0 Bewertungen0% fanden dieses Dokument nützlich (0 Abstimmungen)
1K Ansichten10 Seiten
Ethics are the social and moral values and principles by which we live. Promises made by an advertiser that are either misleading or lacking in truth. You can approach the organisation from which the advertisement originated, outlining your concerns regarding the ethics of the promotional material they are distributing.
Ethics are the social and moral values and principles by which we live. Promises made by an advertiser that are either misleading or lacking in truth. You can approach the organisation from which the advertisement originated, outlining your concerns regarding the ethics of the promotional material they are distributing.
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Verfügbare Formate
Als DOC, PDF, TXT herunterladen oder online auf Scribd lesen
Ethics are the social and moral values and principles by which we live. Promises made by an advertiser that are either misleading or lacking in truth. You can approach the organisation from which the advertisement originated, outlining your concerns regarding the ethics of the promotional material they are distributing.
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Verfügbare Formate
Als DOC, PDF, TXT herunterladen oder online auf Scribd lesen
unethical. This is particularly true in the case of the Internet, which is more difficult to police than other forms of promotion and advertising. The point is, what can we do about unethical advertising? However, before answering the question is it important to understand the definition of the term unethical. Ethics are the social and moral values and principles by which we live. These values tell us what is good or bad and right or wrong. To equate these to an advertising environment one needs therefore to look a little deeper. In this case, the question of ethics can be further extended to those promises made by an advertiser that are either misleading or lacking in truth. For example, if an advert promises that use of their product will make the user look seven years younger it is obvious that this promise is wrong as no-one can be that definite in the description and claims of their product. However, to claim the product will make you look younger, without a specific age attached, could not be held to be unethical. On the other hand, if an advertisement promises you can buy a certain product at a special price, with this ploy simply a means of getting you to visit his retail or Internet outlet, where you will be offered an alternative that does not have the benefits of the original, then it can be considered unethical. Furthermore, if a marketer makes false claims about a product, for example suggesting that it is recommended by others when this is clearly not the case, this again can be perceived to be unethical, as it is making a misleading statement and misrepresenting the facts simply to make you purchase the product or service. With regard to what you can do about unethical advertising, there are several options available. Firstly, you could approach the organisation from which the advertisement originated, outlining your concerns regarding the ethics of the promotional material they are distributing through whatever source, and requesting that this advertising be either withdrawn or that they justify their actions. An important thing to remember with this approach is to contact the organisation whose product or service is being promoted, not the advertising agency. The former are far more likely to respond positively to consumer complaints. If this first step does not produce the desired result, the next is to approach the publication or media through which the advertisement was promoted. For example, this point of contact could be the newspaper, magazine or television station that carried the advertisement. This organisation will respond by informing you of the action that they will be taking, which can include their banning of the offending advert, or explain their reasons for rejecting your claim that the advertisement is unethical. In the event that you are still not satisfied with the response given, the final step that can be taken to address the issue of unethical advertising is to lodge a complaint either with the advertising regulator or an appropriate commercial association, whose members are expected to comply with a set code of conduct. Most of these organisations will act to ensure the integrity of their profession. Unethical advertising is not only unacceptable, but also unfair and potentially costly for the consumer. It is therefore important, if you feel that an advertisement falls within the category, to take action to endeavour to have the advertising campaign stopped or the content altered. Did you know that the average contemporary consumer is exposed to several thousand advertising messages per day? These can be in the form of radio spots, all-too-familiar TV commercials, signage displayed on the side of the bus, or even unsolicited text messages sent directly to your mobile phone. All of this ad clutter has caused many consumers to develop almost an "ad-radar," often tuning out and ignoring advertising messages. Advertisers realize this, and they are constantly looking for new ways to grab consumers' attention and break through the clutter. Shock tactics have proven quite lucrative. New media, such as cellular technology and the internet, have also not gone unnoticed by those seeking to broadcast their advertising communications. Because of their increased boldness and reliance on shock, ads are naturally going to become less ethical and more offensive. So what can you, the consumer, do when exposed to an ad that gets your attention for all the wrong reasons?
When unethical ads offend us by their
television commercials and other offensive advertising there are several things we can do: We can either ignore them, switch channels, turn off our television, or we can get good and mad and decide to do something. What will we do? If the advertisement offends us because it is a lie, we can oppose that lie by telling the truth to everyone we know. We can alert the television company, the newspaper or the company responsible for the unethical advertisement that their ad is offensive and it is wrong. We can present them with our facts. If we are truly incensed and the practice continues we can get our own bandwagon and go on our own rebuttal campaigns. Yet, before we do any of this we find out the real truth of the advertising and attempt to see who is responsible for this particular advertisement. We don't want to go off half- cocked and steam and fuss and agitate and do more damage to our side of the argument when we know little about what prompted the ad in the first place. And, sometimes, it is best to ignore bad publicity and let it run out of steam on it own. This works because the public is not as dense as it is often pictured to be by those selling smut. Offensive ads often play on sympathies of the audience to make headway for their cause. This we've been seeing in the United States for a year or so now and it is shameful and something should be done about it. It is done in the name of politics and no matter how much the public dislikes the character assassination of political candidates, the process continues. It is phony and yet what can be done about it? We can tell the head of the Republican or the Democratic party we've had enough of this type of political maneuvering and we will have no more. We, the voting public deserves better. Advertisers once they have gotten away with a few uncouth remarks or offensive jokes and the general population has seemingly turned their backs, will see this as a sign that the audience is agreeable and more ads will follow. A good example of what can be done about advertising: Once it was commonplace to see cigarettes advertised on television and on sign boards along the highways. Then the cancer scare forced legislation banning the practice. The same way with alcohol and drugs. Alcohol is banned still and rightly so, but the pharmaceutical companies are hawking their wares to unsuspecting people who often insist on being given medicines on no more information than that is peddled in their living rooms via television. Allowing patients to actually see what's in the doctor's little black bag is both good and bad. It gives them more options into their care which is useful but it often forces doctors to go against their better judgment; how many patients can they afford to lose? They have offices to maintain and a staff demanding pay. What can be done? Less advertising by the pharmaceutical companies and more money spent on educating the public about the diseases they are out to cure. There simply is too much emphasis on buying rather than on decision making. This is what allows advertising to lead vulnerable people into avenues they would be better off bypassing.