Sie sind auf Seite 1von 105

A

,/'

NASA Technical Memorandum 81691

Ball Bearing Mechanics


b

( N A:
(NASA)

165

;1

LA.
dC; A ~ u / f i k A d 1

Bernard J. Hamrock
Lewis Research Center
Clmland, Ohio

and
Duncan Dowson
The University of Lccdr
h d s , England

June 1981

31CS
CSCL

131

CHAPTER 3
BALL HEARING MECHANICS

The loads c a r r i e d by b a l l bearings are transmitted through


the b a l l s from one r i n g t o the other.

The magnitude o f the load

c a r r i e d by an i n d i v i d u a l b a l l depends on the i n t e r n a l geometry


of the bearing and the l o c a t i o n a f t h e b a l l a t any i n s t a n t .
Having determfned how a bearing c a r r i e s load, we can determine
how i t i s d i s t r i b u t e d among the b a l l s .

To da t h i s , we must

f i r s t develop load-def l e c t i o n r e l a t i o n s h i p s f o r t h e ball-race


contact.

These r e l a t i o n s h i p s are developed i n Section 3.1 f o r

any t y p e of e l l i p t i c a l contact, such as those found i n a b a l l


bearing.

The defornation w i t h i n the c o n t a c t i s , among o t h e r

thlngs, a f u n c t i o n o f the e l l i p t i c i t y parameter and the e l l i p t i c


i n t e g r a l s o f the f i r s t and second kinds.

Simp1i f i e d expressions

t h a t a1 low quick c a l c u l a t i o n s o f the deformation t o be made


simply from a knowledge o f the applSed load, the m a t e r i a l prope r t ies, and t h e geometry o f the contacting elements are present e d i n Section 3.2.
taost b a l l bearing appl i c a t i a n s i n v o l v e steady-slate rotat i o n o f e i t h e r tire inner or o u t e r si\!g, o r both.
r o t a t i o n a l speeds

However, the

are u s u a l l y not so g r e a t as t o cause centrifrr-

gal forces or gyroscopic moments of s i g n i f i c a n t magnitude t o act

on the b a l l .

Consequently these e f f e c t s are ignored i n analy-

z i n g the d i s t r i b u t i o n o f radial, thrust, and combined b a l l loads

i n Section 3.3.
I n high-speed b a l l bearings the cet'itrifugal f o r c e acting on
t h e i n d i v i d u a l b a l l s can be s i g n i f i c a n t compared w i t h the
applied forces a c t i n g on the bearing.

I n high-speed bearings

b a l l gyroscopic moments can also be o f s i g ~ ~ i f i c a nmagnitude,


t
depending on the contact angles, such t h a t the inner-race
contact angles tend t~ increase and the outer-race contact
angles tend t o decrease.

I n bearings i n which dry f r i c t i o n o r

boundary l u b r i c a t i o n occurs i n the conjunction between the b a l l s


and races, t h i s can cause a s h i f t of c o n t r o l between races and,
i n some cases, unstable bearing operation.

This does n o t occur,

however, ift h e conjunct ions experience f u 11 elastohydrodynamic


lubrication.

Procedures f o r evaluating the perfotmance o f

high-speed b a l l bearings are developed i n Section 3 , 4 .

Elasto-

hydrodynamic l u b r i c a t i o n o f ball-race contacts i s n o t considered


i n t h i s chapter but w i l l be treated i n Chapter 8.
No r o l l ing-element bearing can g i v e u n l i m i t e d 1i f e because
o f the probabi li t y of fatigue.

Any s t r u c t u r a l m a t e r i a l subjec-

t e d t o an u n l i m i t e d suecession of repeated o r reversed stresses

w i l l ultimately f a i l .

Therefore a l l b a l l bearings eventually

succumb t o fatigue, which i s manifested by surface d i s t r e s s i n


t h e form o f f l a k i n g o f m e t a l l i c partScles.

I n marry cases f l a k -

ing may begin as a crack below the surface t h a t i s propagated t o

t h e surface, where i t eventual l y fernis a y it o r spal 1.

Fatigue

i s assumed t o have occurred when the f i r s t crack o r spal 1 i s


observed on a load-carrying surface,

A design c r i t e r i o n f o r t h e

f a t i g u e l i f e of b a l l bearings i s developed i n Section 3.5.


B a l l bearings can be l u b r i c a t e d s a t i s f a c t o r i l y w i t h a, small
amount o f l u b r i c a n t supplied t o t h e r i g h t area w i t h i n t h e
bearing,

Sect i o n 3.6 considers t h e s e l e c t i o n o f a s a t i s f a c t o r y

l u b r i c a n t , as we11 as d e s c r i b i n g systems t h a t p r o v i d e a constant


flow o f l u b r i c a n t t o t h e contact.

When an e l a s t i c s o l i d i s subjected t o a load, stresses are


produced t h a t increase as tire load i s increased.

These stresses

a r e associated w i t h deformations, which are d e f i n e d by s t r a i n s ,


Unique r e l a t i o n s h i p s e x i s t between stresses and t h e i r corre-

sponding s t r a i n s .

For e l a s t i c s o l i d s t h e stresses are li n e a r l y

related t o t h e s t r a i n s , w i t h t h e constant o f p r o p o r t i o n a l i t y
being an e l a s t i c constant t h a t adopts d i f f e r e n t values f o r d i f f e r e n t materials,

Thus a s i n ~ p l et e n s i l e l o a d a p p l i e d t o a bar

produces a s t r e s s

u1 and a s t r a i n

rl,

where

Load
= Stress i n a x i a l d i r e c t i o n
Cross-sect i o t i a l area

(3 1)

el = "lange
in length
= Strain i n axial direction

( 3 4

"1 =

Original length

and
E=

- = E l a s t i c constant o r modulus of
C1

elasticity

(3.3)

A1though no s t r e s s a c t s transversely t o t h e a x i a l d i r e c t i o n ,
t h e r e w i 11 nevertheless be dimensional changes i n t h a t d i r e c t i o n
such t h a t as a bar extends a x i a l l y , St c o n t r a c t s transversely.
The transverse s t r a i n s
rl

c2

by P o i s s o n ~ sr a t i o v

are r e l a t e d t o t h e a x i a l s t r a i n s
such t h a t

where the n e g a t i v e s i g n means t h a t t h e transverse s t r a i n w i l l be


of t h e opposite s i g n t o t h e a x i a l s t r a i n ,

The modulus o f elas-

t i c i t y and Poissonls r a t i o a r e two important parameters used t o


describe t h e m a t e r i a l i n t h e analysis o f c o n t a c t i n g s o l i d s .
As t h e stresses increase w i t h i n t h e i n a t e r i a l , e l a s t i c beh a v i o r i s replaced by p l a s t i c flow, i n which t h e m a t e r i a l i s
pemianently deformed.

The s t r e s s s t a t e a t which t h e t r a n s i t i o n

f r o m e l a s t i c t o p l a s t i c behavior occurs, known as t h e y i e l d


stress, has a d e f i n i t e value f o r a given m a t e r i a l a t a g i v e n
temperature.

3.1.1

I n t h i s book e l a s t i c behavior alone i s considered.

Surface Stresses and Deforn~ation

When two e l a s t i c s o l i d s are brought together under a load,

a contact area develops, t h e shape and s i z e o f which depend o n

the applied load, the e l a s t i c properties of the materials, and


the curvatures of the surfaces.

When the two s o l i d s shown i n

Figure 2.18 have a nomlal load applied t o them, the shape o f the
contact area i s e l l i p t i c a l , w i t h
the semiminor axis.

a being the semimajor and b

I t has been c m o n t o r e f e r t o e l l l p t i c 6 1

contacts as p o i n t contacts, but since t h i s book deals mainly


w i t h loaded contacts, the term e l l i p t i c a l contact i s adopted.
For the special case where

r = raY and rb, = rby,


the r e s u l t i n g contact i s a c j r c l e r a t h e r than an e l l i p s e .

and r
are both i n f i n i t e , the i n i t i a l l i n e
aY
by
contact develops i n t o a rectangle when load i s applied.

Where

The contact e l l i p s e s obtained w i t h e i t h e r a r a d i a l o r a


t h r u s t load f o r the b a l l

- inner-race

and b a l l

- outer-race

contacts i n a b a l l bearing are shown i n Figure 3.1.

This book

i s concerned w i t h the conjunctions between s o l i d s

- w i t h contact

areas ranging from c i r c u l a r t o rectangular


analysis of contacts i n a b a l l bearing.

- and w i t h the

Inasmuch as the s i z e

and shape o f these contact areas are h i g h l y s i g n i f i c a n t t o the


successful operation of b a l l bearings, i t i s important t o
understand t h e i r characteristics.
Hertz (1881) considered the stresses and deformations i n
two p e r f e c t l y smooth, e l l i p s o i d a l , contacting e l a s t i c s o l i d s
much l i k e those shown i n Figure 2.18.

His a p p l i c a t i o n of the

c l a s s i c a l theory of e l a s t i c i t y t o t h i s problem forms t h e basis


o f stress c a l c u l a t i o n f o r machine elements such as b a l l and rol-

l e r bearings, gears, sedls, and cants.

The fo1 lowing assumptions

were made by Hertz (1881) :

(1) The materials are homogeneous and t h e y i e l d stress i s


not exceeded.

(2) No tangential forces are induced between the solids.

( 3 ) Contact i s l i m i t e d t o a small p o r t i o n o f the surface,


such t h a t the dimensions o f the contact region are small c o w
pared w i t h the r a d i i of the e l l i p s o i d s .
(4) The s o l i d s are a t r e s t and i n e q u i l i b r i u m (steady

s t ate)

Making use o f these assumptigns, Hertz (1881) was able t o


o b t a i n t h e f o l l o w i n g expression f o r the pressure w i t h i n t h e e l l i p s o i d a l contact shown i n Figure 3.2:

I f the pressure i s integrated over the contact area, i t i s found

that

Equation (3.5) detennlnes the d i s t r i b u t i o n o f pressure o r compressive s t r e s s on the cornor! izterf 3ce; i t i s c l e a r l y a maximum
a t the center o f the contact and decreases t o zero a t the p e r i phery.

The e l l i p t i c i t y parameter k can be w r i t t e n i n terms of


the remimajor and semiminor axes o f t h e contact e l 1ipse as

Harris (1966) has shown t h a t the e l l i p t j c i t y parameter can be


used t o r e l a t e the curvature difference expressed i n equation
(2.25)

and the e l 1 i p t i c integrals o f the f t r s t J and second

8 kinds as

where

A one-point i t e r a t i o n method that was adopted by Hamrock and

Anderson (1973) can be used t o obtain the e l l i p t i c i t y parameter,


where
=

The i t e r a t i o n process i s normally continued u n t i l

fers from

Itn

(3.11)

J(kn)
kn+l

dif-

by less than 1x10-~. Note t h a t the e l l i p t i c -

i t y parameter i s a function of the r a d i i o f curvature o f the


solids only:
k = f(rax.rbx.'ay.'by)

That i s , as the load increases, the semi~najorand semiminor axes


of the contact e l l i p s e increase proportionately t o each other,
so the e l 1 i p t i c i t y parameter remains constant.
The e l l i p t i c i t y parameter and e l l i p t i c i n t e g r a l s o f the
f i r s t and second k i ~ d sare shown i n Figure 3.3 f o r a range o f
the curvature r a t i o R /R
Y

usually encountered i n concen-

t r a t e d contacts.
Whbn the e l l i p i c i t y parameter
F, Poissonls r a t i o

V,

k, the normal applied load

and the modulus of e l a s t i c i t y E of the

contacting s o l i d s are known, the semimajor and semiminor axes o f


the contact e l 1ipse and the maximum defamation a t the center o f
the contact can be w r i t t e n from the analysis of Hertz (1881) as

where

I n these equations

a and b are proportional t o F~~~

i s proportional t o F213

and

Knowing the deformation a t the center of tne contact and


the natural geometrical separation between the solids, equation

--

,~

--

(2.35), we can w r i t e the defonnrtion a t any p o i n t w i t h i n the dry


Hcrtzian contact as

This equation i s used i n l a t e r chapters t o define the f i l m


thickness w i t h i n the conjunction.

3.1.2

Subsurface Stresses

Fatigue cracks usually s t a r t a t a c e r t a i n depth below the


surface i n planes p a r a l l e l t o ,the d i r e c t i o n of r o l l i n g .

Because

o f this, special a t t e n t i o n must be given t o the shear stress


amp1itude occurring i n t h i s plane.

Furthermore a maximum shear

stress i s reached a t a c e r t a i n depth below the surface.

The

analysis used by Lundberg and Palmgren (1947) w i l l be used t o


define t h i s stress.
The stresses are referred t o a rectangular coordinate system with i t s o r i g i n a t the center o f the contact, i t s z axis
coinciding w i t h the i n t e r i o r normal of the body considered, i t s

x axis i n the d i r e c t i o n o f r o l l i n g , and i t s y axis i n the direct i o n perpendicular t o the r o l l i n g direction.

I n the analysis

t h a t follows i t i s assumed t h a t y = 0.
From Lundberg and Palmgren (1947) the following equations
can be written:
T

"

-.

2
3F cos 9 s i n 9 s i n Y
(a2tan2v + b2cos2#)

r tan y cns $

The maximum shear stress rmplttude i s defined as

The amplitude of the shear stress rj0 i s obtained fmm

For t h e point of maxin~umshear stress


tan24 = La

2y

tan

t,

-1

The p o s i t i o n of the maximum point i s determined by

where

furthermore the magnitude o f the uxirmn shear stress i s gfven by

3.2 Simp1 ifi e d Solution f o r Elliptical-Contact Deformation

The c l a s s i c a l Hertzian solution presented i n the previ 04s


section requires the calculation o f the e l l i p t i c i t y parameter

k and the complete e l l i p t i c integrals o f the f i r s t and secand


kinds 9 and 4. This entaSls f i n d i n g a solution t o a transcendental equation r e l a t i n g , k,

r,and

# t o the geometry o f

the contacting solids, as expressed i n equation (3.8).

This i s

usually accompl ished by some i t e r a t i v e numerical procedure, as


1

described By Hamrsck and Anderson (1973), o r w i t h the a i d o f


charts, as shown by Jones (1946).
Brewe and Hamrock (1977) used a l i n e a r regression by the

method o f least squares t o obtain simplified equations f o r k,


and 8. That i s , f o r given sets o f p a i r s o f data, ([kj,
(R~/R,)J],

J . 1 , 2.

...,

,apowerfit

usinga linear

regression by the method of least squares resulted i n the f o l lowing equation:

.
The asymptotic behavior of 8 and
functional dependence t h a t
s u lt

and

was suggestive o f the


might exhibit.

As a re-

r l o g a r i thmic and an inverse curve f i t were t r i e d f o r

and #, respectively.

The following expressions from Brtwe and

Hamrock (1977) provide an excellent approximation t o the relrtionships between I


.
f and Ry/R,:
0.5968
J = 1.0003 +aTR
Y

Values o f 'ji,

and

(3.29)

are presented i n Table 3.1 and compared

w i t h the Hamrock and Anderson (1973) ~ i r m e r i c a l l ydetermined values of

k, 4, and S. The agreement i s good.

Using these s i m p l i f i e d expressions f o r

r, & and

and

equation (3.15) gives the deformation a t the center o f the contact

where

Note t h a t the load-deflection constant

K i s a f u n c t i o n o f the

bal 1-race geometry and the materi a1 propert ies.


The r e s u l t s of comparing
Table 3.1.

7 with

are also shown i n

The agreement i s again q u i t e good. Therefore the

deformation a t the center o f the contact can be obtained d i -

r e c t l y from equations (3.28)

t o (3.32).

This valuable approxima-

t i o n eliminates the need t o use curve f i t t i n g , charts, o r numri c a l methods.


Figure 3.4 shgws three d i f f e r e n t degrees o f b a l l-contact
a b a l l on a b a l l , a b a l l on a plane, and a b a l l

conformity:

outer r i n g contact.

Table 3.2 uses t h i s f i g u r e t o show how the

degree o f conformity a f f e c t s the contact parameters.


shows t h a t

The t a b l e

i s n o t exactly equal t o u n i t y f o r the ball-on-

b a l l and b a l l-on-plane s i t u a t i o n s because o f the approximat i o n


represented by equation (3.28).

The diameter o f the b a l l s i s

the same throughout, and the material o f the s o l i d s i s steel.


The b a l l

- suter-ring

b a l l bearing.

contact i s representative o f a 209 r a d i a l

A 4.45-N

f o r each situation,

( l - l b f ) normal load has been considered

The maximum pressure decreases s i g n i f 4-

c a n t l y as the curvature o f the mating surface approaches t h a t o f


the b a l l .

Table 3.2 shows t h a t the curvature o f t h e mating

surfaces i s very important i n r e l a t i o n t o the magnitude o f the


maximum pressure o r surface stress produced.

A b a l l and r i n g o f

high c o n f o r n i t y are thus desirable from the standpoint o f


mininiizsing the stress.
fable 3.2 also shows t h a t the area o f the contact

nab

increases w i t h the conformity o f the contacting solids.

Al-

though t h i s e f f e c t minimizes contact stresses, i t can have an


undesirable e f f e c t on the f o r c e o f f r i c t i o n , since f r i c t i o n
f o r c e increases as the contact area and herce t h e area o f t h e

sheared lubricant increase Srr a beartng operat ing under


elastohydrodynamic conditions.

The curvatures of the bearing

races are therefore general ly compromises t h a t take i n t o


consideration the stress, load capacity, and f r i c t i o n
character4 s t i e s o f the bearing.

In equations (3.24) t o (3.27) the location and magnjtude o f


the maximum subsurface s k a r stress are w r i t t e n as functions of
tapan aux il iary paraneter.

Furtllenore i n equation (3.23)

the e l l i p t i c i t y parameter i s wrltten as a function o f

for

t,

i s 0 < Ilk e 1, and the corresponding range

l/k

the range f o r

t,.

- -

is 1< t < 1 4

A l i n e a r regression by

the method o f l e a s t squares was used t o obtain a s i m p l i f i e d

formula for

tl

i n terms of

k, the e l l i p t i c i t y parameter.

That is, f o r given s e t s o f p a i r s o f data ([(I

(Ilk)

J -1, 2,

..., n),

a power f i t using a l i n e a r

regression by the method o f least squares resulted i n the


fa1 lowing equation:

The agreement between t h i s approximate equation and the exact


solution i s w i t h i n *2 percent,

The use of equation ( 3 , 3 3 )

greatly simpltf i e s the determination o f the values for the


locat ion and magnitude o f the maxl'num subsurf ace shear stress
expressed i n equations (3.24) t o ( 3 . 2 7 ) ,

3.3 S t a t i c Load D i s t r i b u t i o n

Now t h a t a simple analytical expression f o r the deformation


i n terns o f the load has been deteniiined, i t i s possible t o consider how the bearing load i s d i s t r i b u t e d among the b a l l s w i t h i n
a b a l l bearing.

Most b a l l bearing applications involve steady-

state r o t a t i o n of e i t h e r t h e inner o r outer ring, o r both.

In

analyzing the load d i s t r i b u t i o n on the balls, i t i s usually sati s f a c t o r y t o ignore these e f f e c t s i n most applications.

I n this

section the radial, thrust, and combined load d i s t r i b u t i o n s of


s t a t i c a l l y loaded b a l l bearings are investigated.
For a given ball-race contact the load d e f l e c t i o n relationship given i n equation (3.31) can be r s w r i t t e n as

The t o t a l normal approach between two races separated by a b a l l


i s the sum of the deformations under load between the bat 1 and
both races.

where

Therefore

S u b s t i t u t i n g equations (3.35) t o (3.37)


solving f o r

gi*

Recall t h a t

i n t o equation (J.34) and

and KO aye def ined by equation (3.32)

Ki

and

t h a t they are a function of ball-race geometry and m a t e r i a l


p r o p e r t i e s alone.
The analysis o f deformation and load d i s t r i b u t i o n presented
i n t h e f o l l o w i n g three sections i s based on the work o f Jones

( 1946).

3.3.1

Radial Load

A r a d i a l l y loaded b a l l bearing w i t h r a d i a l clearance Pd

i s shown i n Figure 3.5.

I n the concentric p o s i t i o n shown i n

Figure 3.5(a)

a uniform r a d i a l clearance between the b a l l s and

the r i n g s o f

Pd/2

i s evident.

l'he a p p l i c a t i o n o f a small

r a d i a l load t o the s h a f t causes the inner r i n g t o move a distance Pd/2 before contact i s made between a b a l l located on
the load l i n e and t h e inner and outer tracks.
there w i l l s t i l l be a small r a d i a l clearance

A t any angle

that, i f

i s small compared w i t h the radius of the tracks, can be expressed w i t h adequate accuracy by

Pd

On the load line, where gr = 0, the clearance i s zero, but when


= 90' the clearance r e t a i n s i t s i n i t i a l value o f

Pd/2.

The application of f u r t h e r load w i l l cause e i a s t i c defomat i o n o f some o f the b a l l s and the elimination o f clearance
around an arc

Ifthe interference o r t o t a l e l a s t i c com-

pression on the load l i n e i s a,m,,


compression ay

the corresponding e l a s t i c

along a radius a t angle

t o the load l i n e

w i l l be given by

6*1=

(%ax cos y

- c) =

(ama,

+)

cos

Now i t i s c l e a r from Figure 3.5(c) t h a t +,,a(,

* - TPd
Pd/2)

represents the t o t a l r a d i a l displacement o f the inner r i n g o r


shaft from the concentric p o s i t i o n a.

Hence

The relationship between load and the e l a s t i c compression along


the radius a t angle

t o the load vector i s given by equation

(3.34) as
Fy = Ka*312

Substituting equation (3.39) i n t o t h i s equation gives

For s t a t i c equilibrium the applied r a d i a l load must equal


the sum of the components o f the b a l l loads p a r a l l e l t o the
d i r e c t i o n o f the applied load.

Fr =

Fq

EOS

Theref ore

The angular extent of the bearing arc

2qk i n which the b a l l s

are loaded i s obtained by s e t t i n g the r o o t expression i n (3.42)


equal t o zero and solving f o r

$.

The summation i n equation (3.42) applies only t o the angul a r extent o f the loaded region,

This equation can be w r i t t e n

i n integral form as

The i n t e g r a l i n t h i s equation can be reduced t o a standard ell i p t i c i n t e g r a l by the hypergeometric series and the beta function.

I f the i n t e g r a l i s numerically evaluated d i r e c t l y , the

following approximate expression i s derived:

(3.45)
This approximate expression f i t s the exact numerical solution t o
w i t h i n *2 percent for s complete rnnge o f

Pd/2&.

The load c a r r i e d by the most heavily loaded b a l l i s ob-

tained by substituting JI = 0. i n equation (3.42) and dropping


the sumnation sign.

Dividing the maximum b a l l load (equation (3.46)) by the t o t a l


applied r a d i a l load o f the bearlng (equation ( 3 4 4 , rearranging terms, and making use o f equation (3.45) give

where

When the diametral clearance Pd


comes 4.37.

i s zero, the value o f

be-

This i s the value derived by Stribeck (1901) f o r

bearings o f zero diametral clearance.

The approach used by

Stribeck was t o evaluate t h e f i n i t e s u m a t i o n


various numbers o f b a l l s .

cor5/20

for

He then derived t h e celebrated S t r i -

beck equation f o r s t a t i c load-carrying capacity by w r i t i n g the


more conservative value o f 5 f o r the t h e o r e t i c a l value o f 4.37:

I n using equation (3.49) i t should be remembered t h a t

Z is

considered t o be a constant and t h a t the e f f e c t s of clearance


and applied load on load d i s t r i b u t i o n are not taken i n t o account.

These e f f e c t s are, however, considered i n o b t a i n i n g

equation (3.47).

Note a l s o t h a t the a n a l y t i c a l expression f o r

Z i n equation (3.48) enables a s o l u t i o n t o be obtained without


the a i d o f t h e c h a r t s used by Jones (1946) and H a r r i s (1966).

3.3.2

Thrust Load

The s t a t i c thrust-load capacity o f a b a l l bearing may be


defined as the maximum t h r u s t load t h a t the bearing can endure
before t h e contact e l l i p s e approaches a race shoulder, as shown
i n Figure 3.6,

o r the load a t which t h e allowable mean compres-

sive s t r e s s i s reached, whichever i s smaller.

Both t h e l i m i t i n g

shoulder height and the mean compressive stress must be calculated t o f i n d t h e s t a t i c thrust-load capacity.

The contact e l l l p s e i n a bearing race under a thrust l o r d


i s shown i n Figure 3.6,

Each b a l l i s subjected t o an i d e n t i c a l

t h r u s t c ~ n p ~ n e nFt/n,
t
where Ft

i s the t o t a l t h r u s t load.

The i n i t i a l contact angle before the application of a thrust


load i s denoted by

rt. Because o f the applied thrust. the

contact angle becomes

The normal b a l l t h r u s t load Ft

acts a t t h i s contact angle and i s w r i t t e n as


Ft

F
n s i n t~

A cross section through an angular-contact bearing under a thrust


load Ft i s shown i n Figure 3.7.

Both racer are a s s w d t o be

r i g i d l y mounted, t h a t is, incapable o f r a d i a l defamation. From


t h i s f i g u r e the contact angle a f t e r the t h r u s t load has been
applied can be w r i t t e n as

The i n i t i a l contact angle was given i n equation (2.9).


t h a t equation and rearranging terms' i n equation (3.51) give

From equation (3.34) we can w r i t e

where

Using

rnd fi, I; and 9 &re given by equrtlons (3.2U).


(3.30).

(3.2Y), dnd

respectively.

From equations (3.50) and (3.53)

Equation (3.55)
method.

can be solved numerically by the Newton-Raphson

The i t e r a t i v e equation t o be s a t i s f i e d i s

This equation i s s a t i s f i e d when e l

-6

i s e s s e n t i a l l y zero.

When a t h r u s t load i s applied, the shoulder height i s l i m i t e d t o the distance by which the pressure-contact e l l i p s e can
approach the shoulder.

As long as the f o l l o w i n g i n e q u a l i t y i s

s a t i s i f ied, the pressure-contact e l l i p s e w i 11 not exceed the


shoulder height 1i m i t :
e > e

s i n-I

(G)

From Figure 2.17 and equation (2.15) the angle used t o d e f i n e


the shoulder height e can be w r i t t e n as

From Figure 3.7 the a x i a l d e f l e c t i o n

at

corresponding

t o a t h r u s t load can be w r i t t e n as
6t

(0

6)sin

S u b s t i t u t i n g equation (3.52)

- D s i n if

( 3 59)

i n t o equation (3.59) gives

D s i n ( @ cf)

6t I
Having determined
(2.9).

COS

i n equation (3.56) and 6f

we can e a s i l y evaluate the r e l a t i o n s h i p f o r

3.3.3

i n equation

at.

Combined Load

For a combined r a d i a l and a x i a l load on a b a l l bearing we


consider the r e l a t i v e displacements of the inner and outer
rings.

We assume t h a t n e g l i g i b l e misalignment of the bearing

can occur.
displacement

The displacements are therefore l i m i t e d t o an a x i a l

at

and a r a d i a l displacement

.6,

The races

are therefore constrained t o r e l a t i v e movement i n para1 l e l


planes,

The end r e s u l t o f t h i s combined loading i s shown i n

Figure 3.8.
3.7,

Note the d i f f e r e n c e between t h i s f i g u r e and Figure

which represents a x i a l loading alone.

As was found when

dealing w i t h a p u r e l y r a d i a l load, the r a d i a l displacement i s a


f u n c t i o n o f the b a l l positioft r e l a t f v e t o the applied load.
From Figure 3.8

(D + 6)2 = ( D cos ef

a, cos $1 + (D s i n ef + at)

(3.61)

Substituting t h i s equation i n t o equation (3.34) gives

(3.63)

where K

i s defined i n equation (3.54).


s i n fit

Also from Figure 3.8

(3.64)

sin 6 =

rf

r cos $

cos if b
6r cos 0

112

cos 0 =

(3.65)

The normal b a l l load F, which acts a t the contact angle


(along the
components.

0 + a

l i n e i n Figure 3.81, can be resolved i n t o two

One i s the t h r u s t force Ft

p a r a l l e l t o the

bearing axis, and the other is the r a d i a l force


t h r u s t component Ft

Fr.

The

can be w r i t t e n as
Ft = F s i n 0

( 3 .b6)

'ly using equrtions (3.63) and (3.64) t h l s mlatfonshfp becaw)

The r r d f r l component of load F


r

crlr be wrftten as

F cos I cot Sr

(3.68)

From equat ions (3.63) and (3.65) t h i s expression can be wri tten as

For the bearing t o be (n equilibrium a f t e r displacement,


the following conditions must be satisfied:

The extent o f the load zone $1

i s obtained by s e t t i n g the

numerator i n these equations t o zero o r

Under c e r t a i n conditions o f a x i a l preload and r a d i a l displacement the value o f


be less than -1.

cos

Jli as determined

This indicates t h a t the loaded zone extends

completely around t h e p i t c h c i r c l e .
value JIR

by equation (3.72) w i l l

i s taken as

Equations (3.71)

I n such cases t h e l i m i t i n g

W.

and (3.72) can be generalized t o include

any number o f b a l l s by the following:

Note t h a t these integrals are functions o f the three parameters


Bt,

6t/D,

and sr/D.

These integrals are h y p e r e l l i p t i c

integrals that cannot be reduced t o standard form t o pennit sol u t i o n i n terms o f e l l i p t i c functions and must therefore be
evaluated numerically on a d i g i t a l computer.
at/D

and a,/D

Having detennined

from equations (S.73) and (3.74).

we can

obtain the normal b a l l load and operating contact angle a t any


b a l l p o s i t i o n JI from equations (3.63) and (3.64)

._

For b a l l bearings tikit opnrate a t modest speeds, as csnsidered i n t h e precedjng section, the c e n t r i f u g a l f o r c e on the
b a l l i s so n e g l i g i b l e t h a t t h e o n l y forces t h a t keep the b a l l i n
equi 1 i b r i u m are the two contact forces r e s u l t i n g from the extern a l l y applied load.

For such conditions t h e contact forces are

equal and opposite, and the inner- and outer-race contact angles
are approximately equal.

The present section deals w i t h

h i gh-speed bearings, where the c e n t r i f u g a l f o r c e developed on


t h e b a l l s becomes s i g n i f i c a n t and the inner- and outer-race
contact angles are no longer equal.

An angular-contact bearing

i s analyzed since t h e equations developed can be applied t o


o t h e r types o f b a l l bearings.

A combined r a d i a l and a x i a l load

i s considered, but n~isalignmentof the inner and outer r i n g s i s


excluded.

The nlaterial i n t h i s section was f i r s t developed by

Jones ( 1956).
When a b a l l bearing operates a t h i g h speed, t h e body forces
r e s u l t i n g from the b a l l ' s motion become s i g n i f i c a n t and must be
considered i n any analysis.

Figure 3.9 shows t h e forces and

moments a c t i n g on a b a l l i n a high-speed b a l l bearing.

The op-

e r a t i n g contact angle a t t h e outer contact i s l e s s than t h a t a t


t h e inner contact because o f appreciable c e n t r i f u g a l force and
gyroscopic moment.

I n t h i s figure,

as w i t h the r e s t o f t h e

book, subscript

i refers t o the inner race arid subscript

t o the outer race.


An exaggerated view i n Figure 3.10 shows the b a l l f i x e d i n
the plane o f the paper and r o t a t i n g about i t s own center w i t h an

c t o the bearing

angular v e l o c i t y og directed a t an angle


centerline.

The inner and outer races r o t a t e about the bearing

axls w i t h t

angular v e l o c i t i e s

thq separatot,.

oi

and o0 r e l a t i v e t o

For the l i n e a r v e l o c i t y of the races t o be equal

t o the b a l l v e l o c i t y a t the contact, the following relationships must be s a t i s f i e d :


a*..

-....-.

I f the outer race i s stationary, the b a l l w i l l o r b i t the bearing

axis w i t h an angular v e l o c i t y uc, where

Then the absolute angular v e l o c i t y o f the inner race i s nip


where

Therefore f o r a stationary outer race and a r o t a t i n g inner race


the following can be written:

"

=
,
F
4)
;
;
"

'

-d

COS Oi

COS Bo

S i m i l a r l y f o r a s t a t i o n a r y inner race and a r o t a t i n g outer race


no

- d cos pi

T r d

COS B0

For simultaneous r o t a t i o n o f t h e outer and inner races

For an a r b i t r a r y choice of

c the b a l l w i l l spin r e l a t i v e t o

the race about the normal a t t h e center o f the contact area.


I t i s c l e a r from t h i s analysis t h a t the s p i n o f the b a l l

may be d i f f e r e n t r e l a t i v e t o each race, and t h i s prompted Jones


(1956) t o introduce t h e concept o f race control.

I f Coulomb

f r i c t i o n o r boundary l u b r i c a t i o n prevai 1s i n the conjunctions


between the b a l l and t h e inner and outer races, the conjunction
subjected t o t h e l e a s t torque w i l l be prevented from spinning by

f r i c t i o n while the other conjunction experiences spin.

The con-

t a c t a t which no spin occurs i s c a l l e d the c o n t r o l l i n g race.


I f a l u b r i c a t i n g f i l m e x i s t s between the b a l l and each o f

t h e races, each o f the conjunctions can experience spin, and the


r e l a t i v e n~oti o n between the b a l l and the races i s detennined by
the equilibrium of the torques r e s u l t i n g from viscous t r a c t i o n s
w i t h i n the lubricant.

The problem of predicting viscous trac-

t i o n s i n elastohydrodynamic f i l m s s t i l l requires f u r t h e r work,


b u t the recent development of the understanding o f lubricant
rheology i n EHL conjunctions out1ined I n Chapter 10, together
w i t h the a b i l i t y t o predict f i l m thickness outlined i n t h i s
t e x t , indicates t h a t a complete s o l u t i o n t o the problem may not
be f a r away.
Spin i n the conjunctions between a b a l l and the races o f a
bearing i s important from the point of view o f energy losses and
heat generation.

For t h i s reason the race-control theory o r i g i -

nated by Jones w i 11 be outlined here, although i t must be rec a l l e d t h a t i t was developed f o r dry f r i c t i o n o r boundary l u b r i c a t ion conditions before solutions t o the elastohydrodynamic
l u b r i c a t i o n problem became available.

The elastohydrodynamic

l u b r i c a t i o n o f b a l l bearings w i 1.1 be considered i n Chapter 8,


Section 8.9.
From Figure 3.10 the b a l l spin r o t a t i o n a l v e l o c i t i e s a t the
inner and outer races can be w r i t t e n as
o

si

= o

sinfii

- uB sin(gi -

5)

SO

-w

s i n 6,

+ og

sin(eo

- c)

The race-control concept of Jones (1956) assumes that a1 1 the


spin occurs a t one contact and none a t the other.

the contact

a t which no spin occurs i s called the c o n t r o l l i n g race.

Lightly

loaded bearings may depart somewhat from t h i s situation.

If uSi ahd us,

are made zero i n equations (3.87)

and (3.88). respectively. the following w i 11 result:


Inner-race control :
d; s i n

<-tan-l(d;

cos Bi

ei
-d)

Outer-race cont ro 1 :
d' s i n go
cos Bo
The existence of a p a r t i c u l a r type of control depends on the
r e l a t i v e torques required t o prcduce spin a t the two contacts.
The f r i c t i o n a l heat generated a t the ball-race contacts.

vWre s l i p takes place, i s

where MS

i s the tarque required t o produce spin.

Poritsky,

e t a l . (1947) integrated the f r i c t i o n force over the contact


e l l i p s e t o obtain Ms

as

where

v = coefficient o f s l i d i n g f r i c t i o n
F = contact load
a = semimajor a x i s o f contact e l l i p s e obtained from equation

(3.13)

8s

e l l i p t i c i n t e g r a l of second k i n d obtained from equation


(3.29)

Equation (3.92) can be w r i t t e n f o r both t h e outer- and inner-

Outer-race c o n t r o l w i l l e x i s t i f Mso > Msi.


Inner-race c o n t r o l w i l l e x i s t i f MSU < MSi.
In a given b a l l

race contacts.

bearing t h a t operates under a given speed and load, r o l l i n g w i ll


take place a t one race and spinning a t t h e other.
therefore take place where

MS

Rolling w i l l

i s greater because o f t h e

greater g r i p p i n g action.
The p o s i t i o n s o f t h e b a l l center and t h e race curvature
centers a t angular p o s i t i o n

are shown i n Figure 3.11 w i t h

and w i t h o u t an applied combined load.


race curvature i s f i x e d .

I n t h i s f i g u r e t h e outer-

When speeds are high and t h e c e n t r i f u -

g a l f o r c e i s appreciable, t h e inner and outer-race contact angles


become d i s s i m i l a r .
B,

This r e s u l t s i n t h e outer-race contact angle

being l e s s than t h e i n i t i a l contact angle

ef,

as shown

i n Figure 3.11.
I n accordance w i t h t h e r e l a t i v e a x i a l displacement o f t h e
inner and outer r i n g s

at, t h e a x i a l distance between t h e l o c i

of inner- and outer-race curvature centers i s

L1

D sin

(3.93)

$f + d t

Furthermore i n accordance w i t h a r e l a t i v e r a d i a l displacement o f


the r i n g centers

,6,

the r a d i a l displacement between t h e l o c i

of the race curvature center a t each b a l l l o c a t i o n i s


L2 = D cos

5 + dr

cos $

(3.94)

= ls2,me.Sfl

(3.95)

where

Jl=
and n

2r(j

- 1)

i s the number o f balls.

From Figure 3.11 t h e f o l l o w i n g

equations can be w r i t t e n :

s i n B~ =

- -0.5)

L1 L3

(fi

6i

The following relationships can thus be w r i t t e n w i t h reference


t o Figure 3.11:
2
2
L4 + L3

( 0 cos pf

a,

cos

- [ d ( f o - 0.5) * do]*

- L4)2 +

( 0 s i n B~

at

= 0

- L3) 2

(3.100)

The f o r c e s and moments a c t i n g on t h e b a l l are shown i n Figu r e 3.9.

The normal forces shown i n t h i s f i g u r e can be w r i t t e n

from equation (3.34) as

E q u i l i b r i u m o f forces i n t h e h o r i z o n t a l and v e r t i c a l d i r e c t i o n s
requires t h a t
F, s i o f10

- F~

- F 1.

Fo cos 0,

s i n si

cos B~

+
2M

2M
9

[ A cos

[ A s i n f10

so

- ( 1 - r l c o s fli]

(1

- sin fliJ - Fc = O

where

A - 1
A =

f o r outer-race c o n t r o l
f o r inner-race c o n t r o l

The c e n t r i f u g a l force i n equation (3.105) can be w r i t t e n as

1' md'u2
Fc = 7
e c

(3.106)

where
d = d + 2L4
e
e
and m i s t h e mass of the b a l l .

- 2 d ( f o - 0.5)cas

flf

(3.107)

Ajso t h e gyroscopic moment i n

equations (3.104) and (3.105) can be w r i t t e n as


C

Mg =

Ip~suc
sin 5

(3.108)

where 1 i s mass momerrt of inert i a o f Ltle b i I~I.


P

F ~ * ~ Lttese
III

relationships, equations (3.104) and (J.105) can be w r i t t e n as

312

Ko60 L3

d(fo

- 0.g

~ ~ 6 3 " ( 0s i n fif + 6, - L3)


d ( f i - 0.5)
ai
a0
+

(1

- A)(O cos 0f

d(fi

a, cos
0.5) + ai

s i ~ u l t a n e o u s fl o~r

$J

(3.109)

sf
- ( 1 - rd)((f D cos
- 0.5)

+ 2 P1 BuC ~s i n c

Equations (3.100),

(3.101).

Lj,

(3.109),

L4, aO,

l o c a t i o n once the values of

at

+ at
di

and (3.110) can be solved

ai

and
and

a t each b a l l
are assumed.

6..

The

Newton-Raphson method i s generally used t o solve these simultaneous nonl inear equations.
To f i n d how good the i n i t i a l guess o f t h e values o f
and at

a,

is, a c o n d i t i o n o f e q u i l i b r i u m applied t o t h e e n t i r e

bearing i s used

C
n

j=l,...

ij

sintlij-

2(1

-A
d

cos sij]

= 0

(3.111)

2(1

..

I -

A~)M
qJ s i n iijcos +j
d

j=l..

Having computed values f o r


p o s i t i o n and knowing Ft
o b t a i n t h e values o f
3.112)

at

L3, L4, ci,


and Fr
and

a,

and

a t each b a l l

do

as i n p u t conditions, we can
from equations (3.111) and

A f t e r obtaining these values f o r

necessary t o repeat t h e c a l c u l a t i o n s f o r

st

and

L3, L4,

ar

it i s

and

6o a t each b a l l p o s i t i o n u n t i l t h e assumed values o f at and


r agree w i t h these values found from equatlons (3.111) and
(3.112).

3.5 ~ a t i ~ uL ief e

B a l l bearings can f a i l from numerous causes, i n c l u d i n g


f a u l t y handling and f i t t i n g , wear associated w i t h d i r t , damage
t o the races o r separators, and fatigue,

However, i f they sur-

vive a1 1 the o t h e r hazards, b a l l bearings eventual l y f a i l because o f f a t i g u e o f t h e bearing material.

For t h i s reason t h e

subject of f a t i g u e c a l l s f o r special considerat ion.

Fatigue i s

caused by t h e repeated stresses developed i n t h e contact areas


between the b a l l and the, races and manifests i t s e l f as a f a t i g u e
crack s t a r t i n g a t o r below the surface.

The f a t i g u e crack pro-

pagates u n t i l a piece o f the race o r b a l l m a t e r i a l s p a l l s out

and produces the f a i l u r e .


Figure 2.24.

A t y p i c a l fatigue spa11 i s shown i n

On a microscale we can surmise t h a t there w i l l be

a wide dispersion i n material strength, o r resistance t o fatigue, because o f Inhomogeneities i n the material.

Bearing ma-

t e r i a l s are complex a1loys and are thus neither homogeneous nor


equally r e s i s t a n t t o f a i l u r e a t a l l points.

Therefore the fa-

tigue process can be expected t o be one i n which a group o f apparent l y i d e n t i c a l b a l l bearings subjected t o i d e n t i c a l loads,
speeds, lubrication, and environmental conditions e x h i b i t wide
variations i n f a i l u r e times.

For t h i s reason the f a t i g u e pro-

cess must be treated s t a t i s t i c a l l y .

That is, the fatigue l i f e

of a bearing i s normally defined i n terms o f i t s s t a t i s t i c a l


a b i l i t y t o survive f o r a c e r t a i n period of time.

3.5.1

Load Factor

The predominant f a c t o r i n determining the f a t i g u e l i f e o f a


b a l l bearing i s the load factor.

The relationship between l i f e

and load developed here i s based on a well-lubricated system and


a bearing made o f air-melted materials.

To predict how long a

p a r t i c u l a r bearing w i l l run under a specific load, two essential


pieces o f information are required:

(1) An accurate, w a n t it a t ive estimate o f the 1i f e


d i spersion o r scatter

(2) An expression f o r the dynamic load capacity o r

abt 1it y of the bearing t o endure

given load

for a s t iyulated number of stress cycles or


revolutions
A t y p i c a l distribution o f the f a t i g u e l i f e o f i d e n t i c a l
b a l l bearings operating under nominally i d e n t i c a l conditions i s
presented i n Figure 3-12,

This f i g u r e shows t h a t the number o f

revolutions that a bearing can complete w i t h 100 percent probab i l i t y o f survival. Ca

1. i s zero.

A l t e r n a t i v e l y the proba-

ba i l l t y o f any bearing i n the population having i n f i n i t e endurance i s zero.

F a i l u r e i s normally assumed t o have occurred when

the f i r s t s p a l l i s observed on a load-carrying surface.


Bearing manufacturers have chosen t o use one o r two points

an the curve i n Figure 3.12 t o describe bearing endurance:

(1) The f a t i g u e l i f e t h a t 90 percent o f the bearing


papulation w i l l endure (LO
l)
( 2 ) The median l i f e , that is, the l i f e t h a t 50 percent

o f the population w i l l endure (LS0)


Bearing manufacturers almost universally r e f e r t o a N r a t i n g
1 i f e w as a measure of the fatigue endurance o f a given bearing

operating under g i v e n load conditions.


the est {mated L10

This " r a t i n g l i f e " i s

fatigue 1i f e of a large population o f such

bearings operat ing under the specified loadi ng.

Fatigue 1iXe i s general ly stated i n rni ll ions of revo lutions.

As an alternative i t may be and frequently i s given i n

hours of successful operation a t a given speed.


Weibull (1949) has postulated t h a t the f a t i g u e l i v e s o f a
homogeneous group o f b a l l bearings are d i spersed accord ing t o
the f o l l o ~ i n gr e l a t i o n :

where

L
e

l i f e , m i l l i o n s o f revolutions
dispersion exponent (slope of Weibull p l o t ) o r measure of

scatter i n bearing l i v e s

constant, such t h a t e I n A

i s v e r t i c a l intercept on

Weibull p l o t when i = 1
The fatigue l i f e L

i n equation (3.113) i s the L10

life,

b u t i t i s simply referred t o here and throughout the remainder


o f the book as f a t i g u e l i f e L.
The so-called Weibull d i s t r i b u t i o n given i n equation
(3.113) r e s u l t s from a s t a t i s t i c a l theory o f strength based on
the theory o f probability, where the dependence af strength on
volume i s explained by the dispersion i n material strength.
This i s the "weakest l i n k M theory.

Equation (3.113) i s used f o r

p l o t t i n g f a t i g u e f a i l u r e s t o determine the L10

lives.

t y p i c a l Ueibull p l o t of bearing fatigue f a i l u r e s i s given i n


Figure 3.13.

The e x p e r i i i n t a l r e s u l t s shown as c i r c u l a r points

i n t h i s f l g u r e confirm t h a t bearing l i v e s conform w e l l w i t h the


Weibull d i s t r i b u t i o n and t h a t t h e bearing f a t i g u e data w i l l p l o t
as a s t r a i g h t l i n e .
With a technique f o r t r e a t i n g l i f e dispersion now a v a i l able, an expression f o r the dynamic load capacity t h a t a bearing
can c a r r y f o r a given number o f stress cycles w i t h a given proba b i l i t y o f s u r v i v a l must be derived.

From the weakest-link

theory we get the r e l a t i o n s h i p between the l i f e o f an assembly


( t h e bearing) and i t s components ( t h e inner and outer r i n g s ) :

For b a l l bearings

e = 1019.

The f o l l o w i n g expression can be

w r i t t e n f o r the f a t i g u e l i f e o f e l l i p t i c a l contacts

where
F = s t a t i c load capacity
C = dynamic load capacity

Using t h i s equdtion and changing t h e f a t i g u e l i f e from m i l l i o n s


o f revolutions t o hours of successful operation a t a given
speed, we can w r i t e equation (3.114) as

The s t a t i c loads Fi

and Fo can be obtained from e i t h e r

Section 3.3 or 3.4 for 'the appropriate load and speed condition.

I n equation (3.116) N

i s expressed i n revolutions per

minute, and the fatigue l i f e i s expressed i n hours of successful


operation a t the given speed N.
From Lundberg and Palmgren (1947) the dynamic load capacity
o f t h e inner r i n g can be w r i t t e n as

where

fO

maximum orthogonal subsurface shear stress

ai = r a t i o of depth of maximum shear stress o f inner r i n g t o


semiminor a x i s o f contact e l l ipse, zO/b

-ui

("k.1
x

number o f stress cycles per revolution o f inner r i n g

With proper changing o f subscripts from i t o o, equation

(3.117) can represent the dynamic load capacity of the outer


r i n g Co.
The number o f stress cycles per revolution

denotes the

number of b a l l s that pass a given point (under load) on the race

o f one piny while the other r i n g Itas turned through one complete
revolution.

Therefore the number o f b a l l s passing a point on

the inner r i n g per u n i t of ttme i s

(d'
ie

d cos

I n equation (3,117) the dianleters o f the inner and outer


races are w r i t t e n as
i = d;
do

= d;

-d
+

ei

(3.120)

d cos B0

(3.121)

CQS

Hamrock and Anderson (1973) found t h a t f o r most b a l l beari n g configorhtions the v a r i a t i o n o f

T and

i s such that the

following approximation can be made:

Table 3.3 presents corresponding values f o r

l / k , T, and @, as

we1 1 as values o f ( T ~ I T ) ~ ' ~ ( @ I @ ~ f)o~r * corresPondin9


~
values of

Ilk,

can be written:

From these values the following simple formula

Table 3.3 a1 so shows the good accuracy of t t l i s apyrox imale


formula.
I n equation (3.117)
from equation (2.24),

the curvature sum R can be obtained

and the e l l i p t i c i n t e g r a l o f the second

k i n d 4 and the e l l i p t i c i t y parameter


equations (3.29)
s t a t i c loads Fi

and (3.28).

k can be obtained from

respectively.

By making use o f t h e

and Fo obtained from e i t h e r Section 3.3

or 3.4 and equations (3.117) t o (3.123),

the fatigue l i f e i n

operating hours o f the bearing can be obtained from equation


(3.116).
The dynamic load capacity C j u s t developed can be used t o
detennine t h e r e l a t i v e importance o f c e n t r i f u g a l effects i n b a l l
bearings of d i f f e r e n t sizes.

This was done by Hamrock and

Anderson (1973) by comparing the r a t i o o f


namic load capacity C.
t h a t db

d 3 ~ ? t o t h e dy-

I n the previous chapter i t was noted

i s the bore diameter i n m i l l i m e t e r s and N

r o t a t i o n a l speed i n revolutions per minute.

i s the

The f a c t o r

d3N2

i s proportional t o the c e n t r i f u g a l force, and the dynamic capac i t y i s a measure o f the load capacity o f t h e bearing.

For

e x t r a - l i g h t series angular-contact b a l l b a r f ngs operating a t a


value of d,~

of 3 m i l l i o n , Table 3.4 shows the t s a t i o . o f d 3N2

t o dynamic capacity

f o r four bore diameters

db.

Centri-

f u g a l e f f e c t s are shown t o be r e l a t i v e l y more severe i n small


bearings when d b ~ i s kept constant.

The e f f e c t of race conformity r a t i o

on f a t i g u e l i f e a t

h i g h operating speeds i s shown i n Figure 3.14.

This f i g u r e was

obtained from Winn, e t al. (1974) f o r a 20-mn-bore b a l l bearing


operating a t 120,000 rpm.

Note t h a t an increase i n outer-race

curvature b r i n g s about a s u b s t a n t i a l decrease i n f a t i g u e l i f e .


On the other hand an increase i n inner-race curvature does n o t
affect the 1 i f ' e t o any appreciable degree.

The reason f o r t h i s

i s t h a t a t h i g h speeds t h e c e n t r i f u g a l f o r c e acts against t h e


o u t e r race.

I t i s thus important i n optimizing the bearing l i f e

i n high-speed appl i c a t ions t h a t the outer-race conforlnity r a t i o


should remain as low as possible.
curvature r a t i o f

Conformity expressed by a

o f 0.515 t o 0.520 represents the lowest

threshold o f present manuf a c t u r i ng practices.


The contact angle i n b a i l bearings i s extremely import ant
inasmuch as i t c r i t i c a l l y a f f e c t s the bearing s t i f f n e s s and
1i f e .

Typical v a r i a t i o n s o f f a t i g u e 1i f e w i t h i n i t i a l corltact

angle

Bf

f o r a medium-size bearing operating a t a value o f dbN

o f 1.5 m i l l i o n are shown i n Figure 3.15.

The contact-angle range

suggested i n Figure 3.15 i s t y p i c a l of bearings operating a t high


speed s.
I n recent years b e t t e r understanding o f b a l l bearing design, materials, processing, and l u b r i c a t i o n has permitted an
improvement i n bearing performance.

Thi s is r e f l e c t e d i n e i t h e r

higher bearing re1 i a b i li t y o r longer expected 1 ives than those


obtained from equation (3.116) o r b a l l bearing catalogs.

As a

r e s u l t Bamberger, e t al. (1971) a r r i v e d a t an expression f o r tire


adjusted bearing f a t i g u e 1i f e
La

..).---

DEFGL

where
"

+=

materiai f a c t o r

processing f a c t o r

= lubrication factor
I
0

G ,= hardness f a c t o r

The next t h r e e sections deal with these factors.

3.5.2 L u b r i c a t i o n Factor

I f a b a l l bearing i s adequately designed and lubricated,

t h e r o l l i n g surfaces can be separated by a l u b r i c a n t f i l m .

En-

durance t e s t i n g of bearings, as reported by T a l l ian, e t a l .


(1965). has demonstrated t h a t when the l u b r i c a n t f i l m i s t h i c k

enough t o separate t h e two contacting bodies, f a t i g u e l i f e o f


the ' ~ e a r i n gi s g r e a t l y extended.

Conversely, when the f i l m i s

n o t t h i c k enough t o provide f u l l separation between t n e asperit i e s i n the contact zone, the l i f e of the bearing i s adversely
a f f e c t e d by t h e high shear r e s u l t i n g from d i r e c t metal-to-metal
contact.

An expression f o r the f il m thickness i n b a l l bearings

i s developed l a t e r , b u t i t i s convenient t o i l l u s t r a t e i t s
e f f e c t on f a t i g u e l i f e i n t h i s section.

To e s t a b l i s h tihe e f f e c t o f filnl thickness on the lift?


of
any given bearing, we f i r s t c a l c u l a t e the f i l m parameter A.

The r e l a t i o n s h i p between h and the f i l m thickness

h is

where
fr = rms s u r f ace f i n i s h o f race

fb = rms surface f i n i s h o f b a l l

A more d e t a i l e d discussion o f surface topography i s given i n


Section 4.1,

and the rms i s defined by equation (4.2).

With the f i l m parameter A

known, Figure 3.16 can be used

t o determine t h e l u b r i c a t i o n f a c t o r

r.

Note from t h i s f i g u r e

t h a t whei t h e f i l m parameter values f a l l below approximately


1.2,

the bearing f a t i g u e l i f e i s adversely a f f e c t e d since

l e s s than 1.

Conversely, when the v.sllres o f A

is

are between 1.2

and 3, bearing f a t i g u e l i f e is,appreciably extended.

F i l m pa-

rameters higher than 3 do n o t y i e l d any f u r t h e r improvement i n


the lubrication factor

mainly because a t these values o f

t h e l u b r i c a n t f i l m i s t h i c k enough t o separate the extreme peaks


o f the i n t e r a c t i n g surfaces.

3.5.3 M a t e r i a l Factor

Bamberger, e t al. (1971) have shown t h a t bearing m a t e r i a l s


can s i g n i f i c a n t l y a f f e c t the u l t i m a t e performance o f a bearing.

As mentioned i n Chapter 2 the most frequent Py used steel f o r


b a l l bearings i s A l S l 52100.

The dynamic load capacity, as cal-

culated from equation (3.117)

o r any bearing manufacturerss cat-

alog, i s based on air-melted 52100 s t e e l t h a t has been hardened


t o 58 Rockwell C (R,).

Because o f improvements i n the q u a l i t y

gf air-melted steels, Bamberger, e t a l . (1971) suggested the

value o f t h e m a t e r i a l factor

shown i n Table 3.5.

Factors

t a k i n g i n t o account vacuum remelting, hardness, and other processing variables are considered separately.

Many o f the mater-

i a l s i n t h i s t a b l e were discussed i n Section 2.4,

and the chemi-

c a l compositions o f many o f these s t e e l s are given i n Tahle 2.1.

3.5.4

Processing Factors

Improvements i n processing techniques have also extended


fatigue l i f e .

The various melting practices have been d i s -

cussed i n Section 2.4.1.

Zaretsky, e t a l . (1969) found t h a t

consumable-electrode vacuum remelting (CVM) gave up t o 13 times


longer l i f e than a i r melting.

Hgwever, Bamberger, e t a l . (1971)

recommended t h a t a processing f a c t o r
CVM bearing steels.

o f 3 be used f o r a l l

This value may be somewhat conservative,

b u t the confidence factor f o r achieving t h i s l e v e i o f improvement i s high.


Another processing f a c t o r t h a t s e r i o u s l y a f f e c t s bearing
f a t i g u e 1i f e i s m a t e r i a l hardness.

The minimum recomnended

hardness f o r b a l l bearlng s t e e l s i s 68 RE.

A drop i n hardness

from t h a t value because o f e i t h e r poor heat treatnwnt o r high


operating temperatures w i ll appreciably shorten the bearing fat i g u e 1 i f e , as pointed o u t by Bamberger, e t a l e (1971).

To

enable an estimate t o be made o f t h e e f f e c t s o f hardness change


on bearing l i f e , a hardness f a c t o r

where Rc
ial,

"

i s defined as

i s the operational hardness o f t h e bearing mater-

Note t h a t t h e r e l a t i o n s h i p presented by equation (3.126)

indicates t h a t bearing l i f e i s h i g h l y s e n s i t i v e t o changes i n


hardness.
56 R,

Thus, f o r example, a two-point drop i n hardness t o

w i l l cause a 32 percent drop i n bearing f a t i g u e l i f e .


Once t h e various f a c t o r s i n equation (3.124)

fined, t h e adjusted f a t i g u e l i f e
t h a t equation.

have been de-

La can be calculated from

This equation enables the designer t o a r r i v e a t

a more r e a l i s t i c estimate of bearing fatigue 1i f e .

3.6 Beari ng L u b r i c a t i o n

Without adequate l u b r i c a t i o n o f t h e ball-race conjunction,


various degrees o f damage w i l l r e s u l t t o t h e r o l l i n g elerrents or
the races, o r both.

These include t h e development o f scuffing,

p l a s t i c flow, and p i t t i n g .

The f a t i g u e l i f e o f tne ball-race

contact therefore depends on t h i s conjunction having an adequate


l u b r i c a n t f i l m , as pointed o u t i n t h e previous section,
For many years the opinion prevai l e d t h a t the maximum cont a c t pressure i n t h e ball-race contact precluded the possibf l i t y
o f a l u b r i c a n t f i l m e x i s t i n g i n the conjunction,

However, i t i s

now generally accepted n o t o n l y t h a t a l u b r i c a n t f i l m i s present, b u t a l s o t h a t the nature of t h e l u b r i c a n t f i l m has an important influence on the f a t i g u e l i f e o f t h e bearing.

Besides

providing a f i l m , t h e l u b r i c a n t i n a b a l l bearing must provide


corrosion p r o t e c t i o n and a c t as a coolant.
Not o n l y the ball-race contact b u t a l s o a l l the interfaces
between moving elements must be properly lubricated.

The b a l l -

separator arid race-separator contacts experience mostly impact


loading and therefore have greater p o s s i b i l i t i e s o f metal-tometal contact, even when the bearing has an adequate supply o f
lubricant.

For t h i s reason t h e separator s u r f aces are general l y

coated w i t h a l o w - f r i c t i o n material.
The ball-race contacts i n b a l l bearings can generally be
s a t i s f a c t o r i l y l u b r i c a t e d w i t h a small amount of appropriate
l u b r i c a n t supplied t o the r i g h t area w i t h i n t h e bearing.

The

major considerations i n proper b a l l bearing l u b r i c a t i o n are

(1) Selection o f a s u i t a b l e l u b r i c a n t
( 2 ) Selection o f a system t h a t w i l l provide an adequate

and constant f l o w o f t h i s l u b r i c a n t t o t h e contact


These two t o p i c s are considered i n t h e f o l l o w i n g sections.

3.6.1 Lubricants

Both o i l s and greases are extensively used as l u b r i c a n t s


f o r a l l types of b a l l bearings over a wide range of speeds and
operating temperatures.

The choice i s f r e q u e n t l y determined by

considerations o t h e r than l u b r i c a t i o n requirements alone.


Because of i t s f l u i d i t y o i l has a number o f advantages over
grease:

I t can e n t e r tilt?loaded conjunctiori most r e a d i l y t o

f l u s h away contaminants, such as water and d i r t , and p a r t i c u l a r l y t o t r a n s f e r heat from h e a v i l y loaded bearings.
f r e q u e n t l y ddvantageous t o l u b r i c a t e bearings from

ti

I t i s also

central o i1

system used f o r o t h e r machine parts.


Grease, however, is extensively used because i t permits
simp1 ifi e d designs of housings and bearing enclosures, which
require l e s s maintenance, and because i t i s more e f f e c t i v e i n
sealing against d i r t and contaminants.

I t a l s o reauces possible

damage t o the process o r product from o i l leakage.

O i 1 Lubrication

Except f o r a few special requirements petroleum o i l s sati s f y most operating conditions.

High-quality products, f r e e

from adulterants t h a t can have an abrasive o r lapping action,


are recomnended.

Animal a r vegetable o i l s o r petroleuni o i l s o f

poor q u a l i t y tend t o oxidize, t o develop acids, and t o form

sludge o r r e s i n l i k e deposits on the bearing surfaces.

They thus

pena 1 ize bearing performance o r endurance.

A composite o f reconmended l u b r i c a n t v i s c o s i t i e s a t 38' C


I n many b a l l bearSng applicat i o n s an o i l equivalent t o an SAE-10 motor o i l (40x10-6 m2 /s, o r
(100' F) i s shown as Figure 3.17.

40 cS, a t 38' C (300' F ) ) o r a l i g h t t u r b i n e o i l i s the most


frequent choice.
For a number of m i l i t a r y applications where t h e operat i o n a l require~nentsspan t h e temperature range -54'

(-65'

t o 400' F), synthetic o i l s are used.

t o 204' C

Ester l u b r i c a n t s are

most frequently employed i n t h i s temperature range.

I n applica-

t i o n s where temperatures exceed 260' C (500' F), most synthetics

w i l l q u i c k l y break down, and e i t h e r a s o l i d l u b r i c a n t (e.g.,


nos2) o r a polyphenyl ether i s recanmnded.

A more d e t a i l e d

discussion of s y n t h e t i c l u b r i c a n t s can be found i n Bisson and


Anderson ( 1964).

Grease L u b r i c a t i o n

The simplest method o f l u b r i c a t i n g a bearing i s t o apply


grease, because o f i t s r e l a t i v e l y n o n f l u i d c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s .
Danger o f leakage i s reduced, and t h e housing and enclosure design can be simpler and l e s s c o s t l y than those used w i t h o i 1.
Grease can be packed i n t o bearings and r e t a i n e d w i t h inexpensive

closures, b u t packing should not be excessive and the manufact u r e r ' s rocommendations should be c l o s e l y adhered to.
The major l i m i t a t i o n o f grease l u b r i c a t i o n i s t h a t i t i s
n o t p a r t i c u l a r l y u s e f u l i n high-speed applications.

I n general

i t i s n o t employed f o r speed f a c t o r s ( d b ~ , bore i n m i 1l i m t e r s


times speed i n revolutions per minute) over 200,000 although
selected greases have been used successfully f o r higher speed
f a c t o r s w i t h s p e c i a l l y designed b a l l bearings.
Greases vary widely i n properties, depending on t h e type
and grade o r consi stency
mendations can be made.

For t h i s reason f @w specif i c recom-

Greases used f o r most bearing operating

conditions cnnsi s t of petroleum, d i e s t e r , polyester, o r s i l i c o n e


o i l s thickened w i t h sodium o r l i t h i u m soaps o r w i t h more recentl y developed nonsoap thickeners,

General c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s of

greases are as follows:


(1) Petroleum o i 1 greases are best f o r general-purpose ope r a t i o n from -34" t o 149' C (-,30' t o 300' F).
( 2 ) Diester o i l greases are designed f o r low--temperature

service down t o -54" C (-65'

F).

(3) Ester-based greases are s i m i l a r t o d i e s t e r o i l greases

but have b e t t e r h i gh-temperature characteri s t ics, covering a


range from -73'

t o 177' C (-100' t o 350' F ) .

( 4 ) S i l i c o n e o i 1 greases are used f o r both high- and low-

temperature operation, over the widest temperature range o f a1 1

greases (-73'

t o 232' C; -100* t o 450' F), b u t have t h e disad-

vantige o f 1ow 1aad-carry i n g capacity.


(5) Fluorosi 1icone 04 1 greases have a1 1 the desirable features o f s i 1 icone 05 1 greases p l u s good load-carrying capacity
and resistance t o fuels, solvents, and corrosive substances.
They have a very low v o l a t i l i t y i n vacuums down t o log7 t o r r ,
which mzkises them u s e f u l i n aerospace y p l i c a t ions.

(6) Perf 1uorinated o i 1 greases have a h i g h degree of chemic a l inertness and are completf!ly nonflamnable.

They have good

load-carrying capacity and can operate a t temperatures as h i g h


as 288' C (550' F ) f o r long periods, ~ h i c hr~akesthem useful i n
the chemical process and aerospace industries, where h i g h r e l i a b i l i t y j u s t i f i e s the a d d i t i o n a l cost.
Grease consistency i s important since grease w i 11 slump
badly and churn excessively when t o o s o f t and f a i l t o l u b r i c a t e
when t o o hard.

E i t h e r c o n d i t i o n causes improper lubrication,

excessive temperature rise, and poor performance and can shorten


bearing 1 i f e .

A valuable guide t o t h e estimation o f t h e useful l i f e o f


grease i n rolling-element bearings has been published by the
Engineering Sciences Data U n i t (1978).
I t has been demonstrated r e c e n t l y by Aihara and Dowson

(1979) and by Wilson (1979) t h a t the f i l m thickness i n grease-

l u b r i c a t e d components can be calculated w i t h adequate accuracy


by using the v i s c o s i t y o f t h e base o i l i n t h e elastohydrodynamic

equations (see Chapter 8).

Aihara and Dowson compared f ilm

thickness measurements made by capacitance techniques on a


grease-lubricated,

two-di sc machine w i t h the p r e d i c t i o n s of

e l astohydrodynamic theory.

W i 1 son reported an extensive and

impressive range o f experSments on a grease-lubricated r o l l e r


bearing.

This work enables t h e elastohydrodynamic theory de-

veloped i n t h i s t e x t t o be applied w i t h confidence t o greasel u b r i c a t e d b a l l bearings,

3.6.2

L u b r i c a t i o n Systems

The q u a n t i t y o f l u b r i c a n t required t o maintain adequate


l u b r i c a t i o n o f b a l l bearings i s small.

Data presented by

W i icock and Booser ( 1957) show t h a t f o r medium-si ze, deep-groove


b a l l bearings operating a t moderate loads and speeds ( 2 . 1 6 ~ 1 0 ~
d b ~ ) , t h e q u a n t i t y o f o i l required i s about 0.5 rnglhr.

The

o i 1 requirement i s determined by the s e v e r i t y o f t h e operating


conditions.
Some o f the techniques most f r e q u e n t l y used t o l u b r i c a t e a
b a l l bearing are aescri bed i n tne f o l l o w i ng paragraphs.

Forced L u b r i c a t i o n

Although t h e q u a n t i t y o f o i 1 r e q u i r e d t o provide adequate


l u b r f c a t i o n i s small, i t i s frequently desirable i n heavily

loaded, high-speed bearings t o use the o i l t o t r a n s f e r heat away


from thc bearing,

I n such cases a eirculatDng l u b r i c a t i o n sys-

tem i s employed i n which a pump de1 i v e r s the l u b r i c a n t o i l t o


j e t s d i r e c t e d i n t o t h e b e a r i ~ gand s u i t a b l e drains r e t u r n i t t o
tire reservoir.

G r a v i t y discharge can be used i n systems where

t h e pressure drop across t h e o i l r e t u r n 1ines i s small.

Care

must be taken t o ensure t h a t no o i l accumulates d i r e c t l y w i t h i n


t h e bearing area since submergence of t h e bearing i n o i l w i l l
cause excessive churning and r e s u l t i n high temperatures w i t h i n
t h e l u b r i c a t i n g system.

To avoid o i l accumulation w i t h i n t h e

bearing c a v i t i e s , scavenge pumps are frequently used.

The scav-

enge pump provides t h e pressure d i f f e r e n t i a l necessary t o evacua t e the o i l from the bearing cavity.

M i s t Lubrication

A t extremely h i g h speeds, where any appreciable q u a n t i t y of

o i 1 present i n the bearings iiould cause an i n t o l e r a b l e power


l o s s due t o o i l churning, o i l - m i s t l u b r i c a t i o n i s necessary.
Small-bore bearings t h a t operate a t speeds o f 50,000 t o about
100,000 rpm arc u s u a l l y l u b r i c a t e d by means of an o i l mist.

In

o i l - m i s t systems the stream o f atonlired o i l i s generally direct e d against t h e inner race of the bearing, which i s the most
d i f f i c u l t t o l u b r i c a t e because of t h e e f f e c t o f c e n t r i f u g a l
f o r c e on t h e o i l .

A i r pressures o f 100 t o 200 ~ / m ' and nozzle

diameters of 0 . 8 x l 0 - ~ t o 1.3x10-~

in

are used.

Because the

compressed a i r must be f r e e frm moisture, i t i s customary t o


i n s t a l l a d r i e r i n the a i r l i n e .
O i l - m i s t systems are noncirculating:

The o i l i s passed

through the bearing once and then discarded.

Extremely low o i 1

flow r a t e s are required f o r l u b r i c a t i o n , exclusjve o f cooling.


Since t h e required r a t e s are so low, a nominal-capacity sump i s
adequate f o r supply ing a m u l t iple-beari ng system f o r an extended
time.

Splash LubricatJon

Splash-feed l u b r i c a t i o n systems are employed i n low-speed


machitier-y such as some gearboxes.

11; these systems o i l i s per-

m i t t e d t o accumulate w i t h i n the bearing c a v i t i e s and i s d e l i v ered d i r e c t l y t o the bearing e i t h e r by t h e imnersion o f the


bearing separator and b a l l s i n t h e o i l o r through t t ~ cuse o f an
o i 1 rStig.

Qi
1 r i n g s are mainly used i n h o r i z o n t a l l y mounted

machines.

The loose-f it t i n g r i n g , whose diameter i s consider-

ably l a r g e r than t h a t o f t h e shaft, d i p s i n t o the l u b r i c a n t rese r v o i r beneath the bearing and c a r r i e s o i l t o the top o f t h e
shaft by a viscous l i f t i n g process.

Wick L u b r i c a t i o n

Wick-feed systems are used e i t h e r i n low-speed machinery o r


i n gyro and momentum wheel applications.

I n both cases the

bearing c a v i t y i s packed w i t h e i t h e r f e l t o r a porous p l a s t i c


capable o f providing a l u b r i c a n t reservoir.

Both the f e l t and

t h e porous p l a s t i c h o l d o i l by c a p i l l a r y forces.

A wick bridg-

i n g the o i l r e s e r v o i r supplies the required q u a n t i t y o f l u b r i cant t o t h e bearing.


I n some designs the r e s e r v o i r i s located above the bearing
t o make use o f g r a v i t y f l o w i n the wick.

Care must be taken t o

adjust t h e wick so t h a t a very l i g h t contact i s made w i t h t h e


slinger, o r the wick may be charred.

Separator L u b r i c a t i o n

Separator l u b r i c a t i o n systems are used mainly i n instrument


bearings, where the bearings are n o t r e a d i l y accessible f o r rel u b r i c a t i o n and t h e system i s s e n s i t i v e t o torque perturba-*.
tions.

Cotton-base phenolic separators have been most fre-.

quently used (as pointed o u t i n Section 2.5).

The separators

are impregnated w i t h e i t h e r mineral o r synthetic o i 1s.

During

operation t h e l u b r i c a n t i s t r a n s f e r r e d from t h e separator onto


t h e b a l l and hence reaches the ball-race contact.

Separator l u b r i c a t i o n systems o f f e r the advantages o f compactness and r e l a t i v e l y low torque varS ation.

Their disadvan-

tages include d i f f i c u l t i e s encountered i n l u b r i c a n t d i s t r i b u t i o n


and r e t e n t i o n t h a t r e s u l t i n premature f a i l u r e .

Because sepa-

rator-impregnated b e a r i ngs a l s o have iow heat-removal capabi l-

ity, they severely 1i m i t t h e maximum permissible operat ing


speeds.

Dry L u b r i c a t i o n

Dry l u b r i c a t i o n i s mainly employed f o r high-temperature o r


cryogenic operations where known l i q u i d l u b r i c a n t s lose t h e i r
1i q u i d i t y analor are subject t o chemical changes such as excess i v e oxidation.

The most common d r y l u b r i c a n t s have a base o f

molybdenum d i s u l f i d e (MoSZ), p o l y t e t r a f luoroethylene (PTFE)


o r carbon powder.
are also available.

Materials combining a l l three d r y l u b r i c a n t s


The l u b r i c a n t i s applied t o m e t a l l i c sepa-

r a t o r s as a coating o r i s incorporated i n t o the cage material.


Lubricant i s t r a n s f e r r e d from t h e cage onto t h e ball-race cont a c t s as i n the case o f separator-impregnated l u b r i c a t i o n , by
t h e b a l l s l i d i n g against the cage pocket w a l l and t r a n s f e r r i n g
t h e l u b r i c a n t i n t o t h e b a l l - r w e contact area (e.g.,
e t al.,

Brewe,

1969).

Dry-lubricated bearings o f t e n have r e l a t i v e l y h i g h wear


rates, which l i m i t t h e i r u s e f u l l i f e .

Because o f t h i s l i m i t a -

t i o n such bearings are generally employed o n l y i n applications


where conventional l u b r i c a n t s become incapable of meeting t h e
harsh operating requirements.

3.7 Closure

I n t h i s chapter load-deflection r e l a t i o n s h i p s have been


developed f o r any type o f e l l i p t i c a l contact.

The deformation

w i t h i n t h e contact i s a function, among c t h e r things, o f t h e


e l l i p t i c i t y parameter and t h e e l l i p t i c i n t e g r a l s of the f i r s t
and second kinds.

Simp1 i f i e d expressions have been w r i t t e n i n

Section 3.2 t h a t allow deformation t o be c a l c u l a t e d quickly, and


generally w i t h adequate accuracy.
The nethods developed i n Section 3.3 t o c a l c u l a t e t h e d i s -

tri bution o f load among t h e b a l l s i n a complete bearing can be


used i n most applications because r o t a t i o n a l speeds are usual l y
slow t o moderate.

Under these conditions t h e e f f e c t s o f b a l l

c e n t r i f u g a l forces and gyroscopic motnents are n e g l i g i b l e .

At

high r o t a t i o n a l speeds these body forces become s i g n i f i c a n t and


tend t o a l t e r contact angles and clearances.

They can thus

g r e a t l y a f f e c t the s t a t i c load d i s t r i b u t i o n .

The e f f e c t o f

these parameters on high-speed-beari ng load d i s t r i b u t i o n has


been discussed i n Section 3.4.
B a l l bearings can f a i l from a number o f causes; b u t i f a l l
o t h e r hazards are avoided, they w i l l eventually f a i l because of

m a t e r i a l fatigue.

The f a t i g u e l i f e o f a bearing i s normally

defined i n terms o f i t s s t a t i s t i c a l a b i l i t y t o survive f o r a


c e r t a i n time.

The predominant f a c t o r i n determining the fatigue

l i f e o f a b a l l bearing i s the dyndmic load factor,

I n Section

3.5 t h i s f a c t c r has been discussed and combined w i t h expressions


f o r the s t a t i c load capacity from previous sections t o enable
the f a t i g u e l i f e o f a b a l l bearing t o be evaluated.

I n that

section material, processing, and l u b r i c a t i o n f a c t o r s were also


introduced i n an adjusted fatigue l i f e expression t h a t g r e a t l y
improves p r e d i c t i o n o f b a l l bearing performance.

Ball bearings can be s a t i s f a c t o r i l y l u b r i c a t e d w i t h a small


amount of an appropriate l u b r i c a n t supplied t o the r i g h t area
w i t h i n the bearing.

The s e l e c t i o n of an appropriate lubricant

and t h e l u b r i c a t i o n systems t h a t provide a constant f l o w o f l u b r i c a n t t o the contact have been discussed i n Section 3-6.

SYHBOLS
constant used I n equation (3.113)

A*, B*, C*,

D*, L*, M*

r e l a x a t i o n coeffjcients
drag area o f .ball, n2
semimajor axis of contact e l l i p s e , m
a/2iii
t o t a l conformity o f bearing
semiminor axis of contact e l l i p s e , m
b/ ;2;
dynamic load capacity,

drag c o e f f i c i e n t
constants
19,609 ~lcrn' (24.440 l b f / in2)
number o f equal d i v i s i o n s o f semimajor axis
distance between race curvature centers, m
material factor
defined by equation (5.63)
Deborah number
b a l l diameter, m
number o f d i v i s i o n s i n semiminor a x i s
o v e r a l l diameter o f bearing (Figure 2.13).

bore dia%eter, m
p i t c h diameter, m
p i t c h djameter after dynamic e f f e c t s have acted on b a l l , m
inner-race diameter, m
outer-race diameter, m

modulus o f e l a s t i c i t y , ~

/ m ~

/(':;

e f f e c t i v e e l a s t i c modulus, 2

;,.'),

./m2

i n t e r n a l energy, m2 1s2
processi ng f a c t o r
[(qmin

- Hmin)/HminI

x 100

e l l i p t f c i n t e g r a l o f second k i n d w i t h modulus (1

- l / k 2 ) 1/2

approximate e l 1 i p t i c i n t e g r a l o f second k i n d
dispersion exponent
n o m a l applled load, N
normal applied load per u n i t length, N l m
lubrication factor
integrated normal applied load, N
c e n t r i f u g a l force, N
maximum normal appl i e d load ( a t $ = 0). N
applied r a d i a l load, N
applied t h r u s t load, N
nornal applied load a t angle $, N
e l l i p t i c i n t e g r a l o f f i r s t k i n d w i t h modulus ( 1
approximate e l l i p t i c i n t e g r a l o f f i r s t k i n d
race conformity r a t i o
rms surface f i n i s h o f b a l l , m
rms s u r f ace f i n i s h o f race, m
dimensionless m a t e r i a l s parameter, aE
f l u i d shear modulus, N / I ~ ~
hardness f a c t o r
g r a v i t a t i o n a l constant, m/s2

63

- 1/k2) 112

dimensionless e l a s t i c i t y parameter, W 813,"2


dimensjonless v i s c o s i t y parmeter, GW3 /U 2
dimensionless f il m thickness, h/Rx

2 3
dimensionless f i l m thickness, H ( U I U ) ~ = F2h/u2noRx
dimensionless central f i l m thickness, hc/R,
dimensionless central f i l m thickness f o r starved
l u b r i c a t i o n condition
f r i c t i o n a l heat, N m/s
dimensionless minimum f il m thickness obtained from EHL
e l 1iptical-contact theory
dimensionless minimum f i l m thickness f o r a rectangular
contact
dimensionless minimum f il m ttiickness f o r starved
l u b r i c a t i o n condition
dimensionless c e n t r a l f i l m thickness obtained from
least-squares f i t o f data
dimensionless minimum f i l m thickness obtajned from
least-squares f i t o f data
dimensionless central-f ilm-thickness

- speed parameter,

dimensionless minimum-f ilm-thickness

- speed parameter,

new estimate of constant i n f i l m thickness equation


f i l m thickness, rn

c e n t r a l f i l m thickness, m
i n l e t f i l m thickness, m

f il m thickness a t p o i n t o f maximum pressure, where

dpldx

0, m

minimum f i l m thickness, m
constant, m
diametral interference, m
b a l l mass moment o f i n e r t i a , m N s2
i n t e g r a l defined by equation (3.76)
i n t e g r a l defined by equation (3.75)
function of

k defined by equation (3.8)

mechanical equivalent o f heat


p o l a r moment o f i n e r t i a , m N s2
load-def l e c t i o n constant
e l 1 i p t i c i t y parameter, a/b
approximate e l 1i p t i c i t y parameter
thermal conductivity, N l s 'C
l u b r i c a n t thermal conduct i v i ty, N/s ' C
fatigue l i f e
adjusted f a t i g u e l i f e
reduced hydrodynamic 1 ift, from equation (6.21)
lengths defined i n Figure 3.11, m
fatigue 1i f e where 90 percent o f bearing population w i l l
endure
f a t i g u e l i f e where 50 percent o f bearing population w i l l
endure
bearing length, m
constant used t o determine w i d t h o f side-leakage region
moment, Nm

65

gyroscopic moment,

Nn

dimensionless load-speed parameter, UlJ' 0.75


torque required t o produce spin, N M
mass o f ball, N sZ/m
dimensionless i n l e t distance a t boundary between f u l l y
f 1ooded and starved conditions

dimensionless i n l e t distance (Figures 7.1 and 9.1)


number o f divisions o f semimajor o r semiminor axis
dimensionless i n l e t distance boundary as obtained from
Wedeven, e t al, (1971)
r o t a t i o n a l speed, rpm
number o f b a l l s
ref pact ive i n d e ~
constant used t o determine length of o u t l e t region
dimensionless pressure
dimensionless pressure differertce
diametral clearance, m
f r e e endpl ay, m
dimensionless Hertzian pressure, N l m2
pressure, N/m2
maximum pressure w i t h i n contact, 3F(2nab, N/m2
isoviscous asymptotic pressure, N/m2
s o l u t i o n t o homogeneous Reynolds equation
thermal loading parameter
dimensionless mass flow r a t e per u n i t width. q n 0 / P d 8 ~ 2
reduced pressure parameter
volume flow r a t e per u n i t width i n x
66

direction, m2 I s

volume f l o w r a t e per u n i t w i d t h i n y direction, "121s


curvature sum, m
a r i t h m e t i c a l mean d e v i a t i o n defined i n equation (4.1). m
operational hardness of hearing m a t e r i a l
e f f e c t i v e radeIus i n x d i r e c t i o n , m
e f f e c t i v e radius f n y d i r e c t i o n , m
race curvature radius, m
r a d i i o f curvature, m
c y l i n d r i c a l p o l a r coordinates
spherical p o l a r coordinates
defined i n Figure 5.4
geometric separation, m
geometric separation f o r l i n e contact, m
empirical constant
shoulder height, m
01pmax
tangential ( t r a c t i o n ) force, N
temperature, 'C
b a l l s u r f ace temperature, 'C
average l u b r i c a n t temperature, 'C
b a l l surface temperature r i s e , 'C
('01pmax 1t=l
viscous drag force, N
time, s
a u x i l i a r y parameter
v e l o c i t y of b a l 1-race contact, mls

velocity o f b a l l center, m/s


d i m s ionless speed parameter, nou/EtRx
surface velocity i n d i r e c t i o n of notion, (u, + ub)/2. m/s
number of stress cycles per revolution
s l i d i n g velocity, ua

- ub,

mls

surface velocity i n transverse dqrection, mls


dlmensicnless load parameter, F/E@R*
surface velocity i n direction of f i l m , m/s
dimensionless coordinate, x/Rx
dimension less coordinate, y/Rx
dimensionless grouping from equation (6.14)
external forces,

constant defined by equation (3.48)


viscosity pressure index, a dimensionless constant

coord inate system

pressure-vi scosity coefficient o f lubrication, $IN'


radius ratio, Ry/Rx
contact angle, rad
free or i n i t i a l contact angle, rad
iterated value of contact angle, rad
curvature difference
viscous dissipation, ~ l i ns ~
t o t a l s t r a i n rate, s-l
e l a s t i c s t r a i n rate, s-l
Y ~ S C O U Ss t r a i n

rate, so'
68

flow angle, deg


t o t a l e l a s t i c deformation, m
l u b r i c a n t v i s c o s i t y temperature c o e f f i c i e n t , oc- 1
e l a s t i c deformat i o n due t o pressure difference, m
r a d i a l displacement, m
a x i a l displacement, m
displacement a t some l o c a t i o n x, m
approximate e l a s t i c deformat ion, m
e l a s t i c deformation o f r e c t a n g u l a r area, m
c o e f f i c i e n t o f determination
strain i n axial direction
s t r a i n i n transverse d i r e c t i o n
angle between b a l l r o t a t i o n a l a x i s and bearing
c e n t e r l i n e (Figure 3.10)
yrobabi 1i t y o f s u r v i v a l
absolute v i s c o s i t y a t gauge pressure, N slm2
dimensionless v i s c o s i t y , n I n

v i s c o s i t y a t atmospheric pressure, N s/m2


6.31x10-~ N sl18(0.0631

cPj

angle used t o d e f i n e shoulder h e i g h t


f il m parameter ( r a t i o o f f il m thickness t o composite

s u r f ace roughness)
equals 1 f o r outer-race c o n t r o l ana 0 f o r inner-race
control
second c o e f f i c i e n t o f v i s c o s i t y
Archard-Cowking side-leakage f a c t o r , ( 1
relaxation factor
69

213

t~~1-l

coefficient o f sliding f r i c t i o n

Poisson's r a t i o
divergence of v e l o c i t y vector, ( t u l a x ) + (avlay) + ( a ) , sol
l u b r i c a n t density, N s2 /m 4
dimens ionless density,

o/p

0
densSty a t atmospheric pressure, N s2 /m4
normal stress, Nlm2

stress i n a x i a l direction, N/m2


shear stress, N/&
maximum subsurface shear stress, N/m2
shear stress, N/m 2
equivalent stress, Nlm2
l i m i t i n g shear stress, N/m 2
r a t i o o f depth o f maximum shear stress t o semiminor a x i s o f
contact e l l ipse

a u x i l i a r y angle
thermal reduction f a c t o r
angular l o c a t i o n
1i m i t i n g value o f $
absolute angular v e l o c i t y o f inner race, r a d l s
absolute angular v e l o c i t y o f outer race, r a d l s
angular velocity, rad/s
"'B
"'b

angular v e l o c i t y of ball-race contact, r a d l s


angular v e l o c i t y o f b a l l about i t s own center, rad/s

10
0

angular v e l o c i t y o f Q a l l around s h a f t center, r a d / s


b a l l spin r o t a t i o n a l velocity, rad/s

Subscripts:
solid

solid b
central
b a l l center

isovi scous-el ast i c regime


i s o v i s c o u s - r i g i d regime

inner r a c e
Kapitza
minimum
iteration
outer race
P VE

p i e z o v i scous-elast i c regime

PVR

p i e z o v i scous-rigid regime
f o r rectangul ar area
f o r starved c o n d i t i o n s

X,Y .Z

coordinate system

Superscript :

(-1

approximate

REkiERENCSS
Abbott, E. J. and F i r e r t o n e , F- A. (1933) Specifying S u r f a c e Q u a l i t y , .rech.

Eng., 55, 569-572.


~ ~ r i c o l G.
a , (1556) De Re W c t a l l i c a , Barel.
Aiharr, S. and Dowson, D* (1979) "A Study of Film Thickners i n Cxeare
Lubricated Elastohydrodynamic Cont ac ts," Proceeding8 of F i f t h Leeds-Lyon
Symposium on Tribology on 'Elartohydrodynamics and Related T o p i c s ' ,
D. Dowron, C. ?l
Taylor,
.
M. Codet, and D. Berthe, eds.
Engineering Ihrblicationr, Ltd.,

, Hechrnical

104-115.

Allan, R. K. (1945) R o l l i n g Bearirrer, S i r I r a a c Pitman i Sons, 'London.


Alsaad, H., B d i r , S . ,

Sonborn, D. M., and Winer, W. 0. (1978) "Clars

T r a n s i t ions i n Lubricant r : It s R e l a t i o n t o Elartohydrodynarnic L u b r i c a t i o n

(Em)

,'I

J. Lubr. Techno l., 100(3), 404-417.

Amontons, G. (1699) "De l a r e s i s t a n c e c a u s ' c e dans l e s machines,"


Memoires de 1'Academie Royal, A , Chez Gerard Kuypec, Amsrerdam, 1706,
257-282.
Anderson, W. J. ( 1978) "The P r a c t i c a l Impact of Elastohydrodynamic
Lubrication," Proceedings of F i f t h Leeds-Lyon Symposium on Tribology on

'E lastohy drodynamics and Related Topics, ' D. Dowson, C. M. Taylor,

MU

Coder, and D. Berthe, eds., Hechanical Engineering P u b l i c a t i o n s , Ltd.

217-226.
Anderson, W. J . and Zaretsky , E. V. (1968) "Rolling-Element Bearings."
Mach. Des. (Bearing Reference I s s u e ) , 40( 14), 22-39.

Anderson, W. J. and Z a r e t s k y , E. V. (1973) n'Rolling-Element Bearings

-A

Review of t h e S t a t e of t h e A r t , " Tribology Workshop rponsored by National


S c i e n c e Foundation, A t l a n t a , Ca.

, Oc t.

19-20, 1972.

Archa rd, J. F. (1968) "Non-Dimenrional

Parameters i n Isothexmal T h e o r i e s

o f Elastohydrodyna~nic~ u b r i c i t i o n . " J. Mach.

Em. S c i . ,

1 0 ( 2 ) , 165-167.

Archard, J . F. and Cowking, E. W. (1965-66) "Elartohydrodynamic


L u b r i c a t i o n a t Point Contac tr," Proc. I n r t . Mech. Eng., London, 180(31)),

4 7-56.
Archard, J. F. and K i r k , M. T. (1961) " L u b r i c a t i o n a t P o i n t Conticta"
Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A , 261, 532-350,
Archard, J. F. and K i r k , H. T. (1964) "Film T h i c k n e r r f o r a Range of
L u b r i c a n t s Under Severe S t r e s s , " J. Hech. Eng. S c i . ,
Aurhennan, V. K.

, Nagaraj,

6, 101-102.

H. S., Sanborn, D. M., and Winer, W. 0. (1976)

" I n f r a r e d Temperature Happing i n Elastohydrodynamic L u b r i c a t i o n , " J. Lubr.


Technol.

, 98(2),

236-243.

Baglin, K. P. and Archard, J. F. (1972) "An A n a l y t i c S o l u t i o n of t h e


Elastohydrodynamic L u b r i c a t i o n sf M a t e r i a l s of Low E l a r t i c Uoduluc, I1
P r o c e e d i w s of Second Symposium on Elastohydrodynnmic L u b r i c a t i o n ,
I n s t i t u t i o n of Mechanical Engineers, London, 13.
C s i r , S. and Winer, W , (1979) "Shear S t r e n g t h Measurements of L u b r i c a n t s a t
High P r e s s u r e s , " J. Lubr. Technol. 1 0 1 ( 3 ) , 251-257.
Bamberger, E. N. (1967) "The E f f e c t o f Ausfonnilrg on t h e R o l l i n g Contact
F a t i g u e L i f e of a T y p i c a l Bearing S t e e l , " J. Lubr. Technol., 89( 11, 63-75.
Bamberger, E. N, ( 1972) "The Thermomechanical Working of E l e c t r o - S l a g Melted

M-50 B e a t i n g S t e e 1," R72AEG290, General E l e c t r i c Co.

+ .

Bamberger, E. N.,

, Cincinnati,

Ohio.

H a r r i s , T. A., Kacmarsky, W. H . , Moyer, C. A , , P a r k e r ,

R. J., Sherlock, J. J., and Z a r e t s k y , E. V. (1971) L i f e Adiustment F a c t o r s


f o r B a l l and R o l l e r Bearings.
New York.

American S o c i e t y of Mechanical Engineers,

Barberper, E.

E., Z a r e t r k y ,

Er V.,

and S i q e r , H. (1976) "Endurance asrd

F a i l u r e C h a r a c t e r i r t i c s o f Hain-Shaft J e t Cwim B e a r i w a t 3 x 1 0 % ~ , ~
J. Lubr. Technol.,

98(4), 580-585.

B ~ N I , C. ( t 8 9 3 j " I ~ O ~ ~ C
1sop1;,esticr,
I ~ P I I , and I r o m e t r i c r R e l a t i v e t o
Viscosity ," Am. J. Sc i., 45, 87-96.
b a w c l l , F. T. (1974) "The Tribology of Wheel on ail," T r i b o l .
*I n t

7, (41, 146-150.

Barwell, F. T. (1979) "Bearing Syrtems

- P r i n c i p l e r and P r a c t i c e , # '

Oxford U n i v e r r i t y P r e r r , Oxford.
B e l l , J. C. and Kannel, J . W. (1979) " ~ i m u l a t i o nof all-~earing
L u b r i c a t i o n with a Rolling-Disk Apparatus," J. Lubr. Technol., 92, 1-15.
B e l l , J. C., Kannel, J . W . ,

and Allen, C. M e ( 1964) "The Rheological

Behaviour of t h e Lubricant i n t h e Contact Zone of a R o l l i n g Contact


System," J . Bnsic Eq., 8 6 ( 3 ) , 423-432.
B i r r o n , E. E. and Anderson, W. J. (1964) "Advanced Bearing Technology,"
NASA SP-38.

Biswas, S. and S n i d l e , R. W. ( 1976) "Elastohydrodynamic L u b r i c a t i o n of


S p h e r i c a l S u r f a c e r of Low E l a r t i c H ~ d u l u r ,J.~ Lubr. Technol.,

98(4),

524-529.
Blok, H. (1952) D i r c u s s i o n o f paper by E. HcEwen.
Sym,osium.

Gear L u b r i c a t i o n

P a r t I. The L u b r i c a t i o n of Gears, J. I n s t . P e t r o l . ,

38, 673.

Blok, H. (1965) " I n v e r r e Problems i n Hydrodynamic L u b r i c a t i o n and Design


D i r e c t i v e s f o r Lubricated F l e x i b l e Surfaces," ~ r o c e e d i n g sof I n t e r n a t i o n a l
Symposium on L u b r i c a t i o n and Wear, D. Muster and B. S t e r n l i c h t , eds.,
McCutchan, Berkeley, 1-151.

Breve, D. E., Coe, H. H.,

and Scibbe, H. W. (1969) ''Cooling S t u d i e r with

High-Speed b a l l Dearit@# Operating i n Cool Hydrogen Car," Tranr. ASLE,


vol. 12, 66-76.
Brewe,

D o

nd Hamrock, B. 3. (1977) "Simplified S o l u t i o n f o r L l l i p t i c a l -

E.

Contact Deformation Between Tvo E l a r t i c S o l i d r , " J. Lubr. Technol. 99(4),

485-487.
Brewe, D. E . , Hamrock, B. J .

, and

Taylor, C. PI. (1979) " E f f e c t of Geometry

on Hydrodynamic Film Thickness," J. Lubr. Technol.,


Brown, P. F, and P o t t s ,

J o

R. (1977) "Evaluation of Powder Procerred Turbine

Engine B a l l ~ e a r i n g r , " PW-FR-8481,


Palm Beach, Fla.

101(2), 231-239.

P r r t t & Whitney A i r c r a f t Croup, Wert

(AFAPL-TR-7 7-26. )

Cameron, A. (1954) "Surface F a i l u r e i n Gearo," 3. I n e t . P e t r o l .

, vol.

40,

191.
Cameron, A. (1966) The P r i n c i p l e s of L u b r i c a t i o n , Wiley, New York.
Cameron, A. and Gohar, R. (1966) "Theoretical and Experimental S t u d i e s o f t h e
O i l Film i n Lubricated Point Contact ," Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A.,

291,

520-536.
I

Carburi, M. (1777) "Monument Eleve a l a G l o i r e d e Pierre-le-Grand,


I

ou
I

R e l a t i o n Des Travaux e t d e s Hoyens Nechaniques Qui o n t e r e employes pour

;Petersbourg un Rocher
b a s e ;l a S t a t u e e q u e s t r e

transporter

de t r o i s millions pesant, d e s t i n e a

r e r v i r de

d e c e t Empemur; avec un Examen


n

Physique e t Chymique d e meme Rocher," P a r i s , (Bookseller:

Nyon a i n e ,
#

L i b r a i n e , m e Saint-Lean-de-Beauvoir
l a Harpe, vis-;-vis

; P r i n t e r : I m p r i m e u r L i b r a i r e , rue d e

l a r u e S. $ e v e r i n ) .

Castle, P. and Dowson, D. (1972) "A Theoretical Analyrir of t h e S t a r r e d


Contact ," Proceedings of Second Gympooium on E l a s t o ~ d r o d y n a m i c
Lubrication, I n s t i t u t i o n of Mechanical Emginrers, London, 131.
Chew, H. S. ( 1967) "Calculation of Elastohydrodynamic Film Thicknerr i n
High-Speed Rolling and S l i d i n g Contacts," Mechanical Technology Technical
Report MTI-67TR24, Hay 1967.
Cheng, H. S. (1970) "A Numerical S o l u t i o n t o t h e Elastohydrodynacaic Film
Thicknesr i n an E l l i p t i c a l Contact ,'I

Lubr.
-Technol., 92( 11, 155-162.

Cheng, H. S, and Orcutt, F. K, (1965-66) "A C o r r e l a t i o n Between t h e Theoreti c a l and Experimental Results on t h e Elastohydrodynamic Lubrication of
Rolling and S l i d i n g Contacts," E lastrohy drodynamic Lubrication, Symporium,
Leeds, England, Sept. 21-23, 1965, Central Paperr.

I n s t i t u t i o n of

nechanicrl Engineers, London, 111-121.


Cheng, H. S. and S t e r n l i c h t , 0 . (1964) "A Numerical Solution f o r t h e
Pressure, Temperature, and Film Thickness Between Two I n f i n i t e l y Long,
Lubricated Rolling and S l i d i n g Cylinders, Under Heavy Loads," J . Basic
Eng

. 87(3),

695-707.

Chiu, Y. P. (1974) "An Analysis and Prediction of Lubricant Film S t a r v a t i o n


i n Rolling Contact Syrtemr ," ASME Tranr.

17( 11, 22-35.

Clark, R. H. (1938) " E a r l i e s t Knovm B a l l Thrust Bearing Used i n Windmill,"


English Mechanic, 30 ( ~ e c ). 223,
Coulomb, C. A. (1785) " ~ h g o r i ed e s Machines Simples, en ayant &ard au
frottement d c l e u r p a r t i e s , e t a l a roideur d e r cordages," Academic Royale
d e s Sciences, Mem. Math. Phy 6.

, X, P a r i r , 161-342.

Crook, A. W. ( 1957) "Simulated Gear-Tooth Contact : Some Experiment6 Upon


T h e i r L u b r i c a t i o n and Sub-Surf a c e D e f o m a t ion," Proc. I n s t . Hcch. E q .
London, 171,
-

187-

Crook, A. W. ( 1958) "The L u b r i c a t i o n o f G o l l c r s , I," Phil. Tranr. I.Soc.


London, Set. A, 250, 387-409.
Crook, A. W. ( 1961) "Elasto-Hydrodynamic

L u b r i c a t i o n o f R o l l e r s , Nature,"

190, 1182.
Crook, A. W, ( 1963) "The L u b r i c a t i o n o f R o l l e r r , I V

- nerrurements of

F r i c t i o n and E f f e c t i v e V i r c o s i t y , " P h i l . Trans. R. Soc. London, Ser. A ,


255, 281-312,
Dalmaz, G. and Godet, H. (1973) "Traction, Load, and Film T h i c k n e s s i n
L i g h t l y Lorded L u b r i c a t e d P o i n t Contacts," J. Hech. Eng. S c i . ,

15(6),

400-409.
Dalmaz, G. and Godet, M. (1978) "Film T h i c k n e s s and E f f e c t i v e V i r c o s i t y of
Some F i r e R e s i s t a n t F l u i d s i n S l i d i n g Point Contacts," J. Lubr. Technol.,
1 0 0 ( 2 ) , 304-308.
Denhard, W. G. (1966) "Cost Versus Value of B a l l Bearings," Gyro-Spin A x i s
Hydrodynamic Bearing Symposium, Vol. 11, B a l l Bearings.

Hassachusett s

I n r t i t u t e o f Technology, Cambridge, Mass., Tab. 1.


D e s a g u l i e r s , J. T. (1734) A Course o f Experimental Philorophy, 2 Volumes,
London, Volume I , w i t h 32 c o p p e r p l a t e s .
Dowson, D. (1962) "A G e n e r a l i z e d Reynolds E q u a t i o n f o r Fluid-Film
~ u b r i c a t i o n , " I n t . J. Hech. S c i . , 4, 159-170.
Douson, D. (1965) " E l a s t ~ h y d r o d y n ~ m iLc u b r i c a t i o n

- An I n t r o d u c t i o n and a

Review of T h e o r e t i c a l S t u d i e s , " I n s t i t u t e o f Mechanical E n g i n e e r s , London,


P a p e r R 1 , 7-15.

Dowson, D. (1968) "Elrrtohydrodynmicr,"

Prac. I n r t . Uech. EM..

London,

182(3A), 151-167.
Dowson, D. ( 1975) "The I n l e t Boundary Condition," C a v i t a t i o n and Related
Phenomena i n Lubrication.

D. Dovson, X. Godct, and C. W. Taylor, edr.,

Mechanical ling ineetitrg P u b l i c a t ions, Ltd.

, New York,

143-152.

Dowron, D. (1976) "The O r i g i n s of Rolling Contact Btaringr," T. Sakuri,


td.

, Proceedings

of JSLE-ASLE I n t e r n a t i o n a l Lubricat i o n Conf c r e m e ,

E l r e v i e r , Amste rdrm, 20-38.


Doweon, D. (1979) Hirtory of Tribology, Lomnrn, London and New York.
Dovson, D. (1981) "Lubrication of J o i n t s , " Chapter 1 3 i n "The
Biomechanics of J o i n t r and J o i n t Replacements," Edited by D. Dowron and V.
Wright, Mechanical Engineering P u b l i c a t i o n s , Bury S t . Edmunds, Suffolk.

(To be published. )
Dowson, D. and Hamrock, B. J. ( 1976) "Numerical E v a l u a t i o n of t h e S u r f a c e
Deformation of E l a s t i c S o l i d s Subjected t o a Hertzian Contact ~ t n e s , "
ASLE Trans., 1 9 ( 4 ) , 279-286.
Dowson, D. and Higginson, G. R. (1959) "A Numerical S o l u t i o n t o the
Elastohydrodynamic Problem," J. Hech. Eng. Sc i . , 1( I ) , 7-15.
Dowson, D. and Higginson, G . R. (1961) "New R o l l e r B e a r i l r g L u b r i c a t i o n
Formula," Engineering London, vol. 192, 158.
Dowson, D. and Higginson, G. R. (1964), "A Theory of I n v o l u t e Gear
~ u b r i c a t i o n , " I n s t i t u t e of Petroleum Cear L u b r i c a t i o n ; Proceedings of a
Symposium organized by t h e Mechanical T e s t r of L u b r i c a n t s Panel of t h e
I n s t i t u t e , (19641, E l s e v i e r , 3-15.
Dowron, D. and Higginson, C. R. ( 1966) Elastohydrodynamic L u b r i c a t i o n ,
Fundamentals of R o l l e r and Cear Lubrication.

Pergamon, Oxford.

Dowron, D , , Sasan, W e Y e , and Toyoda, S. (1979) 'A Study of Starved


t lartohydrodynanic L i n e Cont ac tr," P r o c e e d i ~ ro f F i f t h Leedr9Ly6n

Symposium on Tribology on 'Clartohydrodyn.ricr


C

D. Dowson, C.

)1.

and R e l a t e d Topica,

Taylor, He Godet, and D. Berthe, e d r .

Engineering P u b l i c a t i o n r , LCI.

'

, Mechanical

, 92-103.

Dovron, 0 . and S u a l e s , P. D. (1969) "The Development of Elartohydrodynamic

," Proceedintr

Conditions i n a Rec l p r o c a t i n g Sea 1

o i F o u r t h ~ n t e r n aito n a l

Conference on F l u i d S e a l i n g , Vol. 2, Paper 1, B r i t i s h Hydromechanicr


4

Rerea rch A o o c i a t i o n , 1-9.


Dowson, D. and Toyoda, S. (1979) "A C e n t r a l Film Thicknerr Foxmula f o r
Elartodydrodynamic Line Contactr."

Proceedings of F i f t h Leedr-Lyon

Symposium on T r i bology on 'E lrstohydrodynamics and Related Topicr , ' D.


Dowson, C. M. T a y l o r , H. Godet, and D. Berthe, e d r . , Mechanical
Engineering k u b l i c a t i o n s , Ltd,

, 104-115,

Dowson, D. and Whitaker, A. V. (1965-66) "A Numerical Procedure f o r t h e


S o l u t i o n of t h e Elastohydrodynrmic Problems of R o l l i n g and S l i d i n g
Contacts L u b r i c a t e d by a Newtonian F l u i d , l t Proc. I n s t , Hech. Eng., London,
180(3B), 57.
Dyson, A. (1970) "Flow P r o p e r t i e r of Mineral O i l r i n Elartohydrodynamic
,

I.ubrication,"

P h l l . Trans. R. Soc. London, Ser. A , 258(1093), 529-564.

Dy son, A . , Nay l o r , H., and Wilron, A. R. ( 1 9 6 5 6 6 ) "The Measurement of O i l F i l m Thickness i n Elastohydrodynamic Contacts,'' Proceedings of Symposium

on Elartohydrodynamic L u b r i c a t i o n , Leeds, England, I n s t i t u t i o n of


Xechanical Engineers, London, 76-91.
Dupuit, A. J . B. J . (1839). "~;rumi d e Mgmoire r u r 1. t i r a p e d e r v o i t u r e r e t
r u r l e f t o e t t l n c n t d e ccconde erpece," C o m ~ e t e srendus d e l ' ~ c a d & i e d e s

S c i e n c e s , P a r i s , I X , 689-700,

775.

79

Eaton, 3, T. H.

, ed.

(1969) "A T r i p Down Memory k n e ," The Dragon, XLIV (53,

5-7.
LSDU ( 1965) "General Guide t o t h e Choice of ~ o u r r u lB' e a r i l y Type,"
Engineering S c i e n c e r Data h i r , Item 65007, I n s t i t u t e o f Mechanical
E y l i n e e r r , London.
tSDU (1967) "General Guide tcr t h e Choice of Thrust Beariry Type,"
E q i n e e ring Science r Data U n i t , Item 67033, I n r t i t u t i o n of Mechanics 1

Etq i n e e r r , London.
ESDU (1978) "Grease L i f e E r t i m t i o n i n Rollin# Beariryr," E l y i n e e r i n g
Sciences Data U n i t , I tern 78032, I n r t i t u t i o n of Mechanical E m i n e e r s ,
London.
ESDU (1978) "Contact Phenomena.

I:

S t r e r r e s , Def l e c t i o n r and

Contact dimension^ f ~ NamaLLy-Locded


r
Unlubricated E l r r t i c Components,"
Engineering Science6 Data U n i t , I tern 78035, I n r t i t u t i o n of Uechanical
Engineers, London.
Evans, H. P., Birwas, S . , and S n i d l c , R. W. (1978) "Numerical S o l u t i o n
of Isothelmal P o i n t Contact Elastohydrodynamic L u b r i c a t i o n Pmblemr,"
Proceeding of F i r s t I n t e r n a t i o n a l Conference on Numerical Methods i n
Laminar and Turbulent Flow, Pentech P r e r r , London, 639-656.
Evans, H. P. and S n i d l e , R. W. (1978) "Toward
Isothermal Point Contact EHD Problem."

Refined S o l u t i o n of t h e

I n t e r n a t ion81 Conf e r e n c e

Fundmentals of Tribology, Marsachusetts I n s t i t u t e of Technology,


Cambridge, Mass., June 19-22, 1978.
F t i n , R. S. (1968) Dircussion on t h e Papera o f J. K. Appeldorn and
A. B. Uetzner, J. Lubr. Technol.,

90, 540-542.

F e l l o v r , Te C., Dovron, D I , Perry, F. C., and P l i n t , M. A. (1963)


"Perbuty Continuourly Variable R a t i o Tranrmirrion," i n N. A. C a n e r , Ed.
Advancer i n Automobile Eruineerina, P a r t 2; Pezgamon Press, 123-139.
Poord, C e Am, Hawnmn, W. C., and Cameron, A. (1968) "Evaluation of
Lubricant r Using O p t i c a l Elartotydrodynamic r ," ASLE Tranr.,
Foord, C, A.,

11, 31-43.

Wedeven, L. D., Vertlake, F. J. and Cameron, A. (3969-70)

"Optical Elartohydrodynamicr," Proc. Xnrt. Hech. Em., London, P a r t I ,


184, 487-503.

F r o m , H , ( 19481, "Laminre

st r b . m u ~Nevtonrcher

und Waxwel l r c h e r

~ l ~ r s i ~ k e i t e nAngew
, " Wath. Hech., 28(2), 43-54.
Furey, H. J. (1961) " H e t a l l i c Contact and F r i c t i o n Between S l i d i n g
Surfaces," ASLE Trans., vol. 4, 1-11.
Gentle, C. R. and Cameron, A. (1973) "Optical Elartohydrodynamics a t
Extreme Pressure," Nature, 216(5434), 478-479,
Gohar, R. and Cameron A. (1966) "The Happing of Elastohydrodynamic
Contact 6," ASLE Trans., 10, 215-225.
Goodman, J. (1912) "(1) R o l l e r and B a l l Bearings;" "(2) The T e s t i n g of
Ant i f r i c t i o n Bearing H a t e r i a l s , " Proceedings of t h e I n s t i t u t e of C i v i l
Engineers, CLXXXIX, S e r r i o n 1911-12, P t . 111, pp. 4-88.
Greenvood, J. A. ( 1969) "Presentatian of Elartohydrodynamic FilorThicknes s
~ e s u l t s . " J. Mech. Eng. Sci., l 1 ( 2 ) , 128-132.
Greenwood, J . A. and Kauzlarich, J . J . (1973) " I n l e t Shear Heating i n
Elastohydrodynamic Lubrication," J. Lubr. Technol., 95(4), 401-416.

Grubin. A. N. ( 1 9 4 9 ) "Fundamentals o f t h e Hydrodynamic Theory of L u o r i s a t i o n


of Heavily Loaded C y l i n d r i c a l S ~ r f a c e r ,l n~v e r t i g a t i o n o f t h e Contact
Machine Components.

Kh. ?. Kegova, e d , , T r a n s l a t i o n of R u r r i r n D w k No.

30, C e n t r a l S c i e n t i f i c I n r t i t u t e f o r Technology and Mechanical


t q i n e e r i n g , ?loscow, Chapter 2.

(Available f ma Dept. of S c i e n t i f i c and

I n d u r t r i a l Research, G r e a t Bri t a i n , Tr4nsl. CTS-235, and from S p e c i 8 l


L i b r a r i e s A s r o c i a t i o n , Chicago, Tranr. R-3554.)
Gunther, R. T. (1930), E a r l y Science i n Oxfexd, Volumtr V I and V I I , "The L i f e
and Work of Robert Hooke," Vol. VII, Pt. f I , 666-679, p r i n t e d f o r t h e
a u t h o r a t t h e Oxford U n i v e r r i t y P r e r r by John Johnson (0x::'ord).
Hall, L, F. (1957) "A Review of t h e Papers on t h e L u b r i c a t i o n of R o t a t i n g
Bearings and Gears," Proceedings of Conference on L u b r i c a t ion and Wear,
X n s t i t u t i s n of Mechanical Engineers, pp. 425-429.
Hamilton, G. M. and Moore, S . L. (1971) "Deformation and Pressure i n a n
Elastohydrodynamic Contact
Halling ,

J o

," Proc.

R. Soc., London, Ser.

( 1976) I n t r o d u c t i o n of Tribology, Wykeham Publ.

A , 322, 313-3300

, London.

Hamrock, B. J. (1976) Elastohydrodynamic L u b r i c a t i o n of Point Contacts,

Ph.D. D i s s e r t a t i o n , U n i v e r s i t y of Leeds, Leedr, England.


Hamrock, B. J. and Anderson, W. J . (1973) "Analyrir of a n Arched Outer-Race
B a l l Bearitig Considering C e n t r i f u g a l Forces," J. Lubr. Tcchnol., 95(3),
265-276.
Hamrock, B. J. and Dowaon, D. (1974) "Numerical E v a l u a t i o n of S u r f a c e
Deformation of E l a s t i c S o l i d s Subjected t o Hertzian Contact S t r e s s , " NASA
TN D-7774.
Hamrock, B e J. and Dowson, D. ( 19760) " I r o t h e n n a l Elastohydrodynamic
L u b r i c a t i o n of Point Contacts, P a r t I
Technol., 98( 2 ) . 223-2290

82

- Theoretical ~onaulation,"

J. Lubt-

Hamrock, B. J . and Dowron, D m ( 1976b) "Xrotherpa 1 Elartohydrodynamic


L u b r i c a t i o n of Point Contactr, Part 11
J. Lubr. Technol.,

- E l l i p t i c i t y Parameter R e r u l t ~ ~ "

98(3), 375-378.

Hamrock, B. J. and Dowson, D , (19778) " I r o t h e n n ~ l~ l a s t o h y d r o d y n a m i c


I

L u b r i c a t i o n of Point Contacts, P a r t 111

'Technol

'

F u l l y Flooded ~ e r u l t r , " 3. Lubr.

99(2), 264-2760

Hamrock, B. J . and Dowson, D. (197%) " I r o t h e n a a l Elastohydrodynamic


L u b r i c a t i o n of Point Contact 8 , P a r t I V
Techno1

- S t a r v a t i o n ~ e r u l t r , "J.

Lubr.

99( 11, 15-23.

Hamrock, B. J. and Dowson, D. ( 1978) "Elartohydrodynamic L u b r i c a t i o n of


E l l i p t i c a l Contacts f o r M a t e r i a l 6 of Low E l a r t i c Modulus, P a r t 1
Flooded Conjunc t ion,"

2,. Lubr.

Technol.

Fully

100(2), 236-245.

Hamrock, B. J. and Dowson, D. ( 1979~1)"Elastohydrodynamic L u b r i c r t i o n of


E l l i p t i c a l C o n t a c t s f o r M a t e r i a l s of Low E l a s t i c Modulus, Part I1
Starved Conjunction," J. Lubr. Technol.,

10.!<1), 92-98.

Hamrock, B. J. and Dowson, D. (1979b) "Minimum Film Thickness i n E i l i p t i c a l


Contacts f o r D i f f e r e n t Regimes of Fluid-Film ~ u b r i c aion,"
t
Proceedings of
F i f t h Leeds-Lyon Symposium on Tribology on ' E l a s t o h y d r o d y ~ a m i s s and
Relnted
- T o p i c s , ' D. Dowson, C. M. T a y l o r , M. Godet, and D. Berthe, eds.,
Hechnical Engineering P u b l i c a t i o n s , Ltd.

, 22-2

7.

Hard;?, W e 0 . and Doubleday, I. (1922a) "Boundary L u b r i c a t i o n

- the

Temperature C o e f f i c i e n t ," Proc. R. Soc- London, Ser. A , 101, 487-492.


Hardy, W. B. and Doubleday, I. C1922b) "Boundary L u b r i c a t i o n
S e r i e s , " Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A.,

- t h e Paraff i n

100, 550-574.

H a r r i s , T. A. (1966) R o l l i n g Bearing Analysir.

Wiley, New York.

Marrim, T. A. (1991) "An A n a l y t i c a l Method t o P r e d i c t Skidding i n h r u r t Loaded, Angular-Cont a c t B a l l B e a r i w r , " J , Lubr. Technol.,

vol. 93, 17-24,

Harrison, H. C. (1949) The S t o r y of Sprowrton M i-l -l , Phoenix Houre, London.


Harriron, W. 3. (1913) "The Hydrodynamical Theory of L u b r i c a t i o n with
S p e c i a l Reference t o A i r a r a Lubricant ," Tranr. Cambridne Philoa. Soc.
x x i i (1912-25),

6-54.

Harrison, C. and Trachman, E. C. (1972) "The

ole

of Comprersional

V i r c o e l a r t i c i t y i n t h e L u b r i c a t i o n of R o l l i n g Contacts," J. Lubr.
Technol., 94, 306-312.
Heathcote, H. L. (1921) "The B a l l Bearing:

I n t h e Making, Under T e a t , and

on S e r v i c e , " Proc. I n s t n . Automotive Enprr., London, 15, pp. 569-702.


Herrebrugh, K, (1968) "Solving t h e Incomprt s s i b l e and I s o t h e n n a l Problem i n
Elastohydrodynclmic L u b r i c a t i o n Through a n I n t e g r a l Equation," J. Lubr.
Technol., 90( 1) , 262-2 70.
Hersey, M. D. (1966) Theory and Research i n L u b r i c a t i o n

- Foundations f o r

F u t u r e Developments, Wiley, New YorL.


liersey, M. S. and Hopkins, R. F. (1954) "Viscosity of L u b r i c a n t s
Under Pressure. Coordinated Data from Twelve I n v e s t i g a t i o n s . "

ASME, New

York.
Hertz, H. (1881) "The Contact of E l a s t i c S o l i d s , " S . Reine Angew. Math-, 92,

Honke, C. J . ( 1977) "The Elastohydrodynamic L u b r i c a t i o n of Heavily Loaded


Contacts," J . Hech. Eng. S c i . , 19(4), 149-156.

Hitst, W. and Moore, A. J. (1974) "Non-Newtonian Behavior i n


Elartohydrodynamic Lubrication," Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A, 337,
101-121.

84

Houghton, P. S. (1976) B a l l and R o l l e r Bearings,


P u b l i s h e r s , Ltd.,

Applied Science

London.

Jacobron, B. (1970) "On t h e L u b r i c a t i o n of Heavily Loaded S p h e r i c a l S u r f a c e r


Conridering S u r f a c e Defonnationr and S o l i d i f i c a t i o n o f t h e Lubricant."
Acta Polytech. Scand., Mech.
*

Em. Ser.

No. 54.

Jacobson, 8. (1972) i'Elasto-Solidifying L u b r i c a t i o n of Spheri,cal Surfacer."


American S o c i e t y of Mechanical Eng i n e e r r Paper No.

72-LUB-7.

Jacobson, B. (1973) "On t h e L u b r i c a t i o n of Heavily Loaded C y l i n d r i c a l


Surf a c e s Conridering Surf a c e Deformations and S o l i d i f i c a t i o n of t h e
Lubricant," J. Lubr. Technol., 95(3), 321-27.
I'

Jamison, W. E . , Lee, C. C . ,

and Kauzlarich, J. J. (1978) " E l a s t i c i t y E f f e c t s

on the L u b r i c a t i o n of Point Contacts," ASLE Trans.,

21(4), 299-306.

Johnson, B. L. ( 1964) ''A ' S t a i , n l e s s High Speed' S t e e l f o r Aerospace


A p p l i c a t i o n s , " Metal Prog., 8 6 ( 3 ) , 116-118.
Johnson, B. L. (1965) "High Temperature Wear R e s i s t i n g S t e e l , "

U.S.

Patent

No. 3,167,423, Jan. 1965.


Johcson, K. L. ( 1970) "Regimes of Elastohydrodynamic Lubrication."

J. M e c k

Eng. Sc i. , 12( 11, 9-16.


Johnson, K. L. and Cameron, R. (1967) "Shear Behavior of Elastohydrodynamic
O i l Films a t High P o l l i n g Contact P r e s s u r e s , " Proc. I n s . Mech. Eng.,
1

Part 1, 182, 307-3199


Johnson, K. L. and Roberts, A. D. ( 1974) "Observation of V i s c o e l a s t i c
Behaviour of an Elastohydrodynamic L u b r i c a n t Film," Proc. R. Soc. London,
337,
Ser.
A,

217-242.

Johnron, K. L. and Tevaarverk, J. L. (1977) "Shear Behaviour of


Elastohydrodynamic O i l Films,'' Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A , 356, 215-236.

Jones, A. 8. (1946) "Analysis of S t r e s r e s and Def l e c t i o n r , " New Departure


E n s i n e t r i m Data, General Hotorb Corp.

, Bristol,

Conn.

Jones, A. 8. (1956) "The Hathematical Theory of Rolling-Element Bearings,"


Hechanical Design and S~rstemsHandbook.
Kannel, J. W.,
I

B e l l , J. C., and A l l e n , C. M. (1964) "Uethods f o r Deterrrlining

P r e s s u r e D i s r r i b u t i o n i n Lubricated Rolling Contact ," ASLE Paper 64-LC-23,


Presented a t ASHE-ASLE L u b r i c a t i o n Conference, Washiwton, D.C.,

Kakuta, K. (1979)

Oct.

he S t a t e of t h e Art of Rolking Bearings i n Japan," Bull.

Japan Soc. Prec. Eng.

13(4), 169-176.

Kapitza, P. L. ( 1955) "Hydrodynamic Theory of L u b r i c a t i o n Durircg Rolling ,"

Zh. Tekh. F i z . , 25(4), 747-762.


Koye, K. A. find Winer, W. 0. (1980)

I'

An Experimental E v a l u a t i o n of t h e

Hamxock and Dowson Minimum Film Thickness Equation f o r F u l l y Flooded EHD


P o i n t Contacts," I n t e r n a t i o n a l AS%/ASLE L u b r i c a t i o n Conference, Sari
F r a n c i s c o , August 1980.
Kunz, R. K . and Winet, W, 0. (1977) Discussion 275-276, t o Hamrock, B. J.
a ~ Dowson,
d
D. "Isothe m a 1 Elactahydrodynrmic L u b r i c a t i o n of Point
Contacts, P a r t 111

- F u l l y Flooded ~ e s u l t r , " J.

Lubr. Technol.,

99(2),

264-275.
Lane, T. B. (1951) "Scuffing Temperatures of Boundary Lubricant Films,"

Br. J. Appl. Ptry s., 2, (Suppl. 11, 35-38.


Lane, T, B. and Hughes, J. R. (1952) "A Study of t h e O i l Film Formation
i n Gears by E l e c t r i c a l R e s i s t a n c e Measurement 6," B r . J . Appl. Phys.,
3( 10) , 315-318.
Lamb, H. ( 1932) Hydrodynamics,

Cambridge U n i v e r s i t y Press.

Layard, A. H. (1849) Nineveh and I t s Remains,. Volr. I and XI, John Hurray,
London.
L r y r r d , A. H. (1853) D i s c o v e r i e s i n t h e Ruins of Nineveh and Babylon,
Vols. I and 11, John Hurray, London.
Lee, D.,

Sanborn, D. H.,

and Winer, W. 0. 0 9 7 3 ) "Some O b r e r v a t i o n r of t h e

R e l a t i o n s h i p Between Film Thickners and Load i n High Hertz P r e s s u r e


t

S l i d i n g Elastohydrodynamic Contacts," J. Lubr. Technol.

, 95(3),

386.

L e i b n i t z, G. W. (1706) "Tentamen d e n a t u r a e t n m e d l i e r e r i r t e n z i a r u m i n
machines," H i r c e l l a n e a B e r o l i n e n s i a .
Paris),

Class. aiathnm, 1710, ( J e a n Boudot ,

1, 307.

Lewicki, W. ( 1955) "Some P h y s i c a l Aspects of L u b r i c a t i o n i n R o l l i n g Bearings


and Gears," s n g i n e e r , 200 (51931, 176-178, and (51941, 212-215.
Lundberg , G, and Palmgren, A . ( 1947) "Dynamic Capacity of R o l l i n g Bearings, I t
Acta Polytech., Mech. Eng. S c i . , l ( 3 ) .
Hart i n , H. M. (1916) " L u b r i c a t i o n of Gear Teeth," E n g i n e e r i n g , London, 102,
199.
McEwen, E. (1952) "The E f f e c t of V a r i a t i o n of V i s c o s i t y with P r e s s u r e on t h e
Load Carrying Capacity of O i l Films Between Gear ~ e e t h , "J. I n s t . P e t r o l . ,

38, 6 4 6 .
Meldahl, A. (1941) " C o n t r i b u t i o n t o t h e Theory of t h e L u b r i c a t i o n of Gears
and o f the S t r e s s i n g of t h e Lubricated F l a n k s of Gear Teeth," Brown Boveri

Review, 28(11)

, 374.

H e r r i t t , H. E. (1935) "Worm-Gear Performance," Proc. I n s t . Mech. Eng.,


London, 129, 127-lZa
Heyer, D. R. and Wilson, C. C. ( 1971) "Measurement of Elastohydrodynamic O i l
Film Thickness and Wear i n B a l l Bearings by t h e S t r a i n Cage Method ,"
J. Lubr. Tecr3u1ol., 93( 21, 224-230.

87

m e 8 , H. ( 1965-66) wCormunication, Elastohydrodynamic Lubrication," Proc .,


I n r t . Hech. Eng
noes,

.,

H. and Ilorma,

London, 180(30), 244-245.


R. (1972) "Film Thickness and T r a c t i o n i n EHL a t Point

~0nt.c t ," Proceedings o f Second Symposium on Elastohydrodym8mic


L u b r i c a t i o n , Laeds, England, I n r t i t u t i o n of Mechanical E m i n e e r r , London,
149.
Moore, A. J . ( 19731 "Non-Newtonian Behaviour i n Elastohydrodynamic
Lubrication," Ph.D. T h e s i s , U n i v e r r i t y of Reading.
Morgan, M. H. and Warren, H. L. (1960) T r a n s l a t i o n of V i t r u v i u r :

The Ten

Books of A r c h i t e c t u r e , Dover, New York.


Morin, A. J. (1835) "Nouvelles ewp;ricnces

faites

;Metz

e n 1833 s u r l e

f r o t t e m e n t , s u r l a transmir8ion due movement p a r l e choc, rur l e


8

r i s i s t a n c e d e s milieun i m p a t f a i t s a l e p e n e t r a t i o n d e s p r o j e c t i l e s , e t s u r
l e f r o t t e m e n t pendant i e choc," Mem. Savans Etrang. ( P a r i s ) , V I , 641-785;
Arrn. Min. X, (1836), 27-56.
Nagaraj, H. S., Sanborn, D. M . ,

and Winer, W, 0. (1977) " E f f e c t s of Load,

Speed, and S u r f a c e Roughness on S l i d i n g EHD Contact ~ e r n ~ e r a t u r e ,J". Lubr.

Technol. , 99(4), 254-263.


Navier, C. L. H. H. (1823) "Memoire s u r l e s l o i s du mouvement Qer f l u i d e s , "

Mem. kcad. R e S c i . , 6 ( 2 ) , 389-440.


Needham, J. (1965) Science and C i v i l i z a t i o n i n China, Vol. 4, Phyrics and
Physical Technology, P a r t I S , Hechanical Engieering , Cambridge U n i v e r s i t y
Press.

Newton, I. ( 1687) P h i l o s o p h i a e Natura l e s P r i n c i p i a Wathematira, Xmprimature


S. P e p y r , Reg. S o c * P r a e s e r , 5 J u l i i 1686.

R e v i r e d and a u p p l i e d w i t h a

h i s t o r i c a l and e x p l a n a t o r y appendix by Fu C a j o r i , e d i t e d by R. T. Crawford


( 1 9 3 4 ) , and p u b l i s h e d by t h e U n i v e r s i t y of C a X i f o t n i a P r e a a , B e r k e l e y and
Los Angelea (1966)
J

O r c u t t , F. K. and Cheng, H* S, (1966) " L u b r i c a t i o n o f R o l l i n g - C o n t a c t


I n s t r u m e n t b e a r i n g s , " Gyro-Spin h i s H y d r o d y n m i c B e a r i t s Syaposium,
Vol. 2 , B a l l B e a r i n g s , H o s s a c h u r e t t s I n r t i t u t e of Technology, Cambridge,
Hair., Tab. 5.

T a i , S , I ( 1956) Viscous Flow Theory, Vol. I

- Laminar Flow.

Van N o r t r a n d

R e i n h o l d , New J e r s e y .
Palmgren, A. (1945) " B a l l and R o i P l e r B e a r i n g E n g i n e e r i n g , " S. K. F.
Industries, Philadelphia.
P a r k e r , R . J. and Hodder, R. S. (1978) "Roller-Element

F a t i g u e L i f e of MIS

5749 C o r r a s i o n R e s i s t a n t , High Temperature B e a r i n g S t e e l , " J . Lubr.


Technol.

1 0 0 ( 2 ) , 226-235.

P a r k e r , R . J, and Kannel, J . W. (1971) "Elastohydrodynamic F i l m T h i c k n e s s


Between R o l l i n g D i s k s w i t h a S y n t h e t i c P a r a f f i n i c O i l t o 589 K (600' F);
NASA TM D-6411.

P a r k e r , R . J. and Z a r e t s k y , E. V. (1978) "Rolling-Element F a t i g u e L i f e of


AISI H-50 and 18-4-1 B a l l s . "

NASA TP-1202.

P e p p l e r , W. ( 1 9 3 6 ) "Untersuchunge u b e r d i e Drukubertragung b e i B a l a s t e t e n ond


G e r c h m i e r t e n um Leufenden A c h s p a r a l l e l e n Zy l i n d e r ," Hesc hinenelement eTagung Archen 1935, 4 2 ; V. D. I.

V e r l e g , B e r l i n , 1936.

P e p p l e r , W. ( 1938) "Druchubert rrgung a n G e s c h n e i r t e n Zy l i n d r i a c h e n Gleit und


~ 3 i l z f l j i c h e n , " V. D. I. F o r s c h u n g s h a f t , 391.

Petrov, N. P. (1883) " F r i c t i o n i n Machines and t h e E f f e c t of t h e Lubricant,"


Inrh. Zh., S t . Peterb.,

1, 71-140;

2, 221-279;

3, 377-436; 4, 535-564.

h t n t r e v i c h , A. S. (1951) "Fundamental Conclumion from t h e ContactHydrodynamic T h e o y of Lubrication," dzo. Akad. Nauk. SSSR (OTN), 2, 209.
P i t p o t t , S. (1968) "The E a r l i e r t WhLtled Vehicler and t h e Caucarian
Evidence," -isthirt.

Soc., XXXIV, ( 8 ) , 266-318.

P i r v i c 8, J . (1980) "Numerical A n a l y r i r Techniq~\esand Derign He thology f o r


R o l l i n g Element Bearing Load Support Sy8temu," i n I n t e r n a t i o n n l Conference
on Bearing Design:

H i s t o r i c a l Aspects, P r e r e n t Technoloay and F u t u r e

Problemr; Century 2

Emerging Technology, W. Jr Anderron, ed., American

S o c i e t y of Mechanical Engineerr, New Yotk, 1980, 47-85.


i n Elastohydrodynamic Contact," Proc. I n r t .

P l i n t , M. A. (1967) "Traction

Wech. Em., London, P a r t 1, 182(14), 300-306.


P o r i t r k y , H.,

H e v l e t t , C. W.,

Jr., and Coleman, R. E l , Jr. (19Lb7) "Sliding

F r i c t i o n of B a l l Bearings of t h e Pivot Type," J. Appl. Mech.,

14(4),

261-268.
P r i t c h a r d , C. ( 1981) "Traction Between R o l l i n g S t e e l S u r f a c e s

A Survey of Railway and Laboratory Services," Proceedings of t h e

7th

Leeds-Lyon Symposium on ' F r i c t i o n and T r a c t i o n , Leeds, September 1980,


Mechanical Engineering Publications.

(To be published. )

Ramelli, A. ( 1588) "Le ~ i v e r s ee t A r t ifi c i o s e ~ a c h i n e , " P a r i 6, France.


Ranger, A. P., E t t l e s , C, M. M.,

and Cameron, A. (1975) "The S o l u t i o n of

P o i n t Contact E lastohydrodynamic Problem," Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A ,


346, 277-244.

R t t i , L. (1971) "Leonardo on Bearings and Gears," S c i e n t i f i c American, 224,


(21, 101-110.

90

Reynolds, 0 , (1875) "On R o l l i n g Friction,"

Phil. Trans. R e Soc.,

166, Pt. 1,

155.
Reynolds, 0 . (1886) "On t h e Theory of L u b r i c a t i o n and It8 A p p l i c a t i o n t o Hr.
Beauchamp Tower's Experiment 8, lnc luding an Experimental Determination of
t h e V i s c o s i t y of Olive O i l , " Philor. Trans. R. Soc. London, 177, 157-234.
Roeland s , C. J. A. (1966) C o r r e l a t i o n a l A ~ p e c t sof t h e V i 1~08ity-TemperatureP r e r s u r e R e l a t i o n s h i p of Lubricating O i l s .

Dwk. V. R e B.,

Croningen,

Netherland s.
Rowe, J. (1734) " A l l S o r t 8 of Wheel-Carriage Improved," p r i n t e d f o r Alexander
Lyon under Tom's Coffee House i n R u s s e l l S t r e e t , Covent Garden, London.
Sanborn, D. H, ( 1969) "An Experiment 81 I n v e s t i g a t i o n of t h e Elastohydrodynamic
Lubrication o f Point Contacts i n Pure S l i d i n g , " Ph.D. T h e s i s , u n i v e r s i t y
of Michigan.
S c h l s t t e r , R. *( 1974) "Double Vacuum Melting of High Perf onnance Bearing
S t e e l s , " Ind. Heat, 1 1 ( 9 ) , 40-55.
Shaw, M I C. and Macks, E. F. (1949) Analysis and L u b r i c a t i o n of Bearings,
McGraw-Hill, New York.
S i b l e y , L. B.,

B e l l , J. C . , O r c u t t , F. It., and A l l e n , C. M. (1960) "A Study

of t h e I n f l u e n c e of Lubricant P r o p e r t i e r on t h e Performance of A i r c r a f t
Gas Turbine Engine R o l l i n g Contact Bearings," WADD Technical Report,

60-189.
R

Sibley,
*

L.

0 , and O r c u t t ,

F. K. (1961) "Elasto-Hydrodynamic L u b r i c a t i o n of

R o l l i n g Contact Surfaces," Trans. Amer. Soc. Lub. Engrs., 4 ( 2 ) , 234.


Smith, F. W. (1959) "Lubricant Behavior i n Concentrated Contact Systems
t

The C a s t e r O i l

- S t e e l System," w ,2 ( 4 ) ,

250-264.

Smith, 8'. W e (1962) The E f f e c t of Temperature i n Concentrated Contact


L u b r i c r t ion.

ASLE Tranr. 5( 1) , 142-148.

Stokec, C. C, (1845) "On t h e Theory of I n t e r n a l F r i c t i o n of F l u i d a i n


Motion," Trrnr. Cambridge Philor. Soc. 8, 287-319.
S t r i b e c k , R e (1901)

" Ku8ellager

f u r b e l i e b i g e Belaaturrgen," 2. Ver. d t .

Ing., 45(3), 73-125.


S t r i b e c k , R (1907) "Ball Bearings f o r Variour Loads"

- tranrlation

by H e Herr, Trans. Am. Soc. Hech. Engrs., 29, 420.

Swingier, C. L. ( 1980) "Surf a c e Roughners i n Elartohydrodynamic L i n t

Contacts," Ph.D.

T h t r i s , U n i v e r s i t y of London (Imperial College).

Tcrbor, D. (1962) "Introductory Remarks," i n R o l l i n g Contact Phenomena,


J. B. Bidwell, ed., E l s e v i e r , Amsterdam, 1-5.

T r l l i a n , T. E. ( 1969) "Progress i n Rolling Cont cret ~ e c h n o l o ~ ~Report,


,"
AL 690007, SKF I n d u s t r i e s , King of P r u s s i a , Pa.

T a l l i a n , T., S i b l e y , L., and Valori, R. ( 1965) '~ElartohydrodynamicFilm


E f f e c t s on i h e Loed-Life Behavior of R o l l i n g Contacts," ASHS Paper
65-LubS-11.
Theyre, F. H. (19661 "Some Aspects of t h e I n f l u e n c e of Hydrodynamic Film
Formation on t h e Contact Between R o l l i n g / S l i d i n g s u r f a c e r , " Wear, 9, 41-59.
Thorp, N. and Gohsr, R. (1972) " O i l Film Thickness and Shape f o r

Ball

Sliding i n a Grooved Raceway," J. Lubr. Technol., 94131, 199-210.


Timoshenko, S. and Coodier, J. N. (1951) Theory of E l a r t i c i i y , 2nd e d . ,
UcGraw-Hi1 1, New York.

T r a c k a n , E. C. and C h r n g , He S. (1972) "Thermal aqd Non-Newtonian EEfects oli


Trac t i o n i n Elartohydrodynamic Cont actr," Proceeding6 of Second Symposium
on Clartohydrodynrmic L u b r i c a t i o n , X n r t i t u t i o n of ldeehanicrl Engineers,
London, 142-148,
f

Tower, 11. (1883) " F i r s t Report on F r i c t i o n Experiments ( F r i c t i o n o f


Lubricated bearings)
Turchina, V.,

," Proc.

I n r t . Mech. E r g . , London, 632-659.

Sanborn, D. H e , and Winer, W. 0 , ( 1974) "Tempcraturc

~ e a r u r e m e n t si n S l i d i n g Elartohydrodynamic Point Contrctr," J. Lubr.


Technol.

, 96( 3) , 464-471.

U c c l l i , G. ( 1940) "Le Navi Di Nemi," La L i b e r i a D e l l o S t a t o , Roma.


Valori, R e (19781 Discussion t o Parker, R e J. and Hodder, R. S. (1978)
Rolling-Element F a t i g u e L i f e of AMS 5749 Corrosion R e s i s t a n t , High
Temperatsre Bearing S t e e l , " J. Lubr. Technol., 100(2), 226-235.
Vac Natrus, L., P o l l y , 3.

and Van Vuuren, C. (1734 and 17361, Groot

Volkomen Moolenbock, 2 MoZume s , Amsterdam.


Varlo, C. (1772) " R e f l e c t i o n s Upon F r i c t i o n with a Plan of t h e New Machine
f o r Taking I t Off i n Wheel-Carriages, Windlasses of S h i p s , e t c . , Together
with Metal Proper f o r t h e Machine, the F u l l D i r e c t i o n s f o r Making It."

.
,

Vaughan, P. (1794) "Axle T r e e s , Amr, and ~ o x e s , "B r i t i s h P a t e n t No. 2006


of A.D.

1794, 1-2, accompanied by 11 diagrams on one s k e e t .

Wailes, R. (1954) The E w l i r h Windmill, Routledge L Kegan Paul, London.


Wailes, R e (1957) "Windmills" i n History o f T e c h n o l o u , C. Singer,
E, J. Holmyard, A, R. H e l l , and T. I. Williams, e d s . , Volume 111, Ox ord
U n i v e r s i t y P r e s s , pp. 89-109.
Weber, C. and S a a l f e l d , K. (1954) Schmierf i l m b e i Walten m i t Verformung,
Z e i t s ang* tiash. Wech. 34 (Nos. 1-21.

93

Wedeven, L. E., Evans, D.,

and Cameron, A. (1971) 7t0peieal Analyrir of b a l l

Bearing tarv vat ion," J. Lubr. Technol.,

93(3), 349-363.

Weibull, W. (1949) "A S t q t i r t i c a l Reprerentation of Fatigue l r i l u n r i n


~ o l i d r , " Trans. Roy. I n r t . Technol.,
(27), Stockholm.
Whmer, T. L. (1966) The E f f e c t of Surface Quality of Lubricating Film
Performance, Ph-D. D i r r e r t a t i o n , Univerrity of Leedr, Leedr, E a l a n d .
Wilcqck, D , F. and l o o s e r , E. R. (1957) Bearins Derinn and Application.
HcCrarHi11, New York.

Willir, T., Seth, B.,


nethod f o r Thickner

and Dave, H. (1975) 'fEvaluation of a D i f f r a c t i o n


H e r r u n r e n t of Oil-Filled Cap8 ," J. Lubr. Techno 1.

97(4), 649-650.
Wilrcn, A. R. (1979) "The Relative Thicknerr of Grtare and O i l Pilmr i n
R o l l i n g b c r r i n g r , " Prer. Znrh. Mech. E n g * . London, 1931 17), 185-191.

Winn, L. W.,

Eurepi, M. W , ,

and Smalley, A. J. (1974) "Small, High-Speed

Bearing Technology f o r Cryogenic Turbo-Pumps," HI-74TR29, Hechanical


Technology, Xnc., Latham, N.Y.

(NASA CR-134615.)

Wslveridge, P. E . , Baglin, K, P., and Archard, J. G. (1971) "The Starved


Lubrictrtion of Cy l i n d e r r i n Line Contact ," Proc. I n a t . Mech. E r g . , London,
185( 1)

, 1l59+iZo1?.

Zaretrky , E. V . , Anderron, W. J . , and Bamberger, E. N. ( 1969) "Rolling


Element Bearing L i f e f o r 400' t o 600. F,"
Zaretrky , E. V.,

NASA TN D-5002.

Parker, R. J., and Anderron, W. J. (1967) "Component

l b r d n e r r Differrrncer and Their E f f e c t on Bearing Fatigue," J . Lubr.


Technol.

, 87( 11,

47-62.

Table 3 , l Conparlrm of Apprwlmrb and Exrot Formulu


nrdlur
Ratlo,

%IR,

Elllpticlty
k

-k

Par*
oant
Ecmr

Elliptic Inttayralr

Wond
kind
Peraent
Error

Daformation at Center of Contaet

Fir#t
kind
J

Parcent
Error

Numerlcrl,
From
PerCurve
Fit
C@nt
6,
om
Equatlon, Error

Table 3,2 Effect of kwee of Conformity on Contact Parameters


[FQ~all three essee, El = 2.28~10" s/mZ (steel an steel),
F = 4 , 4 5 N , and r n r r r r =6,35mm, Fortilaball-.
aY
outer ring aontact, da 65 mm. p 0'. fo = 0.02
(aasurno 209 radial ball bearing).]

Contnct

h l l on Ball

Ball on Plane

- Outer

Ring Contact

Parameters
'bx

Ball

6.35 mm

-38.9 m m

Table 3,3 &ear Strerr Parmeterr nu a ?hnotion


of Inverre Elllptlalty PIrambter

Ponaent error

-0.63

-0.55

Table 3.4 Ratio of $ N ~ to Dlnamlc


Capacity for Four Baaring Bore Diameters
Bore
Diameter,

db*
mrn

EN^

~ n m i c
Capaclt~,
C

-0.68

-0.75

-0.36

0.60

Tablo 3.5 Matorlrl Faotor


for Throughhardened
Bearlng Materlrls
krom Bunberger, et al.
(1971). Air-melted
materials assumed,]
Material

@N~/c
52100

M- 1

M- 2

M-10
M-50

T-1
Halmo
M-42

WB-49

Matarlal
Factor,
D

Figure 2 1 Conbct arms in a ball baring.

Figure 3.2 Pt~crfurcdistribution in an eilipsoid8l wnbd

Cuwrturr ntio, R4Rw

Figun 11 Elliplicity p l f m b r and rlliplic integrals d first and second kinds as r


functbn d curvature ratio.

(b) Ball on pbne,

- outer-ring conbd

(c) MI(

Figure 3.4 Three drgms of conformity.

(c) hterkrmce.

Figure 3.5 Radb!Cf lonlsd ball brrflng.

Figure 1 6 Conbd ellipse In bmring race.

Figure 3.7 Angukrsontilct bll b r i n g under thrust bad.

Figure X 8 hCnrl1It raulting from w M n d


Wing of btl Wring,

Figure 3.9 Ball forces and mornants at high-sped


conditbs.

Figure 3 10 Ball mtkn vecbrs,

Final wltlon d innerram curvature cantar:

l------

FO

Fixad-outer-ram
curvrtun onbr

L2

----------------r .:

Figure 3.12 Ball Wring lrtlgua tile distribution,

95
90
a0
70

60

Ti:

k,

9 20

'g '0
ul

Sprcirnan lifa, milllons d strrss cyela


Figure I13 -1yplal WeiWlI plot d b r i n g ktlgu8 bilura,

g
4

.P

f
?

hnrr-rre curvature ratb, ti

Figure 1 1 4 Baring fatigue life as r function


of race curvature. From Winn, etai. (1914).
Ball diameter, d , 4 76 mm IQ1815 in, 1:
number of b l i s , n, 10; pitch dhmhr, ,d,
28.5 mrn (1,122 in. inltkl oonbd angle, h,
20; radial load, F, 9 thrust b d , Ft, 445 N
(100 Ib).

15

25
30
35
Initial contact angle, 4, dog

20

Flgure 3.15 Typiul variation of fatigue life 8s a


function of initial contadangle.

Film pnrameter, A

Figure 3.16 Lubriution kctor at t fundion of film prametu.

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen