Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
____________________
No. 94-2168
LORRAINE GRISWOLD,
Plaintiff, Appellant,
v.
Defendant, Appellee.
____________________
____________________
Before
____________________
United
Regional Counsel,
United
States
States Attorney,
and
Department of Health
Attorney,
Karen L. Goodw
________________
Jessie M. Klyce,
________________
Assist
on br
for appellee.
____________________
____________________
Per Curiam.
__________
record
decision of
September 8, 1994.
We
add only
limited insight into her condition and, thus, did not realize
In December
consulting
neurologist,
psychological
counselor.
that she
otherwise.
Dr. J. Stephen
was
scheduled
Fink, a
to see
1989, she stated that she never had pursued treatment for her
depression.
psychotherapy.
The
first
occasion
was
in
suicidal ideation.
refused
November
1990
after
claimant
expressed
the referral.
Finally, Dr.
indicated that
psychotherapeutic
and,
in
examiner,
related vein,
opined that
course of medication.
Dr.
claimant
Elizabeth
needed
P.
Hess, another
more
aggressive
As we noted in Tsarelka v.
________
restorative treatment
prescribed by
404.1530(a)).
her physician.
Id. at
___
of
not
disabled.
Id.
___
(citing 20
C.F.R.
404.1530(b)).
treatment
are
"evidence"
determination.
for
purposes
Irlanda-Ortiz
_____________
Human Services,
_______________
955 F.2d
v.
765,
of the
lack of
disability
769
(1st
Cir. 1991)
(per
curiam).
Thus,
claimant's
disregard
referrals to psychotherapy,
to indicate
that her
proper considerations.
say
as well as the
of
the
specific
lack of evidence
re-evaluated, are
determination
that
treatment as one
claimant
was
not disabled.
See
___
the
id.
___
In this
-3-