Kentucky Fellows 2006 Kyle/Warsh DADT Aff DADT Aff 1AC TAC ses een ee 5 ‘Topicality T—Plan = Increase in # Serving, 38 Case - Adv. 1 Solveney ~ Anti-Gay Violence. Solveney ~ Societal Spillover. AT: Military Can't Change. AT: States won't follow SC law. . Sourt uses gay sex health risks to ban marriage Courts solve sexual discrimination AT: Scrutiny Inappropriate—gays can chang! Courts effective @ social change . Equal Protection Solvency Court Solvency — 1" Amendment. AT: Lawrence v. Texas overtums DADT. AT: Lawrence eventually overturns DADT.. AT: Lawrence v. Texas Solved Credible Information Standard ~ Weak... Impact Ext. - Societal Spillover occ Impact Ext. - Genocide... Impact Ext. - Oppression (T chal), Impact Ext. — Richards... Impact Ext. ~ Discrimination. Advantage Modules Status-Conduct Dichotomy Module... DADT = Sexual Discrimination... DADT = Lesbian Baiting Lesbian Baiting = Patriarchy Abuse of Women IL... AT: No Sexual Harassmentiit’s Limited .. Militarism Module..... . ennnnniinenniiennnnannnnnnnnninne TD Free Speech Module. 81 Free Speech Adv. UL. 84 Mulifunctional Free Speech Ans, 88 AT: Military Members Can’t Speak Out Political 89 Gay Rights Dissent Module... . 91 94 AT: They Can Still Speak.Kentucky Fellows 2006 Kyle/Warsh DADT Aff Disease Module 95 Disease Impact ~ Reps.. 99 ‘Reps Impact. 101 Disease Impacts. 103 Disease Adv. UL. M1 AT: But Really, Only Gays Spread AIDS... us Case - Adv. 2 DADT > Most qualified People Expelled. U7 DADT > Qualified personnel discharges... 118 DADT Training/Recuitment Declines 119 DADT > Criminals/Spending, 120 Ext—Dumb Military Hurts Readiness, 122 DADT > Medical Personnel leave.. 123 Recruitment/Readiness Brink..... 124 Readiness Declines Snowball 126 Readiness key to hegemony 127 Overstretch kills US hegemony 128 US Amny key to deter adversaries 129 AT: US technology solves hegemony 130 Threats coming, 131 DADT > Witch Hunts; Doesn’t hurt morale... 132 Unit Cohesion Link (Intemational Cooperation 135 AT: Plan hurts unit cohesion .. 136 Disease Intemal Link Extension (HEG) : See 137 138 Deference Uniqueness*.. . a . Deference Uniqueness (Roberts and DADT), : : 148, Plan decreases deference... a : = ssnneesees A49) Plan spills over (overturns Feres Seetine. 150 Deference Kill CMR... nnn snnnnnninnenesnees SZ Deference Bad—Recruiting Extension... so - SA AT: Negative Case Arguments AT: Generals/Soldiers hate gays “ ns SS AT: Straight soldiers don’t like gays/Anecdotes.... 156 AT: Soldiers Don’t Like Gays. 157 AT: Homosexuals bad at fighting, : 158 AT: Disobey Orders/Harass Straight People = 159 AT: Officers rape soldiers‘undermine discipline. stunt 160 AT: Won't Obey a Homosexual Leadet curso so 161 AT: Plan hurts readiness (I of 2) a 162 AT: Plan hurts readiness (2 of 2) 163 AT: Neg Turns—Integration Empirically denies. 164 AT: Neg Turns—Integration Empirically denies (1 of 3). 165 AT: Neg Turns—Integration Empirically denies (2 of 3). eee 100) AT: Neg Turns—Integration Empirically denies (3 03)... 167Kentucky Fellows 2006 Kyle/Warsh DADT Aff AT: Butler (gays didn’t suffer as much as blacks!) se ectsestnsentee se 168 AT: You trivialize black suffering! Gays have it okt. snsevenenee A svi 169 AT: Gays don’t suffer racism... soe sonsnnnnnnnsnnnnnnel TO AT: Holocaust/Genocide Trivialization. esse v A ATL AT: Neg Turns—Other nations empirically deny. sow 72 AT: Foreign militaries aren't like the US sececenennentncneeseceneerete : 174 AT: Israel isn’t analogous! v Ms 7 7 176 AT: Qualified Military Authors. 7 177 AT: Turns from the Center for Military Readiness. sosnsnsenee Ms ose LID a 180 AT: Mass Coming Out Bad. Enforcement Solvency (Abuse) ‘AT: Beatings — Police/Fire Depts. disprove. Enforcement solves abuses of gay’s Enforcement key — Punishment/Reward. Enforcement key—Sanctions Enforcement solves circumvention (1 of 2) Enforcement solves circumvention (2 of 2). DoD enforcement solves transition/backlash......m No DoD enforcement now. Homosexual disclosure solves backlash—Contact Hypothesis. Homosexual disclosure solves backlash—Contact Hypothesis (1 of 2) Homosexual disclosure solves backlash—Contact Hypothesis (2 of 2). AT: Contact Hypothesis doesn’t assume conservative military... AT: Contact Hypothesis=Correlation, not causality . Homosexual disclosure solves backlash—Contact Hyp of 2).. Homosexual disclosure solves backlash—Contact Hyposheis @ of 2 AT: Gays will be beaten (1 of 2) AT: Gays will be beaten (2 of 2) AT: Gays will be beaton. AT: Yeah, but soldiers have already said they'll beat gays up. AT: Backlash (“military mission” solves) Equal Protection key — solves favoritism. Traditional Rational Basis/Deference Now Rational Basis } Deference Rational Basis Bad/AT: Rational Basis CP... AT: Strict Scrutiny Inappropriate—not powerless... AT: Equal Protection Bad DAs... . No strict scrutiny now AT: Strict Scrutiny Bad DAS...s.csnsnnnnssann AT: Supreme Court Equal Protection Bad DAs Equal Protection solves deference (1 of 2).. Equal Protection solves deference (2 of 2)... Equal Protection solves deference.Kentucky Fellows 2006 Kyle/Warsh DADT Aff AT: Disads ‘AT: Court Legitimacy/Court DA’s AT: Court Flip Flop DAs AT: Court Clog/DA’s to soldier suits.. AT: DA links off Roberts and Alito... 216 217 218, 219 AAT: DAs to backlash against comt (atv ct). 220 AT: Hollow Hope... “ 222 AT: Military Spending DA... 223 Presidential Powers Slayer 207 AT: CP's ‘AT: Non-Supreme Court CP’s oe ae 29 AT: Kriti AT: ID Politics K ...... : AT: You Single out GLBT... AT: You ignore women! AT: Biopower K. AT: Ethnocentrism K stt*Negative Neg: DOD CP Solvency...... Congress CP Solvency SQ Solves ~ Lawrence v, Texas Alt. Cause — Enforcement. AT: Disease Advantage... Courts Fail ID Politics Link Public Backlash Case Tum NEG: Don’t solve moral judgments ee cere eee ‘NEG: Courts ineffective @ social change ....onsnnnnnnnnnnn 261 NEG: No timeffame to solvency’... enn sere 282 NEG: All officers key (impact to backlash turn). sent NEG: Enforcement from officers key... CMR Link (1 of 2) CMR Link (2 of 2) CMR Link cone Plan unpopular with generals (CMR tink Defense Spending Link Politics Republicans hate plan (election issue)... Religious conservatives hate plan (1 of 2) Religious conservatives hate plan (2 0f2)... 273 Plan unpopular . 274 Plan Popular 275 Plan Popular. 276 Politics—Democrats support plan ea few Republicans) 277 Plan = Bipart ce 278 Public Likes Plan. 2279Kentucky Fellows 2006 Kyle/Warsh DADT Aff 1AC Contention 1 is Inherency ~ In 1993 President Clinton initiated the Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell policy (DADT) which allowed gays to serve in the military, provided they did not reveal their sexual preferences. Despite attempts to curb sexual harassment, it has continued to plague the military Luker, 2001 (Debra A., Captain, United States Air Force, JD. Candidate at St. Mary's University School of Law, “The ‘Homosexual Law and Policy in the Military: ‘Don't Ask, Don’t Tell, Don’t Pursue, Don’t Harass,’...Don’t be Absurd,” Si Mary's Law Review on Minority Issues, 3 SCHOLAR 267, Spring, lexis) In January 1993, the policy gained unparalleled attention when President Clinton acted on his campaign, promise to remove the military's ban on homosexuals, 80 On January 29, 1993, the Joint Chics of init ov recruits if thev wi " 7 ‘current policy. 81 In addition, the Senate and House of Representatives Armed Services Committees held hearings to investigate how changes to the homosexual policy would affect the Armed Forces. 82 The Secretary of Defense sted these hearings, along with reports from a military working group, 83 the RAND Corporation 84 and conferences with the Joint Chiefs of Staff and the Secretaries of each [*286] of the military services. 85 After six months of research, on July 19, 1993, the Secretary of Defense presented President Clinton with a proposed poliy. 86 Four months later, Congress passed the military’s curent "Dont Ask, Dont Tell” homosexual law. 87 By Congress action. the formes military homosexual policy ‘became law. $8 The military formally implemented the new law on December 21. 1993, through poliey ‘guidlines outlined in DoDD 1332.14. 89 The const ident Clin open access to serve in the military. 90 ‘The military's basie policy has always essentially been (and stil is) that "homosexuality is incompatible ‘vith military service." 91 The "Don't Ask, Don't Tell” law includes provisions that a military member ‘cannot (1) engage in homosexual acts, (2) state homosexual or bisexual preferences or (3) attempt to marry ‘or marry an individual of the same sex. 92 A violation of any of these provisions results in discharge from the armed forces. 93 The intended purpose of the "Don't Ask, Dont Tell” law is “sexual orientation alone will not bar individuals from military service unless it involves homosexual conduct." 94 SOE i io harassment of soldi ‘aShomosexual: 95 as a result, on March 24, 1997, the Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and. Readiness reiterated the military's basic anti-harassment policy, and also clarified it as applicable to alleged homosexuals. 96 +288) thr the structing the 4 Doni port 3, In April 1997, the Secretary of Defense initiated @ review of the military's application and enforcement of the homosexual policy, 97 after spending a year in review, the military recognized the need for improvements. On April 7, 1998, the Department of Defense recommended five changes to ensure the implementation of the policy and prevent abusive investigative practices, 98