Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
PHILOSOPHY:
Intellectual Heroes and Key Themes
LECTURES
I.
II.
III.
IV.
V.
VI.
MAKING DIFFERENCES
1.DECONSTRUCTIVISM
How to read this world?
2.HEARING AND SEEING
Why should one make a difference?
3. JUSTICE AND FORGIVENESS
Is there a match between the conditional and
the unconditional?
1. DECONSTRUCTIVISM
JACQUES DERRIDA
BIOGRAPHICAL DATA:
1930: Born July 15, in El-Bia (Algeria).
1942: As Jew expelled from school.
1952-1954: cole Normale Superiure.
1967: An annus mirabilis because of the
publication of three influential books.
1965-1984: Professor of the history of philosophy at
the cole Normale Superiure.
1982: One of the founders of the Collge
Internationale de Philosophie.
1983: Director of Studies at the cole des Hautes
tudes et Sciences Sociales.
2001: Theodor W. Adorno Award.
2002: A documentary on Derrida.
2004: Died October 8, in Paris.
MAJOR WORKS
De la grammatologie (1967).
La Voix et le phnomne (1967).
Lcriture et la diffrence (1967).
Marges de la philosophie (1972).
Glas (1974).
La Carte postale. De Socrate Freud et au-del (1980).
Limited Inc (1990).
Sauf le nom (1993).
Les spectres de Marx (1993).
Force de loi. Le Fondement mystique de lautorit (1994).
Cosmopolites de tous les pays, encore un effort! (1997).
De lhospitalit (1997).
Philosophy in a time of terror. Diaglogues with Jrgen Habermas and
Jacques Derrida (2003).
Rogues (2003).
PHILOSOPHICAL STYLE
Derrida discusses a subject often indirectly and
mixes genres.
His style is more evocative than argumentative and
more circular than linear.
Examples:
- Glas > two columns (Hegel and Genet).
- La Carte postale > starts with love letters with
no address.
Derrida wants to show the equivocality of a text.
REITERATION AND
DECONSTRUCTION
Reiterate > putting (old) texts into new contexts.
Deconstructivism > a way of criticizing texts and
institutions that is neither negative, nor positive.
Aim: to open texts up to alternative readings, i.e. to
look for neglected elements in texts (especially the
aporias).
Moral drive: to render justice and to prevent the use
of violence.
A deconstruction is always an intervention that
changes the one way or the other the object of
research.
Derrida wants to subvert a text by showing its limits.
A CRITIQUE OF WESTERN
PHILOSOPHY
Metaphysics is one of the main objects of
Derridas criticism.
Philosophical activity: to subvert various binary
oppositions that dominate different ways of
thinking.
Binary oppositions reproduce hierarchies and
forms of subordination.
An insistence upon the importance of the other, the
marginal, that what is different.
HEURISTIC VALUE
Literary theory (Paul de Man amongst
others).
Feminism (Judith Butler amongst others).
Architecture (Frank Gehry amongst others).
Cultural studies (Stuart Hall amongst
others).
Philosophy (Christophe Menke amongst
others).
SIGNS OF SIGNS
Derrida criticizes the metaphysical idea that
symbols that are part of the written language are
parasitic to the symbols that are part of the spoken
language.
Logocentrism: metaphysics of the presence to
oneself.
The written word is not a derivate of the spoken
word.
Writing is not a sign of a sign, except if one says it
of all signs, which would be more profoundly true.
Metaphysics freezes identities and doesnt do
justice to differences.
TRACES
Traces > signs that are present, but refer at the same
time to what is not present.
Derrida: The (pure) trace is the diffrance.
Deconstructivism traces the relations between signs
that are present and those that are not.
To trace something means showing the aporias >
irresolvable contradictions that cannot be
reconciled.
Example: the aporia of love.
If a person asks why he or she loves someone, he or
she can give two kinds of answers that are not
compatible.
Who do I love?
What do I love?
Answer
I love you
I love you
because you are because of your
you
qualities
Focus
The singularity
of a person
The particular
aspects of a
person
Language
Proper name
Predicate
THE DECONSTRUCTION OF
JUSTICE
Justice can not be grasped, i.e. objectified.
One can only speak in an indirect way about
justice.
The aporia of law and justice > fixed rules
versus unfixed morality.
The general and the particular > application of
the law to concrete issues.
Justice as a deconstruction of law > show what
particularly cannot be subsumed under a general
judicial norm.
MESSIANISM
Messianism > stories about the arrival of a hero
(the Messiah) in the future.
The transfiguration of utopia.
There is often no clear description of the hero that
will come.
Central question: does the hero really comes?
Deconstruct various messianisms.
There is no identifiable other.
THE UNFORGIVABLE
Truth and reconciliation commissions > about forgiveness.
Derrida argues that forgiveness isnt and shouldnt be
normal.
The impossibility: forgiving something that cannot be
forgiven.
Derrida: If one is only prepared to forgive what appears
forgivable, what the church calls venial sin, then the very
idea of forgiveness would disappear. If there is something to
forgive, it would be what in religious language is called
mortal sin, the worst, the unforgivable crime or harm. From
which comes the aporia, which can be described in its dry
and implacable formality, without mercy: forgiveness
forgives only the unforgivable.
The state cannot organize in a proper way the reconciliation.
PLURALITY
Because of globalisation and migration
more people live in a plural world with
different lifestyles and religions.
Two reactions:
1. Intolerance, xenophobia, racism.
2. Tolerance, xenophilia, respectful
integration of the other.
ANTISEMITISM
Derrida was a victim of anti-Semitism.
He lost his citizenship rights during the Second
World War and had to leave the public school.
Relation between anti-Semitism and
deconstructivism > the fixation of a collective
identity trigger people to oversee differences.
A deconstruction of such a collective identity
creates space for the non-identical.
HOSPITALITY
The fixation of a collective identity frustrates the
hospitality towards strangers.
Derrida > hospitality is only possible when
strangers are recognized in their irreducible
difference.
Two forms of hospitality.
1. Pure form of hospitality: unconditional
acceptance of the stranger.
2. Impure form of hospitality: the stranger is only
welcome when he accepts certain conditions.
Hospitality has to be realized.