Porter, Et Al. RNC Delegate Contest - Statement of Position

STATEMENT OF POSITION BY CONTESTANTS AGAINST THE
COLORADO AT-LARGE DELEGATION TO THE 2016 REPUBLICAN

NATIONAL CONVENTION
Synopsis
The principles embedded in our partys platform form the foundation for this
contest.
Honest elections are the foundation of representative government
Every time that a fraudulent vote is cast, it effectively candles out the vote
of a legitimate voter.
We call on every citizen, elected official, and member of the judiciary to
preserve the integrity of the vote.
We recognize that having a physical verification of the vote is the best way
to ensure a fair election. Let ambition counter ambition, as James Madison
said. When all parties have representatives observing the counting of ballots
in a transparent process, integrity is assured.
Indeed, the fundamental purpose of the Convention Rules, rules of order and the
credentialing process is to ensure the integrity of the elections of delegates
permitted to vote at the Convention. Through its pervasive, knowing, and continued
violations of its bylaws, the April 9 Convention standing meeting rules, and state
laws, the Colorado Republican Party conducted an eminently unfair election of
delegates.
The flawed election results are marred by both unintentional material errors,
flagrant violations, and conscious bias on the part of the CRC to benefit the official
Page 1
Cruz slate. That 16-member official slate won all 13 delegate seats and the top
three alternate seats, and benefitted from the CRCs favorable treatment and from
the ensuing confusion and chaos.
National media exposed the chaotic and highly irregular balloting practices during
Colorados April 8-9 Congressional District and State Conventions. Exhibit 1.
Hundreds of voting delegates left the conventions disgusted by the practices
employed, knowing that the partys principles of fair elections had been
compromised.
Despite the purported large margins of victory of the official Cruz slate delegates,
the error-riddled election must not be permitted to stand. To fail to decertify the
delegation would make a mockery of the RNCs election standards, and would
reward election manipulation. The Contestants do not claim to be the sole rightful
delegates for the five seats in which they seek to serve. Instead, they are
representatives of the hundreds of candidates who were disenfranchised, or harmed
by the unequal treatment from the party, or who were negatively impacted by
material errors in the balloting process that cause the true will of the state
convention delegates to be unknowable. The rightful owners of any of the delegate
seats is undeterminable because of the flawed processes employed.
Through this Statement of Position the Constants have presented abundant
evidence of election irregularities (Rules and bylaws violations) that calls into
question the results of the Convention election. Important additional information,
needed for a full assessment by this Committee, has been improperly withheld from
the Contestants.
First, the balloting processes violated the most fundamental election bylaw
requirement to print names and affiliation of candidates on the ballot. Once the
State Party decided to circumvent this basic ballot format rule by only printing
Page 2
assigned numbers on the ballots, a host of errors, irregularities and violations

naturally resulted. The failure to produce an official list of candidate names and
assigned numbers further exacerbated the failures of the numbers-only ballot.
Contestants have located nine different CRC-prepared ballot number lists and
supplements, each with different and frequently conflicting information.
Contestants believe that more lists were likely issued by CRC, creating unavoidable
voter confusion. Material non-compliant and chaotic balloting methods are grossly
unfair to all candidates and voters, save those who have undue influence with the
State Party to advance and protect their candidates slate.
Second, the ballot tabulation process appears to have been materially inaccurate
with a likely impact on the outcome, given the thin margins that separate the atlarge delegates from the alternates. At least 136 votes were counted for unassigned
numbers in a manner to suggest ballot scanner or software problems. 2,132 votes
were invalidated for purported over-votes that may have actually been a result of
scanner or software problems. The Teller Committee did not attempt to validate
such votes. The State Party and their vendor have refused to permit review of the
ballots or ballot images to verify the count.
Third, the State Party gave improper favorable treatment to the official Cruz
campaign slate in numerous material ways resulting in a likely positive impact on
the election outcome. The unfavorable treatment of all other candidates
significantly injured all Contestant candidates creating an almost impossible
obstacle to winning a seat. The collective actions of the State Party in favoring the
Cruz official slate over all other candidates violates the spirit and provisions of the
pre-convention neutrality clauses in the state party bylaws.
Fourth, ineligible candidates were not excluded, and their vote totals were certified,
taking significant votes from eligible candidates. For example, there were 1,190
votes counted for ineligible candidates from Denver County who had not paid their
Page 3
convention fees.
Fifth, the wrongful certification of the at-large delegation was a willful act by State
Party officials, who were engaged in a pattern of deceptive certifications of
Congressional Districts 2,3,4 and 5. The above four issues also plagued the
Congressional District delegate elections of the preceding day, April 8, where fraud
has been credibly demonstrated in one district. Numerous complaints and protests
have been filed with the state party and the Executive Committee, which refused to
investigate or refer the alleged fraud to the Attorney General. False certifications
were made in CDs 2,3,4 and 5 where the conventions delegates were precluded
from objecting to irregularities as no Tellers report was permitted.
Sixth, the rights of the members to object and attempt corrections during the
meeting was obstructed as essential, required parliamentary procedures and
meeting rules were ignored.
Seventh, the cumulative weight of numerous other subsidiary and related violations
of rules and laws combined to exacerbate an unfair and unverifiable election.
The CRCs pervasive violations of state law, rules and bylaws created an
environment in which no fair and proper election result could be achieved. The RNC
must not condone elections where governing rules and fairness are abandoned for
political gains.
Page 4
In the Matter of the Porter, et al. Petition for Contest )

Against the Colorado At-large Delegation to the
)
2016 Republican National Convention
)
Statement of Position
June 22, 2016
STATEMENT OF POSITION BY CONTESTANTS AGAINST THE COLORADO

AT-LARGE DELEGATION TO THE 2016 REPUBLICAN NATIONAL
CONVENTION
Contested delegates should be decertified because the delegates and

alternates were chosen in a manner that violates numerous bylaws, Rules of the
Republican National Convention, CRC meeting Rules, rules of order, and the laws
of the State of Colorado (XX), and fails to reflect the clear will of the Colorado
Convention.
I.
Facts
A. Names and pledged status were not printed on the face of the ballots
The failure to meet the most basic ballot layout requirements and related
rules and bylaws created a fatal flaw from which the election could not recover.
Fundamental election principles and CRC Bylaw Article XIII 5c require that the
ballot include on its face the presidential candidate pledge for each delegate
candidate or indicate that the candidate is unpledged. The April 9, 2016, State
Convention Rules (CO Rules) (Exhibit 2) also require that the ballot shall include
the presidential preference of those so pledging. (CO Rule 7.4(b)) Ballots must
include the name of the candidate to reduce risk of error, voter confusion, and fraud.
CRC officials made the affirmative decision to exclude the candidates required
names and pledged information from the face of the at-large state ballots and CDs
Page 5
2, 3, 4, and 5 ballots. The at-large ballot contained only target areas for voting
(ovals) and a series of numbers 1 through 948 (Exhibit 1) assigned to 636
candidates. The resulting confusion, errors, misprinted official candidate lists, and
misprinted campaign materials, and unequal treatment of candidates as described
herein created a materially inaccurate and flawed election.
No supplemental ballot lists can mitigate for excluding the candidates
name on the face of the ballot. The lists can be, and were in this case, incomplete,
misprinted and unavailable to voters. Campaigns can harm targeted delegates
intentionally or unintentionally by misprinting the candidate number on campaign
materials.
In a failed attempt to compensate for the improper and purposeful exclusion
of candidate names from the ballot, the convention program listed the candidates
through number 588. This program was distributed at credentialing. An additional
ballot supplement booklet listing 595 candidate names, pledged information, and
ballot numbers was distributed to all delegates during balloting. A third one-page
ballot supplement addendum with similar information for additional candidates
who were purportedly excluded from the ballot supplement booklet was distributed
separately during ballot issuance. A fourth supplemental list of ballot numbers was
projected on the screen for a brief period, after ballots had been distributed and
voting had begun. A fifth list of 7 selected candidates and ballot numbers left out of
the program was projected on the convention screen. CRCs failure to disclose the
names of 48 candidates until just as voting began gave unfair advantage to the
Respondents.
To date, Contestants have located nine different official ballot lists and
supplements, none of which are have identical candidate information. The voter
confusion created was obvious to all concerned, including CRC officials. (It should be
noted that the candidate information for the 16-member Cruz slate Respondents
was not changed or omitted from the official lists after April 4.)
Page 6
Additionally, the sequencing of the candidates names on both supplements

violated CO Rule 7.4(d) sequencing rules intended for ballot name sequencing and
caused further confusion and voter error. Voter confusion was also created by the
exclusion of names from the ballot and by the purportedly mitigating ballot
supplements and supplemental projected slides with candidates listed in a
different order than voting delegates had been instructed to expect. Voters could not
reasonably consider all candidates in the constantly changing list of candidates.
Below of a few examples of ballot number assignment errors:
Duplicate
Ballot #
15 & 617
326 & 599
411 & 601
440 & 605
532 & 607
LAST
Bamber
Martinez
Piper
Rendleman
Tonkins
FIRST
Robert
Solomon
Barbara
Kay
Vickie
Missing Ballot numbers:
378 on ballot twice - no 379

378 - Marty Nielson - Cruz
379 - Nicolas Neitzel - Trump
523 on ballot twice - no 513
513 - Molly Sullivan - UnP
523 - Bradley Templeman - UnP
B. Ballot tabulation errors create uncertain, unverifiable results
A material number of votes were improperly tabulated. The result was a
likely impact on the outcome, particularly in determining the close races between
the lowest vote-ranked Respondent delegate and highest vote-ranked alternates.
For example, only 2 votes separated the 13th delegate from the 1st alternate. Only
Page 7
8 votes separated the 13th delegate from the 2nd alternate. Only 7 votes separate
the 4th alternate from the 5th alternate. These are but a few examples of the close
reported vote tallies as further detailed on the Election Summary (Exhibit 3
[provided by link in the paper copy of this complaint.]) http://cologop.org/wpcontent/uploads/2016/01/2016_ElectionSummaryReport-National-Delegate-by-Votetotals.pdf
Given the pervasive errors and tabulation questions, it is likely that results
are in error, but accurate results are unknowable. It is likely that some
Respondents have been improperly certified as delegates because of the material
errors in the election process. It is impossible accurate measure the quantitative
material impacts on candidates, alternates, and delegates vote counts.
The vote total summary discloses 136 votes were counted for invalid
ballot numbers higher than 636, which were not associated with a candidate. The
ballot contained 948 numbers and oval target areas, 312 of which were ineligible
but permitted recording of votes. These votes were improperly counted although
there was no candidate associated with the ballot number. One-third of the ballot
was invalid, but marks on the invalid area were counted, presumably creating
invalidated over-voted ballots. The delegates and alternates officially elected were
elected with vote tallies between 380 votes and 2,272 votes; therefore, the anomaly
of 136 votes became a material irregularity that likely impacted the close, thinmargin election outcomes. As an example, 41 votes were counted for nonexistent
candidate #948, but those votes were likely intended for eligible candidates. 22
votes were counted for nonexistent candidate #777. These material counts
suggest software or ballot scanning problems.
Tallies for unassigned ballot numbers suggest the lack of names on the
ballots, multiple, confusing ballot supplements, and 312 excess ballot numbers on
the ballot caused voter confusion and mismarked ballots. Given the material
percentage of over-voted ballots (82) and the 136 votes for nonexistent candidate
numbers, questions have been raised as to the accuracy of the ballot scanning and
Page 8
tabulation equipment as well. Requested access to ballots and electronic ballot

scans in order to investigate the source of the problem has been denied by the state
party and EPCO, which performed the Teller operation. CRCs Executive
Committee also voted not to investigate.
The vote tally data appears to indicate that 82 ballots and all votes thereon
(2,132 votes) were invalidated because of over-voting (voting for more than 26
candidates.) Additionally, 136 votes were counted for ballot numbers not assigned
to candidates. Delegates were not informed of the highly unusual situation that
marks in unassigned ovals were live and would count toward the maximum of 26
votes. If marks in any target areas associated with unassigned numbers caused
some ballots to be invalidated as over-voted, all valid votes on those 82 ballots
should be counted. A review of those ballots for voter intent is essential to
determine the impact of this particular potential error. Additionally, votes for any
candidate with two ballot numbers should not be penalized as over-votes.
Further, 2,132 votes exceed 3% of the votes cast. Rejecting 3% of the votes
cast on noncompliant ballots is improper and calls the election results into question.
Additionally, candidates who were assigned two or more numbers, such as
candidates noted above were not given the benefit of adding their multiple ballot
numbers.
CO Convention Standing Rule 8.4 required ballot tabulations to be recorded
and reported by county. CRC violated this rule by adopting the noncompliant ballot
layout and permitting the ballots to be commingled without regard to county. Thus,
no county tabulations are possible, rendering it more difficult to detect error, fraud,
or other source of the irregularities or make real-time objections to the reported
tallies.
Contestants agents request to inspect the ballots or electronic ballot images
has been denied.
Page 9
C. Favored treatment given to Respondents in the official sixteen member

Cruz slate
The 16 official Cruz slate candidates won the top 16

delegate/alternate slots, although the thin, but erroneous, margins of victory
make it unclear what the accurate vote rankings would be among the 13 Cruz
slate delegates and 3 Cruz slate alternates. The 16 Cruz slate candidates
whose names and numbers were projected for an extended time on the screen
each were credited with over 1,000 more votes each than any candidate who
was not given the favored treatment explained here.
The CRCs favoritism shown the official Cruz slate began early in the
campaign process, as the CRC prohibited independent candidates, such as
the Contestant candidates, from having copies of the amended 16 (f) filling,
permitting only presidential campaigns could have access to the candidate
election rules. The favorable treatment continued as campaign literature
distribution in voting delegates bags was permitted only by campaigns with
multiple volunteers to perform other CRC volunteer tasks. Objections
concerning the favorable treatment from non-Cruz slate candidates were
ignored by CRC officials.
Five of the official Cruz slate members were added to the website lists
and transmitted to the balloting vendor after the March 27 deadline for filing
Letters of Intent to Run as delegates. These candidates names (Shari
Bjorkland (590), Kristi Brown (591), Scott Anderson (592), John Hotaling
(593), and Steve Humphrey (594)) were printed, out of alphabetical order at
the end of the official ballot lists, although other candidates who were
transmitted to the vendor late, with ballot numbers from 595 to 636 were not
given such favored treatment of being included in the official printed list. The
Committee is encouraged to inspect the transmittal of the Letters of Intent
Page 10
from the Respondents to ascertain the timeliness of their transmittals.

The Cruz slate candidates ballot numbers were accurately
posted on the State Party website and the printed ballot listings and
supplements, while many other candidates were not listed on the website
until just before the election or not at all. Exhibit 4 shows a slide of
additional candidates, some of them disclosed for the first time while
delegates were voting.
The 16 member Cruz slates ballot numbers were protected by CRC
and not changed or misprinted, --a benefit not afforded to many other
candidates. The official Cruz slate was permitted 20 minutes on stage with
correct ballot names and numbers projected by CRC on large screens as
Senator Cruz spoke. (Exhibit 5) In contrast, Contestant candidates were
permitted 10 seconds of on stage time as were all other pledged and
unpledged candidates. Some candidates spent their 10 seconds announcing
corrections to their misprinted ballot numbers on official lists and erroneous
campaign literature.
Perhaps the most telling signal of bias by the party is the now-famous
Tweet sent from the Colorado GOP Twitter account moments after the
Respondents election results were announced. The Tweet proclaimed, We
did it. #Never Trump. (See Exhibit 1, Blaze article) While the party has
claimed that the Tweet was unauthorized, the circumstances that would
permit such unauthorized communications, suggest a culture of CRC staff
bias toward the official Cruz slate.
While the Cruz slate campaign organization and vigorous
electioneering is respected and encouraged, the favored treatment CRC
afforded those 16 Respondents was unfair and violated CRC bylaws Article
Page 11
III C., requiring neutrality.

D. Votes were accepted for ineligible candidates
Upon information and belief, votes were permitted for some candidates
who did not meet the requirements of paying their convention badge fees,
or submitting timely Letters of Intent to Run. (Exhibit 6)
As an example, in Denver County alone, numerous candidates
apparently failed to pay their convention fees and were listed on the
ballot, and accumulated 1,190 votes. Votes for ineligible candidates
obviously harm other candidates such as Contestant candidates.
E. State Party officials knowingly certified flawed and improper results
Respondents have been certified by House and Brandi Meeks (CRC
Secretary) under the provisions of RNC Rule 20. The certification was not
made in good faith given the known material election irregularities, rules
bylaws and state law violations, improper favoritism and inaccurate results
as reported above.
Such material irregularities were raised by members of the CRC
Executive Committee during their May 20 meeting. House and Meeks
attended the May 20 meeting and participated in the discussion. A motion to
undertake an internal investigation before delegate certification to the RNC
was defeated.
House and Ms. Meeks are aware of the numerous material discrepancies, the
allegations of fraud, and the election bylaws and rules violations both from
their April 8-9 convention experiences and the Executive Committee
discussion. Their knowledge of such irregularities should have prevented the
delegation certification.
Page 12
F. Delegates were obstructed from effective objections

RNC-stated requirements at the January 2016 Chairmans
Session were clear that a Professional Registered Parliamentarian must be
engaged to avoid parliamentary and process errors that may invite contests.
The acting parliamentarian for the Colorado convention was not
professionally credentialed and was ineffective in carrying out his
responsibility to correct pre- and real-time convention process errors. (Porter
affidavit Exhibit 7)
Contestants, other candidates, and all voting delegates were
prejudiced by the failure of CRC officials to make the proposed state
convention meeting rules available prior to their adoption and during the
conduct of the meeting. (Porter affidavit Exhibit 7) Timely objections were
made to the rules adoption without reasonable access to a copy, but
objections could not be heard in the chaotic environment caused by CRCs
failure to run an orderly meeting under the CO Rules and RNC-stated
requirements as well as by CRCs failure to provide floor microphones.
The unavailable rules included requirements for balloting and
challenges to balloting that were therefore unknown to candidates and all
participants, prejudicing the Contestants ability to make timely objections to
material ballot processing errors.
Meeting protocol requires microphones be made available on the
convention floor for delegate access to raise objections, motions, and points of
order. The lack of available microphones in an arena with over 4,000
attendees made real-time objections impossible. Porter lodged a complaint
with House concerning the lack of floor microphones as the meeting was
beginning. (Porter affidavit Exhibit 7) The complaint was ignored.
Page 13
Vote tallies require 38 pages to print. The Teller Committee failed to

disclose anomalies to the convention delegates such as the 136 votes for
nonexistent candidates counted in the results. They did not disclose ballot
formatting and ballot supplement printing errors. The convention body had
no way to consider the errors and their impact on the reported results during
their vote to approve the Teller Committee report. The Teller Committee had
the duty to present an accurate report and disclose any such discrepancies
and anomalies prior to asking the convention to adopt the results.
The Teller Committee violated their duties by conducting this reckless
and error-riddled election and by reporting the results as if material
problems did not impact the results.
G. Numerous related and subsidiary violations combined to exacerbate the
unfair and unverifiable election
The individual experiences detailed in the attached affidavits of

Contestants Porter (Exhibit 7), Gamache (Exhibit 8,) Carr (Exhibit 9),
Alexander (Exhibit 10), and Fore (Exhibit 11) provide the practical harmful
impacts of the variety of rules violations incurred. Candidate Molly Sullivans
affidavit (Exhibit 12) provides one example of a candidate who was listed in
the published ballot lists but whose number did not appear on the ballot.
Delegate Cindy Lyons affidavit (Exhibit 13) further details the practical
inability of voters to meaningfully consider all the candidates in a fair
manner, given the disorderly and disorganized non-compliant nature of the
convention process.
CRC wilfully repeated improper processes. CRC officials and its

balloting vendor, the El Paso County Clerks office, (EPCO) managed the
balloting processes for Congressional Districts (CD) 2, 3, 4, and 5 on April 8
using essentially the same flawed, noncompliant processes as described
Page 14
above. CDs 1, 6, and 7 elections were independently conducted prior to April

8 and reported only material problems associated with the CRC-generated
national delegate candidate lists. Each CD elected 3 national convention
delegates and 3 alternates.
The April 8 CD elections were plagued with the same problems
identified above in the state convention. Ballots excluded the required
candidate name and information. April 8 CD ballots included 300 live voting
ovals in every CD, more than three times the number of candidates in any
CD election. All April 8 CD elections recorded a material number of
erroneous votes for unassigned numbers, clearly impacting the votes for
eligible candidates and possibly impacting the outcomes. In their role of
conducting Teller functions, EPCO concealed such errors from the delegates
as the Teller reports were presented. The winners were never presented to
or approved by the bodies of CDs 2, 3, 4, and 5. The incomplete and
materially inaccurate Teller reports in those districts were unilaterally
adopted by the Chair with known material errors after adjournment of the
meetings, and the convention bodies were denied their right to hear, object to,
amend, or reject the Teller reports.
Allegations of material voter fraud are pervasive in CD3 where some
eligible voters were denied ballots because their ballots had been reportedly
fraudulently voted by another countys delegation. This was confirmed by the
Chair of CD3, Linda Sorenson. (Exhibit 14) This result was approved by the
Teller Committee and EPCO.
The erroneous procedures, wrong ballot numbers, and voter confusion
of the April 8 elections attracted the attention of the national press. EPCO,
CD officers, House, and CRC received numerous complaints about the
noncompliant balloting processes amid the negative press reports on April 8.
CRC and EPCO made no known attempts to redesign and improve the
process and materials for the hereby contested state at-large election on April
Page 15
9. CRC and EPCO made no attempt to investigate the excess invalid votes
counted for unassigned numbers, to reprint the ballots, reprogram the
software, repair the ballot scanner, print a complete and accurate candidate
list, etc. in order to avoid repetition of the balloting errors the following day
for the at-large election. CRC and EPCO had a full business day after
material flaws were exposed early on April 8 and chose not to address the
similar known errors and predictable failures for the April 9 at-large election.
The decision to repeat and not correct the known April 8th
noncompliant and failed processes indicates that the CRC, House, and EPCO
knowingly permitted the April 9th at-large election to be flawed by the same
violations.
Additional facts. The allegations, details and exhibits in the Notice of
Contest filed June 18, 2016 are incorporated herein and provide some
additional detail on important, yet subsidiary issues. An electronic copy of
the filing can be located at https://www.scribd.com/doc/316124613/Challengeof-Colo-At-Large-Delegates-Amended-6-18-16.
Representatives affidavit (Exhibit 16)
II.
Discussion
This action seeks to set aside the flawed election to find a more equitable
result, and seeks to assure Colorado voters that reckless and materially noncompliant elections will not be tolerated by the party. The election was conducted
with pervasive disregard for the fundamental principles of election fairness and
legal compliance, resulting in an election that is incapable of authentication or
verification. Such elections must not be allowed to stand in seating delegates to the
National Convention, given the critical nature of the decisions to be made there.
Seating delegates chosen by illicit means and willful wrongdoing invites a public
disrespect of the Convention, and its legitimacy, and creates a chilling effect on
candidates and delegates in future delegate elections.
Page 16
In summary, the willful violation of multiple essential rules, laws, and

bylaws as presented above clearly impacted the outcome of the election to an
unknown, but likely material degree, and as as result, the certification should not
be permitted to stand.
III.
Request for additional information and adverse inference
CRC and its balloting vendor have repeatedly denied access to

documents needed for this contest, even when those documents are public
documents or required to be available to delegates.
Contestants respectfully request the Committee on Contests require the CRC
to immediately deliver to Contestants the information requested in Exhibit 15, to
ensure all information presented in future filings or hearings is accurate and
complete. Electronic scans of all voted ballots should also be delivered to
Contestants. They are available as standard records created by the Dominion voting
system.
On June 1, Molly Sullivan, potential contestant, requested copies of
necessary documentation from the state party. On June 3, Chairman House denied
her document request, stating that potential contestants would be required to file a
contest in order to obtain the information. It should be noted that House therein
misinformed Sullivan of the deadline for filing this contest. This followed a similar
unsuccessful request for documents by Nicholas Lundberg, potential contestant and
delegate to the state convention who was unable to vote for certain eligible
candidates whose ballot numbers were improperly excluded from the ballot. House
also denied Lundberg the needed documentation.
Contestants have requested copies of the convention Credentials Committee
report from the CRC, and have been denied as recently as June 21, although the
applicable rules of order permit any delegate to obtain this report. The Credentials
Page 17
Committee report is a key document in reconciling participation, eligible electors,

and ballot tabulations.
In an attempt both to resolve this controversy without a contest and to
properly prepare documentation for this Committee if a contest could not be
averted, agents assisting Contestants requested documents from CRC officials as
public records prepared under contract with the EPCO staff to conduct the
convention balloting services. The public records were improperly denied by EPCO.
CRC officials denied Contestants agents access to needed documents to fully
document this contest.
Under the Colorado Open Records Act, the electronic ballot images are public
records created by the El Paso County Clerks Office (EPCO) and subject to public
disclosure, but have been wrongfully denied by EPCO. Without proper disclosure,
Contestants are further prejudiced in this contest, as CRC controls the original
ballots. Without orders to the contrary from this committee, CRC may provide
favored access to records to the Respondents. Contestants request the Committee to
advise the CRC that all requested information related to this action must be shared
with all parties on a fully equal basis.
Adverse inference finding requested. Contestants respectfully request that
the refusal of the CRC to reasonably provide needed records for proper analysis and
submission to this Committee be found to be evidence of the validity of Contestants
allegations.
IV. Relief requested
Determining the voting delegates will as of April 9 as to who should

represent them at the National Convention is an impossible task given the material
nature of the errors. The broad discretion of this Committee will be required to
determine an equitable remedy under such circumstances.
Page 18
CRCs wilful failure to act in good faith and to apply reasonable care and
judgment in planning and conducting the election should subject the party to
sanctions and penalties to be determined by the Committee. Respondents who are
members 16 members of the Cruz official slate should be subject to sanctions for
seeking and accepting CRCs favored treatment, taking advantage of known
violations of the party rules.
Porter, Fore, Alexander, and Gamache should be declared as delegates to the
convention, taking the place of delegates ranked 9, 10, 11, and 12 in revised vote
totals, once the Committee can obtain information to refine vote totals.
We request that one additional delegate (with 13th vote ranking) be
decertified and replaced by one other candidate as a representative of the 610
candidates who were treated less favorably than the Respondents. Such a delegate
could be selected from another slate. We further request such additional relief that
the Committee on Contests deems appropriate to assure a more equitable
representation in Colorados delegation, and appropriate sanctions and penalties to
ensure that CRC is not motivated to repeat the manipulative election practices.
Respectfully submitted,
Marilyn Marks
Non-attorney representative for the Contestants
Page 19
Page 20
Exhibit 1
CONTRIBUTION
Colorados Convention
Craziness Could Cause
Chaos in Cleveland
Apr. 11, 2016 12:24pm
Jennifer Kerns

Jennifer Kerns is a branded contributor to The Blaze and other publications
where she writes about the 2nd Amendment, religious liberty, the future of the
GOP, limited government battles and other political hot topics. She served as
Spokeswoman for the historic Colorado recalls, as Spokeswoman for the
California Republican Party, twice as an Appointee of Governor Arnold
Schwarzenegger, and as Spokeswoman for Prop. 8 which went all the way to the
U.S. Supreme Court.During her career as a GOP strategist, she has been
described as one of the most relevant Press Secretaries in the West -- winning
every major newspaper endorsement for her candidates. Proud of her ability to
win over tough liberal reporters and coalitions, she made her mark by being the
first known Press Secretary in history (Republican or Democrat) to win 52
unanimous endorsements from such liberal publications as the Los Angeles
Times, San Francisco Chronicle and the Spanish-language La Opinion
arguably among the toughest Press Corps, in the most populous State in the
nation.

Page 21
Just as in caucus states Iowa and Wyoming before them, Coloradans over
the weekend solidified their delegates who will advance to the Republican
National Convention in Cleveland this summer.
Ted Cruz swept all of the states delegates.

But accusations swirled on Saturday with photo proof by convention
attendees suggesting that Donald Trump delegates were left off of ballots,
Cruz delegates were placed on ballots twice, ballot numbers for some
delegate candidates were wrong, and the Republican Party admitted that at
least one delegates paperwork may have been lost, costing him an
opportunity to become a delegate.
US Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump (R) is greeted on stage by fellow

Republican candidate Ted Cruz before speaking at a rally organized by the Tea Party
Page 22
Patriots against the Iran nuclear deal in front of the Capitol in Washington, DC, on
September 9, 2015. Nicholas Kamm/AFP/Getty Images

To make matters worse in the sharply divided primary season, as the
convention drew to an end the official account of the Colorado GOP
published a tweet that read, We did it. #NeverTrump. It appeared to
suggest the Republican Party was glad that Trump had been shut out.
The tweet was sent out at 8:07 p.m. local time and then deleted within
minutes.
The tweet is problematic primarily because it included the divisive Never
Trump phrase created by a wing of the party who has stated they would
rather vote for Hillary Clinton, a Democrat, over Trump.
Screengrab. Courtesy of Author.
It is also problematic because state parties are required to support all GOP
candidates equally during a primary season and to serve as an unbiased
adjudicator at caucuses and state conventions.
To that end, the Republican National Committee recently released

ConventionFacts.GOP, a website dedicated to carefully explaining the rules
of convention season and specifically to underscore that the GOP does not
take sides in presidential nominating conventions.
Therefore, a state party publicly supporting one campaign over another?
Most certainly frowned upon.
The Colorado GOP asserted that the post was tweeted by a person with
unauthorized access to the state partys account. But reporters in the
press box late Saturday night, including myself, were not buying it.
Whether it has to do with errant tweets or the states lenghty, convoluted
process itself, it is likely that Colorados convention craziness could cause
chaos in Cleveland.
Heres how:
Trumps campaign is considering the possibility of preventing the Colorado
Page 23
delegation from being seated at the RNC convention. After all, Trump says
if the delegates were won by fraud or administered by a party that was in
the tank for Cruz, the votes should be discounted.
After Cruzs surprise blowout in Wisconsin last week and Cruzs clean
sweep of Colorado, the delegate math now shows that Cruz may be able to
keep Trump from achieving that magic number of 1,237 delegates after all.
With another loss handed to them, on Sunday it appeared that Trumps
campaign began doubling down on convention strategy a sign that Trump
may be giving up on his effort to win any more delegates and instead focus
on wining and dining delegates in the lead-up to the convention.
As if that werent enough, top officials from Colorado over the weekend
began to talk of an open convention.
U.S. Sen. Cory Gardner said that Cruzs success in Colorado continues
the momentum he gained in Wisconsin and leads to an open convention.
A party operative who agrees with that is Andrew Boucher, Gov. John
Kasichs newly-hired convention strategist who was spotted at the
Colorado convention on Saturday. I shadowed Boucher briefly as he made
the rounds briefing reporters on the possibility of an open convention and
even running through various scenarios with them including the fact that
80 percent of delegates become unbound and can suddenly vote for
whomever they want if the RNC nomination process makes it through a
second ballot.
Whatever the outcome at the RNC convention this summer, one thing is
certain: the road to Cleveland just went right through the bumpy roads and
the oh-so-Rocky Mountains of Colorado.

TheBlaze contributor channel supports an open discourse on a range of
views. The opinions expressed in this channel are solely those of each
individual author.

Page 24
Breitbart.com
EXCLUSIVE: Colorado County GOP Chair: Errors with Ted Cruzs
Delegate Win, Might Need Do-Over
11543
http://www.breitbart.com/2016-presidential-race/2016/04/25/colorado-3/
33
AP/Brennan Linsley
by PATRICK HOWLEY25 Apr 20165,546
Page 25
The chairwoman of the Boulder County GOP

has admitted that grave errors affected the
Colorado Republican caucus, in which Ted Cruz
won a clean sweep of 34 delegates without
opening up the process to voting by everyday
citizens.
Breitbart News has obtained an email that Boulder County GOP
chairwoman Peg Cage sent to other top Republican officials in
Colorado, including to other party chairs, describing the errors in
the process that led to the perception of fraud. Reached for
comment on the email, Cage said that the caucus might have to be
done over.
Since Breitbart Newss original report on massive voting problems
at the caucus including names of candidates being left off
ballots and at least one woman not being able to vote insiders
have come forward to tell this reporter about other alleged
inconsistencies, including a screw-up in the Pueblo and Mesa
counties that led to one county having twenty more ballots and
another twenty less. Trump supporters even protested the results
of the caucus on the steps of the Colorado State Capitol.
Rather than spend their time working on try to build integrity
and correct errors I know thats happening theyre working on
it right now today at 1:30 theres a bill being pushed by [state
chairman] Steve House to push from a caucus system to a primary
system as if that would change things, Boulder County
chairwoman Peg Cage told Breitbart News.
Page 26
The Trump supporters think that the Cruz supporters stole the
election. The Cruz supporters were very concerned that they
might not get seated in Cleveland so they have been publicizing
that the Trump campaign does not plan to contest the results,
Cage said. But those delegates could still be un-seated by the
Republican National Committee.
If its that bad, I guess if theres any question that our delegates
wont be seated, then that would be a case where it might make
sense to have a do-over, Cage said. I would say it would. It might
be the better way to go just to make sure that our delegates, they
ought to be able to go forth and get seated.
I think they were mostly, from what I saw, clerical errors. To me,
its inexcusable The ballots themselves had names missing.
People who had signed up.
It seemed to happen in all of the districts. So I guess the state has
something to do it because it was up to the state who received
those forms There were many people at the state convention
itself who they had to say, well this person was this number and it
doesnt appear that way in the book. It just wasnt clean It
wasnt clean because of those clerical mistakes, Cage added.
Cage indicated that she is not a Trump supporter, but rather a
Cruz supporter simply concerned with electoral integrity, saying,
As a county chairman I cant publicly declare. I do have a favorite
Well, I was standing up by the stage when [Cruz] was up there.
Cage sent an email expressing her concerns to fellow party chairs
last Tuesday.
Changing the process by which we get to counting votes wont
change the perception of fraud, Cage wrote. There were
problems with the election in Colorado Springs:
1 Many people who had filed their Intent to Run for National
Delegate forms were not put on a ballot.
2 Clerical errors created the perception of fraud (duplicate and
Page 27
omitted names and numbers)

3 Despite calls for unity by elected party officials, one candidate
was perceived to have been favored
4 Ballot counting was perceived to have been done in secret, by
the Secretary of State (in his orange Cruz shirt) on
equipment from the county where he was the County Clerk.
Cage was referring to Secretary of State Wayne Williams, who
showed up to the caucus in an orange Ted Cruz shirt and was
photographed with Cruz election lawyer David Sawyer in a
Facebook photo:
Cage detailed further problems:

SOLUTION: We, the elected party officials for our counties, are
responsible to call for a complete airing of the problems, including
naming each offended party and the candidate they pledged to
support and showing all ballots with their additions and
omissions. A flow chart, like Anils, for each county should be
included to show that procedures were followed correctly to get
delegates to the assembly. We must insist that professional
clerical staff be added and trained at the State level to avoid
mistakes that cause such contention
There were mistakes- people who had filed their Intent to Run
Page 28
forms were not put on the ballot. It happened in every CD and at

the state assembly. Im pretty sure it wasnt done to favor Cruz, as
his Colorado campaign chairman, Ken Buck, was left off the CD4
ballot. But it happened frequently enough that the perception was
that fraud had been committed. That was bad, but leaving
numbers off of a simple sequenced number ballot is inexcusable.
These were simply clerical errors (I hope see, theres room for
doubt), but they brought division among our ranks and could have
been prevented if the staff had been more professional and
double-checked their work.
Cage wrote to the state party chairman Steve House:
Steve, if you see this note, thats why its seen as bad for me to be
on your side. You ran on election integrity and promised that
youd create a team of people that could train us at the county
level to watch for fraud in our elections, but that hasnt happened
yet. Republican County Clerks should be included in such a team,
but there also need to be folks who are not Clerks. Clerks get reelected if they make voting easy, but as weve seen in this
discussion, ease of voting doesnt equate to integrity in
votingYou may not agree with my particular solution, and I am
certainly open to discussion that leads to the best solution, but we
must take the blame and make it stop here. Or lose.
Reached by phone, Colorado GOP spokesman Kyle Kohli said that
Trump convention manager Paul Manafort indicated to our
delegates directly that Trump would not contest Cruzs delegate
share.
There was never any concern about the delegation being unseated to begin with, Kohli said.
Page 29
Disclosure--this story written by

Contestant Kathryn Porter
Trump Campaign Mulls Contesting Colorado Delegates;

Convention Plagued With Irregularities
Posted On Apr 12 2016By : Kathryn Porter3 CommentsTag: 2016 Presidential elections, CO GOP, Colorado GOP
Convention, Kathryn Porter, Politichicks
Share Tweet Pin
Colorado was Cruz Country on April 9th as Senator Ted Cruz completed his
sweep of Colorado delegates. However, the Trump campaign took note of a
multitude of irregularities.
Alan Cobb, a senior advisor to the Trump campaign told Politichicks that they
are not ruling out contesting Colorado delegates. We are gathering all the facts
and documenting everything, Cobb said.
Page 30
While the day was a big win for Cruz, the convention itself was riddled with
problemsincluding disenfranchisement of candidates for national delegate.
Some candidates were missing from the ballot. Others were included on the
ballot twice. One U.S. Senate candidate was missing from the ballot.
Numerous irregularities surfaced before the convention from violating party
bylaws to withholding information on convention rules.
Here is a detailed breakdown of some of the issues:
Candidates for national delegate were disenfranchised at the State

Convention.
The convention program excluded several candidates for national delegate.
In addition to the convention program, the party published an error- filled
booklet listing candidates for national delegate. In this supplemental,
candidates were listed in alphabetical order and again based on to whom
they pledgedstill excluding candidates. The party attempted to rectify
errors by printing the missing candidate names and numbers on a
corrections list on a separate blue sheet of paper. However, the
addendum was distributed separate from the supplemental booklet,
leaving some delegates unsure of its purpose.
Page 31
Five candidates were given two different numbers because they were included
in the original list and on the corrections list.

Two delegates had numbers missing from the ballot itself. Instead, it
contained two numbers with duplications. (378 was listed in place of 379;
523 was listed in place of 513.)
Some candidates who stated they filed their letters of intent were never placed
on the ballot or on the corrections list.
Candidates for national delegate were also disenfranchised at the Congressional
Assemblies and Convention. Attendees across all seven congressional
assemblies and conventions reported that candidates who submitted their
correctly filled paperwork on time were missing from the ballots.
Ten names were missing from the ballot for Congressional District 5 (CD5)
including one member from the officially endorsed Cruz slate. A motion was
approved for all the candidates missing from the ballot to be given ballot
numbers which were then posted on an easel.
In contrast, Congressional District 3 (CD3) did not provide numbers for
Page 32
candidates missing from the ballotthough the issue was addressed at the
meeting. When approached after the conclusion of the meeting regarding how
many national delegate candidates from CD3 were missing from the ballot, the
CD3 chair admitted, I have no clue.
The CD lists of candidates are generated by the state party based on letters of
intent submitted by those eligible to run. Some candidates on a previous
version of the list found their names missing from the updated list.
Delegates were shut out from participating in the process at the State
Convention. Process irregularities included an absence of microphones on the
convention room floor, discouraging delegates from calling out points of order
and points of information as per Roberts Rules of Order. Attendees of the
Congressional Assemblies and Conventions report that microphones were
available at their respective meetings.
The State GOP violated party bylaws related to the State Central
Committee (SCC) meeting that covered agenda items related to the State
Convention. The day prior to the State Convention, the State Central
Committee (SCC) convened a meeting to discuss convention issueswith less
than a weeks notice to central committee members in violation of state party
bylaws. The state GOP sent out the notice as an amended call, however there
was no original call to amend. This was confirmed by several SCC members.
At the meeting, SCC members did not receive copies of the Standing Rules
for the State Convention. A delegate who was not a member of the SCC was
Page 33
reported to have seconded one of the motions in the meeting.

The decision on the Standing Rules Committee Chair presented a clear
conflict of interest. The state party chose a woman who was running for
Republican National Committeewoman to chair the Standing Rules Committee.
In the end, she lost her bid for the RNC position.
The parliamentarian was not a Professionally Registered Parliamentarian
(PRP), but an attorney with a longstanding relationship with the Republican
Party. According to an RNC source who wished to remain anonymous, the RNC
recommended at their Spring meeting in South Carolina that state parties hire
PRPs for their state conventions.
Terry Campo served as Parliamentarian at the Colorado State Convention.
Campos Linked In profile states that he served as Parliamentarian at half the
state GOP conventions electing delegates to the 2012 Republican National
Convention. He also served as Parliamentarian to the Standing Rules Committee
at the 2012 convention.
When confronted if he was credentialed as a PRP with either the National
Association of Parliamentarians or the American Institute of Parliamentarians,
Campo stated, I dont remember if I am or not. I used to be a long time ago.
He referred to the credentialing organizations as mere trade associations. You
can be a parliamentarian who is qualified without paying a hundred dollar dues
to an organization that primarily exists to get peoples dues, Campo said,
emphasizing his extensive experience. After continued questioning, Campo
stated that he would join one of the associations.
The Colorado GOP did not make the Standing Rules available to State
Convention delegates. As the convention came to order, Colorado GOP
Chairman Steve House stated that the Standing Rules for the convention were
posted on the Colorado GOP Web site. Delegates reported that they were not
posted on the Web site nor did they receive an email of the Standing Rules.
Delegates voted on and approved the Standing Rules without seeing them.
Although the program did not include the Standing Rules, it did include all the
resolutions in their entirety to be considered by delegates. The entire text of the
resolutions was also included on the resolutions ballot.
The state party charged delegates $65 and alternates $45 to attend.
Page 34
Screen shot of Colorado GOP Web site on day of convention. No link to standing rules for State
Convention.
Page 35
nbcnews.com
6/21/16, 1:31 AM
POLITICS APR 10 2016, 7:19 PM ET
Cruz Sweeps Colorado as Trump Campaign Issues

Error-Filled Ballots
by BENJY SARLIN
COLORADO SPRINGS, Colorado Sen. Ted Cruz finished Colorado's delegate fight the way he
started it: With overwhelming victory.
Donald Trump finished it the way he started as well: With a disorganized and frustrated campaign
plagued by mistakes.
Cruz took all 13 of the delegates up for grabs on Saturday to complete a clean sweep of the state.
Delegates endorsed by his campaign swept all seven congressional district conventions held over
the last week as well, which added another 21 delegates. Another three slots are reserved for state
party ocials.
"Today was another resounding victory for conservatives, Republicans, and Americans who care
about the future of our country," the Cruz campaign said in a statement Saturday night.
Trump's aides set expectations at rock bottom heading into Saturday's contest, citing the state's
unfavorable demographics and a complicated process that empowers local party activists to vote
on delegates.
Supporters in Colorado nonetheless said they were frustrated with the campaign's chaotic and
uncommunicative campaign, which failed to reach basic levels of competence.
"We could have had some things going, but the campaign decided to not put resources here,"
Becky Mizel, a former Pueblo County GOP chair and Trump delegate candidate, told NBC News.
Related: Trump's Colorado Supporters 'Feeling Demoralized' as He Battles Cruz
On Saturday, Trump backers passed out flyers at the convention site with ocial campaign slate of
13 delegates and 13 alternates accompanied by their three-digit number position on the 600-plus
person ballot. Seven of the names, however, directed people to the wrong number and one
delegate's name was misspelled. Other candidates did not have errors on their slates.
http://www.nbcnews.com/pages/print
Page 1 of 5
Page 36
nbcnews.com
6/21/16, 1:31 AM
In one case, an erroneous number corresponded with a Cruz supporter. A second flyer handed out
by the Trump campaign contained four mismatched names and numbers.
Among the names listed incorrectly on both flyers: Becky Mizel.
Related: Bernie Sanders Wins Wyoming Democratic Caucuses
It was the second major error concerning campaign materials this week. On Thursday, a Trump
slate of three names in the 7th Congressional District convention contained two that weren't listed
on the ballot. The campaign's state director, Patrick Davis, said they failed to pay the necessary
fees to qualify.
Trump's campaign wasn't the only one who made mistakes, though. Colorado Republican
chairman Steve House announced several corrections to the ballot from the stage, including
multiple names that were on the ballot twice, none of which aected any candidate's ocial slate.
One Trump alternate, Jerome Parks, was not on the numbers-only ballot at #379 instead the
ballot listed #378 twice.
"They're not in there!" Trump supporter Karen Kasel said to herself in frustration as she tried to
find #379 on her ballot in the hallway.
Related: Cruz Swipes Delegates in Trump-Backed Virginia District
There were also discrepancies between delegate guides posted to the state party's website and
printed materials distributed by the state GOP. Mizel, for example, was listed on a delegate list on
the party website as number #610, but a brochure from the state GOP listing delegates
alphabetically cut o at #588.
Trump campaign aide Alan Cobb accused the Colorado GOP of altering its delegate lists at
dierent points, leaving them in the lurch as it changed, and threatened to dispute the results over
its ballot inconsistencies.
"We'll do whatever it takes to protect the legitimacy of our support in Colorado," Cobb told NBC
News. "Clearly there are some serious issues with the ballot and balloting.
A spokesman for the Colorado GOP said they were looking into the matter.
Page 2 of 5
Page 37
nbcnews.com
6/21/16, 1:31 AM
In another mix-up, the party's Twitter account appeared to be hacked in the aftermath of the
results, tweeting "We did it. #NeverTrump." A spokesman for the party said that their account had
been taken over and the tweet was not authorized.
Cruz's all-volunteer Colorado campaign distributed accurate slates not only on flyers, but also on
bright orange t-shirts. Groups like Gun Owners of America that endorsed Cruz distributed their
own materials backing the same slate.
Dustin Olson, a delegate whip for Cruz, manned a "persuasion team" in the halls of the arena. The
heavily pro-Cruz crowd needed little convincing, Olson said, but he worked hard to make sure no
one split the vote by supporting Cruz delegates who weren't on the campaign's ocial slate.
Cruz personally addressed the state convention on Saturday while Trump campaign and Ohio
Governor John Kasich supplied campaign surrogates on their behalf.
"It's easy to talk about making America great again, you can even print that on a baseball cap,"
Cruz said. "The real question is do you understand the principles and values that made America
great in the first place?"
Afterwards Cruz told NBC aliate KUSA that Trump's absence "illustrates that when it comes to
the grassroots, Donald has a very hard time competing."
Speaking on behalf of Trump, policy adviser Stephen Miller devoted nearly all his remarks to
recounting Americans who had been killed by undocumented immigrants.
"WE SMOKED THEM"

"The special interests in DC who have controlled our political process for 40 years, they don't care
about you, they don't care about your family, and they don't care about your security," Miller said.
Former New Hampshire Senator John Sununu represented Kasich, who he described as "tough,"
"conservative" and a "fighter" who was willing to take on his own party to balance the budget in
the 1990s.
The Colorado results come as the race increasingly hinges on a complex war over delegate
selection that requires foresight and grassroots organization to win.
Page 3 of 5
Page 38
nbcnews.com
6/21/16, 1:31 AM
Unlike Colorado, most of these fights are taking place in states where voters have already weighed
in on how many delegates are bound to each candidate, but where the state party has a separate
process for choosing the actual delegates.
The results are crucial because most
delegates are free to vote for any candidate
they choose in a contested convention that
goes beyond the first ballot.
Several states held delegate selection events
on Saturday, with Cruz's campaign continuing
his string of success in most cases but falling
prey to a surprise alliance between Trump and
Cruz shakes hands with supporters in Colorado on Saturday.
Stacie Scott / AP
Kasich in one state.
In Iowa, Cruz supporters nearly swept up each

of Iowa's 12 national delegate slots up for grabs. Each of Iowa's four congressional districts voted
to send three delegates to the convention in Cleveland, and all but one of those 12 delegates
committed to backing Cruz on a second ballot if the race comes down to a contested convention
at July's Republican National Convention in Cleveland.
"We smoked them," said Matt Schultz, Cruz's campaign chair in the state.
The Trump campaign despite the results pushed back on suggestions they amounted to a
loss for the candidate.
"It was definitely obvious Ted's camp thought they'd come in and clean up and sweep the whole
slate of delegates, so I consider it a Trump victory for the Trump campaign," said Tana Goertz,
who led Trump's eorts in the state after chairing his caucus eorts. "We were just happy the full
slate wasn't filled with all Cruz people."
Meanwhile in Virginia's 9th Congressional District which Trump won with 47% of the vote
Cruz supporters took two delegate slots to one for Trump.
In South Carolina where all delegates are bound to Trump on the first ballot Cruz secured
three delegate seats out of six up for grabs in two districts on Saturday while Trump won just one.
Two more were uncommitted.
Page 4 of 5
Page 39
nbcnews.com
6/21/16, 1:31 AM
In Michigan, though, Trump and Kasich supporters appeared to team up to deny Cruz any spots
on the important convention committees that will determine rules and credentials for delegates.
Trump supporters took five of eight slots, while Kasich supporters took the other three.
Page 5 of 5
Page 40
How Colorado confusion could spell convention trouble - CNNPolitics.com
6/10/16, 11:19 PM
How Colorado
confusion could spell
convention trouble
Story by Maeve Reston; Video by Gabe Ramirez, CNN
Updated 9:51 AM ET, Mon April 11, 2016
Story highlights
Donald Trump's campaign is mad about the
delegate selection process in Colorado
The GOP front-runner says political insiders
are plotting against him
Colorado Springs, Colorado (CNN) Ted Cruz's resounding

win in Colorado's GOP contest this weekend provided fresh
evidence that Donald Trump's campaign is still scrambling to
catch up in the state-by-state delegate hunt.
But the Trump campaign's threat that they might challenge the
Colorado results at the Republican National Convention showed
something else: Their campaign is gearing up for battle in
Cleveland -- and no error will go unnoticed.
The debate over the national delegate selection in Colorado this
weekend qualied as the very denition of inside baseball.
But that is the game that the GOP campaigns will be playing at the convention if no candidate reaches the 1,237
delegates needed to clinch the nomination before Cleveland.
READ: The Colorado delegate process has to be see to be believed
By Sunday, the Trump campaign had voiced a litany of complaints about Colorado's complex process, even
though it was obvious on the ground that they had not done the aggressive leg work to court Colorado delegates
that the Cruz team had done.
"I win a state in votes and then get non-representative delegates because they are oTered all sorts of goodies by
Cruz campaign. Bad system!" Trump tweeted Sunday.
http://www.cnn.com/2016/04/10/politics/donald-trump-ted-cruz-colorado-delegates/
Page 1 of 6
Page 41
Donald J. Trump
@realDonaldTrump
6/10/16, 11:19 PM
Follow
I win a state in votes and then get non-representative delegates

because they are offered all sorts of goodies by Cruz campaign.
Bad system!
9:47 AM - 10 Apr 2016
10,149
26,857
Later in the day, Trump took to Twitter again to protest the fact that Colorado did not hold a primary or a caucus,
due to costs, and inside used arcane party rules for choosing delegates.
"How is it possible that the people of the great State of Colorado never got to vote in the Republican Primary?"
Trump tweeted Sunday evening. "Great anger - totally unfair!"
Donald J. Trump
@realDonaldTrump
Follow
How is it possible that the people of the great State of Colorado

never got to vote in the Republican Primary? Great anger - totally
unfair!
8:28 PM - 10 Apr 2016
10,567
27,916
He also retweeted a link to a Facebook post where one of his supporters burned his Colorado Republican Party
registration over anger at the process at the Colorado state convention.
Page 2 of 6
Page 42
6/10/16, 11:19 PM
Donald J. Trump
Follow
@realDonaldTrump
#MakeAmericaGreatAgain
#Trump2016thegatewaypundit.com/2016/04/despit
3:23 PM - 10 Apr 2016
DESPITE LATEST MEDIA SMEAR=> Trump's Fa
A new Associated Press poll released today found
after months of media and GOP establishment
attacks a majority of Americans ...
thegatewaypundit.com
3,526
8,763
Then he declared: "The people of Colorado had their vote taken away from them by the phony politicians. Biggest
story in politics. This will not be allowed!"
Donald J. Trump
Follow
@realDonaldTrump
The people of Colorado had their vote taken away from them by the
phony politicians. Biggest story in politics. This will not be allowed!
8:50 PM - 10 Apr 2016
11,525
26,881
On NBC's "Meet the Press" Sunday, Trump's new convention manager Paul Manafort accused the Cruz campaign
of using "Gestapo tactics" to wrangle delegates.
Cruz campaign spokeswoman Catherine Frazier said the campaign had won "because we've put in the hard work
to build a superior organization," dismissing the complaints as sour grapes.
But it was the threat of a convention challenge over the ballot
problems in Colorado this weekend that is the kind of legal spat
that could lead to campaign-on-campaign legal warfare at the
convention.
2016 Election Center
cnn delegate estimate R

2472 total, 1237 to win
1415
unbound: 126
1541 bound:
If a campaign alleges that delegates were elected improperly,

those challenges can be heard by the credentials committee,
which decides whether the delegates in question will be
allowed on the oor to vote.
Page 3 of 6
Page 43
TRUMP
presumptive
1237 delegates needed to win
nominee
563
bound: 512
unbound: 51
CRUZ

138
unbound: 23
161 bound:
KASICH
6/10/16, 11:19 PM
In a race that could be decided by handful of delegates those

challenges could be a pivotal part of the nomination process
this cycle.
To the casual observer of politics, the details of what went awry
for the Trump campaign in Colorado Springs might seem like
an irrelevant debate over minutia. National delegate ballot
positions, to be exact.
Ballot positions were assigned to more than 600 people who
ran for the nal 13 delegate slots at the GOP convention on
Saturday.
To narrow the eld, each presidential campaign printed up
slates listing the national delegate candidates that they had
endorsed. Those slates were handed out by volunteers at the
convention.
But the slates put out by the Trump campaign contained

numerous errors when it matched names to ballot numbers. At
the Congressional District 7 convention Thursday night where
three convention delegates were selected, the slate printed by the Trump campaign contained the names of two
delegate candidates supporting Trump who weren't even running in that district.
all republican candidates
On the rst slate printed by Trump campaign for Saturday's election -- which detailed the names and ballot
numbers of 26 people who were running to be Trump delegates at the convention -- more than a half dozen
names were listed with inaccurate ballot numbers.
Page 4 of 6
Page 44
6/10/16, 11:19 PM
Inside the battle to become a Colorado GOP delegate 02:32

If you were a Trump supporter at the convention hoping to support his slate of delegates that mattered -- a lot -because the paper ballots that attendees used to cast their votes late Saturday afternoon contained only numbers,
not the names of each delegate candidate.
The Trump campaign printed a second slate that was meant to correct the corresponding numbers and names
that were wrong on the rst slate. But there were mistakes on the second as well.
The campaigns of Cruz and Ohio Gov. John Kasich did not have the same problems -- suggesting that the
mistakes could have amounted to printing errors by the Trump campaign on their slates.
Political Prediction Market
Donald Trump
to be Republican nominee
But the ballot distributed by the state party did include at least
one clerical error: There was no bubble on the ballot for
delegate candidate #379 (who was running as a Trump
delegate, according to the state party list). Instead in the spot
where #379 should have appeared, there was a second bubble
for #378 (who was running as an unpledged delegate).
Another wrinkle: Inside the convention program printed by the
state party, the list of candidates running for the 13 national
delegate slots (and their corresponding ballot numbers) only
went up to #588, even though there were 619 candidates.
The state GOP printed a supplemental ballot and placed the
Page 5 of 6
Page 45
99%
live odds
Will the odds go up or down?
click to play
Powered by Pivit
6/10/16, 11:19 PM
names and ballot positions of the remaining candidates on two

screens above the stage, but Trump supporters said that not
every attendee got one.
Beyond that, the Trump campaign said a number of their
potential national delegates had their ballot positions changed.
Others, Trump advisers said, led the proper paperwork but
never ended up on the ballot.
"We're not taking a credential challenge oT the table," said
Trump adviser Alan Cobb. "It's something we'll be looking into
over the next few months."
A spokesman for the Colorado GOP said party ofcials were
looking into whether there were problems with the ballot.
But it's clear the Trump campaign is not going to be dismissing
these issues anytime soon.
French robbers pick the

wrong McDonald's
Pakistani teen was still

breathing when set on re,
report says
A home of their own after foster care
U.S. apologizes to Qatar

for video of laughing
American soldiers
Page 6 of 6
Page 46
Page 47
Exhibit 2
PROPOSED RULES
COLORADO REPUBLICAN STATE ASSEMBLY AND CONVENTION
April 9, 2016
Colorado Springs, Colorado
These Proposed Rules are submitted by the Committee on Rules appointed
by State Chairman Steve House as provided in Section B1e of Article V of
the Bylaws of the Colorado Republican State Central Committee ("CRC"),
and shall govern the conduct and proceedings of the 2016 Colorado
Republican State Assembly and Convention.
1. Organization
1.1 Delegates. The delegates and alternates to the Colorado Republican State Assembly ("the
Assembly") shall be the delegates and alternates to the Colorado Republican State Convention ("the
Convention"). The Assembly and the Convention hereinafter collectively are referred to as the
"Assembly and Convention."
1.2 Alternate Delegates. Alternate delegates moved into a delegate position due to the absence
of a delegate (see Rule 2.4) are considered delegates under these rules.
1.3
Quorum. A quorum at the State Assembly, and at the Convention, shall consist of those
delegates present. (State Bylaws, Art. XIII, G.)
1.4
Permanent Officers. The permanent officers of the Assembly and Convention shall be the
officers of the Colorado Republican State Central Committee, and the State Chairman may appoint
or designate such other officers, Committee Chairmen, and Committees as the State Chairman may
deem necessary for the operation and conduct of the Assembly and Convention. (State Bylaws, Art.
v, B.)
1.5
Committee Rules. Each Committee of this Assembly and Convention may each establish teller credential
such rules as it deems necessary for the conduct of its meeting(s), including rules relating to
matters to be considered and length of discussion.
1.6 Chairman Pro Tem. The permanent Chairman of the Assembly and Convention may
designate a Chairman Pro Tem to serve for brief periods during the absence of the permanent
Chairman. The term "Chairman" shall refer both to the permanent Chairman and any Chairman Pro
Tem.
1.7 Agenda. The agenda for the Assembly and Convention shall be printed in the Assembly and
Convention program and shall constitute general orders and the order of business for the Assembly
and Convention, except that the Chairman may recognize any person to address the delegates at
any time and for any purpose and may alter the order of business to facilitate the efficient conduct
of the business of the Assembly and Convention.
1.8
Adjournment. The Assembly and Convention may not be adjourned until the order of
business has been completed.
2. Credentials
2.1
Delegate Authentication. Each County Chairman shall provide a written list authenticating
all delegates and alternates elected by the county assembly to the Assembly and Convention,
together with their mailing addresses and zip codes and, where available, e-mail addresses, and
shall provide such list to the State Chairman as soon after the county assembly as practical, and
within (10) days of the county assembly. (State Bylaws, Art. XIII, B3.)
2.2
Contests.
(a) Every person intending to contest the seat of any delegate shall give written notice of such
intention, specifying the grounds of the contest, to the Secretary of the CRC and to the delegate
Page 48
whose seat he intends to contest. He shall give such notice at least seventy-two hours before the
Assembly and Convention convenes. (State Bylaws Art. XV, A4.)
(b) The State Central Committee shall meet at 7:30a.m. on Friday, April 8, 2016, at the Broadmoor
World Arena in Colorado Springs, Colorado, to hear any and all contests of persons claiming seats in
the Assembly and Convention and the recommendations of the Credentials Committee relating
thereto. (State Bylaws Art. XV, A2.)
2.3 Delegate Roll. The names of all delegates elected and uncontested shall be placed on the
temporary roll. All delegates who have been contested and whose names have been placed
upon the temporary roll by a majority of the CRC present and voting shall have the right to vote
on all questions until otherwise determined by the Assembly and Convention, except upon
contests involving their own credentials. (State Bylaws Art. XV, A3.)
2.4 Credentialing Required by 9:30 A.M./Voting by Alternates.
(a) Delegates and Alternates are required to be credentialed by 9:30a.m. on April 9, 2016.
(b) Any delegate who is not credentialed by 9:30a.m. may have his ballot given to the first
alternate of that county and continuing numerically thereafter, except in any county where an
alternate to the Assembly and Convention was elected to represent a designated district or
precinct. In such case, the designated district or precinct alternate shall be entitled to vote in the
absence of the delegate in accordance with the rules of the County Republican Party or the ruling of
the County Chairman.
(c) The decisions and rulings of the County Chairman regarding the promotion of alternates shall
be final.
3. Recognition, Identification and Motions
3.1 Recognition. The Chairman may recognize any person to make either an announcement or
a seconding speech for any candidate, except for candidates for National Delegate. Except as
specified in these rules or as may be necessary for the conduct of business the Assembly and
Convention, only delegates or alternates to the Assembly and Convention may be recognized.
3.2 Identification. With the exception of persons making announcements or a nominating or
seconding speech for any candidate, each person recognized by the Chairman for the purpose of
addressing the Assembly and Convention shall state his name, the name of his delegation, and that
he is a delegate or alternate to the Assembly and Convention, and the purpose for which he wishes
to be recognized. The Chairman may refuse to recognize or may terminate the remarks of any
person who fails to identify himself pursuant to provisions of this rule.
3.3 Written Motions and Amendments. All motions of substance and amendments thereto
shall be in writing, shall be signed by the maker thereof and shall be delivered to the Secretary or
the Chairman of the Assembly and Convention immediately after being made. Unless the Chairman
determines otherwise, no vote shall be taken on any motion or amendment until the written motion
or amendment has been delivered to the Secretary or the Chairman.
3.4 One Amendment at a Time. The Chairman shall permit only one amendment to a motion to
be considered at a time.
4. Debated Issues
4.1 Individual Time Limitation. Except as otherwise provided for in these rules, and except for
officers of the Assembly or Committee Chairmen, no person shall speak more than two minutes on
any debated issue or question, and no person shall speak more than once on each debated issue or
question. The determination as to time spent shall be made by the timekeeper of the Assembly and
Convention, and the determination of the timekeeper shall be conclusive. The timekeeper shall stand
at the end of each period, and the speaker shall end his remarks. In the event the speaker fails to
terminate his remarks, the Chairman may terminate the speaker's access to any microphone.
4.2 Aggregate Time Limitation. The time allotted to debate any issue or question, including all
amendments to motions and substitutions for motions shall not exceed an aggregate of ten
Page 49
minutes. At the end of such period, the Chairman shall call for a vote on such motions or
amendments as may be necessary without further debate or action by the Assembly and
Convention.
4.3 Alternating Comments. To the extent reasonably possible, the Chairman shall recognize in
alternating order persons who wish to speak in favor or in opposition to any debated issue or
question.
5. Demonstrations
5.1 Definition. The term "demonstration" shall be deemed to include all actions, such as
organized verbal or audible disruptions, clapping, waving and parading, which shall disrupt the
business of the Assembly and Convention.
5.2 Prohibition. Except as provided for in 7.2, demonstrations on behalf of, or opposed to, any
candidate or issue are prohibited. The Chairman, in his sole discretion, may charge the time
consumed by any such demonstration to the time otherwise allotted to the candidate or issue being
supported by such demonstration. No personal sound amplification devices or noisemakers shall
be allowed on the floor of the Assembly and Convention, in the facility, or on the premises, that
interfere with or disrupt the business of the Assembly and Convention.
6. Resolutions
6.1 Referral to the Resolutions Committee. Before any resolution shall be considered by the
Assembly and Convention, it shall be referred to the Resolutions Committee. All resolutions
proposed to be considered by the Assembly and Convention shall be submitted to the State
Chairman by March 23, 2016. The State Chairman shall refer all resolutions received by him by
5:00p.m. April 1, 2016 to the Resolutions Committee. (State Bylaws, Art. XIII, E.)
6.2 Consideration by the Resolutions Committee. The Resolutions Committee shall consider
all resolutions properly referred by the State Chairman. The Resolutions Committee shall provide
an opportunity for any person to speak for or against a Resolution at a meeting of the
Resolutions Committee held on March 21, 2016 and March 22, 2016, and at such additional dates
and times and by such means as the Resolutions Committee may provide. The Resolutions
Committee may create, amend, consolidate and/or combine duplicate and similar resolutions into
one Resolution for the efficiency of time and space, and may, but is not required to, consider
additional resolutions as may be submitted or referred by the State Chairman after April 1, 2016.
The Resolutions Committee shall report to the Assembly and Convention all resolutions approved
by a majority of the members of the Resolutions Committee. The Resolutions Committee may
establish such additional rules as it deems necessary for the conduct of its meetings.
6.3 Resolutions for Consideration. Only resolutions submitted in the report of the Resolutions
Committee as provided for in Rule 6.2 shall be considered by the Assembly and Convention.
6.4 No Amendment or Debate. No resolution may be amended or debated at the Assembly and
Convention.
6.5 Two-Thirds Vote to Pass. Resolutions concerning the Republican Party Platform or
concerning the position of the Colorado Republican Party with respect to matters of public policy or
public concern shall be deemed to be adopted only if approved by a two-thirds vote of the delegates
present and voting.
7. Nominations
7.1 Qualifications of Nominators. Only delegates to the Assembly and Convention may make
nominations for any candidate. Seconding and acceptance speeches may be made by any individual
recognized by the Chairman.
Page 50
Florence
7.2 Candidate Nominations and Speeches

(a) Each candidate for United States Senator seeking designation at the Assembly shall be allotted
a total of twelve (12) minutes for nominating and seconding speeches, candidate remarks, audio or
video presentation, and any demonstration.
(b) Each Regent of the University of Colorado candidate seeking designation at the Assembly
shall be allotted a total of twelve (12) minutes for nominating and seconding speeches, candidate
remarks, audio or video presentation, and any demonstration.
(c) Each National Committeeman, and National Committeewoman candidate seeking election at
the Convention shall be allotted a total of eight (8) minutes for nominating and seconding speeches,
candidate remarks, audio or video presentation, and any demonstration.
(d) Each Republican candidate for President of the United States, or his designated representative,
who has at least one (1) eligible candidate for National Convention Delegate pledged to support him
as reflected on the National Delegate ballot, shall be allotted a total of twenty (20) minutes for
speeches in support of candidacy, candidate remarks to the Assembly and Convention, audio or
video presentation, and any demonstration.
(e) The Chairman may reduce the time allotted if the number of candidates for any one office
exceeds four.
(f) The order of nomination for the office of United States Senator, Regent, Committeeman and
Committeewoman has been determined by lot drawing at State Party Headquarters and shall
correspond to the order of listing on the ballot. The order of candidate speeches for President of the
United States shall be determined by Chairman.
7.3 Names of Persons Who Will Nominate and Second Candidates. The names of persons
who will nominate and second candidates or who will introduce or speak on behalf of any
candidate for President of the United States shall be provided to the permanent Chairman no later
than immediately following the adoption of these Rules.
7.4 Delegates/Alternates to National Convention.
(a) Each eligible person who has filed, no later than thirteen days prior to the State Convention, a
letter of intent to run for National Delegate at the State Convention shall be considered to have been
nominated, and no additional nominations from the floor or write-in candidates will be
permitted. Only delegates or alternates to the Assembly and Convention may be elected as National
Delegates or as National Alternate Delegates to the Republican National Convention. (State Bylaws,
Art. XIII, A5a.)
(b) Candidates for National Convention Delegate need not identify the presidential candidate they
are pledged to support, but may do so at their option. The ballot shall include the presidential
preference of those individuals so pledging. (State Bylaws, Art. XIII, A5c.)
(c) Each candidate for National Delegate will be given ten (10) seconds in which to give his orher
name and county of residence and address the convention and other brief remarks in support of their
candidacy, and the order shall be on a first-come basis. The time will start immediately upon the end
of the preceding candidate's speech.
(d) The ballot order for National Delegate shall be by alphabetical order of the candidates' names,
using last name first, grouped by pledged presidential preference and in the order of the national
pledged delegate count as reported by the Republican National Committee as of April1, 2016, with
unpledged candidates for National Delegate grouped last.
7.5 Speech Timing. The allotted time for candidate nomination, candidate addresses and
demonstrations, as provided for in 7.2 and 7.4(c) of these rules, shall commence with the opening
comment of the first speaker or the beginning of any audio or video presentation, and shall be
measured continuously until the specified time has elapsed.
Page 51
8. Ballots
Florence, in
normal
meaning this
would
suggest that
subtotals
were to be by
county as
well. ??
8.1 Official Ballots.

(a) All ballots used at the Assembly and Convention shall be prepared and distributed by the Teller
Committee.
(b) In order to be listed on the pre-printed ballot, candidates for U.S. Senator, Regent of
the University of Colorado and National Committeeman and National Committeewoman must
h a v e notified the State Chairman in writing by April 1, 2016.
(c) One ballot will be used for U.S. Senator, Regent of the University of Colorado, National
Committeeman and National Committeewoman. A Second ballot will be used for Resolutions.
The Resolutions Ballot numbers will correspond to the number assigned to the Resolutions as
printed in the Convention and Assembly program.
(d) A third ballot will be used to elect National Delegates and Alternates.
8.2 Blank or Illegal Ballots. A ballot with a legal vote for an office shall be counted as "present
and voting" for that office in calculating the threshold for ballot access, only if a legal vote was cast,
or if the box for the write-in candidate corresponding to that office is marked and the word
"ABSTAIN" is written on the ballot for that office. A ballot with only illegal or only blank votes will
not be counted as "present and voting." No ballots will be duplicated, and no recount by hand will be
authorized.
8.3
No Proxies, Unit Rule, Cumulative Voting, or Polling. Voting by proxy shall not be
permitted. Cumulative voting in any election in which more than one person is to be elected or
nominated shall not be permitted. Unit rule or proportional voting shall not be permitted. In no
instance shall the vote of the County delegation be determined by polling fewer than the number of
delegates present and voting.
8.4
Balloting.
(a) Balloting shall be conducted by county. Balloting shall commence and balloting shall conclude
and the polls shall close at the direction of the Chairman. No ballots shall be issued to any delegate
until the Chairman directs, and no ballots shall be accepted prior to the commencement of balloting
or after the polls have closed. The County Chairman or his designee shall distribute ballots to all
delegates and shall resolve all disputes related thereto. The decisions and rulings of the County
Chairman regarding the distribution of ballots shall be final.
(b) Spoiled ballots may be exchanged for a duplicate ballot at the Teller Committee booth prior to
the end of balloting for that specific office or issue. A ballot which is distributed but which is not
cast or is otherwise marred, illegal or illegible will not be counted.
(c) In order to obtain a replacement ballot, the original ballot must be exchanged. No lost ballots
will be replaced.
(d) Any claim of any ballot impropriety shall be referred to the Teller Committee immediately and
prior to the report by the Teller Committee for the office or issue.
8.5
Number of Votes Permitted.
(a) A county shall be entitled to the number of votes equal to the number of delegates allocated to
that county, to the extent that the county has duly accredited delegates and alternates present. In
no case may a county cast more votes than delegates (or alternates moved into a delegate position)
who are present.
(b) Except in the election of candidates for National Delegate, ballots cast for more than one
candidate for each office will not be counted and will be listed as not counted by the Teller
Committee.
(c) Each convention delegate shall be entitled to vote for up to twenty-six (26) candidates for
National Delegate on a single ballot. (State Bylaws, Art. XIII, A5b.) Ballots cast for more than
twenty-six (26) candidates for National Delegate will not be counted and will be listed as not
counted by the Teller Committee.
in the case of no name votes in

excess of 26, those were not
votes for delegates, and rest of
ballot should not be
invalidated.
Page 52
interesting
9. Nomination and Election

9.1 Nomination/Designation or Election by Acclamation.
In the event that there is only one candidate nominated for U.S. Senator, Regent of the University
of Colorado, National Committeeman or Committeewoman, the Chairman may dispense with
balloting and shall declare that the candidate shall be certified to the primary election ballot or
would they
elected by acclamation.
have had
9.2 Ballot Tabulations. Ballot shall be tabulated by the Teller Committee, and the results shall
this
be announced by the Chairman, except that a roll call vote by county in alphabetical order may be
information
called by the Chairman at his sole discretion.
by county??
9.3 Ties. Ties of consequence shall be determined by lot drawn by the Chairman of the Teller
Committee in the presence of at least two other members of the Teller Committee.
9.4 Designation Rules for U.S. Senator and Regent of the University of Colorado. Every
candidate for U.S. Senator and for Regent of the University of Colorado receiving thirty percent or
more of the votes of all duly-accredited delegates to the Assembly and Convention who are present
and voting shall be certified by affidavit of the permanent Chairman and the Secretary of the
Assembly and Convention. If no candidate receives thirty percent or more of the votes of all
delegates present and voting on the first ballot, there shall be a second ballot cast on all candidates
for that office. If on the second ballot no candidate receives thirty percent or more of the votes cast,
the two candidates receiving the highest number of votes shall be certified as candidates for that
office by the Assembly and Convention.
The Assembly and Convention shall take no more than two ballots upon candidates for each office to
be filled at the ensuing general election.
9.5 Election of National Committeeman and Committeewoman. A plurality of votes cast by
all duly-accredited delegates present and voting shall elect the National Committeeman and
Committeewoman. In accordance with RNC Rule 3(a), the National Committeeman and National
Committeewomen shall assume their office upon the adjournment of the 2016 national convention
and shall serve until the adjournment of the 2020 national convention, or until their successors
shall have been elected and ratified.
9.6 Election of Delegates/Alternates to the National Convention.
(a) As required by RNC Rule 14(a)(2), the State Chairman and the current National Committeeman
and Committeewoman of the Colorado Republican Party shall be delegates to the 2016 national
convention. (State Bylaws, Art. XIII, A3.)
(b) The thirteen (13) candidates for National Delegate receiving the highest number of votes shall be
assigned the National Delegate at-large positions and the next thirteen (13) candidates according to
the total number of votes each received shall be assigned the National Alternate Delegate at-large
positions allocated to the Colorado Republican Party in accordance with the rules of the (national)
Republican Party. (State Bylaws, Art. XIII, A3b.)
10. Presidential Electors
10.1 Electors. By adoption of these rules, and in accordance with the laws of the State of Colorado
and longstanding procedures of the Republican Party, the Convention hereby appoints a Presidential
Electors Nominating Committee consisting of the State Chairman, State Vice-Chairman, State
Secretary, National Committeeman, and National Committeewoman of the Colorado Republican
Party, who shall nominate nine Republican Presidential Electors, and who shall nominate candidates
for vacancies in Republican Presidential Electors in accordance with
applicable statutes, and hereby authorizes said Nominating Committee to prepare and execute the
resolutions and/or other documents certifying the nomination of the nine Republican Presidential
Electors to the Colorado Secretary of State and other officials in accordance with law. (C.R.S. 14-302,1-4-701, 1-5-403(2).)
11. Assembly Vacancy Committee
Page 53
11.1 Appointment. By the adoption of these rules, the Assembly designates the Executive
Committee of the Colorado Republican State Central Committee as the Assembly Vacancy
Committee, and said Assembly Vacancy Committee is empowered to fill any vacancy that may occur
in designation or nomination for any statewide public office. (State Bylaws, Art. XIV, B1d.)
12. Other Rules
12.1 Reasonable Rules. The permanent Chairman shall make such other reasonable rules as
may be necessary for the operation of the Assembly and Convention and the operation or regularity
of the delegation to the Republican National Convention, provided that such rules shall not conflict
with the Rules of the (national) Republican Party, the rules and bylaws of the Colorado Republican
Party, applicable Colorado statutes and these rules.
12.2 Candidate Literature. Only literature for Republican candidates to be chosen at the
Assembly and Convention or for Republican candidates for President of the United States may be
distributed on the floor of the Assembly and Convention, in the facility, or on the premises. The
State Chairman may bar any literature that does not comply with this rule or fails to identify the
candidate, person, or organization responsible for the literature. No petitions for any candidate or
ballot issue shall be permitted or circulated on the floor, in the facility, or on the premises, except as
the State Chairman may authorize.
12.3 Future Assembly and Convention. These Rules shall serve as the temporary rules of any
succeeding Assembly and Convention of the Colorado Republican Party until such time as
permanent rules are adopted by that Assembly and Convention.
12.4 Suspension. The rules of the Assembly and Convention may be suspended by a two-thirds
vote.
12.5 Deferral to RNC Rules, State Law and CRC Bylaws. Should any rule herein contradict
governing provisions of state or federal law, the Rules of the (national) Republican Party, or the
Bylaws or rules of the Colorado Republican State Central Committee, the Chairman may rule that
such law, rule, or bylaw governs.
13. Parliamentary Authority.
13.1 Robert's Rules of Order, Newly Revised. The eleventh and most recent edition of Robert's
Rules of Order, Newly Revised, shall govern the Assembly and Convention in all cases in which they
are not in conflict with Colorado Revised Statutes, the Bylaws of the Colorado Republican State
Central Committee, the Rules of the National Republican Party, and these rules. The foregoing will be
available for inspection during the Assembly and Convention.
Adopted by the Rules Committee this 7th day of April, 2016.
Joy Hoffman, Rules Committee Chairman
Page 54
Exhibit 3
Page: 1 of 1
Official Summary Report

Registered Voters: 3,825 of 3,897 (98.15%)
Ballots Cast: 3,825
Colorado National Delegates (Vote for 26)

Total
Times Cast
3,825 / 3,897
Undervotes
27,653
Overvotes
2,132
Candidate
98.15%
Total
58. Buck, Ken -- [ Ted Cruz ]
2,272
3.26%
380. Neville, Patrick -- [ Ted Cruz ]
1,988
2.85%
477. Sharkey, Sue -- [ Ted Cruz ]
1,940
2.78%
228. Harvey, Ted -- [ Ted Cruz ]
1,869
2.68%
429. Ransom, Kim -- [ Ted Cruz ]
1,861
2.67%
200. Grantham, Kevin -- [ Ted Cruz ]
1,843
2.65%
522. Teal, George -- [ Ted Cruz ]
1,820
2.61%
457. Saine, Lori -- [ Ted Cruz ]
1,809
2.60%
1,792
2.57%
1,709
2.45%
1,708
2.45%
1,661
2.38%
1,590
2.28%
1,588
2.28%
1,582
2.27%
1,546
2.22%
518
0.74%
493
0.71%
486
0.70%
476
0.68%
475
0.68%
469
0.67%
444
0.64%
410
0.59%
409
0.59%
396
0.57%
380
0.55%
371
0.53%
355
0.51%
566. Williams, Wayne W -- [ Ted Cruz

]
54. Brown, Dudley -- [ Ted Cruz ]
189. Gilbreath, Jim -- [ Ted Cruz ]
591. Burton Brown, Kristi -- [ Ted
Cruz ]
594. Humphrey, Stephen -- [ Ted
Cruz ]
592. Anderson, Scott -- [ Ted Cruz ]
593. Hotaling, Jon -- [ Ted Cruz ]
590. Bjorklund, Sharon -- [ Ted Cruz ]
59. Buck, Perry -- [ Ted Cruz ]
114. Davis, Patrick -- [ Donald Trump
]
19. Barlock, Edward Stephen E -- [
Donald Trump ]
133. Dooley, Sherry M -- [ Donald
Trump ]
184. Gerlock, Beverly A -- [ Donald
Trump ]
474. Sengenberger, Jimmy -- [ Ted
Cruz ]
127. Dimanna, Michael -- [ Donald
Trump ]
240. Holbrook, Bradley A -- [ Donald
Trump ]
272. Keith, Seth -- [ Ted Cruz ]
12. Bailsley, Mark -- [ Ted Cruz ]
589. Jajack, Kimberly -- [ Donald
Trump ]
518. Szabo, Libby -- [ Ted Cruz ]
168. Fore, Lana -- [ Unpledged ]
Page 55
Page: 1 of 1
471. Seger, Wendi -- [ Donald Trump
]
1. Adams, Ronald -- [ Ted Cruz ]
354
0.51%
353
0.51%
350
0.50%
349
0.50%
348
0.50%
344
0.49%
343
0.49%
331
0.48%
326
0.47%
318
0.46%
309
0.44%
308
0.44%
306
0.44%
300
0.43%
17. Barker, Bradley -- [ Ted Cruz ]
297
0.43%
50. Brown, J. Paul -- [ Ted Cruz ]
289
0.41%
602
281
0.40%
185. Gessler, Scott -- [ Ted Cruz ]
279
0.40%
275
0.39%
274
0.39%
268
0.38%
266
0.38%
260
0.37%
257
0.37%
252
0.36%
252
0.36%
250
0.36%
241
0.35%
240
0.34%
238
0.34%
238
0.34%
238
0.34%
236
0.34%
233
0.33%
233
0.33%
230
0.33%
227
0.33%
433. Reed, Jonathan Prescott -- [

Donald Trump ]
444. Rising, Robert -- [ Donald Trump
]
541. Varangot, Helbis -- [ Donald
Trump ]
257. Jackson, Wesley -- [ Donald
Trump ]
449. Rollans, Peg E -- [ Donald Trump
]
598
610
551. Watkins, James Charles -- [
Donald Trump ]
576. Wrench, Gerald -- [ Donald
Trump ]
565. Williams, Howard -- [ Donald
Trump ]
263. Jones, Ryan -- [ Unpledged ]
503. Stephens, Amy -- [ John Kasich ]
326. Martinez, Solomon -- [ Ted Cruz

]
60. Bugby, Dale -- [ John Kasich ]
516. Swalm, Spencer -- [ Unpledged
]
182. George, Thomas -- [ John Kasich
]
535. Trachman, William Edward -- [
John Kasich ]
289. Krause, Ervin -- [ Ted Cruz ]
76. Chavez-Rey, Hugo -- [ Ted Cruz ]
325. Martinez, Caleb J -- [ John
Kasich ]
71. Cartier, Michael -- [ John Kasich ]
68. Carheden, Adam -- [ John Kasich ]
603
339. McElroy, Denis -- [ Donald
Trump ]
410. Pimentel, Alexander -- [ Donald
Trump ]
532. Tonkins, Vickie -- [ Unpledged ]
70. Carpenter, Christopher -- [ John
Kasich ]
320. Lowe, Jeffrey -- [ Unpledged ]
334. McCaskill, Richard -- [ Donald
Trump ]
156. Fassel, Michael -- [ John Kasich
]
47. Brockman, Jason -- [ Ted Cruz ]
Page 56
Page: 1 of 1
103. Currey, Edmund -- [ John Kasich
]
305. Laxar, Philip -- [ John Kasich ]
199. Grantham, Caroline -- [ Ted Cruz
]
292. Kueera, Jay -- [ Ted Cruz ]
227
0.33%
224
0.32%
223
0.32%
222
0.32%
411. Piper , Barbara -- [ Unpledged ]
217
0.31%
600
215
0.31%
632
210
0.30%
92. Couey, Carrie -- [ Ted Cruz ]
207
0.30%
303. Larsen, Dale -- [ Ted Cruz ]
201
0.29%
631
195
0.28%
190
0.27%
188
0.27%
184
0.26%
181
0.26%
178
0.26%
178
0.26%
170
0.24%
170
0.24%
169
0.24%
167
0.24%
166
0.24%
164
0.24%
164
0.24%
159
0.23%
595. Call, Ryan -- [ Unpledged ]
158
0.23%
328. Massey, Drew -- [ Unpledged ]
155
0.22%
153
0.22%
153
0.22%
153
0.22%
152
0.22%
403. Patterson, Jon Mark -- [ Donald

Trump ]
494. Sorrentino, Rolly -- [ Unpledged
]
319. Louth, Rexford L -- [ Ted Cruz ]
11. Bailey, Richard Olsen -- [ Donald
Trump ]
298. Lambert, William P -- [ Donald
Trump ]
517. Szabo, Denes -- [ Ted Cruz ]
84. Clard, Mary Wrenn -- [ Ted Cruz ]
423. Radhakrishnan, Jennifer -- [
Unpledged ]
15. Bamber, Robert -- [ Donald
Trump ]
37. Boelens, James -- [ Ted Cruz ]
259. Jenkins, Robert -- [ Donald
Trump ]
110. Dambman, Mary -- [ Unpledged
]
537. Trujillo, Floyd -- [ Ted Cruz ]
4. Andersen, Clifford -- [ Unpledged ]
124. Densmore, Ellen -- [ Unpledged

]
563. Wilburn, Derrick -- [ Unpledged
]
636
174. Gamache, Celeste R -- [
Unpledged ]
40. Bollwerk, Albert G -- [ Ted Cruz ]
151
0.22%
297. Lambert, Kent -- [ Ted Cruz ]
150
0.22%
222. Harris, Marilyn -- [ Unpledged ]
146
0.21%
445. Roach, John A -- [ Unpledged ]
145
0.21%
491. Snyder, Laura -- [ Unpledged ]
145
0.21%
580. You, Aleta -- [ Unpledged ]
145
0.21%
585. Zuniga, Miguel A -- [ Ted Cruz ]
144
0.21%
141
0.20%
139
0.20%
138
0.20%
447. Rodriguez, Julio -- [ Donald

Trump ]
414. Porter, Kathryn -- [ Unpledged ]
46. Bright, Daniel Morgan -- [ Ted
Cruz ]
Page 57
Page: 1 of 1
132. Dooley, John M -- [ Donald
Trump ]
14. Baldwin, Jacob -- [ Ted Cruz ]
136
0.20%
135
0.19%
133
0.19%
131
0.19%
130
0.19%
128
0.18%
127
0.18%
127
0.18%
126
0.18%
126
0.18%
125
0.18%
125
0.18%
123
0.18%
123
0.18%
123
0.18%
122
0.18%
122
0.18%
122
0.18%
122
0.18%
120
0.17%
118
0.17%
117
0.17%
117
0.17%
117
0.17%
116
0.17%
115
0.17%
114
0.16%
113
0.16%
82. Clai, Rodolfo -- [ Donald Trump ]
111
0.16%
171. Foxhoven, Caitlyn -- [ Ted Cruz ]
111
0.16%
460. Sandoval, John -- [ Unpledged ]
111
0.16%
9. Austin, Michele -- [ Unpledged ]
110
0.16%
35. Bliss, John S -- [ Ted Cruz ]
110
0.16%
110
0.16%
108
0.16%
106
0.15%
104
0.15%
104
0.15%
104
0.15%
588. Hoffman, Joy -- [ Unpledged ]

154. Evans, Kathleen Elaine -- [
Unpledged ]
32. Blake, Rachel -- [ Unpledged ]
513. Sullivan, Molly -- [ Unpledged ]
295. LaCount, Christopher -- [
Unpledged ]
386. Nunez, Joe -- [ Ted Cruz ]
83. Clair, Deborah -- [ Unpledged ]
350. Mentz, George S -- [ Donald
Trump ]
188. Gibson, Shretta -- [ Unpledged ]
421. Rabinovich, Barry -- [
Unpledged ]
8. Athanasopoulos, George -- [
Unpledged ]
201. Grassia, Thomas -- [ Donald
Trump ]
376. Nasrallah, Ruba -- [ Unpledged ]
112. Darrell, Levi -- [ Donald Trump ]
379. Neitzel, Nicolas Robert -- [
Donald Trump ]
401. Parks, Jr, Jerome Patterson -- [
Donald Trump ]
437. Reinicke, Brenda Colleen -- [
Ted Cruz ]
584. Zubrin, Robert -- [ Marco Rubio
]
511. Sullenberger, Sharon -- [
Unpledged ]
435. Reichert, Marla Spinuzzi -- [
Unpledged ]
458. Sanchez, Tony -- [ Ted Cruz ]
539. Unruh, Kendal -- [ Ted Cruz ]
337. McCune, Candace -- [
Unpledged ]
22. Barton, Steven -- [ Ted Cruz ]
501. Stapleton, Anita M -- [ Ted Cruz
]
440. Rendleman, Kay -- [ Ted Cruz ]
115. Davis, Scott E -- [ Donald Trump

]
23. Baumann, David -- [ Ted Cruz ]
441. Rentfrow, Elisha -- [ Ted Cruz ]
192. Glesener, Laurence -- [ Ted Cruz
]
578. Wright, Richard Warren -- [
Unpledged ]
635
Page 58
Page: 1 of 1
90. Corporon, Randy B -- [ Ted Cruz ]
103
0.15%
103
0.15%
103
0.15%
103
0.15%
102
0.15%
101
0.14%
99
0.14%
99
0.14%
99
0.14%
99
0.14%
98
0.14%
98
0.14%
98
0.14%
97
0.14%
96
0.14%
495. Sparks, Dylan -- [ Unpledged ]
96
0.14%
44. Bosley, Steven -- [ Unpledged ]
95
0.14%
95
0.14%
95
0.14%
93
0.13%
93
0.13%
249. Huneycutt, Steven -- [ Donald

Trump ]
374. Mulholland, Samantha
Elizabeth -- [ Donald Trump ]
623
16. Banta, Bill -- [ Unpledged ]
549. Wallison, Frieda K -- [
Unpledged ]
25. Beckman, Philip -- [ Marco Rubio
]
119. Del Valle, Alexander Winston --
[ Donald Trump ]
368. Moore, Brett -- [ Unpledged ]
582. Ytterberg, Donald -- [
Unpledged ]
153. Engel, John -- [ Donald Trump ]
399. Palmer, John R -- [ Marco Rubio
]
575. Woyte, Joseph Christian -- [ Ted
Cruz ]
448. Roehm, Lauren L -- [ Unpledged
]
49. Brophy, Todd -- [ Ted Cruz ]
207. Gutierrez, Laureen Adele -- [

Ted Cruz ]
509. Sturm, Melanie -- [ Ted Cruz ]
526. Thompson, Emily -- [ Marco
Rubio ]
583. Zielinski, Matthew -- [ Marco
Rubio ]
179. Geffre, Jesica -- [ Unpledged ]
91
0.13%
219. Harms, Brenda -- [ Unpledged ]
91
0.13%
239. Hofman, Steven -- [ Ted Cruz ]
90
0.13%
90
0.13%
89. Coran, Robin -- [ Ted Cruz ]
89
0.13%
253. Imer, Laurel -- [ Donald Trump ]
88
0.13%
87
0.12%
360. Miller, Bernetta -- [ Unpledged ]
75. Chandler, Kathleen A -- [

Unpledged ]
301. Lane, Jared -- [ Ted Cruz ]
87
0.12%
264. Jones, Roger -- [ Unpledged ]
85
0.12%
596
85
0.12%
84
0.12%
84
0.12%
139. Dykes III, Osborne J -- [

Unpledged ]
420. Quinlar, Michael -- [ Unpledged
]
424. Raiffie, Jennifer -- [ Ted Cruz ]
84
0.12%
173. Gaiter, III, Lew -- [ Unpledged ]
82
0.12%
309. Leve, Terrence -- [ Ted Cruz ]
82
0.12%
82
0.12%
81
0.12%
81
0.12%
530. Tomlinson, Roydan Thomas -- [

Unpledged ]
269. Jordan, Richard J -- [ Unpledged
]
614
Page 59
Page: 1 of 1
39. Bolin, Drew -- [ Ted Cruz ]
80
0.11%
346. McQueen, Daniel -- [ Ted Cruz ]
80
0.11%
80
0.11%
79
0.11%
79
0.11%
79
0.11%
373. Mulder, Joy -- [ Donald Trump ]

80. Cirbo, Pamela S -- [ Ted Cruz ]
262. Jolley, Brett Lincoln -- [
Unpledged ]
280. Kijewski, Kevin -- [ Donald
Trump ]
348. Meek, Brandi -- [ Unpledged ]
79
0.11%
405. Perry, Loretta J -- [ Unpledged ]
79
0.11%
417. Primsky, John -- [ Unpledged ]
78
0.11%
609
78
0.11%
366. Monson, Kim -- [ Unpledged ]
77
0.11%
117. Deats, Susan C -- [ Ted Cruz ]
76
0.11%
75
0.11%
75
0.11%
75
0.11%
74
0.11%
28. Bergman, Daniel -- [ Unpledged ]

30. Binse, Liselotte (Lisa) -- [ Ben
Carson ]
606
466. Schlegel, Kurt -- [ Donald Trump
]
166. Foley, Dana -- [ Unpledged ]
73
0.10%
615
72
0.10%
62. Burrows, Spenser -- [ Ted Cruz ]
71
0.10%
619
71
0.10%
66. Buxman, Justin -- [ Ted Cruz ]
70
0.10%
68
0.10%
68
0.10%
68
0.10%
66
0.09%
64
0.09%
63
0.09%
63
0.09%
63
0.09%
63
0.09%
63
0.09%
175. Garcia, Raymond -- [ Unpledged

]
213. Halligan, Gavin Marie -- [
Unpledged ]
616
27. Behrens, Charles Ludovicus -- [
Unpledged ]
52. Brown, Jennifer -- [ Unpledged ]
45. Bremer, Robert "Eli" -- [
Unpledged ]
151. Elsey, Elizabeth M -- [
Unpledged ]
312. Licht, Randy -- [ Ted Cruz ]
343. McKernan, Patricia Marie -- [
Unpledged ]
367. Montgomery, Lucia K -- [
Unpledged ]
41. Bollwerk, John -- [ Ted Cruz ]
62
0.09%
508. Stucky, Tamara -- [ Unpledged ]
62
0.09%
316. Loban, Shawna -- [ Ted Cruz ]
61
0.09%
507. Stucky, Joe -- [ Unpledged ]
61
0.09%
60
0.09%
59
0.08%
58
0.08%
58
0.08%
58
0.08%
391. Olmstead, Donald -- [ Ted Cruz

]
540. Van Atten, Jarilyn M -- [
Unpledged ]
196. Goldberger, Art -- [ Ted Cruz ]
271. Kaufman, David M -- [ Ted Cruz
]
604
Page 60
Page: 1 of 1
371. Moss, Katy Lynn -- [ Ted Cruz ]
57
0.08%
599
57
0.08%
56
0.08%
473. Seitz, Kelly Michele -- [

Unpledged ]
202. Green, Daniel -- [ Ted Cruz ]
55
0.08%
102. Cunniff, Susan -- [ Ted Cruz ]
52
0.07%
141. Ebert , Cynthia -- [ Ted Cruz ]
52
0.07%
290. Krause, Heidi -- [ Ted Cruz ]
52
0.07%
51
0.07%
50
0.07%
50
0.07%
50
0.07%
50
0.07%
49
0.07%
47
0.07%
47
0.07%
357. Middleton, Philip Charles -- [

Ted Cruz ]
123. Dembowski, John -- [ Ted Cruz ]
330. Mathai, Anil -- [ Unpledged ]
395. Ortegon, Arthur -- [ Unpledged ]
434. Reed, Stephen R -- [ Unpledged
]
572. Woodward, Robert -- [ Ted Cruz
]
120. Delgado, Mark -- [ Unpledged ]
475. Serfoss, Chandra -- [ Unpledged
]
605
47
0.07%
489. Smith, Matthew -- [ Ted Cruz ]
46
0.07%
617
46
0.07%
136. Dreyer, Jennifer -- [ Ted Cruz ]
45
0.06%
45
0.06%
45
0.06%
44
0.06%
160. Fernandez, Rick -- [ Unpledged ]

226. Harting, Debra -- [ Ted Cruz ]
345. McMiller, Gregory -- [
Unpledged ]
381. Newkirk, John -- [ Unpledged ]
44
0.06%
553. Watson, Kirk -- [ Ted Cruz ]
44
0.06%
554. Watson, Theresa -- [ Ted Cruz ]
44
0.06%
73. Cast, Priscilla -- [ Ted Cruz ]
43
0.06%
43
0.06%
122. Dembowski, Caitlin -- [ Ted

Cruz ]
142. Ebert , Robert -- [ Ted Cruz ]
43
0.06%
318. Lomax, Simon -- [ Ted Cruz ]
43
0.06%
390. Oliger, Travis J -- [ Ted Cruz ]
43
0.06%
482. Sitki, Laural -- [ Ted Cruz ]
43
0.06%
611
43
0.06%
109. Dalton, Henry -- [ Unpledged ]
42
0.06%
443. Rinard, Gregory -- [ Ted Cruz ]
42
0.06%
527. Thomson, Regina -- [ Ted Cruz ]
42
0.06%
3. Ames, Andrea -- [ Unpledged ]
41
0.06%
329. Mateer, Carter -- [ Ted Cruz ]
41
0.06%
552. Watkins, Joel -- [ Unpledged ]
41
0.06%
948
41
0.06%
43. Booth, James F -- [ Ted Cruz ]
39
0.06%
426. Randell, Christian -- [ Ted Cruz ]
39
0.06%
291. Krause, Katrina -- [ Ted Cruz ]
38
0.05%
409. Phillips, Michael -- [ Unpledged

]
38
0.05%
Page 61
Page: 1 of 1
418. Pringnano, Charles -- [ Donald
Trump ]
608
38
0.05%
38
0.05%
37
0.05%
37
0.05%
37
0.05%
67. Byers, David -- [ Ted Cruz ]
36
0.05%
125. Dickinson, Peggy -- [ Ted Cruz ]
36
0.05%
126. Dickinson, Regan -- [ Ted Cruz ]
36
0.05%
36
0.05%
36
0.05%
35
0.05%
34
0.05%
256. Jackson, Mary Ann -- [ Ted Cruz

]
396. Padgett, Kyle James -- [
Unpledged ]
427. Randell, Michele -- [ Ted Cruz ]
232. Henderson, Clancey S -- [

Unpledged ]
452. Rudolph, Jonathan -- [ Ted Cruz
]
284. Knudsen, Peter J -- [ Ted Cruz ]
394. Orr, Vallery Jean -- [ Unpledged
]
152. Elsner, Richard -- [ Unpledged ]
32
0.05%
177. Garza, Charity -- [ Unpledged ]
32
0.05%
275. Kelly, Susan -- [ Ted Cruz ]
32
0.05%
359. Mikes, Gary -- [ Ted Cruz ]
32
0.05%
32
0.05%
32
0.05%
31
0.04%
31
0.04%
31
0.04%
31
0.04%
31
0.04%
30
0.04%
30
0.04%
30
0.04%
30
0.04%
30
0.04%
30
0.04%
377. Neel, Jr, John LeRoy -- [ Ted

Cruz ]
388. O'Hare, Michael -- [ Ted Cruz ]
145. Edwards, Roger -- [ Unpledged ]
250. Hunt, Edward -- [ Ted Cruz ]
555. Weaver, Patterson S -- [
Unpledged ]
556. Webb, Joseph Anthony -- [
Unpledged ]
601
230. Heatherly, Charles L -- [ Ted
Cruz ]
242. Hoopes, Karl -- [ Unpledged ]
277. Kennedy, Thomas Joseph -- [
Ted Cruz ]
352. Meston, Orvis M -- [ Ted Cruz ]
402. Parrot, Donald -- [ Unpledged ]
404. Peck, Steven Charles -- [ Ted
Cruz ]
478. Shay, Reese -- [ Unpledged ]
30
0.04%
550. Warner, Wendy -- [ Ted Cruz ]
30
0.04%
569. Wind, John -- [ Ted Cruz ]
30
0.04%
29. Bilkie, Richard -- [ Unpledged ]
29
0.04%
29
0.04%
96. Crowl, Michael -- [ Ted Cruz ]
29
0.04%
97. Crump, Irving -- [ Ted Cruz ]
29
0.04%
304. LaValley, Thomas -- [ Ted Cruz ]
29
0.04%
29
0.04%
33. Blake, Bradford P -- [ Unpledged ]
533. Toomey, III, John Edward -- [

Ted Cruz ]
85. Cole, Benjamin -- [ Unpledged ]
28
0.04%
224. Hartfield, Ivy -- [ Unpledged ]
28
0.04%
278. Kent, Michael -- [ Unpledged ]
28
0.04%
Page 62
Page: 1 of 1
307. Lee, Frank -- [ Unpledged ]
28
0.04%
310. Levine, Howard -- [ Ted Cruz ]
28
0.04%
28
0.04%
333. Mcalpine, Michael -- [

Unpledged ]
20. Barlow, Nancy F -- [ Unpledged ]
27
0.04%
129. Doherty, Jay -- [ Unpledged ]
27
0.04%
499. Stahl, Joleen -- [ Ted Cruz ]
27
0.04%
27
0.04%
547. Walker, Matthew Richard -- [

Ted Cruz ]
118. Decker, Mindy -- [ Unpledged ]
26
0.04%
131. Doherty, John -- [ Unpledged ]
26
0.04%
216. Hampton, Robert -- [ Ted Cruz ]
26
0.04%
252. Hutchings, Shari -- [ Ted Cruz ]
26
0.04%
265. Jones, Andrew M -- [ Ted Cruz ]
26
0.04%
26
0.04%
25
0.04%
536. Trout, Trevor Daniel -- [ Ted

Cruz ]
190. Gilleland, Michelle -- [
Unpledged ]
244. Horn, Angela -- [ Unpledged ]
25
0.04%
248. Huisman, Ryan -- [ Ted Cruz ]
25
0.04%
486. Small, Lawrence -- [ Ted Cruz ]
25
0.04%
618
25
0.04%
24
0.03%
24
0.03%
24
0.03%
24
0.03%
24
0.03%
24
0.03%
24
0.03%
23
0.03%
23
0.03%
223. Harris, Travis "Blu" -- [ Ted Cruz

]
235. Hettinger, Daniel -- [ Unpledged
]
260. Jerome, Mark -- [ Ted Cruz ]
324. Mammoser, Matthew -- [
Unpledged ]
462. Schaefer, Elizabeth -- [ Ted Cruz
]
524. Tesitor, David -- [ Unpledged ]
613
439. Reitman, James S -- [ Unpledged
]
493. Sorensen, Debbera -- [ Ted Cruz
]
520. Taylor, Jennifer -- [ Unpledged ]
23
0.03%
587. Zynen, Patricia -- [ Ted Cruz ]
23
0.03%
624
23
0.03%
79. Christi, Matt -- [ Ted Cruz ]
22
0.03%
81. Citron, Scott -- [ Ted Cruz ]
22
0.03%
22
0.03%
22
0.03%
22
0.03%
22
0.03%
22
0.03%
22
0.03%
22
0.03%
21
0.03%
21
0.03%
130. Doherty, John Darren -- [

Unpledged ]
148. Eigles, William Philip -- [ Ted
Cruz ]
302. Larimer, Joni -- [ Ted Cruz ]
358. Middleton, William Paul -- [ Ted
Cruz ]
432. Ream, Ross -- [ Unpledged ]
521. Taylor, Douglas -- [ Unpledged ]
777
21. Bartlett, Jr., James (Jim) David -- [
Unpledged ]
197. Gorman, Melodie -- [ Ted Cruz ]
Page 63
Page: 1 of 1
362. Mische, Ted -- [ Ted Cruz ]
21
0.03%
463. Schaefer, Sue -- [ Unpledged ]
21
0.03%
484. Skipper, Taryn -- [ Ted Cruz ]
21
0.03%
21
0.03%
20
0.03%
137. Dryden, Ken H -- [ Unpledged ]
20
0.03%
220. Harper, Cheryl -- [ Unpledged ]
20
0.03%
336. McCrary, Susan F -- [ Ted Cruz ]
20
0.03%
20
0.03%
20
0.03%
548. Wallenburg, Matthew Jay -- [

Ted Cruz ]
34. Blancken, Robert -- [ Unpledged ]
338. McDonald, Terrence -- [ Ted

Cruz ]
387. Oakley, Robert Wayne -- [ Ted
Cruz ]
392. Olson, Carolyn -- [ Unpledged ]
20
0.03%
514. Sullivan, Thomas -- [ Ted Cruz ]
20
0.03%
72. Case, Judith -- [ Unpledged ]
19
0.03%
19
0.03%
19
0.03%
19
0.03%
18
0.03%
18
0.03%
18
0.03%
18
0.03%
18
0.03%
18
0.03%
18
0.03%
18
0.03%
18
0.03%
18
0.03%
18
0.03%
18
0.03%
18
0.03%
18
0.03%
18
0.03%
17
0.02%
17
0.02%
17
0.02%
342. McKee, Justin -- [ Ted Cruz ]
17
0.02%
347. Meals, Sue Ann -- [ Unpledged ]
17
0.02%
378. Neilson, Marty -- [ Unpledged ]
17
0.02%
383. Newnam, Patrick -- [ Unpledged

]
17
0.02%
105. Currier, William Sterling -- [ Ted

Cruz ]
144. Eby , Cheryl -- [ Unpledged ]
488. Smith, Davonne -- [ Unpledged ]
2. Alexander, Jimmy Clayton -- [
Unpledged ]
95. Crawford, Richard Edward -- [
Ted Cruz ]
194. Goetsch, Jeffrey -- [ Ted Cruz ]
205. Gross, Jeffrey -- [ Ted Cruz ]
270. Josephson, Russell -- [ Ted Cruz
]
299. Lameiro, Gerard Francis -- [ Ted
Cruz ]
321. Lunceford, Brooke S -- [ Ted
Cruz ]
412. Polimino, Daniel -- [ Unpledged
]
453. Ruffing, William -- [ Ted Cruz ]
467. Schlierf, Michael -- [ Unpledged
]
480. Sherwood, Lorna J -- [ Ted Cruz ]
492. Soehnlein, Jeffrey -- [
Unpledged ]
523. Templeman, Bradley -- [
Unpledged ]
557. Weese, Maria del Carmen -- [
Unpledged ]
597
150. Ellmann, Kipp C -- [ Ted Cruz ]
246. Howe, Thomas W -- [
Unpledged ]
335. McConnell, Erin -- [ Ted Cruz ]
Page 64
Page: 1 of 1
393. Oram, Nathan Paulus -- [ Ted
Cruz ]
425. Raleigh, Helen Qiang -- [
Unpledged ]
529. Tintera, Elaine -- [ Ted Cruz ]
17
0.02%
17
0.02%
17
0.02%
17
0.02%
17
0.02%
634
17
0.02%
10. Auville, Marc -- [ Unpledged ]
16
0.02%
106. Curtner, Walter -- [ Ted Cruz ]
16
0.02%
111. Damerson, Ruth -- [ Ted Cruz ]
16
0.02%
143. Eby, William -- [ Unpledged ]
16
0.02%
16
0.02%
16
0.02%
544. Voss, Emily -- [ Unpledged ]

568. Willms, Beverly Jo -- [ Ted Cruz ]
227. Hartley, Milton Watson -- [

Unpledged ]
234. Herron, Leonard -- [ Unpledged
]
273. Keller, Thomas -- [ Ted Cruz ]
16
0.02%
456. Saffer, Diane -- [ Ted Cruz ]
16
0.02%
633
16
0.02%
6. Aragon, Raymond -- [ Unpledged ]
15
0.02%
300. Landfair, Benny -- [ Ted Cruz ]
15
0.02%
26. Begier, Ronald J -- [ Unpledged ]
14
0.02%
48. Brofford, Elaine -- [ Unpledged ]
14
0.02%
53. Brown, Dan -- [ Unpledged ]
14
0.02%
14
0.02%
14
0.02%
14
0.02%
14
0.02%
14
0.02%
14
0.02%
14
0.02%
14
0.02%
14
0.02%
14
0.02%
14
0.02%
14
0.02%
77. Cheetham, Bradley -- [

Unpledged ]
134. Dorman, Steven Paul -- [
Unpledged ]
135. Doyle, Derrick Todd -- [
Unpledged ]
218. Hansen, Erik -- [ Unpledged ]
243. Hooten, Steven Paul -- [
Unpledged ]
251. Hunt, III, Edward E -- [ Ted Cruz
]
281. Kinder, Rebecca Lea -- [
Unpledged ]
323. Mahoney, William C -- [ Ted
Cruz ]
327. Mason, Charles -- [ Unpledged ]
375. Murray, Dawne -- [ Unpledged ]
542. Viano, Jacob -- [ Unpledged ]
558. Westbrook, Richard J -- [
Unpledged ]
579. Yaciuk, Daniel -- [ Unpledged ]
14
0.02%
7. Arney, Alan -- [ Unpledged ]
13
0.02%
38. Bogani, Tina -- [ Unpledged ]
13
0.02%
13
0.02%
140. Eagen, Cheryl -- [ Unpledged ]
13
0.02%
193. Gloriod, John -- [ Unpledged ]
13
0.02%
364. Moeller, Karen -- [ Unpledged ]
13
0.02%
479. Sherman, Sara Christine -- [ Ted

Cruz ]
13
0.02%
94. Crane, Alexander -- [ Unpledged ]
Page 65
Page: 1 of 1
485. Skotty, Donald -- [ Ted Cruz ]
545. Wagner, Betty Lou -- [
Unpledged ]
559. Westbrook, Robert Lee -- [
Unpledged ]
607
13
0.02%
13
0.02%
13
0.02%
13
0.02%
36. Boaz, Benjamin -- [ Unpledged ]
12
0.02%
64. Busch, Cheryl -- [ Unpledged ]
12
0.02%
12
0.02%
12
0.02%
12
0.02%
12
0.02%
12
0.02%
104. Currier, Stuart Vincent -- [

Unpledged ]
170. Forenza, David -- [ Unpledged ]
217. Hamrick, Katrina -- [ Unpledged
]
464. Schefter, Timothy James -- [ Ted
Cruz ]
470. Schwerk, Benjamin -- [
Unpledged ]
5. Andree, Victoria -- [ Unpledged ]
11
0.02%
13. Baker, William -- [ Unpledged ]
11
0.02%
56. Brubaker, Terry -- [ Unpledged ]
11
0.02%
11
0.02%
11
0.02%
11
0.02%
11
0.02%
86. Collier, Richard Harlow -- [

Unpledged ]
161. Fielding, Linda -- [ Unpledged ]
180. Geisler, Lisa -- [ Unpledged ]
276. Kennedy, Robert -- [ Unpledged
]
313. Linke, Jolene -- [ Unpledged ]
11
0.02%
351. Mertz, John -- [ Unpledged ]
11
0.02%
363. Mocon, Philip -- [ Unpledged ]
11
0.02%
11
0.02%
11
0.02%
11
0.02%
11
0.02%
11
0.02%
11
0.02%
11
0.02%
18. Barkey, David -- [ Unpledged ]
10
0.01%
51. Brown, James C -- [ Unpledged ]
10
0.01%
10
0.01%
10
0.01%
10
0.01%
10
0.01%
10
0.01%
10
0.01%
10
0.01%
10
0.01%
10
0.01%
382. Newman, Wanda -- [ Unpledged

]
398. Page, David M -- [ Unpledged ]
413. Pope-Eagen, Cheryl -- [
Unpledged ]
428. Randolph , Ernest -- [
Unpledged ]
528. Tierney, Patrick -- [ Unpledged ]
577. Wright, Dinah Stacy -- [
Unpledged ]
626
63. Burton, Kimberly Ann -- [

Unpledged ]
88. Coonradt, David -- [ Ted Cruz ]
107. Dailey, Angela Sue -- [
Unpledged ]
206. Guillon, Benjamin -- [
Unpledged ]
279. Kettering, Mary Elizabeth -- [
Unpledged ]
287. Kopaz, John -- [ Unpledged ]
455. Rusterholtz, David -- [
Unpledged ]
468. Scholz, Theresa A -- [ Unpledged
]
510. Sugg, Joseph A -- [ Ted Cruz ]
Page 66
Page: 1 of 1
560. Westbrook, Zane Mark -- [
Unpledged ]
57. Brunette, Alice T -- [ Unpledged ]
78. Chervenak, Richard -- [
Unpledged ]
98. Crumplar, Marilyn Gwyn -- [
Unpledged ]
100. Cundiff, Mollie Jeneane -- [
Unpledged ]
116. Davis, William Michael -- [
Unpledged ]
121. Delohery, Patrick -- [ Unpledged
]
210. Hahn, Gabriel -- [ Unpledged ]
215. Hammett, Scott -- [ Unpledged ]
231. Hecht, Jeffrey -- [ Unpledged ]
238. Hindley, Forrest Giles -- [
Unpledged ]
245. Hott, Robert Troy -- [
Unpledged ]
314. Lipetzky, Tom -- [ Unpledged ]
317. Locke, Peter Vance -- [ Ted Cruz
]
331. Mayes, Barbara -- [ Unpledged ]
365. Momper, Arthur -- [ Unpledged
]
408. Petton, Rodney -- [ Unpledged ]
10
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
438. Reinicke, Paul -- [ Unpledged ]
0.01%
512. Sullice, Gabriel -- [ Unpledged ]
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
534. Torres, Stephen -- [ Unpledged

]
571. Woodhouse, Jeremy -- [
Unpledged ]
55. Brown, Lawrence Harmon -- [
Unpledged ]
61. Burrows, Daniel -- [ Unpledged ]
108. Daily, Jason Garrick -- [
Unpledged ]
113. Davila, Eric -- [ Unpledged ]
167. Forbes, Heidi Louise -- [
Unpledged ]
198. Graham, Mary Lu -- [ Unpledged
]
266. Jones, Kevin -- [ Unpledged ]
322. Mack, Robert James -- [
Unpledged ]
389. O'Leary, Thomas -- [ Unpledged
]
415. Poston, Joan -- [ Unpledged ]
0.01%
505. Storbeck, Telbe -- [ Unpledged ]
0.01%
506. Stovall, Julian -- [ Unpledged ]
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
31. Blackman, Pam -- [ Unpledged ]
0.01%
158. Feichko, Jase Maurice -- [

Unpledged ]
0.01%
562. White, Mark Edward -- [

Unpledged ]
620
Page 67
Page: 1 of 1
187. Gibson, Russel L -- [ Unpledged ]
229. Hayward, Justin Peter -- [
Unpledged ]
267. Jones-Carson, Jessica -- [
Unpledged ]
282. Kinney, Holly -- [ Unpledged ]
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
288. Krajewski, Eric -- [ Unpledged ]
0.01%
306. Lee, Debra Sue -- [ Unpledged ]
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
570. Wood, Carl D -- [ Unpledged ]
0.01%
641
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
344. McMaster, Jonathan -- [

Unpledged ]
385. Nilsson, Sandra -- [ Unpledged ]
397. Page, Charles L -- [ Unpledged ]
461. Scanlon, Steven M -- [
Unpledged ]
487. Smith, Cindy (Cynthia) N -- [
Unpledged ]
490. Smith, Russell P -- [ Unpledged
]
496. Speed, Wilisa Shoupe -- [ Ted
Cruz ]
502. Stearns, Charles D -- [
Unpledged ]
543. Vigil, Vincente -- [ Unpledged ]
24. Beamguard, H. Gordon -- [

Unpledged ]
65. Buttke, Joni -- [ Unpledged ]
69. Carpenter, Sharon -- [ Unpledged
]
91. Couchman, Donald Edward -- [
Unpledged ]
93. Coulter, Matthew R -- [
Unpledged ]
101. Cundiff, Trevor Cole -- [
Unpledged ]
147. Ehrlin, Elena -- [ Unpledged ]
0.01%
149. Elliott, David -- [ Unpledged ]
0.01%
157. Faught, John -- [ Unpledged ]
0.01%
163. Fireman, Hal -- [ Unpledged ]
0.01%
191. Gills, Jr, Robert D -- [ Ted Cruz ]
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
225. Hartgraves, Bradley E -- [

Unpledged ]
233. Hennessey, Thomas M -- [
Unpledged ]
254. Isaacs, Jonathon -- [ Unpledged
]
274. Kelley, Scott R -- [ Unpledged ]
356. Middleton, Cheryl Jean -- [
Unpledged ]
369. Moore, Joshua Richard -- [ Ted
Cruz ]
419. Propp, Brian R -- [ Unpledged ]
431. Reagor, Caleb -- [ Unpledged ]
454. Runnells, Dennis Dean -- [
Unpledged ]
472. Seidel, Daniel -- [ Unpledged ]
Page 68
Page: 1 of 1
531. Tone, Marian Adams -- [
Unpledged ]
546. Wagner, Thomas Melvin -- [
Unpledged ]
612
159. Felts, William -- [ Unpledged ]
164. Fitzgerald, Francis Patrick
(Patrick) -- [ Unpledged ]
209. Hadlock, LuAnn L -- [ Unpledged
]
211. Hahn, Sarah -- [ Unpledged ]
236. Hewgley, Richard Lucian -- [
Unpledged ]
258. Janssen, Mary -- [ Unpledged ]
332. Mazzullo-Reuel, Matteo -- [
Unpledged ]
361. Miller, Robert Edwin -- [
Unpledged ]
422. Rabner III, Richard T -- [
Unpledged ]
451. Rosales, John -- [ Unpledged ]
459. Sanders, Kristine -- [ Unpledged
]
497. Spenks, Gavin Matthew -- [
Unpledged ]
504. Stinnett, Michelle -- [
Unpledged ]
538. Tumlinson, April -- [ Unpledged
]
561. Wheeler, Jerry -- [ Unpledged ]
581. Youngman, Chase -- [
Unpledged ]
629
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
42. Bolset, Clark -- [ Unpledged ]
0.01%
74. Celaya, Gerald -- [ Unpledged ]
0.01%
87. Comyford, Dale -- [ Unpledged ]
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
186. Gibbs, Denis -- [ Unpledged ]
0.01%
195. Goff, Lance -- [ Unpledged ]
0.01%
203. Green, Jonthan -- [ Unpledged ]
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
99. Cummings, James -- [ Unpledged

]
128. Doak , Lester -- [ Unpledged ]
181. Genrich, John Howard -- [
Unpledged ]
183. Gerlock, Arnold -- [ Unpledged ]
208. Haddock, Robert Marshall -- [

Unpledged ]
241. Holleyman, Kirk -- [ Unpledged ]
285. Koller, Kimberly K -- [
Unpledged ]
296. Laewerineim, Lara -- [
Unpledged ]
308. Lee Jr, John Ellis -- [ Unpledged ]
340. McHugh, Cathleen -- [
Unpledged ]
355. Michaels, Norman C -- [
Unpledged ]
Page 69
Page: 1 of 1
407. Peterson, Tara -- [ Unpledged ]
0.01%
430. Ray, Ian -- [ Unpledged ]
0.01%
450. Ronen, Amir -- [ Unpledged ]
0.01%
515. Sutter, James -- [ Unpledged ]
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
567. Williamson, Alexander -- [

Unpledged ]
574. Works, John David -- [
Unpledged ]
676
0.01%
693
0.01%
146. Ehret, Robert -- [ Unpledged ]
0.00%
162. Fields, Marlene -- [ Unpledged ]
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
353. Meyer, John -- [ Unpledged ]
0.00%
416. Powell, Nicole -- [ Unpledged ]
0.00%
442. Richardson, Bill -- [ Unpledged ]
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
627
0.00%
630
0.00%
654
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
176. Garrett, Beth -- [ Unpledged ]
0.00%
178. Geary, Wendell -- [ Unpledged ]
0.00%
204. Grimm, Alice -- [ Unpledged ]
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
294. Kwist, Dana -- [ Unpledged ]
0.00%
406. Peters, Joan -- [ Unpledged ]
0.00%
436. Reifschneider, Daniel -- [

Unpledged ]
0.00%
214. Hamlyn, Cynthia -- [ Unpledged

]
221. Harrell, William Lamar -- [
Unpledged ]
255. Jackson, Derek -- [ Unpledged ]
261. Johansen, Roger -- [ Unpledged
]
283. Kling, Andrea Brett -- [
Unpledged ]
293. Kuhn, Michael -- [ Unpledged ]
315. Loar, Helen -- [ Unpledged ]
341. McHugh, Timothy -- [
Unpledged ]
349. Meiniwler, John -- [ Unpledged ]
446. Roberts, Ronald Ray -- [

Unpledged ]
476. Shaffer, Kirk M -- [ Unpledged ]
519. Taylor, John -- [ Unpledged ]
573. Workens, Monica -- [
Unpledged ]
586. Zweifel, Samuel -- [ Unpledged ]
165. Fleming, II, E. Nelson -- [

Unpledged ]
169. Foreman, Brian -- [ Unpledged ]
237. Hicks, Lawrence Eugene -- [

Unpledged ]
247. Howell, Gregary -- [ Unpledged ]
Page 70
Page: 1 of 1
498. Springer, Gerald -- [ Unpledged
]
621
0.00%
0.00%
625
0.00%
652
0.00%
665
0.00%
667
0.00%
677
0.00%
694
0.00%
705
0.00%
713
0.00%
719
0.00%
774
0.00%
800
0.00%
929
0.00%
138. Dybus, Arthur -- [ Unpledged ]
0.00%
155. Faber, Maria -- [ Unpledged ]
0.00%
172. Fuller, Wesley -- [ Unpledged ]
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
212. Halleyman, Kirk -- [ Unpledged ]

268. Jooter, Steven Paul -- [
Unpledged ]
286. Koller, John -- [ Unpledged ]
311. Lewis , James -- [ Unpledged ]
370. Moskowitz, Jonathan -- [
Unpledged ]
372. Mound, David -- [ Unpledged ]
0.00%
400. Paris, Sean -- [ Unpledged ]
0.00%
465. Scheimer, Gary -- [ Unpledged ]
0.00%
481. Shields, Ethan -- [ Unpledged ]
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
644
0.00%
646
0.00%
653
0.00%
660
0.00%
666
0.00%
671
0.00%
672
0.00%
680
0.00%
681
0.00%
687
0.00%
690
0.00%
692
0.00%
698
0.00%
700
0.00%
703
0.00%
483. Skeen Jr., Matthew David -- [

Unpledged ]
500. Stahl, Merle -- [ Unpledged ]
525. Thielemier, Brian Thomas -- [
Unpledged ]
622
Page 71
Page: 1 of 1
704
0.00%
714
0.00%
726
0.00%
728
0.00%
739
0.00%
748
0.00%
749
0.00%
770
0.00%
785
0.00%
792
0.00%
795
0.00%
796
0.00%
844
0.00%
868
0.00%
870
0.00%
872
0.00%
888
0.00%
898
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
354. Meyers, Jason Philip -- [

Unpledged ]
384. Niland, Mike -- [ Unpledged ]
469. Schrant, Maxine -- [ Unpledged
]
564. Willey, Kenneth David -- [
Unpledged ]
628
0.00%
637
0.00%
638
0.00%
639
0.00%
640
0.00%
642
0.00%
643
0.00%
645
0.00%
647
0.00%
648
0.00%
649
0.00%
650
0.00%
651
0.00%
655
0.00%
656
0.00%
657
0.00%
658
0.00%
659
0.00%
661
0.00%
662
0.00%
663
0.00%
664
0.00%
668
0.00%
669
0.00%
Page 72
Page: 1 of 1
670
0.00%
673
0.00%
674
0.00%
675
0.00%
678
0.00%
679
0.00%
682
0.00%
683
0.00%
684
0.00%
685
0.00%
686
0.00%
688
0.00%
689
0.00%
691
0.00%
695
0.00%
696
0.00%
697
0.00%
699
0.00%
701
0.00%
702
0.00%
706
0.00%
707
0.00%
708
0.00%
709
0.00%
710
0.00%
711
0.00%
712
0.00%
715
0.00%
716
0.00%
717
0.00%
718
0.00%
720
0.00%
721
0.00%
722
0.00%
723
0.00%
724
0.00%
725
0.00%
727
0.00%
729
0.00%
730
0.00%
731
0.00%
732
0.00%
733
0.00%
734
0.00%
735
0.00%
736
0.00%
737
0.00%
738
0.00%
Page 73
Page: 1 of 1
740
0.00%
741
0.00%
742
0.00%
743
0.00%
744
0.00%
745
0.00%
746
0.00%
747
0.00%
750
0.00%
751
0.00%
752
0.00%
753
0.00%
754
0.00%
755
0.00%
756
0.00%
757
0.00%
758
0.00%
759
0.00%
760
0.00%
761
0.00%
762
0.00%
763
0.00%
764
0.00%
765
0.00%
766
0.00%
767
0.00%
768
0.00%
769
0.00%
771
0.00%
772
0.00%
773
0.00%
775
0.00%
776
0.00%
778
0.00%
779
0.00%
780
0.00%
781
0.00%
782
0.00%
783
0.00%
784
0.00%
786
0.00%
787
0.00%
788
0.00%
789
0.00%
790
0.00%
791
0.00%
793
0.00%
794
0.00%
Page 74
Page: 1 of 1
797
0.00%
798
0.00%
799
0.00%
801
0.00%
802
0.00%
803
0.00%
804
0.00%
805
0.00%
806
0.00%
807
0.00%
808
0.00%
809
0.00%
810
0.00%
811
0.00%
812
0.00%
813
0.00%
814
0.00%
815
0.00%
816
0.00%
817
0.00%
818
0.00%
819
0.00%
820
0.00%
821
0.00%
822
0.00%
823
0.00%
824
0.00%
825
0.00%
826
0.00%
827
0.00%
828
0.00%
829
0.00%
830
0.00%
831
0.00%
832
0.00%
833
0.00%
834
0.00%
835
0.00%
836
0.00%
837
0.00%
838
0.00%
839
0.00%
840
0.00%
841
0.00%
842
0.00%
843
0.00%
845
0.00%
846
0.00%
Page 75
Page: 1 of 1
847
0.00%
848
0.00%
849
0.00%
850
0.00%
851
0.00%
852
0.00%
853
0.00%
854
0.00%
855
0.00%
856
0.00%
857
0.00%
858
0.00%
859
0.00%
860
0.00%
861
0.00%
862
0.00%
863
0.00%
864
0.00%
865
0.00%
866
0.00%
867
0.00%
869
0.00%
871
0.00%
873
0.00%
874
0.00%
875
0.00%
876
0.00%
877
0.00%
878
0.00%
879
0.00%
880
0.00%
881
0.00%
882
0.00%
883
0.00%
884
0.00%
885
0.00%
886
0.00%
887
0.00%
889
0.00%
890
0.00%
891
0.00%
892
0.00%
893
0.00%
894
0.00%
895
0.00%
896
0.00%
897
0.00%
899
0.00%
Page 76
Page: 1 of 1
900
0.00%
901
0.00%
902
0.00%
903
0.00%
904
0.00%
905
0.00%
906
0.00%
907
0.00%
908
0.00%
909
0.00%
910
0.00%
911
0.00%
912
0.00%
913
0.00%
914
0.00%
915
0.00%
916
0.00%
917
0.00%
918
0.00%
919
0.00%
920
0.00%
921
0.00%
922
0.00%
923
0.00%
924
0.00%
925
0.00%
926
0.00%
927
0.00%
928
0.00%
930
0.00%
931
0.00%
932
0.00%
933
0.00%
934
0.00%
935
0.00%
936
0.00%
937
0.00%
938
0.00%
939
0.00%
940
0.00%
941
0.00%
942
0.00%
943
0.00%
944
0.00%
945
0.00%
946
0.00%
0.00%
947
Total Votes
69,665
Page 77
Page: 1 of 1
Total
Unresolved Write-In
Page 78
Exhibit 4
Page 79
Exhibit 5
Page 80
Exhibit 6
Obtained by Molly Sullivan, Denver Delegate.
D1
A22
A25
A4
A9
A28
A29
A14
D3
A27
A3
A14
D2
D2
A10
A26
A4
A15
A23
D4
A8
D5
D5
A31
D7
A22
A11
DAL2
A1
A12
A13
A4
A4
D6
D9
D8
A9
D10
A20
A21
D5
A8
Denver
Denver
Denver
Denver
Denver
Denver
Denver
Denver
Denver
Denver
Denver
Denver
Denver
Denver
Denver
Denver
Denver
Denver
Denver
Denver
Denver
Denver
Denver
Denver
Denver
Denver
Denver
Denver
Denver
Denver
Denver
Denver
Denver
Denver
Denver
Denver
Denver
Denver
Denver
Denver
Denver
Denver
600836684
778045
2837143
2943422
2544665
2527762
2397370
2648049
2798478
600342063
2879597
2676304
4075726
600754743
2551619
2478404
756631
2416348
601128951
2809446
2640333
2546025
2711324
200304075
600199195
2573937
601096276
2829785
600148748
2533224
601110965
600180422
8009218
600856452
2502875
3967038
2781265
2777325
2484052
601125595
2688172
2427927
RONALD
ADAMS
MARY
ALBI
THOMAS
ALIREZ
GERALD
ASTWOOD
BRUCE
BAIRD
ARDATH
BAKER
HOWARD
BEAMGUARD
KAA
BENTON
DANIEL
BERGMAN
DANIEL
BETTINGER
ANDREW
BICKHARD
JOSEPH
BLOMBERG
T
BOLIN
DOYT
BOLLING
SUSAN
BRANSON
MARY
BURNS
LELIA
CAMERON
ROBERT
CANTER
LAURA
CARR
JANET
CHOYCE
JILENE
COHN
ANNETTE
COLE
THOMAS
COOK
EMILY
CORDES
ERIC
CREWS
CHARLES
CROSSE
EDMUND
CURRY
THEODORE DANN
RANDOLPH DAVILA
WILLIAM
DEERE
CAITLIN
DEMBOWSKI
RICKY
DENNY
ROCKY
DRAUGHON
GRANT
DUPART
PATRICIA
DURBIN
DOUGLAS DYE
CHRISTOPHEREDDY
CYNTHIA
ENGEL
MARGARET FLORENTIN
LAWRENCE FLOWERS
BETH
FOLSOM
JOHN
FRIED
2705N MACON ST
Denver
4875S DTC BLVD APT 12-103
Denver
7200E EVANS AVE APT 1Denver
10
1919N YOSEMITE ST
Denver
6095W JEFFERSON AVE Denver
3521S HILLCREST DR APT
Denver
2
1707S JASMINE ST
Denver
5044N FONTANA CT
Denver
10700E DARTMOUTH AVE
Denver
APT PP111
2908S CLERMONT DR Denver
1313N WILLIAMS ST APT Denver
402
1552S SYRACUSE ST
Denver
252515TH ST APT 2H Denver
1174N GRAPE ST
Denver
4816W 36TH AVE
Denver
1972S GRANT ST
Denver
4970W 8TH AVE
Denver
4877N KNOX CT
Denver
10050E HARVARD AVE ADenver
PT A701
4591N ORLEANS ST
Denver
2750S JAY ST
Denver
15090 ROBINS DR
Denver
1523N QUITMAN ST APT Denver
701
3144S AKRON ST
Denver
3066S TRENTON ST
Denver
220N JACKSON ST
Denver
3602N DECATUR ST
Denver
3923S NEWPORT WAY Denver
4151N KALAMATH ST Denver
13004E ELGIN DR
Denver
6343E GIRARD PL APT 378
Denver
5173W COLUMBIA PL Denver
3357N NAVAJO ST
Denver
2146GLENARM PL
Denver
8101E DARTMOUTH AVE
Denver
APT 6
5511N TUCSON ST
Denver
2733N JAVA CT
Denver
6700E MANSFIELD AVE Denver
3903S CHASE WAY
Denver
10050E HARVARD AVE ADenver
PT A701
4567E ILIFF AVE
Denver
3271S GLENCOE ST
Denver
Page 81
A15
A11
D13
A28
D10
D7
D11
A17
D14
A25
D12
A22
A11
A10
A12
A21
A25
A32
A3
A12
A7
A14
A3
A28
A33
D11
A18
A2
A13
A13
A24
A26
A1
A16
A5
D18
A15
D11
A4
D19
A5
D16
Denver
Denver
Denver
Denver
Denver
Denver
Denver
Denver
Denver
Denver
Denver
Denver
Denver
Denver
Denver
Denver
Denver
Denver
Denver
Denver
Denver
Denver
Denver
Denver
Denver
Denver
Denver
Denver
Denver
Denver
Denver
Denver
Denver
Denver
Denver
Denver
Denver
Denver
Denver
Denver
Denver
Denver
2534112
5920213
200005185
2839226
2707827
600929355
200259312
200259363
5793243
2424343
827713
2916624
5946858
5776028
2774330
2456906
200316966
601167566
4030618
2774009
2401982
234833
601117939
2913343
2913956
2886066
2421648
2448034
2476161
2476161
2767133
2773740
600342088
4076134
200089822
136408
2757697
600906022
2479492
600330257
2454990
200006159
ALISA
GARNER
LISA
GEISLER
BEATRICE
GREEN
LAWRENCE GREEN
JEFFREY
GUARD
BRENT
GUGLIELMINO
GABRIEL
HAHN
SARAH
HAHN
BRADLEY
HARTGRAVES
CAROLYN
HEADRICK
CHARLES
HEATHERLY
MARY
HEATHMAN
CLAUDIA
HEIDINGER
CARLA
HEINEN
DARRYL
HOGEBACK
FRANCIS
HOLLIGAN
LINDSAY
IVEY
NATHAN
JAMES
WILLIAM
JEFFERS
ROBERT
JOHN
GLENN
JORDAN
DANIEL
KENDALL
KEVIN
KIJEWSKI
GEORGE
KLIPPENSTEIN
CYNTHIA
KLIPPENSTEIN
JAY
KUCERA
WARREN
LAWRENCE
JAMES
LEWIS
JOY
LEWIS
JOY
LEWIS
PAUL
LINTON
PAUL
MARTIN
JAMES
MATHERS
ZACHARY
MCCLAIN
STEPHEN
MCCULLOCH
CHRISTOPHERMCGOWNE
THOMAS
MCINERNEY
JUSTIN
MCKEE
JOHN
MEININGER
MARINA
MILLER
ROBERT
MONKS
BRETT
MOORE
1611S GLENCOE ST
Denver
1150S COOK ST
Denver
8625E DARTMOUTH AVEDenver
2503S WINONA CT
Denver
3967S JASMINE ST
Denver
742N CORONA ST
Denver
4635S XAVIER ST
Denver
4635S XAVIER ST
Denver
7500 E QUINCY AVE 1107
Denver
1491S WOLFF ST
Denver
3555W UNION AVE
Denver
3200E MEXICO AVE
Denver
3465S POPLAR ST APT 107
Denver
5648S GRAY ST
Denver
1754S GRANT ST APT B2Denver
2595S WOLFF ST
Denver
939N WASHINGTON ST ADenver
PT 4
4280E IOWA AVE APT 507
Denver
4642W DAKOTA AVE Denver
2912N RALEIGH ST
Denver
5003S GARLAND ST
Denver
1545N QUITMAN ST APT Denver
104
1560N MARKET ST APT 8Denver
08
40 MADISON ST APT 309Denver
40 MADISON ST APT 399Denver
2636N EMPORIA ST
Denver
2535S NEWTON ST
Denver
3904S DEPEW WAY
Denver
3904S DEPEW WAY
Denver
3904S DEPEW WAY
Denver
3835E WARREN AVE Denver
9995E HARVARD AVE APT
Denver
P229
2241N GILPIN ST
Denver
4786S GAR WAY
Denver
3232N FRANKLIN ST
Denver
9141E MANSFIELD AVE Denver
130N PEARL ST APT 1802Denver
4545N ELIOT ST
Denver
4633E ARKANSAS AVE Denver
3424S IVANHOE WAY Denver
1008N SYRACUSE ST Denver
177S OGDEN ST
Denver
Page 82
A9
A17
A7
A5
A30
D26
A14
A2
D21
D10
D28
A18
A18
D11
A5
A6
D17
A6
A23
A17
A13
D14
A13
A17
A6
D32
A22
A2
A29
D24
A19
D33
D25
A15
D27
A24
D29
D24
A6
A11
A16
D13
Denver
Denver
Denver
Denver
Denver
Denver
Denver
Denver
Denver
Denver
Denver
Denver
Denver
Denver
Denver
Denver
Denver
Denver
Denver
Denver
Denver
Denver
Denver
Denver
Denver
Denver
Denver
Denver
Denver
Denver
Denver
Denver
Denver
Denver
Denver
Denver
Denver
Denver
Denver
Denver
Denver
Denver
2535545
2508834
823553
2556465
2938222
600672015
4265191
4295689
2386257
600983772
2693904
2785281
200314924
2456442
2778765
2630250
600199087
2859580
4149155
2432848
764967
2477362
2478051
2520182
2890647
600861666
818289
708302
2618015
2894856
2624820
2437913
600185719
4272036
2412564
601010816
2487685
600426591
600261881
2931875
2382154
600611696
CRAIG
MORRONI
THOMAS
MULCAHY
QUINLAN
O'NEILL
STEPHEN
OBRAND
JANET
OCALLAGHAN
CASEY
OLEARY
BRENDAN ONEILL
JOSUE
OQUELI
LOUIS
ORZOLEK
PETER
OSTIGUY
DAVID
OZMAN
VICKI
PEARSON
LEVI
PETERSON
JAMES
PLUNKETT
RICHARD
POOLE
JENNIFER
QUALTERI
MITCHELL RASMUSSEN
LARRY
REINERTH
BEVERLY
RIEBE
GARY
SALVUCCI
JOHN
SCHMITTER
MAXINE
SCHRANT
THOMAS
SCHRANT
PHYLLIS
SMITH
CHERYL
STOCKELMANN
TELBE
STORBECK
DAVID
STRUNK
LOGAN
SURKAU
PHILLIP
SYKORA
MATT
TEAHAN
LUKE
TERRY
WILLIAM
THODE
KENT
THORNBERY
SHANNON THORNBERY
SARAH
TIMMONS
CHRISTOPHERVINCENT
MICHAEL
VITCO
PAUL
WEELDREYER
JOSHUA
WEINER
KENNETH
WESTLUND
JERRY
WHEELER
SEAN
WHITE
3282S MAGNOLIA ST
3602S GRAPE ST
Denver
Denver
Denver
3021S QUINCE WAY
Denver
9043E EASTMAN PL
Denver
8001E 11TH AVE UNIT 2204
Denver
4869S HOYT ST
Denver
1863 WAZEE ST. #6F Denver
3730S ONEIDA WAY
Denver
2938N VALLEJO ST
Denver
8225E FAIRMOUNT DR ADenver
PT 4-108
2015S ELATI ST
Denver
1427S ONEIDA ST
Denver
241W 4TH AVE
Denver
4435N ATCHISON WAY Denver
3253W CONEJOS PL
Denver
911S WASHINGTON ST ADenver
PT 302
1420S ELIZABETH ST
Denver
7700W GRANT RANCH BDenver
LVD UNIT 5D
1835S CORONA ST
Denver
3108N SYRACUSE ST Denver
5095N TENNYSON ST Denver
5095N TENNYSON ST Denver
725S ALTON WAY APT 4A
Denver
300W 11TH AVE APT 6ADenver
6300E HAMPDEN AVE APT
Denver
2302
3610S MARSHALL WAY Denver
Denver
9-O
5424W PRENTICE CIR Denver
9905W WAGONTRAIL DRDenver
3084S LINLEY CT
Denver
235N JERSEY ST
Denver
4613W OBERLIN PL
Denver
Denver
2111
2785S RALEIGH ST
Denver
136S PENNSYLVANIA ST Denver
APT 103
861N CHERRY ST APT 33Denver
8063W CHENANGO PL Denver
7645E QUINCY AVE APT Denver
207
5090N SHERMAN ST Denver
Page 83
A7
D35
A5
Denver
Denver
Denver
2964591 WILLIAM
200297709 MATTHEW
3997626 ELLEN
WINDLER
WOLD
WOOD
2001N LINCOLN ST UNIT Denver

2622
675N DAHLIA ST
Denver
4903W RADCLIFF AVE Denver
Page 84
Exhibit 7
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Exhibit 8
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Exhibit 9
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Exhibit 10
Affidavit of Kelsey McEwen Alexander
1. I, Kelsey McEwen Alexander, am a registered Republican voter in Douglas County,

Colorado, and have been since about August of 2001.
2. Kelsey McEwen Alexander, Kelsey M. Alexander, and Alexander are one and the same
person for the purposes of this Contest filing.
3. I am a precinct committee person, an Assistant District Captain, a former County
Chairman of the Douglas County (Colorado) Republican Party, former Board Member of
the Colorado Federation of Republican Women, former Chairman of the 18th Judicial
District for the Republican Party (the largest judicial district in Colorado) and as such, I
am a frequent voter and fully aware of the compliant balloting processes required for
party and public elections.
4. I sit on numerous advisory boards, and attend events and regular meetings, of politically
active people of similar mindset such as the Leadership Program of the Rockies,
Steamboat Institute, Independence Institute, Lincoln Club, First Friday Republican
Breakfast Club, Third Friday Republican Breakfast Club, American Association of
Individual Investors, Douglas County Republican Women, Arapahoe County Republican
Breakfast Club, Center Right Coalition, and more. As such, and including the information
in number 3, I am well-known by many people who were voting delegates at the
Colorado Republican State Convention, and I was and still am a serious contender for
an at-large National Delegate position.
5. In 2016, I was re-elected Precinct Committee Person and elected as a delegate to the
Douglas County Republican Assembly at my precinct caucus. At the Douglas County
Republican Assembly, I was elected as a delegate to the Colorado Republican State
Convention. Thus I attended the Colorado Republican State Convention as a voting
delegate.
6. At the Douglas County Republican Assembly, I sought out the appropriate Intent to Run
as National Delegate form, filled it out correctly, and returned it appropriately to the
Douglas County Republican County Chairman, who turned it in to the Colorado
Republican State Party in a timely manner. On this form, I declared my intention to run
for Republican National Convention delegate in both the 4th Congressional District
Convention and the Colorado Republican State Convention. The Intent to Run as
National Delegate form was the only document I submitted to run as a delegate.
Page 1
Page 94
7. My name was published in voting material that the 4th Congressional District Convention
received, thus making it clear that the Colorado Republican Party had received my
correct form to run for National Delegate and setting up my assurance that I would be on
the ballot at the Colorado Republican State Convention election on April 9, the day
following the 4th Congressional District Convention.
8. About two hours into the Colorado Republican State Convention, I had a friendly
conversation with former State Chairman Ryan Call and asked if he was running for
National Delegate. Call replied that he had planned to run as a candidate but that the
State Party had failed to give him a number.
9. The ballots for National Delegate at the Colorado Republican State Convention did not
have names on them, only numbers with ovals beside them. This methodology clearly
violated both reasonable judgment and the bylaws for conducting an election.
Separately, a booklet was provided to the State Delegates when they entered the
convention area. The booklet contained a list of the individuals running for National
Delegate and their assigned numbers. Near the end of the convention, I received a
second booklet, followed by an addendum sheet containing the National Delegate
candidates names, their ballot numbers, and their pledging status. I had to crossreference the multiple published lists of numbers and National Delegate candidates
names with my ballot to determine how to vote.
10. Following the conversation with former Chairman Call, I suspected that I might not have
been assigned a number.
11. Upon review of the booklet I was given when I arrived at the convention, I found my
name was not published anywhere as a candidate running for National Delegate. I set
out to find out how to remedy this situation by approaching various volunteers and
inquiring as to where the Teller Committee room was located or where the Credentials
room and or any room in which Republican Party officials who could help me with my
ballot number was located.
12. After some time, I finally encountered a volunteer who connected me with someone who
listened to my situation and told me to wait where I was (in the hallway) and she would
return with information. After about 20 minutes, a State Party staff person returned and
told me my assigned number was 632. I repeated that number and wrote it on my
program. The volunteer repeated the number as well to confirm it was in fact 632.
13. The remaining details of my situation are shown by my Protest email (Exhibit 1) that I
sent first to Colorado Republican Party Executive Director Shana Kohn, who never
acknowledged receipt, and then to Colorado Republican Party State Chairman Steve
House.
14. In emails (Exhibit 2) between House and me, I inquired as to the status of my Protest,
and House repeatedly responded that the attorney was reviewing my situation. House
Page 2
Page 95
never gave me a definite Yes or No to my Protest even after the deadline to file this
Contest and after he had certified the official Colorado National Delegate and Alternate
list to the Republican National Convention. House kept telling me it was at the attorneys
and House was waiting on the attorney.
15. Getting no resolution from Chairman House and feeling that I certainly had had every
expectation of being elected as an at-large delegate to the Republican National
Convention, I saw no other avenue of resolution than to join in this Contest.
16. As stated in my Protest email (Exhibit 1), my name was not published in the booklet
provided to state convention voting delegates when they arrived at the convention. My
name was not published in the official booklet that was handed out to the Douglas
County state convention voting delegates some 30 minutes before the ballots were
handed out. My name was not published in any addendum sheets that were passed out
to the Douglas County state convention voting delegates some 15 minutes before the
ballots were handed out. In fact, my name and number for a National Delegate ballot
position were not provided to any voting delegate at the state convention in print form at
all.
17. Late in the day, it was announced that the candidates for National Delegates should start
lining up to give their ten-second speeches. I was paying close attention and was near
the beginning of this line. At this time, I and the other Douglas County state convention
delegates had already received our ballots, and many were casting their voted ballots
before my name had even been published as a candidate. I observed other state
delegates putting their ballots in the ballot boxes before I proceeded to the line to give
my National Delegate speech.
18. While I was waiting in line for the start of the ten-second National Delegate speeches
and after people were putting their ballots into the ballot boxes, an overhead projection
image (Exhibit 3) was displayed that showed errors and omissions in the booklet of
National Delegate candidates. From my memory, this list contained misspellings and
incorrect first names or last names and corrections such as that. Then a document was
projected with additions with numbers higher than those on the addendum sheet that
had been handed out just prior to ballots. The 632 number I had campaigned with most
of the day was listed as someone elses number! My name was the very last one
displayed and with number 636.
19. My chances of obtaining votes for the correct number of 636 were very limited. The
chances of people not having already voted, or having already selected their 26 people
to vote for, were immense. The convention at this time was unruly, disorderly, and
chaotic with delegates moving about placing their ballots in the ballot boxes and leaving
the arena to go home. No one can know how many delegates were actually paying
attention and would even notice my now new number as different from the 632 I had
campaigned with, or even that I was on this list at all.
Page 3
Page 96
20. In the end, my vote count was impressive, considering all the factors involved. Adding
the votes cast for number 632 (no name in vote tally results, 210 votes), number 636 (no
name in vote tally results, 153 votes), and number 2 (Jimmy Clayton Alexander in vote
tally results, 18 votes) that is discussed in my Protest email (Exhibit 1), I did receive 381
votes. I feel confident if I had not been treated so wrongly by my number not being
published anywhere, including on the face of the ballot as required, I would certainly
have gotten the votes to be a National Delegate. In my Protest email to Chairman House
(Exhibit 1), I pointed out to him that I would not have thought about including Number 2's
votes for me, but during the State Convention while I was telling my story to Brandi Meek
(State Party Secretary) at Chairman House's request, a voting delegate named Betty
Benson from Leadville, Colorado, interrupted our conversation and very enthusiastically
told us she had voted for me and she so hoped I would get elected as a National
Delegate. I thanked her and asked her how she had voted for me. She explained she
hoped I was running, searched the entire booklet, and only found one last name
Alexander so she figured they just messed up the first name. She told Brandi and me
she voted for me as number 2. It could be surmised that others may have voted for other
people with the first name Alexander as there were at least four of those in the booklet of
candidates running for National Delegate. I am not including those here. Looking now at
the total votes above, this is more votes than some of the alternates who were certified
by the Colorado State Republican Party got, showing that even with all the
disadvantages raised in this Contest, I got enough votes to be at least an Alternate
delegate. Without the disadvantages, I would certainly have gotten enough votes to be a
delegateby looking any of the published material, no one could even see that I was
running. PLEASE NOTE these vote numbers are different than in Exhibit 1.
21. As a voting delegate I was also disadvantaged by being unable to vote for eligible
candidates whose names were not published along with other candidates. For example,
my friend Lemoine Dowds number was not published until the final image was projected
(Exhibit 3), which was too late for me vote for her.
22. Another friend, Marty Neilson, was assigned number 378, which appeared twice on the
ballot, once where 379 should have been printed. It was unclear how to vote for Neilson
with this ballot layout error and with no name beside her number. After speaking with
Neilson yesterday, I believe she thought she withdrew from running as an at-large
National Delegate altogether. It is therefore unclear why she was assigned a ballot
number at all.
23. By this reference, I hereby incorporate into this affidavit all other irregularities for election
of National Delegate at the Colorado Republican State Convention presented in this
Contest even though I might not have personally been aware of them. The irregularities
caused me to not be properly credited with votes that I would have gotten had the
irregularities not occurred.
Page 4
Page 97
Page 98
Exhibit 1
From: "Kelsey M. Alexander"
Date: April 14, 2016 at 11:23:43 AM MDT
To: seh@gmail.com, steve@cologop.org
Subject: Fwd: Protest of Colorado National Delegate/Alternate list and votes
Hi Steve,
Tyler Hart told me to send this protest to Shana at the email I sent it to on Monday. Tyler told this to me
when I came into the State GOP office Monday afternoon.
I have received nothing from Shana....not even an acknowledgement that is requested.
Would you please see that this protest is taken seriously and in a timely manner?
And I repeat from within the protest, would you please confirm this protest is received?
I would like a list of all those who ran for national delegate and the vote counts for each. I hope we believe in
transparency.
You and I discussed this Saturday at the assembly.
Thanks,
Kelsey Alexander
Sent from my iPad

Begin forwarded message:
From: Kelsey Alexander
Date: April 12, 2016 at 12:18:50 AM MDT
To: Shana Kohn <shana@cologop.org>
Cc: Tanne Blackburn
, Ron Remy
Abraham Laydon
Subject: Protest of Colorado National Delegate/Alternate list and votes

Hi Shana,
I sent you an email earlier this evening advising you this protest email would be coming, but it looks like it bounced
back to me. This is the followup I am sending now that I have time to write it out.
I am the one that spoke to you near the beginning of the National Assembly candidates' speeches at our Assembly
Saturday. My friend Betty from Leadville, whom I think you know, had just come up to me and said she voted for
me and hoped I got to be a delegate. I asked her what number she voted for and she said, "Number 2" - - the only
last name Alexander printed in the program. I wanted you to hear her say that in preparation for what has turned
into this protest of the delegate vote counts.
The short story is that I was not put on the ballot, got number 632 several hours into the assembly, worked my tail
off to get elected anyway, only to find the number 636 was put up on the monitor at the end of the assembly with
my name. Those who might still not have voted by then and might want to vote for me resulted in a lot of votes! I
spoke with Chairman Steve House about this right away. He told me to look at the votes after they were tallied and
Page 6
Page 99
see if adding the votes for my numbers would be significant -- and if it was he would figure out how to make it
right. Today (Monday) Tyler Hart told me the vote counts for the numbers that might have been votes for me and I
think I should be seated as an alternate or as a delegate. I understand the list has not yet been published. I want to
be on it.
The long story -Today after calling State Party numerous times -- getting busy signals and full mailboxes, I drove to State Party HQ
and spoke with Tyler Hart at the front desk. I told her my story which is this -- I turned in my form to run for
delegate to the National Assembly through my county chair with my intention to run for National delegate at both
CD4 and State. I know you all got my form because I was correctly on the ballot for CD 4. But I was not on the
ballot at the State Assembly.
A couple of hours into the assembly I happened to see Ryan Call and asked him if he was running for National
delegate. He told me he had been left off the ballot. I was surprised. After thinking about Ryan's situation for some
time, I wondered if I had been left out too. Not having a ballot -- I found a list someone had printed -- and I was not
on that. It was in alphabetical order and the last name Alexander only showed up once -- with Jimmy Carlson (?) as
the first name. So....I went in search of how to resolve this and run anyway.
I finally connected with some State Party people and my first question was -- could they check to see if there were
two delegates with the last name Alexander -- if not, I should be number 2 and they just got the first name wrong.
The request was flatly denied -- we can't verify that for you. Then I asked if they could tell me if Jimmy Carlson (?)
was a delegate or alternate -- it seemed like that was an entire name for someone rather than a first name as the
printed list showed. No, they would not verify that either. So, I had to ask for a new number. After and standing
and waiting for quite some time a State Party person told me my number was 632. I wrote it down on my hand. I
admit I was pretty amazed because the last number in the list I had seen was in the 580's. How could it be that
there were fifty people not listed on the ballot and 580 on the ballot? That means that more than ten percent of
the candidates for national delegate were missing from the published list!!!! If this is true, I find it totally
unacceptable!!!!!
So, my first protest is to say this cannot be a fair election with fifty some people missing off the ballot. Through the
day I found at least twenty more people who told me their name was left off the ballot too!
But I went back into the arena and ran into several of my friends whom I told my situation. One of them wrote the
number 632 on my forehead in ink and I proceeded to use a good deal of my remaining time campaigning to get
votes by showing the number 632 and asking for votes.. A lot of people wrote down my number and said they
would vote for me. I worked hard for several hours -- I really want to be a delegate or an alternate to the national
assembly!
After the ballots were distributed to the County Chairmen, an official booklet of people running for national
delegate and their assigned numbers came through our county chair and our district captains. I looked at that
booklet -- I was not in it either -- the highest number was in the 580's like the previous list I had seen. Very soon
after that a blue addendum sheet came out through the same channels. I was hoping I would be printed on that,
but no! It only went to 619. That means that my name and my assigned number were still not printed anywhere to
Page 7
Page 100
facilitate my supporters being able to vote for me. If I had not directly interfaced with a voting member of the
assembly there was no way they could know I was running nor what number to mark in their ballot to vote for me.
And people were marking their ballots as soon as they got them.
Candidates for offices had just finished speaking. People started lining up to speak for national delegate -- I was
paying attention - I was about 15th in line to speak. Chairman Steve House made the announcement that there
were some corrections and additions -- he put up that list on the monitor. I was dismayed to find my number 632
was indicated to belong to Rebecca Wang (not sure I have the last name right)! And I was the last one listed with
636! I had done all that campaigning for a number different than what was displayed on the monitor!
When Steve House came down from the stage I went over and explained this situation to him. He told me to find
out the numbers after the vote and see if I got enough votes when adding those of the various numbers were close
to being what was needed to be a delegate or alternate. I did that today and they exceed the number of the lowest
seated alternate. Tyler Hart told me the lowest seated alternate was a Cruz supporter with 396 votes..
I want to be placed as an alternate or as a delegate to the National Assembly!
Even though I was not published as a candidate I can take credit for the following votes -Number 2 (only place last name Alexander was printed) 18 votes
Alexander Pinto (don't know number, but my name) 238 votes
Alexander DeValle (don't know number, but my name) 99 votes
Alexander Crane (don't know number, but my name) 13 votes
Alexander Williamson (don't know number, but my name) 4 votes
Number 632 (I campaigned for votes on this number -- even had it written on my face! ) 210 votes
Number 636 - only shown on monitor and after many had turned in their ballots but had my correct name - 153
votes.
Total votes 735
I got these numbers from Tyler Hart this afternoon -- I was denied a request for a printed copy of all the candidates
and votes. I was denied a request to actually look at this list -- I do not know why there is no transparency in our
vote counts. Very disturbing!
Tyler told me the last alternate had gotten 396 votes. I clearly had more -- even if you take out the votes for first
name Alexander I am short only 15 votes. Considering I was not printed anywhere when many people marked their
ballots this is certainly clear a lot of people want me to be a delegate! or at least an alternate! I did not have time
to connect with many people beyond the Douglas County section, the people on the aisles, and people I just
happen to see that I knew. I did not have anywhere near the entire day to campaign because I was (it seems) the
very last person to get a number.
Tyler told me the list of alternates was not yet published. I asked her to delay publishing it until my protest was
considered and played out. I told her I would be submitting it this evening. I am asking to be seated. I believe the
intention of the voters at the assembly clearly shows I should be a delegate or maybe an alternate. I do not know
where the number of votes between alternate and delegate is. But I exceed the number of votes the lowest
alternate got.
Page 8
Page 101
I have been a County Chair, a Judicial Chair, President of a large Republican Women's Club for several terms, and
on the CFRW state board. I am on the LPR ,and Steamboat Institute Advisory boards. I belong to and attend
regularly CRBC, Lincoln Club, Arapahoe Republican Men's Club, and attend Center Right Coalition. I know a lot of
Republicans who were voting delegates at this assembly! I have worked hard for Ted Cruz - made phone calls into
NH, WI, MS, NV, FL, and other states. I know a lot of Republicans around the state who could not have voted for
me because I was not published on the ballot list!!!! I am positive I would have gotten more than fifteen more
votes had you all not made the mistake and not put my name on the list with a number that people could find and
thus vote for me!!!! Look how many votes I got in the short time I campaigned for them! Especially that last
number which was only up on the monitor part of the time at the end when many had already voted!!!!
I am sincerely asking you to seat me as a delegate or as an alternate depending on where my vote count falls.
I am further requesting a complete printout of all the people running for national delegate at the state assembly
and the number of votes received by each person.
I look forward to hearing from you as soon as possible on this. I am sending it to you, Shana, because Tyler Hart
told me you were the one to send it to. Please acknowledge you got this as soon as you read it so I will know that.
And please let me know what the process will be for considering my protest. I am available by phone with my
numbers below, or I can come down to State Party HQ if you would like. I worked very hard to campaign for this
position. I have worked hard through the years and hoped I had enough respect from a lot of people around the
state to get elected. And then you left me off the ballot. I did everything I could to recover only to find my number
was wrong. A double - bad whammy! Please attempt to make this right and see that I am seated correctly.
I also request you bring this to the attention of Chairman Steve House as I spoke with him about it at the assembly
as mentioned above. He should have an opportunity to correct this unfortunate error.
I look forward to hearing from you at your soonest convenience.
Sincerely,
Kelsey M. Alexander
cc: Tanne Blackburn, Chairman, Douglas Co. GOP
Ron Remey, District 2 Captain, Douglas Co. GOP
Abe Laydon, Treasurer, Douglas Co. GOP
Page 9
Page 102
Exhibit 2
From: Chairman House <steve@cologop.org>
Date: Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 2:02 PM
Subject: Re: Protest status
To: Kelsey Alexander
Kelsey,
I was waiting on our attorney to look at officially. My original view of it was that we cannot add all the
votes by people named Alexander. There are legitimately people named Alexander who were in those
name slots and legitimate delegate candidates who earned votes and I don't see how confusion could
have occurred in those cases. To get on the delegation as an alternate you had to have more than 396
votes overall to get into the last alternate slot. To be a delegate you had to get over 1500 votes and
there is nothing that shows me that if we added anything up we get to that level.
The guest pass is an offer and it is not conditional on anything. You have earned that and I am not trying
to pacify you on this issue. Chris is out of trial finally and he should weigh in also.
Thanks
Steve
Sent from my iPad
On Jun 16, 2016, at 12:41 PM, Kelsey Alexander
Hi Steve,
wrote:
What I really want is a positive resolution to my protest which it seems you have still not answered.
A guest pass? Well, I can't say no, but I need to look in to what it would cost to get there, where I would
stay, etc. Would I be able to get into housing with our delegation at all? What does a "guest" get to
attend? I appreciate the offer and would like more information on it.
And I am not sure you are actually offering me a guest pass -- you did say it conditionally. A bit strange.
But I really want you to address my protest which was submitted in a timely and serious manner. I have
followed up with you several times including in person at Center Right last month.
If you will add up the votes for the one published person with my last name Alexander, the number 632
that I was given during the assembly and that was later put up on the monitor after many had turned in
their ballots and credited to someone named Rebecca Wang (sp?) and number 636 that was also put up
on the monitor after many had voted but had my name by it -- I think those add tmo a total of votes that
exceeds what Tyler Hart told me when I went in on Monday afternoon after our Saturday State
Assembly/Convention. The information Tyler gave me now seems to have been incorrect. That sum puts
me well INTO the pack of alternates. It does not put me 15 votes out of being an alternate as Tyler told
me -- and as my Protest stated. I definitely believe I should be seated as a delegate because the number
Page 10
Page 103
of votes I most certainly would have gotten had you published my name on the ballot or even in the
booklet, or even on the add-on sheet would have bumped me into the delegate vote count.
I still await you answer on the Protest and info on the guest pass info.
Thanks,
Kelsey
On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 11:28 AM, Chairman House <steve@cologop.org> wrote:
Kelsey,
I have no doubt that what we are going to find is that we cannot add all the potential votes you
suggested which means we wouldn't get to a point of having you on the delegation. Personally I think
you are an important activist so would you go to Cleveland if I gave you a guest pass?
Thanks
Steve
Sent from my iPad
On Jun 16, 2016, at 11:21 AM, Kelsey Alexander
> wrote:
Hi Steve,
It has now been two more days and I still do not have an answer from you. Your response was to ask
your attorney for an answer.
I am asking you as State Chair for an answer.
Please get back to me with substantive information. I am certainly trying to resolve this with you in good
faith.
Kelsey Alexander
On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 2:37 PM, Chairman House <steve@cologop.org> wrote:
I agree Kelsey it has been long enough.
Chris Murray I sent this over to you in April can you please give us your opinion on Kelsey's protest.
Sent from my iPad
> On Jun 14, 2016, at 1:44 PM, Kelsey M. Alexander <
wrote:
>
> Hi Steve,
> Please send me the results of the protest I filed regarding my running for national delegate. Your
attorneys have had enough time to give an opinion.
> Thanks,
> Kelsey Alexander
>
> Kelsey M. Alexander
Page 11
Page 104
Exhibit 3
Page 12
Page 105
Exhibit 11
Page 106
Exhibit 12
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Exhibit 13
Page 112
Page 113
Text messages with Linda Sorenson, CD3 Chair

With Marilyn Marks
Exhibit 14
Friday, May 20, 2016 at 11:53:18 AM Eastern Daylight Time
Hi Marilyn; I am the 3rd CD

chairman. Which county do
you represent? Why are you
asking about the ballot issue?
Hi, Linda. I don't represent

any county. Some delegates
who are concerned about the
vote count have asked me to
help them understand what
happened. Do you mind
talking with me?
I am a close friend of Bekcy

Mizels
Becky, I mean.
I don't know if I should at this

point, we are still investigating.
I am waiting for a package
from George Rivera, then I will
know some more on the
subject. I am not sure how to
proceed with
the information gathered so
far. I don't want to burden
Page 114Page 1 of 8
Steve House. And I certainly

don't want the media to get
wind of this.
The media is already

becoming aware. And of
course it has to be the
decision that you are
comfortable with, but vote
counting and teller committee
activities should never, ever
be secret.
Who is the attorney for CD3?
That is who you should be

talking to for sure.
Pueblo County certainly need

to know the details and decide
within their committee how
they want to proceed. This
has nothing to do with the
Teller Committee.
You know, I don't know who

our attorney is. There are
several in the 3rd CD.
It all stems from the ethics of

the Pueblo County Executive
committee.
Page 115Page 2 of 8
How could something impact

one county and not the ballot
counting?
Ballots are not marked by who

votes them. The Teller
Committee counted correctly.
Pueblo County was not honest
in distributing the ballots.
I have heard that ballots were

counted in excess of those
authorized.
from Pueblo
I know. Ballots MUST be

anonymous, by bylaw!!
Did Mesa get shorted ballots?
Yes, Mesa County were

shorted 20 ballots. Pueblo got
those extra ballots, rather than
give them back, they voted the
extra.
That is what I heard, but I was

having trouble believing it.
Page 116Page 3 of 8
did some people not get to

vote?
Thiis is the problem with the

county chair handling their
delegations ballots.
Please, do not say anything

until we have completed our
investigation. Yes, some did
not get to vote. This has only
to do with the Nat'l Delegate
ballots, none other.
There really is not any way to

contain the information. There
are enough people talking
about it already.
Who is in charge of the

investigation?
yes, I understand it is only the

National Delegate race, not
other ballots.
Why was Wayne Williams in

the room?
He is not in CD3.
Page 117Page 4 of 8
No the Pueblo County Chair

did not handle the ballots his
VC did. He is the SOS,
monitoring the count and
integrity of the people present.
He was very helpful.
that is NOT his role in the

party convention.
it is crucial to separate his

official role from the party role--he was just a voter and on
the Cruz slate.
He only suggested options,

not run the committee.
Does not matter, Cruz vs

Trump was not and is not a
factor in this issue.
well, it will not appear that way

when unauthorized member
who is cruz guy comes in to
mediate ballot counting
problems.
I don't like Trump, not one bit,

and am supporting Cruz, but I
am concerned about the
process that hurts everyone.
Page 118Page 5 of 8
Integrity of Pueblo County

Executive Committee is an
issue. The process was open
and honest. It was the
Executives of Pueblo County.
They should have returned
those ballots when they
realized
they had way too many.
Who is conducting
investigation?
Yes, the actions of the Pueblo

County Executive committee
does hurt everyone. Now the
trust has been taken away
from them & things will be
handled differently in the
future. The Executive
Committee
with the 3rd CD, myself, the
VC and Secretary. Like I said,
I am waiting for a response
from George Rivera and at
that point I will take action.
We must be patient, gather

the facts and them proceed. I
will keep you updated. I don't
have anything to hide.
I am only trying to do a good

job and be fair.
Page 119Page 6 of 8
APR 14TH, 3:11PM
I understand and I feel for the

position that you are in. The
problems will likely be very
high profile because the
process errors are likely to get
mixed up with the illegitimate
claims Trump
is making about the caucus
process.
APR 14TH, 4:39PM
Did you see that George R's

FB account appears to have
been hacked? My guess, and
I'm paranoid, that it is Trump
shock troops attacking
because of CD3. ???
Not many know of 3rd CD.
That I'm aware of. If you know

of someone directly involved
have them contact me please.
970-210-6102 my celll phone.
Okay thanks. Will do. I think ,

as you say, that people are
afraid to talk.
Page 120Page 7 of 8
APR 16TH, 7:39AM
Did the CD3 body hear and

accept the teller committee
report, or did it adjourn before
teller report prepared?
APR 16TH, 3:22PM
Linda, someone told me that

they had to go back some
time later to learn whether
they won. It sounds like the
meeting just ended without the
body accepting the Teller
Committee report and having
time to object and raise
issues. Is that correct? If so,
how will you remedy that?
Without an adoption of the
report, I don't see how these
delegates are officially
elected.
APR 16TH, 8:06PM
Did you sign the certification

of the delegates yet, or are
you waiting for the adoption of
the Teller's report?
Page 121Page 8 of 8
Exhibit 15
Requested Documentation from Colorado Republican Party
The following information is needed promptly to provide appropriate documentation
for claims in this contest. The majority of this information has been requested by
potential contestants and denied by CRC. (See Exhibit 4).
1) Provide national delegate candidate names corresponding to all ballot counts
showing ballot numbers with no names on the published Election Summary for
National Delegates.
http://cologop.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/2016_ElectionSummaryReportNational-Delegate-by-Vote-totals.pdf
2) Provide high quality electronic scans of all ballots, which are automatically
generated by the Dominion voting equipment used.
3) Provide Intent to Run forms of all Respondents. Provide documentation of the
date the form was received in CRC office.
4) Provide the recording of the YouTube live-stream of the assembly/convention.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V2k8PB0gIxw
5) Provide all slides shown on the projection screen at the assembly/convention
relating to national delegate balloting.
6) Provide copies of all ballot supplements whether paper or electronically projected
at the convention.
7) Provide the written scope of services excerpted from the agreements with
Dominion (voting system vendor), and the El Paso County Clerks office.
8) Provide each iteration of national delegate candidate list posted to the CRC
website from inception through April 9, 2016.
9) Provide Intent to Run forms from all candidates who were allowed to file Intent
to Run forms after the deadline of March 28, 2016.
10) Provide a copy of the amended Rule 16(f) filing.
We respectfully request that the Committee on Contest order the CRC to give
Contestants and Respondents equal access to documents.
Page 122
Exhibit 16
Page 123

Porter, Et Al. RNC Delegate Contest - Statement of Position

Hochgeladen von

Dokumentinformationen

Originaltitel

Copyright

Verfügbare Formate

Dieses Dokument teilen

Dokument teilen oder einbetten

Freigabeoptionen

Stufen Sie dieses Dokument als nützlich ein?

Sind diese Inhalte unangemessen?

Copyright:

Verfügbare Formate

Porter, Et Al. RNC Delegate Contest - Statement of Position

Hochgeladen von

Copyright:

Verfügbare Formate

STATEMENT OF POSITION BY CONTESTANTS AGAINST THE

COLORADO AT-LARGE DELEGATION TO THE 2016 REPUBLICAN

assigned numbers on the ballots, a host of errors, irregularities and violations

In the Matter of the Porter, et al. Petition for Contest )

STATEMENT OF POSITION BY CONTESTANTS AGAINST THE COLORADO

Contested delegates should be decertified because the delegates and

Additionally, the sequencing of the candidates names on both supplements

Missing Ballot numbers:

378 on ballot twice - no 379

tabulation equipment as well. Requested access to ballots and electronic ballot

C. Favored treatment given to Respondents in the official sixteen member

The 16 official Cruz slate candidates won the top 16

from the Respondents to ascertain the timeliness of their transmittals.

III C., requiring neutrality.

F. Delegates were obstructed from effective objections

Vote tallies require 38 pages to print. The Teller Committee failed to

The individual experiences detailed in the attached affidavits of

CRC wilfully repeated improper processes. CRC officials and its

above. CDs 1, 6, and 7 elections were independently conducted prior to April

In summary, the willful violation of multiple essential rules, laws, and

Request for additional information and adverse inference

CRC and its balloting vendor have repeatedly denied access to

Committee report is a key document in reconciling participation, eligible electors,

Determining the voting delegates will as of April 9 as to who should

US Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump (R) is greeted on stage by fellow

Screengrab. Courtesy of Author.

To that end, the Republican National Committee recently released

The chairwoman of the Boulder County GOP

omitted names and numbers)

Cage detailed further problems:

forms were not put on the ballot. It happened in every CD and at

Disclosure--this story written by

Trump Campaign Mulls Contesting Colorado Delegates;

Share Tweet Pin

Candidates for national delegate were disenfranchised at the State

reported to have seconded one of the motions in the meeting.

POLITICS APR 10 2016, 7:19 PM ET

Cruz Sweeps Colorado as Trump Campaign Issues

"WE SMOKED THEM"

Kasich in one state.

In Iowa, Cruz supporters nearly swept up each

How Colorado confusion could spell convention trouble - CNNPolitics.com

Colorado Springs, Colorado (CNN) Ted Cruz's resounding

How Colorado confusion could spell convention trouble - CNNPolitics.com

I win a state in votes and then get non-representative delegates

How is it possible that the people of the great State of Colorado

How Colorado confusion could spell convention trouble - CNNPolitics.com

2016 Election Center

cnn delegate estimate R

If a campaign alleges that delegates were elected improperly,

How Colorado confusion could spell convention trouble - CNNPolitics.com

1237 delegates needed to win

1237 delegates needed to win

1237 delegates needed to win

In a race that could be decided by handful of delegates those

But the slates put out by the Trump campaign contained

all republican candidates

How Colorado confusion could spell convention trouble - CNNPolitics.com

Inside the battle to become a Colorado GOP delegate 02:32

Political Prediction Market

How Colorado confusion could spell convention trouble - CNNPolitics.com

Will the odds go up or down?

names and ballot positions of the remaining candidates on two