Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
RAYMOND LUCE,
Defendant, Appellant.
____________________
ERRATA SHEET
ERRATA SHEET
The opinion of this court issued
on December 6, 1994,
is amen
as follows:
On page 4,
"undertaken".
December 6, 1994
____________________
No. 92-2453
Appellee,
v.
DAVID PHELAN,
Defendant, Appellant.
____________________
No. 92-2454
Appellee,
v.
STEPHEN LILLIS,
Defendant, Appellant.
____________________
No. 92-2455
Appellee,
v.
RAYMOND LUCE,
Defendant, Appellant.
____________________
____________________
Before
Circuit Judges.
______________
____________________
Step
Raymond Luce.
George W. Vien, Assistant
_______________
John Pappalardo, United States
_______________
United States
Uni
____________________
____________________
BOUDIN,
appellant
phencyclidine
Circuit Judge.
______________
Stephen
("PCP"
Lillis'
or
"angel
From
1988
drug
dust")
through
organization
in
and
1991,
sold
around
smoked
substances.
after
it
has
been
liquid
form, and
then treat
making
it smokable.
diluted
with
PCP is
other
mint leaves
with
the liquid,
telephone number.
A street
dealer
to meet
in late
PCP
with
841(a)(1), 846.
of
and Luce
possession
intent
to
distribute.
intent
to
21
U.S.C.
of several counts
distribute,
21
U.S.C.
an organizer, U.S.S.G.
262-month sentence,
largely
due to
3B1.1(a), received a
the
trial judge's
U.S.S.G.
360-month sentence.
-3-3-
Lillis,
finding
sentence.
that he
Luce,
was
On this
sentence.
that the
appeal, each
Lillis' target
of the appellants
challenges his
or possessed
with
PCP.
Findings as
to drug
quantities are
sentencing
1287
court has
have
United States
_____________
Cir.
to determine
1992).
be used
v. Tardiff, 969
_______
Yet,
because
F.2d
guidelines
stressed that
district
broad discretion
379 (1994).
(1st
sentences vary
we review
in imposing sentence."
1283,
factual, and
(1st Cir.
courts must
exercise care
in
114 S.
Ct.
2714 (1994).
Here, the
between
three and
containing PCP.
ten kilograms
U.S.S.G.
to the
of a mixture
2D1.1(a)(3),
(c).
conspiracy
or substance
The district
judge
At sentencing,
detail.
trial
he set
forth and
The district
testimony of
organization
Knapik's
court
explained his
relied most
Robert Knapik,
through
much
testimony,
the
of
heavily upon
a dealer
1988
district
findings in
and
in the
1989.
court
found
the
Lillis
Based
on
that
the
-4-4-
Using
the unchallenged
figure
of 2.64
kilograms
of the
Knapik testimony.
Knapik
statement, Knapik
PCP."
made
agreed that
clear that
on
he was
he saw a gallon of
testifying
In
other
PCP at what
note
also
sentencing
that none
hearing when
of
the
the
parties
ring.
objected at
the
said that
two
district court
if
altogether,
outcome.
it
observed
appears
that
treated
mint
gallon--would
minimum.
Further,
figures,
there
witnesses
at trial
this
leaves,
more
while
was
about
modest, as
an
one
would
liquid
not
gallon
affect
the
with
one
than exceed
the
three kilogram
these
the
most
were
considerable
only
pounds of
liquid
Knapik
the
scope
testimony
specific
from
and duration
other
of
the
estimate of
the
conspiracy's scale
of
operations.
-5-5-
the organization
conspirator
acts and
is responsible
for "all
omissions of others
undertaken
criminal
commission of
that
sold.
reasonably foreseeable
in furtherance of
activity,
that
detection or
or
in
the
course
responsibility for
1B1.3(a)(1)(B).
the jointly
occurred
offense,
Guidelines, a
during
the
in preparation for
of attempting
that offense."
to
avoid
U.S.S.G.
effective
language
sentenced.
in
force
when
Luce
and
Phelan
were
988 F.2d
organization's
foreseeable to
both
was
activities
Luce and
Phelan.
of PCP, the
comparatively small,
were
reasonably
Although
the
number of people in
and the
small size
ring
the
of this
York to
and
the
amount
of
PCP
it
was
treated mint
three times,"
New
scope
leaves to
and testified
Massachusetts.
the Reading
apartment "two
-6-6-
to
PCP from
Phelan making
The
had more
Luce was an
who
Theresa Marrapodi,
Knapik
and
dealing with
a number
him.
While
of
customers
testified to
their
do not add
up to
these purchases
challenges the
court's use
of Marrapodi's
grand
Cir.
But reliable
hearsay
can
be used
at
U.S.
927 (1991).
In
jury
testimony
reliability.
914-15
provided
it
has
sufficient
(1st Cir.
1993).
Williams--testimony given
________
The
indicia
Williams, 10
________
factors
under oath
F.3d 910,
that we
and in a
of
listed
in
formal grand
-7-7-
He points to
part
of
or
sentenced
the
to
more prior
be relied
which states
of an offense
unless
attorney files an
upon."
under
increased punishment
convictions,
court . . . stating
conviction to
851(a)(1),
shall be
one
21 U.S.C.
in
writing
Since
by
before
information
the
previous
no information
was
status,
Luce reasons
that
his
sentence must
be
vacated.
Section 851(a)(1)
maximum
conviction.
or
minimum
sentence increases
penalty
based
Koller,
______
956
Whitaker,
________
Ct. 977
prior
on
F.2d 1408
(7th
See, e.g.,
_________
Cir. 1992);
Every circuit
United States v.
_____________
United States v.
______________
Here, Luce's
indictment charged
him with
conspiracy
intent
distribute
to
statutory
minimum
of
it,
a felony
ten
years
-8-8-
and
that
a
carries
maximum
with
of
life
imprisonment,
21
U.S.C.
841(b)(1)(A)(iv),
and
he
was
by refusing to
We review
v. Welch, 15 F.3d
_____
plausibly
charged,
the
Luce
United
______
has
made
no
such
against
Lillis and
his trial
Innamorati, 996
__________
had
been
severed.
See
___
United States
______________
v.
-9-9-