To: Members of the Board of Trustees of the University of Louisville
Dear Members of the Board: I am writing on behalf of an ad hoc group of 47 University of Louisville faculty who met today to discuss the crisis in governance created by Governor Matt Bevins Executive Orders 2016-338 and 2016-339 of June 17, 2016. First, we urge you to continue to consider yourselves to be the legally appointed members of the Board of Trustees, and to act accordingly. As you surely are aware, there is no provision in Kentucky Revised Statutes that permits the wholesale dissolution of the University of Louisville Board of Trustees by the Governor. However, KRS does specify that legally appointed members may be removed only after a finding of cause at a hearing by the Council on Postsecondary Education [KRS 164.218(b)]. Since no such hearings were conducted, nor any findings of cause determined, you remain the duly appointed Trustees, and as such retain your full powers and duties as the Board of the Trustees. Second, we urge you, either individually or collectively, to file a motion for an immediate injunction staying Executive Orders 2016-338 and 2016-339. Such a motion is warranted on several grounds. The Southern Association of Colleges and Schools mandates that the governing Board be free from undue influence from politicalbodies and protects the institution from such influence (Principles of Accreditation, 3.2.4), and that the governing Board have a policy whereby members can be dismissed only for appropriate reasons and by a fair process (3.2.5). The Governors Executive Orders violate both of these standards of accreditation and therefore place the University of Louisvilles accreditation in jeopardy. Further, we should consider how these Executive Orders might undermine the professional accreditations in the School of Medicine, Brandeis Law School, the College of Education and Human Development, the School of Social Work, and others. Further reasons in support of a motion for an injunction include the loss of political independence for the Board, loss of institutional memory embodied in the membership of the Board, and the immediate diminishment of the academic legitimacy and reputation of the University of Louisville. Very truly yours,