads = 20.9ha
Commercial = 7.3ha
Mixed Use = 1.7ha ha
Existing Museum Area (Zone 9) = 5.1ha
7.2.8
Area 2:
Residential (Zone 7, 8) = 6.8ha
Roads = 8.2ha
7.2.9
Area 3:
Commercial = 21.7ha
17
Roads = 1.2ha
7.2.10
Area 4:
Existing Runway =14.4ha
7.2.11
In order to size the attenuation for the purpose of the planning application, the draining areas
have been calculated as per the Tables below.
Table 7-2 - Area 1 Drainage Areas
AREA 1
Development
Area
Residential
Total Area
%
(ha)
Impermeable
(100% runoff
coefficient)
27.5
80
Commercial
Mixed Use
Roads
Existing Museum
Area
Total
7.3
1.7
20.9
5.1
95
90
100
95
% Permeable
(30% runoff
coefficient)
20
23.65
5
10
0
5
7.04
1.58
20.90
4.92
62.5
58.09
Development
Area
Residential
AREA 2
Total Area
%
% Permeable
(ha)
Impermeable
(30% runoff
(100% runoff
coefficient)
coefficient)
6.8
80
20
Roads
8.2
Total
15
100
5.85
8.20
14.05
Development Area
AREA 3
Total Area
%
% Permeable Total Drainage Area (ha)
(ha)
Impermeable (30% runoff
(100% runoff coefficient)
coefficient)
Commercial
21.7
95
20.94
Roads
1.2
100
1.20
Total
22.9
22.14
18
AREA 4
Development Area
14.4
% Permeable
(30% runoff
coefficient)
Total Drainage
Area (ha)
14.40
100
14.4
14.40
7.2.12
The total development area is 114.6ha (impermeable and permeable), the total drainage area
considered from the site is 108.69ha.
7.2.13
As part of the proposed development each area has been modelled in MicroDrainage to
determine the required amount of attenuation to accommodate the 1:100 year +20%cc storm
event and to ensure that as a whole the sites discharge rate does not exceed the existing for each
storm event. The results of this modelling are provided within Appendix G, and summarised in the
Tables below.
Table 7-6 - Proposed Discharge Rates
1:2
1:30
1:100
1:100+20%cc
843.1
136.1
137.2
56.1
1172.5
1778.1
231.2
182.0
90.6
2281.9
2506.9
302.9
217.7
117.3
3144.8
2975.6
349.3
257.0
140.1
3722.0
Existing
Discharge
Rates (l/s)
Proposed
Discharge
Rates (l/s)
Percentage
Reduction (%)
1:2
1:30
1:100
1:100+20%cc
2216.5
3376.4
3762.2
3762.2
1172.2
2281.9
3144.8
3722.0
47
32
16
19
Table 7-8 - Proposed Attenuation Requirements
DEVELOPMENT TOTAL MAX ALLOWABLE ATTENUATION
AREA
DRAINAGE
DISCHARGE
PROVIDED FOR
AREA (HA) RATE (THROUGH 1:100YR+20%CC
FLOW CONTROLS)
Area 1
Area 2
Area 3
Area 4
Total
58.10
14.05
22.14
3000
350
260
PLAN AREA
2
REQUIRED (M )
1:100+40%CC EVENT
28570.4
8126.4
15920.2
26839.6
8423.8
15548.6
OK, in freeboard
OK, in freeboard
OK, in freeboard
OK, within swale
14.2
150
28617.9
59434.2(3km
linear swale
with three
basins)
108.49
3760
81234.7
110246.2
7.2.14
As indicated above in Table 7-7, the site will reduce discharge compared to existing for all storm
events up to the 1:100 year + 20% climate change event. Table 7-8 provides an indication of the
required amount of attenuation needed for each Area of the Site.
7.2.15
In terms of climate change and the impact that an upper end climate change allowance (40%)
would have on the site, this scenario was modelled in Micro-Drainage, and it was determined that
the increased water level within the proposed attenuation can be managed within the existing
300mm freeboard, and thus no flooding occurs.
7.2.16
It should be noted that the outline drainage strategy excludes any permeable paving, on plot
attenuation features, swales, and pipe network and therefore provides a worst case attenuation
requirement, we have also taken very precautionary values in terms of runoff coefficients for the
residential areas and commercial areas which will need to be refined at the detailed design stage.
7.2.17
Each basin is designed to be 1.5m deep, including 300mm freeboard and therefore with an
effective depth of 1.2m, the proposed side slopes are 1:6 for health and safety reasons, the
basins have been designed at this outline stage in accordance with general best practice and the
SuDS manual. However the design will need to be further investigated and refined at the detailed
design stage having full consideration of Health & Safety requirements. Consideration of reservoir
safety requirements should be given at the detailed design stage depending on the design
proposed and volume of attenuation provided.
7.2.18
The large linear swale with basins proposed along the southern boundary, will have a base of
10m, 1:6 side slopes, this will be designed to cater for the runoff from the retained runway but
also convey attenuated flows from the rest of the development before discharging to the existing
outfall pipe which eventually connects further downstream to Pegwell Bay.
7.2.19
Although the above strategy identifies the general principles of surface water drainage
management at the site, assumptions and design solutions proposed will need to be re-assessed
at the detailed design stage and any necessary approvals sought.
7.2.20
20
7.3
7.3.1
Following meetings and discussions with SW it has been made clear that the existing foul water
drainage network surrounding the site will not have capacity to accommodate the development
and confirmed that it is likely that off-site reinforcement works will need to be undertaken to
st
resolve this. In a meeting undertaken on the 1 February 2016, SW recommended that a Section
98 be undertaken once planning is granted to account for the provision of a terminal pumping
station and rising main.
7.3.2
Given the size of the site, the location of the existing public foul sewers and the topography of the
site it is not expected that gravity connections will be achievable. It is therefore proposed that foul
water pumping stations will be provided to discharge to the existing public foul water network, the
location of these pumping stations will be largely dependent on the construction phasing of the
development and therefore cannot be confirmed at this stage.
7.4
7.4.1
The following drainage maintenance and management strategy (Table 7-9) has been produced by
us and builds on information provided within the SUDS Manual; it is expected that the
maintenance for the entire scheme will be under the management of Stone Hill Park Ltd, in which
a suitably qualified maintenance specialist will undertake the work.
21
Drainage Feature
Permeable Paving
Regular Maintenance
Brushing and vacuuming three times/year at
end of winter, mid-summer, after autumn leaf
fall, or as required on Site-specific
observations of clogging or manufacturer
recommendations.
Occasional/Remedial Maintenance
Stabilise and mow contributing and
adjacent areas, as required.
Removal of weed, as required.
Monitoring
Remediate any landscaping which,
through vegetation maintenance or
soil slip, has been raised to within
50mm of the level of the paving, as
required.
Remedial work to any depressions,
rutting and cracked or broken blocks
considered detrimental to the
structural performance or a hazard to
users, as required.
Attenuation Ponds/basins
22
Dry Swales
Pumps
Catchpit
Manholes/Inspection
Stone Hill Park
Stone Hill Park Ltd
Clean as necessary.
Repair/rehabilitation of inlets, outlets,
alarms and vents as required.
23
Chambers
Drainage Channels/Gullies
24
OFFSITE IMPACT
8.1.1
The outline surface water drainage strategy demonstrates that the drainage network at the site is
designed to accommodate run-off during all events up to and including the 100 year plus 20%
climate change allowance. It also shows that for the 100 year plus 40% climate change allowance
surface water will be accommodated within the site by the use of freeboards and therefore
prevents potential exceedance flows off site. As such the development will have a positive impact
offsite as the existing surface water flow paths crossing the site will be eliminated minimising the
risk of surface water runoff generated at the site affecting the surroundings.
8.1.2
SW have confirmed that the public foul water drainage network will not be able to accommodate
the proposed development and that off-site reinforcement works will be required. Provided the
appropriate reinforcement works are carried out the scheme will not have a negative impact on
the public drainage network.
8.1.3
Given that the sites surface water discharge rates are to match the existing rates there is no
impact on the existing private surface water sewer which is to be utilised.
8.1.4
Given that the sites surface water is to discharge to Pegwell Bay which is a tidally influenced
body, there is no impact by increasing the volumetric runoff from the site. Given the proposals to
use SuDS as pre-treatment devices on the Site, water quality to Pegwell Bay is not considered to
be negatively affected; in fact the use of a SuDS management train is expected to improve the
quality of the surface water runoff discharged into the bay.
8.1.5
The development will not cause impacts elsewhere in terms of fluvial and tidal flood risk due to its
location within Flood Zone 1.
25
RESIDUAL RISK
9.1.1
Since the site is located within Flood Zone 1, away from any floodplain, residual fluvial/tidal flood
risk is considered to be low to negligible.
9.1.2
The outline surface water drainage strategy demonstrates that the drainage network at the site is
designed to accommodate run-off during all events up to and including the 100 year plus a
climate change allowance preventing potential exceedance flows off site. Drainage exceedance
routes have also been considered and allowed for as part of the masterplanning process ensuring
that any surface water runoff exceeding the drainage network capacity would naturally flow
towards the attenuation basins at the bottom of the valley rather than impacting on the
development itself. See Appendix G for a plan displaying potential exceedance routing.
9.1.3
It is also recommended in accordance with best practice that housing plots have raised thresholds
above road level, to help mitigate against any surface water flooding.
26
10
CONCLUSIONS
10.1.1
This FRA has been prepared on behalf of Stone Hill Park Ltd to support a hybrid planning
application for the redevelopment of the Former Manston Airport.
10.1.2
The EA and TDCs SFRA both confirm the site as being located in Flood Zone 1 where the
probability of river or sea flooding is less than 0.1% (1 in 1000) chance in any given year.
Meaning that the probability of tidal or fluvial flooding can therefore be assessed as low to
negligible.
10.1.3
Surface Water could in theory be a source of flood risk as the area along Manston Road is a
potential flow route based on the available information; this however has been mitigated by the
design of an outline drainage strategy which demonstrates the ability to accommodate surface
water run-off during all events up to and including the 100 year plus appropriate climate change
allowance therefore preventing potential exceedance flows off site. As such the proposed
development will in fact significantly reduce the probability of surface water flooding at the site
and in the surroundings.
10.1.4
The proposed surface water drainage strategy optimises the use of SuDS in line with best
practice, national and local policy and has been developed in discussion with the relevant
stakeholders. At this outline stage it is proposed to discharge surface water runoff into Pegwell
Bay mimicking the current drainage arrangements; however this will need to be re-assessed post
planning following ground investigations assessing the feasibility of infiltration at the site. A large
percentage of the site will remain undeveloped and natural infiltration in those areas will not be
affected by the proposed development.
10.1.5
Other potential sources of flooding have been investigated and are deemed low risk.
10.1.6
SW have confirmed that foul development flows cannot be accommodated within the pubic
drainage network and have stated that offsite improvement works will be necessary.
Appendix A
SITE LOCATION
WESTGATE ON SEA
C
C
MARGATE
PLANNING APPLICATION SITE BOUNDARY
BIRCHINGTON ON SEA
WESTWOOD CROSS
ACOL
MANSTON
RAMSGATE
MINSTER
CLIFFSEND
02 12.05.16
Boundary Amend
MP
JW
01 05.05.16
A 29.04.16
00 22.04.16
Planning
Planning
First Issue
MP
MP
MP
JW
JW
JW
Rev
Date
NOTE:
1. Do not scale from this drawing unless for planning
2. All setting out, levels and dimensions to be agreed on site.
3. The dimensions of all materials must be checked on site
before being laid out.
4. This drawing must be read with the relevant specification
clauses and detail drawings
5. Order of construction and setting out to be agreed on site.
6. This drawing is copyright protected and may not be
reproduced in whole or part without written authority.
7. All Dimensions are in millimetres unless Otherwise Stated
Planit - IE LLP
2 Back Grafton St Altrincham WA14 1DY
0161 928 9281
18 Bowling Green Lane London EC1R 0BW
020 7430 0754
Project
Client
Drg title
Location Plan
Drg nr
PL1436-VW-018
Scale
n.t.s
Date:
Status
Planning
Revision
12.05.16
02
Drawn
MP
Checked
JW
VINC
ENT
ROAD
C
C
MANSTON ROAD
Track
LB
Stone
WB
Stone
Stone
GP
Mast
ON
MA
RO
T
UR
AD
Reservoir
(covered)
Drain
Stone
CO
NST
Reservoir
(covered)
Stone
Letter
Box
Tra
PR
ES
T
Stone
ck
ON
Stone
RO
AD
Stone
Stones
Stone
Pylon
PR
ES
T
ON
RO
AD
Pylon
Tennis
Court
El
Sub Sta
Silo
Stone
El
Sub Sta
ROAD
TON
MANS
Stone
Letter
Box
LB
Wind
Sock
MUSGRAVE
FS
20
50
Stone
ROAD
ALLAND GRAN
GE
El Sub Sta
CLOSE
Tennis
Court
AD
BEAM
RO
TOLLEMACHE CL
TO
NS
DRIVE
Stone
MANS
TON
COUR
T
MA
ESMOND
E
Manston Park
El Sub
Sta
ONT
CLOSE
Mast
El Sub Sta
(Telec
ommu
nicati
on)
21
90
SPRATL
ING STR
EET
MBUS
AVEN
UE
BEL
Track
FIRE
WAY
SPIT
MINSTER
WAY
PRES
TON
CTA
DRIV
INVI
Tank
ROAD
IE
AV
-D
COLU
ve
Ca
ROAD
90
B 21
Path
B 2050
MANSTON ROAD
The Leys
Pond
Lighting Tower
El Sub Sta
Ruin
TCB
Icehouse
(disused)
Lighting Tower
VE
TH
ERIN
N
EE
GR
E'S
GRO
Y
IN WA
MERL
TH
E
E WAY
SPITFIR
ELM GROV
Track
ST
CA
War Meml
GP
0
B 219
HIG
Tra
ck
ST
RE
TCB
RE WA
Y
ET
Lighting Tower
SPITFI
NE
OR
LA
IG
DA
0
B 219
B 2190
20
50
Sports Ground
(private)
Sports Ground
(private)
Mast
RE
ST
MINSTER
ROAD
HIG
Telegraph Hill
Wind Sock
Track
Track
Mast (Telecommunication)
A299
MINSTER
ROUNDABOUT
A299
Stones
Dunstrete
Masts (Telecommunication)
Gas Govn
SEMPLE
CLOSE
Dunstrete
HIL
LB
SOUT
HA
LL CL
OS
HENGIST WAY
TTA
IVY
CO
RY ROA
D
Mast
YH
Boundary Amends
Planning
Planning
First Issue
02 12.05.16
01 05.05.16
Stone
ILL
WA
A 29.04.16
00 15.04.16
GP
A299
CLIFFSEND
ROUNDABOUT
TH
E
N
OR
L
HIL
Tank
TCB
Date
LB
El Sub
Sta
Reservoir
FOADS HILL
JW
JW
JW
JW
Planit - IE LLP
SEA VIEW
ROAD
CLIFF VIEW
ROAD
MP
MP
MP
MP
NOTE:
1. Do not scale from this drawing unless for planning
2. All setting out, levels and dimensions to be agreed on site.
3. The dimensions of all materials must be checked on site
before being laid out.
4. This drawing must be read with the relevant specification
clauses and detail drawings
5. Order of construction and setting out to be agreed on site.
6. This drawing is copyright protected and may not be
reproduced in whole or part without written authority.
7. All Dimensions are in millimetres unless Otherwise Stated
WINDSOR ROAD
ARUNDEL ROAD
Rev
MP 84.25
SL
CLIVE ROAD
Project
A299
Cliffsend Crossing
Client
Tunnel
A299
El Sub Sta
SEVENSCORE
ROUNDABOUT
MP 84
Drg title
Drg nr
PL1436-VW-017
DRIVE
HO
A256
USE
HILL
LAUND
DRIV
E
STREET
GE
Scale
1:5500@A1
Date:
Status
Planning
Revision
12.05.16
02
Drawn
MP
Checked
JW
Appendix B
TOPOGRAPHICAL AND UTILITIES SURVEY
50.6m
Reservoir
(covered)
Dra
in
Stone
Reservoir
(covered)
FF
Stone
Nursery
BP
Plai
n View
Fair
way
Small
Ros
Coal Yard
Acres
ema
ry
Hoppers
Pen
elop
Per
Ardu
a
Depot
De
Ho
ppe
r
Ta
nk
47.0m
Garage
Letter
Box
De
LEGEND
PR
ES
TO
Tra
Stone
ck
Dro
mes
ide
TELECOM / IT
RO
AD
Stone
Un
GAS
Stone
San
WATER
z
47.5m
49.4m
FF
El Sub Sta
ELECTRICITY (HV)
Ste
inke
rqu
e
ELECTRICITY (LV)
CCTV DUCTS
Dieu
don
ne
Stones
SURFACE WATER
Ne
wla
SR
nds
FOUL WATER
De
46.6m
FF
The
Con
ifers
De
Stone
Pylon
The
De
Coach
House
Def
PR
ES
TO
N
RO
AD
Pylon
Solar Power
Ele
ctr
icit
y Su
b
Generating Station
Sta
Cou
rt Roa
RH
tion
ston
Tennis
Man
Court
48.0m
45.8m
BP
El
Sub Sta
Substation
Pouces
Nursery
Stone
El
Sub Sta
45.0m
Shelter
40.2m
Manston Court
Cottages
Park
ROA
Lodge
STO
MAN
El Sub Sta
Well
Annies Cottage
House
Stone
47.2m
Letter
Box
LB
Wind
38.6m
Sock
Manston
40.3m
Court
MUSGRAVE
CR
FS
20
50
Spitfire and
Stone
Hurricane
GRANGE
CLOS
El Sub Sta
Memorials Museum
ALLAND
38.6m
47.5m
Memorial Garden
The Courtyard
Stone
TCB
ESMOND
DRIVE
NS
MA
TO
ROA
N
AD
N COU
RT
RO
TOLLEMACHE
El Sub
Sta
ston
Villa
MAN
CL
Court
Pre
STO
Tennis
Manston Park
Ferndale Lodge
Caravan
Caravan
Park
Park
Pre
sto
Orc
har
Holmecroft
urt
Co
Caravan
Caravan Park
Park
CLOSE
Mast
10
Co
BEA
MON
T
El Sub Sta
tt
166500 N
48.0m
ad
(Telec
ommu
nicatio
n)
on
Ro
nst
Caravan Park
Ma
Sta
on
El Sub
ad
Ro
nst
Ma
39.4m
Manston Road
Kent International
Riding
SPRAT
LING
Magpies
Centre
1
STREE
T
41.3m
y
e Wa
fields
itfir
Ther
Sp
Shelter
COLU
MBUS
AVEN
UE
Airport
N ROA
D
Silos
Wood Farm
WAY
WAY
FIRE
SPIT
Track
MINSTER
Wood Farm
ves
ROAD
Ca
Cottage
49.0m
Track
CTA
PRE
STO
Silos
INVI
Tank
El Sub Sta
44.7m
Rd
48.1m
Manston
Court
The
Coach
House
Path
Cleve
Lodge
Cleve Cottage
44.8m
Telephone Exchange
MANSTON
Cleve Court
Manston
ROAD
46.9m
Road
The Leys
Pond
Alland
Grange
Manston
Manston
Lighting Tower
Works
166250 N
Jubilee
El Sub Sta
Cottages
Ruin
Garden Cottage
TCB
Icehouse
Hall
C Tk
us
Ave
Col
umb
Ave
(disused)
Col
um
bus
C Tk
Manston
Green Farm
Lighting Tower
MERL
Rose Farm
44.8m
Pouces Cottages
IN WAY
TH
use
rch
E WAY
Chu
GR
Ho
Old
rge
Fo
OV
EE
SPITFIR
'S
GR
Works
C Tk
Grenham
War Meml
Lodge
HER
CAT
ST
lter
She
Minster Road
INE
47.9m
GP
CCTV Camera
er
gs
rm
stlin
Farthings
Jol
(PH
)
ly
Track
Fa
Ru
Tre-Hern
B2190
w
Hedgero
ine
odb
Grosvenor
Cot
tag
Wo
Spitfire Way
B2190
Lighting Tower
TCB
46.9m
ET
H
HIG
ST
RE
Tra
R
BA
Way
ck
STO
Spitfire
CCTV Camera
Oaklands
NE
LA
OR
IG
DA
Lyngrove
Grove House
Spitfire
Way
Sign
Cheviots
49.6m
The
CCTV Camera
CL:49.38
7
IL:47.657
CCTV Camera
Sign
B
205
0
Club
Sports Ground
CL:49.979
(private)
IL:48.780
166000 N
Sign
CL:50.97
6
IL:49.543
CL:51.90
Sign
IL:50.25
Sign
WW
HO
LD
Manston
A2
Sports Ground
Methodist
CL:52.570
(private)
Tall Trees
Church
LD
HO
IL:50.534
E1
WW
Runway Approach Lights
Mast
Sign
Rowan
CCTV Camera
Cottage
CL:52.77
4
IL:50.915
Sign
ST
RE
ET
HIG
Sign
Sign
CL:52.951
Sign
Chapel Farm
IL:51.296
Whitebeams
POST-DEMOLITION
Minster Road (B2190)
RUBBLE
Building
CL:52.777
IL:51.577
WINDSOCK 10/28
Willow Bank
Willowbank
CL:52.76
OLD 10
Tan-Et
10 PAPIs
Nursery
IL:51.577
HOLD D
Wind Sock
THRESH
Lodge
Und
CL:52.45
HOLD E2
Sign
IL:51.296
WW
HOLD
End of 28 TODA
WW
Sign
C1
Building
Sign
Track
Sign
Sign
Smugglers Leap
Sign
Caravan Park
CL:52.21
Start of 10 TORA
Bush Farm
Track
IL:50.915
Def
Sign
Start of 10 LDA
Smugglers Leap
Sign
Caravan Park
Start of 10 TODA
CL:52.00
Start of 10 LDA
Sign
IL:50.53
Sign
HOLD
B1
End of 28 TORA
Mast (Telecommunication)
Sign
End of 28 EDA
Sun
CL:51.625
Villa
Sign
IL:50.152
End of 28 LDA
A253
165750 N
Comms Mast
Sign
CL:51.90
5
CL:51.22
IL:47.104
Sign
IL:49.771
A253
El Sub Sta
Sign
53.7m
Heng
ist Way
Heng
ist Way
CL:49.69
CL:50.59
Sign
(A299
)
IL:49.39
IL:46.646
Stones
Sign
(A299
)
Sign
HOLD C2
CL:50.61
WW
Hotel
IL:49.06
5
WW
Filling Station
Sign
Sign
hill
Str
eet
Sign
Tot
CL:51.28
Boundary Stone
IL:48.780
49.5m
CL:51.06
49.1m
IL:48.476
CL:46.780
Minster Services
IL:46.341
Sign
Sign
Sign
Minster Services
WW
Sign
Sign
HOLD B2
WW
CL:50.63
Sign
Sign
IL:48.323
CL:47.256
Sign
IL:45.732
CL:48.91
Smugglers
IL:45.193
Retreat
Minster-Thanet Cemetery
49.6m
(PH)
Sign
Dunstrete
CL:48.84
IL:44.92
CL:47.964
Hotel
IL:45.100
Chapel
War Memorial
Def
Boundary Stone
Masts (Telecommunication)
Ashenmeade
Shelter
Gas Govn
HENGIST WAY
165500 N
49.3m
CL:51.372
Dellside
IL:47.973
CL:46.64
6
IL:45.10
39.7m
LL
CLO
SE
50.6m
Dunstrete
SOU
THA
SEMPLE
CLOSE
CL:46.64
6
LB
IL:44.724
THRESH
OLD 28
28 PAPIs
Tank
TELEGRAPH
TELEGRAPH HILL
HILL
CL:47.950
IL:44.409
INDUSTRIAL
INDUSTRIAL PARK
PARK
HIL
Mill
IVY
CO
TTA
GE
Cottage
CL:46.18
CL:46.03
LAUND
DRI
RY ROAD
VE
IL:43.796
E
US
End of 10 TODA
Start of 28 TORA
CL:44.600
CL:45.27
IL:43.520
Start of 28 EDA
CL:44.817
IL:43.293
IL:42.850
Start of 28 TODA
Mast
CL:44.970
Larksfield
Start of 28 LDA
IL:42.986
End of 10 TORA
Stone
End of 10 EDA
Depot
End of 10 LDA
CL:50.87
CL:44.10
9
IL:47.713
IL:42.51
Primrose Cottage
HEN
GIS
T WAY
(A29
CL:43.901
L
Y HIL
WA
CL:44.97
9)
Boundary Stone
IL:41.92
IL:42.378
HEN
GIS
T WAY
(A29
9)
CANTERBURY ROAD
GP
CL:44.233
CL:43.445
IL:41.970
IL:41.387
TH
OR
CL:48.32
NE
0
Und
165250 N
Tank
San Remo
Heimetli
FF
Cedar
Top
Bayview
Mia
42.6m
Boundary Stone
Ohio
CL:40.70
Bayview
Billion
IL:38.56
White-Walls
Miltom
Chez Nous
Lamorna
CR
Cons
Tanks
& Ward
Bdy
The
Bungalow
Parkville
Martrice
Ronalds
The Homestead
Way
Nursery
House
40.2m
Ward Bdy
t, ED
WINDSOR ROAD
Co
Co Const, ED &
Casa
HIL
IL:46.794
CL:43.75
IL:41.819
Patrol
Mansfield Villas
CL:39.477
ate
IL:37.050
dg
Bra
Und
HO
HILL
ARUNDEL ROAD
STREET
IL:44.055
Nursery
CL:37.968
IL:35.732
38.0m
Garage
Shelter
CR
TCB
39.3m
Appendix C
DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS
VINC
ENT
ROAD
C
C
MANSTON ROAD
Track
LB
Stone
WB
Stone
Stone
GP
MA
RO
T
UR
AD
Reservoir
(covered)
Drain
Stone
CO
NST
Reservoir
(covered)
Stone
DEVELOPMENT ZONES
Land where new built form (buildings
/ structures) and associated
infrastructure and open space is
permitted
Letter
Box
Tra
PR
ES
T
Stone
ck
ON
Stone
RO
AD
Stone
Stones
Stone
Pylon
PR
ES
T
ON
RO
AD
Pylon
Tennis
Court
El
Sub Sta
Silo
Stone
El
Sub Sta
ROAD
TON
MANS
Stone
Letter
Box
LB
Wind
Sock
MUSGRAVE
FS
20
50
Stone
ROAD
ALLAND GRAN
GE
El Sub Sta
CLOSE
NS
DRIVE
ZONE 9
TO
RO
TOLLEMACHE CL
AD
BEAM
Tennis
Court
El Sub
Sta
ONT
CLOSE
Mast
Stone
MANS
TON
COUR
T
MA
ESMOND
E
Manston Park
El Sub Sta
(Telec
ommu
nicati
on)
21
90
SPRATL
ING STR
EET
MBUS
AVEN
UE
BEL
Track
FIRE
WAY
SPIT
MINSTER
Tank
WAY
PRES
TON
CTA
DRIV
INVI
ROAD
IE
AV
-D
COLU
ve
Ca
ROAD
90
B 21
Path
B 2050
ZONE 5
Pond
MANSTON ROAD
The Leys
Lighting Tower
El Sub Sta
No Development
Ruin
TCB
Icehouse
(disused)
Lighting Tower
E'S
GRO
VE
TH
E
N
EE
GR
0
B 219
TH
ERIN
ZONE 8
ST
CA
War Meml
GP
ELM GROV
Track
Y
IN WA
MERL
ZONE 10
E WAY
SPITFIR
HIG
ZONE 4
0
B 219
NE
OR
LA
IG
DA
ZONE 6
ZONE 1
B 2190
Tra
ck
ST
RE
TCB
RE WA
Y
ET
Lighting Tower
SPITFI
SPECIAL OUTDOOR
WATER-BASED RECREATION
ZONE
20
50
Sports Ground
(private)
Mast
ZONE 2
Sports Ground
(private)
ET
RE
ST
MINSTER
ROAD
HIG
Telegraph Hill
Wind Sock
Track
Track
A299
ZONE 3
Mast (Telecommunication)
MINSTER
ROUNDABOUT
A299
Stones
ZONE 7
25.04.16
Boundary Amends MP
Planning
MP
Planning
MP
Dev Area Amend MP
20.04.16
JW
H 06.04.16
G 05.04.16
F 22.03.16
For Approval
Design Issue
Seventh Issue
MP
MP
MP
JW
JW
JW
18.03.16
Sixth Issue
MP
JW
04.03.16
Fifth Issue
MP
JW
29.02.16
Fourth Issue
MP
JW
09.02.16
Third Issue
MP
JW
Second Issue
First Issue
MP
MP
JW
JW
M 12.05.16
L 05.05.16
K 29.04.16
Dunstrete
Masts (Telecommunication)
Gas Govn
SEMPLE
CLOSE
Dunstrete
HIL
LB
SOUT
HA
LL CL
OS
HENGIST WAY
TTA
IVY
CO
RY ROA
D
Mast
Stone
YH
ILL
WA
A 04.02.16
00 21.01.16
GP
A299
CLIFFSEND
ROUNDABOUT
TH
E
N
OR
L
HIL
Tank
TCB
LB
El Sub
Sta
Reservoir
FOADS HILL
Planit - IE LLP
SEA VIEW
ROAD
CLIFF VIEW
ROAD
Date
JW
NOTE:
1. Do not scale from this drawing unless for planning
2. All setting out, levels and dimensions to be agreed on site.
3. The dimensions of all materials must be checked on site
before being laid out.
4. This drawing must be read with the relevant specification
clauses and detail drawings
5. Order of construction and setting out to be agreed on site.
6. This drawing is copyright protected and may not be
reproduced in whole or part without written authority.
7. All Dimensions are in millimetres unless Otherwise Stated
WINDSOR ROAD
ARUNDEL ROAD
Rev
MP 84.25
SL
CLIVE ROAD
Project
Client
Drg title
Drg nr
PL1436-VW-011
A299
Cliffsend Crossing
Tunnel
A299
El Sub Sta
SEVENSCORE
ROUNDABOUT
MP 84
DRIVE
HO
A256
USE
HILL
LAUND
DRIV
E
STREET
GE
JW
JW
JW
Scale
1:5500@A1
Date:
Status
Planning
Revision
12.05.16
M
Drawn
MP
Checked
JW
2
3
2
1
45.8m
Flete Farm
Cottages
VINC
ENT
ROAD
MANSTON ROAD
Track
C
C
42 .1m
Caravan Site
KEY:
LB
Flete Farm
47.1m
43.3m
Fleet Farm
Bungalow
47.2m
Flete Lodge
Stone
WB
Stone
Stone
Brooklands
GP
Cottage
Nurseries
47.0m
Mast
Tank
ON
Mushroom Farm
MA
CO
RO
T
UR
AD
NST
Pumping Station
50.6m
Reservoir
(covered)
Drain
Stone
Reservoir
(covered)
FF
Stone
Nursery
BP
Plai
n Vi
ew
Small
Acres
Fairw
Rose ays
mar
y
Coal Yard
Hoppers
Pene
Per
lope
Ardu
Letter
Box
nk
De
Ta
Ho
pp
er
Garage
Depot
De
f
47.0m
Drom
Tra
d
Un
Stone
PR
esid
e
Stone
ck
ES
T
ON
Stei
FF
El Sub Sta
Stone
RO
AD
Sanz
49.4m
47.5m
nker
que
Dieu
donn
Stones
Ne
wla
SR
nd
s
De
fers
46.6m
No
rthc
Coni
De
Stone
ot
The
nsto
ne
FF
The
Chippings
Gle
Stone
Shanklin
Pylon
The
Coach
House
De
De
PR
ES
T
ON
RO
AD
Pylon
RH
Solar Power
Generating Station
Tennis
Court
48.0m
Barn Owls
2
1
Leo Cottage
45.8m
Preston
Farm Cottages
Silo
Pouces
Nursery
El
Sub Sta
BP
Stone
El
Sub Sta
45.0m
Shelter
ROAD
40.2m
Manston Court
Cottages
TON
MANS
Park
Lodge
El Sub Sta
Well
House
Annies Cottage
Stone
Letter
Box
18
47.2m
LB
Wind
Sock
38.6m
12
40.3m
Manston
Court
14
MUSGRAVE
Spitfire and
Hurricane
38.6m
47.5m
17
The Courtyard
AD
Tennis
Court
El Sub
Sta
13
RO
19
Stone
Pres
ton
ONT
Holmecroft
El Sub Sta
15
12
(Telec
ommu
nicati
14
on)
El Sub
Sta
Pre
sto
Orc
ha
rd
Co
tt
Caravan Park
CLOSE
14
Mast
Villa
Ferndale Lodge
Caravan
Park
BEAM
TOLLEMACHE CL
17
TO
NS
DRIVE
MANS
TON
COUR
T
MA
ESMOND
E
ROAD
23
Manston Park
10
Stone
4
Memorials Museum
19
ALLAND GRAN
GE
Caravan Park
50
El Sub Sta
CLOSE
12
14
FS
20
CR
Co
urt
48.0m
Caravan Park
12
39.3m
RAF Manston
History Museum
12
39.4m
s
field
Ther
MBUS
Silos
DRIV
Track
FIRE
49.0 PRESTO
N RO
m
AD
COLU
Silos
WAY
WAY
Wood Farm
SPIT
Wood Farm
Cottage
E
1
ve
Ca
s
ROAD
44.7m
90
B 21
2
1
19
20
48.1m
14
The
Coach
House
ING STR
EET
1a
25
26
12
MINSTER
Tank
Path
10
Cleve
16
17
B 2050
Cleve Cottage
Lodge
18
44.8m
Telephone Exchange
14
15
13
El Sub Sta
SPRATL
Magpies
41.3m
Shelter
BEL
IE
AV
CTA
90
-D
INVI
21
Centre
AVEN
UE
Riding
45.4m
MANSTON ROAD
46.9m
11
12
Cleve Court
The Leys
Pond
CR
Alland
Grange
Works
Lighting Tower
Jubilee
Cottages
El Sub Sta
4
Ruin
TCB
Garden Cottage
Icehouse
Hall
(disused)
15
8
18
C Tk
Lighting Tower
Manston
Green Farm
44.8m
10
3
3
w
1
Wo
Cottodbin
age e
Grosvenor
Tre-Hern
ST
RE
ck
10
18
HIG
Tra
RE WA
Y
ET
TCB
46.9m
SPITFI
Farthings
ng
stli
ELM GROV
Ru
Jo
ll
(P y Fa
H) rm
Track
er
Lighting Tower
VE
ERIN
TH
lte
CA
She
War Meml
GP
Hedgero
N
EE
47.9m
Grenham
Lodge
44.3m
0
B 219
E'S
GRO
Old orge
F
Ho
Chu
GR
SPI
Works
C Tk
use
rch
TH
E
WAY
TFIRE
ST
Y
IN WA
MERL
Pouces Cottages
Rose Farm
NE
IG
49.6m
Lyngro
ve
Grove House
0
B 219
Cedarwood
20
50
32
B 2190
Club
HIGHLANDS GLADE
DA
17
NOTES:
Oaklands
3
Def
LA
The
Cheviots
15
OR
Sports Ground
(private)
36
50 .7m
38
Manston
Methodist
Church
Runway Approach Lights
Mast
Sports Ground
(private)
Tall Trees
Rowan
Cottage
ET
RE
ST
ROAD
HIG
Chapel Farm
MINSTER
21
22
Willow Bank
Nursery
25
26
Tan-Et
Lodge
Whitebeams
Mount Pleasant
24
Telegraph Hill
37
39
28
Willowbank
Wind Sock
40
17
Und
35
32
11
36
38
Smugglers Leap
Caravan Park
12
12a
Def
4
6a
Bush Farm
Track
3
Track
31
31a
The
House
12b
Mast (Telecommunication)
Sun
Villa
6
5a
A299
MINSTER
ROUNDABOUT
A299
53.7m
Stones
Filling Station
Boundary Stone
49.5m
49.1m
Minster Services
Smugglers
Retreat
(PH)
Dunstrete
Hotel
Chapel
Def
Boundary Stone
Masts (Telecommunication)
Shelter
11
Ashenmeade
15
Gas Govn
HENGIST WAY
12
10
35
8
4
34
E
LL CL
OS
Sta
1 to 9
33
50.6m
Dunstrete
111
11
CLOSE
SOUT
HA
19
SEMPLE
15
115
LB
39.7m
49.3m
Dellside
El Su
b
21a
21b
21
Tank
109
27
HO
HIL
GE
CO
Mast
Larksfield
Stone
46.6m
Primrose Cottage
The Mill House
YH
ILL
Boundary Stone
WA
GP
A299
CLIFFSEND
ROUNDABOUT
TH
E
N
OR
L
HIL
Und
Tank
28
San Remo
JW
JW
K
J
I
H
G
29.04.16
25.04.16
20.04.16
06.04.16
05.04.16
Planning
Dev Area Amend
Red Line Amend
For Approval
Design Issue
MP
MP
AS
MP
MP
JW
JW
JW
JW
JW
22.03.16
Seventh Issue
MP
JW
E
D
18.03.16
04.03.16
Sixth Issue
Fifth Issue
MP
MP
JW
JW
C
B
A
00
29.02.16
09.02.16
04.02.16
21.01.16
Fourth Issue
Third Issue
Second Issue
First Issue
MP
MP
MP
MP
JW
JW
JW
JW
Rev
Date
Heimetli
21
FF
26
Cedar
Top
Casa
Mia
42.6m
Bayview
Bayview
Billion
White-Walls
Lamorna
CR
11
The
Bungalow
Tanks
Parkville
Nursery
House
40.2m
ROAD
Martrice
Ronalds
Way
ARUNDEL ROAD
Bdy
12
ard
t, ED
&W
NOTE:
1. Do not scale from this drawing unless for planning
2. All setting out, levels and dimensions to be agreed on site.
3. The dimensions of all materials must be checked on site
before being laid out.
4. This drawing must be read with the relevant specification
clauses and detail drawings
5. Order of construction and setting out to be agreed on site.
6. This drawing is copyright protected and may not be
reproduced in whole or part without written authority.
7. All Dimensions are in millimetres unless Otherwise Stated
Chez Nous
Miltom
Co Co
ns
The Homestead
Mansfield Villas
8a
Patrol
54
ate
dg
Und
Bra
44
Nursery
40
Katrina
38.0m
Shelter
Garage
CR
TCB
39.3m
22
18
14
10
LB
20
El Sub
Sta
14
17
Nursery
22
26
25
19
22
17a
21
17
14
10
15
11
12
11
10
Cliff
House
Boundary Stone
Ohio
Planit - IE LLP
27
37
34
SEA VIEW
ROAD
28
31
27
CLIFF VIEW
ROAD
26
30
28
22
Reservoir
FOADS HILL
MP 84.25
SL
11
48
13
46
17
49
47
39
46
43
41
38
39
36
31
Und
37a
7
51
22.3m
24.4m
5a
5
1
CLIVE ROAD
56
24
26
24a
50
14
10
2
55
Project
Client
Drg title
Drg nr
PL1436-VW-012
60
63
58
56
A299
Cliffsend Crossing
Tunnel
A299
El Sub Sta
SEVENSCORE
ROUNDABOUT
MP 84
El Sub Sta
19.8m
24
12
18
DRIVE
Def
17
11
A256
Depot
MP
MP
IVY
28 to 32
105
HILL
Mill
Cottage
USE
TTA
14 to 27
INDUSTRIAL PARK
RY ROA
D
14
4
19
LAUND
11
22
DRIV
E
STREET
35
TELEGRAPH HILL
Boundary Amends
Planning
M 12.05.16
L 05.05.16
49.6m
Tank
17
15
Scale
1:5500@A1
Date:
Status
Planning
Revision
12.05.16
M
Drawn
MP
Checked
JW
VINC
ENT
ROAD
Track
C
C
MANSTON ROAD
Stone
WB
Stone
Stone
GP
Mast
ON
MA
RO
T
UR
AD
Reservoir
(covered)
Drain
Stone
CO
NST
Reservoir
(covered)
Stone
Letter
Box
Tra
PR
ES
T
Stone
ck
ON
Stone
RO
AD
Stone
Stones
Stone
Pylon
PR
ES
T
ON
RO
AD
Pylon
DEVELOPMENT ZONE
Tennis
Court
El
Sub Sta
Silo
Stone
El
Sub Sta
STRUCTURE PLANTING
ROAD
TON
MANS
Stone
Letter
Box
LB
Wind
Sock
MUSGRAVE
FS
20
50
Stone
ROAD
ALLAND GRAN
GE
El Sub Sta
CLOSE
BEAM
Tennis
Court
AD
Manston Park
RO
TOLLEMACHE CL
TO
NS
DRIVE
Stone
MANS
TON
COUR
T
MA
ESMOND
E
El Sub
Sta
ONT
CLOSE
Mast
El Sub Sta
(Telec
ommu
nicati
on)
21
90
SPRATL
ING STR
EET
MBUS
AVEN
UE
BEL
Track
FIRE
WAY
SPIT
MINSTER
WAY
PRES
TON
CTA
DRIV
INVI
Tank
ROAD
IE
AV
-D
COLU
ve
Ca
ROAD
90
B 21
Path
B 2050
MANSTON ROAD
The Leys
Pond
Lighting Tower
El Sub Sta
Ruin
TCB
Icehouse
(disused)
Lighting Tower
VE
TH
ERIN
N
EE
GR
E'S
GRO
Y
IN WA
MERL
TH
E
E WAY
SPITFIR
ELM GROV
Track
ST
CA
War Meml
GP
0
B 219
SPITFI
HIG
RE WA
Y
Tra
ck
ST
RE
TCB
ET
Lighting Tower
NE
OR
LA
IG
DA
ATTENUATION AREA
0
B 219
B 2190
20
50
Sports Ground
(private)
Sports Ground
(private)
Mast
RE
ST
ROAD
HIG
MINSTER
No Development
Telegraph Hill
Wind Sock
SPECIAL OUTDOOR
WATER-BASED RECREATION
ZONE
As per Structural Open Space and
infrastructure Zone but also
where recreational surface water
body and associated built facilities
allowed (wave garden)
Track
Track
Mast (Telecommunication)
A299
MINSTER
ROUNDABOUT
A299
Stones
Dunstrete
Masts (Telecommunication)
Gas Govn
SEMPLE
CLOSE
Dunstrete
HIL
LB
SOUT
HA
LL CL
OS
HENGIST WAY
TTA
IVY
CO
RY ROA
D
Mast
Stone
YH
ILL
WA
GP
A299
CLIFFSEND
ROUNDABOUT
TH
E
N
OR
L
HIL
TCB
12.05.16
05.05.16
29.04.16
25.04.16
20.04.16
06.04.16
05.04.16
22.03.16
18.03.16
04.03.16
29.02.16
09.02.16
04.02.16
21.01.16
Rev
Date
LB
El Sub
Sta
Reservoir
FOADS HILL
MP
MP
MP
MP
AS
MP
MP
MP
MP
MP
MP
MP
MP
MP
JW
JW
JW
JW
JW
JW
JW
JW
JW
JW
JW
JW
JW
JW
Planit - IE LLP
SEA VIEW
ROAD
CLIFF VIEW
ROAD
Boundary Amends
Planning
Planning
Dev Area Amend
Red Line Amend
For Approval
Design Issue
Seventh Issue
Sixth Issue
Fifth Issue
Fourth Issue
Third Issue
Second Issue
First Issue
NOTE:
1. Do not scale from this drawing unless for planning
2. All setting out, levels and dimensions to be agreed on site.
3. The dimensions of all materials must be checked on site
before being laid out.
4. This drawing must be read with the relevant specification
clauses and detail drawings
5. Order of construction and setting out to be agreed on site.
6. This drawing is copyright protected and may not be
reproduced in whole or part without written authority.
7. All Dimensions are in millimetres unless Otherwise Stated
WINDSOR ROAD
ARUNDEL ROAD
Tank
MP 84.25
SL
CLIVE ROAD
Project
Client
Drg title
Drg nr
PL1436-VW-015
A299
Cliffsend Crossing
Tunnel
A299
El Sub Sta
SEVENSCORE
ROUNDABOUT
MP 84
DRIVE
HO
A256
USE
HILL
LAUND
DRIV
E
STREET
GE
M
L
K
J
I
H
G
F
E
D
C
B
A
00
Scale
1:5500@A1
Date:
Status
Planning
Revision
12.05.16
M
Drawn
MP
Checked
JW
Appendix D
SOUTHERN WATER ASSET AND CORRESPONDENCE
APPENDIX D-1
DATA
ATKINS CHECKED
BE
APPENDIX D-2
CORRESPONDENCE
Appendix E
KENT COUNTY COUNCIL AND THANET DISTRICT COUNCIL DATA
AND CORRESPONDENCE
APPENDIX E-1
MAPPING DATA
Legend
Recorded Flood Events
Sewer flooding incident postcode area
Note:
The size of the sewer flooding
incident areas represents the
size of the postcode area the
incident occurred in not the
scale of the flood event.
Drawing Title:
Figure 4
0 2.5 5
Kilometers
This map is based upon Ordnance Survey material with the permission of Ordnance Survey on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty's Stationery Office (C) Crown Copyright.
Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown Copyright and may lead to prosecution or civil proceedings. 100019238. 2010
10
Legend
Dwellings predicted to be
flooded by 1 in 200 year rain
storm event
Flooded dwellings per sq. km
0-4
5-7
8 - 21
22 - 50
51 - 83
84 - 210
Drawing Title:
Figure 5
0 2.5 5
Kilometers
This map is based upon Ordnance Survey material with the permission of Ordnance Survey on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty's Stationery Office (C) Crown Copyright.
Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown Copyright and may lead to prosecution or civil proceedings. 100019238. 2010
10
Legend
Grioundwater Risk Areas
Negligible
Low
Medium
High
Drawing Title:
Drawing Number:
Figure 6
0 2.5 5
Kilometers
This map is based upon Ordnance Survey material with the permission of Ordnance Survey on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty's Stationery Office (C) Crown Copyright.
Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown Copyright and may lead to prosecution or civil proceedings. 100019238. 2010
10
626000
627000
628000
629000
630000
631000
632000
633000
634000
635000
636000
637000
638000
639000
640000
Key:
174000
625000
174000
624000
173000
172000
171000
171000
172000
173000
Urban Areas
Margate
170000
170000
Kingsgate
Westgate on Sea
169000
168000
168000
169000
Birchington
167000
166000
166000
167000
Broadstairs
165000
165000
Ramsgate
164000
164000
163000
163000
Minster
Scale: 1:55,000 @ A3
162000
161000
160000
160000
161000
162000
624000
625000
626000
627000
628000
629000
630000
631000
Based upon the Ordnance Survey Map with the permission of the Controller of Her Majesty's Stationery Office. Crown Copyright. Thanet District Council 100018261
632000
633000
634000
635000
636000
637000
638000
639000
640000
July 2008
22266-S03 RAMPJ
626000
627000
628000
629000
630000
631000
632000
633000
634000
635000
636000
637000
638000
639000
640000
Key:
174000
625000
174000
624000
Urban Areas
!
173000
173000
172000
172000
BULLHEAD BED
HARWICH FORMATION
171000
171000
LAMBETH GROUP
Kingsgate
Margate
170000
170000
169000
168000
168000
169000
Birchington
167000
166000
166000
167000
Broadstairs
165000
165000
Ramsgate
164000
164000
163000
163000
Minster
Scale: 1:55,000 @ A3
162000
161000
161000
162000
160000
160000
624000
625000
626000
627000
628000
629000
630000
631000
632000
Based upon the Ordnance Survey Map with the permission of the Controller of Her Majesty's Stationery Office. Crown Copyright. Thanet District Council 100018261
633000
634000
635000
636000
637000
638000
639000
640000
July 2008
22266-S04 RAMPJ
626000
627000
628000
629000
630000
631000
632000
633000
634000
635000
636000
637000
638000
639000
640000
Key:
174000
625000
174000
624000
Urban Areas
173000
172000
171000
171000
172000
173000
Kingsgate
170000
170000
Margate
Westgate on Sea
169000
168000
168000
169000
Birchington
167000
166000
166000
167000
Broadstairs
165000
165000
Ramsgate
164000
164000
163000
163000
Minster
Scale: 1:55,000 @ A3
161000
160000
162000
161000
160000
162000
624000
625000
626000
627000
628000
629000
630000
631000
632000
Based upon the Ordnance Survey Map with the permission of the Controller of Her Majesty's Stationery Office. Crown Copyright. Thanet District Council 100018261
633000
634000
635000
636000
637000
638000
639000
640000
Figure 5
Environment Agency
Groundwater Vulnerability Maps
July 2008
22266-S05 RAMPJ
626000
627000
628000
629000
630000
631000
632000
633000
634000
635000
636000
637000
638000
639000
640000
Key:
174000
625000
174000
624000
Urban Areas
Groundwater Source Protection Zones
173000
173000
Zone 1
172000
Zone 3
Source Protection Zones supplied by
Environment Agency March 2008
171000
171000
172000
Zone 2
Margate
170000
170000
Kingsgate
Westgate on Sea
169000
168000
168000
169000
Birchington
167000
166000
166000
167000
Broadstairs
165000
165000
Ramsgate
164000
164000
163000
163000
Minster
Scale: 1:55,000 @ A3
162000
161000
160000
160000
161000
162000
624000
625000
626000
627000
628000
629000
630000
631000
632000
Based upon the Ordnance Survey Map with the permission of the Controller of Her Majesty's Stationery Office. Crown Copyright. Thanet District Council 100018261
633000
634000
635000
636000
637000
638000
639000
640000
July 2008
22266-S06 RAMPJ
624000
625000
626000
627000
628000
629000
630000
631000
632000
633000
634000
635000
636000
637000
638000
639000
640000
Key:
173000
172000
High
172000
173000
Urban Areas
Low
171000
171000
Medium
Kingsgate
170000
170000
Margate
Westgate on Sea
169000
168000
168000
169000
Birchington
167000
166000
166000
167000
Broadstairs
165000
165000
Ramsgate
164000
164000
163000
163000
Minster
162000
162000
Scale: 1:55,000 @ A3
161000
161000
160000
160000
624000
625000
626000
627000
628000
629000
630000
631000
Based upon the Ordnance Survey Map with the permission of the Controller of Her Majesty's Stationery Office. Crown Copyright. Thanet District Council 100018261
632000
633000
634000
635000
636000
637000
638000
639000
640000
Figure 20
Potential for Surface Water Run-off
Generation
April 2008
22266-S20 RAMPJ
Legend
North
E
C
F
D
MARGATE
)
"
G
F
#
!
<
Y
X
Education
Healthcare and Medical Services
Emergency Services
Nursing, Retirement and Rest Homes
Water Utilities
_
^
Military
Receptors
C
D
E
F
G
H
West Birchington
South Birchington
Westgate on Sea
Garlinge South
Margate North and Dreamland Heritage Site
Margate South and QEQM
Margate East
Cliftonville
Client:
E
G
F
Partners:
Consultant:
Scale 1:35,000
Please NOTE: The Flood Map for Surface Water provides an indicative outline of areas that may be susceptible to surface water flood risk, it does not indicate actual risk
This map is based upon Ordnance Survey material with the permission of Ordnance Survey on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty's Stationery Office (C) Crown Copyright.
Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown Copyright and may lead to prosecution or civil proceedings. 100019238. 2012
APPENDIX E-2
CORRESPONDENCE
Thwaites, Craig
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
SUDS@kent.gov.uk
02 March 2016 16:45
Bansal, Gurdeep
RE: Manston Airport - Flood Risk Consultation - CONFIDENTIAL
1. In your role as lead local flood authority (LLFA) for the area could you please provide details of any
known land drainage and surface water issues within the area?
We are unaware of any land drainage or surface water issues in the area. Please see our Surface Water
Management Plan for Thanet for a more detailed exploration of the local flood risk issues in the district.
2. In relation to the above, could you also please confirm that you are the sole party responsible for
minor watercourses and ditches within the area; and if not what other authorities there are within
the area?
KCC are not directly responsible for any minor watercourses. However, any feature on this site capable of
conveying water can be considered to fall under the definition of an ordinary watercourse. As such, the
formal Land Drainage Consent of KCC (in its role as Lead local Flood Authority) would be required for any
works which have the capacity to reduce/affect the ability of any ditch or ordinary watercourse to convey
flow (including any temporary works, outfalls and/or any culverting required for access).
The maintenance of an ordinary watercourse will always be the responsibility of the riparian owner.
3. Could you please provide details on the history of flooding within the area if available, including any
flooding from highway systems if this is known?
Our SWMP for Thanet states:
As with any development, we would recommend that our Water. People. Places (masterplanning for
SuDS) document is given full regard when the masterplanning of the development is considered. This
document is available here.
It should be noted that the site overlies a valuable and vulnerable aquifer; the Environment Agency should
therefore be contacted to discuss their requirements, particularly with regard to the disposal of surface
water through infiltration and any potentially contaminative previous uses of the site.
We would welcome the opportunity to discuss your proposed drainage strategy for this development site at
your earliest convenience.
Please let me know if I can be of any further assistance?
Kind regards,
Joe Williamson
Joseph Williamson | Flood Risk Project Officer | Kent County Council
Environment Planning and Enforcement, Invicta House, County Hall, Maidstone, Kent, ME14 1XX
t: 03000 413481| e: joseph.williamson@kent.gov.uk | www.kent.gov.uk
Please consider the environment before printing this email
We are currently in the process of undertaking some baseline flood risk and drainage works and eventually
a formal Flood Risk Assessment for the above 350 hectare (ha) site (see attached Site location plan). The
existing site is the disused Manston Airport. The proposed redevelopment is to be mixed use including light
industrial, residential and public areas, please note that the scheme is at the very early stages. In order to
understand the potential sources of flooding and the level of flood risk at the site we have some specific
queries below and would be grateful for your attention to them.
We are aware of the following documents, and are currently reviewing to help inform our assessment, if
you are aware of any other we would appreciate it if you could advise.
Thanet District Strategic Flood Risk Assessment (SFRA), 2009
Thanet Stage 1 Surface Water Management Plan (SWMP), 2013
Kent County Council Preliminary Flood Risk Assessment (PFRA), 2011
Kent County Council Local Flood Risk Management Strategy, July 2013
Kent County Council - Drainage and Planning Policy Statement (Local Flood Risk Management
Strategy Guidance), September 2015.
Thanet Local Plan, 2006
Thanet District Council (TDC) Annual Monitoring Report 2014
We would be most obliged if you could answer the following queries:
1. In your role as lead local flood authority (LLFA) for the area could you please provide details of any
known land drainage and surface water issues within the area.
2. In relation to the above, could you also please confirm that you are the sole party responsible for
minor watercourses and ditches within the area; and if not what other authorities there are within
the area.
3. Could you please provide details on the history of flooding within the area if available, including any
flooding from highway systems if this is known.
4. Please also indicate whether the Strategic Flood Risk Assessment (SFRA) stated above is due to
be updated or revised, and if so when?
5. Please also let us know if the Thanet Surface Water Management Plan (SWMP) is due to be
revised, and if so when?
6. We were unable to find a Water Cycle Study, is one available?
7. Please let us know if the Preliminary Flood Risk Assessment (PFRA) is due to be revised, and if so
when?
8. The new Drainage and Planning Policy Statement (Local Flood Risk Management Strategy
Guidance), September 2015 sets out local policies in relation to flood risk and drainage, however
please confirm any specific requirements we should be aware off.
We are consulting the Environment Agency and Southern Water as well in relation to flood risk and
drainage.
We would welcome your comments on any issues or concerns you may have involving this site, and we
would be very keen on a meeting if you are available. Please do not hesitate to contact me, if you wish to
discuss.
Kind Regards
Gurdeep Bansal
Senior Engineer
Appendix F
EA DATA AND CORRESPONDENCE
APPENDIX F-1
MAPPING DATA
Source Protection Zone Map Manston Airport created on 25-9-16 KSL 150909KR91
Legend
95
190
285 m.
Environment Agency copyright and / or database rights 2014. All rights reserved. Crown Copyright and database right 2014. Ordnance Survey licence number 100024198.
APPENDIX F-2
CORRESPONDENCE
Thwaites, Craig
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Attachments:
Dear Craig
Re: Manston Airport - Flood Risk Consultation
Thank you for your enquiry which was received on 26 August 2015 and subsequent payment received on
10 September 2015.I have attached a receipt for your records.
We respond to requests under the Freedom of Information Act 2000 and Environmental Information
Regulations 2004.
River and tidal flooding
1. The site shown is within Flood Zone 1 according to the Environment Agency online Flood Maps for
Planning. Could you please confirm this is correct? It is correct
2. Please let us know if hydraulic modelling has been undertaken within the area (and of what type, for
example J-Flow) and provide any available modelled flood water levels relevant to the site. Could
you please also indicate whether the levels take into account the potential impact of climate
change; and whether additional hydraulic modelling is planned in the foreseeable future. Not
applicable no main rivers.
3. If climate change has been incorporated, please define how this has been calculated if different
from that sued with the Technical Guidance to the NPPF (for example if UKCP09 has been used).
N/A
4. Please provide details on the level, condition and standard of protection of any flood defences that
protect the site, taking into account the impact of climate change if known. Not main river so none
there that the Environment Agency are aware of.
5. Have the Environment Agency undertaken or are planning to undertake any flood alleviation works
in the near future which may affect the site? Please provide details of any relevant schemes if this
is applicable. No not main river.
6. Please advise us of any hydraulic structures either upstream or downstream that may affect the site
and of their working regimes if these are maintained by the Agency. Unknown you will need to
contact the LLFA/IDB for the area.
7. Please provide us with details of any known historical flooding at the site. Any known information on
the mechanism of flooding (including any studies undertaken) for the area would also be
appreciated. None on record
8. Are there any specific policies relating to the stretch or the River in this location? N/A
Other sources of flooding
9. Are there any watercourses/ditches that are within the area that are may pose a flood risk to the
site? Could you please supply any known contact details of the relevant responsible authority (for
example Internal Drainage Board). Please contact the Internal Drainage Board
10. Are there any issues related to surface water flooding (including past flooding linked to drainage
systems) within the area? We shall, of course, be contacting the relevant Local Authority/Water
Company for their records.
The Environment Agency no longer comment on surface water drainage systems this is
something that the Lead Local Planning Authority will comment on.
1
11. Could you please (if available) supply a pluvial flooding map; or any information available from a
SWMP, PFRA or similar that may indicate potential flooding issues. Please contact the local
authority.
12. We would be interested in any information in your possession on groundwater (e.g. groundwater
level) and the potential for groundwater flooding within the area. This includes if the site is located
within a source protection zone and whether infiltration would be an appropriate means of disposing
of surface water. Please contact the local authority.
13. Are there any water quality issues/requirements for the watercourses / groundwater on site or
downstream that we need to take into account? N/A
Drainage
14. Is there any current Agency preference on any drainage strategy for the site? This includes
precautions on infiltration, preferred discharge rates or SuDS options. Yes the site in an SPZ, I
have provide you with relevant map and yes there are historic GW quality concerns related
to airfield use, local fuel storage and some commercial activities on site that will need to be
taken account of in any re-development.
Remediation of any discovered contamination would be expected of any development proposals in
accordance with NPPF and Local plan requirements and to meet WFD aims and objectives.
Drainage design would have to take into account SPZ1 and2, but we would support appropriate
SUDS designs in suitable locations for infiltration swales, ponds etc in clean uncontaminated areas
outside SPZ1
Groundwater flooding should not be an issue here.
Water Quality
In addition to the above, could you please provide the following water quality data for a 1.5 km study area
from the current proposed red line boundary:
15. Confirmation of any culverted Main Rivers or Ordinary Watercourse. N/A
16.Confirmation of the current (i.e. RBMP Cycle 2 if available) WFD classification of any main rivers in
the vicinity of the site. Please include details of any information on existing pressures, risks or proposed
mitigation and improvements. Please see the attached word document Minster
17. Details of active discharge consents and abstraction licences to / from surface waters (location,
source and use) as GIS layer or Excel file.
No active discharge consents or abstraction licences in the specified location .
18.Details of recorded water pollution incidents during the last 5 years including location, pollution
source, category and receiving waters (as Excel table if possible).
No recorded incidents relating to water pollutions for the area.
19. A list of known fish species present in any main river (in close proximity to the site) at the nearest
monitored reach together with and annual counts data for
the past 5 years.
The fish sampling points closest to the site boundary are on the River Stour at Sturry, Grove Ferry
and Plucks Gutter.
Attached is information from these sites from 2010, 2012 and 2015. These show the usual variety of
coarse fish species that we would expect at this point on a river. The Stour also supports an annual
run of Sea Trout.
Minster Marshes is just over 1.5km from the site boundary this is important habitat for eels.
20.Any other reports or studies that may be relevant (e.g. relating to the hydrology of the study area or
sediment quality in any river in close proximity to the site or other water body). N/a
In addition, could you please let us know the names and contact details of the Development Control Officer
is Sam Howe and she can be email at PSOEastKent@environment-agency.gov.uk and Planning Liaison
Officer is Jo Beck and she can be contact at the following email address KSLPlanning@environmentagency.gov.uk who are responsible for the area.
This information is subject to the attached standard notice.
I trust this information is of use. If you have any further questions, please contact us and we will be happy
to help.
If you have any further queries or if youd like us to review the information we have provided under the
Freedom of Information Act 2000 and Environmental Information Regulations 2004 please contact us
within two months and we will happily do this for you.
We would be really grateful if you could spare five minutes to help us improve our service. Please click on
the link below and fill in our survey we use every piece of feedback we receive:
http://www.smartsurvey.co.uk/s/EnvironmentAgencyCustomerSurvey/?a=KSL
Kind regards
Karen
Karen Rigg
Customers and Engagement Officer
Environment Agency, Kent and South London
Tel: 01732 223 224 Email: kslenquiries@environment-agency.gov.uk
Orchard House, Endeavour Park, London Road, Addington, West Malling, Kent, ME19 5SH
Information in this message may be confidential and may be legally privileged. If you
have received this message by mistake, please notify the sender immediately, delete it
and do not copy it to anyone else.
We have checked this email and its attachments for viruses. But you should still check
any attachment before opening it.
We may have to make this message and any reply to it public if asked to under the
Freedom of Information Act, Data Protection Act or for litigation. Email messages and
attachments sent to or from any Environment Agency address may also be accessed by
someone other than the sender or recipient, for business purposes.
Click here to report this email as spam
89_07_SD02, Version 6
Standard notice [not for use with Special Data, Personal Data or unlicensed 3
rd
party rights]
Information warning
We (The Environment Agency) do not promise that the Information supplied to You will always be accurate,
free from viruses and other malicious or damaging code (if electronic), complete or up to date or that the
Information will provide any particular facilities or functions or be suitable for any particular purpose. You
must ensure that the Information meets your needs and are entirely responsible for the consequences of
using the Information. Please also note any specific information warning or guidance supplied to you.
Permitted use
The Information is protected by intellectual property rights and whilst you have certain statutory rights
which include the right to read the Information, you are granted no additional use rights whatsoever
unless you agree to the licence set out below.
Commercial use of anything except EA OpenData is subject to payment of a 50 licence fee (+VAT) for
each person seeking the benefit of the licence, except for use as an Environment Agency contractor or
for approved media use.
To activate this licence you do not need to contact us (unless you need to pay us a Commercial licence
fee) but if you make any use in excess of your statutory rights you are deemed to accept the terms
below.
Licence
We grant you a worldwide, royalty-free (apart from the 50 licence fee for commercial use), perpetual, nonexclusive licence to use the Information subject to the conditions below.
You are free to:
copy, publish, distribute and transmit the Information
adapt the Information
exploit the Information commercially, for example, by combining it with other Information, or by
including it in your own product or application
You must (where you do any of the above):
acknowledge the source of the Information by including the following attribution statement:
Contains Environment Agency information Environment Agency and database right
ensure that you do not use the Information in a way that suggests any official status or that We
endorse you or your use of the Information
ensure that you do not mislead others or misrepresent the Information or its source or use the
Information in a way that is detrimental to the environment, including the risk of reduced future
enhancement
ensure that your use of the Information does not breach the Data Protection Act 1998 or the Privacy
and Electronic Communications (EC Directive) Regulations 2003
These are important conditions and if you fail to comply with them the rights granted to you under this
licence, or any similar licence granted by us will end automatically.
No warranty
The Information is licensed as is and We exclude all representations, warranties, obligations and liabilities
in relation to the Information to the maximum extent permitted by law. We are not liable for any errors or
omissions in the Information and shall not be liable for any loss, injury or damage of any kind caused by its
use. We do not guarantee the continued supply of the Information.
Governing Law
This licence is governed by the laws of England and Wales.
Definitions
Information means the information that is protected by copyright or by database right (for example, literary
and artistic works, content, data and source code) offered for use under the terms of this licence.
Commercial means:
offering a product or service containing the Information, or any adaptation of it, for a charge, or
internal use for any purpose, or offering a product or service based on the Information for indirect
commercial advantage, by an organisation that is primarily engaged in trade, commerce or a profession.
Contact: enquiries@environment-agency.gov.uk
03708 506506
Appendix G
SURFACE WATER DRAINAGE STRATEGY AND MODELLING
APPENDIX G-1
EXISTING NETWORK MODELLING RESULTS
Page 1
Manston Airport
Existing Drainage Model
FEH Rainfall
Designed by GB
Checked by GB
Network 2015.1
0.000
0.750
0
0.200
1.500
1.200
1.00
500
Area
(ha)
0-4 4.980
4-8 13.255
Time
Area
(mins) (ha)
Time
Area
(mins) (ha)
8-12 3.183
12-16 9.103
16-20 7.230
20-24 7.172
Time
Area
(mins) (ha)
24-28 8.290
28-32 5.751
Time
Area
(mins) (ha)
Time
Area
(mins) (ha)
32-36 3.390
36-40 2.864
40-44 3.776
44-48 2.665
1982-2015 XP Solutions
Time
(mins)
Area
(ha)
48-52 10.525
52-56 13.612
Time
(mins)
Area
(ha)
56-60 5.729
60-64 4.910
Time
(mins)
Area
(ha)
64-68 4.800
68-72 0.980
Page 2
Manston Airport
Existing Drainage Model
FEH Rainfall
Designed by GB
Checked by GB
Network 2015.1
Network Design Table for Storm
PN
Length
(m)
Fall
(m)
S1.000
S1.001
S1.002
S1.003
S1.004
S1.005
S1.006
146.654
146.778
146.654
146.248
146.186
146.500
185.000
0.281
0.381
0.381
0.284
0.707
0.763
0.898
521.9
385.2
384.9
515.0
206.8
192.0
206.0
1.857
1.857
1.857
1.857
1.857
1.857
1.857
8.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
15.00
0.00
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.600
0.600
0.600
0.600
0.600
0.600
0.600
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
300
300
375
450
450
450
450
0.0 0.600
0.0 0.600
o
o
675
675
Rain
T.C.
US/IL
(mm/hr) (mins)
(m)
I.Area
Base
Foul Add Flow Vel
Cap
Flow
(ha)
Flow (l/s) (l/s)
(l/s)
(m/s) (l/s) (l/s)
S1.000
S1.001
S1.002
S1.003
S1.004
S1.005
S1.006
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
11.59
14.66
17.33
20.07
21.80
23.47
25.65
51.577
51.296
50.915
50.534
50.250
49.543
48.780
1.857
3.714
5.571
7.428
9.285
11.142
12.999
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.68
0.80
0.92
0.89
1.41
1.46
1.41
48.2
56.2
101.3
141.4
224.3
232.8
224.7
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
S2.000
S2.001
0.00
0.00
18.65 49.000
30.00 48.000
18.000
36.000
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
1.46 522.6
0.63 225.0
0.0
0.0
1982-2015 XP Solutions
Page 3
Manston Airport
Existing Drainage Model
FEH Rainfall
Designed by GB
Checked by GB
Network 2015.1
Network Design Table for Storm
PN
Length
(m)
S1.007
S1.008
S1.009
S1.010
S1.011
S1.012
S1.013
S1.014
S1.015
267.366
195.000
105.741
170.359
131.296
65.509
110.562
108.161
147.406
0.553
0.458
0.305
0.609
0.539
0.093
0.180
0.196
0.315
483.5
425.8
346.7
279.7
243.6
704.4
614.2
551.8
468.0
0.400
2.764
1.544
1.544
1.544
1.544
1.544
1.544
1.544
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.600
0.600
0.600
0.600
0.600
0.600
0.600
0.600
0.600
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
675
675
675
675
915
915
900
915
915
S1.007
S1.008
S1.009
S1.010
S1.011
S1.012
S1.013
S1.014
S1.015
Rain
T.C.
US/IL
(mm/hr) (mins)
(m)
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
30.00
30.00
30.00
30.00
30.00
30.00
30.00
30.00
30.00
I.Area
Base
Foul Add Flow Vel
Cap
Flow
(ha)
Flow (l/s) (l/s)
(l/s)
(m/s) (l/s) (l/s)
47.657
47.104
46.646
46.341
45.732
45.193
45.100
44.920
44.724
49.399
52.163
53.707
55.251
56.795
58.339
59.883
61.427
62.971
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
1982-2015 XP Solutions
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
1.19 424.1
1.26 452.2
1.40 501.6
1.56 559.0
2.02 1330.7
1.18 779.2
1.26 799.6
1.34 881.4
1.46 957.8
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Page 4
Manston Airport
Existing Drainage Model
FEH Rainfall
Designed by GB
Checked by GB
Network 2015.1
Network Design Table for Storm
PN
Length
(m)
S1.016
S1.017
S1.018
S1.019
S1.020
S1.021
S1.022
S1.023
S1.024
S1.025
156.651
144.458
125.972
72.485
147.984
90.887
140.994
81.869
265.046
32.569
0.354
0.259
0.276
0.227
0.307
0.136
0.340
0.132
0.408
0.050
442.5
557.8
456.4
319.3
482.0
668.3
414.7
620.2
649.6
651.4
1.544
0.600
0.250
0.250
7.100
0.000
0.000
0.500
0.000
0.200
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.600
0.600
0.600
0.600
0.600
0.600
0.600
0.600
0.600
0.600
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
915
915
915
915
1050
1050
1050
1050
1050
1050
S1.016
S1.017
S1.018
S1.019
S1.020
S1.021
S1.022
S1.023
S1.024
S1.025
Rain
T.C.
US/IL
(mm/hr) (mins)
(m)
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
30.00
30.00
30.00
30.00
30.00
30.00
30.00
30.00
30.00
30.00
I.Area
Base
Foul Add Flow Vel
Cap
Flow
(ha)
Flow (l/s) (l/s)
(l/s)
(m/s) (l/s) (l/s)
44.409
44.055
43.796
43.520
43.293
42.986
42.850
42.510
42.378
41.970
64.515
65.115
65.365
65.615
72.715
72.715
72.715
73.215
73.215
73.415
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
1982-2015 XP Solutions
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
1.50
1.33
1.48
1.77
1.56
1.33
1.69
1.38
1.34
1.34
985.2
876.6
969.9
1161.2
1353.3
1147.7
1459.9
1191.7
1164.2
1162.6
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Page 5
Manston Airport
Existing Drainage Model
FEH Rainfall
Designed by GB
Checked by GB
Network 2015.1
Network Design Table for Storm
PN
Length
(m)
0.200
7.200
0.000
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.0 0.600
0.0 0.600
0.0 0.600
o 1050
o 1050
o 1050
S3.000
S3.001
S3.002
S3.003
S3.004
S3.005
1.927
1.927
1.927
1.927
1.927
1.927
8.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
o
o
o
o
o
o
146.326
146.500
146.500
146.500
146.500
146.532
0.281
0.381
0.381
0.382
0.381
0.381
520.7
384.5
384.5
383.5
384.5
384.6
0.600
0.600
0.600
0.600
0.600
0.600
300
375
450
525
525
600
Rain
T.C.
US/IL
(mm/hr) (mins)
(m)
I.Area
Base
Foul Add Flow Vel
Cap
Flow
(ha)
Flow (l/s) (l/s)
(l/s)
(m/s) (l/s) (l/s)
S1.026
S1.027
S1.028
0.00
0.00
0.00
30.00 41.920
30.00 41.819
30.00 41.387
73.615
80.815
80.815
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
1.29 1116.8
2.31 1997.6
4.16 3605.3
0.0
0.0
0.0
S3.000
S3.001
S3.002
S3.003
S3.004
S3.005
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
11.58
14.23
16.60
18.75
20.90
22.88
1.927
3.854
5.781
7.708
9.635
11.562
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.68
0.92
1.03
1.14
1.14
1.24
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
51.577
51.296
50.915
50.534
50.152
49.771
1982-2015 XP Solutions
48.2
101.4
163.9
246.3
246.0
349.4
Page 6
Manston Airport
Existing Drainage Model
FEH Rainfall
Designed by GB
Checked by GB
Network 2015.1
Network Design Table for Storm
PN
Length
(m)
S3.006
S3.007
S3.008
S3.009
S3.010
S3.011
S3.012
S3.013
146.468
146.500
146.500
146.500
162.977
141.254
74.604
246.535
0.325
0.285
0.304
0.153
0.350
0.260
1.276
7.870
450.7
514.0
481.9
957.5
465.6
543.3
58.5
31.3
1.927
1.927
1.927
1.927
1.927
0.000
1.600
1.600
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.600
0.600
0.600
0.600
0.600
0.600
0.600
0.600
7.000
0.00
0.0 0.600
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
680
760
760
760
840
840
840
840
o 1050
Rain
T.C.
US/IL
(mm/hr) (mins)
(m)
I.Area
Base
Foul Add Flow Vel
Cap
Flow
(ha)
Flow (l/s) (l/s)
(l/s)
(m/s) (l/s) (l/s)
S3.006
S3.007
S3.008
S3.009
S3.010
S3.011
S3.012
S3.013
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
24.85
26.83
28.74
30.00
30.00
30.00
30.00
30.00
49.390
49.065
48.780
48.476
48.323
47.973
47.713
46.437
13.489
15.416
17.343
19.270
21.197
21.197
22.797
24.397
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
1.23 448.0
1.24 561.4
1.28 580.0
0.90 409.9
1.38 767.3
1.28 709.9
3.93 2178.4
5.37 2978.7
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
S1.029
0.00
30.00 38.567
112.212
0.0
0.0
0.0
2.76 2390.6
0.0
1982-2015 XP Solutions
Page 7
Manston Airport
Existing Drainage Model
FEH Rainfall
Designed by GB
Checked by GB
Network 2015.1
Network Design Table for Storm
PN
Length
(m)
64.8
17.4
0.000
0.000
0.00
0.00
0.0 0.600
0.0 0.600
o 1050
o 900
S1.030
S1.031
Rain
T.C.
US/IL
(mm/hr) (mins)
(m)
0.00
0.00
I.Area
Base
Foul Add Flow Vel
Cap
Flow
(ha)
Flow (l/s) (l/s)
(l/s)
(m/s) (l/s) (l/s)
30.00 37.050
30.00 35.732
112.212
112.212
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
1982-2015 XP Solutions
0.0
0.0
4.29 3710.4
7.53 4789.8
0.0
0.0
Page 8
Manston Airport
Existing Drainage Model
FEH Rainfall
Designed by GB
Checked by GB
Network 2015.1
Manhole Schedules for Storm
MH
MH
MH
Name CL (m) Depth
(m)
MH
Connection
MH
Diam.,L*W
(mm)
PN
Pipe Out
Invert
Diameter
Level (m)
(mm)
PN
Pipes In
Invert
Diameter Backdrop
Level (m)
(mm)
(mm)
1200 S1.000
51.577
300
1200 S1.001
51.296
300 S1.000
51.296
300
1350 S1.002
50.915
375 S1.001
50.915
300
1350 S1.003
50.534
450 S1.002
50.534
375
1350 S1.004
50.250
450 S1.003
50.250
450
1350 S1.005
49.543
450 S1.004
49.543
450
1350 S1.006
48.780
450 S1.005
48.780
450
1500 S2.000
49.000
675
1500 S2.001
48.000
675 S2.000
48.000
675
1500 S1.007
47.657
675 S1.006
47.882
450
S2.001
47.657
675
1500 S1.008
47.104
675 S1.007
47.104
675
1500 S1.009
46.646
675 S1.008
46.646
675
1500 S1.010
46.341
675 S1.009
46.341
675
1815 S1.011
45.732
915 S1.010
45.732
675
1815 S1.012
45.193
915 S1.011
45.193
915
1815 S1.013
45.100
900 S1.012
45.100
915
1815 S1.014
44.920
915 S1.013
44.920
900
1815 S1.015
44.724
915 S1.014
44.724
915
1982-2015 XP Solutions
Page 9
Manston Airport
Existing Drainage Model
FEH Rainfall
Designed by GB
Checked by GB
Network 2015.1
Manhole Schedules for Storm
MH
MH
MH
Name CL (m) Depth
(m)
MH
Connection
MH
Diam.,L*W
(mm)
PN
Pipe Out
Invert
Diameter
Level (m)
(mm)
PN
Pipes In
Invert
Diameter Backdrop
Level (m)
(mm)
(mm)
1815 S1.016
44.409
915 S1.015
44.409
915
1815 S1.017
44.055
915 S1.016
44.055
915
1815 S1.018
43.796
915 S1.017
43.796
915
1815 S1.019
43.520
915 S1.018
43.520
915
1950 S1.020
43.293
1050 S1.019
43.293
915
1950 S1.021
42.986
1050 S1.020
42.986
1050
1950 S1.022
42.850
1050 S1.021
42.850
1050
1950 S1.023
42.510
1050 S1.022
42.510
1050
1950 S1.024
42.378
1050 S1.023
42.378
1050
1950 S1.025
41.970
1050 S1.024
41.970
1050
1950 S1.026
41.920
1050 S1.025
41.920
1050
1950 S1.027
41.819
1050 S1.026
41.819
1050
1950 S1.028
41.387
1050 S1.027
41.387
1050
1200 S3.000
51.577
300
1350 S3.001
51.296
375 S3.000
51.296
300
1350 S3.002
50.915
450 S3.001
50.915
375
1500 S3.003
50.534
525 S3.002
50.534
450
1500 S3.004
50.152
525 S3.003
50.152
525
1500 S3.005
49.771
600 S3.004
49.771
525
1982-2015 XP Solutions
Page 10
Manston Airport
Existing Drainage Model
FEH Rainfall
Designed by GB
Checked by GB
Network 2015.1
Manhole Schedules for Storm
MH
MH
MH
Name CL (m) Depth
(m)
MH
Connection
MH
Diam.,L*W
(mm)
PN
Pipe Out
Invert
Diameter
Level (m)
(mm)
PN
Pipes In
Invert
Diameter Backdrop
Level (m)
(mm)
(mm)
1500 S3.006
49.390
680 S3.005
49.390
600
1800 S3.007
49.065
760 S3.006
49.065
680
1800 S3.008
48.780
760 S3.007
48.780
760
1800 S3.009
48.476
760 S3.008
48.476
760
1800 S3.010
48.323
840 S3.009
48.323
760
1800 S3.011
47.973
840 S3.010
47.973
840
1800 S3.012
47.713
840 S3.011
47.713
840
1800 S3.013
46.437
840 S3.012
46.437
840
1950 S1.029
38.567
1050 S1.028
38.567
1050
S3.013
38.567
840
1950 S1.030
37.050
1050 S1.029
37.050
1050
1950 S1.031
35.732
900 S1.030
35.732
1050
1800
OUTFALL
S1.031
27.400
900
1982-2015 XP Solutions
Page 11
Manston Airport
Existing Drainage Model
FEH Rainfall
Designed by GB
Checked by GB
Network 2015.1
PIPELINE SCHEDULES for Storm
Upstream Manhole
PN
MH
Connection
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
MH DIAM., L*W
(mm)
S1.000
S1.001
S1.002
S1.003
S1.004
S1.005
S1.006
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
300
300
375
450
450
450
450
S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
S6
S7
52.770
52.951
52.774
52.570
51.900
50.976
49.979
51.577
51.296
50.915
50.534
50.250
49.543
48.780
0.893
1.355
1.484
1.586
1.200
0.983
0.749
Manhole
Manhole
Manhole
Manhole
Manhole
Manhole
Manhole
1200
1200
1350
1350
1350
1350
1350
S2.000
675
S8
51.000
49.000
1500
Downstream Manhole
PN
S1.000
S1.001
S1.002
S1.003
S1.004
S1.005
S1.006
MH
Connection
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
MH DIAM., L*W
(mm)
521.9
385.2
384.9
515.0
206.8
192.0
206.0
S2
S3
S4
S5
S6
S7
S8
52.951
52.774
52.570
51.900
50.976
49.979
49.387
51.296
50.915
50.534
50.250
49.543
48.780
47.882
1.355
1.559
1.661
1.200
0.983
0.749
1.055
Manhole
Manhole
Manhole
Manhole
Manhole
Manhole
Manhole
1200
1350
1350
1350
1350
1350
1500
S9
50.000
48.000
1500
1982-2015 XP Solutions
Page 12
Manston Airport
Existing Drainage Model
FEH Rainfall
Designed by GB
Checked by GB
Network 2015.1
PIPELINE SCHEDULES for Storm
Upstream Manhole
PN
MH
Connection
MH DIAM., L*W
(mm)
S2.001
675
S9
50.000
48.000
1500
S1.007
S1.008
S1.009
S1.010
S1.011
S1.012
S1.013
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
675
675
675
675
915
915
900
S8
S11
S12
S13
S14
S15
S16
49.387
51.905
49.695
49.695
47.256
48.917
49.964
47.657
47.104
46.646
46.341
45.732
45.193
45.100
1.055
4.126
2.374
2.679
0.609
2.809
3.964
1500
1500
1500
1500
1815
1815
1815
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
Manhole
Manhole
Manhole
Manhole
Manhole
Manhole
Manhole
Downstream Manhole
PN
Length
(m)
Slope
MH C.Level I.Level D.Depth
(1:X) Name
(m)
(m)
(m)
267.366
195.000
105.741
170.359
131.296
65.509
110.562
483.5
425.8
346.7
279.7
243.6
704.4
614.2
MH
Connection
MH DIAM., L*W
(mm)
S8
49.387
47.657
1500
S11
S12
S13
S14
S15
S16
S17
51.905
49.695
49.695
47.256
48.917
49.964
48.849
47.104
46.646
46.341
45.732
45.193
45.100
44.920
4.126
2.374
2.679
0.849
2.809
3.949
3.029
1500
1500
1500
1815
1815
1815
1815
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
1982-2015 XP Solutions
Manhole
Manhole
Manhole
Manhole
Manhole
Manhole
Manhole
Page 13
Manston Airport
Existing Drainage Model
FEH Rainfall
Designed by GB
Checked by GB
Network 2015.1
PIPELINE SCHEDULES for Storm
Upstream Manhole
PN
S1.014
S1.015
S1.016
S1.017
S1.018
S1.019
S1.020
S1.021
S1.022
o 915
o 915
o 915
o 915
o 915
o 915
o 1050
o 1050
o 1050
S17
S18
S19
S20
S21
S22
S23
S24
S25
48.849
46.646
47.950
46.189
46.037
44.600
45.274
44.970
44.817
44.920
44.724
44.409
44.055
43.796
43.520
43.293
42.986
42.850
3.014
1.007
2.626
1.219
1.326
0.165
0.931
0.934
0.917
MH
Connection
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
MH DIAM., L*W
(mm)
Manhole
Manhole
Manhole
Manhole
Manhole
Manhole
Manhole
Manhole
Manhole
1815
1815
1815
1815
1815
1815
1950
1950
1950
Downstream Manhole
PN
S1.014
S1.015
S1.016
S1.017
S1.018
S1.019
S1.020
S1.021
S1.022
551.8
468.0
442.5
557.8
456.4
319.3
482.0
668.3
414.7
S18
S19
S20
S21
S22
S23
S24
S25
S26
46.646
47.950
46.189
46.037
44.600
45.274
44.970
44.817
44.109
44.724
44.409
44.055
43.796
43.520
43.293
42.986
42.850
42.510
1.007
2.626
1.219
1.326
0.165
1.066
0.934
0.917
0.549
MH
Connection
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
1982-2015 XP Solutions
Manhole
Manhole
Manhole
Manhole
Manhole
Manhole
Manhole
Manhole
Manhole
MH DIAM., L*W
(mm)
1815
1815
1815
1815
1815
1950
1950
1950
1950
Page 14
Manston Airport
Existing Drainage Model
FEH Rainfall
Designed by GB
Checked by GB
Network 2015.1
PIPELINE SCHEDULES for Storm
Upstream Manhole
PN
MH
Connection
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
MH DIAM., L*W
(mm)
S1.023
S1.024
S1.025
S1.026
S1.027
S1.028
o
o
o
o
o
o
1050
1050
1050
1050
1050
1050
S26
S27
S28
S29
S30
S31
44.109
43.901
44.233
44.970
43.750
43.445
42.510
42.378
41.970
41.920
41.819
41.387
0.549
0.473
1.213
2.000
0.881
1.008
Manhole
Manhole
Manhole
Manhole
Manhole
Manhole
1950
1950
1950
1950
1950
1950
S3.000
S3.001
o
o
300
375
S34
S35
52.768
52.454
51.577
51.296
1200
1350
Downstream Manhole
PN
MH
Connection
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
MH DIAM., L*W
(mm)
S27
S28
S29
S30
S31
S32
43.901
44.233
44.970
43.750
43.445
40.701
42.378
41.970
41.920
41.819
41.387
38.567
0.473
1.213
2.000
0.881
1.008
1.084
Manhole
Manhole
Manhole
Manhole
Manhole
Manhole
1950
1950
1950
1950
1950
1950
S35
S36
52.454
52.210
51.296
50.915
1350
1350
1982-2015 XP Solutions
Page 15
Manston Airport
Existing Drainage Model
FEH Rainfall
Designed by GB
Checked by GB
Network 2015.1
PIPELINE SCHEDULES for Storm
Upstream Manhole
PN
S3.002
S3.003
S3.004
S3.005
S3.006
S3.007
S3.008
S3.009
S3.010
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
450
525
525
600
680
760
760
760
840
S36
S37
S38
S39
S40
S41
S42
S43
S44
52.210
52.000
51.625
51.220
50.591
50.610
51.287
51.067
50.637
50.915
50.534
50.152
49.771
49.390
49.065
48.780
48.476
48.323
0.845
0.941
0.948
0.849
0.521
0.785
1.747
1.831
1.474
MH
Connection
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
MH DIAM., L*W
(mm)
Manhole
Manhole
Manhole
Manhole
Manhole
Manhole
Manhole
Manhole
Manhole
1350
1500
1500
1500
1500
1800
1800
1800
1800
Downstream Manhole
PN
S3.002
S3.003
S3.004
S3.005
S3.006
S3.007
S3.008
S3.009
S3.010
384.5
383.5
384.5
384.6
450.7
514.0
481.9
957.5
465.6
S37
S38
S39
S40
S41
S42
S43
S44
S45
52.000
51.625
51.220
50.591
50.610
51.287
51.067
50.637
51.372
50.534
50.152
49.771
49.390
49.065
48.780
48.476
48.323
47.973
1.016
0.948
0.924
0.601
0.865
1.747
1.831
1.554
2.559
MH
Connection
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
1982-2015 XP Solutions
Manhole
Manhole
Manhole
Manhole
Manhole
Manhole
Manhole
Manhole
Manhole
MH DIAM., L*W
(mm)
1500
1500
1500
1500
1800
1800
1800
1800
1800
Page 16
Manston Airport
Existing Drainage Model
FEH Rainfall
Designed by GB
Checked by GB
Network 2015.1
PIPELINE SCHEDULES for Storm
Upstream Manhole
PN
MH
Connection
MH DIAM., L*W
(mm)
S3.011
S3.012
S3.013
o
o
o
840
840
840
S45
S46
S47
51.372
50.878
48.323
47.973
47.713
46.437
1800
1800
1800
S1.029
S1.030
S1.031
o 1050
o 1050
o 900
S32
S35
S36
40.701
39.477
37.968
38.567
37.050
35.732
1950
1950
1950
Downstream Manhole
PN
MH
Connection
MH DIAM., L*W
(mm)
S46
S47
S32
50.878
48.323
40.701
47.713
46.437
38.567
1800
1800
1950
S35
S36
S37
39.477
37.968
29.390
37.050
35.732
27.400
1950
1950
1800
1982-2015 XP Solutions
Page 17
Manston Airport
Existing Drainage Model
FEH Rainfall
Designed by GB
Checked by GB
Network 2015.1
Area Summary for Storm
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
1.857
1.857
1.857
1.857
1.857
1.857
1.857
18.000
18.000
0.400
2.764
1.544
1.544
1.544
1.544
1.544
1.544
1.544
1.544
0.600
0.250
0.250
7.100
0.000
0.000
0.500
0.000
1.857
1.857
1.857
1.857
1.857
1.857
1.857
18.000
18.000
0.400
2.764
1.544
1.544
1.544
1.544
1.544
1.544
1.544
1.544
0.600
0.250
0.250
7.100
0.000
0.000
0.500
0.000
1982-2015 XP Solutions
1.857
1.857
1.857
1.857
1.857
1.857
1.857
18.000
18.000
0.400
2.764
1.544
1.544
1.544
1.544
1.544
1.544
1.544
1.544
0.600
0.250
0.250
7.100
0.000
0.000
0.500
0.000
Page 18
Manston Airport
Existing Drainage Model
FEH Rainfall
Designed by GB
Checked by GB
Network 2015.1
Area Summary for Storm
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
0.200
0.200
7.200
0.000
1.927
1.927
1.927
1.927
1.927
1.927
1.927
1.927
1.927
1.927
1.927
0.000
1.600
1.600
7.000
0.000
0.000
Total
112.212
0.200
0.200
7.200
0.000
1.927
1.927
1.927
1.927
1.927
1.927
1.927
1.927
1.927
1.927
1.927
0.000
1.600
1.600
7.000
0.000
0.000
Total
112.212
1982-2015 XP Solutions
0.200
0.200
7.200
0.000
1.927
1.927
1.927
1.927
1.927
1.927
1.927
1.927
1.927
1.927
1.927
0.000
1.600
1.600
7.000
0.000
0.000
Total
112.212
Page 19
Manston Airport
Existing Drainage Model
FEH Rainfall
Designed by GB
Checked by GB
Network 2015.1
Free Flowing Outfall Details for Storm
Outfall
Outfall C. Level I. Level
Min
D,L
W
Pipe Number
Name
(m)
(m)
I. Level (mm) (mm)
(m)
S1.031
S37
29.390
27.400
0.000 1800
0.500
Inlet Coeffiecient 0.800
0.000 Flow per Person per Day (l/per/day) 0.000
0.000
Run Time (mins)
60
2.000
Output Interval (mins)
1
1982-2015 XP Solutions
0.316
2.489
Yes
No
0.750
0.840
30
Page 20
Manston Airport
Existing Drainage Model
FEH Rainfall
Designed by GB
Checked by GB
Network 2015.1
2 year Return Period Summary of Critical Results by Maximum Level (Rank 1) for Storm
Simulation Criteria
Areal Reduction Factor 1.000
Manhole Headloss Coeff (Global) 0.500
MADD Factor * 10m/ha Storage 2.000
Hot Start (mins)
0
Foul Sewage per hectare (l/s) 0.000
Inlet Coeffiecient 0.800
Hot Start Level (mm)
0 Additional Flow - % of Total Flow 0.000 Flow per Person per Day (l/per/day) 0.000
Number of Input Hydrographs 0
Number of Offline Controls 0 Number of Time/Area Diagrams 0
Number of Online Controls 0 Number of Storage Structures 0 Number of Real Time Controls 0
Synthetic Rainfall Details
Rainfall Model
FEH
D3 (1km)
Site Location GB 633250 166550 TR 33250 66550
E (1km)
C (1km)
-0.025
F (1km)
D1 (1km)
0.315 Cv (Summer)
D2 (1km)
0.438 Cv (Winter)
0.242
0.316
2.489
0.750
0.840
Margin for Flood Risk Warning (mm) 300.0 DTS Status ON Inertia Status OFF
Analysis Timestep Fine DVD Status ON
Profile(s)
Summer and Winter
Duration(s) (mins) 15, 30, 60, 120, 240, 360, 480, 960, 1440
Return Period(s) (years)
2, 30, 100
Climate Change (%)
0, 0, 0
1982-2015 XP Solutions
Page 21
Manston Airport
Existing Drainage Model
FEH Rainfall
Designed by GB
Checked by GB
Network 2015.1
2 year Return Period Summary of Critical Results by Maximum Level (Rank 1) for Storm
PN
S1.000
S1.001
S1.002
S1.003
S1.004
S1.005
S1.006
S2.000
S2.001
S1.007
S1.008
S1.009
S1.010
S1.011
S1.012
S1.013
S1.014
S1.015
S1.016
S1.017
S1.018
S1.019
S1.020
S1.021
S1.022
US/MH
Name
S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
S6
S7
S8
S9
S8
S11
S12
S13
S14
S15
S16
S17
S18
S19
S20
S21
S22
S23
S24
S25
Event
60
30
30
30
30
60
120
60
120
240
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
minute
minute
minute
minute
minute
minute
minute
minute
minute
minute
minute
minute
minute
minute
minute
minute
minute
minute
minute
minute
minute
minute
minute
minute
minute
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
year
year
year
year
year
year
year
year
year
year
year
year
year
year
year
year
year
year
year
year
year
year
year
year
year
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
I+0%
I+0%
I+0%
I+0%
I+0%
I+0%
I+0%
I+0%
I+0%
I+0%
I+0%
I+0%
I+0%
I+0%
I+0%
I+0%
I+0%
I+0%
I+0%
I+0%
I+0%
I+0%
I+0%
I+0%
I+0%
60
30
30
30
30
60
120
60
120
240
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
52.770
52.951
52.774
52.570
51.900
50.976
49.979
51.000
50.000
49.387
51.905
49.695
49.695
47.256
48.917
49.964
48.849
46.646
47.950
46.189
46.037
44.600
45.274
44.970
44.817
1.073 179.715
1.419
64.397
1.543
59.210
1.599
13.185
1.241
41.044
1.073
90.666
1.115 366.866
2.069 743.987
2.702 1377.257
1.484 429.058
1.198
0.000
0.806
0.000
0.518
0.000
-0.158
0.000
0.199
0.000
0.188
0.000
0.142
0.000
0.123
0.000
0.129
0.000
0.128
0.000
0.054
0.000
0.027
0.000
-0.074
0.000
0.000
0.000
-0.124
0.000
1982-2015 XP Solutions
1.67
1.35
1.27
1.50
1.13
1.14
1.09
0.79
1.69
1.47
1.40
1.42
1.34
0.61
1.17
1.14
1.09
1.01
1.01
1.14
1.05
0.93
0.86
1.06
0.79
78.8
74.4
125.3
204.9
245.3
256.3
238.9
403.7
489.3
603.1
608.3
661.5
715.7
738.8
770.4
822.7
866.1
893.9
922.1
925.2
926.3
932.8
1061.6
1058.2
1047.8
Status
FLOOD
FLOOD
FLOOD
FLOOD
FLOOD
FLOOD
FLOOD
FLOOD
FLOOD
FLOOD
SURCHARGED
SURCHARGED
SURCHARGED
OK
SURCHARGED
SURCHARGED
SURCHARGED
SURCHARGED
SURCHARGED
SURCHARGED
SURCHARGED
FLOOD RISK
OK
OK
OK
Page 22
Manston Airport
Existing Drainage Model
FEH Rainfall
Designed by GB
Checked by GB
Network 2015.1
2 year Return Period Summary of Critical Results by Maximum Level (Rank 1) for Storm
PN
S1.023
S1.024
S1.025
S1.026
S1.027
S1.028
S3.000
S3.001
S3.002
S3.003
S3.004
S3.005
S3.006
S3.007
S3.008
S3.009
S3.010
S3.011
S3.012
S3.013
S1.029
S1.030
S1.031
US/MH
Name
S26
S27
S28
S29
S30
S31
S34
S35
S36
S37
S38
S39
S40
S41
S42
S43
S44
S45
S46
S47
S32
S35
S36
Event
120
120
120
240
240
240
30
30
30
30
30
30
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
120
15
15
15
minute
minute
minute
minute
minute
minute
minute
minute
minute
minute
minute
minute
minute
minute
minute
minute
minute
minute
minute
minute
minute
minute
minute
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
year
year
year
year
year
year
year
year
year
year
year
year
year
year
year
year
year
year
year
year
year
year
year
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
I+0%
I+0%
I+0%
I+0%
I+0%
I+0%
I+0%
I+0%
I+0%
I+0%
I+0%
I+0%
I+0%
I+0%
I+0%
I+0%
I+0%
I+0%
I+0%
I+0%
I+0%
I+0%
I+0%
120
120
120
240
240
240
30
30
30
30
30
30
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
120
15
15
15
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
44.109
43.901
44.233
44.970
43.750
43.445
52.768
52.454
52.210
52.000
51.625
51.220
50.591
50.610
51.287
51.067
50.637
51.372
50.878
48.323
40.701
39.477
37.968
1982-2015 XP Solutions
0.004
-0.009
0.028
0.000
-0.428
-0.629
0.960
0.855
0.895
0.956
0.974
0.780
0.529
0.419
0.408
0.326
-0.030
0.000
-0.485
-0.544
-0.096
-0.402
-0.449
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
68.558
72.479
50.175
15.409
25.587
0.000
8.448
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
1.04
0.95
1.25
1.08
0.65
0.34
1.50
1.58
1.37
1.03
1.43
1.19
1.10
1.01
1.12
1.76
0.99
1.04
0.37
0.27
0.99
0.70
0.50
1055.2
1043.7
1044.6
1007.2
1138.2
1138.2
71.0
155.3
217.1
243.2
336.3
397.1
465.6
530.2
606.4
674.6
713.5
684.4
712.0
761.9
2221.3
2220.7
2216.5
Status
SURCHARGED
OK
SURCHARGED
OK
OK
OK
FLOOD
FLOOD
FLOOD
FLOOD
FLOOD
FLOOD RISK
FLOOD
SURCHARGED
SURCHARGED
SURCHARGED
OK
OK
OK
OK
OK
OK
OK
Page 23
Manston Airport
Existing Drainage Model
FEH Rainfall
Designed by GB
Checked by GB
Network 2015.1
30 year Return Period Summary of Critical Results by Maximum Level (Rank 1) for Storm
Simulation Criteria
Areal Reduction Factor 1.000
Manhole Headloss Coeff (Global) 0.500
MADD Factor * 10m/ha Storage 2.000
Hot Start (mins)
0
Foul Sewage per hectare (l/s) 0.000
Inlet Coeffiecient 0.800
Hot Start Level (mm)
0 Additional Flow - % of Total Flow 0.000 Flow per Person per Day (l/per/day) 0.000
Number of Input Hydrographs 0
Number of Offline Controls 0 Number of Time/Area Diagrams 0
Number of Online Controls 0 Number of Storage Structures 0 Number of Real Time Controls 0
Synthetic Rainfall Details
Rainfall Model
FEH
D3 (1km)
Site Location GB 633250 166550 TR 33250 66550
E (1km)
C (1km)
-0.025
F (1km)
D1 (1km)
0.315 Cv (Summer)
D2 (1km)
0.438 Cv (Winter)
0.242
0.316
2.489
0.750
0.840
Margin for Flood Risk Warning (mm) 300.0 DTS Status ON Inertia Status OFF
Analysis Timestep Fine DVD Status ON
Profile(s)
Summer and Winter
Duration(s) (mins) 15, 30, 60, 120, 240, 360, 480, 960, 1440
Return Period(s) (years)
2, 30, 100
Climate Change (%)
0, 0, 0
1982-2015 XP Solutions
Page 24
Manston Airport
Existing Drainage Model
FEH Rainfall
Designed by GB
Checked by GB
Network 2015.1
30 year Return Period Summary of Critical Results by Maximum Level (Rank 1) for Storm
PN
S1.000
S1.001
S1.002
S1.003
S1.004
S1.005
S1.006
S2.000
S2.001
S1.007
S1.008
S1.009
S1.010
S1.011
S1.012
S1.013
S1.014
S1.015
S1.016
S1.017
S1.018
S1.019
S1.020
S1.021
S1.022
US/MH
Name
S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
S6
S7
S8
S9
S8
S11
S12
S13
S14
S15
S16
S17
S18
S19
S20
S21
S22
S23
S24
S25
Event
120
60
60
30
60
240
240
120
120
240
15
15
15
60
15
15
15
60
60
120
120
120
120
120
120
minute
minute
minute
minute
minute
minute
minute
minute
minute
minute
minute
minute
minute
minute
minute
minute
minute
minute
minute
minute
minute
minute
minute
minute
minute
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
year
year
year
year
year
year
year
year
year
year
year
year
year
year
year
year
year
year
year
year
year
year
year
year
year
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
I+0%
I+0%
I+0%
I+0%
I+0%
I+0%
I+0%
I+0%
I+0%
I+0%
I+0%
I+0%
I+0%
I+0%
I+0%
I+0%
I+0%
I+0%
I+0%
I+0%
I+0%
I+0%
I+0%
I+0%
I+0%
120
60
60
30
60
240
240
120
120
240
15
15
15
60
15
15
15
60
60
120
120
120
120
120
120
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
52.770
52.951
52.774
52.570
51.900
50.976
49.979
51.000
50.000
49.387
51.905
49.695
49.695
47.256
48.917
49.964
48.849
46.646
47.950
46.189
46.037
44.600
45.274
44.970
44.817
1982-2015 XP Solutions
1.435
1.686
1.813
1.813
1.522
1.725
2.219
4.921
5.433
2.916
3.305
2.505
2.542
1.204
1.640
1.755
1.629
1.382
1.319
1.217
1.026
0.901
0.766
0.690
0.569
542.171
330.986
328.637
227.204
322.397
741.656
1470.339
3596.569
4107.573
1861.054
0.000
131.357
0.000
595.659
0.000
0.000
0.000
375.405
0.000
0.000
0.000
735.868
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.75
1.29
1.26
1.50
1.13
1.09
0.98
0.77
2.37
1.76
1.48
1.43
1.68
0.77
1.47
1.49
1.77
1.22
1.32
1.49
1.37
1.23
1.13
1.38
1.02
35.4
70.9
123.9
204.9
245.2
245.3
214.3
389.9
685.5
723.4
640.9
663.0
891.9
932.5
974.4
1072.9
1403.9
1081.6
1206.8
1202.8
1209.5
1232.7
1396.5
1369.9
1356.8
Status
FLOOD
FLOOD
FLOOD
FLOOD
FLOOD
FLOOD
FLOOD
FLOOD
FLOOD
FLOOD
SURCHARGED
FLOOD
FLOOD RISK
FLOOD
SURCHARGED
SURCHARGED
SURCHARGED
FLOOD
SURCHARGED
FLOOD RISK
SURCHARGED
FLOOD
FLOOD RISK
FLOOD RISK
SURCHARGED
Page 25
Manston Airport
Existing Drainage Model
FEH Rainfall
Designed by GB
Checked by GB
Network 2015.1
30 year Return Period Summary of Critical Results by Maximum Level (Rank 1) for Storm
PN
S1.023
S1.024
S1.025
S1.026
S1.027
S1.028
S3.000
S3.001
S3.002
S3.003
S3.004
S3.005
S3.006
S3.007
S3.008
S3.009
S3.010
S3.011
S3.012
S3.013
S1.029
S1.030
S1.031
US/MH
Name
Event
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
44.109
43.901
44.233
44.970
43.750
43.445
52.768
52.454
52.210
52.000
51.625
51.220
50.591
50.610
51.287
51.067
50.637
51.372
50.878
48.323
40.701
39.477
37.968
1982-2015 XP Solutions
0.555
0.465
0.287
0.211
0.293
0.013
1.242
1.157
1.177
1.200
1.275
1.102
1.071
1.206
1.751
1.850
1.374
0.613
-0.306
-0.381
2.014
0.110
-0.309
6.640
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
350.798
374.314
332.104
259.297
327.415
252.683
549.552
422.014
4.428
19.091
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
930.486
0.000
0.000
1.42
1.25
1.67
1.50
1.29
0.56
1.16
1.14
1.06
0.98
1.65
1.22
1.42
1.59
1.39
2.20
1.72
1.76
0.72
0.57
1.51
1.06
0.76
1445.0
1382.4
1397.8
1406.7
2251.3
1885.7
54.9
112.2
168.0
232.0
388.3
407.1
602.8
836.6
755.9
846.7
1233.0
1156.5
1378.4
1618.1
3387.4
3376.2
3376.4
Status
FLOOD
FLOOD RISK
SURCHARGED
SURCHARGED
SURCHARGED
SURCHARGED
FLOOD
FLOOD
FLOOD
FLOOD
FLOOD
FLOOD
FLOOD
FLOOD
FLOOD
FLOOD
FLOOD RISK
SURCHARGED
OK
OK
FLOOD
SURCHARGED
OK
Page 26
Manston Airport
Existing Drainage Model
FEH Rainfall
Designed by GB
Checked by GB
Network 2015.1
100 year Return Period Summary of Critical Results by Maximum Level (Rank 1) for Storm
Simulation Criteria
Areal Reduction Factor 1.000
Manhole Headloss Coeff (Global) 0.500
MADD Factor * 10m/ha Storage 2.000
Hot Start (mins)
0
Foul Sewage per hectare (l/s) 0.000
Inlet Coeffiecient 0.800
Hot Start Level (mm)
0 Additional Flow - % of Total Flow 0.000 Flow per Person per Day (l/per/day) 0.000
Number of Input Hydrographs 0
Number of Offline Controls 0 Number of Time/Area Diagrams 0
Number of Online Controls 0 Number of Storage Structures 0 Number of Real Time Controls 0
Synthetic Rainfall Details
Rainfall Model
FEH
D3 (1km)
Site Location GB 633250 166550 TR 33250 66550
E (1km)
C (1km)
-0.025
F (1km)
D1 (1km)
0.315 Cv (Summer)
D2 (1km)
0.438 Cv (Winter)
0.242
0.316
2.489
0.750
0.840
Margin for Flood Risk Warning (mm) 300.0 DTS Status ON Inertia Status OFF
Analysis Timestep Fine DVD Status ON
Profile(s)
Summer and Winter
Duration(s) (mins) 15, 30, 60, 120, 240, 360, 480, 960, 1440
Return Period(s) (years)
2, 30, 100
Climate Change (%)
0, 0, 0
1982-2015 XP Solutions
Page 27
Manston Airport
Existing Drainage Model
FEH Rainfall
Designed by GB
Checked by GB
Network 2015.1
100 year Return Period Summary of Critical Results by Maximum Level (Rank 1) for Storm
PN
S1.000
S1.001
S1.002
S1.003
S1.004
S1.005
S1.006
S2.000
S2.001
S1.007
S1.008
S1.009
S1.010
S1.011
S1.012
S1.013
S1.014
S1.015
S1.016
S1.017
S1.018
S1.019
S1.020
S1.021
S1.022
US/MH
Name
S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
S6
S7
S8
S9
S8
S11
S12
S13
S14
S15
S16
S17
S18
S19
S20
S21
S22
S23
S24
S25
Event
120
120
60
30
360
360
360
120
120
360
15
15
15
60
15
15
15
60
60
120
120
60
60
60
60
minute
minute
minute
minute
minute
minute
minute
minute
minute
minute
minute
minute
minute
minute
minute
minute
minute
minute
minute
minute
minute
minute
minute
minute
minute
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
year
year
year
year
year
year
year
year
year
year
year
year
year
year
year
year
year
year
year
year
year
year
year
year
year
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
I+0%
I+0%
I+0%
I+0%
I+0%
I+0%
I+0%
I+0%
I+0%
I+0%
I+0%
I+0%
I+0%
I+0%
I+0%
I+0%
I+0%
I+0%
I+0%
I+0%
I+0%
I+0%
I+0%
I+0%
I+0%
120
120
60
30
360
360
360
120
120
360
15
15
15
60
15
15
15
60
60
120
120
60
60
60
60
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
52.770
52.951
52.774
52.570
51.900
50.976
49.979
51.000
50.000
49.387
51.905
49.695
49.695
47.256
48.917
49.964
48.849
46.646
47.950
46.189
46.037
44.600
45.274
44.970
44.817
1982-2015 XP Solutions
1.716
1.948
2.056
2.028
1.841
2.426
3.082
7.382
7.682
3.908
4.174
2.847
2.741
1.767
2.466
2.599
2.321
1.842
1.723
1.577
1.385
1.269
1.152
1.071
0.967
822.749
593.163
571.609
441.596
641.448
1443.417
2333.099
6057.472
6357.754
2852.989
47.693
472.586
61.875
1158.331
0.000
0.000
0.000
835.019
0.000
358.421
59.031
1103.586
221.347
136.733
50.457
0.79
1.34
1.26
1.50
1.11
1.07
1.16
0.84
2.87
1.89
1.91
1.55
1.72
0.69
1.34
1.62
2.29
1.21
1.34
1.49
1.41
1.25
1.30
1.58
1.12
37.4
73.8
124.4
204.9
240.7
240.1
254.5
426.7
830.4
777.7
829.4
722.3
916.9
836.6
888.1
1173.0
1813.7
1070.6
1223.6
1202.0
1243.7
1250.5
1601.3
1569.0
1481.4
Status
FLOOD
FLOOD
FLOOD
FLOOD
FLOOD
FLOOD
FLOOD
FLOOD
FLOOD
FLOOD
FLOOD
FLOOD
FLOOD
FLOOD
SURCHARGED
SURCHARGED
SURCHARGED
FLOOD
SURCHARGED
FLOOD
FLOOD
FLOOD
FLOOD
FLOOD
FLOOD
Page 28
Manston Airport
Existing Drainage Model
FEH Rainfall
Designed by GB
Checked by GB
Network 2015.1
100 year Return Period Summary of Critical Results by Maximum Level (Rank 1) for Storm
PN
S1.023
S1.024
S1.025
S1.026
S1.027
S1.028
S3.000
S3.001
S3.002
S3.003
S3.004
S3.005
S3.006
S3.007
S3.008
S3.009
S3.010
S3.011
S3.012
S3.013
S1.029
S1.030
S1.031
US/MH
Name
S26
S27
S28
S29
S30
S31
S34
S35
S36
S37
S38
S39
S40
S41
S42
S43
S44
S45
S46
S47
S32
S35
S36
Event
60
60
15
15
15
30
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
30
15
15
15
15
30
15
30
30
30
minute
minute
minute
minute
minute
minute
minute
minute
minute
minute
minute
minute
minute
minute
minute
minute
minute
minute
minute
minute
minute
minute
minute
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
year
year
year
year
year
year
year
year
year
year
year
year
year
year
year
year
year
year
year
year
year
year
year
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Summer
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
I+0%
I+0%
I+0%
I+0%
I+0%
I+0%
I+0%
I+0%
I+0%
I+0%
I+0%
I+0%
I+0%
I+0%
I+0%
I+0%
I+0%
I+0%
I+0%
I+0%
I+0%
I+0%
I+0%
60
60
15
15
15
30
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
30
15
15
15
15
30
15
30
30
30
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
44.109
43.901
44.233
44.970
43.750
43.445
52.768
52.454
52.210
52.000
51.625
51.220
50.591
50.610
51.287
51.067
50.637
51.372
50.878
48.323
40.701
39.477
37.968
1982-2015 XP Solutions
0.983 433.542
0.921 449.319
1.058
0.000
1.106
0.000
1.203 321.865
1.063
55.362
1.500 609.320
1.416 633.434
1.431 586.260
1.441 499.899
1.539 591.216
1.414 564.721
1.431 910.215
1.558 773.510
1.833
86.400
2.066 235.092
1.536
61.678
0.744
0.000
-0.204
0.000
-0.137
0.000
3.204 2119.885
0.468
0.000
-0.261
0.000
1.44
1.43
1.83
1.64
1.64
0.69
1.22
1.16
1.08
1.01
1.28
1.22
1.46
1.57
1.51
2.05
1.84
1.90
0.92
0.79
1.68
1.18
0.85
1470.1
1573.7
1534.0
1531.8
2852.6
2304.1
57.7
114.6
171.3
238.9
302.1
407.3
616.1
826.8
823.5
787.9
1324.2
1253.6
1754.3
2237.1
3772.8
3762.2
3762.2
Status
FLOOD
FLOOD
FLOOD RISK
SURCHARGED
FLOOD
FLOOD
FLOOD
FLOOD
FLOOD
FLOOD
FLOOD
FLOOD
FLOOD
FLOOD
FLOOD
FLOOD
FLOOD
SURCHARGED
OK
OK
FLOOD
SURCHARGED
OK
APPENDIX G-2
PROPOSED MODELLING RESULTS
Page 1
Stone Hill Park
Area 1
1:2 year
Designed by GB
Checked by
Source Control 2015.1
15
30
60
120
180
240
360
480
600
720
960
1440
2160
2880
4320
5760
7200
8640
10080
15
30
Storm
Event
Status
Max
Max
Max
Max
Level Depth Control Volume
(m)
(l/s)
(m)
(m)
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
8.723
8.764
8.801
8.825
8.834
8.837
8.834
8.825
8.815
8.804
8.795
8.773
8.746
8.724
8.678
8.648
8.628
8.614
8.602
8.723
8.764
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Winter
Winter
Storm
Event
15
30
60
120
180
240
360
480
600
720
960
1440
2160
2880
4320
5760
7200
8640
10080
15
30
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
0.223
0.264
0.301
0.325
0.334
0.337
0.334
0.325
0.315
0.304
0.295
0.273
0.246
0.224
0.178
0.148
0.128
0.114
0.102
0.223
0.264
556.9
659.4
753.1
811.9
835.6
843.1
834.4
813.1
788.1
760.6
736.9
683.1
614.4
560.6
444.4
370.6
320.6
284.4
255.6
556.9
660.6
4950.7
5877.9
6729.0
7273.8
7489.0
7556.0
7479.5
7282.1
7047.7
6804.8
6577.3
6093.2
5469.5
4979.1
3933.6
3278.6
2828.9
2502.6
2252.0
4952.8
5884.2
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
Rain
Flooded Discharge Time-Peak
(mm/hr) Volume
Volume
(mins)
(m)
(m)
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Winter
Winter
39.713
24.407
15.000
9.219
6.934
5.666
4.262
3.482
2.977
2.619
2.217
1.753
1.386
1.173
0.857
0.685
0.577
0.501
0.444
39.713
24.407
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
5469.0
6724.7
8268.1
10165.4
11470.8
12497.5
14102.0
15363.8
16419.7
17336.1
19567.9
23209.0
27527.3
31070.0
34034.6
36308.1
38175.0
39771.9
41173.5
5469.0
6724.7
1982-2015 XP Solutions
31
42
64
100
132
166
234
300
366
430
558
808
1176
1540
2260
3000
3688
4416
5152
31
42
Page 2
Stone Hill Park
Area 1
1:2 year
Designed by GB
Checked by
Source Control 2015.1
60
120
180
240
360
480
600
720
960
1440
2160
2880
4320
5760
7200
8640
10080
Storm
Event
Status
Max
Max
Max
Max
Level Depth Control Volume
(m)
(l/s)
(m)
(m)
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
8.802
8.824
8.829
8.828
8.816
8.801
8.786
8.771
8.754
8.725
8.692
8.669
8.628
8.604
8.588
8.577
8.568
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Storm
Event
60
120
180
240
360
480
600
720
960
1440
2160
2880
4320
5760
7200
8640
10080
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
0.302
0.324
0.329
0.328
0.316
0.301
0.286
0.271
0.254
0.225
0.192
0.169
0.128
0.104
0.088
0.077
0.068
754.4
809.4
823.1
819.4
790.6
753.1
714.4
678.1
635.6
561.9
479.4
421.9
319.4
259.4
219.4
191.9
170.6
6744.9
7249.1
7372.6
7338.6
7073.3
6727.4
6377.0
6045.0
5661.0
4989.8
4250.2
3730.6
2813.8
2281.6
1932.8
1683.5
1498.5
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
Rain
Flooded Discharge Time-Peak
(mm/hr) Volume
Volume
(mins)
(m)
(m)
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
15.000
9.219
6.934
5.666
4.262
3.482
2.977
2.619
2.217
1.753
1.386
1.173
0.857
0.685
0.577
0.501
0.444
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
8268.1
10165.4
11470.8
12497.5
14102.0
15363.8
16419.8
17336.1
19567.8
23208.9
27527.3
31070.0
34034.3
36307.5
38175.3
39771.6
41173.5
1982-2015 XP Solutions
64
104
140
178
250
318
386
452
582
836
1204
1568
2296
3008
3752
4424
5152
Page 3
Stone Hill Park
Area 1
1:2 year
Designed by GB
Checked by
Source Control 2015.1
Rainfall Details
Rainfall Model
FEH
Return Period (years)
2
Site Location GB 633250 166550 TR 33250 66550
C (1km)
-0.025
D1 (1km)
0.315
D2 (1km)
0.438
D3 (1km)
0.242
E (1km)
0.316
F (1km)
2.489
Summer Storms
Yes
Winter Storms
Yes
Cv (Summer)
0.950
Cv (Winter)
0.950
Shortest Storm (mins)
15
Longest Storm (mins)
10080
Climate Change %
+0
Area
(ha)
4 11.620
8 11.620
Time (mins)
From:
To:
8
12
Area
(ha)
Time (mins)
From:
To:
12 11.620
16 11.620
4 0.000
1982-2015 XP Solutions
16
Area
(ha)
20 11.620
Page 4
Stone Hill Park
Area 1
1:2 year
Designed by GB
Checked by
Source Control 2015.1
Model Details
21867.3
1.200
25804.4
1.500
26839.6
500.0000
1000.0000
1500.0000
2000.0000
2500.0000
3000.0000
3000.0000
3000.0000
1.800
2.000
2.200
2.400
2.600
2.800
3.000
3.200
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
3.400
3.600
3.800
4.000
4.200
4.400
4.600
4.800
1982-2015 XP Solutions
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
5.000
5.200
5.400
5.600
5.800
6.000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Page 1
Stone Hill Park
Area 1
1:30 year
Designed by GB
Checked by CT
Source Control 2015.1
15
30
60
120
180
240
360
480
600
720
960
1440
2160
2880
4320
5760
7200
8640
10080
15
30
Storm
Event
Status
Max
Max
Max
Max
Level Depth Control Volume
(m)
(l/s)
(m)
(m)
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
9.060
9.132
9.188
9.210
9.211
9.205
9.180
9.152
9.123
9.095
9.066
9.012
8.949
8.902
8.811
8.755
8.717
8.690
8.669
9.060
9.132
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Winter
Winter
Storm
Event
15
30
60
120
180
240
360
480
600
720
960
1440
2160
2880
4320
5760
7200
8640
10080
15
30
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
0.560
0.632
0.688
0.710
0.711
0.705
0.680
0.652
0.623
0.595
0.566
0.512
0.449
0.402
0.311
0.255
0.217
0.190
0.169
0.560
0.632
1399.4
1579.4
1720.6
1774.4
1778.1
1761.9
1700.6
1629.4
1556.9
1488.1
1414.4
1280.6
1123.1
1005.6
776.9
638.1
543.1
475.6
423.1
1400.6
1580.6
12740.9
14448.0
15805.3
16324.1
16363.4
16202.6
15620.4
14928.2
14236.7
13583.6
12883.4
11618.1
10148.0
9055.6
6951.8
5679.8
4821.9
4212.8
3749.9
12745.8
14463.3
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
Rain
Flooded Discharge Time-Peak
(mm/hr) Volume
Volume
(mins)
(m)
(m)
Summer 102.037
Summer 59.853
Summer 35.108
Summer 20.594
Summer 15.073
Summer 12.080
Summer
8.842
Summer
7.086
Summer
5.968
Summer
5.186
Summer
4.306
Summer
3.313
Summer
2.549
Summer
2.116
Summer
1.504
Summer
1.180
Summer
0.978
Summer
0.839
Summer
0.736
Winter 102.037
Winter 59.853
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
14068.9
16507.0
19367.2
22722.4
24948.6
26658.8
29270.2
31276.9
32927.5
34340.5
38016.5
43875.1
50636.4
56056.0
59750.8
62529.9
64754.1
66639.6
68277.0
14068.9
16507.0
1982-2015 XP Solutions
31
42
64
100
134
168
234
302
368
432
558
808
1176
1540
2260
3000
3688
4416
5152
31
42
Page 2
Stone Hill Park
Area 1
1:30 year
Designed by GB
Checked by CT
Source Control 2015.1
60
120
180
240
360
480
600
720
960
1440
2160
2880
4320
5760
7200
8640
10080
Storm
Event
Status
Max
Max
Max
Max
Level Depth Control Volume
(m)
(l/s)
(m)
(m)
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
9.190
9.208
9.201
9.186
9.146
9.105
9.066
9.032
8.990
8.922
8.852
8.803
8.724
8.678
8.649
8.628
8.613
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Storm
Event
60
120
180
240
360
480
600
720
960
1440
2160
2880
4320
5760
7200
8640
10080
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
0.690
0.708
0.701
0.686
0.646
0.605
0.566
0.532
0.490
0.422
0.352
0.303
0.224
0.178
0.149
0.128
0.113
1724.4
1769.4
1753.1
1715.6
1615.6
1511.9
1415.6
1329.4
1225.6
1055.6
879.4
758.1
559.4
445.6
371.9
320.6
283.1
15843.2
16275.9
16124.3
15755.0
14793.8
13808.8
12898.8
12081.4
11099.1
9519.7
7885.9
6782.0
4967.8
3947.7
3292.2
2831.9
2493.2
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
Rain
Flooded Discharge Time-Peak
(mm/hr) Volume
Volume
(mins)
(m)
(m)
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
35.108
20.594
15.073
12.080
8.842
7.086
5.968
5.186
4.306
3.313
2.549
2.116
1.504
1.180
0.978
0.839
0.736
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
19367.2
22722.4
24948.6
26658.8
29270.3
31276.9
32927.5
34340.5
38016.4
43875.2
50636.4
56056.4
59751.0
62519.1
64754.7
66639.9
68276.7
1982-2015 XP Solutions
64
104
142
178
250
320
386
454
584
836
1204
1572
2296
3008
3752
4488
5152
Page 3
Stone Hill Park
Area 1
1:30 year
Designed by GB
Checked by CT
Source Control 2015.1
Rainfall Details
Rainfall Model
FEH
Return Period (years)
30
Site Location GB 633250 166550 TR 33250 66550
C (1km)
-0.025
D1 (1km)
0.315
D2 (1km)
0.438
D3 (1km)
0.242
E (1km)
0.316
F (1km)
2.489
Summer Storms
Yes
Winter Storms
Yes
Cv (Summer)
0.950
Cv (Winter)
0.950
Shortest Storm (mins)
15
Longest Storm (mins)
10080
Climate Change %
+0
Area
(ha)
4 11.620
8 11.620
Time (mins)
From:
To:
8
12
Area
(ha)
Time (mins)
From:
To:
12 11.620
16 11.620
4 0.000
1982-2015 XP Solutions
16
Area
(ha)
20 11.620
Page 4
Stone Hill Park
Area 1
1:30 year
Designed by GB
Checked by CT
Source Control 2015.1
Model Details
21867.3
1.200
25804.4
1.500
26839.6
500.0000
1000.0000
1500.0000
2000.0000
2500.0000
3000.0000
3000.0000
3000.0000
1.800
2.000
2.200
2.400
2.600
2.800
3.000
3.200
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
3.400
3.600
3.800
4.000
4.200
4.400
4.600
4.800
1982-2015 XP Solutions
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
5.000
5.200
5.400
5.600
5.800
6.000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Page 1
Stone Hill Park
Area 1
1:100 year
Designed by GB
Checked by CT
Source Control 2015.1
15
30
60
120
180
240
360
480
600
720
960
1440
2160
2880
4320
5760
7200
8640
10080
15
30
Storm
Event
Status
Max
Max
Max
Max
Level Depth Control Volume
(m)
(l/s)
(m)
(m)
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
9.342
9.429
9.492
9.503
9.494
9.477
9.434
9.388
9.344
9.303
9.258
9.179
9.089
9.024
8.900
8.826
8.775
8.740
8.713
9.342
9.430
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Winter
Winter
Storm
Event
15
30
60
120
180
240
360
480
600
720
960
1440
2160
2880
4320
5760
7200
8640
10080
15
30
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
0.842
0.929
0.992
1.003
0.994
0.977
0.934
0.888
0.844
0.803
0.758
0.679
0.589
0.524
0.400
0.326
0.275
0.240
0.213
0.842
0.930
2104.4
2323.1
2479.4
2506.9
2485.6
2443.1
2334.4
2220.6
2110.6
2008.1
1894.4
1696.9
1473.1
1309.4
1000.6
814.4
688.1
599.4
531.9
2104.4
2325.6
19541.1
21708.2
23273.0
23552.3
23328.7
22907.6
21826.3
20686.4
19600.7
18600.4
17493.4
15583.3
13442.6
11887.8
9006.3
7288.1
6141.4
5334.9
4723.6
19549.0
21730.9
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
Rain
Flooded Discharge Time-Peak
(mm/hr) Volume
Volume
(mins)
(m)
(m)
Summer 156.286
Summer 89.763
Summer 51.555
Summer 29.610
Summer 21.408
Summer 17.007
Summer 12.295
Summer
9.768
Summer
8.171
Summer
7.062
Summer
5.812
Summer
4.417
Summer
3.357
Summer
2.763
Summer
1.939
Summer
1.508
Summer
1.241
Summer
1.059
Summer
0.925
Winter 156.286
Winter 89.763
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
21554.6
24761.3
28444.9
32676.1
35437.1
37536.4
40708.0
43119.7
45088.0
46762.8
51317.4
58499.5
66686.7
73181.5
77049.1
79916.1
82213.5
84140.1
85803.6
21554.6
24761.3
1982-2015 XP Solutions
31
42
64
100
134
168
236
302
368
432
560
810
1176
1540
2260
3000
3688
4424
5152
31
42
Page 2
Stone Hill Park
Area 1
1:100 year
Designed by GB
Checked by CT
Source Control 2015.1
60
120
180
240
360
480
600
720
960
1440
2160
2880
4320
5760
7200
8640
10080
Storm
Event
Status
Max
Max
Max
Max
Level Depth Control Volume
(m)
(l/s)
(m)
(m)
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
9.494
9.501
9.481
9.453
9.388
9.326
9.269
9.219
9.158
9.061
8.962
8.896
8.788
8.728
8.689
8.662
8.642
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Storm
Event
60
120
180
240
360
480
600
720
960
1440
2160
2880
4320
5760
7200
8640
10080
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
0.994
1.001
0.981
0.953
0.888
0.826
0.769
0.719
0.658
0.561
0.462
0.396
0.288
0.228
0.189
0.162
0.142
2485.6
2501.9
2453.1
2381.9
2220.6
2064.4
1923.1
1798.1
1645.6
1403.1
1155.6
989.4
720.6
569.4
473.1
405.6
355.6
23327.3
23490.4
23004.4
22290.6
20691.3
19154.5
17775.1
16557.4
15082.5
12775.2
10446.6
8901.5
6432.3
5062.5
4190.1
3584.0
3139.4
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
Rain
Flooded Discharge Time-Peak
(mm/hr) Volume
Volume
(mins)
(m)
(m)
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
51.555
29.610
21.408
17.007
12.295
9.768
8.171
7.062
5.812
4.417
3.357
2.763
1.939
1.508
1.241
1.059
0.925
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
28444.9
32676.1
35437.1
37536.4
40708.1
43119.5
45088.0
46762.8
51317.3
58499.5
66686.7
73181.6
77048.9
79916.1
82214.1
84139.5
85803.9
1982-2015 XP Solutions
64
104
142
178
250
320
388
454
584
838
1208
1572
2296
3008
3744
4440
5152
Page 3
Stone Hill Park
Area 1
1:100 year
Designed by GB
Checked by CT
Source Control 2015.1
Rainfall Details
Rainfall Model
FEH
Return Period (years)
100
Site Location GB 633250 166550 TR 33250 66550
C (1km)
-0.025
D1 (1km)
0.315
D2 (1km)
0.438
D3 (1km)
0.242
E (1km)
0.316
F (1km)
2.489
Summer Storms
Yes
Winter Storms
Yes
Cv (Summer)
0.950
Cv (Winter)
0.950
Shortest Storm (mins)
15
Longest Storm (mins)
10080
Climate Change %
+0
Area
(ha)
4 11.620
8 11.620
Time (mins)
From:
To:
8
12
Area
(ha)
Time (mins)
From:
To:
12 11.620
16 11.620
4 0.000
1982-2015 XP Solutions
16
Area
(ha)
20 11.620
Page 4
Stone Hill Park
Area 1
1:100 year
Designed by GB
Checked by CT
Source Control 2015.1
Model Details
21867.3
1.200
25804.4
1.500
26839.6
500.0000
1000.0000
1500.0000
2000.0000
2500.0000
3000.0000
3000.0000
3000.0000
1.800
2.000
2.200
2.400
2.600
2.800
3.000
3.200
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
3.400
3.600
3.800
4.000
4.200
4.400
4.600
4.800
1982-2015 XP Solutions
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
5.000
5.200
5.400
5.600
5.800
6.000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Page 1
Stone Hill Park
Area 1
1:100 year + 20%cc
Designed by GB
Checked by CT
Source Control 2015.1
15
30
60
120
180
240
360
480
600
720
960
1440
2160
2880
4320
5760
7200
8640
10080
15
30
15
30
60
120
180
240
360
480
600
720
960
1440
2160
2880
4320
5760
7200
8640
10080
15
30
Storm
Event
Status
Max
Max
Max
Max
Level Depth Control Volume
(m)
(l/s)
(m)
(m)
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
9.500
9.603
9.677
9.690
9.680
9.661
9.611
9.557
9.505
9.457
9.404
9.311
9.205
9.127
8.979
8.890
8.830
8.788
8.755
9.500
9.604
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Winter
Winter
1.000
1.103
1.177
1.190
1.180
1.161
1.111
1.057
1.005
0.957
0.904
0.811
0.705
0.627
0.479
0.390
0.330
0.288
0.255
1.000
1.104
2499.4
2756.9
2941.9
2975.6
2950.6
2901.9
2776.9
2643.1
2513.1
2393.1
2260.6
2028.1
1761.9
1566.9
1198.1
975.6
825.6
719.4
638.1
2499.4
2759.4
23467.0
26077.7
27973.0
28324.0
28064.9
27565.5
26279.5
24915.3
23614.9
22412.2
21086.5
18789.8
16208.5
14333.5
10851.0
8779.0
7392.3
6420.1
5683.4
23476.2
26104.8
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
Storm
Event
Rain
Flooded Discharge Time-Peak
(mm/hr) Volume
Volume
(mins)
(m)
(m)
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
187.543
107.715
61.866
35.533
25.689
20.408
14.755
11.721
9.805
8.474
6.975
5.300
4.028
3.315
2.327
1.810
1.490
1.271
1.111
187.543
107.715
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Winter
Winter
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
25867.7
29715.7
34136.0
39224.3
42537.6
45056.8
48862.8
51745.7
54107.7
56117.5
61582.9
70201.6
80026.3
87819.9
92460.7
95901.9
98658.9
100970.4
102966.6
25867.7
29715.7
1982-2015 XP Solutions
31
42
64
100
134
168
236
302
368
434
560
810
1176
1540
2260
3000
3688
4424
5152
31
42
Page 2
Stone Hill Park
Area 1
1:100 year + 20%cc
Designed by GB
Checked by CT
Source Control 2015.1
60
120
180
240
360
480
600
720
960
1440
2160
2880
4320
5760
7200
8640
10080
Storm
Event
Status
Max
Max
Max
Max
Level Depth Control Volume
(m)
(l/s)
(m)
(m)
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
9.679
9.688
9.666
9.633
9.558
9.484
9.418
9.359
9.287
9.172
9.054
8.974
8.846
8.773
8.727
8.694
8.671
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Storm
Event
60
120
180
240
360
480
600
720
960
1440
2160
2880
4320
5760
7200
8640
10080
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
1.179
1.188
1.166
1.133
1.058
0.984
0.918
0.859
0.787
0.672
0.554
0.474
0.346
0.273
0.227
0.194
0.171
2948.1
2969.4
2914.4
2831.9
2644.4
2460.6
2295.6
2146.9
1966.9
1679.4
1384.4
1185.6
864.4
683.1
566.9
485.6
426.9
28037.7
28258.7
27685.1
26837.0
24928.1
23086.8
21430.3
19965.0
18191.6
15410.2
12597.7
10730.4
7747.0
6093.2
5042.9
4310.9
3775.3
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
Rain
Flooded Discharge Time-Peak
(mm/hr) Volume
Volume
(mins)
(m)
(m)
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
61.866
35.533
25.689
20.408
14.755
11.721
9.805
8.474
6.975
5.300
4.028
3.315
2.327
1.810
1.490
1.271
1.111
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
34136.0
39213.4
42537.6
45056.8
48851.9
51745.6
54107.8
56117.6
61583.1
70201.6
80026.4
87819.9
92460.9
95901.9
98658.6
100970.1
102966.6
1982-2015 XP Solutions
64
106
142
178
250
320
388
454
586
838
1208
1572
2296
3008
3752
4488
5152
Page 3
Stone Hill Park
Area 1
1:100 year + 20%cc
Designed by GB
Checked by CT
Source Control 2015.1
Rainfall Details
Rainfall Model
FEH
Return Period (years)
100
Site Location GB 633250 166550 TR 33250 66550
C (1km)
-0.025
D1 (1km)
0.315
D2 (1km)
0.438
D3 (1km)
0.242
E (1km)
0.316
F (1km)
2.489
Summer Storms
Yes
Winter Storms
Yes
Cv (Summer)
0.950
Cv (Winter)
0.950
Shortest Storm (mins)
15
Longest Storm (mins)
10080
Climate Change %
+20
Area
(ha)
4 11.620
8 11.620
Time (mins)
From:
To:
8
12
Area
(ha)
Time (mins)
From:
To:
12 11.620
16 11.620
4 0.000
1982-2015 XP Solutions
16
Area
(ha)
20 11.620
Page 4
Stone Hill Park
Area 1
1:100 year + 20%cc
Designed by GB
Checked by CT
Source Control 2015.1
Model Details
21867.3
1.200
25804.4
1.500
26839.6
500.0000
1000.0000
1500.0000
2000.0000
2500.0000
3000.0000
3000.0000
3000.0000
1.800
2.000
2.200
2.400
2.600
2.800
3.000
3.200
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
3.400
3.600
3.800
4.000
4.200
4.400
4.600
4.800
1982-2015 XP Solutions
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
5.000
5.200
5.400
5.600
5.800
6.000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Page 1
Stone Hill Park
Area 1
1:100 year + 40%cc
Designed by GB
Checked by CT
Source Control 2015.1
15
30
60
120
180
240
360
480
600
720
960
1440
2160
2880
4320
5760
7200
8640
10080
15
30
Storm
Event
Max
Max
Max
Max
Level Depth Control Volume
(m)
(l/s)
(m)
(m)
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
9.654
9.775
9.869
9.892
9.880
9.856
9.793
9.725
9.665
9.610
9.549
9.442
9.320
9.229
9.058
8.955
8.885
8.835
8.798
9.655
9.776
15
30
60
120
180
240
360
480
600
720
960
1440
2160
2880
4320
5760
7200
8640
10080
15
30
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Winter
Winter
1.154
1.275
1.369
1.392
1.380
1.356
1.293
1.225
1.165
1.110
1.049
0.942
0.820
0.729
0.558
0.455
0.385
0.335
0.298
1.155
1.276
2885.6
3000.0
3000.0
3000.0
3000.0
3000.0
3000.0
3000.0
2911.9
2774.4
2621.9
2354.4
2049.4
1823.1
1395.6
1138.1
961.9
838.1
744.4
2886.9
3000.0
27398.1
30514.9
32982.8
33587.7
33264.8
32642.9
30984.3
29213.4
27657.2
26255.4
24709.2
22024.7
19001.2
16800.0
12709.5
10278.6
8651.8
7511.0
6648.1
27408.5
30541.0
Status
Flood
Flood
Flood
Flood
Flood
Flood
Flood
Flood
O K
Risk
Risk
Risk
Risk
Risk
Risk
Risk
O K
O K
O K
O K
O K
O K
O K
O K
O K
O K
O K
O K
Risk
Storm
Event
Rain
Flooded Discharge Time-Peak
(mm/hr) Volume
Volume
(mins)
(m)
(m)
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
218.800
125.668
72.177
41.455
29.971
23.809
17.214
13.675
11.439
9.887
8.137
6.184
4.699
3.868
2.715
2.112
1.738
1.482
1.296
218.800
125.668
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Winter
Winter
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
30180.9
34678.8
39838.0
45761.8
49627.3
52566.3
57006.6
60382.6
63138.4
65472.4
71848.6
81903.7
93365.8
102458.4
107873.0
111887.4
115104.0
117799.8
120129.0
30180.9
34678.8
1982-2015 XP Solutions
31
42
66
106
138
172
238
304
368
434
560
810
1180
1540
2260
3000
3696
4424
5152
31
42
Page 2
Stone Hill Park
Area 1
1:100 year + 40%cc
Designed by GB
Checked by CT
Source Control 2015.1
60
120
180
240
360
480
600
720
960
1440
2160
2880
4320
5760
7200
8640
10080
Storm
Event
Max
Max
Max
Max
Level Depth Control Volume
(m)
(l/s)
(m)
(m)
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
9.871
9.890
9.862
9.822
9.726
9.641
9.565
9.497
9.414
9.282
9.145
9.053
8.903
8.819
8.765
8.727
8.699
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Storm
Event
60
120
180
240
360
480
600
720
960
1440
2160
2880
4320
5760
7200
8640
10080
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
1.371
1.390
1.362
1.322
1.226
1.141
1.065
0.997
0.914
0.782
0.645
0.553
0.403
0.319
0.265
0.227
0.199
3000.0
3000.0
3000.0
3000.0
3000.0
2851.9
2661.9
2493.1
2285.6
1954.4
1613.1
1381.9
1008.1
796.9
661.9
566.9
496.9
33040.6
33525.2
32805.0
31736.2
29243.0
27051.3
25116.5
23404.2
21330.3
18070.9
14768.9
12575.7
9070.8
7129.9
5897.2
5038.5
4414.1
Status
Flood
Flood
Flood
Flood
Flood
Risk
Risk
Risk
Risk
Risk
O K
O K
O K
O K
O K
O K
O K
O K
O K
O K
O K
O K
Rain
Flooded Discharge Time-Peak
(mm/hr) Volume
Volume
(mins)
(m)
(m)
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
72.177
41.455
29.971
23.809
17.214
13.675
11.439
9.887
8.137
6.184
4.699
3.868
2.715
2.112
1.738
1.482
1.296
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
39838.0
45761.8
49627.3
52566.3
57006.6
60371.7
63127.6
65472.2
71848.6
81903.7
93365.8
102458.3
107872.7
111887.4
115103.7
117800.4
120129.3
1982-2015 XP Solutions
66
110
146
182
252
322
388
456
586
838
1208
1572
2300
3008
3752
4488
5160
Page 3
Stone Hill Park
Area 1
1:100 year + 40%cc
Designed by GB
Checked by CT
Source Control 2015.1
Rainfall Details
Rainfall Model
FEH
Return Period (years)
100
Site Location GB 633250 166550 TR 33250 66550
C (1km)
-0.025
D1 (1km)
0.315
D2 (1km)
0.438
D3 (1km)
0.242
E (1km)
0.316
F (1km)
2.489
Summer Storms
Yes
Winter Storms
Yes
Cv (Summer)
0.950
Cv (Winter)
0.950
Shortest Storm (mins)
15
Longest Storm (mins)
10080
Climate Change %
+40
Area
(ha)
4 11.620
8 11.620
Time (mins)
From:
To:
8
12
Area
(ha)
Time (mins)
From:
To:
12 11.620
16 11.620
4 0.000
1982-2015 XP Solutions
16
Area
(ha)
20 11.620
Page 4
Stone Hill Park
Area 1
1:100 year + 40%cc
Designed by GB
Checked by CT
Source Control 2015.1
Model Details
21867.3
1.200
25804.4
1.500
26839.6
500.0000
1000.0000
1500.0000
2000.0000
2500.0000
3000.0000
3000.0000
3000.0000
1.800
2.000
2.200
2.400
2.600
2.800
3.000
3.200
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
3.400
3.600
3.800
4.000
4.200
4.400
4.600
4.800
1982-2015 XP Solutions
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
5.000
5.200
5.400
5.600
5.800
6.000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Page 1
Stone Hill Park
Area 2
1:2 yr
Designed by GB
Checked by CT
Source Control 2015.1
15
30
60
120
180
240
360
480
600
720
960
1440
2160
2880
4320
5760
7200
8640
10080
15
30
Storm
Event
Status
Max
Max
Max
Max
Level Depth Control Volume
(m)
(l/s)
(m)
(m)
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
8.707
8.747
8.788
8.819
8.832
8.839
8.844
8.843
8.838
8.831
8.828
8.813
8.787
8.763
8.703
8.672
8.650
8.633
8.620
8.707
8.747
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Winter
Winter
Storm
Event
15
30
60
120
180
240
360
480
600
720
960
1440
2160
2880
4320
5760
7200
8640
10080
15
30
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
0.207
0.247
0.288
0.319
0.332
0.339
0.344
0.343
0.338
0.331
0.328
0.313
0.287
0.263
0.203
0.172
0.150
0.133
0.120
0.207
0.247
101.7
111.8
121.9
129.8
132.9
134.8
136.1
135.7
134.4
132.7
132.1
128.3
121.7
115.7
100.8
85.9
74.9
66.4
60.1
101.7
111.8
1224.7
1471.0
1722.5
1918.0
1998.6
2044.7
2077.1
2066.7
2035.1
1992.6
1974.4
1881.1
1716.5
1565.7
1201.9
1011.4
878.7
777.5
702.6
1225.1
1472.5
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
Rain
Flooded Discharge Time-Peak
(mm/hr) Volume
Volume
(mins)
(m)
(m)
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Winter
Winter
39.713
24.407
15.000
9.219
6.934
5.666
4.262
3.482
2.977
2.619
2.217
1.753
1.386
1.173
0.857
0.685
0.577
0.501
0.444
39.713
24.407
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
1322.3
1626.0
1999.2
2458.0
2773.7
3022.0
3410.0
3715.1
3970.5
4192.0
4731.8
5612.3
6656.6
7513.3
8230.1
8779.8
9231.4
9617.6
9956.5
1322.3
1626.0
1982-2015 XP Solutions
31
43
68
116
146
180
248
316
386
452
586
846
1220
1592
2296
3008
3752
4488
5160
31
43
Page 2
Stone Hill Park
Area 2
1:2 yr
Designed by GB
Checked by CT
Source Control 2015.1
60
120
180
240
360
480
600
720
960
1440
2160
2880
4320
5760
7200
8640
10080
Storm
Event
Status
Max
Max
Max
Max
Level Depth Control Volume
(m)
(l/s)
(m)
(m)
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
8.788
8.820
8.831
8.836
8.835
8.827
8.816
8.804
8.792
8.763
8.724
8.696
8.651
8.623
8.605
8.592
8.582
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Storm
Event
60
120
180
240
360
480
600
720
960
1440
2160
2880
4320
5760
7200
8640
10080
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
0.288
0.320
0.331
0.336
0.335
0.327
0.316
0.304
0.292
0.263
0.224
0.196
0.151
0.123
0.105
0.092
0.082
122.1
130.1
132.7
133.9
133.7
131.7
129.1
126.1
123.1
115.8
106.1
98.1
75.4
61.6
52.6
45.9
40.9
1726.0
1925.6
1991.0
2022.1
2016.8
1967.7
1900.4
1826.2
1749.9
1570.6
1329.5
1158.4
884.4
721.3
612.8
535.5
476.9
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
Rain
Flooded Discharge Time-Peak
(mm/hr) Volume
Volume
(mins)
(m)
(m)
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
15.000
9.219
6.934
5.666
4.262
3.482
2.977
2.619
2.217
1.753
1.386
1.173
0.857
0.685
0.577
0.501
0.444
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
1999.2
2458.0
2773.7
3022.0
3410.0
3715.1
3970.5
4192.1
4731.7
5612.3
6656.5
7513.3
8230.1
8779.9
9231.3
9617.5
9956.5
1982-2015 XP Solutions
68
118
152
190
266
340
410
480
618
880
1252
1600
2336
3056
3760
4504
5248
Page 3
Stone Hill Park
Area 2
1:2 yr
Designed by GB
Checked by CT
Source Control 2015.1
Rainfall Details
Rainfall Model
FEH
Return Period (years)
2
Site Location GB 633250 166550 TR 33250 66550
C (1km)
-0.025
D1 (1km)
0.315
D2 (1km)
0.438
D3 (1km)
0.242
E (1km)
0.316
F (1km)
2.489
Summer Storms
Yes
Winter Storms
Yes
Cv (Summer)
0.950
Cv (Winter)
0.950
Shortest Storm (mins)
15
Longest Storm (mins)
10080
Climate Change %
+0
Time (mins)
From:
To:
4 3.050
8 3.000
8
12
Area
(ha)
Time (mins)
From:
To:
12 3.000
16 3.000
16
4 0.000
1982-2015 XP Solutions
Area
(ha)
20 2.000
Page 4
Stone Hill Park
Area 2
1:2 yr
Designed by GB
Checked by CT
Source Control 2015.1
Model Details
5750.1
1.200
7848.3
1.500
8423.8
100.0000
150.0000
200.0000
250.0000
300.0000
350.0000
350.0000
350.0000
1.800
2.000
2.200
2.400
2.600
2.800
3.000
3.200
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
3.400
3.600
3.800
4.000
4.200
4.400
4.600
4.800
1982-2015 XP Solutions
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
5.000
5.200
5.400
5.600
5.800
6.000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Page 1
Stone Hill Park
Area 2
1:30yr
Designed by GB
Checked by CT
Source Control 2015.1
15
30
60
120
180
240
360
480
600
720
960
1440
2160
2880
4320
5760
7200
8640
10080
15
30
Storm
Event
Status
Max
Max
Max
Max
Level Depth Control Volume
(m)
(l/s)
(m)
(m)
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
9.019
9.092
9.161
9.210
9.221
9.225
9.222
9.212
9.198
9.182
9.173
9.141
9.088
9.039
8.916
8.832
8.772
8.729
8.699
9.019
9.092
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Winter
Winter
Storm
Event
15
30
60
120
180
240
360
480
600
720
960
1440
2160
2880
4320
5760
7200
8640
10080
15
30
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
0.519
0.592
0.661
0.710
0.721
0.725
0.722
0.712
0.698
0.682
0.673
0.641
0.588
0.539
0.416
0.332
0.272
0.229
0.199
0.519
0.592
179.7
197.9
215.3
227.6
230.2
231.2
230.6
228.1
224.6
220.6
218.2
210.2
196.9
184.8
153.9
132.9
117.9
107.2
99.4
179.7
198.1
3203.9
3692.9
4165.1
4505.7
4578.4
4603.7
4588.1
4517.9
4420.6
4310.6
4246.5
4026.3
3664.4
3340.2
2531.5
1998.4
1624.0
1358.4
1174.9
3204.8
3696.1
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
Rain
Flooded Discharge Time-Peak
(mm/hr) Volume
Volume
(mins)
(m)
(m)
Summer 102.037
Summer 59.853
Summer 35.108
Summer 20.594
Summer 15.073
Summer 12.080
Summer
8.842
Summer
7.086
Summer
5.968
Summer
5.186
Summer
4.306
Summer
3.313
Summer
2.549
Summer
2.116
Summer
1.504
Summer
1.180
Summer
0.978
Summer
0.839
Summer
0.736
Winter 102.037
Winter 59.853
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
3402.0
3990.5
4683.2
5494.6
6032.9
6446.5
7078.0
7563.3
7962.4
8304.1
9193.1
10609.8
12244.9
13555.6
14449.0
15118.5
15658.9
16114.8
16510.7
3402.0
3990.5
1982-2015 XP Solutions
32
44
70
122
162
192
258
328
396
464
600
866
1252
1624
2352
3072
3816
4504
5160
32
44
Page 2
Stone Hill Park
Area 2
1:30yr
Designed by GB
Checked by CT
Source Control 2015.1
60
120
180
240
360
480
600
720
960
1440
2160
2880
4320
5760
7200
8640
10080
Storm
Event
Status
Max
Max
Max
Max
Level Depth Control Volume
(m)
(l/s)
(m)
(m)
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
9.162
9.213
9.223
9.223
9.214
9.195
9.173
9.149
9.124
9.069
8.991
8.928
8.796
8.716
8.678
8.654
8.636
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Storm
Event
60
120
180
240
360
480
600
720
960
1440
2160
2880
4320
5760
7200
8640
10080
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
0.662
0.713
0.723
0.723
0.714
0.695
0.673
0.649
0.624
0.569
0.491
0.428
0.296
0.216
0.178
0.154
0.136
215.6
228.3
230.8
230.8
228.4
223.8
218.2
212.2
206.1
192.2
172.8
156.9
123.9
104.1
88.9
76.9
67.9
4172.9
4526.0
4595.2
4594.9
4530.1
4399.9
4243.5
4078.7
3914.5
3538.5
3025.2
2608.8
1773.4
1280.2
1048.9
904.2
795.8
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
Rain
Flooded Discharge Time-Peak
(mm/hr) Volume
Volume
(mins)
(m)
(m)
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
35.108
20.594
15.073
12.080
8.842
7.086
5.968
5.186
4.306
3.313
2.549
2.116
1.504
1.180
0.978
0.839
0.736
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
4683.2
5494.6
6032.9
6446.5
7078.1
7563.3
7962.4
8304.1
9193.1
10609.8
12244.9
13555.5
14451.9
15118.4
15658.9
16114.9
16510.8
1982-2015 XP Solutions
70
122
172
198
274
350
424
496
638
912
1304
1684
2424
3112
3760
4504
5248
Page 3
Stone Hill Park
Area 2
1:30yr
Designed by GB
Checked by CT
Source Control 2015.1
Rainfall Details
Rainfall Model
FEH
Return Period (years)
30
Site Location GB 633250 166550 TR 33250 66550
C (1km)
-0.025
D1 (1km)
0.315
D2 (1km)
0.438
D3 (1km)
0.242
E (1km)
0.316
F (1km)
2.489
Summer Storms
Yes
Winter Storms
Yes
Cv (Summer)
0.950
Cv (Winter)
0.950
Shortest Storm (mins)
15
Longest Storm (mins)
10080
Climate Change %
+0
Time (mins)
From:
To:
4 3.050
8 3.000
8
12
Area
(ha)
Time (mins)
From:
To:
12 3.000
16 3.000
16
4 0.000
1982-2015 XP Solutions
Area
(ha)
20 2.000
Page 4
Stone Hill Park
Area 2
1:30yr
Designed by GB
Checked by CT
Source Control 2015.1
Model Details
5750.1
1.200
7848.3
1.500
8423.8
100.0000
150.0000
200.0000
250.0000
300.0000
350.0000
350.0000
350.0000
1.800
2.000
2.200
2.400
2.600
2.800
3.000
3.200
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
3.400
3.600
3.800
4.000
4.200
4.400
4.600
4.800
1982-2015 XP Solutions
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
5.000
5.200
5.400
5.600
5.800
6.000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Page 1
Stone Hill Park
Area 2
1:100 yr
Designed by GB
Checked by CT
Source Control 2015.1
15
30
60
120
180
240
360
480
600
720
960
1440
2160
2880
4320
5760
7200
8640
10080
15
30
Storm
Event
Status
Max
Max
Max
Max
Level Depth Control Volume
(m)
(l/s)
(m)
(m)
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
9.273
9.362
9.445
9.500
9.506
9.504
9.493
9.475
9.453
9.430
9.415
9.369
9.297
9.232
9.069
8.959
8.879
8.817
8.771
9.273
9.363
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Winter
Winter
Storm
Event
15
30
60
120
180
240
360
480
600
720
960
1440
2160
2880
4320
5760
7200
8640
10080
15
30
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
0.773
0.862
0.945
1.000
1.006
1.004
0.993
0.975
0.953
0.930
0.915
0.869
0.797
0.732
0.569
0.459
0.379
0.317
0.271
0.773
0.863
243.2
265.6
286.2
299.9
301.4
300.9
298.2
293.7
288.3
282.4
278.7
267.3
249.2
232.9
192.3
164.7
144.7
129.2
117.7
243.2
265.8
4942.1
5583.2
6183.3
6591.3
6638.1
6622.3
6538.2
6404.6
6244.9
6074.5
5963.1
5631.1
5111.6
4652.5
3542.7
2810.7
2294.1
1904.0
1615.5
4943.6
5587.7
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
Rain
Flooded Discharge Time-Peak
(mm/hr) Volume
Volume
(mins)
(m)
(m)
Summer 156.286
Summer 89.763
Summer 51.555
Summer 29.610
Summer 21.408
Summer 17.007
Summer 12.295
Summer
9.768
Summer
8.171
Summer
7.062
Summer
5.812
Summer
4.417
Summer
3.357
Summer
2.763
Summer
1.939
Summer
1.508
Summer
1.241
Summer
1.059
Summer
0.925
Winter 156.286
Winter 89.763
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
5209.3
5982.6
6878.4
7901.6
8569.3
9077.0
9844.0
10427.2
10903.1
11308.1
12409.5
14146.4
16126.3
17696.8
18632.1
19325.6
19881.1
20346.9
20749.2
5209.3
5982.6
1982-2015 XP Solutions
32
45
70
124
170
198
262
332
400
468
604
870
1260
1640
2380
3112
3824
4520
5248
32
44
Page 2
Stone Hill Park
Area 2
1:100 yr
Designed by GB
Checked by CT
Source Control 2015.1
60
120
180
240
360
480
600
720
960
1440
2160
2880
4320
5760
7200
8640
10080
Storm
Event
Status
Max
Max
Max
Max
Level Depth Control Volume
(m)
(l/s)
(m)
(m)
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
9.446
9.504
9.512
9.504
9.485
9.458
9.426
9.393
9.360
9.285
9.182
9.098
8.924
8.814
8.739
8.694
8.671
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Storm
Event
60
120
180
240
360
480
600
720
960
1440
2160
2880
4320
5760
7200
8640
10080
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
0.946
1.004
1.012
1.004
0.985
0.958
0.926
0.893
0.860
0.785
0.682
0.598
0.424
0.314
0.239
0.194
0.171
286.6
300.9
302.9
300.9
296.3
289.4
281.4
273.2
264.9
246.3
220.6
199.6
155.9
128.4
109.8
97.1
85.4
6195.6
6621.0
6680.4
6623.5
6485.4
6278.1
6044.2
5803.8
5563.5
5029.4
4311.7
3735.1
2584.1
1883.2
1420.9
1147.3
1004.8
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
Rain
Flooded Discharge Time-Peak
(mm/hr) Volume
Volume
(mins)
(m)
(m)
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
51.555
29.610
21.408
17.007
12.295
9.768
8.171
7.062
5.812
4.417
3.357
2.763
1.939
1.508
1.241
1.059
0.925
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
6878.4
7901.6
8569.3
9077.0
9844.0
10427.1
10903.1
11308.2
12409.6
14146.4
16126.2
17696.8
18632.1
19325.5
19881.1
20346.8
20749.1
1982-2015 XP Solutions
70
124
176
204
278
354
428
502
644
922
1320
1704
2436
3176
3888
4504
5240
Page 3
Stone Hill Park
Area 2
1:100 yr
Designed by GB
Checked by CT
Source Control 2015.1
Rainfall Details
Rainfall Model
FEH
Return Period (years)
100
Site Location GB 633250 166550 TR 33250 66550
C (1km)
-0.025
D1 (1km)
0.315
D2 (1km)
0.438
D3 (1km)
0.242
E (1km)
0.316
F (1km)
2.489
Summer Storms
Yes
Winter Storms
Yes
Cv (Summer)
0.950
Cv (Winter)
0.950
Shortest Storm (mins)
15
Longest Storm (mins)
10080
Climate Change %
+0
Time (mins)
From:
To:
4 3.050
8 3.000
8
12
Area
(ha)
Time (mins)
From:
To:
12 3.000
16 3.000
16
4 0.000
1982-2015 XP Solutions
Area
(ha)
20 2.000
Page 4
Stone Hill Park
Area 2
1:100 yr
Designed by GB
Checked by CT
Source Control 2015.1
Model Details
5750.1
1.200
7848.3
1.500
8423.8
100.0000
150.0000
200.0000
250.0000
300.0000
350.0000
350.0000
350.0000
1.800
2.000
2.200
2.400
2.600
2.800
3.000
3.200
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
3.400
3.600
3.800
4.000
4.200
4.400
4.600
4.800
1982-2015 XP Solutions
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
5.000
5.200
5.400
5.600
5.800
6.000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Page 1
Stone Hill Park
Area 2
1:100yr + 20%cc
Designed by GB
Checked by CT
Source Control 2015.1
15
30
60
120
180
240
360
480
600
720
960
1440
2160
2880
4320
5760
7200
8640
10080
15
30
15
30
60
120
180
240
360
480
600
720
960
1440
2160
2880
4320
5760
7200
8640
10080
15
30
Storm
Event
Status
Max
Max
Max
Max
Level Depth Control Volume
(m)
(l/s)
(m)
(m)
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
9.412
9.517
9.613
9.680
9.690
9.688
9.677
9.659
9.636
9.610
9.596
9.547
9.467
9.394
9.207
9.077
8.982
8.909
8.852
9.413
9.518
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Winter
Winter
0.912
1.017
1.113
1.180
1.190
1.188
1.177
1.159
1.136
1.110
1.096
1.047
0.967
0.894
0.707
0.577
0.482
0.409
0.352
0.913
1.018
278.1
304.3
328.3
345.1
347.6
347.1
344.3
339.7
333.9
327.6
323.9
311.8
291.8
273.6
226.7
194.3
170.6
152.2
137.9
278.2
304.4
5945.9
6721.6
7454.3
7971.8
8049.2
8034.9
7947.7
7802.6
7624.2
7431.0
7320.1
6950.9
6351.0
5813.6
4478.5
3594.8
2963.7
2488.7
2122.6
5947.7
6726.5
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
Storm
Event
Rain
Flooded Discharge Time-Peak
(mm/hr) Volume
Volume
(mins)
(m)
(m)
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
187.543
107.715
61.866
35.533
25.689
20.408
14.755
11.721
9.805
8.474
6.975
5.300
4.028
3.315
2.327
1.810
1.490
1.271
1.111
187.543
107.715
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Winter
Winter
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
6249.9
7177.5
8254.7
9482.5
10283.8
10895.8
11816.2
12516.0
13087.2
13573.2
14894.9
16976.2
19352.1
21236.7
22359.1
23191.1
23857.8
24416.8
24899.5
6249.9
7177.5
1982-2015 XP Solutions
32
45
72
124
174
202
266
334
402
470
608
876
1264
1648
2384
3120
3832
4584
5256
32
45
Page 2
Stone Hill Park
Area 2
1:100yr + 20%cc
Designed by GB
Checked by CT
Source Control 2015.1
60
120
180
240
360
480
600
720
960
1440
2160
2880
4320
5760
7200
8640
10080
Storm
Event
Status
Max
Max
Max
Max
Level Depth Control Volume
(m)
(l/s)
(m)
(m)
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
9.615
9.685
9.697
9.689
9.671
9.641
9.607
9.571
9.537
9.455
9.340
9.243
9.039
8.909
8.818
8.753
8.706
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Storm
Event
60
120
180
240
360
480
600
720
960
1440
2160
2880
4320
5760
7200
8640
10080
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
1.115
1.185
1.197
1.189
1.171
1.141
1.107
1.071
1.037
0.955
0.840
0.743
0.539
0.409
0.318
0.253
0.206
328.8
346.2
349.3
347.3
342.7
335.3
326.8
317.8
309.2
288.7
259.9
235.8
184.8
152.2
129.6
113.2
101.6
7469.2
8008.3
8105.2
8042.7
7898.3
7670.2
7406.1
7131.5
6868.4
6258.1
5418.0
4733.5
3341.9
2487.3
1913.3
1506.4
1221.0
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
Rain
Flooded Discharge Time-Peak
(mm/hr) Volume
Volume
(mins)
(m)
(m)
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
61.866
35.533
25.689
20.408
14.755
11.721
9.805
8.474
6.975
5.300
4.028
3.315
2.327
1.810
1.490
1.271
1.111
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
8254.7
9482.5
10283.8
10895.8
11816.2
12516.0
13087.2
13570.4
14892.1
16976.3
19352.1
21236.7
22359.0
23191.1
23858.0
24416.8
24899.5
1982-2015 XP Solutions
70
124
176
208
280
356
432
504
648
926
1324
1712
2464
3184
3896
4592
5256
Page 3
Stone Hill Park
Area 2
1:100yr + 20%cc
Designed by GB
Checked by CT
Source Control 2015.1
Rainfall Details
Rainfall Model
FEH
Return Period (years)
100
Site Location GB 633250 166550 TR 33250 66550
C (1km)
-0.025
D1 (1km)
0.315
D2 (1km)
0.438
D3 (1km)
0.242
E (1km)
0.316
F (1km)
2.489
Summer Storms
Yes
Winter Storms
Yes
Cv (Summer)
0.950
Cv (Winter)
0.950
Shortest Storm (mins)
15
Longest Storm (mins)
10080
Climate Change %
+20
Time (mins)
From:
To:
4 3.050
8 3.000
8
12
Area
(ha)
Time (mins)
From:
To:
12 3.000
16 3.000
16
4 0.000
1982-2015 XP Solutions
Area
(ha)
20 2.000
Page 4
Stone Hill Park
Area 2
1:100yr + 20%cc
Designed by GB
Checked by CT
Source Control 2015.1
Model Details
5750.1
1.200
7848.3
1.500
8423.8
100.0000
150.0000
200.0000
250.0000
300.0000
350.0000
350.0000
350.0000
1.800
2.000
2.200
2.400
2.600
2.800
3.000
3.200
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
3.400
3.600
3.800
4.000
4.200
4.400
4.600
4.800
1982-2015 XP Solutions
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
5.000
5.200
5.400
5.600
5.800
6.000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Page 1
Stone Hill Park
Area 2
1:100yr + 40%cc
Designed by GB
Checked by CT
Source Control 2015.1
15
30
60
120
180
240
360
480
600
720
960
1440
2160
2880
4320
5760
7200
8640
10080
15
30
Storm
Event
Max
Max
Max
Max
Level Depth Control Volume
(m)
(l/s)
(m)
(m)
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
9.547
9.666
9.778
9.863
9.884
9.882
9.868
9.848
9.822
9.792
9.778
9.723
9.635
9.554
9.342
9.196
9.086
9.003
8.935
9.548
9.667
15
30
60
120
180
240
360
480
600
720
960
1440
2160
2880
4320
5760
7200
8640
10080
15
30
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Winter
Winter
1.047
1.166
1.278
1.363
1.384
1.382
1.368
1.348
1.322
1.292
1.278
1.223
1.135
1.054
0.842
0.696
0.586
0.503
0.435
1.048
1.167
311.8
341.6
350.0
350.0
350.0
350.0
350.0
350.0
350.0
350.0
350.0
350.0
333.7
313.6
260.6
223.9
196.6
175.7
158.8
311.9
341.7
6951.0
7861.7
8744.0
9429.0
9603.6
9583.7
9475.8
9306.9
9094.9
8860.3
8748.3
8309.2
7619.6
7003.0
5438.8
4401.9
3656.9
3099.3
2658.8
6953.0
7867.6
Status
Flood
Flood
Flood
Flood
Flood
Flood
Flood
Flood
Flood
Flood
O K
O K
Risk
Risk
Risk
Risk
Risk
Risk
Risk
Risk
Risk
Risk
O K
O K
O K
O K
O K
O K
O K
O K
O K
Storm
Event
Rain
Flooded Discharge Time-Peak
(mm/hr) Volume
Volume
(mins)
(m)
(m)
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
218.800
125.668
72.177
41.455
29.971
23.809
17.214
13.675
11.439
9.887
8.137
6.184
4.699
3.868
2.715
2.112
1.738
1.482
1.296
218.800
125.668
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Winter
Winter
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
7290.0
8371.6
9633.8
11066.3
12001.1
12711.8
13785.6
14602.0
15268.4
15835.4
17377.1
19806.2
22580.7
24776.7
26086.0
27056.8
27834.6
28486.8
29049.9
7290.0
8371.6
1982-2015 XP Solutions
32
45
72
126
182
216
276
342
410
478
614
880
1268
1652
2388
3120
3832
4584
5264
32
45
Page 2
Stone Hill Park
Area 2
1:100yr + 40%cc
Designed by GB
Checked by CT
Source Control 2015.1
60
120
180
240
360
480
600
720
960
1440
2160
2880
4320
5760
7200
8640
10080
Storm
Event
Max
Max
Max
Max
Level Depth Control Volume
(m)
(l/s)
(m)
(m)
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
9.780
9.867
9.891
9.887
9.862
9.830
9.790
9.748
9.709
9.621
9.494
9.387
9.155
9.005
8.900
8.823
8.765
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Storm
Event
60
120
180
240
360
480
600
720
960
1440
2160
2880
4320
5760
7200
8640
10080
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
1.280
1.367
1.391
1.387
1.362
1.330
1.290
1.248
1.209
1.121
0.994
0.887
0.655
0.505
0.400
0.323
0.265
350.0
350.0
350.0
350.0
350.0
350.0
350.0
350.0
350.0
330.3
298.6
271.7
213.8
176.2
150.1
130.8
116.3
8759.5
9464.4
9656.3
9623.6
9421.8
9159.1
8841.3
8504.1
8199.8
7514.0
6552.0
5758.6
4122.8
3112.5
2431.9
1944.4
1581.8
Status
Flood
Flood
Flood
Flood
Flood
Flood
Flood
Flood
Flood
Risk
Risk
Risk
Risk
Risk
Risk
Risk
Risk
Risk
O K
O K
O K
O K
O K
O K
O K
O K
Rain
Flooded Discharge Time-Peak
(mm/hr) Volume
Volume
(mins)
(m)
(m)
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
72.177
41.455
29.971
23.809
17.214
13.675
11.439
9.887
8.137
6.184
4.699
3.868
2.715
2.112
1.738
1.482
1.296
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
9633.8
11066.3
12001.1
12711.8
13785.6
14602.0
15268.4
15835.4
17377.2
19806.2
22577.9
24776.7
26086.1
27056.8
27834.6
28489.6
29049.9
1982-2015 XP Solutions
72
126
180
232
288
364
438
510
652
930
1328
1716
2468
3184
3904
4664
5352
Page 3
Stone Hill Park
Area 2
1:100yr + 40%cc
Designed by GB
Checked by CT
Source Control 2015.1
Rainfall Details
Rainfall Model
FEH
Return Period (years)
100
Site Location GB 633250 166550 TR 33250 66550
C (1km)
-0.025
D1 (1km)
0.315
D2 (1km)
0.438
D3 (1km)
0.242
E (1km)
0.316
F (1km)
2.489
Summer Storms
Yes
Winter Storms
Yes
Cv (Summer)
0.950
Cv (Winter)
0.950
Shortest Storm (mins)
15
Longest Storm (mins)
10080
Climate Change %
+40
Time (mins)
From:
To:
4 3.050
8 3.000
8
12
Area
(ha)
Time (mins)
From:
To:
12 3.000
16 3.000
16
4 0.000
1982-2015 XP Solutions
Area
(ha)
20 2.000
Page 4
Stone Hill Park
Area 2
1:100yr + 40%cc
Designed by GB
Checked by CT
Source Control 2015.1
Model Details
5750.1
1.200
7848.3
1.500
8423.8
100.0000
150.0000
200.0000
250.0000
300.0000
350.0000
350.0000
350.0000
1.800
2.000
2.200
2.400
2.600
2.800
3.000
3.200
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
3.400
3.600
3.800
4.000
4.200
4.400
4.600
4.800
1982-2015 XP Solutions
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
5.000
5.200
5.400
5.600
5.800
6.000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Page 1
Stone Hill Park
Area 3
1:2 yr
Designed by GB
Checked by CT
Source Control 2015.1
15
30
60
120
180
240
360
480
600
720
960
1440
2160
2880
4320
5760
7200
8640
10080
15
30
Storm
Event
Status
Max
Max
Max
Max
Level Depth Control Volume
(m)
(l/s)
(m)
(m)
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
8.667
8.701
8.739
8.777
8.796
8.806
8.818
8.825
8.829
8.830
8.842
8.849
8.843
8.832
8.777
8.736
8.706
8.686
8.670
8.667
8.701
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Winter
Winter
Storm
Event
15
30
60
120
180
240
360
480
600
720
960
1440
2160
2880
4320
5760
7200
8640
10080
15
30
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
0.167
0.201
0.239
0.277
0.296
0.306
0.318
0.325
0.329
0.330
0.342
0.349
0.343
0.332
0.277
0.236
0.206
0.186
0.170
0.167
0.201
83.4
100.3
109.8
119.3
123.9
126.4
129.6
131.3
132.2
132.6
135.4
137.2
135.8
132.9
119.2
109.1
101.6
93.1
85.1
83.4
100.3
2004.1
2424.3
2895.2
3367.6
3598.6
3721.6
3879.3
3970.0
4016.8
4034.0
4174.7
4264.0
4197.1
4048.5
3360.2
2856.0
2487.3
2244.9
2049.9
2004.9
2426.7
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
Rain
Flooded Discharge Time-Peak
(mm/hr) Volume
Volume
(mins)
(m)
(m)
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Winter
Winter
39.713
24.407
15.000
9.219
6.934
5.666
4.262
3.482
2.977
2.619
2.217
1.753
1.386
1.173
0.857
0.685
0.577
0.501
0.444
39.713
24.407
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
2030.7
2494.5
3149.0
3872.0
4369.4
4760.6
5371.0
5849.5
6249.7
6595.7
7437.1
8789.2
10488.1
11838.1
12960.4
13833.8
14545.4
15153.8
15688.0
2030.7
2494.5
1982-2015 XP Solutions
33
46
72
128
182
222
282
348
418
486
624
898
1300
1684
2428
3168
3840
4584
5272
33
46
Page 2
Stone Hill Park
Area 3
1:2 yr
Designed by GB
Checked by CT
Source Control 2015.1
60
120
180
240
360
480
600
720
960
1440
2160
2880
4320
5760
7200
8640
10080
Storm
Event
Status
Max
Max
Max
Max
Level Depth Control Volume
(m)
(l/s)
(m)
(m)
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
8.740
8.778
8.797
8.807
8.817
8.822
8.823
8.821
8.826
8.822
8.802
8.780
8.716
8.680
8.656
8.639
8.625
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Storm
Event
60
120
180
240
360
480
600
720
960
1440
2160
2880
4320
5760
7200
8640
10080
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
0.240
0.278
0.297
0.307
0.317
0.322
0.323
0.321
0.326
0.322
0.302
0.280
0.216
0.180
0.156
0.139
0.125
109.9
119.6
124.3
126.8
129.2
130.4
130.7
130.2
131.4
130.4
125.6
120.1
104.1
90.1
78.1
69.4
62.4
2900.9
3379.3
3616.8
3740.5
3865.0
3926.3
3936.6
3915.3
3977.5
3923.2
3682.2
3402.9
2609.0
2167.6
1876.4
1660.1
1491.0
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
Rain
Flooded Discharge Time-Peak
(mm/hr) Volume
Volume
(mins)
(m)
(m)
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
15.000
9.219
6.934
5.666
4.262
3.482
2.977
2.619
2.217
1.753
1.386
1.173
0.857
0.685
0.577
0.501
0.444
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
3149.0
3872.0
4369.4
4760.6
5371.1
5849.5
6249.7
6595.8
7437.3
8789.8
10488.0
11838.0
12961.7
13833.8
14545.4
15153.8
15688.0
1982-2015 XP Solutions
72
126
180
234
292
368
446
522
670
956
1368
1764
2480
3184
3912
4672
5360
Page 3
Stone Hill Park
Area 3
1:2 yr
Designed by GB
Checked by CT
Source Control 2015.1
Rainfall Details
Rainfall Model
FEH
Return Period (years)
2
Site Location GB 633250 166550 TR 33250 66550
C (1km)
-0.025
D1 (1km)
0.315
D2 (1km)
0.438
D3 (1km)
0.242
E (1km)
0.316
F (1km)
2.489
Summer Storms
Yes
Winter Storms
Yes
Cv (Summer)
0.950
Cv (Winter)
0.950
Shortest Storm (mins)
15
Longest Storm (mins)
10080
Climate Change %
+0
Time (mins)
From:
To:
4 4.428
8 4.428
8
12
Area
(ha)
Time (mins)
From:
To:
12 4.428
16 4.428
16
4 0.000
1982-2015 XP Solutions
Area
(ha)
20 4.428
Page 4
Stone Hill Park
Area 3
1:2 yr
Designed by GB
Checked by CT
Source Control 2015.1
Model Details
11824.8
1.200
14763.1
1.500
15548.6
100.0000
150.0000
170.0000
190.0000
220.0000
260.0000
260.0000
260.0000
1.800
2.000
2.200
2.400
2.600
2.800
3.000
3.200
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
3.400
3.600
3.800
4.000
4.200
4.400
4.600
4.800
1982-2015 XP Solutions
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
5.000
5.200
5.400
5.600
5.800
6.000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Page 1
Stone Hill Park
Area 3
1:30 yr
Designed by GB
Checked by CT
Source Control 2015.1
15
30
60
120
180
240
360
480
600
720
960
1440
2160
2880
4320
5760
7200
8640
10080
15
30
Storm
Event
Status
Max
Max
Max
Max
Level Depth Control Volume
(m)
(l/s)
(m)
(m)
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
8.921
8.987
9.056
9.124
9.158
9.176
9.189
9.192
9.192
9.190
9.208
9.220
9.209
9.185
9.064
8.970
8.901
8.852
8.811
8.921
8.987
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Winter
Winter
Storm
Event
15
30
60
120
180
240
360
480
600
720
960
1440
2160
2880
4320
5760
7200
8640
10080
15
30
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
0.421
0.487
0.556
0.624
0.658
0.676
0.689
0.692
0.692
0.690
0.708
0.720
0.709
0.685
0.564
0.470
0.401
0.352
0.311
0.421
0.487
152.1
158.7
165.6
172.4
175.8
177.6
178.9
179.2
179.2
179.0
180.8
182.0
180.9
178.5
166.4
157.0
150.1
137.9
127.8
152.1
158.7
5189.5
6031.9
6940.6
7836.8
8287.1
8532.4
8706.9
8748.3
8750.3
8723.7
8968.8
9121.4
8974.4
8655.7
7044.5
5823.2
4928.4
4302.9
3794.3
5191.2
6036.1
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
Rain
Flooded Discharge Time-Peak
(mm/hr) Volume
Volume
(mins)
(m)
(m)
Summer 102.037
Summer 59.853
Summer 35.108
Summer 20.594
Summer 15.073
Summer 12.080
Summer
8.842
Summer
7.086
Summer
5.968
Summer
5.186
Summer
4.306
Summer
3.313
Summer
2.549
Summer
2.116
Summer
1.504
Summer
1.180
Summer
0.978
Summer
0.839
Summer
0.736
Winter 102.037
Winter 59.853
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
5188.9
6064.4
7375.9
8651.2
9495.8
10144.2
11131.7
11887.8
12506.6
13033.2
14394.6
16477.2
19294.1
21359.5
22746.3
23822.3
24674.0
25392.4
26012.6
5188.9
6064.4
1982-2015 XP Solutions
34
47
76
132
188
246
352
404
466
530
668
948
1364
1768
2524
3280
3968
4680
5440
33
47
Page 2
Stone Hill Park
Area 3
1:30 yr
Designed by GB
Checked by CT
Source Control 2015.1
60
120
180
240
360
480
600
720
960
1440
2160
2880
4320
5760
7200
8640
10080
Storm
Event
Status
Max
Max
Max
Max
Level Depth Control Volume
(m)
(l/s)
(m)
(m)
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
9.057
9.125
9.159
9.178
9.192
9.191
9.188
9.183
9.194
9.189
9.153
9.107
8.956
8.860
8.794
8.744
8.708
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Storm
Event
60
120
180
240
360
480
600
720
960
1440
2160
2880
4320
5760
7200
8640
10080
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
0.557
0.625
0.659
0.678
0.692
0.691
0.688
0.683
0.694
0.689
0.653
0.607
0.456
0.360
0.294
0.244
0.208
165.7
172.5
175.9
177.8
179.2
179.1
178.8
178.3
179.4
178.9
175.3
170.7
155.6
139.9
123.4
111.1
101.9
6948.3
7851.8
8309.3
8562.5
8754.8
8735.9
8699.1
8631.9
8776.7
8702.8
8221.7
7609.4
5635.7
4406.3
3577.1
2959.9
2507.1
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
Rain
Flooded Discharge Time-Peak
(mm/hr) Volume
Volume
(mins)
(m)
(m)
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
35.108
20.594
15.073
12.080
8.842
7.086
5.968
5.186
4.306
3.313
2.549
2.116
1.504
1.180
0.978
0.839
0.736
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
7375.9
8651.2
9495.8
10144.2
11131.8
11888.1
12507.1
13034.0
14396.1
16483.2
19294.1
21359.4
22749.0
23822.2
24673.9
25392.4
26016.2
1982-2015 XP Solutions
74
130
186
242
350
446
480
558
712
1016
1452
1872
2636
3352
4056
4768
5448
Page 3
Stone Hill Park
Area 3
1:30 yr
Designed by GB
Checked by CT
Source Control 2015.1
Rainfall Details
Rainfall Model
FEH
Return Period (years)
30
Site Location GB 633250 166550 TR 33250 66550
C (1km)
-0.025
D1 (1km)
0.315
D2 (1km)
0.438
D3 (1km)
0.242
E (1km)
0.316
F (1km)
2.489
Summer Storms
Yes
Winter Storms
Yes
Cv (Summer)
0.950
Cv (Winter)
0.950
Shortest Storm (mins)
15
Longest Storm (mins)
10080
Climate Change %
+0
Time (mins)
From:
To:
4 4.428
8 4.428
8
12
Area
(ha)
Time (mins)
From:
To:
12 4.428
16 4.428
16
4 0.000
1982-2015 XP Solutions
Area
(ha)
20 4.428
Page 4
Stone Hill Park
Area 3
1:30 yr
Designed by GB
Checked by CT
Source Control 2015.1
Model Details
11824.8
1.200
14763.1
1.500
15548.6
100.0000
150.0000
170.0000
190.0000
220.0000
260.0000
260.0000
260.0000
1.800
2.000
2.200
2.400
2.600
2.800
3.000
3.200
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
3.400
3.600
3.800
4.000
4.200
4.400
4.600
4.800
1982-2015 XP Solutions
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
5.000
5.200
5.400
5.600
5.800
6.000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Page 1
Stone Hill Park
Area 3
1:100 yr
Designed by GB
Checked by CT
Source Control 2015.1
15
30
60
120
180
240
360
480
600
720
960
1440
2160
2880
4320
5760
7200
8640
10080
15
30
Storm
Event
Status
Max
Max
Max
Max
Level Depth Control Volume
(m)
(l/s)
(m)
(m)
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
9.136
9.220
9.307
9.390
9.430
9.452
9.467
9.464
9.460
9.454
9.473
9.485
9.471
9.442
9.291
9.167
9.067
8.987
8.923
9.136
9.220
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Winter
Winter
Storm
Event
15
30
60
120
180
240
360
480
600
720
960
1440
2160
2880
4320
5760
7200
8640
10080
15
30
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
0.636
0.720
0.807
0.890
0.930
0.952
0.967
0.964
0.960
0.954
0.973
0.985
0.971
0.942
0.791
0.667
0.567
0.487
0.423
0.636
0.720
173.6
182.0
191.0
203.5
209.5
212.8
215.1
214.6
214.0
213.1
216.0
217.7
215.6
211.3
189.1
176.7
166.7
158.7
152.3
173.6
182.0
8000.9
9122.3
10311.8
11461.4
12031.6
12338.8
12553.1
12511.8
12446.5
12360.5
12639.1
12803.9
12600.7
12192.0
10091.8
8412.0
7086.0
6039.2
5213.9
8002.1
9126.2
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
Rain
Flooded Discharge Time-Peak
(mm/hr) Volume
Volume
(mins)
(m)
(m)
Summer 156.286
Summer 89.763
Summer 51.555
Summer 29.610
Summer 21.408
Summer 17.007
Summer 12.295
Summer
9.768
Summer
8.171
Summer
7.062
Summer
5.812
Summer
4.417
Summer
3.357
Summer
2.763
Summer
1.939
Summer
1.508
Summer
1.241
Summer
1.059
Summer
0.925
Winter 156.286
Winter 89.763
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
7851.9
8944.6
10825.4
12428.9
13473.0
14264.7
15455.9
16354.9
17081.7
17692.4
19334.5
21712.7
25410.3
27885.3
29318.1
30451.7
31327.3
32061.1
32689.6
7851.9
8944.8
1982-2015 XP Solutions
34
48
76
132
190
248
362
436
494
556
688
968
1380
1792
2596
3352
4056
4768
5456
34
47
Page 2
Stone Hill Park
Area 3
1:100 yr
Designed by GB
Checked by CT
Source Control 2015.1
60
120
180
240
360
480
600
720
960
1440
2160
2880
4320
5760
7200
8640
10080
Storm
Event
Status
Max
Max
Max
Max
Level Depth Control Volume
(m)
(l/s)
(m)
(m)
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
9.307
9.391
9.432
9.455
9.472
9.470
9.459
9.451
9.464
9.459
9.419
9.366
9.170
9.020
8.911
8.843
8.791
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Storm
Event
60
120
180
240
360
480
600
720
960
1440
2160
2880
4320
5760
7200
8640
10080
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
0.807
0.891
0.932
0.955
0.972
0.970
0.959
0.951
0.964
0.959
0.919
0.866
0.670
0.520
0.411
0.343
0.291
191.1
203.7
209.8
213.3
215.8
215.5
213.8
212.6
214.6
213.9
207.8
199.9
177.0
162.0
151.1
135.8
122.7
10319.4
11480.8
12062.6
12382.7
12623.5
12589.4
12433.7
12319.5
12511.9
12442.3
11871.7
11130.2
8456.3
6469.8
5057.1
4198.6
3538.3
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
Rain
Flooded Discharge Time-Peak
(mm/hr) Volume
Volume
(mins)
(m)
(m)
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
51.555
29.610
21.408
17.007
12.295
9.768
8.171
7.062
5.812
4.417
3.357
2.763
1.939
1.508
1.241
1.059
0.925
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
10825.4
12429.0
13473.1
14264.9
15456.0
16355.2
17082.2
17693.2
19336.1
21718.8
25410.4
27885.2
29321.8
30451.7
31327.1
32061.2
32693.1
1982-2015 XP Solutions
76
130
186
242
354
460
512
574
728
1038
1480
1912
2724
3464
4120
4848
5560
Page 3
Stone Hill Park
Area 3
1:100 yr
Designed by GB
Checked by CT
Source Control 2015.1
Rainfall Details
Rainfall Model
FEH
Return Period (years)
100
Site Location GB 633250 166550 TR 33250 66550
C (1km)
-0.025
D1 (1km)
0.315
D2 (1km)
0.438
D3 (1km)
0.242
E (1km)
0.316
F (1km)
2.489
Summer Storms
Yes
Winter Storms
Yes
Cv (Summer)
0.950
Cv (Winter)
0.950
Shortest Storm (mins)
15
Longest Storm (mins)
10080
Climate Change %
+0
Time (mins)
From:
To:
4 4.428
8 4.428
8
12
Area
(ha)
Time (mins)
From:
To:
12 4.428
16 4.428
16
4 0.000
1982-2015 XP Solutions
Area
(ha)
20 4.428
Page 4
Stone Hill Park
Area 3
1:100 yr
Designed by GB
Checked by CT
Source Control 2015.1
Model Details
11824.8
1.200
14763.1
1.500
15548.6
100.0000
150.0000
170.0000
190.0000
220.0000
260.0000
260.0000
260.0000
1.800
2.000
2.200
2.400
2.600
2.800
3.000
3.200
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
3.400
3.600
3.800
4.000
4.200
4.400
4.600
4.800
1982-2015 XP Solutions
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
5.000
5.200
5.400
5.600
5.800
6.000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Page 1
Stone Hill Park
Area 3
1:100yr + 20%cc
Designed by GB
Checked by CT
Source Control 2015.1
15
30
60
120
180
240
360
480
600
720
960
1440
2160
2880
4320
5760
7200
8640
10080
15
30
15
30
60
120
180
240
360
480
600
720
960
1440
2160
2880
4320
5760
7200
8640
10080
15
30
Storm
Event
Status
Max
Max
Max
Max
Level Depth Control Volume
(m)
(l/s)
(m)
(m)
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
9.257
9.355
9.458
9.557
9.606
9.633
9.653
9.652
9.648
9.642
9.667
9.685
9.676
9.648
9.487
9.354
9.240
9.144
9.063
9.257
9.355
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Winter
Winter
0.757
0.855
0.958
1.057
1.106
1.133
1.153
1.152
1.148
1.142
1.167
1.185
1.176
1.148
0.987
0.854
0.740
0.644
0.563
0.757
0.855
185.7
198.3
213.7
231.3
241.1
246.5
250.6
250.3
249.5
248.3
253.3
257.0
255.1
249.6
218.1
198.1
184.0
174.4
166.3
185.7
198.3
9625.6
10980.8
12422.1
13831.5
14540.0
14932.1
15232.2
15209.8
15149.3
15066.9
15434.0
15703.7
15559.3
15158.9
12839.3
10964.9
9402.4
8103.2
7030.1
9627.0
10985.4
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
Storm
Event
Rain
Flooded Discharge Time-Peak
(mm/hr) Volume
Volume
(mins)
(m)
(m)
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
187.543
107.715
61.866
35.533
25.689
20.408
14.755
11.721
9.805
8.474
6.975
5.300
4.028
3.315
2.327
1.810
1.490
1.271
1.111
187.543
107.715
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Winter
Winter
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
9325.7
10579.1
12984.0
14904.2
16153.3
17099.6
18520.8
19590.1
20451.0
21170.0
23093.8
25759.9
30496.2
33460.0
35154.9
36543.2
37593.8
38474.5
39227.2
9325.7
10579.3
1982-2015 XP Solutions
34
48
76
134
190
248
362
446
502
564
692
970
1384
1796
2604
3392
4120
4856
5560
34
48
Page 2
Stone Hill Park
Area 3
1:100yr + 20%cc
Designed by GB
Checked by CT
Source Control 2015.1
60
120
180
240
360
480
600
720
960
1440
2160
2880
4320
5760
7200
8640
10080
Storm
Event
Status
Max
Max
Max
Max
Level Depth Control Volume
(m)
(l/s)
(m)
(m)
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
9.459
9.558
9.609
9.637
9.660
9.660
9.650
9.641
9.661
9.663
9.626
9.575
9.369
9.198
9.060
8.952
8.880
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Storm
Event
60
120
180
240
360
480
600
720
960
1440
2160
2880
4320
5760
7200
8640
10080
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
0.959
1.058
1.109
1.137
1.160
1.160
1.150
1.141
1.161
1.163
1.126
1.075
0.869
0.698
0.560
0.452
0.380
213.8
231.6
241.7
247.3
251.9
252.0
249.9
248.2
252.1
252.5
245.2
234.9
200.4
179.8
166.0
155.2
144.9
12432.2
13856.2
14580.9
14990.7
15327.8
15332.1
15180.1
15060.4
15346.1
15370.8
14838.8
14090.9
11174.5
8823.8
6985.0
5588.5
4656.9
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
Rain
Flooded Discharge Time-Peak
(mm/hr) Volume
Volume
(mins)
(m)
(m)
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
61.866
35.533
25.689
20.408
14.755
11.721
9.805
8.474
6.975
5.300
4.028
3.315
2.327
1.810
1.490
1.271
1.111
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
12984.0
14904.3
16153.3
17099.7
18521.0
19590.2
20451.1
21170.3
23094.0
25759.5
30496.2
33459.9
35157.0
36543.2
37599.7
38480.5
39231.6
1982-2015 XP Solutions
76
132
188
244
354
462
554
578
732
1040
1488
1920
2768
3528
4264
4944
5648
Page 3
Stone Hill Park
Area 3
1:100yr + 20%cc
Designed by GB
Checked by CT
Source Control 2015.1
Rainfall Details
Rainfall Model
FEH
Return Period (years)
100
Site Location GB 633250 166550 TR 33250 66550
C (1km)
-0.025
D1 (1km)
0.315
D2 (1km)
0.438
D3 (1km)
0.242
E (1km)
0.316
F (1km)
2.489
Summer Storms
Yes
Winter Storms
Yes
Cv (Summer)
0.950
Cv (Winter)
0.950
Shortest Storm (mins)
15
Longest Storm (mins)
10080
Climate Change %
+20
Time (mins)
From:
To:
4 4.428
8 4.428
8
12
Area
(ha)
Time (mins)
From:
To:
12 4.428
16 4.428
16
4 0.000
1982-2015 XP Solutions
Area
(ha)
20 4.428
Page 4
Stone Hill Park
Area 3
1:100yr + 20%cc
Designed by GB
Checked by CT
Source Control 2015.1
Model Details
11824.8
1.200
14763.1
1.500
15548.6
100.0000
150.0000
170.0000
190.0000
220.0000
260.0000
260.0000
260.0000
1.800
2.000
2.200
2.400
2.600
2.800
3.000
3.200
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
3.400
3.600
3.800
4.000
4.200
4.400
4.600
4.800
1982-2015 XP Solutions
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
5.000
5.200
5.400
5.600
5.800
6.000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Page 1
Stone Hill Park
Area 3
1:100yr + 40%cc
Designed by GB
Checked by CT
Source Control 2015.1
15
30
60
120
180
240
360
480
600
720
960
1440
2160
2880
4320
5760
7200
8640
10080
15
30
Storm
Event
Max
Max
Max
Max
Level Depth Control Volume
(m)
(l/s)
(m)
(m)
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
9.375
9.487
9.605
9.718
9.777
9.811
9.842
9.847
9.841
9.834
9.868
9.898
9.894
9.865
9.672
9.532
9.413
9.309
9.216
9.375
9.488
15
30
60
120
180
240
360
480
600
720
960
1440
2160
2880
4320
5760
7200
8640
10080
15
30
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Winter
Winter
0.875
0.987
1.105
1.218
1.277
1.311
1.342
1.347
1.341
1.334
1.368
1.398
1.394
1.365
1.172
1.032
0.913
0.809
0.716
0.875
0.988
201.2
218.1
240.9
260.0
260.0
260.0
260.0
260.0
260.0
260.0
260.0
260.0
260.0
260.0
254.3
226.4
206.9
191.4
181.6
201.2
218.2
11250.6
12837.1
14527.6
16189.8
17057.5
17571.2
18045.5
18111.3
18025.1
17927.3
18436.3
18886.7
18826.9
18392.6
15501.7
13480.7
11784.3
10347.4
9073.0
11252.2
12842.6
Status
Flood
Flood
Flood
Flood
Flood
Flood
Flood
Flood
Flood
Flood
Flood
O K
O K
O K
Risk
Risk
Risk
Risk
Risk
Risk
Risk
Risk
Risk
Risk
Risk
O K
O K
O K
O K
O K
O K
O K
Storm
Event
Rain
Flooded Discharge Time-Peak
(mm/hr) Volume
Volume
(mins)
(m)
(m)
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
218.800
125.668
72.177
41.455
29.971
23.809
17.214
13.675
11.439
9.887
8.137
6.184
4.699
3.868
2.715
2.112
1.738
1.482
1.296
218.800
125.668
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Winter
Winter
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
10741.1
12126.7
15139.2
17374.2
18825.6
19923.2
21566.0
22795.4
23778.9
24593.7
26737.6
29453.0
35577.8
39031.3
40971.1
42634.9
43860.4
44888.0
45765.1
10741.1
12126.9
1982-2015 XP Solutions
34
48
76
134
192
248
364
480
530
590
722
998
1416
1828
2604
3400
4184
4928
5656
34
48
Page 2
Stone Hill Park
Area 3
1:100yr + 40%cc
Designed by GB
Checked by CT
Source Control 2015.1
60
120
180
240
360
480
600
720
960
1440
2160
2880
4320
5760
7200
8640
10080
Storm
Event
Max
Max
Max
Max
Level Depth Control Volume
(m)
(l/s)
(m)
(m)
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
9.606
9.720
9.780
9.815
9.849
9.856
9.849
9.834
9.863
9.874
9.838
9.778
9.555
9.378
9.225
9.096
8.993
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Storm
Event
60
120
180
240
360
480
600
720
960
1440
2160
2880
4320
5760
7200
8640
10080
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
1.106
1.220
1.280
1.315
1.349
1.356
1.349
1.334
1.363
1.374
1.338
1.278
1.055
0.878
0.725
0.596
0.493
241.1
260.0
260.0
260.0
260.0
260.0
260.0
260.0
260.0
260.0
260.0
260.0
231.0
201.7
182.5
169.6
159.3
14540.2
16221.9
17110.6
17641.9
18148.7
18253.1
18141.7
17926.6
18356.9
18532.9
17983.1
17076.2
13811.1
11303.8
9196.7
7472.2
6108.7
Status
Flood
Flood
Flood
Flood
Flood
Flood
Flood
Flood
Flood
Flood
Flood
O K
Risk
Risk
Risk
Risk
Risk
Risk
Risk
Risk
Risk
Risk
Risk
O K
O K
O K
O K
O K
Rain
Flooded Discharge Time-Peak
(mm/hr) Volume
Volume
(mins)
(m)
(m)
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
72.177
41.455
29.971
23.809
17.214
13.675
11.439
9.887
8.137
6.184
4.699
3.868
2.715
2.112
1.738
1.482
1.296
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
15139.2
17374.2
18825.5
19923.1
21566.0
22795.5
23779.1
24594.5
26741.5
29478.3
35577.9
39031.9
40968.0
42634.9
43866.4
44893.9
45770.4
1982-2015 XP Solutions
76
132
188
244
358
468
570
608
750
1064
1512
1940
2772
3584
4336
5104
5760
Page 3
Stone Hill Park
Area 3
1:100yr + 40%cc
Designed by GB
Checked by CT
Source Control 2015.1
Rainfall Details
Rainfall Model
FEH
Return Period (years)
100
Site Location GB 633250 166550 TR 33250 66550
C (1km)
-0.025
D1 (1km)
0.315
D2 (1km)
0.438
D3 (1km)
0.242
E (1km)
0.316
F (1km)
2.489
Summer Storms
Yes
Winter Storms
Yes
Cv (Summer)
0.950
Cv (Winter)
0.950
Shortest Storm (mins)
15
Longest Storm (mins)
10080
Climate Change %
+40
Time (mins)
From:
To:
4 4.428
8 4.428
8
12
Area
(ha)
Time (mins)
From:
To:
12 4.428
16 4.428
16
4 0.000
1982-2015 XP Solutions
Area
(ha)
20 4.428
Page 4
Stone Hill Park
Area 3
1:100yr + 40%cc
Designed by GB
Checked by CT
Source Control 2015.1
Model Details
11824.8
1.200
14763.1
1.500
15548.6
100.0000
150.0000
170.0000
190.0000
220.0000
260.0000
260.0000
260.0000
1.800
2.000
2.200
2.400
2.600
2.800
3.000
3.200
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
3.400
3.600
3.800
4.000
4.200
4.400
4.600
4.800
1982-2015 XP Solutions
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
5.000
5.200
5.400
5.600
5.800
6.000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Page 1
Stone Hill Park
Area 4
1:2 yr
Designed by GB
Checked by CT
Source Control 2015.1
Storm
Event
15
30
60
120
180
240
360
480
600
720
960
1440
2160
2880
4320
5760
7200
8640
10080
15
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Winter
9.525
9.542
9.559
9.577
9.587
9.594
9.603
9.608
9.611
9.613
9.621
9.631
9.640
9.644
9.636
9.628
9.620
9.614
9.608
9.525
0.125
0.142
0.159
0.177
0.187
0.194
0.203
0.208
0.211
0.213
0.221
0.231
0.240
0.244
0.236
0.228
0.220
0.214
0.208
0.125
Storm
Event
15
30
60
120
180
240
360
480
600
720
960
1440
2160
2880
4320
5760
7200
8640
10080
15
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Winter
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
14.7
19.0
23.5
28.3
31.5
34.7
38.5
40.8
42.1
43.3
46.7
51.4
54.7
56.1
53.3
49.8
46.4
43.5
41.0
14.7
Status
Max
Max
Outflow Volume
(m)
(l/s)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
14.7
19.0
23.5
28.3
31.5
34.7
38.5
40.8
42.1
43.3
46.7
51.4
54.7
56.1
53.3
49.8
46.4
43.5
41.0
14.7
1343.7
1643.0
1999.1
2408.9
2665.0
2843.6
3073.6
3206.3
3288.2
3357.8
3584.5
3898.4
4161.3
4291.1
4033.6
3789.4
3574.2
3385.6
3223.4
1343.9
Rain
Flooded Discharge Overflow Time-Peak
(mm/hr) Volume
Volume
Volume
(mins)
(m)
(m)
(m)
39.713
24.407
15.000
9.219
6.934
5.666
4.262
3.482
2.977
2.619
2.217
1.753
1.386
1.173
0.857
0.685
0.577
0.501
0.444
39.713
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
785.3
987.4
1675.4
2081.0
2356.7
2571.0
2900.2
3151.8
3355.6
3525.3
3934.9
4514.5
6477.5
7242.6
7633.2
8894.9
9321.2
9639.5
9825.7
785.3
1982-2015 XP Solutions
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
34
49
78
136
192
250
366
482
548
600
718
984
1392
1800
2600
3360
4120
4864
5648
34
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
Page 2
Stone Hill Park
Area 4
1:2 yr
Designed by GB
Checked by CT
Source Control 2015.1
Storm
Event
30
60
120
180
240
360
480
600
720
960
1440
2160
2880
4320
5760
7200
8640
10080
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
9.542
9.559
9.577
9.587
9.594
9.603
9.608
9.612
9.613
9.621
9.630
9.635
9.637
9.625
9.615
9.606
9.599
9.592
0.142
0.159
0.177
0.187
0.194
0.203
0.208
0.212
0.213
0.221
0.230
0.235
0.237
0.225
0.215
0.206
0.199
0.192
Storm
Event
30
60
120
180
240
360
480
600
720
960
1440
2160
2880
4320
5760
7200
8640
10080
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
19.0
23.5
28.3
31.5
34.7
38.7
41.0
42.6
43.3
46.7
50.7
53.2
53.7
48.7
44.2
40.1
36.7
33.6
Status
Max
Max
Outflow Volume
(m)
(l/s)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
19.0
23.5
28.3
31.5
34.7
38.7
41.0
42.6
43.3
46.7
50.7
53.2
53.7
48.7
44.2
40.1
36.7
33.6
1643.6
2000.5
2412.6
2671.1
2852.5
3089.2
3230.1
3316.2
3369.6
3584.9
3852.7
4027.3
4071.6
3720.9
3419.6
3169.9
2961.5
2783.4
Rain
Flooded Discharge Overflow Time-Peak
(mm/hr) Volume
Volume
Volume
(mins)
(m)
(m)
(m)
24.407
15.000
9.219
6.934
5.666
4.262
3.482
2.977
2.619
2.217
1.753
1.386
1.173
0.857
0.685
0.577
0.501
0.444
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
987.4
1675.4
2081.0
2356.7
2571.0
2900.2
3151.7
3355.3
3524.8
3934.0
4512.4
6477.0
7242.1
7628.1
8894.6
9320.9
9639.2
9828.4
1982-2015 XP Solutions
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
48
76
132
190
246
358
468
574
664
748
1052
1496
1920
2740
3536
4328
5104
5864
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
Page 3
Stone Hill Park
Area 4
1:2 yr
Designed by GB
Checked by CT
Source Control 2015.1
Rainfall Details
Rainfall Model
FEH
Return Period (years)
2
Site Location GB 633250 166550 TR 33250 66550
C (1km)
-0.025
D1 (1km)
0.315
D2 (1km)
0.438
D3 (1km)
0.242
E (1km)
0.316
F (1km)
2.489
Summer Storms
Yes
Winter Storms
Yes
Cv (Summer)
0.950
Cv (Winter)
0.950
Shortest Storm (mins)
15
Longest Storm (mins)
10080
Climate Change %
+0
Time (mins)
From:
To:
4 2.880
8 2.880
8
12
Area
(ha)
Time (mins)
From:
To:
12 2.880
16 2.880
16
4 0.000
1982-2015 XP Solutions
Area
(ha)
20 2.880
Page 4
Stone Hill Park
Area 4
1:2 yr
Designed by GB
Checked by CT
Source Control 2015.1
Model Details
Complex Structure
Swale
Infiltration Coefficient Base (m/hr) 0.00000
Length (m) 3000.0
Infiltration Coefficient Side (m/hr) 0.00000
Side Slope (1:X)
6.0
Safety Factor
2.0
Slope (1:X) 10000.0
Porosity
1.00
Cap Volume Depth (m)
0.000
Invert Level (m)
9.400 Cap Infiltration Depth (m)
0.000
Base Width (m)
10.0
Tank or Pond
Invert Level (m) 9.400
Depth (m) Area (m) Depth (m) Area (m)
0.000
2000.0
0.600
2611.4
Tank or Pond
Invert Level (m) 9.400
Depth (m) Area (m) Depth (m) Area (m)
0.000
2000.0
0.600
2611.4
Tank or Pond
Invert Level (m) 18.800
Depth (m) Area (m) Depth (m) Area (m)
0.000
2000.0
0.600
2611.4
9.7
37.3
0.300
0.400
75.3
119.9
0.500
0.600
1982-2015 XP Solutions
150.0
150.0
0.800
1.000
150.0
150.0
Page 5
Stone Hill Park
Area 4
1:2 yr
Designed by GB
Checked by CT
Source Control 2015.1
Hydroslide Outflow Control
Depth (m) Flow (l/s) Depth (m) Flow (l/s) Depth (m) Flow (l/s) Depth (m) Flow (l/s)
1.200
1.400
1.600
1.800
2.000
2.200
150.0
135.0
144.3
153.1
161.4
169.2
2.400
2.600
3.000
3.500
4.000
4.500
176.8
184.0
197.6
213.5
228.2
242.0
5.000
5.500
6.000
6.500
7.000
7.500
255.1
267.6
279.5
290.9
301.9
312.5
8.000
8.500
9.000
9.500
1982-2015 XP Solutions
322.7
332.6
342.3
351.7
Page 1
Stone Hill Park
Area 4
1:30 yr
Designed by GB
Checked by CT
Source Control 2015.1
Storm
Event
15
30
60
120
180
240
360
480
600
720
960
1440
2160
2880
4320
5760
7200
8640
10080
15
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Winter
9.616
9.635
9.655
9.675
9.686
9.693
9.701
9.705
9.707
9.709
9.717
9.727
9.735
9.738
9.721
9.706
9.693
9.681
9.671
9.616
0.216
0.235
0.255
0.275
0.286
0.293
0.301
0.305
0.307
0.309
0.317
0.327
0.335
0.338
0.321
0.306
0.293
0.281
0.271
0.216
Storm
Event
15
30
60
120
180
240
360
480
600
720
960
1440
2160
2880
4320
5760
7200
8640
10080
15
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
44.6
53.2
59.8
66.6
70.4
72.8
75.7
77.1
77.7
78.2
81.0
85.7
89.2
90.6
82.9
77.4
72.8
68.9
65.3
44.6
Max
Max
Outflow Volume
(m)
(l/s)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
44.6
53.2
59.8
66.6
70.4
72.8
75.7
77.1
77.7
78.2
81.0
85.7
89.2
90.6
82.9
77.4
72.8
68.9
65.3
44.6
3446.2
4019.4
4664.6
5359.7
5765.7
6037.7
6369.4
6541.7
6622.4
6677.5
7008.4
7437.3
7749.7
7858.0
7187.3
6573.8
6047.8
5597.7
5213.1
3446.7
Rain
Flooded Discharge Overflow Time-Peak
(mm/hr) Volume
Volume
Volume
(mins)
(m)
(m)
(m)
Summer 102.037
Summer 59.853
Summer 35.108
Summer 20.594
Summer 15.073
Summer 12.080
Summer
8.842
Summer
7.086
Summer
5.968
Summer
5.186
Summer
4.306
Summer
3.313
Summer
2.549
Summer
2.116
Summer
1.504
Summer
1.180
Summer
0.978
Summer
0.839
Summer
0.736
Winter 102.037
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
2211.8
2624.8
4118.1
4846.8
5319.7
5675.3
6201.3
6587.5
6890.0
7134.0
7762.1
8575.2
12011.2
13160.4
13505.8
15369.6
15869.0
16221.0
16396.1
2211.8
1982-2015 XP Solutions
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
34
49
78
134
192
250
366
482
584
628
752
1010
1420
1832
2644
3416
4192
4936
5664
34
Status
Flood
Flood
Flood
Flood
Flood
Flood
Flood
Flood
Flood
Flood
O K
O K
O K
O K
O K
O K
Risk
Risk
Risk
Risk
Risk
Risk
Risk
Risk
Risk
Risk
O K
O K
O K
O K
Page 2
Stone Hill Park
Area 4
1:30 yr
Designed by GB
Checked by CT
Source Control 2015.1
Storm
Event
30
60
120
180
240
360
480
600
720
960
1440
2160
2880
4320
5760
7200
8640
10080
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
9.635
9.655
9.675
9.686
9.693
9.702
9.706
9.709
9.710
9.717
9.725
9.730
9.729
9.707
9.688
9.671
9.657
9.645
0.235
0.255
0.275
0.286
0.293
0.302
0.306
0.309
0.310
0.317
0.325
0.330
0.329
0.307
0.288
0.271
0.257
0.245
Storm
Event
30
60
120
180
240
360
480
600
720
960
1440
2160
2880
4320
5760
7200
8640
10080
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
53.2
60.0
66.6
70.4
73.0
75.9
77.4
78.2
78.6
81.0
84.8
86.9
86.4
77.6
71.1
65.4
60.5
56.4
Max
Max
Outflow Volume
(m)
(l/s)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
53.2
60.0
66.6
70.4
73.0
75.9
77.4
78.2
78.6
81.0
84.8
86.9
86.4
77.6
71.1
65.4
60.5
56.4
4021.2
4668.6
5368.3
5778.8
6055.7
6396.2
6579.0
6672.2
6711.0
6996.9
7356.6
7526.7
7494.1
6600.1
5845.0
5231.5
4732.6
4326.8
Rain
Flooded Discharge Overflow Time-Peak
(mm/hr) Volume
Volume
Volume
(mins)
(m)
(m)
(m)
59.853
35.108
20.594
15.073
12.080
8.842
7.086
5.968
5.186
4.306
3.313
2.549
2.116
1.504
1.180
0.978
0.839
0.736
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
2624.8
4118.0
4846.8
5319.7
5675.4
6201.7
6588.3
6891.0
7135.4
7764.9
8579.2
12011.6
13160.5
13510.3
15370.1
15870.1
16224.2
16407.8
1982-2015 XP Solutions
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
48
76
132
190
246
360
470
578
680
770
1076
1528
1968
2816
3592
4392
5112
5856
Status
Flood
Flood
Flood
Flood
Flood
Flood
Flood
Flood
Flood
O K
O K
O K
O K
O K
Risk
Risk
Risk
Risk
Risk
Risk
Risk
Risk
Risk
O K
O K
O K
O K
Page 3
Stone Hill Park
Area 4
1:30 yr
Designed by GB
Checked by CT
Source Control 2015.1
Rainfall Details
Rainfall Model
FEH
Return Period (years)
30
Site Location GB 633250 166550 TR 33250 66550
C (1km)
-0.025
D1 (1km)
0.315
D2 (1km)
0.438
D3 (1km)
0.242
E (1km)
0.316
F (1km)
2.489
Summer Storms
Yes
Winter Storms
Yes
Cv (Summer)
0.950
Cv (Winter)
0.950
Shortest Storm (mins)
15
Longest Storm (mins)
10080
Climate Change %
+0
Time (mins)
From:
To:
4 2.880
8 2.880
8
12
Area
(ha)
Time (mins)
From:
To:
12 2.880
16 2.880
16
4 0.000
1982-2015 XP Solutions
Area
(ha)
20 2.880
Page 4
Stone Hill Park
Area 4
1:30 yr
Designed by GB
Checked by CT
Source Control 2015.1
Model Details
Complex Structure
Tank or Pond
Invert Level (m) 9.400
Depth (m) Area (m) Depth (m) Area (m)
0.000
2000.0
0.600
2611.4
Tank or Pond
Invert Level (m) 9.400
Depth (m) Area (m) Depth (m) Area (m)
0.000
2000.0
0.600
2611.4
Swale
Infiltration Coefficient Base (m/hr) 0.00000
Length (m) 3000.0
Infiltration Coefficient Side (m/hr) 0.00000
Side Slope (1:X)
6.0
Safety Factor
2.0
Slope (1:X) 10000.0
Porosity
1.00
Cap Volume Depth (m)
0.000
Invert Level (m)
9.400 Cap Infiltration Depth (m)
0.000
Base Width (m)
10.0
Tank or Pond
Invert Level (m) 18.800
Depth (m) Area (m) Depth (m) Area (m)
0.000
2000.0
0.600
2611.4
9.7
37.3
0.300
0.400
75.3
119.9
0.500
0.600
1982-2015 XP Solutions
150.0
150.0
0.800
1.000
150.0
150.0
Page 5
Stone Hill Park
Area 4
1:30 yr
Designed by GB
Checked by CT
Source Control 2015.1
Hydroslide Outflow Control
Depth (m) Flow (l/s) Depth (m) Flow (l/s) Depth (m) Flow (l/s) Depth (m) Flow (l/s)
1.200
1.400
1.600
1.800
2.000
2.200
150.0
135.0
144.3
153.1
161.4
169.2
2.400
2.600
3.000
3.500
4.000
4.500
176.8
184.0
197.6
213.5
228.2
242.0
5.000
5.500
6.000
6.500
7.000
7.500
255.1
267.6
279.5
290.9
301.9
312.5
8.000
8.500
9.000
9.500
1982-2015 XP Solutions
322.7
332.6
342.3
351.7
Page 1
Stone Hill Park
Area 4
1:100 yr
Designed by GB
Checked by CT
Source Control 2015.1
15
30
60
120
180
240
360
480
600
720
960
1440
2160
2880
4320
5760
7200
8640
10080
15
Storm
Event
Max
Max
Max
Max
Max
Level Depth Infiltration Control Overflow
(l/s)
(l/s)
(l/s)
(m)
(m)
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
9.672
9.692
9.713
9.734
9.746
9.754
9.762
9.766
9.767
9.768
9.776
9.787
9.793
9.795
9.772
9.753
9.736
9.722
9.709
9.672
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Winter
0.272
0.292
0.313
0.334
0.346
0.354
0.362
0.366
0.367
0.368
0.376
0.387
0.393
0.395
0.372
0.353
0.336
0.322
0.309
0.272
Storm
Event
15
30
60
120
180
240
360
480
600
720
960
1440
2160
2880
4320
5760
7200
8640
10080
15
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
65.8
72.6
79.8
89.0
94.6
98.1
102.1
103.9
104.4
104.6
108.6
113.5
116.6
117.3
106.7
97.6
89.9
83.2
78.2
65.8
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Max
Max
Outflow Volume
(m)
(l/s)
65.8 5276.8
O K
72.6 6031.4
O K
79.8 6860.7 Flood Risk
89.0 7727.6 Flood Risk
94.6 8216.7 Flood Risk
98.1 8533.3 Flood Risk
102.1 8896.7 Flood Risk
103.9 9060.8 Flood Risk
104.4 9111.6 Flood Risk
104.6 9131.4 Flood Risk
108.6 9486.6 Flood Risk
113.5 9938.7 Flood Risk
116.6 10232.3 Flood Risk
117.3 10289.9 Flood Risk
106.7 9313.2 Flood Risk
97.6 8486.8 Flood Risk
89.9 7794.9 Flood Risk
83.2 7199.1 Flood Risk
78.2 6670.3 Flood Risk
65.8 5277.7
O K
Rain
Flooded Discharge Overflow Time-Peak
(mm/hr) Volume
Volume
Volume
(mins)
(m)
(m)
(m)
Summer 156.286
Summer 89.763
Summer 51.555
Summer 29.610
Summer 21.408
Summer 17.007
Summer 12.295
Summer
9.768
Summer
8.171
Summer
7.062
Summer
5.812
Summer
4.417
Summer
3.357
Summer
2.763
Summer
1.939
Summer
1.508
Summer
1.241
Summer
1.059
Summer
0.925
Winter 156.286
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
3488.4
4007.4
6115.9
7016.8
7593.0
8022.5
8647.8
9095.6
9437.5
9706.6
10455.0
11382.6
15851.3
17203.2
17396.2
19667.1
20168.4
20507.4
20645.1
3488.4
1982-2015 XP Solutions
Status
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
34
49
78
136
192
250
366
482
590
632
754
1012
1424
1832
2644
3424
4192
5008
5752
34
Page 2
Stone Hill Park
Area 4
1:100 yr
Designed by GB
Checked by CT
Source Control 2015.1
Storm
Event
30
60
120
180
240
360
480
600
720
960
1440
2160
2880
4320
5760
7200
8640
10080
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
9.693
9.713
9.735
9.747
9.754
9.763
9.767
9.769
9.769
9.776
9.785
9.787
9.785
9.756
9.732
9.712
9.694
9.679
0.293
0.313
0.335
0.347
0.354
0.363
0.367
0.369
0.369
0.376
0.385
0.387
0.385
0.356
0.332
0.312
0.294
0.279
Storm
Event
30
60
120
180
240
360
480
600
720
960
1440
2160
2880
4320
5760
7200
8640
10080
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
72.8
79.8
89.2
94.8
98.3
102.5
104.4
105.3
105.3
108.6
112.6
113.7
112.6
99.3
88.1
79.4
73.3
68.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Max
Max
Outflow Volume
(m)
(l/s)
72.8
79.8
89.2
94.8
98.3
102.5
104.4
105.3
105.3
108.6
112.6
113.7
112.6
99.3
88.1
79.4
73.3
68.2
6033.5
6865.0
7737.6
8232.9
8555.9
8932.3
9111.5
9181.6
9186.5
9482.6
9849.7
9963.5
9844.7
8627.8
7643.9
6812.2
6107.3
5524.8
Rain
Flooded Discharge Overflow Time-Peak
(mm/hr) Volume
Volume
Volume
(mins)
(m)
(m)
(m)
89.763
51.555
29.610
21.408
17.007
12.295
9.768
8.171
7.062
5.812
4.417
3.357
2.763
1.939
1.508
1.241
1.059
0.925
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
4007.5
6115.9
7017.0
7593.4
8022.9
8648.5
9096.6
9438.6
9708.1
10456.7
11384.1
15851.3
17202.5
17389.3
19667.0
20170.1
20511.9
20660.0
1982-2015 XP Solutions
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
48
76
132
190
246
360
472
580
682
772
1076
1528
1968
2816
3640
4416
5192
5952
Status
Flood
Flood
Flood
Flood
Flood
Flood
Flood
Flood
Flood
Flood
Flood
Flood
Flood
Flood
Flood
O K
Risk
Risk
Risk
Risk
Risk
Risk
Risk
Risk
Risk
Risk
Risk
Risk
Risk
Risk
Risk
O K
O K
Page 3
Stone Hill Park
Area 4
1:100 yr
Designed by GB
Checked by CT
Source Control 2015.1
Rainfall Details
Rainfall Model
FEH
Return Period (years)
100
Site Location GB 633250 166550 TR 33250 66550
C (1km)
-0.025
D1 (1km)
0.315
D2 (1km)
0.438
D3 (1km)
0.242
E (1km)
0.316
F (1km)
2.489
Summer Storms
Yes
Winter Storms
Yes
Cv (Summer)
0.950
Cv (Winter)
0.950
Shortest Storm (mins)
15
Longest Storm (mins)
10080
Climate Change %
+0
Time (mins)
From:
To:
4 2.880
8 2.880
8
12
Area
(ha)
Time (mins)
From:
To:
12 2.880
16 2.880
16
4 0.000
1982-2015 XP Solutions
Area
(ha)
20 2.880
Page 4
Stone Hill Park
Area 4
1:100 yr
Designed by GB
Checked by CT
Source Control 2015.1
Model Details
Complex Structure
Swale
Infiltration Coefficient Base (m/hr) 0.00000
Length (m) 3000.0
Infiltration Coefficient Side (m/hr) 0.00000
Side Slope (1:X)
6.0
Safety Factor
2.0
Slope (1:X) 10000.0
Porosity
1.00
Cap Volume Depth (m)
0.000
Invert Level (m)
9.400 Cap Infiltration Depth (m)
0.000
Base Width (m)
10.0
Tank or Pond
Invert Level (m) 9.400
Depth (m) Area (m) Depth (m) Area (m)
0.000
2000.0
0.600
2611.4
Tank or Pond
Invert Level (m) 9.400
Depth (m) Area (m) Depth (m) Area (m)
0.000
2000.0
0.600
2611.4
Tank or Pond
Invert Level (m) 18.800
Depth (m) Area (m) Depth (m) Area (m)
0.000
2000.0
0.600
2611.4
9.7
37.3
0.300
0.400
75.3
119.9
0.500
0.600
1982-2015 XP Solutions
150.0
150.0
0.800
1.000
150.0
150.0
Page 5
Stone Hill Park
Area 4
1:100 yr
Designed by GB
Checked by CT
Source Control 2015.1
Hydroslide Outflow Control
Depth (m) Flow (l/s) Depth (m) Flow (l/s) Depth (m) Flow (l/s) Depth (m) Flow (l/s)
1.200
1.400
1.600
1.800
2.000
2.200
150.0
135.0
144.3
153.1
161.4
169.2
2.400
2.600
3.000
3.500
4.000
4.500
176.8
184.0
197.6
213.5
228.2
242.0
5.000
5.500
6.000
6.500
7.000
7.500
255.1
267.6
279.5
290.9
301.9
312.5
8.000
8.500
9.000
9.500
1982-2015 XP Solutions
322.7
332.6
342.3
351.7
Page 1
Stone Hill Park
Area 4
1:100yr+20%cc
Designed by GB
Checked by CT
Source Control 2015.1
15
30
60
120
180
240
360
480
600
720
960
1440
2160
2880
4320
5760
7200
8640
10080
15
Storm
Event
Max
Max
Max
Max
Max
Level Depth Infiltration Control Overflow
(l/s)
(l/s)
(l/s)
(m)
(m)
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
9.700
9.723
9.747
9.771
9.785
9.794
9.804
9.808
9.810
9.810
9.820
9.832
9.840
9.842
9.816
9.793
9.774
9.758
9.743
9.700
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Winter
0.300
0.323
0.347
0.371
0.385
0.394
0.404
0.408
0.410
0.410
0.420
0.432
0.440
0.442
0.416
0.393
0.374
0.358
0.343
0.300
Storm
Event
15
30
60
120
180
240
360
480
600
720
960
1440
2160
2880
4320
5760
7200
8640
10080
15
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
75.3
83.6
94.8
106.3
112.8
116.8
121.7
123.9
124.6
124.8
129.4
135.5
139.2
140.1
127.5
116.6
107.7
100.0
93.2
75.3
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Max
Max
Outflow Volume
(m)
(l/s)
75.3
83.6
94.8
106.3
112.8
116.8
121.7
123.9
124.6
124.8
129.4
135.5
139.2
140.1
127.5
116.6
107.7
100.0
93.2
75.3
6333.7
7241.5
8237.0
9277.2
9864.8
10246.2
10684.9
10884.4
10947.5
10970.1
11396.6
11941.0
12297.6
12371.6
11207.7
10224.1
9397.0
8695.1
8099.5
6334.8
Rain
Flooded Discharge Overflow Time-Peak
(mm/hr) Volume
Volume
Volume
(mins)
(m)
(m)
(m)
Summer 187.543
Summer 107.715
Summer 61.866
Summer 35.533
Summer 25.689
Summer 20.408
Summer 14.755
Summer 11.721
Summer
9.805
Summer
8.474
Summer
6.975
Summer
5.300
Summer
4.028
Summer
3.315
Summer
2.327
Summer
1.810
Summer
1.490
Summer
1.271
Summer
1.111
Winter 187.543
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
4199.5
4807.7
7355.1
8435.1
9124.0
9634.1
10375.0
10905.9
11311.7
11631.6
12525.9
13555.8
19041.6
20654.3
20845.5
23615.0
24219.4
24632.6
24803.5
4199.5
1982-2015 XP Solutions
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
34
49
78
136
192
250
366
484
594
636
756
1012
1424
1832
2644
3456
4192
5008
5752
34
Status
Flood
Flood
Flood
Flood
Flood
Flood
Flood
Flood
Flood
Flood
Flood
Flood
Flood
Flood
Flood
Flood
Flood
Flood
Flood
Flood
Risk
Risk
Risk
Risk
Risk
Risk
Risk
Risk
Risk
Risk
Risk
Risk
Risk
Risk
Risk
Risk
Risk
Risk
Risk
Risk
Page 2
Stone Hill Park
Area 4
1:100yr+20%cc
Designed by GB
Checked by CT
Source Control 2015.1
30
60
120
180
240
360
480
600
720
960
1440
2160
2880
4320
5760
7200
8640
10080
Storm
Event
Max
Max
Max
Max
Max
Level Depth Infiltration Control Overflow
(l/s)
(l/s)
(l/s)
(m)
(m)
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
9.723
9.747
9.772
9.785
9.794
9.805
9.810
9.812
9.812
9.820
9.830
9.833
9.830
9.797
9.770
9.748
9.729
9.712
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
0.323
0.347
0.372
0.385
0.394
0.405
0.410
0.412
0.412
0.420
0.430
0.433
0.430
0.397
0.370
0.348
0.329
0.312
Storm
Event
30
60
120
180
240
360
480
600
720
960
1440
2160
2880
4320
5760
7200
8640
10080
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
83.6
94.8
106.5
112.8
117.1
122.2
124.6
125.6
125.6
129.4
134.3
136.0
134.5
118.5
105.8
95.3
86.4
79.3
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Max
Max
Outflow Volume
(m)
(l/s)
83.6
94.8
106.5
112.8
117.1
122.2
124.6
125.6
125.6
129.4
134.3
136.0
134.5
118.5
105.8
95.3
86.4
79.3
7243.8
8241.9
9289.0
9885.0
10274.4
10729.3
10946.9
11033.8
11042.3
11397.5
11843.3
11988.3
11853.1
10406.7
9237.8
8287.0
7498.9
6803.8
Rain
Flooded Discharge Overflow Time-Peak
(mm/hr) Volume
Volume
Volume
(mins)
(m)
(m)
(m)
Winter 107.715
Winter 61.866
Winter 35.533
Winter 25.689
Winter 20.408
Winter 14.755
Winter 11.721
Winter
9.805
Winter
8.474
Winter
6.975
Winter
5.300
Winter
4.028
Winter
3.315
Winter
2.327
Winter
1.810
Winter
1.490
Winter
1.271
Winter
1.111
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
4807.8
7355.2
8435.3
9124.3
9634.5
10375.6
10906.7
11312.5
11632.7
12526.7
13556.1
19041.3
20652.8
20836.5
23614.5
24219.7
24637.0
24818.2
1982-2015 XP Solutions
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
48
76
132
190
246
360
472
580
684
774
1078
1532
1968
2816
3640
4416
5200
5976
Status
Flood
Flood
Flood
Flood
Flood
Flood
Flood
Flood
Flood
Flood
Flood
Flood
Flood
Flood
Flood
Flood
Flood
Flood
Risk
Risk
Risk
Risk
Risk
Risk
Risk
Risk
Risk
Risk
Risk
Risk
Risk
Risk
Risk
Risk
Risk
Risk
Page 3
Stone Hill Park
Area 4
1:100yr+20%cc
Designed by GB
Checked by CT
Source Control 2015.1
Rainfall Details
Rainfall Model
FEH
Return Period (years)
100
Site Location GB 633250 166550 TR 33250 66550
C (1km)
-0.025
D1 (1km)
0.315
D2 (1km)
0.438
D3 (1km)
0.242
E (1km)
0.316
F (1km)
2.489
Summer Storms
Yes
Winter Storms
Yes
Cv (Summer)
0.950
Cv (Winter)
0.950
Shortest Storm (mins)
15
Longest Storm (mins)
10080
Climate Change %
+20
Time (mins)
From:
To:
4 2.880
8 2.880
8
12
Area
(ha)
Time (mins)
From:
To:
12 2.880
16 2.880
16
4 0.000
1982-2015 XP Solutions
Area
(ha)
20 2.880
Page 4
Stone Hill Park
Area 4
1:100yr+20%cc
Designed by GB
Checked by CT
Source Control 2015.1
Model Details
Complex Structure
Tank or Pond
Invert Level (m) 9.400
Depth (m) Area (m) Depth (m) Area (m)
0.000
2000.0
0.600
2611.4
Tank or Pond
Invert Level (m) 9.400
Depth (m) Area (m) Depth (m) Area (m)
0.000
2000.0
0.600
2611.4
Swale
Infiltration Coefficient Base (m/hr) 0.00000
Length (m) 3000.0
Infiltration Coefficient Side (m/hr) 0.00000
Side Slope (1:X)
6.0
Safety Factor
2.0
Slope (1:X) 10000.0
Porosity
1.00
Cap Volume Depth (m)
0.000
Invert Level (m)
9.400 Cap Infiltration Depth (m)
0.000
Base Width (m)
10.0
Tank or Pond
Invert Level (m) 18.800
Depth (m) Area (m) Depth (m) Area (m)
0.000
2000.0
0.600
2611.4
9.7
37.3
0.300
0.400
75.3
119.9
0.500
0.600
1982-2015 XP Solutions
150.0
150.0
0.800
1.000
150.0
150.0
Page 5
Stone Hill Park
Area 4
1:100yr+20%cc
Designed by GB
Checked by CT
Source Control 2015.1
150.0
135.0
144.3
153.1
161.4
169.2
2.400
2.600
3.000
3.500
4.000
4.500
176.8
184.0
197.6
213.5
228.2
242.0
5.000
5.500
6.000
6.500
7.000
7.500
255.1
267.6
279.5
290.9
301.9
312.5
8.000
8.500
9.000
9.500
1982-2015 XP Solutions
322.7
332.6
342.3
351.7
Page 1
Stone Hill Park
Area 4
1:100yr+40%cc
Designed by GB
Checked by CT
Source Control 2015.1
15
30
60
120
180
240
360
480
600
720
960
1440
2160
2880
4320
5760
7200
8640
10080
15
Storm
Event
Max
Max
Max
Max
Max
Level Depth Infiltration Control Overflow
(l/s)
(l/s)
(l/s)
(m)
(m)
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
9.726
9.752
9.779
9.807
9.823
9.832
9.844
9.849
9.851
9.851
9.862
9.877
9.887
9.889
9.858
9.833
9.811
9.793
9.777
9.726
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Winter
0.326
0.352
0.379
0.407
0.423
0.432
0.444
0.449
0.451
0.451
0.462
0.477
0.487
0.489
0.458
0.433
0.411
0.393
0.377
0.326
Storm
Event
15
30
60
120
180
240
360
480
600
720
960
1440
2160
2880
4320
5760
7200
8640
10080
15
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
85.3
97.2
110.0
123.4
130.9
135.5
141.1
143.8
144.5
144.7
150.0
150.0
150.0
150.0
147.9
135.8
125.3
116.3
108.8
85.3
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Max
Max
Outflow Volume
(m)
(l/s)
85.3
97.2
110.0
123.4
130.9
135.5
141.1
143.8
144.5
144.7
150.0
150.0
150.0
150.0
147.9
135.8
125.3
116.3
108.8
85.3
7391.3
8449.9
9611.6
10826.3
11513.0
11958.8
12473.6
12709.3
12786.2
12811.7
13311.5
13991.5
14465.1
14581.5
13108.6
11963.1
11004.1
10192.2
9498.3
7392.5
Rain
Flooded Discharge Overflow Time-Peak
(mm/hr) Volume
Volume
Volume
(mins)
(m)
(m)
(m)
Summer 218.800
Summer 125.668
Summer 72.177
Summer 41.455
Summer 29.971
Summer 23.809
Summer 17.214
Summer 13.675
Summer 11.439
Summer
9.887
Summer
8.137
Summer
6.184
Summer
4.699
Summer
3.868
Summer
2.715
Summer
2.112
Summer
1.738
Summer
1.482
Summer
1.296
Winter 218.800
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
4896.0
5588.1
8593.1
9847.2
10644.1
11234.6
12092.6
12708.4
13180.0
13552.4
14559.7
15650.5
22213.3
24080.0
24292.9
27562.3
28269.4
28761.5
28962.0
4896.0
1982-2015 XP Solutions
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
34
49
78
136
194
250
366
484
596
638
758
1026
1448
1856
2644
3456
4200
5008
5752
34
Status
Flood
Flood
Flood
Flood
Flood
Flood
Flood
Flood
Flood
Flood
Flood
Flood
Flood
Flood
Flood
Flood
Flood
Flood
Flood
Flood
Risk
Risk
Risk
Risk
Risk
Risk
Risk
Risk
Risk
Risk
Risk
Risk
Risk
Risk
Risk
Risk
Risk
Risk
Risk
Risk
Page 2
Stone Hill Park
Area 4
1:100yr+40%cc
Designed by GB
Checked by CT
Source Control 2015.1
30
60
120
180
240
360
480
600
720
960
1440
2160
2880
4320
5760
7200
8640
10080
Storm
Event
Max
Max
Max
Max
Max
Level Depth Infiltration Control Overflow
(l/s)
(l/s)
(l/s)
(m)
(m)
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
9.752
9.779
9.807
9.823
9.833
9.845
9.851
9.853
9.853
9.862
9.874
9.879
9.875
9.837
9.807
9.782
9.761
9.742
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
Winter
0.352
0.379
0.407
0.423
0.433
0.445
0.451
0.453
0.453
0.462
0.474
0.479
0.475
0.437
0.407
0.382
0.361
0.342
Storm
Event
30
60
120
180
240
360
480
600
720
960
1440
2160
2880
4320
5760
7200
8640
10080
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
min
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
97.2
110.0
123.4
131.1
136.0
141.8
144.5
145.5
145.7
150.0
150.0
150.0
150.0
137.9
123.4
111.2
101.4
92.7
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Max
Max
Outflow Volume
(m)
(l/s)
97.2
110.0
123.4
131.1
136.0
141.8
144.5
145.5
145.7
150.0
150.0
150.0
150.0
137.9
123.4
111.2
101.4
92.7
8452.7
9617.4
10840.6
11537.0
11992.5
12526.4
12783.8
12888.4
12901.0
13316.0
13874.5
14081.1
13920.5
12185.0
10831.6
9729.7
8821.9
8059.5
Rain
Flooded Discharge Overflow Time-Peak
(mm/hr) Volume
Volume
Volume
(mins)
(m)
(m)
(m)
Winter 125.668
Winter 72.177
Winter 41.455
Winter 29.971
Winter 23.809
Winter 17.214
Winter 13.675
Winter 11.439
Winter
9.887
Winter
8.137
Winter
6.184
Winter
4.699
Winter
3.868
Winter
2.715
Winter
2.112
Winter
1.738
Winter
1.482
Winter
1.296
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
5588.1
8593.2
9847.4
10644.4
11234.9
12093.1
12708.9
13180.5
13553.0
14560.2
15660.7
22218.2
24091.2
24284.7
27561.6
28268.5
28765.6
28978.9
1982-2015 XP Solutions
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
48
76
132
190
246
360
472
580
684
776
1086
1544
1992
2820
3640
4416
5200
5968
Status
Flood
Flood
Flood
Flood
Flood
Flood
Flood
Flood
Flood
Flood
Flood
Flood
Flood
Flood
Flood
Flood
Flood
Flood
Risk
Risk
Risk
Risk
Risk
Risk
Risk
Risk
Risk
Risk
Risk
Risk
Risk
Risk
Risk
Risk
Risk
Risk
Page 3
Stone Hill Park
Area 4
1:100yr+40%cc
Designed by GB
Checked by CT
Source Control 2015.1
Rainfall Details
Rainfall Model
FEH
Return Period (years)
100
Site Location GB 633250 166550 TR 33250 66550
C (1km)
-0.025
D1 (1km)
0.315
D2 (1km)
0.438
D3 (1km)
0.242
E (1km)
0.316
F (1km)
2.489
Summer Storms
Yes
Winter Storms
Yes
Cv (Summer)
0.950
Cv (Winter)
0.950
Shortest Storm (mins)
15
Longest Storm (mins)
10080
Climate Change %
+40
Time (mins)
From:
To:
4 2.880
8 2.880
8
12
Area
(ha)
Time (mins)
From:
To:
12 2.880
16 2.880
16
4 0.000
1982-2015 XP Solutions
Area
(ha)
20 2.880
Page 4
Stone Hill Park
Area 4
1:100yr+40%cc
Designed by GB
Checked by CT
Source Control 2015.1
Model Details
Complex Structure
Swale
Infiltration Coefficient Base (m/hr) 0.00000
Length (m) 3000.0
Infiltration Coefficient Side (m/hr) 0.00000
Side Slope (1:X)
6.0
Safety Factor
2.0
Slope (1:X) 10000.0
Porosity
1.00
Cap Volume Depth (m)
0.000
Invert Level (m)
9.400 Cap Infiltration Depth (m)
0.000
Base Width (m)
10.0
Tank or Pond
Invert Level (m) 9.400
Depth (m) Area (m) Depth (m) Area (m)
0.000
2000.0
0.600
2611.4
Tank or Pond
Invert Level (m) 9.400
Depth (m) Area (m) Depth (m) Area (m)
0.000
2000.0
0.600
2611.4
Tank or Pond
Invert Level (m) 18.800
Depth (m) Area (m) Depth (m) Area (m)
0.000
2000.0
0.600
2611.4
9.7
37.3
0.300
0.400
75.3
119.9
0.500
0.600
1982-2015 XP Solutions
150.0
150.0
0.800
1.000
150.0
150.0
Page 5
Stone Hill Park
Area 4
1:100yr+40%cc
Designed by GB
Checked by CT
Source Control 2015.1
150.0
135.0
144.3
153.1
161.4
169.2
2.400
2.600
3.000
3.500
4.000
4.500
176.8
184.0
197.6
213.5
228.2
242.0
5.000
5.500
6.000
6.500
7.000
7.500
255.1
267.6
279.5
290.9
301.9
312.5
8.000
8.500
9.000
9.500
1982-2015 XP Solutions
322.7
332.6
342.3
351.7
APPENDIX G-3
SURFACE WATER STRATEGY DRAWINGS
Appendix H
PRELIMINARY GROUNDWATER RISK AND MITIGATION
ASSESSMENT
REPORT N 70009799-011
APRIL 2016
QUALITY MANAGEMENT
ISSUE/REVISION FIRST ISSUE
Remarks
V1.0
Date
April 2016
Prepared by
Roisin Lindsay
Signature
Checked by
Reena Gohel
Signature
Authorised by
Andy ODea
Signature
Project number
70009799-011
iv
TABLE OF CONTENTS
APRIL 2016 ...............................................................................................1
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .............................................................................1
1
1.1
1.2
AIMS ................................................................................................................... 1
1.3
1.4
1.5
SOURCES OF INFORMATION.......................................................................... 2
1.6
LIMITATIONS ..................................................................................................... 2
2.1
SITE DETAILS.................................................................................................... 3
2.2
2.3
2.4
2.5
3.1
GENERAL .......................................................................................................... 8
3.2
3.3
3.4
4.1
GEOLOGY ........................................................................................................ 13
v
4.1.1
4.1.2
4.2
HYDROLOGY ................................................................................................... 14
4.3
HYDROGEOLOGY ........................................................................................... 14
4.3.1
4.4
4.5
4.6
FLOODING ....................................................................................................... 17
4.7
RADON ............................................................................................................. 17
5.1
REGULATORY DATABASE............................................................................ 18
5.2
5.3
5.4
5.5
6.1
INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................. 23
6.2
6.3
6.4
7.1
RECOMMENDATIONS .................................................................................... 29
vi
APPENDICES
APPENDIX A
LIMITATIONS
APPENDIX B
DEVELOPMENT PLANS
APPENDIX C
SITE PLANS
APPENDIX D
PHOTOGRAPHIC RECORD
APPENDIX E
ENVIROCHECK REPORT
APPENDIX F
REGULATORY CORRESPONDANCE
APPENDIX G
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Authorisation and
purpose of
assessment
WSP | Parsons Brinckerhoff was instructed by Stone Hill Park Limited (the Client) to
undertake a Preliminary Environmental Risk Assessment (PRA) at the former Kent
International Airport, Manston, Kent (the Site).
This assessment is required to support a planning application for a mixed-use
redevelopment. The proposed masterplan includes up to 2,500 homes and associated
infrastructure and amenities, commercial and retail use and community facilities (GP
surgery, primary school, village hall, indoor swimming pool, outdoor wave garden). A
number of existing buildings will be demolished although some will be retained and
renovated. The majority of the runway will be retained as a development feature.
Key findings
The former airport air-side area makes up the majority of the Site and is fenced. It
comprises the airport runway running east-west, through the southern part of the Site,
which is 2.7km long and 230m wide including associated aprons, taxiways and stands.
Runway construction is anticipated to be between 6m and 9m thick.
The northern area of the Site is largely unfenced with open access to the public. The
area is accessed from the east via Manston Court Road. The main fuel storage area
for the former airport is on the south-eastern part of the northern area. It comprises
6No. tanks surrounded by palisade fencing and was heavily overgrown.
The Site comprised agricultural land from 1873. In 1915 aircrafts started to use the
open farmlands at Manston as a site of emergency landings which lead to the
establishment of the Aerodrome. By 1916 the Operational War Flight Command and
the Handley Page Training School (pilot training) were stationed at Manston. Manston
comprised a grass runway (in a northeast to southwest orientations along the eastern
area of the current Site) until the 1940s when the current runway was constructed.
RAF Manstons strategic location and the long, broad runway meant the airfield was
utilised as a south coast emergency landing ground. During the Battle of Britain in
1940, the site was heavily bombed. During the 1950s Manston airfield was utilised by
the United States Air Force as a strategic air command base. Subsequently the airfield
became a joint civilian and RAF airport from 1960. The RAF left Manston in 1999 and
the remaining civilian airport was named London Manston.
Geological mapping indicates no superficial deposits to be present for majority of the
Site with the exception of Head Brickearth deposits in limited areas. The Site is
entirely underlain by Upper Chalk bedrock, present at shallow depth.
The significant historic usage is likely to have resulted in large quantities of Made
Ground. Furthermore, numerous subterranean structures, bunkers, service channels
and tunnels are understood to have been constructed across the Site historically.
A chalk adit is present beneath the Site, beginning at the Lord of the Manor
groundwater abstraction well (located 350m southeast of the Site) and running parallel
with and/or beneath the runway. Lord of the Manor abstraction well is operated by
Southern Water and was constructed circa 1923 (likely hand dug). The adit is
anticipated to be 3km in length (3315 yards) and present at a level of approximately
2.7m AOD and is understood to be below the groundwater table. Groundwater levels
within the Upper Chalk beneath the Site are anticipated to be between 30m and 45m
bgl
The chalk adit extends from the Lord of the Manor abstraction point beneath the
runway for approximately 3km. Therefore, the adit and a buffer zone either side have
been classified as an SPZ I, with a further buffer zone being classified as and SPZ II.
1
The remainder, and majority, of the Site is classified as an SPZ III .
The adit is understood to be below the groundwater table but during times of drought
the groundwater table can drop below the roof of the adit. Groundwater levels within
the Upper Chalk beneath the Site are anticipated to be between 30m and 45m bgl.
A UXO Threat Assessment has been undertaken for the Site. Overall the UXO Risk is
considered to be High.
Environmental
Risk Assessment
A number of sensitive receptors have been identified which may be affected by the
potential sources of contamination including future site users such as residents,
visitors and employees, and the underlying Principal Aquifer and nearby Lord of the
Manor groundwater abstraction.
It should be noted that there is significant uncertainty regarding the location of
potentially contaminating activities and sources, as well as receptors (such as the
chalk adit) due to the extent and complexity of the Site history and use. However,
following our assessment a number of potential pollutant linkages have been identified.
Therefore, in the context of the proposed missed use development WSP | Parsons
Brinckerhoff considers risks to Human Health to be Medium to High and risks to
Controlled Waters to be High.
Recommendations
Chalk Adit Survey: A survey is undertaken of the chalk adit underlying the Site to
determine its depth, orientation and location. This will allow protection and
avoidance measures to be incorporated with future planning, design and
construction of the proposed development. It will also allow baseline information
to be collected prior to the commencement of the development and potential
changes to be monitored. The ownership of the adit and related responsibilities
should be confirmed.
UXO Risk: A Threat Assessment has been undertaken for the Site by a UXO
specialist. A full list of recommendations are provided within the report (Appendix
G). These include Explosive Ordnance Safety and Awareness Briefings, a UXO
survey of specific buildings prior to demolition, EOD Engineer monitoring of
excavations, and Intrusive Magnetometer Survey of borehole/pile locations. This
final recommendation of the UXO specialist has potentially high cost and
programme implications. Further discussions with the UXO specialist should be
carried out in advance of future ground investigation works to establish if the need
for magnetometer survey can be rationalised or removed in specific locations.
Radon: The Site is located within an area where between 1% and 3% of homes
are above the Public Health Englands defined Action Level. Therefore, basic
protection measures are required to be installed within all new proposed buildings.
1
1.1
1.2
AIMS
The key aims of this assessment are to:
Develop a preliminary Conceptual Site Model (CSM) to identify potential contamination risks
associated with the proposed development of the Site; and,
Evaluate likely contaminated land exposure pathways and their potential significance on
identified receptors to support the proposed redevelopment.
1.3
DEVELOPMENT PLANS
The proposed masterplan development comprises a mixed use development which includes up to
2,500 homes and associated parking facilities and amenities, commercial and retail use,
community uses including GP Surgery, primary school, village hall, and areas for leisure space
including an indoor swimming pool, and outdoor wave garden.
A number of buildings which are currently present on the Site will be demolished; however others
will be retained and renovated to form part of the development. Furthermore, it is understood that
the majority of the runway will also be retained as feature of the proposed development.
The proposed masterplan and demolition plan are contained within Appendix B.
1.4
SCOPE OF WORKS
In order to meet the aims stated in Section 1.2 the following scope of works were undertaken:
A site walkover survey of accessible areas, to document the current land use and site setting;
A review of publicly available historical maps to identify former land uses and potential
contaminative activities on and surrounding the Site;
A review of relevant regulatory databases and informal enquiries with relevant regulatory
authorities including: Local Council planning website, the Environmental Health Officer (EHO)
(contacted November 2015), the Environment Agency (EA) and Southern Water;
A review of relevant publicly available information relating to hydrological features,
hydrogeology, neighbouring land use, ecologically sensitive uses and geology in order to
establish the environmental setting of the Site and the sensitivity of the location;
The development of a preliminary Conceptual Site Model (CSM) following the sourcepathway-receptor contaminant linkage approach; and
2
An outline of the environmental risks with respect to ground, groundwater and ground gas
conditions, which may potentially arise as liabilities or constraints to support the development
of the Site.
This report has been prepared in general accordance with:
Part 2A of the Environmental Protection Act 1990;
The National Planning Policy Framework 2012;
Environment Agency (EA) Model Procedures for the Management of Land
Contamination,CLR11. 2004; and,
NHBC, EA and CIEH Guidance for the Safe Development of Housing on Land Affected by
Contamination R&D66. 2008.
1.5
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
The following sources of information have been used in the production of the report:
th
1.6
LIMITATIONS
This report is addressed to and may be relied upon by Stone Hill Park Limited and may not be
relied upon or transferred to any other parties without the express written agreement of WSP |
Parsons Brinckerhoff.
This report should be read and used in full. No responsibility will be accepted where this report is
used, either in its entirety or in part, by any other party. WSP | Parsons Brinckerhoff cannot be
held liable for third party information. Full details of the limitations are provided as Appendix A.
2
2.1
2.2
DETAILS
Name and Address of Site
DESCRIPTION
Former Kent International Airport, Manston Rd, Manston, Kent
Grid Reference
633279, 165828
310 Ha
The current Site is a disused commercial airport which closed on 15 May 2014. The Site is
bisected by the B2050 Manston Road which runs east-west through the northern part of the site
and divides the Site into two areas. For the purpose of the Site description the Site has been
separated into the former air-side and northern area for ease of reference but combined
throughout the rest of the report. A site location plan is provided in Appendix C.
An Indicative Site Features Plan has also been produced showing the location of relevant
features across the Site as is also contained in Appendix C.
A walkover survey of accessible areas of the Site was carried out by WSP | Parsons Brinckerhoff
th
on 7 October 2015, accompanied by a site representative. A photographic record is provided in
Appendix D.
FORMER AIR-SIDE
The former air-side area of the airport makes up the majority of the Site, is irregular in shape and
is surrounded by a fence. It comprises the airport runway running east-west, through the
southern part of the Site. The former runway is approximately 2.7km long and 230m wide (not
including the aprons) with a series of associated aprons, taxiways and stands. A number of
buildings are present to the north of the runway and are detailed below in Table 2-2.
A small structure understood to be a Maritime and Coastguard beacon is located in the centre of
the air-side area, north of the runway and is outside the Site boundary.
A large water tank and associated pipe work is located on the south-eastern part of the Site,
adjacent to the Jentex site located adjacent to the south-eastern boundary (see photo in
Appendix D). A small balancing pond is located to the north of the north-eastern edge of the
runway.
A plan showing the location and schedule of the buildings is provided in Appendix C.
Table 2-2: Air Side Building Use Summary
BUILDING
Engine shop used and still in use for aero engine maintenance. Hangar 1 used
for aircraft maintenance.
Used for cargo handling, storage and inspection of produce by Local Authority.
Most imported goods were transferred directly from the aircraft to trucks so the
facility was significantly underutilised.
Used for occasional aircraft and general storage.
Used for the inspection of horses entering the country (infrequently).
Hangar 3
Equine BIP
4
BUILDING
Terminal Building
Fire Station
Air Traffic Control Building
Stourcare Building
Operations Building
Nissen Hut
Cargo Building
NORTHERN AREA
The northern area of the Site is irregular in shape and is largely unfenced with open access to the
public. The area is accessed from the east via Manston Court Road. A track runs along the east
and north of the area.
There are a number of other buildings former structures with associated roadways and
hardstanding areas present in the south-eastern and western part of the northern area of the Site.
Details of the former building uses are summarised in Table 2-3 below. Some of these buildings
are still operational as stated within the same table.
An oval shaped area of hardstanding in poor condition is located on the west of the area,
accessed via Manston Road. The site representative reported that this area was used as a
former RAF fuel facility which was decommissioned in the 1990s.
The fuel farm, which was the main bulk fuel storage area which was in use when the airport was
in operation, is located on the south-eastern part of the northern area. The former fuel farm
comprises of 6No. tanks and it is surrounded by palisade fencing and was noted to be overgrown
with vegetation at the time of the site reconnaissance. It comprises a small office building which
was used for storing fuel samples and monitoring the underground storage tanks (USTs). A
strong hydrocarbon odour was noted within the former fuel farm and there is a vehicle turning
circle running around the tanks. At the surface the tanks are covered by concrete and gravel and
vegetation and breather pipes and associated pipework were visible. Further details regarding
the fuel farm is provided below in Section 2.4.
An observation post dating from WWII is located on the southwest of the northern area and
comprises a small brick structure on top of an earth covered mound. A number of rooms are
accessed via a staircase beneath the mound.
Table 2-3: Northern Area Building Use Summary
BUILDING
5
BUILDING
Building 46
Sectional building on Manston Road, vacant prior to closure and previously let
to non-aviation tenant.
Museum (currently in use).
2.3
Used by local company supplying gifts, who have subsequently ceased trading.
Museum (currently in use).
SITE OBSERVATIONS
Tables 2-4 and Table 2-5 detail those key observations made during our site reconnaissance.
Table 2-4: Site Description
DETAILS
Topography
DESCRIPTION
The Sites topography generally falls towards the B2050 Manston Road
which bisects the site, levels from the north to Manston Road are
approximately from 48.20mAOD to 39.00mAOD, levels from the south are
approximately from 54.60mAOD to 39.00mAOD. The runway in the south of
the Site forms a high ridge, from this point the levels tend to fall north to
south from approximately 54.60mAOD to 50.00mAOD.
The Site slopes relatively steeping downwards to south from the runway to
an elevation of approximately 44m AOD.
The Site is wholly located within the administrative area of Thanet District
Council (TDC), is located to the west of Ramsgate, Margate and Broadstairs
and is bound by the A299 Hengist Way to the south, B2190 Spitfire Way to
the west, arable farmland to the north and Manston Court Road and further
farmland to the east.
The majority of the Site comprises open grassland covering the majority of
the northern area, the areas to the east, west and north of the runway.
Large areas of hardstanding and building cover are also present, in
particular the runway, the area west of the terminal building, the car parking
on the east of the Site and the taxiways and aprons.
An area of burned waste including metal, wood and office equipment was
noted to be present south of the fire station. A further larger area of land
adjacent to the west of the Thanet Flying Club was noted to be covered by
stockpiles of waste materials including demolition rubble, tyres and other
waste.
DESCRIPTION
The Site is currently largely inactive with limited ongoing potentially
contaminating activities. However Polar Helicopters are still operation in
Hangar 10 and operate as a helicopter training centre. Based upon
information from the site representative it is understood that fuel used for the
aircraft is brought in via tanker and is not stored on Site.
Thanet Flying Club may also still be operational in the north-eastern part of the
former air-side area of the Site. However no aircraft are understood to be kept
on, or in use at the Site.
Drainage
It is understood that all surface water run-off from the areas of hardstanding on
the air side area of the Site enter a surface water drain on Manston Road, are
pumped uphill west along the Manston Road to a point near the junction of
Spitfire Way and Columbus Avenue. The drain is then gravity fed along the
west and southern perimeter of the Site before it enters a drain on the
6
DETAILS
DESCRIPTION
southeast of the Site which discharges to Pegwell Bag.
The site representative reports a soakaway may be located adjacent to a
balancing pond on the southeast of the Site.
A Foul Water Strategy has been produced by WSP | Parsons Brinckerhoff
(dated April 2016) to support the planning application and should be reference
for further information regarding drainage at the Site.
Polychlorinated Biphenyls
2
(PCBs) in Electrical Plant
A number of electrical substations are located around the Site within fenced
enclosures and appeared to be in reasonable condition. The age of the
substations could not be determined, and therefore there is potential that they
contain PCBs, which were phased out of use in transformer oils in the 1970s.
The locations of the substations are shown on the Site Features Plan
contained in Appendix C.
Asbestos Containing
Materials (ACM)
2.4
BULK STORAGE
INTERCEPTORS
The site representative reported the following interceptors to be present at the Site:
Polychlorinated biphenyls have properties that once favoured their use as a coolant, though concerns over their
environmental persistence led to a widespread ban on their use by the Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic
Pollutants in 2001. Albeit the use of PCBs has been progressively restricted since the 1970s. In 1986 their sale and use in
new plant and equipment was banned in the UK. Upgraded electrical substations now generally use non-toxic, stable
silicone-based oils. Substation transformer oil used to contain polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) as intentional oil
contaminants. Older substations should be assessed for PCBs spill and removal.
7
An 800,000L interceptor associated with the site wide drainage system (installed in the
2000s) is understood to be located on the southwest of the northern area, in the vicinity of the
RAF Museum.
A 40,000L interceptor is understood to be located in the north-eastern part of the former airside area, situated beneath the hardstanding northeast of the terminal building.
A 10,000L interceptor tank was installed outside the palisade fencing adjacent to the fuel farm
in the south-eastern part of the northern area. This dates back to the 1990s and was installed
to intercept any oil spills associated with the fuel farm. It was noted to be overgrown with
vegetation at surface during the site reconnaissance.
2.5
ANECDOTAL INFORMATION
The site representative, who had worked at the former airport for over 23 years reported the
following historic spills and remediation to have been undertaken at the Site. These are also
illustrated on the Site Features Plan in Appendix C:
Numerous fuels spills were reported across the site but in particular within the aircraft
engineering works and the aircraft aprons/stands to the north of the runway (within the former
air-side area). Fuel is understood to have been allowed to drain into the grassed areas
between the stands.
Prior to the installation of the 10,000L interceptor adjacent to the fuel farm, (and following
installation), any fuel spills were allowed to drain directly to ground. A number of flag stones
were noted to be loose and would be lifted to allow the fuel to drain to ground (see photo
provided in Appendix D).
The area of stockpiling adjacent to the west of the Thanet Flying Club within the former airside area was reportedly used as a dumping ground during the operation of the airport and
was partially remediated. The type, date and extent of remediation is not known.
3
3.1
3.2
SITE HISTORY
Historical maps indicate that the Site comprised agricultural land from 1873. By 1947 aerial
mapping indicated a runway located across the majority of the south of the Site in a west to east
direction. Aerial mapping also indicates buildings and one large warehouse in the north of the Site
at this time. The runway and associated structures were not marked on the historical maps
between 1951 and 1963. The lack of labelled airfield on maps pre 1947 and in the 1950s is
thought to relate to the sensitive nature of the airfield at the time.
By 1963 the site was labelled as Manston Aerodrome with a runway in the south of the site and
roads, airplane parking bays, warehouses and associated buildings in the centre to north of the
site.
By 1991 the site was marked as Kent International Airport representing the current site layout.
The following represents a summary of the available mapping information for the Site:
Table 3-1: Summary of Pertinent Site History
LAND USE ON-SITE
DATES*
LOCATION ONSITE
Windmill
1873 - 1896
South
Then cleared
1896 - 1963
Then runway
1963 - Present
Chalk pit
1873 1896
1896 1907
1907 1938
Then cleared
1938 1963
1963 Present
1963 1977
Then cleared
1977 Present
Tank
1963 Present
Southeast
Substation
1979 Present
Northwest
Telephone exchange
1981 Present
Northeast
1947 1951
Multiple locations
Then unmarked
1951 1960
East
Southeast
9
1960 1968
* Denotes the dates the historical maps were published, although the published date given on the maps is often some
years later than the surveyed date.
3.3
DISTANCE
DIRECTION
DATES*
Pit
Adjacent
East
1873 1963
1963 Present
Adjacent
East
1964 Present
Adjacent
South-east
1907 1963
1963 Present
Adjacent
South-east
1963 Present
Garage
10m
North
1963 Present
Chalk pit
30m
West
1873 1938
Then disused
1938 1963
1963 1990
1990 Present
Small pits
50m
North
1939 1963
1963 1993
2015 Present
1993 2015
50m
South-west
1989 1907
1907 Present
Then unlabelled
Commercial yard
150m
North
2015 Present
200m
South-west
1908 1968
1968 2015
2015 Present
Cemetery
230m
South-west
1908 1968
1968 2015
2015 Present
250m
North-east
2015 Present
* Denotes the dates the historical maps were published, although the published date given on the maps is often some
years later than the surveyed date.
10
3.4
RAF MANSTON
It is common that during the WWII historical mapping were often doctored or altered to protect
sensitive sites and infrastructure, such as military sites, for national security purposes. In the
case of RAF Manston, many of the maps prior to and following WWII are blank and do not show
any details of the infrastructure of the Site, such as buildings, tanks and hangers that were known
to be present from historical sources. Sections 3.4.1 to 3.4.3 provide a brief summary of the
history of the Site and surrounding area based upon available online sources and records
contained within the National Archives. Current satellite imagery also shows a number of
rectangular and circular features within the grassland area in the centre of the Site north of the
runway which may indicate the historic location of structures which are not shown on historical
mapping.
WSP | Parsons Brinckerhoff visited the National Archives on 7th April 2016, and performed a
search of the resources available. Historical aerial photography was indicated to be held at Kent
History and Library Centre, Maidstone, with digital copies not available at the National Archive.
Limited relevant information was identified within the National Archive and has been incorporated
into the below sections where relevant.
It should be noted that RAF Manston covered a wider area than the current Site boundary and
therefore some features and activities may not be located within the current Site.
3.4.1
WORLD WAR I
In 1915 aircrafts started to use the open farmlands at Manston as a site of emergency landings
which lead to the establishment of the Aerodrome at Manston. By 1916 the Operational War
Flight Command and the Handley Page Training School (pilot training) were stationed at
3
Manston . By 1917 Manston airfield had grown to include four a partially underground hangars, its
4
own railway line, an electric power station and barracks for 3,000 men . Information from the RAF
Manston Museum indicated the power station utilised coal fired generators, the waste produced
was used to make building blocks. The power station and hangers are not thought to have been
located within the current Site boundary.
Information available at the RAF Manston Museum shows that four underground hangers were
planned in the site vicinity (within 250m) in 1917. Two hangers were finished in 16 week at Alland
Grange Road. Hangers 3 and 4 (located near the current day Drome Garage) were not
completed. The underground hanger sites were sold in the 1920s and did not see military service.
After WWI Manston airfield was utilised for the training of airmen in airframe maintenance and
3
engine repairs .
3.4.2
WORLD WAR II
Manston comprised a grass runway (in a northeast to southwest orientations along the eastern
area of the current Site) until the 1940s when the current runway 2,752 metres long and 61
metres wide was developed. The runway comprised three lanes. The northern and central lanes
were used for flying control whilst the southern lane was utilised for emergency landing.
Given RAF Manstons location near the front line and the long broad runway the airfield was
utilised as a south coast emergency landing ground for bomber crews who had suffered damage
3
4
11
or were running low on fuel. A large number of badly damaged aircrafts landed on the Site to the
5
extent that the airfield was described as a graveyard for heavy bombers . The runway had a
large number of aprons where the damaged aircraft could quickly be dragged from the main
runway onto the aprons.
During the Battle of Britain in 1940, the Site was heavily bombed destroying many aircraft and
2
buildings and leaving unexploded bombs across the Site .
It should be noted that luminous paint used on aircraft dials and gauges to allow pilots to fly at
night contained radium 226 (an alpha emitter). Radium paint was used on such devices from
1900s until 1960s. Due to the large numbers of damaged aircraft that landed and were
dismantled/repaired at RAF Manston, it is likely that such devices may be buried at the Site.
A series of correspondence was found at the National Archive discussing the potential for the use
6
of Manston Airfield as a civilian airfield post WWII . The file contained correspondence between
interested parties relating to proposed ongoing use, however it was decided that the location was
not ideal for a civilian airport.
FIDO SYSTEM
7
Based upon information taken from the a local history groups website the Fog Intensive
Dispersal Operation (FIDO) system was installed at Manston in 1944, soon after the runway was
built and was last used circa 1958. The system entailed burning vaporised petrol under pressure
in channels along both lengths of the runway which would burn off the fog during conditions of
poor visibility and allow aircraft to land.
The fuel was stored within four tanks with a capacity of approximately 250,000 gallons each
situated directly to the south-east of the site. Twelve pumps were used to pump the fuel to the
south-eastern corner of the runway. The fuel would be pumped to the Valve House before being
pumped to the rest of the system. The fuel used within the FIDO system was contaminated fuel
which was considered to be unusable for aircrafts. It was pumped from rail delivery tankers on
railway sidings which were located on the Minster to Ramsgate railway line located between
Abbey Farm and Sevenscore (located offsite to the south of the Site) via buried pipelines across
the field to fuel storage tanks installed for the FIDO system.
No evidence of the FIDO system was observed during the site reconnaissance. Two fuel storage
tanks are present within the Jentex site which are now immediately outside the Site boundary to
the southeast. It is not known if the system was decommissioned, removed or whether the
infrastructure remains within the runway.
3.4.3
http://www.transportheritage.com/find-heritage-locations.html?sobi2Task=sobi2Details&sobi2Id=244
th
(accessed 8 April 2016)
6
AVIA 2/2679: Manston Aerodrome Use Post War
7
th
http://www.ramsgatehistory.com/forum/index.php?topic=81.0 (accessed 5 April 2016)
12
Following this the airfield became a joint civilian and RAF airport from 1960. Manston was also
designated as one of the UKs MEDAs (Military Emergency Diversion Airfield) for emergency
military and civilian landings and a fire training school was formed. The fire training school is still
active and is located adjacent to the north-eastern part of the former air-side area of the Site. The
airfield also had a foam carpet crash landing system, where two tractors would pull tankers
4
laying a metre thick layer of foam over a strip of runway, for aircraft with landing gear problems .
3
Helicopter search and rescue were also present at Manston from 1961 to 1994 .
The RAF left Manston in 1999 and the remaining civilian airport was named London Manston.
3
The MOD still operate the fire training school .
13
4
4.1
ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING
GEOLOGY
The 1:50,000 British Geological Survey (BGS) Map (Sheet 274 Ramsgate) and BGS Geology of
Britain online viewer have been reviewed. No superficial deposits are mapped for majority of the
Site; however, Head Brickearth deposits are mapped as being present in limited areas across the
Site. The Site is entirely underlain by Upper Chalk bedrock, which is anticipated to be present at
shallow depths across the Site.
A summary of the anticipated geology at the Site is presented below in Table 4-1.
Table 4-1: Geological Description
GEOLOGICAL UNIT
DISTRIBUTION
AQUIFER
DESIGNATION*
Unclassified
(Unproductive Strata)
Unclassified
(Unproductive Strata)
Site wide.
Principal Aquifer
A number of historical exploratory hole records are available from the BGS Geology of Britain
online viewer. Five trial pits were excavated in 1987 (TR36NW76 to TR36NW80) although they
all appear to have been mapped to the same coordinates north of the runway and therefore their
actual location on the Site is uncertain. However, in general they indicate geology comprising
brown and white chalky Made Ground overlying, Head deposits comprising brown sandy silty clay
encountered from a depths of 0.2-0.5m bgl with Upper Chalk present from depths of around 1m
bgl.
A borehole was progressed to a depth of approximately 53m depth in 1935 (TR36NW3) on the
southeast boundary of the Site and indicates chalk from a depth of approximately 1.2m bgl. A
th
handwritten note dated 13 February 1940 states that This is a shaft made in connection with the
driving of the adit of the main scheme. This may relate to chalk adit discussed in more detail in
Section 4.1.2.
4.1.1
MADE GROUND
The runway is the dominant feature at the Site extending for 2.7km in length and 230m wide. The
site representative reported that the runway was cored a number of years ago to determine the
thickness of its construction and was found to be between 6m and 9m thick.
The significant historic development and site usage is likely to have resulted in large quantities of
Made Ground being deposited across the Site. Based upon the surrounding the area, the Site
was likely to have been relatively flat and level prior to WWII making it a suitable location for the
grass runway used until the construction of the current runway in the 1943. As the current runway
14
represents a high ridge along the Site, it is considered likely that land either side has been infilled
to re-profile the Site.
Furthermore, it is understood the Site was heavily bombed during WWII and numerous
subterranean structures, bunkers, service channels and tunnels are likely to have been
constructed across the Site whilst under ownership of the RAF/MOD. These bomb craters are
likely to have been infilled with rubble or waste with haste to bring the airport back into operation.
Some of the subsurface features may still be present whilst others may have been infilled over
time.
4.1.2
MINING
The entire Site is underlain by Upper Chalk, present at shallow depths (approximately 1m bgl).
The BGS Mineral Resource Map for Kent 1:100,000 indicates a number of historic chalk pits
within the vicinity of the Site including Spratling Court Chalk Pit located immediately east of the
8
Site boundary east of the runway. Based upon information from the Kent Archaeological Society ,
an archaeological investigation of the chalk pit was undertaken as a Roman cave was
encountered in 1996. The extraction of chalk at Spratling Court began in 1992 to provide
materials for the construction of road improvements at the Lord of the Manor intersection.
Information provided by the Environment Agency (EA) indicates that a chalk adit is present
beneath the Site, beginning at the Lord of the Manor groundwater abstraction well running parallel
with and/or beneath the runway. Lord of the Manor abstraction well is operated by Southern
Water and located 350m southeast of the Site. Information subsequently provided by Southern
Water indicates the adit (referred to as the western adit) was constructed circa 1923 (likely hand
dug) and is anticipated to be approximately 3km in length (3315 yards) and present at a depth of
approximately 2.7m AOD. The adit is anticipated to be approximately 1.5-2m in height and 0.5-1m
wide. The EA reported that the location of the adit has been interpolated from historic mining
records by BGS and therefore its actual depth, length, dimensions and location are uncertain.
4.2
HYDROLOGY
A small balancing pond is located on the Site to the north of the north-eastern edge of the runway.
It was constructed below ground level (slightly sunken) and covered by a grate.
The closest surface water feature to the site is a pond located approximately 300m to the south of
the Site, adjacent to the southbound carriageway of Hengist Way (A299).
The EA Online River Basin District maps show that the southern end of the site falls within the
Monkton and Minster Marshes catchment, with the nearest ditch being approximately 1km south
of the site. The River Stour is approximately 3.1km to the south of the site, both the River Stour
and Monkton and Minster Marshes are classed as main rivers and are managed by the EA.
The Site is situated approximately 1.2km north west of the coast of Pegwell Bay.
4.3
HYDROGEOLOGY
The Head Deposits underlying isolated parts of the site is considered to be an unclassified
aquifer. The Upper Chalk beneath the Site is classified as a Principal Aquifer. The entire Site is
15
also located within a Groundwater Source Protection Zone (SPZ) for public water supply. The site
is located within a Major Aquifer Intermediate Groundwater Vulnerability Zone (GWVZ).
As previously discussed in Section 5.1.2 a major groundwater abstraction well, named Lord of
the Manor, is located approximately 350m southeast of the Site and is operated by Southern
Water. A chalk adit extends from the abstraction point beneath the runway for approximately 3km.
9
Therefore, the adit and a buffer zone either side have been classified as an SPZ I , with a further
10
buffer zone being classified as and SPZ II . The remainder, and majority, of the Site is classified
11
as an SPZ III . A map showing the SPZs and interpolated location of the adit is provided in
Appendix C.
The adit is understood to be below the groundwater table, however during times of drought the
groundwater table can drop below the roof of the adit. Groundwater levels within the Upper Chalk
beneath the Site are anticipated to be between 30m and 45m bgl.
4.3.1
Defined as the 50 day travel time from any point below the water table to the source. This zone has a
minimum radius of 50m.
10
Defined by a 400 day travel time from a point below the water table. This zone has a minimum radius of
250m or 500m around the source, depending on the size of the abstraction
11
Defined as the area around a source within which all groundwater recharge is presumed to be discharged
at the source.
16
4.4
13
Pegwell Bay is located 1.2km southeast of the Site and is classified as an SSSI , SPA ,
14
15
RAMSAR and SAC . It is likely to be a major recipient of groundwater discharge from the Site
due to the high transmissivity of the Upper Chalk and therefore Pegwell Bay is considered to be
Groundwater Dependent Terrestrial Ecosystems (GWDTE) as defined by the Water Framework
Directive 2000.
4.5
12
13
14
15
A site in the UK which is of particular importance because of its geology, topography, or ecology. SSSIs are graded in
terms of importance from 1 to 4.
A special protection area (SPA) is a designation under the European Union Directive on the Conservation
of Wild Birds.
Ramsar sites are wetlands of international importance designated under the Ramsar Convention.
A Special Area of Conservation (SAC) is defined in the European Union's Habitats Directive (92/43/EEC), also known as
the Directive on the Conservation of Natural Habitats and of Wild Fauna and Flora.
17
4.6
FLOODING
The Site is located within Flood Zone 1 as designated by the EA. A Flood Risk Assessment
report has been produced by WSP | Parsons Brinckerhoff for the Site dated April 2016 and should
be referenced for further information.
4.7
RADON
The Site is reported by the Public Health England (PHE) to be located within an area where
16
between 1% and 3% of homes are above the Action Level .
Therefore, basic protection
17
measures should be installed .
16
Public Health England defines radon Affected Areas as those with 1% chance or more of a house having a radon
concentration at or above the Action Level of 200 Bq m-3
17
New buildings located within localities delineated by the appropriate government authorities should be constructed with
precautions against radon.
18
5
5.1
Waste Management
Facilities
18
19
DESCRIPTOR
Release Incidents
Discharge Consents
Local Authority
Pollution Prevention
and Controls (LAPPC)
WSP | Parsons Brinckerhoff has reviewed the Contemporary Trade Entries data provided by
Envirocheck and notes the following uses which may represent off-site contamination sources.
Four active and three inactive trade entries for vehicle services including a road haulage service
and MOT testing centre are recorded within 35m of the Site. Local Authority Environmental
Health Officer (EHO).
The EHO holds digital information showing historical industrial land uses across the Council
region, which is used to identify sites which may in the future be investigated under their
Contaminated Land Strategy. The EHO at Thanet District Council was contacted by WSP |
Parsons Brinckerhoff regarding any environmentally pertinent information to held relating to the
th
Site. A response was received on 18 November 2015 and is contained in full in Appendix F.
A summary of the information is provided below:
The EHO reports that they hold no information relating to any MOD remediation at the Site;
The EHO reports former land uses in line with those detailed in Section 3 of this report;
Surrounding site uses (within 250m) have included former fuel depot, cemetery, hospital,
laundry, military land, petroleum tanks, quarry, filled ground, brickworks, refuse disposal and
petrol fuelling stations;
The EHO reports that there are no plans to take action under Part IIA of the EPA 1990; and
Should redevelopment or a change of use take place at the Site the developer would be
required, as a condition of planning, to investigate whether any land contamination exists and,
if necessary, devise a strategy to deal with it.
19
Including pollution incidents, enforcements, prohibitions or prosecutions, and Control of Major Accident Hazards
(COMAH)
20
5.2
ENVIRONMENT AGENCY
WSP | Parsons Brinkerhoff attended a meeting with the EA and Kent County Council (KCC) on
th
16 November 2015 regarding protection of the SPZ and potential drainage options. Notes from
the meeting are provided in Appendix F.
The EA provided information regarding the delineation of the SPZ, presence of the adit beneath
the Site and the Lord of the Manor abstraction well. They reported that based upon their data the
Principal Aquifer is considered to be highly responsive to rainfall. Regarding drainage, KCC
expressed concern over potential contamination at Site due to its historic uses. The EA stated
that the use of Sustainable Urban Drainage Systems (SuDS) may increase turbidity within the
adit.
5.3
SOUTHERN WATER
st
WSP | Parsons Brinkerhoff attended a meeting with Southern Water on 1 February 2016
regarding the Lord of the Manor abstraction well, as well as drainage issues (such as current and
proposed foul water sewers and surface water discharge). Notes from the meeting are provided in
Appendix F.
Southern Water indicated that groundwater within the Isle of Thanet has high level of natural
radioactivity originating from the Upper Chalk and Green Sand Member. The location of the adit is
inferred and uncertain. It is understood that a survey has been carried out in the past but may be
inaccurate. Therefore Southern Water would be in favour of a new survey to give some
confidence to the location of the adit in order to protect its integrity during any proposed
redevelopment.
Lastly, Southern Water expressed concern regarding the potential increase in turbidly from
proposed future SuDS features and the risks from potential contamination at the Site.
5.4
A UXO Threat Assessment has been commission by WSP | Parsons Brinckerhoff dated 18
February 2016 as is contained within Appendix G.
The report contains a number of aerial photos of the Site including of an aerial attack of RAF
Manston in 1940. Defensive zig-zag trenches are shown on the area immediately south of the
current runway. A summary of the information and conclusions of the assessment is provided
below:
Manston was primarily a fighter base however due to the Coastal Command and ground
attack missions also flown out of Manston during WWII, the bomb stores (situated just west of
the site boundary) contained a wide variety of ordnance including High Explosives (HE)
bombs, rockets, depth charges, torpedoes, anti-aircraft shells. Note however the larger
weapons (depth charges and torpedoes) are highly unlikely to remain at former airfield sites
today.
Defective munitions would often be discarded on the ground at RAF bases during WWII and
over time could have become buried in the soft ground.
The airfield was heavily fortified with pillboxes and a battalion of Army soldiers were stationed
at Manston. These armed troops would have manned the defences, whilst also carrying out
regular anti-invasion training at the airfield. Such activities often involved the use of live
ammunition and pyrotechnic battle simulants and therefore the possibility of Low Specific
Activity (LSA) / Small Arms Ammunition (SAA) contamination associated with such
activities is elevated.
As a German invasion defensive measure, RAF Manston was pipe mined. Explosive filled
steel pipes were laid in a criss-cross pattern under the flying field to ~6ft depth. Manston was
21
given a Class I Clearance Certificate after WWII, confirming that all mines were
accounted for during the 1940s. However in 1981 an Army Explosive Ordnance Disposal
(EOD) unit cleared 34 mines from Manston. Furthermore, between April and August 2001, 4 x
filled pipe mines and 3 x empty pipe mines were also recovered during two separate Army
EOD tasks at Manston. Anecdotal information from an ex RAF EOD engineer that one of his
first jobs was a de-mining job at RAF Manston, this was to remove WWII pipe bombs laid
under the runway and grass surfaces. He notes that some pipe mines were destroyed in situ
as they were leaking Nitro Glycerine.
RAF Manston was bombed on at least 22 occasions, including some large scale attacks, one
of which resulted in >100 High Explosive (HE) bomb craters on Site and the identification of
multiple UXOs. Although Manstons anti-aircraft gunners would have observed the air raids,
the airfield was all but evacuated for much of the Battle of Britain and therefore, during the
heavy raids, it is possible that that a UXO strike could have been missed and gone
unrecorded. A German 50kg HE UXO was discovered at Site in April 2001.
A number of publications including detailed biographies of RAF Manston were reviewed as
part of the Threat Assessment study. No mention of Mustard Gas storage has been located,
however due to the secrecy and sensitivity relating to chemical warfare during WWII,
information relating to such matters was not always put on public record. Although the
possibility of Mustard Gas storage at RAF Manston cannot be completely ruled out, the
likelihood of Mustard Gas remaining on Site is considered to be unlikely.
Overall the UXO Risk is considered to be High.
5.5
PLANNING HISTORY
th
A search was made of the Thanet District Councils planning portal on 15 February 2016.
An outline planning application (Ref. OL/TH/15/0020) was identified for the Jentex site located to
the south of the Site. The application included for demolition of existing buildings and structures
and the erection of 56no. care units and 56no. dwellings and community use building with a retail
th
unit and was granted planning permission in 16 January 2016. A Geo-Environmental
Assessment was undertaken to support the application. The Jentex site was formerly part of RAF
Manston and was the site of the four fuel storage tanks used to supply the FIDO system.
Pertinent information is provided below:
GEO-ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT, JENTEX PETROLEUM, CLIFFSEND, KENT. IDOM
MEREBROOK LTD, MAY 2015. (REF. GEA-18996-15-134)
The site was predominantly occupied by concrete hardstanding with small areas of
landscaping. It comprised petrol filling pumps associated with two large bunded fuel tanks
and a small disused breeze block building. There are two below ground fuel storage tanks on
the east of the site. There are two maintenance buildings used to maintain and store
company equipment and vehicles.
The two current tanks were constructed circa 2002. The three of the four historical tanks
were removed by 2010 (which the report mistakenly identified as sewage tanks).
The site investigation comprised three cable percussion borehole to a maximum depth of
10.85m bgl and fifteen trail pits to a maximum depth of 4m bgl.
IDOM report ground conditions to comprise Made ground to a depth of approximately 3m bgl
underlain by chalk. IDOM do not report any evidence of contamination within the natural
deposits or encounter any groundwater.
25no. soil samples were submitted for chemical analysis, 15no. from natural ground and
11no. from Made Ground. Samples were submitted for a chemical suite including, metals,
pH, asbestos screening, Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPH), and Polycyclic aromatic
Hydrocarbons (PAHs) and screened against values published in LQM/CIEH 2015.
22
IDOM reported that three samples exceeded the thresholds of PAHs for human health.
Asbestos was identified within two of the three samples analysed from Made Ground.
No groundwater was observed and no samples were retrieved.
23
6
6.1
6.2
LIKELY / ANTICIPATED
DISTRIBUTION
ON-SITE
Made Ground
Organic matter in
Made Ground
Fuel farm: 5 x
55,000L tank & 1 x
28,500L
Flying Club: 1 x
24
POTENTIAL SOURCE POTENTIAL CONTAMINANTS OF
CONCERN
60,000L tank.
LIKELY / ANTICIPATED
DISTRIBUTION
Interceptors:
Fire Station
Substations
Former
RAF/MOD/USAF
usage
Historic Landfills
1 x 800,000L near
to the RAF
Museum
1 x 40,000L beside
the Terminal
building
1 x 10,000L
associated with the
fuel farm.
OFF-SITE
The Jentex site is located down hydraulic gradient of the Site and therefore will not be considered
further as a potential source of contamination.
6.3
POTENTIAL RECEPTORS
In the context of the proposed development, the following potential receptors of were identified:
HUMAN HEALTH
Future site users: including residents, visitors and employees;
Construction workers and future maintenance workers; and
Third party neighbours.
25
CONTROLLED WATERS
Principal Aquifer: including the SPZ I,II and III and the chalk adit present beneath the Site
which relate to the Lord of the Manor groundwater abstraction well)
Groundwater Dependant Terrestrial Ecosystems (GWDTE): Pegwell Bay located 1.2km
southeast of the Site.
OTHER
Future below ground services and building structures: including potable water supply
pipes and building foundations.
6.4
26
PATHWAYS
COMMENTS
ON-SITE
The Site has been subject to significant historic usage /
development and potential sources of contamination, as listed in
Table 7-1 above. Therefore significant quantities of Made
Ground are likely to be present beneath the Site. Furthermore
the distribution and composition of the Made ground is likely to
be highly variable.
Human Health
Interceptors
future maintenance
workers
Fire Station
Due to the historic use of the Site by the RAF/MOD and USAF it
may be that undocumented areas of Made Ground, fuel stores
and service lines exist, which are currently unknown or have not
been identified within this report.
The proposed development includes residential housing and
commercial and public spaces. Human exposure to potentially
contaminated soils and groundwater via direct contact is likely to
occur within areas of open landscaping (such as parkland) or
within residential gardens.
Risks to construction workers during redevelopment is
considered to be High, although exposure to potentially
impacted materials will be mitigated through appropriate
precautions and site practices such as use of PPE.
Former RAF/MOD
/USAF usage
Principal Aquifer
GWDTE
27
POTENTIAL
RECEPTOR
CONTAMINANT SOURCES
PATHWAYS
COMMENTS
during the former use of the Site as a military and commercial
airport. Although areas of perched groundwater are likely to be
present within Made Ground deposits (which may have been
impacted), the majority of the fuel releases are likely to have
migrated vertically and impacted the Principal Aquifer.
In addition to fuel releases, other potential contaminants such
as PFOS from foams used by fire fighters, are likely or have
impacted upon the Principal Aquifer.
The Principal Aquifer is classified as a SPZI, II and II beneath
the Site which relates to the Lord of the Manor groundwater
abstraction well (located 350m southeast) which is a regionally
significant resource. Any impacted groundwater beneath the
Site has the potential to migrate laterally, particularly within the
chalk adit (SPZI) running beneath the Site and impact upon the
abstraction well.
Groundwater beneath the Site is also anticipated to flow to the
southeast and discharge to a GWDTE (Pegwell Bay). Therefore
any contamination within groundwater beneath the Site has the
potential to impact upon Pegwell Bay which is a designated
ecological site (SSSI etc). Furthermore, although the surface
water drainage from areas of hardstanding on the Site are
thought to be directed through an oil/water interceptor prior to
discharge to Pegwell Bay, should the system have failed,
impacted surface water runoff could have discharged directly to
the bay. Therefore risks to Controlled Waters from potential on
site sources of contamination are considered to be High.
28
POTENTIAL
RECEPTOR
CONTAMINANT SOURCES
PATHWAYS
COMMENTS
Made Ground anticipated to be present on Site may present a
source of ground gas and vapour which has the potential to
migrate through the subsurface and accumulate in built
structures, presenting an explosion and/or asphyxiation risk.
Ground Gas/Vapours
from Made Ground
Asphyxiation
Interceptors
Explosive risk
Large bulk fuel stores, fuel spills and other former site uses are
also likely to present a vapour risk.
The potential for ground gas and volatile vapours is considered
to pose a Medium risk to the proposed development.
Former RAF/MOD
/USAF usage
Aggressive compounds
OFF-SITE
Within in the vicinity of the Site groundwater within the Upper
Chalk Principal Aquifer is anticipated to flow to the southeast
towards the sea. Therefore any potential contaminant sources
which are upgradient of the Site have the potential to impact
upon on-Site receptors via lateral migration of impacted
groundwater.
Human Health
Historic Landfills
Controlled Waters
Principal Aquifer
Stone Hill Park
Stone Hill Park Limited
29
CONCLUSIONS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS
The Site has an extensive history of use associated with significant potentially contaminating
activities which have included military uses, industrial uses as well as recent use as a commercial
airport. Following the desk based assessment a number of sensitive receptors have been
identified which may be affected by the potential sources of contamination including future site
users such as residents, visitors and employees, and the underlying Principal Aquifer and nearby
Lord of the Manor groundwater abstraction.
It should be noted that there is significant uncertainty regarding the location of potentially
contaminating activities and source, as well as receptors (such as the chalk adit) due to the extent
and complexity of the Site history and use. However following our assessment a number of
potential pollutant linkages have been identified. Therefore in the context of the proposed mixed
use development WSP | Parsons Brinckerhoff considers risks to Human Health to be Medium to
High and risks to Controlled Waters to be High.
7.1
RECOMMENDATIONS
We therefore we make the following recommendations:
Chalk Adit Survey: A survey is undertaken of the chalk adit underlying the Site to determine
its depth, orientation and location. This will provide greater certainty over its location beneath
the Site to allow for its protection and avoidance in the planning, design and construction of
the proposed development. This will also allow baseline information to be collected prior to
the commencement of the development and any potential changes can be monitored. As the
adit runs beneath the Site it may also fall under the ownership of the Client. The ownership of
the adit and related responsibilities should be confirmed.
Site Investigation: No information is available regarding the ground conditions beneath the
Site. A site investigation compliant with BS10175 and Generic Quantitative Risk Assessment
(GQRA) are likely to be a requirement of planning and will allow assessment of the identified
plausible contaminant linkages. This would be undertaken through a phased approach taking
into consideration the proposed programme of the development, when available. It is
recommended that a ground investigation is designed based on the following technical
objectives:
Characterisation of the underlying Made Ground, Head deposits and Upper Chalk,
Establishment of the ground gas and vapour regime across the site to determine
concentrations of carbon dioxide and methane that may have been generated,
Assessment of the materials encountered in terms of the suitability of materials for re-use in
earthworks (if required), or for off-site disposal,
30
UXO Risk: A Threat Assessment has been undertaken for the Site by a UXO specialist. A full
list of recommendations are provided within Appendix G, however the following
recommendations regarding any planned future intrusive works (potentially including
archaeological works) are provided below:
Explosive Ordnance Safety and Awareness Briefings to any personnel conducting intrusive
works and the provision of Unexploded Ordnance Site Safety Instructions.
An UXO survey be completed by a competent party of all buildings used during the RAF
operation of the Site prior to demolition.
Intrusive Magnetometer Survey of any borehole/pile locations down to the maximum bomb
penetration. (This final recommendation of the UXO specialist has potentially high cost and
programme implications. Further discussions with the UXO specialist should be carried out
in advance of future ground investigation works to establish if the need for magnetometer
survey can be rationalised or removed in specific locations, such as beneath the runway).
Appendix A
GENERAL LIMITATIONS
general indication of conditions. The number of sampling points and the methods of sampling and
testing do not preclude the possible existence of localised "hotspots" of contamination where
concentrations may be significantly higher than those actually encountered or ground conditions that
vary from those identified. In addition, there may be exceptional ground conditions elsewhere on the
site which have not been disclosed by this investigation and which have therefore not been taken into
account in this report. For example these include spatial variations in soil properties; the varying
thickness and physical nature of the strata identified and changes in groundwater levels or flow rates.
The inspection; testing and monitoring records relate specifically to the investigation points and the
timeframe that the works were undertaken. They will also be limited by the techniques employed.
WSP has interpreted between these points based upon assumptions to develop our interpretation and
conclusions. The assumption made in forming our conclusions is that the ground and groundwater
conditions (both chemically and physically) are the same as have been encountered during the works
undertaken at the specific points of investigation.
On 1st April 2010, BS EN 1997-1:2004 (Eurocode 7: Geotechnical Design Part 1) became the
mandatory baseline standard for geotechnical ground investigations.
In terms of geotechnical design for foundations, slopes, retaining walls and earthworks, EC7 sets
guidance on design procedures including specific guidance on the numbers and spacings of
boreholes for geotechnical design, there are limits to methods of ground investigation and the quality
of data obtained and there are also prescriptive methods of assessing soil strengths and methods of
design. Unless otherwise explicitly stated, the work has not been undertaken in accordance with
EC7.
A standard geotechnical interpretative report will not meet the requirements of the
Geotechnical Design Report (GDR) under Eurocode 7. A GDR can strictly only be prepared following
confirmation of all structural loads and serviceability requirements. The design process requires close
co-operation between the geotechnical engineer and the structural engineer and is iterative. Where a
GDR is prepared using preliminary or assumed loadings and/or serviceability limits it should only be
considered as an interim report and should not be relied upon for the procurement or construction of
the works it describes. A GDR will be a standalone specifically entitled report.
During any build programme WSP should be consulted if alternative ground conditions are
encountered. It assumes during any site works that the contractor will use their best endeavours to
manage and control groundwater and other unforeseen ground conditions. WSP will not be liable for
actions taken prior to consultation.
The scope of the investigation was selected on the basis of the specific development and land use
scenario proposed by the Client and may be inappropriate to another form of development or scheme.
If the development layout was not known at the time of the investigation the report findings may need
revisiting once the development layout is confirmed.
The risk assessment and opinions provided are based on currently available guidance relating to
acceptable contamination concentrations; no liability can be accepted for the retrospective effects of
any future changes or amendments to these values. Specific assumptions associated with the WSP
risk assessment process have been outlined within the body or associated appendix of the report.
Additional investigations may be required in order to satisfy relevant planning conditions or to resolve
any engineering and environmental issues.
If costs have been included in relation to additional site works, and / or site remediation works these
must be considered as indicative only and must, be confirmed by a qualified quantity surveyor.
The following report titles (or combination) may cover this category of work: geo environmental site
investigation; geotechnical assessment; GIR (Ground Investigation reports); preliminary
environmental and geotechnical risk assessment; geotechnical risk register.
Detailed Quantitative Risk Assessments and Remedial Strategy Reports
These reports either use primary data or build upon previous report versions and associated notes.
The scope of the investigation; further testing and monitoring and associated risk assessments were
selected on the basis of the specific development and land use scenario proposed by the Client and
may not be appropriate to another form of development or scheme layout. The risk assessment and
opinions provided are based on currently available approaches in the generation of Site Specific
Assessment Criteria relating to contamination concentrations and are not considered to represent a
risk in a specific land use scenario to a specific receptor. No liability can be accepted for the
retrospective effects of any future changes or amendments to these values, associated models or
associated guidance.
The outputs of the Detailed Quantitative Risk Assessments are based upon WSP manipulation of
standard risk assessment models. Models are simulations based on the available data set and should
not be used as predictions.
Where a remediation strategy is proposed, this is based on our interpretation of the risk assessment
criteria and is specific to a particular location and a particular intended land use and configuration /
layout. Prior to adoption they will need discussing and agreeing with the Regulatory Authorities prior
to adoption on site. The regulatory discussion and engagement process may result in an alternative
interpretation being determined and agreed. The process and timescales associated with the
Regulatory Authority engagement are not within the control of WSP. All costs and programmes
presented as a result of this process should be validated by a quantity surveyor and should be
presumed to be indicative.
Monitoring (including Remediation Monitoring reports)
These reports are factual in nature and comprise monitoring, normally groundwater and ground gas
and data provided by contractors as part of an earthworks or remedial works.
The data is presented and will be compared with assessment criteria.
Asbestos in soils
Unless explicitly included for in our proposal, our investigation does not include for a formal asbestos
assessment and the inspection for asbestos, either as asbestos containing materials (ACMs) lying on
the surface or as ACMs and/or as loose asbestos fibres within made ground/stockpiles is excluded.
Our report will include only the factual reporting of any laboratory asbestos soil screening results, if
completed. These results should be treated cautiously and should not be relied upon to provide
detailed and representative information on the delineation, type and extent of bulk ACMs and/or trace
loose asbestos fibres within the soil matrix at the site.
Where we indicate in our proposal that we will consider asbestos we will undertake screening of
representative soil samples for the presences / absence of loose asbestos fibres. If these are found a
further and more detailed specific investigation into asbestos in soils will need to be undertaken,
which will include asbestos quantification testing. These investigations are associated with more
rigorous monitoring of asbestos and health and safety provisions.
Appendix I
IDB CONSULTATION
Bansal, Gurdeep
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Dear Gurdeep,
According to my search Manston Airport is not covered by a IDB however parts of the CT12 postcode are covered by
River Stour IDB so I would recommend contacting them, enquires@riverstouridb.org.uk
Kind regards
Sue
From: Bansal, Gurdeep [mailto:Gurdeep.Bansal@wspgroup.com]
Sent: 15 April 2016 12:25
To: Admin shared mailbox <admin@ada.org.uk>
Cc: Thwaites, Craig <Craig.Thwaites@wspgroup.com>
Subject: Manston Airport - IDB Consultation
Dear Sirs
We are looking at the redevelopment of Manston Airport (site location plan attached). Can you confirm if the site falls
within an IDB controlled area?
We are aware that the site drains surface water directly to Pegwell Bay (sea), we therefore presume that the site will
not affect any IDB assets in the area.
Kind Regards
Gurdeep Bansal
Principal Engineer