ECE 521 Mini-Project Evaluation Form (Sept 2015)

ECE 521: Microprocessor System

Mini-Project Evaluation Form

Panel Name:
Project Title:

Allow second demonstration? (OPTIONAL, to be

filled at the discretion of evaluating panel)
YES

NO

Group Members
1.
2.
3.

Role
Leader (L) /System Designer (SD)
Programmer (P)
Testing Leader (TL)

PRESENTATION EVALUATION
Item

Good
9 - 10
The presentation details
all important points in
hardware and software
design, as well as
functionality of the
project.

Satisfactory
6-8
The presentation
sufficiently covers all
important points in
hardware and software
design, as well as
functionality of the
project.

Unsatisfactory
3-5
The presentation failed
to sufficiently cover all
important points in
hardware and software
design, and did not
demonstrate the full
functionality of the
project.

Poor
0-2
The presentation did not
cover all important
points in hardware and
software design, and did
not demonstrate any
functionality of the
project.

Visual Aides

Visual aides are

interesting, of very high
quality and used
effectively to articulate
points.

Visual aides are of high

quality and sufficiently
used to articulate points.

Visual aides are used,

but lack the level of
detail necessary, and are
not used to present
points effectively.

Visual aides are not

provided.

0.10

Time
Management

Presentation is
completed the in
allocated time frame.
Presentation time is
utilized efficiently for
presentation.

Presentation is
completed slightly above
or below the allocated
time frame. Noticeable
delays, but does not
significantly impede the
overall efficiency of the
time given.

Presentation is
completed moderately
above the allocated time
frame. Noticeable
delays that significantly
impede the overall
efficiency of the time
given.

Presentation is
completed significantly
above the allocated time
frame. Significant
delays that take up most
of the presentation time.

0.10

Presentation

Score
(0-10)

Weight

Weighted
Score

0.40

ECE 521 Mini-Project Evaluation Form (Sept 2015)

Fluency

Information articulated
in a clear and audible
tone.

Information articulated
in a sufficiently clear and
audible tone.

Information articulated
in a barely clear and
audible tone.

Information articulated
in an unclear and
inaudible tone.

The presenter is very

fluent in English.

The presenter is fluent in

English. However, there
are noticeable delays in
articulating points.

A significant problem
with the presenters
English, and long delays
in articulating points.

The presenter cannot

present in any
understandable English.

Few grammatical
mistakes that do not
significantly impede
understanding of the
presentation

Many grammatical
mistakes that
significantly impedes
understanding of the
presentation.

The circuit layout is done

using PCB.
The circuit layout is
designed with
reasonable circuit area
and number of
connections.
The components are
reasonably arranged and
soldered.

The circuit layout is done

using Vero board.
The circuit layout is
badly designed.
A lot of connections are
made using jumper
wires.
The components are not
neatly arranged.
The components are
badly soldered.

Few grammatical
mistakes that do not
impede understanding of
the presentation.

Workmanship
(Hardware)

The circuit layout is done

using PCB.
The circuit layout is
designed with optimum
circuit area and number
of connections.
The components are
neatly arranged and
soldered.

0.20

Many grammatical
mistakes that make it
impossible to understand
the presentation.

The circuit layout is done

using Breadboard.

0.60

Connections are done

using only jumper wires.

TOTAL MARKS

/14

GROUP EVALUATION
Item
Explanation
of technical
information

Good
9 - 10
Information is
presented in a
clear and
concise
manner.

Satisfactory
6-8
Information is presented
in a sufficiently clear and
concise manner.

Unsatisfactory
3-5
Information is
presented in an
unclear and
unorganized
manner.

Poor
0-2
Information is
presented in a very
unclear and
unorganized
manner.

Ability to
solve given

Detailed
analysis of

The level of analysis for

the given problem is

The level of
analysis for the

The level of analysis

for the given

Score (0-10)
L

SD

W
P

TL

Weighted Score
L

SD

TL

0.2

0.2

ECE 521 Mini-Project Evaluation Form (Sept 2015)

problem

problem is
provided.
The proposed
solution is
viable and
described
clearly.
The hardware
and software
system fulfils
all of the
required
objectives.

Ability to
articulate
ideas to
solve the
problem

The answers
given to all
questions can
be accepted.

sufficiently detail.
The proposed solution is
viable, but not described
clearly.
The hardware and
software system is
complies with most of
the required objectives.

The answers given to

large number of
questions can be
accepted.

given problem is
not described in
detail.
The proposed
solution is not
viable and not
described clearly.
The hardware and
software system
only complies
with only a small
part of required
objectives.
The answers
given to minimum
number of
questions can be
accepted.

problem is not
provided.
The proposed
solution is not
provided.
The hardware and
software system
does not comply
with any of the
required objectives.

The answers given

to all questions
cannot be accepted
at all.

0.2

TOTAL MARKS

/6

/6

/6

/6

Panels Approval:

Accepted

Rejected

If REJECTED, state reasons:

_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
END OF EVALUATION FORM