Guberina's Theorw in the Context of Contemporary Spoken Language

Studies//Guberinina teorija u kontekstu suvremenih istraivanja govornog jezika,

znanstveno-struna monografija VII. Meunarodnog simpozija verbotonalnog sistema,
poglavlje u monografiji s meunarodnom recenzijom ovjek i govor, Zagreb (2012), 4362. Monograph of the VII International Symposium of the Verbotonal system Man and
Speech, Zagreb (2012) 43-62. Article written in Croatian and English.
Bogdanka Pavelin Lei
Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences
University of Zagreb
Ivana Luia 3

GUBERINA'S THEORY IN THE CONTEXT OF CONTEMPORARY SPOKEN

LANGUAGE STUDIES
SUMMARY
From his earliest studies, Petar Guberina pointed out the importance of spoken language
(langue parle) and the primacy of oral discourse. In the context of his research, the
Saussurean term parole is at the same time a social and an individual phenomenon out of
which language grows and through which it is realized. Therefore, both the Verbo-Tonal and
the Structuro-Global Audio-Visual Approaches (SGAV) to foreign language teaching are
grounded in the linguistics of speech linguistique de la parole.
Parole, in the sense of discourse, is at the center of contemporary linguistic research,
especially with regard to the dialogical approach to the study of discourse, which takes into
consideration spoken discourse, the enunciator and the enunciatee, the speaker and the
interlocutor, and the study of language in its everyday use.
In his 1939 PhD thesis, Valeurs logiques et valeurs stylistiques des propositions complexes,
Guberina took two important steps forward from what was then the dominant approach to
linguistic research:

He focused on the sentence as part of the global utterance,

He explicitly pointed out the role of non-lexicological language means in constituting
the qualities of spoken language: facial expressions, body positions and movement,
intonation, rhythm, intensity and pitch, pauses and silences, speech tempo, and
situation.

Guberina considered that these qualities represent the advantages of oral discourse over
written discourse. They guarantee the richness of oral discourse both on the level of
expression and on the level of content, regardless of the economy and the momentary
character of the interactions. So Guberina was opposed to neglecting non-lexicological means
of language when studying linguistic expression.
The non-lexicological elements create the impression that the speakers thoughts and
affections are visible and tangible, which gives the utterance a synthetic phenomenal
appearance naturally, always and only in solidarity with other elements of language.

His valorization of multidisciplinarity, multimodality, affectivity, and thus subjectivity in the

study of spoken language, makes the work of Petar Guberina contemporary and of permanent
value.
Key words : linguistics, affectivity, multidisciplinarity, multimodality, qualities of spoken
language

INTRODUCTION
In the center of Petar Guberina's linguistic theory is the human individual and his/her dynamic
creativity which originates from affectivity and is reflected in linguistic expression. Guberina
examines the language as an inseparable living part of a human being and a social being who,
creatively, through his biopsychosocial structure, manifests himself in communicational usage
through multimodal means of expression which are at his disposal.
At the biological level, the human being exists as a species and possesses symbolic
communicational structures of expression which constitute human language. At the
sociological level the human being belongs to a certain social community and uses the
language and spoken varieties of that community. At the psychological level, the spoken
activity of an individual is characterized by personal traits of a speaker who uses the language
of the community in his own way, giving it his personality. Bearing in mind the complex
dynamic structuration of language and speech, Guberina's linguistic theory, within the
elaborated procedures of the verbo-tonal approach, permanently opens new types of practical
application in teaching foreign languages, in the diagnostics and rehabilitation of hearing and
speech, as well as in fundamental research in language and speech.
More than a Romance language scholar and linguist, beyond the narrow circles of his primary
academic field, Petar Guberina is more famous for the application of his theory of language
and speech. He is known as the author of the structural-global, audio-visual (SGAV) approach
in foreign language teaching and as the author of the verbo-tonal (VT) approach as a
theoretical base for the procedures of diagnostics and treatment of impairments in speech and
hearing, as well as procedures for the phonetic correction of pronunciation in foreign
language teaching.
Guberina entered different areas of scientific study, and he extensively contributed to their
research by examining the issues of general and French linguistics. Therefore, the aim of this
paper is to show the importance of studying the work of Petar Guberina from the
contemporary linguistic viewpoint.
Although he did not place himself in any specific linguistic movement, Petar Guberina took
many scientific initiatives in his substantial lifes work.
SCIENTIFIC BEGINNINGS
Guberina studied in the 1930s in the context of the positivist, diachronic and atomistic
Neogrammarian tradition that was highly developed at the Department of Romance
Languages of the University of Zagreb.
His study visits to Geneva and later on to Paris, the foci of linguistic research of the first half
of the twentieth century, enabled him to learn directly the latest trends in linguistic research.
At the Sorbonne, the young Guberina was introduced to the French linguistic school through
the works of professors Jules Vendryes, Ferdinand Brunot, Charles Bruneau, Jules
Marouzeau and Pierre Fouch. Their approach to the study of linguistic phenomena took into
account the psychological, physiological and sociological factors by which these phenomena
are formed.
Vendryes emphasized the affective, emotional component in scientific observations of
linguistic phenomena and agreed with Charles Bally in his statement that every spoken act is

affectively colored, so that it is impossible to utter the same sentence twice in the same
manner. Affectivity in linguistic expression will remain one of the fundamental axes of
Guberina's study of language and speech.
The young scientist adopted the latest heritage of linguistic science of that time, in its very
origins, and acquired solid foundations for further departures, reviews and scientific
development.
SPOKEN LANGUAGE: LANGUAGE ACTIVITY, LANGUAGE SYSTEM AND SPEECH
In order to encompass Guberinas contribution, let us recall the basic terminological
postulates which modern linguistics is based on.
Linguistics is the scientific study of human language (French: langage). However, the subject
of linguistics exists only in the form of specific spoken languages that are based on an
arbitrary and self-sufficient language system (langue). Speech (parole) is a
concrete realization of the language that is performed by real participants in real
circumstances. Any associated part of speech in an oral or written form is discourse
(discours).
Realizing a language system by speech through concrete discourse is called
enunciation (nonciation), and the smallest unit of discourse is an utterance (nonc).
From his scientific beginnings, Guberina uses the term spoken language
(langue parle) because the language arises from spoken discourse and it is realized through
it. By doing so, he immediately places the field of his research into the linguistics
of speech (linguistique de la parole), or to be more precise, into the linguistics of spoken
language (de la langue parle), since, according to Guberina, language and speech should not
be studied separately.
THE TERM SPEECH (FRENCH: PAROLE) IN DE SAUSSURE AND GUBERINA

Ferdinand de Saussure was one of the first linguists to differentiate language activity in the
wider sense (langage) from the language system (langue) and its realization in speech
(parole). According to Saussure, speech is a completely individual phenomenon, and the
language system itself is primarily a social phenomenon which exists beyond and
independently from the particular individual and his/her particular use of it.
Therefore, Saussure differentiates the linguistics of a language (linguistique de la langue)
from the linguistics of speech (linguistique de la parole) and explicitly advocates focusing the
language studies of his time on the study of the linguistic system or linguistique de la langue.
This is exactly what followed. Charles Bally and Albert Schehaye gathered Saussure's
lectures from his students notes and published them as the Course in General Linguistics
/Cours de linguistique gnrale in 1916, three years after the author's death. The Course in
General Linguistics provided the incentive for the development of structuralism, an influential
linguistic theory in the mid-twentieth century.

The predecessors of structuralism, the Neogrammarians, observed the language atomistically

as a sum of several elements (phonemes, morphemes), not observing it as a whole in which
the elements were in correlation within the whole.
Saussure and the structuralists observed the language as a structured system in which every
single part is determined in correlation with other parts of that whole. Guberina adopts
Saussure's viewpoint of the language as a whole whose constituent parts have to be observed
in correlation within the whole, and the fact that language is primarily a communicational
phenomenon which is created in oral form.
Guberina, however, distances himself from the structuralist concept of language as a social
abstraction and studies language as an invisible living part of a human being who uses his
body, brain, and feelings creatively to manifest himself in communicational usage through
multimodal means of expression. That is, along with verbal, linear, and segmental elements,
we also come across vertical, suprasegmental, acoustic and visual elements, i.e., qualities of
spoken language: intonation, intensity, tempo, pause, facial expressions, body movement and
situation. Guberina observes that pause is also a spoken activity which functions at the level
of expression and at the level of content of the utterance in a given communicational situation.
Studying the Romance languages, Guberina was thus introduced to Saussure's linguistic
theory; he immediately adopted Saussure's theoretical legacy (synchronic study of a language,
the primacy of the oral over the written language, the idea of language as a structural whole).
From these foundations, Guberina set his path towards the linguistics of speech while
Saussures theory was still being discovered, interpreted and adopted in linguistic circles at
home and abroad.
PETAR GUBERINA

AND CHARLES BALLY

Charles Bally, de Saussures student and inheritor of his university chair, founder and editor
of the influential Course in General Linguistics, observed the system of spoken language
from the point of view of affectivity. He named this approach linguistic stylistics.
En somme, je reste fidle la distinction saussurienne entre la langue et la parole, mais
jannexe au domaine de la langue une province quon a beaucoup de peine lui attribuer : la
langue parle envisage dans son contenu affectif et subjectif. Elle rclame une tude
spciale : cest cette tude que jappelle la stylistique. Un des objets de mon enseignement
sera de montrer comment la stylistique sembote dans la linguistique gnrale. (Langage et
vie, 1965, p. 159)
Translation by the author of this paper: '' In short, I remain faithful to the Saussurean
distinction between language and speech; however, I add to it an area of language which
many are reluctant to attribut to it: spoken language with its affective and subjective content.
This area demands a special field study called stylistics. One of the topics of my teaching will
show how stylistics fits into general linguistics.
Bally introduced psychological and sociological criteria into his research of language, and by
doing so, the human individual and his/her subjective, affective, cognitive and social
dimension. He restricted his study to the analysis of words and the valorization of intonation
which, in the beginning, Bally set into means of indirect expression (moyens indirects

dexpression) and later on, in his book Linguistique gnrale et linguistique franaise (1944),
he included them among the basic elements of language expression.
Besides intonation, Bally also emphasized context, situation, facial expressions and body
movement in general as means of indirect expression. Not only Petar Guberina, but also
Emile Benveniste and Oswald Ducrot, significant representatives of linguistic enunciation
(linguistique nonciative) and pragmatic theories of meaning in language, converged with
Bally's theoretical legacy..
Guberina again made a step forward in the valorization of affectivity and subjectivity in
language studies with his theoretical elaboration of the qualities of spoken language, placing
them in the category of affective and subjective elements of content resulting from
multimodal manifestations of spoken language. For Guberina, language is manifested in
dynamic structuration, and it should be studied within the linguistics of speech and spoken
language.
Guberina does not separate verbal speech from ' body language'. According to him the verbal
and the non-verbal are part of the global body language of human beings in dialogue, in the
space and overall circumstances of the communicational situation. In this way he took the
initiative toward adopting the multidisciplinary and multimodal approach in language studies.
These tendencies were intensified during the 1980s. In the meantime, Guberina implicitly
appealed for pluridisciplinarity in his book The Solidarity of Linguistic Elements (1952:20):
Strunjaci iz eksperimentalne fizike, psiholozi, filozofi, logiari i logistiari, sociolozi i
ekonomisti povezuju vrlo esto svoje nauke s jezikom, dok lingvisti vrlo rijetko povezuju svoju
nauku s drugima.
Translation by the author of this paper : ''Experts in experimental physics, psychology,
philosophy, logic and logistics, sociology and economy, very often associate their sciences
with language, whereas linguists rarely associate their science with others.
Since the 1950s Guberina himself practised multidisciplinarity in his own scientific research,
first at the Institute for Phonetics and then at the Suvag Centre, today's Suvag Polyclinic.
Both Bally and Guberina pointed out that all elements of language can be best structured
when communicating in your mother tongue. Only in their mother tongue can speakers fully
master what Bally calls ''effet par evocation i.e. the effect of evocation which words have
within a specific sociocultural linguistic community. Thus, before the Second World War,
both Bally and Guberina emphasized the importance of the native speaker in the reliable
production and interpretation of linguistic expression. This point would especially be stressed
within the framework of Noam Chomskys transformational-generative grammar in the 1950s
and the 1960s.

LOGIC AND STYLISTIC VALUES OF COMPLEX SENTENCES

In his 1939 PhD thesis entitled Valeur logique et valeur stylistique des propositions
complexes, Guberina immediately ventured further from the traditions of the Genevan and
French linguistics of the first three decades of the twentieth century, constantly expanding the
directions of his research.
Dealing with the structure of French complex sentences, Guberina systematically carried out a
parallel comparative study in the Croatian language and in this way announced the
development of contrastive linguistics, which would become more significant in America
twenty years later.
Guberina examined sentences embedded in context and situation and naturally in conjunction
with the values or qualities of the spoken language. In fact, using contemporary linguistic
terminology, he studied the utterance (nonc) within a given discourse. Therefore, he was
one of the pioneers in textual linguistics and in the linguistics of discourse.
In his PhD thesis Guberina rejects the formalistic and positivistic analysis of the sentence
based on the categorization of formal connective elements and by a priori division into types
of words without much attention being paid to communicational circumstances, qualities of
the spoken language and the logical-affective values of complex sentences. According to
Ferdinand de Saussure, every sign within the language system has a value in relation to the
other signs in the structure of that system. All members of the system are jointly, i.e. mutually,
strongly connected so that the value of every single member derives from the simultaneous
virtual presence of the others.
Guberina analyses the value of the sentence within its context. He observes the dynamics of
the structuration of the sentence in context (i.e. the utterance in discourse) and situation, and
with concrete examples shows that the values or qualities of the spoken language participate
in this structuration and influence the stylistic and logical value of the sentence. He stresses
that a living language emerges from the dynamics of the spoken language and that it lives and
develops in the spoken language.
THE STRUCTURE OF THE SPOKEN LANGUAGE IN STRUCTURALISM AND THE LINGUISTICS OF
SPEECH

Guberina starts from the concept of studying a language as a structure, but he speaks of a
dynamic, multidimensional structure, or rather, of dynamic structuring in which the segmental
language material is connected with the suprasegmental values (qualities) of the spoken
language, with the real context and situation, and with the dialogical relations of the
interlocutors. In fact, language structure according to Guberina is globally
(multidimensionally) structural and inseparable from the human being in his/her affective,
cognitive, physical, and spatial reality.
With this attitude, he confronted the staticity and reductionism of linguistic theories which
aimed at achieving objectivity by eliminating man.
According to Guberina, the qualities of the spoken language witness the presence of the
human individual in the particular situation of spoken language realization.
THE LINGUISTICS OF SPEECH, PHONETICS, PRAGMATICS, TRADUCTOLOGY

Verbotonal phonetics is grounded in the linguistics of speech. Meanwhile, the linguistics of

speech is an area of study which goes beyond the field of phonetics. Besides the
multimodality at the level of spoken linguistic expression, the linguistics of speech also
includes the study of its multilayered content: the stylistic, affective, semantic, logical,
expressive and pragmatic layers of content in discourse and in the utterance. The study of
speech acts was initiated by the philosopher of language J. L. Austin in his work How to do
Things with Words (1962). Let us recall that the domain of speech act theory belongs in
linguistics to the field of pragmatics. Pragmatics is the branch of linguistics which studies the
meaning of context-embedded utterances.
However, ten years earlier, in his book The Solidarity of the Elements of Language (1952:
120), Guberina explicitly states that, besides expressing reality (the reality of thought and
external reality), language can also express an action i.e. the attempt to do something with
speech alone:
Jezik dakle izraava stvarnost (i akciju), odnosno poziv drugome da izvri neku stvarnost
(akciju).
Rije, jezik toliko je povezan sa stvarnou, da se ili izmjenjuje sa stvarnou ili je uope
zamjenjuje u stanovitom smislu.
Language thus expresses reality (and action), or an invitation to perform a reality (action).
The word, the language, is so tied to reality that it alternates with it, or even replaces it in
some sense."
Thus Guberina was a pioneer in the pragmatic dimension of language studies. He is known
for his opinion that there are no true synonyms in language. Even if we find synonyms at the
semantic level, their pragmatic and stylistic content is never the same. The same applies at the
level of the utterance i.e. the context-embedded sentence.
Furthermore, Guberina maintains that spoken language emerged from actions, i.e. the screams
and movements that were man's earliest actions and which gradually became the basis for
man's symbols (Stylistics, 1967: 17; first edition of 1958 as a university textbook). Thus
Guberina quoted J. Vendryes (Langage, 1950: 17):
Avant dtre un moyen de raisonner, le langage a d tre en effet un moyen daction, et lun
des plus efficaces dont lhomme pt disposer.
Translation by the author '' Before it became a means of thought, language had to be, in fact, a
means of activity, and one of the most efficient ones that the man could possess J. Vendryes,
Langage, 1950 : 17.
Guberina entitles On Translation the second chapter of the second part of the same university
textbook (Stylistics), published by the then Department of Phonetics, Faculty of Humanities
and Social Sciences in Zagreb. The chapter deals with the concept of the theory of translation.
Besides the theoretical framework of the new scientific discipline that we now call
traductology or translation studies, Guberina examines the specific problems of translation
and illustrates them with examples of translations from Jean-Dayres French translation of
Nazors narrative Water.
The origins of translation studies as new scientific theory go back to the 1960s, and by the
end of the century, the science of translation became an increasingly important disciplineand

an integral part of numerous university curricula. Again, we can say that in his theory and
practice Guberina pioneered a new scientific direction - which he explicitly and theoretically
elaborated and implemented as part of his university course at the Faculty of Philosophy in
Zagreb.
His close associate Raymond Renard founded Ecole d'Interprtes Internationaux de Mons in
Belgium in 1962. Guberina cooperated with R. Renard from the very beginning in the
development and strengthening of the newly founded institution.
Since the foundation of Ecole d'Interprtes Internationaux de Mons, Guberina organized the
departure of twelve of his close associates to Mons for support. Eventually, the Ecole
d'Interprtes Internationaux de Mons became the Faculty of Interpreters and Translators at the
University of Mons (Facult de traduction et d'interpretation de l'Universit de Mons). The
Faculty of Interpreters and Translators at the University of Mons now includes Departments
of English, German, French, Danish, Italian, Spanish, Russian and Dutch language and offers
internationally recognized undergraduate and graduate programs for professional translators
and interpreters.
EXTERNAL PHENOMENAL APPEARANCE IN LANGUAGE: REALITY-THOUGHT-FEELING BECOME
EXPRESSION

Tako dolazimo do zakljuka da je jezik kao izraz pojavnog karaktera i da je misao kao
misao-izraz opet pojavnog karaktera.
Prema tome kad govorimo o pojavnom liku jezinog izraza, onda tu podrazumijevamo i
pojavni lik misli, misaone operacije, i obratno.
"Thus we come to the conclusion that the formal expression of language is phenomenal in
character and that thought as a thought-expression is also phenomenal.
So when we talk about the phenomenal appearance of linguistic expressions, then we also
think of the phenomenal appearance of thought, cognitive operations, and vice
versa.(Solidarity of the Elements of Language, 1952: 152).
This quote sounds as if it was extracted from the text of a contemporary cognitive linguist.
Cognitive Linguistics, in fact, emerges from the study of language moulded by human
perception and understanding of the world.
Since 1980, this new direction in linguistics has been trying to explain the human ability to
perceive, categorize and understand reality through the study of the structure of language
expression. And here the work of Petar Guberina is a great source of fresh insight.
Reality, thought and feeling are closely connected in the spoken language, so aside from other
things, we use speech to express an objective or cognitive reality. From this solidarity the
language in speech gains a real, external phenomenal appearance. By discovering and
discontinuing the phenomenal world, we gradually come to the conceptual and symbolic
discontinuation of our internal cognitive and affective world. Every language in its own way
structures the events from the experience of our external spatial reality and then the
structuration is transposed at an abstract level of content and linguistic organization in
general:
Kako je prostor u kojemu ovjek ivi i koji ga okruuje toka prema kojoj se odreuje kad ga
podrauje vanjski svijet, osjet spaciocepcije obuhvaa sve osjete.

Koliko vladamo prostorom, toliko razvijamo svoje osjete, svoj govor i svoju osobnost.
As the space in which the man lives and which surrounds him is the point according to
which it is determined when he is stimulated by the external world, the feeling of
spacioception encompasses all senses.
To what extent we master space, is to what extent we develop our senses, our speech and our
personality. (P. Guberina : The Role of the Body in Learning Foreign Languages, RAP,
n73-74-75, Mons, 1985:37).
Mihovil Pansini, a longtime close associate of Petar Guberina, elaborated the notion of
spatioception realized by watching, hearing, and the vestibular, tactile, and proprioceptive
senses. These senses are important units for the rehabilitation of hearing and speech because
they allow the perception of space on which hearing and speaking is based. From this Pansini
derives a neuroscientific argument: an action is a pre-verb (prvotni glagol), an object is a prenoun, an event a pre-sentence and topography pre-syntax course, within the particular
structure of experiential reality in the concrete spoken language.
Today's contemporary linguistic research has branched in different directions, and in scientific
and technical literature in French linguistics the word linguistics is often found used in the
plural, we are in fact talking about modern linguistics in the plural. Let us mention, for
example, the book by Catherine Fuchs & Pierre Le Goffic, Les linguistiques contemporaines
(1992).
However, if we observe it from the perspective of contemporary theoretical sources in the
works of Saussure, Bally, Benveniste and Guberina, we shall find that these contemporary
directions concern spoken language studies embedded in context, and thus the linguistics of
language or the language system and the linguistics of speech seem to constitute an
inseparable whole. This is what Petar Guberina realized at the outset of his scientific studies
of language, and therefore his work was pioneering in a number of directions in modern
language studies.
CONCLUSION
Petar Guberinas huge body of work is difficult to summarize, but four fundamental
postulates could be pointed out:
1. spoken language cannot be observed as a separate unit, separate from the beings who use it,
from the qualities of spoken language and the socio-cultural heritage it results from,
2. spoken language is a dynamic co-activity of participants in communication,
3. teaching and the rehabilitation of speech and hearing includes working on hearing and
speech activity as a polysensoric process involving the human being as a whole,
4. in the center of all considerations of language is the human being in his (or her) creativity
and the constant dynamics of the body, brain and affectivity which result in the human desire
to be in connection with oneself, others and the surroundings.
Thanks to his global and dynamic vision of language and speech, the linguistic theory of Petar
Guberina represents an important milestone in any scientific pursuit of speech and language
issues.
BIBLIOGRAPHY

[1] C.W. ASP (2005), Verbotonal Speech Treatment. Plural Publishing Inc., San Diego Oxford Brisbane.
[2] J. L. AUSTIN (1962) How to do Things with Words. Cambridge, Mass., Harvard University Press.
[3] Ch. BALLY [1909] (1936), Trait de stylistique franaise (1er volume), Heidelberg, Carl Winters
Universitts-Buchhandlung.
[4] Ch. BALLY [1913] (1965), Le langage et la vie, 3e d. refondue et augmente, Genve, Droz, 1952.
[5] Ch. BALLY [1932] (1944), Linguistique gnrale et linguistique franaise. Drugo, prepravljeno i uveano
izdanje. Berne: Francke.
[6] L. BAQU & M. ESTRADA (eds.), (2010), La langue et ltre communiquant. Hommage
Julio MURILLO, Mons, CIPA.
[7] E. BENVENISTE (1966), Problmes de linguistique gnrale. Paris : Gallimard.
[8] E. BENVENISTE (1974), Problmes de linguistique gnrale II. Paris : Gallimard.
[9] M. BERR ( ed.) (2005), Linguistique de la parole et apprentissage des langues, Mons, CIPA.
[10] A. CULIOLI(1990), Pour une Linguistique de l'nonciation. Oprations et reprsentations. Tome 1. Paris,
Ophrys.
[11] O. DUCROT (1989) Enonciation et polyphonie chez Charles Bally. In Ducrot : Logique, structure,
nonciation. Paris : Minuit, 165 191.
[12] C. FUCHS & P. LE GOFFIC (1992), Les linguistiques contemporaines. Paris, Hachette.
[13] P. GUBERINA [1939], (1993) : Valeur logique et valeur stylistique des propositions complexes. Paris.
Didier rudition. Mons CIPA . (PhD dissertation, Sorbonne, Paris, first to situate his study in linguistique
de la parole as de Saussure concieved it).
[14] P. GUBERINA (1952) Zvuk i pokret u jeziku/Sound and Movement in Language, Zagreb, Matica hrvatska.
[15] P. GUBERINA (1952) Povezanost jezinih elemenata/The Solidarity of the Elements of Language, Zagreb,
Matica hrvatska.
[16] P. GUBERINA (1967), Zagreb, Zavod za fonetiku. [university textbook 1958].
[17] P. GUBERINA (1985) The Role of the Body in Learning Foreign Languages, RAP, n73-74-75, Mons,
1985:37
[18] P. GUBERINA (2003), Rtrospection, (ed. Claude ROBERGE), Zagreb, Artresor naklada.
[19] P. GUBERINA (2010) Govor i ovjek/Man and Speech. Verbotonalni sistem. Zagreb, Artresor naklada.
[20] P. INTRAVAIA (2000), Formation des professeurs de langue en phontique corrective. Le systme verbotonal. Paris. Didier rudition. Mons CIPA.
[21] A. KOVAEC (2006), Akademik Petar Guberina. In P. IMUNOVI (Ed.) (2006) Petar Guberina 19132005. Zagreb, Academia Scientiarum et Artium Croatica, 13-23.
[22] A. LANDERCY & R. RENARD (1977), lments de phontique, Didier, Bruxelles.
[23] J. MURILLO (2003), Logique de la physique et logique du vivant en didactique des langues . Cahiers
du Centre interdisciplinaire du langage, n17, pp. 9-28.
[24] J. MURILLO (2009), Paramtrisation verbo-tonale de lintercomprhension , in Jamet, M.-Ch. (ed.),
Orale e intercomprensione tra lingue romanze.Ricerche e implicazioni didattiche, Cafoscarina, Le Bricole,
Venezia, pp. 49-76.
[25] Murillo Puyal, J.; Piccaluga, M.; Harmegnies, B. (2008), Pour un franais partenaire dans l'aire romane :
aspects psycholinguistiques et didactiques de l'intercomprhension entre locuteurs de langues latines, in
Conti, V., Grin, F. (dir.), S'entendre entre langues voisines: vers l'intercomprhension, Georg dit., Genve.
P. 341-370. Intercomprhension Orale. U.Lat. texte dfinitif 22.XI.2010.doc
[26] M. PANSINI (1989), Spaciocepcija i gramatika prostora kao sluanje i govor/ Spacioception and the
Grammar of Space in Speaking and Hearing / Mihovil Pansini. // Filologija. Knj. 17 (1989 : 33-37) :
asopis Razreda za filologiju JAZU u Zagrebu / glavni i odgovorni urednik Rudolf Filipovi.
[27] M. PANSINI (2001-2002) Prvi niz javljanja osobnim internet stranicama: za bolje razumijevanje
verbotonalne metode 15.02.2001-15.02.2002. www.suvag.hr/~mpansini/

[28] M. PANSINI (2003-2004-2006) Drugi niz javljanja na osobnim internet stranicama: za bolje razumijevanje
verbotonalne metode 28.05.2003.-26.6.2006. www.suvag.hr/~mpansini/
[29] M. PANSINI (2010) Petar Guberina. Rukopis upuen 11.8.2010. Vladimiru Prainu za pogovor
japanskome izdanju Rtrospection, u tisku.
[30] R. RENARD (1979), Introduction la mthode verbo-tonale de correction phontique, Didier Bruxelles.
[31] R. RENARD (Ed.) (2002), Apprentissage d'une langue trangre / seconde. 2.- La phontique verbo-tonale.
Bruxelles : De Boeck Universit.
[32] P. RIVENC (1991), "La problmatique structuro-globale audio-visuelle aujourd'hui" Revue de Phontique
Applique (RAP), 99-101, 121-132.
[33] P. RIVENC (2000) : Aider apprendre communiquer en langue trangre. 27 studija, objavljenih izmeu
1956. i 1999., obuhvaaju podruja lingvistike govora, semiotike i didaktike stranih jezika.
[34] P. RIVENC. (Ed.) (2003), Apprentissage d'une langue trangre / seconde. 3.- La mthodologie. Bruxelles :
De Boeck Universit.
[35] F. de SAUSSURE (2001), Teaj ope lingvistike/Course in General Linguistics, ArTresor i Institut za
hrvatski jezik i jezikoslovlje, Zagreb, preveo na hrvatski V. Vinja [1916] (1976), Cours de Linguistique
Gnerale, Paris : Payot.
[36] P. IMUNOVI (Ed.) (2006) Petar Guberina 1913-2005. Zagreb, Academia Scientiarum et Artium
Croatica.
[37] J.-J. VAN VLASSELAER, (1994), SGAV: paradigme ouvert sur l'apprentissage. Paris. Didier rudition.
Mons CIPA. (Essej od didaktici stranih jezika i posebice o strukturo-globalnoj audiovizualnoj
metodologiji).
[38] J. VENDRYES (1950), Le langage. Paris, Albin Michel.
[39] B. VULETI (2005), Fonetika pjesme/ The Phonetics of a Poem. Zagreb, FF Press.
[40] B. VULETI (2006), Govorna stilistika/ The Speech Stylistics. Zagreb, FF Press.