Frontiero v. Richardson

Westlaw Delivery Summary Report for BERMUDEZTEJERO,A
Date/Time of Request: Monday, October 4, 2010 04:29 Central

Client Identifier: ANGEL BERMUDEZ TEJERO
Database: SCTFIND
Citation Text: 93 S.Ct. 1764
Lines: 602
Documents: 1
Images: 0
Recipient(s): c.ortega.1989@gmail.com
The material accompanying this summary is subject to copyright. Usage is governed by contract with Thomson Reuters,
West and their affiliates.
93 S.Ct. 1764 FOR EDUCATIONAL USE ONLY Page 1
411 U.S. 677, 93 S.Ct. 1764, 9 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 1253, 5 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 8609, 36 L.Ed.2d 583
(Cite as: 411 U.S. 677, 93 S.Ct. 1764)
Justice Blackmun joined.
Supreme Court of the United States Mr. Justice Rehnquist filed a dissenting statement.
Sharron A. FRONTIERO and Joseph Frontiero, Ap-
pellants, West Headnotes
v.
[1] Constitutional Law 92 2970
Elliot L. RICHARDSON, Secretary of Defense, et
al. 92 Constitutional Law
No. 71-1694. 92XXV Class Legislation; Discrimination and
Classification in General
Argued Jan. 17, 1973.
92k2970 k. In General. Most Cited Cases
Decided May 14, 1973.
(Formerly 92k208(3))
Suit was brought by a married woman air force of- Classifications based upon sex, like classifications
ficer and her husband against the Secretary of De- based upon race, alienage or national origin, are in-
fense seeking declaratory and injunctive relief herently suspect and must be subjected to strict ju-
against enforcement of federal statutes governing dicial scrutiny. (Per Mr. Justice Douglas, with three
quarters' allowance and medical benefits for mem- Justices concurring and four Justices concurring in
bers of the uniformed services. The Three-Judge the judgment.)
United States District Court for the Middle District
of Alabama, 341 F.Supp. 201, denied relief, and
plaintiffs appealed. Mr. Justice Brennan announced 92 Constitutional Law
the judgment of the Supreme Court and delivered 92XXVI Equal Protection
an opinion, in which Mr. Justice Douglas, Mr. 92XXVI(A) In General
Justice White and Mr. Justice Marshall joined, 92XXVI(A)6 Levels of Scrutiny
holding that classifications based upon sex are in- 92k3052 Rational Basis Standard;
herently suspect and must be subjected to strict ju- Reasonableness
dicial scrutiny, and that statutes providing, solely 92k3057 k. Statutes and Other
for administrative convenience, that spouses of Written Regulations and Rules. Most Cited Cases
male members of the uniformed services are de- (Formerly 92k213.1(2))
pendents for purposes of obtaining increased quar- Under “traditional” equal protection analysis, a le-
ters allowances and medical and dental benefits, but gislative classification must be sustained unless it is
that spouses of female members are not dependents “patently arbitrary” and bears no rational relation-
unless they are in fact dependent for over one-half ship to a legitimate governmental interest. (Per Mr.
of their support, violate due process clause of the Justice Douglas, with three Justices concurring and
Fifth Amendment insofar as they require a female four Justices concurring in the judgment.)
member to prove dependency of her husband.
Reversed.
92 Constitutional Law
Mr. Justice Stewart filed a statement concurring in 92XXV Class Legislation; Discrimination and
the judgment. Classification in General
92k2970 k. In General. Most Cited Cases
Mr. Justice Powell concurred in the judgment and
filed an opinion in which the Chief Justice and Mr.
© 2010 Thomson Reuters. No Claim to Orig. US Gov. Works.

(Cite as: 411 U.S. 677, 93 S.Ct. 1764)
With respect to strict judicial scrutiny of a legislat- (Formerly 92k278.4(5), 92k318(2))

ive classification, “administrative convenience” is Statutes providing, solely for administrative con-
not a shibboleth, the mere recitation of which dic- venience, that spouses of male members of the uni-
tates constitutionality. (Per Mr. Justice Douglas, formed services are dependents for purposes of ob-
with three Justices concurring and four Justices taining increased quarters allowances and medical
concurring in the judgment.) and dental benefits, but that spouses of female
members are not dependents unless they are in fact
[4] Constitutional Law 92 2974 dependent for over one-half of their support violate
due process clause of the Fifth Amendment insofar
92 Constitutional Law
as they require a female member to prove depend-
92XXV Class Legislation; Discrimination and
ency of her husband. (Per Mr. Justice Douglas, with
Classification in General
three Justices concurring and four Justices concur-
92k2974 k. Sex or Gender; Sexual Orienta-
ring in the judgment.) U.S.C.A.Const. Amend. 5;
tion. Most Cited Cases
10 U.S.C.A. §§ 1072, 1076; 37 U.S.C.A. §§ 401,
403.
Any statutory scheme which draws a sharp line
between the sexes, solely for the purpose of achiev- FN*
**1765 *677 Syllabus
ing administrative convenience, necessarily com-
mands dissimilar treatment for men and women FN* The syllabus constitutes no part of the
who are similarly situated and therefore involves opinion of the Court but has been prepared
the very kind of arbitrary legislative choice forbid- by the Reporter of Decisions for the con-
den by the Constitution. (Per Mr. Justice Douglas, venience of the reader. See United States
with three Justices concurring and four Justices v. Detroit Timber & Lumber Co., 200 U.S.
concurring in the judgment.) 321, 337, 26 S.Ct. 282, 287, 50 L.Ed. 499.
[5] Armed Services 34 5(6) A married woman Air Force officer (hereafter ap-
pellant) sought increased benefits for her husband
34 Armed Services as a ‘dependent’ under 37 U.S.C. ss 401, 403, and
34I In General 10 U.S.C. ss 1072, 1076. Those statutes provide,
34k5 Persons in the Armed Services, and Mi- solely for administrative convenience,**1766 that
litia Called Into Service of the United States spouses of male members of the uniformed services
34k5(6) k. Pay and Allowances. Most are dependents for purposes of obtaining increased
Cited Cases quarters allowances and medical and dental bene-
(Formerly 34k13.3(5)) fits, but that spouses of female members are not de-
pendents unless they are in fact dependent for over
Constitutional Law 92 4244
one-half of their support. When her application was
92 Constitutional Law denied for failure to satisfy the statutory depend-
92XXVII Due Process ency standard, appellant and her husband brought
92XXVII(G) Particular Issues and Applica- this suit in District Court, contending that the stat-
tions utes deprived servicewomen of due process. From
92XXVII(G)10 War and National Secur- that Court's adverse ruling, they took a direct ap-
ity peal. Held: The judgment is reversed. Pp.
92k4241 Armed Services 1768-1772, 1772-1773, 341 F.Supp. 201, reversed.
92k4244 k. Pay and Benefits. Most *678 Joseph J. Levin, Jr., Montgomery, Ala., for
Cited Cases appellants.

(Cite as: 411 U.S. 677, 93 S.Ct. 1764)
Ruth B. Ginsburg, New York City, for American FN2. Title 37 U.S.C. s 401 provides in per-
Civil Liberties Union, amicus curiae, by special tinent part:
leave of Court.
‘In this chapter, ‘dependent,’ with respect
Samuel Huntington, Washington, D.C., for ap- to a member of a uniformed service,
pellees. means-
‘(1) his spouse;

Mr. Justice BRENNAN announced the judgment of
the Court in an opinion in which Mr. Justice ‘However, a person is not a dependent of a
DOUGLAS, Mr. Justice WHITE, and Mr. Justice female member unless he is in fact depend-
MARSHALL join. ent on her for over one-half of his support .
. ..’
The question before us concerns the right of a fe-
FN1
male member of the uniformed services to 10 U.S.C. s 1072(2) provides in pertinent
claim her spouse as a ‘dependent’ for the purposes part:
of obtaining increased quarters allowances and
medical and dental benefits under 37 U.S.C. ss 401, “Dependent,' with respect to a member . . .
403, and 10 U.S.C. ss 1072, 1076, on an equal foot- of a uniformed service, means-
ing with male members. Under these statutes, a ser-
‘(A) the wife;
viceman may claim his wife as a ‘dependent’
without regard to whether she is in fact dependent ‘(C) the husband, if he is in fact dependent
upon him for any part of her support. 37 U.S.C. s on the member . . . for over one-half of his
401(1); 10 U.S.C. s 1072(2)(A). A servicewoman, support. . . .’
on the other hand, may not claim her husband as a
‘dependent’ under these programs unless he is in
fact dependent upon her for over one-half of his I
support.*679 37 U.S.C. s 401; 10 U.S.C. s
FN2 In an effort to attract career personnel through reen-
1072(2)(C). Thus, the question for decision is
listment, Congress established, in 37 U.S.C. s 401
whether this difference in treatment constitutes an
et seq., and 10 U.S.C. s 1071 et seq., a scheme for
unconstitutional discrimination against servicewo-
the provision of fringe benefits to members of the
men in violation of the Due Process Clause of the
uniformed services on a competitive basis with
Fifth Amendment. A three-judge District Court for FN3
business and industry. Thus, under 37 U.S.C. s
the Middle District of Alabama, one judge issent-
403, **1767 a member of the uniformed services
ing, rejected this contention and sustained the con-
with dependents is entitled to an *680 increased
stitutionality of the provisions of the statutes mak-
‘basic allowence for quarters' and, under 10 U.S.C.
ing this distinction. 341 F.Supp. 201 (1972). We
s 1076, a member's dependents are provided com-
noted probable jurisdiction. 409 U.S. 840, 93 S.Ct.
prehensive medical and dental care.
64, 34 L.Ed.2d 78 (1972). We reverse.
FN3. See 102 Cong.Rec. 3849-3850
FN1. The ‘uniformed services' include the
(Cong. Kilday), 8043 (Sen. Saltonstall); 95
Army, Navy, Air Force, Marine Corps,
Cong.Rec. 7662 (Cong. Kilday), 7664
Coast Guard, Environmental Science Ser-
(Cong. Short), 7666 (Cong. Havenner),
vices Administration, and Public Health
7667 (Cong. Bates), 7671 (Cong. Price).
Service. 37 U.S.C. s 101(3); 10 U.S.C. s
See also 10 U.S.C. s 1071.
1072(1).

(Cite as: 411 U.S. 677, 93 S.Ct. 1764)
Appellant Sharron Frontiero, a lieutenant in the forbid discrimination that is ‘so unjustifi-
United States Air Force, sought increased quarters able as to be violative of due process.‘‘
allowances, and housing and medical benefits for Schneider v. Rusk, 377 U.S. 163, 168, 84
her husband, appellant Joseph Frontiero, on the S.Ct. 1187, 1190, 12 L.Ed.2d 218 (1964);
ground that he was her ‘dependent.’ Although such see Shapiro v. Thompson, 394 U.S. 618,
benefits would automatically have been granted 641-642, 89 S.Ct. 1322, 1335, 22 L.Ed.2d
with respect to the wife of a male member of the 600 (1969); Bolling v. Sharpe, 347 U.S.
uniformed services, appellant's application was 497, 74 S.Ct. 693, 98 L.Ed. 884 (1954).
denied because she failed to demonstrate that her
husband was dependent on her for more than one- Although the legislative history of these statutes
FN4 sheds virtually no light on the purposes underlying
half of his support. Appellants then com-
menced this suit, contendingthat, by making this the differential treatment accorded male and female
FN6
distinction, the statutes unreasonably discriminate members, a majority of the three-judge District
on the basis of sex in violation of the Due Process Court surmised that Congress might reasonably
FN5 have concluded that, since the husband in our soci-
Clause of the Fifth Amendment. In essence, ap-
pellants asserted that the discriminatory impact of ety is generally the ‘breadwinner’ in the family-and
the statutes is twofold: first, as a procedural matter, the wife typically the ‘dependent’ partner-‘it would
a female member is required to demonstrate her be more economical to require married female
spouse's dependency, while no such burden is im- members claiming husbands to prove actual de-
posed upon male members; and, second, as a sub- pendency than to extend the presumption**1768 of
stantive matter, a male member who does not dependency to such members.’ 341 F.Supp., at 207.
provide more than one-half of his wife's support re- Indeed, given the fact that approximately 99% of all
ceives benefits, while a similarly situated female members of the uniformed services are male, the
member is denied such benefits. Appellants there- District *682 Court speculated that such differential
fore sought a permanent injunction*681 against the treatment might conceivably lead to a ‘considerable
continued enforcement of these statutes and an or- saving of administrative expense and manpower.’
der directing the appellees to provide Lieutenant Ibid.
Frontiero with the same housing and medical bene-
FN6. The housing provisions, set forth in
fits that a similarly situated male member would re-
37 U.S.C. s 401 et seq., were enacted as
ceive.
part of the Career Compensation Act of
FN4. Appellant Joseph Frontiero is a full- 1949, which established a uniform pattern
time student at Huntingdon College in of military pay and allowances, consolidat-
Montgomery, Alabama. According to the ing and revising the piecemeal legislation
agreed stipulation of facts, his living ex- that had been developed over the previous
penses, including his share of the house- 40 years. See H.R.Rep. No. 779, 81st
hold expenses, total approximately $354 Cong., 1st Sess.; S.Rep. No. 733, 81st
per month. Since he receives $205 per Cong., 1st Sess. The Act apparently re-
month in veterans' benefits, it is clear that tained in substance the dependency defini-
he is not dependent upon appellant Sharron tions of s 4 of the Pay Readjustment Act of
Frontiero for more than one-half of his 1942 (56 Stat. 361), as amended by s 6 of
support. the Act of September 7, 1944 (58 Stat.
730), which required a female member of
FN5. ‘(W)hile the Fifth Amendment con- the service to demonstrate her spouse's de-
tains no equal protection clause, it does pendency. It appears that this provision

(Cite as: 411 U.S. 677, 93 S.Ct. 1764)
was itself derived from unspecified earlier 1375, 1385, 87 L.Ed. 1774 (1943).
enactments. See S.Rep. No. 917, 78th
Cong., 2d Sess., 4. In Reed, the Court considered the constitutionality
of an Idaho statute providing that, when two indi-
The medical benefits legislation, 10 U.S.C. viduals are otherwise equally entitled to appoint-
s 1071 et seq., was enacted as the Depend- ment as administrator of an estate, the male applic-
ents' Medical Care Act of 1956. As such, it ant must be preferred to the female. Appellant, the
was designed to revise and make uniform mother of the deceased, and appellee, the father,
the existing law relating to medical ser- filed competing petitions for appointment as admin-
vices for military personnel. It, too, ap- istrator of their son's estate. Since the parties, as
pears to have carried forward, without ex- parents of the deceased, were members of the same
planation, the dependency provisions entitlement class the statutory preference was in-
found in other military pay and allowance voked and the father's petition was therefore gran-
legislation. See H.R.Rep. No. 1805, 84th ted. Appellant claimed that this statute, by giving a
Cong., 2d Sess.; S.Rep. No. 1878, 84th mandatory preference to males over females
Cong., 2d Sess. without regard to their individual qualifications, vi-
olated the Equal Protection Clause of the Four-
teenth Amendment.
II
[2] The Court noted that the Idaho statute ‘provides
[1] At the outset, appellants contend that classifica-
that different treatment be accorded to the applic-
tions based upon sex, like classifications based
FN7 FN8 ants on the basis of their sex; it thus establishes a
upon race, alienage, and national origin,
FN9 classification subject*683 to scrutiny under the
are inherently suspect and must therefore be
Equal Protection Clause.’ 404 U.S., at 75, 92 S.Ct.
subjected to close judicial scrutiny. We agree and,
at 253. Under ‘traditional’ equal protection analys-
indeed, find at least implicit support for such an ap-
is, a legislative classification must be sustained un-
proach in our unanimous decision only last Term in
less it is ‘patently arbitrary’ and bears no rational
Reed v. Reed, 404 U.S. 71, 92 S.Ct. 251, 30
relationship to a legitimate governmental interest.
L.Ed.2d 225 (1971).
See Jefferson v. Hackney, 406 U.S. 535, 546, 92
FN7. See Loving v. Virginia, 388 U.S. 1, S.Ct. 1724, 1731, 32 L.Ed.2d 285 (1972); Richard-
11, 87 S.Ct. 1817, 1823, 18 L.Ed.2d 1010 son v. Belcher, 404 U.S. 78, 81, 92 S.Ct. 254, 257,
(1967); McLaughlin v. Florida, 379 U.S. 30 L.Ed.2d 231 (1971); Flemming v. Nestor, 363
184, 191-192, 85 S.Ct. 283, 287-288, 13 U.S. 603, 611, 80 S.Ct. 1367, 1372, 4 L.Ed.2d 1435
L.Ed.2d 222 (1964); Bolling v. Sharpe, (1960); McGowan v. Maryland, 366 U.S. 420, 426,
supra, 347 U.S., at 499, 74 S.Ct., at 694. 81 S.Ct. 1101, 1105, 6 L.Ed.2d 393 (1961);
Dandridge v. Williams, 397 U.S. 471, 485, 90 S.Ct.
FN8. See Graham v. Richardson, 403 U.S. 115o, 1161, 25 L.Ed.2d 491 (1970).
365, 372, 91 S.Ct. 1848, 1852, 29 L.Ed.2d
534 (1971). In an effort to meet this standard, appellee conten-
ded that the statutory scheme was a reasonable
FN9. See Oyama v. California, 332 U.S. measure designed to reduce the workload on pro-
633, 644-646, 68 S.Ct. 269, 274-275, 92 bate courts by eliminating one class of contests.
L.Ed. 249 (1948); Korematsu v. United Moreover, appellee argued that the mandatory pref-
States, 323 U.S. 214, 216, 65 S.Ct. 193, erence for male applicants was in itself reasonable
194, 89 L.Ed. 194 (1944); Hirabayashi v. since ‘men (are) as a rule more conversant with
FN10
United States, 320 U.S. 81, 100, 63 S.Ct. business affairs than . . . women.’ Indeed, ap-

(Cite as: 411 U.S. 677, 93 S.Ct. 1764)
pellee maintained that ‘it is a matter of common sciousness that, 100 years ago, a distinguished
knowledge, that women still are not engaged in Member of this Court was able to proclaim:
politics, the professions, business or industry to the
FN11 FN13. Indeed, the position of women in
extent that men are.' **1769 And the Idaho
Supreme Court, in upholding the constitutionality this country at its inception is reflected in
of this statute, suggested that the Idaho Legislature the view expressed by Thomas Jefferson
might reasonably have ‘concluded that in general that women should be neither seen nor
men are better qualified to act as an administrator heard in society's decisionmaking councils.
FN12 See M. Gruberg, Women in American
than are women.’
Politics 4 (1968). See also 2 A. de Toc-
FN10. Brief for Appellee in No. 70-4, O.T. queville, Democracy in America (Reeves
1971, Reed v. Reed, p. 12. trans. 1948).
FN11. Id., at 12-13. ‘Man is, or should be, women's protector and de-
fender. The natural and proper timidity and delic-
FN12. Reed v. Reed, 93 Idaho 511, 514, acy which belongs to the female sex evidently un-
465 P.2d 635, 638 (1970). fits it for many of the occupations of civil life. The
constitution of the family organization, which is
Despite these contentions, however, the Court held
founded in the divine ordinance, as well as in the
the statutory preference for male applicants uncon-
nature of things, indicates the domestic sphere as
stitutional. In reaching this result, the Court impli-
that which properly belongs to the domain and
citly rejected appellee's apparently rational explana-
functions of womanhood. The harmony, not to say
tion of the statutory scheme, and concluded that, by
identity, of interests and views which belong, or
ignoring the individual qualifications of particular
should belong, to the family institution is repugnant
applicants, the challenged statute provide
to the idea of a woman adopting a distinct and *685
‘dissimilar treatment for men and women who are .
independent career from that of her husband. . . .
. . similarly situated.’ *684404 U.S., at 77, 92 S.Ct.,
at 254. The Court therefore held that, even though ‘. . . The paramount destiny and mission of woman
the State's interest in achieving administrative effi- are to fulfil the noble and benign offices of wife
ciency ‘is not without some legitimacy,’ ‘(t)o give a and mother. This is the law of the Creator.’ Brad-
mandatory preference to members of either sex well v. State of Illinois, 16 Wall. 130, 141, 21
over members of the other, merely to accomplish L.Ed.2d 442 (1873) (Bradley, J., concurring).
the elimination of hearings on the merits, is to make
the very kind of arbitrary legislative choice forbid- As a result of notions such as these, our statute
den by the (Constitution) . . ..’ Id., at 76, 92 S.Ct. at books gradually became laden with gross, stereo-
254. This departure from ‘traditional’ rational-basis typed distinctions between the sexes and, indeed,
analysis with respect to sex-based classifications is throughout much of the 19th century the position of
clearly justified. women in our society was, in many respects, com-
parable to that of blacks under the pre-Civil War
There can be no doubt that our Nation has had a slave codes. Neither slaves nor women could hold
long and unfortunate history of sex discrimination. office, serve on juries, or bring suit in their own
FN13
Traditionally, such discrimination was ration- names, and married women traditionally were
alized by an attitude of ‘romantic paternalism’ denied the legal capacity to hold or convey property
which, in practical effect, put women, not on a ped- or to serve as legal guardians of their own children.
estal, but in a cage. Indeed, this paternalistic atti- See generally L. Kanowitz, Women and the Law:
tude became so firmly rooted in our national con- The Unfinished Revolution 5-6 (1969); G. Myrdal,

(Cite as: 411 U.S. 677, 93 S.Ct. 1764)
An American Dilemma 1073 (20th Anniversary ed. FN17. It is true, of course, that when
1962). And although blacks were guaranteed the viewed in the abstract, women do not con-
right to vote in 1870, women were denied even that stitute a small and powerless minority.
right-which is itself ‘preservative of other **1770 Nevertheless, in part because of past dis-
FN14
basic civil and political rights' -until adoption crimination, women are vastly underrep-
of the Nineteenth Amendment half a century later. resented in this Nation's decisionmaking
councils. There has never been a female
FN14. Reynolds v. Sims, 377 U.S. 533, President, nor a female member of this
562, 84 S.Ct. 1362, 1381, 12 L.Ed.2d 506 Court. Not a single woman presently sits in
(1964); see Dunn v. Blumstein, 405 U.S. the United States Senate, and only 14 wo-
330, 336, 92 S.Ct. 995, 999, 31 L.Ed.2d men hold seats in the House of Represent-
274 (1972); Kramer v. Union Free School atives. And, as appellants point out, this
District, 395 U.S. 621, 626, 89 S.Ct. 1886, underrepresentation is present throughout
1889, 23 L.Ed.2d 583 (1969); Yick Wo v. all levels of our State and Federal Govern-
Hopkins, 118 U.S. 356, 370, 6 S.Ct. 1064, ment. See Joint Reply Brief of Appellants
1071, 30 L.Ed. 220 (1886). and American Civil Liberties Union
(Amicus Curiae) 9.
It is true, of course, that the position of women in
America has improved markedly in recent decades. Moreover, since sex, like race and national origin,
FN15
*686 Nevertheless, it can hardly be doubted is an immutable characteristic determined solely by
that, in part because of the high visibility of the sex the accident of birth, the imposition of special dis-
FN16
characteristic, women still face pervasive, al- abilities upon the members of a particular sex be-
though at times more subtle, discrimination in our cause of their sex would seem to violate ‘the basic
educational institutions, in the job market and, per- concept of our system that legal burdens should
haps most conspicuously, in the political arena. bear some relationship to individual responsibility .
FN17
See generally K. Amundsen, The Silenced . ..’ Weber v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co., 406
Majority: Women and American Democracy U.S. 164, 175, 92 S.Ct. 1400, 1407, 31 L.Ed.2d 768
(1971); The President's Task Force on Women's (1972). And what differentiates sex from such non-
Rights and Responsibilities, A Matter of Simple suspect statuses as intelligence or physical disabil-
Act of 1964, 84 Harv.L.Rev. 1109 (1971). ity, and aligns it with the recognized suspect criter-
ia, is that the sex characteristic frequently bears no
FN15. See generally The President's Task
relation to ability to perform or contribute to soci-
Force on Women's Rights and Responsibil- FN18
ety. As a result, statutory distinctions*687
ities, A Matter of Simple Justice (1970); L.
between the sexes often have the effect of invidi-
Kanowitz, Women and the Law: The Un-
ously relegating the entire class of females to in-
finished Revolution (1969); A. Montagu,
ferior legal status without regard to the actual cap-
Man's Most Dangerous Myth (4th ed.
abilities of its individual members.
1964); The President's Commission on the
Status of Women, American Women FN18. See, e.g., Developments in the Law-
(1963). Equal Protection, 82 Harv.L.Rev. 1065,
1173-1174 (1969).
FN16. See, e.g., Note, Sex Discrimination
and Equal Protection: Do We Need a Con- We might also note that, over the past decade, Con-
stitutional Amendment?, 84 Harv.L.Rev. gress has itself manifested an increasing sensitivity
1499, 1507 (1971). to sex-based classifications. In Tit. VII of the Civil
Rights Act of 1964, for example, Congress ex-

(Cite as: 411 U.S. 677, 93 S.Ct. 1764)
pressly declared that no employer, labor union, or amended, 85 Stat. 644; 5 U.S.C. s 7152, as
other organization subject to the provisions of the amended, 85 Stat. 644; 5 U.S.C. s 8341, as
Act shall discriminate against any individual on the amended, 84 Stat. 1961; 38 U.S.C. s
basis of ‘race, color, religion, sex, or national ori- 102(b), as amended, 86 Stat. 1092.
FN19
gin.' Similarly, the Equal Pay Act of 1963
provides that no employer covered by the Act ‘shall With these considerations in mind, we can only
discriminate . . . between employees on the basis of conclude that classifications based upon sex, like
FN20 classifications based upon race, alienage, or nation-
sex.' And s 1 of the **1771 Equal Rights
Amendment, passed by Congress on March 22, al origin, are inherently suspect, and must therefore
1972, and submitted to the legislatures of the States be subjected to strict judicial scrutiny. Applying the
for ratification, declares that ‘(e)quality of rights analysis mandated by that stricter standard of re-
under the law shall not be denied or abridged by the view, it is clear that the statutory scheme now be-
United States or by any State on account of sex.' fore us is constitutionally invalid.
FN21
Thus, Congress itself has concluded that clas-
sifications based upon sex are inherently invidious, III
and this conclusion of a coequal *688 branch of
Government is not without significance to the ques- The sole basis of the classification established in
tion presently under consideration. Cf. Oregon v. the challenged statutes is the sex of the individuals
Mitchell, 400 U.S. 112, 240, 248-249, 91 S.Ct. 260, involved. Thus, under 37 U.S.C. ss 401, 403, and
322, 327, 27 L.Ed.2d 272 (1970) (opinion of Bren- 10 U.S.C. ss 2072, 2076, a female member of the
nan, White, and Marshall, JJ.); Katzenbach v. Mor- uniformed services seeking to obtain housing and
gan, 384 U.S. 641, 648-649, 86 S.Ct. 1717, 1722, medical benefits for her spouse must prove his de-
16 L.Ed.2d 828 (1966). pendency in fact, whereas no such burden is im-
posed upon male members. In addition, the statutes
FN19. 42 U.S.C. s 2000e-2(a), (b), (c) operate so as to deny benefits to a female member,
(emphasis added). See generally, Sape & such as appellant Sharron Frontiero, who provides
Hart, Title VII Reconsidered: The Equal less than one-half of her spouse's support, while at
Employment Opportunity Act of 1972, 40 the same time granting such benefits to a male
Geo.Wash.L.Rev. 824 (1972); Develop- member who likewise provides less than one-half
ments in the Law-Employment Discrimina- of his spouse's support. Thus, to this extent at least,
tion and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act it may fairly be said that these statutes command
of 1964, 8j Harv.L.Rev. 1109 (1971). ‘dissimilar treatment for men and women who are .
. . similarly situated.’ Reed v. Reed, 404 U.S., at
FN20. 29 U.S.C. s 206(d) (emphasis ad-
77, 92 S.Ct., at 254.
ded). See generally Murphy, Female Wage
Discrimination: A Study of the Equal Pay Moreover, the Government concedes that the differ-
Act 1963-1970, 39 U.Cin.L.Rev. 615 ential treatment accorded men and women under
(1970). these statutes serves no purpose other than mere
‘administrative convenience.’ In essence, the Gov-
FN21. H.R.J.Res. No. 208, 92d Cong., 2d
ernment maintains that, as an empirical matter,
Sess. (1972). In conformity with these
wives in our society frequently are dependent upon
principles, Congress in recent years has
their husbands, while husbands*689 rarely are de-
amended various statutory schemes similar
pendent upon their wives. Thus, the Government
to those presently under consideration so
argues that Congress might reasonably have con-
as to eliminate the differential treatment of
cluded that it would be both cheaper and easier
men and women. See 5 U.S.C. s 2108, as

(Cite as: 411 U.S. 677, 93 S.Ct. 1764)
simply conclusively to presume that wives of male FN23. In 1971, 43% of all women over the
members are financially dependent upon their hus- age of 16 were in the labor force, and 18%
bands, while burdening female members with the of all women worked full time 12 months
FN22
task of establishing dependency in fact. per year. See U.S. Women's Bureau, Dept.
of Labor, Highlights of Women's Employ-
FN22. It should be noted that these statutes ment & Education 1 (W.B.Pub. No.
are not in any sense designed to rectify the 72-191, Mar. 1972). Moreover, 41.5% of
effects of past discrimination against wo- all married women are employed. See U.S.
men. See Gruenwald v. Gardner, 390 F.2d Bureau of Labor Statistics, Dept. of Labor,
591 (CA2), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 982, 89 Work Experience of the Population in
S.Ct. 456, 21 L.Ed.2d 445 (1968); cf. 1971, p. 4 (Summary Special Labor Force
Jones v. Alfred H. Mayer Co., 392 U.S. Report, Aug. 1972). It is also noteworthy
409, 88 S.Ct. 2186, 20 L.Ed.2d 1189 that, while the median income of a male
(1968); South Carolina v. Katzenbach, 383 member of the armed forces is approxim-
U.S. 301, 86 S.Ct. 803, 15 L.Ed.2d 769 ately $3,686, see The Report of the Presid-
(1966). On the contrary, these statutes ent's Commission on an All-Volunteer
seize upon a group-women-who have his- Armed Force 51, 181 (1970), the median
torically suffered discrimination in em- income for all women over the age of 14,
ployment, and rely on the effects of this including those who are not employed, is
past discrimination as a justification for approximately $2,237. See Statistical Ab-
heaping on additional economic disadvant- stract of the United States Table No. 535
ages. Cf. Gaston County v. United States, (1972), Source: U.S. Bureau of the Census,
395 U.S. 285, 296-297, 89 S.Ct. 1720, Current Population Reports, Series P-60,
1725-1726, 23 L.Ed.2d 309 (1969). No. 80. Applying the statutory definition
of ‘dependency’ to these statistics, it ap-
The Government offers no concrete evidence,
pears that in the ‘median’ family, the wife
however, tending to support its view that such dif-
of a male member must have personal ex-
ferential treatment in **1772 fact saves the Govern-
penses of approximately $4,474, or about
ment any money. In order to satisfy the demands of
75% of the total family income, in order to
strict judicial scrutiny, the Government must
qualify as a ‘dependent.’
demonstrate, for example, that it is actually cheaper
to grant increased benefits with respect to all male FN24. Tr. of Oral Arg. 27-28.
members, than it is to determine which male mem-
bers are in fact entitled to such benefits and to grant [3][4][5] In any case, our prior decisions make
increased benefits only to those members whose clear that, although efficacious administration of
wives actually meet the dependency requirement. governmental programs is not without some import-
Here, however, there is substantial evidence that, if ance, ‘the Constitution recognizes higher values
put to the test, many of the wives of male members than speed and efficiency.’ Stanley v. Illinois, 405
FN23
would fail to qualify for benefits. And in U.S. 645, 656, 92 S.Ct. 1208, 1215, 31 L.Ed.2d 551
light of the fact that the *690 dependency determin- (1972). And when we enter the realm of ‘strict judi-
ation with respect to the husbands of female mem- cial scrutiny,’ there can be no doubt that
bers is presently made solely on the basis of affi- ‘administrative convenience’ is not a shibboleth,
davits rather than through the more costly hearing the mere recitation of which dictates constitutional-
FN24
process, the Government's explanation of the ity. See Shapiro v. Thompson, 394 U.S. 618, 89
statutory scheme is, to say the least, questionable. S.Ct. 1322, 22 L.Ed.2d 600 (1969); Carrington v.

(Cite as: 411 U.S. 677, 93 S.Ct. 1764)
Rash, 380 U.S. 89, 85 S.Ct. 775, 13 L.Ed.2d 675 .Mr. Justice POWELL, with whom THE CHIEF
(1965). On the contrary, any statutory scheme JUSTICE and Mr. Justice BLACKMUN join, con-
which draws a sharp line between the sexes, Solely curring in the judgment.
for the purpose of achieving administrative con- I agree that the challenged statutes constitute an un-
venience, necessarily commands ‘dissimilar treat- constitutional discrimination against servicewomen
ment for men and women who are . . . similarly in violation of the Due Process Clause of the Fifth
situated,’ and therefore involves the ‘very kind of Amendment, but I cannot join the opinion of Mr.
arbitrary legislative choice forbidden by the Justice BRENNAN, which would hold that all clas-
(Constitution) . . ..’ Reed v. Reed, 404 U.S., at 77, sifications based upon sex, ‘like classifications
76, 92 S.Ct., at 254. We therefore conclude that, by based upon race, alienage, and national origin,’ are
according differential treatment to male and female ‘inherently suspect and must therefore be subjected
members of the uniformed services for the sole pur- to close judicial scrutiny.’ Ante, at 1768. It is unne-
pose of achieving administrative *691 convenience, cessary for the Court in this case to *692 character-
the challenged statutes violate the Due Process ize sex as a suspect classification, with all of the
Clause of the Fifth Amendment insofar as they re- far-reaching implications of such a holding. Reed
quire a female member to prove the dependency of v. Reed, 404 U.S. 71, 92 S.Ct. 251, 30 L.Ed.2d 225
FN25
her husband. (1971), which abundantly supports our decision
today, did not add sex to the narrowly limited group
FN25. As noted earlier, the basic purpose of classifications which are inherently suspect. In
of these statutes was to provide fringe be- my view, we can and should decide this case on the
nefits to members of the uniformed ser- authority of Reed and reserve for the future any ex-
vices in order to establish a compensation pansion of its rationale.
pattern which would attract career person-
nel through re-enlistment. See n. 3, supra, There is another, and I find compelling, reason for
and accompanying text. Our conclusion in deferring a general categorizing of sex classifica-
no wise invalidates the statutory schemes tions as invoking the strictest test of judicial scru-
except insofar as they require a female tiny. The Equal Rights Amendment, which if adop-
member to prove the dependency of her ted will resolve the substance of this precise ques-
spouse. See Weber v. Aetna Casualty & tion, has been approved by the Congress and sub-
Surety Co., 406 U.S. 164, 92 S.Ct. 1400, mitted for ratification by the States. If this Amend-
31 L.Ed.2d 768 (1972); Levy v. Louisiana, ment is duly adopted, it will represent the will of
391 U.S. 68, 88 S.Ct. 1509, 20 L.Ed.2d the people accomplished in the manner prescribed
436 (1968); Moritz v. Commissioner of In- by the Constitution. By acting prematurely and un-
ternal Revenue, 469 F.2d 466 (CA10 1972) necessarily, as I view it, the Court has assumed a
. See also 1 U.S.C. s 1. decisional responsibility at the very time when state
legislatures, functioning within the traditional
Reversed. democractic process, are debating the proposed
Amendment. It seems to me that this reaching out
Mr. Justice STEWART concurs in the judgment,
to pre-empt by judicial action a major political de-
agreeing that the statutes before**1773 us work an
cision which is currently in process of resolution
invidious discrimination in violation of the Consti-
does not reflect appropriate respect for duly pre-
tution. Reed v. Reed, 404 U.S. 71, 92 S.Ct. 251, 30
scribed legislative processes.
L.Ed.2d 225.
Mr. Justice REHNQUIST dissents for the reasons There are times when this Court, under our system,
stated by Judge Rives in his opinion for the District cannot avoid a constitutional decision on issues
Court, Frontiero v. Laird, 341 F.Supp. 201 (1972)

(Cite as: 411 U.S. 677, 93 S.Ct. 1764)
which normally should be resolved by the elected

representatives of the people. But democratic insti-
tutions are weakened, and confidence in the re-
straint of the Court is impaired, when we appear
unnecessarily to decide sensitive issues of broad so-
cial and political importance at the very time they
are under consideration within the prescribed con-
stitutional processes.
U.S.Ala. 1973.
Frontiero v. Richardson
411 U.S. 677, 93 S.Ct. 1764, 9 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas.
(BNA) 1253, 5 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 8609, 36
L.Ed.2d 583
END OF DOCUMENT


Database: KEYCITE-HIST
Service: KeyCite
Lines: 127
Documents: 1
Images: 0
AUTHORIZED FOR EDUCATIONAL USE ONLY
Date of Printing: Oct 04, 2010
KEYCITE
Frontiero v. Richardson, 411 U.S. 677, 93 S.Ct. 1764, 36 L.Ed.2d 583, 9 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA)
1253, 5 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 8609 (U.S.Ala.,May 14, 1973) (NO. 71-1694)
History
Direct History
1 Frontiero v. Laird, 341 F.Supp. 201, 9 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 1245, 4 Empl. Prac. Dec. P
7781 (M.D.Ala. Apr 05, 1972) (NO. CIV. A. 3232-N)
Probable Jurisdiction Noted by
2 Frontiero v. Laird, 409 U.S. 840, 93 S.Ct. 64, 34 L.Ed.2d 78 (U.S.Ala. Oct 10, 1972) (NO.
71-1694)
AND Judgment Reversed by
=> 3 Frontiero v. Richardson, 411 U.S. 677, 93 S.Ct. 1764, 36 L.Ed.2d 583, 9 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas.
(BNA) 1253, 5 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 8609 (U.S.Ala. May 14, 1973) (NO. 71-1694)
Negative Citing References (U.S.A.)
Called into Doubt by

4 Cohen v. Brown University, 101 F.3d 155, 65 USLW 2396, 114 Ed. Law Rep. 394, 45 Fed. R.
Evid. Serv. 1369 (1st Cir.(R.I.) Nov 21, 1996) (NO. 95-2205) HN: 1,2,3 (S.Ct.)
Distinguished by
5 Minner v. Minner, 19 Md.App. 154, 310 A.2d 208 (Md.App. Oct 23, 1973) (NO. 94)
HN: 4,5 (S.Ct.)
6 Application of Halligan, 76 Misc.2d 190, 350 N.Y.S.2d 63 (N.Y.Sup. Nov 27, 1973) HN: 4
(S.Ct.)
7 Kahn v. Shevin, 416 U.S. 351, 94 S.Ct. 1734, 40 L.Ed.2d 189 (U.S.Fla. Apr 24, 1974) (NO.
73-78) HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
8 Crawford v. Cushman, 378 F.Supp. 717, 12 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 494, 8 Empl. Prac. Dec.
P 9636 (D.Vt. Jul 12, 1974) (NO. CIV. 6216)
9 Hall v. McKenzie, 537 F.2d 1232 (4th Cir.(W.Va.) Jun 28, 1976) (NO. 75-2250)
10 Johnson v. U.S., 422 F.Supp. 958, 38 A.F.T.R.2d 76-6176, 76-2 USTC P 9798 (N.D.Ind. Nov 08,
1976) (NO. CIV F 74-111, CIV F 74-112, CIV F 74-113) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
11 Gaspard v. U.S., 713 F.2d 1097 (5th Cir.(La.) Sep 06, 1983) (NO. 82-3428, 82-4204) HN: 5
(S.Ct.)
12 Roberts v. Gulf Oil Corp., 147 Cal.App.3d 770, 195 Cal.Rptr. 393 (Cal.App. 5 Dist. Oct 04,
1983) (NO. CIV. 5934/F100) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
© 2010 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved.

13 State Management Ass'n of Connecticut, Inc. v. O'Neill, 40 Conn.Supp. 381, 512 A.2d 240
(Conn.Super. May 20, 1986) (NO. 267363) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
14 Pamella M. Doviak v. Department of the Navy, 1987 WL 908627, EEOC DOC 05860295
(E.E.O.C. Jan 21, 1987) (NO. APL 01860381, RQST 05860295)
15 Matter of: Lieutenant Colonel Joseph T. Ponder, USAF (Retired) - Claim for Basic Allowance
for Quarters, 1994 WL 101057, B- 254,646 (Comp.Gen. Mar 04, 1994) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
16 Baker v. State, 170 Vt. 194, 744 A.2d 864, 81 A.L.R.5th 627 (Vt. Dec 20, 1999) (NO.
1009-97CNC, 98-032) HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
17 Robinson v. U.S., 769 A.2d 747 (D.C. Mar 15, 2001) (NO. 98-CM-106, 98-CO-694) HN: 4
(S.Ct.)
18 Speigner v. Alexander, 248 F.3d 1292, 85 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 1112, 14 Fla. L. Weekly
Fed. C 647 (11th Cir.(Ala.) Apr 24, 2001) (NO. 00-13616) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
19 Booth v. Hvass, 302 F.3d 849 (8th Cir.(Minn.) Sep 11, 2002) (NO. 01-3210) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
20 Mauldin v. Texas State Bd. of Plumbing Examiners, 94 S.W.3d 867 (Tex.App.-Austin Dec 31,
2002) (NO. 03-02-00005-CV) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
21 Dibble v. Fenimore, 339 F.3d 120, 172 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3249 (2nd Cir.(N.Y.) Aug 08, 2003)
(NO. 00-6243) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
22 Maloney v. Social Sec. Admin., 2006 WL 1720399 (E.D.N.Y. Jun 19, 2006) (NO.
02-CV-1725(JFB)(SMG)) HN: 4,5 (S.Ct.)
23 Lawrence v. Board of Election Com'rs of City of Chicago, 524 F.Supp.2d 1011 (N.D.Ill. Feb 27,
2007) (NO. 07 C 566) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
24 Conaway v. Deane, 401 Md. 219, 932 A.2d 571 (Md. Sep 18, 2007) (NO. 44 SEPT.TERM 2006)
HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
Limitation of Holding Recognized by
25 Falkner v. State, 586 So.2d 39 (Ala.Crim.App. Jun 28, 1991) (NO. CR-89-632) HN:
1,3,4 (S.Ct.)
Court Documents
Appellate Court Documents (U.S.A.)
U.S. Appellate Briefs

26 Frontiero v. Laird, 1971 WL 134340 (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jan. 01, 1971) Brief for the Appel-
lants (NO. 71-1694)
27 Frontiero v. Laird, 1972 WL 137566 (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Dec. 27, 1972) Brief for the Ap-
pellees (NO. 71-1694)


Database: KEYCITE-HIST-IMG
Service: KeyCite
Lines: 1
Documents: 1
Images: 1
KEYCITE
1253, 5 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 8609 (U.S.Ala., May 14, 1973) (NO. 71-1694)


Database: KEYCITE-REFS
Service: KeyCite
Lines: 21180
Documents: 1
Images: 0
KEYCITE
1253, 5 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 8609 (U.S.Ala. May 14, 1973) (NO. 71-1694)
Citing References
Negative Cases (U.S.A.)
Called into Doubt by

1 Cohen v. Brown University, 101 F.3d 155, 179+, 65 USLW 2396, 2396+, 114 Ed. Law Rep. 394,
394+, 45 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 1369, 1369+ (1st Cir.(R.I.) Nov 21, 1996) (NO. 95-2205) "
HN: 1,2,3 (S.Ct.)
Distinguished by
2 Conaway v. Deane, 932 A.2d 571, 595+, 401 Md. 219, 259+ (Md. Sep 18, 2007) (NO. 44
SEPT.TERM 2006) " HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
3 Lawrence v. Board of Election Com'rs of City of Chicago, 524 F.Supp.2d 1011, 1025 (N.D.Ill.
Feb 27, 2007) (NO. 07 C 566) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
4 Maloney v. Social Sec. Admin., 2006 WL 1720399, *9+ (E.D.N.Y. Jun 19, 2006) (NO.
02-CV-1725(JFB)(SMG)) " HN: 4,5 (S.Ct.)
5 Dibble v. Fenimore, 339 F.3d 120, 126, 172 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3249, 3249 (2nd Cir.(N.Y.) Aug
08, 2003) (NO. 00-6243) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
6 Mauldin v. Texas State Bd. of Plumbing Examiners, 94 S.W.3d 867, 871+ (Tex.App.-Austin Dec
31, 2002) (NO. 03-02-00005-CV) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
7 Booth v. Hvass, 302 F.3d 849, 853 (8th Cir.(Minn.) Sep 11, 2002) (NO. 01-3210) HN: 2
(S.Ct.)
8 Speigner v. Alexander, 248 F.3d 1292, 1298, 85 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 1112, 1112, 14 Fla.
L. Weekly Fed. C 647, 647 (11th Cir.(Ala.) Apr 24, 2001) (NO. 00-13616) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
9 Robinson v. U.S., 769 A.2d 747, 757 (D.C. Mar 15, 2001) (NO. 98-CM-106, 98-CO-694) HN:
4 (S.Ct.)
10 Baker v. State, 744 A.2d 864, 880+, 170 Vt. 194, 215+, 81 A.L.R.5th 627, 627+ (Vt. Dec 20,
1999) (NO. 1009-97CNC, 98-032) " HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
11 Matter of: Lieutenant Colonel Joseph T. Ponder, USAF (Retired) - Claim for Basic Allowance
for Quarters, 1994 WL 101057, *1, B- 254,646, 254646 (Comp.Gen. Mar 04, 1994) HN: 5
(S.Ct.)
12 State Management Ass'n of Connecticut, Inc. v. O'Neill, 512 A.2d 240, 244, 40 Conn.Supp. 381,
386 (Conn.Super. May 20, 1986) (NO. 267363) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
13 Roberts v. Gulf Oil Corp., 195 Cal.Rptr. 393, 409+, 147 Cal.App.3d 770, 794+ (Cal.App. 5 Dist.
Oct 04, 1983) (NO. CIV. 5934/F100) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)

14 Gaspard v. U.S., 713 F.2d 1097, 1103 (5th Cir.(La.) Sep 06, 1983) (NO. 82-3428, 82-4204)
HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
15 Johnson v. U.S., 422 F.Supp. 958, 968+, 38 A.F.T.R.2d 76-6176, 76-6176+, 76-2 USTC P 9798,
9798+ (N.D.Ind. Nov 08, 1976) (NO. CIV F 74-111, CIV F 74-112, CIV F 74-113) HN:
5 (S.Ct.)
16 Hall v. McKenzie, 537 F.2d 1232, 1235 (4th Cir.(W.Va.) Jun 28, 1976) (NO. 75-2250)
17 Crawford v. Cushman, 378 F.Supp. 717, 724+, 12 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 494, 494+, 8 Em-
pl. Prac. Dec. P 9636, 9636+ (D.Vt. Jul 12, 1974) (NO. CIV. 6216)
18 Kahn v. Shevin, 94 S.Ct. 1734, 1735+, 416 U.S. 351, 351+, 40 L.Ed.2d 189, 189+ (U.S.Fla. Apr
24, 1974) (NO. 73-78) HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
19 Application of Halligan, 350 N.Y.S.2d 63, 67, 76 Misc.2d 190, 193 (N.Y.Sup. Nov 27, 1973)
HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
20 Minner v. Minner, 310 A.2d 208, 211+, 19 Md.App. 154, 159+ (Md.App. Oct 23, 1973) (NO. 94)
" HN: 4,5 (S.Ct.)
Limitation of Holding Recognized by

21 Falkner v. State, 586 So.2d 39, 43+ (Ala.Crim.App. Jun 28, 1991) (NO. CR-89-632) "
HN: 1,3,4 (S.Ct.)
Positive Cases (U.S.A.)
Examined
22 Califano v. Goldfarb, 97 S.Ct. 1021, 1023+, 430 U.S. 199, 199+, 51 L.Ed.2d 270, 270+, 13 Empl.
Prac. Dec. P 11,535, 11535+ (U.S.N.Y. Mar 02, 1977) (NO. 75-699) " HN: 2,4,5 (S.Ct.)
23 Craig v. Boren, 97 S.Ct. 451, 457+, 429 U.S. 190, 198+, 50 L.Ed.2d 397, 397+ (U.S.Okla. Dec
20, 1976) (NO. 75-628) " HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
24 Mathews v. Lucas, 96 S.Ct. 2755, 2758+, 427 U.S. 495, 496+, 49 L.Ed.2d 651, 651+ (U.S.R.I.
Jun 29, 1976) (NO. 75-88) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
25 Weinberger v. Wiesenfeld, 95 S.Ct. 1225, 1227+, 420 U.S. 636, 636+, 43 L.Ed.2d 514, 514+, 9
Empl. Prac. Dec. P 9998, 9998+ (U.S.N.J. Mar 19, 1975) (NO. 73-1892) HN: 4,5 (S.Ct.)
26 Schlesinger v. Ballard, 95 S.Ct. 572, 573+, 419 U.S. 498, 498+, 42 L.Ed.2d 610, 610+, 9 Fair
Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 33, 33+, 9 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 9894, 9894+ (U.S.Cal. Jan 15, 1975) (NO.
73-776) HN: 3,4,5 (S.Ct.)
27 Edwards v. Schlesinger, 377 F.Supp. 1091, 1094+, 19 Fed.R.Serv.2d 281, 281+ (D.D.C. Jun 19,
1974) (NO. CIV 1826-73, CIV. 1825-73) " HN: 3,4,5 (S.Ct.)
28 Silbowitz v. Secretary of Health, Ed. and Welfare, 397 F.Supp. 862, 865+ (S.D.Fla. Jun 20, 1975)
(NO. 74-924-CIV-CF, 74-925-CIV-CF) " HN: 2,4,5 (S.Ct.)
29 Jablon v. Secretary of Health, Ed. and Welfare, 399 F.Supp. 118, 126+ (D.Md. Jul 28, 1975)
(NO. CIV. K-74-739) HN: 2,4,5 (S.Ct.)
30 Wiesenfeld v. Secretary of Health, Educ. and Welfare, 367 F.Supp. 981, 984+ (D.N.J. Dec 11,
1973) (NO. CIV. A. 268-73) HN: 1,4,5 (S.Ct.)

31 Equality Foundation of Greater Cincinnati, Inc. v. City of Cincinnati, 860 F.Supp. 417, 434+, 65
Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 1167, 1167+, 65 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 43,199, 43199+ (S.D.Ohio Aug
09, 1994) (NO. C-1-93-773) HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
32 Smith v. City of East Cleveland, 363 F.Supp. 1131, 1138+, 6 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 493,
493+, 6 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 8831, 8831+ (N.D.Ohio Sep 06, 1973) (NO. C 73-299) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
33 Lewis v. Cohen, 417 F.Supp. 1047, 1054+, 12 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 575, 575+, 11 Empl.
Prac. Dec. P 10,857, 10857+ (E.D.Pa. Mar 05, 1976) (NO. 73-2876) " HN: 1,4,5 (S.Ct.)
34 Kohr v. Weinberger, 378 F.Supp. 1299, 1303+ (E.D.Pa. Jul 26, 1974) (NO. CIV. 73-1698) HN: 4
(S.Ct.)
35 Bowen v. Hackett, 361 F.Supp. 854, 860+ (D.R.I. Jul 13, 1973) (NO. CIV. A. 5038, CIV. A.
5043) " HN: 1,2,5 (S.Ct.)
36 U. S. v. Houston, 12 M.J. 907, 909+ (NMCMR Jan 22, 1982) (NO. NMCM 81 0286) " HN: 1,2,3
(S.Ct.)
37 Arp v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Bd., 132 Cal.Rptr. 112, 115+, 61 Cal.App.3d 296, 296+,
41 Cal. Comp. Cases 472, 472+ (Cal.App. 4 Dist. Aug 18, 1976) (NO. CIV. 14730) HN: 1,4,5
(S.Ct.)
38 Kerrigan v. Commissioner of Public Health, 957 A.2d 407, 426+, 289 Conn. 135, 165+ (Conn.
Oct 28, 2008) (NO. 17716) " HN: 1,4,5 (S.Ct.)
39 Baehr v. Lewin, 852 P.2d 44, 64+, 74 Haw. 530, 573+, 74 Haw. 645, 645+, 61 USLW 2697,
2697+ (Hawai'i May 05, 1993) (NO. 15689) " HN: 1,2,5 (S.Ct.)
40 Wengler v. Druggists Mut. Ins. Co., 583 S.W.2d 162, 165+, 20 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 30,159,
30159+ (Mo. Jun 27, 1979) (NO. 60442) HN: 4,5 (S.Ct.)
41 Palagonia v. City of Newark, 361 A.2d 581, 582+, 142 N.J.Super. 363, 366+ (N.J.Super.Ch. Jun
01, 1976) " HN: 1,2,5 (S.Ct.)
42 Passante v. Walden Printing Co., 385 N.Y.S.2d 178, 179+, 53 A.D.2d 8, 9+ (N.Y.A.D. 3 Dept.
Jul 01, 1976) " HN: 1,4,5 (S.Ct.)
Discussed
43 J.E.B. v. Alabama ex rel. T.B., 114 S.Ct. 1419, 1423+, 511 U.S. 127, 133+, 128 L.Ed.2d 89, 89+,
62 USLW 4219, 4219+, 64 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 42,967, 42967+ (U.S.Ala. Apr 19, 1994) (NO.
92-1239) " HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
44 City of Cleburne, Tex. v. Cleburne Living Center, 105 S.Ct. 3249, 3255+, 473 U.S. 432, 441+, 87
L.Ed.2d 313, 313+, 53 USLW 5022, 5022+ (U.S.Tex. Jul 01, 1985) (NO. 84-468) " HN: 1,2,4
(S.Ct.)
45 Mississippi University for Women v. Hogan, 102 S.Ct. 3331, 3336+, 458 U.S. 718, 725+, 73
L.Ed.2d 1090, 1090+, 29 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 32,868, 32868+, 5 Ed. Law Rep. 103, 103+
(U.S.Miss. Jul 01, 1982) (NO. 81-406) HN: 4,5 (S.Ct.)
46 Parham v. Hughes, 99 S.Ct. 1742, 1744+, 441 U.S. 347, 348+, 60 L.Ed.2d 269, 269+ (U.S.Ga.
Apr 24, 1979) (NO. 78-3) HN: 4,5 (S.Ct.)
47 Geduldig v. Aiello, 94 S.Ct. 2485, 2492+, 417 U.S. 484, 497+, 41 L.Ed.2d 256, 256+, 8 Fair Em-
pl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 97, 97+, 7 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 9432, 9432+ (U.S.Cal. Jun 17, 1974) (NO.

73-640) " HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.)

48 Crawford v. Cushman, 531 F.2d 1114, 1120+, 12 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 501, 501+, 11 Em-
pl. Prac. Dec. P 10,742, 10742+ (2nd Cir.(Vt.) Feb 23, 1976) (NO. 49, 75-7114) HN: 4,5 (S.Ct.)
49 Communications Workers of America, AFL-CIO v. American Tel. & Tel. Co., Long Lines Dept.,
513 F.2d 1024, 1029+, 10 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 435, 435+, 9 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 10,035,
10035+ (2nd Cir.(N.Y.) Mar 26, 1975) (NO. 461, 74-2191) " HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.)
50 Novotny v. Great American Federal Sav. and Loan Ass'n, 584 F.2d 1235, 1243+, 17 Fair Em-
pl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 1252, 1252+, 17 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 8576, 8576+ (3rd Cir.(Pa.) Aug 07,
1978) (NO. 77-1756) " HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
51 Vorchheimer v. School Dist. of Philadelphia, 532 F.2d 880, 885+ (3rd Cir.(Pa.) Mar 16, 1976)
(NO. 75-2005) HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
52 Knussman v. Maryland, 272 F.3d 625, 635+, 81 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 40,804, 40804+, 7 Wage &
Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 710, 710+ (4th Cir.(Md.) Nov 07, 2001) (NO. 99-2349) " HN: 4,5 (S.Ct.)
53 Davis v. Passman, 544 F.2d 865, 868+, 14 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 177, 177+, 13 Empl. Prac.
Dec. P 11,465, 11465+ (5th Cir.(La.) Jan 03, 1977) (NO. 75-1691) HN: 1,2 (S.Ct.)
54 Yellow Springs Exempted Village School Dist. Bd. of Ed. v. Ohio High School Athletic Ass'n,
647 F.2d 651, 664+ (6th Cir.(Ohio) Apr 28, 1981) (NO. 78-3131, 78-3132) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
55 Ogden v. U.S., 758 F.2d 1168, 1176+ (7th Cir.(Ill.) Mar 29, 1985) (NO. 83-3191) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
56 Denberg v. U.S. R.R. Retirement Bd., 696 F.2d 1193, 1206+ (7th Cir.(Ill.) Jan 04, 1983) (NO.
81-2386) (in dissent) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
57 Miller v. Carter, 547 F.2d 1314, 1321+ (7th Cir.(Ill.) Jan 04, 1977) (NO. 75-1162) " HN: 1,5
(S.Ct.)
58 White v. Fleming, 522 F.2d 730, 733+, 11 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 619, 619+, 10 Empl. Prac.
Dec. P 10,313, 10313+ (7th Cir.(Wis.) Jul 24, 1975) (NO. 74-1592) " HN: 1,2,4 (S.Ct.)
59 Bull v. City and County of San Francisco, 595 F.3d 964, 977+, 10 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1767,
1767+, 2010 Daily Journal D.A.R. 2209, 2209+ (9th Cir.(Cal.) Feb 09, 2010) (NO. 05-17080,
06-15566) " HN: 3 (S.Ct.)
60 Watkins v. U.S. Army, 875 F.2d 699, 724+, 57 USLW 2662, 2662+, 49 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas.
(BNA) 1763, 1763+, 50 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 38,967, 38967+ (9th Cir.(Wash.) May 03, 1989)
(NO. 85-4006) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
61 Watkins v. U.S. Army, 837 F.2d 1428, 1444+, 56 USLW 2470, 2470+, 46 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas.
(BNA) 16, 16+, 45 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 37,753, 37753+ (9th Cir.(Wash.) Feb 10, 1988) (NO.
85-4006) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
62 Watkins v. U.S. Army, 847 F.2d 1329, 1345+, 2 IER Cases 1836, 1836+ (9th Cir.(Wash.) Feb 10,
1988) (NO. 85-4006) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
63 Edwards v. Heckler, 770 F.2d 1496, 1500+, 10 Soc.Sec.Rep.Serv. 432, 432+ (9th Cir.(Cal.) Sep
13, 1985) (NO. 82-4156, 83-1652, 83-1672) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
64 Edwards v. Heckler, 789 F.2d 659, 663+, 13 Soc.Sec.Rep.Serv. 320, 320+, Unempl.Ins.Rep.
(CCH) P 16,283, 16283+ (9th Cir.(Cal.) Sep 13, 1985) (NO. 82-4156, 83-1652, 83-1672) HN: 4
(S.Ct.)
65 Olagues v. Russoniello, 770 F.2d 791, 801+ (9th Cir.(Cal.) Sep 03, 1985) (NO. 82-4427,

83-2581) " HN: 4 (S.Ct.)

66 De La Cruz v. Tormey, 582 F.2d 45, 51+ (9th Cir.(Cal.) Sep 13, 1978) (NO. 76-2791, 76-3355) "
HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
67 Berkelman v. San Francisco Unified School Dist., 501 F.2d 1264, 1269+ (9th Cir.(Cal.) Jul 01,
1974) (NO. 73-1686) HN: 1,2,3 (S.Ct.)
68 Downen v. Warner, 481 F.2d 642, 643+, 8 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 332, 332+, 6 Empl. Prac.
Dec. P 8710, 8710+ (9th Cir.(Cal.) Jul 02, 1973) (NO. 71-2683) " HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
69 Blake v. City of Los Angeles, 435 F.Supp. 55, 59+, 14 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 7668, 7668+ (C.D.Cal.
May 13, 1977) (NO. CV 73-1962-JWC) HN: 2,5 (S.Ct.)
70 Saum v. Widnall, 912 F.Supp. 1384, 1393+ (D.Colo. Jan 29, 1996) (NO. CIV. A. 95-K-1340)
HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
71 Owens v. Brown, 455 F.Supp. 291, 294+, 17 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 1292, 1292+, 56 A.L.R.
Fed. 823, 823+, 17 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 8495, 8495+ (D.D.C. Jul 27, 1978) (NO. CIV. 76-2086)
HN: 4,5 (S.Ct.)
72 Coffin v. Secretary of Health, Ed. and Welfare, 400 F.Supp. 953, 957+ (D.D.C. Jul 15, 1975)
(NO. CIV. 1890-73) HN: 4,5 (S.Ct.)
73 Counts v. U.S. Postal Service, 1978 WL 154, *3+, 17 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 1161, 1161+,
18 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 8788, 8788+ (N.D.Fla. Apr 24, 1978) (NO. GCA 77-0028) " HN: 1,2
(S.Ct.)
74 Sterling v. Harris, 478 F.Supp. 1046, 1049+ (N.D.Ill. Oct 05, 1979) (NO. 73 C 2337, 73 C 3070)
" HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
75 Polelle v. Secretary of Health, Ed. and Welfare of U.S., 386 F.Supp. 443, 445+ (N.D.Ill. Apr 19,
1974) (NO. 73 C 774) " HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
76 Gilpin v. Kansas State High School Activities Ass'n, Inc., 377 F.Supp. 1233, 1239+ (D.Kan. Nov
30, 1973) (NO. CIV. W-5366) " HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.)
77 Yates v. Califano, 471 F.Supp. 84, 85+ (W.D.Ky. Jan 25, 1979) (NO. C 77-0323-L(B)) HN: 5
(S.Ct.)
78 Johnston v. Hodges, 372 F.Supp. 1015, 1018+ (E.D.Ky. Mar 25, 1974) (NO. 420) " HN: 1,3
(S.Ct.)
79 Westcott v. Califano, 460 F.Supp. 737, 747+ (D.Mass. Apr 20, 1978) (NO. CIV. 77-222-F) HN:
5 (S.Ct.)
80 Anthony v. Com. of Mass., 415 F.Supp. 485, 495+, 12 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 915, 915+, 12
Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 1824, 1824+, 12 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 10,991, 10991+ (D.Mass. Mar
29, 1976) (NO. CIV. 74-5061-T, CIV. 75-1991-T) HN: 1,3,4 (S.Ct.)
81 Vanguard Justice Soc. Inc. v. Hughes, 471 F.Supp. 670, 697+, 19 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA)
587, 587+, 20 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 30,077, 30077+ (D.Md. Mar 20, 1979) (NO. CIV. 73-1105-K,
CIV. 73-1106-K, CIV. K-74-71) " HN: 1,3,4 (S.Ct.)
82 Sauerhoff v. Hearst Corp., 388 F.Supp. 117, 125+ (D.Md. Dec 19, 1974) (NO. CIV. 72-1189-K)
HN: 3 (S.Ct.)
83 Andrews v. Drew Municipal Separate School Dist., 371 F.Supp. 27, 36+, 6 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas.
(BNA) 872, 872+, 6 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 8727, 8727+ (N.D.Miss. Jul 03, 1973) (NO. GC

73-20-K) " HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.)

84 Force by Force v. Pierce City R-VI School Dist., 570 F.Supp. 1020, 1024+, 13 Ed. Law Rep. 959,
959+ (W.D.Mo. Aug 15, 1983) (NO. 82-5093-CV-SW-0) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
85 U.S. v. Reiser, 394 F.Supp. 1060, 1063+ (D.Mont. May 16, 1975) (NO. CRIM 4517) HN: 1,4,5
(S.Ct.)
86 Able v. U.S., 968 F.Supp. 850, 862+, 71 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 44,999, 44999+ (E.D.N.Y. Jul 02,
1997) (NO. 94 CV 0974) " HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
87 Trautz v. Weisman, 819 F.Supp. 282, 292+, 61 USLW 2614, 2614+, RICO Bus.Disp.Guide 8301,
8301+, 2 A.D. Cases 657, 657+, 2 A.D.D. 45, 45+, 3 NDLR P 353, 353+ (S.D.N.Y. Apr 06,
1993) (NO. 92 CIV. 0534 (GLG)) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
88 Weistrop v. Sec. of HHS, 1983 WL 115155, *2+, Unempl.Ins.Rep. (CCH) P 15,563, 15563+
(S.D.N.Y. Jun 23, 1983) (NO. 80 CIV. 5429 (WK)) " HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
89 Novak v. Harris, 504 F.Supp. 101, 104+ (E.D.N.Y. Jul 28, 1980) (NO. 79- C 924) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
90 Braunstein v. Dwelling Managers, Inc., 476 F.Supp. 1323, 1328+ (S.D.N.Y. Sep 18, 1979) (NO.
78 CIV. 509) " HN: 2,4 (S.Ct.)
91 O'Neill v. Dent, 364 F.Supp. 565, 578+ (E.D.N.Y. Jul 16, 1973) (NO. 71-C-1480) " HN: 3,5
(S.Ct.)
92 Hutchison v. Lake Oswego School Dist. No. 7, 374 F.Supp. 1056, 1061+, 8 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas.
(BNA) 276, 276+, 8 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 9578, 9578+ (D.Or. Apr 25, 1974) (NO. CIV. 73-339) "
HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
93 Doe v. Colautti, 454 F.Supp. 621, 631+ (E.D.Pa. Jun 21, 1978) (NO. CIV. 78-1413) " HN: 1
(S.Ct.)
94 Vorchheimer v. School Dist. of Philadelphia, 400 F.Supp. 326, 337+ (E.D.Pa. Aug 07, 1975)
(NO. CIV. 74-791) " HN: 1,4,5 (S.Ct.)
95 Pendrell v. Chatham College, 370 F.Supp. 494, 500+, 7 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 163, 163+, 7
Empl. Prac. Dec. P 9188, 9188+ (W.D.Pa. Jan 23, 1974) (NO. CIV. 71-1160) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
96 U.S. v. Yingling, 368 F.Supp. 379, 385+ (W.D.Pa. Dec 20, 1973) (NO. CRIM. A. 73-275) " HN:
4 (S.Ct.)
97 Stern v. Massachusetts Indem. & Life Ins. Co., 365 F.Supp. 433, 441+ (E.D.Pa. Oct 12, 1973)
(NO. CIV. A. 71-2987) " HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
98 Lucas v. Secretary, Dept. of Health, Ed. and Welfare, 390 F.Supp. 1310, 1312+ (D.R.I. Feb 25,
1975) (NO. CIV. 4845) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
99 Women's Liberation Union of Rhode Island, Inc. v. Israel, 379 F.Supp. 44, 51+ (D.R.I. Jul 23,
1974) (NO. CIV. 74-139) " HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
100 Cash v. Califano, 469 F.Supp. 129, 133+ (W.D.Va. Mar 13, 1979) (NO. CIV. 78-0042-A) HN:
4,5 (S.Ct.)
101 Crumpler v. Califano, 443 F.Supp. 342, 345+ (E.D.Va. Jan 05, 1978) (NO. CIV. 77-0221-R)
102 White v. Flemming, 374 F.Supp. 267, 270+, 8 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 40, 40+, 8 Empl. Prac.
Dec. P 9504, 9504+ (E.D.Wis. May 07, 1974) (NO. CIV. 70-C-704) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
103 Carrasco v. Secretary of Health, Ed. and Welfare, 463 F.Supp. 1287, 1289+ (D.Puerto Rico Jan
29, 1979) (NO. CIV. 77-1843) " HN: 4,5 (S.Ct.)

104 Ex parte Devine, 398 So.2d 686, 692+ (Ala. Mar 27, 1981) (NO. 79-546) HN: 4,5 (S.Ct.)
105 Orr v. Orr, 351 So.2d 906, 907+ (Ala. Nov 10, 1977) (NO. SC 2536) (in dissent) HN: 1,2,4
(S.Ct.)
106 Peddy v. Montgomery, 345 So.2d 631, 635+ (Ala. Apr 22, 1977) (NO. SC 1693) " HN: 4,5
(S.Ct.)
107 Padilla v. Industrial Commission, 535 P.2d 634, 638+, 24 Ariz.App. 42, 46+ (Ariz.App. Div. 1
May 15, 1975) (NO. 1 CA-IC 1136) HN: 4,5 (S.Ct.)
108 Arp v. Workers' Comp. Appeals Bd., 138 Cal.Rptr. 293, 295+, 563 P.2d 849, 851+, 19 Cal.3d
395, 399+, 42 Cal. Comp. Cases 369, 369+ (Cal. May 05, 1977) (NO. L.A.30685) HN: 4,5
(S.Ct.)
109 In re Marriage of Iverson, 15 Cal.Rptr.2d 70, 73+, 11 Cal.App.4th 1495, 1500+ (Cal.App. 4 Dist.
Dec 29, 1992) (NO. G008570) " HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
110 Page v. Welfare Com'r, 365 A.2d 1118, 1123+, 170 Conn. 258, 265+ (Conn. Feb 24, 1976) HN:
1 (S.Ct.)
111 Stern v. Stern, 332 A.2d 78, 81+, 165 Conn. 190, 194+ (Conn. Jun 29, 1973) " HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
112 Wendt v. Wendt, 1998 WL 161165, *75+ (Conn.Super. Mar 31, 1998) (NO. FA96 0149562 S) "
HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
113 Dean v. District of Columbia, 653 A.2d 307, 338+, 63 USLW 2449, 2449+ (D.C. Jan 19, 1995)
(NO. 92-CV-737) " HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
114 M. v. M., 321 A.2d 115, 117+ (Del.Supr. Apr 18, 1974) " HN: 1,2,3 (S.Ct.)
115 State v. Brothers, 384 A.2d 402, 403+ (Del.Super. Mar 28, 1978) HN: 1,2,4 (S.Ct.)
116 Harrigfeld v. District Court of Seventh Judicial Dist. In and For Freemont County, 511 P.2d 822,
825+, 95 Idaho 540, 543+ (Idaho Jul 05, 1973) (NO. 11281) " HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
117 People v. Mitchell, 593 N.E.2d 882, 885+, 228 Ill.App.3d 917, 921+, 171 Ill.Dec. 62, 65+
(Ill.App. 1 Dist. May 12, 1992) (NO. 1-89-2232) " HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
118 Indiana High School Athletic Ass'n v. Raike, 329 N.E.2d 66, 72+, 164 Ind.App. 169, 177+
(Ind.App. 2 Dist. May 12, 1975) (NO. 2-273A38) HN: 1,2 (S.Ct.)
119 Varnum v. Brien, 763 N.W.2d 862, 888+ (Iowa Apr 03, 2009) (NO. 07-1499) " HN: 1,2,4 (S.Ct.)
120 Loyacano v. Loyacano, 358 So.2d 304, 307+ (La. Jan 30, 1978) (NO. 59688) " HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
121 Maryland State Bd. of Barber Examiners v. Kuhn, 312 A.2d 216, 221+, 270 Md. 496, 506+ (Md.
Dec 05, 1973) (NO. 90) " HN: 1,3,4 (S.Ct.)
122 State v. Rundlett, 391 A.2d 815, 817+ (Me. Sep 20, 1978) " HN: 1,2 (S.Ct.)
123 Application of Maples, 563 S.W.2d 760, 764+ (Mo. Apr 10, 1978) (NO. 60187) HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
124 State v. Pullen, 1992 WL 121791, *8+ (Mo.App. E.D. Jun 09, 1992) (NO. 56820, 58075) " HN:
1,4 (S.Ct.)
125 Smith v. Keator, 206 S.E.2d 203, 209+, 285 N.C. 530, 540+, 10 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA)
1209, 1209+, 8 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 9686, 9686+ (N.C. Jul 01, 1974) (NO. 82) HN: 4,5 (S.Ct.)
126 Smith v. Keator, 203 S.E.2d 411, 416+, 21 N.C.App. 102, 108+, 7 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA)
1312, 1312+, 8 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 9453, 9453+ (N.C.App. Mar 20, 1974) (NO. 7412SC147)
HN: 1,2,5 (S.Ct.)

127 Tharaldson v. Unsatisfied Judgment Fund, 225 N.W.2d 39, 46+ (N.D. Dec 19, 1974) (NO. CIV
8903) " HN: 1,2 (S.Ct.)
128 Johnson v. Hassett, 217 N.W.2d 771, 775+ (N.D. Mar 29, 1974) (NO. CIV. 8968) " HN: 1,2
(S.Ct.)
129 Tomarchio v. Greenwich Tp., 379 A.2d 848, 850+, 75 N.J. 62, 67+ (N.J. Nov 03, 1977) HN: 1,4
(S.Ct.)
130 Mills v. Atlantic City Dept. of Vital Statistics, 372 A.2d 646, 653+, 148 N.J.Super. 302, 315+
(N.J.Super.Ch. Feb 04, 1977) " HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
131 Breen v. Carlsbad Mun. Schools, 120 P.3d 413, 419+, 138 N.M. 331, 337+, 2005-NMSC-028,
028+ (N.M. Aug 15, 2005) (NO. 27,950) " HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
132 New Mexico Right to Choose/NARAL v. Johnson, 975 P.2d 841, 851+, 126 N.M. 788, 788+,
1999-NMSC-005, 005+ (N.M. Nov 25, 1998) (NO. 23,239) " HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
133 Lief v. Hynes, 414 N.Y.S.2d 855, 858+, 98 Misc.2d 817, 820+ (N.Y.Sup. Mar 09, 1979) " HN:
1,4 (S.Ct.)
134 Thaler v. Thaler, 391 N.Y.S.2d 331, 335+, 89 Misc.2d 315, 319+ (N.Y.Sup. Jan 19, 1977) " HN:
2,4,5 (S.Ct.)
135 Bon-R Reproductions, Inc. v. Gift Mate, Ltd., 365 N.Y.S.2d 645, 650+, 81 Misc.2d 630, 634+
(N.Y.City Civ.Ct. Feb 27, 1975) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
136 Matter of Proceeding for Support Under Article 4 of Family Court Act, 380 N.Y.S.2d 904, 907+,
85 Misc.2d 637, 640+ (N.Y.Fam.Ct. Feb 18, 1976) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.)
137 Gordon v. Gordon, 577 P.2d 1271, 1275+, 1978 OK 17, 17+ (Okla. Feb 07, 1978) (NO. 49371) "
HN: 1,4,5 (S.Ct.)
138 Matter of Compensation of Williams, 653 P.2d 970, 974+, 294 Or. 33, 39+ (Or. Nov 16, 1982)
(NO. 19548, SC28252) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
139 Lewis v. Department of Revenue, 1981 WL 2271, *2+, 9 Or. Tax 85, 87+ (Or.Tax Jun 01, 1981)
HN: 4,5 (S.Ct.)
140 Newberg v. Board of Public Educ., 1983 WL 370, *13+, 26 Pa. D. & C.3d 682, 700+
(Pa.Com.Pl. Sep 28, 1983) " HN: 1,2,3 (S.Ct.)
141 Elizabeth Newberg et al. v. Board of Public Education et al., 1983 WL 265443, *265443+, 9
Phila.Co.Rptr. 556, 560+ (Pa.Com.Pl. Aug 30, 1983) (NO. NO. 5822.) " HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.)
142 Hanson v. Hutt, 517 P.2d 599, 602+, 83 Wash.2d 195, 200+ (Wash. Dec 20, 1973) (NO. 42826) "
HN: 1,4,5 (S.Ct.)
143 Swanson v. Kramer, 512 P.2d 721, 727+, 82 Wash.2d 511, 521+ (Wash. Jul 19, 1973) (NO.
42502) " HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
144 Warshafsky v. Journal Co., 216 N.W.2d 197, 200+, 63 Wis.2d 130, 137+, 7 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas.
(BNA) 1105, 1105+, 7 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 9264, 9264+ (Wis. Apr 02, 1974) (NO. 273) HN: 1,2
(S.Ct.)
145 Peters v. Narick, 270 S.E.2d 760, 763+, 165 W.Va. 622, 626+ (W.Va. Oct 02, 1980) (NO. 14776)
HN: 1,2 (S.Ct.)
Cited

146 AT & T Corp. v. Hulteen, 129 S.Ct. 1962, 1979+, 173 L.Ed.2d 898, 898+, 77 USLW 4399,
4399+, 106 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 289, 289+, 92 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 43,561, 43561+, 46
Employee Benefits Cas. 2281, 2281+, 09 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5953, 5953+, 2009 Daily Journal
D.A.R. 7019, 7019+, Pens. Plan Guide (CCH) P 24004Z, 24004Z+, 21 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S
847, 847+ (U.S. May 18, 2009) (NO. 07-543) (in dissent) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
147 Van Orden v. Perry, 125 S.Ct. 2854, 2888, 545 U.S. 677, 732, 162 L.Ed.2d 607, 607, 73 USLW
4690, 4690, 05 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5652, 5652, 5 Daily Journal D.A.R. 7695, 7695, 18 Fla. L.
Weekly Fed. S 494, 494 (U.S. Jun 27, 2005) (NO. 03-1500) (in dissent)
148 Gratz v. Bollinger, 123 S.Ct. 2411, 2430, 539 U.S. 244, 275, 156 L.Ed.2d 257, 257, 71 USLW
4480, 4480, 91 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 1803, 1803, 84 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 41,416, 41416,
177 Ed. Law Rep. 851, 851, 03 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5362, 5362, 2003 Daily Journal D.A.R.
6783, 6783, 16 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 387, 387 (U.S. Jun 23, 2003) (NO. 02-516)
149 Nevada Dept. of Human Resources v. Hibbs, 123 S.Ct. 1972, 1979, 538 U.S. 721, 730, 155
L.Ed.2d 953, 953, 71 USLW 4375, 4375, 84 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 41,391, 41391, 148 Lab.Cas. P
34,704, 34704, 8 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 1221, 1221, 26 NDLR P 35, 35, 03 Cal. Daily Op.
Serv. 4388, 4388, 2003 Daily Journal D.A.R. 5569, 5569, 16 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 291 (U.S.
May 27, 2003) (NO. 01-1368) " HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
150 Tuan Anh Nguyen v. I.N.S., 121 S.Ct. 2053, 2066+, 533 U.S. 53, 74+, 150 L.Ed.2d 115, 115+,
178 A.L.R. Fed. 587, 587+, 01 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4754, 4754+, 2001 Daily Journal D.A.R.
5887, 5887+, 14 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 347, 347+, 2001 DJCAR 2958, 2958+ (U.S. Jun 11, 2001)
(NO. 99-2071) (in dissent) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
151 U.S. v. Virginia, 116 S.Ct. 2264, 2275+, 518 U.S. 515, 531+, 135 L.Ed.2d 735, 735+, 64 USLW
4638, 4638+, 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4694, 4694+, 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 7573, 7573+, 96
Daily Journal D.A.R. 7625, 7625+ (U.S.Va. Jun 26, 1996) (NO. 94-1941, 94-2107) " HN: 1,4
(S.Ct.)
152 Adarand Constructors, Inc. v. Pena, 115 S.Ct. 2097, 2107+, 515 U.S. 200, 217+, 132 L.Ed.2d
158, 158+, 63 USLW 4523, 4523+, 67 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 1828, 1828+, 66 Empl. Prac.
Dec. P 43,556, 43556+, 78 Rad. Reg. 2d (P & F) 357, 357+, 40 Cont.Cas.Fed. (CCH) P 76,756,
76756+ (U.S.Colo. Jun 12, 1995) (NO. 93-1841) HN: 1,2 (S.Ct.)
153 Weiss v. U.S., 114 S.Ct. 752, 769, 510 U.S. 163, 195, 127 L.Ed.2d 1, 1, 62 USLW 4047, 4047
(U.S. Jan 19, 1994) (NO. 92-1482)
154 Bray v. Alexandria Women's Health Clinic, 113 S.Ct. 753, 789+, 506 U.S. 263, 327+, 122
L.Ed.2d 34, 34+, 61 USLW 4080, 4080+, 169 A.L.R. Fed. 649, 649+ (U.S.Va. Jan 13, 1993)
155 International Union, United Auto., Aerospace and Agr. Implement Workers of America, UAW v.
Johnson Controls, Inc., 111 S.Ct. 1196, 1212, 499 U.S. 187, 215, 113 L.Ed.2d 158, 158, 59
USLW 4209, 4209, 55 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 365, 365, 55 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 40,605,
40605, 14 O.S.H. Cas. (BNA) 2102, 2102, 1991 O.S.H.D. (CCH) P 29,256, 29256 (U.S.Wis. Mar
20, 1991) (NO. 89-1215) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
156 Metro Broadcasting, Inc. v. F.C.C., 110 S.Ct. 2997, 3030, 497 U.S. 547, 605, 111 L.Ed.2d 445,
445, 58 USLW 5053, 5053, 53 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 161, 161, 53 Empl. Prac. Dec. P
40,037, 40037 (U.S.Dist.Col. Jun 27, 1990) (NO. 89-453, 89-700) (in dissent) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
157 City of Richmond v. J.A. Croson Co., 109 S.Ct. 706, 729, 488 U.S. 469, 508, 102 L.Ed.2d 854,

854, 57 USLW 4132, 4132, 53 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 197, 197, 48 Empl. Prac. Dec. P
38,578, 38578, 36 Cont.Cas.Fed. (CCH) P 76,005, 76005 (U.S.Va. Jan 23, 1989) (NO. 87-998) "
HN: 3 (S.Ct.)
158 Roberts v. U.S. Jaycees, 104 S.Ct. 3244, 3253+, 468 U.S. 609, 625+, 82 L.Ed.2d 462, 462+
(U.S.Minn. Jul 03, 1984) (NO. 83-724)
159 Heckler v. Mathews, 104 S.Ct. 1387, 1396+, 465 U.S. 728, 740+, 79 L.Ed.2d 646, 646+, 33 Em-
pl. Prac. Dec. P 34,190, 34190+, 4 Soc.Sec.Rep.Serv. 4, 4+, Unempl.Ins.Rep. (CCH) P 15,159,
15159+ (U.S.Ala. Mar 05, 1984) (NO. 82-1050)
160 Marsh v. Chambers, 103 S.Ct. 3330, 3349, 463 U.S. 783, 817, 77 L.Ed.2d 1019, 1019 (U.S.Neb.
Jul 05, 1983) (NO. 82-23) (in dissent) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
161 Newport News Shipbuilding and Dry Dock Co. v. E.E.O.C., 103 S.Ct. 2622, 2628+, 462 U.S.
669, 677+, 77 L.Ed.2d 89, 89+, 32 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 1, 1+, 32 Empl. Prac. Dec. P
33,673, 33673+, 4 Employee Benefits Cas. 1553, 1553+ (U.S.Va. Jun 20, 1983) (NO. 82-411)
HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
162 Michael M. v. Superior Court of Sonoma County, 101 S.Ct. 1200, 1208+, 450 U.S. 464, 476+, 67
L.Ed.2d 437, 437+ (U.S.Cal. Mar 23, 1981) (NO. 79-1344) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
163 Schweiker v. Wilson, 101 S.Ct. 1074, 1080+, 450 U.S. 221, 230+, 67 L.Ed.2d 186, 186+ (U.S.Ill.
Mar 04, 1981) (NO. 79-1380)
164 Wengler v. Druggists Mut. Ins. Co., 100 S.Ct. 1540, 1544+, 446 U.S. 142, 149+, 64 L.Ed.2d 107,
107+, 22 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 30,856, 30856+ (U.S.Mo. Apr 22, 1980) (NO. 79-381) HN: 4,5
(S.Ct.)
165 Califano v. Westcott, 99 S.Ct. 2655, 2660+, 443 U.S. 76, 84+, 61 L.Ed.2d 382, 382+ (U.S.Mass.
Jun 25, 1979) (NO. 78-437, 78-689) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
166 Personnel Adm'r of Massachusetts v. Feeney, 99 S.Ct. 2282, 2293+, 442 U.S. 256, 273+, 60
L.Ed.2d 870, 870+, 19 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 1377, 1377+, 19 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 9240,
9240+ (U.S.Mass. Jun 05, 1979) (NO. 78-233) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
167 Greenholtz v. Inmates of Nebraska Penal and Correctional Complex, 99 S.Ct. 2100, 2117, 442
U.S. 1, 32, 60 L.Ed.2d 668, 668 (U.S.Neb. May 29, 1979) (NO. 78-201) (in dissent)
168 Orr v. Orr, 99 S.Ct. 1102, 1118, 440 U.S. 268, 292, 59 L.Ed.2d 306, 306 (U.S.Ala. Mar 05, 1979)
169 Regents of University of California v. Bakke, 98 S.Ct. 2733, 2784, 438 U.S. 265, 361, 57
L.Ed.2d 750, 750, 17 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 1000, 1000, 17 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 8402, 8402
(U.S.Cal. Jun 28, 1978) (NO. 76-811)
170 Dothard v. Rawlinson, 97 S.Ct. 2720, 2729, 433 U.S. 321, 335, 53 L.Ed.2d 786, 786, 15 Fair Em-
pl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 10, 10, 14 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 7632, 7632 (U.S.Ala. Jun 27, 1977) (NO.
76-422)
171 Califano v. Webster, 97 S.Ct. 1192, 1196+, 430 U.S. 313, 320+, 51 L.Ed.2d 360, 360+ (U.S.N.Y.
Mar 21, 1977) (NO. 76-457) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
172 General Elec. Co. v. Gilbert, 97 S.Ct. 401, 407+, 429 U.S. 125, 134+, 50 L.Ed.2d 343, 343+, 13
Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 1657, 1657+, 12 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 11,240, 11240+, 1 Employee
Benefits Cas. 1046, 1046+ (U.S.Va. Dec 07, 1976) (NO. 74-1589, 74-1590) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)

173 Massachusetts Bd. of Retirement v. Murgia, 96 S.Ct. 2562, 2569+, 427 U.S. 307, 319+, 49
L.Ed.2d 520, 520+, 12 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 1569, 1569+, 12 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 10,998,
10998+, 1 Employee Benefits Cas. 1032, 1032+ (U.S.Mass. Jun 25, 1976) (NO. 74-1044) (in dis-
sent) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
174 Arnett v. Kennedy, 94 S.Ct. 1633, 1670+, 416 U.S. 134, 206+, 40 L.Ed.2d 15, 15+ (U.S.Ill. Apr
16, 1974) (NO. 72-1118) HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
175 Johnson v. Robison, 94 S.Ct. 1160, 1165+, 415 U.S. 361, 366+, 39 L.Ed.2d 389, 389+
(U.S.Mass. Mar 04, 1974) (NO. 72-1297) " HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
176 Memorial Hospital v. Maricopa County, 94 S.Ct. 1076, 1084, 415 U.S. 250, 262, 39 L.Ed.2d 306,
306 (U.S.Ariz. Feb 26, 1974) (NO. 72-847) "
177 Cleveland Bd. of Educ. v. LaFleur, 94 S.Ct. 791, 803, 414 U.S. 632, 653, 39 L.Ed.2d 52, 52, 6
Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 1253, 1253, 7 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 9072, 9072 (U.S.Ohio Jan 21,
1974) (NO. 72-1129, 72-777) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
178 Vlandis v. Kline, 93 S.Ct. 2230, 2239+, 412 U.S. 441, 458+, 37 L.Ed.2d 63, 63+ (U.S.Conn. Jun
11, 1973) (NO. 72-493) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
179 New England Baptist Hosp. v. U.S., 807 F.2d 280, 283, 59 A.F.T.R.2d 87-363, 87-363, 87-1
USTC P 9113, 9113, 8 Employee Benefits Cas. 1088, 1088, Unempl.Ins.Rep. (CCH) P 17,087,
17087 (1st Cir.(Mass.) Dec 17, 1986) (NO. 86-1540)
180 Rodriguez v. Secretary of Health, Ed. & Welfare, 644 F.2d 918, 921 (1st Cir.(Puerto Rico) Mar
30, 1981) (NO. 80-1381) " HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
181 Friedman v. Harold, 638 F.2d 262, 269 (1st Cir.(Mass.) Jan 13, 1981) (NO. 80-1050)
182 Meloon v. Helgemoe, 564 F.2d 602, 604+ (1st Cir.(N.H.) Oct 31, 1977) (NO. 77-1197) HN: 2
(S.Ct.)
183 Peltier v. Peltier, 548 F.2d 1083, 1084 (1st Cir.(R.I.) Feb 09, 1977) (NO. 76-1478)
184 U.S. v. Harris, 537 F.2d 563, 565 (1st Cir.(Mass.) Jun 25, 1976) (NO. 75-1422) "
185 Women's Liberation Union of Rhode Island v. Israel, 512 F.2d 106, 108 (1st Cir.(R.I.) Mar 04,
1975) (NO. 74-1297) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
186 Lewis v. Thompson, 252 F.3d 567, 583+, 74 Soc.Sec.Rep.Serv. 167, 167+ (2nd Cir.(N.Y.) May
22, 2001) (NO. 00-6104) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
187 Pinnacle Nursing Home v. Axelrod, 928 F.2d 1306, 1317, 33 Soc.Sec.Rep.Serv. 17, 17, Med &
Med GD (CCH) P 39,194, 39194 (2nd Cir.(N.Y.) Mar 25, 1991) (NO. 1090, 1091, 1192, 1193,
90-6295, 90-6297, 90-6307, 90-6313) " HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
188 New York State Nat. Organization for Women v. Terry, 886 F.2d 1339, 1359, 14 Fed.R.Serv.3d
922, 922 (2nd Cir.(N.Y.) Sep 20, 1989) (NO. 88-7873, 88-7915, 88-7969, 88-9103, 89-7121,
906, 907, 908, 978) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
189 Alma Soc. Inc. v. Mellon, 601 F.2d 1225, 1234 (2nd Cir.(N.Y.) Jun 22, 1979) (NO. 666,
78-7593)
190 Johnson v. Lefkowitz, 566 F.2d 866, 869, 16 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 239, 239, 15 Empl.
Prac. Dec. P 7996, 7996 (2nd Cir.(N.Y.) Dec 14, 1977) (NO. 381, 77-7282) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
191 Taylor v. Lavine, 497 F.2d 1208, 1218 (2nd Cir.(N.Y.) May 14, 1974) (NO. 669, 701, 73-2671,

192 Farber v. City of Paterson, 440 F.3d 131, 142, 179 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2193, 2193, 152 Lab.Cas. P
60,174, 60174, 24 IER Cases 281, 281 (3rd Cir.(N.J.) Mar 08, 2006) (NO. 04-4498)
193 Jorden v. National Guard Bureau, 799 F.2d 99, 107+ (3rd Cir.(Pa.) Aug 27, 1986) (NO. 85-1664)
194 U.S. v. American Future Systems, Inc., 743 F.2d 169, 181 (3rd Cir.(Pa.) Sep 05, 1984) (NO.
83-1766) " HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
195 Government of Virgin Islands v. Testamark, 528 F.2d 742, 744, 1 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 1105, 1105
(3rd Cir.(Virgin Islands) Jan 29, 1976) (NO. 75-1911) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
196 Colorado Springs Amusements, Ltd. v. Rizzo, 524 F.2d 571, 573, 10 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 10,459,
10459 (3rd Cir.(Pa.) Oct 16, 1975) (NO. 75-1107, 75-1108)
197 Moss v. Clark, 886 F.2d 686, 690 (4th Cir.(Va.) Sep 28, 1989) (NO. 88-7828(L), 88-7832) HN: 1
(S.Ct.)
198 Trerice v. Summons, 755 F.2d 1081, 1083+ (4th Cir.(S.C.) Feb 22, 1985) (NO. 84-1477,
84-1488)
199 Cash v. Califano, 621 F.2d 626, 630+ (4th Cir.(Va.) May 19, 1980) (NO. 79-1279) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
200 Cook v. Arentzen, 1977 WL 4327, *3, 14 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 1643, 1643, 14 Empl. Prac.
Dec. P 7544, 7544 (4th Cir.(Va.) May 06, 1977) (NO. 76-1359)
201 Gilbert v. General Elec. Co., 519 F.2d 661, 666+, 10 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 1201, 1201+, 10
Empl. Prac. Dec. P 10,269, 10269+ (4th Cir.(Va.) Jun 27, 1975) (NO. 74-1557) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
202 U.S. v. Baechler, 509 F.2d 13, 15 (4th Cir.(N.C.) Dec 23, 1974) (NO. 74-1597)
203 U.S. v. Maples, 501 F.2d 985, 986+ (4th Cir.(N.C.) Aug 07, 1974) (NO. 73-2064) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
204 Farmer v. Mabus, 940 F.2d 921, 924 (5th Cir.(Miss.) Aug 20, 1991) (NO. 91-1274) HN: 5
(S.Ct.)
205 Crawford v. Texas Army Nat. Guard, 794 F.2d 1034, 1036 (5th Cir.(Tex.) Jul 23, 1986) (NO.
85-1287)
206 Cleburne Living Center, Inc. v. City of Cleburne, Tex., 735 F.2d 832, 833 (5th Cir.(Tex.) Jul 06,
1984) (NO. 82-1565) " (in dissent)
207 Wayne v. Tennessee Valley Authority, 730 F.2d 392, 404 (5th Cir.(Miss.) Apr 23, 1984) (NO.
83-4043)
208 Turner v. Weinberger, 728 F.2d 751, 758+ (5th Cir.(Tex.) Apr 02, 1984) (NO. 83-1211) HN: 1
(S.Ct.)
209 Young v. U. S. Parole Com'n, 682 F.2d 1105, 1109 (5th Cir.(Tex.) Aug 09, 1982) (NO. 81-1214)
HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
210 Bobo v. ITT, Continental Baking Co., 662 F.2d 340, 344, 27 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 502,
502, 27 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 32,366, 32366 (5th Cir.(Tex.) Nov 25, 1981) (NO. 80-1671) HN: 4
(S.Ct.)
211 King v. Schweiker, 647 F.2d 541, 546 (5th Cir.(La.) Jun 08, 1981) (NO. 80-3052) " HN: 2
(S.Ct.)
212 Matter of Crist, 632 F.2d 1226, 1231+, 23 C.B.C. 839, 839+ (5th Cir.(Ga.) Dec 17, 1980) (NO.
78-3575, 79-1114) " HN: 4,5 (S.Ct.)
213 U.S. v. City of Miami, Fla., 614 F.2d 1322, 1357, 22 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 846, 846, 22

Empl. Prac. Dec. P 30,822, 30822 (5th Cir.(Fla.) Apr 10, 1980) (NO. 77-1856) (in dissent)
214 Chatham v. Jackson, 613 F.2d 73, 79 (5th Cir.(Ga.) Mar 06, 1980) (NO. 78-1114) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
215 Spinkellink v. Wainwright, 578 F.2d 582, 597 (5th Cir.(Fla.) Aug 21, 1978) (NO. 77-2940)
216 Stroud v. Delta Air Lines, Inc., 548 F.2d 356, 356, 13 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 11,302, 11302 (5th
Cir.(Ga.) Feb 23, 1977) (Table, text in WESTLAW, NO. 76-2130) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
217 Stroud v. Delta Air Lines, Inc., 544 F.2d 892, 894, 14 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 206, 206 (5th
Cir.(Ga.) Jan 03, 1977) (NO. 76-2130) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
218 Hill v. Estelle, 537 F.2d 214, 216 (5th Cir.(Tex.) Aug 20, 1976) (NO. 76-1872)
219 State of Fla. v. Mathews, 526 F.2d 319, 325 (5th Cir.(Fla.) Jan 23, 1976) (NO. 75-1905) HN: 2
(S.Ct.)
220 Henderson v. Fort Worth Independent School Dist., 526 F.2d 286, 291 (5th Cir.(Tex.) Jan 22,
1976) (NO. 75-2361) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
221 Tyler v. Vickery, 517 F.2d 1089, 1101, 11 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 972, 972, 30 A.L.R. Fed.
907, 907, 10 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 10,388, 10388 (5th Cir.(Ga.) Aug 20, 1975) (NO. 74-3413)
222 Foster v. Sparks, 506 F.2d 805, 837, 19 Fed.R.Serv.2d 815, 815 (5th Cir.(Ga.) Jan 20, 1975)
(NO. 73-3732)
223 St. Ann v. Palisi, 495 F.2d 423, 426 (5th Cir.(La.) Jun 06, 1974) (NO. 73-2558)
224 Stewart v. Blackwell, 444 F.3d 843, 869, 2006 Fed.App. 0143P, 0143P (6th Cir.(Ohio) Apr 21,
2006) (NO. 05-3044) " HN: 3 (S.Ct.)
225 Montgomery v. Carr, 101 F.3d 1117, 1121, 65 USLW 2412, 2412, 114 Ed. Law Rep. 750, 750,
12 IER Cases 460, 460, 1996 Fed.App. 0371P, 0371P (6th Cir.(Ohio) Dec 04, 1996) (NO.
94-4289)
226 Volunteer Medical Clinic, Inc. v. Operation Rescue, 948 F.2d 218, 224+, 60 USLW 2308, 2308+
(6th Cir.(Tenn.) Oct 29, 1991) (NO. 90-5159, 90-5160, 90-5161, 90-5162)
227 Long v. City of Saginaw, 911 F.2d 1192, 1196, 53 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 1025, 1025, 54
Empl. Prac. Dec. P 40,153, 40153, 116 Lab.Cas. P 10,367, 10367 (6th Cir.(Mich.) Aug 14, 1990)
(NO. 89-1022) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
228 Hillsdale College v. Department of Health, Educ. and Welfare, 696 F.2d 418, 433+, 8 Ed. Law
Rep. 565, 565+ (6th Cir. Dec 16, 1982) (NO. 80-3207) (in dissent) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.)
229 Kalina v. Railroad Retirement Bd., 541 F.2d 1204, 1206+ (6th Cir. Sep 13, 1976) (NO. 75-2256)
HN: 4,5 (S.Ct.)
230 Tanner v. Weinberger, 525 F.2d 51, 54+ (6th Cir.(Ohio) Oct 31, 1975) (NO. 75-1103) HN: 5
(S.Ct.)
231 King v. Little League Baseball, Inc., 505 F.2d 264, 268 (6th Cir.(Mich.) Oct 30, 1974) (NO.
73-1940) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
232 St. John's United Church of Christ v. City of Chicago, 502 F.3d 616, 638 (7th Cir.(Ill.) Sep 13,
2007) (NO. 05-4418, 05-4450, 05-4451) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
233 Varner v. Illinois State University, 226 F.3d 927, 936, 83 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 1361,
1361, 77 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 40,165, 40165, 147 Ed. Law Rep. 451, 451 (7th Cir.(Ill.) Sep 06,
2000) (NO. 97-3253)

234 Knutson v. Wisconsin Air Nat. Guard, 995 F.2d 765, 770+ (7th Cir.(Wis.) Jun 09, 1993) (NO.
92-1118)
235 D'Amato v. Wisconsin Gas Co., 760 F.2d 1474, 1486+, 119 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2325, 2325+, 37
Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 1092, 1092+, 36 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 35,159, 35159+, 1 A.D. Cases
737, 737+ (7th Cir.(Wis.) Apr 25, 1985) (NO. 83-3235) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
236 E.E.O.C. v. Joslyn Mfg. And Supply Co., 706 F.2d 1469, 1483, 31 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA)
1187, 1187, 31 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 33,595, 33595, 4 Employee Benefits Cas. 1465, 1465 (7th
Cir.(Ill.) May 09, 1983) (NO. 82-1634) (in dissent) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
237 Watson v. Arkansas Nat. Guard, 886 F.2d 1004, 1010, 50 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 1718,
1718, 51 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 39,332, 39332 (8th Cir.(Ark.) Sep 22, 1989) (NO. 86-1639) HN: 5
(S.Ct.)
238 Hunter v. St. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Co., 639 F.2d 424, 425, 24 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA)
1601, 1601, 25 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 31,537, 31537 (8th Cir.(Ark.) Jan 28, 1981) (NO. 80-1260)
239 Navedo v. Preisser, 630 F.2d 636, 638 (8th Cir.(Iowa) Sep 22, 1980) (NO. 79-1762)
240 Carmi v. Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer Dist., 620 F.2d 672, 676, 22 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA)
1107, 1107, 23 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 30,893, 30893, 1 A.D. Cases 168, 168 (8th Cir.(Mo.) May 06,
1980) (NO. 79-1325) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
241 U.S. v. Garrett, 521 F.2d 444, 446+ (8th Cir.(Mo.) Jul 23, 1975) (NO. 75-1157) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
242 Mueller v. Auker, 576 F.3d 979, 999, 09 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 10,156, 10156 (9th Cir.(Idaho) Aug
10, 2009) (NO. 07-35554) " HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
243 Costa v. Desert Palace, Inc., 299 F.3d 838, 862+, 89 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 673, 673+, 83
Empl. Prac. Dec. P 41,122, 41122+, 59 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 542, 542+, 02 Cal. Daily Op. Serv.
6959, 6959+, 2002 Daily Journal D.A.R. 8738, 8738+ (9th Cir.(Nev.) Aug 02, 2002) (NO.
99-15645) " HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
244 Hibbs v. Department of Human Resources, 273 F.3d 844, 861, 81 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 40,842,
40842, 145 Lab.Cas. P 34,418, 34418, 7 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 865, 865, 01 Cal. Daily
Op. Serv. 10,272, 10272, 2001 Daily Journal D.A.R. 12,844, 12844 (9th Cir.(Nev.) Dec 11,
2001) (NO. 99-16321) " HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
245 Philips v. Perry, 106 F.3d 1420, 1440, 70 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 44,721, 44721, 97 Cal. Daily Op.
Serv. 1038, 1038, 97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2848, 2848, 97 Daily Journal D.A.R. 1551, 1551, 97
Daily Journal D.A.R. 5031, 5031 (9th Cir.(Wash.) Feb 14, 1997) (NO. 95-35293) (in dissent)
HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
246 U.S. v. Stocks, 104 F.3d 308, 311+, 97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 265, 265+, 97 Daily Journal D.A.R.
469, 469+ (9th Cir.(Or.) Jan 10, 1997) (NO. 95-30074)
247 Bator v. State of Hawai'i, 39 F.3d 1021, 1028, 66 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 290, 290, 65 Empl.
Prac. Dec. P 43,347, 43347 (9th Cir.(Hawai'i) Nov 08, 1994) (NO. 92-15950) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
248 U.S. v. De Gross, 960 F.2d 1433, 1439, 60 USLW 2639, 2639 (9th Cir.(Cal.) Apr 02, 1992) (NO.
87-5226) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
249 U.S. v. De Gross, 913 F.2d 1417, 1423, 59 USLW 2204, 2204 (9th Cir.(Cal.) Sep 10, 1990) (NO.
87-5226) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
250 High Tech Gays v. Defense Indus. Sec. Clearance Office, 895 F.2d 563, 573, 58 USLW 2473,

2473, 60 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 1435, 1435, 52 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 39,608, 39608 (9th
Cir.(Cal.) Feb 02, 1990) (NO. 87-2987) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
251 Forkum v. Claywell, 848 F.2d 1242, 1242 (9th Cir.(Ariz.) Jun 02, 1988) (Table, text in WEST-
LAW, NO. 87-1587) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
252 Olagues v. Russoniello, 797 F.2d 1511, 1520 (9th Cir.(Cal.) Aug 26, 1986) (NO. 82-4427,
83-2581) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
253 Watkins v. U.S. Army, 721 F.2d 687, 690, 37 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 594, 594, 37 Empl.
Prac. Dec. P 35,276, 35276 (9th Cir.(Wash.) Dec 09, 1983) (NO. 82-3681) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
254 Mollnow v. Carlton, 716 F.2d 627, 630+ (9th Cir.(Wash.) Sep 20, 1983) (NO. 80-3452) HN: 5
(S.Ct.)
255 Clark, By and Through Clark v. Arizona Interscholastic Ass'n, 695 F.2d 1126, 1129+, 8 Ed. Law
Rep. 246, 246+ (9th Cir.(Ariz.) Dec 02, 1982) (NO. 82-5132) HN: 1,2 (S.Ct.)
256 U.S. v. Humboldt County, Cal., 628 F.2d 549, 553+ (9th Cir.(Cal.) Sep 24, 1980) (NO. 78-2330,
78-2681) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
257 Blake v. City of Los Angeles, 595 F.2d 1367, 1384+, 19 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 1441,
1441+, 53 A.L.R. Fed. 1, 1+, 19 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 9251, 9251+, 27 Fed.R.Serv.2d 567, 567+
(9th Cir.(Cal.) May 02, 1979) (NO. 77-3595, 77-3601) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
258 Life Ins. Co. of North America v. Reichardt, 591 F.2d 499, 505 (9th Cir.(Cal.) Jan 11, 1979)
(NO. 75-3031, 75-3032) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
259 Holloway v. Arthur Andersen & Co., 566 F.2d 659, 663, 16 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 689,
689, 15 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 8059, 8059 (9th Cir.(Cal.) Dec 23, 1977) (NO. 76-2248) " HN: 1
(S.Ct.)
260 Hutchison v. Lake Oswego School Dist. No. 7, 519 F.2d 961, 965, 11 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA)
161, 161, 10 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 10,325, 10325 (9th Cir.(Or.) Jul 21, 1975) (NO. 74-3181,
74-3182) "
261 Campbell v. Beaughler, 519 F.2d 1307, 1309+, 11 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 1308, 1308+, 10
Empl. Prac. Dec. P 10,242, 10242+ (9th Cir.(Ariz.) Jun 23, 1975) (NO. 74-1763)
262 U.S. v. Bowen, 500 F.2d 960, 963 (9th Cir.(Cal.) May 09, 1974) (NO. 72-1012)
263 Daigle v. Warner, 490 F.2d 358, 366 (9th Cir.(Hawai'i) Oct 24, 1973) (NO. 72-2801)
264 Brown v. Zavaras, 63 F.3d 967, 971 (10th Cir.(Colo.) Aug 18, 1995) (NO. 94-1537) HN: 1
(S.Ct.)
265 Jane L. v. Bangerter, 61 F.3d 1505, 1514 (10th Cir.(Utah) Aug 02, 1995) (NO. 93-4145) HN: 4
(S.Ct.)
266 National Gay Task Force v. Board of Educ. of City of Oklahoma City, 729 F.2d 1270, 1273, 34
Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 459, 459, 34 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 34,357, 34357, 16 Ed. Law Rep.
1035, 1035 (10th Cir.(Okla.) Mar 14, 1984) (NO. 82-1912) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
267 Martinez v. Santa Clara Pueblo, 540 F.2d 1039, 1047 (10th Cir.(N.M.) Aug 16, 1976) (NO.
75-1615) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
268 Duncan v. General Motors Corp., 499 F.2d 835, 838 (10th Cir.(Okla.) Jul 02, 1974) (NO.
73-1941)
269 Junior Chamber of Commerce of Rochester, Inc., Rochester, New York v. U.S. Jaycees, Tulsa,

Oklahoma, 495 F.2d 883, 885+ (10th Cir.(Okla.) Apr 16, 1974) (NO. 73-1560) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
270 Johnson v. Board of Regents of University of Georgia, 263 F.3d 1234, 1256, 156 Ed. Law Rep.
829, 829, 14 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. C 1232, 1232 (11th Cir.(Ga.) Aug 27, 2001) (NO. 00-14340,
00-14382) " HN: 3 (S.Ct.)
271 Lyes v. City of Riviera Beach, Fla., 166 F.3d 1332, 1337, 79 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 330,
330, 74 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 45,728, 45728, 75 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 45,728, 45728, 12 Fla. L.
Weekly Fed. C 515, 515 (11th Cir.(Fla.) Feb 11, 1999) (NO. 96-4577) "
272 Lyes v. City of Riviera Beach, Fla., 126 F.3d 1380, 1390+, 75 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 758,
758+, 11 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. C 686, 686+ (11th Cir.(Fla.) Nov 05, 1997) (NO. 96-4577) " HN: 4
(S.Ct.)
273 Lucero v. Operation Rescue of Birmingham, 954 F.2d 624, 631+ (11th Cir.(Ala.) Feb 05, 1992)
274 Weissinger v. White, 733 F.2d 802, 806 (11th Cir.(Ala.) Jun 01, 1984) (NO. 83-7571) HN: 4
(S.Ct.)
275 Ponder v. U.S., 117 F.3d 549, 553+ (Fed.Cir. Jun 26, 1997) (NO. 97-5040) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
276 U.S. v. Watson, 483 F.3d 828, 831, 376 U.S.App.D.C. 22, 25 (D.C.Cir. Apr 13, 2007) (NO.
04-3082, 04-3090) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
277 Steffan v. Aspin, 8 F.3d 57, 62, 62 USLW 2309, 2309, 63 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 300, 300,
63 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 42,668, 42668, 303 U.S.App.D.C. 404, 409, 87 Ed. Law Rep. 32, 32
(D.C.Cir. Nov 16, 1993) (NO. 91-5409)
278 Lamprecht v. F.C.C., 958 F.2d 382, 391, 60 USLW 2537, 2537, 58 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 41,288,
41288, 70 Rad. Reg. 2d (P & F) 658, 658, 294 U.S.App.D.C. 164, 173 (D.C.Cir. Feb 19, 1992)
(NO. 88-1395) " HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
279 Quiban v. Veterans Admin., 928 F.2d 1154, 1161, 289 U.S.App.D.C. 62, 69 (D.C.Cir. Mar 29,
1991) (NO. 89-5250, 89-5251, 89-5263, 90-5193)
280 Padula v. Webster, 822 F.2d 97, 102+, 56 USLW 2042, 2042+, 44 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA)
174, 174+, 43 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 37,174, 37174+, 261 U.S.App.D.C. 365, 370+, 2 IER Cases
454, 454+ (D.C.Cir. Jun 26, 1987) (NO. 86-5053) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
281 Steele v. F.C.C., 770 F.2d 1192, 1212, 54 USLW 2145, 2145, 58 Rad. Reg. 2d (P & F) 1463,
1463, 248 U.S.App.D.C. 279, 299 (D.C.Cir. Aug 23, 1985) (NO. 84-1176) " (in dissent) HN: 4
(S.Ct.)
282 Laffey v. Northwest Airlines, Inc., 740 F.2d 1071, 1082, 35 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 508,
508, 27 Wage & Hour Cas. (BNA) 4, 4, 34 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 34,540, 34540, 238 U.S.App.D.C.
400, 411, 101 Lab.Cas. P 34,585, 34585 (D.C.Cir. Jul 20, 1984) (NO. 83-1033, 83-1034,
83-1167, 83-1168) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
283 Goldman v. Secretary of Defense, 734 F.2d 1531, 1537, 36 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 1566,
1566, 34 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 34,377, 34377, 236 U.S.App.D.C. 248, 254 (D.C.Cir. May 08, 1984)
(NO. 82-1723) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
284 U.S. v. Cohen, 733 F.2d 128, 135, 236 U.S.App.D.C. 36, 43 (D.C.Cir. May 04, 1984) (NO.
81-1036) "
285 NAACP Legal Defense & Educational Fund, Inc. v. Devine, 727 F.2d 1247, 1263, 234

U.S.App.D.C. 148, 164 (D.C.Cir. Feb 17, 1984) (NO. 83-1822) " HN: 3 (S.Ct.)
286 Hanson v. Hoffmann, 628 F.2d 42, 44, 21 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 1645, 1645, 22 Empl.
Prac. Dec. P 30,618, 30618, 202 U.S.App.D.C. 42, 44 (D.C.Cir. Feb 07, 1980) (NO. 78-1436)
HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
287 Association of Nat. Advertisers, Inc. v. F.T.C., 627 F.2d 1151, 1163, 51 A.L.R. Fed. 335, 335,
201 U.S.App.D.C. 165, 177, 1980-1 Trade Cases P 63,098, 63098, 5 Media L. Rep. 2233, 2233
(D.C.Cir. Dec 27, 1979) (NO. 79-1117) " HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
288 Community-Service Broadcasting of Mid-America, Inc. v. F.C.C., 593 F.2d 1102, 1125, 43 Rad.
Reg. 2d (P & F) 1675, 1675, 192 U.S.App.D.C. 448, 471, 3 Media L. Rep. 1063, 1063, 4 Media
L. Rep. 1257, 1257 (D.C.Cir. Aug 25, 1978) (NO. 76-1081)
289 U.S. v. Harrison, 524 F.2d 421, 429, 173 U.S.App.D.C. 260, 268 (D.C.Cir. Dec 08, 1975) (NO.
74-2029, 74-2030, 74-2031)
290 Evans v. Sheraton Park Hotel, 503 F.2d 177, 185, 8 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 705, 705, 8 Em-
pl. Prac. Dec. P 9661, 9661, 164 U.S.App.D.C. 86, 94, 19 Fed.R.Serv.2d 45, 45 (D.C.Cir. Sep 12,
1974) (NO. 73-1342, 73-1442)
291 Fagan v. National Cash Register Co., 481 F.2d 1115, 1122+, 5 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 1335,
1335+, 27 A.L.R. Fed. 257, 257+, 6 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 8700, 8700+, 157 U.S.App.D.C. 15, 22+
(D.C.Cir. Jun 29, 1973) (NO. 71-1243) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
292 Dinkins v. Charoen Pokphand USA, Inc., 133 F.Supp.2d 1254, 1270 (M.D.Ala. Feb 15, 2001)
(NO. CIV. A. 99-D-1389-N, CIV. A. 99-D-847-N)
293 Williams v. Pryor, 41 F.Supp.2d 1257, 1285 (N.D.Ala. Mar 29, 1999) (NO. CIV.A.
98-S-1938-NE) " HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
294 Sandoval v. Hagan, 7 F.Supp.2d 1234, 1312 (M.D.Ala. Jun 03, 1998) (NO. CIV. A.
96-D-1875-N) " HN: 3 (S.Ct.)
295 Smith v. Smith, 1997 WL 33121865, *8 (M.D.Ala. Nov 29, 1997) (NO. CIV A 96-W-1419-N)
HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
296 Mieth v. Dothard, 418 F.Supp. 1169, 1180, 13 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 1412, 1412, 12 Empl.
Prac. Dec. P 11,040, 11040 (M.D.Ala. Jun 28, 1976) (NO. CIV. 75-433-N) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
297 Jordan v. Wright, 417 F.Supp. 42, 45, 13 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 1125, 1125, 13 Empl. Prac.
Dec. P 11,292, 11292 (M.D.Ala. Mar 12, 1976) (NO. CIV. 75-19-N)
298 Scott v. Opelika City Schools, 63 F.R.D. 144, 147, 8 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 272, 272, 7 Em-
pl. Prac. Dec. P 9375, 9375, 18 Fed.R.Serv.2d 998, 998 (M.D.Ala. May 06, 1974) (NO. CIV
74-5-E)
299 Martin v. Schlesinger, 371 F.Supp. 637, 643 (N.D.Ala. Jan 11, 1974) (NO. CIV. 73-G-819-S)
300 Collins v. Brewer, 2010 WL 2926131, *14 (D.Ariz. Jul 23, 2010) (NO. 2:09-CV-02402 JWS)
301 Ingram v. Sacramento Police Dept., 2009 WL 2905774, *5 (E.D.Cal. Sep 04, 2009) (NO.
CIVS082547LKKEFBPS) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
302 Smelt v. County of Orange, 374 F.Supp.2d 861, 877 (C.D.Cal. Jun 16, 2005) (NO.
SACV04-1042-GLT(MLGX) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
303 Borges v. City of Hollister, 2005 WL 589797, *4 (N.D.Cal. Mar 14, 2005) (NO. C03-05670
HRL)

304 Coalition for Economic Equity v. Wilson, 946 F.Supp. 1480, 1501, 65 USLW 2421, 2421, 72
Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 1101, 1101, 114 Ed. Law Rep. 1146, 1146, 97 Daily Journal D.A.R.
188, 188 (N.D.Cal. Dec 23, 1996) (NO. C 96-4024 TEH) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
305 Murphy v. Bilbray, 782 F.Supp. 1420, 1433 (S.D.Cal. Dec 03, 1991) (NO. CIV 90-0135 GT,
CIV. 89-0820 GT, CIV. 90-0134 GT) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
306 Johnson v. Orr, 617 F.Supp. 170, 173, 37 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 580, 580, 37 Empl. Prac.
Dec. P 35,374, 35374 (E.D.Cal. Mar 14, 1985) (NO. CIV. S-84-1257 EJG)
307 Hurvich v. Califano, 457 F.Supp. 760, 762+ (N.D.Cal. Sep 15, 1978) (NO. C-77-2478 SW) HN:
5 (S.Ct.)
308 Aznavorian v. Califano, 440 F.Supp. 788, 797, 25 Fed.R.Serv.2d 1054, 1054 (S.D.Cal. Aug 12,
1977) (NO. CIV. 75-1103-GT)
309 Officers for Justice v. Civil Service Com'n of City and County of San Francisco, 395 F.Supp.
378, 382, 11 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 815, 815, 11 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 10,618, 10618
(N.D.Cal. May 02, 1975) (NO. C-73-0657 RFP) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
310 Filipino Am. Veterans and Dependents Ass'n v. U. S., 391 F.Supp. 1314, 1327 (N.D.Cal. Nov 14,
1974) (NO. 72 785 WTS) (in dissent) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
311 Chandler v. Callaway, 1974 WL 10553, *2, 8 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 1149, 1149 (N.D.Cal.
Nov 04, 1974) (NO. CO74-1249 RHS) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
312 Quadra v. Superior Court of City and County of San Francisco, 378 F.Supp. 605, 618+ (N.D.Cal.
May 16, 1974) (NO. C-72-1689) HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
313 Ballard v. Laird, 360 F.Supp. 643, 647, 8 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 193, 193, 6 Empl. Prac.
Dec. P 8793, 8793 (S.D.Cal. Jun 26, 1973) (NO. CIV. 72-218-S)
314 Aiello v. Hansen, 359 F.Supp. 792, 796+, 7 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 1041, 1041+, 7 Empl.
Prac. Dec. P 9283, 9283+ (N.D.Cal. May 31, 1973) (NO. C-72-1402 SW, C-72-1547 SW) HN:
1,4 (S.Ct.)
315 Hoover v. Meiklejohn, 430 F.Supp. 164, 167 (D.Colo. Apr 15, 1977) (NO. CIV. 76 M 1007) "
HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
316 Patterson v. Patterson, 381 F.Supp. 1029, 1030 (D.Colo. Aug 19, 1974) (NO. CIV. 74-M-474)
HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
317 Imel v. U.S., 375 F.Supp. 1102, 1115, 32 A.F.T.R.2d 73-5434, 73-5434, 73-2 USTC P 9617,
9617 (D.Colo. Jun 26, 1973) (NO. CIV. C-3264)
318 Thurman v. City of Torrington, 595 F.Supp. 1521, 1528, 53 USLW 2246, 2246 (D.Conn. Oct 23,
1984) (NO. CIV. H-84-120) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
319 Ertman v. Fusari, 442 F.Supp. 1147, 1150 (D.Conn. Dec 21, 1977) (NO. CIV. N-74-94) " HN: 2
(S.Ct.)
320 Feldman v. Allegheny Airlines, Inc., 382 F.Supp. 1271, 1301 (D.Conn. Aug 02, 1974) (NO. CIV
15670)
321 McAuliffe v. Carlson, 377 F.Supp. 896, 902+ (D.Conn. May 30, 1974) (NO. CIV. 15687) HN: 4
(S.Ct.)
322 McDougald v. Norton, 361 F.Supp. 1325, 1327+ (D.Conn. Jun 29, 1973) (NO. CIV. A. B-607)
HN: 2 (S.Ct.)

323 Porter v. Fulgham, 601 F.Supp.2d 205, 224+ (D.D.C. Mar 09, 2009) (NO. CIV. A. 04-1440
RBW)
324 McConnell v. Federal Election Commission, 251 F.Supp.2d 176, 425 (D.D.C. May 01, 2003)
(NO. CIV.02-581CKKKLHRJL, CIV.02-582CKKKLHRJL, CIV.02-633CKKKLHRJL,
CIV.02-751CKKKLHRJL, CIV.02-753CKKKLHRJL, CIV.02-754CKKKLHRJL,
CIV.02-781CKKKLHRJL, CIV.02-874CKKKLHRJL, CIV.02-881CKKKLHRJL) HN: 3 (S.Ct.)
325 Cook v. Babbitt, 819 F.Supp. 1, 13+, 61 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 42,267, 42267+ (D.D.C. Mar 17,
1993) (NO. CIV. A. 91-0338(RCL)) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
326 Steffan v. Cheney, 780 F.Supp. 1, 7, 60 USLW 2389, 2389, 72 Ed. Law Rep. 84, 84 (D.D.C. Dec
09, 1991) (NO. CIV.A. 88-3669-OG)
327 Schumacher v. Aldridge, 665 F.Supp. 41, 52 (D.D.C. Jul 16, 1987) (NO. CIV A 86-2015-LFO)
328 Baker v. Harris, 503 F.Supp. 863, 865+ (D.D.C. Oct 22, 1980) (NO. CIV 79-532) " HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
329 National Black United Fund, Inc. v. Campbell, 494 F.Supp. 748, 756 (D.D.C. Jul 01, 1980) (NO.
CIV. 76-1431) " HN: 3 (S.Ct.)
330 Gray Panthers v. Califano, 466 F.Supp. 1317, 1325+ (D.D.C. Mar 06, 1979) (NO. CIV 77-488)
HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
331 Flanagan v. President and Directors of Georgetown College, 417 F.Supp. 377, 382 (D.D.C. Jul
28, 1976) (NO. CIV. 75-1500)
332 Burner v. Washington, 399 F.Supp. 44, 54 (D.D.C. Jul 15, 1975) (NO. CIV. 242-71) HN: 2
(S.Ct.)
333 Vincent v. Schlesinger, 388 F.Supp. 370, 376 (D.D.C. Jan 29, 1975) (NO. CIV. 74-1847) " HN: 5
(S.Ct.)
334 Beer v. U.S., 374 F.Supp. 363, 383 (D.D.C. Mar 15, 1974) (NO. CIV. 1495-73)
335 Kovach v. Middendorf, 424 F.Supp. 72, 78+ (D.Del. Dec 14, 1976) (NO. CIV. 75-20) HN: 1
(S.Ct.)
336 Trivits v. Wilmington Institute, 383 F.Supp. 457, 460, 10 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 1402, 1402
(D.Del. Oct 04, 1974) (NO. CIV. 4776) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
337 Innocent v. Central Truck Lines, Inc., 680 F.Supp. 1523, 1525 (S.D.Fla. Jan 26, 1988) (NO.
87-2141-CIV) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
338 Sanchez v. Pingree, 494 F.Supp. 68, 71 (S.D.Fla. May 16, 1980) (NO. 79-1661-CIV.-JCP) HN: 2
(S.Ct.)
339 Moss v. Secretary of Health, Ed. and Welfare, 408 F.Supp. 403, 409+ (M.D.Fla. Jan 15, 1976)
(NO. 74-721-CIV-T-H) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
340 Hardin v. Stynchcomb, 1980 WL 18636, *12, 30 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 564, 564 (N.D.Ga.
Oct 21, 1980) (NO. C77-597-A) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
341 McCauley v. City of Chicago, 2009 WL 3055312, *3 (N.D.Ill. Sep 18, 2009) (NO. 09 C 2604)
HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
342 O'Conner v. Commonwealth Edison Co., 770 F.Supp. 448, 457, Nuclear Reg. Rep. P 20,544,
20544 (C.D.Ill. Jul 10, 1991) (NO. 88-1272) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
343 Thomas v. Board of Examiners, Chicago Public Schools, 651 F.Supp. 664, 671, 37 Ed. Law Rep.
520, 520 (N.D.Ill. Nov 19, 1986) (NO. 85 C 9647) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)

344 Grant v. City of Chicago, 594 F.Supp. 1441, 1451, 53 USLW 2216, 2216 (N.D.Ill. Oct 03, 1984)
(NO. 83 C 7757) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
345 Drakeford v. U.S. Parole Com'n, 1984 WL 3233, *4 (S.D.Ill. May 24, 1984) (NO. CV 83-4210)
HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
346 Gary B. v. Cronin, 542 F.Supp. 102, 112, 5 Ed. Law Rep. 755, 755 (N.D.Ill. Jun 10, 1980) (NO.
79 C 5383)
347 Dickerson v. Johnson, 432 F.Supp. 612, 614 (N.D.Ill. May 31, 1977) (NO. 76 C 401)
348 King v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, 406 F.Supp. 36, 39 (E.D.Ill. Jan 14, 1976) (NO. CIV.
74-181-E) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
349 Daugherty v. Daley, 370 F.Supp. 338, 340, 11 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 617, 617, 8 Empl.
Prac. Dec. P 9694, 9694 (N.D.Ill. Feb 05, 1974) (NO. 73 C 1400) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
350 Laketon Asphalt and Refining, Inc. v. U.S. Dept. of Interior, 476 F.Supp. 668, 674+ (N.D.Ind. Jul
17, 1979) (NO. F 77-20) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
351 Doe v. Hartz, 970 F.Supp. 1375, 1408+ (N.D.Iowa Jun 23, 1997) (NO. C 96-4091-MWB) HN: 4
(S.Ct.)
352 Roe v. Ray, 407 F.Supp. 351, 353 (N.D.Iowa Jan 28, 1976) (NO. C 75-2019)
353 Sale v. Waverly-Shell Rock Bd. of Ed., 390 F.Supp. 784, 788+, 9 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA)
138, 138+ (N.D.Iowa Jan 08, 1975) (NO. C 74-2029) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
354 Howe v. United Parcel Service, Inc., 379 F.Supp. 667, 675 (S.D.Iowa Aug 12, 1974) (NO. CIV.
74-15-D) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
355 Jantz v. Muci, 759 F.Supp. 1543, 1547+, 59 USLW 2624, 2624+, 62 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA)
1623, 1623+, 56 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 40,766, 40766+, 66 Ed. Law Rep. 1108, 1108+ (D.Kan. Mar
29, 1991) (NO. 89-1628-K) " HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
356 Coburn By and Through Coburn v. Agustin, 627 F.Supp. 983, 987+ (D.Kan. Nov 25, 1985) (NO.
CIV.A. 80-1520) HN: 2,4 (S.Ct.)
357 Canterino v. Wilson, 546 F.Supp. 174, 207 (W.D.Ky. Jul 26, 1982) (NO. CIV. 80-0545-L)
358 Costa v. Bluegrass Turf Service, Inc., 406 F.Supp. 1003, 1007 (E.D.Ky. Nov 24, 1975) (NO.
CIV. 75-49) HN: 3 (S.Ct.)
359 Kirchberg v. Feenstra, 430 F.Supp. 642, 645+ (E.D.La. Apr 21, 1977) (NO. CIV. 76-842) " HN:
1 (S.Ct.)
360 Kimbrell v. Mathews, 429 F.Supp. 440, 443 (M.D.La. Mar 31, 1977) (NO. CIV. A. 75-172) HN:
1,2 (S.Ct.)
361 Walters v. Edwards, 396 F.Supp. 808, 820 (E.D.La. May 12, 1975) (NO. CIV. 74-653) HN: 1
(S.Ct.)
362 Healy v. Edwards, 363 F.Supp. 1110, 1113+ (E.D.La. Aug 31, 1973) (NO. CIV. 73-688) HN: 5
(S.Ct.)
363 D'Ercole v. D'Ercole, 407 F.Supp. 1377, 1381 (D.Mass. Feb 19, 1976) (NO. CIV. 73-3070-T)
HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
364 Klein v. Mayo, 367 F.Supp. 583, 586 (D.Mass. Sep 07, 1973) (NO. CIV.A. 73-3071-T) HN: 1
(S.Ct.)

365 Norton v. Weinberger, 390 F.Supp. 1084, 1095 (D.Md. Feb 28, 1975) (NO. CIV. 72-271-B) (in
dissent) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
366 Chastang v. Flynn & Emrich Co., 365 F.Supp. 957, 966, 6 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 357, 357,
6 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 8844, 8844, 7 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 9106, 9106 (D.Md. Aug 14, 1973) (NO.
CIV.A. 71-593-M, CIV.A. 71-652-M) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
367 Fathers United for Equal Rights v. Circuit Court for Baltimore County, 361 F.Supp. 1080, 1082
(D.Md. Aug 06, 1973) (NO. CIV. 71-1291) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
368 Acanfora v. Board of Ed. of Montgomery County, 359 F.Supp. 843, 852+ (D.Md. May 31, 1973)
(NO. CIV. 72-1136-Y) " HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
369 Dubay v. Wells, 442 F.Supp.2d 404, 413 (E.D.Mich. Jul 17, 2006) (NO. 06-11016-BC) HN: 4
(S.Ct.)
370 Communities for Equity v. Michigan High School Athletic Ass'n, 178 F.Supp.2d 805, 850, 161
Ed. Law Rep. 172, 172 (W.D.Mich. Dec 17, 2001) (NO. 1:98CV479) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
371 Grace v. City of Detroit, 760 F.Supp. 646, 653 (E.D.Mich. Apr 05, 1991) (NO. CIV. 90
71078-DT) HN: 3 (S.Ct.)
372 Reinforcing Iron Workers Local 426 Health and Welfare Fund v. Michigan Bell Telephone Co.,
746 F.Supp. 668, 671, 54 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 821, 821, 55 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 40,554,
40554, 12 Employee Benefits Cas. 2580, 2580 (E.D.Mich. Oct 05, 1990) (NO. CIV.
90-CV-70590-DT) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
373 Gwinn Area Community Schools v. State of Mich., 574 F.Supp. 736, 749, 14 Ed. Law Rep. 936,
936 (W.D.Mich. Sep 01, 1983) (NO. M82-199 CA2) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
374 Glover v. Johnson, 478 F.Supp. 1075, 1078 (E.D.Mich. Oct 17, 1979) (NO. CIV. 77-1229)
375 Felix v. Milliken, 463 F.Supp. 1360, 1369+ (E.D.Mich. Dec 22, 1978) (NO. CIV. 78-73015, CIV.
78-73159) HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
376 U. S. Jaycees v. McClure, 534 F.Supp. 766, 771 (D.Minn. Mar 25, 1982) (NO. CIV. 4-79-530)
HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
377 National Ass'n of Property Owners v. U. S., 499 F.Supp. 1223, 1243, 11 Envtl. L. Rep. 20,124,
20124 (D.Minn. Jul 24, 1980) (NO. CIV. 5-79-178, CIV. 5-79-95, CIV. 5-80-25) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
378 Seaman v. Spring Lake Park Independent School Dist. No. 16, 387 F.Supp. 1168, 1177+, 10 Fair
Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 31, 31+, 9 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 10,055, 10055+ (D.Minn. Jul 29, 1974)
(NO. 4-73-CIV 23) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
379 Independent Federation of Flight Attendants v. Trans World Airlines, Inc., 682 F.Supp. 1003,
1031, 127 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3266, 3266, 46 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 37,892, 37892, 108 Lab.Cas. P
10,410, 10410 (W.D.Mo. Mar 09, 1988) (NO. 86-6030-CV-SJ-6) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
380 Lowes v. Sayad, 614 F.Supp. 1206, 1207 (E.D.Mo. Aug 15, 1985) (NO. 83-2965C(6)) HN: 2
(S.Ct.)
381 E.E.O.C. v. Cook Paint & Varnish Co., 1980 WL 249, *6, 24 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 51, 51,
24 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 31,319, 31319 (W.D.Mo. Jun 24, 1980) (NO. 75-CV-380-W-2-6)
382 Matter of Murrell, 467 F.Supp. 756, 757, 20 C.B.C. 65, 65 (E.D.Mo. Mar 31, 1978) (NO.
77-1097C(4)) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
383 Williams v. Currie, 103 F.Supp.2d 858, 862 (M.D.N.C. Jul 05, 2000) (NO. 1:99CV00930) HN: 5

(S.Ct.)
384 Gordon v. Forsyth County Hospital Authority, Inc., 409 F.Supp. 708, 726+ (M.D.N.C. Sep 11,
1975) (NO. C-75-25-WS) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
385 Peltier v. City of Fargo, 396 F.Supp. 710, 727, 10 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 1452, 1452, 22
Wage & Hour Cas. (BNA) 393, 393, 77 Lab.Cas. P 33,252, 33252 (D.N.D. Jun 25, 1975) (NO.
CIV. A3-74-78)
386 Turner v. Nevada Bd. of State Prison Com'rs, 624 F.Supp. 318, 322 (D.Nev. Dec 13, 1985) (NO.
CV-R-84-390-ECR) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
387 Ayen v. McLucas, 401 F.Supp. 1001, 1004+, 12 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 537, 537+ (D.Nev.
Jul 31, 1975) (NO. CIVIL LV 74-168 RDF) HN: 1,2 (S.Ct.)
388 Meloon v. Helgemoe, 436 F.Supp. 528, 530+ (D.N.H. Apr 21, 1977) (NO. CIV. 77-11) HN: 1
(S.Ct.)
389 Doe v. Laconia Supervisory Union No. 30, 396 F.Supp. 1291, 1296 (D.N.H. Jun 24, 1975) (NO.
CIV. 74-148) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
390 U.S. v. DeJesus, 2002 WL 32989738, *6 (D.N.J. Jan 24, 2002) (NO. CRIM. 99-728 (JBS)) HN:
1,4 (S.Ct.)
391 Stewart v. Rutgers, 930 F.Supp. 1034, 1052, 111 Ed. Law Rep. 302, 302 (D.N.J. May 10, 1996)
(NO. CIV.A. 95-4373 (AJL)) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
392 Perez v. Cucci, 725 F.Supp. 209, 251 (D.N.J. May 02, 1989) (NO. CIV.A. 86-3595) " HN: 1,4
(S.Ct.)
393 Bryant v. International Schools Services, Inc., 502 F.Supp. 472, 488, 24 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas.
(BNA) 747, 747, 24 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 31,440, 31440 (D.N.J. Dec 04, 1980) (NO. CIV.
78-2517, CIV. 78-2563) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
394 Duffy v. Harris, 1979 WL 6847, *2 (D.N.M. Oct 23, 1979) (NO. CIV. 79-386) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
395 Adusumelli v. Steiner, 2010 WL 3786030, *8 (S.D.N.Y. Sep 30, 2010) (NO. 08 CIV 6932 RJH,
09 CIV 4902 RJH) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
396 U.S. v. City of New York, 2010 WL 1948562, *22, 109 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 600, 600, 93
Empl. Prac. Dec. P 43,883, 43883 (S.D.N.Y. May 13, 2010) (NO. 07 CIV. 2083 (WHP))
397 Lewis v. Grinker, 111 F.Supp.2d 142, 177, 70 Soc.Sec.Rep.Serv. 690, 690 (E.D.N.Y. Jan 19,
2000) (NO. CV-79-1740-CPS) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
398 Thomas v. City of New York, 1997 WL 282211, *5 (S.D.N.Y. May 28, 1997) (NO. 97 CIV. 2156
(JSM)) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
399 General Media Communications, Inc. v. Perry, 952 F.Supp. 1072, 1081, 65 USLW 2489, 2489,
25 Media L. Rep. 1353, 1353 (S.D.N.Y. Feb 20, 1997) (NO. 96 CIV. 7525 (SAS)) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
400 Clarkson v. Coughlin, 898 F.Supp. 1019, 1051, 64 USLW 2080, 2080, 4 A.D. Cases 1056, 1056,
10 A.D.D. 642, 642, 6 NDLR P 434, 434 (S.D.N.Y. Jun 16, 1995) (NO. 91 CIV. 1792 (RWS))
HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
401 Affiliated Livery Drivers v. New York City, 1989 WL 8172, *2 (E.D.N.Y. Jan 27, 1989) (NO.
CV 87-2350) " HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
402 Hill v. Berkman, 635 F.Supp. 1228, 1234+, 54 USLW 2618, 2618+, 40 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas.
(BNA) 1444, 1444+, 40 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 36,260, 36260+ (E.D.N.Y. May 15, 1986) (NO.

85-CV-389 (JBW)) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)

403 Jones on Behalf of Michele v. Board of Educ. of City School Dist. of City of New York, 632
F.Supp. 1319, 1327, 32 Ed. Law Rep. 141, 141 (E.D.N.Y. Apr 11, 1986) (NO. 85 CV 4504)
404 Ayala v. U.S., 624 F.Supp. 259, 262 (S.D.N.Y. Dec 04, 1985) (NO. 85 CIV. 3756(RWS)) HN: 5
(S.Ct.)
405 Davi v. Heckler, 1984 WL 62778, *2, Unempl.Ins.Rep. (CCH) P 16,053, 16053 (E.D.N.Y. Nov
21, 1984) (NO. CV-83-2825) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
406 Cardo v. Lakeland Cent. School Dist. of Shrub Oak, N.Y., 592 F.Supp. 765, 771, 20 Ed. Law
Rep. 444, 444 (S.D.N.Y. Jun 15, 1984) (NO. 83 CIV 4598 (JFK)) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
407 Manufacturers Hanover Trust Co. v. U.S., 576 F.Supp. 837, 842+, 52 A.F.T.R.2d 83-6477,
83-6477+, 83-2 USTC P 13,545, 13545+ (S.D.N.Y. Oct 17, 1983) (NO. 82 CIV. 724 (CES)) HN:
4 (S.Ct.)
408 Jackson v. Congress of U.S., 558 F.Supp. 1288, 1290, 10 Ed. Law Rep. 155, 155 (S.D.N.Y. Mar
11, 1983) (NO. 82 CIV. 2298 (LBS)) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
409 Dopico v. Goldschmidt, 518 F.Supp. 1161, 1179 (S.D.N.Y. Jul 24, 1981) (NO. 80 CIV. 4562, 80
CIV. 4862)
410 Rodriguez v. Harris, 496 F.Supp. 116, 117 (S.D.N.Y. Jul 31, 1980) (NO. 80-CIV-3112)
411 Bacon v. Toia, 493 F.Supp. 865, 872+ (S.D.N.Y. Jun 23, 1980) (NO. 77-CIV-2823(LPG)) " HN:
3 (S.Ct.)
412 Pavlo v. Stiefel Laboratories, Inc., 1979 WL 105, *10+, 22 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 489,
489+, 23 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 30,926, 30926+ (S.D.N.Y. Nov 27, 1979) (NO. 78 CIV. 5551
(VLB)) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
413 Acha v. Beame, 438 F.Supp. 70, 78, 15 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 413, 413, 14 Empl. Prac.
Dec. P 7795, 7795 (S.D.N.Y. Jul 28, 1977) (NO. 75 CIV. 3128) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
414 Roundtree v. Berger, 420 F.Supp. 282, 284+ (E.D.N.Y. Sep 17, 1976) (NO. 75-C-1052) " HN: 2
(S.Ct.)
415 Gallagher v. Codd, 407 F.Supp. 956, 960 (S.D.N.Y. Feb 17, 1976) (NO. 75 CIV. 5164(MP)) HN:
2 (S.Ct.)
416 Fiallo v. Levi, 406 F.Supp. 162, 171+ (E.D.N.Y. Nov 28, 1975) (NO. 74 C 1083) (in dissent)
HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
417 Cohn v. U.S., 399 F.Supp. 168, 171, 37 A.F.T.R.2d 76-451, 76-451, 76-1 USTC P 9116, 9116
(E.D.N.Y. Jul 28, 1975) (NO. 71 C 982) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
418 Expert Elec., Inc. v. Levine, 399 F.Supp. 893, 899 (S.D.N.Y. Jul 24, 1975) (NO. 75 CIV. 2433)
HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
419 Goldfarb v. Secretary of Health, Ed. and Welfare, 396 F.Supp. 308, 309+ (E.D.N.Y. Jun 17,
1975) (NO. 74-C-1188) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
420 Korzenik v. Marrow, 401 F.Supp. 77, 81 (S.D.N.Y. May 19, 1975) (NO. 74 CIV. 516 (WCC))
HN: 1,3,4 (S.Ct.)
421 Communications Workers of America AFL-CIO v. American Tel. & Tel. Co., Long Lines Dept.,
379 F.Supp. 679, 682+, 8 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 529, 529+, 8 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 9615,
9615+ (S.D.N.Y. Jul 30, 1974) (NO. 73 CIV. 3353, 74 CIV. 304) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)

422 National Organization for Women--New York Chapter v. Goodman, 374 F.Supp. 247, 249+
(S.D.N.Y. Apr 17, 1974) (NO. 73 CIV. 4831) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
423 U.S. v. Berrios, 1974 WL 1042, *2, 85 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2168, 2168, 73 Lab.Cas. P 14,285,
14285 (E.D.N.Y. Jan 07, 1974) (NO. 73-CR-22, 73-CR-308) " HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
424 Lowe v. Swanson, 639 F.Supp.2d 857, 871 (N.D.Ohio Jul 07, 2009) (NO. 5:08 CV 686) HN: 5
(S.Ct.)
425 Pendleton v. Jefferson Local School Dist., Bd. of Educ., 754 F.Supp. 570, 578, 54 Fair Em-
pl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 1676, 1676, 56 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 40,664, 40664, 65 Ed. Law Rep. 380, 380,
1 A.D. Cases 1710, 1710 (S.D.Ohio Dec 20, 1990) (NO. C2-88-878) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
426 Vanater v. Village of South Point, 717 F.Supp. 1236, 1244 (S.D.Ohio Jun 29, 1989) (NO. C-
1-87-708) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
427 Low Income People Together, Inc. v. Manning, 615 F.Supp. 501, 517 (N.D.Ohio Aug 19, 1985)
(NO. CIV. A. C84-2863) " HN: 3 (S.Ct.)
428 Dillinger v. Heckler, 1984 WL 991, *4+ (N.D.Ohio Apr 24, 1984) (NO. CIV. A. C82-3188-A)
HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.)
429 Dayton Christian Schools v. Ohio Civil Rights Com'n, 578 F.Supp. 1004, 1034, 33 Fair Em-
pl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 1548, 1548, 36 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 35,020, 35020, 16 Ed. Law Rep. 108, 108
(S.D.Ohio Jan 06, 1984) (NO. C-3-80-410)
430 Spencer v. Herdesty, 571 F.Supp. 444, 452 (S.D.Ohio Sep 22, 1983) (NO. C-1-83-1349) HN: 4
(S.Ct.)
431 Adair v. Koppers Co., Inc., 541 F.Supp. 1120, 1130 (N.D.Ohio May 28, 1982) (NO. CIV.
C81-2482-Y) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
432 Stevens v. Califano, 448 F.Supp. 1313, 1317+ (N.D.Ohio Apr 19, 1978) (NO. CIV C77-103A)
433 Vanko v. Finley, 440 F.Supp. 656, 664 (N.D.Ohio Jun 01, 1977) (NO. C76-1305) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
434 Grove v. Ohio State University, College of Veterinary Medicine, 424 F.Supp. 377, 388 (S.D.Ohio
Dec 16, 1976) (NO. C-2-75-829) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
435 Farkas v. South Western City School Dist., 1974 WL 225, *1+, 8 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA)
288, 288+, 8 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 9619, 9619+ (S.D.Ohio Apr 08, 1974) (NO. C2 73-169) HN: 1
(S.Ct.)
436 Oklahoma Broadcasters Ass'n v. Crisp, 636 F.Supp. 978, 988 (W.D.Okla. Oct 01, 1985) (NO.
CIV-81-1756-W, CIV-82-44-W) "
437 National Gay Task Force v. Board of Educ. of City of Oklahoma City, State of Okl., 1982 WL
31038, *8, 33 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 1009, 1009 (W.D.Okla. Jun 29, 1982) (NO. CIV-
80-1174-E) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
438 Jones v. Oklahoma Secondary School Activities Ass'n (OSSAA), 453 F.Supp. 150, 155
(W.D.Okla. Aug 31, 1977) (NO. CIV-77-0477-T)
439 Walker v. Hall, 399 F.Supp. 1304, 1307+ (W.D.Okla. May 17, 1975) (NO. CIV-72-867) HN: 1
(S.Ct.)
440 McCleester v. Mackel, 2008 WL 821531, *29+ (W.D.Pa. Mar 27, 2008) (NO. CIV.A. 06-120J) "
HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
441 D.R. by L.R. v. Middle Bucks Area Vocational Technical School, 1991 WL 14082, *13 (E.D.Pa.

Feb 01, 1991) (NO. CIV. A. 90-3018, CIV. A.90-3060) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
442 West Virginia University Hospitals, Inc. v. Casey, 701 F.Supp. 496, 518, 24 Soc.Sec.Rep.Serv.
311, 311, Med & Med GD (CCH) P 37,646, 37646 (M.D.Pa. Nov 30, 1988) (NO. CIV. A.
86-0955) " HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
443 Haffer v. Temple University of the Com. System of Higher Educ., 678 F.Supp. 517, 530, 45 Ed.
Law Rep. 85, 85 (E.D.Pa. Oct 30, 1987) (NO. CIV. A. 80-1362)
444 Braun v. Levitt, 1986 WL 15154, *2 (E.D.Pa. Dec 22, 1986) (NO. CIV.A. 86-3348) HN: 2
(S.Ct.)
445 Democratic Party of the U.S. v. National Conservative Political Action Committee, 578 F.Supp.
797, 830, 15 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 1716, 1716 (E.D.Pa. Dec 12, 1983) (NO. CIV. 83-2329, CIV.
83-2823)
446 Strathie v. Department of Transp., Com. of Pa., 547 F.Supp. 1367, 1378, 32 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas.
(BNA) 1496, 1496 (E.D.Pa. Oct 01, 1982) (NO. CIV. 79-519) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
447 Goldberg v. Rostker, 509 F.Supp. 586, 593+ (E.D.Pa. Jul 18, 1980) (NO. CIV. 71-1480) HN: 2
(S.Ct.)
448 Vandermark v. Housing Authority of City of York, 492 F.Supp. 359, 363 (M.D.Pa. Jun 23, 1980)
(NO. CIV. 79-1064) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
449 Gavin v. Peoples Natural Gas Co., 464 F.Supp. 622, 631, 18 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 1431,
1431, 19 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 9033, 9033 (W.D.Pa. Jan 23, 1979) (NO. CIV. 77-1424) HN: 1
(S.Ct.)
450 Cooper v. Califano, 81 F.R.D. 57, 70+ (E.D.Pa. Dec 29, 1978) (NO. 78-594) HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
451 Adamik v. Pullman Standard, 439 F.Supp. 784, 786 (W.D.Pa. Nov 04, 1977) (NO. CIV. 76-1347)
" HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
452 Jackson v. Associated Hospital Service of Philadelphia, 414 F.Supp. 315, 324+ (E.D.Pa. May 11,
1976) (NO. CIV 73-2908) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
453 Colorado Spring Amusements, Ltd. v. Rizzo, 387 F.Supp. 690, 696+ (E.D.Pa. Dec 05, 1974)
(NO. CIV. 74-2174, CIV. 74-955) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
454 Poe v. Werner, 386 F.Supp. 1014, 1019+ (M.D.Pa. Dec 02, 1974) (NO. CIV. 74-53) HN: 1,2
(S.Ct.)
455 Johnson v. University of Pittsburgh, 1974 WL 10610, *3, 12 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 121,
121 (W.D.Pa. Jun 04, 1974) (NO. 73-120) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
456 Samuel v. University of Pittsburgh, 375 F.Supp. 1119, 1132+, 18 Fed.R.Serv.2d 786, 786+
(W.D.Pa. Apr 10, 1974) (NO. CIV. 71-1202) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
457 Magill v. Avonworth Baseball Conference, 364 F.Supp. 1212, 1217 (W.D.Pa. Aug 16, 1973)
(NO. CIV. 73-513) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
458 Lund v. Affleck, 388 F.Supp. 137, 138, 20 Fed.R.Serv.2d 610, 610 (D.R.I. Jan 15, 1975) (NO.
CIV. 74-36)
459 Fortin v. Darlington Little League, Inc. (Am. Division), 376 F.Supp. 473, 479 (D.R.I. May 15,
1974) (NO. CIV. 74-76) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
460 Scott v. U.S., 1973 WL 712, *5, 33 A.F.T.R.2d 74-858, 74-858, 74-1 USTC P 9281, 9281
(D.S.C. Nov 28, 1973) (NO. 72-1324)

461 Francis v. Cleland, 433 F.Supp. 605, 615 (D.S.D. Jun 25, 1977) (NO. CIV 76-5085) HN: 2
(S.Ct.)
462 U.S. v. Miller, 604 F.Supp.2d 1162, 1173 (W.D.Tenn. Feb 26, 2009) (NO. 08-CR-10097) " HN:
1 (S.Ct.)
463 Cape v. Tennessee Secondary School Athletic Ass'n, 424 F.Supp. 732, 739+ (E.D.Tenn. Nov 24,
1976) (NO. CIV. 3-76-234) HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
464 Usery v. Memphis State University, 1976 WL 692, *4+, 20 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 1598,
1598+, 22 Wage & Hour Cas. (BNA) 1430, 1430+, 13 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 11,451, 11451+, 79
Lab.Cas. P 33,452, 33452+ (W.D.Tenn. Oct 29, 1976) (NO. C-75-54) HN: 1,2,3 (S.Ct.)
465 Satty v. Nashville Gas Co., 384 F.Supp. 765, 769+, 10 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 73, 73+, 9
Empl. Prac. Dec. P 9919, 9919+ (M.D.Tenn. Nov 04, 1974) (NO. 74-288-NA-CV) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
466 Maldonado v. Quarterman, 2009 WL 2514087, *2 (W.D.Tex. Aug 14, 2009) (NO. EP-09-C V-
277-KC)
467 Neu v. Quarterman, 2009 WL 1285855, *5+ (N.D.Tex. May 08, 2009) (NO. CIV.A.
4:08-CV-273Y)
468 Dement v. Director, TDCJ-CID, 2007 WL 2264731, *5 (E.D.Tex. Aug 06, 2007) (NO. CIV A
907CV72) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
469 Cain v. Director, TDCJ-CID, 2007 WL 1394143, *12 (E.D.Tex. Apr 05, 2007) (NO. CIV.A.
6:06CV534) HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
470 Morales v. Daley, 116 F.Supp.2d 801, 812+ (S.D.Tex. Jun 07, 2000) (NO. H-00-1010) HN: 1,4
(S.Ct.)
471 Baker v. Wade, 553 F.Supp. 1121, 1144+ (N.D.Tex. Aug 17, 1982) (NO. CIV 3-79-1434-R) HN:
1,5 (S.Ct.)
472 Childers v. Dallas Police Dept., 513 F.Supp. 134, 147, 26 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 949, 949,
27 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 32,362, 32362 (N.D.Tex. Mar 30, 1981) (NO. CA3-76-0469-F) HN: 1
(S.Ct.)
473 Mertz v. Harris, 497 F.Supp. 1134, 1140 (S.D.Tex. Sep 10, 1980) (NO. CIV. B-78-164) HN: 1
(S.Ct.)
474 In re Alien Children Ed. Litigation, 501 F.Supp. 544, 556 (S.D.Tex. Jul 21, 1980) (NO. MDL
398) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
475 Arredondo v. Brockette, 482 F.Supp. 212, 217 (S.D.Tex. Dec 19, 1979) (NO. CIV. B-77-296)
HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
476 East Texas Guidance & Achievement Center, Inc. v. Brockette, 431 F.Supp. 231, 236 (E.D.Tex.
Apr 04, 1977) (NO. TY-76-113-CA)
477 Usery v. Dallas Independent School Dist., 421 F.Supp. 111, 114, 16 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA)
483, 483, 22 Wage & Hour Cas. (BNA) 1377, 1377, 13 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 11,444, 11444, 79
Lab.Cas. P 33,437, 33437 (N.D.Tex. Oct 19, 1976) (NO. CIV. CA-3-7975-D) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
478 Held v. Missouri Pacific R. Co., 1974 WL 157, *1, 7 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 789, 789, 7 Em-
pl. Prac. Dec. P 9350, 9350 (S.D.Tex. Apr 03, 1974) (NO. 73-H-1053) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
479 Held v. Missouri Pac. R. Co., 373 F.Supp. 996, 998 (S.D.Tex. Apr 03, 1974) (NO. CIV.
73-H-1053) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)

480 Stuart v. Heard, 359 F.Supp. 921, 924 (S.D.Tex. Jun 06, 1973) (NO. CIV. 73-H-243)
481 Clements v. Turner, 364 F.Supp. 270, 275 (D.Utah Jun 27, 1973) (NO. C 104-72) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
482 Taylor v. Clore, 2007 WL 2892681, *2 (W.D.Va. Sep 28, 2007) (NO. 7:07CV00448) HN: 1
(S.Ct.)
483 West v. Virginia Dept. of Corrections, 847 F.Supp. 402, 405 (W.D.Va. Mar 29, 1994) (NO. CIV.
A. 92-0887-R) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
484 Gadberry v. Schlesinger, 419 F.Supp. 949, 950 (E.D.Va. Jul 26, 1976) (NO. CIV 75-0187-R)
HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
485 Cramer v. Virginia Commonwealth University, 415 F.Supp. 673, 677+, 12 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas.
(BNA) 1397, 1397+, 12 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 10,968, 10968+ (E.D.Va. May 28, 1976) (NO. CIV.
75-0271-R) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
486 Rebideau v. Stoneman, 398 F.Supp. 805, 812 (D.Vt. Jun 19, 1975) (NO. CIV. 75-115, CIV. 75-3)
" HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
487 Lust v. Sealy, Inc., 277 F.Supp.2d 973, 988 (W.D.Wis. Aug 19, 2003) (NO. 02-C-50-C) HN: 4
(S.Ct.)
488 Byrd v. Unified School Dist. No. 1 of Racine, Wis., 453 F.Supp. 621, 625, 24 Fair Em-
pl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 739, 739, 19 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 8944, 8944 (E.D.Wis. Jul 19, 1978) (NO.
CIV. 73-C-685) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
489 U.S. v. Offord, 373 F.Supp. 1117, 1118 (E.D.Wis. Mar 07, 1974) (NO. 72-CR-65, 73-CR-116,
73-CR-136, 73-CR-140, 73-CR-158, 73-CR-78, 73-CR-84)
490 Sheeler v. Trans-Chem, Inc., 520 F.Supp. 117, 119 (D.Wyo. Aug 10, 1981) (NO. C-80-0366 B)
HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
491 Russell v. DeJongh, 2007 WL 45836, *12 (D.Virgin Islands Jan 07, 2007) (NO. CIV. 2006-228)
HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
492 Smothers v. Benitez, 806 F.Supp. 299, 306, 60 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 616, 616, 79 Ed. Law
Rep. 464, 464 (D.Puerto Rico May 13, 1992) (NO. CIV. 91-1256 (JAF)) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
493 Pascal v. Charley's Trucking Service, Inc., 436 F.Supp. 455, 458 (D.Virgin Islands Feb 08, 1977)
(NO. CIV. 76/707)
494 Benjamin v. Cleburne Truck & Body Sales, Inc., 424 F.Supp. 1294, 1298 (D.Virgin Islands Dec
18, 1976) (NO. CIV. 1975/720)
495 Stevenson v. Castles, 1974 WL 347, *4+, 13 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 1114, 1114+, 12 Empl.
Prac. Dec. P 11,145, 11145+ (D.Canal Zone Nov 15, 1974) (NO. 7452) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
496 In re Goering, 23 B.R. 1010, 1014+ (Bankr.N.D.Ill. Nov 09, 1982) (NO. 81 B 8719, 81 B 8720,
81 B 8721) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
497 In re Healthback, L.L.C., 226 B.R. 464, 472 (Bankr.W.D.Okla. Jul 31, 1998) (NO. 97-22616-BH)
HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
498 Baker v. U.S., 34 Fed.Cl. 645, 658, 69 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 1089, 1089 (Fed.Cl. Dec 12,
1995) (NO. 94-453C) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
499 Sea-Gate, Inc. v. U.S., 4 Cl.Ct. 25, 31 (Cl.Ct. Nov 29, 1983) (NO. CONG. REF. 2-76)
500 Atkins v. U. S., 556 F.2d 1028, 1090+, 214 Ct.Cl. 186, 297+ (Ct.Cl. May 18, 1977) (NO. 132-76,
357-76, 41-76) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)

501 Bruinooge v. U. S., 550 F.2d 624, 626, 213 Ct.Cl. 26, 29, 39 A.F.T.R.2d 77-921, 77-921, 77-1
USTC P 9244, 9244 (Ct.Cl. Feb 23, 1977) (NO. 443-75) "
502 Gentry v. U. S., 546 F.2d 343, 356, 212 Ct.Cl. 1, 25 (Ct.Cl. Nov 17, 1976) (NO. 312-74) HN: 4
(S.Ct.)
503 Sharp, 521 F.2d 1406, 1406+, 207 Ct.Cl. 975, 977+ (Ct.Cl. Jun 20, 1975) (Table, text in WEST-
LAW, NO. 416-74)
504 U.S. v. Leonard, 63 M.J. 398, 399 (U.S. Armed Forces Aug 09, 2006) (NO. 05-0445, CRIM.APP.
35444) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
505 U.S. v. Tulloch, 47 M.J. 283, 285 (U.S. Armed Forces Sep 30, 1997) (NO. 94 00329, 96-5008)
HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
506 U.S. v. Witham, 47 M.J. 297, 301 (U.S. Armed Forces Sep 30, 1997) (NO. 95-0906, 96-1179)
507 U.S. v. Bulger, 41 M.J. 194, 199 (CMA Sep 30, 1994) (NO. 93-0854, CMR 92 0359) HN: 5
(S.Ct.)
508 U.S. v. Santiago-Davila, 26 M.J. 380, 390 (CMA Aug 29, 1988) (NO. 56,250, CM 447830) HN:
5 (S.Ct.)
509 U.S. v. Moore, 26 M.J. 692, 710 (ACMR May 26, 1988) (NO. ACMR 8700123) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
510 Jones v. Commander, Naval Air Force, U.S. Atlantic Fleet, 18 M.J. 198, 203 (CMA Jul 16, 1984)
(NO. MISC. 84-10) (in dissent) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
511 U. S. v. Sykes, 11 M.J. 766, 768 (NMCMR Jun 30, 1981) (NO. NMCM 80 2622) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
512 U. S. v. Harris, 8 M.J. 52, 59 (CMA Nov 13, 1979) (NO. 31481, CM 432368) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
513 Latham v. Brown, 4 Vet.App. 265, 266+ (Vet.App. Feb 12, 1993) (NO. 90-1520) "
514 Wood v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 190, 194 (Vet.App. Mar 28, 1991) (NO. 89-50) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
515 Estate of Brandon v. C.I.R., 91 T.C. 829, 834, 91 T.C. No. 53, 53, Tax Ct. Rep. (CCH) 45,146,
45146, Tax Ct. Rep. Dec. (P-H) 91.53, 91.53 (U.S.Tax Ct. Oct 31, 1988) (NO. 17539-83) HN: 4
(S.Ct.)
516 Danzinger v. C.I.R., 1982 WL 10381, *10381, T.C. Memo. 1982-74, 1982-74, 43 T.C.M. (CCH)
539, 539, T.C.M. (P-H) P 82,074, 82074 (U.S.Tax Ct. Feb 11, 1982) (NO. 686-80) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
517 Black v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 69 T.C. 505, 508+ (U.S.Tax Ct. Dec 21, 1977) (NO.
3986-75, 7461-75) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
518 High Plains Agricultural Credit Corp. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 63 T.C. 118, 129
(U.S.Tax Ct. Nov 12, 1974) (NO. 9170-72) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
519 Hutchins v. DCH Regional Medical Center, 770 So.2d 49, 58 (Ala. Feb 11, 2000) (NO. 1972266,
1972298) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
520 Smith v. Schulte, 671 So.2d 1334, 1350 (Ala. Aug 18, 1995) (NO. 1930362, 1930459) (in dis-
sent) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
521 Plitt v. Griggs, 585 So.2d 1317, 1324 (Ala. Aug 16, 1991) (NO. 89-1017) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
522 Ex parte Dysart, 581 So.2d 545, 547 (Ala. May 10, 1991) (NO. 1900763) (in dissent) HN: 2
(S.Ct.)
523 Indian Rivers Community Health Center v. City of Tuscaloosa, 443 So.2d 894, 896 (Ala. Dec 22,
1983) (NO. 81-1039) "

524 King v. Reid, 428 So.2d 611, 615 (Ala. Mar 04, 1983) (NO. 81-721) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
525 Historic Warehouse, Inc. v. Alabama Alcoholic Beverage Control Bd., 423 So.2d 211, 213 (Ala.
Nov 19, 1982) (NO. 81-910) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
526 Hall v. McBride, 416 So.2d 986, 988+ (Ala. Jun 30, 1982) (NO. 81-69)
527 Mattingly v. Cummings, 392 So.2d 531, 534 (Ala. Oct 03, 1980) (NO. 79-17) (in dissent) HN: 1
(S.Ct.)
528 Gideon v. Alabama State Ethics Commission, 379 So.2d 570, 573 (Ala. Jan 11, 1980) (NO.
78-527) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
529 Orr v. Orr, 351 So.2d 904, 905 (Ala.Civ.App. Mar 16, 1977) (NO. CIV. 1006)
530 Holloway v. City of Birmingham, 317 So.2d 535, 537, 55 Ala.App. 568, 570 (Ala.Crim.App.
May 06, 1975) (NO. 6DIV.782) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
531 State v. Gray, 595 P.2d 990, 991+, 122 Ariz. 445, 446+ (Ariz. May 01, 1979) (NO. 4534) HN:
2,4 (S.Ct.)
532 City of Tucson v. Wolfe, 917 P.2d 706, 708, 185 Ariz. 563, 565 (Ariz.App. Div. 2 Jul 25, 1995)
(NO. 2CA-CR94-0229, 2CA-CR94-0230) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
533 El Dorado Ins. Co. v. Industrial Commission, 545 P.2d 465, 469+, 25 Ariz.App. 617, 621+
(Ariz.App. Div. 1 Jan 29, 1976) (NO. 1 CA-IC 1363) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
534 State v. Fairfield Communities Land Co., 538 S.W.2d 698, 701, 260 Ark. 277, 283, 13 Fair Em-
pl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 291, 291, 22 Wage & Hour Cas. (BNA) 1178, 1178, 12 Empl. Prac. Dec. P
11,143, 11143 (Ark. Jul 19, 1976) (NO. 76-46) (in dissent) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
535 Boshears v. Arkansas Racing Commission, 528 S.W.2d 646, 650, 258 Ark. 741, 747 (Ark. Oct
27, 1975) (NO. 75-179) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
536 Swafford v. Tyson Foods, Inc., 621 S.W.2d 862, 864, 2 Ark. App. 343, 348 (Ark.App. Sep 23,
1981) (NO. CA80-463) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
537 In re Marriage Cases, 76 Cal.Rptr.3d 683, 753, 183 P.3d 384, 443, 43 Cal.4th 757, 843, 08 Cal.
Daily Op. Serv. 5820, 5820, 2008 Daily Journal D.A.R. 7079, 7079 (Cal. May 15, 2008) (NO.
S147999) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
538 Kopp v. Fair Pol. Practices Com., 47 Cal.Rptr.2d 108, 124+, 905 P.2d 1248, 1264+, 11 Cal.4th
607, 633+, 95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9049, 9049+, 95 Daily Journal D.A.R. 15,816, 15816+ (Cal.
Nov 30, 1995) (NO. S038571) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
539 Walker v. Superior Court, 253 Cal.Rptr. 1, 26, 763 P.2d 852, 877, 47 Cal.3d 112, 150, 57 USLW
2375, 2375 (Cal. Nov 10, 1988) (NO. S.F. 24996) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
540 Isbister v. Boys' Club of Santa Cruz, Inc., 219 Cal.Rptr. 150, 162+, 707 P.2d 212, 224+, 40
Cal.3d 72, 89+ (Cal. Oct 21, 1985) (NO. S.F. 24623) HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
541 In re Marriage Cases, 49 Cal.Rptr.3d 675, 758, 143 Cal.App.4th 873, 873, 06 Cal. Daily Op.
Serv. 9451, 9451, 2006 Daily Journal D.A.R. 13,485, 13485 (Cal.App. 1 Dist. Oct 05, 2006)
(NO. A110449, A110450, A110451, A110463, A110651, A110652) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
542 Molar v. Gates, 159 Cal.Rptr. 239, 251+, 98 Cal.App.3d 1, 20+, 12 A.L.R.4th 1197, 1197+
(Cal.App. 4 Dist. Oct 23, 1979) (NO. CIV. 20517) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
543 G. B. v. Lackner, 145 Cal.Rptr. 555, 568, 80 Cal.App.3d 64, 86, 2 A.L.R.4th 752, 752 (Cal.App.
1 Dist. Apr 20, 1978) (NO. CIV. 41363) (in dissent) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)

544 Boren v. Department of Employment Dev., 130 Cal.Rptr. 683, 686, 59 Cal.App.3d 250, 256
(Cal.App. 3 Dist. Jun 17, 1976) (NO. CIV. 14138) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
545 Prescod v. Unemployment Ins. Appeals Bd., 127 Cal.Rptr. 540, 544, 57 Cal.App.3d 29, 36, 16
Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 1181, 1181 (Cal.App. 1 Dist. Apr 05, 1976) (NO. CIV. 37109) HN: 2
(S.Ct.)
546 Long v. State Personnel Bd., 116 Cal.Rptr. 562, 567, 41 Cal.App.3d 1000, 1008, 13 Fair Em-
pl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 1322, 1322, 8 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 9745, 9745 (Cal.App. 3 Dist. Sep 24, 1974)
(NO. CIV. 14303) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
547 Hardy v. Stumpf, 112 Cal.Rptr. 739, 742+, 37 Cal.App.3d 958, 961+, 7 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas.
(BNA) 1091, 1091+, 7 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 9309, 9309+ (Cal.App. 1 Dist. Mar 15, 1974) (NO.
CIV. 32689) HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
548 Evans v. Romer, 854 P.2d 1270, 1298, 62 USLW 2052, 2052, 62 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA)
779, 779, 62 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 42,621, 42621 (Colo. Jul 19, 1993) (NO. 93SA17) (in dissent)
HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
549 Mosgrove v. Town of Federal Heights, 543 P.2d 715, 718, 190 Colo. 1, 5 (Colo. Dec 08, 1975)
(NO. 26808) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
550 People v. Elliott, 525 P.2d 457, 460, 186 Colo. 65, 71 (Colo. Aug 12, 1974) (NO. 26085)
551 State v. Tillman, 600 A.2d 738, 744, 220 Conn. 487, 499 (Conn. Dec 03, 1991) (NO. 14085) HN:
1 (S.Ct.)
552 State v. Nims, 430 A.2d 1306, 1309, 180 Conn. 589, 596 (Conn. May 20, 1980) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
553 Frazier v. Manson, 410 A.2d 475, 479, 176 Conn. 638, 646 (Conn. Feb 27, 1979) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
554 Custer v. Bonadies, 318 A.2d 639, 644+, 30 Conn.Supp. 385, 395+ (Conn.Super. Jan 29, 1974)
(NO. 178366) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
555 Roundtree v. U.S., 581 A.2d 315, 335 (D.C. Oct 02, 1990) (NO. 86-1382) " HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
556 Gay Rights Coalition of Georgetown University Law Center v. Georgetown University, 536 A.2d
1, 36+, 56 USLW 2295, 2295+, 44 Ed. Law Rep. 309, 309+ (D.C. Nov 20, 1987) (NO. 84-50,
84-51) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
557 Group Hospitalization, Inc. v. District of Columbia Commission on Human Rights, 380 A.2d
170, 173+, 16 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 561, 561+, 15 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 7992, 7992+ (D.C.
Nov 10, 1977) (NO. 9623) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
558 In re W. E. P., 318 A.2d 286, 290 (D.C. Apr 23, 1974) (NO. 6979, 7047) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
559 Hall v. Keve, 1976 WL 7958, *1 (Del.Ch. Jul 19, 1976) (NO. CIV. A. 4970) HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.)
560 State v. Phlipot, 2010 WL 94347, *1 (Del.Super. Jan 06, 2010)
561 Household Finance Corporation v. Joseph H. JOHNSON and Emily JOHNSON, 1975 WL
144579, *1 (Del.Com.Pl. Jan 07, 1975) (NO. 67-6, 1974) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
562 State v. Sapps, 820 A.2d 477, 498 (Del.Fam.Ct. Apr 15, 2002) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
563 Matter of Dubreuil, 629 So.2d 819, 828+, 62 USLW 2333, 2333+, 18 Fla. L. Weekly S575,
S575+ (Fla. Nov 04, 1993) (NO. 80,311) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
564 State, Dept. of Health and Rehabilitative Services, on Behalf of Gillespie v. West, 378 So.2d
1220, 1224+ (Fla. Dec 20, 1979) (NO. 53123) HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)

565 Pohlmann v. Pohlmann, 703 So.2d 1121, 1127, 22 Fla. L. Weekly D2592, D2592 (Fla.App. 5
Dist. Nov 14, 1997) (NO. 96-1709, 96-2476) (in dissent)
566 State, Dept. of Health and Rehabilitative Services v. Cox, 627 So.2d 1210, 1226, 62 USLW 2436,
2436, 18 Fla. L. Weekly D2551, D2551, 18 Fla. L. Weekly D2668, D2668 (Fla.App. 2 Dist. Dec
01, 1993) (NO. 93-01138) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
567 Board of Com'rs of Sarasota County v. Gustafson, 616 So.2d 1165, 1167+, 18 Fla. L. Weekly
D1001, D1001+ (Fla.App. 2 Dist. Apr 16, 1993) (NO. 92-02073) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
568 Webb v. Hillsborough County Hosp. Authority, 521 So.2d 199, 202, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 448, 448,
13 Fla. L. Weekly 478, 478 (Fla.App. 2 Dist. Feb 12, 1988) (NO. 87-691) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
569 Lamar v. State, 254 S.E.2d 353, 354, 243 Ga. 401, 401 (Ga. Apr 04, 1979) (NO. 34318) HN: 1
(S.Ct.)
570 Williams v. Owen, 245 S.E.2d 638, 641, 241 Ga. 363, 368 (Ga. May 16, 1978) (NO. 33403) HN:
1 (S.Ct.)
571 Murphy v. Murphy, 206 S.E.2d 458, 459+, 232 Ga. 352, 352+ (Ga. May 21, 1974) (NO. 28782)
HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
572 Holdman v. Olim, 581 P.2d 1164, 1167+, 59 Haw. 346, 350+ (Hawai'i Jul 18, 1978) (NO. 5963)
HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
573 Nelson v. Miwa, 546 P.2d 1005, 1010, 56 Haw. 601, 607, 12 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 1017,
1017, 81 A.L.R.3d 799, 799, 11 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 10,862, 10862 (Hawai'i Feb 24, 1976) (NO.
5560) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
574 Olsen v. Olsen, 557 P.2d 604, 615, 98 Idaho 10, 21 (Idaho Nov 17, 1976) (NO. 12022) (in dis-
sent) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
575 Suter v. Suter, 546 P.2d 1169, 1175, 97 Idaho 461, 467, 83 A.L.R.3d 1283, 1283 (Idaho Feb 26,
1976) (NO. 11788) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
576 Newlan v. State, 535 P.2d 1348, 1351, 96 Idaho 711, 714 (Idaho Apr 30, 1975) (NO. 11561,
11655) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
577 Estate of Hicks, 675 N.E.2d 89, 95, 221 Ill.Dec. 182, 188, 174 Ill.2d 433, 443 (Ill. Dec 19, 1996)
(NO. 80604, 80677)
578 People v. M.A., 529 N.E.2d 492, 494, 124 Ill.Dec. 511, 513, 124 Ill.2d 135, 140 (Ill. Sep 22,
1988) (NO. 64476) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
579 People v. Moore, 463 N.E.2d 728, 730, 79 Ill.Dec. 174, 176, 101 Ill.2d 549, 549 (Ill. Jun 05,
1984) (NO. 59928) (in dissent)
580 People v. Payne, 457 N.E.2d 1202, 1213, 75 Ill.Dec. 643, 654, 99 Ill.2d 135, 158 (Ill. Dec 01,
1983) (NO. 56907)
581 In re Roger B., 418 N.E.2d 751, 756+, 49 Ill.Dec. 731, 736+, 84 Ill.2d 323, 334+ (Ill. Mar 18,
1981) (NO. 53796) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
582 In re Karas' Estate, 329 N.E.2d 234, 239, 61 Ill.2d 40, 51 (Ill. Jun 02, 1975) (NO. 46986, 47092)
HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
583 People v. Ellis, 311 N.E.2d 98, 101+, 57 Ill.2d 127, 132+ (Ill. Mar 20, 1974) (NO. 45745) " HN:
1 (S.Ct.)
584 In re A.S.B., 688 N.E.2d 1215, 1224, 293 Ill.App.3d 836, 847, 228 Ill.Dec. 238, 247 (Ill.App. 2

Dist. Dec 29, 1997) (NO. 2-97-0305) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)

585 People v. M.D., 595 N.E.2d 702, 711, 231 Ill.App.3d 176, 190, 172 Ill.Dec. 341, 350 (Ill.App. 2
Dist. Jun 30, 1992) (NO. 2-90-0878) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
586 Rallo v. Crossroads Clinic, Inc., 565 N.E.2d 15, 19, 206 Ill.App.3d 676, 683, 151 Ill.Dec. 744,
748 (Ill.App. 1 Dist. Sep 28, 1990) (NO. 1-88-2507) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
587 Tranquilli v. Irshad, 454 N.E.2d 377, 378, 117 Ill.App.3d 1074, 1076, 73 Ill.Dec. 517, 518, 33
Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 131, 131, 33 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 33,961, 33961 (Ill.App. 4 Dist. Sep
23, 1983) (NO. 4-83-0109) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
588 Village of Carpentersville v. Fiala, 425 N.E.2d 33, 35, 98 Ill.App.3d 1005, 1008, 54 Ill.Dec. 521,
523 (Ill.App. 2 Dist. Aug 05, 1981) (NO. 80-853) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
589 Matter of Roger B., 407 N.E.2d 884, 888, 85 Ill.App.3d 1064, 1068, 41 Ill.Dec. 386, 390
(Ill.App. 1 Dist. Jun 25, 1980) (NO. 79-763) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
590 Petrie v. Illinois High School Ass'n, 394 N.E.2d 855, 862+, 75 Ill.App.3d 980, 989+, 31 Ill.Dec.
653, 660+ (Ill.App. 4 Dist. Sep 06, 1979) (NO. 15362) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
591 Jeschke v. Ruhlow, 376 N.E.2d 15, 17+, 59 Ill.App.3d 125, 128+, 17 Ill.Dec. 122, 124+ (Ill.App.
1 Dist. Apr 04, 1978) (NO. 77 834) HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.)
592 People v. Williams, 336 N.E.2d 26, 29+, 32 Ill.App.3d 547, 549+ (Ill.App. 1 Dist. Sep 16, 1975)
(NO. 60756) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
593 People ex rel. Hopf v. Barger, 332 N.E.2d 649, 657, 30 Ill.App.3d 525, 534 (Ill.App. 2 Dist. Jul
15, 1975) (NO. 74-35) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
594 David M. CARGILL, Plaintiff, v. WASTE MANAGEMENT, INC., et al., Defendants; Donald
Panzer, Plaintiff, v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., et al., Defendants; Essie Pettis, Special Ad-
min. of the Estate of Orpheus Pettis, Plaintiff, v. Little Company of Mary Hospital and Health
Care Centers, Defendants; Therese Gargano, etc., Plaintiff, v. University of Chicago Hospitals, et
al., Defendants; Myra Holcomb, et al., Plaintiff, v. Hughes Enterprises, et al., Defendants; Mark
Targe, 1996 WL 34394997, *34394997 (Trial Order) (Ill.Cir. May 22, 1996) Order (NO.
95L10088, 95L11012, 95L14738, 95L7867, 95L8852, 95L9815) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
595 Sumpter v. State, 306 N.E.2d 95, 106, 261 Ind. 471, 488 (Ind. Jan 22, 1974) (NO. 1273S261) (in
dissent) HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
596 Hines v. Caston School Corp., 651 N.E.2d 330, 341, 63 USLW 2799, 2799, 101 Ed. Law Rep.
392, 392 (Ind.App. Jun 08, 1995) (NO. 25A05-9401-CV-22) (in dissent) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
597 Matter of Adoption of Thomas, 431 N.E.2d 506, 513+ (Ind.App. 4 Dist. Feb 16, 1982) (NO.
4-681 A 37) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
598 Matter of Parson's Estate, 344 N.E.2d 317, 319, 168 Ind.App. 580, 584 (Ind.App. 1 Dist. Mar 29,
1976) (NO. 1-1275A224) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
599 Kelly v. State, 525 N.W.2d 409, 411 (Iowa Dec 21, 1994) (NO. 93-1030) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
600 Bennett v. City of Redfield, 446 N.W.2d 467, 474 (Iowa Sep 20, 1989) (NO. 88-1073) HN: 2
(S.Ct.)
601 In re Marriage of Vrban, 293 N.W.2d 198, 201 (Iowa Jun 18, 1980) (NO. 62447) " HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
602 Franks v. Kohl, 286 N.W.2d 663, 669+ (Iowa Dec 19, 1979) (NO. 62959) HN: 1,2 (S.Ct.)
603 Hawkins v. Preisser, 264 N.W.2d 726, 729 (Iowa Mar 22, 1978) (NO. 59855) " HN: 2 (S.Ct.)

604 State v. Drake, 219 N.W.2d 492, 496 (Iowa Jun 26, 1974) (NO. 55879) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
605 In re Bowen's Marriage, 219 N.W.2d 683, 688 (Iowa Jun 26, 1974) (NO. 2-56745) HN: 1,3
(S.Ct.)
606 Lunday v. Vogelmann, 213 N.W.2d 904, 907+ (Iowa Dec 19, 1973) (NO. 56088) HN: 1,2 (S.Ct.)
607 Currans v. Linn County Civil Service Com'n, 540 N.W.2d 469, 472 (Iowa App. Sep 22, 1995)
(NO. 94-2085) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
608 Ranney v. Ranney, 548 P.2d 734, 739, 219 Kan. 428, 434 (Kan. Apr 10, 1976) (NO. 47906) HN:
1 (S.Ct.)
609 Talley v. Succession of Stuckey, 614 So.2d 55, 61 (La. Feb 22, 1993) (NO. 92-C-2298) HN: 5
(S.Ct.)
610 Sibley v. Board of Sup'rs of Louisiana State University, 477 So.2d 1094, 1106 (La. Sep 18, 1985)
(NO. 84-C-0571) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
611 Chabert v. Louisiana High School Athletic Ass'n, 323 So.2d 774, 780 (La. Dec 08, 1975) (NO.
56455) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
612 Southland Corp. v. Collector of Revenue for Louisiana, 321 So.2d 501, 505 (La. Nov 03, 1975)
(NO. 56280)
613 State v. Devall, 302 So.2d 909, 912+ (La. Oct 28, 1974) (NO. 54595) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
614 Oettinger v. Oettinger, 463 So.2d 875, 878 (La.App. 2 Cir. Jan 23, 1985) (NO. 16,720-CA) HN:
5 (S.Ct.)
615 Crosby v. Crosby, 434 So.2d 162, 163 (La.App. 5 Cir. Apr 11, 1983) (NO. 82-CA-205)
616 State in Interest of Delcuze v. Office of Human Development of Dept. of Health and Human Re-
sources, 397 So.2d 533, 535 (La.App. 4 Cir. Apr 21, 1981) (NO. 12412) " HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
617 Jones v. LaBarbera, 342 So.2d 1125, 1128 (La.App. 2 Cir. Feb 07, 1977) (NO. 13234) HN: 1
(S.Ct.)
618 DeFrancis v. City of Bossier, 322 So.2d 333, 337 (La.App. 2 Cir. Nov 06, 1975) (NO. 12727) "
HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
619 Primeaux v. Libersat, 307 So.2d 740, 744+ (La.App. 3 Cir. Jan 23, 1975) (NO. 4754) HN: 5
(S.Ct.)
620 Cote-Whitacre v. Department of Public Health, 844 N.E.2d 623, 663, 446 Mass. 350, 398 (Mass.
Mar 30, 2006) (NO. SJC-09436) (in dissent) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
621 Attorney General v. Massachusetts Interscholastic Athletic Ass'n, Inc., 393 N.E.2d 284, 290, 378
Mass. 342, 353 (Mass. Jul 02, 1979)
622 Com. v. MacKenzie, 334 N.E.2d 613, 615+, 368 Mass. 613, 616+ (Mass. Sep 22, 1975)
623 Black v. School Committee of Malden, 310 N.E.2d 330, 339, 365 Mass. 197, 209, 8 Fair Em-
pl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 132, 132, 8 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 9659, 9659 (Mass. Apr 26, 1974)
624 Attorney General of Maryland v. Waldron, 426 A.2d 929, 943+, 289 Md. 683, 708+, 17
A.L.R.4th 794, 794+ (Md. Mar 13, 1981) (NO. 45) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
625 Condore v. Prince George's County, 425 A.2d 1011, 1017, 289 Md. 516, 527 (Md. Feb 19, 1981)
(NO. 6) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
626 Wheeler v. State, 380 A.2d 1052, 1057, 281 Md. 593, 602, 3 Media L. Rep. 1607, 1607 (Md. Dec

12, 1977) (NO. 66) HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)

627 Weaver v. Prince George's County, 379 A.2d 399, 409, 281 Md. 349, 367 (Md. Nov 03, 1977)
(NO. 2 SEPT. TERM 1977) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
628 Colburn v. Colburn, 316 A.2d 283, 287+, 20 Md.App. 346, 353+ (Md.App. Mar 08, 1974) (NO.
173) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
629 Clukey v. Piscataquis County Sheriff's Dept., 696 A.2d 428, 430+, 1997 ME 124, 124+ (Me. Jun
04, 1997) (NO. WCB-95-525) " HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
630 Beal v. Beal, 388 A.2d 72, 74+ (Me. Jun 23, 1978) HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
631 In re Estate of Miltenberger, 753 N.W.2d 219, 244, 482 Mich. 901, 930 (Mich. Jul 31, 2008)
(NO. 133847) (in dissent) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
632 Adair v. State, Dept. of Educ., 709 N.W.2d 567, 588, 474 Mich. 1027, 1052 (Mich. Jan 31, 2006)
(NO. 129467) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
633 Department of Civil Rights ex rel. Forton v. Waterford Tp. Dept. of Parks and Recreation, 387
N.W.2d 821, 829, 425 Mich. 173, 190 (Mich. May 29, 1986) (NO. 71462) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
634 Morales v. Michigan Parole Bd., 676 N.W.2d 221, 235, 260 Mich.App. 29, 51 (Mich.App. Dec
16, 2003) (NO. 239936, 240458) HN: 1,2 (S.Ct.)
635 Rose v. Stokely, 673 N.W.2d 413, 434, 258 Mich.App. 283, 319 (Mich.App. Aug 28, 2003) (NO.
241029) " (in dissent) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
636 Rose v. Stokely, 655 N.W.2d 770, 776, 253 Mich.App. 236, 249, 253 Mich.App. 801, 801
(Mich.App. Oct 01, 2002) (NO. 241029) " HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
637 Walker v. Walker, 2001 WL 965519, *2+ (Mich.App. Aug 24, 2001) (NO. 221515) HN: 2,4
(S.Ct.)
638 Anderson v. City of Detroit, 221 N.W.2d 168, 170, 54 Mich.App. 496, 499 (Mich.App. Jul 25,
1974) (NO. 18558) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
639 City of Minneapolis v. Buschette, 240 N.W.2d 500, 504+, 307 Minn. 60, 68+ (Minn. Jan 23,
1976) (NO. 45040) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
640 Pruett v. State, 574 So.2d 1342, 1362 (Miss. Dec 27, 1990) (NO. 89-CA-0814) HN: 3 (S.Ct.)
641 Leahy v. Leahy, 858 S.W.2d 221, 229 (Mo. Jun 29, 1993) (NO. 75074) " HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
642 State v. Taylor, 726 S.W.2d 335, 336 (Mo. Mar 17, 1987) (NO. 68468) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
643 In Interest of J. D. G., 498 S.W.2d 786, 793 (Mo. Sep 10, 1973) (NO. 57382) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
644 Rolla Manor, Inc. v. Missouri Dept. of Social Services, Div. of Medical Services, 865 S.W.2d
812, 814, 43 Soc.Sec.Rep.Serv. 118, 118 (Mo.App. S.D. Oct 22, 1993) (NO. 18535) HN: 2
(S.Ct.)
645 Williams v. Williams, 498 S.W.2d 585, 588+ (Mo.App. Jul 17, 1973) (NO. 34899) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
646 Tipco Corp., Inc. v. City of Billings, 642 P.2d 1074, 1078, 197 Mont. 339, 346 (Mont. Mar 29,
1982) (NO. 81-330) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
647 State v. Turk, 643 P.2d 224, 227, 197 Mont. 311, 316 (Mont. Mar 25, 1982) (NO. 81-341) HN: 2
(S.Ct.)
648 State v. Craig, 545 P.2d 649, 653, 169 Mont. 150, 156 (Mont. Jan 19, 1976) (NO. 13034) HN: 2
(S.Ct.)

649 Texfi Industries, Inc. v. City of Fayetteville, 269 S.E.2d 142, 149, 301 N.C. 1, 11 (N.C. Aug 15,
1980) (NO. 126) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
650 Jones v. McDowell, 281 S.E.2d 192, 195+, 53 N.C.App. 434, 439+ (N.C.App. Aug 18, 1981)
(NO. 8014SC1000) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
651 City of Mandan v. Fern, 501 N.W.2d 739, 748+ (N.D. Jun 16, 1993) (NO. CRIM 920274) HN: 1
(S.Ct.)
652 Benson v. North Dakota Workmen's Compensation Bureau, 283 N.W.2d 96, 113+ (N.D. Jul 16,
1979) (NO. CIV. 9238-A) (in dissent) HN: 1,2 (S.Ct.)
653 State v. Knoefler, 279 N.W.2d 658, 661 (N.D. May 24, 1979) (NO. CR 671) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
654 Jordana v. Corley, 220 N.W.2d 515, 524 (N.D. Jun 27, 1974) (NO. CIV. 8995) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
655 In Interest of G. H., 218 N.W.2d 441, 447 (N.D. Apr 30, 1974) (NO. CIV. 8930)
656 Tang v. Ping, 209 N.W.2d 624, 627 (N.D. Jul 13, 1973) (NO. CIV 8872) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
657 Hug v. City of Omaha, 2006 WL 6318880, *6318880 (Trial Order) (Neb.Dist.Ct. Sep 26, 2006)
Order (NO. 1063251)
658 State v. Fuller, 862 A.2d 1130, 1138, 182 N.J. 174, 187 (N.J. Dec 22, 2004) (NO. A-76
SEPT.TERM 2002)
659 Holder v. Polanski, 544 A.2d 852, 856, 111 N.J. 344, 352, 57 USLW 2163, 2163 (N.J. Aug 09,
1988) (NO. A-108)
660 Matthews v. City of Atlantic City, 417 A.2d 1011, 1016, 84 N.J. 153, 161 (N.J. Jul 30, 1980)
(NO. 092680) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
661 Levine v. State Dept. of Institutions and Agencies, 418 A.2d 229, 242+, 84 N.J. 234, 258+ (N.J.
Jul 30, 1980) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
662 Jersey Shore Medical Center-Fitkin Hospital v. Baum's Estate, 417 A.2d 1003, 1007, 84 N.J. 137,
146, 11 A.L.R.4th 1147, 1147 (N.J. Jul 02, 1980) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
663 State v. Senno, 398 A.2d 873, 878, 79 N.J. 216, 226 (N.J. Feb 27, 1979) "
664 Taxpayers Ass'n of Weymouth Tp., Inc. v. Weymouth Tp., 364 A.2d 1016, 1034, 80 N.J. 6, 39,
83 A.L.R.3d 1051, 1051 (N.J. Sep 28, 1976) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
665 State v. Chambers, 307 A.2d 78, 82+, 63 N.J. 287, 296+ (N.J. Jun 26, 1973) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
666 Costello v. Board of Review, Dept of Labor, 642 A.2d 1034, 1036, 273 N.J.Super. 536, 540
(N.J.Super.A.D. May 24, 1994) (NO. A-2703-92T5) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
667 Murnane v. Murnane, 552 A.2d 194, 199, 229 N.J.Super. 520, 529 (N.J.Super.A.D. Jan 04, 1989)
(NO. A-3349-87T8)
668 Sykes v. Propane Power Corp., 541 A.2d 271, 278, 224 N.J.Super. 686, 700 (N.J.Super.A.D. May
06, 1988) (NO. A-416-87T8) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
669 Bonilla v. Heil, 315 A.2d 720, 724, 126 N.J.Super. 538, 546 (N.J.Super.A.D. Feb 14, 1974) HN:
1,2 (S.Ct.)
670 Matter of Crichfield Trust, 426 A.2d 88, 90, 177 N.J.Super. 258, 263 (N.J.Super.Ch. Nov 21,
1980) (NO. P-35-80)
671 Humane Soc. of U. S., New Jersey Branch, Inc. v. New Jersey State Fish and Game Council, 322
A.2d 841, 843, 129 N.J.Super. 239, 243 (N.J.Super.Ch. Jun 12, 1974) " HN: 2 (S.Ct.)

672 Cold Indian Springs Corp. v. Ocean Tp., 380 A.2d 1178, 1194, 154 N.J.Super. 75, 107
(N.J.Super.L. Oct 21, 1977) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
673 Arcell v. Ashland Chemical Co., Inc., 378 A.2d 53, 67, 152 N.J.Super. 471, 498 (N.J.Super.L. Jul
14, 1977) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
674 Frazier v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co., 374 A.2d 1259, 1267+, 150 N.J.Super. 123, 139+ (N.J.Super.L.
Apr 07, 1977) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
675 State v. Neely, 819 P.2d 249, 255, 112 N.M. 702, 708 (N.M. Sep 20, 1991) (NO. 19,085) " HN: 2
(S.Ct.)
676 State v. Villalpando, 521 P.2d 1034, 1035, 86 N.M. 193, 194 (N.M.App. Feb 27, 1974) (NO.
1333) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
677 Hernandez v. Robles, 821 N.Y.S.2d 770, 797, 855 N.E.2d 1, 28, 7 N.Y.3d 338, 389, 2006 N.Y.
Slip Op. 05239, 05239 (N.Y. Jul 06, 2006) (NO. 1, 3, 86, 87, 88, 89) (in dissent) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
678 Maresca v. Cuomo, 485 N.Y.S.2d 724, 729, 475 N.E.2d 95, 100, 64 N.Y.2d 242, 253, 45 Fair
Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 1606, 1606, 48 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 38,525, 38525 (N.Y. Dec 31, 1984)
HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
679 In re Adoption of Malpica-Orsini, 370 N.Y.S.2d 511, 524+, 331 N.E.2d 486, 495+, 36 N.Y.2d
568, 581+ (N.Y. May 08, 1975) (in dissent) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
680 National Organization for Women v. State Division of Human Rights, 358 N.Y.S.2d 124, 127,
314 N.E.2d 867, 870, 34 N.Y.2d 416, 420, 8 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 1137, 1137, 8 Empl.
Prac. Dec. P 9591, 9591 (N.Y. Jun 19, 1974) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
681 Sontag v. Bronstein, 351 N.Y.S.2d 389, 392, 306 N.E.2d 405, 407, 33 N.Y.2d 197, 201, 7 Fair
Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 361, 361, 7 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 9046, 9046 (N.Y. Nov 15, 1973) HN: 1
(S.Ct.)
682 Hernandez v. Robles, 805 N.Y.S.2d 354, 382+, 26 A.D.3d 98, 134+, 2005 N.Y. Slip Op. 09436,
09436+ (N.Y.A.D. 1 Dept. Dec 08, 2005) (NO. 103434/04, 6598, 6599) " (in dissent) HN: 1,3
(S.Ct.)
683 Lakeshore Nursing Home v. Axelrod, 586 N.Y.S.2d 433, 438, 181 A.D.2d 333, 341 (N.Y.A.D. 3
Dept. Jul 23, 1992) (NO. 64242A, 64242B) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
684 Linda R. v. Richard E., 561 N.Y.S.2d 29, 32+, 162 A.D.2d 48, 53+, 59 USLW 2327, 2327+
(N.Y.A.D. 2 Dept. Oct 01, 1990) (NO. 90-00199, 90-01642) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
685 Galbraith v. New York Conservative Party, 552 N.Y.S.2d 717, 719, 155 A.D.2d 183, 185
(N.Y.A.D. 3 Dept. Mar 22, 1990) (NO. 60232)
686 Oliver v. Broome County, 495 N.Y.S.2d 799, 802, 113 A.D.2d 239, 242 (N.Y.A.D. 3 Dept. Dec
05, 1985) (NO. 50498) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
687 Shattenkirk v. Finnerty, 471 N.Y.S.2d 149, 153, 97 A.D.2d 51, 55 (N.Y.A.D. 3 Dept. Dec 01,
1983) (NO. 46051) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
688 Slewett & Farber v. Board of Assessors, 438 N.Y.S.2d 544, 560, 80 A.D.2d 186, 207 (N.Y.A.D.
2 Dept. Apr 08, 1981) (NO. 1253, 1254) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
689 People v. Dozier, 424 N.Y.S.2d 1010, 1012, 72 A.D.2d 478, 480 (N.Y.A.D. 1 Dept. Feb 14,
1980) HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.)
690 Childs v. Childs, 419 N.Y.S.2d 533, 536+, 69 A.D.2d 406, 410+ (N.Y.A.D. 2 Dept. Jul 11, 1979)

HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
691 Bauer v. Bauer, 390 N.Y.S.2d 209, 211+, 55 A.D.2d 895, 897+ (N.Y.A.D. 2 Dept. Jan 03, 1977)
HN: 4,5 (S.Ct.)
692 Town of Pompey v. Parker, 385 N.Y.S.2d 959, 964, 53 A.D.2d 125, 130 (N.Y.A.D. 4 Dept. Jul
02, 1976) HN: 1,2 (S.Ct.)
693 People v. Siciliano, 384 N.Y.S.2d 994, 1001+, 52 A.D.2d 408, 419+ (N.Y.A.D. 1 Dept. Jun 10,
1976) " HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.)
694 People v. Smith, 411 N.Y.S.2d 146, 149+, 97 Misc.2d 115, 119+ (N.Y.Co.Ct. Nov 21, 1978)
HN: 1,2 (S.Ct.)
695 Application of Ogilvie, 373 N.Y.S.2d 281, 283, 83 Misc.2d 896, 897 (N.Y.Co.Ct. Sep 03, 1975)
HN: 1,2 (S.Ct.)
696 Fagan v. Axelrod, 550 N.Y.S.2d 552, 560, 146 Misc.2d 286, 299, 1990 O.S.H.D. (CCH) P
28,924, 28924 (N.Y.Sup. Jan 10, 1990) (NO. 1298, 7725-89) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
697 Rio v. Rio, 504 N.Y.S.2d 959, 962, 132 Misc.2d 316, 320 (N.Y.Sup. May 21, 1986) (NO. 6645,
85-19420) " HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
698 Pattberg v. Pattberg, 497 N.Y.S.2d 251, 256, 130 Misc.2d 893, 899 (N.Y.Sup. Dec 04, 1985)
(NO. 81-5986) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
699 Enki Properties, N.V. v. Loft Bd. of City of New York, 489 N.Y.S.2d 841, 847, 128 Misc.2d 485,
492 (N.Y.Sup. May 23, 1985) (NO. 17602/84) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
700 Spring Realty Co. v. New York City Loft Bd., 487 N.Y.S.2d 973, 978, 127 Misc.2d 1090, 1094
(N.Y.Sup. Mar 28, 1985) (NO. 160, 4058/84) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
701 People v. Alyakoub, 463 N.Y.S.2d 380, 384, 119 Misc.2d 470, 475 (N.Y.Sup. May 25, 1983)
(NO. 4350/82) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
702 People v. Ryals, 420 N.Y.S.2d 257, 259, 100 Misc.2d 551, 554 (N.Y.Sup. Aug 09, 1979) HN: 1
(S.Ct.)
703 People v. Prainito, 410 N.Y.S.2d 772, 774, 97 Misc.2d 66, 69 (N.Y.Sup. Nov 20, 1978) HN: 4
(S.Ct.)
704 Cary v. Cary, 404 N.Y.S.2d 534, 535, 94 Misc.2d 257, 258 (N.Y.Sup. Apr 27, 1978) HN: 4
(S.Ct.)
705 Cooper v. Morin, 398 N.Y.S.2d 36, 69, 91 Misc.2d 302, 342 (N.Y.Sup. Aug 05, 1977) HN: 4
(S.Ct.)
706 Repetti v. Gil, 372 N.Y.S.2d 840, 845+, 83 Misc.2d 75, 80+ (N.Y.Sup. Aug 25, 1975) HN: 1
(S.Ct.)
707 New York State Hairdressers & Cosmetologists Ass'n, Inc. v. Cuomo, 369 N.Y.S.2d 965, 973+,
83 Misc.2d 154, 163+ (N.Y.Sup. Jun 16, 1975) HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
708 Gould v. Gould, 371 N.Y.S.2d 267, 270, 82 Misc.2d 835, 838 (N.Y.Sup. Jun 11, 1975) HN: 1
(S.Ct.)
709 People v. Moss, 366 N.Y.S.2d 522, 527+, 80 Misc.2d 633, 637+ (N.Y.Sup. Feb 03, 1975) HN:
1,2,3 (S.Ct.)
710 People v. Bradford, 362 N.Y.S.2d 723, 726, 80 Misc.2d 24, 26 (N.Y.Sup. Dec 12, 1974) HN: 1,2
(S.Ct.)

711 People v. Overton, 389 N.Y.S.2d 253, 256, 88 Misc.2d 531, 535 (N.Y.City Crim.Ct. Nov 19,
1976) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
712 People v. Shing, 371 N.Y.S.2d 322, 333, 83 Misc.2d 462, 472 (N.Y.City Crim.Ct. Jul 17, 1975) "
HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
713 People v. Nelson, 427 N.Y.S.2d 194, 196+, 103 Misc.2d 847, 850+ (N.Y.City Ct. Apr 17, 1980)
HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
714 In re P., 400 N.Y.S.2d 455, 459, 92 Misc.2d 62, 68 (N.Y.Fam.Ct. Dec 05, 1977) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
715 Ellen N. v. Stuart K., 387 N.Y.S.2d 367, 372, 88 Misc.2d 280, 285 (N.Y.Fam.Ct. Sep 07, 1976)
HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
716 Carole K. v. Arnold K., 380 N.Y.S.2d 593, 597, 85 Misc.2d 643, 643 (N.Y.Fam.Ct. Feb 17,
1976) " HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
717 State ex rel. Watts v. Watts, 350 N.Y.S.2d 285, 290+, 77 Misc.2d 178, 183+ (N.Y.Fam.Ct. Aug
08, 1973)
718 Vincent v. Civil Servie Com'n, City of Zanesville, 1989 WL 47944, *4 (Ohio App. 5 Dist. Apr
12, 1989) (NO. CA-88-25, CA-88-26) HN: 1,2 (S.Ct.)
719 In re Rauscher, 531 N.E.2d 745, 749, 40 Ohio App.3d 106, 110 (Ohio App. 8 Dist. Oct 19, 1987)
(NO. 52819) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
720 Cintron v. Nader, 1980 WL 354341, *5+ (Ohio App. 8 Dist. Jun 26, 1980) (NO. 39564) HN: 1,5
(S.Ct.)
721 Lee v. Daugherty, 1979 WL 209353, *2+ (Ohio App. 10 Dist. Sep 27, 1979) (NO. 79AP-223)
HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
722 City of Columbus v. Leonard, 1976 WL 190152, *3 (Ohio App. 10 Dist. Aug 19, 1976) (NO.
76AP-276) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
723 Bassett v. Bassett, 521 P.2d 434, 436+, 1974 OK CIV APP 16, 16+ (Okla.App. Div. 2 Mar 26,
1974) (NO. 46368) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
724 Remington v. Landolt, 541 P.2d 472, 481, 273 Or. 297, 314 (Or. Oct 16, 1975) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
725 Curtis v. Kline, 666 A.2d 265, 271, 542 Pa. 249, 261 (Pa. Oct 10, 1995) (NO. 6 E.D. 1994) " (in
dissent) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
726 Com. v. Parker White Metal Co., 515 A.2d 1358, 1374, 512 Pa. 74, 105, 25 ERC 1173, 1173, 17
Envtl. L. Rep. 20,352, 20352 (Pa. Oct 09, 1986) (NO. 58WD APPEAL 1985) (in dissent) HN: 2
(S.Ct.)
727 James v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transp. Authority, 477 A.2d 1302, 1305, 505 Pa. 137, 144
(Pa. May 24, 1984) (NO. 88 E.D. 1983, J-73-84) " HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
728 Tsarnas v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp., 412 A.2d 1094, 1099, 488 Pa. 513, 522 (Pa. Mar 20,
1980) " HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
729 Roberts v. Board of Directors of School Dist. of City of Scranton, 341 A.2d 475, 479, 462 Pa.
464, 472 (Pa. Jul 07, 1975) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
730 Singer v. Sheppard, 346 A.2d 897, 905, 464 Pa. 387, 402 (Pa. Jun 26, 1975) " HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
731 Com. v. Butler, 328 A.2d 851, 858+, 458 Pa. 289, 301+ (Pa. Oct 16, 1974) HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
732 McIlvaine v. Pennsylvania State Police, 309 A.2d 801, 808+, 454 Pa. 129, 142+, 6 Fair Em-

pl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 768, 768+, 6 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 8860, 8860+ (Pa. Oct 03, 1973) (in dissent)
HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
733 Adler v. Montefiore Hospital Ass'n of Western Pennsylvania, 311 A.2d 634, 643, 453 Pa. 60, 77
(Pa. Jul 02, 1973)
734 Strax v. Com., Dept. of Transp., Bureau of Driver Licensing, 588 A.2d 87, 89, 138 Pa.Cmwlth.
368, 372 (Pa.Cmwlth. Mar 07, 1991) (NO. 314 C.D. 1985) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
735 Germantown Sav. Bank v. City of Philadelphia, 512 A.2d 756, 759, 98 Pa.Cmwlth. 508, 513
(Pa.Cmwlth. Jul 07, 1986) (NO. 15 T.D. 1985, 9 T.D. 1985) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
736 Northeastern Educational Intermediate Unit No. 19 v. Stephens, 510 A.2d 1267, 1273, 98
Pa.Cmwlth. 127, 137, 33 Ed. Law Rep. 347, 347 (Pa.Cmwlth. Jun 12, 1986) (NO. 1449 C.D.
1985) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
737 Formicola v. W.C.A.B. (City of Philadelphia), 509 A.2d 434, 436, 97 Pa.Cmwlth. 274, 279
(Pa.Cmwlth. May 15, 1986) (NO. 2725 C.D. 1983) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
738 Gill v. Northampton County, 488 A.2d 1214, 1216, 88 Pa.Cmwlth. 327, 330 (Pa.Cmwlth. Mar 22,
1985) (NO. 14 T.D. 1984) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
739 Sanders v. Com., Unemployment Compensation Bd. of Review, 482 A.2d 1371, 1375, 86
Pa.Cmwlth. 1, 6 (Pa.Cmwlth. Oct 31, 1984) (NO. 2314 C.D. 1982) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
740 Com., Dept. of Transp., Bureau of Traffic Safety v. Liberati, 472 A.2d 741, 745, 80 Pa.Cmwlth.
519, 526 (Pa.Cmwlth. Feb 29, 1984) (NO. 1270 C.D. 1982) HN: 1,2 (S.Ct.)
741 Morris v. Montgomery County Geriatric and Rehabilitation Center, 459 A.2d 919, 920, 74
Pa.Cmwlth. 363, 366 (Pa.Cmwlth. May 19, 1983) (NO. 36 T.D. 1982) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
742 U.S. Steel Corp. v. W.C.A.B. (Mehalovich), 457 A.2d 155, 157, 72 Pa.Cmwlth. 481, 484
(Pa.Cmwlth. Mar 08, 1983) (NO. 1832 C.D. 1980, 1833 C.D. 1980) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
743 Martin v. Com., Unemployment Compensation Bd. of Review, 439 A.2d 207, 209, 63
Pa.Cmwlth. 629, 634 (Pa.Cmwlth. Jan 06, 1982) (NO. 1910 C.D. 1979) " HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
744 Robson v. Penn Hills School Dist., 437 A.2d 1273, 1276, 63 Pa.Cmwlth. 250, 255, 1 Ed. Law
Rep. 872, 872 (Pa.Cmwlth. Dec 16, 1981) (NO. 2905 C.D. 1980) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
745 Picariello v. Com., 421 A.2d 477, 480, 54 Pa.Cmwlth. 252, 257 (Pa.Cmwlth. Oct 15, 1980) (NO.
21 T.D. 1980) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
746 Radnor Tp. School Dist., Radnor Tp., Delaware County v. Betty, 373 A.2d 1361, 1363, 30
Pa.Cmwlth. 425, 425, 30 Pa.Cmwlth. 651, 428 (Pa.Cmwlth. Jun 06, 1977) " HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
747 Norris v. Wood, 485 A.2d 817, 820+, 336 Pa.Super. 305, 310+ (Pa.Super. Dec 14, 1984) (NO.
1046, J 56045/84) HN: 1,2,4 (S.Ct.)
748 Tierney v. Pennsylvania Assigned Claims Plan, 466 A.2d 168, 171, 319 Pa.Super. 299, 308
(Pa.Super. Sep 23, 1983) (NO. 3005, J. 685/83) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
749 Greider by Ryan v. Pennsylvania Assigned Claims Plan, 462 A.2d 836, 839, 316 Pa.Super. 146,
151 (Pa.Super. Jul 08, 1983) (NO. 3310, J. 196/83) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
750 Murphy v. Harleysville Mut. Ins. Co., 422 A.2d 1097, 1106, 282 Pa.Super. 244, 260 (Pa.Super.
Nov 07, 1980) (NO. 1142) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
751 Doris Lyles v. City of Philadelphia, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Department of Transporta-
tion, and Essie L. Francis, 1983 WL 265436, *265436, 9 Phila.Co.Rptr. 473, 486 (Pa.Com.Pl. Jul

12, 1983) (NO. NO. 3017.) " HN: 2 (S.Ct.)

752 Hamm v. Philadelphia Bd. of Ed., 1979 WL 662, *3, 9 Pa. D. & C.3d 388, 393 (Pa.Com.Pl. Jan
31, 1979) HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
753 Kleimenhagen v. Philadelphia Tramrail Co., 1978 WL 312, *3, 8 Pa. D. & C.3d 48, 53
(Pa.Com.Pl. Sep 08, 1978) " HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
754 In re Englund's Estate, 1975 WL 16931, *16931, 74 Pa. D. & C.2d 230, 234, 26 Fiduc.Rep. 79,
79 (Pa.Com.Pl. 1975) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
755 Kleczek v. Rhode Island Interscholastic League, Inc., 612 A.2d 734, 739, 77 Ed. Law Rep. 349,
349 (R.I. Jul 17, 1992) (NO. 91-500-A) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
756 Harwood v. Harwood, 385 A.2d 1055, 1056+, 120 R.I. 145, 148+ (R.I. May 09, 1978) (NO.
77-397-APPEAL) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
757 Douglas v. Douglas, 306 A.2d 847, 851, 111 R.I. 760, 767 (R.I. Jul 12, 1973) (NO.
1625-APPEAL) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
758 Accounts Management, Inc. v. Williams, 484 N.W.2d 297, 300 (S.D. Apr 15, 1992) (NO. 17370)
HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
759 South Dakota Physician's Health Group v. State By and Through Dept. of Health, 447 N.W.2d
511, 515 (S.D. Oct 18, 1989) (NO. 16440) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
760 Feltman v. Feltman, 434 N.W.2d 590, 591+ (S.D. Jan 11, 1989) (NO. 16168) " HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
761 Birchfield v. Birchfield, 417 N.W.2d 891, 894+, 56 USLW 2483, 2483+ (S.D. Jan 13, 1988)
(NO. 15789) " HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
762 Budahl v. Gordon and David Associates, 287 N.W.2d 489, 492 (S.D. Jan 16, 1980) (NO. 12742)
HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
763 Masad v. Weber, 2008 WL 7662079, *7662079 (Trial Order) (S.D.Cir. Oct 01, 2008)
Plaintiffs'Motion to Amend Complaint and Defendants'Motion for Summary Judgment
(NO. CIV07246)
764 Davis v. Aetna Life and Cas. Co., 603 S.W.2d 718, 720 (Tenn. Aug 18, 1980) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
765 Tennessee Dept. of Human Services v. Vaughn, 595 S.W.2d 62, 65 (Tenn. Feb 11, 1980) HN: 5
(S.Ct.)
766 Robinson v. Trousdale County, 516 S.W.2d 626, 633 (Tenn. Nov 18, 1974) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
767 Flores v. State, 904 S.W.2d 129, 130 (Tex.Crim.App. Jun 28, 1995) (NO. 1183-93) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
768 Ex parte Shivers, 501 S.W.2d 898, 899 (Tex.Crim.App. Oct 24, 1973) (NO. 47226)
769 Fields v. Metroplex Hosp. Foundation, 2006 WL 2089171, *4 (Tex.App.-Austin Jul 28, 2006)
(NO. 03-04-00516-CV) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
770 State v. Cerriteno, 1996 WL 616439, *5+ (Tex.App.-Dallas Oct 17, 1996) (NO.
05-96-00330-CR) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
771 Boetscher v. State, 782 S.W.2d 954, 959 (Tex.App.-Amarillo Jan 11, 1990) (NO.
07-88-0288-CR) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
772 Mercer v. Board of Trustees, North Forest Independent School Dist., 538 S.W.2d 201, 204+
(TexCivApp-Hous (14 Dist.) Jun 02, 1976) (NO. 1302) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
773 Hendricks v. Hendricks, 535 S.W.2d 668, 669 (TexCivApp.-Hous (1 Dist.) Feb 11, 1976) (NO.

16646)
774 Tisko v. Harrison, 500 S.W.2d 565, 572 (Tex.Civ.App.-Dallas Sep 27, 1973) (NO. 18137)
775 Jacobs v. Meade, 315 S.E.2d 383, 384+, 227 Va. 284, 286+ (Va. Apr 27, 1984) (NO. 811718)
HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
776 Badgley v. Walton, 2010 WL 2636138, *2636138, 109 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 1220, 2010
VT 68, 68 (Vt. Jul 02, 2010) (NO. 2008-385) (in dissent)
777 Andersen v. King County, 138 P.3d 963, 1029, 158 Wash.2d 1, 99 (Wash. Jul 26, 2006) (NO.
75934-1, 75956-1)
778 American Network, Inc. v. Washington Utilities and Transp. Com'n, 776 P.2d 950, 960, 113
Wash.2d 59, 78 (Wash. Jul 13, 1989) (NO. 54608-8) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
779 State v. Wanrow, 588 P.2d 1320, 1321, 91 Wash.2d 301, 303 (Wash. Dec 28, 1978) (NO. 45102)
" HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
780 State v. Wood, 569 P.2d 1148, 1150, 89 Wash.2d 97, 100 (Wash. Sep 29, 1977) (NO. 44739)
HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
781 State v. Wanrow, 559 P.2d 548, 559, 88 Wash.2d 221, 240 (Wash. Jan 07, 1977) (NO. 43949) "
HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
782 Darrin v. Gould, 540 P.2d 882, 886+, 85 Wash.2d 859, 865+ (Wash. Sep 25, 1975) (NO. 43276)
HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
783 Kustura v. Department of Labor and Industries, 175 P.3d 1117, 1132+, 142 Wash.App. 655, 685+
(Wash.App. Div. 1 Jan 22, 2008) (NO. 57445-1-I, 57446-9-I, 57447-7-I) " HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
784 Singer v. Hara, 522 P.2d 1187, 1196+, 11 Wash.App. 247, 261+ (Wash.App. Div. 1 May 20,
1974) (NO. 1879-1) HN: 1,2 (S.Ct.)
785 State v. Smith, 780 N.W.2d 90, 96, 323 Wis.2d 377, 389, 2010 WI 16, 16 (Wis. Mar 19, 2010)
(NO. 2008AP1011-CR) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
786 State v. Quintana, 748 N.W.2d 447, 469, 308 Wis.2d 615, 660, 2008 WI 33, 33 (Wis. May 01,
2008) (NO. 2006AP499-CR) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
787 In re Commitment of Dennis H., 647 N.W.2d 851, 861, 255 Wis.2d 359, 382, 2002 WI 104, 104
(Wis. Jul 12, 2002) (NO. 01-0374) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
788 Castellani v. Bailey, 578 N.W.2d 166, 175, 218 Wis.2d 245, 264, 117 A.L.R.5th 643, 643 (Wis.
May 22, 1998) (NO. 95-2733) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
789 State v. McManus, 447 N.W.2d 654, 661, 152 Wis.2d 113, 131 (Wis. Nov 15, 1989) (NO.
87-1815-CR, 88-0951) " HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
790 Marshfield Clinic v. Discher, 314 N.W.2d 326, 336, 105 Wis.2d 506, 526 (Wis. Jan 18, 1982)
(NO. 81-214) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
791 State v. Ewald, 216 N.W.2d 213, 217+, 63 Wis.2d 165, 172+ (Wis. Apr 02, 1974) (NO. STATE
154) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
792 State v. Trepanier, 555 N.W.2d 394, 397, 204 Wis.2d 505, 510 (Wis.App. Sep 24, 1996) (NO.
96-0601-CR) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
793 State v. Martin, 530 N.W.2d 420, 423+, 191 Wis.2d 646, 652+ (Wis.App. Feb 15, 1995) (NO.
94-1643-CR, 94-2130) HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)

794 Moore v. McKenzie, 236 S.E.2d 342, 343, 160 W.Va. 511, 512 (W.Va. Jul 05, 1977) (NO.
13889) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
795 Nyberg v. State Military Dept., 65 P.3d 1241, 1247, 2003 WY 43, 43 (Wyo. Mar 31, 2003) (NO.
02-117) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
796 De Paz Lisk v. Aponte Roque, 124 D.P.R. 472, 488, 1989 P.R.-Eng. 607,276, 607276 (P.R. Jun
30, 1989) (NO. CE-86-710)
797 Pueblo Int'l, Inc. v. Srio. de Justicia, 122 D.P.R. 703, 788, 22 P.R. Offic. Trans. 649, 649 (P.R.
Nov 23, 1988) (NO. CE-86-430)
798 Nudelman v. Ferrer Bolivar, 107 D.P.R. 495, 519, 7 P.R. Offic. Trans. 544, 544 (P.R. May 31,
1978) (NO. R-77-144)
799 Zachry International v. Tribunal Superior, 104 D.P.R. 267, 278+, 4 P.R. Offic. Trans. 376, 376+
(P.R. Oct 23, 1975) (NO. O-74-437)
800 Death Benefits for Surviving Spouses of Certain Commonwealth Employes, 1976 WL 47876,
*2+, 75 Pa. D. & C.2d 641, 644+ (Pa.Dept.Just. Mar 17, 1976) (NO. 76-6.) HN: 4,5 (S.Ct.)
Mentioned
801 U.S. v. Stanley, 107 S.Ct. 3054, 3063, 483 U.S. 669, 683, 97 L.Ed.2d 550, 550, 55 USLW 5101,
5101 (U.S.Fla. Jun 25, 1987) (NO. 86-393)
802 Chappell v. Wallace, 103 S.Ct. 2362, 2368, 462 U.S. 296, 304, 76 L.Ed.2d 586, 586, 34 Fair Em-
pl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 1846, 1846, 32 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 33,651, 33651 (U.S.Cal. Jun 13, 1983)
(NO. 82-167) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
803 Rostker v. Goldberg, 101 S.Ct. 2646, 2653+, 453 U.S. 57, 67+, 69 L.Ed.2d 478, 478+ (U.S.Pa.
Jun 25, 1981) (NO. 80-251)
804 Kirchberg v. Feenstra, 101 S.Ct. 1195, 1199, 450 U.S. 455, 461, 67 L.Ed.2d 428, 428 (U.S.La.
Mar 23, 1981) (NO. 79-1388)
805 Cannon v. University of Chicago, 99 S.Ct. 1946, 1984, 441 U.S. 677, 747, 60 L.Ed.2d 560, 560,
19 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 9202, 9202 (U.S.Ill. May 14, 1979) (NO. 77-926) (in dissent) HN: 1
(S.Ct.)
806 Caban v. Mohammed, 99 S.Ct. 1760, 1771, 441 U.S. 380, 398, 60 L.Ed.2d 297, 297 (U.S.N.Y.
Apr 24, 1979) (NO. 77-6431) (in dissent)
807 Vance v. Bradley, 99 S.Ct. 939, 955, 440 U.S. 93, 121, 59 L.Ed.2d 171, 171, 19 Fair Em-
pl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 1, 1, 18 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 8915, 8915 (U.S.Dist.Col. Feb 22, 1979) (NO.
808 City of Los Angeles, Dept. of Water and Power v. Manhart, 98 S.Ct. 1370, 1379, 435 U.S. 702,
715, 55 L.Ed.2d 657, 657, 17 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 395, 395, 16 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 8250,
8250, 1 Employee Benefits Cas. 1813, 1813 (U.S.Cal. Apr 25, 1978) (NO. 76-1810) HN: 4
(S.Ct.)
809 Fiallo v. Bell, 97 S.Ct. 1473, 1487, 430 U.S. 787, 809, 52 L.Ed.2d 50, 50 (U.S.N.Y. Apr 26,
1977) (NO. 75-6297) (in dissent)
810 Stanton v. Stanton, 95 S.Ct. 1373, 1377, 421 U.S. 7, 13, 43 L.Ed.2d 688, 688 (U.S.Utah Apr 15,
1975) (NO. 73-1461) HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)

811 U. S. Dept. of Agriculture v. Moreno, 93 S.Ct. 2821, 2825, 413 U.S. 528, 533, 37 L.Ed.2d 782,
782 (U.S.Dist.Col. Jun 25, 1973) (NO. 72-534) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
812 Wigginton v. Centracchio, 205 F.3d 504, 512 (1st Cir.(R.I.) Mar 13, 2000) (NO. 98-2053) HN: 5
(S.Ct.)
813 Fortin v. Darlington Little League, Inc., 514 F.2d 344, 347 (1st Cir.(R.I.) Mar 31, 1975) (NO.
74-1216) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
814 Korineck v. General Dynamics Corp. Elec. Boat Div., 835 F.2d 42, 44, 1988 A.M.C. 742, 742
(2nd Cir. Dec 08, 1987) (NO. 47, 87-4026) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
815 Manufacturers Hanover Trust Co. v. U.S., 775 F.2d 459, 467, 56 A.F.T.R.2d 85-6560, 85-6560,
85-2 USTC P 9692, 9692, 85-2 USTC P 13,640, 13640 (2nd Cir.(N.Y.) Sep 16, 1985) (NO. 1334,
84-6051) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
816 Girard v. 94th St. & Fifth Ave. Corp., 530 F.2d 66, 75 (2nd Cir.(N.Y.) Jan 13, 1976) (NO. 372,
817 Breyer v. Meissner, 214 F.3d 416, 425 (3rd Cir.(Pa.) Jun 06, 2000) (NO. 98-1842)
818 Faulkner v. Jones, 10 F.3d 226, 231, 87 Ed. Law Rep. 394, 394 (4th Cir.(S.C.) Nov 17, 1993)
(NO. 93-2030) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
819 Kirchberg v. Feenstra, 609 F.2d 727, 734 (5th Cir.(La.) Dec 12, 1979) (NO. 77-1991) HN: 4
(S.Ct.)
820 McLellan v. Mississippi Power & Light Co., 545 F.2d 919, 933 (5th Cir.(Miss.) Jan 20, 1977)
(NO. 73-3226)
821 NAACP v. Allen, 493 F.2d 614, 619, 7 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 873, 873, 7 Empl. Prac. Dec.
P 9287, 9287 (5th Cir.(Ala.) Apr 19, 1974) (NO. 72-1796) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
822 Lane v. Attorney General of U. S., 492 F.2d 121, 123 (5th Cir.(Ga.) Apr 04, 1974) (NO. 72-1747)
823 Shirley v. Chagrin Falls Exempted Village Schools Bd. of Ed., 521 F.2d 1329, 1333+, 11 Fair
Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 549, 549+, 10 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 10,390, 10390+ (6th Cir.(Ohio) Sep 16,
1975) (NO. 75-1180) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
824 Satty v. Nashville Gas Co., 522 F.2d 850, 853+, 11 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 1, 1+, 10 Empl.
Prac. Dec. P 10,359, 10359+ (6th Cir.(Tenn.) Aug 08, 1975) (NO. 75-1083) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
825 Smith v. Troyan, 520 F.2d 492, 496, 10 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 1380, 1380, 10 Empl. Prac.
Dec. P 10,263, 10263 (6th Cir.(Ohio) Jul 03, 1975) (NO. 73-2226, 73-2227) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
826 Tucson Woman's Clinic v. Eden, 379 F.3d 531, 543+, 04 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7750, 7750+, 2004
Daily Journal D.A.R. 10,485, 10485+ (9th Cir.(Ariz.) Aug 23, 2004) (NO. 02-17375, 02-17381,
02-17382) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
827 Tucson Woman's Clinic v. Eden, 371 F.3d 1173, 1185+, 04 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5324, 5324+,
2004 Daily Journal D.A.R. 7335, 7335+ (9th Cir.(Ariz.) Jun 18, 2004) (NO. 02-17375, 02-17381,
02-17382) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
828 E.E.O.C. v. Puget Sound Log Scaling and Grading Bureau, 752 F.2d 1389, 1391, 53 USLW
2408, 2408, 36 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 1664, 1664, 36 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 34,969, 34969, 6
Employee Benefits Cas. 1212, 1212 (9th Cir.(Wash.) Jan 29, 1985) (NO. 84-3767, 84-3807) HN:
5 (S.Ct.)
829 Rose v. Morris, 619 F.2d 42, 43 (9th Cir.(Wash.) May 15, 1980) (NO. 78-2613)

830 U.S. v. Hicks, 625 F.2d 216, 218 (9th Cir.(Ariz.) Apr 16, 1980) (NO. 78-2534)
831 U.S. v. Antelope, 523 F.2d 400, 403 (9th Cir.(Idaho) Sep 04, 1975) (NO. 74-2741, 74-2742) HN:
5 (S.Ct.)
832 Walden v. Bartlett, 840 F.2d 771, 774 (10th Cir.(Kan.) Mar 01, 1988) (NO. 86-2475)
833 U.S. v. Crenshaw, 140 Fed.Appx. 836, 840 (11th Cir.(Ga.) Jul 19, 2005) (Table, text in WEST-
LAW, NO. 03-14853)
834 Nicholson v. Georgia Dept. of Human Resources (DHR), 918 F.2d 145, 148, 54 Fair Em-
pl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 737, 737, 55 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 40,401, 40401 (11th Cir.(Ga.) Nov 27,
1990) (NO. 89-8435) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
835 Johnson v. Smith, 696 F.2d 1334, 1336 (11th Cir.(Ga.) Feb 03, 1983) (NO. 81-7660) HN: 4
(S.Ct.)
836 Woodward v. U.S., 871 F.2d 1068, 1076, 49 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 38,877, 38877 (Fed.Cir. Mar 29,
1989) (NO. 86-1283) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
837 Doe v. Sullivan, 938 F.2d 1370, 1381, 60 USLW 2080, 2080, 291 U.S.App.D.C. 111, 122
(D.C.Cir. Jul 16, 1991) (NO. 91-5019)
838 Pitts v. Thornburgh, 866 F.2d 1450, 1454, 275 U.S.App.D.C. 332, 336 (D.C.Cir. Jan 31, 1989)
(NO. 88-5058)
839 Walker v. Jones, 733 F.2d 923, 933, 34 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 1097, 1097, 34 Empl. Prac.
Dec. P 34,427, 34427, 236 U.S.App.D.C. 92, 102 (D.C.Cir. May 01, 1984) (NO. 83-1425)
840 Waldie v. Schlesinger, 509 F.2d 508, 509, 166 U.S.App.D.C. 175, 176 (D.C.Cir. Nov 20, 1974)
(NO. 74-1636, 74-1637)
841 Roe v. Conn, 417 F.Supp. 769, 783 (M.D.Ala. Jul 06, 1976) (NO. CIV. 75-232-N, CIV.
75-233-N, CIV. 75-457-N) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
842 U.S. v. Tsuda Maru, 479 F.Supp. 519, 522 (D.Alaska Nov 01, 1979) (NO. CIV. A79-031)
843 Kastl v. Maricopa County Community College Dist., 2004 WL 2008954, *8 (D.Ariz. Jun 03,
2004) (NO. CIV.02-1531PHX-SRB)
844 McAllister v. Gunja, 2009 WL 80985, *3 (E.D.Cal. Jan 13, 2009) (NO.
106CV00082OWWWMWPC)
845 White v. U.S., 2008 WL 2543246, *3 (E.D.Cal. Jun 23, 2008) (NO. 108CV00738 OWW GSA)
HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
846 Merrell v. All Seasons Resorts, Inc., 720 F.Supp. 815, 821, 52 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 1412,
1412, 52 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 39,555, 39555 (C.D.Cal. Sep 01, 1989) (NO. CV 89-3218 DT) HN:
2 (S.Ct.)
847 Harriss v. Pan Am. World Airways, Inc., 437 F.Supp. 413, 428+, 15 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA)
1663, 1663+, 15 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 8015, 8015+ (N.D.Cal. Sep 02, 1977) (NO. C-
74-1884-WWS) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
848 In re Paris Air Crash of March 3, 1974., 427 F.Supp. 701, 708 (C.D.Cal. Feb 10, 1977) (NO.
MDL 172)
849 Brown v. Santa Barbara County, 427 F.Supp. 112, 113, 16 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 770, 770,
23 Wage & Hour Cas. (BNA) 210, 210, 13 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 11,491, 11491, 81 Lab.Cas. P
33,494, 33494, 81 Lab.Cas. P 33,529, 33529 (C.D.Cal. Jan 14, 1977) (NO. 75-3978-HP,

75-4084-HP, 75-4177-HP, CIV 75-3492-HP)

850 California Licensed Vocational Nurses Ass'n, Inc.,v. N.L.R.B., 1975 WL 12027, *3, 88 L.R.R.M.
(BNA) 3124, 3124 (N.D.Cal. Feb 28, 1975) (NO. C-74-2188-CBR) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
851 Taxation with Representation of Washington v. Blumenthal, 1979 WL 1286, *4, 43 A.F.T.R.2d
79-679, 79-679, 79-1 USTC P 9185, 9185 (D.Colo. Jan 31, 1979) (NO. 78-834) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
852 Fitzpatrick v. Bitzer, 390 F.Supp. 278, 290, 8 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 877, 877, 8 Empl. Prac.
Dec. P 9685, 9685 (D.Conn. Sep 16, 1974) (NO. CIV. 15492) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
853 Vaccarella v. Fusari, 365 F.Supp. 1164, 1167 (D.Conn. Sep 13, 1973) (NO. CIV. 15343) HN: 2
(S.Ct.)
854 U.S. v. Roberts, 726 F.Supp. 1359, 1371 (D.D.C. Nov 16, 1989) (NO. CR. 89-0033 (HHG), CR.
89-0074 (HHG), CR. 89-0319 (HHG), CR. 89-0342 (HHG)) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
855 Masjid Muhammad-D. C. C. v. Keve, 479 F.Supp. 1311, 1323 (D.Del. Oct 22, 1979) (NO. CIV.
77-221)
856 Cimaglia v. Schweiker, 555 F.Supp. 710, 713, 1 Soc.Sec.Rep.Serv. 581, 581 (S.D.Fla. Jan 12,
1983) (NO. 78-6353-CIV-JCP)
857 Vitale v. Harris, 507 F.Supp. 854, 858 (S.D.Fla. Feb 12, 1981) (NO. 78-6551-CIV-EPS)
858 U.S. v. Jenison, 485 F.Supp. 655, 660 (S.D.Fla. Dec 18, 1979) (NO. 78-296-CR-JWH)
859 Woody v. City of West Miami, 477 F.Supp. 1073, 1081, 21 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 315, 315,
22 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 30,605, 30605 (S.D.Fla. Sep 13, 1979) (NO. 77-1934-CIV-SMA)
860 Naia v. Deal, 13 F.Supp.2d 1369, 1377 (S.D.Ga. Jun 30, 1998) (NO. CIV.A. CV297-113) HN: 2
(S.Ct.)
861 Rush v. Johnson, 565 F.Supp. 856, 869, 2 Soc.Sec.Rep.Serv. 840, 840, Med & Med GD (CCH) P
33,403, 33403 (N.D.Ga. Jun 09, 1983) (NO. CIV. C76-1445A) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
862 Collins v. Schweitzer, Inc., 774 F.Supp. 1253, 1261 (D.Idaho Oct 02, 1991) (NO. CIV. 89-3056)
863 Spence v. Holesinger, 693 F.Supp. 703, 708+ (C.D.Ill. Jul 29, 1988) (NO. 87-1020)
864 Marozsan v. U.S., 635 F.Supp. 578, 580 (N.D.Ind. Apr 30, 1986) (NO. S 84-500) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
865 Uhl v. Swanstrom, 876 F.Supp. 1545, 1563 (N.D.Iowa Feb 21, 1995) (NO. C 91-4012)
866 McInnis v. Weinberger, 388 F.Supp. 381, 392 (D.Mass. Jan 10, 1975) (NO. CIV. 74-1481-T)
HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
867 Allen v. Califano, 456 F.Supp. 168, 171 (D.Md. Jul 05, 1978) (NO. 73-1095-B, B-75-462) HN: 5
(S.Ct.)
868 Allen v. Califano, 452 F.Supp. 205, 217 (D.Md. Feb 08, 1978) (NO. CIV. 73-1095-B, CIV.
73-1142-B, CIV. B-75-462) HN: 2,5 (S.Ct.)
869 Norton v. Weinberger, 364 F.Supp. 1117, 1121+ (D.Md. Sep 14, 1973) (NO. CIV. 72-271-B)
HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
870 Curran v. Portland Superintending School Committee, City of Portland, Me., 435 F.Supp. 1063,
1084, 15 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 644, 644, 46 A.L.R. Fed. 304, 304, 15 Empl. Prac. Dec. P
7871, 7871 (D.Me. Jul 18, 1977) (NO. CIV. 75-27-SD) HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
871 Estate of Scott by Scott v. deLeon, 603 F.Supp. 1328, 1332, 37 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 563,
563, 23 Ed. Law Rep. 907, 907 (E.D.Mich. Mar 13, 1985) (NO. CIV. 82-60399)

872 Schaefer v. Tannian, 394 F.Supp. 1128, 1134, 8 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 12, 12, 7 Empl. Prac.
Dec. P 9404, 9404 (E.D.Mich. May 22, 1974) (NO. CIV. 39943) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
873 Montana Contractors' Ass'n v. Secretary of Commerce of United States, 439 F.Supp. 1331, 1333,
24 Cont.Cas.Fed. (CCH) P 81,950, 81950 (D.Mont. Nov 07, 1977) (NO. CV 77-62-M) HN: 2
(S.Ct.)
874 Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes of Flathead Reservation, Montana (""Tribes"") v. Moe,
In and For Missoula County, Montana, 392 F.Supp. 1297, 1321 (D.Mont. May 10, 1974) (NO.
CIV 2145) (in dissent)
875 Suhr v. North Carolina State University Agr. Research Service, 1987 WL 5853, *12 (E.D.N.C.
Jan 27, 1987) (NO. 86-674-CIV-5) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
876 Association for Retarded Citizens of North Dakota v. Olson, 561 F.Supp. 473, 490 (D.N.D. Aug
31, 1982) (NO. CIV. A1-80-141)
877 Richenberg v. Perry, 909 F.Supp. 1303, 1311, 68 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 44,121, 44121 (D.Neb. Dec
11, 1995) (NO. 8:CV95-00393) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
878 Skadegaard v. Farrell, 578 F.Supp. 1209, 1219, 33 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 1528, 1528, 34
Empl. Prac. Dec. P 34,323, 34323 (D.N.J. Jan 19, 1984) (NO. CIV. 83-945) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
879 Downes v. J.P. Morgan Chase & Co., 2007 WL 1468218, *9, 100 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA)
1183, 1183, 154 Lab.Cas. P 35,294, 35294 (S.D.N.Y. May 16, 2007) (NO. 03 CIV. 8991 (GEL))
880 Baker v. Department of Environmental Conservation of State of N.Y., 634 F.Supp. 1460, 1467,
16 Envtl. L. Rep. 20,838, 20838 (N.D.N.Y. May 16, 1986) (NO. 85-CV-145)
881 Miller v. Department of Health and Human Services, 517 F.Supp. 1192, 1194 (E.D.N.Y. Jul 10,
1981) (NO. CV-80-1792) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
882 Troyer v. Town of Babylon, 483 F.Supp. 1135, 1142 (E.D.N.Y. Jan 04, 1980) (NO. 79-C-401)
HN: 3 (S.Ct.)
883 U.S. v. City of Buffalo, 457 F.Supp. 612, 629, 19 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 776, 776, 18 Empl.
Prac. Dec. P 8899, 8899 (W.D.N.Y. Aug 01, 1978) (NO. CIV. 1973-414, CIV. 1974-195) HN: 4
(S.Ct.)
884 Cave v. Beame, 433 F.Supp. 172, 179 (E.D.N.Y. Jun 01, 1977) (NO. 77-C-2) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
885 New York City Jaycees, Inc. v. U.S. Jaycees, Inc., 377 F.Supp. 481, 486 (S.D.N.Y. Jun 13, 1974)
(NO. 74 CIV 652) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
886 Yates v. Wilson, 2008 WL 755271, *19 (N.D.Ohio Mar 19, 2008) (NO. 5:06CV1940) HN: 1
(S.Ct.)
887 Davie v. Wingard, 958 F.Supp. 1244, 1252, 166 A.L.R. Fed. 709, 709 (S.D.Ohio Mar 06, 1997)
(NO. CIV. A. C-2-95-513) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
888 Bosco's Club, Inc. v. City of Oklahoma City, 598 F.Supp. 583, 589 (W.D.Okla. Nov 21, 1984)
(NO. CIV 83-2439-R) HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.)
889 Harbert v. Rapp, 415 F.Supp. 83, 86, 14 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 18, 18 (W.D.Okla. Mar 30,
1976) (NO. CIV. 75-0634-D) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
890 Buclary v. Borough of Northampton, 1991 WL 133851, *11 (E.D.Pa. Jul 17, 1991) (NO. CIV. A.
90-7950) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
891 Murphy v. Garrett, 729 F.Supp. 461, 467 (W.D.Pa. Jan 18, 1990) (NO. CIV.A. 89-1853) HN: 5

(S.Ct.)
892 Ramos v. United States, 1986 WL 6147, *3 (E.D.Pa. May 23, 1986) (NO. CIV.A. 86-0417)
893 Constructors Ass'n of Western Pennsylvania v. Kreps, 441 F.Supp. 936, 946, 24 Cont.Cas.Fed.
(CCH) P 81,753, 81753 (W.D.Pa. Oct 13, 1977) (NO. CIV. 77-1035) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
894 Bykofsky v. Borough of Middletown, 401 F.Supp. 1242, 1265 (M.D.Pa. Aug 22, 1975) (NO.
CIV. 75-74) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
895 Rhode Island Chapter, Associated General Contractors of America, Inc. v. Kreps, 450 F.Supp.
338, 354, 25 Cont.Cas.Fed. (CCH) P 82,429, 82429 (D.R.I. Feb 06, 1978) (NO. CIV. A.
77-0676)
896 Faulkner v. Jones, 858 F.Supp. 552, 566, 93 Ed. Law Rep. 1210, 1210 (D.S.C. Jul 22, 1994) (NO.
CIV. A. 2:93-488-2) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
897 South Carolina Educ. Ass'n v. Campbell, 697 F.Supp. 908, 921, 131 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2389,
2389, 49 Ed. Law Rep. 1198, 1198 (D.S.C. Aug 10, 1988) (NO. CIV. A. 3:87-2838-0) HN: 5
(S.Ct.)
898 Mitchell v. Board of Trustees of Pickens County School Dist. "A", 415 F.Supp. 512, 519, 11 Em-
pl. Prac. Dec. P 10,652, 10652 (D.S.C. Apr 06, 1976) (NO. CIV. 75-143) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
899 Oliver v. Kanan, 2010 WL 2927333, *3 (N.D.Tex. Jul 28, 2010) (NO. 409-CV-767-Y)
900 Eldridge v. Bouchard, 645 F.Supp. 749, 752 (W.D.Va. Oct 09, 1986) (NO. CIV. A. 85-0042-A)
HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
901 Newport News Shipbuilding and Dry Dock Co. v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission,
510 F.Supp. 66, 68+, 25 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 5, 5+, 25 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 31,552,
31552+, 25 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 31,679, 31679+, 2 Employee Benefits Cas. 1001, 1001+ (E.D.Va.
Feb 25, 1981) (NO. CIV.80-20-NN) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
902 Newport News Shipbuilding and Dry Dock Co. v. E.E.O.C., 1981 WL 26979, *1+, 24 Fair Em-
pl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 1363, 1363+ (E.D.Va. Jan 26, 1981) (NO. 80-20-NN) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
903 Taliaferro v. State Council of Higher Ed., 372 F.Supp. 1378, 1385, 7 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA)
492, 492, 7 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 9345, 9345, 18 Fed.R.Serv.2d 765, 765 (E.D.Va. Mar 06, 1974)
(NO. CIV. 73-584-R)
904 Bellamy v. Mason's Stores, Inc., 368 F.Supp. 1025, 1028, 6 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 1145,
1145, 7 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 9113, 9113 (E.D.Va. Dec 07, 1973) (NO. CIV. A. 322-73-R) HN: 1
(S.Ct.)
905 Betts v. Weinberger, 391 F.Supp. 1122, 1133 (D.Vt. Mar 24, 1975) (NO. CIV. 73-182)
906 Standlee v. Rhay, 403 F.Supp. 1247, 1254 (E.D.Wash. Nov 07, 1975) (NO. C-75-18)
907 Betts v. McCaughtry, 827 F.Supp. 1400, 1406 (W.D.Wis. Jul 21, 1993) (NO. 92-C-640-C) HN: 2
(S.Ct.)
908 Kelly v. Wisconsin Interscholastic Athletic Ass'n, 367 F.Supp. 1388, 1392 (E.D.Wis. Jan 16,
1974) (NO. CIV. A. 73-C-269) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
909 Southwestern Community Action Council, Inc. v. Community Services Administration, 462
F.Supp. 289, 292, 19 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 9258, 9258 (S.D.W.Va. Dec 13, 1978) (NO. CIV.
76-0351-H)
910 Lindquist v. Xerox Corp., 571 F.Supp. 470, 471 (D.Virgin Islands Sep 23, 1983) (NO. CIV.

172/1983)
911 Ramos v. U.S. Civil Service Com'n, 376 F.Supp. 361, 368, 10 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 55, 55
(D.Puerto Rico May 29, 1974) (NO. CIV. 326-73, CIV. 63-73) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
912 Mapes v. U. S., 576 F.2d 896, 901+, 217 Ct.Cl. 115, 125+, 41 A.F.T.R.2d 78-1423, 78-1423+,
78-1 USTC P 9445, 9445+ (Ct.Cl. May 17, 1978) (NO. 403-77) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
913 Fredrick v. U. S., 507 F.2d 1264, 1266, 205 Ct.Cl. 791, 796 (Ct.Cl. Dec 18, 1974) (NO. 255-73)
HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
914 U. S. v. Courtney, 1 M.J. 438, 439 (CMA Jul 02, 1976) (NO. 30,864)
915 U. S. v. Larner, 1 M.J. 371, 375 (CMA Mar 26, 1976) (NO. 30,361) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
916 Giancaterino v. Brown, 7 Vet.App. 555, 557 (Vet.App. May 03, 1995) (NO. 93-830) HN: 5
(S.Ct.)
917 Hrvatin v. Principi, 3 Vet.App. 426, 429 (Vet.App. Nov 04, 1992) (NO. 91-217)
918 Laks v. Laks, 540 P.2d 1277, 1280, 25 Ariz.App. 58, 61 (Ariz.App. Div. 2 Oct 08, 1975) (NO. 2
CA-CIV 1874) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
919 Bakke v. Regents of University of California, 132 Cal.Rptr. 680, 711, 553 P.2d 1152, 1183, 18
Cal.3d 34, 79 (Cal. Sep 16, 1976) (NO. S.F. 23311) (in dissent) HN: 3 (S.Ct.)
920 Central Valley Chap. 7th Step Foundation v. Younger, 157 Cal.Rptr. 117, 132, 95 Cal.App.3d
212, 238 (Cal.App. 1 Dist. Jul 24, 1979) (NO. CIV. 43712) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
921 Ayala v. Unemployment Ins. Appeals Bd., 126 Cal.Rptr. 210, 213, 54 Cal.App.3d 676, 680
(Cal.App. 2 Dist. Jan 22, 1976) (NO. CIV. 45990)
922 People v. Green, 514 P.2d 769, 770, 183 Colo. 25, 28 (Colo. Oct 01, 1973) (NO. 25290) HN: 1,4
(S.Ct.)
923 Wroblewski v. Lexington Gardens, Inc., 448 A.2d 801, 808, 188 Conn. 44, 59, 47 Fair Em-
pl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 644, 644, 32 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 33,791, 33791 (Conn. Aug 10, 1982) HN: 5
(S.Ct.)
924 Evening Sentinel v. National Organization for Women, 357 A.2d 498, 501, 168 Conn. 26, 29, 10
Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 1043, 1043, 9 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 10,027, 10027 (Conn. Feb 25,
1975) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
925 U.S. v. Hamid, 461 A.2d 1043, 1047 (D.C. Jun 02, 1983) (NO. 81-1294)
926 Lewis v. District of Columbia Commission on Licensure to Practice Healing Art, 385 A.2d 1148,
1159, 17 A.L.R.4th 925, 925 (D.C. Apr 27, 1978) (NO. 11821) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
927 Estate of French, 365 A.2d 621, 623 (D.C. Nov 01, 1976) (NO. 9490) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
928 Stratton v. Travis, 380 A.2d 985, 987 (Del.Super. Oct 05, 1977) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
929 State, Dept. of Ins. v. Insurance Services Office, 434 So.2d 908, 918 (Fla.App. 1 Dist. May 03,
1983) (NO. VV-367) (in dissent)
930 Sasso v. Ram Property Management, 431 So.2d 204, 221 (Fla.App. 1 Dist. Apr 29, 1983) (NO.
AG-112) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
931 Barnes v. State, 260 S.E.2d 40, 42, 244 Ga. 302, 303 (Ga. Sep 10, 1979) (NO. 35027) HN: 2
(S.Ct.)
932 Schmidt v. State, 647 P.2d 796, 805, 103 Idaho 340, 349 (Idaho App. Jun 29, 1982) (NO. 13795)

933 People v. McCalvin, 302 N.E.2d 342, 346, 55 Ill.2d 161, 167 (Ill. Oct 01, 1973) (NO. 44839)
HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
934 Davis v. Attic Club, 371 N.E.2d 903, 913, 56 Ill.App.3d 58, 71, 13 Ill.Dec. 811, 821 (Ill.App. 1
Dist. Dec 21, 1977) (NO. 62654) (in dissent) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
935 People v. Boyer, 321 N.E.2d 312, 315, 24 Ill.App.3d 671, 675 (Ill.App. 4 Dist. Dec 05, 1974)
(NO. 12389) (in dissent) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
936 Heminger v. Police Commission of City of Fort Wayne, 314 N.E.2d 827, 831, 161 Ind.App. 72,
77 (Ind.App. 3 Dist. Jul 29, 1974) (NO. 3-473A45)
937 Cedar Rapids Community School Dist. v. Parr, 227 N.W.2d 486, 493, 12 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas.
(BNA) 54, 54, 9 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 10,016, 10016 (Iowa Mar 19, 1975) (NO. 2-56518)
938 Matter of Adoption of Baby Boy L., 643 P.2d 168, 184, 231 Kan. 199, 218 (Kan. Apr 03, 1982)
(NO. 53592) (in dissent)
939 Corpus Christi Parish Credit Union v. Martin, 358 So.2d 295, 298+ (La. Apr 10, 1978) (NO.
61739) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
940 Williams v. Williams, 331 So.2d 438, 440 (La. Mar 29, 1976) (NO. 56805) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
941 State v. Barton, 315 So.2d 289, 292 (La. Jun 23, 1975) (NO. 55977)
942 Whitt v. Vauthier, 316 So.2d 202, 204, 85 A.L.R.3d 930, 930 (La.App. 4 Cir. Jul 08, 1975) (NO.
6845) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
943 Opinion of the Justices to the Senate, 366 N.E.2d 733, 735, 373 Mass. 883, 887 (Mass. Aug 24,
1977) HN: 1,2 (S.Ct.)
944 House v. House, 330 N.E.2d 152, 154, 368 Mass. 120, 123 (Mass. Jun 11, 1975) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
945 Green v. Commissioner of Corporations and Taxation, 305 N.E.2d 92, 95, 364 Mass. 389, 394,
82 A.L.R.3d 1268, 1268 (Mass. Dec 13, 1973)
946 Cason v. State, 354 A.2d 840, 842, 31 Md.App. 121, 123 (Md.App. Apr 12, 1976) (NO. 275)
HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
947 Pike v. City of Wyoming, 433 N.W.2d 768, 770+, 431 Mich. 589, 594+ (Mich. Nov 10, 1988)
(NO. 78746) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
948 Blair v. Wayne State University, 220 N.W.2d 202, 203, 53 Mich.App. 641, 643 (Mich.App. May
31, 1974) (NO. 14255) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
949 People v. Andrea, 210 N.W.2d 474, 477, 48 Mich.App. 310, 314 (Mich.App. Jul 23, 1973) (NO.
12285) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
950 Petterssen v. Commissioner of Employment Services, 236 N.W.2d 168, 169, 306 Minn. 542, 544
(Minn. Nov 21, 1975) (NO. 45104)
951 Montgomery v. State, 811 So.2d 471, 476 (Miss.App. Mar 19, 2002) (NO.
2000-KA-01904-COA) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
952 State v. Wilson, 250 S.E.2d 621, 629, 296 N.C. 298, 311, 99 A.L.R.3d 115, 115 (N.C. Jan 04,
1979) (NO. 38) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
953 Spencer v. Spencer, 246 S.E.2d 805, 810, 37 N.C.App. 481, 488 (N.C.App. Aug 15, 1978) (NO.
7718DC823) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
954 Bingert v. Bingert, 247 N.W.2d 464, 468+ (N.D. Nov 19, 1976) (NO. CIV. 9214) HN: 1,4

(S.Ct.)
955 Belkner v. Preston, 332 A.2d 168, 171, 115 N.H. 15, 18 (N.H. Jan 31, 1975) (NO. 6869) HN: 2
(S.Ct.)
956 Robinson v. Cahill, 355 A.2d 129, 169, 69 N.J. 449, 524 (N.J. Jan 30, 1976) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
957 Robinson v. Cahill, 339 A.2d 193, 211, 67 N.J. 333, 365 (N.J. May 23, 1975)
958 Robinson v. Cahill, 351 A.2d 713, 731, 69 N.J. 133, 168 (N.J. May 23, 1975)
959 Ballou v. State, Dept. of Civil Service, 372 A.2d 333, 340, 148 N.J.Super. 112, 126, 18 Fair Em-
pl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 408, 408 (N.J.Super.A.D. Mar 07, 1977) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
960 State v. Thompson, 392 A.2d 678, 679, 162 N.J.Super. 302, 304 (N.J.Super.L. Aug 15, 1978)
HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
961 Trujillo v. City of Albuquerque, 798 P.2d 571, 586, 110 N.M. 621, 636 (N.M. Aug 27, 1990)
(NO. 18,296)
962 Under 21 v. City of New York, 492 N.Y.S.2d 522, 532, 482 N.E.2d 1, 11, 65 N.Y.2d 344, 366,
37 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 35,477, 35477 (N.Y. Jun 28, 1985) (NO. 362) (in dissent)
963 People v. Guardino, 880 N.Y.S.2d 244, 250, 62 A.D.3d 544, 550, 2009 N.Y. Slip Op. 03995,
03995 (N.Y.A.D. 1 Dept. May 21, 2009) (NO. 3491/04, 5053) (in dissent)
964 Bertoldi v. State, 712 N.Y.S.2d 113, 116, 275 A.D.2d 227, 229, 2000 N.Y. Slip Op. 07378,
07378 (N.Y.A.D. 1 Dept. Aug 10, 2000) (NO. 2544, 2544A) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
965 McDermott v. Forsythe, 594 N.Y.S.2d 436, 438, 188 A.D.2d 173, 175 (N.Y.A.D. 3 Dept. Mar 04,
1993) (NO. 65076) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
966 Board of Ed., Levittown Union Free School Dist., Nassau County v. Nyquist, 443 N.Y.S.2d 843,
855, 83 A.D.2d 217, 236, 1 Ed. Law Rep. 361, 361 (N.Y.A.D. 2 Dept. Oct 26, 1981) (NO. 2966
E/80) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
967 Bethlehem Steel Corp. v. Board of Ed. of City School Dist. of Lackawanna, 402 N.Y.S.2d 655,
665, 61 A.D.2d 147, 164 (N.Y.A.D. 4 Dept. Jan 20, 1978) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
968 Carter v. Carter, 397 N.Y.S.2d 88, 94, 58 A.D.2d 438, 447 (N.Y.A.D. 2 Dept. Jul 25, 1977) HN:
4 (S.Ct.)
969 People v. Mndange-Pfupfu, 411 N.Y.S.2d 1000, 1003+, 97 Misc.2d 496, 499+ (N.Y.Co.Ct. Dec
27, 1978)
970 People v. Reilly, 381 N.Y.S.2d 732, 737, 85 Misc.2d 702, 705 (N.Y.Co.Ct. Jan 15, 1976) HN: 1
(S.Ct.)
971 People v. Michael D., 417 N.Y.S.2d 604, 606, 99 Misc.2d 816, 818 (N.Y.Sup. Apr 30, 1979)
HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
972 Garrett v. New York State Athletic Commission, 370 N.Y.S.2d 795, 798, 82 Misc.2d 524, 527
(N.Y.Sup. Jun 16, 1975) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
973 State ex rel. William R v. New York State Family Court, Bronx County, 416 N.Y.S.2d 960, 967,
99 Misc.2d 427, 437 (N.Y.Fam.Ct. Mar 23, 1979)
974 Department of Social Services v. Witzel, 398 N.Y.S.2d 86, 87, 91 Misc.2d 274, 275
(N.Y.Fam.Ct. Aug 10, 1977)
975 Matter of Johnson's Will, 439 N.Y.S.2d 250, 253, 108 Misc.2d 1066, 1070 (N.Y.Sur. May 04,

1981) (NO. 1790) HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)

976 State v. Faulk, 1978 WL 216536, *3+ (Ohio App. 1 Dist. Sep 13, 1978) (NO. C-77486) HN: 4
(S.Ct.)
977 State v. Freeland, 667 P.2d 509, 519, 295 Or. 367, 382, 44 A.L.R.4th 371, 371 (Or. Jul 26, 1983)
(NO. A22721, SC28856, TC C81-04-32282)
978 Matter of Compensation of Williams, 635 P.2d 384, 386+, 54 Or.App. 398, 402+ (Or.App. Oct
26, 1981) (NO. 19548, WCB 79-7248) HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
979 Larkin v. Com., Pennsylvania Bd. of Probation and Parole, 555 A.2d 954, 956, 124 Pa.Cmwlth.
184, 187 (Pa.Cmwlth. Mar 15, 1989) (NO. 1844 C.D. 1988)
980 Oknefski v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Bd., 439 A.2d 846, 848, 63 Pa.Cmwlth. 450, 454
(Pa.Cmwlth. Dec 29, 1981) (NO. 2915 C.D. 1980) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
981 Foster v. Com., Dept. of Public Welfare, 408 A.2d 216, 218, 47 Pa.Cmwlth. 441, 445
(Pa.Cmwlth. Nov 28, 1979) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
982 Com. By Packel v. Pennsylvania Interscholastic Athletic Ass'n, 334 A.2d 839, 841, 18
Pa.Cmwlth. 45, 48 (Pa.Cmwlth. Mar 19, 1975) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
983 Com. v. Maute, 485 A.2d 1138, 1146, 336 Pa.Super. 394, 410 (Pa.Super. Dec 07, 1984) (NO.
2220, J 33048/1984) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
984 Com. v. Feingold, 360 A.2d 692, 695, 240 Pa.Super. 262, 266 (Pa.Super. Apr 22, 1976)
985 Elizabeth Anastasi, Administratrix of the Estate of Frank Anastasi, Deceased v. Workmen's Com-
pensation Appeal Board, Pacor, Inc., and Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, 1984 WL 320879,
*320879, 10 Phila.Co.Rptr. 610, 614 (Pa.Com.Pl. Apr 11, 1984) (NO. NO. 3272.) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
986 Anastasi v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Bd., 1984 WL 351, *3, 30 Pa. D. & C.3d 525, 530
(Pa.Com.Pl. Apr 11, 1984) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
987 Narragansett Elec. Co. v. Rhode Island Commission for Human Rights, 374 A.2d 1022, 1024+,
118 R.I. 457, 461+, 20 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 1784, 1784+ (R.I. Jun 21, 1977) (NO.
75-151-M.P.) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
988 Saccoccia v. Silver, 1979 WL 200303, *5 (R.I.Super. Apr 09, 1979) (NO. C.A. 76-3297, C.A.
77-2262, C.A. 77-285) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
989 Warwick Teachers Union Local 915 v. The School Committee of City of Warwick, 1976 WL
177047, *2 (R.I.Super. Jun 04, 1976) (NO. M.P. 76-10)
990 Ex parte Groves, 571 S.W.2d 888, 892 (Tex.Crim.App. Oct 04, 1978) (NO. 58945)
991 Whitney v. Fisher, 417 A.2d 934, 936, 138 Vt. 468, 471 (Vt. Jun 16, 1980) (NO. 144-79)
992 Young v. Konz, 588 P.2d 1360, 1364, 91 Wash.2d 532, 538 (Wash. Jan 05, 1979) (NO. 44071,
44214) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
993 Sharpe Furniture, Inc. v. Buckstaff, 299 N.W.2d 219, 225, 99 Wis.2d 114, 126, 19 A.L.R.4th
421, 421 (Wis. Nov 25, 1980) (NO. 79-277)
994 Ray-O-Vac, Division of E.S.B., Inc. v. Wisconsin Dept. of Industry, Labor and Human Relations,
236 N.W.2d 209, 213+, 70 Wis.2d 919, 929+, 12 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 64, 64+, 10 Empl.
Prac. Dec. P 10,564, 10564+ (Wis. Dec 19, 1975) (NO. 600 (1974)) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
995 Israel by Israel v. West Virginia Secondary Schools Activities Com'n, 388 S.E.2d 480, 487, 182
W.Va. 454, 461, 58 Ed. Law Rep. 795, 795 (W.Va. Dec 20, 1989) (NO. 18904) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)

996 Mun. de Ponce v. A. C. et al., 153 D.P.R. 1, 121, 2001 JTS 3, 3, 2000TSPR194, 194 (P.R. Dec
29, 2000) (NO. CC-98-231, CC-98-241, CC-98-250, CC-98-257, CC-98-258, CC-98-259)
997 Milan Rodriguez v. Munoz, 110 D.P.R. 610, 618, 1981 JTS 5, 5, 10 P.R. Offic. Trans. 790, 790
(P.R. Jan 15, 1981) (NO. O-80-445)
998 Hermina Gonzalez v. Srio. del Trabajo, 107 D.P.R. 667, 673, 7 P.R. Offic. Trans. 740, 740 (P.R.
Oct 05, 1978) (NO. O-78-55)
Administrative Decisions (U.S.A.)
Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals

999 Appeal of Westinghouse Elec. Corp., 1985 WL 16498 (A.S.B.C.A.), *33+, 85-1 BCA P 17910,
17910+, ASBCA No. 25787, 25787+ (A.S.B.C.A. Jan 30, 1985) (NO. F0963-78-C-4195) "
HN: 1,2 (S.Ct.)
Comptroller General Decisions

1000 DEPENDENCY DETERMINATION FOR BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR QUARTERS, 1981 WL
22496, *3, 60 Comp. Gen. 399, 402, B- 198,818, 198818 (Comp.Gen. Apr 21, 1981) HN: 5
(S.Ct.)
1001 DIRECTOR, FPCD - H. L. KRIEGER:, 1980 WL 16347, *3, B- 198,317, 198317, B-
198317.OM, 198317.OM (Comp.Gen. Jul 02, 1980)
1002 ASSOCIATE DIRECTOR, FGMSD - CLAIMS GROUP (ROOM 5858):, 1980 WL 16484, *1+,
B- 198,166, 198166+, B- 198166.OM, L/M, 198166.OM, L/M+ (Comp.Gen. Jun 06, 1980)
HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
1003 RUBY M. ROUSS - FAMILY SEPARATION ALLOWANCE:, 1976 WL 9880, *1+, B-
186,091, 186091+ (Comp.Gen. Aug 10, 1976) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
1004 SUSANNE DONNELLY - RECONSIDERATION OF CLAIM FOR LIVING QUARTERS AL-
LOWANCES:, 1975 WL 8281, *1+, B- 173,325, 173325+ (Comp.Gen. Jul 03, 1975) HN: 5
(S.Ct.)
1005 TRAVEL REIMBURSEMENT FOR DEPENDENT - SERGEANT SHARON K. O'BRYANT,
USAF:, 1974 WL 7327, *1+, B- 180,694, 180694+ (Comp.Gen. Nov 19, 1974) HN: 5
(S.Ct.)
1006 ENTITLEMENT TO BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR QUARTERS (BAQ) WITH DEPENDENTS -
WARRANT OFFICER LEOLA F. CRUISE:, 1974 WL 7412, *2, B- 180,328, 180328
(Comp.Gen. Oct 21, 1974) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
1007 TO THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE, 1974 WL 8519, *1+, 53 Comp. Gen. 539, 539+, B-
178,979, 178979+ (Comp.Gen. Feb 01, 1974) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
1008 TO MRS. D. RUSSELLE HEDLEY:, 1973 WL 7420, *1+, B- 168,161, 168161+ (Comp.Gen.
Nov 16, 1973) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
1009 TO THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE, 1973 WL 8741, *2+, 53 Comp. Gen. 148, 150+, B-
1010 TO THE SECRETARY OF THE NAVY, 1973 WL 8729, *1+, 53 Comp. Gen. 116, 116+, B-

EEOC Decisions
1011 William S. Anderson v. Frank, Postmaster General, U.S. Postal Service, 1990 WL 711510, *6,
EEOC DOC 01890285, 01890285 (E.E.O.C. Apr 02, 1990) (NO. AGCY 4-J-0057-7, APL
01890285) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
1012 Ronald H. Russell, Appellant, v. Anthony M. Frank, Postmaster General (USPS-SR), Agency.,
1988 WL 921477, *4, EEOC DOC 05880758, 05880758 (E.E.O.C. Nov 17, 1988) (NO. AGCY
3-V-0189-88, APL 01881151, RQST 05880758) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
1013 Rosa Harris, Appellant, v. Anthony M. Frank, Postmaster General (USPS-SR), Agency., 1988
WL 921433, *5, EEOC DOC 05880690, 05880690 (E.E.O.C. Oct 25, 1988) (NO. AGCY
3-V-0195-88, APL 01881206, RQST 05880690) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
1014 Robert Gay, Appellant, v. Anthony M. Frank, Postmaster General (USPS-SR), Agency., 1988
3-V-0192-88, APL 01881288, RQST 05880691) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
1015 Donald Guidry, Appellant, v. Anthony M. Frank, Postmaster General (USPS-SR), Agency., 1988
3-V-0214-88, APL 01881302, RQST 05880692) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
1016 Patricia Rogers, Appellant, v. Anthony M. Frank, Postmaster General (USPS-SR), Agency., 1988
3-V-0220-88, APL 01881366, RQST 05880693) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
1017 Douglas C. Hooper, Appellant, v. Anthony M. Frank, Postmaster General (USPS-SR), Agency.,
1988 WL 921437, *5, EEOC DOC 05880694, 05880694 (E.E.O.C. Oct 25, 1988) (NO. AGCY
3-V-0767-87, APL 01880690, RQST 05880694) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
1018 Leonard R. Faucett, Jr. Appellant, v. Ralph E. Kennickell, Public Printer, U.S. Government Print-
ing Office, Agency., 1988 WL 917456, *7, EEOC DOC 01873052, 01873052 (E.E.O.C. Jun 20,
1988) (NO. AGCY 85-7, APL 01873052, HRNG 081-086-X0060)
F.C.C. Decisions
1019 In the Matter of Amendment of the Commission's Rules to Allow the Selection from Among Cer-
tain Competing Applications Using Random Selection or Lotteries Instead of Comparative Hear-
ings, 1985 WL 259987, *9, 58 Rad. Reg. 2d (P & F) 1077, 1077, 102 F.C.C.2d 1401, 1401
(F.C.C. Aug 16, 1985) (NO. FCC 85-453, GEN 81-768) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
1020 In re Applications of ALEXANDER S. KLEIN, JR. Media, Pennsylvania GREATER MEDIA
RADIO COMPANY Media, Pennsylvania ROBERTS BROADCASTING CORPORATION ME-
DIA, PENNSYLVANIA For Construction Permits, 1981 WL 158539, *9, 49 Rad. Reg. 2d (P &
F) 606, 606, 86 F.C.C.2d 423, 423 (F.C.C. Apr 30, 1981) (NO. 20567, 20568, 20569, BPH-8905,
BPH-9011, BPH-9156, FCC 81-209)
NLRB Decisions
1021 Salmon Terminal Division, 233 NLRB 1178, 1189, 233 NLRB No. 169, 1977 WL 9404, *20, 97
L.R.R.M. (BNA) 1276 (N.L.R.B. Dec 13, 1977) (NO. 19-CA-8985, 19-CB-2744) HN: 1

(S.Ct.)
State Administrative Materials (U.S.A.)

1022 Ariz. Op. Atty. Gen. No. I79-252, The Honorable Morris Farr (1979) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
.... Ark. Op. Atty. Gen. No. 2007-011, The Honorable Donna Hutchinson (2007) (Text not avail-
able on WESTLAW)
1024 Ark. Op. Atty. Gen. No. 91-232, Mr. Rick Johnson (1991) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
1025 Ark. Op. Atty. Gen. No. 84-209, Senator Stanley Russ (1984) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
1026 1986 Ga. Op. Atty. Gen. 32, Honorable James G. Ledbetter, Ph.D. (1986) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
1027 1979 Iowa Op. Atty. Gen. 356, Mrs. Catherine G. Williams (1979)
1028 1978 Iowa Op. Atty. Gen. 621, Honorable Kenneth D. Miller (1978) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
1029 1977 Iowa Op. Atty. Gen. 211, Mr. John W. Criswell, Warren County Attorney (1977) HN:
2 (S.Ct.)
1030 1987-88 Mass. Op. Atty. Gen. No. 1, Robert Q. Crane (1987) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
1031 1979-1980 Mich. Op. Atty Gen. 375, Honorable H. Lynn Jondahl (1978) HN: 4,5 (S.Ct.)
1032 UNIVERSITY POLICE OFFICERS UNION, INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF PO-
LICE OFFICERS, LOCAL 567, PLAINTIFF UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA, A BODY COR-
PORATE, UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA-LINCOLN, ET AL., DEFENDANTS, 1977 WL
371086 (NE CIR), *3 (1977)
1033 1977 N.M. Op. Atty. Gen. 99, Representative William E. Warren (1977) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
1034 In the Matter of: Pavelko and Sherron Platt v. Lordstown, 1977 WL 45568 (Ohio Civ. Rts.
Com.), *4+ (1977)
1035 18 Okl. Op. Atty. Gen. 6, The Honorable Freddye Williams (1986)
1036 68 Ops. Cal. Atty. Gen. 153, THE HONORABLE BILL LOCKYER (1985) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
1037 60 Ops. Cal. Atty. Gen. 326, THE HONORABLE BARRY KEENE (1977) HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.)
1038 39 Or. Op. Atty. Gen. 298 (1978) HN: 4,5 (S.Ct.)
1039 1978 S.C. Op. Atty. Gen. 94, TO: William S. Hall, M.D. (1978) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
1040 Tenn. Op. Atty. Gen. No. 96-068, Dr. Robert "Bob" Patton (1996) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
1041 Tenn. Op. Atty. Gen. No. 87-193, Honorable Charles D. Akers Representative Ruth C. Mont-
gomery Representative Dan Byrd (1987) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
1042 Tenn. Op. Atty. Gen. No. 85-110, Senator Leonard C. Dunavant (1985) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
1043 1977-78 Va. Op. Atty. Gen. 158, The Honorable James M. Thomson (1978)
Other Administrative Materials (U.S.A.)

1044 F (2010)
1045 GUIDANCE ON PARENTAL LEAVE, CCH EEOC Compliance Manual 4818 (2010)
1046 WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION, CCH Cost Accounting Standards Guide
8529+ (2010)
1047 P 98,612 DIFFERING MALE-FEMALE AGE OF MAJORITY, (APR. 15, 1975), CCH Con-

sumer Credit Guide 98612 (2010)
Registers (U.S.A.)
1048 Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Sex in Education Programs or Activities Receiving Federal
Financial Assistance, 71 Federal Register 62530 (Oct 25, 2006)
1049 Allow the Selection From Among Certain Competing Applications Using Random Selection or
Lotteries Instead of Comparative Hearings, 50 Federal Register 36056 (Sep 05, 1985) HN:
4 (S.Ct.)
Secondary Sources (U.S.A.)

1050 Equal Protection and Due Process Clause Challenges Based on Sex Discrimination--Supreme
Court Cases, 178 A.L.R. Fed. 25 (2002) HN: 1,2,3,4,5 (S.Ct.)
1051 What Constitutes Reverse Sex or Gender Discrimination Against Males Violative of Federal
Constitution or Statutes--Nonemployment Cases, 166 A.L.R. Fed. 1 (2000) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
1052 Sex discrimination in United States Armed Forces, 56 A.L.R. Fed. 850 (1982) HN: 1,3,4,5
(S.Ct.)
1053 ANNUAL JUDICIAL CONFERENCE SECOND JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF THE UNITED
STATES, 74 F.R.D. 215, 318+ (1976) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
1054 BNA Tax Management Federal Portfolios No. 363 Biblio, BIBLIOGRAPHY OFFICIAL
1055 BNA Tax Management Federal Portfolios No. 363 s III, III. Sex Discrimination in Employee Be-
nefit Plans
1056 16 Colorado Practice Series S 10.42, Gender discrimination--Title VII (2010) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
1057 16 Colorado Practice Series S 13.20, The public employee's case for equal protection claims
(2010) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
1058 Consumer Financial Services s 2.03, AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE (2009) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
1059 Disabilities & The Law s 1:43, Constitutional protections (2010) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
1060 Education Law: First Amendment, Due Process and Discrimination Litigation s 4:8, Curriculum
and Single Gender Education Issues (2010)
1061 Employment Discrimination Law and Litigation s 25:14, The elements of a Section 1983 cause of
action--Right deprived (2010) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
1062 Employment Discrimination Law and Litigation s 25:16, Standard of proof (2010) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
1063 Employment Discrimination Law and Litigation s 8:19, Generally (2010) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
1064 Federal Civil Rights Acts s 1:27, Expanding the topical reach of civil rights legislation to prohibit
new forms of discrimination (2010)
1065 Federal Civil Rights Acts s 1:46, A philosophical and policy overview of constitutional and stat-
utory civil rights law principles--Examples of the tension between the process and outcome the-
ories--Metro overruled: Adarand and (2010) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
1066 Federal Civil Rights Acts s 1:53, The changing face of equal protection--Gender discrimination:
United States v. Virginia (2010)
1067 Federal Evidence s 2:12, Legislative and incidental facts (2010)

1068 Fundamentals of Sports Law s 13:5, Constitutional challenges (2009) HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.)
1069 Gov. Discrim.: Equal Protection Law & Litig. s 5:1, Overview (2010) HN: 1,3,4 (S.Ct.)
1070 Gov. Discrim.: Equal Protection Law & Litig. s 5:11, Gender (2010) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
1071 Gov. Discrim.: Equal Protection Law & Litig. s 5:12, Gender--Equal rights amendments (2010)
HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
1072 Gov. Discrim.: Equal Protection Law & Litig. s 8:2, Generally (2010) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
1073 Grand Jury Law and Practice s 3:14, What constitutes cognizable or distinct group--Case law
analysis (2010)
1074 Grand Jury Law and Practice s 3:15, What constitutes cognizable or distinct group--Alternative
analysis (2010)
1075 Handling Child Custody, Abuse and Adoption Cases s 9:15, Surrogacy generally (2010)
1076 Land Use Prac. & Forms: Handling Land Use Case s 23:2, Burden of Proof and Standing (2010)
HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
1077 Law of Defamation s 7:18, Four common-law slander per se categories--Imputations of un-
chastity (2010) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
1078 Legal Rights of Children s 25:41, Freedom from sex discrimination; Education Amendments of
1972 (2009)
1079 Local Government Law s 10:23, Remedies concerning entitlement to public office-
-Discrimination in employment and affirmative action plans (2010)
1080 Local Government Law s 10:4, Eligibility for public service--Other qualifications (2010) HN: 1
(S.Ct.)
1081 16 LA Civil Law Treatise s 1.4, United States Supreme Court decisions (2010) HN: 4,5 (S.Ct.)
1082 3 Mass. Prac. Series s 69:44, Proceedings relating to maternity and pregnancy (2010)
1083 18 Mass. Prac. Series s 15.19, Validity--Classification (2010) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
1084 17 Minnesota Practice Series s 12.12, The public employer's case for equal protection claims
(2009) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
1085 Restatement (Second) of Contracts s 12, Capacity To Contract (1981)
1086 Restatement (Third) of Trusts s 28, Charitable Purposes (2003)
1087 Reynolds Hornbook on Local Government Law s 13.80, S 80. Qualifications for Local Office-
Age, Residency, Freedom From Conflicts, etc. (2009)
1088 Rights of Prisoners s 5:11, Standard of review (2010) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
1089 Rutter Practice Guide: Fed.Civ.Trials & Ev. CH. 8D-A, A. Judicial Notice (2010) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
1090 Scoles, Hay, Borchers and Symeonides Hornbook on Conflict of Laws s 14.III, III. Movables
(2004)
1091 Sex-Based Employment Discrimination s 16:1, Fringe benefits defined and conduct prohibited
(2010) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
1092 Sex-Based Employment Discrimination s 27:1, Constitutional overview (2010) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
1093 Sex-Based Employment Discrimination s 27:2, Some protections for federal employees (2010)
HN: 2 (S.Ct.)

1094 Sex-Based Employment Discrimination s 2:1, Federal constitutional law (2010) HN: 1,4,5
(S.Ct.)
1095 Social Security Claims and Procedures (5th Ed.) s 5:19, Widow(er) (2010) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
1096 Social Security Claims and Procedures (5th Ed.) s 6:21, Historical perspective on support re-
quirements (2010) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
1097 State Taxation P 3.03, SUPREME COURT DECISIONS UNDER THE EQUAL PROTECTION
CLAUSE (2010) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
1098 Sutherland Statutes and Statutory Construction s 40:27, Special legislation under the Fourteenth
Amendment (2010) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
1099 Texas Practice Guide, Real Estate Transactions s 20:5, Sex discrimination (2010) HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
1100 Treatise on Constitutional Law s 18.20, Gender--Introduction (2010) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
1101 Treatise on Constitutional Law s 18.22, Definition of a Standard--From Reed v. Reed to Craig v.
Boren (2010) HN: 4,5 (S.Ct.)
1102 Treatise on Constitutional Law s 18.23(K), Conclusion (2010) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
1103 3 Witkin Cal. Crim. L. 3d Punishment s 582, When Previously Sentenced Probationer Is Entitled
to Counsel.
1104 8 Witkin, California Summary 10th Constitutional Law s 763, Modern View. HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
1105 8 Witkin, California Summary 10th Constitutional Law s 768, Social Security Benefits.
1106 8 Witkin, California Summary 10th Constitutional Law s 771, Other Discriminatory Treatment.
HN: 4,5 (S.Ct.)
1107 8 Witkin, California Summary 10th Constitutional Law s 772, In General. HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
1108 8 Witkin, California Summary 10th Constitutional Law s 773, Workers' Compensation. HN: 4
(S.Ct.)
1109 22 Am. Jur. Trials 347, Child Custody Litigation (2010) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
1110 Am. Jur. 2d Constitutional Law s 865, Suspect classes (2010) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
1111 Am. Jur. 2d Constitutional Law s 877, Gender discrimination under Equal Protection Clause
(2010) HN: 1,2 (S.Ct.)
1112 Am. Jur. 2d Constitutional Law s 884, Other matters (2010) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
1113 Am. Jur. 2d Military and Civil Defense s 153, Allowances; travel and transportation (2010) HN:
5 (S.Ct.)
1114 CJS Armed Services s 141, Allowances; medical and dental care (2010) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
1115 CJS Constitutional Law s 1120, Rational or reasonable basis test (2010) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
1116 CJS Constitutional Law s 1822, Pay, allowances, and family benefits (2010) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
1117 FL Jur. 2d Constitutional Law s 456, Generally (2010) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
1118 FL Jur. 2d Constitutional Law s 457, Race (2010) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
1119 FL Jur. 2d Constitutional Law s 463, Alienage (2010) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
1120 TX Jur. 3d Constitutional Law s 279, Judicial review of classification (2010) HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
1121 GAYS, THE MILITARY, AND JUDICIAL DEFERENCE: WHEN THE COURTS MUST RE-
CLAIM EQUAL PROTECTION AS THEIR AREA OF EXPERTISE, 9 Admin. L.J. Am. U.

1273, 1306 (1996) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)

1122 GENDER DISCRIMINATION IN THE WORKPLACE: "WE'VE COME A LONG WAY,
BABY", 49 The Advoc. (Texas) 11, 15 (2009) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
1123 MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IN MIXED CASES: USING MATSUSHITA AND
THE MSPB ADJUDICATION TO INCREASE PLAINTIFF'S PRETRIAL BURDEN, 38 A.F. L.
Rev. 109, 140+ (1994) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
1124 "HORROR OF A WOMAN": MYRA BRADWELL, THE 14TH AMENDMENT, AND THE
GENDERED ORIGINS OF SOCIOLOGICAL JURISPRUDENCE, 42 Akron L. Rev. 1201, 1244
(2009)
1125 RESTRICTION OF TORT REMEDIES AND THE CONSTRAINTS OF DUE PROCESS: THE
RIGHT TO AN ADEQUATE REMEDY, 39 Akron L. Rev. 975, 1000 (2006) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
1126 GIVING THE BAT BACK TO CASEY: SUGGESTIONS TO REFORM TITLE IX'S INEQUIT-
ABLE APPLICATION TO INTERCOLLEGIATE ATHLETICS, 35 Akron L. Rev. 117, 158+
(2001) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
1127 THE PASSING OF THE CARDOZO GENERATIONS, 34 Akron L. Rev. 283, 292 (2000)
1128 A CURRENT PERSPECTIVE: THE EROSION OF AFFIRMATIVE ACTION IN UNIVERSITY
ADMISSIONS, 32 Akron L. Rev. 181, 232+ (1999)
1129 UNANIMITY ON THE REHNQUIST COURT, 31 Akron L. Rev. 387, 408 (1998)
1130 BEYOND STEREOTYPING IN EQUAL PROTECTION DOCTRINE: REFRAMING THE EX-
CLUSION OF WOMEN FROM COMBAT, 57 Ala. L. Rev. 303, 306+ (2005) HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
1131 THE CONSTITUTION OF WOMEN, 48 Ala. L. Rev. 861, 884+ (1997) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
1132 ALASKA EQUAL PROTECTION: CONSTITUTIONAL LAW OR COMMON LAW?, 15
Alaska L. Rev. 209, 280+ (1998) HN: 2,4,5 (S.Ct.)
1133 DENYING PROTECTION TO THOSE MOST IN NEED: THE FDA'S UNCONSTITUTIONAL
TREATMENT OF CHILDREN, 8 Alb. L.J. Sci. & Tech. 121, 149 (1997)
1134 "KNICKEL" AND DIME ISSUES: AN UNEXPLORED LOOPHOLE IN NEW YORK'S GE-
NETIC DISCRIMINATION STATUTE AND THE VIABILITY OF GENETIC TESTING IN
THE SPORTS EMPLOYMENT CONTEXT, 70 Alb. L. Rev. 771, 793 (2007) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
1135 THE FORGOTTEN SUPREME COURT JUSTICES, 68 Alb. L. Rev. 295, 304 (2005) HN: 4
(S.Ct.)
1136 JUDICIAL ACTIVISM, JUDGES' SPEECH, AND MERIT SELECTION: CONVENTIONAL
WISDOM AND NONSENSE, 68 Alb. L. Rev. 557, 576 (2005) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
1137 STATE EQUAL PROTECTION: ITS DIVERSE GUISES AND EFFECTS, 66 Alb. L. Rev. 599,
632 (2003)
1138 DOES AN EQUAL RIGHTS AMENDMENT MAKE A DIFFERENCE?, 60 Alb. L. Rev. 1581,
1612 (1997) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
1139 "FAMILY" BUT NOT "PARENT": THE SAME-SEX COUPLING JURISPRUDENCE OF THE
NEW YORK COURT OF APPEALS, 58 Alb. L. Rev. 813, 842 (1995) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
1140 UNFULFILLED ASPIRATIONS: THE COURT PACKING EFFORTS OF PRESIDENTS RE-
AGAN AND BUSH, 57 Alb. L. Rev. 1111, 1131 (1994) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
1141 THE APPLICATION OF EQUAL PROTECTION TO PROSPECTIVE JURORS WITH DISAB-

ILITIES: WILL BATSON COVER DISABILITY-BASED STRIKES?, 57 Alb. L. Rev. 289, 363
(1993) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
1142 MAJORITARIAN MORALITY AND PARENTAL RIGHTS, 52 Alb. L. Rev. 405, 469 (1988)
HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
1143 DEATH OF A LIBERAL ICON Justice William J. Brennan Jr. Shaped Constitutional Law
Through Personality, Perseverence and Vision, 83-SEP A.B.A. J. 30, 30 (1997) HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.)
1144 TWO PATHS FOR GINSBURG; The Trailblazing Women's Rights Litigator Become a Moder-
ate Judge, 79-AUG A.B.A. J. 16, 18 (1993)
1145 JUSTICE WILLIAM J. BRENNAN, JR. A JUSTICE FOR ALL SEASONS, 72-JUN A.B.A. J.
18, 20 (1986) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
1146 MOTHERS WHO KILL: COMING TO TERMS WITH MODERN AMERICAN INFANTICIDE,
34 Am. Crim. L. Rev. 1, 90 (1996) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
1147 CRIMINAL LAW AND WOMEN: GIVING THE ABUSED WOMAN WHO KILLS A JURY
OF HER PEERS WHO APPRECIATE TRIFLES, 33 Am. Crim. L. Rev. 229, 348+ (1996) HN: 4
(S.Ct.)
1148 THE NUMBERS DON'T ADD UP: CHALLENGING THE PREMISE OF J.E.B. V. ALABAMA
EX REL. T.B., 31 Am. Crim. L. Rev. 1253, 1277 (1994) HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.)
1149 WINNER, BEST APPELLATE BRIEF IN THE 2003 NATIVE AMERICAN LAW STUDENT
ASSOCIATION MOOT COURT COMPETITION, 28 Am. Indian L. Rev. 237, 250 (2004) HN:
2 (S.Ct.)
1150 PROPORTIONAL, NOT STRICT, SCRUTINY: AGAINST A U.S. "SUSPECT CLASSIFICA-
TIONS" MODEL UNDER ARTICLE 14 ECHR IN THE U.K., 56 Am. J. Comp. L. 847, 893
(2008)
1151 EQUAL BY COMPARISON: UNSETTLING ASSUMPTIONS OF ANTIDISCRIMINATION
LAW, 55 Am. J. Comp. L. 295, 345+ (2007) HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
1152 UNITED STATES V. GATEWOOD: DOES THE THREE STRIKES STATUTE (FN2) VIOL-
ATE DUE PROCESS AND UNDERMINE THE PRESUMPTION OF INNOCENCE?, 29 Am. J.
Crim. L. 83, 113 (2001)
1153 A LEGISLATIVE AND CONSTITUTIONAL EXAMINATION OF "ABUSE AND LOSE" JU-
VENILE DRIVING STATUTES, 19 Am. J. Crim. L. 411, 433 (1992) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
1154 REEXAMINING THE DOCTRINE OF SELF DEFENSE TO ACCOMMODATE BATTERED
WOMEN, 18 Am. J. Crim. L. 169, 185 (1991) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
1155 WHAT MAKES GENETIC DISCRIMINATION EXCEPTIONAL?, 29 Am. J.L. & Med. 77, 116
(2003) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
1156 HELLER V. DOE? INVOLUNTARY CIVIL COMMITMENT AND THE "OBJECTIVE" LAN-
GUAGE OF PROBABILITY, 20 Am. J.L. & Med. 457, 477 (1994) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
1157 THE UNIFORM STATUS OF CHILDREN OF ASSISTED CONCEPTION ACT: DOES IT
PROTECT THE BEST INTERESTS OF THE CHILD IN A SURROGATE ARRANGEMENT?,
16 Am. J.L. & Med. 525, 553 (1990) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
1158 THE INCOMPETENT DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLED PERSON'S RIGHT OF SELF-
DETERMINATION: RIGHT-TO-DIE, STERLIZATION AND INSTITUTIONALIZATION, 15

Am. J.L. & Med. 333, 361 (1989) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)

1159 EXPLORING THE FRONTIERS OF BATSON v. KENTUCKY: SHOULD THE SAFE-
GUARDS OF EQUAL PROTECTION EXTEND TO GENDER?, 14 Am. J. Trial Advoc. 289,
304+ (1990) HN: 1,3,4 (S.Ct.)
1160 BATSON AND GROUPS OTHER THAN BLACKS: A STRICT SCRUTINY ANALYSIS, 11
Am. J. Trial Advoc. 377, 416 (1988)
1161 CENTENNIAL PANEL TWO DECADES OF INTERMEDIATE SCRUTINY: EVALUATING
EQUAL PROTECTION FOR WOMEN, 6 Am. U. J. Gender & L. 1, 30+ (1997) HN: 1,2,3
(S.Ct.)
1162 EXPANDING THE FEMINIST IMAGINATION: AN ANALYSIS OF REPRODUCTIVE
RIGHTS, 6 Am. U. J. Gender & L. 113, 138 (1997) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
1163 REFLECTIONS ON THE VMI DECISION, 6 Am. U. J. Gender & L. 35, 42+ (1997) HN: 1,3
(S.Ct.)
1164 THE TREATMENT OF WOMEN PRISONERS AFTER THE VMI DECISION: APPLICATION
OF A NEW "HEIGHTENED SCRUTINY", 6 Am. U. J. Gender & L. 65, 87+ (1997) HN: 1,3
(S.Ct.)
1165 THE RHETORIC OF DISRESPECT: UNCOVERING THE FAULTY PREMISES INFECTING
REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS, 5 Am. U. J. Gender & L. 147, 205+ (1996) HN: 4,5 (S.Ct.)
1166 DEAN v. THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA: GOIN' TO THE CHAPEL AND WE'RE GONNA
GET MARRIED, 5 Am. U. J. Gender & L. 93, 146+ (1996) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
1167 WHAT IF MARY SUE WANTED AN ABORTION INSTEAD? THE EFFECT OF DAVIS v.
DAVIS ON ABORTION RIGHTS, 3 Am. U. J. Gender & L. 265, 299 (1995) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
1168 UNITED STATES v. VIRGINIA: THE CASE OF COEDUCATION AT VIRGINIA MILITARY
INSTITUTE, 3 Am. U. J. Gender & L. 69, 115+ (1994) HN: 1,2,3 (S.Ct.)
1169 LOST INNOCENCE AND THE MORAL FOUNDATION OF LAW, 1 Am. U. J. Gender & L.
165, 183+ (1993) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
1170 THE GENDERED NATURE OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE: STATISTICAL DATA FOR LAW-
YERS CONSIDERING EQUAL PROTECTION ANALYSIS, 17 Am. U.J. Gender Soc. Pol'y &
L. 229, 268 (2009) HN: 4,5 (S.Ct.)
1171 SAVE ME FROM HARM: THE CONSEQUENCES OF THE ORDINARY REMAND RULE'S
MISAPPLICATION TO GAO V. GONZALES, 16 Am. U.J. Gender Soc. Pol'y & L. 527, 552+
(2008) HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
1172 ARE YOU MY MOTHER? DEFENDING THE RIGHTS OF INTENDED PARENTS IN GEST-
ATIONAL SURROGACY ARRANGEMENTS IN PENNSYLVANIA, 14 Am. U.J. Gender Soc.
Pol'y & L. 131, 161 (2006) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
1173 FEMINIST LEGAL THEORY, 13 Am. U.J. Gender Soc. Pol'y & L. 13, 23+ (2005) HN: 5
(S.Ct.)
1174 AFFIRMATIVE ACTION FOR THE FEMALE ENTREPRENEUR: GENDER AS A PRE-
SUMED SOCIALLY DISADVANTAGED GROUP FOR 8(a) PROGRAM PURPOSES, 10 Am.
U.J. Gender Soc. Pol'y & L. 185, 231 (2001) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
1175 UNEQUAL BEFORE THE LAW: MEN, WOMEN AND THE DEATH PENALTY, 8 Am. U.J.

Gender Soc. Pol'y & L. 427, 470+ (2000) HN: 1,3,4 (S.Ct.)
1176 THE ESSENCE OF HER WOMANHOOD: DEFINING THE PRIVACY RIGHTS OF WOMEN
PRISONERS AND THE EMPLOYMENT RIGHTS OF WOMEN GUARDS, 7 Am. U.J. Gender
Soc. Pol'y & L. 1, 53 (1999)
1177 DO PARENTS HAVE THE LEGAL AUTHORITY TO CONSENT TO THE SURGICAL AM-
PUTATION OF NORMAL, HEALTHY TISSUE FROM THEIR INFANT CHILDREN?: THE
PRACTICE OF CIRCUMCISION IN THE UNITED STATES, 7 Am. U.J. Gender Soc. Pol'y &
L. 87, 123 (1999) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
1178 CRACKING FOUNDATIONS AS FEMINIST METHOD, 8 Am. U.J. Gender Soc. Pol'y & L.
31, 54 (1999) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
1179 THE GENDER CURVE: AN ANALYSIS OF COLLEGES' USE OF AFFIRMATIVE ACTION
POLICIES TO BENEFIT MALE APPLICANTS, 56 Am. U. L. Rev. 719, 750+ (2007) HN: 4
(S.Ct.)
1180 CONSTITUTIONAL HISTORICISM: AN EXAMINATION OF THE EIGHTH AMENDMENT
EVOLVING STANDARDS OF DECENCY TEST, 54 Am. U. L. Rev. 1355, 1448+ (2005) HN:
4 (S.Ct.)
1181 CORRECTIVE JUSTICE AND TITLE I OF THE ADA, 52 Am. U. L. Rev. 1213, 1289+ (2003)
HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
1182 SELECTIVE DISSERVICE: THE INDEFENSIBLE DISCRIMINATION OF DRAFT REGIS-
TRATION, 52 Am. U. L. Rev. 703, 759+ (2003) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
1183 BANNING CORPORAL PUNISHMENT: A CONSTITUTIONAL ANALYSIS, 52 Am. U. L.
Rev. 447, 492+ (2002) HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
1184 SEX-BASED DISCRIMINATION IN U.S. IMMIGRATION LAW: THE HIGH COURT'S LOST
OPPORTUNITY TO BRIDGE THE GAP BETWEEN WHAT WE SAY AND WHAT WE DO,
47 Am. U. L. Rev. 1353, 1392 (1998) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
1185 REDISTRIBUTIVE JUSTICE AND CULTURAL FEMINISM, 45 Am. U. L. Rev. 1275, 1322+
(1996) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
1186 IDENTITY NOTES PART ONE: PLAYING IN THE LIGHT, 45 Am. U. L. Rev. 695, 720
(1996) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
1187 RECONSIDERING ABORTION LAW: LIBERTY, EQUALITY, AND THE NEW RHETORIC
OF PLANNED PARENTHOOD V. CASEY, 45 Am. U. L. Rev. 77, 150+ (1995) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
1188 EMPLOYMENT DIVISION v. SMITH: THE SUPREME COURT ALTERS THE STATE OF
FREE EXERCISE DOCTRINE, 40 Am. U. L. Rev. 1431, 1476 (1991) HN: 3 (S.Ct.)
1189 ROY v. COHEN: SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBERS AND THE FREE EXERCISE CLAUSE, 36
Am. U. L. Rev. 217, 244+ (1986) HN: 4,5 (S.Ct.)
1190 THE EXTENSION OF COMITY: FAIR ASSESSMENT IN REAL ESTATE ASSOCIATION v.
McNARY, 32 Am. U. L. Rev. 1123, 1181 (1986) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
1191 GOLDMAN v. SECRETARY OF DEFENSE: RESTRICTING THE RELIGIOUS RIGHTS OF
MILITARY SERVICEMEMBERS, 34 Am. U. L. Rev. 881, 926 (1985) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
1192 JUSTIFYING UNISEX INSURANCE: ANOTHER PERSPECTIVE, 34 Am. U. L. Rev. 329, 367
(1985) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)

1193 TEMPERED EXTENSION: GRANTING S 1985(3) CLASS STATUS TO MENTALLY RE-

TARDED INDIVIDUALS, 1998 Ann. Surv. Am. L. 389, 434+ (1998) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
1194 A TRIBUTE TO JUSTICE SANDRA DAY O'CONNOR, 1996 Ann. Surv. Am. L. XVI, xix+
(1996) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
1195 AFFIRMATIVE ACTION AS A WOMEN'S ISSUE, 1995 Ann. Surv. Am. L. 373, 382 (1995)
HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
1196 'SEPARATE BUT EQUAL' REVISITED: THE DETROIT MALE ACADEMIES CASE,
1992/1993 Ann. Surv. Am. L. 85, 115 (1993) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
1197 COVERING THE COURT, 43-APR Ariz. Att'y 18, 22 (2007)
1198 THE FREEDOM TO MARRY MUST NOT BE DENIED, 40-MAR Ariz. Att'y 14, 21+ (2004)
HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
1199 OPENING CIVIL MARRIAGE TO SAME-GENDER COUPLES: A NETHERLANDS-UNITED
STATES COMPARISON, 18 Ariz. J. Int'l & Comp. L. 141, 207+ (2001)
1200 I AM WHO IAM, OR AM I? A COMPARISON OF THE EQUAL PROTECTION OF SEXUAL
MINORITIES IN CANADIAN AND U.S. COURTS: IMMUTABILITY HAS ONLY FOUND A
HOME NORTH OF THE BORDER, 17 Ariz. J. Int'l & Comp. L. 371, 411 (2000) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
1201 VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN IN THE UNITED STATES: AN INTERNATIONAL SOLU-
TION, 13 Ariz. J. Int'l & Comp. L. 551, 594+ (1996) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
1202 EQUAL PROTECTION FOR WOMEN IN INDIA AND CANADA: AN EXAMINATION AND
COMPARISON OF SEX EQUALITY PROVISIONS IN THE INDIAN AND CANADIAN
CONSTITUTIONS, 13 Ariz. J. Int'l & Comp. L. 31, 67+ (1996) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
1203 BORN OSAMA: MUSLIM-AMERICAN EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION, 51 Ariz. L.
Rev. 1069, 1096 (2009)
1204 The Tradition of Reproduction, 37 Ariz. L. Rev. 453, 500 (1995) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
1205 VIVA LA DIFERENCIA: A NON-SOLUTION TO THE DIFFERENCE DILEMMA, 36 Ariz. L.
Rev. 973, 1009+ (1994) HN: 4,5 (S.Ct.)
1206 WEDDING BELL BLUES : THE POSITION OF UNMARRIED PEOPLE IN AMERICAN
LAW, 30 Ariz. L. Rev. 207, 242+ (1988) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
1207 IS THERE A PLACE FOR "RACE" AS A LEGAL CONCEPT?, 36 Ariz. St. L.J. 1093, 1159
(2004) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
1208 APPLYING THE ADA TO MITIGATING MEASURES CASES: A CHOICE OF STATUTORY
EVILS, 31 Ariz. St. L.J. 1071, 1120+ (1999) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
1209 LETTING KATZ OUT OF THE BAG: THE EMPLOYER'S DUTY TO ACCOMMODATE
PERCEIVED DISABILITIES, 30 Ariz. St. L.J. 603, 642 (1998) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
1210 RELIGION-BASED PEREMPTORY STRIKES IN CRIMINAL TRIALS AND THE ARIZONA
CONSTITUTION: CAN THEY COEXIST?, 26 Ariz. St. L.J. 883, 898 (1994)
1211 JUSTICE THURGOOD MARSHALL'S JURISPRUDENCE OF EQUAL PROTECTION OF
THE LAWS AND THE POOR, 26 Ariz. St. L.J. 429, 460+ (1994) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
1212 IN(RE)DIGNITY: THE NEW FEDERALISM IN PERSPECTIVE, 57 Ark. L. Rev. 1, 68 (2004)
HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
1213 A JUSTIFIABLE PEREMPTORY: THE OXYMORON OF JURY SELECTION, 26-FALL Ark.

Law. 24, 26 (1992) HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.)

1214 THE CONTINUED VIABILITY OF PEREMPTORY CHALLENGES IN COURTS-MARTIAL,
1992-JAN Army Law. 20, 26 (1992) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
1215 "IN HIS OPINION'-A CONVENING AUTHORITY'S GUIDE TO THE SELECTION OF PAN-
EL MEMBERS, 1989-APR Army Law. 43, 46 (1989) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
1216 THE MIXED-RACE EXPERIENCE: TREATMENT OF RACIALLY MISCATEGORIZED IN-
DIVIDUALS UNDER TITLE VII, 12 Asian L.J. 161, 186 (2005) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
1217 THE LEGACY OF KOREMATSU V. UNITED STATES: A DANGEROUS NARRATIVE RE-
TOLD, 4 Asian Pac. Am. L.J. 72, 128 (1996)
1218 7 Ave Maria L. Rev. 307, WHY THE EQUAL PROTECTION CLAUSE CANNOT "FIX"
ABORTION LAW (2008) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
1219 3 Ave Maria L. Rev. 349, BY ANY OTHER NAME: DEFINING MALE AND FEMALE IN
MARRIAGE STATUTES (2005) HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
1220 CASAREZ v. STATE: TEXAS DRAWS A LINE IN THE SAND AND REFUSES TO EXTEND
BATSON TO RELIGION-BASED PEREMPTORY CHALLENGES, 49 Baylor L. Rev. 233,
254+ (1997) HN: 1,2 (S.Ct.)
1221 INSURANCE RISK CLASSIFICATION AFTER MCGANN: MANAGING RISK EFFI-
CIENTLY IN THE SHADOW OF THE ADA, 47 Baylor L. Rev. 59, 95 (1995) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
1222 HOW FAMILY LEAVE LAWS LEFT OUT LOW-INCOME WORKERS, 28 Berkeley J. Emp.
& Lab. L. 1, 62 (2007) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
1223 SAME-SEX MARRIAGE THROUGH THE EQUAL PROTECTION CLAUSE: A GENDER-
CONSCIOUS ANALYSIS, 21 Berkeley J. Gender L. & Just. 213, 240 (2006)
1224 GENDER OUTLAWS: CHALLENGING MASCULINITY IN TRADITIONALLY MALE IN-
STITUTIONS, 17 Berkeley Women's L.J. 68, 121+ (2002) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
1225 CULTURAL DEFENSE OR FALSE STEREOTYPE? WHAT HAPPENS WHEN LATINA DE-
FENDANTS COLLIDE WITH THE FEDERAL SENTENCING GUIDELINES, 12 Berkeley
Women's L.J. 45, 72+ (1997) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
1226 THE IMPLANTATION OF RIGHTS: AN ARGUMENT FOR UNCONDITIONALLY FUNDED
NORPLANT REMOVAL, 11 Berkeley Women's L.J. 19, 48 (1996) HN: 3 (S.Ct.)
1227 GENDERED INEQUALITY: LESBIANS, GAYS, AND FEMINIST LEGAL THEORY, 9
Berkeley Women's L.J. 103, 143+ (1994) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
1228 THE SOCIAL MEANING OF THE NORPLANT CONDITION: CONSTITUTIONAL CONSID-
ERATIONS OF RACE, CLASS, AND GENDER, 9 Berkeley Women's L.J. 9, 57+ (1994) HN: 4
(S.Ct.)
1229 THE LEGAL IMPLICATIONS OF GENDER BIAS IN STANDARDIZED TESTING, 7 Berke-
ley Women's L.J. 13, 89+ (1992) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
1230 THE CONSIDERATION OF NEW SPOUSE INCOME IN SETTING SPOUSAL AND CHILD
SUPPORT, 28 Beverly Hills B. Ass'n J. 71, 78+ (1994) HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.)
1231 DO WE STILL NEED A FEDERAL EQUAL RIGHTS AMENDMENTS?, 44-FEB B. B.J. 10,
26+ (2000) HN: 2,4,5 (S.Ct.)
1232 THE EXTRATERRITORIAL APPLICATION OF U.S. LAW: THE PERVERSION OF DEMO-

CRATIC GOVERNANCE, THE REVERSAL OF INSTITUTIONAL ROLES, AND THE IM-

PERATIVE OF ESTABLISHING NORMATIVE PRINCIPLES, 19 B.C. Int'l & Comp. L. Rev.
297, 321 (1996) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
1233 IN DEFENSE OF THE 2006 TITLE IX REGULATIONS FOR SINGLE-SEX PUBLIC EDUCA-
TION: HOW SEPARATE CAN BE EQUAL, 49 B.C. L. Rev. 217, 217+ (2008) HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
1234 LABOR AND EMPLOYMENT LAW AT THE MILLENIUM: A HISTORICAL REVIEW AND
CRITICAL ASSESSMENT, 43 B.C. L. Rev. 351, 460 (2002)
1235 BUT DADDY, WHY CAN'T I GO TO COLLEGE? THE FRIGHTENING DE-KLINE OF SUP-
PORT FOR CHILDREN'S POST-SECONDARY EDUCATION, 37 B.C. L. Rev. 1099, 1132+
(1996) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
1236 DO REINDEER GAMES COUNT AS TERMS, CONDITIONS OR PRIVILEGES OF EM-
PLOYMENT UNDER TITLE VII?, 37 B.C. L. Rev. 643, 690 (1996) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
1237 COLORADO'S AMENDMENT 2 AND HOMOSEXUALS' RIGHT TO EQUAL PROTECTION
OF THE LAW, 35 B.C. L. Rev. 221, 258 (1993) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
1238 EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION AGAINST SUBSTANCE ABUSERS: THE FEDERAL
RESPONSE, 33 B.C. L. Rev. 155, 209 (1991)
1239 LADIES' NIGHT DISCOUNTS: SHOULD WE BAR THEM OR PROMOTE THEM?, 32 B.C.
L. Rev. 487, 528+ (1991) HN: 4,5 (S.Ct.)
1240 THE TRADITION OF PREJUDICE VERSUS THE PRINCIPLE OF EQUALITY: HOMO-
SEXUALS AND HEIGHTENED EQUAL PROTECTION SCRUTINY AFTER BOWERS v.
HARDWICK, 31 B.C. L. Rev. 375, 475+ (1990) HN: 1,2,3 (S.Ct.)
1241 SEXUAL HARASSMENT AND TITLE VII - A BETTER SOLUTION, 30 B.C. L. Rev. 1071,
1101 (1989)
1242 SOME RUNS, SOME HITS, SOME ERRORS-KEEPING SCORE IN THE AFFIRMATIVE AC-
TION BALLPARK FROM WEBER TO JOHNSON, 30 B.C. L. Rev. 1, 97 (1988)
1243 ENDA BEFORE IT STARTS: SECTION 5 OF THE FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT AND THE
AVAILABILITY OF DAMAGES AWARDS TO GAY STATE EMPLOYEES UNDER THE
PROPOSED EMPLOYMENT NON-DISCRIMINATION ACT, 22 B.C. Third World L.J. 1, 65+
(2002) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
1244 RENO v. FLORES AND THE SUPREME COURT'S CONTINUING TREND TOWARD NAR-
ROWING DUE PROCESS RIGHTS, 15 B.C. Third World L.J. 115, 139 (1995)
1245 THE MODERN SCHOOLS OF JURISPRUDENCE AND STANDING TO SUE THE GOVERN-
MENT FOR FAILURE TO ACT AGAINST A THIRD PARTY: DISSECTING ALLEN v.
WRIGHT, 11 B.C. Third World L.J. 165, 201 (1991) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
1246 THE MENTALLY RETARDED: THE NEED FOR INTERMEDIATE SCRUTINY, 7 B.C. Third
World L.J. 109, 131+ (1987) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
.... FREE AT LAST! ANTI-SUBORDINATION AND THE THIRTEENTH AMENDMENT, 90
B.U. L. Rev. 255, 312+ (2010) (Text not available on WESTLAW)
1248 PUNISHING FAMILY STATUS, 88 B.U. L. Rev. 1327, 1423 (2008) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
1249 THE INTRIGUING FEDERALIST FUTURE OF REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS, 88 B.U. L. Rev.
175, 225 (2008)

1250 DEMOCRACY'S HANDMAID, 86 B.U. L. Rev. 1, 64+ (2006) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)

1251 FORCING A SQUARE PEG INTO A ROUND HOLE: THE NEGATIVE RAMIFICATIONS OF
MISALIGNED PROTECTION FOR PREDISPOSED INDIVIDUALS UNDER THE ADA, 85
B.U. L. Rev. 323, 354+ (2005) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
1252 OUTCOMES, REASONS, AND EQUALITY, 80 B.U. L. Rev. 1095, 1126 (2000) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
1253 THE LOGIC OF EGALITARIAN NORMS, 80 B.U. L. Rev. 693, 771 (2000) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
1254 SHAHAR V. BOWERS: IS PUBLIC OPINION TRANSFORMED INTO A LEGITIMATE
GOVERNMENT INTEREST WHEN GOVERNMENT ACTS AS EMPLOYER?, 78 B.U. L.
Rev. 1235, 1274+ (1998) HN: 4,5 (S.Ct.)
1255 WOMEN'S COLLEGES: IS SEGREGATION BY SEX STILL JUSTIFIABLE AFTERUNITED
STATES v. VIRGINIA?, 77 B.U. L. Rev. 209, 271+ (1997) HN: 1,3,4 (S.Ct.)
1256 LANGUAGE CLASSIFICATIONS AND THE EQUAL PROTECTION CLAUSE: WHEN IS
LANGUAGE A PRETEXT FOR RACE OR ETHNICITY?, 74 B.U. L. Rev. 481, 504 (1994)
HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
1257 PRESERVING THE PUBLIC HEALTH: A PROPOSAL TO QUARANTINE RECALCITRANT
AIDS CARRIERS, 68 B.U. L. Rev. 441, 505+ (1988) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
1258 BETWEEN THE BOSS AND A HARD PLACE: A CONSIDERATION OF MERITOR SAV-
INGS BANK, FSB v. VINSON AND THE LAW OF SEXUAL HARASSMENT, 67 B.U. L. Rev.
445, 474 (1987) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
1259 DENYING UNDOCUMENTED IMMIGRANTS ACCESS TO MEDICAID: A DENIAL OF
THEIR EQUAL PROTECTION RIGHTS?, 17 B.U. Pub. Int. L.J. 255, 287+ (2008) HN: 4
(S.Ct.)
1260 STRICT SCRUTINY, BIRACIAL CHILDREN, AND ADOPTION, 12 B.U. Pub. Int. L.J. 203,
219+ (2002) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.)
1261 THE MALLEABILITY OF CONSTITUTIONAL DOCTRINE AND ITS IRONIC IMPACT ON
PRISONERS' RIGHTS, 11 B.U. Pub. Int. L.J. 73, 95 (2001)
1262 REINSTITUTION OF THE CHAIN GANG: A HISTORICAL AND CONSTITUTIONAL ANA-
LYSIS, 6 B.U. Pub. Int. L.J. 753, 775 (1997)
1263 USING DISCOURSE ETHICS TO PROVIDE EQUALITY IN EDUCATION FOR AFRICAN-
AMERICAN CHILDREN FORTY YEARS AFTER BROWN V. BOARD OF EDUCATION, 5
B.U. Pub. Int. L.J. 99, 126 (1995)
1264 CHALLENGING LEGAL CULTURE FROM CLASSROOM TO PRACTICE: A CASE STUDY
OF NEW COLLEGE'S POLITICS OF LAW PRACTICE COURSE, 4 B.U. Pub. Int. L.J. 363,
387 (1995) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
1265 UNCHARTERED TERRITORY: MARKET COMPETITION'S CONSTITUTIONAL COLLI-
SION WITH ENTREPRENEURIAL SEX-SEGREGATED CHARTER SCHOOLS, 2010 B.Y.U.
Educ. & L.J. 307, 357 (2010)
1266 CAROLENE PRODUCTS: A GAME-THEORETIC APPROACH, 2002 B.Y.U. L. Rev. 53, 109+
(2002) HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
1267 PROTECTING BOTH ETHNIC MINORITIES AND THE EQUAL PROTECTION CLAUSE:
THE DILEMMA OF LANGUAGE-BASED PEREMPTORY CHALLENGES, 1997 B.Y.U. L.

Rev. 101, 130+ (1997) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)

1268 A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF CONSTITUTIONAL CLAIMS FOR SAME-SEX MARRIAGE,
1996 B.Y.U. L. Rev. 1, 96+ (1996) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
1269 CONSTITUTIONAL IMPERFECTION, JUDICIAL MISINTERPRETATION, AND THE
POLITICS OF CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT: THOUGHTS GENERATED BY SOME
CURRENT PROPOSALS TO AMEND THE CONSTITUTION, 1996 B.Y.U. L. Rev. 611, 626
(1996)
1270 "CHEERS!" A TRIBUTE TO JUSTICE BYRON R. WHITE, 1994 B.Y.U. L. Rev. 223, 226
(1994) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
1271 THE ROLE OF PUBLIC OPINION IN CONSTITUTIONAL INTERPRETATION, 1993 B.Y.U.
L. Rev. 1037, 1138 (1993) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
1272 THE RELIGIOUS FREEDOM RESTORATION ACT: LEGISLATIVE CHOICE AND JUDI-
CIAL REVIEW, 1993 B.Y.U. L. Rev. 73, 96 (1993) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
1273 TRANSFORMING HUMANITARIAN INTERVENTION FROM AN EXPEDIENT ACCIDENT
TO A CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE, 30 Brook. J. Int'l L. 421, 452 (2005) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
1274 TO BEAR OR NOT TO BEAR: REPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM AS AN INTERNATIONAL HU-
MAN RIGHT, 17 Brook. J. Int'l L. 309, 358 (1991) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
1275 JUSTICE BLACKMUN, ABORTION, AND THE MYTH OF MEDICAL INDEPENDENCE, 72
Brook. L. Rev. 147, 197 (2006) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
1276 JUSTICE GINSBURG AND THE MIDDLE WAY, 68 Brook. L. Rev. 629, 682 (2003) HN: 4
(S.Ct.)
1277 TOWARD GENDER EQUALITY AND UNDERSTANDING: RECOGNIZING THAT SAME-
SEX SEXUAL HARASSMENT IS SEX DISCRIMINATION "We take these words(of Title
VII)to mean that gender must be irrelevant to employment decisions." - U.S. Suprem, 62 Brook.
L. Rev. 1165, 1215 (1996) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
1278 HOW THE SUPREME COURT IS DEALING WITH PRECEDENTS IN CONSTITUTIONAL
CASES, 62 Brook. L. Rev. 973, 1038 (1996) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
1279 IF MEN COULD GET PREGNANT: AN EQUAL PROTECTION MODEL FOR FEDERAL
FUNDING OF ABORTION UNDER A NATIONAL HEALTH CARE PLAN, 60 Brook. L. Rev.
349, 405+ (1994) HN: 1,2,4 (S.Ct.)
1280 THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT: IMPLICATIONS FOR JOB REASSIGN-
MENT AND THE TREATMENT OF HYPERSUSCEPTIBLE EMPLOYEES, 57 Brook. L. Rev.
1237, 1275 (1992)
1281 ALLEGHENY PITTSBURGH COAL CO. v. COUNTY COMMISSION OF WEBSTER
COUNTY, WEST VIRGINIA : THE SUPREME COURT GIVES "WELCOME STRANGER"
TAX ASSESSMENTS A COLD RECEPTION, 56 Brook. L. Rev. 1383, 1411 (1991) HN: 2
(S.Ct.)
1282 SOME REFLECTIONS ON GOLDBERG v. KELLY AT TWENTY YEARS, 56 Brook. L. Rev.
805, 822+ (1990) HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
1283 POTENTIAL FATHERS AND ABORTION: A WOMAN'S WOMB IS NOT A MAN'S
CASTLE, 55 Brook. L. Rev. 1359, 1404 (1990) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)

1284 UNDOCUMENTED ALIENS AND THE EQUAL PROTECTION CLAUSE: AN ANALYSIS

OF DOE v. PLYLER, 48 Brook. L. Rev. 43, 74 (1981) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
1285 BEYOND PRESUMPTIONS AND PEAFOWL: RECONCILING THE LEGAL PRINCIPLE OF
EQUALITY WITH THE PEDAGOGICAL BENEFITS OF GENDER DIFFERENTIATION, 53
Buff. L. Rev. 1059, 1109+ (2005) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
1286 THE PROGRESS AND PITFALLS OF LAWRENCE V. TEXAS, 52 Buff. L. Rev. 1417, 1456+
(2004) HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
1287 CRAFTING A CHALLENGE TO THE PRACTICE OF DRUG TESTING WELFARE RECIPI-
ENTS: FEDERAL WELFARE REFORM AND STATE RESPONSE AS THE MOST RECENT
CHAPTER IN THE WAR ON DRUGS, 46 Buff. L. Rev. 281, 335 (1998) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
1288 SUSAN GLASPELL'S TRIFLES AND A JURY OF HER PEERS: WOMAN ABUSE IN A LIT-
ERARY AND LEGAL CONTEXT, 45 Buff. L. Rev. 779, 779 (1997) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
1289 TOWARD GENDER EQUALITY: TESTING THE APPLICABILITY OF A BROADER DIS-
CRIMINATION STANDARD IN THE WORKPLACE, 40 Buff. L. Rev. 217, 249+ (1992) HN:
4 (S.Ct.)
1290 INJUNCTIVE RELIEF AND SECTION 1985(3): ANTI-ABORTION BLOCKADERS MEET
THE "KU KLUX KLAN ACT", 39 Buff. L. Rev. 855, 889+ (1991) HN: 1,2,4 (S.Ct.)
1291 REGULATING HATE SPEECH AT PUBLIC UNIVERSITIES: ARE FIRST AMENDMENT
VALUES FUNCTIONALLY INCOMPATIBLE WITH EQUAL PROTECTION PRINCIPLES?,
39 Buff. L. Rev. 1, 52 (1991) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
1292 SIN, STIGMA & SOCIETY: A CRITIQUE OF MORALITY AND VALUES IN DEMOCRATIC
LAW AND POLICY, 38 Buff. L. Rev. 859, 901 (1990)
1293 THE FAILURE OF GENDER EQUALITY: AN ESSAY IN CONSTITUTIONAL DISSON-
ANCE, 36 Buff. L. Rev. 573, 644+ (1987) HN: 4,5 (S.Ct.)
1294 15 Buff. Women's L.J. 1, CENTERING MEN'S EXPERIENCE: NORAH VINCENT'S SELF-
MADE MAN COMPLICATES FEMINIST LEGAL THEORISTS' VIEWS OF GENDER (2007)
HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
1295 9 Buff. Women's L.J. 97, BETTER BITCH THAN MOUSE: RUTH BADER GINSBURG, FEM-
INISM AND VMI (2001) HN: 4,5 (S.Ct.)
1296 "GOD'S CREATED ORDER," GENDER COMPLEMENTARITY, AND THE FEDERAL MAR-
RIAGE AMENDMENT, 20 BYU J. Pub. L. 313, 343 (2006)
1297 TRANSGENDER LEGAL ADVOCACY: WHAT DO FEMINIST LEGAL THEORIES HAVE
TO OFFER?, 97 Cal. L. Rev. 1719, 1762 (2009) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
1298 INTRODUCTION OF JUSTICE RUTH BADER GINSBURG, 95 Cal. L. Rev. 2213, 2215
(2007) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
1299 CLOSING REMARKS FOR SYMPOSIUM ON "JUSTICE BRENNAN AND THE LIVING
CONSTITUTION", 95 Cal. L. Rev. 2217, 2220 (2007) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
1300 SEX STEREOTYPING PER SE: TRANSGENDER EMPLOYEES AND TITLE VII, 95 Cal. L.
Rev. 561, 596 (2007)
1301 CONSTITUTIONAL CULTURE, SOCIAL MOVEMENT CONFLICT AND CONSTITUTION-
AL CHANGE: THE CASE OF THE DE FACTO ERA 2005-06 Brennan Center Symposium Lec-

ture, 94 Cal. L. Rev. 1323, 1419+ (2006) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)

1302 INTERPRETING THE WOMEN'S MOVEMENT, 94 Cal. L. Rev. 1421, 1437+ (2006) HN: 5
(S.Ct.)
1303 CONSTITUTIONAL CULTURE OR ORDINARY POLITICS: A REPLY TO REVA SIEGEL,
94 Cal. L. Rev. 1465, 1486 (2006)
1304 THE CASE FOR TREATING EX-OFFENDERS AS A SUSPECT CLASS, 94 Cal. L. Rev. 1191,
1242+ (2006) HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
1305 GEDULDIG REBORN: HIBBS AS A SUCCESS (?) OF JUSTICE RUTH BADER GINS-
BURG'S SEX-DISCRIMINATION STRATEGY, 93 Cal. L. Rev. 541, 586+ (2005) HN: 4,5
(S.Ct.)
1306 JUDICIAL SUPREMACY AND THE MODEST CONSTITUTION, 92 Cal. L. Rev. 1045, 1067
(2004) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
1307 POPULAR CONSTITUTIONALISM, CIRCA 2004, 92 Cal. L. Rev. 959, 1011 (2004) HN: 1
(S.Ct.)
1308 CONSTITUTIONAL CHOICES: LEGAL FEMINISM AND THE HISTORICAL DYNAMICS
OF CHANGE, 92 Cal. L. Rev. 755, 839+ (2004) HN: 1,2,3 (S.Ct.)
1309 TOWARD A PEOPLE'S CONSTITUTION, 91 Cal. L. Rev. 621, 639 (2003) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
1310 CONSTITUTIONALIZING WOMEN'S EQUALITY, 90 Cal. L. Rev. 735, 764+ (2002) HN:
1,3,4 (S.Ct.)
1311 REFLECTIONS ON CONSTITUTIONALIZING WOMEN'S EQUALITY, 90 Cal. L. Rev. 765,
790+ (2002) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
1312 THE PATHS TO LEGAL EQUALITY: A REPLY TO DEAN SULLIVAN, 90 Cal. L. Rev. 791,
812 (2002)
1313 OF TIERS OF SCRUTINY AND TIME TRAVEL: A REPLY TO DEAN SULLIVAN, 90 Cal. L.
Rev. 819, 828 (2002)
1314 EQUALITY TROUBLE: SAMENESS AND DIFFERENCE IN TWENTIETH-CENTURY
RACE LAW, 88 Cal. L. Rev. 1923, 2015 (2000) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
1315 FROM THE SECOND SEX TO THE JOINT VENTURE: AN OVERVIEW OF WOMEN'S
RIGHTS AND FAMILY LAW IN THE UNITED STATES DURING THE TWENTIETH CEN-
TURY, 88 Cal. L. Rev. 2017, 2093+ (2000) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
1316 PUSHING THINGS UP TO THEIR FIRST PRINCIPLES: REFLECTIONS ON THE VALUES
OF AFFIRMATIVE ACTION, 87 Cal. L. Rev. 1299, 1407 (1999) HN: 3 (S.Ct.)
1317 JUSTIFYING GENDER-BASED AFFIRMATIVE ACTION UNDER UNITED STATES V.
VIRGINIA'S "EXCEEDINGLY PERSUASIVE JUSTIFICATION" STANDARD, 86 Cal. L.
Rev. 1169, 1210+ (1998) HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.)
1318 STANDING BACK FROM THE FOREST: JUSTICIABILITY AND SOCIAL CHOICE, 83 Cal.
L. Rev. 1309, 1413 (1995)
1319 BEYOND STATUS: THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT AND THE PARENTAL
RIGHTS OF PEOPLE LABELED DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLED OR MENTALLY RE-
TARDED, 83 Cal. L. Rev. 1415, 1475 (1995) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
1320 QUEERS, SISSIES, DYKES, AND TOMBOYS: DECONSTRUCTING THE CONFLATION OF

"SEX," "GENDER," AND "SEXUAL ORIENTATION" IN EURO-AMERICAN LAW AND SO-

CIETY, 83 Cal. L. Rev. 1, 377+ (1995) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
1321 CRITICAL RACE THEORY AND CLASSICAL-LIBERAL CIVIL RIGHTS SCHOLARSHIP:
A DISTINCTION WITHOUT A DIFFERENCE?, 82 Cal. L. Rev. 787, 845 (1994)
1322 ORGANIC GOODS: LEGAL UNDERSTANDINGS OF WORK, PARENTHOOD, AND
GENDER EQUALITY IN COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE, 81 Cal. L. Rev. 531, 592 (1993)
HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
1323 JUDICIAL MATTERS The Hollow Hope: Can Courts Bring About Social Change? BY Gerald
N. Rosenberg. Chicago, Illinois: The University of Chicago Press, 1991. Pp. vii, 425. Cloth, 80
Cal. L. Rev. 1027, 1069 (1992) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
1324 A PROPOSAL FOR COMBATTING SEXUAL DISCRIMINATION IN THE MILITARY:
AMENDMENT OF TITLE VII, 78 Cal. L. Rev. 165, 195+ (1990) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
1325 FEMINISM, THEOLOGY, AND ABORTION: TOWARD LOVE, COMPASSION, AND WIS-
DOM, 77 Cal. L. Rev. 1011, 1075 (1989)
1326 THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF STATE LAWS PROVIDING EMPLOYMENT LEAVE FOR
PREGNANCY: RETHINKING GEDULDIG AFTER CAL FED, 77 Cal. L. Rev. 171, 221 (1989)
HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
1327 DISCRIMINATION ON CAMPUS: A CRITICAL EXAMINATION OF SINGLE-SEX COL-
LEGE SOCIAL ORGANIZATIONS, 75 Cal. L. Rev. 2117, 2164+ (1987) HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
1328 RECONSTRUCTING SEXUAL EQUALITY, 75 Cal. L. Rev. 1279, 1337 (1987) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
1329 IMPORTANT RIGHTS AND THE PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL DOCTRINE, 73 Cal. L.
Rev. 1929, 1955 (1985) HN: 3 (S.Ct.)
1330 THE AUTHORITY OF THE FRAMERS OF THE CONSTITUTION: CAN ORIGINALIST IN-
TERPRETATION BE JUSTIFIED?, 73 Cal. L. Rev. 1482, 1539 (1985) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
1331 THE CROSS-SECTION REQUIREMENT AND JURY IMPARTIALITY, 73 Cal. L. Rev. 1555,
1596 (1985)
1332 MONEY AND POLITICS: A PRESPECTIVE ON THE FIRST AMENDMENT AND CAM-
PAIGN FINANCE REFORM, 73 Cal. L. Rev. 1045, 1090 (1985)
1333 HOMOSEXUAL DISCRIMINATION AND GENDER: WAS ROMER V. EVANS REALLY A
VICTORY FOR GAY RIGHTS?, 35 Cal. W. L. Rev. 271, 312+ (1999) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.)
1334 THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF CALIFORNIA'S PROPOSITION 187: AN EQUAL PRO-
TECTION ANALYSIS, 32 Cal. W. L. Rev. 129, 166+ (1995) HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
1335 IMMORAL BECAUSE THEY'RE BAD, BAD BECAUSE THEY'RE WRONG: SEXUAL ORI-
ENTATION AND PRESUMPTIONS OF PARENTAL UNFITNESS IN CUSTODY DISPUTES,
26 Cal. W. L. Rev. 395, 424+ (1990) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
1336 TEN TROUBLES WITH TITLE VII AND TRAIT DISCRIMINATION PLUS ONE SIMPLE
SOLUTION (A TOTALITY OF THE CIRCUMSTANCES FRAMEWORK), 37 Cap. U. L. Rev.
965, 1116+ (2009) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
1337 PROPOSITION 209 AS PROPOSITION 14 (AS AMENDMENT 2): THE UNREMARKED
DEATH OF POLITICAL STRUCTURE EQUAL PROTECTION, 27 Cap. U. L. Rev. 337, 392
(1999) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)

1338 "UNWED CHILDREN" AND THEIR PARENTS BEFORE THE UNITED STATES SUPREME
COURT FROM LEVY TO MICHAEL H.: UNLIKELY PARTICIPANTS IN CONSTITUTION-
AL JURISPRUDENCE, 28 Cap. U. L. Rev. 1, 72+ (1999) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
1339 MILLER V. ALBRIGHT: THE DENIAL OF EQUAL PROTECTION THROUGH A LETHAL
COMBINATION OF STEREOTYPING AND MISAPPLIED DEFERENCE, 28 Cap. U. L. Rev.
153, 195 (1999) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
1340 UNITED STATES v. VIRGINIA: GENDER SCRUTINY UNDER AN "EXCEEDINGLY PER-
SUASIVE JUSTIFICATION" STANDARD, 26 Cap. U. L. Rev. 173, 176+ (1997) HN: 1,2,5
(S.Ct.)
1341 EVANS v. ROMER AND AMENDMENT 2: HOMOSEXUALITY AND THE CONSTITU-
TIONAL DILEMMA, 24 Cap. U. L. Rev. 485, 505+ (1995) HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
1342 CABINING FREEDOM: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF LESBIAN AND GAY RIGHTS IN
THE UNITED STATES AND CANADA, 6 Cardozo J. Int'l & Comp. L. 425, 460 (1998)
1343 WHAT TO EXPECT: LEGAL DEVELOPMENTS AND CHALLENGES IN REPRODUCTIVE
JUSTICE, 15 Cardozo J.L. & Gender 503, 616 (2009) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
1344 SOMETHING OLD, SOMETHING NEW, SOMETHING BORROWED, SOMETHING BLUE
AND A SILVER SIXPENCE FOR HER SHOE: DUKES V. WAL-MART & SEX DISCRIMIN-
ATION CLASS ACTIONS, 12 Cardozo J.L. & Gender 969, 1007 (2006) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
1345 AFFIRMATIVE ACTION: AN INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS DIALOGUE, 21 Cardozo
L. Rev. 253, 282+ (1999) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
1346 RUTH BADER GINSBURG: THE FIRST JEWISH WOMAN ON THE UNITED STATES SU-
PREME COURT, 19 Cardozo L. Rev. 1441, 1454 (1998) HN: 1,2,3 (S.Ct.)
1347 ABOLITIONIST FEMINISM, MORAL SLAVERY, AND THE CONSTITUTION: "ON THE
SAME PLATFORM OF HUMAN RIGHTS", 18 Cardozo L. Rev. 767, 843 (1996)
1348 STATE CALLS FOR AN ARTICLE FIVE CONVENTION: MOBILIZATION AND INTER-
PRETATION, 2009 Cardozo L. Rev. de novo 74, 95+ (2009) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
1349 JUSTICE KENNEDY'S SHORT-LIVED LIBERTARIAN REVOLUTION: A BRIEF HISTORY
OF SUPREME COURT LIBERTARIAN IDEOLOGY, 7 Cardozo Pub. L. Pol'y & Ethics J. 1,
44+ (2008) HN: 4,5 (S.Ct.)
1350 DISABILITY-BASED PEREMPTORY CHALLENGE: NEED FOR ELIMINATION, 4 Cardozo
Pub. L. Pol'y & Ethics J. 121, 152 (2006) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
1351 THE SEXUAL ASSAULT CRISIS IN THE UNITED STATES AIR FORCE ACADEMY, 11
Cardozo Women's L.J. 177, 202 (2004)
1352 SUPREME COURT NARRATIVES ON EQUALITY AND GENDER DISCRIMINATION IN
EMPLOYMENT: 1971-2002, 10 Cardozo Women's L.J. 501, 576+ (2004) HN: 4,5 (S.Ct.)
1353 INTRODUCING LAWRENCE V. TEXAS: SOME BACKGROUND AND A GLIMPSE OF
THE FUTURE, 10 Cardozo Women's L.J. 263, 288+ (2004)
1354 RUTH BADER GINSBURG AND GENDER EQUALITY: A REASSESSMENT OF HER CON-
TRIBUTION, 9 Cardozo Women's L.J. 1, 25+ (2002)
1355 WOMEN IN THE NEW MILLENNIUM: THE PROMISES OF THE PAST ARE NOW THE
PROBLEMS FOR THE MILLENNIUM, 6 Cardozo Women's L.J. 1, 47+ (1999) HN: 4,5 (S.Ct.)

1356 JUSTICE RUTH BADER GINSBURG AND THE VIRGINIA MILITARY INSTITUTE: A
CULMINATION OF STRATEGIC SUCCESS, 4 Cardozo Women's L.J. 541, 584+ (1998) HN:
1,4,5 (S.Ct.)
1357 WHILE IGNORANCE MAY NOT BE BLISS, IT IS A MOTHER'S RIGHT: CONSTITUTION-
AL IMPLICATIONS OF TESTING NEWBORN BABIES FOR HIV, 3 Cardozo Women's L.J.
71, 95+ (1996) HN: 1,2,3 (S.Ct.)
1358 TAKING FREE EXERCISE RIGHTS SERIOUSLY, 57 Case W. Res. L. Rev. 55, 146+ (2006)
HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
1359 THE EQUITY TRAP: HOW RELIANCE ON TRADITIONAL CIVIL RIGHTS CONCEPTS
HAS RENDERED TITLE I OF THE ADA INEFFECTIVE, 56 Case W. Res. L. Rev. 1, 63
(2005) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
1360 THE POSTPARTUM PSYCHOSIS DEFENSE AND FEMINISM: MORE OR LESS JUSTICE
FOR WOMEN?, 53 Case W. Res. L. Rev. 143, 169 (2002) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
1361 UPDATING ROMER V. EVANS: THE IMPLICATIONS OF THE SUPREME COURT'S DENI-
AL OF CERTIORARI IN EQUALITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER CINCINNATI V. CITY
OF CINCINNATI, 49 Case W. Res. L. Rev. 645, 670 (1999) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
1362 UNITED STATES v. VIRGINIA AND OUR EVOLVING "CONSTITUTION": PLAYING
PEEK-A-BOO WITH THE STANDARD OF SCRUTINY FOR SEX-BASED CLASSIFICA-
TIONS, 47 Case W. Res. L. Rev. 1121, 1121+ (1997) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
1363 SCALIA 18:22: THOU SHALL NOT LIE WITH THE ACADEMIC AND LAW SCHOOL
ELITE; IT IS AN ABOMINATION-ROMER V. EVANS AND AMERICA'S CULTURE WAR,
47 Case W. Res. L. Rev. 207, 252+ (1996) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
1364 THE FOOL ON THE HILL: CONGRESSIONAL FINDINGS, CONSTITUTIONAL ADJUDIC-
ATION, AND UNITED STATES V. LOPEZ, 46 Case W. Res. L. Rev. 695, 730+ (1996) HN: 2
(S.Ct.)
1365 PHYSICIAN ASSISTED SUICIDE A CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT?, 37 Cath. Law. 225, 259
(1997)
1366 INTEGRATING MARITAL PROPERTY INTO A SPOUSE'S ELECTIVE SHARE, 59 Cath. U.
L. Rev. 617, 717 (2010) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
1367 SPEAK NO EVIL: ACADEMIC FREEDOM AND THE APPLICATION OF GARCETTI v. CE-
BALLOS TO PUBLIC UNIVERSITY FACULTY, 59 Cath. U. L. Rev. 125, 181 (2009) HN: 1
(S.Ct.)
1368 ILLUSIONS OF LIBERTY AND EQUALITY: AN "ALIEN'S" VIEW OF TIERED SCRUTINY,
AD HOC BALANCING, GOVERNMENTAL POWER, AND JUDICIAL IMPERIALISM, 55
Cath. U. L. Rev. 5, 30+ (2005) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
1369 CAN HOMOSEXUAL EQUAL PROTECTION CLAIMS WITHSTAND THE IMPLICATIONS
OF BOWERS V. HARDWICK?, 50 Cath. U. L. Rev. 703, 729 (2001)
1370 CONSTITUTIONAL EQUAL PROTECTION, STRICT SCRUTINY, AND THE POLITICS OF
MARRIAGE LAW, 47 Cath. U. L. Rev. 1231, 1243+ (1998) HN: 1,2 (S.Ct.)
1371 "TO LOVE AND HONOR ALL THE DAYS OF YOUR LIFE": A CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT
TO SAME-SEX MARRIAGE?, 43 Cath. U. L. Rev. 907, 950+ (1994) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)

1372 THE FUTURE CIVIL RIGHTS AGENDA: SPECULATION ON LITIGATION, LEGISLA-

TION, AND ORGANIZATION, 38 Cath. U. L. Rev. 795, 846+ (1989) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
1373 FROM BABY DOE TO GRANDPA DOE: THE IMPACT OF THE FEDERAL AGE DISCRIM-
INATION ACT ON THE "HIDDEN' RATIONING OF MEDICAL CARE, 37 Cath. U. L. Rev.
993, 1072 (1988) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
1374 CONSTITUTIONALITY OF AFFIRMATIVE ACTION REGULATIONS IMPOSED UNDER
THE CABLE COMMUNICATIONS POLICY ACT OF 1984, 35 Cath. U. L. Rev. 807, 849
(1986)
1375 GROVE CITY COLLEGE v. BELL AND PROGRAM-SPECIFICITY: NARROWING THE
SCOPE OF FEDERAL CIVIL RIGHTS STATUTES, 34 Cath. U. L. Rev. 1087, 1124 (1985)
HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
1376 THE TROUBLE WITH JAYCEES, 34 Cath. U. L. Rev. 901, 918 (1985) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
1377 NARENJI v. CIVILETTI: EQUAL PROTECTION AND THE IRANIAN CRISIS, 31 Cath. U. L.
Rev. 101, 121+ (1981) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
1378 DAMNED YANKEES: RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS THAT DISCRIMINATE AGAINST
GEOGRAPHIC ORIGIN, 2 Charleston L. Rev. 671, 701 (2008)
1379 DOMA AND THE INTERNAL REVENUE CODE, 84 Chi.-Kent L. Rev. 481, 518 (2009) HN: 4
(S.Ct.)
1380 RE-ENFRANCHISEMENT LAWS PROVIDE UNEQUAL TREATMENT: EX-FELON RE-
ENFRANCHISEMENT AND THE FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT, 81 Chi.-Kent L. Rev. 199,
234 (2006) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
1381 PETS OR MEAT, 80 Chi.-Kent L. Rev. 1129, 1150 (2005) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
1382 REVIVING THE PUBLIC/PRIVATE DISTINCTION IN FEMINIST THEORIZING, 75
Chi.-Kent L. Rev. 847, 867 (2000) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
1383 IS THE LAW MALE?: THE CASE OF FAMILY LAW, 69 Chi.-Kent L. Rev. 345, 358 (1993)
HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
1384 RIGHTS, REMEDIES AND RESTRAINT, 64 Chi.-Kent L. Rev. 531, 572 (1988) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
1385 LOS CONFUNDIDOS: DE-CONFLATING LATINOS/AS' RACE AND ETHNICITY, 19 Chi-
cano-Latino L. Rev. 69, 161 (1998) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
1386 PROPOSITION 187 AND THE GHOST OF JAMES BRADLEY THAYER, 17 Chicano-Latino
L. Rev. 24, 45+ (1995) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
1387 DOES CONGRESS FIND FACTS OR CONSTRUCT THEM? THE ASCENDANCE OF POLIT-
ICS OVER RELIABILITY, PERFECTED IN GONZALES v. CARHART, 56 Clev. St. L. Rev.
319, 385 (2008) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
1388 EQUAL PROTECTION FOR HOMOSEXUALS: WHY THE IMMUTABILITY ARGUMENT
IS NECESSARY AND HOW IT IS MET, 53 Clev. St. L. Rev. 545, 548+ (2006) HN: 1,2,3
(S.Ct.)
1389 POLICE DISCRETION AND TRAFFIC ENFORCEMENT: A GOVERNMENT OF MEN?, 50
Clev. St. L. Rev. 425, 453+ (2003) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.)
1390 OPERATION RESCUE BLOCKADES AND THE MISUSE OF 42 U.S.C. S 1985 (3), 41 Clev.
St. L. Rev. 145, 173+ (1993) HN: 1,2,5 (S.Ct.)

1391 THE ADA: STRICT SCRUTINY PROTECTION FOR DISABLED WORKERS, 21 Colo. Law.
733, 735 (1992) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
1392 JUSTIFYING THE USE OF INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS PRINCIPLES IN AMERIC-
AN CONSTITUTIONAL LAW, 37 Colum. Hum. Rts. L. Rev. 1, 100 (2005) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
1393 NATIONAL DAYCARE: A NECESSARY PRECURSOR TO GENDER EQUALITY WITH
NEWFOUND PROMISE FOR SUCCESS, 36 Colum. Hum. Rts. L. Rev. 561, 661 (2005) HN: 4
(S.Ct.)
1394 WOMEN PRISONERS, PENOLOGICAL INTERESTS, AND GENDER STEREOTYPING: AN
APPLICATION OF EQUAL PROTECTION NORMS TO FEMALE INMATES, 32 Colum.
Hum. Rts. L. Rev. 251, 288 (2000) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
1395 MAKING THE GRADE, PUBLIC EDUCATION REFORM: THE USE OF STANDARDIZED
TESTING TO RETAIN STUDENTS AND DENY DIPLOMAS, 30 Colum. Hum. Rts. L. Rev.
495, 536 (1999) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
1396 SAME-SEX MARRIAGE: THE FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT OF MARRIAGE AND AN EXAM-
INATION OF CONFLICT OF LAWS AND THE FULL FAITH AND CREDIT CLAUSE, 26
Colum. Hum. Rts. L. Rev. 247, 272 (1994)
1397 THE NORPLANT DEBATE: BIRTH CONTROL OR WOMAN CONTROL?, 25 Colum. Hum.
Rts. L. Rev. 131, 169 (1993)
1398 CORRECT DIAGNOSIS; WRONG CURE: A RESPONSE TO PROFESSOR SUK, 110 Colum.
L. Rev. Sidebar 24, 34+ (2010) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
1399 THE EQUAL RIGHTS AMENDMENT: THEN AND NOW, 17 Colum. J. Gender & L. 419,
435+ (2008) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
1400 EQUALITY WITH A VENGEANCE: FEMALE CONSCIENTIOUS OBJECTORS IN PURSUIT
OF A VOICE AND SUBSTANTIVE GENDER EQUALITY, 16 Colum. J. Gender & L. 97, 145
(2007) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
1401 SEX AS A FORM OF GENDER AND EXPRESSION AFTER LAWRENCE v. TEXAS, 15
Colum. J. Gender & L. 297, 325 (2006) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
1402 RE-ORIENTING THE SEX DISCRIMINATION ARGUMENT FOR GAY RIGHTS AFTER
LAWRENCE v. TEXAS, 14 Colum. J. Gender & L. 131, 145+ (2005) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
1403 RUPTURE, LEAKAGE, AND RECONSTRUCTION: THE BODY AS A SITE FOR THE EN-
FORCEMENT AND REPRODUCTION OF SEX-BASED LEGAL NORMS IN THE BREAST
IMPLANT CONTROVERSY, 14 Colum. J. Gender & L. 85, 113+ (2005) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
1404 COUNTENANCING THE OPPRESSION OF WOMEN: HOW LIBERALS TOLERATE RELI-
GIOUS AND CULTURAL PRACTICES THAT DISCRIMINATE AGAINST WOMEN, 12
Colum. J. Gender & L. 154, 164+ (2003) HN: 1,3,4 (S.Ct.)
1405 PROTECTING SEX: SEXUAL DISINCENTIVES AND SEX-BASED DISCRIMINATION IN
NGUYEN v. INS, 12 Colum. J. Gender & L. 222, 273 (2003) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
1406 CATEGORICAL EXCLUSIONS: EXPLORING LEGAL RESPONSES TO HEALTH CARE
DISCRIMINATION AGAINST TRANSSEXUALS, 11 Colum. J. Gender & L. 88, 126 (2002)
HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
1407 DON'T AWAKEN THE SLEEPING CHILD: JAPAN'S GENDER EQUALITY LAW AND THE

RHETORIC OF GRADUALISM, 8 Colum. J. Gender & L. 143, 184+ (1999) HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
1408 "FEMINIST JURISPRUDENCE"--THE 1990 MYRA BRADWELL DAY PANEL, 1 Colum. J.
Gender & L. 5, 46 (1991) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
1409 THE CALL FOR A COLOR-BLIND LAW, 30 Colum. J.L. & Soc. Probs. 407, 458 (1997) HN: 4
(S.Ct.)
1410 DISTINGUISHING PRIVATE WOMEN'S COLLEGES FROM THE VMI DECISION, 30
Colum. J.L. & Soc. Probs. 137, 183+ (1997) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
1411 SEXUAL HARASSMENT: A THIRTEENTH AMENDMENT RESPONSE, 28 Colum. J.L. &
Soc. Probs. 519, 557+ (1995) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
1412 EDUCATIONAL VOUCHERS: A CONSTITUTIONAL ANALYSIS, 28 Colum. J.L. & Soc.
Probs. 423, 473 (1995) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
1413 COMBATING THE TUBERCULOSIS EPIDEMIC: THE LEGALITY OF COERCIVE TREAT-
MENT MEASURES, 27 Colum. J.L. & Soc. Probs. 101, 149 (1993) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
1414 ECONOMIC RIGHTS UNDER THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION, 32 Colum. J.
Transnat'l L. 97, 132 (1994) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
1415 THE TRAJECTORY OF TRAUMA: BODIES AND MINDS OF ABORTION DISCOURSE, 110
Colum. L. Rev. 1193, 1252 (2010) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
1416 ARE GENDER STEREOTYPES BAD FOR WOMEN? RETHINKING ANTIDISCRIMINA-
TION LAW AND WORK-FAMILY CONFLICT, 110 Colum. L. Rev. 1, 69 (2010) HN: 4
(S.Ct.)
1417 CONSTITUTIONAL TIPPING POINTS: CIVIL RIGHTS, SOCIAL CHANGE, AND FACT-
BASED ADJUDICATION, 106 Colum. L. Rev. 1955, 2022 (2006)
1418 BOLLING ALONE, 104 Colum. L. Rev. 975, 1041+ (2004) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.)
1419 THE POLITICAL ECONOMY OF ENTITLEMENT, 104 Colum. L. Rev. 633, 728 (2004) HN: 5
(S.Ct.)
1420 JUSTICE GINSBURG AND THE JUDICIAL ROLE IN EXPANDING "WE THE PEOPLE":
THE DISABILITY RIGHTS CASES, 104 Colum. L. Rev. 49, 59 (2004) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
1421 REMARKS FOR THE CELEBRATION OF 75 YEARS OF WOMEN'S ENROLLMENT AT
COLUMBIA LAW SCHOOL OCTOBER 19, 2002, 102 Colum. L. Rev. 1441, 1448+ (2002)
HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
1422 IN MEMORY OF HERBERT WECHSLER, 100 Colum. L. Rev. 1359, 1361 (2000)
1423 A SKELETON IN THE CLOSET: SINGLE-SEX SCHOOLS FOR PREGNANT GIRLS, 98
Colum. L. Rev. 1203, 1237 (1998) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
1424 WILLIAM J. BRENNAN, JR., 97 Colum. L. Rev. 1609, 1611 (1997)
1425 RETHINKING THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF CEREMONIAL DEISM, 96 Colum. L. Rev.
2083, 2174 (1996) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
1426 SUSPECT SYMBOLS: THE LITERARY ARGUMENT FOR HEIGHTENED SCRUTINY FOR
GAYS, 96 Colum. L. Rev. 1753, 1834+ (1996) HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
1427 INDIVIDUALIZING JUSTICE THROUGH MULTICULTURALISM: THE LIBERALS' DI-
LEMMA, 96 Colum. L. Rev. 1093, 1167 (1996) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)

1428 STRICT SCRUTINY FOR GENDER, VIA CROSON, 93 Colum. L. Rev. 508, 520+ (1993) HN:
1,3,4 (S.Ct.)
1429 EQUAL CITIZENS OF EQUAL AND TERRITORIAL STATES: THE CONSTITUTIONAL
FOUNDATIONS OF CHOICE OF LAW, 92 Colum. L. Rev. 249, 337+ (1992) HN: 1,2 (S.Ct.)
1430 SEX(UAL ORIENTATION) AND TITLE VII, 91 Colum. L. Rev. 1158, 1187 (1991) HN: 4
(S.Ct.)
1431 OBSCURING THE STRUGGLE: SEX DISCRIMINATION, SOCIAL SECURITY, AND
STONE, SEIDMAN, SUNSTEIN & TUSHNET'S CONSTITUTIONAL LAW, 89 Colum. L.
Rev. 264, 289 (1989) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
1432 STARE DECISIS AND CONSTITUTIONAL ADJUDICATION, 88 Colum. L. Rev. 723, 773
(1988) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
1433 THE IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE AND RACIALLY MOTIVATED
QUESTIONING: DOES EQUAL PROTECTION PICK UP WHERE THE FOURTH AMEND-
MENT LEFT OFF?, 86 Colum. L. Rev. 800, 822 (1986)
1434 JUDICIAL REVIEW OF CONSTITUTIONAL CLAIMS AGAINST THE MILITARY, 84
Colum. L. Rev. 387, 424+ (1984) HN: 2,5 (S.Ct.)
1435 TO LURE THE TARANTULA FROM ITS HOLE: A RESPONSE, 83 Colum. L. Rev. 1186,
1208 (1983) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
1436 SEXUAL EQUALITY UNDER THE PREGNANCY DISCRIMINATION ACT, 83 Colum. L.
Rev. 690, 726+ (1983) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
1437 THE STANDARD OF CAUSATION IN THE MIXED-MOTIVE TITLE VII ACTION: A SO-
CIAL POLICY PERSPECTIVE, 82 Colum. L. Rev. 292, 326 (1982) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
1438 THE PRECEDENTIAL VALUE OF SUPREME COURT PLURALITY DECISIONS, 80 Colum.
L. Rev. 756, 781+ (1980) HN: 1,4,5 (S.Ct.)
1439 MODERN EQUAL PROTECTION: A CONCEPTUALIZATION AND APPRAISAL, 79 Colum.
L. Rev. 1023, 1084+ (1979) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
1440 MAN'S TRIAL, WOMAN'S TRIBULATION: RAPE CASES IN THE COURTROOM, 77
Colum. L. Rev. 1, 103 (1977)
1441 THE EFFECT OF THE TWENTY-FIRST AMENDMENT ON STATE AUTHORITY TO CON-
TROL INTOXICATING LIQUORS, 75 Colum. L. Rev. 1578, 1610 (1975)
1442 JUDICIAL SCRUTINY OF "BENIGN" RACIAL PREFERENCE IN LAW SCHOOL ADMIS-
SIONS, 75 Colum. L. Rev. 559, 602+ (1975) HN: 1,2 (S.Ct.)
1443 GEDULDIG V. AIELLO: PREGNANCY CLASSIFICATIONS AND THE DEFINITION OF
SEX DISCRIMINATION, 75 Colum. L. Rev. 441, 446+ (1975) HN: 1,4,5 (S.Ct.)
1444 PRE-MARRIAGE NAME CHANGE, RESUMPTION AND REREGISTRATION STATUTES,
74 Colum. L. Rev. 1508, 1521+ (1974) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
1445 EQUAL PROTECTION OF THE LAWS, 74 Colum. L. Rev. 357, 362 (1974)
1446 FEDERAL POWER TO REGULATE PRIVATE DISCRIMINATION: THE REVIVAL OF THE
ENFORCEMENT CLAUSES OF THE RECONSTRUCTION ERA AMENDMENTS, 74 Colum.
L. Rev. 449, 527 (1974) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
1447 A JURISPRUDENCE OF NONVIOLENCE, 9 Conn. Pub. Int. L.J. 65, 159+ (2009)

1448 NOT ALL CHILDREN ARE CREATED EQUAL: A PROPOSAL TO ADDRESS EQUAL PRO-
TECTION INHERITANCE RIGHTS OF POSTHUMOUSLY CONCEIVED CHILDREN, 4
Conn. Pub. Int. L.J. 234, 287+ (2005) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
1449 DEREGULATION OF BROADCAST OWNERSHIP CAPS: MORE MONOPOLIES, LESS
LOCALISM, DECREASED DIVERSITY AND VIOLATIONS OF EQUAL PROTECTION, 5
CommLaw Conspectus 269, 287+ (1997) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
1450 GENETIC TESTING IN THE WORKPLACE: EMPLOYER DREAM, EMPLOYEE NIGHT-
MARE-LEGISLATIVE REGULATION IN THE UNITED STATES AND THE FEDERAL RE-
PUBLIC OF GERMANY, 18 Comp. Lab. L.J. 547, 599+ (1997) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
1451 EMPLOYMENT LEGISLATION: A VEHICLE FOR PROMOTING EQUALITY OF THE
HANDICAPPED IN INDIA AND IN THE UNITED STATES, 11 Comp. Lab. L.J. 352, 371+
(1990) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
1452 IN DEFENSE OF THE ROOSEVELT COURT, 2 Fla. A & M U. L. Rev. 1, 90 (2007) HN: 4
(S.Ct.)
1453 PUTTING THE GOVERNMENT TO THE (HEIGHTENED, INTERMEDIATE, OR STRICT)
SCRUTINY TEST: DISPARATE APPLICATION SHOWS NOT ALL RIGHTS AND POWERS
ARE CREATED EQUAL, 10 Fla. Coastal L. Rev. 421, 485+ (2009) HN: 1,3,4 (S.Ct.)
1454 CHANGING THE IMMUTABLE, 41 Conn. L. Rev. 1495, 1522 (2009) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
1455 MARCHING TOWARD WAR: RECONNOITERING THE USE OF ALL FEMALE PLA-
TOONS, 40 Conn. L. Rev. 1531, 1579+ (2008) HN: 1,2,5 (S.Ct.)
1456 TITLE IX AND THE CONTACT SPORTS EXEMPTION: GENDER STEREOTYPES IN A
CIVIL RIGHTS STATUTE, 32 Conn. L. Rev. 381, 449+ (2000) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
1457 SIGNALING A NEW DIRECTION IN GENDER CLASSIFICATION SCRUTINY: UNITED
STATES V. VIRGINIA, 29 Conn. L. Rev. 521, 560+ (1996) HN: 1,3,4 (S.Ct.)
1458 DAMN THE TORPEDOES, FULL SPEED AHEAD: THE ARGUMENT FOR TOTAL SEX IN-
TEGRATION IN THE ARMED SERVICES, 28 Conn. L. Rev. 621, 629+ (1996) HN: 2,4,5
(S.Ct.)
1459 BEYOND GRISWOLD: FOUCAULDIAN AND REPUBLICAN APPROACHES TO PRI-
VACY, 23 Conn. L. Rev. 861, 954 (1991) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
1460 INTIMACY OUTSIDE OF THE NATURAL FAMILY: THE LIMITS OF PRIVACY, 23 Conn.
L. Rev. 955, 972 (1991) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
1461 STUDENTS VERSUS PROFESSORS: COMBATTING SEXUAL HARASSMENT UNDER
TITLE IX OF THE EDUCATION AMENDMENTS OF 1972, 23 Conn. L. Rev. 355, 412 (1991)
1462 REPUBLICATION - LOCHNER ABROAD: SUBSTANTIVE DUE PROCESS AND EQUAL
PROTECTION IN THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY, 9 German L.J. 2179, 2222
(2008) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
1463 ABORTION AND ORIGINAL MEANING, 24 Const. Comment. 291, 352+ (2007) HN: 1
(S.Ct.)
1464 ORIGINAL MEANING AND CONSTITUTIONAL REDEMPTION, 24 Const. Comment. 427,
532+ (2007) HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
1465 WHAT ARE THE FACTS OF MARBURY V. MADISON?, 20 Const. Comment. 255, 281

(2003) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)

1466 NECROMANCING THE EQUAL RIGHTS AMENDMENT, 17 Const. Comment. 593, 602
(2000) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
1467 THE LIMITS OF GAYLAW, 17 Const. Comment. 603, 649 (2000)
1468 MIDNIGHT IN THE COURTROOM OF GOOD AND EVIL, 16 Const. Comment. 499, 504
(1999) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
1469 THE PARIAH PRINCIPLE, 13 Const. Comment. 257, 284 (1996)
1470 DOES FOOTNOTE FOUR DESCRIBE?, 11 Const. Comment. 197, 214 (1994)
1471 ON THE "USEFULNESS' OF SUSPECT CLASSIFICATIONS, 3 Const. Comment. 375, 384
(1986) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
1472 SHARING GOVERNANCE: FAMILY LAW IN CONGRESS AND THE STATES, 18 Cornell
J.L. & Pub. Pol'y 267, 335 (2009)
1473 RACE AND SEX DISCRIMINATION IN CHARITABLE TRUSTS, 12 Cornell J.L. & Pub.
Pol'y 275, 318 (2003) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
1474 DETERMINING REASONABLENESS UNDER THE FOURTH AMENDMENT: PHYSICAL
FORCE TO CONTROL AND PUNISH STUDENTS, 10 Cornell J.L. & Pub. Pol'y 397, 453+
(2001) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
1475 ACT OF INFIDELITY: WHY THE DEFENSE OF MARRIAGE ACT IS UNFAITHFUL TO
THE CONSTITUTION, 7 Cornell J.L. & Pub. Pol'y 203, 253+ (1997) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
1476 NEITHER LIBERTY NOR JUSTICE: ANTI-GAY INITIATIVES, POLITICAL PARTICIPA-
TION, AND THE RULE OF LAW, 5 Cornell J.L. & Pub. Pol'y 431, 513+ (1996) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
1477 THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT: A MODEL FOR TITLE VII ENFORCE-
MENT, 2 Cornell J.L. & Pub. Pol'y 25, 40 (1992) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
1478 SEPARATE BUT EQUAL AND SINGLE-SEX SCHOOLS, 90 Cornell L. Rev. 443, 461+ (2005)
HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
1479 AGENCY, EQUALITY, AND ANTIDISCRIMINATION LAW, 85 Cornell L. Rev. 1194, 1220
(2000) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
1480 TOWARD A FORMATIVE PROJECT OF SECURING FREEDOM AND EQUALITY, 85 Cor-
nell L. Rev. 1221, 1258 (2000) HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
1481 EQUAL PROTECTION'S ANTINOMIES AND THE PROMISE OF A CO-CONSTITUTIVE
APPROACH, 85 Cornell L. Rev. 1392, 1425+ (2000) HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
1482 "THE VERY STEREOTYPE THE LAW CONDEMNS": CONSTITUTIONAL SEX DISCRIM-
INATION (FNdd1) LAW AS A QUEST FOR PERFECT PROXIES, 85 Cornell L. Rev. 1447,
1491+ (2000) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
1483 EQUALITY AS THE PRIMARY CONSTITUTIONAL VALUE: THE CASE FOR APPLYING
EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION LAWS TO RELIGION, 81 Cornell L. Rev. 1049, 1128
(1996) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
1484 "BY REASON OF THEIR SEX": FEMINIST THEORY, POSTMODERNISM, AND JUSTICE,
80 Cornell L. Rev. 1536, 1594+ (1995) HN: 4,5 (S.Ct.)
1485 WE HAVE NOTHING TO FEAR BUT GENDER STEREOTYPES: OF KATIE AND AMY
AND "BABE FEMINISM" The Morning After: Sex, Fear, and Feminism on Campus. By Katie

Roiphe. Boston: Little, Brown & Co. 1993. 180 pp. $19.95., 80 Cornell L. Rev. 612, 645 (1995)
1486 JUDICIAL REVIEW, EQUAL PROTECTION AND THE PROBLEM WITH PLEBISCITES, 79
Cornell L. Rev. 527, 630 (1994) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
1487 WOMEN IN THE CROSSFIRE: SHOULD THE COURT ALLOW IT?, 78 Cornell L. Rev. 252,
301+ (1993) HN: 4,5 (S.Ct.)
1488 DEATH, PRIVACY, AND THE FREE EXERCISE OF RELIGION, 77 Cornell L. Rev. 490,
595+ (1992) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
1489 THE SUPREME COURT, CIVIL RIGHTS LITIGATION, AND DEJA VU, 76 Cornell L. Rev.
643, 655 (1991)
1490 BATTERED WOMEN SUING POLICE FOR FAILURE TO INTERVENE: VIABLE LEGAL
AVENUES AFTER DESHANEY v. WINNEBAGO COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL
SERVICES, 75 Cornell L. Rev. 1393, 1425 (1990) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
1491 GOVERNMENTAL FUNCTIONS AND CONSTITUTIONAL DOCTRINE: THE HISTORICAL
CONSTITUTION, 72 Cornell L. Rev. 553, 597 (1987) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
1492 THE ANTIDISCRIMINATION MODEL RECONSIDERED: ENSURING EQUAL OPPOR-
TUNITY WITHOUT RESPECT TO HANDICAP UNDER SECTION 504 OF THE REHABIL-
ITATION ACT OF 1973, 69 Cornell L. Rev. 401, 516+ (1984) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
1493 GENDER-BASED STATUTORY RAPE LAW DOES NOT VIOLATE THE EQUAL PROTEC-
TION CLAUSE: MICHAEL M. v. SUPERIOR COURT OF SONOMA COUNTY, 67 Cornell L.
Rev. 1109, 1109+ (1982) HN: 1,2,4 (S.Ct.)
1494 MARITAL REGIMES: A STORY OF COMPROMISE AND DEMORALIZATION, TOGETH-
ER WITH CRITICISM AND SUGGESTIONS FOR REFORM, 67 Cornell L. Rev. 45, 102
(1981) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
1495 NGUYEN V. INS: THE SUPREME COURT RATIONALIZES GENDER-BASED DISTINC-
TIONS IN UPHOLDING AN EQUAL PROTECTION CHALLENGE, 35 Creighton L. Rev. 789,
856+ (2002) HN: 1,4,5 (S.Ct.)
1496 HAND-UP OR HANDOUT? THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT AND "UNREAS-
ONABLE ACCOMMODATION" OF LEARNING DISABLED BAR APPLICANTS: TOWARD
A NEW PARADIGM, 34 Creighton L. Rev. 611, 674+ (2001) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
1497 THE DEATH OF THE PEREMPTORY CHALLENGE: J.E.B. V. ALABAMA, 28 Creighton L.
Rev. 1177, 1207+ (1995) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
1498 FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHTS IN THE MILITARY CONTEXT: WHAT DEFERENCE IS
DUE?-GOLDMAN v. WEINBERGER, 20 Creighton L. Rev. 85, 110+ (1987) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
1499 CONSTITUTIONAL LAW--EQUAL PROTECTION CLAUSE--UNCONSTITUTIONAL FED-
ERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION GENDER PREFERENCE POLICY NOT SUB-
STANTIALLY RELATED TO ACHIEVING BROADCAST PROGRAMMING DIVERSITY.
LAMPRECHT v. FCC, 958 F.2d, 23 Cumb. L. Rev. 219, 235 (1993) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
1500 TAX EXEMPTION AND CHURCHES: A HISTORICAL AND CONSTITUTIONAL ANALYS-
IS, 22 Cumb. L. Rev. 521, 594 (1992) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
1501 BOOK REVIEW: BECOMING JUSTICE BLACKMUN BY LINDA GREENHOUSE, 74 Def.
Couns. J. 362, 378+ (2007)

1502 THE BURDENS OF MANLINESS, 33 Harv. J. L. & Gender 477, 507+ (2010)
1503 KEEPING MEN "MEN" AND WOMEN DOWN: SEX SEGREGATION, ANTI-ES-
SENTIALISM, AND MASCULINITY, 33 Harv. J. L. & Gender 509, 553 (2010)
1504 HEALTH CARE REFORM AND REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS: SEX EQUALITY ARGU-
MENTS FOR ABORTION COVERAGE IN A NATIONAL PLAN, 33 Harv. J. L. & Gender
357, 402+ (2010)
1505 SOCIAL REFORM LITIGATION AND ITS CHALLENGES: AN ESSAY IN HONOR OF
JUSTICE RUTH BADER GINSBURG, 32 Harv. J. L. & Gender 251, 302+ (2009) HN: 1,4,5
(S.Ct.)
1506 FEMINIST DISAGREEMENT (COMPARATIVELY) RECAST, 31 Harv. J. L. & Gender 277,
321+ (2008) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
1507 EXPOSING SEX STEREOTYPES IN RECENT SAME-SEX MARRIAGE JURISPRUDENCE,
30 Harv. J. L. & Gender 461, 505 (2007) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
1508 MARRIAGE AND THE ELEPHANT: THE LIBERAL DEMOCRATIC STATE'S REGULA-
TION OF INTIMATE RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN ADULTS, 30 Harv. J. L. & Gender 25, 66
(2007)
1509 IT'S TIME THAT YOU KNOW: THE SHORTCOMINGS OF IGNORANCE AS FAIRNESS IN
EMPLOYMENT LAW AND THE NEED FOR AN "INFORMATION-SHIFTING" MODEL, 30
Harv. J. L. & Gender 99, 150 (2007)
1510 TITLE IX: BEYOND EQUAL PROTECTION, 28 Harv. J. L. & Gender 217, 283+ (2005) HN:
1,2 (S.Ct.)
1511 IMPLICIT BIAS, "SCIENCE," AND ANTIDISCRIMINATION LAW, 1 Harv. L. & Pol'y Rev.
477, 493+ (2007) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
1512 ASPIRATION AND UNDERENFORCEMENT, 119 Harv. L. Rev. F. 193, 193+ (2006) HN: 2
(S.Ct.)
1513 MILLER V. ALBRIGHT: CONTINUING TO DISCRIMINATE ON THE BASIS OF GENDER
AND ILLEGITIMACY, 76 Denv. U. L. Rev. 281, 305+ (1998) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.)
1514 J.E.B. v. ALABAMA EX REL T.B. : DISCRIMINATION BY ANY OTHER NAME . . ., 72
Denv. U. L. Rev. 169, 189 (1994) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
1515 AFFIRMATIVE ACTION OR THE SAME SIN?, 67 Denv. U. L. Rev. 421, 451 (1990) HN: 3
(S.Ct.)
1516 MOTHERS WHO KILL: COMING TO TERMS WITH MODERN AMERICAN INFANTICIDE,
8 DePaul J. Health Care L. 3, 107+ (2004) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
1517 DOE AND SMITH V. MUTUAL OF OMAHA INSURANCE COMPANY: THE POSSIBLE IM-
PACT OF INSURANCE CAPS ON HIV-INFECTED INDIVIDUALS, 4 DePaul J. Health Care
L. 193, 222 (2000) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
1518 FARBER V. CITY OF PATERSON: THE THIRD CIRCUIT WEIGHS IN ON THE FUTURE
OF PROTECTING POLITICAL CLASSES UNDER SECTION 1985(3), 57 DePaul L. Rev.
1053, 1092 (2008)
1519 THE BIOLOGICAL CAUSES AND CONSEQUENCES OF HOMOSEXUAL BEHAVIOR AND
THEIR RELEVANCE FOR FAMILY LAW POLICIES, 56 DePaul L. Rev. 997, 1033 (2007)

HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
1520 ENFORCING THE EQUAL PROTECTION CLAUSE ON BEHALF OF DOMESTIC VIOL-
ENCE VICTIMS: THE IMPACT OF DOE v. CALUMET CITY, 45 DePaul L. Rev. 123, 131+
(1995) HN: 1,4,5 (S.Ct.)
1521 COLORADO'S AMENDMENT 2 DEFEATED: THE EMERGENCE OF A FUNDAMENTAL
RIGHT TO PARTICIPATE IN THE POLITICAL PROCESS, 44 DePaul L. Rev. 841, 915 (1995)
HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
1522 SHAW V. RENO: A COLOR-BLIND COURT IN A RACE-CONSCIOUS SOCIETY, 44 DePaul
L. Rev. 917, 997 (1995) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
1523 IN SICKNESS OR IN HEALTH: THE RIGHT TO MARRY AND THE CASE OF HIV ANTI-
BODY TESTING, 38 DePaul L. Rev. 87, 126 (1988)
1524 DENIAL OF TITLE VII PROTECTION TO TRANSSEXUALS: ULANE v. EASTERN AIR-
LINES, INC., 34 DePaul L. Rev. 553, 586 (1985) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
1525 NEWPORT NEWS SHIPBUILDING & DRY DOCK CO. v. EEOC: THE FAMILY UNIT PRO-
TECTED FROM PREGNANCY DISCRIMINATION, 33 DePaul L. Rev. 545, 574+ (1984)
1526 J.E.B. v. ALABAMA EX REL. T.B.: GENDER-BASED PEREMPTORY CHALLENGES, 1995
Det. C.L. Rev. 819, 851+ (1995) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
1527 THE SUPREME COURT AS A (COUNTER) MAJORITARIAN INSTITUTION: MISPERCEP-
TIONS OF THE WARREN, BURGER, AND REHNQUIST COURTS, 1994 Det. C.L. Rev. 1,
60+ (1994) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
1528 REDUCTION IN FORCE EARLY RETIREMENT INCENTIVES AND THE AGE DISCRIM-
INATION IN EMPLOYMENT ACT, 1989 Det. C.L. Rev. 987, 1052 (1989) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
1529 WASHOUT ON THE ROAD TO EQUAL PROTECTION: WATKINS v. U.S. ARMY, 1989
Det. C.L. Rev. 243, 261+ (1989) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
1530 PIKE v. CITY OF WYOMING: RES JUDICATA, REVISITED, 1989 Det. C.L. Rev. 1509, 1526
(1989) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
1531 COMMUNITY HOUSING RIGHTS FOR THE MENTALLY RETARDED, 1987 Det. C.L. Rev.
869, 921 (1987) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
1532 AN ANALYSIS OF THE SIXTH AMENDMENT RIGHT TO COUNSEL AS IT APPLIES TO
SUSPENDED SENTENCES AND PROBATION: DO ARGERSINGER AND SCOTT BLOW A
FLAT NOTE ON GIDEON'S TRUMPET?, 107 Dick. L. Rev. 699, 722 (2003)
1533 TITLE VII: HOW RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN THE LAW OF SEXUAL HARASSMENT
APPLY WITH EQUAL FORCE TO CLAIMS OF RACIAL HARASSMENT, 103 Dick. L. Rev.
765, 800+ (1999) HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
1534 CREATING CHAOS IN THE NAME OF CONSISTENCY: AFFIRMATIVE ACTION AND
THE ODD LEGACY OF ADARAND CONSTRUCTORS, INC. v. PENA, 101 Dick. L. Rev.
281, 324+ (1997) HN: 1,2,3 (S.Ct.)
1535 JUSTICE BLACKMUN AND INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS, 97 Dick. L. Rev. 421, 436 (1993) HN: 1
(S.Ct.)
1536 LAWRENCE BEYOND GAY RIGHTS: TAKING THE RATIONALITY REQUIREMENT FOR
JUSTIFYING CRIMINAL STATUTES SERIOUSLY, 53 Drake L. Rev. 231, 279 (2005) HN: 2

(S.Ct.)
1537 THE STATE OF THE NATION, NOT THE STATE OF THE RECORD: FINDING PROBLEMS
WITH JUDICIAL "REVIEW" OF ELEVENTH AMENDMENT ABROGATION LEGISLA-
TION, 53 Drake L. Rev. 421, 476 (2005) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
1538 "LE ROI EST MORT; VIVE LE ROI!": AN ESSAY ON THE QUIET DEMISE OF MCDON-
NELL DOUGLAS AND THE TRANSFORMATION OF EVERY TITLE VII CASE AFTER
DESERT PALACE, INC. V. COSTA INTO A "MIXED-MOTIVES" CASE, 52 Drake L. Rev.
71, 143 (2003) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
1539 A FEMINIST REPUDICATION OF THE RAPE SHIELD LAWS, 51 Drake L. Rev. 45, 72+
(2002) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
1540 THREE GENERATIONS LATER AND STILL NO CLASS: PROTECTING AMERICANS
WITH DISABILITIES UNDER 42 U.S.C. S 1985(3), THE KU KLUX KLAN ACT, 47 Drake L.
Rev. 537, 583+ (1999) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
1541 THE PULSE OF LIFE IN JUSTICE BRENNAN'S JURISPRUDENCE, 46 Drake L. Rev. I, xxiv
(1997)
1542 HEIGHTENED SCRUTINY UNDER THE EQUAL PROTECTION CLAUSE: A REMEDY TO
DISCRIMINATION BASED ON SEXUAL ORIENTATION, 42 Drake L. Rev. 485, 504+ (1993)
HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
1543 TORTS--CONVENIENCE STORES THAT SELL ALCOHOL EXCLUSIVELY FOR OFF-
PREMISES CONSUMPTION ARE EXCLUDED FROM LIABILITY UNDER THE IOWA
DRAMSHOP ACT AND THE IOWA SUPREME COURT DOES NOT RECOGNIZE A COM-
MON-LAW NEGLIGENCE CLAIM AGA, 42 Drake L. Rev. 511, 523 (1993) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
1544 THE NATURAL RIGHTS CLAUSE OF THE IOWA CONSTITUTION: WHEN THE LAW
SITS TOO TIGHT, 42 Drake L. Rev. 593, 658 (1993)
1545 GLIMMERS OF HOPE: THE EVOLUTION OF EQUALITY RIGHTS DOCTRINE IN JAPAN-
ESE COURTS FROM A COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE, 20 Duke J. Comp. & Int'l L. 167,
246 (2010) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
1546 FINDING LGBTS A SUSPECT CLASS: ASSESSING THE POLITICAL POWER OF LGBTS
AS A BASIS FOR THE COURT'S APPLICATION OF HEIGHTENED SCRUTINY, 17 Duke J.
Gender L. & Pol'y 385, 398+ (2010) HN: 1,2,4 (S.Ct.)
1547 (TRANS)FORMING TRADITIONAL INTERPRETATIONS OF TITLE VII: "BECAUSE OF
SEX" AND THE TRANSGENDER DILEMMA, 17 Duke J. Gender L. & Pol'y 219, 239 (2010)
HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
1548 ABORTION POST-GLUCKSBERG AND POST-GONZALES: APPLYING AN ANALYSIS
THAT DEMANDS EQUALITY FOR WOMEN UNDER THE LAW, 16 Duke J. Gender L. &
Pol'y 293, 314+ (2009) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
1549 A MAN'S RIGHT TO CHOOSE HIS SURNAME IN MARRIAGE: A PROPOSAL, 16 Duke J.
Gender L. & Pol'y 155, 168 (2009) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
1550 LEGAL IMPEDIMENTS TO SERVICE: WOMEN IN THE MILITARY AND THE RULE OF
LAW, 14 Duke J. Gender L. & Pol'y 1061, 1096+ (2007) HN: 1,2,3 (S.Ct.)
1551 HARVARD LAW SCHOOL LAMBDA SECOND ANNUAL GAY AND LESBIAN LEGAL
ADVOCACY CONFERENCE "DON'T ASK, DON'T TELL", 14 Duke J. Gender L. & Pol'y

1173, 1288+ (2007)

1552 "BUT SOME OF (THEM) ARE BRAVE": IDENTITY PERFORMANCE, THE MILITARY,
AND THE DANGERS OF AN INTEGRATION SUCCESS STORY, 14 Duke J. Gender L. &
Pol'y 693, 748+ (2007) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
1553 MILITARY VALUES IN LAW, 14 Duke J. Gender L. & Pol'y 977, 1008 (2007) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
1554 WOMEN'S RIGHTS AND FETAL PERSONHOOD IN CRIMINAL LAW, 7 Duke J. Gender L.
& Pol'y 89, 115+ (2000) HN: 1,2,4 (S.Ct.)
1555 GIRLS' SCHOOLS AFTER VMI: DO THEY MAKE THE GRADE?, 4 Duke J. Gender L. &
Pol'y 69, 72+ (1997) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
1556 GENDER LAW, 1 Duke J. Gender L. & Pol'y 1, 1+ (1994) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
1557 ARE WOMEN WORTH AS MUCH AS MEN?: EMPLOYMENT INEQUITIES, GENDER
ROLES, AND PUBLIC POLICY, 1 Duke J. Gender L. & Pol'y 119, 157+ (1994) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
1558 RACE AND GENDER DISCRIMINATION: A HISTORICAL CASE FOR EQUAL TREAT-
MENT UNDER THE FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT, 1 Duke J. Gender L. & Pol'y 89, 117+
(1994) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
1559 STRUCK BY STEREOTYPE: RUTH BADER GINSBURG ON PREGNANCY DISCRIMINA-
TION AS SEX DISCRIMINATION, 59 Duke L.J. 771, 798+ (2010) HN: 4,5 (S.Ct.)
1560 DISABILITY, DISPARATE IMPACT, AND CLASS ACTIONS, 56 Duke L.J. 861, 922 (2006)
HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
1561 WHEN PRIVACY FAILS: INVOKING A PROPERTY PARADIGM TO MANDATE THE DE-
STRUCTION OF DNA SAMPLES, 54 Duke L.J. 179, 219 (2004) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
1562 TOWARD A PRAGMATIC UNDERSTANDING OF STATUS-CONSCIOUSNESS: THE CASE
OF DEREGULATED EDUCATION, 50 Duke L.J. 753, 886+ (2000) HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
1563 THE JUSTICES OF STRATEGY A review of The Choices Justices Make, by Lee Epstein and
Jack Knight (Congressional Quarterly Press, 1998)., 48 Duke L.J. 511, 570+ (1998) HN: 4
(S.Ct.)
1564 CRACKING THE CODE OF UNITED STATES V. VIRGINIA, 48 Duke L.J. 305, 339+ (1998)
HN: 1,2,3 (S.Ct.)
1565 THE LEAST AMONG US: UNCONSTITUTIONAL CHANGES IN PRISONER LITIGATION
UNDER THE PRISON LITIGATION REFORM ACT OF 1995, 47 Duke L.J. 117, 160 (1997)
HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
1566 THE NEW LOGIC OF AFFIRMATIVE ACTION, 45 Duke L.J. 559, 578 (1995) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
1567 WOMEN'S BODY IMAGE AND THE LAW, 43 Duke L.J. 113, 147+ (1993) HN: 2,4 (S.Ct.)
1568 AN EQUAL PROTECTION ANALYSIS OF UNITED STATES REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH
POLICY: GENDER, RACE, AGE, AND CLASS, 1991 Duke L.J. 324, 364+ (1991) HN: 4
(S.Ct.)
1569 A HAIR PIECE: PERSPECTIVES ON THE INTERSECTION OF RACE AND GENDER, 1991
Duke L.J. 365, 396 (1991) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
1570 TOWARD A BLACK LEGAL SCHOLARSHIP: RACE AND ORIGINAL UNDERSTAND-
INGS, 1991 Duke L.J. 39, 105 (1991) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
1571 SEX DISCRIMINATION IN THE SUPREME COURT-A COMMENT ON SEX EQUALITY,

SEX DIFFERENCES, AND THE SUPREME COURT, 1985 Duke L.J. 177, 182+ (1985)
1572 WOMAN'S CONSTITUTION, 1984 Duke L.J. 447, 508 (1984) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
1573 GENDER DISCRIMINATION AND THE MILITARY SELECTIVE SERVICE ACT: WOULD
THE MSSA PASS CONSTITUTIONAL MUSTER TODAY?, 36 Duq. L. Rev. 171, 184+ (1997)
HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
1574 A PRIMER FOR THE CONSTITUTIONALLY IMPAIRED, 32 Duq. L. Rev. 743, 771 (1994)
HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
1575 THE SUPREME COURT, THE FIRST AMENDMENT AND ANTI-SEX-DISCRIMINATION
LEGISLATION: PUTTING AMERICAN BOOKSELLERS ASSOCIATION, INC. v. HUDNUT
IN PERSPECTIVE, 32 Duq. L. Rev. 187, 218+ (1994)
1576 THE EMPEROR'S NEW CLOTHES: A SURVEY OF SIGNIFICANT COURT DECISIONS IN-
TERPRETING PENNSYLVANIA'S SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY ACT AND ITS WAIVERS, 32
Duq. L. Rev. 1, 108 (1993) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
1577 PROVIDING RELIEF TO THE VICTIMS OF MILITARY MEDICINE: A NEW CHALLENGE
TO THE APPLICATION OF THE FERES DOCTRINE IN MILITARY MEDICAL MALPRAC-
TICE CASES, 32 Duq. L. Rev. 109, 131 (1993) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
1578 HETEROSEXUAL REPRODUCTIVE IMPERATIVES, 56 Emory L.J. 1157, 1172 (2007) HN: 4
(S.Ct.)
1579 LAWRENCE V. GEDULDIG: REGULATING WOMEN'S SEXUALITY, 56 Emory L.J. 1235,
1303+ (2007) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
1580 SEX EQUALITY ARGUMENTS FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS: THEIR CRITICAL BASIS
AND EVOLVING CONSTITUTIONAL EXPRESSION, 56 Emory L.J. 815, 842 (2007) HN: 2
(S.Ct.)
1581 HOW NEW GENETIC TECHNOLOGIES WILL TRANSFORM ROE V. WADE, 56 Emory L.J.
843, 864 (2007) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
1582 UNTANGLING THE "LOOSE THREADS": EQUITABLE ADOPTION, EQUITABLE LEGIT-
IMATION, AND INHERITANCE IN EXTRALEGAL FAMILY ARRANGEMENTS, 48 Emory
L.J. 943, 990 (1999)
1583 SOME THOUGHTS ABOUT SOCIAL PERCEPTION AND EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINA-
TION LAW: A MODEST PROPOSAL FOR REOPENING THE JUDICIAL DIALOGUE, 46
Emory L.J. 1487, 1531 (1997) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
1584 NEITHER EQUAL NOR PROTECTED: THE INVISIBLE LAW OF EQUAL PROTECTION,
THE LEGAL INVISIBILITY OF ITS GENDER-BASED VICTIMS, 44 Emory L.J. 1069, 1185
(1995) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
1585 THE POWER OF GOVERNMENT TO REGULATE CLASS DISCRIMINATION BY RELI-
GIOUS ENTITIES: A STUDY IN CONFLICTING VALUES, 43 Emory L.J. 1189, 1245+ (1994)
HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
1586 PUBLIC EDUCATION: AN INNER-CITY CRISIS! SINGLE-SEX SCHOOLS: AN INNER-
CITY ANSWER?, 42 Emory L.J. 591, 646+ (1993) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
1587 THE RIGHT TO "PLEAD OUT" ISSUES AND BLOCK THE ADMISSION OF PREJUDICIAL
EVIDENCE: THE DIFFERENTIAL TREATMENT OF CIVIL LITIGANTS AND THE CRIM-

INAL ACCUSED AS A DENIAL OF EQUAL PROTECTION, 40 Emory L.J. 341, 391+ (1991)
HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
1588 CONSTITUTIONALISM AS THE AMERICAN RELIGION: THE GOOD PORTION, 39 Emory
L.J. 203, 215+ (1990) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
1589 DAVIS v. BANDEMER: REMEDIAL DIFFICULTIES IN POLITICAL GERRYMANDERING,
37 Emory L.J. 443, 493 (1988) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
1590 RECONSIDERATION OF SEPARATION OF POWERS AND THE BARGAINING GAME:
LIMITING THE POLICY DISCRETION OF JUDGES AND PLAINTIFFS IN INSTITUTION-
AL SUITS, 33 Emory L.J. 685, 732+ (1984) HN: 2,5 (S.Ct.)
1591 THE EXPANSION OF CONSTITUTIONAL AND STATUTORY REMEDIES FOR SEX SE-
GREGATION IN EDUCATION: THE FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT AND TITLE IX OF
THE EDUCATION AMENDMENTS OF 1972, 32 Emory L.J. 1111, 1165+ (1983) HN: 1,5
(S.Ct.)
1592 CONSTITUTIONAL LAW - EQUAL PROTECTION - CABELL v. CHAVEZ-SALIDO, 31
Emory L.J. 707, 744 (1982) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
1593 IS COGNITIVE BIAS AT WORK A DANGEROUS CONDITION ON LAND?, 7 Employee Rts.
& Emp. Pol'y J. 459, 494 (2003)
1594 THE INTERSECTION OF RACE, SEX, AND PARENTAL STATUS: EMPLOYMENT DIS-
CRIMINATION AGAINST SINGLE BLACK WOMEN WITH CHILDREN, 4 How. Scroll Soc.
Just. L. Rev. 37, 37+ (1999) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
1595 READING DOLAN v. CITY OF TIGARD, 25 Envtl. L. 127, 142 (1995) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
1596 GOLDEN ANNIVERSARY REFLECTIONS: CHANGES IN MARRIAGE AFTER FIFTY
YEARS, 42 Fam. L.Q. 333, 352 (2008) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
1597 PARADIGM SHIFTS AND PENDULUM SWINGS IN CHILD CUSTODY: THE INTERESTS
OF CHILDREN IN THE BALANCE, 42 Fam. L.Q. 381, 418 (2008)
1598 THE CONSTITUTIONALIZATION OF FAMILY LAW, 42 Fam. L.Q. 529, 572 (2008) HN: 1
(S.Ct.)
1599 PREMARITAL WAIVER OF ALIMONY, 38 Fam. L.Q. 141, 153 (2004) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
1600 WOMEN LAWYERS IN FAMILY LAW, 33 Fam. L.Q. 501, 513 (1999) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
1601 MARRIAGE AT THE MILLENNIUM, 33 Fam. L.Q. 647, 661 (1999) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
1602 EPILOGUE: OF FAMILIES, FEDERALIZATION, AND A QUEST FOR POLICY, 33 Fam.
L.Q. 843, 863 (1999)
1603 FATHERS' RIGHTS v. CHILDREN'S BEST INTERESTS: ESTABLISHING A PREDICTABLE
STANDARD FOR CALIFORNIA ADOPTION DISPUTES, 31 Fam. L.Q. 169, 214+ (1997) HN:
5 (S.Ct.)
1604 TRENDS IN CHILD CUSTODY AWARDS: HAS THE REMOVAL OF MATERNAL PREFER-
ENCE MADE A DIFFERENCE?, 28 Fam. L.Q. 247, 267 (1994)
1605 CRITERIA FOR DECIDING CHILD CUSTODY IN THE TRIAL AND APPELLATE
COURTS, 18 Fam. L.Q. 1, 42 (1984) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
1606 THE FCC AND REGULATION OF BROADCAST INDECENCY: IS THERE A NATIONAL
BROADCAST STANDARD IN THE AUDIENCE?, 41 Fed. Comm. L.J. 369, 400 (1989) HN: 3

(S.Ct.)
1607 1 Fla. Coastal L.J. 421, THE FLORIDA EQUAL RIGHTS AMENDMENT: RAISING THE
STANDARD APPLIED TO GENDER UNDER THE EQUAL PROTECTION CLAUSE OF THE
FLORIDA CONSTITUTION (2000) HN: 1,3,4 (S.Ct.)
1608 BUILDING BRIDGES V-CUBANS WITHOUT BORDERS: MUJERES UNIDAS POR SU HIS-
TORIA, 55 Fla. L. Rev. 225, 252+ (2003) HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.)
1609 TITLE 8 U.S.C. S 1409 OF THE UNITED STATES IMMIGRATION AND NATIONALITY
ACT-CHILDREN BORN OUT OF WEDLOCK: UNDERMINING FATHERS' RIGHTS AND
PERPETUATING GENDERED PARENTHOOD IN CITIZENSHIP LAW, 54 Fla. L. Rev. 949,
977+ (2002)
1610 DIVERSITY IS A VALUE IN AMERICAN HIGHER EDUCATION, BUT IT IS NOT A LEG-
AL JUSTIFICATION FOR AFFIRMATIVE ACTION, 52 Fla. L. Rev. 929, 955 (2000) HN: 5
(S.Ct.)
1611 CRUMBLING FOUNDATIONS: WHY RECENT JUDICIAL AND LEGISLATIVE CHAL-
LENGES TO TITLE IX MAY SIGNAL ITS DEMISE, 47 Fla. L. Rev. 741, 813 (1995) HN: 1
(S.Ct.)
1612 THE VALUES OF FREEDOM, 47 Fla. L. Rev. 499, 540 (1995) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
1613 WHEN WORLDS COLLIDE: PEREMPTORY CHALLENGES, GENDER, AND INTERMEDI-
ATE SCRUTINY IN J.E.B. V. ALABAMA, 46 Fla. L. Rev. 261, 290+ (1994) HN: 1,3,4 (S.Ct.)
1614 THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT OF 1990: A CONGRESSIONAL MANDATE
FOR HEIGHTENED JUDICIAL PROTECTION OF DISABLED PERSONS, 44 Fla. L. Rev.
417, 440+ (1992) HN: 1,2,4 (S.Ct.)
1615 EQUALITY THEORY, MARITAL RAPE, AND THE PROMISE OF THE FOURTEENTH
AMENDMENT, 42 Fla. L. Rev. 45, 79 (1990) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
1616 NEW GROUPS AND OLD DOCTRINE: RETHINKING CONGRESSIONAL POWER TO EN-
FORCE THE EQUAL PROTECTION CLAUSE, 37 Fla. St. U. L. Rev. 451, 537+ (2010)
1617 ELUSIVE EQUALITY IN DOMESTIC AND SEXUAL VIOLENCE LAW REFORM, 34 Fla. St.
U. L. Rev. 731, 777 (2007) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
1618 DISABUSING THE DEFINITION OF DOMESTIC ABUSE: HOW WOMEN BATTER MEN
AND THE ROLE OF THE FEMINIST STATE, 30 Fla. St. U. L. Rev. 791, 855 (2003)
1619 UNIVERSALISM, LIBERAL THEORY, AND THE PROBLEM OF GAY MARRIAGE, 25 Fla.
St. U. L. Rev. 705, 730+ (1998)
1620 LAGGING BEHIND THE TIMES: PARENTHOOD, CUSTODY, AND GENDER BIAS IN THE
FAMILY COURT, 25 Fla. St. U. L. Rev. 891, 925+ (1998) HN: 1,2,4 (S.Ct.)
1621 FOR BETTER OR FOR WORSE: A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF FLORIDA'S DEFENSE OF
MARRIAGE ACT, 25 Fla. St. U. L. Rev. 439, 462+ (1998) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
1622 HOLDING THE LINE AT VMI AND THE CITADEL: THE PRSERVATION OF A STATE'S
RIGHT TO OFFER A SINGLE-GENDER MILITARY EDUCATION, 23 Fla. St. U. L. Rev.
795, 836+ (1996) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
1623 HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL EQUITY IN TAXATION AS CONSTITUTIONAL PRIN-
CIPLES: GERMANY AND THE UNITED STATES CONTRASTED, 7 Fla. Tax Rev. 259, 335

(2006) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)

1624 ONE FLESH, TWO TAXPAYERS: A NEW APPROACH TO MARRIAGE AND WEALTH
TRANSFER TAXATION, 6 Fla. Tax Rev. 757, 806+ (2004) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
1625 THE GLASS SNEAKER: THIRTY YEARS OF VICTORIES AND DEFEATS INVOLVING
TITLE IX AND SEX DISCRIMINATION IN ATHLETICS, 13 Fordham Intell. Prop. Media &
Ent. L.J. 551, 616 (2003)
1626 BRINGING THEORIES OF HUMAN RIGHTS CHANGE HOME, 77 Fordham L. Rev. 459, 500
(2008) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
1627 "THERE IS ONLY ONE EQUAL PROTECTION CLAUSE": AN APPRECIATION OF
JUSTICE STEVENS'S EQUAL PROTECTION JURISPRUDENCE, 74 Fordham L. Rev. 2301,
2311 (2006) HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.)
1628 THE FLAWS OF RATIONAL BASIS WITH BITE: WHY THE SUPREME COURT SHOULD
ACKNOWLEDGE ITS APPLICATION OF HEIGHTENED SCRUTINY TO CLASSIFICA-
TIONS BASED ON SEXUAL ORIENTATION, 73 Fordham L. Rev. 2769, 2814+ (2005) HN:
1,4 (S.Ct.)
1629 IDENTITY POLITICS AND THE SECOND AMENDMENT, 73 Fordham L. Rev. 549, 572
(2004)
1630 NEGOTIATING GENDER AND (FREE AND EQUAL) CITIZENSHIP: THE PLACE OF AS-
SOCIATIONS, 72 Fordham L. Rev. 1569, 1598 (2004) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
1631 THE "ART" OF PROCREATION: WHY ASSISTED REPRODUCTION TECHNOLOGY AL-
LOWS FOR THE PRESERVATION OF FEMALE PRISONERS' RIGHT TO PROCREATE, 70
Fordham L. Rev. 2561, 2602 (2002) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
1632 WHEN EQUAL PROTECTION FAILS: HOW THE EQUAL PROTECTION JUSTIFICATION
FOR ABORTION UNDERCUTS THE STRUGGLE FOR EQUALITY IN THE WORKPLACE,
70 Fordham L. Rev. 2657, 2703+ (2002) HN: 1,4,5 (S.Ct.)
1633 DOMESTIC RELATIONS JURISPRUDENCE AND THE GREAT, SLUMBERING BAEHR:
ON DEFINITIONAL PRECLUSION, EQUAL PROTECTION, AND FUNDAMENTAL IN-
TERESTS, 64 Fordham L. Rev. 921, 986+ (1995) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
1634 QUESTIONING THE USE OF RACE-SPECIFIC AND GENDER-SPECIFIC ECONOMIC
DATA IN TORT LITIGATION: A CONSTITUTIONAL ARGUMENT, 63 Fordham L. Rev. 73,
124 (1994) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
1635 INDETERMINACY, JUSTIFICATION AND TRUTH IN CONSTITUTIONAL THEORY, 60
Fordham L. Rev. 595, 642 (1992) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
1636 A QUESTION OF CLASS: DOES 42 U.S.C. SECTION 1985 (3) PROTECT WOMEN WHO
ARE BARRED FROM ABORTION CLINICS, 60 Fordham L. Rev. 715, 737+ (1992) HN: 4
(S.Ct.)
1637 THE USES AND ABUSES OF INCUMBENCY: PEOPLE v. OHRENSTEIN AND THE LIM-
ITS OF INHERENT LEGISLATIVE POWER, 60 Fordham L. Rev. 217, 255 (1991) HN: 2
(S.Ct.)
1638 DUTY IN DIVORCE: SHARED INCOME AS A PATH TO EQUALITY, 58 Fordham L. Rev.
539, 592 (1990) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)

1639 GOD BLESS THE CHILD?: THE USE OF RELIGION AS A FACTOR IN CHILD CUSTODY
AND ADOPTION PROCEEDINGS, 58 Fordham L. Rev. 383, 426 (1989) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
1640 WOMEN LAWYERS IN BIG FIRMS: A STUDY IN PROGRESS TOWARD GENDER
EQUALITY, 57 Fordham L. Rev. 111, 126 (1988) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
1641 MATERNITY LEAVE: TAKING SEX DIFFERENCES INTO ACCOUNT, 54 Fordham L. Rev.
699, 765+ (1986) HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
1642 STANDING AND ADVERSENESS IN CHALLENGES OF TAX EXEMPTIONS FOR DIS-
CRIMINATORY PRIVATE SCHOOLS, 52 Fordham L. Rev. 441, 471+ (1984) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
1643 PREGNANCY DISCRIMINATION, EQUAL COMPENSATION AND THE GHOST OF GIL-
BERT: MEDICAL INSURANCE COVERAGE FOR SPOUSES OF EMPLOYEES, 51 Fordham
L. Rev. 696, 721+ (1983) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
1644 NO SCRUTINY WHATSOEVER: DECONSTITUTIONALIZATION OF POVERTY LAW,
DUAL RULES OF LAW, & DIALOGIC DEFAULT, 35 Fordham Urb. L.J. 629, 671+ (2008)
HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
1645 THE FUTURE OF SODOMY, 32 Fordham Urb. L.J. 197, 229 (2005) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
1646 QUEER LAW 1999 CURRENT ISSUES IN LESBIAN, GAY, BISEXUAL AND TRANS-
GENDERED LAW This Conference is a Joint Effort of the The Lesbian and Gay Law Associ-
ation Foundation of Greater New York (LeGaL Foundation) and the Gay and, 27 Fordham Urb.
L.J. 283, 433 (1999)
1647 GAY RIGHTS THROUGH THE LOOKING GLASS: POLITICS, MORALITY AND THE TRI-
AL OF COLORADO'S AMENDMENT 2, 21 Fordham Urb. L.J. 1057, 1081 (1994)
1648 NEWBORN HIV SCREENING AND NEW YORK ASSEMBLY BILL NO. 6747-B: PRIVACY
AND EQUAL PROTECTION OF PREGNANT WOMEN, 21 Fordham Urb. L.J. 857, 926+
(1994) HN: 1,2,5 (S.Ct.)
1649 PUBLIC FUNDING OF SECTARIAN EDUCATION: ESTABLISHMENT AND FREE EXER-
CISE CLAUSE IMPLICATIONS, 2 Geo. Mason Indep. L. Rev. 7, 95 (1993) HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
1650 SAME-SEX MARRIAGE AND THE NEW MEXICO EQUAL RIGHTS AMENDMENT, 20
Geo. Mason U. Civ. Rts. L.J. 209, 235 (2010)
1651 RACIAL AND SEXUAL PATERNALISM, 19 Geo. Mason U. Civ. Rts. L.J. 553, 624+ (2009)
HN: 1,2,4 (S.Ct.)
1652 INTERSECTIONALITY AND IDENTITY: REVISITING A WRINKLE IN TITLE VII, 17 Geo.
Mason U. Civ. Rts. L.J. 199, 235 (2006) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
1653 HITTING THE HOME RUN OR WISHFUK THINKING: CINCINNATI'S ISSUE THREE AND
THE SIGNIFICANCE OF EQUALITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER CINCINNATI v. CITY
OF CINCINNATI, 5 Geo. Mason U. Civ. Rts. L.J. 223, 249 (1995) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
1654 JUST DON'T GOT NO CLASS: THE SUPREME COURT, THE QUESTION OF CLASS
DEFINITION UNDER 42 U.S.C. s 1985(3) AND THE OPERATION RESCUE CLASS, 3 Geo.
Mason U. Civ. Rts. L.J. 157, 180+ (1992) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
1655 FEMINIST THEORIES OF INTERPRETATION: THE BIBLE AND THE LAW, 2 Geo. Mason
U. L. Rev. 305, 331+ (1995) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
1656 THE ASPIRATIONAL CONSTITUTION, 77 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1631, 1671 (2009)

1657 RECENT DECISIONS OF THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DIS-
TRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT: FOREIGN AFFAIRS, 74 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 810, 821+
(2006)
1658 TRAIT DISCRIMINATION AS RACE DISCRIMINATION: AN ARGUMENT ABOUT AS-
SIMILATION, 74 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 365, 438 (2006) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
1659 RECENT DECISIONS OF THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DIS-
TRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT: MILITARY LAW, 72 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1113, 1121
(2004)
1660 TRIBUNALS AND TRIBULATIONS: THE ANTITHETICAL ELEMENTS OF MILITARY
GOVERNANCE IN A MADISONIAN DEMOCRACY, 70 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 649, 768+ (2002)
HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
1661 FROM CHASTITY REQUIREMENT TO SEXUALITY LICENSE: SEXUAL CONSENT AND
A NEW RAPE SHIELD LAW, 70 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 51, 162 (2002) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
1662 FORTY YEAS AND FIVE NAYS-THE NAYS HAVE IT: MORRISON'S BLURRED POLITIC-
AL ACCOUNTABILITY AND THE DEFEAT OF THE CIVIL RIGHTS PROVISION OF THE
VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN ACT, 69 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 251, 292 (2001) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
1663 THE REVERSE EQUAL PROTECTION ANALYSIS: A NEW METHODOLOGY FOR "SPE-
CIAL NEEDS" CASES, 68 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 447, 499+ (2000) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
1664 DEFENDING THE MIDDLE WAY: INTERMEDIATE SCRUTINY AS JUDICIAL MINIMAL-
ISM, 66 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 298, 352 (1998) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
1665 LAMPRECHT v. FCC: A LOOKING-GLASS INTO THE FUTURE OF AFFIRMATIVE AC-
TION?, 61 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1895, 1954+ (1993) HN: 1,3,4 (S.Ct.)
1666 INTERPRETATION OF THE EQUAL PROTECTION CLAUSE: A CONSTITUTIONAL
SHELL GAME, 61 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1349, 1364+ (1993) HN: 1,2,5 (S.Ct.)
1667 WAIVING FOR THE FLAG: SHOULD INFORMED CONSENT RULES APPLY IN THE
CONTEXT OF MILITARY EMERGENCIES?, 60 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1387, 1435 (1992) HN: 5
(S.Ct.)
1668 SPOUSAL BENEFITS UNDER THE PREGNANCY DISCRIMINATION ACT, 50 Geo. Wash.
L. Rev. 827, 847 (1982) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
1669 PLENARY POWER UNDERGROUND IN NGUYEN v. INS: A RESPONSE TO PROFESSOR
SPIRO, 16 Geo. Immigr. L.J. 835, 853 (2002)
1670 MILLER V. ALBRIGHT: PLENARY POWER, EQUAL PROTECTION, AND THE RIGHTS
OF AN ALIEN LOVE CHILD, 12 Geo. Immigr. L.J. 621, 656+ (1998) HN: 4,5 (S.Ct.)
1671 AFFIRMATIVE ACTION FOR CERTAIN NON-BLACK MINORITIES AND RECENT IM-
MIGRANTS-"MEND IT OR END IT?", 11 Geo. Immigr. L.J. 835, 857+ (1997) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
1672 THE RHETORIC OF EXCLUSION: THE ART OF DRAWING A LINE BETWEEN ALIENS
AND CITIZENS, 10 Geo. Immigr. L.J. 401, 430+ (1996) HN: 2,4 (S.Ct.)
1673 IN SEARCH OF QUALITY CHILDCARE: CLOSING THE IMMIGRATION GATE TO
CHILDCARE WORKERS, 8 Geo. Immigr. L.J. 161, 199 (1994)
1674 ORIGINALISM AND THE GOOD CONSTITUTION, 98 Geo. L.J. 1693, 1747+ (2010)
1675 PREGNANCY, WORK, AND THE PROMISE OF EQUAL CITIZENSHIP, 98 Geo. L.J. 567,

628+ (2010)
1676 CONSTITUTIONALIZING JURY SELECTION IN CRIMINAL CASES: A CRITICAL EVAL-
UATION, 86 Geo. L.J. 945, 1010 (1998)
1677 PROVING INTENTIONAL DISCRIMINATION: THE REALITY OF SUPREME COURT
RHETORIC, 86 Geo. L.J. 279, 350 (1997) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
1678 CHURCH OF THE LUKUMI BABALU AYE: OF ANIMAL SACRIFICE AND RELIGIOUS
PERSECUTION, 85 Geo. L.J. 1, 69 (1996)
1679 SUBSTANTIVE EQUALITY AND ANTIDISCRIMINATION: ACCOMMODATING PREG-
NANCY UNDER THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT, 82 Geo. L.J. 193, 235 (1993)
HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
1680 EQUAL PROTECTION, PUBLIC CHOICE THEORY, AND LEARNFARE: WEALTH CLAS-
SIFICATIONS REVISITED, 81 Geo. L.J. 2141, 2167+ (1993) HN: 4,5 (S.Ct.)
1681 HIV-POSITIVE, EQUAL PROTECTION NEGATIVE, 81 Geo. L.J. 375, 408 (1992) HN: 2
(S.Ct.)
1682 RACIAL PURITY AND INTERRACIAL SEX IN THE LAW OF COLONIAL AND ANTEBEL-
LUM VIRGINIA, 77 Geo. L.J. 1967, 2028 (1989) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
1683 GENDER BASED DISCRIMINATION IN POLICE RELUCTANCE TO RESPOND TO DO-
MESTIC ASSAULT COMPLAINTS, 75 Geo. L.J. 667, 680+ (1986) HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
1684 APOLOGIA FOR THE STATUS QUO GENDER JUSTICE BY DAVID L. KIRP, MARK G.
YUDOF & MARLENE STRONG FRANKS, CHICAGO: THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO
PRESS, 1986. Pp. x, 246. $19.95., 74 Geo. L.J. 1791, 1809+ (1986) HN: 4,5 (S.Ct.)
1685 STRUCTURAL DISCRIMINATION AND THE RIGHTS OF THE DISABLED, 74 Geo. L.J.
1435, 1489+ (1986) HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.)
1686 THE JURISPRUDENCE OF DISCRIMINATION AS OPPOSED TO SIMPLE INEQUALITY IN
THE INTERNATIONAL CIVIL SERVICE, 36 Ga. J. Int'l & Comp. L. 1, 87+ (2007) HN: 4,5
(S.Ct.)
1687 WOMEN AND LAW: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE UNITED STATES AND INDI-
AN SUPREME COURTS' EQUALITY JURISPRUDENCE, 34 Ga. J. Int'l & Comp. L. 557,
618+ (2006) HN: 1,4,5 (S.Ct.)
1688 GEORGIA'S WORKERS' COMPENSATION LAW: ARE LIMITATIONS ON DEATH BENE-
FITS TO FOREIGN, NONRESIDENT DEPENDENTS CONSTITUTIONAL? BARGE-WA-
GENER CONSTR. CO. v. MORALES, 24 Ga. J. Int'l & Comp. L. 397, 410+ (1994) HN: 5
(S.Ct.)
1689 EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION IN THE UNITED STATES IN 1989: REVISIONS OR A
PAUSE, 20 Ga. J. Int'l & Comp. L. 57, 70 (1990) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
1690 CLIMATE CHANGE LITIGATION: THE FEDERAL COMMON LAW OF INTERSTATE
NUISANCE AND FEDERALISM CONCERNS, 40 Ga. L. Rev. 661, 698+ (2006)
1691 A SIX-THREE RULE: REVIVING CONSENSUS AND DEFERENCE ON THE SUPREME
COURT, 37 Ga. L. Rev. 893, 1017+ (2003) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
1692 THE ORIGINS AND APPLICATION OF THE MILITARY DEFERENCE DOCTRINE, 35 Ga.
L. Rev. 161, 311+ (2000) HN: 1,2,5 (S.Ct.)

1693 DEADBEAT DADS: UNDESERVING OF THE RIGHT TO INHERIT FROM THEIR ILLE-
GITIMATE CHILDREN AND UNDESERVING OF EQUAL POTECTION, 34 Ga. L. Rev.
1773, 1800 (2000) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
1694 FEMINISM AND THE LIMITS OF EQUALITY, 24 Ga. L. Rev. 803, 847 (1990) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
1695 FINDING A VOICE, GIVING AN EAR: REFLECTIONS OF MASTERS/SLAVES, MEN/
WOMEN, 24 Ga. L. Rev. 883, 907+ (1990) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
1696 SEXUAL ORIENTATION DISCRIMINATION IN THE WAKE OF BOWERS v. HARDWICK,
22 Ga. L. Rev. 773, 803+ (1988) HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.)
1697 CONDITIONING ACCESS TO THE PUBLIC FORUM ON THE PURCHASE OF INSUR-
ANCE, 17 Ga. L. Rev. 815, 849 (1983) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
1698 CONSTITUTIONAL CHALLENGES TO GRAND JURY FOREPERSON-SELECTION PRO-
CEDURES, 17 Ga. L. Rev. 153, 199 (1982) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
1699 THE CONCEPT OF THE DOCTRINE OF THE COURT IN CONSTITUTIONAL LAW, 16 Ga.
L. Rev. 357, 405 (1982)
1700 EQUAL PROTECTION AND PERSONAL RIGHTS: THE REGIME OF THE "DISCRETE
AND INSULAR MINORITY"', 16 Ga. L. Rev. 407, 444+ (1982) HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
1701 ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY EDUCATION: AMEND PART 3 OF ARTICLE 16 OF
CHAPTER 2 OF TITLE 20 OF THE OFFICIAL CODE OF GEORGIA ANNOTATED, RELAT-
ING TO STUDENT HEALTH IN ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY EDUCATION, SO AS
TO REQUIRE IMMUNI, 24 Ga. St. U. L. Rev. 143, 157+ (2007) HN: 1,4,5 (S.Ct.)
1702 COUNTING THE DRAGON'S TEETH AND CLAWS: THE DEFINITION OF HARD PATER-
NALISM, 20 Ga. St. U. L. Rev. 659, 722 (2004)
1703 THE HIDDEN GENDER BIAS BEHIND "THE BEST INTEREST OF THE CHILD" STAND-
ARD IN CUSTODY DECISIONS, 13 Ga. St. U. L. Rev. 845, 845 (1997) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
1704 THE GHOSTS OF HOMER PLESSY, 12 Ga. St. U. L. Rev. 1037, 1088 (1996) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
1705 SEX-BLIND, SEPARATE BUT EQUAL, OR ANTI-SUBORDINATION? THE UNEASY LEG-
ACY OF PLESSY V. FERGUSON FOR SEX AND GENDER DISCRIMINATION, 12 Ga. St.
U. L. Rev. 1089, 1128 (1996) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
1706 THE MILITARY BAN ON HOMOSEXUALS: SUSPECT, CONSTITUTIONAL, OR BOTH?,
12 Ga. St. U. L. Rev. 845, 872+ (1996) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
1707 QUASI-SUSPECT STATUS FOR HOMOSEXUALS IN EQUAL PROTECTION ANALYSIS:
EQUALITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER CINCINNATI V. CITY OF CINCINNATI, 12 Ga.
St. U. L. Rev. 873, 897+ (1996) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
1708 In Re A.R.B.: Toward A Redefinition of the Best Interests Standard in Georgia Child Custody
Cases, 11 Ga. St. U. L. Rev. 711, 735 (1995)
1709 NOT-SO-EQUAL PROTECTION: SECURING INDIVIDUALS OF LIMITED ENGLISH PRO-
FICIENCY WITH MEANINGFUL ACCESS TO MEDICAL SERVICES, 32 Golden Gate U. L.
Rev. 239, 270 (2002) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
1710 THE CLAIMS OF WOMEN OF COLOR UNDER TITLE VII: THE INTERACTION OF RACE
AND GENDER, 26 Golden Gate U. L. Rev. 413, 436+ (1996) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
1711 BAEHR V. LEWIN : HAWAII TAKES A TENTATIVE STEP TO LEGALIZE SAME-SEX

MARRIAGE, 24 Golden Gate U. L. Rev. 41, 66+ (1994) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.)
1712 THE ESTABLISHMENT CLAUSE ARGUMENT FOR CHOICE, 20 Golden Gate U. L. Rev.
479, 500 (1990)
1713 SEXUAL SPEECH AND THE STATE: PUTTING PORNOGRAPHY IN ITS PLACE, 17
Golden Gate U. L. Rev. 359, 378 (1987)
1714 A SURVEY OF GAY RIGHTS CULMINATING IN LAWRENCE V. TEXAS, 39 Gonz. L. Rev.
539, 573+ (2004) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
1715 TREADING THE SUPREME COURT'S MURKY IMMUTABILITY WATERS, 38 Gonz. L.
Rev. 409, 444+ (2003) HN: 1,2 (S.Ct.)
1716 OUT IN THE STREET: JUVENILE CRIME, JUVENILE CURFEWS, AND THE CONSTITU-
TION, 34 Gonz. L. Rev. 267, 327 (1999) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
1717 INVISIBLE PLAINTIFFS: A FEMINIST CRITIQUE ON THE RIGHTS OF PRIVATE INDI-
VIDUALS IN THE WAKE OF HUSTLER MAGAZINE V. FALWELL, 35 Gonz. L. Rev. 291,
317+ (1999) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
1718 CHANGING OUR PERSPECTIVE: SHOULD WASHINGTON ADOPT THE REASONABLE
VICTIM STANDARD OF VIEWING HOSTILE ENVIRONMENT CLAIMS?, 30 Gonz. L. Rev.
315, 341 (1995) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
1719 THE AMERICAN MILITARY: WE'RE LOOKING FOR A FEW GOOD (STRAIGHT) MEN, 29
Gonz. L. Rev. 133, 163+ (1994) HN: 1,2,4 (S.Ct.)
1720 LOOKING BEYOND TRADITIONAL EDUCATIONAL PARADIGMS: WHEN OLD VIC-
TIMS BECOME NEW VICTIMIZERS, 23 Hamline L. Rev. 101, 110+ (1999) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
1721 CHALLENGING CONGRESS'S LATEST ATTEMPT TO CONFINE PRISONERS' CONSTI-
TUTIONAL RIGHTS: EQUAL PROTECTION AND THE PRISON LITIGATION REFORM
ACT, 23 Hamline L. Rev. 58, 80+ (1999)
1722 UNFINISHED BUSINESS: INTERMEDIATE SCRUTINY, "REAL DIFFERENCES," AND
"SEPARATE-BUT-EQUAL" IN UNITED STATES v. VIRGINIA, 116 S.CT. 2264 (1996), 20
Hamline L. Rev. 471, 483+ (1996) HN: 1,4,5 (S.Ct.)
1723 TO BE FREE: LIBERTY, CITIZENSHIP, PROPERTY, AND RACE, 14 Harv. BlackLetter L.J.
45, 90 (1998)
1724 EQUAL PROTECTION ANALOGIES--IDENTITY AND "PASSING": RACE AND SEXUAL
ORIENTATION, 13 Harv. BlackLetter L.J. 65, 74+ (1997) HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
1725 DISCRIMINATORY INTENT RECONSIDERED: FOLK CONCEPTS OF INTENTIONALITY
AND EQUAL PROTECTION JURISPRUDENCE, 45 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev. 517, 562 (2010)
1726 IMPUNITY: SEXUAL ABUSE IN WOMEN'S PRISONS, 42 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev. 45, 87
(2007) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
1727 SMITH v. CITY OF SALEM: TITLE VII PROTECTS CONTRA-GENDER BEHAVIOR, 40
Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev. 277, 288 (2005) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
1728 IS THIS AMERICA? THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA AND THE RIGHT TO VOTE, 34 Harv.
C.R.-C.L. L. Rev. 39, 97 (1999) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
1729 PREFACE, 33 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev. 313, 315 (1998) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
1730 IS IT LAWYERS WE ARE FUNDING: A CONSTITUTIONAL CHALLENGE TO THE 1996

RESTRICTIONS ON THE LEGAL SERVICES CORPORATION, 33 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev.

107, 158 (1998) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
1731 THE SEARCH FOR CITIZEN-SOLDIERS: FEMALE CADETS AND THE CAMPAIGN
AGAINST THE VIRGINIA MILITARY INSTITUTE--UNITED STATES v. COMMON-
WEALTH OF VIRGINIA, 852 F. SUPP. 471 (W.D. VA. 1994), 30 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev. 247,
266 (1995)
1732 CIVIL RIGHTS AND SPECIAL WRONGS -- THE AMENDMENT 2 LITIGATION, 29 Harv.
C.R.-C.L. L. Rev. 581, 598 (1994) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
1733 AGAINST MARRIAGE, 29 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev. 505, 530+ (1994) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
1734 A TRIBUTE TO NORMAN DORSEN, 27 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev. 309, 314+ (1992) HN: 1,3
(S.Ct.)
1735 LIFE AFTER HARDWICK, 27 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev. 531, 554+ (1992)
1736 A JUDICIAL BLOW TO THE MILITARY'S ANTI-GAY POLICIES: PRUITT v. CHENEY, 943
F.2D 989 (9TH CIR. 1991), 27 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev. 244, 261 (1992) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
1737 A TRIBUTE TO MR. JUSTICE BRENNAN, 26 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev. 1, 5 (1991) HN: 5
(S.Ct.)
1738 EFFICIENCY'S THREAT TO THE VALUE OF ACCESSIBLE COURTS FOR MINORITIES,
25 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev. 341, 429+ (1990) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
1739 DECLARING ENGLISH THE OFFICIAL LANGUAGE: PREJUDICE SPOKEN HERE, 24
Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev. 293, 348 (1989)
1740 WORK AND FAMILY: THE GENDER PARADOX AND THE LIMITATIONS OF DISCRIM-
INATION ANALYSIS IN RESTRUCTURING THE WORKPLACE, 24 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev.
79, 172+ (1989) HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
1741 BLACK WOMEN AND THE CONSTITUTION: FINDING OUR PLACE; ASSERTING OUR
RIGHTS, 24 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev. 9, 44 (1989) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
1742 RIGHTS, 23 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev. 393, 406 (1988) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
1743 THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT: TRENDS AND PROSPECTS, 21 Harv. C.R.-C.L.
L. Rev. 1, 26 (1986) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
1744 PORNOGRAPHY, CIVIL RIGHTS, AND SPEECH, 20 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev. 1, 70 (1985)
HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
1745 CONSTITUTIONAL REMEDIES FOR UNDERINCLUSIVE STATUTES: A CRITICAL AP-
PRAISAL OF HECKLER v. MATHEWS, 20 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev. 79, 151+ (1985) HN: 5
(S.Ct.)
1746 THE FUTURE OF AFFIRMATIVE ACTION: A JURISPRUDENTIAL/LEGAL CRITIQUE, 17
Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev. 503, 553+ (1982) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
1747 WHY PHYLLIS SCHLAFLY IS RIGHT (BUT WRONG) ABOUT PORNOGRAPHY, 31 Harv.
J.L. & Pub. Pol'y 105, 125 (2008) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
1748 CLOSE BUT NO CIGAR: A REPLY TO PROFESSOR GRAGLIA, 25 Harv. J.L. & Pub. Pol'y
369, 384 (2001)
1749 A BLESSING IN DISGUISE: PROTECTING MINORITY FAITHS THROUGH STATE RELI-
GIOUS FREEDOM NON-RESTORATION ACTS, 23 Harv. J.L. & Pub. Pol'y 411, 486 (2000)

HN: 3 (S.Ct.)
1750 A NONORIGINALIST PERSPECTIVE ON THE LESSONS OF HISTORY, 19 Harv. J.L. &
Pub. Pol'y 351, 361 (1996) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
1751 OF RICHARD EPSTEIN AND OTHER RADICAL FEMINISTS, 18 Harv. J.L. & Pub. Pol'y
369, 407+ (1995) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
1752 THE PROPOSED EQUAL PROTECTION FIX FOR ABORTION LAW: REFLECTIONS ON
CITIZENSHIP, GENDER, AND THE CONSTITUTION, 18 Harv. J.L. & Pub. Pol'y 419, 455
(1995) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
1753 ONE PERSON, ONE VOTE REVISITED: CHOOSING A POPULATION BASIS TO FORM
POLITICAL DISTRICTS, 17 Harv. J.L. & Pub. Pol'y 521, 565 (1994)
1754 DO JUDGES HAVE A POLICY-MAKING ROLE IN THE AMERICAN SYSTEM OF GOV-
ERNMENT?, 17 Harv. J.L. & Pub. Pol'y 119, 130 (1994)
1755 A MODEST PROPOSAL FOR A POLITICAL COURT, 17 Harv. J.L. & Pub. Pol'y 137, 147
(1994)
1756 THE AMENDMENT PROCESS OF ARTICLE V: A MICROCOSM OF THE CONSTITUTION,
12 Harv. J.L. & Pub. Pol'y 113, 121+ (1989) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
1757 HOW THE CONSTITUTION WAS TAKEN OUT OF CONSTITUTIONAL LAW, 10 Harv. J.L.
& Pub. Pol'y 597, 630 (1987) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
1758 THE EQUAL RIGHTS AMENDMENT EXTENSION: A CRITICAL ANALYSIS, 2 Harv. J.L.
& Pub. Pol'y 19, 56 (1979)
1759 JURISDICTION-STRIPPING: THE PLEDGE PROTECTION ACT OF 2004, 42 Harv. J. on Le-
gis. 511, 523 (2005)
1760 PSYCHOLOGICAL INJURY AND THE PRISON LITIGATION REFORM ACT: A "NOT EX-
ACTLY," EQUAL PROTECTION ANALYSIS, 37 Harv. J. on Legis. 105, 134+ (2000) HN: 1,4
(S.Ct.)
1761 SAME-SEX MARRIAGE, 36 Harv. J. on Legis. 581, 590+ (1999) HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.)
1762 BEYOND THE CONSTITUTION. BY HADLEY ARKES. PRINCETON, N.J.: PRINCETON
UNIVERSITY PRESS, 1990. PP. 248, NOTES, INDEX. $24.95 CLOTH, 28 Harv. J. on Legis.
631, 638 (1991) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
1763 11 Harv. Latino L. Rev. 19, FROM HERNANDEZ V. TEXAS TO THE PRESENT: DOCTRIN-
AL SHIFTS IN THE SUPREME COURT'S LATINA/O JURISPRUDENCE (2008) HN: 1
(S.Ct.)
1764 EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION - CONGRESS CONSIDERS BILL TO PROHIBIT EM-
PLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION ON THE BASIS OF SEXUAL ORIENTATION AND
GENDER IDENTITY. - EMPLOYMENT NONDISCRIMINATION ACT OF 2009, H.R. 3017,
111TH CONG. (2009)., 123 Harv. L. Rev. 1803, 1810+ (2010)
1765 1. JURY SELECTION - BATSON CHALLENGES, 122 Harv. L. Rev. 346, 355 (2008)
1766 FOREWORD: DEMOSPRUDENCE THROUGH DISSENT, 122 Harv. L. Rev. 4, 138 (2008)
1767 JUDICIALLY MANAGEABLE STANDARDS AND CONSTITUTIONAL MEANING, 119
Harv. L. Rev. 1274, 1332 (2006) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
1768 LEGITIMACY AND THE CONSTITUTION, 118 Harv. L. Rev. 1787, 1853 (2005) HN: 4

(S.Ct.)
1769 LAWRENCE V. TEXAS: THE "FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT" THAT DARE NOT SPEAK ITS
NAME, 117 Harv. L. Rev. 1893, 1955+ (2004) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
1770 REASONABLE UMBRAGE: RACE AND CONSTITUTIONAL ANTIDISCRIMINATION
LAW IN THE UNITED STATES AND SOUTH AFRICA, 117 Harv. L. Rev. 1378, 1419+
(2004)
1771 EQUALITY TALK: ANTISUBORDINATION AND ANTICLASSIFICATION VALUES IN
CONSTITUTIONAL STRUGGLES OVER BROWN, 117 Harv. L. Rev. 1470, 1547+ (2004)
HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
1772 "THEY DREW A CIRCLE THAT SHUT ME IN": THE FREE EXERCISE IMPLICATIONS OF
ZELMAN V. SIMMONS-HARRIS, 117 Harv. L. Rev. 919, 940 (2004)
1773 CONSTITUTIONAL LAW, 117 Harv. L. Rev. 236, 246+ (2003) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
1774 FOREWORD: FASHIONING THE LEGAL CONSTITUTION: CULTURE, COURTS, AND
LAW, 117 Harv. L. Rev. 4, 112+ (2003) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
1775 A. AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT, 116 Harv. L. Rev. 342, 352 (2002)
1776 SHE THE PEOPLE: THE NINETEENTH AMENDMENT, SEX EQUALITY, FEDERALISM,
AND THE FAMILY, 115 Harv. L. Rev. 947, 1046+ (2002) HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
1777 LEADING CASES, 115 Harv. L. Rev. 376, 386 (2001) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
1778 THE IRRELEVANCE OF CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENTS, 114 Harv. L. Rev. 1457,
1505+ (2001) HN: 1,3,4 (S.Ct.)
1779 FOREWORD: THE NEW CONSTITUTIONAL ORDER AND THE CHASTENING OF CON-
STITUTIONAL ASPIRATION, 113 Harv. L. Rev. 29, 109 (1999) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
1780 IN MEMORIAM: WILLIAM J. BRENNAN, JR., 111 Harv. L. Rev. 3, 5 (1997) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
1781 IN MEMORIAM: WILLIAM J. BRENNAN, JR., 111 Harv. L. Rev. 41, 48+ (1997) HN: 1,2,3
(S.Ct.)
1782 DEMOCRACY AND FEMINISM, 110 Harv. L. Rev. 1657, 1703+ (1997) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
1783 CONSTITUTIONAL LAW-DUE PROCESS AND EQUAL PROTECTION-CALIFORNIA BE-
COMES FIRST STATE TO REQUIRE CHEMICAL CASTRATION OF CERTAIN SEX OF-
FENDERS.-ACT OF SEPT. 17, 1996, CH. 596, 1996 CAL. STAT. 92 (TO BE CODIFIED AT
CAL. PENAL, 110 Harv. L. Rev. 799, 804 (1997) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
1784 SINGLE-SEX SCHOOLING, 110 Harv. L. Rev. 175, 185 (1996) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
1785 FOREWORD: LEAVING THINGS UNDECIDED, 110 Harv. L. Rev. 4, 101 (1996)
1786 PATRIARCHY IS SUCH A DRAG: THE STRATEGIC POSSIBILITIES OF A POSTMODERN
ACCOUNT OF GENDER, 108 Harv. L. Rev. 1973, 2008 (1995)
1787 INCOMPLETELY THEORIZED AGREEMENTS, 108 Harv. L. Rev. 1733, 1772+ (1995)
1788 THE JUSTICES OF RULES AND STANDARDS, 106 Harv. L. Rev. 22, 123 (1992)
1789 BEYOND BATSON: ELIMINATING GENDER-BASED PEREMPTORY CHALLENGES, 105
Harv. L. Rev. 1920, 1939 (1992) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
1790 ANTIDISCRIMINATION AND CONSTITUTIONAL ACCOUNTABILITY (WHAT THE
BORK-BRENNAN DEBATE IGNORES), 105 Harv. L. Rev. 80, 151+ (1991) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)

1791 A TRIBUTE TO JUSTICE WILLIAM J. BRENNAN, JR., 104 Harv. L. Rev. 1, 8+ (1990) HN: 2
(S.Ct.)
1792 A TRIBUTE TO JUSTICE WILLIAM J. BRENNAN, JR., 104 Harv. L. Rev. 15, 22 (1990)
1793 A TRIBUTE TO JUSTICE WILLIAM J. BRENNAN, JR., 104 Harv. L. Rev. 9, 13 (1990)
1794 TELLING STORIES ABOUT WOMEN AND WORK: JUDICIAL INTERPRETATIONS OF
SEX SEGREGATION IN THE WORKPLACE IN TITLE VII CASES RAISING THE LACK OF
INTEREST ARGUMENT, 103 Harv. L. Rev. 1749, 1843 (1990) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
1795 FIRST AMENDMENT-RACIST AND SEXIST EXPRESSION ON CAMPUS-COURT
STRIKES DOWN UNIVERSITY LIMITS ON HATE SPEECH.-DOE v. UNIVERSITY OF
MICHIGAN, 721 F.SUPP. 852 (E.D.MICH.1989), 103 Harv. L. Rev. 1397, 1402 (1990) HN: 2
(S.Ct.)
1796 FEMINIST LEGAL METHODS, 103 Harv. L. Rev. 829, 888+ (1990) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
1797 CIVIL RIGHTS-DISPARATE-IMPACT DOCTRINE-COURT PROHIBITS AWARDING
SCHOLARSHIPS ON THE BASIS OF STANDARDIZED TESTS THAT DISCRIMINATOR-
ILY IMPACT WOMEN. - SHARIF v. NEW YORK STATE EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, 709
F.SUPP. 345 (S.D.N., 103 Harv. L. Rev. 806, 811+ (1990) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
1798 UNRAVELING COMPROMISE, 103 Harv. L. Rev. 105, 135+ (1989) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
1799 III. EMPLOYMENT LAW ISSUES AFFECTING GAY MEN AND LESBIANS, 102 Harv. L.
Rev. 1554, 1584+ (1989) HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
1800 WHERE RIGHTS BEGIN: THE PROBLEM OF BURDENS ON THE FREE EXERCISE OF
RELIGION, 102 Harv. L. Rev. 933, 990+ (1989) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
1801 CUSTODY DENIALS TO PARENTS IN SAME-SEX RELATIONSHIPS: AN EQUAL PRO-
TECTION ANALYSIS, 102 Harv. L. Rev. 617, 636 (1989) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
1802 FEMINISM AND LEGAL THEORY FEMINISM UNMODIFIED. BY CATHARINE A.
MACKINNON. CAMBRIDGE, MASSACHUSETTS: HARVARD UNIVERSITY PRESS. 1987.
P.P. 315. $25.00., 101 Harv. L. Rev. 826, 848 (1988) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
1803 "OFFICIAL ENGLISH': FEDERAL LIMITS ON EFFORTS TO CURTAIL BILINGUAL SER-
VICES IN THE STATES, 100 Harv. L. Rev. 1345, 1362 (1987) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
1804 FAILED PRAGMATISM: REFLECTIONS ON THE BURGER COURT, 100 Harv. L. Rev.
1436, 1456 (1987) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
1805 MILITARY BAN ON YARMULKES, 100 Harv. L. Rev. 163, 172 (1986) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
1806 THE CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS OF AIDS CARRIERS, 99 Harv. L. Rev. 1274, 1292 (1986)
HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
1807 DISCRIMINATION AGAINST THE MENTALLY RETARDED, 99 Harv. L. Rev. 161, 173+
(1985) HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
1808 FAIR REPRESENTATION AS EQUAL PROTECTION, 98 Harv. L. Rev. 1211, 1283+ (1985)
HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
1809 THE CONSTITUTIONAL STATUS OF SEXUAL ORIENTATION: HOMOSEXUALITY AS A
SUSPECT CLASSIFICATION, 98 Harv. L. Rev. 1285, 1309+ (1985) HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
1810 REPRODUCTIVE TECHNOLOGY AND THE PROCREATION RIGHTS OF THE UNMAR-
RIED, 98 Harv. L. Rev. 669, 685 (1985) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)

1811 1. FREEDOM OF ASSOCIATION, 98 Harv. L. Rev. 195, 205+ (1984) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
1812 A CONSTITUTION WE ARE AMENDING: IN DEFENSE OF A RESTRAINED JUDICIAL
ROLE, 97 Harv. L. Rev. 433, 445 (1983)
1813 2. SEX DISCRIMINATION IN EMPLOYMENT BENEFITS, 97 Harv. L. Rev. 252, 260 (1983)
HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
1814 THE FAMILY AND THE MARKET: A STUDY OF IDEOLOGY AND LEGAL REFORM, 96
Harv. L. Rev. 1497, 1578 (1983)
1815 VI. DISCRIMINATION AGAINST DOCUMENTED ALIENS, 96 Harv. L. Rev. 1400, 1433
(1983) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
1816 THE EMPTY IDEA OF EQUALITY, 95 Harv. L. Rev. 537, 596 (1982)
1817 2. ALL MALE DRAFT REGISTRATION, 95 Harv. L. Rev. 161, 171+ (1981)
1818 3. GENDER-BASED STATUTORY RAPE LAWS, 95 Harv. L. Rev. 171, 181+ (1981) HN: 5
(S.Ct.)
1819 THE CALIFORNIA RENT-A-JUDGE EXPERIMENT: CONSTITUTIONAL AND POLICY
CONSIDERATIONS OF PAY-AS-YOU-GO COURTS, 94 Harv. L. Rev. 1592, 1615 (1981)
HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
1820 PLURALITY DECISIONS AND JUDICIAL DECISIONMAKING, 94 Harv. L. Rev. 1127,
1138+ (1981) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
1821 WOMEN AND THE DRAFT: THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF ALL-MALE REGISTRA-
TION, 94 Harv. L. Rev. 406, 421+ (1980) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.)
1822 II. SOURCES OF CONSTITUTIONAL PROTECTION FOR FAMILY RIGHTS, 93 Harv. L.
Rev. 1161, 1197+ (1980) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
1823 IV. THE RIGHT TO JOIN A FAMILY: TRADITIONAL MARRIAGE AND THE ALTERNAT-
IVES, 93 Harv. L. Rev. 1242, 1296+ (1980) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
1824 VI. RIGHTS ASSOCIATED WITH DIVORCE AND CHILD CUSTODY RELATIONSHIPS, 93
Harv. L. Rev. 1308, 1350 (1980)
1825 VII. THE PARENT-CHILD RELATIONSHIP, 93 Harv. L. Rev. 1350, 1383+ (1980) HN: 2
(S.Ct.)
1826 2. GENDER DISCRIMINATION, 93 Harv. L. Rev. 130, 141+ (1979) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
1827 A DUAL STANDARD FOR STATE DISCRIMINATION AGAINST ALIENS, 92 Harv. L. Rev.
1516, 1527+ (1979) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
1828 BIVENS ACTIONS FOR EQUAL PROTECTION VIOLATIONS: DAVIS V. PASSMAN, 92
Harv. L. Rev. 745, 756 (1979) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
1829 1. TITLE VII OF THE CIVIL RIGHTS ACT OF 1964, 92 Harv. L. Rev. 299, 311 (1978) HN: 1
(S.Ct.)
1830 FOREWORD: ON DISCOVERING FUNDAMENTAL VALUES, 92 Harv. L. Rev. 5, 55+
(1978)
1831 LEGISLATIVE ALTERATION OF PRIVATE PENSION AGREEMENTS, 92 Harv. L. Rev. 86,
99 (1978) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
1832 THE SUPREME COURT 1976 TERM FOREWORD: EQUAL CITIZENSHIP UNDER THE

FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT, 91 Harv. L. Rev. 1, 68+ (1977) HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)

1833 2. INTERMEDIATE STANDARD OF REVIEW, 91 Harv. L. Rev. 177, 188+ (1977) HN: 1,4
(S.Ct.)
1834 CONGRESSIONAL ACCESS TO THE FEDERAL COURTS, 90 Harv. L. Rev. 1632, 1655
(1977) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
1835 VETERANS' PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT PREFERENCE AS SEX DISCRIMINATION: AN-
THONY V. MASSACHUSETTS AND BRANCH V. DU BOIS, 90 Harv. L. Rev. 805, 814+
(1977) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
1836 EQUAL PROTECTION UNDER THE INDIAN CIVIL RIGHTS ACT: MARTINEZ V. SANTA
CLARA PUEBLO, 90 Harv. L. Rev. 627, 636 (1977) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
1837 90 Harv. L. Rev. 293, 305+ (1976) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
1838 90 Harv. L. Rev. 380, 411+ (1976) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
1839 FOREWORD: IN DEFENSE OF THE ANTIDISCRIMINATION PRINCIPLE, 90 Harv. L. Rev.
1, 54 (1976) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
1840 D. EQUAL PROTECTION, 90 Harv. L. Rev. 114, 123+ (1976) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
1841 2. DISCRIMINATION AGAINST ILLEGITIMATE CHILDREN., 90 Harv. L. Rev. 123, 132+
(1976) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
1842 2. SEX DISCRIMINATION., 89 Harv. L. Rev. 95, 97+ (1975) HN: 4,5 (S.Ct.)
1843 3. ZONING ORDINANCES LIMITING THE NUMBER OF UNRELATED INDIVIDUALS IN
A DWELLING UNIT, 88 Harv. L. Rev. 119, 129 (1974) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
1844 4. TAX EXEMPTIONS FOR WIDOWS, 88 Harv. L. Rev. 129, 130+ (1974) HN: 1,2,5 (S.Ct.)
1845 DUE PROCESS OF LAW - PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT - REQUIREMENT THAT VETERANS
EMPLOYED BY MUNICIPAL GOVERNMENT HAVE BEEN HONORABLY DISCHARGED
IS IRRATIONAL. - THOMPSON v. GALLAGHER, 489 F.2D 443 (5TH CIR.1973)., 87 Harv.
L. Rev. 1842, 1851 (1974) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
1846 THE IRREBUTTABLE PRESUMPTION DOCTRINE IN THE SUPREME COURT, 87 Harv. L.
Rev. 1534, 1556+ (1974) HN: 1,2 (S.Ct.)
1847 I. INTRODUCTION, 87 Harv. L. Rev. 1190, 1406+ (1974) HN: 1,2 (S.Ct.)
1848 FOREWORD: TOWARD A MODEL OF ROLES IN THE DUE PROCESS OF LIFE AND
LAW, 87 Harv. L. Rev. 1, 53+ (1973) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
1849 2. SEX DISCRIMINATION BY FEDERAL GOVERNMENT IN PAYMENT OF FRINGE BE-
NEFITS TO ARMED SERVICES PERSONNEL., 87 Harv. L. Rev. 116, 125+ (1973) HN: 1,2,5
(S.Ct.)
1850 PELVIC EXAM PREREQUISITE TO HORMONAL CONTRACEPTIVES: UNJUSTIFIED IN-
FRINGEMENT ON CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS, GOVERNMENTAL COERCION, AND
BAD PUBLIC POLICY, 27 Harv. Women's L.J. 177, 233+ (2004) HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
1851 CHALLENGING THE HYPOTHETICAL II: LEADING THE WAY TO EFFECTIVE DI-
VERSITY, 27 Harv. Women's L.J. 397, 409 (2004) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
1852 SINGLE-SEX PUBLIC EDUCATION AFTER VMI: THE CASE FOR WOMEN'S SCHOOLS,
21 Harv. Women's L.J. 19, 77+ (1998) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)

1853 PUBLIC WOMEN AND THE FEMINIST STATE, 20 Harv. Women's L.J. 47, 162 (1997) HN: 2
(S.Ct.)
1854 FOR THE WOMEN'S REACH SHOULD EXCEED THEIR GRASP: OR HOW'S A LAW
JOURNAL TO BE BORN?, 20 Harv. Women's L.J. 5, 9+ (1997) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
1855 AT WAR: NARRATIVE TACTICS IN THE CITADEL AND VMI LITIGATION, 19 Harv. Wo-
men's L.J. 1, 21+ (1996) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
1856 IN A GREENER VOICE: FEMINIST THEORY AND ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE, 19 Harv.
Women's L.J. 23, 88+ (1996) HN: 4,5 (S.Ct.)
1857 THURGOOD MARSHALL AND THE STRUGGLE FOR WOMEN'S RIGHTS, 17 Harv. Wo-
men's L.J. 1, 4 (1994) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
1858 KILLING "THE HANDICAPPED"--BEFORE AND AFTER BIRTH, 16 Harv. Women's L.J. 79,
138 (1993) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
1859 SEPARATE IDENTITIES: BLACK WOMEN, WORK, AND TITLE VII, 14 Harv. Women's L.J.
21, 75+ (1991) HN: 4,5 (S.Ct.)
1860 BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL v. ROTARY CLUB OF DUARTE:
PRYING OPEN THE DOORS OF THE ALL-MALE CLUB, 11 Harv. Women's L.J. 117, 145
(1988)
1861 BOUMEDIENE V. BUSH AND EXTRATERRITORIAL HABEAS CORPUS IN WARTIME, 36
Hastings Const. L.Q. 425, 456 (2009)
1862 INCONGRUENT DISPROPORTIONALITY, 29 Hastings Const. L.Q. 645, 720+ (2002) HN:
1,2,3 (S.Ct.)
1863 IRRATIONAL PREJUDICE: THE MILITARY'S EXCLUSION OF GAY, LESBIAN, AND BI-
SEXUAL SERVICE MEMBERS AFTER ROMER V. EVANS, 28 Hastings Const. L.Q. 461,
504+ (2001) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
1864 SOME THOUGHTS ON AUTONOMY AND EQUALITY IN RELATION TO JUSTICE
BLACKMUN, 26 Hastings Const. L.Q. 59, 71 (1998)
1865 EQUAL PROTECTION, UNEQUAL POLITICAL BURDENS, AND THE CCRI, 23 Hastings
Const. L.Q. 1019, 1056 (1996)
1866 EXERCISING THE AMENDMENT POWER TO DISAPPROVE OF SUPREME COURT DE-
CISIONS: A PROPOSAL FOR A "REPUBLICAN VETO", 22 Hastings Const. L.Q. 325, 357
(1995)
1867 COMMENT: BLINKING AT REALITY: AN EXAMINATION OF BRAY v. ALEXANDRIA,
20 Hastings Const. L.Q. 905, 943+ (1993) HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.)
1868 ALL-MALE BLACK SCHOOLS: EQUAL PROTECTION, THE NEW SEPARATISM AND
BROWN v. BOARD OF EDUCATION, 20 Hastings Const. L.Q. 725, 782 (1993) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
1869 RECKONING WITH THE BLUSTER OF APOLITICAL JURISPRUDENCE, 19 Hastings
Const. L.Q. 715, 744 (1992) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
1870 THE REHNQUIST COURT AND THE NEW ESTABLISHMENT CLAUSE, 19 Hastings Const.
L.Q. 567, 597 (1992)
1871 LEGISLATION PUNISHING DRUG USE DURING PREGNANCY: ATTACK ON WOMEN'S
RIGHTS IN THE NAME OF FETAL PROTECTION, 19 Hastings Const. L.Q. 197, 234 (1991)

HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
1872 RESTRICTING SURROGACY TO MARRIED COUPLES: A CONSTITUTIONAL PROB-
LEM? THE MARRIED-PARENT REQUIREMENT IN THE UNIFORM STATUS OF CHIL-
DREN OF ASSISTED CONCEPTION ACT, 18 Hastings Const. L.Q. 487, 534+ (1991) HN: 2
(S.Ct.)
1873 CAN'T WE ENLARGE THE BLANKET AND THE BED? A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF
POSITIVE/AFFIRMATIVE ACTION IN THE EUROPEAN COURT OF JUSTICE AND THE
UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT, 28 Hastings Int'l & Comp. L. Rev. 39, 93 (2004) HN: 2
(S.Ct.)
1874 THE EUROPEAN COURT OF JUSTICE AND THE U.S. SUPREME COURT: PARALLELS IN
FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS JURISPRUDENCE, 15 Hastings Int'l & Comp. L. Rev. 253, 295
(1992)
1875 THE EVOLUTION OF "FRED": FAMILY RESPONSIBILITIES DISCRIMINATION AND DE-
VELOPMENTS IN THE LAW OF STEREOTYPING AND IMPLICIT BIAS, 59 Hastings L.J.
1311, 1358+ (2008) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
1876 HARRY BLACKMUN, INDEPENDENCE AND PATH DEPENDENCE University Of Califor-
nia-Hastings College Of The Law March 4, 2005, 56 Hastings L.J. 1235, 1247+ (2005)
1877 TAX EXPENDITURE ANALYSIS AND CONSTITUTIONAL DECISIONS, 50 Hastings L.J.
407, 474 (1999) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
1878 EQUAL PROTECTION AFTER ROMER V. EVANS: IMPLICATIONS FOR THE DEFENSE
OF MARRIAGE ACT AND OTHER LAWS, 49 Hastings L.J. 175, 224 (1997) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
1879 THE MEANING OF ROMER V. EVANS, 48 Hastings L.J. 1343, 1361+ (1997) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
1880 SOCIAL SECURITY DISCRIMINATION AGAINST AFRICAN-AMERICANS: AN EQUAL
PROTECTION ARGUMENT, 48 Hastings L.J. 105, 127 (1996) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
1881 SHATTERING THE GLASS CEILING: A LEGAL THEORY FOR ATTACKING DISCRIMIN-
ATION AGAINST WOMEN PARTNERS, 46 Hastings L.J. 17, 83 (1994) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
1882 SHARED INTERESTS: PROMOTING HEALTHY BIRTHS WITHOUT SACRIFICING WO-
MEN'S LIBERTY, 43 Hastings L.J. 569, 614 (1992) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
1883 JUSTICE REHNQUIST AND CONSTITUTIONAL INTERPRETATION, 34 Hastings L.J. 1011,
1053 (1983) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
1884 THE RELEVANCE OF STATISTICS TO PROVE DISCRIMINATION: A TYPOLOGY, 34
Hastings L.J. 553, 598 (1983) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
1885 ECONOMIC, SOCIAL, AND CULTURAL RIGHTS AND THE RIGHT TO EDUCATION IN
AMERICAN JURISPRUDENCE: BARRIERS AND APPROACHES TO IMPLEMENTATION,
19 Hastings Women's L.J. 303, 323 (2008) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
1886 HONOR THY MOTHER?: THE SUPREME COURT'S JURISPRUDENCE OF MOTHER-
HOOD, 17 Hastings Women's L.J. 187, 226+ (2006) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
1887 UNCHAIN MY HEART: SLAVERY AS A DEFENSE TO THE DISMANTLING OF THE VI-
OLENCE AGAINST WOMEN ACT, 17 Hastings Women's L.J. 115, 140+ (2006) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
1888 USING POSTMODERN FEMINIST LEGAL THEORY TO INTERRUPT THE REINSCRIP-
TION OF SEX STEREOTYPES THROUGH THE INSTITUTION OF MARRIAGE, 16 Hastings

Women's L.J. 159, 175 (2005) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)

1889 THE RISKS OF STATE INTERVENTION IN PREVENTING PRENATAL ALCOHOL ABUSE
AND THE VIABILITY OF AN INCLUSIVE APPROACH: ARGUMENTS FOR LIMITING
PUNITIVE AND COERCIVE PRENATAL ALCOHOL ABUSE LEGISLATION IN MIN-
NESOTA, 10 Hastings Women's L.J. 287, 346 (1999) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
1890 SELF-REFLECTION WITHIN THE ACADEMY: THE ABSENCE OF WOMEN IN CONSTI-
TUTIONAL JURISPRUDENCE, 9 Hastings Women's L.J. 273, 312 (1998) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
1891 UNITED STATES v. VIRGINIA: REINFORCING ARCHAIC STEREOTYPES ABOUT WO-
MEN IN THE MILITARY UNDER THE FLAWED GUISE OF EDUCATIONAL DIVERSITY,
7 Hastings Women's L.J. 1, 84+ (1996) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
1892 THE CASE AGAINST GENDER-BASED PREEMPTORY CHALLENGES, 4 Hastings Wo-
men's L.J. 109, 130+ (1993) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
1893 ETHICAL AND LEGAL ISSUES ACCOMPANYING LEGISLATION REQUIRING HPV
VACCINATION OF GIRLS, 18 Health Matrix 209, 228+ (2008) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
1894 ARE WE THERE YET? FORTY YEARS AFTER THE PASSAGE OF THE CIVIL RIGHTS
ACT: REVOLUTION IN THE WORKFORCE AND THE UNFULFILLED PROMISES THAT
REMAIN, 22 Hofstra Lab. & Emp. L.J. 627, 670+ (2005) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
1895 WHEN HARRY MET LARRY AND LARRY GOT SICK: WHY SAME-SEX FAMILIES
SHOULD BE ENTITLED TO BENEFITS UNDER THE FAMILY AND MEDICAL LEAVE
ACT, 22 Hofstra Lab. & Emp. L.J. 276, 323 (2004) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
1896 VICTIMS OF ABUSE AND DISCRIMINATION: PROTECTING BATTERED HOMOSEXU-
ALS UNDER DOMESTIC VIOLENCE LEGISLATION, 28 Hofstra L. Rev. 1095, 1145+ (2000)
HN: 1,3,4 (S.Ct.)
1897 COMPARING RACE AND SEX DISCRIMINATION IN CUSTODY CASES, 28 Hofstra L.
Rev. 877, 894 (2000) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
1898 CONSTITUTIONAL ADJUDICATION IN THE UNITED STATES AS A MEANS OF AD-
VANCING THE EQUAL STATURE OF MEN AND WOMEN UNDER THE LAW, 26 Hofstra
L. Rev. 263, 271 (1997) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
1899 LAWYERING FOR SOCIAL CHANGE: THE POWER OF THE NARRATIVE IN DOMESTIC
VIOLENCE LAW REFORM, 21 Hofstra L. Rev. 1243, 1293 (1993) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
1900 THE CHANNELLING FUNCTION IN FAMILY LAW, 20 Hofstra L. Rev. 495, 532+ (1992)
1901 THE REASONABLENESS OF THE "REASONABLE WOMAN" STANDARD: AN EVALU-
ATION OF ITS USE IN HOSTILE ENVIRONMENT SEXUAL HARASSMENT CLAIMS UN-
DER TITLE VII OF THE CIVIL RIGHTS ACT, 21 Hofstra L. Rev. 483, 504 (1992) HN: 4
(S.Ct.)
1902 THE ROLE OF MENTAL HEALTH PROFESSIONALS IN CHILD CUSTODY RESOLUTION,
15 Hofstra L. Rev. 115, 138 (1986) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
1903 COURTS AND LEGISLATURES IN A FEDERAL SYSTEM: THE CASE OF SCHOOL FIN-
ANCE, 11 Hofstra L. Rev. 1205, 1260 (1983) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
1904 JUSTICIABILITY AND THE LIMITS OF PRESIDENTIAL FOREIGN POLICY POWER, 11
Hofstra L. Rev. 517, 556 (1982)

1905 FEMINIST JURISPRUDENCE AND CHILD-CENTERED JURISPRUDENCE: HISTORICAL

ORIGINS AND CURRENT DEVELOPMENTS, 46 Hous. L. Rev. 671, 702 (2009) HN: 3
(S.Ct.)
1906 CONFINING MENTALLY DISORDERED "SUPER CRIMINALS": A REALIGNMENT OF
RIGHTS IN THE NINETIES, 33 Hous. L. Rev. 651, 730+ (1996) HN: 3 (S.Ct.)
1907 PURKETT V. ELEM: RESUSCITATING THE NONDISCRIMINATORY HUNCH, 33 Hous. L.
Rev. 1267, 1282 (1996) HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.)
1908 STRICTLY SPEAKING: VIEWING J.E.B. V. ALABAMA EX REL. T.B. AS SUB SILENTIO
APPLICATION OF STRICT SCRUTINY TO GENDER-BASED CLASSIFICATIONS, 32
Hous. L. Rev. 869, 893+ (1995) HN: 1,3,4 (S.Ct.)
1909 TITLE IX OR COLLEGE FOOTBALL?, 32 Hous. L. Rev. 993, 1058+ (1995) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
1910 A VERY RATIONAL COURT, 30 Hous. L. Rev. 1509, 1595+ (1993) HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
1911 PATENTING TRANSGENIC HUMAN EMBRYOS: A NONUSE COST PERSPECTIVE, 30
Hous. L. Rev. 1597, 1669 (1993) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
1912 RACE-CONSCIOUS EMPLOYMENT PROGRAMS IN THE POST-BRENNAN ERA: AN END
TO FALSELY REMEDIAL PREFERENCES?, 28 Hous. L. Rev. 993, 1093 (1991)
1913 LAW SCHOOL FEMINIST CHIC AND RESPECT FOR PERSONS: COMMENTS ON CON-
TRACT THEORY AND FEMINISM IN THE FLESH-COLORED BAND AID, 28 Hous. L. Rev.
819, 859 (1991) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
1914 WOMEN IN COMBAT: AN ESSAY ON ULTIMATE RIGHTS AND RESPONSIBILITIES, 28
Hous. L. Rev. 503, 547+ (1991) HN: 4,5 (S.Ct.)
1915 JOHNSON v. TRANSPORTATION AGENCY, SANTA CLARA COUNTY: A PARADIGM OF
AFFIRMATIVE ACTION, 26 Hous. L. Rev. 229, 253+ (1989) HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
1916 WHEN PRIVATE MORALITY BECOMES PUBLIC CONCERN: HOMOSEXUALITY AND
PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT, 24 Hous. L. Rev. 519, 547 (1987) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
1917 CHARLOTTE E. RAY PLEADS BEFORE COURT, 43 How. L.J. 121, 126 (2000) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
1918 WHEN A DOOR CLOSES, A WINDOW OPENS: DO TODAY'S PRIVATE HISTORICALLY
BLACK COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES RUN AFOUL OF CONVENTIONAL EQUAL
PROTECTION ANALYSIS?, 42 How. L.J. 469, 504+ (1999) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
1919 FOREWORD: FEDERALISM AND ANTI-FEDERALISM AS CIVIL RIGHTS TOOLS, 39
How. L.J. 615, 632 (1996) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
1920 WELFARE QUEENS AND OTHER FAIRY TALES: WELFARE REFORM AND UNCONSTI-
TUTIONAL REPRODUCTIVE CONTROLS, 38 How. L.J. 473, 519 (1995)
1921 CLASSISM AND EQUAL OPPORTUNITY: A PROPOSAL FOR AFFIRMATIVE ACTION IN
EDUCATION BASED ON SOCIAL CLASS, 33 How. L.J. 113, 136+ (1990) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
1922 Random Urinalysis: Violating The Athlete's Individual Rights?, 30 How. L.J. 93, 93 (1987) HN:
1 (S.Ct.)
1923 The Spiritual Nature of Equality: Natural Principles of Constitutional Law, 28 How. L.J. 809,
815+ (1985) HN: 2,5 (S.Ct.)
1924 DEFUNCT MARRIAGE: ITS POSSIBLE APPLICATION IN IDAHO DIVORCE LAW, 30
Idaho L. Rev. 725, 753 (1994)

1925 THE AMERICANIZATION OF CONSTITUTIONAL LAW AND ITS PARADOXES: CONSTI-

TUTIONAL THEORY AND CONSTITUTIONAL JURISDICTION IN THE CONTEMPOR-
ARY WORLD, 16 ILSA J. Int'l & Comp. L. 579, 625 (2010) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
1926 95-03 Immigration Briefings 1, THE CHANGING FACE OF EQUAL PROTECTION: GENDER
BIAS IN U.S. CITIZENSHIP LAW (1995) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.)
1927 BALANCING THE ADOPTION TRIANGLE: THE STATE, THE ADOPTIVE PARENTS AND
THE BIRTH PARENTS--WHERE DOES THE ADOPTEE FIT IN?, 15 In Pub. Int. 49, 83+
(1997) HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
1928 MY FATHER, JOHN LOCKE, AND ASSISTED SUICIDE: THE REAL CONSTITUTIONAL
RIGHT, 3 Ind. Health L. Rev. 45, 100+ (2006) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
1929 DISCRIMINATION OUT OF DISMISSIVENESS: THE EXAMPLE OF INFERTILITY, 85 Ind.
L.J. 143, 186+ (2010) HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
1930 CROSSROADS AND SIGNPOSTS: THE ADA AMENDMENTS ACT OF 2008, 85 Ind. L.J.
187, 224 (2010)
1931 NO BOY LEFT BEHIND? SINGLE-SEX EDUCATION AND THE ESSENTIALIST MYTH OF
MASCULINITY, 84 Ind. L.J. 135, 188 (2009) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
1932 RECONSIDERING SEVERE OR PERVASIVE: ALIGNING THE STANDARD IN SEXUAL
HARASSMENT AND RACIAL HARASSMENT CAUSES OF ACTION, 80 Ind. L.J. 1119,
1139+ (2005) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
1933 PROTECTING THE CONSTITUTION FROM THE PEOPLE: JURICENTRIC RESTRICTIONS
ON SECTION FIVE POWER, 78 Ind. L.J. 1, 32+ (2003) HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
1934 RONALD REAGAN AND THE REHNQUIST COURT ON CONGRESSIONAL POWER:
PRESIDENTIAL INFLUENCES ON CONSTITUTIONAL CHANGE, 78 Ind. L.J. 363, 412
(2003) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
1935 REHNQUIST'S VIETNAM: CONSTITUTIONAL SEPARATISM AND THE STEALTH AD-
VANCE OF MARTIAL LAW, 77 Ind. L.J. 701, 785+ (2002) HN: 2,4,5 (S.Ct.)
1936 THE PATH OF AMERICAN RELIGIOUS LIBERTY: FROM THE ORIGINAL THEOLOGY
TO FORMAL NEUTRALITY AND AN UNCERTAIN FUTURE, 75 Ind. L.J. 1, 36 (2000) HN:
1 (S.Ct.)
1937 MULTIVOCAL PREJUDICES AND HOMO EQUITY Addison C. Harris Lecture October 27,
1998, 74 Ind. L.J. 1085, 1128+ (1999) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
1938 DISCRIMINATION AS ACCIDENT: OLD WHINE, NEW BOTTLE, 74 Ind. L.J. 1233, 1249
(1999) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
1939 UNPROTECTED UNTIL FORTY: THE LIMITED SCOPE OF THE AGE DISCRIMINATION
IN EMPLOYMENT ACT OF 1967, 73 Ind. L.J. 1295, 1312+ (1998) HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
1940 APPLYING THE BREAK: RELIGION AND THE PEREMPTORY CHALLENGE, 70 Ind. L.J.
569, 612+ (1995) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
1941 "MOTHER," "PARENT," AND BIAS, 69 Ind. L.J. 1165, 1192 (1994) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
1942 NINTH LIFE: AN INTERPRETIVE THEORY OF THE NINTH AMENDMENT, 69 Ind. L.J.
759, 847 (1994) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
1943 HOMOSEXUALITY AND THE CONSTITUTION, 70 Ind. L.J. 1, 28+ (1994)

1944 THE RIGHT NOT TO ENDORSE GAY RIGHTS: A REPLY TO SUNSTEIN, 70 Ind. L.J. 29,
37+ (1994) HN: 1,2 (S.Ct.)
1945 FENCING OUT POLITICALLY UNPOPULAR GROUPS FROM THE NORMAL POLITICAL
PROCESSES: THE EQUAL PROTECTION CONCERNS OF COLORADO AMENDMENT
TWO, 69 Ind. L.J. 275, 298 (1993)
1946 THE GENDER GAP: SEPARATING THE SEXES IN PUBLIC EDUCATION, 68 Ind. L.J. 149,
176 (1992)
1947 PUTATIVE FATHERS AND PARENTAL INTERESTS: A SEARCH FOR PROTECTION, 65
Ind. L.J. 939, 964 (1990) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
1948 RATIONAL BASIS WITH BITE: INTERMEDIATE SCRUTINY BY ANY OTHER NAME, 62
Ind. L.J. 779, 803 (1987) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
1949 CANCER-BASED EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION: WHETHER THE PROPOSED
AMENDMENT TO TITLE VII WILL PROVIDE AN EFFECTIVE ANTI-DISCRIMINATION
REMEDY, 62 Ind. L.J. 827, 856+ (1987) HN: 1,2 (S.Ct.)
1950 HONORING THE LEGACIES OF JUSTICE WILLIAM J. BRENNAN, JR., AND JUSTICE
THURGOOD MARSHALL A Panel Discussion Presented by the Indianapolis Lawyer Chapter of
the American Constitution Society, 43 Ind. L. Rev. 441, 465+ (2010) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
1951 NATIONAL INGRATITUDE: THE EGREGIOUS DEFICIENCIES OF THE UNITED STATES'
HOUSING PROGRAMS FOR VETERANS AND THE "PUBLIC SCANDAL" OF VETERANS'
HOMELESSNESS, 38 Ind. L. Rev. 103, 176 (2005) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
1952 SUCCESSFUL RATIONAL BASIS CLAIMS IN THE SUPREME COURT FROM THE 1971
TERM THROUGH ROMER V. EVANS, 32 Ind. L. Rev. 357, 415 (1999) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
1953 POLITICAL REPRESENTATION AND ACCOUNTABILITY UNDER DON'T ASK, DON'T
TELL, 89 Iowa L. Rev. 1633, 1716+ (2004) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
1954 RURALISM, 88 Iowa L. Rev. 273, 342 (2003) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
1955 PATH DEPENDENCE IN THE LAW: THE COURSE AND PATTERN OF LEGAL CHANGE
IN A COMMON LAW SYSTEM, 86 Iowa L. Rev. 601, 665+ (2001) HN: 2,3 (S.Ct.)
1956 AN ARGUMENT FOR ASSISTED OUTPATIENT TREATMENT FOR PERSONS WITH SER-
IOUS MENTAL ILLNESS ILLUSTRATED WITH REFERENCE TO A PROPOSED STATUTE
FOR IOWA, 85 Iowa L. Rev. 1269, 1386 (2000) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
1957 DUMB AND DOMA: WHY THE DEFENSE OF MARRIAGE ACT IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL,
83 Iowa L. Rev. 1, 33 (1997) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
1958 DUE PROCESS COMES DUE: AN ARGUMENT FOR THE CLEAR AND CONVINCING
EVIDENTIARY STANDARD IN SENTENCING HEARINGS, 77 Iowa L. Rev. 1803, 1814+
(1992) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
1959 BROKEN PROMISES REVISITED: THE WINDOW OF VULNERABILITY FOR SURVIVING
SPOUSES UNDER ERISA, 76 Iowa L. Rev. 431, 502 (1991) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
1960 ORIGINAL UNDERSTANDING, LEGAL REALISM, AND THE INTERPRETATION OF
"THIS CONSTITUTION', 72 Iowa L. Rev. 1177, 1279+ (1987)
1961 HONEST DIFFERENCES IN DISCERNING THE CONSTITUTION'S MEETING-THE TASK
OF DEFINING CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS FOR PERSONS WHO ARE RETARDED, 72

Iowa L. Rev. 1301, 1308 (1987)

1962 STUDENT FEES IN PUBLIC SCHOOLS: DEFINING THE SCOPE OF EDUCATION, 72 Iowa
L. Rev. 1401, 1421+ (1987) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
1963 CONFLICT, COHERENCE, AND CONSTITUTIONAL INTENT, 72 Iowa L. Rev. 753, 890+
(1987) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
1964 EQUAL PROTECTION AND THE MENTALLY RETARDED: A DENIAL OF QUASI-
SUSPECT STATUS IN CITY OF CLEBURNE v. CLEBURNE LIVING CENTER, 72 Iowa L.
Rev. 241, 254 (1986) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
1965 THE GENESIS AND PRESENT STATUS OF AFFIRMATIVE ACTION IN EMPLOYMENT:
ECONOMIC, LEGAL, AND POLITICAL REALITIES, 70 Iowa L. Rev. 901, 944 (1985)
1966 THE WITHDRAWAL OR REFUSAL OF FOOD AND HYDRATION AS AGE DISCRIMINA-
TION: SOME POSSIBILITIES, 2 Issues L. & Med. 39, 58 (1986) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
1967 HOW DO YOU SOLVE A PROBLEM LIKE IN KELO?, 40 J. Marshall L. Rev. 609, 650 (2007)
1968 LIMITING THE PRESIDENCY TO NATURAL BORN CITIZENS VIOLATES DUE PRO-
CESS, 39 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1343, 1370 (2006)
1969 RUTH BADER GINSBURG: EXTENDING THE CONSTITUTION, 32 J. Marshall L. Rev. 197,
225+ (1998) HN: 1,3,4 (S.Ct.)
1970 THE FUTURE OF FAIR HOUSING LITIGATION, 26 J. Marshall L. Rev. 745, 773 (1993) HN:
1 (S.Ct.)
1971 NEIGHBORHOOD PRESERVATION OR XENOPHOBISM?: AN EXAMINATION OF THE
ISSUES SURROUNDING THE TOWN OF BROOKHAVEN'S RENTAL OCCUPANCY LAW,
13-FALL J. Affordable Housing & Community Dev. L. 122, 136 (2003) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
1972 CHILD SAFETY RESTRAINTS: A CONTROVERSY OVER SAFE INFANT AIR TRAVEL, 57
J. Air L. & Com. 201, 255 (1991)
1973 THE WRIGHT AMENDMENT: THE CONSTITUTIONALITY AND PROPRIETY OF THE
RESTRICTIONS ON DALLAS LOVE FIELD, 55 J. Air L. & Com. 1011, 1074 (1990) HN: 5
(S.Ct.)
1974 OVERTURNING THE LAST STONE: THE FINAL STEP IN RETURNING PRECEDENTIAL
STATUS TO ALL OPINIONS, 10 J. App. Prac. & Process 61, 177+ (2009) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
1975 LITIGATION CAMPAIGNS AND THE SEARCH FOR CONSTITUTIONAL RULES, 6 J. App.
Prac. & Process 101, 111+ (2004)
1976 LEGISLATION: CONGRESSIONAL INITIATIVES, 1 J. Bankr. L. & Prac. 533, 553 (1992)
HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
1977 WOMEN IN CATHOLIC SOCIAL THOUGHT: THE CREATION OF A NEW SOCIAL REAL-
ITY, 44 J. Cath. Legal Stud. 461, 478 (2005)
1978 "BECAUSE OF SEX": THE EVOLVING LEGAL RIDDLE OF SEXUAL vs. GENDER IDEN-
TITY, 32 J.C. & U.L. 361, 410 (2006)
1979 LOWER PAY FOR WOMEN'S COACHES: REFUTING SOME COMMON JUSTIFICATIONS,
21 J.C. & U.L. 643, 689 (1995) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
1980 BAEHR v. LEWIN: QUESTIONABLE REASONING; SOUND JUDGMENT, 11 J. Contemp.
Health L. & Pol'y 589, 616+ (1995) HN: 1,2,3 (S.Ct.)

1981 GENETIC DETERMINISM OR GENETIC DISCRIMINATION?, 11 J. Contemp. Health L. &

Pol'y 23, 61+ (1994) HN: 1,2,4 (S.Ct.)
1982 HOMOSEXUALS AND THE MILITARY: INTEGRATION OR DISCRIMINATORY, 8 J. Con-
temp. Health L. & Pol'y 429, 453+ (1992) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
1983 QUALITY-OF-LIFE ETHICS AND CONSTITUTIONAL JURISPRUDENCE: THE DEMISE
OF NATURAL RIGHTS AND EQUAL PROTECTION FOR THE DISABLED AND INCOM-
PETENT, 2 J. Contemp. Health L. & Pol'y 71, 130+ (1986) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
1984 THE DEMISE OF THREE-TIER REVIEW: HAS THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT
ADOPTED A "SLIDING SCALE" APPROACH TOWARD EQUAL PROTECTION JURIS-
PRUDENCE?, 23 J. Contemp. L. 475, 514 (1997)
1985 I. UNITED STATES V. VIRGINIA: THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT APPLIED
HEIGHTENED SCRUTINY TO GENDER DISCRIMINATION IN RULING THAT VIRGIN-
IA'S ONLY SINGLE-SEX PUBLIC UNDERGRADUATE INSTITUTION VIOLATES EQUAL
PROTECTION GUAR, 23 J. Contemp. L. 279, 293 (1997) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
1986 J.E.B. v. ALABAMA EX REL. T.B.: PEREMPTORY CHALLENGES IN PRIVATE LITIGA-
TION-AN ENDANGERED SPECIES, 21 J. Contemp. L. 341, 363+ (1995) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
1987 EQUAL PROTECTION AND GENDER PREFERENCE IN DIVORCE CONTESTS OVER
CUSTODY, 16 J. Contemp. Legal Issues 165, 176 (2007) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
1988 STRICT SCRUTINY AND THE SEXUAL REVOLUTION: FRONTIERO V. RICHARDSON,
14 J. Contemp. Legal Issues 117, 128+ (2004) HN: 1,4,5 (S.Ct.)
1989 ORR V. ORR, 14 J. Contemp. Legal Issues 137, 144 (2004) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
1990 DO WOMEN NEED SPECIAL TREATMENT? DO FEMINISTS NEED EQUALITY?, 9 J. Con-
temp. Legal Issues 279, 320 (1998) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
1991 A LEAGUE OF THEIR OWN: DO WOMEN WANT SEX-SEGREGATED SPORTS?, 9 J. Con-
temp. Legal Issues 321, 356+ (1998) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
1992 THE ROLE OF GENDER IN A STRUCTURED SENTENCING SYSTEM: EQUAL TREAT-
MENT, POLICY CHOICES, AND THE SENTENCING OF FEMALE OFFENDERS UNDER
THE UNITED STATES SENTENCING GUIDELINES, 85 J. Crim. L. & Criminology 181, 221
(1994) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
1993 MOTHERHOOD v. EQUAL TREATMENT, 29 J. Fam. L. 1, 50+ (1991) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.)
1994 WILL THE S 1983 EQUAL PROTECTION CLAIM SOLVE THE EQUAL PROTECTION
PROBLEM FACED BY VICTIMS OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE? A REVIEW OF BALIS-
TRERI, WATSON, HYNSON, AND MCKEE, 29 J. Fam. L. 635, 658+ (1991) HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
1995 THE BATTERED WIFE SYNDROME: A BACKDOOR ASSAULT ON DOMESTIC VIOL-
ENCE, 23 J. Fam. L. 359, 390 (1985)
1996 EQUALITY OPPORTUNITY: MARRIAGE LITIGATION AND IOWA'S EQUAL PROTEC-
TION LAW, 12 J. Gender Race & Just. 107, 113 (2008)
1997 PROTECTION OR PRIVILEGE? REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION, REVERSE DIS-
CRIMINATION, AND THE FAIR COSTS OF REPAIRING RECOGNITION FOR DISABLED
PEOPLE IN THE WORKFORCE, 8 J. Gender Race & Just. 561, 594 (2005) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
1998 THE MYTH OF INDEPENDENCE AND THE MAJOR LIFE ACTIVITY OF CARING, 8 J.

Gender Race & Just. 327, 359+ (2004) HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
1999 CIVIL RIGHTS AND THE ADMINISTRATION OF ELECTIONS - TOWARD SECRET BAL-
LOTS AND POLLING PLACE ACCESS, 8 J. Gender Race & Just. 101, 150 (2004)
2000 CONSTRUCTING THE TRANNIE: TRANSGENDER PEOPLE AND THE LAWFOOTNOTE,
8 J. Gender Race & Just. 237, 280 (2004) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
2001 GENDERED SHADES OF PROPERTY: A STATUS CHECK ON GENDER, RACE & PROP-
ERTY, 5 J. Gender Race & Just. 361, 409 (2002) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
2002 "THERE'S NO CRYING IN BASEBALL": SPORTS AND THE LEGAL AND SOCIAL CON-
STRUCTION OF GENDER, 4 J. Gender Race & Just. 283, 319 (2001) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
2003 PART I-ROMANTIC PATERNALISM-THE TIES THAT BIND ALSO FREE: REVEALING
THE CONTOURS OF JUDICIAL AFFINITY FOR WHITE WOMEN, 3 J. Gender Race & Just.
107, 180+ (1999) HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
2004 PART II-ROMANTIC PATERNALISM-THE TIES THAT BIND: HIERARCHIES OF ECO-
NOMIC OPPRESSION THAT REVEAL JUDICIAL DISAFFINITY FOR BLACK WOMEN
AND MEN, 3 J. Gender Race & Just. 181, 256+ (1999) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
2005 HIGHLIGHTS IN NORTH AMERICAN LITIGATION DURING THE TWENTIETH CEN-
TURY ON ARTIFICIAL FLUORIDATION OF PUBLIC WATER SUPPLIES, 14 J. Land Use &
Envtl. L. 195, 248 (1999)
2006 EVOLUTION, CHILD ABUSE AND THE CONSTITUTION, 11 J.L. & Pol'y 687, 744+ (2003)
HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
2007 PANEL VI: FIGHTING GENDER AND SEXUAL ORIENTATION HARASSMENT The Sex
Discrimination Argument in Gay Rights Cases, 9 J.L. & Pol'y 397, 416 (2001) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
2008 THE SUPREME COURT ENDORSES "INVIDIOUS DISCRIMINATION": BOY SCOUTS OF
AMERICA V. DALE CREATES A CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO EXCLUDE GAY MEN, 9
J.L. & Pol'y 929, 1003 (2001) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
2009 THE CASE FOR LEGAL RECOGNITION OF SAME-SEX MARRIAGE, 8 J.L. & Pol'y 61,
106+ (1999) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
2010 THE VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN ACT AND THE CONSTRUCTION OF MULTIPLE
CONSCIOUSNESS IN THE CIVIL RIGHTS AND FEMINIST MOVEMENTS, 4 J.L. & Pol'y
463, 511 (1996)
2011 ELIMINATING A SAFE HAVEN FOR DISCRIMINATION: WHY NEW YORK MUST BAN
PEREMPTORY CHALLENGES FROM JURY SELECTION, 3 J.L. & Pol'y 605, 636 (1995)
2012 IOLTA'S LAST OBSTACLE: WASHINGTON LEGAL FOUND v. MASSACHUSETTS BAR
FOUND.'S FAULTY ANALYSIS OF ATTORNEYS' FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHTS, 2 J.L. &
Pol'y 187, 212 (1994) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
2013 DISCRETIONARY JUSTICE: A LEGAL AND POLICY ANALYSIS OF A GOVERNOR'S
USE OF THE CLEMENCY POWER IN THE CASES OF INCARCERATED BATTERED WO-
MEN, 3 J.L. & Pol'y 1, 79+ (1994) HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
2014 THE STORIES OF MARRIAGE, 12 J. L. & Fam. Stud. 1, 55 (2010) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
2015 VIOLENCE AND THE PRIVATE: A GIRARDIAN MODEL OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN
SOCIETY, 11 U. Pa. J. L. & Soc. Change 105, 105 (2008) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)

2016 7 J. L. Society 18, THE SOMEWHAT SUSPECT CLASS: TOWARDS A CONSTITUTIONAL

FRAMEWORK FOR EVALUATING OCCUPATIONAL RESTRICTIONS AFFECTING
PEOPLE WITH CRIMINAL RECORDS (2005) HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
2017 IMMIGRATION JURISPRUDENCE FROM THE DARK AGES TOWARD THE LIGHT, 2 J.
Legal Advoc. & Prac. 51, 68+ (2000)
2018 ABORTION LAW TODAY, 14 J. Legal Med. 3, 24 (1993)
2019 THE GENETIC INFORMATION NONDISCRIMINATION ACT OF 2008: A CASE STUDY
OF THE NEED FOR BETTER CONGRESSIONAL RESPONSES TO FEDERALISM JURIS-
PRUDENCE, 35 J. Legis. 113, 146+ (2009) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
2020 LAW THAT VALUES ALL FAMILIES: BEYOND (STRAIGHT AND GAY) MARRIAGE, 22
J. Am. Acad. Matrim. Law. 85, 104 (2009)
2021 17 J. Legal Aspects Sport 253, SEXUAL ORIENTATION HARASSMENT AND DISCRIMINA-
TION: LEGAL PROTECTION FOR STUDENT-ATHLETES (2007) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
2022 COMMITTED PARTNERSHIP: THE LEGAL STATUS OF COMMITTED PARTNERS AND
THEIR CHILDREN, 13 J. Suffolk Acad. L. 221, 254+ (1999) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
2023 EXPLAINING TRANSFORMATIONS IN SUPREME COURT POLICY, 79 Judicature 80, 85
(1995) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
2024 JUSTICE BRENNAN AND THE BRANDENBURG DECISION-A LAWGIVER IN ACTION,
79 Judicature 24, 29 (1995)
2025 THE NATURE OF FEMINIST JURISPRUDENCE, 77 Judicature 140, 143 (1993) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
2026 ORIGINALISM AND ORIGINAL EXCLUSIONS, 98 Ky. L.J. 397, 459 (2010) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
2027 ENGLISH ONLY?-THE "POWER" OF KENTUCKY'S OFFICIAL LANGUAGE STATUTE, 98
Ky. L.J. 855, 887+ (2010) HN: 3 (S.Ct.)
2028 WHAT THE DOCTOR ORDERED: BALANCING RELIGION AND PATIENT RIGHTS IN
U.S. PHARMACIES, 97 Ky. L.J. 521, 539 (2009) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
2029 PROPORTIONAL EQUALITY: READINGS OF ROMER, 89 Ky. L.J. 885, 910 (2001) HN: 1
(S.Ct.)
2030 PLAYING THE "GENDER" CARD: AFFIRMATIVE ACTION AND WORKING WOMEN, 84
Ky. L.J. 863, 901+ (1996) HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
2031 EMPLOYMENT DIVISION v. SMITH: OVERLOOKING THE MIDDLE GROUND IN FREE
EXERCISE ANALYSIS, 80 Ky. L.J. 531, 554 (1992) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
2032 THE UNWED FATHER AND THE RIGHT TO KNOW OF HIS CHILD'S EXISTENCE, 76 Ky.
L.J. 949, 1009 (1988)
2033 EQUAL PROTECTION FOR CHILDREN OF GAY AND LESBIAN PARENTS: CHALLEN-
GING THE THREE PILLARS OF EXCLUSION-LEGITIMACY, DUAL-GENDER PARENT-
ING, AND BIOLOGY, 28 Law & Ineq. 307, 332 (2010)
2034 INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS LAW: PRINCIPLED, DOUBLE, OR ABSENT STAND-
ARDS?, 25 Law & Ineq. 467, 513 (2007) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
2035 OBESITY HARASSMENT IN SCHOOL: SIMPLY "TEASING" OUR WAY TO UN-
FETTERED OBESITY DISCRIMINATION AND STRIPPING AWAY THE RIGHT TO EDU-
CATION, 23 Law & Ineq. 429, 454 (2005) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)

2036 THE SUPREME COURT'S BLIND PURSUIT OF OUTDATED DEFINITIONS OF FAMILIAL

RELATIONSHIPS IN UPHOLDING THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF 8 U.S.C. S 1409 IN
NGUYEN V. INS, 20 Law & Ineq. 275, 312+ (2002) HN: 4,5 (S.Ct.)
2037 NONCITIZEN VOTING RIGHTS: THE HISTORY, THE LAW AND CURRENT PROSPECTS
FOR CHANGE, 18 Law & Ineq. 271, 322 (2000) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
2038 EQUAL PROTECTION IN STATE COURTS: THE NEW ECONOMIC EQUALITY RIGHTS,
17 Law & Ineq. 239, 357 (1999) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
2039 SEPARATION ANXIETY AND BOOT CAMP: WHY BASIC TRAINING SHOULD REMAIN
GENDER-INTEGRATED, 17 Law & Ineq. 139, 170+ (1999)
2040 FISCAL RESTRAINTS TRUMP DUE PROCESS: CHILDREN'S DIMINISHING RIGHT TO
COUNSEL IN MINNESOTA, 14 Law & Ineq. 647, 688+ (1996) HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
2041 TOWARDS A NEW EQUAL PROTECTION: TWO KINDS OF EQUALITY, 12 Law & Ineq.
381, 428+ (1994) HN: 1,2,4 (S.Ct.)
2042 THE RIGHT OF WOMEN TO NAME THEIR CHILDREN, 3 Law & Ineq. 91, 159 (1985) HN:
2 (S.Ct.)
2043 EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION IN THE PUBLIC SECTOR BASED ON SEXUAL ORI-
ENTATION: CONFLICTS BETWEEN RESEARCH EVIDENCE AND THE LAW, 19 Law &
Psychol. Rev. 113, 152+ (1995) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
2044 SCIENCE, IDENTITY, AND THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE GAY POLITICAL NARRAT-
IVE, 12 Law & Sexuality 1, 86 (2003) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
2045 BREAKING THE ENIGMA CODE: WHY THE LAW HAS FAILED TO RECOGNIZE SEX AS
EXPRESSIVE CONDUCT UNDER THE FIRST AMENDMENT, AND WHY SEX BETWEEN
MEN PROVES THAT IT SHOULD, 12 Law & Sexuality 159, 269 (2003) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
2046 THE LOW ROAD TO VIOLENCE: GOVERNMENTAL DISCRIMINATION AS A CATA-
LYST FOR PANDEMIC HATE CRIME, 10 Law & Sexuality 1, 91 (2001) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
2047 THE GENDER CASTE SYSTEM: IDENTITY, PRIVACY, AND HETERONORMATIVITY, 10
Law & Sexuality 123, 186 (2001)
2048 THE (BACK)DOOR OF ONCALE V. SUNDOWNER OFFSHORE SERVICES, INC.: "OUT-
ING" HETEROSEXUALITY AS A GENDER-BASED STEREOTYPE, 10 Law & Sexuality
239, 276+ (2001) HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
2049 THE ARC OF HISTORY: OR, THE RESURRECTION OF FEMINISM'S SAMENESS/DIF-
FERENCE DICHOTOMY IN THE GAY AND LESBIAN MARRIAGE DEBATE, 7 Law &
Sexuality 1, 30+ (1997) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
2050 BAEHR v. LEWIN: A STEP IN THE RIGHT DIRECTION FOR GAY RIGHTS?, 4 Law &
Sexuality 1, 34 (1994) HN: 1,2 (S.Ct.)
2051 GAY AND LESBIAN: AN ETHNIC IDENTITY DESERVING EQUAL PROTECTION, 4 Law
& Sexuality 195, 207+ (1994) HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
2052 SOCIETAL PREJUDICE VERSUS THE CONSTITUTIONAL GUARANTEE OF EQUAL
PROTECTION, 3 Law & Sexuality 139, 163+ (1993) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
2053 EQUAL PROTECTION AND SEXUAL ORIENTATION IN MILITARY AND SECURITY
CONTEXTS: AN ANALYSIS OF RECENT FEDERAL DECISIONS, 3 Law & Sexuality 201,

243 (1993) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)

2054 INSIDE AND OUT OF THE MILITARY, 3 Law & Sexuality 27, 43+ (1993)
2055 THE DISPARATE TREATMENT OF RACE AND CLASS IN CONSTITUTIONAL JURIS-
PRUDENCE, 72-FALL Law & Contemp. Probs. 109, 130 (2009) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
2056 DIMENSIONS OF EQUALITY: DOCTRINES OF LIMITATION, 55-WTR Law & Contemp.
Probs. 201, 210 (1992)
2057 INSTITUTIONAL DESIGN AND THE POLITICS OF CONSTITUTIONAL MODIFICATION:
UNDERSTANDING AMENDMENT FAILURE IN THE UNITED STATES AND CANADA,
31 Law and Society Review 111, 117+ (1997) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
2058 25 Law and Society Review 411, LAW'S PATRIARCHY (1991) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
2059 CONSTITUTIONAL LIMITATIONS ON STATE TAXATION OF NONRESIDENT CITIZENS,
1999 L. Rev. Mich. St. U. Det. C.L. 95, 169+ (1999) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
2060 TRANSSEXUALISM AND THE BINARY DIVIDE: DETERMINING SEX USING OBJECT-
IVE CRITERIA, 2 Liberty U. L. Rev. 459, 514+ (2008) HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
2061 THE ACTIVIST INSECURITY AND THE DEMISE OF CIVIL RIGHTS LAW, 63 La. L. Rev.
785, 873+ (2003) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
2062 LOUISIANA ASSOCIATED GENERAL CONTRACTORS: A CASE STUDY IN THE FAIL-
URE OF A STATE EQUALITY GUARANTEE TO FURTHER THE TRANSFORMATIVE
VISION OF CIVIL RIGHTS, 63 La. L. Rev. 887, 915 (2003) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
2063 PARALYZING DISCORD: WORKPLACE SAFETY, PATERNALISM, AND THE ACCOM-
MODATION OF BIOLOGICAL VARIANCE IN THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES
ACT, 63 La. L. Rev. 509, 588+ (2003)
2064 GEORGIA v. MCCOLLUM: IT'S STRIKE THREE FOR PEREMPTORY CHALLENGES, BUT
IS IT THE BOTTOM OF THE NINTH?, 53 La. L. Rev. 1723, 1758+ (1993) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
2065 REVOLUTIONS AND CONSTITUTIONS, 49 La. L. Rev. 1023, 1056 (1989) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
2066 EQUAL PROTECTION-THE LOUISIANA EXPERIENCE IN DEPARTING FROM GENER-
ALLY ACCEPTED FEDERAL ANALYSIS, 49 La. L. Rev. 903, 919 (1989) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
2067 NONBANK BANKS: WHO'S MINDING THE STORE?, 46 La. L. Rev. 1087, 1105+ (1986)
HN: 3 (S.Ct.)
2068 JOINT CUSTODY IN LOUISIANA, 43 La. L. Rev. 85, 116 (1982) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
2069 WHY SAME-SEX SPOUSES SHOULD BE GRANTED PREFERENTIAL IMMIGRATION
STATUS" REEVALUATING ADAMS v. HOWERTON, 16 Loy. L.A. Int'l & Comp. L.J. 763,
798+ (1994)
2070 FOUR MODELS OF EQUALITY, 27 Loy. L.A. Int'l & Comp. L. Rev. 63, 100+ (2005) HN: 1,4
(S.Ct.)
2071 LETTING GO OF A NATIONAL RELIGION: WHY THE STATE SHOULD RELINQUISH
ALL CONTROL OVER MARRIAGE, 38 Loy. L.A. L. Rev. 2185, 2218 (2005)
2072 CONTRIBUTOR, 31 Loy. L.A. L. Rev. 739, 744+ (1998) HN: 1,3,4 (S.Ct.)
2073 CONTRIBUTOR, 31 Loy. L.A. L. Rev. 739, 744+ (1998) HN: 1,3,4 (S.Ct.)
2074 CONTRIBUTOR, 31 Loy. L.A. L. Rev. 769, 774+ (1998) HN: 2,4 (S.Ct.)

2075 CONTRIBUTOR, 31 Loy. L.A. L. Rev. 769, 774+ (1998) HN: 2,4 (S.Ct.)
2076 EQUAL BENEFITS, EQUAL BURDENS: "SKEPTICAL SCRUTINY" FOR GENDER CLAS-
SIFICATIONS AFTER UNITED STATES v. VIRGINIA, 30 Loy. L.A. L. Rev. 1333, 1378+
(1997) HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
2077 SOUNDS OF SILENCE: THE SUPREME COURT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION, 28 Loy.
L.A. L. Rev. 923, 969 (1995)
2078 ANALYZING THE MILITARY'S JUSTIFICATIONS FOR ITS EXCLUSIONARY POLICY:
FIFTY YEARS WITHOUT A RATIONAL BASIS, 26 Loy. L.A. L. Rev. 151, 211+ (1992) HN:
2,4 (S.Ct.)
2079 PEREMPTORY CHALLENGES AND RELIGION: THE UNANSWERED PRAYER FOR A
SUPREME COURT OPINION, 36 Loy. U. Chi. L.J. 285, 328+ (2004) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
2080 ROMER v. EVANS: A POSITIVE PORTENT OF THE FUTURE, 28 Loy. U. Chi. L.J. 593, 657
(1997)
2081 J.E.B. v. ALABAMA EX REL. T.B.: STRIKE TWO FOR THE PEREMPTORY CHALLENGE,
26 Loy. U. Chi. L.J. 549, 587+ (1995) HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
2082 HELLER v. DOE: THE SUPREME COURT DIMINISHES THE RIGHTS OF INDIVIDUALS
WITH MENTAL RETARDATION, 26 Loy. U. Chi. L.J. 99, 130 (1994) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
2083 CONGRESSIONAL POWER TO REGULATE SEX DISCRIMINATION: THE EFFECT OF
THE SUPREME COURT'S "NEW FEDERALISM", 55 Me. L. Rev. 63, 87 (2003) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
2084 GROUNDED APPLICATIONS: FEMINISM AND LAW AT THE MILLENNIUM, 50 Me. L.
Rev. 201, 209 (1998)
2085 MAINE'S "ACT TO PROTECT TRADITIONAL MARRIAGE AND PROHIBIT SAME-SEX
MARRIAGES": QUESTIONS OF CONSTITUTIONALITY UNDER STATE AND FEDERAL
LAW, 50 Me. L. Rev. 345, 403+ (1998)
2086 PORNOGRAPHY COMMISSIONS AND THE FIRST AMENDMENT: ON CONSTITUTION-
AL VALUES AND CONSTITUTIONAL FACTS, 39 Me. L. Rev. 275, 320 (1987)
2087 THE MASTER'S TOOLS: DECONSTRUCTING THE SOCRATIC METHOD AND ITS DIS-
PARATE IMPACT ON WOMEN THROUGH THE PRISM OF THE EQUAL PROTECTION
DOCTRINE, 3 Margins: Md. L.J. Race, Religion, Gender & Class 125, 165+ (2003) HN: 1
(S.Ct.)
2088 BREAKING OUT: VMI AND THE COMING OF WOMEN. BY LAURA FAIRCHILD BROD-
IE. NEW YORK, NY: VINTAGE BOOKS, 2001. PP. 368. $14.00, 2 Margins: Md. L.J. Race,
Religion, Gender & Class 281, 305 (2002) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
2089 DRAINING THE MORASS: ENDING THE JURISPRUDENTIALLY UNSOUND UNPUBLIC-
ATION SYSTEM, 92 Marq. L. Rev. 685, 747 (2009)
2090 FROM THE TWIN CITIES TO "TWIN" STATES: LEGISLATING THE CLASSROOM
PLACEMENT OF TWINS AND OTHER HIGHER ORDER MULTIPLES, 91 Marq. L. Rev.
587, 604 (2007) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
2091 PPI, PATRIARCHY, AND THE SCHIZOPHRENIC VIEW OF WOMEN: A FEMINIST ANA-
LYSIS OF WELFARE REFORM IN MARYLAND, 6 Md. J. Contemp. Legal Issues 317, 375
(1995)

2092 CONAWAY V. DEANE: TO HAVE AND TO HOLD, FROM THIS DAY FORWARD-
MARYLAND'S UNFIT MARRIAGE TO FEDERAL EQUAL PROTECTION ANALYSIS, 68
Md. L. Rev. 957, 986+ (2009)
2093 EQUAL PROTECTION, THE CONSCIENTIOUS JUDGE, AND THE 2000 PRESIDENTIAL
ELECTION, 61 Md. L. Rev. 576, 605+ (2002) HN: 4,5 (S.Ct.)
2094 CONSTITUTIONAL LAW Frankel v. Board of Regents of the University of Maryland System -
In the Name of Equality: The Proper Expansion of Maryland's Heightened Rational Basis Stand-
ard, 61 Md. L. Rev. 847, 868 (2002) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
2095 DEMOCRACY AND INCLUSION: RECONCEPTUALIZING THE ROLE OF THE JUDGE IN
A PLURALIST POLITY, 58 Md. L. Rev. 150, 270 (1999) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
2096 J.E.B. V. ALABAMA EX REL. T.B.: THE SUPREME COURT MOVES CLOSER TO ELIMIN-
ATION OF THE PEREMPTORY CHALLENGE, 54 Md. L. Rev. 261, 279+ (1995) HN: 1,3,4
(S.Ct.)
2097 A CONFLICT OF LAWS AND MORALS: THE CHOICE OF LAW IMPLICATIONS OF
HAWAII'S RECOGNITION OF SAME-SEX MARRIAGES, 53 Md. L. Rev. 450, 493+ (1994)
HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
2098 III. CONSTITUTIONAL LAW, 53 Md. L. Rev. 683, 696+ (1994) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
2099 COMPARABLE WORTH AND THE MARYLAND ERA, 47 Md. L. Rev. 1129, 1187+ (1988)
HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
2100 BURNING TREE CLUB, INC. v. BAINUM-STATE ACTION, STRICT SCRUTINY, AND
THE "NEW JUDICIAL FEDERALISM', 47 Md. L. Rev. 1219, 1250+ (1988) HN: 1,2,3 (S.Ct.)
2101 THE ROLE OF THE SUPREME COURT: JUDICIAL ACTIVISM OR SELF-RESTRAINT, 47
Md. L. Rev. 118, 138 (1987)
2102 COMMENT, 47 Md. L. Rev. 38, 45 (1987) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
2103 INTRODUCTION, 47 Md. L. Rev. 7, 9 (1987) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
2104 IV. CONSTITUTIONAL LAW, 46 Md. L. Rev. 647, 674 (1987) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
2105 CLEBURNE: AN EVOLUTIONARY STEP IN EQUAL PROTECTION ANALYSIS, 46 Md. L.
Rev. 163, 193+ (1986) HN: 1,2,5 (S.Ct.)
2106 MASSACHUSETTS CIVIL RIGHTS LAW, 76 Mass. L. Rev. 77, 96 (1991) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
2107 STATUTORY REGULATION OF LEGAL PARENTAGE IN CASES OF ARTIFICIAL IN-
SEMINATION BY DONOR: A NEW FRONTIER OF GENDER DISCRIMINATION, 41
McGeorge L. Rev. 371, 405 (2010) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
2108 REGULATING CALIFORNIA'S SQUID FISHING INDUSTRY-HEEDING THE LESSONS OF
CANNERY ROW Code Sections Affected Fish and Game Code SS 8420, 8420.5, 8421, 8421.5,
8422, 8423, 8423.5, 8424, 8425, 8426, 8427, 8428, 8429, 8429.5, 8, 29 McGeorge L. Rev. 595,
603 (1998) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
2109 SUPREME COURT: ABA'S AMICUS BRIEF IN GARRETT, 24 Mental & Physical Disability
L. Rep. 691, 697 (2000) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
2110 SUPREME COURT: ABA'S AMICUS BRIEF IN GARRETT, 24 Mental & Physical Disability
L. Rep. 691, 697 (2000) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
2111 STEFFAN v. ASPIN: A COURT'S UNFORTUNATE READING OF REASONABLENESS

OUT OF THE MILITARY'S SENSIBLE BAN ON HOMOSEXUALS, 45 Mercer L. Rev. 1123,

1136+ (1994) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
2112 THE BEAT GOES ON: DISTRICT COURT UPHOLDS VIRGINIA MILITARY INSTITUTE'S
ALL-MALE ADMISSIONS POLICY IN UNITED STATES v. VIRGINIA, 43 Mercer L. Rev.
767, 785+ (1992) HN: 1,2,3 (S.Ct.)
2113 PASSIONS WE LIKE . . . AND THOSE WE DON'T: ANTI-GAY HATE CRIME LAWS AND
THE DISCURSIVE CONSTRUCTION OF SEX, GENDER, AND THE BODY, 16 Mich. J.
Gender & L. 1, 48+ (2009) HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
2114 TOWARD A THIRD-WAVE FEMINIST LEGAL THEORY: YOUNG WOMEN, PORNO-
GRAPHY AND THE PRAXIS OF PLEASURE, 14 Mich. J. Gender & L. 99, 168 (2007)
2115 FEMINIST VOICES IN THE DEBATE OVER SINGLE-SEX SCHOOLING: FINDING COM-
MON GROUND, 11 Mich. J. Gender & L. 63, 95 (2004) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
2116 WHATEVER HAPPENED TO G.I. JANE?: CITIZENSHIP, GENDER, AND SOCIAL POLICY
IN THE POSTWAR ERA, 9 Mich. J. Gender & L. 91, 129 (2002) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
2117 AMICUS CURIAE BRIEF OF NOW LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATION FUND AND
EQUAL RIGHTS ADVOCATES IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT AND IN SUP-
PORT OF REVERSAL IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST
CIRCUIT LUCAS ROSA V, 7 Mich. J. Gender & L. 163, 177 (2001) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
2118 THE FREEDOM TO MARRY FOR SAME-SEX COUPLES: THE OPENING APPELLATE
BRIEF OF PLAINTIFFS STAN BAKER ET AL. IN BAKER ET AL. V. STATE OF VER-
MONT, 5 Mich. J. Gender & L. 409, 475 (1999)
2119 CONSENSUAL RELATIONSHIPS AND THE CONSTITUTION: A CASE OF LIBERTY
DENIED, 6 Mich. J. Gender & L. 47, 77+ (1999) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
2120 "WHAT'S SO MAGIC(AL) ABOUT BLACK WOMEN?" PEREMPTORY CHALLENGES AT
THE INTERSECTION OF RACE AND GENDER, 3 Mich. J. Gender & L. 369, 412 (1996)
2121 INNOCENT SPOUSES, REASONABLE WOMEN AND DIVORCE: THE GAP BETWEEN
REALITY AND THE INTERNAL REVENUE CODE, 3 Mich. J. Gender & L. 421, 492 (1996)
HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
2122 FAIR AND FACIALLY NEUTRAL HIGHER EDUCATIONAL ADMISSIONS THROUGH
DISPARATE IMPACT ANALYSIS, 9 Mich. J. Race & L. 467, 502 (2004)
2123 SEEKING REDRESS FOR GENDER-BASED BIASCRIMES-CHARTING NEW GROUND IN
FAMILIAR LEGAL TERRITORY, 6 Mich. J. Race & L. 265, 283 (2001) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
2124 IDENTITY CRISIS: "INTERSECTIONALITY," "MULTIDIMENSIONALITY," AND THE DE-
VELOPMENT OF AN ADEQUATE THEORY OF SUBORDINATION, 6 Mich. J. Race & L.
285, 317 (2001)
2125 THE NEW CULTURAL DIVERSITY AND TITLE VII, 6 Mich. J. Race & L. 127, 179 (2000)
HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
2126 THE EVOLUTION OF RACE IN THE LAW: THE SUPREME COURT MOVES FROM AP-
PROVING INTERNMENT OF JAPANESE AMERICANS TO DISAPPROVING AFFIRMAT-
IVE ACTION FOR AFRICAN AMERICANS, 1 Mich. J. Race & L. 165, 193 (1996)
2127 CAN CRIMINAL LAW BE CONTROLLED?, 108 Mich. L. Rev. 971, 991+ (2010) HN: 2

(S.Ct.)
2128 BURKEAN MINIMALISM, 105 Mich. L. Rev. 353, 408 (2006)
2129 EVOLVING OBJECTIVE STANDARDS: A DEVELOPMENTAL APPROACH TO CONSTI-
TUTIONAL REVIEW OF MORALS LEGISLATION, 105 Mich. L. Rev. 151, 181 (2006)
2130 ARE SINGLE-SEX SCHOOLS INHERENTLY UNEQUAL?, 102 Mich. L. Rev. 1219, 1244
(2004)
2131 THE PRINCIPLE AND PRACTICE OF WOMEN'S "FULL CITIZENSHIP": A CASE STUDY
OF SEX-SEGREGATED PUBLIC EDUCATION, 101 Mich. L. Rev. 755, 810+ (2002) HN:
1,3,4 (S.Ct.)
2132 SOME EFFECTS OF IDENTITY-BASED SOCIAL MOVEMENTS ON CONSTITUTIONAL
LAW IN THE TWENTIETH CENTURY, 100 Mich. L. Rev. 2062, 2407+ (2002) HN: 1,4
(S.Ct.)
2133 DISSING CONGRESS, 100 Mich. L. Rev. 80, 144 (2001)
2134 A LAW OF HER OWN: THE REASONABLE WOMAN AS A MEASURE OF MAN. BY CAR-
OLINE A. FORELL AND DONNA M. MATTHEWS. NEW YORK: NEW YORK UNI-
VERSITY PRESS. 2000. PP. XXII, 260. $35., 98 Mich. L. Rev. 1797, 1821 (2000) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
2135 SINCERE AND STRATEGIC VOTING NORMS ON MULTIMEMBER COURTS, 97 Mich. L.
Rev. 2297, 2380 (1999) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
2136 CONSTITUTIONAL FACT AND THEORY: A RESPONSE TO CHIEF JUDGE POSNER, 97
Mich. L. Rev. 1287, 1295 (1999)
2137 AN ORIGINAL MODEL OF THE INDEPENDENT COUNSEL STATUTE, 97 Mich. L. Rev.
601, 695 (1998)
2138 WHOSE LAW IS THIS ANYWAY? Gender and Law: Theory, Doctrine, Commentary. By Kath-
arine T. Bartlett. Boston: Little, Brown & Co. 1993. Pp. xxxviii, 1009. $54. Sex Discrimination
and the Law: History, Practice, and Theory. S, 95 Mich. L. Rev. 1560, 1577 (1997) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
2139 FOREWORD: "RACIALISM" AND REASON, 95 Mich. L. Rev. 723, 740 (1997) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
2140 ATTAINDER AND AMENDMENT 2: ROMER 'S RIGHTNESS, 95 Mich. L. Rev. 203, 235+
(1996) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
2141 "A GOVERNMENT OF LIMITED AND ENUMERATED POWERS": IN DEFENSE OF
UNITED STATES V. LOPEZ, 94 Mich. L. Rev. 752, 831 (1995) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
2142 RELIGION-BASED PEREMPTORY CHALLENGES AFTER BATSON V. KENTUCKY AND
J.E.B. V. ALABAMA: AN EQUAL PROTECTION AND FIRST AMENDMENT ANALYSIS,
94 Mich. L. Rev. 191, 216 (1995) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
2143 JUSTICE LEWIS F. POWELL AND THE JURISPRUDENCE OF CENTRISM Justice Lewis F.
Powell, Jr. By John C. Jeffries, Jr. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons. 1994. Pp. xii, 690.
$30.00., 93 Mich. L. Rev. 1854, 1884+ (1995)
2144 REHABILITATING FEDERALISM To Make A Nation: The Rediscovery Of American Federal-
ism. By Samuel H. Beer. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. 1993. Pp. xxi, 474. $29.95., 92
Mich. L. Rev. 1333, 1346 (1994) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
2145 POISED AT THE THRESHOLD: SEXUAL ORIENTATION, LAW, AND THE LAW SCHOOL
CURRICULUM IN THE NINETIES Lesbians, Gay Men, and the Law. Edited by William B.

Rubenstein. New York: The New Press. 1993. Pp. xxi, 569. $30., 92 Mich. L. Rev. 1910, 1928
(1994) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
2146 THE LENSES OF GENDER: TRANSFORMING THE DEBATE ON SEXUAL INEQUALITY.
BY SANDRA LIPSITZ BEM. NEW HAVEN: YALE UNIVERSITY PRESS. 1993. PP. XII, 244.
$30., 92 Mich. L. Rev. 1929, 1942 (1994)
2147 INCOMMENSURABILITY AND VALUATION IN LAW, 92 Mich. L. Rev. 779, 861 (1994)
HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
2148 "WAS BLIND, BUT NOW I SEE": WHITE RACE CONSCIOUSNESS AND THE REQUIRE-
MENT OF DISCRIMINATORY INTENT, 91 Mich. L. Rev. 953, 1017+ (1993) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
2149 LEGISLATIVE INPUTS AND GENDER-BASED DISCRIMINATION IN THE BURGER
COURT, 90 Mich. L. Rev. 1023, 1027 (1992)
2150 AN INTERPRETIVE HISTORY OF MODERN EQUAL PROTECTION, 90 Mich. L. Rev. 213,
305+ (1991) HN: 4,5 (S.Ct.)
2151 BEYOND THE CONSTITUTION. BY HADLEY ARKES. PRINCETON: PRINCETON UNI-
VERSITY PRESS. 1990. PP. IX, 278. $24.95, 89 Mich. L. Rev. 1395, 1406+ (1991) HN: 5
(S.Ct.)
2152 THE APOLOGETICS OF SUPPRESSION: THE REGULATION OF PORNOGRAPHY AS
ACT AND IDEA, 86 Mich. L. Rev. 1564, 1634 (1988)
2153 WHY WE LOST THE ERA. BY JANE J. MANSBRIDGE. CHICAGO: UNIVERSITY OF
CHICAGO PRESS. 1986. Pp. xii, 327. CLOTH, $35; PAPER, $9.95., 86 Mich. L. Rev. 1408,
1413 (1988)
2154 A JOB FOR THE JUDGES: THE JUDICIARY AND THE CONSTITUTION IN A MASSIVE
AND COMPLEX SOCIETY, 86 Mich. L. Rev. 657, 721 (1988) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
2155 PREVENTIVE PRETRIAL DETENTION AND THE FAILURE OF INTEREST-BALANCING
APPROACHES TO DUE PROCESS, 85 Mich. L. Rev. 510, 569 (1986) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
2156 FROM FALSE PATERNALISM TO FALSE EQUALITY: JUDICIAL ASSAULTS ON FEMIN-
IST COMMUNITY, ILLINOIS 1869-1895, 84 Mich. L. Rev. 1518, 1541 (1986)
2157 THE FORMULAIC CONSTITUTION, 84 Mich. L. Rev. 165, 205+ (1985) HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
2158 THE CLASS-BASED ANIMUS REQUIREMENT OF 42 U.S.C. s 1985(3): A LIMITING
STRATEGY GONE AWRY?, 84 Mich. L. Rev. 88, 95+ (1985) HN: 1,2,3 (S.Ct.)
2159 BACKING OFF BIVENS AND THE RAMIFICATIONS OF THIS RETREAT FOR THE VIN-
DICATION OF FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHTS, 83 Mich. L. Rev. 269, 340 (1984)
2160 CONSEQUENCES OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS UPHOLDING INDIVIDUAL CON-
STITUTIONAL RIGHTS, 83 Mich. L. Rev. 1, 202+ (1984)
2161 THE ESTABLISHMENT CLAUSE AND RELIGION IN CHILD CUSTODY DISPUTES:
FACTORING RELIGION INTO THE BEST INTEREST EQUATION, 82 Mich. L. Rev. 1702,
1738 (1984)
2162 IS THE BURGER COURT REALLY LIKE THE WARREN COURT? THE BURGER COURT:
THE COUNTER-REVOLUTION THAT WASN'T. EDITED BY VINCENT BLASI. NEW
HAVEN AND LONDON: YALE UNIVERSITY PRESS. 1983. PP. XIV, 326. $25., 82 Mich. L.
Rev. 635, 654 (1984)

2163 EMPLOYEE SELECTION BASED ON SUSCEPTIBILITY TO OCCUPATIONAL ILLNESS,

81 Mich. L. Rev. 1379, 1496 (1983) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
2164 IN DEFENSE OF EQUALITY: A REPLY TO PROFESSOR WESTEN, 81 Mich. L. Rev. 575,
599 (1983) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
2165 ALTERNATIVES TO THE JUDICIALLY PROMULGATED FERES DOCTRINE, 192 Mil. L.
Rev. 1, 80+ (2007) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
2166 RACIAL EXTREMISM IN THE ARMY, 159 Mil. L. Rev. 1, 86 (1999) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
2167 ILLEGITIMATE CHILDREN AND MILITARY BENEFITS, 132 Mil. L. Rev. 5, 42+ (1991)
HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
2168 MILITARY POLICY TOWARD HOMOSEXUALS: SCIENTIFIC, HISTORICAL, AND LEG-
AL PERSPECTIVES, 131 Mil. L. Rev. 55, 108+ (1991) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
2169 THE JUSTICIABILITY OF CLAIMS BROUGHT BY NATIONAL GUARDSMEN UNDER
THE CIVIL RIGHTS STATUTES FOR INJURIES SUFFERED IN THE COURSE OF MILIT-
ARY SERVICE, 125 Mil. L. Rev. 99, 138 (1989) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
2170 IDENTITY SCRIPTS & DEMOCRATIC DELIBERATION, 94 Minn. L. Rev. 897, 971+ (2010)
HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
2171 FIGHTING WOMEN: THE MILITARY, SEX, AND EXTRAJUDICIAL CONSTITUTIONAL
CHANGE, 93 Minn. L. Rev. 96, 164+ (2008) HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
2172 MARRIAGE LICENSES, 89 Minn. L. Rev. 1758, 1797 (2005) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
2173 MORALS-BASED JUSTIFICATIONS FOR LAWMAKING: BEFORE AND AFTER
LAWRENCE V. TEXAS, 88 Minn. L. Rev. 1233, 1311 (2004) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
2174 THE ADA'S ABROGATION OF ELEVENTH AMENDMENT STATE IMMUNITY AS A
VALID EXERCISE OF CONGRESS'S POWER TO ENFORCE THE FOURTEENTH AMEND-
MENT, 82 Minn. L. Rev. 1139, 1170 (1998) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
2175 "ANIMUS" AND MORAL DISAPPROVAL: A COMMENT ON ROMER v. EVANS, 82 Minn.
L. Rev. 833, 854 (1998) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
2176 PUTTING TEETH INTO MINNESOTA'S EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION LAW: A LE-
GISLATIVE PROPOSAL DEFINING GENDER STEREOTYPING, 79 Minn. L. Rev. 211, 242
(1994) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
2177 ELIMINATING UNCONSTITUTIONAL JURIES: APPLYING UNITED STATES v. DE
GROSS TO ALL HEIGHTENED SCRUTINY EQUAL PROTECTION GROUPS IN THE EX-
ERCISE OF PEREMPTORY CHALLENGES, 77 Minn. L. Rev. 689, 718 (1993) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
2178 THE CONSTITUTIONAL CASE AGAINST INTRACIRCUIT NONACQUIESCENCE, 75
Minn. L. Rev. 1339, 1444 (1991)
2179 AN ILL WIND BLOWS: RESTRICTING THE PUBLIC'S RIGHT OF ACCESS TO SEARCH
WARRANT AFFIDAVITS, 74 Minn. L. Rev. 661, 688 (1990) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
2180 LEGAL PRAGMATISM AND THE CONSTITUTION, 72 Minn. L. Rev. 1331, 1378 (1988)
HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
2181 LEGISLATIVE ENFORCEMENT OF EQUAL PROTECTION, 72 Minn. L. Rev. 311, 365+
(1987) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
2182 OF EVIDENCE AND EQUAL PROTECTION: THE UNCONSTITUTIONALITY OF EX-

CLUDING GOVERNMENT AGENTS' STATEMENTS OFFERED AS VICARIOUS ADMIS-

SIONS AGAINST THE PROSECUTION, 71 Minn. L. Rev. 269, 315+ (1986) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
2183 DISABILITY AND EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION AT THE REHNQUIST COURT, 75
Miss. L.J. 945, 973 (2006)
2184 SEX DISCRIMINATION IN PUBLIC EDUCATION, 58 Miss. L.J. 323, 348 (1988) HN: 1,4
(S.Ct.)
2185 RATIONALIZING AWAY POLITICAL POWERLESSNESS: EQUAL PROTECTION ANA-
LYSIS OF LAWS CLASSIFYING GAYS AND LESBIANS, 72 Mo. L. Rev. 891, 907+ (2007)
HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
2186 DISINHERITING THE "LEGAL ORPHAN": INHERITANCE RIGHTS OF CHILDREN
AFTER TERMINATION OF PARENTAL RIGHTS, 70 Mo. L. Rev. 125, 176+ (2005) HN: 1
(S.Ct.)
2187 CUTTING FUNDS FOR ORAL CONTRACEPTIVES: VIOLATION OF EQUAL PROTEC-
TION RIGHTS AND THE DISPARATE IMPACT ON WOMEN'S HEALTHCARE, 5 Mod. Am.
23, 28 (2009) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
2188 EQUAL MARRIAGE RIGHTS FOR TRANSGENDERED INDIVIDUALS, 3 Mod. Am. 66, 71
(2007) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
2189 SYNOPSES OF PAST ARTICLES IN THE MONTANA LAW REVIEW DISCUSSING THE
1972 MONTANA CONSTITUTION (1972-2009), 71 Mont. L. Rev. 503, 570 (2010) HN: 1
(S.Ct.)
2190 PRIVACY AND REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS: WHERE WE'VE BEEN AND WHERE WE'RE
GOING, 68 Mont. L. Rev. 299, 317 (2007) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
2191 THE RELIGIOUS FREEDOM RESTORATION ACT: THE CONSTITUTIONAL SIGNIFIC-
ANCE OF AN UNCONSTITUTIONAL STATUTE, 56 Mont. L. Rev. 39, 93+ (1995) HN: 1,2,4
(S.Ct.)
2192 CHAPTER 19 OF THE NAFTA: ARE BINATIONAL PANELS CONSTITUTIONAL?, 3-SUM
NAFTA: L. & Bus. Rev. Am. 129, 144+ (1997) HN: 1,2 (S.Ct.)
2193 TO HAVE AND TO UPHOLD: THE COMMON LANGUAGE OF STATUS-PRESERVING
COUNTERMOVEMENTS, 21 Nat'l Black L.J. 122, 136 (2009) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
2194 THE STOP AND FRISK OF CRIMINAL STREET GANG MEMBERS, 14 Nat'l Black L.J. 1, 58
(1995) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
2195 MR. JUSTICE BRENNAN: HIS IMPRINT WILL ENDURE, 8/4/97 Nat'l L.J. A24, col. 1, A24,
col. 1 (1997) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
2196 DECISIONS EXPAND EQUAL PROTECTION RIGHTS COURT ENDS EXCLUSION OF
WOMEN AT VMI AND GRANTS EQUAL PROTECTION STATUS TO GAY MEN AND
LESBIANS., 7/29/96 Nat'l L.J. C7, col. 1, C7, col. 1 (1996) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
2197 JUDGE GINSBURG'S EX-CLIENTS REFLECT UPON THEIR CASES THE "WIDOWS BE-
NEFITS' PLAINTIFF RECALLS HOW SHE URGED HIM TO SUE., 6/28/93 Nat'l L.J. 34, col.
1, 34, col. 1 (1993) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
2198 CONSTITUTIONAL PROTECTION FOR MINORITY RIGHTS, 4/27/87 Nat'l L.J. S14, col. 1,
S14, col. 1+ (1987) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)

2199 JUSTICE BRENNAN DESERVES BETTER TREATMENT, 3/2/87 Nat'l L.J. 13, col. 1, 13, col.
1 (1987)
2200 REHNQUIST LONE DISSENTER IN 47 CASES, 6/30/86 Nat'l L.J. 48, col. 1, 48, col. 1 (1986)
HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
2201 THE COMBAT EXCLUSION FOR WOMEN AVIATORS; A CONSTITUTIONAL ANALYS-
IS, 39 Naval L. Rev. 171, 185+ (1990)
2202 WOMEN IN COMBAT; CHANGING THE RULES, 39 Naval L. Rev. 187, 195 (1990)
2203 CHAPPELL v. WALLACE: A BIVENS ANSWER TO A POLITICAL QUESTION, 35 Naval L.
Rev. 1, 43+ (1986) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
2204 GOLDMAN v. WEINBERGER: JUDICIAL DEFERENCE TO MILITARY JUDGMENT IN
MATTERS OF RELIGIOUS ACCOMMODATION OF SERVICEMEMBERS, 36 Naval L. Rev.
257, 280 (1986) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
2205 IN GOOD TIMES AND IN DEBT: THE EVOLUTION OF MARITAL AGENCY AND THE
MEANING OF MARRIAGE, 87 Neb. L. Rev. 373, 419 (2008) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
2206 SEXUAL HARASSMENT AND DISPARATE IMPACT: SHOULD NON-TARGETED WORK-
PLACE SEXUAL CONDUCT BE ACTIONABLE UNDER TITLE VII?, 81 Neb. L. Rev. 1152,
1257 (2003) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
2207 TRIBAL JURISPRUDENCE AND CULTURAL MEANINGS OF THE FAMILY, 79 Neb. L.
Rev. 577, 656 (2000)
2208 TREADING ON THE CONSTITUTION TO GET A FOOT IN THE CLUBHOUSE DOOR, 78
Neb. L. Rev. 644, 676 (1999) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
2209 LEAPFROGGING OVER EQUAL PROTECTION ANALYSIS: THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
SANCTIONS SEPARATE AND UNEQUAL PRISON FACILITIES FOR MALES AND FE-
MALES IN KLINGER v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, 31 F.3D 727 (8TH CIR. 1994),
76 Neb. L. Rev. 371, 398 (1997) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
2210 DEFENSE OF MARRIAGE ACT: ISN'T IT IRONIC . . . DON'T YOU THINK? A LITTLE TOO
IRONIC?, 76 Neb. L. Rev. 924, 978+ (1997) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
2211 ACCOUNTING TO OURSELVES FOR OURSELVES: AN ANALYSIS OF ADJUDICATION
IN THE RESOLUTION OF CHILD CUSTODY DISPUTES, 71 Neb. L. Rev. 1228, 1271+
(1992)
2212 9 Nev. L.J. 580, AGENTS OF (INCREMENTAL) CHANGE: FROM MYRA BRADWELL TO
HILLARY CLINTON (2009)
2213 WHEN THE HONEYMOON IS OVER: HOW A FEDERAL COURT'S DENIAL OF THE
SPOUSAL PRIVILEGE TO A LEGALLY MARRIED SAME-SEX COUPLE CAN RESULT IN
THE INCARCERATION OF A SPOUSE WHO REFUSES TO ADVERSELY TESTIFY, 33
New Eng. J. on Crim. & Civ. Confinement 243, 274+ (2007)
2214 HOW A NOTE OR A GROPE CAN BE JUSTIFICATION FOR THE KILLING OF A HOMO-
SEXUAL. AN ANALYSIS OF THE EFFECTS OF THE SUPREME COURT'S VIEWS ON HO-
MOSEXUALS, AFRICAN-AMERICANS AND WOMEN, 29 New Eng. J. on Crim. & Civ. Con-
finement 219, 241+ (2003) HN: 1,2,4 (S.Ct.)
2215 NONTHERAPEUTIC HUMAN RESEARCH EXPERIMENTS ON INSTITUTIONALIZED

MENTALLY RETARDED CHILDREN: CIVIL RIGHTS AND REMEDIES, 23 New Eng. J. on

Crim. & Civ. Confinement 139, 181+ (1997) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
2216 JELDNESS V. PEARCE: WILL THE REQUIREMENTS OF TITLE IX "HANDCUFF" PRISON
ADMINISTRATORS?, 22 New Eng. J. on Crim. & Civ. Confinement 73, 108 (1996)
2217 FORCED DRUG OR ALCOHOL TREATMENT FOR PREGNANT AND POSTPARTUM WO-
MEN: PART OF THE SOLUTION OR PART OF THE PROBLEM?, 17 New Eng. J. on Crim. &
Civ. Confinement 1, 16 (1991) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
2218 SECOND CLASS PRISONERS: NEW HAMPSHIRE'S PLACEMENT POLICY FOR FEMALE
OFFENDERS, 15 New Eng. J. on Crim. & Civ. Confinement 225, 241 (1989) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
2219 LESS EQUAL THAN OTHERS: PERSONS WITH MENTAL RETARDATION, EQUAL PRO-
TECTION AND DEINSTITUTIONALIZATION, 15 New Eng. J. on Crim. & Civ. Confinement
81, 102+ (1989)
2220 THE FIGHT TO BE A PARENT: HOW COURTS HAVE RESTRICTED THE CONSTITU-
TIONALLY-BASED CHALLENGES AVAILABLE TO HOMOSEXUALS, 38 New Eng. L.
Rev. 841, 896 (2004)
2221 SOLDIERS OF MISFORTUNE: THE JUSTICIABILITY OF INJUNCTIVE RELIEF ACTIONS
IN THE FEDERAL COURTS AND THE U.S. MILITARY'S MANDATORY ANTHRAX IN-
OCULATION PROGRAM, 37 New Eng. L. Rev. 429, 469+ (2003)
2222 STROPNICKY V. NATHANSON: CHOOSY MASSACHUSETTS LAWYERS, CHOOSE
YOUR FIGHTS WITH CARE!, 33 New Eng. L. Rev. 125, 172+ (1998) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
2223 CATCH ME IF YOU CAN! RESOLVING THE ETHICAL TRAGEDIES IN THE BRAVE NEW
WORLD OF JURY SELECTION, 32 New Eng. L. Rev. 343, 400+ (1998) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
2224 THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF THE DEFENSE OF MARRIAGE ACT IN THE WAKE OF
ROMER V. EVANS, 32 New Eng. L. Rev. 263, 342+ (1997) HN: 1,2 (S.Ct.)
2225 ADARAND CONSTRUCTORS, INC. v. PENA: IS STRICT SCRUTINY FATAL IN FACT
FOR GOVERNMENTAL AFFIRMATIVE ACTION PROGRAMS?, 31 New Eng. L. Rev. 975,
975 (1997) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
2226 PHANTOM OF THE STRICT SCRUTINY, 31 New Eng. L. Rev. 397, 469+ (1997) HN: 1,4,5
(S.Ct.)
2227 FAULKNER V. JONES: THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF THE CIT-
ADEL'SSINGLE-GENDER ADMISSIONS POLICY, 31 New Eng. L. Rev. 523, 566+ (1997)
HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
2228 TAKING A CLOSER LOOK AT MASSACHUSETTS PUBLIC SCHOOL EXPULSIONS: PRO-
POSING AN INTERMEDIATE STANDARD OF JUDICIAL REVIEW AFTER DOE V. SU-
PERINTENDENT OF SCHOOLS, 31 New Eng. L. Rev. 605, 654 (1997) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
2229 "KEEP YOUR LAWS OFF MY BODY": ABORTION REGULATION AND THE TAKINGS
CLAUSE, 29 New Eng. L. Rev. 253, 284 (1995) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
2230 KINSHIP AND MARRIAGE IN MASSACHUSETTS PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETIREMENT
LAW: AN ANALYSIS OF THE BENEFICIARY PROVISIONS, AND PROPOSALS FOR
CHANGE, 28 New Eng. L. Rev. 991, 1023 (1994) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
2231 SEXUAL EQUALITY AND SEXUAL DIFFERENCE IN AMERICAN LAW, 26 New Eng. L.

Rev. 665, 682 (1992) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)

2232 WALDIE ANSWERED: EQUAL PROTECTION AND THE ADMISSIONS OF WOMEN TO
MILITARY COLLEGES AND ACADEMIES, 25 New Eng. L. Rev. 1137, 1145+ (1991) HN:
2,4,5 (S.Ct.)
2233 UNITED STATES v. STANLEY: HAS THE FERES DOCTRINE BECOME A GRANT OF AB-
SOLUTE IMMUNITY?, 23 New Eng. L. Rev. 767, 816 (1989) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
2234 126 New Jersey Law Journal 425, TIME FOR A SOUNDING OF BILL BRENNAN'S LEGACY
(1990)
2235 A WOMAN FOR HER TIME AND OUR FUTURE, 39 N.M. L. Rev. 29, 45+ (2009) HN: 5
(S.Ct.)
2236 ACLU OF NEW MEXICO V. CITY OF ALBUQUERQUE: DOES CURRENT EQUAL PRO-
TECTION ADEQUATELY PROTECT SOME OF THE MOST HATED MEMBERS OF OUR
SOCIETY?, 37 N.M. L. Rev. 637, 669 (2007) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
2237 TRANS-LITERACY WITHIN EIGHTH AMENDMENT JURISPRUDENCE: DE/FUSING
GENDER AND SEX, 36 N.M. L. Rev. 627, 660+ (2006) HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
2238 VALUING RELATIONSHIPS: THE ROLE OF DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF SOCIETY, 35 N.M.
L. Rev. 301, 336 (2005)
2239 CUSTODY STANDARDS IN NEW MEXICO: BETWEEN THIRD PARTIES AND BIOLO-
GICAL PARENTS, WHAT IS THE TREND?, 27 N.M. L. Rev. 547, 578 (1997) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
2240 FREEDOM AT HOME: STATE CONSTITUTIONS AND MEDICAID FUNDING FOR ABOR-
TIONS, 26 N.M. L. Rev. 433, 454 (1996) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
2241 DELINKING DISPROPORTIONALITY FROM DISCRIMINATION: PROCEDURAL BUR-
DENS AS PROXY FOR SUBSTANTIVE VISIONS, 23 N.M. L. Rev. 87, 168 (1993)
2242 INTRODUCTION: LEARNING TO LISTEN TO RUTH BADER GINSBURG, 7 N.Y. City L.
Rev. 213, 219+ (2004) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
2243 TWIN PILLARS OF JUDICIAL PHILOSOPHY: THE IMPACT OF THE GINSBURG COL-
LEGIALITY AND GENDER DISCRIMINATION PRINCIPLES ON HER SEPARATE OPIN-
IONS INVOLVING GENDER DISCRIMINATION, 7 N.Y. City L. Rev. 275, 314+ (2004) HN:
1,2,3 (S.Ct.)
2244 RUTH BADER GINSBURG: AN ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY, 7 N.Y. City L. Rev. 391,
451 (2004) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
2245 PREVENTION OF GENDER DISCRIMINATION WITHIN THE EUROPEAN UNION, 9 N.Y.
Int'l L. Rev. 77, 96 (1996) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
2246 FORENSIC CUSTODY REPORTS: WHERE'S THE DUE PROCESS?, 5/6/2010 N.Y. L.J. 3,
col. 1, 3, col. 1 (2010)
2247 5053. PEOPLE, RES, V. ANTHONY GUARDINO, DEF-AP, 5/26/2009 N.Y. L.J. 24, col. 1, 24,
col. 1 (2009)
2248 SOUTHERN DISTRICT Computer Professionals Exempt From Equal Pay Act; Fact Issue Exists
if Plaintiff Was Computer Analyst, 5/30/2007 N.Y. L.J. 24, col. 3, 24, col. 3 (2007) HN: 4
(S.Ct.)
2249 COURT OF APPEALS DECISION Court of Appeals Decisions Constitutional Law, 7/7/2006

N.Y. L.J. 23, col. 5, 23, col. 5 (2006) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)

2250 DECISION OF THE DAY Appellate Division Hernandez, plaintiffs-respondents v. Robles, de-
fendant-appellant Decided Dec. 8, 2005 Before Saxe, J.P.; Marlow, Williams, Sweeny Jr., and
Catterson, JJ. Docket No. 103434/04, 12/14/2005 N.Y. L.J. 18, col. 1, 18, col. 1+ (2005) HN: 1,4
(S.Ct.)
2251 Second Circuit DECISION OF THE DAY U.S. Court of Appeals Dibble, plaintiff-appellee v.
Fenimore, defendant-appellant Decided Aug. 8, 2003 Before Kearse, Leval and Katzmann, C.JJ.
Docket No. 00-6243, 9/4/2003 N.Y. L.J. 18, col. 1, 18, col. 1 (2003) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
2252 LEWIS, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE V. THOMPSON, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT DECIDED
MAY 22, 2001, 5/25/2001 N.Y. L.J. 17, col. 3, 17, col. 3+ (2001) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
2253 EQUAL PROTECTION DEVELOPMENTS, 9/17/96 N.Y. L.J. 3, col. 1, 3, col. 1+ (1996) HN:
1,3,4 (S.Ct.)
2254 HOPE v. PERALES, 4/17/91 N.Y. L.J. 21, col. 6, 21, col. 6 (1991) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
2255 LINDA R. (ANONYMOUS) v. RICHARD E. (ANONYMOUS) LINDA R. (ANONYMOUS),
APPELLANT-RESPONDENT, v. RICHARD E. (ANONYMOUS), RESPONDENT-APPEL-
LANT. DECIDED OCTOBER 1, 1990. BEFORE LAWRENCE, J.P.; ROSENBLATT, KUNZE-
MAN AND MILLER,, 10/9/90 N.Y. L.J. 25, col. 3, 25, col. 3+ (1990) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
2256 "BIVENS' REVISITED: "SLIP, SLIDIN AWAY', 11/21/89 N.Y. L.J. 3, col. 1, 3, col. 1+ (1989)
2257 RIGHT TO ABORTION BLOCKING OF INGRESS AND EGRESS TO CLINICS NEW YORK
STATE NATIONAL ORGANIZATION FOR WOMEN, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLEES,
CITY OF NEW YORK, PLAINTIFF-INTERVENOR-APPELLEE, V. TERRY, ET AL., DE-
FENDANTS-APPE, 10/2/89 N.Y. L.J. 21, col. 3, 21, col. 3 (1989) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
2258 FOREIGN STUDENTS V. NATIONAL SECURITY: WILL DENYING EDUCATION PRE-
VENT TERRORISM?, 19 N.Y.L. Sch. J. Hum. Rts. 497, 527 (2003)
2259 TITLE IX IN THE NINETIES, 15 N.Y.L. Sch. J. Hum. Rts. 561, 577+ (1999) HN: 1,2,3 (S.Ct.)
2260 FACT PATTERN, 13 N.Y.L. Sch. J. Hum. Rts. 719, 730+ (1997) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
2261 BENCH BRIEF, 13 N.Y.L. Sch. J. Hum. Rts. 757, 769+ (1997) HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
2262 BEST PETITIONER'S BRIEF, 13 N.Y.L. Sch. J. Hum. Rts. 783, 789+ (1997) HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
2263 THE HOUSE THAT RUTH BUILT: JUSTICE RUTH BADER GINSBURG, GENDER AND
JUSTICE, 14 N.Y.L. Sch. J. Hum. Rts. 311, 324+ (1997) HN: 1,2,4 (S.Ct.)
2264 CRIMINAL SANCTIONS FOR DRUG ABUSE DURING PREGNANCY: THE ANTITHESIS
OF FETAL HEALTH, 8 N.Y.L. Sch. J. Hum. Rts. 415, 459+ (1991) HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
VENT TERRORISM?, 22 N.Y.L. Sch. J. Int'l & Comp. L. 497, 527 (2003)
2266 THE MEANING OF SEXUAL EQUALITY: A COMPARISON OF THE SOVIET AND AMER-
ICAN DEFINITIONS, 10 N.Y.L. Sch. J. Int'l & Comp. L. 151, 182+ (1989) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
2267 REFLECTIONS ON THE LAW REVIEW SYMPOSIUM ON WOMEN'S RIGHTS AND POR-
NOGRAPHY: BIG SISTER, BIG BROTHER, AND THE ROLE OF LEGAL SCHOLARSHIP
IN AFFIRMING HUMAN RIGHTS, 51 N.Y.L. Sch. L. Rev. 747, 759 (2007)
2268 SEPARATE BUT EQUAL EDUCATION IN THE CONTEXT OF GENDER, 49 N.Y.L. Sch. L.
Rev. 785, 807 (2005) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)


VENT TERRORISM?, 46 N.Y.L. Sch. L. Rev. 867, 897 (2003)
2270 FOREWORD, 43 N.Y.L. Sch. L. Rev. 1, 7 (1999)
2271 WILL THE BRENNAN LEGACY ENDURE?, 43 N.Y.L. Sch. L. Rev. 177, 194+ (1999) HN:
1,4 (S.Ct.)
2272 THE CENTER MOVES, THE CENTER REMAINS, 40 N.Y.L. Sch. L. Rev. 877, 897+ (1996)
HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
2273 CHARTING THE REHNQUIST COURT'S COURSE: HOW THE CENTER FOLDS, HOLDS,
AND SHIFTS, 40 N.Y.L. Sch. L. Rev. 981, 998 (1996)
2274 AM I CAUGHT IN A TIME WARP, OR WHAT? REFLECTIONS ON PORONOGRAPHY
AND PURITY, 38 N.Y.L. Sch. L. Rev. 335, 350 (1993) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
2275 MANDATORY TESTING OF HEALTH-CARE WORKERS FOR AIDS: WHEN POSITIVE
RESULTS LEAD TO NEGATIVE CONSEQUENCES, 37 N.Y.L. Sch. L. Rev. 339, 382 (1992)
HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
2276 ADDICTED MOTHERS, DRUG-EXPOSED BABIES: THE UNPRECEDENTED PROSECU-
TION OF MOTHERS UNDER DRUG-TRAFFICKING STATUTES, 36 N.Y.L. Sch. L. Rev.
573, 607+ (1991) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
2277 SIMPLIFIED INFORMATION v. INFORMATION: AN UNCONSTITUTIONAL STAND-
ARD?, 67-DEC N.Y. St. B.J. 20, 27+ (1995)
2278 POLICE TREATMENT OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE AND SEXUAL ABUSE: AFFIRMATIVE
DUTY TO PROTECT VS. FOURTH AMENDMENT PRIVACY, 59 N.Y.U. Ann. Surv. Am. L.
51, 88 (2003)
2279 TRIBUTE TO NORMAN DORSEN, 58 N.Y.U. Ann. Surv. Am. L. 9, 14+ (2001) HN: 1,3
(S.Ct.)
2280 MOTHER LOAD OR OVERLOAD: THE NEED FOR A NATIONAL MATERNITY POLICY,
17 N.Y.U. J. Int'l L. & Pol. 717, 749+ (1985) HN: 1,2 (S.Ct.)
2281 LOWERING THE BAR: RETHINKING UNDERAGE DRINKING, 9 N.Y.U. J. Legis. & Pub.
Pol'y 303, 397 (2006)
2282 THE ANTI-STEREOTYPING PRINCIPLE IN CONSTITUTIONAL SEX DISCRIMINATION
LAW, 85 N.Y.U. L. Rev. 83, 173+ (2010)
2283 PROTECTING THEM FROM THEMSELVES: THE PERSISTENCE OF MUTUAL BENEFITS
ARGUMENTS FOR SEX AND RACE INEQUALITY, 84 N.Y.U. L. Rev. 1464, 1539 (2009)
HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
2284 JUVENILE CURFEWS AND THE BREAKDOWN OF THE TIERED APPROACH TO EQUAL
PROTECTION, 82 N.Y.U. L. Rev. 1857, 1894+ (2007) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
2285 PERFORMING RACIAL AND ETHNIC IDENTITY: DISCRIMINATION BY PROXY AND
THE FUTURE OF TITLE VII, 79 N.Y.U. L. Rev. 1134, 1270+ (2004) HN: 1,2,5 (S.Ct.)
2286 TWO WRONGS MAKE A RIGHT: HYBRID CLAIMS OF DISCRIMINATION, 79 N.Y.U. L.
Rev. 685, 711 (2004) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
2287 LIBERTY, THE NEW EQUALITY, 77 N.Y.U. L. Rev. 1491, 1558 (2002)
2288 NO PROMO HOMO: THE SEDIMENTATION OF ANTIGAY DISCOURSE AND THE

CHANNELING EFFECT OF JUDICIAL REVIEW, 75 N.Y.U. L. Rev. 1327, 1411 (2000)

2289 WOMEN AND THE CONSTITUTION: WHERE WE ARE AT THE END OF THE CENTURY,
75 N.Y.U. L. Rev. 1, 25+ (2000) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.)
2290 CAN COURTS CONFER CITIZENSHIP? PLENARY POWER AND EQUAL PROTECTION,
74 N.Y.U. L. Rev. 1376, 1406 (1999)
2291 PROTECTING STUDENTS AGAINST PEER SEXUAL HARASSMENT: CONGRESS'S CON-
STITUTIONAL POWERS TO PASS TITLE IX, 74 N.Y.U. L. Rev. 235, 276 (1999) HN: 5
(S.Ct.)
2292 CHOOSE OR LOSE: EMBRACING THEORIES OF CHOICE IN GAY RIGHTS LITIGATION
STRATEGIES, 73 N.Y.U. L. Rev. 921, 964+ (1998) HN: 1,2 (S.Ct.)
2293 RISING ABOVE FACTIONALISM: A MADISONIAN THEORY OF JUDICIAL REVIEW, 69
N.Y.U. L. Rev. 963, 1013 (1994) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
2294 WHY DISCRIMINATION AGAINST LESBIANS AND GAY MEN IS SEX DISCRIMINA-
TION, 69 N.Y.U. L. Rev. 197, 287 (1994) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
2295 WHERE PRIVACY FAILS: EQUAL PROTECTION AND THE ABORTION RIGHTS OF
MINORS, 68 N.Y.U. L. Rev. 597, 638+ (1993) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
2296 SPEAKING IN A JUDICIAL VOICE, 67 N.Y.U. L. Rev. 1185, 1209 (1992) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
2297 PORTIA'S PROGRESS, 66 N.Y.U. L. Rev. 1546, 1558 (1991) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
2298 "NATURALLY" WITHOUT GENDER: WOMEN, JURISDICTION, AND THE FEDERAL
COURTS, 66 N.Y.U. L. Rev. 1682, 1767 (1991) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
2299 CRIMINAL ABORTION REVISITED, 66 N.Y.U. L. Rev. 1774, 1831+ (1991) HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
2300 WHEN PREGNANCY DISCRIMINATION IS GENDER DISCRIMINATION: THE CONSTI-
TUTIONALITY OF EXCLUDING PREGNANT WOMEN FROM DRUG TREATMENT PRO-
GRAMS, 66 N.Y.U. L. Rev. 1832, 1850+ (1991) HN: 1,4,5 (S.Ct.)
2301 WOMEN IN LAW: THE LAW CAN CHANGE PEOPLE, 66 N.Y.U. L. Rev. 1929, 1939 (1991)
HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
2302 THE AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION AND WOMEN'S RIGHTS, 66 N.Y.U. L. Rev.
1940, 1961+ (1991) HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
2303 WIMBERLY AND BEYOND: ANALYZING THE REFUSAL TO AMARD UNEMPLOY-
MENT COMPENSATION TO WOMEN WHO TERMINATE PRIOR EMPLOYMENT DUE TO
PREGNANCY, 63 N.Y.U. L. Rev. 532, 574+ (1988) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.)
2304 CONSTITUTIONAL FEDERALISM AND JUDICIAL REVIEW: THE ROLE OF TEXTUAL
ANALYSIS, 62 N.Y.U. L. Rev. 1, 51 (1987) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
2305 THE CONVERGENCE OF FEMINIST AND CIVIL LIBERTIES PRINCIPLES IN THE POR-
NOGRAPHY DEBATE WOMEN AGAINST CENSORSHIP. EDITED BY VARDA
BURSTYN. VANCOUVER, B. C.: DOUGLAS AND MCINTYRE LTD. 1985. PP. VII, 210., 62
N.Y.U. L. Rev. 201, 234 (1987) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
2306 ANTI-SUBORDINATION ABOVE ALL: SEX, RACE, AND EQUAL PROTECTION, 61
N.Y.U. L. Rev. 1003, 1024+ (1986) HN: 1,2,3 (S.Ct.)
2307 CONSTITUTIONAL LEGITIMACY AND CONSTITUTIONAL PRIVACY, 61 N.Y.U. L. Rev.
800, 862 (1986) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)

2308 THE DIALECTIC OF RIGHTS AND POLITICS: PERSPECTIVES FROM THE WOMEN'S
MOVEMENT, 61 N.Y.U. L. Rev. 589, 652 (1986) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
2309 PRESUMPTIVE AND PER SE TAKINGS: A DECISIONAL MODEL FOR THE TAKING IS-
SUE, 58 N.Y.U. L. Rev. 465, 551 (1983) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
2310 RULES FOR AN EXCEPTIONAL CLASS: THE COMMITMENT AND RELEASE OF PER-
SONS ACQUITTED OF VIOLENT OFFENSES BY REASON OF INSANITY, 57 N.Y.U. L.
Rev. 281, 329+ (1982) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
2311 BREAKING THE LAW BY GIVING BIRTH: THE WAR ON DRUGS, THE WAR ON REPRO-
DUCTIVE RIGHTS, AND THE WAR ON WOMEN, 32 N.Y.U. Rev. L. & Soc. Change 381,
421+ (2008) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.)
2312 SINGLE-SEX SCHOOLS AND THE ANTISEGREGATION PRINCIPLE, 30 N.Y.U. Rev. L. &
Soc. Change 35, 87+ (2005) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
2313 TOWARDS CONSTITUTIONAL RECOGNITION OF THE LESBIAN-PARENTED FAMILY,
26 N.Y.U. Rev. L. & Soc. Change 245, 307+ (2001) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
2314 TO HAVE AND TO HOLD: PROPERTY AND STATE REGULATION OF SEXUALITY AND
MARRIAGE, 24 N.Y.U. Rev. L. & Soc. Change 235, 269 (1998) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
2315 GETTING DIRTY: A LITIGATION STRATEGY FOR CHALLENGING SEX DISCRIMINA-
TION LAW BY BEGINNING WITH TRANSSEXUALISM, 24 N.Y.U. Rev. L. & Soc. Change
383, 418 (1998) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
2316 THE NEW FEDERALISM AND THE ADA: STATE SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY FROM
PRIVATE DAMAGE SUITS AFTER BOERNE, 24 N.Y.U. Rev. L. & Soc. Change 481, 546
(1998) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
2317 THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF PREGNANCY DISCRIMINATION: THE LINGERING EF-
FECTS OF GEDULDIG AND SUGGESTIONS FOR FORCING ITS REVERSAL, 23 N.Y.U.
Rev. L. & Soc. Change 59, 103 (1997) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
2318 CROSSING THE THRESHOLD: EQUAL MARRIAGE RIGHTS FOR LESBIANS AND GAY
MEN AND THE INTRA-COMMUNITY CRITIQUE, 21 N.Y.U. Rev. L. & Soc. Change 567,
615 (1995) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
2319 GESTATIONAL SURROGACY: UNSETTLING STATE PARENTAGE LAW AND SURROG-
ACY POLICY, 19 N.Y.U. Rev. L. & Soc. Change 571, 612 (1993) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
2320 BURYING THE DEAD: THE CASE AGAINST REVIVAL OF PRE-ROE AND PRE-CASEY
ABORTION STATUTES IN A POST-CASEY WORLD, 19 N.Y.U. Rev. L. & Soc. Change 355,
389+ (1992) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
2321 AFFIRMATIVE ACTION: UNRESOLVED QUESTIONS AMIDST A CHANGING JUDI-
CIARY, 18 N.Y.U. Rev. L. & Soc. Change 81, 92 (1991) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
2322 PERMITTING PREJUDICE TO GOVERN: EQUAL PROTECTION, MILITARY DEFER-
ENCE, AND THE EXCLUSION OF LESBIANS AND GAY MEN FROM THE MILITARY, 17
N.Y.U. Rev. L. & Soc. Change 171, 183+ (1990) HN: 1,4,5 (S.Ct.)
2323 EQUAL PROTECTION AND A DEAF PERSON'S RIGHT TO SERVE AS A JUROR, 17
N.Y.U. Rev. L. & Soc. Change 81, 117+ (1990) HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
2324 FIRST PACIFIC BANCORP, INC. V. HELFER: A CASE FOR AN IMPLIED PRIVATE

CAUSE OF ACTION, 5 N.C. Banking Inst. 395, 419+ (2001)

2325 OHIO ISSUE 1 IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL, 28 N.C. Cent. L.J. 1, 31+ (2005) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
2326 THE MEDIAN JUSTICE ON THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT, 83 N.C. L. Rev.
1275, 1317+ (2005) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
2327 DISCRIMINATING AMONG DISCRIMINATION: THE APPROPRIATENESS OF TREAT-
ING REVERSE AGE DISCRIMINATION DIFFERENTLY FROM REVERSE RACE DIS-
CRIMINATION, 83 N.C. L. Rev. 1065, 1087+ (2005) HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
2328 AWAKENING THE MORAL CONSCIOUSNESS: ON THE NUMBING OF THE CON-
SCIENCE OF A NATION, 83 N.C. L. Rev. 289, 321+ (2004) HN: 1,2,3 (S.Ct.)
2329 GENDER, GENES, AND CHOICE: A COMPARATIVE LOOK AT FEMINISM, EVOLUTION,
AND ECONOMICS, 80 N.C. L. Rev. 465, 525 (2002)
2330 REORIENTING BOWERS V. HARDWICK, 79 N.C. L. Rev. 359, 491 (2001)
2331 ROMER v. EVANS: "TERMINAL SILLINESS, "OR ENLIGHTED JURISPRUDENCE?, 75
N.C. L. Rev. 1891, 1941+ (1997) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
2332 THE CHILDREN WE ABANDON: RELIGIOUS EXEMPTIONS TO CHILD WELFARE AND
EDUCATION LAWS AS DENIALS OF EQUAL PROTECTION TO CHILDREN OF RELI-
GIOUS OBJECTORS, 74 N.C. L. Rev. 1321, 1478+ (1996) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
2333 TAKING CARE SERIOUSLY: RELATIONAL FEMINISM, SEXUAL DIFFERENCE, AND
ABORTION, 73 N.C. L. Rev. 1323, 1480 (1995)
2334 ESCAPING LOCHNER'S SHADOW: TOWARD A COHERENT JURISPRUDENCE OF ECO-
NOMIC RIGHTS, 73 N.C. L. Rev. 329, 442 (1995)
2335 J.E.B. v. ALABAMA EX REL. T.B. AND THE FATE OF THE PEREMPTORY CHALLENGE,
73 N.C. L. Rev. 525, 561+ (1995) HN: 1,2,3 (S.Ct.)
2336 BRAY v. ALEXANDRIA WOMEN'S HEALTH CLINIC: "RATIONAL OBJECTS OF DISFA-
VOR" AS A NEW WEAPON IN MODERN CIVIL RIGHTS LITIGATION, 72 N.C. L. Rev.
764, 782+ (1994) HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
2337 THE AMBIGUITY OF LEGAL DREAMS: A COMMUNITARIAN DEFENSE OF JUDICIAL
RESTRAINT, 71 N.C. L. Rev. 805, 847 (1993) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
2338 THE NATURE OF PRECEDENT, 66 N.C. L. Rev. 367, 393 (1988)
2339 BOWERS v. HARDWICK: AN INCOMPLETE CONSTITUTIONAL ANALYSIS, 65 N.C. L.
Rev. 1100, 1123 (1987) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
2340 SOME THOUGHTS ON AUTONOMY AND EQUALITY IN RELATION TO ROE v. WADE,
63 N.C. L. Rev. 375, 377+ (1985) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
2341 THE SEPARATE COMMUNITY: MILITARY UNIQUENESS AND SERVICEMEN'S CON-
STITUTIONAL RIGHTS, 62 N.C. L. Rev. 177, 198+ (1984) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
2342 RETROACTIVITY: A STUDY IN SUPREME COURT DOCTRINE "AS APPLIED', 61 N.C. L.
Rev. 745, 765+ (1983) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
2343 CONSTITUTIONAL LAW-PERSONAL, CIVIL, AND POLITICAL RIGHTS: THE RIGHTS
OF THE DISABLED TO PHYSICAL AND LEGAL ACCESS TO THE COURTS IS UPHELD
UNDER TITLE II OF THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT Tennessee v. Lane, 541
U.S., 81 N.D. L. Rev. 199, 231+ (2005) HN: 1,2 (S.Ct.)

2344 CONSTITUTIONAL LAW-EQUAL PROTECTION OF LAWS: THE EQUAL PROTECTION

CHALLENGE TO THE MEDICAL MALPRACTICE STATUTE OF REPOSE IN NORTH
DAKOTA Hoffner v. Johnson, 2003 ND 79, 660 N.W.2d 909, 80 N.D. L. Rev. 175, 204 (2004)
HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
2345 FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS IN CONFLICT: THE PRICE OF A MATURING DEMOCRACY,
77 N.D. L. Rev. 27, 51 (2001) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
2346 CONSTITUTIONAL LAW-EQUAL PROTECTION-GENDER DISCRIMINATION: THE VIR-
GINIA MILITARY INSTITUTE IS GIVEN THE OPPORTUNITY TO CREATE "CITIZEN-
SOLDIERS" OUT OF QUALIFIED WOMEN UNITED STATES v. VIRGINIA, 116 S. CT.
2264 (1996), 73 N.D. L. Rev. 323, 344+ (1997) HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
2347 MAKING A REAL DIFFERENCE: THE DOMINANCE APPROACH IN THE OPINIONS OF
JUSTICE BERYL J. LEVINE, 72 N.D. L. Rev. 1031, 1047 (1996) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
2348 CONSTITUTIONAL LAW - JURIES: GENDER-BASED PEREMPTORY CHALLENGES VI-
OLATE THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION'S FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT EQUAL
PROTECTION GUARANTEE CITY OF MANDAN V. FERN, 501 N.W.2D 739 (N.D. 1993), 70
N.D. L. Rev. 657, 673+ (1994) HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
2349 NOTARIES PUBLIC FROM THE TIME OF THE ROMAN EMPIRE TO THE UNITED
STATES TODAY, AND TOMORROW, 68 N.D. L. Rev. 873, 896+ (1992) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
2350 INEQUALITIES IN ILLINOIS CONSTITUTIONAL EQUALITY, 30 N. Ill. U. L. Rev. 169,
209+ (2009) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
2351 EQUALITY IN CULTURE AND LAW: AN INTRODUCTION TO THE ORIGINS AND
EVOLUTION OF THE EQUAL PROTECTION PRINCIPLE, 24 N. Ill. U. L. Rev. 425, 456+
(2004) HN: 1,2,4 (S.Ct.)
2352 THROWING LIKE A GIRL: CONSTITUTIONAL IMPLICATIONS OF TITLE IX REGARD-
ING GENDER DISCRIMINATION IN HIGH SCHOOL ATHLETIC PROGRAMS, 18 N. Ill. U.
L. Rev. 575, 600+ (1998) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
2353 BLIND LEADING THE "COLORBLIND": THE EVISCERATION OF AFFIRMATIVE AC-
TION AND A DREAM STILL DEFERRED, 17 N. Ill. U. L. Rev. 305, 356 (1997) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
2354 THE UNCONVENTIONAL EQUAL PROTECTION JURISPRUDENCE OF JURY SELEC-
TION, 16 N. Ill. U. L. Rev. 295, 340 (1996) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
2355 J.E.B. v. ALABAMA EX REL. T.B.: GENDER-BASED PEREMPTORY CHALLENGES ON
TRIAL, 16 N. Ill. U. L. Rev. 209, 238+ (1995) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
2356 PROCRUSTEAN JURISPRUDENCE: AN AUSTRIAN SCHOOL ECONOMIC CRITIQUE OF
THE SEPARATION AND REGULATION OF LIBERTIES IN THE TWENTIETH CENTURY
UNITED STATES, 15 N. Ill. U. L. Rev. 671, 718 (1995) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
2357 What's Good for the Goose is Good for the Gander: Toward Recognition of Men's Reproductive
Rights, 15 N. Ill. U. L. Rev. 141, 236 (1994) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
2358 A Judicial Blow for "Jane Crowism" at The Citadel in Faulkner v. Jones, 15 N. Ill. U. L. Rev. 3,
24+ (1994) HN: 1,2 (S.Ct.)
2359 ADDICTED PREGNANCY AS A SEX CRIME, 13 N. Ill. U. L. Rev. 263, 334+ (1993) HN: 5
(S.Ct.)

2360 SEVERED ROOTS: THE SEALED ADOPTION RECORDS CONTROVERSY, 6 N. Ill. U. L.

Rev. 103, 127 (1986) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
2361 DE-CLOTHING SEX-BASED CLASSIFICATIONS - SAME-SEX MARRIAGE IS JUST THE
BEGINNING: ACHIEVING FORMAL SEX EQUALITY IN THE MODERN ERA, 36 N. Ky. L.
Rev. 1, 43+ (2009)
2362 AN EMERGING CIVIL RIGHTS MOVEMENT: IMMIGRANT POPULATIONS IN NEED OF
EQUAL PROTECTION UNDER THE FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT, 34 N. Ky. L. Rev. 749,
773 (2007) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
2363 THE EMBARRASSING INTERPRETATION OF THE SECOND AMENDMENT, 29 N. Ky. L.
Rev. 705, 799+ (2002) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
2364 THE EMBARRASSING INTERPRETATION OF THE SECOND AMENDMENT, 29 N. Ky. L.
Rev. 705, 798+ (2002) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
2365 THE ANTIDISCRIMINATION PARADOX: WHY SEX BEFORE RACE?, 104 Nw. U. L. Rev.
1, 47+ (2010) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
2366 A NEW E.R.A. OR A NEW ERA? AMENDMENT ADVOCACY AND THE RECONSTITU-
TION OF FEMINISM, 103 Nw. U. L. Rev. 1223, 1301 (2009)
2367 FRAMEWORK ORIGINALISM AND THE LIVING CONSTITUTION, 103 Nw. U. L. Rev.
549, 614+ (2009)
2368 TWO CHEERS FOR PROFESSOR BALKIN'S ORIGINALISM, 103 Nw. U. L. Rev. 663, 701
(2009)
2369 RECONCILING ORIGINALISM AND PRECEDENT, 103 Nw. U. L. Rev. 803, 855+ (2009)
2370 THE PROBLEM OF EQUALITY IN TAKINGS, 102 Nw. U. L. Rev. 1, 53+ (2008) HN: 2
(S.Ct.)
2371 RACE AND GENDER IN THE LAW REVIEW, 100 Nw. U. L. Rev. 27, 70 (2006) HN: 4
(S.Ct.)
2372 REACHING FOR THE SILVER LINING: CONSTRUCTING A NONREMEDIAL YET "EX-
CEEDINGLY PERSUASIVE" RATIONALE FOR SINGLE-SEX EDUCATIONAL PRO-
GRAMS IN PUBLIC SCHOOLS, 96 Nw. U. L. Rev. 367, 401 (2001)
2373 VETO BURDENS AND THE LINE ITEM VETO ACT, 91 Nw. U. L. Rev. 771, 797 (1997)
2374 INTRODUCTION: THIRD WAVE--CAN FEMINISTS USE THE LAW TO EFFECT SOCIAL
CHANGE IN THE 1990S?, 87 Nw. U. L. Rev. 1252, 1259+ (1993) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
2375 "REASONABLE" DOUBTS: A CRITIQUE OF THE REASONABLE WOMAN STANDARD
IN AMERICAN JURISPRUDENCE, 87 Nw. U. L. Rev. 326, 375+ (1992) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
2376 FORCED LABOR: A THIRTEENTH AMENDMENT DEFENSE OF ABORTION, 84 Nw. U. L.
Rev. 480, 535 (1990) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
2377 ULANE v. EASTERN AIRLINES: TITLE VII AND TRANSSEXUALISM, 80 Nw. U. L. Rev.
1037, 1065+ (1986) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
2378 THE INDEFINITE CIVIL COMMITMENT OF DANGEROUS SEX OFFENDERS IS AN AP-
PROPRIATE LEGAL COMPROMISE BETWEEN "MAD" AND "BAD" - A STUDY OF MIN-
NESOTA'S SEXUAL PSYCHOPATHIC PERSONALITY STATUTE, 10 Notre Dame J.L. Eth-
ics & Pub. Pol'y 227, 296 (1996) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)

2379 PHYSICIAN ASSISTED SUICIDE: ITS CHALLENGE TO THE PREVAILING CONSTITU-

TIONAL PARADIGM, 9 Notre Dame J.L. Ethics & Pub. Pol'y 345, 366 (1995) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
2380 HOMOSEXUAL RIGHTS AND CITIZEN INITIATIVES: IS CONSTITUTIONALISM UN-
CONSTITUTIONAL?, 9 Notre Dame J.L. Ethics & Pub. Pol'y 93, 135+ (1995) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
2381 POLYPHONIC STARE DECISIS: LISTENING TO NON-ARTICLE III ACTORS, 83 Notre
Dame L. Rev. 1303, 1337+ (2008) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
2382 CAN SEPARATE BE EQUAL? SINGLE-SEX CLASSROOMS, THE CONSTITUTION, AND
TITLE IX, 83 Notre Dame L. Rev. 409, 442 (2007) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
2383 WHO WANTS TO STOP THE CHURCH: HOMOSEXUAL RIGHTS LEGISLATION, PUBLIC
POLICY, AND RELIGIOUS FREEDOM, 69 Notre Dame L. Rev. 393, 445 (1994) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
2384 THE ELIMINATION OF GENDER DISCRIMINATION IN INSURANCE PRICING: DOES
AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE RATE WITHOUT SEX?, 61 Notre Dame L. Rev. 748, 776+
(1986) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
2385 SUIT FILING BY WOMEN: AN EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS, 62 Notre Dame L. Rev. 61, 82+
(1986) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
2386 CASE SELECTION IN THE BURGER COURT: A PRELIMINARY INQUIRY, 60 Notre Dame
L. Rev. 947, 1049 (1985)
2387 CONSTITUTIONAL PROTECTION OF INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS IN CANADA: THE IMPACT
OF THE NEW CANADIAN CHARTER OF RIGHTS AND FREEDOM, 59 Notre Dame L. Rev.
1191, 1242 (1984)
2388 THE REHNQUIST COURT: HOLDING STEADY ON FREEDOM OF SPEECH, 22 Nova L.
Rev. 711, 739 (1998)
2389 SET IT AND FORGET IT? MARKET POWER AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF PREMA-
TURE DEREGULATION IN TELECOMMUNICATIONS MARKETS, 1 N.Y.U. J. L. & Bus.
675, 707 (2005)
2390 ERA IS STILL THE WAY, 3 NYU J. L. & Liberty 124, 154+ (2008) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
2391 THE INFLUENCE OF CASE COMPLEXITY ON THE OPINION WRITING OF THE
REHNQUIST COURT, 25 Ohio N.U. L. Rev. 45, 63 (1999)
2392 BACK TO BASICS: A "FUNCTIONAL STRICT SCRUTINY" SOLUTION TO THE AFFIRM-
ATIVE ACTION CONTROVERSY, 22 Ohio N.U. L. Rev. 1363, 1372+ (1996) HN: 1,3,4
(S.Ct.)
2393 Regulating the Abortion Clinic Battleground: Will Free Speech be the Ultimate Casualty?, 21
Ohio N.U. L. Rev. 995, 1059+ (1995) HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
2394 EQUAL PROTECTION UNDER THE FIFTH AND FOURTEENTH AMENDMENTS: PAT-
TERNS OF CONGRUENCE, DIVERGENCE AND JUDICIAL DEFERENCE, 16 Ohio N.U. L.
Rev. 591, 635+ (1989) HN: 2,4,5 (S.Ct.)
2395 GENDER, RACE, AND INDIVIDUAL DIGNITY: EVALUATING JUSTICE GINSBURG'S
EQUALITY JURISPRUDENCE, 70 Ohio St. L.J. 1053, 1084+ (2009) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
2396 PREGNANCY AND SEX ROLE STEREOTYPING: FROM STRUCK TO CARHART, 70 Ohio
St. L.J. 1095, 1113+ (2009) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
2397 KEYNOTE ADDRESS: JUSTICE RUTH BADER GINSBURG: A JUDGE'S PERSPECTIVE,

70 Ohio St. L.J. 825, 837 (2009) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)

2398 CELEBRATING THE DIFFERENCES THAT COULD MAKE A DIFFERENCE: UNITED
STATES V. VIRGINIA AND A NEW VISION OF SEXUAL EQUALITY, 70 Ohio St. L.J. 943,
1001 (2009) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
2399 THE JUDICIAL RESTRAINT OF THE WARREN COURT (AND WHY IT MATTERS), 69
Ohio St. L.J. 255, 299 (2008)
2400 THE PRICE OF FAME: BROWN AS CELEBRITY, 69 Ohio St. L.J. 939, 1013+ (2008) HN: 1
(S.Ct.)
2401 LAWRENCE, THE FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT, AND THE SUPREME COURT'S RELI-
ANCE ON FOREIGN CONSTITUTIONAL LAW: AN ORIGINALIST REAPPRAISAL, 65
Ohio St. L.J. 1097, 1131+ (2004) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
2402 QUERYING LAWRENCE, 65 Ohio St. L.J. 1151, 1263+ (2004) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
2403 THE RESTORATION OF STATES' CIVIL RIGHTS AUTHORITY: AN ALTERNATIVE AP-
PROACH TO EXPRESSIVE ASSOCIATION AFTER BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA V. DALE,
62 Ohio St. L.J. 1473, 1513 (2001) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
2404 DISABILITY, FEDERALISM, AND A COURT WITH AN ECCENTRIC MISSION, 62 Ohio St.
L.J. 31, 107 (2001) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
2405 THE GENDER ANALOGY IN THE DISABILITY DISCRIMINATION LITERATURE, 62
Ohio St. L.J. 465, 479 (2001) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
2406 ESCAPING THE EXPRESSION-EQUALITY CONUNDRUM: TOWARD ANTI-OR-
THODOXY AND INCLUSION, 61 Ohio St. L.J. 1671, 1724 (2000) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
2407 TOLERATION, AUTONOMY, AND GOVERNMENTAL PROMOTION OF GOOD LIVES:
BEYOND "EMPTY" TOLERATION TO TOLERATION AS RESPECT, 59 Ohio St. L.J. 19,
132 (1998)
2408 EDUCATIONAL DIVERSITY: VIEWPOINTS AND PROXIES, 59 Ohio St. L.J. 551, 601
(1998)
2409 THE CLINTONIFICATION OF AMERICAN LAW: ABORTION, WELFARE, AND LIBERAL
CONSTITUTIONAL THEORY, 58 Ohio St. L.J. 731, 818+ (1997)
2410 ANALOGIZING RACE AND SEX IN WORKPLACE HARASSMENT CLAIMS, 58 Ohio St.
L.J. 819, 882+ (1997) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
2411 RE-MAKING DISTINCTIONS ON THE BASIS OF SEX: MUST GAY WOMEN BE ADMIT-
TED TO THE MILITARY EVEN IF GAY MEN ARE NOT?, 58 Ohio St. L.J. 953, 966+ (1997)
HN: 4,5 (S.Ct.)
2412 THE RFRA REVISION OF THE FREE EXERCISE CLAUSE, 57 Ohio St. L.J. 65, 143 (1996)
HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
2413 THE FUSION OF GAY RIGHTS AND FEMINISM: GENDER IDENTITY AND MARRIAGE
AFTER BAEHR v. LEWIN, 56 Ohio St. L.J. 985, 1004+ (1995) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
2414 SEXUAL PREFERENCE AS A SUSPECT (RELIGIOUS) CLASSIFICATION: AN ALTERN-
ATIVE PERSPECTIVE ON THE UNCONSTITUTIONALITY OF ANTI-LESBIAN/GAY INI-
TIATIVES, 55 Ohio St. L.J. 491, 553+ (1994) HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
2415 AFFIRMATIVE ACTION AND JUDICIAL INCOHERENCE, 55 Ohio St. L.J. 79, 159 (1994)

2416 THE NEW LEGAL PURITANISM OF CATHARINE MACKINNON, 54 Ohio St. L.J. 1375,
1424+ (1993) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
2417 THE CODE OF PERFECT PREGNANCY: AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE IDEOLOGY OF
MOTHERHOOD, THE PRACTICE OF DEFAULTING TO SCIENCE, AND THE INTERVEN-
TIONIST MINDSET OF LAW, 53 Ohio St. L.J. 1205, 1306 (1992) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
2418 BOYS MUSCLING IN ON GIRLS' SPORTS, 53 Ohio St. L.J. 891, 907+ (1992)
2419 BFOQ REVISITED: JOHNSON CONTROLS HALTS THE EXPANSION OF THE DEFENSE
TO INTENTIONAL SEX DISCRIMINATION, 52 Ohio St. L.J. 5, 53 (1991) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
2420 HARMONIZING THE HEAVENLY AND EARTHLY SPHERES: THE FRAGMENTATION
AND SYNTHESIS OF RELIGION, EQUALITY, AND SPEECH IN THE CONSTITUTION, 51
Ohio St. L.J. 89, 174+ (1990) HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
2421 AFFIRMATIVE ACTION, JUSTICE, AND EQUALITIES: A PHILOSOPHICAL AND CON-
STITUTIONAL APPRAISAL, 46 Ohio St. L.J. 845, 924 (1985) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
2422 CRACKS IN THE STRUCTURE: THE COMING BREAKDOWN OF THE LEVELS OF SCRU-
TINY, 45 Ohio St. L.J. 161, 175+ (1984) HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
2423 AN INTERMEDIATE STANDARD FOR EQUAL PROTECTION REVIEW OF MUNICIPAL
RESIDENCE REQUIREMENTS, 43 Ohio St. L.J. 195, 227+ (1982) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
2424 CULTURE SHOCK IN THE WORKPLACE: THE LEGAL TREATMENT OF CULTURAL BE-
HAVIOR UNDER TITLE VII, 29 Okla. City U. L. Rev. 139, 163 (2004) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
2425 "BRENNAN VS. REHNQUIST"-MIRROR IMAGES IN CONSTITUTIONAL CONSTRUC-
TION, 19 Okla. City U. L. Rev. 213, 250 (1994) HN: 3 (S.Ct.)
2426 BEYOND OBSERVABLE PREJUDICE- MOVING FROM RECOGNITION OF DIFFER-
ENCES TO FEASIBLE SOLUTIONS: A CRITIQUE OF IAN AYRES' PERVASIVE PREJU-
DICE?, 55 Okla. L. Rev. 361, 371+ (2002) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
2427 THE FUNCTIONAL EFFECT OF ELIMINATING GENDER BIAS IN JURY SELECTION: A
CRITIQUE AND ANALYSIS OF J.E.B. v. ALABAMA, 48 Okla. L. Rev. 173, 188+ (1995) HN:
4 (S.Ct.)
2428 A TRIBUTE TO THURGOOD MARSHALL: A MAN WHO BROKE WITH TRADITION ON
ISSUES OF RACE AND GENDER, 47 Okla. L. Rev. 127, 138+ (1994) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
2429 CRIMINALIZING SEXUAL TRANSMISSION OF HIV: OKLAHOMA'S INTENTIONAL
TRANSMISSION STATUTE: UNCONSTITUTIONAL OR MERELY UNENFORCEABLE?, 46
Okla. L. Rev. 687, 712+ (1993) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
2430 CONSTITUTIONAL LAW: A NEW SUSPECT CLASS: A FINAL REPRIEVE FOR HOMO-
SEXUALS IN THE MILITARY?, 42 Okla. L. Rev. 273, 290+ (1989) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
2431 EXECUTING WHITE MASCULINITIES: LEARNING FROM KARLA FAYE TUCKER, 81
Or. L. Rev. 183, 229 (2002) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
2432 GENDER DISCRIMINATION IN THE SUPREME COURT'S CLERKSHIP SELECTION PRO-
CESS, 75 Or. L. Rev. 359, 388+ (1996) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
2433 SWEET LAND OF LIBERTY: THE CASE AGAINST THE FEDERAL MARRIAGE AMEND-
MENT, 24 Pace L. Rev. 301, 355+ (2003) HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
2434 THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT: WILL THE COURT GET THE HINT? CON-

GRESS' ATTEMPT TO RAISE THE STATUS OF PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES IN

EQUAL PROTECTION CASES, 15 Pace L. Rev. 621, 683+ (1995) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
2435 ABUSE IT AND LOSE IT: A LOOK AT CALIFORNIA'S MANDATORY CHEMICAL CAS-
TRATION LAW, 28 Pac. L.J. 547, 593+ (1997) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
2436 MAINSTREAMING FEMINIST LEGAL THEORY, 23 Pac. L.J. 1493, 1542+ (1992) HN: 4
(S.Ct.)
2437 THE FIRST AMENDMENT ON THE BATTLEFIELD: A CONSTITUTIONAL ANALYSIS OF
PRESS ACCESS TO MILITARY OPERATIONS IN GRENADA, PANAMA AND THE PER-
SIAN GULF, 23 Pac. L.J. 315, 359 (1992)
2438 RECONSTRUCTION OF THE PEREMPTORY CHALLENGE SYSTEM: A LOOK AT
GENDER-BASED PEREMPTORY CHALLENGES, 22 Pac. L.J. 1305, 1331 (1991) HN: 4
(S.Ct.)
2439 MOVING BEYOND MONKEYS: THE EXPANSION AND RELOCATION OF THE RELI-
GIOUS CURRICULUM DEBATE, 114 Penn St. L. Rev. 1067, 1104+ (2010) HN: 1,2 (S.Ct.)
2440 SCRUTINIZE THIS!: THE QUESTIONABLE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF GENDER-
CONSCIOUS ADMISSIONS POLICIES UTILIZED BY PUBLIC UNIVERSITIES, 37 Pepp. L.
Rev. 339, 374+ (2010) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
2441 NGUYEN V. INS AND THE APPLICATION OF INTERMEDIATE SCRUTINY TO GENDER
CLASSIFICATIONS: THEORY, PRACTICE, AND REALITY, 30 Pepp. L. Rev. 185, 271+
(2003) HN: 2,3,4 (S.Ct.)
2442 DISENTANGLING SYMMETRIES: SPEECH, ASSOCIATION, PARENTHOOD, 28 Pepp. L.
Rev. 641, 665 (2001) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
2443 THURGOOD MARSHALL AND THE HOLY GRAIL-THE DUE PROCESS JURISPRU-
DENCE OF A CONSUMMATE JURIST, 26 Pepp. L. Rev. 289, 352+ (1999) HN: 2,5 (S.Ct.)
2444 GENDER CLASSIFICATIONS AND UNITED STATES V. VIRGINIA: MUDDYING THE
WATERS OF EQUAL PROTECTION, 24 Pepp. L. Rev. 1353, 1396+ (1997) HN: 1,2,4 (S.Ct.)
2445 CHIPPING AWAY AT DISCRIMINATION AT THE COUNTRY CLUB, 25 Pepp. L. Rev. 495,
529 (1997)
2446 THE SEPARATION OF POWERS DOCTRINE: STRAINING OUT GNATS, SWALLOWING
CAMELS?, 18 Pepp. L. Rev. 95, 122 (1990) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
2447 THE PROFITS AND PENALTIES OF KINSHIP: CONFLICTING MEANINGS OF FAMILY
IN ESTATE TAX LAW, 3 Pitt. Tax. Rev. 1, 68 (2005) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
2448 LEGAL STANDARDS, EXPERTISE, AND EXPERTS IN THE RESOLUTION OF CON-
TESTED CHILD CUSTODY CASES, 6 Psychol. Pub. Pol'y & L. 843, 846+ (2000)
2449 WHEN SILENCE SPEAKS LOUDER THAN WORDS: AUTHORITARIANISM AND THE
FEMINIST ANTIPORNOGRAPHY MOVEMENT, 1 Psychol. Pub. Pol'y & L. 643, 713 (1995)
HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
2450 THE TITLE IX PROBLEM: IS IT SUFFICIENTLY COMPREHENSIVE TO PRECLUDE S
1983 ACTIONS?, 27 Quinnipiac L. Rev. 499 (2009) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
2451 THE POTENTIAL FOR AN EQUAL PROTECTION REVOLUTION, 25 Quinnipiac L. Rev.
287+ (2006) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)

2452 Culturally Speaking: Equality, Responsibility and the Social Compact, 14 QLR 347, 400 (1994)
HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
2453 MANDATORY HIV TESTING OF NEWBORNS: IS THERE A BETTER WAY TO ACHIEVE
THE STATE'S GOAL OF PREVENTING TRANSMISSION OF HIV TO NEWBORNS AND
ENSURING THEM TREATMENT, 4 Quinnipiac Health L.J. 69, 105+ (2000) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.)
2454 5 Regent Journal of International Law 203, THE DEBATE OVER THE PROPOSED SEXUAL
ORIENTATION ANTI-DISCRIMINATION LEGISLATION IN HONG KONG: WHAT'S THE
CONTROVERSY REALLY ABOUT? (2007) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
2455 3 Regent Journal of International Law 75, RALPH BUNCHE: DISTINGUISHED SCHOLAR,
INTERNATIONAL STATESMAN AND EQUAL RIGHTS ACTIVIST (2005)
2456 IT'S NOT WHETHER YOU WIN OR LOSE, BUT WHETHER YOU GET TO PLAY: TITLE IX
FINALLY EXPANDS PARTICIPATION OPPORTUNITIES FOR FEMALE ATHLETES IN
THE '90S, 13 Rev. Litig. 495, 528+ (1994) HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
2457 DERECHO CONSTITUCIONAL, 69 Rev. Jur. U.P.R. 419, 459 (2000)
2458 A DECADE LATER: UNITED STATES V. VIRGINIA AND THE RISE AND FALL OF "SKEP-
TICAL SCRUTINY", 12 Roger Williams U. L. Rev. 182, 228+ (2006) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.)
2459 THE PATH OF E-LAW: LIBERTY, PROPERTY, AND DEMOCRACY FROM THE COLON-
IES TO THE REPUBLIC OF CYBERIA, 24 Rutgers Computer & Tech. L.J. 223, 304+ (1998)
2460 CANAANITES, CATHOLICS AND THE CONSTITUTION DEVELOPING CHURCH DOC-
TRINE, SECULAR LAW AND WOMEN PRIESTS, 7 Rutgers Journal of Law & Religion 3
(2005) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
2461 CONSTITUTIONAL LAW-EQUAL RIGHTS AMENDMENT, EQUAL PROTECTION, AND
DUE PROCESS-THE RIGHT OF SAME-SEX MARRIAGE IS NOT FUNDAMENTAL, PRO-
HIBITING SAME-SEX MARRIAGE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE GENDER-BASED DISCRIM-
INATION, AND RESTRICTI, 39 Rutgers L.J. 1003, 1035 (2008) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
2462 EQUAL PROTECTION-"AND NOW, BY THE POWER VESTED IN THE PEOPLE OF NEW
JERSEY YOU WILL NOT BE PRONOUNCED. . ." POPULAR CONSTITUTIONALISM AND
THE STRUGGLE FOR SAME- SEX MARRIAGE. LEWIS V. HARRIS, 908 A.2D 196 (N.J.
2006)., 38 Rutgers L.J. 1215, 1234 (2007) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
2463 INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS-RATIONAL BASIS REVIEW REVEALS THAT WASHINGTON
STATUTE FORBIDDING SAME-SEX MARRIAGE IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL AND IM-
PLICATES THE FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT TO MARRIAGE. ANDERSEN V. KING
COUNTY, 138 P.3D 963 (WASH. 2006, 38 Rutgers L.J. 1299, 1327+ (2007) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
2464 STATE EQUAL RIGHTS AMENDMENTS REVISITED: EVALUATING THEIR EFFECTIVE-
NESS IN ADVANCING PROTECTION AGAINST SEX DISCRIMINATION, 36 Rutgers L.J.
1201, 1293+ (2005) HN: 1,2,4 (S.Ct.)
2465 THE EVOLUTION OF EQUALITY IN STATE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW, 34 Rutgers L.J.
1013, 1123+ (2003) HN: 1,3,4 (S.Ct.)
2466 SAME-SEX BUT EQUAL: REFORMULATING THE MISCEGENATION ANALOGY, 34 Rut-
gers L.J. 107, 185+ (2002) HN: 1,2,4 (S.Ct.)
2467 HIGGINBOTHAM: A GIANT, STRIVING FOR FREEDOM, 53 Rutgers L.J. 655, 655 (2001)
HN: 1 (S.Ct.)

2468 THE CONSTITUTIONALIZATION OF RULE 10B-5, 27 Rutgers L.J. 1, 76 (1995)

2469 VI. EQUAL PROTECTION, 26 Rutgers L.J. 1110, 1129 (1995) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
2470 JUSTICE RUTH BADER GINSBURG AND JUSTICE THURGOOD MARSHALL: A MIS-
LEADING COMPARISON, 26 Rutgers L.J. 887, 907+ (1995) HN: 4,5 (S.Ct.)
2471 A. INTRODUCTION, 25 Rutgers L.J. 1004, 1021+ (1994) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
2472 EQUALITY AND JUSTICE FOR LESBIAN AND GAY FAMILIES AND RELATIONSHIPS,
61 Rutgers L. Rev. 529, 560 (2009)
2473 STRUCTURING CONSTITUTIONAL DOCTRINE: PRINCIPLES, PROOF, AND THE FUNC-
TIONS OF JUDICIAL REVIEW, 58 Rutgers L. Rev. 777, 937 (2006)
2474 TO SECURE THESE RIGHTS: CONGRESS, COURTS AND THE 1964 CIVIL RIGHTS ACT,
57 Rutgers L. Rev. 945, 1007 (2005) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
2475 MALE COVERTURE: LAW AND THE ILLEGITIMATE FAMILY, 56 Rutgers L. Rev. 73, 118
(2003) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
2476 WHAT'S GOD GOT TO DO WITH IT? CHURCH AND STATE COLLABORATION IN THE
SUBORDINATION OF WOMEN AND DOMESTIC VIOLENCE, 51 Rutgers L. Rev. 1207,
1288+ (1999) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
2477 THE WEINTRAUB LECTURE: JUDICIAL DECISION MAKING AND THE EXTERNAL EN-
VIRONMENT, 51 Rutgers L. Rev. 181, 191 (1998) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
2478 HARRIS V. FORKLIFT SYSTEMS, INC.: KEEPING THE STATUS QUO, 47 Rutgers L. Rev.
291, 342+ (1994) HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
2479 THE UNCONSCIONABILITY OF SUB-MINIMUM WAGES PAID APPOINTED COUNSEL
IN CAPITAL CASES, 43 Rutgers L. Rev. 281, 348 (1991) HN: 3 (S.Ct.)
2480 J.E.B. V. ALABAMA EX REL. T.B.: THE COLLAPSE OF THE PEREMPTORY CHAL-
LENGE, 14 St. Louis U. Pub. L. Rev. 655, 678 (1995)
2481 PLANNED PARENTHOOD v. CASEY: THE FLIGHT FROM REASON IN THE SUPREME
COURT, 13 St. Louis U. Pub. L. Rev. 15, 137 (1993) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
2482 10 San Diego Int'l L.J. 63, EQUALITY IN GERMANY AND THE UNITED STATES (2008)
HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
2483 DOMESTIC PARTNERSHIP: RECOGNITION AND RESPONSIBILITY, 32 San Diego L. Rev.
163, 220+ (1995) HN: 1,2,3 (S.Ct.)
2484 MISTRETTA v. UNITED STATES: MISTREATING THE SEPARATION OF POWERS DOC-
TRINE?, 27 San Diego L. Rev. 209, 246 (1990) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
2485 JUSTICE BRENNAN AND FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION DOCTRINE IN THE BURGER
COURT, 24 San Diego L. Rev. 1153, 1175+ (1987) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
2486 NO DISTINCTIONS EXCEPT THOSE WHICH MERIT ORIGINATES: THE UNLAWFUL-
NESS OF LEGACY PREFERENCES IN PUBLIC AND PRIVATE UNIVERSITIES, 49 Santa
Clara L. Rev. 51, 136 (2009) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
2487 THE DEREGULATION OF THE DEATH PENALTY, 40 Santa Clara L. Rev. 677, 728 (2000)
2488 THE AFTERMATH OF THE VIRGINIA MILITARY INSTITUTE DECISION: WILL SINGLE-
GENDER EDUCATION SURVIVE?, 38 Santa Clara L. Rev. 1183, 1222+ (1998) HN: 1,2,3
(S.Ct.)

2489 THE BATTLE OVER STRICT SCRUTINY: COALITIONAL CONFLICT IN THE

REHNQUIST COURT, 32 Santa Clara L. Rev. 1049, 1105 (1992)
2490 THE COMBAT EXCLUSION RULE AND EQUAL PROTECTION, 32 Santa Clara L. Rev. 229,
263+ (1992) HN: 1,4,5 (S.Ct.)
2491 TEXAS v. JOHNSON, 30 Santa Clara L. Rev. 649, 675 (1990) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
2492 BASIC EQUAL PROTECTION ANALYSIS, 29 Santa Clara L. Rev. 121, 169+ (1989) HN: 2
(S.Ct.)
2493 MOVING BEYOND THE "IMMUTABILITY DEBATE" IN THE FIGHT FOR EQUALITY
AFTER PROPOSITION 8, 12 SCHOLAR 1, 45+ (2009) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
2494 PHARMACOGENOMICS: A BRAVE NEW WORLD IN DESIGNER DRUGS, 5 SCHOLAR
111, 152+ (2002) HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
2495 CHATTING WITH THE LADY IN THE GROCERY STORE ABOUT HERNANDEZ v.
ROBLES, THE NEW YORK SAME-SEX MARRIAGE CASE, 6 Seattle J. for Soc. Just. 255,
283+ (2007) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
2496 IN MEMORIAM: RALPH SEELEY OBSCURED BY SMOKE: MEDICINAL MARIJUANA
AND THE NEED FOR REPRESENTATION REINFORCEMENT REVIEW, 22 Seattle U. L.
Rev. 175, 233 (1998) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
2497 FROM PROPERTY TO PERSON: THE CASE OF EVELYN HART, 11 Seton Hall Const. L.J.
1, 68+ (2000) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
2498 FIFTH AMENDMENT-EQUAL PROTECTION-STATUTE WHICH REQUIRES ADDTIONAL
PROOF OF PATERNITY FOR CITIZENSHIP WHENEVER THE CITIZEN PARENT OF A
CHILD BORN OUT OF WEDLOCK IS THE CHILD'S FATHER DOES NOT REPRESENT AN
UNCONSTITUTIONAL, 9 Seton Hall Const. L.J. 993, 1035+ (1999) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
2499 DISREGARDING THE CONSTITUTION IN THE NAME OF DEFENDING MARRIAGE: THE
UNCONSTITUTIONALITY OF THE DEFENSE OF MARRIAGE ACT, 8 Seton Hall Const.
L.J. 157, 203 (1997) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
2500 ONE NATION DIVISIBLE BY LANGUAGE: AN ANALYSIS OF OFFICIAL ENGLISH
LAWS IN THE WAKE OF YNIGUEZ V. ARIZONANS FOR OFFICIAL ENGLISH, 8 Seton
Hall Const. L.J. 205, 252 (1997) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
2501 FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT-EQUAL PROTECTION CLAUSE-VIRGINIA'S CATEGORIC-
AL EXCLUSION OF WOMEN FROM THE EDUCATIONAL OPPORTUNITIES AT VMI
DENIES EQUAL PROTECTION TO WOMEN-UNITED STATES V. VIRGINIA, 116 S. CT.
2264 (1996)., 8 Seton Hall Const. L.J. 253, 277 (1997) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
2502 POPULAR SOVEREIGNTY, CONSTITUTIONAL INTERPRETATION, AND THE NEW JER-
SEY CONSTITUTION OF 1947: A REPLY TO JUSTICE O'HERN AND PROFESSOR WILLI-
AMS, 7 Seton Hall Const. L.J. 839, 844 (1997) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
2503 THE RELEVANCE OF DISPARATE IMPACT ANALYSIS IN REACHING FOR GENDER
EQUALITY, 6 Seton Hall Const. L.J. 941, 951 (1996)
2504 SEX AS A SUSPECT CLASS: AN ARGUMENT FOR APPLYING STRICT SCRUTINY TO
GENDER DISCRIMINATION, 6 Seton Hall Const. L.J. 953, 954+ (1996) HN: 1,4,5 (S.Ct.)
2505 THE EQUAL PROTECTION CLAUSE AND SINGLE-SEX PUBLIC EDUCATION: UNITED

STATES v. VIRGINIA AND VIRGINIA MILITARY INSTITUTE, 6 Seton Hall Const. L.J. 999,
1012 (1996) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
2506 AGE CLASSIFICATIONS AND THE FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT: IS THE MURGIA
STANDARD TOO OLD TO STAND?, 6 Seton Hall Const. L.J. 263, 294+ (1995) HN: 1,3,4
(S.Ct.)
2507 OUR NINE TRIBUNES: A REVIEW OF PROFESSOR LUSKY'S CALL FOR JUDICIAL RE-
STRAINT Our Nine Tribunes: The Supreme Court in Modern America . By Louis Lusky. West-
port, Connecticut, Praeger. 1993. pp. xviii, 213., 5 Seton Hall Const. L.J. 1289, 1325+ (1995)
HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
2508 EQUITY AND EQUALITY FOR WOMEN--RATIFICATION OF INTERNATIONAL COVEN-
ANTS AS A FIRST STEP, 3 Seton Hall Const. L.J. 363, 408+ (1993) HN: 1,4,5 (S.Ct.)
2509 BATSON'S INCOMPLETE LEGACY: GENDER DISCRIMINATION AND THE PEREMP-
TORY CHALLENGE, 3 Seton Hall Const. L.J. 475, 523+ (1993) HN: 1,4,5 (S.Ct.)
2510 JUSTICE RUTH BADER GINSBURG, 3 Seton Hall Const. L.J. 657, 663+ (1993) HN: 1,5
(S.Ct.)
2511 A CRY FOR HELP TO THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT: WHAT IS THE CONSTI-
TUTIONAL STATUS OF AFFIRMATIVE ACTION IN HIGHER EDUCATION?, 3 Seton Hall
Const. L.J. 161, 216 (1993) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
2512 CONTROLLING HIV-POSITIVE WOMEN'S PROCREATIVE DESTINY: A CRITICAL
EQUAL PROTECTION ANALYSIS, 2 Seton Hall Const. L.J. 643, 718+ (1992) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.)
2513 SOCIETAL PREJUDICE REFLECTED IN OUR COURTS: THE UNFAVORABLE TREAT-
MENT OF THE MENTALLY RETARDED, 2 Seton Hall Const. L.J. 771, 803 (1992) HN: 1
(S.Ct.)
2514 THE SCOPE OF TITLE IX PROTECTION GAINS YARDAGE AS COURTS CONTINUE TO
TACKLE THE CONTACT SPORTS EXCEPTION, 10 Seton Hall J. Sport L. 415, 434+ (2000)
HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
2515 SCOREBOARD: A CONCISE CHRONOLOGICAL TWENTY-FIVE YEAR HISTORY OF
TITLE IX INVOLVING INTERSCHOLASTIC AND INTERCOLLEGIATE ATHLETICS, 7
Seton Hall J. Sport L. 391, 422+ (1997) HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
2516 CONSTITUTIONAL LAW -- FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT -- EXCLUSION OF MALES
FROM GIRLS' VOLLEYBALL TEAM DOES NOT VIOLATE EQUAL PROTECTION
CLAUSE -- CLARK V. ARIZONA INTERSCHOLASTIC ASSOCIATION, 886 F.2D 1991
(9TH CIR. 1989), 1 Seton Hall J. Sport L. 307, 324+ (1991) HN: 1,2,4 (S.Ct.)
2517 CLOSING THE EQUITABLE LOOPHOLE: ASSESSING THE SUPREME COURT'S NEXT
MOVE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF EQUITABLE RELIEF FOR MILITARY
PLAINTIFFS, 35 Seton Hall L. Rev. 699, 737+ (2005) HN: 4,5 (S.Ct.)
2518 PHYSICIAN-ASSISTED SUICIDE IN THE DARK WARD: THE INTERSECTION OF THE
THIRTEENTH AMENDMENT AND HEALTH CARE TREATMENTS HAVING DISPRO-
PORTIONATE IMPACTS ON DISFAVORED GROUPS, 28 Seton Hall L. Rev. 774, 896+
(1998) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
2519 THROWING STONES: RATIONAL BASIS REVIEW TRIUMPHS OVER HOMOPHOBIA, 27
Seton Hall L. Rev. 1064, 1093 (1997) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)

2520 WOMEN WIN THE WAR AT VMI, 28 Seton Hall L. Rev. 233, 281+ (1997) HN: 3,4,5 (S.Ct.)
2521 JUSTICE HARRY A. BLACKMUN: A RETROSPECTIVE CONSIDERATION OF THE
JUSTICE'S ROLE IN THE EMANCIPATION OF WOMEN, 25 Seton Hall L. Rev. 1176, 1218+
(1995) HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
2522 CIVIL RIGHTS-ABORTION PROTESTS-42 U.S.C. s 1985(3) DOES NOT PROVIDE A FED-
ERAL CAUSE OF ACTION AGAINST PROTESTERS WHO OBSTRUCT ACCESS TO
ABORTION CLINICS-BRAY v. ALEXANDRIA WOMEN'S HEALTH CLINIC, 113 S. CT.
753 (1993), 24 Seton Hall L. Rev. 2096, 2145+ (1994) HN: 1,4,5 (S.Ct.)
2523 CONSTITUTIONAL LAW - FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT - EQUAL PROTECTION
CLAUSE PROHIBITS LITIGANTS FROM EXERCISING PEREMPTORY CHALLENGES ON
THE BASIS OF GENDER - J.E.B. V. ALABAMA EX REL T.B., 114 S. CT. 1419 (1994)., 25
Seton Hall L. Rev. 756, 787+ (1994) HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
2524 BREAKING UP THE TREBLE PLAY: ATTACKS ON THE PRIVATE TREBLE DAMAGE
ANTITRUST ACTION, 14 Seton Hall L. Rev. 17, 73 (1983) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
2525 WHAT CAN STATES DO TO MAINTAIN VICTIMS' SECURITY, DETER AGGRESSOR'S
REPEATED ABUSE, AND MOTIVATE POLICE DEPARTMENTS TO PURSUE CRIMINALS
IN THE DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CONTEXT?, 30 Seton Hall Legis. J. 509, 541 (2006)
2526 HISTORICIZING JUDICIAL SCRUTINY, 57 S.C. L. Rev. 1, 83 (2005) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
2527 THE SOUTH CAROLINA WORKERS' COMPENSATION ACT TREATS NONMARITAL
CHILDREN LIKE BASTARDS OUT OF CAROLINA, 49 S.C. L. Rev. 1281, 1302 (1998) HN:
4 (S.Ct.)
2528 QUEERLY UNCONSTITUTIONAL?: SOUTH CAROLINA BANS SAME-SEX MARRIAGE
The State came first for the homosexuals, but I didn't speak up because I wasn't a homosexual . . .
., 48 S.C. L. Rev. 685, 704 (1997) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
2529 ADDING CONSTITUTIONAL DEPRAVATION TO UNTIMELY DEATH: SOUTH
DAKOTA'S LIVING WILL PREGNANCY PROVISION, 37 S.D. L. Rev. 388, 412+ (1992) HN:
1 (S.Ct.)
2530 SAME-SEX MARRIAGE? BAEHR v. MIIKE AND THE MEANING OF MARRIAGE, 38 S.
Tex. L. Rev. 1, 119 (1997) HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.)
2531 CONSTITUTIONAL LAW-THE DEVELOPMENT OF LIBERTY AND THE RIGHT TO
PHYSICIAN-ASSISTED SUICIDE-COMPASSION IN DYING v. WASHINGTON, 49 F.3D
586 (9TH CIR. 1995), 38 S. Tex. L. Rev. 353, 374 (1997) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
2532 HOMOSEXUALITY AS A SUSPECT CLASS, 34 S. Tex. L. Rev. 205, 249+ (1993) HN: 1,3,4
(S.Ct.)
2533 EQUALITY WITHOUT TIERS, 77 S. Cal. L. Rev. 481, 582+ (2004) HN: 1,2,4 (S.Ct.)
2534 DEEPENING THE LEGAL UNDERSTANDING OF BIAS: ON DEVALUATION AND
BIASED PROTOTYPES, 74 S. Cal. L. Rev. 747, 806+ (2001) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
2535 RODRIGO'S COMMITTEE ASSIGNMENT: A SKEPTICAL LOOK AT JUDICIAL INDE-
PENDENCE, 72 S. Cal. L. Rev. 425, 454 (1999)
2536 ELASTICITY IN CONSTITUTIONAL STANDARDS OF REVIEW: ADARAND CON-
STRUCTORS, INC. v. PENA AND CONTINUING UNCERTAINTY IN THE SUPREME

COURT'S EQUAL PROTECTION JURISPRUDENCE, 70 S. Cal. L. Rev. 591, 642+ (1997) HN:
1,3 (S.Ct.)
2537 DISPOSING OF THE RED HERRINGS: A DEFENSE OF THE RELIGIOUS FREEDOM RES-
TORATION ACT, 69 S. Cal. L. Rev. 589, 766 (1996) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
2538 DUE PROCESS AND EQUAL PROTECTION CHALLENGES TO THE INADEQUATE RE-
SPONSE OF THE POLICE IN DOMESTIC VIOLENCE SITUATIONS, 68 S. Cal. L. Rev. 1295,
1334 (1995) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
2539 BIRTHRIGHT OR LIFE SENTENCE: CONTROLLING THE THREAT OF GENETIC TEST-
ING, 65 S. Cal. L. Rev. 2081, 2128 (1992)
2540 THE POLITICAL DIMENSION OF CONSTITUTIONAL ADJUDICATION, 63 S. Cal. L. Rev.
1237, 1323+ (1990) HN: 4,5 (S.Ct.)
2541 PREGNANCY AND EQUALITY: A PRECARIOUS ALLIANCE, 60 S. Cal. L. Rev. 1345, 1374
(1987) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
2542 WHERE THE BOYS ARE: CAN SEPARATE BE EQUAL IN SCHOOL SPORTS?, 58 S. Cal.
L. Rev. 1425, 1466+ (1985) HN: 1,2,4 (S.Ct.)
2543 SEX DISCRIMINATION IN THE VOIR DIRE PROCESS: THE RIGHTS OF PROSPECTIVE
FEMALE JURORS, 58 S. Cal. L. Rev. 1225, 1259+ (1985) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
2544 AN ARGUMENT FOR THE APPLICATION OF EQUAL PROTECTION HEIGHTENED
SCRUTINY TO CLASSIFICATIONS BASED ON HOMOSEXUALITY, 57 S. Cal. L. Rev. 797,
836+ (1984) HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
2545 PREFERENTIAL HIRING POLICIES FOR OLDER WORKERS UNDER THE AGE DISCRIM-
INATION IN EMPLOYMENT ACT, 56 S. Cal. L. Rev. 825, 861 (1983)
2546 UNIONS, FAIRNESS, AND THE CONUNDRUMS OF COLLECTIVE CHOICE, 56 S. Cal. L.
Rev. 461, 525 (1983) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
2547 ARGUMENT SELECTION IN CONSTITUTIONAL LAW: CHOOSING AND RECON-
STRUCTING CONCEPTUAL SYSTEMS, 18 S. Cal. Rev. L. & Soc. Just. 209, 392 (2009)
2548 THE FEMINIST PERVASION: HOW GENDER-BASED SCHOLARSHIP INFORMS LAW
AND LAW TEACHING, 15 S. Cal. Rev. L. & Women's Stud. 3, 63 (2005) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
2549 THE POLITICS OF BIOLOGY: EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY AND THE EXCLUSION OF
WOMEN FROM COMBAT, 14 S. Cal. Rev. L. & Women's Stud. 83, 117+ (2004) HN: 4,5
(S.Ct.)
2550 NGUYEN V. INS AND SEX STEREOTYPING IN CITIZENSHIP LAWS: BUILDING ON THE
EQUAL PROTECTION LEGACY OF RUTH BADER GINSBURG, 10 S. Cal. Rev. L. & Wo-
men's Stud. 293, 305+ (2001) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
2551 BRIEF OF PETITIONERS, 10 S. Cal. Rev. L. & Women's Stud. 307, 338 (2001) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
2552 A MATTER OF FACT: HOSTILE ENVIRONMENTS AND SUMMARY JUDGMENTS, 8 S.
Cal. Rev. L. & Women's Stud. 311, 371+ (1999) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
2553 THE THREAT-TO-SELF DEFENSE AND THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT, 27
S. Ill. U. L.J. 539, 574 (2003) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
2554 EQUAL OPPORTUNITY AT VMI: UNITED STATES V. VIRGINIA, 116 S. CT. 2264 (1996).,
22 S. Ill. U. L.J. 443, 466+ (1998) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.)

2555 THE AFTERMATH OF UNITED STATES V. VIRGINIA: WHY FIVE JUSTICES ARE
PULLING IN THE REINS ON THE "EXCEEDINGLY PERSUASIVE JUSTIFICATION", 55
SMU L. Rev. 1755, 1779+ (2002) HN: 1,3,4 (S.Ct.)
2556 SOME UNSOLICITED ADVICE TO MY WOMEN FRIENDS IN EASTERN EUROPE, 46
SMU L. Rev. 557, 583+ (1992) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
2557 AIDS AND DISABILITY-BASED DISCRIMINATION IN EMPLOYER-PROVIDED HEALTH
INSURANCE: THE ADA IMPOSES LIABILITY FOR BROKEN PROMISES, 20 S.U. L. Rev.
457, 480 (1993)
2558 SICK AND TIRED OF THE KNOX-KEENE ACT: THE EQUAL PROTECTION RIGHT OF
NON-MEXICAN CALIFORNIANS TO ENROLL IN MEXICO-BASED HMO PLANS, 14 Sw.
J.L. & Trade Am. 357, 378 (2008) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
2559 LOCAL GOVERNMENT LAW, 40 Sw. L.J. 727, 774 (1986) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
2560 BIOLOGY, EQUALITY, AND THE LAW: THE LEGAL SIGNIFICANCE OF BIOLOGICAL
SEX DIFFERENCES, 38 Sw. L.J. 617, 702 (1984) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
2561 WHEN THE FOREVER FAMILY ISN'T: WHY STATE LAWS ALLOWING ADOPTIVE PAR-
ENTS TO VOLUNTARILY RESCIND AN ADOPTION VIOLATE THE ADOPTED CHILD'S
EQUAL PROTECTION RIGHTS, 39 Sw. L. Rev. 569, 591 (2010) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
2562 DISCRIMINATION AND DEVELOPMENTAL DELAYS: A FAILING GRADE IN THE PUB-
LIC SCHOOLS, 34 Sw. U. L. Rev. 551, 573+ (2005) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
2563 INTRODUCING RUTH BADER GINSBURG AND PREDICTING THE PERFORMANCE OF
A GINSBURG COURT, 32 Sw. U. L. Rev. 181, 188 (2003) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
2564 THE FEAR OF OPENING PANDORA'S BOX: THE NEED TO RESTORE BIRTH PARENTS'
PRIVACY RIGHTS IN THE ADOPTION PROCESS, 28 Sw. U. L. Rev. 133, 156+ (1998)
2565 CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS OF UNWED FATHERS: IS EQUAL PROTECTION EQUAL
FOR UNWED FATHERS?, 19 Sw. U. L. Rev. 1087, 1111+ (1990) HN: 2,4 (S.Ct.)
2566 "AND THTHTHAT'S ALL FOLKS": PAY EQUITY CLAIMS ARE NO LONGER VIABLE
UNDER TITLE VII AFTER AMERICAN FEDERATION OF STATE, COUNTY, AND MUNI-
CIPAL EMPLOYEES v. STATE OF WASHINGTON, 17 Sw. U. L. Rev. 83, 107 (1987) HN: 5
(S.Ct.)
2567 FACTS ON THE GROUND AND FEDERALISM IN THE AIR: THE SOLICITOR GENERAL'S
EFFORT TO DEFEND FEDERAL STATUTES DURING THE FEDERALISM REVIVAL, 21
St. John's J. Legal Comment. 473, 483 (2007)
2568 NEW YORK PUBLIC HEALTH LAW S 2500-F: THE HAND THAT ROBBED THE CRADLE
OF PRIVACY, 18 St. John's J. Legal Comment. 175, 221 (2003) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
2569 WATERED DOWN CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS: A HOSPITAL'S ROLE IN PROSECUTING
PREGNANT WOMEN FOR DRUG USE IN FERGUSON V. CITY OF CHARLESTON, 16 St.
John's J. Legal Comment. 767, 796 (2002) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
2570 THE COLLISION BETWEEN THE RIGHTS OF WOMEN, THE RIGHTS OF THE FETUS
AND THE RIGHTS OF THE STATE: A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF THE CRIMINAL PRO-
SECUTION OF DRUG ADDICTED PREGNANT WOMEN, 16 St. John's J. Legal Comment.
267, 305+ (2002) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)

2571 VIRTUAL EQUALITY AS CONSTITUTIONAL REALITY: AN INTRODUCTION, 11 St.

John's J. Legal Comment. 1, 18+ (1995) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
2572 QUALITY OF LIFE - AT WHAT PRICE?: CONSTITUTIONAL CHALLENGES TO LAWS
ADVERSELY IMPACTING THE HOMELESS, 10 St. John's J. Legal Comment. 89, 121+
(1994)
2573 TESTING HEALTH CARE WORKERS FOR AIDS: PUBLIC NECESSITY OR PRIVATE IN-
TRUSTION?, 7 St. John's J. Legal Comment. 359, 387+ (1991) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
2574 SAME-SEX MARRIAGE: A THREAT TO TIERED EQUAL PROTECTION DOCTRINE?, 82
St. John's L. Rev. 1409, 1446 (2008)
2575 RETARGETING AFFIRMATIVE ACTION: A PROGRAM TO SERVE THOSE MOST
HARMED BY PAST RACISM AND AVOID INTRACTABLE PROBLEMS TRIGGERED BY
PER SE RACIAL PREFERENCES, 80 St. John's L. Rev. 323, 388 (2006)
2576 PEEPING THROUGH THE CLOSET KEYHOLE: SODOMY, HOMOSEXUALITY, AND THE
AMORPHOUS RIGHT OF PRIVACY, 74 St. John's L. Rev. 1087, 1138+ (2000) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
2577 A VICTORY FOR THE LANDLORDS-OR IS IT? THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF THE 1997
AMENDMENTS TO THE RPAPL, 74 St. John's L. Rev. 799, 841+ (2000) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
2578 EQUALITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER CINCINNATI, INC. V. CITY OF CINCINNATI:
THE SIXTH CIRCUIT NARROWLY CONSTRUES ROMER V. EVANS, 73 St. John's L. Rev.
951, 987+ (1999) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
2579 UNITED STATES v. VIRGINIA: SKEPTICAL SCRUTINY AND THE FUTURE OF GENDER
DISCRIMINATION LAW, 70 St. John's L. Rev. 801, 820+ (1996) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.)
2580 PATRIARCHY OR EQUALITY: FAMILY VALUES OR INDIVIDUALITY, 70 St. John's L.
Rev. 435, 538 (1996)
2581 TRANS-RACIAL ADOPTION AND THE STATUTORY PREFERENCE SCHEMES: BEFORE
THE "BEST INTERESTS" AND AFTER THE "MELTING POT", 68 St. John's L. Rev. 137, 197
(1994) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
2582 U.S. v. FAGG: STRETCHING THE BOUNDS OF PRIVACY, 66 St. John's L. Rev. 1193, 1207
(1993) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
2583 ROBERTSON v. DEAN WITTER REYNOLDS, INC.: SEARCHING FOR THE BASIS OF AN
IMPLIED CAUSE OF ACTION UNDER SEC RULE 10B-16, 60 St. John's L. Rev. 372, 384
(1986)
2584 THE FUNDAMENTAL TRUTH ABOUT BEST INTERESTS, 54 St. Louis U. L.J. 113, 165
(2009) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
2585 JUDICIAL SUPREMACY, JUDICIAL ACTIVISM: COOPER V. AARON AND PARENTS IN-
VOLVED, 52 St. Louis U. L.J. 1191, 1210+ (2008) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
2586 ALIENATING THE UNALIENABLE: EQUAL PROTECTION AND VALLEY PARK, MIS-
SOURI'S ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION ORDINANCE, 52 St. Louis U. L.J. 1317, 1348 (2008)
2587 EXPANDING THE PROTECTIONAL SCOPE OF TITLE VII "BECAUSE OF SEX" TO IN-
CLUDE DISCRIMINATION BASED ON SEXUALITY AND SEXUAL ORIENTATION, 51 St.
Louis U. L.J. 581, 605 (2007) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
2588 ORIGINALISM AND THE SENSE-REFERENCE DISTINCTION, 50 St. Louis U. L.J. 555, 627

(2006)
2589 ERICKSON V. BARTELL: THE "COMMON SENSE" APPROACH TO EMPLOYER-BASED
INSURANCE FOR WOMEN, 47 St. Louis U. L.J. 463, 516+ (2003) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
2590 TOWARD A COLORBLIND CONSTITUTION: JUSTICE O'CONNOR'S NARROWING OF
AFFIRMATIVE ACTION, 42 St. Louis U. L.J. 619, 675 (1998) HN: 3 (S.Ct.)
2591 J.E.B. V. ALABAMA EX REL. T.B.: THE EXTENSION OF THE EQUAL PROTECTION
CLAUSE TO GENDER-BASED PEREMPTORY CHALLENGES - IS THIS THE END?, 39 St.
Louis U. L.J. 1349, 1387+ (1995) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
2592 INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS, JUDICIAL DISCRETION, AND JUDGE FRANK M. JOHNSON, JR.,
39 St. Louis U. L.J. 523, 566 (1995) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
2593 FOUCHA v. LOUISIANA: CONFINEMENT BASED ON DANGEROUSNESS ALONE, 37 St.
Louis U. L.J. 731, 752+ (1993) HN: 1,2 (S.Ct.)
2594 HOLLOW VERDICT: NOT GUILTY BY REASON OF INSANITY PROVOKES ANIMUS-
BASED DISCRIMINATION IN THE SOCIAL SECURITY ACT, 31 St. Mary's L.J. 697, 750+
(2000) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
2595 THE FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT AND TITLE IX: A SOLUTION TO PEER SEXUAL
HARASSMENT, 29 St. Mary's L.J. 153, 206 (1997) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
2596 SPEAKING THE LANGUAGE OF EXCLUSION: HOW EQUAL PROTECTION AND FUN-
DAMENTAL RIGHTS ANALYSES PERMIT LANGUAGE DISCRIMINATION, 28 St. Mary's
L.J. 149, 212 (1996) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
2597 THE NATURAL LAW TRADITION ON THE MODERN SUPREME COURT: NOT BURKE,
BUT THE ENLIGHTENMENT TRADITION REPRESENTED BY LOCKE, MADISON, AND
MARSHALL, 26 St. Mary's L.J. 1051, 1087 (1995) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
2598 J.E.B. V. ALABAMA EX REL. T.B.: EXCELLENT IDEOLOGY, INEFFECTIVE IMPLE-
MENTATION, 26 St. Mary's L.J. 503, 531+ (1995) HN: 1,2,4 (S.Ct.)
2599 THE WOMEN'S CONVENTION AND THE EQUAL PROTECTION CLAUSE, 26 St. Mary's
L.J. 755, 790+ (1995) HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
2600 BEAUTY AND THE BEAST: PHYSICAL APPEARANCE DISCRIMINATION IN AMERIC-
AN CRIMINAL TRIALS, 27 St. Mary's L.J. 193, 235 (1995)
2601 FEDERAL LAW--CIVIL RIGHTS--INDIVIDUALS OBSTRUCTING INGRESS AND EGRESS
TO ABORTION FACILITIES DO NOT VIOLATE A WOMAN'S FEDERAL RIGHTS WITHIN
42 U.S.C. S 1985(3), 25 St. Mary's L.J. 753, 782+ (1994) HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
2602 APPLYING EDGEWOOD v. KIRBY TO ANALYSIS OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS UNDER
THE TEXAS CONSTITUTION, 22 St. Mary's L.J. 69, 114 (1990) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
2603 RENDERING UNTO CAESAR: LEGAL RESPONSES TO RELIGIOUS NONCONFORMITY
IN THE ARMED FORCES, 18 St. Mary's L.J. 1233, 1294 (1987) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
2604 CIVIL RIGHTS-TITLE VII-PUBLIC EMPLOYER MAY CONSIDER GENDER TO PROMOTe
EMPLOYEE WITHOUT VIOLATING TITLE VII OF CIVIL RIGHTS ACT OF 1964 WHEN
ENFORCING A VALID AFFIRMATIVE ACTION PLAN Johnson v. Transportation Agency,
Sant, 19 St. Mary's L.J. 455, 468 (1987) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
2605 CONSTITUTIONAL LAW-EQUAL PROTECTION-MENTAL RETARDATION IS NOT A

QUASI-SUSPECT CLASSIFICATION; THEREFORE, CLASSIFICATIONS ON THAT BASIS

ARE SUBJECT TO RATIONAL RELATION LIMITATIONS CITY OF CLEBURNE v.
CLEBURNE LIVING CENT, 17 St. Mary's L.J. 1053, 1083+ (1986) HN: 1,2,3 (S.Ct.)
2606 CONSTITUTIONAL LAW-FREE EXERCISE CLAUSE-APPROPRIATE MILITARY OFFI-
CIALS MAY PROHIBIT THE WEARING OF VISIBLE RELIGIOUS APPAREL IN THE IN-
TEREST OF PRESERVING UNIFORMITY, 18 St. Mary's L.J. 605, 632+ (1986) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
2607 FAIR EMPLOYMENT OF THE HANDICAPPED IN TEXAS, 16 St. Mary's L.J. 433, 456
(1985) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
2608 THE UNIVERSITY INTERSCHOLASTIC LEAGUE OF TEXAS: WHO ARE THESE GUYS
AND WHAT CAN THEY DO?, 16 St. Mary's L.J. 979, 1014 (1985) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
2609 EDUCATION-HANDICAPPED-FREE APPROPRIATE PUBLIC EDUCATION OF HANDI-
CAPPED CHILDREN REQUIRES PERSONALIZED INSTRUCTION AND SUPPORT SER-
VICES TO PRODUCE BENEFICIAL RESULTS BUT DOES NOT REQUIRE REACHING
FULL POTENTIAL OF HANDICA, 14 St. Mary's L.J. 425, 442 (1983) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
2610 A THEORY OF EQUAL PROTECTION, 14 St. Mary's L.J. 829, 897+ (1983) HN: 1,2,4 (S.Ct.)
2611 TEXAS ADOPTION LAWS AND ADOPTEES' RIGHTS OF ACCESS TO CONFIDENTIAL
RECORDS, 15 St. Mary's L.J. 153, 183+ (1983) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
2612 RHYMES WITH RICH: POWER, LAW, AND THE BITCH, 21 St. Thomas L. Rev. 281, 301+
(2009) HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
2613 HUMAN CAPABILITIES AND HUMAN AUTHORITIES: A COMMENT ON MARTHA
NUSSBAUM'S WOMEN AND HUMAN DEVELOPMENT, 15 St. Thomas L. Rev. 757, 790
(2003)
2614 DECONSTRUCTING CHILDREN'S RIGHTS AND REIMAGINING CHILDREN'S NEEDS: A
GENDER, RACE, AND CLASS ANALYSIS OF INFANTICIDE, 10 St. Thomas L. Rev. 229,
234 (1998) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
2615 DIVERSITY AND DISCRIMINATION IN OUR MIDST: MUSINGS ON CONSTITUTIONAL
SCHIZOPHRENIA, CULTURAL CONFLICT, AND "INTERCULTURALISM" AT THE
THRESHOLD OF A NEW CENTURY, 5 St. Thomas L. Rev. 293, 357+ (1993) HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
2616 INVOKING PRIVATE PROPERTY RIGHTS FOR ENVIRONMENTAL PURPOSES: THE
TAKINGS IMPLICATIONS OF GOVERNMENT-AUTHORIZED AERIAL PESTICIDE
SPRAYING, 18 Stan. Envtl. L.J. 65, 106 (1999) HN: 3 (S.Ct.)
2617 MARRIAGE RIGHTS AND PARENTAL RIGHTS: PARENTS, THE STATE, AND PROPOSI-
TION 8, 5 Stanford Journal of Civil Rights & Civil Liberties 357 (2009) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
2618 DOROTHY KENYON AND THE MAKING OF MODERN LEGAL FEMINISM, 5 Stanford
Journal of Civil Rights & Civil Liberties 423 (2009) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
2619 WHO GETS TO INTERPRET THE CONSTITUTION? THE CASE OF MAYORS AND MAR-
RIAGE EQUALITY, 3 Stanford Journal of Civil Rights & Civil Liberties 1+ (2007) HN: 1,3
(S.Ct.)
2620 THE DIVERSITY RATIONALE: A PROBLEMATIC SOLUTION, 1 Stanford Journal of Civil
Rights & Civil Liberties 171 (2005) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
2621 HOMOSEXUAL OR FEMALE? APPLYING GENDER-BASED ASYLUM JURISPRUDENCE

TO LESBIAN ASYLUM CLAIMS, 16 Stan. L. & Pol'y Rev. 417, 444 (2005)
2622 CONSTITUTIONAL AND STATUTORY VOTING RIGHTS FOR PEOPLE WITH DISABIL-
ITIES, 14 Stan. L. & Pol'y Rev. 353, 387 (2003)
2623 THE LIMITS OF BORDERS: A MODERATE PROPOSAL FOR IMMIGRATION REFORM, 7
Stan. L. & Pol'y Rev. 35, 55 (1996)
2624 "ON THE BASIS OF SEX": RECOGNIZING GENDER-BASED BIAS CRIMES, 5 Stan. L. &
Pol'y Rev. 21, 43+ (1994) HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
2625 DOES SEXUAL SPEECH HARM WOMEN? THE SPLIT WITHIN FEMINISM, 5 Stan. L. &
Pol'y Rev. 49, 60+ (1994) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
2626 HOW THE FEMINISTS WANT TO CHANGE OUR LAWS, 5 Stan. L. & Pol'y Rev. 65, 66+
(1994) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
2627 JURISPRUDENCE OF BREASTS, 5 Stan. L. & Pol'y Rev. 83, 88 (1994) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
2628 A FEW STRAIGHT MEN: HOMOSEXUALS IN THE MILITARY AND EQUAL PROTEC-
TION, 6 Stan. L. & Pol'y Rev. 109, 119 (1994) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
2629 DISPATCH FROM THE SUPREME COURT ARCHIVES: VAGRANCY, ABORTION, AND
WHAT THE LINKS BETWEEN THEM REVEAL ABOUT THE HISTORY OF FUNDAMENT-
AL RIGHTS, 62 Stan. L. Rev. 1361, 1393 (2010)
2630 RETHINKING CONSTITUTIONAL WELFARE RIGHTS, 61 Stan. L. Rev. 203, 269+ (2008)
HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.)
2631 "A NATION OF MINORITIES": RACE, ETHNICITY, AND REACTIONARY COLORBLIND-
NESS, 59 Stan. L. Rev. 985, 1063+ (2007)
2632 YOU'VE COME A LONG WAY, BABY: REHNQUIST'S NEW APPROACH TO PREG-
NANCY DISCRIMINATION IN HIBBS, 58 Stan. L. Rev. 1871, 1898+ (2006) HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
2633 DISABILITY, EMPLOYMENT POLICY, AND THE SUPREME COURT Crippled Justice: The
History of Modern Disability Policy in the Workplace. By Ruth O'Brien. Chicago: The Uni-
versity of Chicago Press, 2001. 288 pp. + xiv., 55 Stan. L. Rev. 607, 634 (2002) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
2634 "APPROPRIATE" MEANS-ENDS CONSTRAINTS ON SECTION 5 POWERS, 53 Stan. L.
Rev. 1127, 1199+ (2001) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
2635 THE EPISTEMIC CONTRACT OF BISEXUAL ERASURE, 52 Stan. L. Rev. 353, 461 (2000)
2636 WHAT IS A GENDER NORM AND WHY SHOULD WE CARE? IMPLEMENTING A NEW
THEORY IN SEXUAL HARASSMENT LAW, 51 Stan. L. Rev. 161, 182+ (1998) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
2637 TOLERATING DECEPTION AND DISCRIMINATION AFTER BATSON, 50 Stan. L. Rev. 9,
64 (1997) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
2638 WHAT'S WRONG WITH SEXUAL HARASSMENT?, 49 Stan. L. Rev. 691, 772+ (1997) HN: 4
(S.Ct.)
2639 GAY RIGHTS, THICK AND THIN, 49 Stan. L. Rev. 45, 110 (1996) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
2640 SINGLE-SEX COURSES, TITLE IX, AND EQUAL PROTECTION: THE CASE FOR SELF-
DEFENSE FOR WOMEN, 48 Stan. L. Rev. 177, 216+ (1995) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
2641 PROGRESSIVE REGRESSION PROGRESSIVE CONSTITUTIONALISM: RECONSTRUCT-
ING THE FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT. BY ROBIN WEST. DURHAM: DUKE UNI-
VERSITY PRESS. 1994. 359 PP. $39.95., 47 Stan. L. Rev. 1097, 1115 (1995) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)

2642 POWER, PREJUDICE, AND THE RIGHT TO SPEAK: LITIGATING "OUTNESS" UNDER
THE EQUAL PROTECTION CLAUSE, 47 Stan. L. Rev. 269, 293 (1995) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
2643 WOMEN'S JURY SERVICE: RIGHT OF CITIZENSHIP OR PRIVILEGE OF DIFFERENCE?,
46 Stan. L. Rev. 1115, 1160 (1994)
2644 SEXUAL ORIENTATION AND THE POLITICS OF BIOLOGY: A CRITIQUE OF THE AR-
GUMENT FROM IMMUTABILITY, 46 Stan. L. Rev. 503, 507+ (1994) HN: 1,2,4 (S.Ct.)
2645 FACIAL CHALLENGES TO STATE AND FEDERAL STATUTES, 46 Stan. L. Rev. 235, 304+
(1994) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
2646 NEWSGATHERING, PRESS ACCESS, AND THE FIRST AMENDMENT, 44 Stan. L. Rev.
927, 960 (1992) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
2647 CORRUPTION OF BLOOD AND EQUAL PROTECTION: WHY THE SINS OF THE PAR-
ENTS SHOULD NOT MATTER, 44 Stan. L. Rev. 727, 757+ (1992) HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
2648 REASONING FROM THE BODY: A HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE ON ABORTION REGU-
LATION AND QUESTIONS OF EQUAL PROTECTION, 44 Stan. L. Rev. 261, 381+ (1992)
HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
2649 BEYOND ATOMIZED DISCRIMINATION: USE OF ACTS OF DISCRIMINATION
AGAINST "OTHER" MINORITIES TO PROVE DISCRIMINATORY MOTIVATION UNDER
FEDERAL EMPLOYMENT LAW, 43 Stan. L. Rev. 241, 273+ (1990) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
2650 DISAGREEABLE PEOPLE; Constitutional Cultures: The Mentality and Consequences of Judi-
cial Review. By Robert F. Nagel. Berkeley: University of California Press. 1989. xii + 232 pp.
$27.50, 43 Stan. L. Rev. 275, 288+ (1990) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
2651 THE MYTH OF INTENT IN EQUAL PROTECTION, 41 Stan. L. Rev. 1105, 1151 (1989)
2652 THE COLLISION OF RELIGIOUS EXERCISE AND GOVERNMENTAL NONDISCRIMINA-
TION POLICIES, 41 Stan. L. Rev. 1201, 1231 (1989)
2653 THE ID, THE EGO, AND EQUAL PROTECTION: RECKONING WITH UNCONSCIOUS RA-
CISM, 39 Stan. L. Rev. 317, 388 (1987) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
2654 DEMOGRAPHIC EVIDENCE IN CAPITAL SENTENCING, 39 Stan. L. Rev. 499, 543+ (1987)
HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
2655 CONGRESSIONAL POWER TO VALIDATE UNCONSTITUTIONAL STATE LAWS: A FOR-
GOTTEN SOLUTION TO AN OLD ENIGMA, 35 Stan. L. Rev. 387, 422 (1983)
2656 PLEA BARGAINING AS DUE PROCESS IN DETERMINING GUILT, 32 Stan. L. Rev. 887,
941 (1980)
2657 COMMERCIAL TREATIES AND THE AMERICAN CIVIL RIGHTS LAWS: THE CASE OF
JAPANESE EMPLOYERS, 31 Stan. L. Rev. 947, 976 (1979) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
2658 THE PROVINCE OF CONSTITUTIONAL LAW CASEBOOK JURISPRUDENCE REDETER-
MINED, 29 Stan. L. Rev. 1299, 1310+ (1977)
2659 SECTION 1981 AND THE THIRTEENTH AMENDMENT AFTER RUNYON v. MCCRARY-
ON THE DOORSTEPS OF DISCRIMINATORY PRIVATE CLUBS, 29 Stan. L. Rev. 747, 793
(1977)
2660 THE NEW FEDERALISM: TOWARD A PRINCIPLED INTERPRETATION OF THE STATE
CONSTITUTION, 29 Stan. L. Rev. 297, 321 (1977) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)

2661 CONGRESSIONAL POWER TO INTERPRET DUE PROCESS AND EQUAL PROTECTION,

27 Stan. L. Rev. 603, 620 (1975) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
2662 IRREBUTTABLE PRESUMPTIONS: AN ILLUSORY ANALYSIS, 27 Stan. L. Rev. 449, 473
(1975) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
2663 HOMOSEXUALITY AND THE LAW, 26 Stan. L. Rev. 965, 979+ (1974) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
2664 THREE RING CIRCUS: THE ADVENTURE CONTINUES INTO THE TWENTY-FIRST CEN-
TURY, 30 Stetson L. Rev. 271, 313+ (2000) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.)
2665 UNDERSTANDING THE PROCESS OF JUDICIAL POLICYMAKING THROUGH CASE
ANALYSIS, 29 Stetson L. Rev. 1155, 1172+ (2000) HN: 1,2,3 (S.Ct.)
2666 REMARKS IN CELEBRATION OF STETSON'S LAW LIBRARY AND INFORMATION
CENTER, 28 Stetson L. Rev. 231, 239+ (1998) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
2667 BEYOND THE COURT'S STANDARD RESPONSE: CREATING AN EFFECTIVE TEST FOR
DETERMINING HOSTILE WORK ENVIRONMENT HARASSMENT UNDER TITLE VII
Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc., 114 S. Ct. 367 (1993)., 24 Stetson L. Rev. 719, 763 (1995) HN:
4 (S.Ct.)
2668 STRENGTH IN DIVERSITY: FEMINIST THEORETICAL APPROACHES TO CHILD CUS-
TODY AND SAME-SEX RELATIONSHIPS, 23 Stetson L. Rev. 701, 742+ (1994) HN: 1
(S.Ct.)
2669 FEDERAL LAW'S INDIFFERENCE TO HOUSING DISCRIMINATION BASED ON SEXUAL
ORIENTATION, 7 Suffolk J. Trial & App. Advoc. 11, 37+ (2002) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
2670 FIVE IS A CROWD: A CONSTITUTIONAL ANALYSIS OF THE BOSTON ZONING
AMENDMENT PROHIBITING MORE THAN FOUR COLLEGE STUDENTS FROM LIVING
TOGETHER, 43 Suffolk U. L. Rev. 217, 241+ (2009) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
2671 HOW THE SUPREME COURT TALKS ABOUT ABORTION: THE IMPLICATIONS OF A
SHIFTING DISCOURSE, 42 Suffolk U. L. Rev. 41, 59+ (2008) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
2672 WHOSE CONSCIENCE IS IT ANYWAY? THE STATE'S ROLE IN CONSCIENCE CLAUSE
CREATION AND THE DENIAL OF CONTRACEPTION, 40 Suffolk U. L. Rev. 215, 235
(2006) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
2673 THE DIVERSITY JUSTIFICATION IN HIGHER EDUCATION: EVALUATING DISAD-
VANTAGED STATUS IN SCHOOL ADMISSIONS, 34 Suffolk U. L. Rev. 305, 344 (2001)
2674 CONSTITUTIONAL LAW, 35 Suffolk U. L. Rev. 713, 719+ (2001) HN: 1,2 (S.Ct.)
2675 THE EVOLVING DEFINITION OF MARRIAGE, 31 Suffolk U. L. Rev. 917, 944+ (1998) HN:
1,5 (S.Ct.)
2676 CONSTITUTIONAL LAW-FLAGRANT DISREGARD FOR TRADITION: THE DEMISE OF
SINGLE SEX EDUCATION-UNITED STATES v. VIRGINIA, 116 S. CT. 2264 (1996), 30 Suf-
folk U. L. Rev. 1269, 1276 (1997) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
2677 BANKING CRISIS JUSTIFIES DISCRIMINATORY CLASSIFICATION OF NONSETTLING
JOINT TORTFEASORS-RHODE ISLAND DEPOSITORS ECONOMIC PROTECTION CORP.
v. BROWN, 659 A.2d 95 (R.I.), CERT. DENIED, 116 S. CT. 476 (1995), 30 Suffolk U. L. Rev.
513, 518 (1997) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
2678 CONSTITUTIONAL LAW-COLORADO AMENDMENT 2 VIOLATES EQUAL PROTEC-

TION CLAUSE BY CLASSIFYING HOMOSEXUALS WITHOUT PROPER LEGISLATIVE

END-ROMER V. EVANS, 116 S. CT. 1620 (1996), 31 Suffolk U. L. Rev. 183, 183 (1997) HN:
2 (S.Ct.)
2679 CONSTITUTIONAL LAW Further Restricting the Jury Selection Process by Pro hibiting
Gender-Based Peremptory Challenges-J.E.B. v. Alabama ex rel. T.B., 114 S. Ct. 1419 (1994), 29
Suffolk U. L. Rev. 315, 322+ (1995) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
2680 CONSTITUTIONAL LAW-HAWAII SUBJECTS SEX-BASED CLASSIFICATIONS TO
STRICT SCRUTINY ANALYSIS-BAEHR V. LEWIN, 74 HAW. 530, 852 P.2D 44 (1993), 28
Suffolk U. L. Rev. 164, 171+ (1994) HN: 1,2,3 (S.Ct.)
2681 CONSTITUTIONAL LAW--ANTIABORTION BLOCKADES TO PREVENT WOMEN FROM
ACCESSING ABORTION CLINICS UNDERGO SECTION 1985 (3) CHALLENGE--BRAY v.
ALEXANDRIA WOMEN'S HEALTH CLINIC, 113 S. CT. 753 (1993), 27 Suffolk U. L. Rev.
145, 156 (1993) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
2682 PROTECTING THE POWER BROKERS: OF FERES, IMMUNITY, AND PRIVILEGE, 22 Suf-
folk U. L. Rev. 623, 648 (1988)
2683 CONSTITUTIONAL LAW-AFFIRMATIVE ACTION PLAN CONSIDERING GENDER AS A
FACTOR IN PROMOTION DECISIONS CONSTITUTIONAL-JOHNSON v. TRANSPORTA-
TION AGENCY, SANTA CLARA COUNTY, 107 S.CT. 1442 (1987)., 22 Suffolk U. L. Rev.
159, 167+ (1988) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
2684 THE FUTURE OF ZONING LIMITATIONS UPON RELIGIOUS USES OF LAND: DUE PRO-
CESS OR EQUAL PROTECTION?, 22 Suffolk U. L. Rev. 1087, 1120 (1988) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
2685 ASPEN AND THE TRANSFORMATION OF HARRY BLACKMUN, 2005 Sup. Ct. Rev. 307,
329 (2005)
2686 WHAT DID LAWRENCE HOLD? OF AUTONOMY, DESUETUDE, SEXUALITY, AND
MARRIAGE, 55 Sup. Ct. Rev. 27, 74 (2003) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
2687 SKEPTICAL SCRUTINY OF PLENARY POWER: JUDICIAL AND EXECUTIVE BRANCH
DECISION MAKING IN MILLER V ALBRIGHT, 1998 Sup. Ct. Rev. 1, 70 (1998)
2688 AFFIRMATIVE ACTION AND THE PUBLIC INTEREST, 1995 Sup. Ct. Rev. 1, 43 (1995)
HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
2689 IMPLICIT THEORIES AND CAPITAL SENTENCING: AN EXPERIMENTAL STUDY, 59
Syracuse L. Rev. 1, 29 (2008) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
2690 MORE THAN JUST A PRETTY FACE: PREVENTING THE PERPETUATION OF SEXUAL
STEREOTYPES IN THE WORKPLACE, 57 Syracuse L. Rev. 657, 684+ (2007) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
2691 REAL MEN MAY NOT CRY, BUT THEY ARE VICTIMS OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE: BIAS
IN THE APPLICATION OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE LAWS, 58 Syracuse L. Rev. 171, 215+
(2007) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.)
2692 THE ADA, RESPIRATORY DISABILITIES AND SMOKING: CAN SMOKERS AT BURGER
KING REALLY HAVE IT THEIR WAY?, 50 Syracuse L. Rev. 1, 62+ (2000) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
2693 MAKING EQUAL PROTECTION ANALYSIS MAKE SENSE, 49 Syracuse L. Rev. 1191, 1246
(1999) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
2694 CONSTITUTIONAL FIDELITY AND THE COMMERCE CLAUSE: A REPLY TO PROFESS-

OR ACKERMAN, 48 Syracuse L. Rev. 139, 226 (1998) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)

2695 RESPECT FOR THE HUMAN DIGNITY OF MINORS: WHAT THE CONSTITUTION RE-
QUIRES, 39 Syracuse L. Rev. 1293, 1349+ (1988)
2696 WHITE RIGHTS AS A MODEL FOR BLACK: OR-WHO'S AFRAID OF THE PRIVILEGES
OR IMMUNITIES CLAUSE?, 38 Syracuse L. Rev. 859, 877 (1987)
2697 MIXING THE GENE POOL AND THE LABOR POOL: PROTECTING WORKERS FROM
GENETIC DISCRIMINATION IN EMPLOYMENT, 20 Temp. Envtl. L. & Tech. J. 51, 72
(2001)
2698 BREAKING THE CYCLE: SCIENTIFIC DISCOURSE IN LEGAL EDUCATION, 26 Temp. J.
Sci. Tech. & Envtl. L. 191, 221+ (2007) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
2699 NO PREGNANCY AND NO PARENTHOOD: THE LIKELY LEGITIMACY OF VMI'S PAR-
ENTING POLICY, 76 Temp. L. Rev. 411, 450+ (2003) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.)
2700 DEFENSE OF MARRIAGE ACTS: AN ANALYSIS UNDER STATE CONSTITUTIONAL
LAW, 70 Temp. L. Rev. 1017, 1035+ (1997) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
2701 STATE EQUAL RIGHTS AMENDMENTS: MAKING A DIFFERENCE OR MAKING A
STATEMENT?, 70 Temp. L. Rev. 907, 944 (1997)
2702 EQUAL PROTECTION PRINCIPLES AND THE ESTABLISHMENT CLAUSE: EQUAL PAR-
TICIPATION IN THE COMMUNITY AS THE CENTRAL LINK, 69 Temp. L. Rev. 95, 144
(1996)
2703 WORKABILITY OF THE UNDUE BURDEN TEST, 66 Temp. L. Rev. 1003, 1037 (1993) HN:
1 (S.Ct.)
2704 RELIGION, EQUALITY, AND DIFFERENCE, 65 Temp. L. Rev. 1, 89 (1992)
2705 A CELEBRATION OF EQUALITY, 64 Temp. L. Rev. 371, 373 (1991)
2706 THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT: THE MOVE TO INTEGRATION, 64 Temp.
L. Rev. 393, 469+ (1991) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
2707 CONSTITUTIONAL LAW-REASONABLE VERSUS INTERMEDIATE STANDARD: RE-
VIEWING PRISONERS' CONSTITUTIONAL CLAIMS-GOODWIN v. TURNER, 908 F.2D
1395 (8TH CIR. 1990)., 64 Temp. L. Rev. 1109, 1123 (1991) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
2708 CONSTITUTIONAL LAW - THE ESTABLISHMENT CLAUSE AND OVERTLY DENOMIN-
ATIONAL ACCOMMODATIONS - OLSEN v. DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION,
878 F.2D 1458 (D.C. CIR. 1989), PETITION FOR CERT. FILED, U.S. DEC. 13, 1989 (NO.
89-627, 63 Temp. L. Rev. 143, 154 (1990) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
2709 JUSTICE BRENNAN AND THE JURISPRUDENCE OF DISSENT, 61 Temp. L. Rev. 307,
352+ (1988) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
2710 JURISCENTRISM AND THE ORIGINAL MEANING OF SECTION FIVE, 13 Temp. Pol. &
Civ. Rts. L. Rev. 485, 513 (2004) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
2711 A CRITICAL LINGUISTIC ANALYSIS OF EQUAL PROTECTION DOCTRINE: ARE
WHITES A SUSPECT CLASS?, 13 Temp. Pol. & Civ. Rts. L. Rev. 583, 610+ (2004) HN: 1,3,4
(S.Ct.)
2712 SINGLE-GENDER MARRIAGE: A RELIGIOUS PERSPECTIVE, 7 Temp. Pol. & Civ. Rts. L.
Rev. 429, 484 (1998)

2713 INTERMEDIATE REVIEW "WITH TEETH' IN GENDER DISCRIMINATION CASES: THE

NEW STANDARD IN UNITED STATES v. VIRGINIA, 7 Temp. Pol. & Civ. Rts. L. Rev. 221,
244+ (1997) HN: 1,2,5 (S.Ct.)
2714 WHEN CIVIL RIGHTS GO WRONG: AGENDA AND PROCESS IN CIVIL RIGHTS RE-
FORM, 2 Temp. Pol. & Civ. Rts. L. Rev. 177, 208 (1993)
2715 THE ROLE OF THE PEOPLE'S LAWYER IN THE 1990S, 2 Temp. Pol. & Civ. Rts. L. Rev.
209, 226+ (1993)
2716 AFFIRMATIVE ACTION: IN SEARCH OF A NATIONAL POLICY, 2 Temp. Pol. & Civ. Rts.
L. Rev. 1, 48+ (1992) HN: 1,4,5 (S.Ct.)
2717 AMERICA MEETS THE JUSTICES: EXPLAINING THE SUPREME COURT TO THE GEN-
ERAL READER, 72 Tenn. L. Rev. 573, 612 (2005)
2718 JOHN MARSHALL AND THE CONFLUENCE OF LAW AND POLITICS, 71 Tenn. L. Rev.
241, 249 (2004) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
2719 CHECK AND CHECKMATE: CONGRESS'S SECTION 5 POWER AFTER HIBBS, 71 Tenn. L.
Rev. 315, 336 (2004) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
2720 CONSTITUTIONAL LAW-SUSPECT CLASS STATUS AND EQUAL ACCESS TO THE
POLITICAL PROCESS UNDER THE EQUAL PROTECTION CLAUSE OF THE FOUR-
TEENTH AMENDMENT-LAWS PRECLUDING ANTI-DISCRIMINATION LEGISLATION
FOR HOMOSEXUALS Equality, 63 Tenn. L. Rev. 239, 259+ (1995) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
2721 THE JURISDICTIONAL LEGACY OF THE CIVIL RIGHTS MOVEMENT, 61 Tenn. L. Rev.
869, 932 (1994)
2722 THE PROCESS OF SELECTING CONSTITUTIONAL STANDARDS: SOME INCONGRUIT-
IES OF TENNESSEE PRACTICE, 61 Tenn. L. Rev. 573, 608 (1994) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
2723 THE MUNICIPAL MANAGEMENT OF EMERGENCIES: THE HOUSTON PLAN, 4 Tex. F.
on C.L. & C.R. 139, 187 (1999) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
2724 AIDS VICTIMS IN THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITY AND THE UNITED STATES: ARE
THEY PROTECTED FROM UNJUSTIFIED DISCRIMINATION?, 24 Tex. Int'l L.J. 295, 329
(1989)
2725 WOMEN CONFINED BY PRISON BARS AND MALE IMAGES, 18 Tex. J. Women & L. 103,
124+ (2008)
2726 PROTECTING WOMEN: A FEMINIST LEGAL ANALYSIS OF THE HPV VACCINE, GAR-
DASIL, 17 Tex. J. Women & L. 67, 107+ (2007) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
2727 WOMEN'S CITIZENSHIP AND THE PROBLEM OF LEGAL PERSONHOOD IN THE
UNITED STATES IN THE 1960S AND 1970S, 13 Tex. J. Women & L. 1, 39+ (2003) HN: 1,4
(S.Ct.)
2728 SUBVERSIVE MOMENTS: CHALLENGING THE TRADITIONS OF CONSTITUTIONAL
HISTORY, 13 Tex. J. Women & L. 91, 111 (2003) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
2729 FOREWORD, 12 Tex. J. Women & L. 193, 195 (2003) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
2730 ROUND TABLE DISCUSSION: SUBVERSIVE LEGAL MOMENTS?, 12 Tex. J. Women & L.
197, 246+ (2003) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
2731 GENDERED WORKERS/MARKET EQUALITY, 12 Tex. J. Women & L. 323, 343 (2003) HN:

1 (S.Ct.)
2732 RAISING THE BAR: RUTH BADER GINSBURG AND THE ACLU WOMEN'S RIGHTS
PROJECT, 11 Tex. J. Women & L. 157, 242+ (2002) HN: 1,4,5 (S.Ct.)
2733 REVISITING GAY RIGHTS COALITION OF GEORGETOWN LAW CENTER V. GEOR-
GETOWN UNIVERSITY A DECADE LATER: FREE EXERCISE CHALLENGES AND THE
NONDISCRIMINATION LAWS PROTECTING HOMOSEXUALS, 9 Tex. J. Women & L. 219,
249+ (2000) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
2734 WOMEN'S PARTICIPATION IN SPORTS: FOUR FEMINIST PERSPECTIVES, 7 Tex. J. Wo-
men & L. 1, 36 (1997) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
2735 IS THERE A DUTY OF PRIVACY? LAW, SEXUAL ORIENTATION, AND THE CON-
STRUCTION OF IDENTITY, 6 Tex. J. Women & L. 47, 128 (1996) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
2736 A DELICATE IMBALANCE-FAMILY AND WORK, 5 Tex. J. Women & L. 37, 82+ (1995)
HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
2737 BREAST-FEEDING AND THE LAW, 3 Tex. J. Women & L. 417, 445 (1994) HN: 3 (S.Ct.)
2738 "IF YOU DON'T AIM TO PLEASE, DON'T DRESS TO TEASE" AND OTHER PUBLIC
SCHOOL SEX EDUCATION LESSONS SUBSIDIZED BY YOU, THE FEDERAL TAXPAY-
ER, 14 Tex. J. on C.L. & C.R. 1, 25 (2008)
2739 PUBLIC LAW AS A WHOLE AND NORMATIVE DUALITY: RECLAIMING ADMIN-
STRATIVE INSIGHTS IN ENFORCEMENT REVIEW, 12 Tex. J. on C.L. & C.R. 43, 99 (2006)
HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
2740 GOING TO THE CHAPEL AND WE'RE GOING TO GET MARRIED; BUT WILL THE
STATE RECOGNIZE THE MARRIAGE? (FN2) THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF STATE
MARRIAGE LAWS AFTER LAWRENCE V. TEXAS (FN3), 10 Tex. J. on C.L. & C.R. 189,
221 (2005) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
2741 INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS UNDER STATE CONSTITUTIONS WHEN THE FOURTEENTH
AMENDMENT WAS RATIFIED IN 1868: WHAT RIGHTS ARE DEEPLY ROOTED IN
AMERICAN HISTORY AND TRADITION?, 87 Tex. L. Rev. 7, 120+ (2008) HN: 4,5 (S.Ct.)
2742 DISPARATE IMPACT LEGISLATION AND ABROGATION OF THE STATES' SOVEREIGN
IMMUNITY AFTER NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES V. HIBBS AND
TENNESSEE V. LANE, 83 Tex. L. Rev. 1173, 1224 (2005)
2743 TRAIT DISCRIMINATION AS SEX DISCRIMINATION: AN ARGUMENT AGAINST NEUT-
RALITY, 83 Tex. L. Rev. 167, 235 (2004) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
2744 THE RISE OF THE PERSONAL ANIMOSITY PRESUMPTION IN TITLE VII AND THE RE-
TURN TO "NO CAUSE" EMPLOYMENT, 81 Tex. L. Rev. 1177, 1247+ (2003) HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
2745 DOING THE IMPOSSIBLE: APPELLATE REWEIGHING OF HARM AND MITIGATION IN
CAPITAL CASES AFTER WILLIAMS V. TAYLOR, WITH A SPECIAL FOCUS ON TEXAS,
80 Tex. L. Rev. 193, 218 (2001)
2746 IS TORT LAW INDIFFERENT TO MORAL LUCK?, 78 Tex. L. Rev. 467, 492 (1999) HN: 4
(S.Ct.)
2747 RETHINKING MILITARY DEFERENCE: MALE-ONLY DRAFT REGISTRATION AND THE
INTERSECTION OF MILITARY NEED WITH CIVILIAN RIGHTS, 78 Tex. L. Rev. 173, 209+

(1999) HN: 2,4,5 (S.Ct.)

2748 SUCCESSIVE PROSECUTIONS AND COMPOUND CRIMINAL STATUTES: A FUNCTION-
AL TEST, 77 Tex. L. Rev. 333, 401 (1998)
2749 LAWYERS, ARBITRARINESS, AND THE EIGHTH AMENDMENT, 75 Tex. L. Rev. 1301,
1371 (1997) HN: 3 (S.Ct.)
2750 IMAGES OF WOMEN AND CAPITAL SENTENCING AMONG FEMALE OFFENDERS: EX-
PLORING THE OUTER LIMITS OF THE EIGHTH AMENDMENT AND ARTICULATED
THEORIES OF JUSTICE, 75 Tex. L. Rev. 1413, 1453 (1997) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
2751 NORMALIZATION AS A GOAL: THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT AND INDI-
VIDUALS WITH MENTAL RETARDATION, 73 Tex. L. Rev. 409, 440+ (1994)
2752 BREEDING CONSTITUTIONAL DOCTRINE: THE PROVENANCE AND PROGENY OF
THE "HYBRID SITUATION" IN CURRENT FREE EXERCISE JURISPRUDENCE, 71 Tex. L.
Rev. 833, 863 (1993) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
2753 METRO BROADCASTING, INC. v. FCC: REQUIEM FOR A HEAVYWEIGHT, 69 Tex. L.
Rev. 125, 156+ (1990) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
2754 THE EQUAL RIGHTS AMENDMENT: GOVERNMENTAL ACTION AND INDIVIDUAL
LIBERTY, 68 Tex. L. Rev. 1545, 1572 (1990)
2755 PRIVATE CONSPIRACIES AND THE CONSTITUTION: A MODERN VISION OF 42 U.S.C.
SECTION 1985(3), 64 Tex. L. Rev. 527, 578+ (1985) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
2756 RATIONING MEDICAL RESOURCES: A CONSTITUTIONAL, LEGAL, AND POLICY
ANALYSIS, 59 Tex. L. Rev. 1345, 1400 (1981)
2757 TAKING CONSTITUTIONS SERIOUSLY: A THEORY OF JUDICIAL REVIEW Democracy
and Distrust: A Theory of Judicial Review By John Hart Ely. Cambridge: Harvard University
Press, 1980. Pp. viii, 268. $15.00, 59 Tex. L. Rev. 343, 394+ (1981) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
2758 THE VALUE OF THE BRETHREN: A RESPONSE TO ITS CRITICS The Brethren: Inside the
Supreme Court By Bob Woodward and Scott Armstrong. (FNr1) New York: Simon and Schuster,
1979. Pp. 467. $13.95, 58 Tex. L. Rev. 1475, 1497 (1980)
2759 TRUTH, JUSTICE, AND THE AMERICAN WAY: AN INTERPRETATION OF PUBLIC LAW
SCHOLARSHIP IN THE SEVENTIES, 57 Tex. L. Rev. 1307, 1359 (1979)
2760 THE SUPREME COURT MESS, 57 Tex. L. Rev. 1361, 1444 (1979) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
2761 RATIFICATION OF THE EQUAL RIGHTS AMENDMENT: A QUESTION OF TIME, 57 Tex.
L. Rev. 919, 937+ (1979) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
2762 PREGNANCY, JUSTICE, AND THE JUSTICES, 57 Tex. L. Rev. 947, 964+ (1979) HN: 1
(S.Ct.)
2763 LEGISLATIVE RESPONSE TO THE MEDICAL MALPRACTICE INSURANCE CRISIS:
CONSTITUTIONAL IMPLICATIONS, 55 Tex. L. Rev. 759, 800+ (1977) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
2764 A NEW LOOK AT THE TEXAS EQUAL RIGHTS AMENDMENT, 55 Tex. L. Rev. 323, 342+
(1977)
2765 THE ERA AND TEXAS MARITAL LAW, 54 Tex. L. Rev. 590, 615+ (1976) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
2766 SEX DISCRIMINATION AND THE LAW: CAUSES AND REMEDIES By Barbara Allen Bab-
cock, Ann E. Freedman, Eleanor Holmes Norton, and Susan C. Ross. Boston: Little, Brown and

Co., 1975. Pp. xlix, 1092. $22.50, 53 Tex. L. Rev. 1354, 1358+ (1975) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
2767 TITLE IX OF THE 1972 EDUCATION AMENDMENTS: PREVENTING SEX DISCRIMINA-
TION IN PUBLIC SCHOOLS, 53 Tex. L. Rev. 103, 126+ (1974) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
2768 THE DUTY OF FAIR REPRESENTATION: A THEORETICAL STRUCTURE, 51 Tex. L. Rev.
1119, 1178 (1973) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
2769 DEFENDING DOMESTIC TRANQUILITY FROM FEMINISM'S ASSAULT ON MARRIAGE
AND MOTHERHOOD Domestic Tranqiulity: A Brief Against Feminism. By F. Carolyn Graglia.
Dallas: Spence Publishing Co., 1998. Pp. 451. $29.95., 2 Tex. Rev. L. & Pol. 293, 313+ (1998)
HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
2770 THE EQUALITY PARADISE: PARADOXES OF THE LAW'S POWER TO ADVANCE
EQUALITY, 13 Tex. Wesleyan L. Rev. 515, 543 (2007) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
2771 HON. RUTH BADER GINSBURG ASSOCIATE JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT OF THE
UNITED STATES, 57-MAY Fed. Law. 24, 27 (2010) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
2772 VMI AND THE OLD/NEW FACE OF SEX DISCRIMINATION, 43-OCT Fed. Law. 22, 27
(1996) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
2773 LEARNING LAW THROUGH THE LENS OF RACE, 21 J.L. & Pol. 1, 30 (2005) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
2774 THE DEFENSE OF TRADITIONAL MARRIAGE, 15 J.L. & Pol. 581, 644 (1999) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
2775 THE PRINCIPLE OF DEFERENCE: FACIAL CONSTITUTIONAL CHALLENGES TO MIL-
ITARY REGULATIONS, 10 J.L. & Pol. 147, 181+ (1993)
2776 SANTA CLARA PUEBLO v. MARTINEZ: TWENTY-FIVE YEARS OF DISPARATE Cultural
Visions an Essay Introducing the Case for Re-Argument before the American Indian Nations Su-
preme Court, 14-FALL Kan. J.L. & Pub. Pol'y 49, 59 (2004) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
2777 THE CHANGING COMPLEXION OF WORKPLACE LAW: LABOR AND EMPLOYMENT
DECISIONS OF THE SUPREME COURT'S 1999-2000 TERM, 16 Lab. Law. 151, 200+ (2000)
HN: 2,4 (S.Ct.)
2778 INCONCEIVABLE CONSEQUENCES: WHY THE RECENT UPC AMENDMENTS WERE
CORRECT TO REJECT A "CONSENT IN A RECORD" REQUIREMENT, 23 Quinnipiac Prob.
L.J. 80, 100 (2009) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
2779 IN WHOSE BEST INTERESTS? COURTS' FAILURE TO APPLY STATE CUSTODIAL
LAWS EQUALLY AMONGST SPOUSES AND ITS CONSTITUTIONAL IMPLICATIONS, 20
Quinnipiac Prob. L.J. 223, 259+ (2007) HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
2780 EQUAL RIGHTS LEVEL PLAYING FIELD: WHAT TITLE IX MONEY CANNOT BUY, 10
Sports Law. J. 135, 154+ (2003) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
2781 PRESERVING AND PROTECTING TITLE IX: AN ANALYSIS AND HISTORY OF AD-
VOCACY AND BACKLASH, 10 Sports Law. J. 155, 187 (2003)
2782 ADMITTING THAT WOMEN'S ONLY PUBLIC EDUCATION IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL
AND ADVANCING THE EQUALITY OF THE SEXES, 25 T. Jefferson L. Rev. 53, 88+ (2002)
HN: 1,2,4 (S.Ct.)
2783 THE DEFENSE OF MARRIAGE ACT: CONGRESS RE-WRITES THE CONSTITUTUION TO
PACIFY ITS FEARS, 23 T. Marshall L. Rev. 513, 518+ (1998) HN: 1,2,3 (S.Ct.)
2784 SON, GET A HAIRCUT OR LEAVE MY SCHOOL? HAIR LENGTH RESTICTION FOR

MALE STUDENTS UPHELD BY TEXAS SUPREME COURT IN BARBER V. COLORADO

INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT, 21 T. Marshall L. Rev. 185, 201+ (1996) HN: 1,5
(S.Ct.)
2785 PUBLIC AFFIRMATIVE ACTION AND THE FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT: THE FRAG-
MENTATION OF THEORY AFTER RICHMOND v. J.A. CROSON CO. AND METRO
BROADCASTING, INC. v. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION, 17 T. Marshall
L. Rev. 317, 358+ (1992) HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
2786 AN ANALYSIS OF THE DEATH PENALTY JURISPRUDENCE OF THE OCTOBER 2007
SUPREME COURT TERM, 25 Touro L. Rev. 625, 677 (2009) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
2787 COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK Cubas v. Martinez (decided June 7, 2007), 24 Touro L.
Rev. 455, 470 (2008) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
2788 SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION FIRST DEPARTMENT, 17 Touro L. Rev. 31,
35+ (2000) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
2789 LITIGATION STRATEGIES: THE RIGHTS OF HOMOSEXUALS TO ADOPT CHILDREN,
16 Touro L. Rev. 161, 204 (1999) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
2790 "THE LIBERAL AGENDA": BIBLICAL VALUES AND THE FIRST AMENDMENT, 14
Touro L. Rev. 129, 197+ (1997) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
2791 UNITED STATES v. VIRGINIA: DOES INTERMEDIATE SCRUTINY STILL EXIST?, 13
Touro L. Rev. 229, 233+ (1996) HN: 1,2 (S.Ct.)
2792 GENDER BASED PEREMPTORY CHALLENGES AND THE NEW YORK STATE CONSTI-
TUTION, 8 Touro L. Rev. 91, 97+ (1991) HN: 4,5 (S.Ct.)
2793 THE SECTION 5 POWER AND THE RATIONAL BASIS STANDARD OF EQUAL PROTEC-
TION, 79 Tul. L. Rev. 519, 585+ (2005)
2794 THE RELEVANCE OF CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENTS: A RESPONSE TO DAVID
STRAUSS, 77 Tul. L. Rev. 247, 282+ (2002) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
2795 "CLOSET CASE": BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA V. DALE AND THE REINFORCEMENT OF
GAY, LESBIAN, BISEXUAL, AND TRANSGENDER INVISIBILITY, 76 Tul. L. Rev. 81,
148+ (2001) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
2796 FROM STATUS TO PERSON IN BOOK I, TITLE 1 OF THE CIVIL CODE, 73 Tul. L. Rev.
1263, 1286 (1999)
2797 UNITED STATES v. VIRGINIA: THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT RULES THAT
THE VIRGINIA MILITARY INSTITUTE'S MALE-ONLY ADMISSIONS POLICY VIOLATES
THE EQUAL PROTECTION CLAUSE OF THE CONSTITUTION, 71 Tul. L. Rev. 1375, 1388+
(1997) HN: 2,5 (S.Ct.)
2798 NORMALIZING THE SEPARATION OF POWERS, 70 Tul. L. Rev. 2681, 2717 (1996)
2799 ALL-MALE BLACK SCHOOLS AND THE EQUAL PROTECTION CLAUSE: A STEP FOR-
WARD TOWARD EDUCATION, 66 Tul. L. Rev. 2003, 2055 (1992) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
2800 BRAY v. ALEXANDRIA WOMEN'S HEALTH CLINIC: THE SUPREME COURT'S NEXT
OPPORTUNITY TO UNSETTLE CIVIL RIGHTS LAW, 66 Tul. L. Rev. 1357, 1400+ (1992)
HN: 4,5 (S.Ct.)
2801 WE ARE NOT SISTERS: AFRICAN-AMERICAN WOMEN AND THE FREEDOM TO ASSO-

CIATE AND DISASSOCIATE, 66 Tul. L. Rev. 1467, 1515+ (1992) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
2802 INTEGRATION IN THE 1980S: THE DREAM OF DIVERSITY AND THE CYCLE OF EX-
CLUSION, 64 Tul. L. Rev. 1625, 1676+ (1990) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
2803 THE JUNKING OF THE FOURTH AMENDMENT: ILLINOIS v. KRULL AND NEW YORK
v. BURGER, 63 Tul. L. Rev. 335, 377 (1988) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
2804 EQUAL EMPLOYMENT LAW: CRISIS IN INTERPRETATION-SURVIVAL AGAINST THE
ODDS, 62 Tul. L. Rev. 681, 715 (1988) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
2805 JUDICIAL REVIEW REVISITED: THE GERMAN EXPERIENCE, 59 Tul. L. Rev. 1013, 1031
(1985) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
2806 SOME OBSERVATIONS ABOUT RACE, SEX, AND EQUAL PROTECTION, 59 Tul. L. Rev.
928, 958+ (1985) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
2807 THE CONSTITUTIONAL GUARANTEE OF EQUAL PROTECTION IN CANADA AND THE
UNITED STATES: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE STANDARDS FOR DETERMIN-
ING THE VALIDITY OF GOVERNMENTAL ACTION., 5 Tulsa J. Comp. & Int'l L. 1, 87+
(1997) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
2808 WOMEN AS CONSTITUTIONAL EQUALS: THE BURGER COURT'S OVERDUE EVOLU-
TION, 33 Tulsa L.J. 23, 30+ (1997) HN: 4,5 (S.Ct.)
2809 VMI AND VIRGINIA LOSE AGAIN: UNITED STATES V. VIRGINIA, 32 Tulsa L.J. 681, 705
(1997) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
2810 PAVED WITH GOOD INTENTIONS: AFFIRMATIVE ACTION AFTER ADARAND?, 31
Tulsa L.J. 611, 642 (1996) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
2811 SUPREME COURT SUPERSTARS: THE TEN GREATEST JUSTICES, 31 Tulsa L.J. 93, 159
(1995)
2812 STEFFAN V. ASPIN: GAYS IN THE MILITARY WIN A VICTORY - OR DID THEY?, 30
Tulsa L.J. 171, 193 (1994)
2813 ALL DRESSED UP WITH NO PLACE TO GO: GENDER BIAS IN OKLAHOMA FEDERAL
COURT DRESS CODES, 30 Tulsa L.J. 395, 422+ (1994) HN: 1,2,4 (S.Ct.)
2814 EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY FOR PREGNANT WORKERS: CALIFORNIA
FEDERAL SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION v. GUERRA, 23 Tulsa L.J. 77, 104+ (1987)
HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
2815 THE MISCONCEPTION OF "SEX" IN TITLE VII: FEDERAL COURTS REEVALUATE
TRANSSEXUAL EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION CLAIMS, 43 Tulsa L. Rev. 765, 791+
(2008) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
2816 AN ILLEGITIMATE USE OF LEGISLATIVE POWER: MISSISSIPPI'S INAPPROPRIATE
CHILD SURNAME LAW IN PATERNITY PROCEEDINGS, 8 U.C. Davis J. Juv. L. & Pol'y
153, 197 (2004) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
2817 HUNTING EXPEDITIONS: PERVERTING SUBSTANTIVE DUE PROCESS AND UNDER-
MINING SEXUAL PRIVACY IN THE PURSUIT OF MORAL TROPHY GAME, 15 UCLA
Women's L.J. 171, 211+ (2006) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
2818 INTERWOVEN THREADS: SOME THOUGHTS ON PROFESSOR MACKINNON'S ESSAY
OF MICE AND MEN, 14 UCLA Women's L.J. 163, 212+ (2005) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)

2819 REACHING ACROSS DIFFERENCE: EXTENDING EQUALITY'S REACH TO ENCOMPASS

GOVERNMENTAL PROGRAMS THAT SOLELY BENEFIT WOMEN, 13 UCLA Women's
L.J. 375, 406+ (2005) HN: 1,2,3 (S.Ct.)
2820 LEGITIMIZING MALE DOMINANCE: GENDERING THE NONGENDERED EQUAL PRO-
TECTION DOCTRINE A CRITIQUE OF JUDITH BAER'S OUR LIVES BEFORE THE LAW,
12 UCLA Women's L.J. 291, 315+ (2003) HN: 4,5 (S.Ct.)
2821 THE MYTHOGENESIS OF GENDER: JUDICIAL IMAGES OF WOMEN IN PAID AND UN-
PAID LABOR, 6 UCLA Women's L.J. 457, 539+ (1996) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
2822 DOMINANCE AND DEMOCRACY: THE LEGACY OF WOMAN SUFFRAGE FOR THE
VOTING RIGHT, 5 UCLA Women's L.J. 103, 216+ (1994) HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
2823 IN RE MARRIAGE OF IVERSON: DUBIOUS BENEFITS IN REDUCING JUDICIAL
GENDER BIAS, 3 UCLA Women's L.J. 105, 112+ (1993) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
2824 DOES IT STILL MAKE SENSE TO TALK ABOUT "WOMEN"?, 1 UCLA Women's L.J. 15,
52+ (1991) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
2825 "THE FIGHT FOR THE RIGHT TO FIGHT": EQUAL PROTECTION & THE UNITED
STATES MILITARY, 74 UMKC L. Rev. 383, 410 (2005) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
2826 ASSIMILATE ME. IT'S AS EASY AS (GETTING RID OF) UNO, DOS, TRES, 74 UMKC L.
Rev. 455, 486 (2005) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
2827 NEW COMPLEXITY THEORIES: FROM THEORETICAL INNOVATION TO DOCTRINAL
REFORM, 71 UMKC L. Rev. 431, 445 (2002)
2828 CAN MISSOURI CATCH UP? WHY MISSOURI LAWS WORK UNCONSTITUTIONAL DIS-
CRIMINATION AGAINST LAY MIDWIVES AND WHAT CAN BE DONE TO STOP IT, 67
UMKC L. Rev. 427, 444 (1998) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
2829 SEXISM AND BIAS IN THE NAME OF TRADITION: MISSOURI'S STANDARD OF IN-
EQUALITY REGARDING CHILDREN'S SURNAMES, 66 UMKC L. Rev. 169, 190+ (1997)
HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
2830 TRENDS IN CONSTITUTION-BASED LITIGATION IN THE FEDERAL COURTS, 63
UMKC L. Rev. 41, 77 (1994) HN: 1,2 (S.Ct.)
2831 NO MORE NERVOUS BREAKDOWNS: SEXUAL HARASSMENT AND THE HOSTILE
WORK ENVIRONMENT, 62 UMKC L. Rev. 521, 548 (1994) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
2832 THE VMI DECISION: A LOOK AT THE BALANCING PROCESS IN EQUAL PROTECTION
CASES, 60 UMKC L. Rev. 393, 410+ (1991) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
2833 THE FETAL RIGHTS CONTROVERSY: A RESURFACING OF SEX DISCRIMINATION IN
THE GUISE OF FETAL PROTECTION, 57 UMKC L. Rev. 261, 288+ (1989) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
2834 CONSTITUTIONAL LAW-GENDER EQUALITY AND SINGLE-SEX EDUCATION.
UNITED STATES v. VIRGINIA, 116 S.Ct. 2264 (1996)., 20 U. Ark. Little Rock L.J. 191, 199+
(1997) HN: 1,3,4 (S.Ct.)
2835 CIVIL RIGHTS-EMPLOYER'S BEWARE: THE SUPREME COURT'S REJECTION OF THE
PSYCHOLOGICAL INJURY REQUIREMENT IN HARRIS v. FORKLIFT SYSTESM, INC.,
114 S. CT. 376 (1993), MAKES IT EASIER FOR EMPLOYEES TO ESTABLISH A CLAIM
FOR, 17 U. Ark. Little Rock L.J. 839, 864 (1995) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)

2836 THE AFFIRMATIVE ACTION/QUOTA ISSUE: BACK TO THE FUTURE IN THE YEAR
2000? (THE BEN J. ALTHEIMER LECTURE), 15 U. Ark. Little Rock L.J. 361, 381 (1993) HN:
1 (S.Ct.)
2837 EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION-TITLE VII'S LIMITED PREEMPTIVE EFFECT AL-
LOWS STATE LAWS MANDATING PREGNANCY LEAVE AND REINSTATEMENT.
CALIFORNIA FEDERAL SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION v. GUERRA, 107 S.CT 683
(1987)., 9 U. Ark. Little Rock L.J. 669, 681 (1987) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
2838 THE PEREMPTORY CHALLENGE AT THE FEDERAL LEVEL AND IN MARYLAND: ITS
UNCERTAIN FUTURE AFTER GEORGIA v. McCOLLUM, 23 U. Balt. L. Rev. 225, 267
(1993) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
2839 AMERICA'S STATUTORY "CONSTITUTION", 41 U.C. Davis L. Rev. 1, 44 (2007)
2840 BEYOND INTERSTATE RECOGNITION IN THE SAME-SEX MARRIAGE DEBATE, 40
U.C. Davis L. Rev. 313, 383+ (2006) HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
2841 REPRESENTATIONAL STRUCTURES THROUGH WHICH WE THE PEOPLE RATIFY
CONSTITUTIONS: THE TROUBLING ORIGINAL UNDERSTANDING OF THE CONSTITU-
TION'S RATIFICATION CLAUSES, 38 U.C. Davis L. Rev. 1373, 1504 (2005)
2842 LOFTON V. KEARNEY: EQUAL PROTECTION MANDATES EQUAL ADOPTION RIGHTS,
36 U.C. Davis L. Rev. 1285, 1312+ (2003) HN: 1,2 (S.Ct.)
2843 NGUYEN V. INS: NO, YOUR HONOR, MEN ARE NOT FROM MARS, 36 U.C. Davis L. Rev.
1023, 1049 (2003)
2844 THE PHAGES OF AMERICAN LAW, 36 U.C. Davis L. Rev. 455, 504 (2003) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
2845 THE TRANSFORMATION OF THE EDUCATION OF THE HANDICAPPED ACT: A STUDY
IN THE INTERPRETATION OF RADICAL STATUTES, 24 U.C. Davis L. Rev. 349, 436
(1990)
2846 THE SEX DISCOUNT, 57 UCLA L. Rev. 1149, 1197+ (2010) HN: 2,4 (S.Ct.)
2847 WHAT FEMINISTS HAVE TO LOSE IN SAME-SEX MARRIAGE LITIGATION, 57 UCLA L.
Rev. 1199, 1233+ (2010) HN: 4,5 (S.Ct.)
2848 SEXUAL AND GENDER VARIATION IN AMERICAN PUBLIC LAW: FROM MALIGNANT
TO BENIGN TO PRODUCTIVE, 57 UCLA L. Rev. 1333, 1373 (2010) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
2849 THE GAY TIPPING POINT, 57 UCLA L. Rev. 1537, 1544+ (2010) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
2850 TAKING THE "HATE" OUT OF HATE CRIMES: APPLYING UNFAIR ADVANTAGE THE-
ORY TO JUSTIFY THE ENHANCED PUNISHMENT OF OPPORTUNISTIC BIAS CRIMES,
56 UCLA L. Rev. 489, 541 (2008) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
2851 THE LIBERTIES OF EQUAL CITIZENS: GROUPS AND THE DUE PROCESS CLAUSE, 55
UCLA L. Rev. 99, 142 (2007) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
2852 STRICT JUDICIAL SCRUTINY, 54 UCLA L. Rev. 1267, 1337+ (2007) HN: 1,2,3 (S.Ct.)
2853 LEGAL RECOGNITION OF SAME-SEX CONJUGAL RELATIONSHIPS: THE 2003 CALI-
FORNIA DOMESTIC PARTNER RIGHTS AND RESPONSIBILITIES ACT IN COMPARAT-
IVE CIVIL RIGHTS AND FAMILY LAW PERSPECTIVE, 51 UCLA L. Rev. 1555, 1617
(2004) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
2854 THE FAILED JURISPRUDENCE OF MANAGED CARE, AND HOW TO FIX IT: REINTER-

PRETING ERISA PREEMPTION, 51 UCLA L. Rev. 457, 537 (2003)

2855 DESCENT INTO RACE, 49 UCLA L. Rev. 1373, 1394 (2002) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
2856 EVALUATING THE SEX DISCRIMINATION ARGUMENT FOR LESBIAN AND GAY
RIGHTS, 49 UCLA L. Rev. 471, 518+ (2001)
2857 DEFENDING THE SEX DISCRIMINATION ARGUMENT FOR LESBIAN AND GAY
RIGHTS: A REPLY TO EDWARD STEIN, 49 UCLA L. Rev. 519, 538 (2001) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
2858 RACE-BASED SUSPECT SELECTION AND COLORBLIND EQUAL PROTECTION DOC-
TRINE AND DISCOURSE, 48 UCLA L. Rev. 1075, 1124 (2001)
2859 NINTH AMENDMENT ADJUDICATION: AN ALTERNATIVE TO SUBSTANTIVE DUE
PROCESS ANALYSIS OF PERSONAL AUTONOMY RIGHTS, 48 UCLA L. Rev. 85, 157
(2000) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
2860 THE SECTION FIVE QUAGMIRE, 47 UCLA L. Rev. 653, 702+ (2000) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
2861 OF RACE AND IMMUTABILITY, 46 UCLA L. Rev. 1375, 1463+ (1999) HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
2862 MANAGING LEGAL CHANGE: THE TRANSFORMATION OF ESTABLISHMENT CLAUSE
LAW, 46 UCLA L. Rev. 343, 459 (1998) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
2863 JUROR SEXUAL ORIENTATION: THE FAIR CROSS-SECTION REQUIREMENT, PRI-
VACY, CHALLENGES FOR CAUSE, AND PEREMPTORIES, 46 UCLA L. Rev. 231, 288
(1998) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
2864 DEMOCRACY, DISTRUST, AND THE PUBLIC TRUST: PROCESS-BASED CONSTITU-
TIONAL THEORY, THE PUBLIC TRUST DOCTRINE, AND THE SEARCH FOR A SUB-
STANTIVE ENVIRONMENTAL VALUE, 45 UCLA L. Rev. 385, 451 (1997)
2865 FEMINISM FOR MEN: LEGAL IDEOLOGY AND THE CONSTRUCTION OF MALENESS,
43 UCLA L. Rev. 1037, 1116 (1996) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
2866 THE GLASS CEILING IN THE LEGAL PROFESSION: WHY DO LAW FIRMS STILL HAVE
SO FEW FEMALE PARTNERS?, 42 UCLA L. Rev. 1631, 1689 (1995)
2867 UNNATURAL SELECTION: NONTHERAPEUTIC PREIMPLANTATION GENETIC
SCREENING AND PROPOSED REGULATION, 41 UCLA L. Rev. 1581, 1650 (1994) HN: 1
(S.Ct.)
2868 ANTI-GAY INITIATIVES: A CALL FOR HEIGHTENED JUDICIAL SCRUTINY, 41 UCLA
L. Rev. 153, 198+ (1993) HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
2869 THE BORDERS OF THE EQUAL PROTECTION CLAUSE: INDIANS AS PEOPLES, 38
UCLA L. Rev. 759, 870+ (1991) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
2870 THE POLITICS OF THE CLOSET: TOWARDS EQUAL PROTECTION FOR GAY, LESBIAN,
AND BISEXUAL IDENTITY, 36 UCLA L. Rev. 915, 927+ (1989) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
2871 OVERINCLUSION AND UNDERINCLUSION: A NEW MODEL, 36 UCLA L. Rev. 447, 528+
(1989) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
2872 A THEORY OF FREE SPEECH, 34 UCLA L. Rev. 1837, 1903 (1987) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
2873 PROVOKED REASON IN MEN AND WOMEN: HEAT-OF-PASSION MANSLAUGHTER
AND IMPERFECT SELF-DEFENSE, 33 UCLA L. Rev. 1679, 1735 (1986)
2874 INEQUALITY "FROM THE TOP": APPLYING AN ANCIENT PROHIBITION TO AN EMER-
GING PROBLEM OF DISTRIBUTIVE JUSTICE, 32 UCLA L. Rev. 100, 134 (1984)

2875 THE PROTECTIVE JURISDICTION OF THE FEDERAL COURTS, 30 UCLA L. Rev. 542, 616
(1983) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
2876 THE MODERNIZING MISSION OF JUDICIAL REVIEW, 76 U. Chi. L. Rev. 859, 907 (2009)
2877 UNDER SIEGE: FREEDOM OF CHOICE AND THE STATUTORY BAN ON ABORTIONS
ON MILITARY BASES, 71 U. Chi. L. Rev. 1549, 1582+ (2004) HN: 2,5 (S.Ct.)
2878 THE EQUAL PROTECTION CLAUSE, THE FREE EXERCISE CLAUSE AND RELIGION-
BASED PEREMPTORY CHALLENGES, 63 U. Chi. L. Rev. 1639, 1672+ (1996)
2879 DEFINING THE SCOPE OF THE EQUAL PROTECTION CLAUSE WITH RESPECT TO
WELFARE WAITING PERIODS, 61 U. Chi. L. Rev. 291, 323+ (1994) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
2880 THE BRICOLEUR AT THE CENTER; The Partial Constitution. Cass R. Sunstein, Harvard Uni-
versity Press, 1993. PP. 414., 60 U. Chi. L. Rev. 1071, 1116 (1993) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
2881 QUITTIN' TIME?: THE ANTIDISCRIMINATION PRINCIPLE OF TITLE VII vs. THE FREE
MARKET, 60 U. Chi. L. Rev. 757, 781 (1993)
2882 THE BILL OF RIGHTS: A CENTURY OF PROGRESS, 59 U. Chi. L. Rev. 13, 38 (1992) HN: 5
(S.Ct.)
2883 SEXUAL ORIENTATION AND THE CONSTITUTION: A NOTE ON THE RELATIONSHIP
BETWEEN DUE PROCESS AND EQUAL PROTECTION, 55 U. Chi. L. Rev. 1161, 1179
(1988)
2884 THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF REGULATING HUMAN GENETIC ENGINEERING:
WHERE PROCREATIVE LIBERTY AND EQUAL OPPORTUNITY COLLIDE, 53 U. Chi. L.
Rev. 1274, 1342+ (1986) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
2885 STILL NEWER EQUAL PROTECTION: IMPERMISSIBLE PURPOSE REVIEW IN THE 1984
TERM, 53 U. Chi. L. Rev. 1454, 1484 (1986)
2886 THE "SUBSTANTIAL RELATION"' QUESTION IN GENDER DISCRIMINATION CASES,
52 U. Chi. L. Rev. 149, 158+ (1985) HN: 2,4,5 (S.Ct.)
2887 SOJOURNERS AND SURVIVORS: TWO LOGICS OF CONSTITUTIONAL PROTECTION, 3
U. Chi. L. Sch. Roundtable 121, 184 (1996)
2888 "A CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO BE TREATED LIKE . . . LADIES': WOMEN, CIVIC OB-
LIGATION, AND MILITARY SERVICE, 1993 U. Chi. L. Sch. Roundtable 95, 128 (1993) HN:
5 (S.Ct.)
2889 PRISONER PARENTS: AN ARGUMENT FOR EXTENDING THE RIGHT TO PROCREATE
TO INCARCERATED MEN AND WOMEN, 2002 U. Chi. Legal F. 271, 301+ (2002) HN: 5
(S.Ct.)
2890 LIBERTY, EQUALITY, AND PRIVACY: CHOOSING A LEGAL FOUNDATION FOR GAY
RIGHTS, 2002 U. Chi. Legal F. 73, 104 (2002)
2891 PATRIARCHY AND INEQUALITY: TOWARDS A SUBSTANTIVE FEMINISM, 1999 U. Chi.
Legal F. 21, 86 (1999) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
2892 TWO CHEERS FOR CHEERLEADING: THE NOISY INTEGRATION OF VMI AND THE
QUIET SUCCESS OF VIRGINIA WOMEN IN LEADERSHIP, 1999 U. Chi. Legal F. 347, 380
(1999) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
2893 ANTI-SUBORDINATION ANALYSIS AFTER UNITED STATES V VIRGINIA: EVALUAT-

ING THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF K-12 SINGLE-SEX PUBLIC SCHOOLS, 1999 U. Chi.

Legal F. 381, 460+ (1999) HN: 1,2,4 (S.Ct.)
2894 FUNDING OF MEDICALLY-NECESSARY ABORTIONS: A REEXAMINATION OF U.S.
LAW AND A CALL FOR EC FEDERALISM, 1992 U. Chi. Legal F. 517, 538 (1992) HN: 4
(S.Ct.)
2895 AN EQUAL PROTECTION ANALYSIS OF PUBLIC AND PRIVATE ALL-MALE MILITARY
SCHOOLS, 1991 U. Chi. Legal F. 211, 230 (1991)
2896 INHERITANCE RIGHTS FOR EXTRAMARITAL CHILDREN: NEW SCIENCE PLUS OLD
INTERMEDIATE SCRUTINY ADD UP TO THE NEED FOR CHANGE, 65 U. Cin. L. Rev.
891, 891+ (1997) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
2897 JUSTICE RUTH BADER GINSBURG AND SEXUAL HARASSMENT LAW: WILL THE
SECOND FEMALE SUPREME COURT JUSTICE BECOME THE COURT'S WOMEN'S
RIGHTS CHAMPION?, 63 U. Cin. L. Rev. 1893, 1945+ (1995) HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
2898 HISPANICS: NOT A COGNIZABLE ETHNIC GROUP, 63 U. Cin. L. Rev. 497, 522+ (1994)
HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.)
2899 BALLOT INITIATIVES AND GAY RIGHTS: EQUAL PROTECTION CHALLENGES TO
THE RIGHT'S CAMPAIGN AGAINST LESBIANS AND GAY MEN, 62 U. Cin. L. Rev. 1055,
1103+ (1994) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
2900 A PLACE IN THE PALLADIUM: WOMEN'S RIGHTS AND JURY SERVICE, 61 U. Cin. L.
Rev. 1139, 1180+ (1993) HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
2901 THE CONTINUING CLASH ABORTION: THE CLASH OF ABSOLUTES. BY LAURENCE
TRIBE. NEW YORK, W.W. NORTON & CO, 1990, 270PP, 59 U. Cin. L. Rev. 1231, 1251
(1991) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
2902 THE SIXTH CIRCUIT'S DOUBLE STANDARD IN HOSTILE WORK ENVIRONMENT
CLAIMS: DAVIS v. MONSANTO CHEMICAL CO., 858 F.2d 345 (6TH CIR. 1988)., 58 U.
Cin. L. Rev. 779, 817+ (1989) HN: 1,2,3 (S.Ct.)
2903 ILLICIT LEGISLATIVE MOTIVE IN THE MUNICIPAL LAND USE REGULATION PRO-
CESS, 57 U. Cin. L. Rev. 1, 124 (1988)
2904 A STEP TOWARD ENHANCING EQUALITY, CHOICE, AND OPPORTUNITY TO DEVEL-
OP IN MARRIAGE AND AT DIVORCE, 56 U. Cin. L. Rev. 493, 519 (1987) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
2905 WOMEN AND THE LAW: FROM ABIGAIL TO SANDRA, 52 U. Cin. L. Rev. 967, 976+
(1983) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
2906 NAVIGATING DANGEROUS CONSTITUTIONAL STRAITS: A PROLEGOMENON ON
THE FEDERAL MARRIAGE AMENDMENT AND THE DISENFRANCHISEMENT OF
SEXUAL MINORITIES, 76 U. Colo. L. Rev. 599, 652+ (2005) HN: 1,2,4 (S.Ct.)
2907 JUSTICE WHITE AND JUDICIAL REVIEW, 74 U. Colo. L. Rev. 1305, 1317 (2003)
2908 STATE IMMUNITY AND THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT AFTER BOARD
OF TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA V. GARRETT, 74 U. Colo. L. Rev.
1239, 1281 (2003)
2909 IS TRADITION ACTIVIST? THE COMMON LAW OF THE FAMILY IN THE LIBERAL
CONSTITUTIONALIST WORLD, 73 U. Colo. L. Rev. 1291, 1306 (2002)

2910 INCREASING ACCESS TO JUSTICE: EXPANDING THE ROLE OF NONLAWYERS IN THE

DELIVERY OF LEGAL SERVICES TO LOW-INCOME COLORADANS, 72 U. Colo. L. Rev.
459, 505 (2001) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
2911 UNCONSTITUTIONAL? DON'T ASK; IF IT IS, DON'T TELL: ON DEFERENCE, RATION-
ALITY, AND THE CONSTITUTION, 66 U. Colo. L. Rev. 375, 460+ (1995) HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
2912 POST-LIBERAL JUDGING: THE ROLES OF CATEGORIZATION AND BALANCING, 63 U.
Colo. L. Rev. 293, 317+ (1992) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
2913 61 U. Colo. L. Rev. 715, 719 (1990)
2914 61 U. Colo. L. Rev. 727, 735+ (1990) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
2915 COMMON SENSE AND THE CONSTITUTION: JUSTICE WHITE AND THE EGALITARI-
AN IDEAL, 58 U. Colo. L. Rev. 433, 470 (1987) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
2916 THE RIGHTS OF HANDICAPPED STUDENTS IN DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS BY
PUBLIC SCHOOL AUTHORITIES, 53 U. Colo. L. Rev. 367, 409 (1982) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
2917 THE USE OF EXPERT TESTIMONY IN THE DEFENSE OF BATTERED WOMEN, 52 U.
Colo. L. Rev. 587, 599+ (1981) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
2918 A COMMENT ON THE BURGER COURT AND "JUDICIAL ACTIVISM", 52 U. Colo. L. Rev.
223, 245+ (1981) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
2919 TITLE IX, DISPARATE IMPACT AND CHILD CARE: CAN A REFUSAL TO COOPERATE
IN THE PROVISION OF CHILD CARE CONSTITUTE SEX DISCRIMINATION UNDER
TITLE IX?, 52 U. Colo. L. Rev. 271, 299 (1981) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
2920 STANDING TO CHALLENGE SPECIAL ADMISSION PROGRAMS DiLeo v. Board of Re-
gents of the University of Colorado, 50 U. Colo. L. Rev. 361, 374 (1979) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
2921 ANTENUPTIAL CONTRACTS, 50 U. Colo. L. Rev. 141, 164 (1979) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
2922 THE PREMATURE DEMISE OF IRREBUTTABLE PRESUMPTIONS, 47 U. Colo. L. Rev.
653, 705+ (1976) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
2923 BACKWASH BENEFITS FOR SECOND CLASS CITIZENS: PRISONERS' FIRST AMEND-
MENT AND PROCEDURAL DUE PROCESS RIGHTS, 46 U. Colo. L. Rev. 377, 431 (1975)
HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
2924 BY WAY OF THE DODO: THE UNCONSTITUTIONALITY OF THE SELECTIVE SERVICE
ACT MALE-ONLY REGISTRATION REQUIREMENT UNDER MODERN GENDER-BASED
EQUAL PROTECTION, 29 U. Dayton L. Rev. 135, 167+ (2003) HN: 1,4,5 (S.Ct.)
2925 TITLE VII'S FLIGHT WITHIN FIRST AMENDMENT RADAR: THE OUTER COSMOS OF
EMPLOYER LIABILITY FOR WORKPLACE HARASSMENT ABSENT A TANGIBLY DIS-
CRIMINATORY EMPLOYMENT ACTION, 25 U. Dayton L. Rev. 1, 74 (1999) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
2926 THE INDEPENDENCE OF THE JUDICIARY: HISTORY AND PURPOSES, 21 U. Dayton L.
Rev. 565, 584 (1996)
2927 CONNECTICUT'S CLASS DIVIDE: SEXUAL ORIENTATION AS A QUASI-SUSPECT
CLASS, 87 U. Det. Mercy L. Rev. 227, 246+ (2010) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
2928 RELIGION, SEXUAL ORIENTATION, AND SELF-REALIZATION: FIRST AMENDMENT
PRINCIPLES AND ANTI-DISCRIMINATION LAWS, 76 U. Det. Mercy L. Rev. 189, 410
(1999) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)

2929 AGE DISCRIMINATION: DISPARATE IMPACT UNDER THE ADEA AFTER HAZEN PA-
PER CO. v. BIGGINS: ARGUMENTS IN FAVOR, 73 U. Det. Mercy L. Rev. 591, 611+ (1996)
HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
2930 CONSTITUTIONAL LAW--FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT--THE EQUAL PROTECTION
CLAUSE OF THE FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT PROHIBITS DISCRIMINATION IN JURY
SELECTION WHERE THE SOLE BASIS OF A PEREMPTORY CHALLENGE IS GENDER.
J.E.B. v. ALABAMA, 73 U. Det. Mercy L. Rev. 103, 115 (1995) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
2931 CONSTITUTIONAL LAW: THE REDEFINITION OF "MINORITY" AND ITS IMPACT ON
POLITICAL STRUCTURE EQUAL PROTECTION ANALYSIS Coalition for Economic Equity
v. Wilson, 110 F.3d 1431 (9th Cir. 1997), 9 U. Fla. J.L. & Pub. Pol'y 121, 130 (1997)
2932 THE REASONABLE WOMAN STANDARD: PERPETUATING SEX DISCRIMINATION IN
THE WORKPLACE ELLISON v. BRADY, 924 F.2D 872 (9TH CIR. 1990), 5 U. Fla. J.L. &
Pub. Pol'y 329, 341 (1993) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
2933 THE DEFENSE OF MARRIAGE ACT: SEX AND THE CITIZEN, 24 U. Haw. L. Rev. 279,
307+ (2001) HN: 1,3,4 (S.Ct.)
2934 THE FUTURE OF SAME-SEX MARRIAGE, 22 U. Haw. L. Rev. 119, 147+ (2000) HN: 1,4
(S.Ct.)
2935 THE FINE LINE BETWEEN LOVE AND THE LAW: HAWAI'I'S ATTEMPT TO RESOLVE
THE SAME-SEX MARRIAGE ISSUE, 22 U. Haw. L. Rev. 149, 184+ (2000) HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.)
2936 RUTH BADER GINSBURG: A PERSONAL, VERY FOND TRIBUTE, 20 U. Haw. L. Rev. 583,
587 (1998)
2937 HEARING THE VOICES OF INDIVIDUAL WOMEN AND MEN: JUSTICE RUTH BADER
GINSBURG, 20 U. Haw. L. Rev. 635, 646 (1998) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
2938 JUSTICE RUTH BADER GINSBURG'S JURISPRUDENCE OF PROCESS AND PROCED-
URE, 20 U. Haw. L. Rev. 647, 698 (1998) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
2939 JUSTICE RUTH BADER GINSBURG AND GENDER DISCRIMINATION, 20 U. Haw. L. Rev.
699, 796+ (1998) HN: 1,2,4 (S.Ct.)
2940 RUTH BADER GINSBURG AND JOHN MARSHALL HARLAN: A JUSTICE AND HER
HERO, 20 U. Haw. L. Rev. 797, 833+ (1998) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
2941 WHEN IS AN INNOVATION IN ORDER?: JUSTICE BADER RUTH GINSBURG AND
STARE DECISIS, 20 U. Haw. L. Rev. 835, 894+ (1998) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
2942 RETHINKING RACE FOR STRICT SCRUTINY PURPOSES: YNIGUEZ AND THE RACIAL-
IZATION OF ENGLISH ONLY, 19 U. Haw. L. Rev. 221, 263+ (1997) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
2943 A BIOLOGIC ARGUMENT FOR GAY ESSENTIALISM-DETERMINISM: IMPLICATIONS
FOR EQUAL PROTECTION AND SUBSTANTIVE DUE PROCESS, 18 U. Haw. L. Rev. 571,
622+ (1996) HN: 1,3,4 (S.Ct.)
2944 FOR BETTER OR FOR WORSE, IN SICKNESS AND IN HEALTH, UNTIL DEATH DO US
PART: A LOOK AT SAME-SEX MARRIAGE IN HAWAII, 16 U. Haw. L. Rev. 447, 479+
(1994) HN: 3,5 (S.Ct.)
2945 THE CONSTITUTIONAL STRUCTURE OF THE COURTS OF THE UNITED STATES TER-
RITORIES: THE CASE OF AMERICAN SAMOA, 13 U. Haw. L. Rev. 379, 451+ (1991)

2946 CONDITIONAL SPENDING AND COMPULSORY MATERNITY, 2010 U. Ill. L. Rev. 751,
798 (2010) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
2947 REBOOTING ORIGINALISM, 2008 U. Ill. L. Rev. 1185, 1223 (2008)
2948 THE NEW POLITICS OF ABORTION: AN EQUALITY ANALYSIS OF WOMAN-PRO-
TECTIVE ABORTION RESTRICTIONS, 2007 U. Ill. L. Rev. 991, 1053+ (2007) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
2949 RUNNING IN PLACE: THE PARADOX OF EXPANDING RIGHTS AND RESTRICTED
REMEDIES, 2005 U. Ill. L. Rev. 1199, 1255 (2005)
2950 EMBRACING SEGREGATION: THE JURISPRUDENCE OF CHOICE AND DIVERSITY IN
RACE AND SEX SEPARATISM IN SCHOOLS, 2005 U. Ill. L. Rev. 455, 512 (2005) HN: 5
(S.Ct.)
2951 DISARMING THE PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL, 2003 U. Ill. L. Rev. 183, 209 (2003)
HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
2952 "UNEXPLAINABLE ON GROUNDS OTHER THAN RACE": THE INVERSION OF PRIV-
ILEGE AND SUBORDINATION IN EQUAL PROTECTION JURISPRUDENCE, 2003 U. Ill.
L. Rev. 615, 700+ (2003)
2953 ENHANCING THE SPECTRUM: MEDIA POWER, DEMOCRACY, AND THE MARKET-
PLACE OF IDEAS, 2000 U. Ill. L. Rev. 813, 887 (2000) HN: 3 (S.Ct.)
2954 HARDWICK AND HISTORIOGRAPHY, 1999 U. Ill. L. Rev. 631, 686 (1999)
2955 WARRING WITH WARDLE: MORALITY, SOCIAL SCIENCE, AND GAY AND LESBIAN
PARENTS, 1998 U. Ill. L. Rev. 253, 339 (1998)
2956 A CONVERSATION WITH JUSTICE RUTH BADER GINSBURG, 53 U. Kan. L. Rev. 957,
982 (2005) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
2957 MEMBERS ONLY? DESIGNING CITIZENSHIP REQUIREMENTS FOR INDIAN NATIONS,
50 U. Kan. L. Rev. 437, 471 (2002) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
2958 UNPUBLISHED OPINIONS, PRECEDENT, AND THE FIFTH AMENDMENT: WHY DENY-
ING UNPUBLISHED OPINIONS PRECEDENTIAL VALUE IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL, 50 U.
Kan. L. Rev. 195, 223+ (2001) HN: 2,5 (S.Ct.)
2959 ROMER v. EVANS: HEIGHTENED SCRUTINY HAS FOUND A RATIONAL BASIS--IS THE
COURT TACITLY RECOGNIZING QUASI-SUSPECT STATUS FOR GAYS, LESBIANS,
AND BISEXUALS?, 45 U. Kan. L. Rev. 953, 969+ (1997) HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.)
2960 GENDER-BASED AFFIRMATIVE ACTION: WHERE DOES IT FIT IN THE TIERED
SCHEME OF EQUAL PROTECTION SCRUTINY?, 41 U. Kan. L. Rev. 591, 613+ (1993) HN:
1,2,4 (S.Ct.)
2961 RENDERING EACH WOMAN HER DUE: CAN A BATTERED WOMAN CLAIM SELF-
DEFENSE WHEN SHE KILLS HER SLEEPING BATTERER?, 38 U. Kan. L. Rev. 169, 192+
(1989) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
2962 IN NOBODY'S BEST INTERESTS: A CONSIDERATION OF ABSOLUTE BANS ON SEXU-
AL MINORITY ADOPTION FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF THE UNADOPTED CHILD, 35
U. Louisville J. Fam. L. 25, 74+ (1997) HN: 1,3,4 (S.Ct.)
2963 HOMOSEXUALS AS A NEW CLASS OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE SUBJECTS UNDER THE
NEW JERSEY PREVENTION OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ACT OF 1991, 31 U. Louisville J.

Fam. L. 557, 611+ (1993) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)

2964 THE ROLE OF COURTS VIS- A-VIS LEGISLATURES IN THE SAME-SEX MARRIAGE
CONTEXT: SEXUAL ORIENTATION AS A SUSPECT CLASSIFICATION, 9 U. Md. L.J.
Race, Religion, Gender & Class 213, 239+ (2009) HN: 1,2,4 (S.Ct.)
2965 THE GENETIC INFORMATION NONDISCRIMINATION ACT OF 2008: HISTORY, SUC-
CESSES, AND FUTURE CONSIDERATIONS, 7 U. Md. L.J. Race, Religion, Gender & Class
192, 214+ (2007) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
2966 THE FATE OF SEPARATE BUT EQUAL IN THE ATHLETIC ARENA, 10 U. Miami Bus. L.
Rev. 649, 685+ (2002) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
2967 WOMEN & ATHLETICS: A TWENTY YEAR RETROSPECTIVE ON TITLE IX, 9 U. Miami
Ent. & Sports L. Rev. 1, 64+ (1992) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
2968 WHEN HUMAN RIGHTS CONFLICT: MEDIATING INTERNATIONAL PARENTAL KID-
NAPPING DISPUTES INVOLVING THE DOMESTIC VIOLENCE DEFENSE, 40 U. Miami
Inter-Am. L. Rev. 49, 108 (2008) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
2969 REMEDYING UNDERINCLUSIVE ENTITLEMENT STATUES: LESSONS FROM A CON-
TRAST OF THE CANADIAN AND U.S. DOCTRINES, 24 U. Miami Inter-Am. L. Rev. 121,
160 (1992) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
2970 ENVISIONING A U.S. GOVERNMENT THAT ISN'T 84% MALE: WHAT THE UNITED
STATES CAN LEARN FROM SWEDEN, RWANDA, BURUNDI, AND OTHER NATIONS, 62
U. Miami L. Rev. 129, 156+ (2007) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
2971 HOLISTIC INTERPRETATION, COMPARATIVE CONSTITUTIONALISM, AND FISS-IAN
FREEDOMS, 58 U. Miami L. Rev. 265, 321 (2003)
2972 JUST ASK THE KID! TOWARDS A RULE OF CHILDREN'S CHOICE IN CUSTODY DE-
TERMINATIONS, 49 U. Miami L. Rev. 299, 376 (1994) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
2973 BRAY v. ALEXANDRIA WOMEN'S HEALTH CLINIC: WOMEN UNDER SIEGE, 47 U.
Miami L. Rev. 1415, 1448+ (1993) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
2974 MARCHING TO THE BEAT OF A DIFFERENT DRUMMER: THE CASE OF THE VIRGINIA
MILITARY INSTITUTE, 47 U. Miami L. Rev. 1449, 1488 (1993) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
2975 FUNCTIONS OF WOMANHOOD: THE DOCTRINE OF NECESSARIES IN FLORIDA, 47 U.
Miami L. Rev. 397, 436+ (1992) HN: 4,5 (S.Ct.)
2976 CAN TWO REAL MEN EAT QUICHE TOGETHER? STORYTELLING, GENDER-ROLE
STEROTYPES, AND LEGAL PROTECTION FOR LESBIANS AND GAY MEN, 46 U. Miami
L. Rev. 511, 651 (1992) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
2977 OF SUPERVISION, CENTERFOLDS, AND CENSORSHIP: SEXUAL HARASSMENT, THE
FIRST AMENDMENT, AND THE CONTOURS OF TITLE VII, 46 U. Miami L. Rev. 403, 453
(1991) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
2978 SUSPECT CLASS DEMOCRACY: A SOCIAL THEORY, 45 U. Miami L. Rev. 107, 158+
(1990) HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
2979 REFLECTIONS ON THE SIGNIFICANCE OF THE SEX/GENDER SYSTEM: DIVORCE
LAW REFORM IN NEW YORK, 42 U. Miami L. Rev. 55, 73 (1987) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
2980 WOMEN'S RIGHTS AND THE PROPOSED FAMILY PROTECTION ACT, 36 U. Miami L.

Rev. 141, 163+ (1981)

2981 SUBORDINATION AND THE FORTUITY OF OUR CIRCUMSTANCES, 41 U. Mich. J.L. Re-
form 585, 610+ (2008) HN: 2,4 (S.Ct.)
2982 BILINGUALISM AND EQUALITY: TITLE VII CLAIMS FOR LANGUAGE DISCRIMINA-
TION IN THE WORKPLACE, 38 U. Mich. J.L. Reform 57, 140 (2004) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
2983 DISABILITY, EQUAL PROTECTION, AND THE SUPREME COURT: STANDING AT THE
CROSSROADS OF PROGRESSIVE AND RETROGRESSIVE LOGIC IN CONSTITUTIONAL
CLASSIFICATION, 35 U. Mich. J.L. Reform 81, 136+ (2002) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
2984 THE ATTACHMENT GAP: EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION LAW, WOMEN'S CUL-
TURAL CAREGIVING, AND THE LIMITS OF ECONOMIC AND LIBERAL LEGAL THE-
ORY, 34 U. Mich. J.L. Reform 371, 468 (2001) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
2985 THE STRUGGLE FOR SEX EQUALITY IN SPORT AND THE THEORY BEHIND TITLE IX,
34 U. Mich. J.L. Reform 13, 149+ (2001) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
2986 LIFE AFTER ADARAND: WHAT HAPPENED TO THE METRO BROADCASTING DI-
VERSITY RATIONALE FOR AFFIRMATIVE ACTION IN TELECOMMUNICATIONS
OWNERSHIP?, 33 U. Mich. J.L. Reform 87, 132 (2000)
2987 VERBAL SEXUAL HARASSMENT AS EQUALITY-DEPRIVING CONDUCT, 27 U. Mich.
J.L. Reform 565, 611 (1994)
2988 THE USUAL SUSPECT CLASSIFICATIONS: CRIMINALS, ALIENS AND THE FUTURE OF
SAME-SEX MARRIAGE, 12 U. Pa. J. Const. L. 1, 56+ (2009) HN: 1,2,4 (S.Ct.)
2989 RECONSTRUCTING RECONSTRUCTION: SOME PROBLEMS FOR ORIGINALISTS (AND
EVERYONE ELSE, TOO), 11 U. Pa. J. Const. L. 1201, 1238 (2009) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
2990 A PLURALIST THEORY OF THE EQUAL PROTECTION CLAUSE, 11 U. Pa. J. Const. L.
1239, 1267 (2009) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
2991 ON SECTION 5 OF THE FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT, 11 U. Pa. J. Const. L. 1431, 1450
(2009)
2992 ON THE ROLE OF IDEOLOGICAL HOMOGENEITY IN GENERATING CONSEQUENTIAL
CONSTITUTIONAL DECISIONS, 10 U. Pa. J. Const. L. 361, 386 (2008) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
2993 THE EQUAL APPLICATION DEFENSE: THE EQUAL APPLICATION DEFENSE, 9 U. Pa. J.
Const. L. 1207, 1231 (2007) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
2994 THE CONSTITUTIONAL IMPLICATIONS OF BATHROOM ACCESS BASED ON GENDER
IDENTITY: AN EXAMINATION OF RECENT DEVELOPMENTS PAVING THE WAY FOR
THE NEXT FRONTIER OF EQUAL PROTECTION, 9 U. Pa. J. Const. L. 895, 928+ (2007)
HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
2995 POOR LAW: THE DEFICIT REDUCTION ACT'S CITIZENSHIP DOCUMENTATION RE-
QUIREMENT FOR MEDICAID ELIGIBILITY, 8 U. Pa. J. Const. L. 1033, 1070 (2006) HN: 1
(S.Ct.)
2996 FORGET THE FUNDAMENTALS: FIXING SUBSTANTIVE DUE PROCESS, 8 U. Pa. J.
Const. L. 983, 1004 (2006) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
2997 PROTECTING LAWS DESIGNED TO REMEDY ANTI-GAY DISCRIMINATION FROM
EQUAL PROTECTION CHALLENGES: THE DESIRABILITY OF RATIONAL BASIS SCRU-

TINY, 8 U. Pa. J. Const. L. 513, 558+ (2006) HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)

2998 LAW AS A REFLECTION OF HER/HIS-STORY: CURRENT INSTITUTIONAL PERCEP-
TIONS OF, AND POSSIBILITIES FOR, PROTECTING TRANSSEXUALS' INTERESTS IN
LEGAL DETERMINATIONS OF SEX, 5 U. Pa. J. Const. L. 128, 185+ (2002) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
2999 THE RIGHT OF MEN TO CHANGE THEIR NAMES UPON MARRIAGE, 5 U. Pa. J. Const. L.
186, 218+ (2002) HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
3000 MARBURY AND JUDICIAL DEFERENCE: THE SHADOW OF WHITTINGTON V. POLK
AND THE MARYLAND JUDICIARY BATTLE, 5 U. Pa. J. Const. L. 58, 108 (2002)
3001 STANDARDS OF REVIEW UNDER THE EQUAL PROTECTION CLAUSE AND RELATED
CONSTITUTIONAL DOCTRINES PROTECTING INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS: THE "BASE PLUS
SIX" MODEL AND MODERN SUPREME COURT PRACTICE, 4 U. Pa. J. Const. L. 225, 258+
(2002) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
3002 CURIOUS CHIASMA: RISING AND FALLING PROTECTION OF RELIGIOUS FREEDOM
AND GENDER EQUALITY, 4 U. Pa. J. Const. L. 394, 449+ (2002) HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
3003 CONSTRUCTIVE IMMUTABILITY, 3 U. Pa. J. Const. L. 646, 721+ (2001) HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
3004 THE DEADWEIGHT OF FORMULAE: WHAT MIGHT HAVE BEEN THE SECOND GER-
MANIZATION OF AMERICAN EQUAL PROTECTION REVIEW, 1 U. Pa. J. Const. L. 284,
324+ (1998)
3005 SINGLE-SEX PUBLIC EDUCATION: EQUALITY VERSUS CHOICE, 1 U. Pa. J. Const. L.
154, 172+ (1998) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
3006 ACCOMMODATING OUTNESS: HURLEY, FREE SPEECH, AND GAY AND LESBIAN
EQUALITY, 1 U. Pa. J. Const. L. 85, 126+ (1998) HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
3007 THE DENIAL OF BENEFITS TO THE SAME-SEX DOMESTIC PARTNERS OF STATE EM-
PLOYEES: HOW DO CLAIMS OF DISCRIMINATION FARE OUTSIDE THE SHADOW OF
ERISA PREEMPTION?, 4 U. Pa. J. Lab. & Emp. L. 669, 693 (2002) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
3008 THE IRRELEVANCE OF WRITTENNESS IN CONSTITUTIONAL INTERPRETATION, 158
U. Pa. L. Rev. 1025, 1091 (2010) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
3009 SAME STRUGGLE, DIFFERENT DIFFERENCE: ADA ACCOMMODATIONS AS ANTI-
DISCRIMINATION, 153 U. Pa. L. Rev. 579, 673 (2004)
3010 VANGUARD STATES, LAGGARD STATES: FEDERALISM AND CONSTITUTIONAL
RIGHTS, 152 U. Pa. L. Rev. 1745, 1827 (2004)
3011 WHEN IS SEX BECAUSE OF SEX? THE CAUSATION PROBLEM IN SEXUAL HARASS-
MENT LAW, 150 U. Pa. L. Rev. 1697, 1794+ (2002) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
3012 TEXT IN CONTEST: GENDER AND THE CONSTITUTION FROM A SOCIAL MOVEMENT
PERSPECTIVE, 150 U. Pa. L. Rev. 297, 351+ (2001) HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.)
3013 CHANNELING: IDENTITY-BASED SOCIAL MOVEMENTS AND PUBLIC LAW, 150 U. Pa.
L. Rev. 419, 525 (2001) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
3014 EXPRESSIVE THEORIES OF LAW: A GENERAL RESTATEMENT, 148 U. Pa. L. Rev. 1503,
1575 (2000) HN: 3 (S.Ct.)
3015 A THIRTEENTH AMENDMENT DEFENSE OF THE VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN ACT,
146 U. Pa. L. Rev. 1097, 1167+ (1998) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)

3016 SINGLE-SEX EDUCATION AFTER VMI: EQUAL PROTECTION AND EAST HARLEM'S
YOUNG WOMEN'S LEADERSHIP SCHOOL, 145 U. Pa. L. Rev. 987, 1033+ (1997) HN: 4,5
(S.Ct.)
3017 THE CENTRAL MISTAKE OF SEX DISCRIMINATION LAW:THE DISAGGREGATION OF
SEX FROM GENDER, 144 U. Pa. L. Rev. 1, 99+ (1995) HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
3018 THE FEMINIST CHALLENGE IN CRIMINAL LAW, 143 U. Pa. L. Rev. 2151, 2207+ (1995)
HN: 4,5 (S.Ct.)
3019 POVERTY, DEMOCRACY AND CONSTITUTIONAL LAW, 141 U. Pa. L. Rev. 1277, 1389
(1993)
3020 WHEN THE SUPREME COURT RESTRICTS CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS, CAN CON-
GRESS SAVE US? AN EXAMINATION OF SECTION 5 OF THE FOURTEENTH AMEND-
MENT, 141 U. Pa. L. Rev. 1029, 1101 (1993) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
3021 JUSTICE BRENNAN, EQUALITY, AND MAJORITY RULE, 139 U. Pa. L. Rev. 1357, 1371+
(1991) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.)
3022 FCC TAX CERTIFICATES FOR MINORITY OWNERSHIP OF BROADCAST FACILITIES:
A CRITICAL RE-EXAMINATION OF POLICY, 138 U. Pa. L. Rev. 979, 1026 (1990) HN: 5
(S.Ct.)
3023 ABORTION POLITICS: WRITING FOR AN AUDIENCE OF ONE, 138 U. Pa. L. Rev. 119,
155 (1989) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
3024 FROM DRIVING TO DRUGS: GOVERNMENTAL REGULATION OF PREGNANT WO-
MEN'S LIVES AFTER WEBSTER, 138 U. Pa. L. Rev. 179, 215 (1989)
3025 UNDOING A LESSON OF FEAR IN THE CLASSROOM: THE LEGAL RECOURSE OF
AIDS-LINKED CHILDREN, 135 U. Pa. L. Rev. 193, 221 (1986) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
3026 A THEORY OF TORT LIABILITY FOR SEXUAL HARASSMENT IN THE WORKPLACE,
134 U. Pa. L. Rev. 1461, 1495 (1986) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
3027 INTERMEDIATE EQUAL PROTECTION SCRUTINY OF WELFARE LAWS THAT DENY
SUBSISTENCE, 132 U. Pa. L. Rev. 1547, 1576+ (1984) HN: 1,3,4 (S.Ct.)
3028 RETHINKING SEX AND THE CONSTITUTION, 132 U. Pa. L. Rev. 955, 979+ (1984) HN:
1,4,5 (S.Ct.)
3029 SEXUAL POLITICS, SEXUAL COMMUNITIES: THE MAKING OF A HOMOSEXUAL
MINORITY IN THE UNITED STATES, 1940-1970. BY JOHN D'EMILIO. CHICAGO: UNI-
VERSITY OF CHICAGO PRESS, 1983, PP. X., 257. PRICE $20.00., 132 U. Pa. L. Rev. 391,
412+ (1984) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
3030 WOMEN, WORK, WELFARE, AND THE PRESERVATION OF PATRIARCHY, 131 U. Pa. L.
Rev. 1249, 1339 (1983) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
3031 HOMOSEXUALS' RIGHT TO MARRY: A CONSTITUTIONAL TEST AND A LEGISLATIVE
SOLUTION, 128 U. Pa. L. Rev. 193, 216+ (1979) HN: 1,2,4 (S.Ct.)
3032 O'NEIL V. BAINE: APPLICATION OF MIDDLE-LEVEL SCRUTINY TO OLD-AGE CLASSI-
FICATIONS, 127 U. Pa. L. Rev. 798, 816+ (1979) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
3033 THE JUDICIAL POWER OF THE PURSE, 126 U. Pa. L. Rev. 715, 736+ (1978) HN: 4,5 (S.Ct.)
3034 THE CONCLUSIVE PRESUMPTION SHUFFLE, 125 U. Pa. L. Rev. 761, 798+ (1977) HN: 2,5

(S.Ct.)
3035 THE RELIGIOUS RIGHTS OF THE INCARCERATED, 125 U. Pa. L. Rev. 812, 875 (1977)
3036 APPLYING THE EQUAL PAY ACT TO STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENTS: THE EF-
FECT OF NATIONAL LEAGUE OF CITIES V. USERY, 125 U. Pa. L. Rev. 665, 681 (1977)
HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
3037 DOES THE CONSTITUTION PREVENT THE DISCHARGE OF CIVIL SERVICE EMPLOY-
EES?, 124 U. Pa. L. Rev. 942, 1012 (1976) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
3038 IMPLEMENTING TITLE IX: THE NEW REGULATIONS, 124 U. Pa. L. Rev. 806, 815+ (1976)
HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
3039 CONGRESSIONAL POWER TO CONTROL THE JURISDICTION OF LOWER FEDERAL
COURTS: A CRITICAL REVIEW AND A NEW SYNTHESIS, 124 U. Pa. L. Rev. 45, 109+
(1975) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
3040 THE INEVITABLE INTERPLAY OF TITLE VII AND THE NATIONAL LABOR RELA-
TIONS ACT: A NEW ROLE FOR THE NLRB, 123 U. Pa. L. Rev. 158, 186+ (1974) HN: 1,4
(S.Ct.)
3041 TAX INCENTIVES AS STATE ACTION, 122 U. Pa. L. Rev. 414, 470 (1973) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
3042 AFFIRMATIVE ACTION AND THE "INDIVIDUAL" RIGHT TO EQUAL PROTECTION, 71
U. Pitt. L. Rev. 241, 277+ (2009) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.)
3043 BALANCING PUBLIC HEALTH AGAINST INDIVIDUAL LIBERTY: THE ETHICS OF
SMOKING REGULATIONS, 61 U. Pitt. L. Rev. 419, 498+ (2000) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
3044 RULES, RESPONSIBILITY AND COMMITMENT TO CHILDREN: THE NEW LANGUAGE
OF MORALITY IN FAMILY LAW, 60 U. Pitt. L. Rev. 1111, 1205 (1999) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
3045 JUST DESERTS: NARRATIVE, PERSPECTIVE, CHOICE, AND BLAME, 57 U. Pitt. L. Rev.
525, 548 (1996)
3046 DOMINATION IN THE THEORY OF JUSTIFICATION AND EXCUSE, 57 U. Pitt. L. Rev.
553, 578 (1996)
3047 SEXUAL ORIENTATION, MORALITY, AND THE LAW: DEVLIN REVISITED, 57 U. Pitt.
L. Rev. 237, 336+ (1996) HN: 1,3,4 (S.Ct.)
3048 EQUALITY AND FEMINIST LEGAL THEORY, 48 U. Pitt. L. Rev. 1043, 1059 (1987) HN: 4
(S.Ct.)
3049 WHEN A HEARING IS NOT A HEARING: IRREBUTTABLE PRESUMPTIONS AND TER-
MINATION OF PARENTAL RIGHTS BASED ON STATUS, 44 U. Pitt. L. Rev. 879, 926+
(1983) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
3050 CHILDREN IN THE LABYRINTH: THE COMPLEXITIES OF PLYLER v. DOE, 44 U. Pitt. L.
Rev. 379, 398 (1983)
3051 ARTICLE III AND THE "RELATED TO' BANKRUPTCY JURISDICTION: A CASE STUDY
IN PROTECTIVE JURISDICTION, 11 U. Puget Sound L. Rev. 1, 72 (1987) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
3052 PLEASE CHECK ONE-MALE OR FEMALE?: CONFRONTING GENDER IDENTITY DIS-
CRIMINATION IN COLLEGIATE RESIDENTIAL LIFE, 44 U. Rich. L. Rev. 1365, 1397+
(2010) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
3053 READING, WRITING, AND RACE: THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF EDUCATIONAL

STRATEGIES DESIGNED TO TEACH RACIAL LITERACY, 41 U. Rich. L. Rev. 707, 757+

(2007) HN: 4,5 (S.Ct.)
3054 STUDENTS' RIGHTS AND HOW THEY ARE WRONGED, 32 U. Rich. L. Rev. 457, 475
(1998)
3055 FERES TO CHAPPELL TO STANLEY: THREE STRIKES AND SERVICEMEMBERS ARE
OUT, 25 U. Rich. L. Rev. 93, 134+ (1990) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
3056 THE GREAT AMERICAN MAKEOVER: THE SEXING UP AND DUMBING DOWN OF WO-
MEN'S WORK AFTER JESPERSEN V. HARRAH'S OPERATING COMPANY, INC., 42
U.S.F. L. Rev. 299, 328 (2007) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
3057 MARRIAGES OF CONVENIENCE: INTERNATIONAL MARRIAGE BROKERS, "MAIL-
ORDER BRIDES," AND DOMESTIC SERVITUDE, 38 U. Tol. L. Rev. 895, 922 (2007) HN: 4
(S.Ct.)
3058 MY LIFE AND THE LAW: A SHORT OVERVIEW, 36 U. Tol. L. Rev. 863, 882+ (2005) HN: 5
(S.Ct.)
3059 WOMEN OF THE HIGHEST COURT: DOES GENDER BIAS OR PERSONAL LIFE EXPERI-
ENCES INFLUENCE THEIR OPINIONS?, 36 U. Tol. L. Rev. 995, 1022 (2005) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
3060 FORBIDDING FEMALE TOPLESSNESS: WHY "REAL DIFFERENCE" JURISPRUDENCE
LACKS "SUPPORT" AND WHAT CAN BE DONE ABOUT IT, 36 U. Tol. L. Rev. 273, 319+
(2005) HN: 4,5 (S.Ct.)
3061 PUBLIC SINGLE-SEX ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS: "SEPARATE BUT EQUAL" IN GENDER
FIFTY YEARS FOLLOWING BROWN V. BOARD OF EDUCATION, 35 U. Tol. L. Rev. 857,
887 (2004) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
3062 ROMER v. EVANS AND COLORADO'S AMENDMENT 2: THE GAY MOVEMENT'S SYM-
BOLIC VICTORY IN THE BATTLE FOR CIVIL RIGHTS, 28 U. Tol. L. Rev. 219, 245+ (1996)
HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
3063 STANDING TO SUE: TRANSFORMATIONS IN SUPREME COURT METHODOLOGY,
DOCTRINE AND RESULTS, 28 U. Tol. L. Rev. 93, 121+ (1996) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
3064 STATE v. GRAY: DE-CRIMINALIZATION OF MATERNAL DRUG ABUSE OR A MO-
MENTARY REPRIEVE?, 25 U. Tol. L. Rev. 1013, 1038 (1995) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
3065 JUSTICE RUTH BADER GINSBURG: A PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT, 26 U. Tol. L. Rev.
1, 26+ (1994) HN: 1,2 (S.Ct.)
3066 CLEANING OUT THE PENTAGON'S CLOSET: AN OVERVIEW OF THE DEFENSE DE-
PARTMENT'S ANTI-GAY POLICY, 23 U. Tol. L. Rev. 433, 467+ (1992) HN: 1,2 (S.Ct.)
3067 THE SIXTH CIRCUIT TAKES A STAND: CONKLIN v. LOVELY AND THE EXTENSION
OF PROTECTION UNDER 42 U.S.C. S 1985(3) TO VICTIMS OF NON-RACIAL, POLITIC-
ALLY DISCRIMINATORY CONSPIRACIES, 20 U. Tol. L. Rev. 733, 764 (1989) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
3068 FROM IDENTITY POLITICS TO IDEOLOGY POLITICS, 2009 Utah L. Rev. 749, 795+ (2009)
HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
3069 FAMILY GOVERNANCE IN THE AGE OF DIVORCE, 1998 Utah L. Rev. 211, 211+ (1998)
HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
3070 DISMANTLING A RELIC OF THE NINETEENTH CENTURY: AN END TO DISCRIMINA-

TION AT THE VIRGINIA MILITARY INSTITUTE, 1996 Utah L. Rev. 717, 721+ (1996) HN:
1,2,4 (S.Ct.)
3071 CONSTRUCTING THE OUTLAW, OUTING THE LAW, AND THROWING OUT THE LAW,
1994 Utah L. Rev. 255, 267 (1994) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
3072 REFOCUSING ABORTION JURISPRUDENCE TO INCLUDE THE WOMAN: A RESPONSE
TO BOPP AND COLESON AND WEBSTER v. REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH SERVICES, 1990
Utah L. Rev. 543, 611 (1990) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
3073 ROBERTS v. UNITED STATES JAYCEES: DOES THE RIGHT OF FREE ASSOCIATION IM-
PLY AN ABSOLUTE RIGHT OF PRIVATE DISCRIMINATION?, 1986 Utah L. Rev. 373, 398
(1986)
3074 THE MATURING NATURE OF STATE CONSTITUTION JURISPRUDENCE, 30 Val. U. L.
Rev. 421, 457 (1996) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
3075 WILL THE RELIGIOUS FREEDOM RESTORATION ACT BE STRIKE THREE AGAINST
PEREMPTORY CHALLENGES?, 30 Val. U. L. Rev. 701, 748+ (1996) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
3076 QUEER JUSTICE: EQUAL PROTECTION FOR VICTIMS OF SAME-SEX DOMESTIC VIOL-
ENCE, 30 Val. U. L. Rev. 335, 379+ (1995) HN: 1,3,4 (S.Ct.)
3077 STYLES OF CONSTITUTIONAL INTERPRETATION AND THE FOUR MAIN AP-
PROACHES TO CONSTITUTIONAL INTERPRETATION IN AMERICAN LEGAL HIS-
TORY, 29 Val. U. L. Rev. 121, 232+ (1994) HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
3078 HIV AND DENTISTRY, 29 Val. U. L. Rev. 297, 359 (1994) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
3079 THE PROGRESSION OF WOMEN IN THE LAW, 28 Val. U. L. Rev. 1161, 1181 (1994)
3080 PRIVILEGED BUT EQUAL? A COMPARISON OF U.S. AND ISRAELI NOTIONS OF SEX
EQUALITY IN EMPLOYMENT LAW, 40 Vand. J. Transnat'l L. 357, 416+ (2007) HN: 4
(S.Ct.)
3081 EQUIVALENCE AT LAW (AND SOCIETY): SOCIAL STATUS IN KOREA, RACE IN
AMERICA, 37 Vand. J. Transnat'l L. 109, 180+ (2004) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
3082 SHERMAN MINTON: RESTRAINT AGAINST A TIDE OF ACTIVISM, 62 Vand. L. Rev. 757,
794 (2009) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
3083 "THE HOUSE WAS QUIET AND THE WORLD WAS CALM THE READER BECAME THE
BOOK" Reading the Bill of Rights as a Poem: An Essay in Honor of the Fiftieth Anniversary of
Brown v. Board of Education, 57 Vand. L. Rev. 2007, 2083 (2004) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
3084 SINGLE-SEX CLASSES IN PUBLIC SECONDARY SCHOOLS: MAXIMIZING THE VALUE
OF A PUBLIC EDUCATION FOR THE NATION'S STUDENTS, 57 Vand. L. Rev. 629, 691
(2004) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
3085 COMMERCIAL SPEECH AND THE UNCONSTITUTIONAL CONDITIONS DOCTRINE: A
SECOND LOOK AT "THE GREATER INCLUDES THE LESSER", 55 Vand. L. Rev. 693, 796
(2002) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
3086 CONSTITUTIONAL ISSUES RAISED BY STATES' EXCLUSION OF FERTILITY DRUGS
FROM MEDICAID COVERAGE IN LIGHT OF MANDATED COVERAGE OF VIAGRA, 54
Vand. L. Rev. 451, 480+ (2001) HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
3087 SCRUTINIZING JUVENILE CURFEWS: CONSTITUTIONAL STANDARDS & THE FUN-

DAMENTAL RIGHTS OF JUVENILES AND PARENTS, 53 Vand. L. Rev. 653, 683+ (2000)
HN: 1,2,4 (S.Ct.)
3088 UNITED STATES v. VIRGINIA'S NEW GENDER EQUAL PROTECTION ANALYSIS WITH
RAMIFICATIONS FOR PREGNANCY, PARENTING, AND TITLE VII, 50 Vand. L. Rev. 845,
915 (1997) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
3089 ALL THE SUPREME COURT REALLY NEEDS TO KNOW IT LEARNED FROM THE WAR-
REN COURT, 50 Vand. L. Rev. 459, 486 (1997) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
3090 THE HISTORY OF THE WOMEN'S SUFFRAGE MOVEMENT, 49 Vand. L. Rev. 657, 675
(1996) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
3091 Hooters: Should There Be an Assumption of Risk Defense to Some Hostile Work Environment
Sexual Harassment Claims?, 48 Vand. L. Rev. 1107, 1153 (1995)
3092 TEMPERING TITLE VII'S STRAIGHT ARROW APPROACH: RECOGNIZING AND PRO-
TECTING GAY VICTIMS OF EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION, 46 Vand. L. Rev. 1533,
1551+ (1993) HN: 1,2,4 (S.Ct.)
3093 QUASI-CONSTITUTIONAL LAW: CLEAR STATEMENT RULES AS CONSTITUTIONAL
LAWMAKING, 45 Vand. L. Rev. 593, 646 (1992) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
3094 LEGAL RIGHTS AND ISSUES SURROUNDING CONCEPTION, PREGNANCY, AND
BIRTH, 39 Vand. L. Rev. 597, 850+ (1986) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
3095 THE LEMON TEST SOURED: THE SUPREME COURT'S NEW ESTABLISHMENT CLAUSE
ANALYSIS, 37 Vand. L. Rev. 1175, 1203 (1984)
3096 TRANSCRIPT OF LAW DAY PANEL, 34 Vt. L. Rev. 243, 275+ (2009) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
3097 PEREMPTORY CHALLENGES, GRUTTER, AND CRITICAL MASS: A MEANS OF RE-
CLAIMING THE PROMISE OF BATSON, 29 Vt. L. Rev. 297, 363 (2005) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
3098 ONE PERSON, ONE VOTE, SEVERAL ELECTIONS?: INSTANT RUNOFF VOTING AND
THE CONSTITUTION, 28 Vt. L. Rev. 343, 372 (2004) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
3099 Baker v. State Stan BAKER, et al. v. STATE of Vermont, et al. No. 98-032., 25 Vt. L. Rev. 285,
339+ (2000) HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
3100 HARDLY A REVOLUTION-THE ELIGIBILITY OF NONHUMAN ANIMALS FOR DIG-
NITY-RIGHTS IN A LIBERAL DEMOCRACY, 22 Vt. L. Rev. 793, 915+ (1998) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
3101 BIOLOGY, BEHAVIOR, AND CRIMINAL LAW: SEEKING A RESPONSIBLE APPROACH
TO AN INEVITABLE INTERCHANGE, 22 Vt. L. Rev. 263, 294 (1997) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
3102 AN ANALYSIS OF THE DOCTRINES AND GOALS OF FEMINIST LEGAL THEORY AND
THEIR CONSTITUTIONAL IMPLICATIONS, 19 Vt. L. Rev. 137, 190+ (1994) HN: 1,2,4
(S.Ct.)
3103 WORKPLACE DISCRIMINATION: TRUTHFULNESS AND THE MORAL IMAGINATION,
16 Vt. L. Rev. 137, 182+ (1991) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
3104 THE DOUBTFUL VALIDITY OF VICTIM-SPECIFIC LIBEL LAWS, 52 Vill. L. Rev. 533, 567
(2007) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
3105 COULD JESUS SERVE ON A JURY? NOT IN THE THIRD CIRCUIT: RELIGION-BASED
PEREMPTORY CHALLENGES IN UNITED STATES V. DEJESUS AND BRONSHTEIN V.
HORN, 51 Vill. L. Rev. 1057, 1084 (2006) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)

3106 BUILDING "A DOLL'S HOUSE': A FEMINIST ANALYSIS OF MARITAL DEBT DIS-
CHARGEABILITY IN BANKRUPTCY, 48 Vill. L. Rev. 381, 467+ (2003) HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
3107 THE "INTELLIGENT WICKEDNESS" OF U.S. IMMIGRATION LAW CONFERRING CIT-
IZENSHIP TO CHILDREN BORN ABROAD AND OUT-OF-WEDLOCK: A FEMINIST PER-
SPECTIVE, 47 Vill. L. Rev. 707, 745 (2002)
3108 CONFLATING SCOPE OF RIGHT WITH STANDARD OF REVIEW: THE SUPREME
COURT'S "STRICT SCRUTINY' OF CONGRESSIONAL EFFORTS TO ENFORCE THE
FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT, 46 Vill. L. Rev. 1091, 1110+ (2001) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
3109 LITIGATING AGAINST EMPLOYMENT PENALTIES FOR PREGNANCY, BREASTFEED-
ING AND CHILDCARE, 44 Vill. L. Rev. 355, 393 (1999) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
3110 A PERRY, PERRY POOR POLICY PROMOTING PREJUDICE REBUKED BY THE REAL-
ITY OF THE ROMER RULING: THOMASSON v. PERRY, 42 Vill. L. Rev. 1293, 1341 (1997)
HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
3111 "SUBSTANTIALLY LIMITED" PROTECTION FROM DISABILITY DISCRIMINATION:
THE SPECIAL TREATMENT MODEL AND MISCONSTRUCTIONS OF THE DEFINITION
OF DISABILITY, 42 Vill. L. Rev. 409, 585 (1997) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
3112 JURADO v. POPEJOY CONSTRUCTION CO.: DETERMINING THE CONSTITUTIONAL-
ITY OF DISPARATE AWARDS OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION DEATH BENEFITS TO
NONRESIDENT ALIEN DEPENDENTS, 39 Vill. L. Rev. 705, 736 (1994) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
3113 REGULATING WORKPLACE SEXUAL HARASSMENT AND UPHOLDING THE FIRST
AMENDMENT-AVOIDING A COLLISION, 37 Vill. L. Rev. 757, 782 (1992) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
3114 THE NEW STANDARD OF REVIEW FOR PRISONERS' RIGHTS: A "TURNER' FOR THE
WORSE?TITURNER v. SAFLEY, 33 Vill. L. Rev. 393, 436 (1988) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
3115 CONSTITUTIONAL LIMITATIONS ON TORT REFORM: HAVE THE STATE COURTS
PLACED INSURMOUNTABLE OBSTACLES IN THE PATH OF LEGISLATIVE RE-
SPONSES TO THE PERCEIVED LIABILITY INSURANCE CRISIS?, 32 Vill. L. Rev. 1299,
1347 (1987)
3116 THE UNEQUAL PLAYING FIELD-EXCLUSION OF MALE ATHLETES FROM SINGLE-
SEX TEAMS: WILLIAMS v. SCHOOL DISTRICT OF BETHLEHEM, PA., 2 Vill. Sports &
Ent. L.F. 99, 126 (1995)
3117 THE NBA DRESS CODE AND OTHER FASHION FAUX PAS UNDER TITLE VII, 16 Vill.
Sports & Ent. L.J. 1, 47 (2009) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
3118 THE HUNKIEST LITTLE WHOREHOUSE IN TOWN IS LOOKING FOR A FEW GOOD
MEN, BUT ONLY TO WORK: THE CONSTITUTIONAL IMPLICATIONS OF HEIDI
FLEISS'S FEMALE BROTHEL, 14 Vill. Sports & Ent. L.J. 77, 125 (2007) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
3119 VIEWPOINT DISCRIMINATION IN THE MILITARY CONTEXT: DEFINING THE DEFER-
ENCE DUE TO THE MILITARY HONOR AND DECENCY ACT OF 1996 IN GENERAL ME-
DIA COMMUNICATIONS, INC.V. COHEN, 6 Vill. Sports & Ent. L.J. 127, 169+ (1999) HN: 5
(S.Ct.)
3120 EXPECTATIONS OF DISCRIMINATION AS A JUSTIFICATION FOR AFFIRMATIVE AC-
TION, 8 Va. J. Soc. Pol'y & L. 517, 566 (2001) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
3121 INCARCERATION, ACCOMMODATION, AND STRICT SCRUTINY, 95 Va. L. Rev. 2053,

2128 (2009) HN: 3 (S.Ct.)

3122 CONSTITUTIONAL CALCIFICATION: HOW THE LAW BECOMES WHAT THE COURT
DOES, 91 Va. L. Rev. 1649, 1720+ (2005) HN: 1,2 (S.Ct.)
3123 WHAT BROWN TEACHES US ABOUT CONSTITUTIONAL THEORY, 90 Va. L. Rev. 1537,
1577 (2004)
3124 SOME LEGACIES OF BROWN V. BOARD OF EDUCATION, 90 Va. L. Rev. 1693, 1720
(2004) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
3125 EQUAL PROTECTION INCORPORATION, 88 Va. L. Rev. 951, 1024+ (2002) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
3126 INTERCLAUSAL IMMUNITY, 87 Va. L. Rev. 1185, 1199 (2001) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
3127 SOCIAL NORMS AND THE LEGAL REGULATION OF MARRIAGE, 86 Va. L. Rev. 1901,
1970 (2000) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
3128 SCHOOL CHOICE AND STATE CONSTITUTIONS, 86 Va. L. Rev. 117, 162+ (2000) HN: 4
(S.Ct.)
3129 CONSTITUTIONAL FETISHISM AND THE CLINTONIMPEACHMENT DEBATE, 85 Va. L.
Rev. 631, 659 (1999)
3130 BARGAINING IN THE SHADOW OF THE MARKET: IS THERE A FUTURE FOR EGALIT-
ARIAN MARRIAGE?, 84 Va. L. Rev. 509, 672 (1998) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
3131 BROWN, ORIGINALISM, AND CONSTITUTIONAL THEORY: A RESPONSE TO PRO-
FESSOR MCCONNELL, 81 Va. L. Rev. 1881, 1936 (1995)
3132 GENDER EQUALITY: STATES AS LABORATORIES, 80 Va. L. Rev. 945, 977+ (1994) HN:
2,4 (S.Ct.)
3133 A FEMINIST CRITIQUE OF "THE" FEMINIST CRITIQUE OF PORNOGRAPHY, 79 Va. L.
Rev. 1099, 1187 (1993) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
3134 PURSUING A PERFECT POLITICS: THE ALLURE AND FAILURE OF PROCESS THEORY,
77 Va. L. Rev. 721, 745+ (1991) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
3135 THE PUZZLING RESISTANCE TO POLITICAL PROCESS THEORY, 77 Va. L. Rev. 747,
832+ (1991) HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
3136 LIKE FATHER, LIKE CHILD: THE RIGHTS OF PARENTS IN THEIR CHILDREN'S SUR-
NAMES, 70 Va. L. Rev. 1303, 1355+ (1984) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
3137 CONGRESSIONAL POWER AND CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS: REFLECTIONS ON PRO-
POSED "HUMAN LIFE' LEGISLATION, 68 Va. L. Rev. 333, 458+ (1982) HN: 3 (S.Ct.)
3138 THE PERNICIOUS REACH OF 26 U.S.C. SECTION 6672, 13 Va. Tax Rev. 225, 270+ (1993)
HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
3139 CONSTITUTIONAL EQUALITY AS A CULTURAL FORM: THE COURTS AND THE
MEANINGS OF SEX AND GENDER, 38 Wake Forest L. Rev. 513, 552 (2003) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
3140 FEDERALISM'S PARADOX: THE SPENDING POWER AND WAIVER OF SOVEREIGN IM-
MUNITY, 37 Wake Forest L. Rev. 141, 216 (2002) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
3141 TAKING RIGHTS SPHERICALLY: FORMAL AND COLLECTIVE ASPECTS OF LEGAL
RIGHTS, 34 Wake Forest L. Rev. 409, 450+ (1999) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
3142 ORIGINALISM AND THE FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT, 33 Wake Forest L. Rev. 909, 1034

(1998)
3143 GAYS AND LESBIANS IN THE MILITARY: A RATIONALLY BASED SOLUTION TO A
LEGAL RUBIK'S CUBE, 29 Wake Forest L. Rev. 393, 434 (1994)
3144 DISCRIMINATION FOR THE SAKE OF THE CHILDREN (LOFTON V. SEC'Y OF THE
DEP'T OF CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVS., 358 F.3D 804 (11TH CIR. 2004)), 44 Washburn
L.J. 247, 273+ (2004)
3145 WASHBURN LAW SCHOOL CELEBRATES A CENTURY OF WELCOMING WOMEN, 42
Washburn L.J. 853, 907+ (2004) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
3146 A PRIMER ON POSTHUMOUS CONCEPTION AND RELATED ISSUES OF ASSISTED RE-
PRODUCTION, 38 Washburn L.J. 599, 654+ (1999) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
3147 CONSTITUTIONAL LAW: ELIMINATING GENDER-BASED PEREMPTORY STRIKES:
THE END OF THE PEREMPTORY CHALLENGE? (J.E.B. v. ALABAMA EX. REL. T.B., 114
S. CT. 1419 (1994)), 34 Washburn L.J. 193, 213+ (1994) HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
3148 EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION: TUBERCULOSIS IS A HANDICAP WITHIN THE
MEANING OF SECTION 504 OF THE REHABILITATION ACT OF 1973 (SCHOOL BOARD
v. ARLINE, 107 S. CT. 1123 (1987)), 27 Washburn L.J. 207, 222 (1987)
3149 GENDER TROUBLE IN THE LAW: ARGUMENTS AGAINST THE USE OF STATUS/
CONDUCT BINARIES IN SEXUAL ORIENTATION LAW, 15 Wash. & Lee J. Civil Rts. &
Soc. Just. 147, 189 (2008)
3150 PERSONNEL IS POLICY: SCHOOLS, STUDENT GROUPS, AND THE RIGHT TO DIS-
CRIMINATE, 66 Wash. & Lee L. Rev. 1793, 1830 (2009) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
3151 THE CONSTITUTION IN A POSTMODERN AGE, 64 Wash. & Lee L. Rev. 165, 231 (2007)
HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
3152 COME BACK TO THE NICKEL AND FIVE: TRACING THE WARREN COURT'S PURSUIT
OF EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW, 59 Wash. & Lee L. Rev. 1203, 1307+ (2002) HN: 1
(S.Ct.)
3153 A REMEDY WITHOUT A WRONG: J.E.B. AND THE EXTENSION OF BATSON TO SEX-
BASED PEREMPTORY CHALLENGES, 52 Wash. & Lee L. Rev. 1725, 1770+ (1995) HN: 1,2
(S.Ct.)
3154 THE DUBIOUS TITLE VII CAUSE OF ACTION FOR SEXUAL FAVORITISM, 51 Wash. &
Lee L. Rev. 547, 597 (1994) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
3155 THE VIRGINIA MILITARY INSTITUTE AND THE EQUAL PROTECTION CLAUSE: A
FACTUAL AND LEGAL INTRODUCTION, 50 Wash. & Lee L. Rev. 15, 33 (1993) HN: 5
(S.Ct.)
3156 THE CURIOUS CASE OF THE VIRGINIA MILITARY INSTITUTE: AN ESSAY ON THE JU-
DICIAL FUNCTION, 50 Wash. & Lee L. Rev. 35, 48 (1993)
3157 THE COURT BETWEEN HEGEMONIES, 49 Wash. & Lee L. Rev. 31, 52+ (1992) HN: 4
(S.Ct.)
3158 RATIONALITY-AND THE IRRATIONAL UNDERINCLUSIVENESS OF THE CIVIL
RIGHTS LAWS, 45 Wash. & Lee L. Rev. 1, 118 (1988) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
3159 LOFTON v. KEARNEY 157 F. SUPP. 2D 1372 (S.D. FLA. 2001), 8 Wash. & Lee Race & Eth-

nic Anc. L.J. 153, 159 (2002) HN: 3 (S.Ct.)

3160 DEPOLITICIZING JUDICIAL REVIEW OF AGENCY RULEMAKING, 84 Wash. L. Rev. 419,
489+ (2009) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
3161 DISABILITY, VULNERABILITY, AND THE LIMITS OF ANTIDISCRIMINATION, 83 Wash.
L. Rev. 513, 568 (2008) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
3162 YOU CAN'T TAKE IT WITH YOU: CONSTITUTIONAL CONSEQUENCES OF INTER-
STATE GENDER-IDENTITY RULINGS, 80 Wash. L. Rev. 819, 885+ (2005) HN: 1,2,3 (S.Ct.)
3163 CLASSES, PERSONS, EQUAL PROTECTION, AND VILLAGE OF WILLOWBROOK V.
OLECH, 78 Wash. L. Rev. 367, 428+ (2003) HN: 1,2 (S.Ct.)
3164 EXPERT TESTIMONY ON RAPE TRAUMA SYNDROME: AN ARGUMENT FOR LIMITED
ADMISSIBILITY-STATE v. BLACK, 109 WASH.2d 336, 745 P.2d 12 (1987)., 63 Wash. L.
Rev. 1063, 1086 (1988) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
3165 WASHINGTON'S EQUAL RIGHTS AMENDMENT AND LAW AGAINST DISCRIMINA-
TION-THE APPROVAL OF THE SEATTLE SONICS' "LADIES' NIGHT'-MACLEAN v.
FIRST NORTHWEST INDUSTRIES, INC., 96 WN.2D 338, 635 P.2D 683 (1981)., 58 Wash. L.
Rev. 465, 480 (1983) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
3166 GENDER-BASED PEREMPTORY CHALLENGES UNDER UNITED STATES v. DE GROSS,
960 F.2D 1433 (9TH CIR. 1992), 43 Wash. U. J. Urb. & Contemp. L. 465, 480+ (1993) HN: 1,4
(S.Ct.)
3167 THE JUVENILE CURFEW ORDINANCE: IN SEARCH OF A NEW STANDARD OF RE-
VIEW, 41 Wash. U. J. Urb. & Contemp. L. 163, 192+ (1992) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
3168 POPULAR SOVEREIGN GENERATED VERSUS GOVERNMENT INSTITUTION GENER-
ATED CONSTITUTIONAL NORMS: WHEN DOES A CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT
NOT AMEND THE CONSTITUTION?, 80 Wash. U. L.Q. 127, 242+ (2002) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
3169 THE LEGACY OF JUSTICE BRENNAN: CONSTITUTIONALIZATION OF THE LEFT-
LIBERAL POLITICAL AGENDA, 77 Wash. U. L.Q. 183, 192 (1999) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
3170 THE JEFFERSONIAN MYTH IN SUPREME COURT SEDITION JURISPRUDENCE, 76
Wash. U. L.Q. 683, 720 (1998)
3171 SALVAGING THE UNDUE BURDEN STANDARD - IS IT A LOST CAUSE? THE UNDUE
BURDEN STANDARD AND FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS ANALYSIS, 73 Wash. U. L.Q. 295,
332 (1995) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
3172 DISCRIMINATION BY PRIVATE CLUBS, 67 Wash. U. L.Q. 815, 853 (1989) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
3173 THE CONSTITUTION AND THE POLICE: INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS AND LAW ENFORCE-
MENT, 66 Wash. U. L.Q. 11, 32 (1988) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
3174 MEDICAL MALPRACTICE DAMAGE CAPS: NAVIGATING THE SAFE HARBORS, 65
Wash. U. L.Q. 565, 587 (1987) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
3175 ORAL ADVOCACY BEFORE THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT: DOES IT AF-
FECT THE JUSTICES' DECISIONS?, 85 Wash. U. L. Rev. 457, 527 (2007)
3176 THE MICHIGAN SUPREME COURT, STARE DECISIS, AND OVERRULING THE OVER-
RULINGS, 55 Wayne L. Rev. 1911, 1953 (2009) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
3177 THE CONSTITUTION SHOULD PROTECT THE RIGHT TO SAME-SEX MARRIAGE, 49

Wayne L. Rev. 975, 991+ (2004) HN: 2,4 (S.Ct.)

3178 THE SETTLED NATURE OF AMERICAN CONSTITUTIONAL LAW, 48 Wayne L. Rev. 173,
361+ (2002) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
3179 TAX LIABILITY DIFFERENCES BETWEEN MARRIED AND UNMARRIED COUPLES: DO
THE MARRIED FILING STATUSES VIOLATE EQUAL PROTECTION?, 40 Wayne L. Rev.
1337, 1355 (1994) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
3180 CONSTITUTIONAL LAW, 38 Wayne L. Rev. 717, 801 (1992)
3181 WORKERS' DISABILITY COMPENSATION, 36 Wayne L. Rev. 1029, 1083 (1990) HN: 5
(S.Ct.)
3182 POST-PRUNEYARD ACCESS TO MICHIGAN SHOPPING CENTERS: THE "MALLING' OF
CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS, 30 Wayne L. Rev. 93, 126 (1983) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
3183 BATTERED BY MEN, BRUISED BY INJUSTICE: THE PLIGHT OF WOMEN WHO FIGHT
BACK AND THE NEED FOR A BATTERED WOMEN DEFENSE IN WEST VIRGINIA, 110
W. Va. L. Rev. 1139, 1189 (2008) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
3184 BRENNAN V. SCALIA, JUSTICE OR JURISPRUDENCE? A MODERATE PROPOSAL, 110
W. Va. L. Rev. 1265, 1301+ (2008) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
3185 "NO CIVILIZED SYSTEM OF JUSTICE": THE FATE OF THE VIOLENCE AGAINST WO-
MEN ACT, 102 W. Va. L. Rev. 499, 546 (2000)
3186 CHEMICAL CASTRATION: CONSTITUTIONAL ISSUES OF DUE PROCESS, EQUAL PRO-
TECTION, AND CRUEL AND UNUSUAL PUNISHMENT, 100 W. Va. L. Rev. 853, 896
(1998) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
3187 RELATIONAL AND LIBERAL FEMINISM: THE "ETHIC OF CARE," FETAL PERSON-
HOOD AND AUTONOMY, 99 W. Va. L. Rev. 291, 310 (1996)
3188 IS THERE A LAW OF FEDERAL COURTS?, 96 W. Va. L. Rev. 147, 167 (1993)
3189 AN EQUAL RIGHT TO FIGHT: AN ANALYSIS OF THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF LAWS
AND POLICIES THAT EXCLUDE WOMEN FROM COMBAT IN THE UNITED STATES
MILITARY, 93 W. Va. L. Rev. 421, 454+ (1991) HN: 1,3,4 (S.Ct.)
3190 UNITED STATES v. STANLEY: HAS THE SUPREME COURT GONE A STEP TOO FAR?,
90 W. Va. L. Rev. 473, 498 (1988) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
3191 LAW, POLITICS AND THE HOMELESS, 89 W. Va. L. Rev. 115, 147+ (1986) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
3192 CIVIL RIGHTS/EMPLOYMENT LAW-STATES CARRY WEIGHT OF EMPLOYMENT DIS-
CRIMINATION PROTECTION: RESOLVING THE GROWING PROBLEM OF WEIGHT BI-
AS IN THE WORKPLACE, 32 W. New Eng. L. Rev. 173, 213 (2010) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
3193 USING GENDER AS A BASIS OF CLIENT SELECTION: A FEMINIST PERSPECTIVE, 20
W. New Eng. L. Rev. 79, 91+ (1998) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
3194 THE EQUAL RIGHTS AMENDMENT: THE MERGING OF JURISPRUDENCE AND SOCIAL
ACCEPTANCE, 30 W. St. U. L. Rev. 205, 223+ (2003) HN: 1,3,4 (S.Ct.)
3195 PROPOSITION 22: VEILED DISCRIMINATION OR SOUND CONSTITUTIONAL LAW?, 23
Whittier L. Rev. 239, 266 (2001) HN: 1,3,4 (S.Ct.)
3196 ADARAND v. PENA: DO ALL RACE-BASED CLASSIFICATIONS DESERVE STRICT JU-
DICIAL SCRUTINY?, 17 Whittier L. Rev. 955, 994+ (1996) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)

3197 UNFINISHED WOMEN: THE SUPREME COURT AND THE INCOMPLETE TRANS-
FORMATION OF WOMEN'S RIGHTS IN THE UNITED STATES, 9 Whittier L. Rev. 445,
490+ (1987) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
3198 TOWARDS A ""MORE PERFECT UNION'': SOME THOUGHTS ON AMENDING THE CON-
STITUTION, 10 Widener J. Pub. L. 1, 19 (2000) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
3199 ADARAND CONSTRUCTORS, INC. v. PENA: SIGNALING THE END OF AFFIRMATIVE
ACTION, 6 Widener J. Pub. L. 263, 321 (1996)
3200 SAME-SEX MARRIAGE-WHY NOT?, 4 Widener J. Pub. L. 461, 492+ (1995) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
3201 RELIGION: THE COGNIZABLE DIFFERENCE IN PEREMPTORY CHALLENGES, 5 Widen-
er J. Pub. L. 131, 170+ (1995) HN: 1,2,4 (S.Ct.)
3202 AN ANALYSIS OF THE IMPACT OF THE PENNSYLVANIA EQUAL RIGHTS AMEND-
MENT, 3 Widener J. Pub. L. 743, 798 (1994)
3203 ASSESSING THE ACKERMAN AND AMAR THESES: NOTES ON EXTRATEXTUAL CON-
STITUTIONAL CHANGE, 4 Widener J. Pub. L. 229, 271 (1994)
3204 GREGORY v. ASHCROFT: SETTING THE STAGE TO OVERRULE GARCIA IN THE CON-
TEXT OF MANDATORY RETIREMENT OF STATE JUDGES, 2 Widener J. Pub. L. 139, 197+
(1992) HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.)
3205 THE NEW LIBERTY, 11 Widener L. Rev. 221, 248+ (2005) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
3206 THE LIMITS OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL IMAGINATION: EQUAL PROTECTION IN THE
ERA OF ASSIMILATION, 4-SPG Widener L. Symp. J. 121, 166 (1999) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
3207 THE LIMITS OF QUEER THEORY IN LGBT LITIGATION AND THE INTERNATIONAL
HUMAN RIGHTS DISCOURSE, 14 Willamette J. Int'l L. & Disp. Resol. 73, 96 (2006) HN: 2
(S.Ct.)
3208 MULLER V. OREGON: ONE HUNDRED YEARS LATER, 45 Willamette L. Rev. 359, 380+
(2009) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
3209 THE DISTRICT OF OREGON IN THE U.S. SUPREME COURT, 39 Willamette L. Rev. 851,
1029 (2003)
3210 PEREMPTORY CHALLENGES: THE LAST BARRIER TO JURY SERVICE FOR PEOPLE
WITH DISABILITIES, 33 Willamette L. Rev. 1, 66 (1997)
3211 PROTECTING PARENTAL LEAVE: A FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS MODEL, 33 Willamette L.
Rev. 177, 214 (1997) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
3212 BAEHR V. LEWIN AND SAME-SEX MARRIAGE: THE CONTINUED STRUGGLE FOR SO-
CIAL, POLITICAL AND HUMAN LEGITIMACY, 30 Willamette L. Rev. 891, 916+ (1994)
HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
3213 THE UNBEARABLE LIGHTNESS OF MARRIAGE IN THE ABORTION DECISIONS OF
THE SUPREME COURT: ALTERED STATES IN CONSTITUTIONAL LAW, 18 Wm. & Mary
Bill Rts. J. 61, 74 (2009) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
3214 HOW THE DIVERSITY RATIONALE LAYS THE GROUNDWORK FOR NEW DISCRIMIN-
ATION: EXAMINING THE TRAJECTORY OF EQUAL PROTECTION DOCTRINE, 17 Wm.
& Mary Bill Rts. J. 607, 655+ (2009) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
3215 WHITHER SEXUAL ORIENTATION ANALYSIS?: THE PROPER METHODOLOGY WHEN

DUE PROCESS AND EQUAL PROTECTION INTERSECT, 16 Wm. & Mary Bill Rts. J. 685,
743 (2008)
3216 THE CONTRADICTION BETWEEN EQUAL PROTECTION'S MEANING AND ITS LEGAL
SUBSTANCE: HOW DELIBERATE INDIFFERENCE CAN CURE IT, 15 Wm. & Mary Bill
Rts. J. 533, 586 (2006)
3217 FORM AND SUBSTANCE IN PARENTAGE LAW, 15 Wm. & Mary Bill Rts. J. 203, 262
(2006) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
3218 PARENTAGE AT BIRTH: BIRTHFATHERS AND SOCIAL FATHERHOOD, 14 Wm. & Mary
Bill Rts. J. 909, 942 (2006)
3219 FEDERAL POWER, STATES' RIGHTS, INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS: MENTALLY DISABLED
PRISONERS AND THE SUPREME COURT'S NEW ACTIVISM, 10 Wm. & Mary Bill Rts. J.
861, 879+ (2002) HN: 1,2 (S.Ct.)
3220 HATE SPEECH AND HARASSMENT: THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF CAMPUS CODES
THAT PROHIBIT RACIAL INSULTS, 3 Wm. & Mary Bill Rts. J. 179, 217 (1994)
3221 "ENTREAT ME NOT TO LEAVE THEE": BOTTOMS v. BOTTOMS AND THE CUSTODY
RIGHTS OF GAY AND LESBIAN PARENTS, 3 Wm. & Mary Bill Rts. J. 289, 325+ (1994)
3222 SEPARATE BUT UNEQUAL - WHEN OVERCROWDED: SEX DISCRIMINATION IN JAIL
EARLY RELEASE POLICIES, 15 Wm. & Mary J. Women & L. 591, 631+ (2009) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
3223 ESSENTIALLY A MOTHER, 13 Wm. & Mary J. Women & L. 429, 482 (2007)
3224 ADAM AND STEVE AND EVE: WHY SEXUALITY SEGREGATION IN ASSISTED REPRO-
DUCTION IN VIRGINIA IS NO LONGER ACCEPTABLE, 11 Wm. & Mary J. Women & L.
293, 315+ (2005) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
3225 AUTONOMY, GAY RIGHTS AND HUMAN SELF-FULFILLMENT: AN ARGUMENT FOR
MODIFIED LIBERALISM IN PUBLIC EDUCATION, 10 Wm. & Mary J. Women & L. 137,
193 (2004) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
3226 AIR FORCE WOMEN'S ACCESS TO ABORTION SERVICES AND THE EROSION OF 10
U.S.C. S 1093, 9 Wm. & Mary J. Women & L. 351, 412+ (2003) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
3227 THE CRACK IN JUSTICE SCALIA'S CRYSTAL BALL: SINGLE-SEX CHARTER SCHOOLS
MAY PROVE HIS PREDICTION IN VMI WAS WRONG, 8 Wm. & Mary J. Women & L. 133,
153 (2001) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
3228 THE FAMILY MEDICAL LEAVE ACT: STATE SOVEREIGNTY AND THE NARROWING
OF FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT PROTECTION, 7 Wm. & Mary J. Women & L. 1011,
1037+ (2001) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
3229 PATHS TO PROTECTION: A COMPARISON OF FEDERAL PROTECTION BASED ON DIS-
ABILITY AND SEXUAL ORIENTATION, 6 Wm. & Mary J. Women & L. 323, 379+ (2000)
HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
3230 RECONSTRUCTING THE RACE-SEX ANALOGY, 49 Wm. & Mary L. Rev. 1789, 1857+
(2008) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
3231 THE DIVERSITY RATIONALE FOR AFFIRMATIVE ACTION IN EMPLOYMENT AFTER
GRUTTER: THE CASE FOR CONTAINMENT, 48 Wm. & Mary L. Rev. 1091, 1158 (2006)
HN: 2 (S.Ct.)

3232 CONSTITUTIONAL LESSONS FOR THE NEXT GENERATION OF PUBLIC SINGLE-SEX

ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY SCHOOLS, 47 Wm. & Mary L. Rev. 1953, 2043+ (2006)
HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
3233 WHEN EQUALITY LEAVES EVERYONE WORSE OFF: THE PROBLEM OF LEVELING
DOWN IN EQUALITY LAW, 46 Wm. & Mary L. Rev. 513, 618+ (2004) HN: 4,5 (S.Ct.)
3234 DISABILITY HARASSMENT IN THE PUBLIC SCHOOLS, 43 Wm. & Mary L. Rev. 1079,
1158 (2002)
3235 A CONSTITUTION OF COLLABORATION: PROTECTING FUNDAMENTAL VALUES
WITH SECOND-LOOK RULES OF INTERBRANCH DIALOGUE, 42 Wm. & Mary L. Rev.
1575, 1870+ (2001) HN: 1,2,5 (S.Ct.)
3236 RETHINKING THE HISTORY OF AMERICAN FREEDOM (REVIEW ESSAY OF ERIC
FONER, THE STORY OF AMERICAN FREEDOM (1998)), 42 Wm. & Mary L. Rev. 265, 288
(2000) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
3237 GAZING INTO THE CRYSTAL BALL: REFLECTIONS ON THE STANDARDS STATE
JUDGES SHOULD USE TO ASCERTAIN FEDERAL LAW, 40 Wm. & Mary L. Rev. 1143,
1222 (1999) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
3238 THE SIXTIES SHIFT TO FORMAL EQUALITY AND THE COURTS: AN ARGUMENT FOR
PRAGMATISM AND POLITICS, 40 Wm. & Mary L. Rev. 209, 273+ (1998) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
3239 URBAN, SINGLE-SEX, PUBLIC SECONDARY SCHOOLS: ADVANCING FULL DEVELOP-
MENT OF THE TALENT AND CAPACITIES OF AMERICA'S YOUNG WOMEN, 39 Wm. &
Mary L. Rev. 507, 556+ (1998) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
3240 MUDDLE OR MUDDLE THROUGH? TAKINGS JURISPRUDENCE MEETS THE EN-
DANGERED SPECIES ACT, 38 Wm. & Mary L. Rev. 825, 993 (1997) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
3241 THE LEFT, THE RIGHT, AND CERTAINTY IN CONSTITUTIONAL LAW, 33 Wm. & Mary
L. Rev. 1181, 1200 (1992)
3242 TOWARD A NEW STANDARD IN GENDER DISCRIMINATION: THE CASE OF VIRGINIA
MILITARY INSTITUTE, 33 Wm. & Mary L. Rev. 489, 542+ (1992) HN: 1,4,5 (S.Ct.)
3243 REDEFINING THE HARM OF PEREMPTORY CHALLENGES, 32 Wm. & Mary L. Rev.
1027, 1064 (1991) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
3244 PRIVATE POSSESSION OF CHILD PORNOGRAPHY: THE TENSIONS BETWEEN STAN-
LEY v. GEORGIA AND NEW YORK v. FERBER, 29 Wm. & Mary L. Rev. 187, 214 (1987)
3245 DOE AND DRONENBURG: SODOMY STATUTES ARE CONSTITUTIONAL, 26 Wm. &
Mary L. Rev. 645, 682+ (1985) HN: 1,2,4 (S.Ct.)
3246 THE MENTALLY RETARDED AND PRIVATE RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS, 25 Wm. &
Mary L. Rev. 421, 462+ (1984) HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
3247 FOREIGN AND INTERNATIONAL LAW IN CONSTITUTIONAL GAY RIGHTS LITIGA-
TION: WHAT CLAIMS, WHAT USE, AND WHOSE LAW?, 32 Wm. Mitchell L. Rev. 455,
508+ (2006) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
3248 AGE DISCRIMINATION LAW-MANDATORY RETIREMENT OF JUDGES: LAW AND
POLICY-GREGORY v. ASHCROFT, 898 F.2D 598 (8TH CIR.), CERT. GRANTED, 111 S. CT.
507 (1990), 17 Wm. Mitchell L. Rev. 858, 882+ (1991) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)

3249 GAY AMERICAN "DEVIANCE:" USING INTERNATIONAL COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

TO ARGUE FOR A FREE SPEECH AND ESTABLISHMENT CLAUSE APPROACH TO
FURTHERING GAY MARRIAGE IN THE UNITED STATES, 26 Wis. Int'l L.J. 1, 85+ (2008)
HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
3250 IN SUPREME JUDGMENT OF THE POOR: THE ROLE OF THE UNITED STATES SU-
PREME COURT IN WELFARE LAW AND POLICY, 23 Wis. J.L. Gender & Soc'y 1, 39 (2008)
3251 NON-ECONOMIC-DAMAGE AWARD CAPS IN WISCONSIN: WHY FERDON WAS
(ALMOST) RIGHT AND THE LAW IS WRONG, 2009 Wis. L. Rev. 105, 149 (2009) HN: 1
(S.Ct.)
3252 PUTTING THE CONTRACT INTO CONTRACTIONS: REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS AND THE
FOUNDING OF THE REPUBLIC, 2005 Wis. L. Rev. 1535, 1610+ (2005) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
3253 CLASS STRUGGLES: A CENTURY AFTER THE KU KLUX KLAN ACT AND STILL SEEK-
ING PROTECTION FOR THE DISABLED, 1999 Wis. L. Rev. 153, 184+ (1999) HN: 1,4
(S.Ct.)
3254 THE BATSON DOCTRINE: THE SUPREME COURT'S UTTER FAILURE TO MEET THE
CHALLENGE OF DISCRIMINATION IN JURY SELECTION, 1999 Wis. L. Rev. 501, 552
(1999) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
3255 THE YOUNG WOMEN'S LEADERSHIP SCHOOL: SINGLE-SEX PUBLIC EDUCATION
AFTER V.M.I., 1997 Wis. L. Rev. 827, 864+ (1997) HN: 1,4,5 (S.Ct.)
3256 MULES, MADONNAS, BABIES, BATHWATER, RACIAL IMAGERY AND STEREOTYPES:
THE AFRICAN -AMERICAN WOMAN AND THE BATTERED WOMAN SYNDROME, 1995
Wis. L. Rev. 1003, 1080+ (1995) HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
3257 THE GAY RIGHTS STATE: WISCONSIN'S PIONEERING LEGISLATION TO PROHIBIT
DISCRIMINATION BASED ON SEXUAL ORIENTATION, 22 Wis. Women's L.J. 91, 131+
(2007) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
3258 OUT OF THE SHADOWS: TRAVERSING THE IMAGINARY OF SAMENESS, DIFFER-
ENCE, AND RELATIONALISM - A HUMAN RIGHTS PROPOSAL, 17 Wis. Women's L.J.
111, 162 (2002) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
3259 CONSTITUTIONAL REVIEW OF AFFIRMATIVE ACTION POLICIES FOR WOMEN OF
COLOR: A HOPELESS PARADOX?, 15 Wis. Women's L.J. 391, 437+ (2000) HN: 4,5 (S.Ct.)
3260 EQUAL PROTECTION, GENDER, AND JUSTICE AT THE DAWN OF A NEW CENTURY,
14 Wis. Women's L.J. 123, 154+ (1999) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
3261 THE NAME OF THE MAIDEN, 12 Wis. Women's L.J. 253, 299+ (1997) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
3262 PREGNANCY DISCRIMINATION: TOWARD SUBSTANTIVE EQUALITY, 10 Wis. Wo-
men's L.J. 351, 402 (1995)
3263 DEFINING FAMILY IN AMERICAN PRISONS, 30 Women's Rts. L. Rep. 357, 406+ (2009)
3264 NGUYEN V. INS: THE WEAKENING OF EQUAL PROTECTION IN THE FACE OF PLEN-
ARY POWER, 24 Women's Rts. L. Rep. 43, 64+ (2002) HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.)
3265 THIRTY YEARS, 22 Women's Rts. L. Rep. 147, 158+ (2001) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
3266 "FATAL IN FACT'?: AN EXAMINATION OF THE VIABILITY OF AFFIRMATIVE ACTION
FOR WOMEN IN THE POST-ADARAND ERA, 21 Women's Rts. L. Rep. 151, 168+ (2000)

HN: 4,5 (S.Ct.)

3267 THOUGHTS ABOUT WHY THE FIRST AMENDMENT OPERATES TO STIFLE THE FREE-
DOM AND EQUALITY OF A SUBORDINATED MAJORITY, 21 Women's Rts. L. Rep. 25, 38
(1999) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
3268 THE GENDER LINE: MEN, WOMEN, AND THE LAW BY NANCY LEVIT, 21 Women's Rts.
L. Rep. 57, 69+ (1999) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
3269 AVOIDING GENDER EQUALITY, 19 Women's Rts. L. Rep. 127, 154+ (1998) HN: 1,2,3
(S.Ct.)
3270 WHY MARRIAGE SHOULD BE ABOLISHED, 18 Women's Rts. L. Rep. 283, 313+ (1997)
HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
3271 BAEHR v. LEWIN: HOW FAR HAS THE DOOR BEEN OPENED? FINDING A STATE
POLICY FOR RECONGNIZING SAME-SEX MARRIAGES, 16 Women's Rts. L. Rep. 331, 345
(1995) HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.)
3272 THE LEGAL VICIMIZATION OF BATTERED WOMEN, 15 Women's Rts. L. Rep. 101, 101
(1993)
3273 THE EQUALITY CRISIS: SOME REFLECTIONS ON CULTURE, COURTS, AND FEMIN-
ISM, 14 Women's Rts. L. Rep. 151, 174+ (1992) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
3274 DESCRIBING AND CHANGING: WOMEN'S SELF-DEFENSE WORK AND THE PROBLEM
OF EXPERT TESTIMONY ON BATTERING, 14 Women's Rts. L. Rep. 213, 241 (1992) HN: 4
(S.Ct.)
3275 IN PURSUIT OF EQUALITY: ONE WOMAN'S WORK TO CHANGE THE LAW, 14 Women's
Rts. L. Rep. 335, 359+ (1992) HN: 1,2,3 (S.Ct.)
3276 SEX EQUALITY AND THE CONSTITUTION: THE STATE OF THE ART, 14 Women's Rts.
L. Rep. 361, 366+ (1992) HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
3277 WHAT BUSH V. GORE MEANS FOR ELECTIONS IN THE 21ST CENTURY, 2 Wyo. L. Rev.
419, 433 (2002)
3278 GENDER RULES, 22 Yale J.L. & Feminism 133, 191+ (2010)
3279 DISCRIMINATION BY DEFINITION: THE HISTORICAL AND LEGAL PATHS TO THE
PREGNANCY DISCRIMINATION ACT OF 1978, 21 Yale J.L. & Feminism 1, 14 (2009) HN: 4
(S.Ct.)
3280 MAKING PREGNANCY WORK: OVERCOMING THE PREGNANCY DISCRIMINATION
ACT'S CAPACITY-BASED MODEL, 21 Yale J.L. & Feminism 15, 50 (2009)
3281 RECONSTRUCTIVE FEMINISM: CHANGING THE WAY WE TALK ABOUT GENDER
AND WORK THIRTY YEARS AFTER THE PDA, 21 Yale J.L. & Feminism 79, 117+ (2009)
HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
3282 BOOK REVIEW: MANLINESS BY HARVEY MANSFIELD, 19 Yale J.L. & Feminism 201,
220+ (2007) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
3283 "TO THE TABLES DOWN AT MORY'S": EQUALITY AS MEMBERSHIP AND LEADER-
SHIP IN PLACES OF PUBLIC ACCOMMODATIONS, 16 Yale J.L. & Feminism 241, 274+
(2004)
3284 SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND HOSPITAL: STRATEGIES TO PROTECT PRO-CHOICE

PHYSICIANS IN RELIGIOUSLY AFFILIATED HOSPITALS, 15 Yale J.L. & Feminism 135,

173 (2003)
3285 FOREWORD, 14 Yale J.L. & Feminism 213, 216 (2002)
3286 WRITING OUR OWN RARE BOOKS, 14 Yale J.L. & Feminism 429, 451 (2002) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
3287 WHEN GENDER DIFFERENCES BECOME A TRAP: THE IMPACT OF CHINA'S LABOR
LAW ON WOMEN, 14 Yale J.L. & Feminism 69, 96 (2002) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
3288 DEFINING QUEER: LESBIAN AND GAY VISIBILITY IN THE COURTROOM, 12 Yale J.L.
& Feminism 143, 176 (2000) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
3289 LYNCHING, FEDERALISM, AND THE INTERSECTION OF RACE AND GENDER IN THE
PROGRESSIVE ERA, 8 Yale J.L. & Feminism 31, 78 (1996) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
3290 ADDING COMPLEXITY TO CONFUSION AND SEEING THE LIGHT: FEMINIST LEGAL
INSIGHTS AND THE JURISPRUDENCE OF THE RELIGION CLAUSES, 7 Yale J.L. & Fem-
inism 137, 172 (1995)
3291 RACE, GENDER, AND THE PEREMPTORY CHALLENGE: A POSTMODERN FEMINIST
APPROACH, 7 Yale J.L. & Feminism 173, 193 (1995)
3292 BRIEF OF AMICI CURIAE NOW LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATION FUND AND 117
ORGANIZATIONS COMMITTED TO WOMEN'S EQUALITY IN SUPPORT OF THE PETI-
TIONERS: RUST v. SULLIVAN, 3 Yale J.L. & Feminism 161, 181+ (1990) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
3293 THE REAL ACLU, 2 Yale J.L. & Feminism 161, 187+ (1989) HN: 4,5 (S.Ct.)
3294 TRANSFORMING THE GROUNDS: AUTONOMY AND REPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM, 2
Yale J.L. & Feminism 75, 98 (1989) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
3295 PORNOGRAPHY AND THE TRAFFIC IN WOMEN: BRIEF ON BEHALF OF TRUDEE
ABLE-PETERSON, ET AL., AMICI CURIAE IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT AND INTER-
VENOR-DEFENDANTS, VILLAGE BOOKS v. CITY OF BELLINGHAM, 1 Yale J.L. & Fem-
inism 111, 147+ (1989) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
3296 THE STRANGE CAREER OF JANE CROW: SEX SEGREGATION AND THE TRANSFORM-
ATION OF ANTI-DISCRIMINATION DISCOURSE, 18 Yale J.L. & Human. 187, 272+ (2006)
HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
3297 INVIOLABILITY AND PRIVACY: THE CASTLE, THE SANCTUARY, AND THE BODY, 7
Yale J.L. & Human. 195, 241 (1995) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
3298 CONSTITUTIONAL CLASH: WHEN ENGLISH-ONLY MEETS VOTING RIGHTS, 28 Yale
L. & Pol'y Rev. 353, 377 (2010) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
3299 DUTIES OF CARE AND THE CONSTITUTION: A NEGLIGENCE MODEL OF INDIVIDUAL
RIGHTS, 21 Yale L. & Pol'y Rev. 473, 499+ (2003) HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.)
3300 NGUYEN V. INS: IS SEX REALLY MORE IMPORTANT NOW?, 19 Yale L. & Pol'y Rev.
525, 537+ (2001) HN: 1,2 (S.Ct.)
3301 WELFARE REFORM, 16 Yale L. & Pol'y Rev. 221, 263 (1997) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
3302 MARRIAGE, EQUAL PROTECTION, AND NEW JUDICIAL FEDERALISM: A VIEW FROM
THE STATES, 14 Yale L. & Pol'y Rev. 237, 286+ (1996) HN: 1,2,3 (S.Ct.)
3303 THE CONFIRMATION PROCESS AND THE QUALITY OF POLITICAL DEBATE, 11 Yale
L. & Pol'y Rev. 407, 432 (1993) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)

3304 SPELLING "RELIEF' FOR TRANSSEXUALS: EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION AND

THE CRITERIA OF SEX, 4 Yale L. & Pol'y Rev. 125, 140+ (1985) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
3305 CREATED IN ITS IMAGE: THE RACE ANALOGY, GAY IDENTITY, AND GAY LITIGA-
TION IN THE 1950S-1970S, 119 Yale L.J. 316, 372+ (2009)
3306 DIGNITY AND THE POLITICS OF PROTECTION: ABORTION RESTRICTIONS UNDER
CASEY/CARHART, 117 Yale L.J. 1694, 1800+ (2008) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
3307 FROM EMPLOYMENT TO CONTRACT: SECTION 1981 AND ANTIDISCRIMINATION
LAW FOR THE INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR WORKFORCE, 116 Yale L.J. 170, 215
(2006) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
3308 PLURALISM AND DISTRUST: HOW COURTS CAN SUPPORT DEMOCRACY BY
LOWERING THE STAKES OF POLITICS, 114 Yale L.J. 1279, 1328 (2005)
3309 PUNISHING MASCULINITY IN GAY ASYLUM CLAIMS, 114 Yale L.J. 913, 920 (2005)
3310 THE FUTURE OF DISABILITY LAW, 114 Yale L.J. 1, 83 (2004)
3311 LEGISLATIVE CONSTITUTIONALISM AND SECTION FIVE POWER: POLICENTRIC IN-
TERPRETATION OF THE FAMILY AND MEDICAL LEAVE ACT, 112 Yale L.J. 1943, 2059+
(2003) HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
3312 FRIEDMAN'S LAW, 112 Yale L.J. 925, 959 (2003)
3313 "A COMMON FATE OF DISCRIMINATION": RACE-GENDER ANALOGIES IN LEGAL
AND HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE, 110 Yale L.J. 1045, 1087+ (2001) HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
3314 EQUAL PROTECTION BY LAW: FEDERAL ANTIDISCRIMINATION LEGISLATION
AFTER MORRISON AND KIMEL, 110 Yale L.J. 441, 526+ (2000) HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
3315 VISIONARIES OF THE LAW: JOHN MINOR WISDOM AND FRANK M. JOHNSON, JR.,
109 Yale L.J. 1219, 1236 (2000)
3316 EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW: THE JURISPRUDENTIAL LEGACY OF JUDGE FRANK
M. JOHNSON, JR., 109 Yale L.J. 1237, 1251 (2000) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
3317 EQUAL PROTECTION AND THE STATUS OF STEREOTYPES, 108 Yale L.J. 1885, 1892
(1999) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
3318 ASSIMILATIONIST BIAS IN EQUAL PROTECTION: THE VISIBILITY PRESUMPTION
AND THE CASE OF "DON'T ASK, DON'T TELL", 108 Yale L.J. 485, 571+ (1998) HN: 1,2,4
(S.Ct.)
3319 RE-VIEWING HISTORY: THE USE OF THE PAST AS NEGATIVE PRECEDENT IN
UNITED STATES V. VIRGINIA, 108 Yale L.J. 237, 269+ (1998) HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
3320 AFFIRMATIVE ACTION AND LEGISLATIVE PURPOSE Jed Rubenfeld, Affirmative Action,
107 Yale L.J. 427 (1997)., 107 Yale L.J. 2679, 2684 (1998) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
3321 GENDER BLINDNESS AND THE HUNTER DOCTRINE Coalition for Economic Equity v.
Wilson, 110 F.3d 1431 (9th Cir. 1997), reh'g en banc denied, Nos. 97-15030, 97-15031, 1997 WL
528335 (9th Cir. Aug. 21, 1997)., 107 Yale L.J. 261, 266 (1997) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
3322 THE CONSTITUTION OF STATUS, 106 Yale L.J. 2313, 2374 (1997) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
3323 PRINCIPLED SILENCE Romer v. Evans, 116 S. Ct. 1620 (1996)., 106 Yale L.J. 247, 252 (1996)
3324 NO, I'LL CATEGORIZE YOU Virtually Normal: An Argument About Homosexuality. By An-
drew Sullivan. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, Inc., 1995. pp. x, 212. $22.00., 105 Yale L.J. 2025,

2030 (1996) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)

3325 DISAGGREGATING GENDER FROM SEX AND SEXUAL ORIENTATION: THE EFFEMIN-
ATE MAN IN THE LAW AND FEMINIST JURISPRUDENCE, 105 Yale L.J. 1, 105+ (1995)
HN: 1,4,5 (S.Ct.)
3326 STEREOTYPING AND DIFFERENCE: PLANNED PARENTHOOD v. CASEY AND THE FU-
TURE OF SEX DISCRIMINATION LAW, 104 Yale L.J. 1875, 1883+ (1995) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
3327 RESTATEMENT OF LOVE (TENATIVE DRAFT), 104 Yale L.J. 707, 730 (1994) HN: 2
(S.Ct.)
3328 THE JURISPRUDENCE OF JUSTICE BYRON WHITE, 103 Yale L.J. 419, 461 (1993)
3329 CONCEPTUALIZING BLACK WOMEN'S EMPLOYMENT EXPERIENCES, 98 Yale L.J.
1457, 1478+ (1989) HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
3330 THE MISCEGENATION ANALOGY: SODOMY LAW AS SEX DISCRIMINATION, 98 Yale
L.J. 145, 164 (1988)
3331 VOTING RIGHTS AND THE CONSTITUTION: THE DISENFRANCHISEMENT OF NON-
ENGLISH SPEAKING CITIZENS, 97 Yale L.J. 1419, 1437 (1988)
3332 SEX DISCRIMINATION AND THE FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT: LOST HISTORY, 97
Yale L.J. 1153, 1172 (1988)
3333 RETHINKING EQUALITY AND DIFFERENCE: DISABILITY DISCRIMINATION IN PUB-
LIC TRANSPORTATION, 97 Yale L.J. 863, 880 (1988)
3334 THE NATURAL-BORN CITIZEN CLAUSE AND PRESIDENTIAL ELIGIBILITY: AN AP-
PROACH FOR RESOLVING TWO HUNDRED YEARS OF UNCERTAINTY, 97 Yale L.J.
881, 899 (1988) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
3335 TOWARDS A MODERN ART OF LAW, 96 Yale L.J. 2051, 2081+ (1987) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
3336 MAKING THE ARMY SAFE FOR DIVERSITY: A TITLE VII REMEDY FOR DISCRIMINA-
TION IN THE MILITARY, 96 Yale L.J. 2082, 2109 (1987)
3337 CONSTITUTIONAL LAW IN THE AGE OF BALANCING, 96 Yale L.J. 943, 1005+ (1987)
HN: 3 (S.Ct.)
3338 CHOICE AND FREEDOM: ELUSIVE ISSUES IN THE SEARCH FOR GENDER JUSTICE
GENDER JUSTICE. BY DAVID L. KIRP, MARK G. YUDOF, AND MARLENE STRONG
FRANKS. UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO PRESS, 1986. PP. X, 205. $19.95., 96 Yale L.J. 914,
943 (1987) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
3339 FULLILOVE, 96 Yale L.J. 453, 485 (1987) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
3340 A NORM-BASED REMEDIAL MODEL FOR UNDERINCLUSIVE STATUTES, 95 Yale L.J.
1185, 1209+ (1986) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
3341 THE PROCEDURAL DUE PROCESS APPROACH TO ADMINISTRATIVE DISCRETION:
THE COURTS' INVERTED ANALYSIS, 95 Yale L.J. 1017, 1042 (1986) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
3342 BATTERED WOMEN AND THE EQUAL PROTECTION CLAUSE: WILL THE CONSTITU-
TION HELP THEM WHEN THE POLICE WON'T?, 95 Yale L.J. 788, 809+ (1986) HN: 4
(S.Ct.)
3343 THE CREATION OF FETAL RIGHTS: CONFLICTS WITH WOMEN'S CONSTITUTIONAL
RIGHTS TO LIBERTY, PRIVACY, AND EQUAL PROTECTION, 95 Yale L.J. 599, 625 (1986)

HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
3344 WOMEN'S PRISONS: AN EQUAL PROTECTION EVALUATION, 94 Yale L.J. 1182, 1206+
(1985) HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
3345 CONSTITUTIONAL LAW AND THE TEACHING OF THE PARABLES, 93 Yale L.J. 455, 502
(1984) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
3346 RACE AND THE DECISION TO DETAIN A SUSPECT, 93 Yale L.J. 214, 258 (1983) HN: 4
(S.Ct.)
3347 DISCRIMINATORY PURPOSE AND MENS REA: THE TORTURED ARGUMENT OF INVI-
DIOUS INTENT, 93 Yale L.J. 111, 134 (1983)
3348 SEX EQUALITY, SEX DIFFERENCES, AND THE SUPREME COURT, 92 Yale L.J. 913,
950+ (1983) HN: 1,2,4 (S.Ct.)
3349 MAKING THE VIOLATION FIT THE REMEDY: THE INTENT STANDARD AND EQUAL
PROTECTION LAW, 92 Yale L.J. 328, 351 (1982) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
3350 A MADISONIAN INTERPRETATION OF THE EQUAL PROTECTION DOCTRINE, 91 Yale
L.J. 1403, 1429+ (1982) HN: 2,4 (S.Ct.)
3351 A TOUND TRIP TO EIRE: TWO BOOKS ON THE IRISH CONSTITUTION Cases and Materi-
als on the Irish Constitution. By James O'Reilly and Mary Redmond. Dublin: The Incorporated
Law Society of Ireland, 1980. Pp. 698. The Irish Const, 91 Yale L.J. 391, 396 (1981)
3352 SLOUCHING TOWARD BETHLEHEM WITH THE NINTH AMENDMENT Decision Accord-
ing to Law. By Charles L. Black, Jr. New York: W. W. Norton & Co., Inc, 1981. Pp. 83. $12.95,
91 Yale L.J. 207, 210+ (1981) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
3353 QUASI-SUSPECT CLASSES AND PROOF OF DISCRIMINATORY INTENT: A NEW MOD-
EL, 90 Yale L.J. 912, 931+ (1981) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
3354 PRIVATE ABRIDGMENT OF SPEECH AND THE STATE CONSTITUTIONS, 90 Yale L.J.
165, 188 (1980) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
3355 STATE BURDENS ON RESIDENT ALIENS: A NEW PREEMPTION ANALYSIS, 89 Yale L.J.
940, 961 (1980) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
3356 THE GRAYING OF CIVIL RIGHTS LAW: THE AGE DISCRIMINATION ACT OF 1975, 89
Yale L.J. 27, 93 (1979) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
3357 PAROLE RELEASE DECISIONMAKING AND THE SENTENCING PROCESS, 84 Yale L.J.
810, 900 (1975)
3358 MENTAL ILLNESS: A SUSPECT CLASSIFICATION?, 83 Yale L.J. 1237, 1270+ (1974) HN:
1,4 (S.Ct.)
3359 COMMON LAW RULES AND CONSTITUTIONAL DOUBLE STANDARDS: SOME NOTES
ON ADJUDICATION, 83 Yale L.J. 221, 311 (1973)
3360 143 BNA Daily Labor Report A-6, 2010, DOMESTIC PARTNERS: JUDGE ENJOINS EN-
FORCEMENT OF ARIZONA LAW REMOVING DOMESTIC PARTNERS FROM INSUR-
ANCE (2010)
3361 94 BNA Daily Labor Report D-3, 2009 (2009) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
3362 96 BNA Daily Labor Report E-1, 2007 (2007) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
3363 121 BNA Daily Labor Report E-26, 2003 (2003)

3364 102 BNA Daily Labor Report C-2, 2003 (2003) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
3365 13 BNA Daily Labor Report E-8, 2003 (2003)
3367 238 BNA Daily Labor Report D-6, 2001 (2001) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
3371 1995 BNA Daily Labor Report 147 D45, DECISION OF THE U.S. SUPREME COURT IN
ADARAND CONSTRUCTORS INC. V. PENA (1995) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
3372 1995 BNA Daily Labor Report 113 D25, DECISION OF THE U.S. SUPREME COURT IN
ADARAND CONSTRUCTORS INC. V. PENA (1995) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
3373 1994 BNA Daily Labor Report 75 D33, DECISION OF SUPREME COURT IN J.E.B. V.
ALABAMA (1994) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
3374 224 BNA Daily Labor Report F-1, 1990, EEOC POLICY GUIDANCE ON PARENTAL LEAVE
(1990) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
3375 211 BNA Daily Report for Executives K-14, 1988, MARITAL DEDUCTION-STATE DOWER
STATUTE HELD UNCONSTITUTIONAL AT TIME OF SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT:
Arkansas dower statute was unconstitutional at the time decedent's surviving spouse reached set-
tlement agreement with the estat (1988) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
3376 211 BNA Daily Tax Report K-14, 1988, MARITAL DEDUCTION-STATE DOWER STATUTE
HELD UNCONSTITUTIONAL AT TIME OF SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT: Arkansas dower
statute was unconstitutional at the time decedent's surviving spouse reached settlement agreement
with the estat (1988) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
3377 7/28/2010 BNA Employment Policy & Law Daily D11, DOMESTIC PARTNERS: JUDGE EN-
JOINS ENFORCEMENT OF ARIZONA LAW REMOVING DOMESTIC PARTNERS FROM
INSURANCE (2010)
3378 7/29/2010 BNA Pensions & Benefits Daily D21, DOMESTIC PARTNERS: JUDGE ENJOINS
ARIZONA LAW TO REMOVE DOMESTIC PARTNERS FROM INSURANCE COVERAGE
(2010)
3379 9 BNA United States Law Week Supreme Court Today 93, 2009 (2009) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
3380 5 BNA United States Law Week Supreme Court Today 122, 2005 (2005)
3381 S 26.8 Notice of Class Action Dismissal, 4 Class Action Reports 40 (1975)
3382 RECENT DECISIONS, 3 Class Action Reports 5 (1974) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
3383 HIGH COURT RULES FOR UNION: STATE LIMITATIONS PERIOD GOVERNS WARN
ACT SUITS, 10 Corporate Counselor 1 (1995)
3384 45 NO 5 Criminal Law Bulletin ART 1, The Rights of Delinquents in Juvenile Court: Why Not
Equal Protection? (2010)
3385 DCSL MD. Inst. for Contin. Prof. Educ. of Lawyers 2-41, ALIMONY (2009)
3386 DCSL MD. Inst. for Contin. Prof. Educ. of Lawyers 41, ALIMONY (2003)
3387 18867 National Business Institute 101, USING TRUSTS TO MEET THE NEEDS OF YOUR

ELDERLY CLIENT (2004)

3388 23985 National Business Institute 155, APPENDICES (2004)
3389 SELECTED CASES RELATED TO DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA v. HELLER, 217 Practising
Law Institute Litig. & Admin. Prac.: Crim. Law & Urban Problems 121 (2009)
3390 THE EMPLOYMENT LAW YEAR IN REVIEW, 547 Practising Law Institute Litigation and
Administrative Practice: Litigation 9 (1996)
3391 CIVIL ISSUES RELATED TO DWI CASES: LOCATING AND PRESERVING NEGLIGENCE
AND 'DRAM SHOP' LIABILITY COVERAGES, 488 Practising Law Institute Litigation and
Administrative Practice: Litigation 177 (1993)
3392 34 Preview of the United States Supreme Court Cases 432, Women's Issues and the Roberts
Court (2007)
3393 1995-96 Preview of the United States Supreme Court Cases 160, Sex and the Single-Sex School:
Are Gender Classifications Now Inherently Suspect? United States v. Commonwealth of Virginia
and Commonwealth of Virginia v. United States (1995) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
3394 TITLE IX MARKS ITS 35th ANNIVERSARY BY OPENING THE DOORS TO SINGLE-SEX
PUBLIC ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY SCHOOLS, 237 Ed. Law Rep. 1, 1 (2008) HN:
1,4 (S.Ct.)
3395 TRACING THE HISTORY OF PEER SEXUAL HARASSMENT IN TITLE IX CASES, 183 Ed.
Law Rep. 1, 28 (2004)
3396 TITLE IX TAPESTRY: THRESHOLD and PROCEDURAL ISSUES, 153 Ed. Law Rep. 849,
870 (2001)
3397 VMI AND SINGLE-SEX PUBLIC SCHOOLS: THE END OF AN ERA?, 114 Ed. Law Rep. 999,
1010 (1997)
3398 LEGAL STANDARDS REGARDING GENDER EQUITY AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION, 100
Ed. Law Rep. 841, 847+ (1995) HN: 1,2 (S.Ct.)
3399 POVERTY AS A SUSPECT CLASS IN PUBLIC EDUCATION EQUAL PROTECTION
SUITS, 54 Ed. Law Rep. 1085, 1098+ (1989) HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.)
3400 PLYLER V. DOE: ISSUES AND IMPLICATIONS, 7 Ed. Law Rep. 235, 241 (1983) HN: 2
(S.Ct.)
3401 OBSCURING THE STRUGGLE: SEX DISCRIMINATION, SOCIAL SECURITY, AND
STONE, SEIDMAN, SUNSTEIN & TUSHNET'S CONSTITUTIONAL LAW, 28
Soc.Sec.Rep.Serv. 630, 655 (1990) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
Court Documents
Appellate Court Documents (U.S.A.)
Appellate Petitions, Motions and Filings

3402 Hassan v. The United States of America, 2010 WL 2937742, *2937742+ (Appellate Petition,
Motion and Filing) (U.S. Jul 23, 2010) Petition for Writ of Certiorari (NO. 10-141) HN:
1 (S.Ct.)

3403 Zmysly v. United States of America, 2010 WL 979064, *979064+ (Appellate Petition, Motion
and Filing) (U.S. Mar 15, 2010) Petition for a Writ of Certiorari (NO. 09-1108) HN: 4
(S.Ct.)
3404 Pietrangelo, II v. Gates, 2008 WL 5451850, *5451850+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing)
(U.S. Dec 23, 2008) Petition for a Writ of Certiorari (NO. 08-824) HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
3405 Hadley v. Hawaii Government Employees Ass'n (HGEA), 2008 WL 4360902, *4360902+
(Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Sep 18, 2008) Petition for a Writ of Certiorari
(NO. 08-371) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
3406 In the Interest of: K.M.H. v. Harrington, 2008 WL 1827434, *1827434+ (Appellate Petition, Mo-
tion and Filing) (U.S. Apr 21, 2008) Motion for Leave to File Brief Amicus Curiae of the Alli-
ance Defense Fund and Brief in Support of Petitioner (NO. 07-1201) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
3407 Henley v. Bell, 2008 WL 743139, *743139+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Mar
17, 2008) Petition for a Writ of Certiorari (NO. 07-1194) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
3408 Fitzgerald v. Barnstable School Committee, 2008 WL 596047, *596047+ (Appellate Petition,
Motion and Filing) (U.S. Mar 03, 2008) Petition for a Writ of Certiorari (NO. 07-1125)
HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
3409 Michigan High School Athletic Ass'n, Inc. v. Communities for Equity, 2007 WL 626655,
*626655+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Feb 28, 2007) Brief in Opposition (NO.
06-1038) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
3410 Means v. Navajo Nation, 2006 WL 2453502, *2453502+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing)
(U.S. Aug 21, 2006) Brief for the United States in Opposition (NO. 05-1614) HN: 1
(S.Ct.)
3411 Morris v. Tanner, 2006 WL 1635662, *1635662+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S.
Jun 09, 2006) Brief for the United States in Opposition (NO. 05-1285) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
3412 eBay Inc. v. MercExchange, L.L.C., 2005 WL 2381068, *2381068+ (Appellate Petition, Motion
and Filing) (U.S. Sep 23, 2005) Brief of Amici Curiae Qualcomm Incorporated, Tessera, Inc.
and Biogen Idec Inc. in Support of Respondent (NO. 05-130) "
3413 Donald J. DIBBLE, Petitioner, v. John H. FENIMORE, Respondent., 2004 WL 596175,
*596175+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Mar 22, 2004) Brief in Opposition (NO.
03-1184) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
3414 Robert TOCKES, Petitioner, v. AIR-LAND TRANSPORT SERVICE, INC., Respondent., 2004
WL 50137, *50137+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Jan 07, 2004) Respondents
Brief in Opposition to Petition for a Writ of Certiorari (NO. 03-817) " HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
3415 BOSTON UNIVERSITY, Petitioner, v. UNIVERSITY OF MEDICINE AND DENTISTRY OF
NEW JERSEY, and Altec, Inc., Respondents., 2003 WL 22428716, *22428716+ (Appellate Peti-
tion, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Aug 05, 2003) Petition for Writ of Certiorari (NO. 03-191)
HN: 3 (S.Ct.)
3416 Thomas A. MARTIN, Petitioner, v. KEYCORP, Key Bank National Association (f1k1a Key
Bank of New York, N. A., Key Bank of Southeastern New York), Robert G. Qulia., 2003 WL
21698636, *21698636+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Jan 30, 2003) Petition for
a Writ of Certiorari (NO. 02-1150) HN: 3 (S.Ct.)
3417 UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER AT SAN ANTONIO, Petitioner, v.

Theresa M. SILER-KHODR, et al., 2002 WL 32134090, *32134090+ (Appellate Petition, Mo-

tion and Filing) (U.S. Nov 15, 2002) Brief for the United States in Opposition (NO. 02-253) "
HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
3418 John Geddes LAWRENCE and Tyron Garner, Petitioners, v. STATE OF TEXAS, Respondent.,
2002 WL 32101086, *32101086+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Aug 16, 2002)
Motion for Leave to File Brief Amicus Curiae and Brief of Amicus Curiae, Pro Family Law
Center, in Support of Denying Review (NO. 02-102) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
3419 John Geddes LAWRENCE and Tyron Garner, Petitioners, v. STATE OF TEXAS, Respondent.,
2002 WL 32101039, *32101039+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Jul 16, 2002) Pe-
tition for a Writ of Certiorari (NO. 02-102) " HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
3420 NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES, et al., Petitioners, v. William HIBBS, et
al., 2002 WL 32135355, *32135355+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. May 20,
2002) Brief for the United States in Opposition (NO. 01-1368) " HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
3421 Eric ELDRED, et al., Petitioners, v. John D. ASHCROFT, in his official capacity as Attorney
General, Respondent., 2002 WL 32135676, *32135676+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing)
(U.S. May 20, 2002) Brief for Petitioners (NO. 01-618) " HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
3422 Marvin K. SPEIGNER, Jr., Petitioner, v. Willie A. ALEXANDER, Clyde C. Hennies, and the
Alabama State Military Department, Respondents., 2001 WL 34115896, *34115896+ (Appellate
Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Sep 27, 2001) Petition for Writ of Certiorari (NO. 01-561)
3423 Dee Ellen Garrison BARDES, Petitioner, v. Samuel Pogue TODD III, Respondent., 2001 WL
34115491, *34115491+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Aug 31, 2001) Petition for
Writ of Certiorari (NO. 01-398) " HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
3424 Francis A. AFFRONTI, Anthony F. Bonadio, Joan S. Kohout, Estate of Leonard E. Maas, Mi-
chael J. Miller, Anthony J. Sciolino and Charles L. Willis, Petitioners, v. Jonathan LIPPMAN,
Chief Administrator of the Courts of the State of New York; H. Carl McCall, as the Comptroller
of the State of New York; and the State of New York, Respondents., 2001 WL 34125299,
*34125299+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Jun 20, 2001) Petition for Writ of
Certiorari (NO. 00-1907) HN: 1,2 (S.Ct.)
3425 Thomas F. PALMER, Petitioner, v. Susan M. BERTRAND, Respondent., 2001 WL 34116004,
*34116004+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. May 31, 2001) Petition for Writ of
Certiorari (NO. 01-180) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
3426 CITY OF YONKERS, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES and Yonkers Branch, National Associ-
ation for the Advancement of Colored People, Respondents., 2001 WL 34125455, *34125455
(Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Mar 28, 2001) Petition for a Writ of Certiorari
(NO. 00-1497) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
3427 NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES, et al., Petitioners, v. William HIBBS, et
al., Respondents., 2001 WL 34116242, *34116242+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing)
(U.S. 2001) Brief in Opposition (NO. 01-1368) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
3428 ADARAND CONSTRUCTORS, INC., Petitioner, v. RODNEY SLATER, Secretary of the
United States Department of Transportation, Kenneth Wykle, Administrator of the Federal High-
way Administration, Vincent F. Schimmoller, Administrator of Region VIII, Federal Highway
Administration, and Larry C. Smith, Engineer of the Central Federal Lands Highway Division,

Respondents., 2000 WL 34015598, *34015598+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S.
Nov 07, 2000) Petition for Writ of Certiorari (NO. 00-730) " HN: 3 (S.Ct.)
3429 ADARAND CONSTRUCTORS, INC., Petitioner, v. Rodney SLATER, Secretary of the United
States Department of Transportation, Kenneth Wykle, Administrator of the Federal Highway Ad-
ministration, Vincent F. Schimmoller, Administrator of Region VIII, Federal Highway Adminis-
tration, and Larry C. Smith, Engineer of the Central Federal Lands Highway Division, Respond-
ents., 2000 WL 33979522, *33979522+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Nov 03,
2000) Petition for Writ of Certiorari (NO. 00-730) " HN: 3 (S.Ct.)
3430 ILLINOIS STATE UNIVERSITY, et al., petitioners, v. Iris I. VARNER, et al., 2000 WL
34001044, *34001044+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. 2000) Brief for the United
States in Opposition (NO. 00-1277) " HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
3431 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Petitioner, v. FLORIDA BOARD OF REGENTS, et al. J.
Daniel Kimel, jr., et al., Petitioners, v. Florida Board of Regents, et al., 1999 WL 33609325,
*33609325+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Sep 15, 1999) Reply Brief for the
United States (NO. 98-791, 98-796) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
3432 Selisia C. ARLEAUX, Plaintiff, v. Stephan M. ARLEAUX, Defendant., 1997 WL 33548852,
*33548852+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Dec 11, 1997) Petition for Writ of
3433 Joseph T. PONDER and Judyl Ponder, Petitioners, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Re-
spondent., 1997 WL 33557593, *33557593+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Dec
02, 1997) Petition for Writ of Certiorari (NO. 97-922) HN: 4,5 (S.Ct.)
3434 Angelina Anita CARRERAS, Petitioner, v. The State of Texas, Respondent., 1997 WL
33549900, *33549900+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Aug 25, 1997) Petition for
Writ of Certiorari (NO. 97-342) " HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
3435 Alexis COLON, Estate of the Decedent by Personal Representative Peaches Martinez, Luis
Colon, Peaches Martinez and Alexander Martinez, Petitioners, v. UNITED STATES OF AMER-
ICA, Waddell, Lt. Col., Tyronne S. Leonard, Staff Sergeant, McDonald, Staff Sergeant, Dax Ar-
ies, Sergeant, Respondents., 1997 WL 33557909, *33557909+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and
Filing) (U.S. Aug 05, 1997) Petition for a Writ of Certiorari (NO. 97-227) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
3436 Richard F. RICHENBERG, Jr., Petitioner, v. William J. PERRY, Secretary of Defense, and
Sheila Widnall, Secretary of the Department of the Air Force, Respondents., 1997 WL 33558071,
*33558071+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Apr 16, 1997) Petition for a Writ of
3437 Richard Dirk SELLAND, Petitioner, v. William J. PERRY, Secretary of Defense, John H.
Dalton, Secretary of the Navy, Respondents., 1997 WL 33557930, *33557930+ (Appellate Peti-
tion, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Feb 05, 1997) Petition for a Writ of Certiorari (NO. 96-1238)
HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
3438 Christi HAAS, as parent and natural guardian of Scott M. Glenn, II, Petitioner, v. Shirley S.
CHATER, Commissioner of Social Security, Respondent., 1997 WL 33557011, *33557011+
(Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Jan 27, 1997) Reply for Petitioner (NO. 96-602)
3439 Wendy L. KERN, Petitioner, v. CITY OF ROCHESTER; Fire Department of the City of
Rochester; Police Department of the City of Rochester; Rochester Firefighters Association, Inc.,

Local 1071 IAFF; International Association of Firefighters; Daniel Cavuoto, Individually and as
President of Local 1071, IAFF and as a Full Time City of Rochester Employee and Lt. in the City
of Rochester Fire Department; Charles D. Ippolito, Individually and as Chief of the City of, 1997
WL 33561610, *33561610+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Jan 13, 1997) Petition
for Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit (NO.
96-1190) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
3440 K.D.H., Petitioner, v. K. M., Respondent., 1996 WL 33422706, *33422706+ (Appellate Petition,
Motion and Filing) (U.S. Sep 12, 1996) Petition for a Writ of Certiorari (NO. 96-487)
HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
3441 CITY OF BOERNE, Texas, Petitioner, v. P.F. FLORES, Archbishop of San Antonio and United
States of America., 1996 WL 33413750, *33413750+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing)
(U.S. Aug 26, 1996) Brief for the United States in Opposition (NO. 95-2074) HN: 4
(S.Ct.)
3442 Arthur J. MIER, an individual, Petitioner, v. Glen W. Van DYKE, in his capacity as Adjutant
General of the Arizona State Army National Guard; Togo D. West, Jr., in his capacity as Secret-
ary of the Army, Respondents., 1995 WL 17036112, *17036112+ (Appellate Petition, Motion
and Filing) (U.S. Nov 21, 1995) Petition for Writ of Certiorari (NO. 95-816)
3443 Robin Floyd PANIS, Petitioner, v. MISSION HILLS BANK, N.A., E. Dudley McElvain, Mark
R. Larrabee, Leon G. Rupp, Alan L. Atterbury, J. Philip Coulson, Julie C. Esrey, Fred L. Merril,
Sr., Estelle G. Sosland, Morton Sosland, Neil Sosland, Christopher Y. Thomas, Thomas J. Turn-
er, III, Respondents., 1995 WL 17048706, *17048706+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing)
(U.S. Oct 31, 1995) Petition for Writ of Certiorari (NO. 95-1238) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
3444 James E. JONES, Jr., et al., Petitioners, v. Shannon Richey FAULKNER, Respondent, UNITED
STATES OF AMERICA, Respondents., 1995 WL 17047693, *17047693+ (Appellate Petition,
Motion and Filing) (U.S. Sep 11, 1995) Respondent's Brief in Opposition (NO. 95-258)
HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
3445 Berman J. WATTS., Petitioner, v. Michael P. W. STONE., Secretary of the Army; Department of
the Army, Headquarters United States army Aviation Center and Ft. Rucker, Respondent., 1995
WL 17036088, *17036088+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Jul 28, 1995) Petition
for Writ of Certiorari (NO. 95-165) HN: 2,4 (S.Ct.)
3446 Shannon Richey FAULKNER, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Peti-
tioner, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent, v. James E. JONES, Jr., et al., Respond-
ents., 1995 WL 17035778, *17035778+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Jul 10,
1995) Petition for a Writ of Certiorari (NO. 95-31) " HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
3447 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Petitioner, v. COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, et al.,
Jun 23, 1995) Brief for the Commonwealth of Virginia, et al., in Opposition (NO. 94-1941)
HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.)
3448 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Petitioner, v. COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, et al.,
1995 WL 17013870, *17013870+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. May 26, 1995)
Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Cir-
cuit (NO. 94-1941) " HN: 4,5 (S.Ct.)
3449 GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY and GEICO GENERAL INSUR-

ANCE COMPANY, Petitioners, v. Vincent P. DUANE, Respondent., 1994 WL 16043980,

*16043980+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Dec 29, 1994) Petition for Writ of
3450 Paul E. SPRAGENS, Petitioner, v. Donna E. SHALALA, Secretary of Health and Human Ser-
vices, Respondent., 1994 WL 16042778, *16042778+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing)
(U.S. Dec 21, 1994) Petition for Writ of Certiorari (NO. 94-1102) HN: 1,2 (S.Ct.)
3451 Juan R. GONZALEZ, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent., 1994 WL
16042837, *16042837+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Sep 21, 1994) Petition for
a Writ of Certiorari (NO. 94-519)
3452 Juan R. GONZALEZ, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent., 1994 WL
16042899, *16042899+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Sep 21, 1994) Petition for
a Writ of Certiorari (NO. 94-519)
3453 Michael C. COLLINS, Leslie Collins, and Barbara Collins, Plaintiffs, v. SCHWEITZER, INC.,
and World Wide Ski Corp dba Nastar, Defendants., 1994 WL 16042554, *16042554+ (Appellate
Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Aug 31, 1994) Petition for Writ of Certiorari (NO. 94-382)
HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
3454 Joyce L. WALMER, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE and DE-
PARTMENT OF THE ARMY, Respondent., 1994 WL 16042605, *16042605+ (Appellate Peti-
tion, Motion and Filing) (U.S. 1994) Petition for Writ of Certiorari (NO. 230) HN: 2
(S.Ct.)
3455 Reid KNUTSON, Petitioner, v. WISCONSIN AIR NATIONAL GUARD and Gerald D. Slack,
Oct 08, 1993) Brief in Opposition to Petition for a Writ of Certiorari (NO. 93-386)
HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
3456 Jose A. MORALES (Deceased/Employee), Julia Corpus de Morales (Widow), Juan Antonio
Morales and Daniel Morales (Minor Children), Petitioners, v. BARGE-WAGENER CON-
STRUCTION COMPANY (Employer) and Argonaut Insurance Company (Insurer), Respond-
ents., 1993 WL 13075330, *13075330+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Sep 16,
1993) Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the Supreme Court for the State of Georgia (NO.
93-432) " HN: 3,5 (S.Ct.)
3457 Glendale MORE, Jr., Michael E. Burrows and John Coburn, Petitioners, v. Harold FARRIER, et
al., Respondents., 1993 WL 13075893, *13075893+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing)
(U.S. May 25, 1993) Petition (NO. 92-1901) "
3458 William J. O'BRIEN, Petitioner, v. CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION, Respondent.,
1992 WL 12074022, *12074022+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Nov 03, 1992)
Petition for a Writ of Certiorari (NO. 92-870) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
3459 Arthur J. FARMER, Petitioner, v. Ray MABUS, Governor of the State of Mississippi, Respond-
ent., 1991 WL 11178978, *11178978+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Nov 18,
1991) Petition for Writ of Certiorari (NO. 91-813) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
3460 Regina BROWN, Administratrix and Administratrix Ad Prosequendum of the Estate of Debbie
Evans, Petitioner, v. Detective Felix GRABOWSKI, individually and as a police officer of the
Roselle Police Department, New Jersey; Patrolman William Schwartz, individually and as a po-
lice officer of the Roselle Police Department, New Jersey; Chief Vincent F. Trolan, individually

and as Chief of the Roselle Police Department, New Jersey; Roselle Police, 1991 WL 11178148,
*11178148+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. May 23, 1991) Brief in Opposition to
Petition for Writ of Certiorari (NO. 90-1680) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
3461 Regina BROWN, Administratrix and Administratrix Ad Prosequendum of the Estate of Debbie
Evans, Petitioner, v. Detective Felix GRABOWSKI, individually and as a police officer of the
Roselle Police Department, New Jersey; Patrolman William Sschwartz individually and as a po-
lice officer of the Roselle Police Department, New Jersey; Chief Vincent F. Trolan, individually
and as Chief of the Roselle Police Department, New Jersey; Roselle Police, 1991 WL 11179000,
*11179000+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Apr 29, 1991) Petition for Writ of
3462 Arthur Frank MILLARD, Petitioner, v. THE UNITED STATES, Respondent., 1991 WL
11176361, *11176361+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Feb 11, 1991) Petition
(NO. 90-1276) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
3463 Monica GETZ, Petitioner, v. Stanley GETZ, Respondent., 1990 WL 10058468, *10058468+
(Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Oct 01, 1990) Petition (NO. 90-562) HN: 1,2
(S.Ct.)
3464 DUDOSH v. WARG, 1988 WL 1093850, *1093850+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing)
(U.S. Sep 12, 1988) Petition (NO. 88-450) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
3465 Heyden v. Schoenfeld, 1987 WL 955206, *955206+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing)
(U.S. Aug 19, 1987) Petition (NO. 87-387) HN: 1,2 (S.Ct.)
3466 Catherine duPont Schlaeppi v. Delaware Trust Co., 1987 WL 954989, *954989+ (Appellate Peti-
tion, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Jun 09, 1987) Petition (NO. 86-1962) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
3467 Sajer v. Jorden, 1987 WL 954687, *954687+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Feb
20, 1987) Petition (NO. 86-1382) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
3468 Mack v. Rumsfeld, 1986 WL 766473, *766473+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S.
Apr 28, 1986) Petition (NO. 85-1797) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
3469 Mfrs. Hanover Trust Co. v. U.S., 1986 WL 767153, *767153+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and
Filing) (U.S. Jan 03, 1986) Petition (NO. 85-1142) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
3470 Rustin v. District of Columbia, 1985 WL 695174, *695174+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Fil-
ing) (U.S. Sep 04, 1985) Petition (NO. 85-365) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
3471 Hu Chuan NING, Petitioner, v. Alberto GONZALES, Attorney General of the United States, Re-
spondent., 2007 WL 5994563, *5994563+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (2nd Cir. May
16, 2007) Petitioner's Brief (NO. 07-0008-AG) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
3472 Kalman WEISS, as assignee, Hershy Meisels, Yida Weinstock, Chaim M. Rubin, Samuel M.
Stern, Moshe Herman, Binie Vizel, f/k/a Bini Schwartz, Blima Rosenfeld, f/k/a Blima Green,
Herman Freund, Idy Weinberg, f/k/a Idy Samet, Devorah Herskovits, f/k/a Devorah Mermelstein,
Avrum Yitschok Gluck, Ester Ekstein, f/k/a Ester Zoldan, Mosha Grunfeld, Miriam Klein, f/k/a
Miriam Leonorovitz, David Rubenfeld, Isaac Goldberger, Shara Yides Salamon, f/k/a Yides,
2005 WL 4680426, *4680426 (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (2nd Cir. Aug 05, 2005)
Petition for Panel Rehearing and for Rehearing En Banc (NO. 04-2589, L) HN: 4
(S.Ct.)
3473 Robert PILCHMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, Defendant-Ap-

pellee., 2002 WL 32750828, *32750828 (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (2nd Cir. Aug
14, 2002) Petition for Rehearing En Banc (NO. 01-6209)
3474 Catherine WILCE, Petitioner, v. Director, OWCP, Respondent., 2004 WL 5000491, *5000491+
(Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (3rd Cir. Dec 07, 2004) Brief for Petitioner (NO.
04-3998) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
3475 GEORGE HYMAN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, Petitioner, v. OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY
AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION and Ray F. Marshall, Secretary of Labor, Respond-
ents., 1977 WL 203876, *203876+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (4th Cir. Nov 18,
1977) Brief for the Secretary Of Labor (NO. 77-1591)
3476 Russell J. HENDERSON, Doreen Keeler, Robert H. Loewy and Greater New Orleans Section of
the National Council of Jewish Women, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Richard L. STALDER, Secret-
ary, Department of Public Safety and Corrections, and John Kennedy, State Treasurer, Defend-
ants-Appellants., 2002 WL 32750955, *32750955+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (5th
Cir. Apr 12, 2002) Plaintiffs-Appellees' Petition for Rehearing En Banc (NO. 00-31171) "
HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
3477 Robert SOLOMON, Petitioner, v. OFFICE OF COMPLIANCE, Respondent, Office of the Archi-
tect of the Capitol, Respondent., 2005 WL 4828101, *4828101+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and
Filing) (Fed.Cir. Jan 07, 2005) Reply Brief of Petitioner Robert Solomon (NO. 04-6003)
HN: 2,5 (S.Ct.)
3478 Sharon L.C. HENDERSON, Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR, Respondent., 2000
WL 34467037, *34467037+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (Fed.Cir. Mar 01, 2000) Pe-
tition for Rehearing of Petitioner Sharon L.C. Henderson (NO. 98-3343) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
3479 Joseph T. and Judy L. PONDER, Plaintiff-Appellants, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Ap-
pellee., 1997 WL 34722692, *34722692+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (Fed.Cir. Aug
11, 1997) Appellant's Informal Combined Petition for Rehearing and Suggestion for Re-
hearing in Banc (NO. 97-5040) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
3480 COVAD COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY, et al., Petitioners, v. FEDERAL COMMUNICA-
TIONS COMMISSION and the United States of America, Respondents. New Jersey Division of
the Ratepayer Advocate, Petitioner, v. Federal Communications Commission and the United
States of America, Respondents., 2005 WL 6491430, *6491430+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and
Filing) (D.C.Cir. Nov 14, 2005) Brief of Petitioner New Jersey Division of Ratepayer Advoc-
ate (NO. 05-1095, LEAD) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
3481 Evanglin MCCAIN, Defendant and Appellant, v. A.F. EVANS COMPANY, et al., Plaintiff and
Respondent., 2010 WL 3181944, *3181944+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (Cal. Jun
11, 2010) Petition for Review (NO. S183480)
3482 In re Marriage CASES Judicial Council Coordination Proceeding No. 4365 No. A 110450. Robin
Tyler, et al., Petitioners and Respondents, v. The State of California, et al., Respondents and Ap-
pellants., 2006 WL 3522226, *3522226+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (Cal. Nov 14,
2006) Petition for Review (NO. S147999)
3483 In re Marriage CASES Judicial Council Coordination Proceeding No. 4365 No. A110451. Lancy
Woo, et al., Plaintiffs-Petitioners and Respondents, v. Bill Lockyer, et al., Defendants-Respond-
ents and Appellants., 2006 WL 3522227, *3522227+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing)
(Cal. Nov 14, 2006) Petition for Review (NO. S147999)

3484 Deborah Hermann ANDERSON, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. Curtis ALLEN, Defendant and Re-
spondent. Jason STEVENS, Defendant and Appellant., 1999 WL 33747362, *33747362+
(Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (Cal. Nov 03, 1999) Petition for Review (NO. S083399)
HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
3485 Imad Mohammad SHAHHAL, M.D., Petitioner and Appellant, v. MEDICAL BOARD OF CALI-
FORNIA, Respondent., 1998 WL 34287899, *34287899+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing)
(Cal. Dec 04, 1998) Petition for Review (NO. S075141)
3486 PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Juan Manuel DAV-
ILA, Defendant and Appellant., 1998 WL 34287181, *34287181+ (Appellate Petition, Motion
and Filing) (Cal. Oct 09, 1998) Appellant's Petition for Review After the Decision of the
Court of Appeal, Second Appellate District, Division Four, Affirming the Judgment (NO.
S073571)
3487 THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Plaintiff and respondent, v. Cecil Douglas
CARR, Defendant and appellant., 1998 WL 34284862, *34284862+ (Appellate Petition, Motion
and Filing) (Cal. Sep 25, 1998) Petition of Appellant for Review After the Unpublished De-
cision of the Court of Appeal, Second Appellate District, Division 3, Affirming the Judg-
ment of the Superior Court (NO. S073714)
3488 PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Pablo Valenzuela
NUNEZ, Defendant and Appellant., 1998 WL 34284613, *34284613+ (Appellate Petition, Mo-
tion and Filing) (Cal. Aug 31, 1998) Appellant's Petition for Review After the Decision of the
Court of Appeal, Second Appellate District, Division Four, Affirming the Judgment (NO.
S072971)
3489 PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Byron GOODWIN,
Defendant and Petitioner., 1998 WL 34282375, *34282375+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Fil-
ing) (Cal. Jan 14, 1998) Petition for Review (NO. S067264)
3490 State of Ohio, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. AMERICAN BAIL BOND AGENCY, et al., Defendants-Ap-
pellants., 1998 WL 34276289, *34276289+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (Ohio Nov
16, 1998) Appellee's Memorandum in Opposition to Jurisdiction (NO. 98-2199)
3491 STATE OF OHIO, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jerry BAISDEN, Defendant-Appellant., 1997 WL
33810458, *33810458 (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (Ohio Oct 20, 1997) Memor-
andum in Support of Jurisdiction of Appellant Jerry Baisden (NO. 97-2176)
Appellate Briefs
3492 Flores-Villar v. United States of America, 2010 WL 2565285, *2565285+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S.
Jun 25, 2010) Brief for the National Immigrant Justice Center and The American Immigra-
tion Lawyers Association as Amici Curiae Supporting Petitioner (NO. 09-5801) HN: 5
(S.Ct.)
Jun 25, 2010) Brief Amici Curiae of Professors of History, Political Science, and Law in Sup-
port of Petitioner (NO. 09-5801) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
Jun 25, 2010) Brief Amici Curiae of the American Civil Liberties Union and the ACLU of

San Diego and Imperial Counties in Support of Petitioner (NO. 09-5801) " HN: 4
(S.Ct.)
Jun 18, 2010) Brief for Petitioner (NO. 09-5801)
3496 Christian Legal Society Chapter of University of California, Hastings College of the Law v. Mar-
tinez, 2010 WL 989697, *989697+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Mar 15, 2010) Brief of Amici Curiae
Lambda Legal Defense and Education Fund, Inc. and Gay & Lesbian Advocates & Defend-
ers in Support of Respondents (NO. 08-1371) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
3497 Berghuis v. Smith, 2009 WL 4307581, *4307581+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Nov 24, 2009) Brief
Amicus Curiae of the Criminal Justice Legal Foundation in Support of Petitioner (NO.
08-1402) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
3498 Fitzgerald v. Barnstable School Committee, 2008 WL 4698781, *4698781+ (Appellate Brief)
(U.S. Oct 22, 2008) Brief for Respondents Barnstable School Committee and Dr. Russell De-
ver (NO. 07-1125)
3499 Fitzgerald v. Barnstable School Committee, 2008 WL 4054831, *4054831+ (Appellate Brief)
(U.S. Aug 29, 2008) Brief of the National Association of Women Lawyers as Amicus Curiae
in Support of Petitioners (NO. 07-1125) " HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
3500 District of Columbia v. Heller, 2008 WL 405566, *405566+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Feb 11,
2008) Amicus Curiae Brief of the Goldwater Institute in Support of Respondent (NO.
07-290) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
3501 Parents Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School District No. 1, 2006 WL 2882694,
*2882694+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Oct 10, 2006) Brief for the National Women's Law Center
and the National Partnership for Women & Families et al. as Amici Curiae Supporting Re-
spondents (NO. 05-908, 05-915) " HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
3502 Gonzales v. Carhart, 2006 WL 2736636, *2736636+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Sep 20, 2006) Mo-
tion for Leave to File Out of Time in Case No. 05-380 Brief Amici Curiae and Brief Amici
Curiae for the National Women's Law Center and 31 Other Organizations Committed to
the Safest Health Care ... (NO. 05-1382, 05-280) " HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
3503 eBay Inc. v. MercExchange, L.L.C., 2006 WL 639170, *639170+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Mar
10, 2006) Brief of Amici Curiae to Qualcomm Incorporated and Tessera, Inc. in Support of
Respondent (NO. 05-130) "
3504 Rumsfeld v. Forum for Academic and Institutional Rights, 2005 WL 2347171, *2347171+
(Appellate Brief) (U.S. Sep 21, 2005) Brief Amicus Curiae of Servicemembers Legal Defense
Network in Support of Respondents (NO. 04-1152) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
3505 Jackson v. Birmingham Board of Education, 2004 WL 1881765, *1881765+ (Appellate Brief)
(U.S. Aug 19, 2004) Amici Curiae Brief of Women's Sports Foundation, Myra Sadker Ad-
vocates, et al. in Support of the Petitioner (NO. 02-1672) " HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
3506 ELK GROVE UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, and David W. GORDON, Superintendent,
EGUSD, Petitioners, v. Michael A. NEWDOW, Respondent., 2004 WL 314156, *314156+
(Appellate Brief) (U.S. Feb 13, 2004) Repondent's Brief on the Merits (NO. 02-1624) "
HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
3507 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Petitioner, v. Billy Jo LARA., 2003 WL 22811829,

*22811829+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Nov 14, 2003) Brief for the United States (NO. 03-107) "
HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
3508 Lawrence v. Texas, 2003 WL 470115, *470115+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Feb 18, 2003) Brief of
Amici Curiae, Pro Family Law Center, Traditional Values Coalition, Traditional Values
Education & Legal Institute & James Hartline, in Support of Respondents (NO. 02-102)
HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
3509 Lawrence v. Texas, 2003 WL 470177, *470177+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Feb 18, 2003) Brief of
Texas Eagle Forum, Daughters of Liberty Republican Women, Houston, Texas and Spirit of
Freedom Republican Women's Club as Amici Curiae in Support of Respondent (NO.
02-102) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
3510 Lawrence v. Texas, 2003 WL 470184, *470184+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Feb 17, 2003) Re-
spondent's Brief (NO. 02-102) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
3511 Lawrence v. Garner, 2003 WL 152348, *152348+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jan 16, 2003) Brief of
the National Lesbian and Gay Law Association, The Asian American Legal Defense and
Education Fund, Action Wisconsin, The Bay Area Lawyers for Individual Freedom, The
Bay Area Transgender ... (NO. 02-102) " HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
3512 Lawrence v. Texas, 2003 WL 164146, *164146+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jan 16, 2003) Brief of
Now Legal Defense and Education Fund as Amicus Curiae in Support of Petitioners (NO.
02-102) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
3513 Nevada Dept. of Human Resources v. Hibbs, 2002 WL 31427565, *31427565+ (Appellate Brief)
(U.S. Oct 25, 2002) BRIEF OF THE STATES OF NEW YORK, CONNECTICUT,
ILLINOIS, MINNESOTA, NEW MEXICO, AND WASHINGTON AS AMICI CURIAE IN
SUPPORT OF RESPONDENTS (NO. 01-1368) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
3514 Department of Human Resources v. Hibbs, 2002 WL 31444460, *31444460+ (Appellate Brief)
(U.S. Oct 25, 2002) BRIEF OF THE NATIONAL WOMEN'S LAW CENTER ET AL. AS
AMICI CURIAE IN SUPPORT OF RESPONDENTS (NO. 01-1368) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
(U.S. Oct 25, 2002) BRIEF FOR THE UNITED STATES (NO. 01-1368) " HN: 4
(S.Ct.)
(U.S. Oct 25, 2002) BRIEF FOR RESPONDENT WILLIAM HIBBS (NO. 01-1368) HN:
4 (S.Ct.)
3517 Eldred v. Ashcroft, 2002 WL 1041928, *1041928+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. May 20, 2002)
BRIEF FOR PETITIONERS (NO. 01-618) " HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
3518 Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. Echazabal, 2002 WL 264620, *264620+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Feb 01,
2002) BRIEF AMICUS CURIAE OF THE AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION,
EQUAL RIGHTS ADVOCATES, THE NATIONAL WOMEN'S LAW CENTER, THE
NORTHWEST WOMEN'S LAW CENTER, NOW LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATION
FUND, THE PUERTO ... (NO. 00-1406) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
3519 Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. Echazabal, 2002 WL 187456, *187456+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jan 30,
2002) BRIEF OF THE NATIONAL COUNCIL ON DISABILITY AS AMICUS CURIAE IN
SUPPORT OF RESPONDENT (NO. 00-1406) " HN: 2,4 (S.Ct.)

3520 Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. Echazabal, 2002 WL 187464, *187464+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jan 02,
2002) BRIEF FOR THE RESPONDENT (NO. 00-1406) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
3521 Nguyen v. I.N.S., 2000 WL 1706737, *1706737+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Nov 13, 2000) BRIEF
OF PETITIONERS (NO. 99-2071) " HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
3522 Board of Trustees of University of Alabama v. Garrett, 2000 WL 1178761, *1178761+
(Appellate Brief) (U.S. Aug 11, 2000) BRIEF FOR THE UNITED STATES (NO. 99-1240)
HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
3523 Board of Trustees of University of Alabama v. Garrett, 2000 WL 1593420, *1593420+
(Appellate Brief) (U.S. Aug 11, 2000) BRIEF FOR THE RESPONDENTS PATRICIA GAR-
RETT AND MILTON ASH (NO. 99-1240) " HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
3524 Ferguson v. City of Charleston, South Carolina, 2000 WL 1506983, *1506983+ (Appellate Brief)
(U.S. Jun 01, 2000) MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AND BRIEF AMICUS CURIAE OF
THE AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION; NOW LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCA-
TION FUND; NATIONAL ORGANIZATION FOR WOMEN FOUNDATION, INC.;
AFRICAN-AMERICAN WOMEN ... (NO. 99-936) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
3525 Boy Scouts of America v. Dale, 2000 WL 339875, *339875+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Mar 29,
2000) BRIEF OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, ET AL., AS AMICI CURIAE IN SUP-
PORT OF RESPONDENT (NO. 99-699) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
3526 Boy Scouts of America v. Dale, 2000 WL 339890, *339890+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Mar 29,
2000) BRIEF AMICUS CURIAE OF THE AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION; THE
AMERICAN FEDERATION OF TEACHERS; THE ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE;
THE CALIFORNIA WOMEN'S LAW CENTER; THE CENTER FOR WOMEN POLICY
STUDIES; ... (NO. 99-699)
3527 Stenberg v. Carhart, 2000 WL 340111, *340111+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Mar 29, 2000) BRIEF
OF AMICI CURIAE SENATOR BARBARA BOXER AND REPRESENTATIVE NITA M.
LOWEY AND OTHER MEMBERS OF CONGRESS IN SUPPORT OF RESPONDENT
LEROY H. CARHART, M.D. (NO. 99-830) " HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
3528 Brzonkala v. Morrison, 1999 WL 1566657, *1566657+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Nov 12, 1999)
MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE BRIEF AND AMICUS CURIAE BRIEF OF THE ASSO-
CIATION OF TRIAL LAWYERS OF AMERICA IN SUPPORT OF THE PETITIONER
(NO. 99-5) HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
3529 U.S. v. Florida Bd. of Regents, 1999 WL 513848, *513848+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jul 14,
1999) BRIEF FOR THE UNITED STATES (NO. 98-791, 98-796) " HN: 1,2 (S.Ct.)
3530 Pennsylvania Dept. of Corrections v. Yeskey, 1998 WL 139854, *139854+ (Appellate Brief)
(U.S. Mar 22, 1998) BRIEF OF NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF PROTECTION AND AD-
VOCACY SYSTEMS, JUDGE DAVID L. BAZELON CENTER FOR MENTAL HEALTH
LAW, AND NEW YORK LAWYERS FOR THE PUBLIC INTEREST, AS AMICI CURI-
AE IN SUPPORT OF ... (NO. 97-634) HN: 1,2,3 (S.Ct.)
3531 Com. of Pa., Dept. of Corrections v. Yeskey, 1998 WL 104594, *104594+ (Appellate Brief)
(U.S. Mar 04, 1998) BRIEF OF AMICUS CURIAE, THE REPUBLICAN CAUCUS OF THE
PENNSYLVANIA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES IN SUPPORT OF PETITIONER
(NO. 97-634) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)

3532 Miller v. Albright, 1997 WL 583469, *583469+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Sep 19, 1997) REPLY
BRIEF OF PETITIONER (NO. 96-1060) " HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
3533 Miller v. Albright, 1997 WL 327565, *327565+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jun 12, 1997) BRIEF
OF AMICI CURIAE THE AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION AND NOW LEGAL
DEFENSE AND EDUCATION FUND IN SUPPORT OF PETITIONERS (NO. 96-1060) "
HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
3534 City of Boerne, Tex. v. Flores, 1997 WL 13201, *13201+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jan 10, 1997)
BRIEF FOR THE UNITED STATES (NO. 95-2074) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
3535 City of Boerne, Tex. v. Flores, 1997 WL 9088, *9088+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jan 10, 1997)
BRIEF OF AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION AS AMICUS CURIAE IN SUPPORT OF
RESPONDENTS (NO. 95-2074) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
3536 State v. Washington v. Glucksberg, 1996 WL 708943, *708943+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Dec 10,
1996) BRIEF OF THE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE LAW & POLICY AS AMICUS
CURIAE IN SUPPORT OF RESPONDENTS (NO. 96-110) " HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
3537 U.S. v. Lanier, 1996 WL 470900, *470900+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Aug 15, 1996) MOTION
FOR LEAVE TO FILE BRIEF AMICI CURIAE AND BRIEF AMICI CURIAE OF THE
SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER, THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF HUMAN
RIGHTS WORKERS AND THE CALIFORNIA WOMEN'S LAW CENTER IN ... (NO.
95-1717) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
3538 Arizonans for Official English v. State of Arizona, 1996 WL 426403, *426403+ (Appellate
Brief) (U.S. Jul 25, 1996) BRIEF OF PUERTO RICAN LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCA-
TION FUND; NATIONAL ASIAN PACIFIC AMERICAN LEGAL CONSORTIUM; LEG-
AL AID SOCIETY OF SAN FRANCISCO, EMPLOYMENT LAW CENTER; ET AL., AS
AMICI CURIAE IN SUPPORT ... (NO. 95-974)
3539 U.S. v. Commonwealth of VA, 1995 WL 761812, *761812+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Dec 19,
1995) AMICI CURIAE BRIEF OF WOMEN'S SCHOOLS TOGETHER, INC.; BOYS'
SCHOOLS: AN INTERNATIONAL COALITION; ROBERT BOBB; THOMAS H. BUT-
LER, Ed.D; DR. ROY J. DAWSON; PETER M. FLANIGAN; DR. RICHARD HAWLEY;
FRANK ... (NO. 94-1941, 94-2107) HN: 3,4 (S.Ct.)
1995) BRIEF OF AMICI CURIAE STATES IN SUPPORT OF THE COMMONWEALTH
OF VIRGINIA (NO. 94-1941, 94-2107) HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.)
1995) AMICUS BRIEF OF LAWYERS' COMMITTEE FOR CIVIL RIGHTS UNDER
LAW IN SUPPORT OF CROSS-RESPONDENT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (NO.
94-2107) " HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
1995) BRIEF OF AMICI CURIAE INDEPENDENT WOMEN'S FORUM, WOMEN'S
ECONOMIC PROJECT, DIANA FURCHTGOTT-ROTH, LINDA CHAVEZ, LYNNE V.
CHENEY, CHRISTINA HOFF SOMMERS, ABIGAIL THERNSTROM IN SUPPORT OF
RESPONDENTS (NO. 94-1941, 94-2107) " HN: 1,2 (S.Ct.)
1995) BRIEF FOR THE RESPONDENTS (NO. 94-1941, 94-2107) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)

3544 U.S. v. Commonwealth of Va., 1995 WL 702836, *702836+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Nov 16,
1995) BRIEF OF THE EMPLOYMENT LAW CENTER, A PROJECT OF THE LEGAL
AID SOCIEY OF SAN FRANCISCO, EQUAL RIGHTS ADVOCATES, INC., CHINESE
FOR AFFIRMATIVE ACTION, NATIONAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND LAW
CENTER, ... (NO. 94-1941, 94-2107) " HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
3545 U.S. v. Commonwealth of Virginia, 1995 WL 703385, *703385+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Nov 16,
1995) AMICUS BRIEF OF NANCY MELLETTE IN SUPPORT OF PETITIONER
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (NO. 94-1941, 94-2107) " HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
1995) BRIEF OF THE STATES OF MARYLAND, HAWAII, MASSACHUSETTS,
NEVADA, AND OREGON, AND THE COMMONWEALTH OF THE NORTHERN
MARIANA ISLANDS AS AMICI CURIAE IN SUPPORT OF PETITIONER (NO. 94-1941)
" HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
1995) BRIEF OF AMICI CURIAE NATIONAL WOMEN' S LAW CENTER AMERICAN
CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION IN SUPPORT OF PETITIONER AMERICAN ASSOCI-
ATION OF UNIVERSITY WOMEN THE AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE ANTI-
DEFAMATION ... (NO. 94-1941) " HN: 1,3,4 (S.Ct.)
1995) BRIEF FOR THE PETITIONER (NO. 94-1941) " HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
3549 Roy ROMER, as Governor of the State of Colorado, and the State of Colorado, Petitioners, v.
Richard G. EVANS, Angela Romero, Linda Fowler, Paul Frown, Priscilla Inkpen, John Miller,
the Boulder Valley School District RE-2, the City and County of Denver, the City of Aspen, and
the City Council of Aspen, Respondents., 1995 WL 17008436, *17008436+ (Appellate Brief)
(U.S. Jun 19, 1995) Brief of the Human Rights Campaign Fund et al., as Amici Curiae in
Support of Respondents (NO. 94-1039) " HN: 1,2,3 (S.Ct.)
3550 Roy ROMER, as Governor of the State of Colorado and the State of Colorado, Petitioners, v.
Richard G. EVANS, et al., Respondents., 1995 WL 17008437, *17008437+ (Appellate Brief)
(U.S. Jun 19, 1995) Brief of the American Association on Mental Retardation, the American
Orthopsychiatric Association, the ARC, the National Association of Protection and Ad-
vocacy Systems, the National Association for ... (NO. 94-1039) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
3551 Romer v Evans, 1995 WL 782809, *782809+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jun 19, 1995) BRIEF OF
THE HUMAN RIGHIS CAMPAIGN FUND ET AL., AS AMICI CURIAE IN SUPPORT
OF RESPONDENTS (NO. 94-1039) " HN: 1,3,4 (S.Ct.)
3552 Term Limits, Inc. v. Thornton, 1994 WL 513192, *513192+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Aug 16,
1994) BRIEF FOR RESPONDENTSREPRESENTATIVE JAY DICKEY ANDREPRES-
ENTATIVE TIM HUTCHINSONSUPPORTING PETITIONERS (NO. 93-1456, 93-1828) "
HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
3553 J.E.B. v. T.B., 1993 WL 381231, *381231+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jul 16, 1993) PETITION-
ER'S BRIEF ON THE MERITS (NO. 92-1239) " HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
3554 PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA, et al., Petitioners/
Cross-Respondents, v. Robert P. CASEY, et al., Respondents/Cross-Petitioners., 1992 WL
12006426, *12006426+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Apr 06, 1992) Brief Amicus Curiae of Life Is-

sues Institute Supporting Respondents/Cross-Petitioners (NO. 91-744, 91-902) HN: 4

(S.Ct.)
3555 PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA, Reproductive Health
and Counseling Center, Womens Health Services, Inc., Womens Suburban Clinic, Allentown
Womens Center, and Thomas Allen, M.D., on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated,
Petitioners, v. Robert P. CASEY, N. Mark Richards, and Ernest D. Preate, Jr., personally and in
their official capacities, Respondents., 1992 WL 12006400, *12006400+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S.
Mar 06, 1992) Brief for Representatives Don Edwards, Patricia Schroeder, Les Aucoin, Vic
Fazio, Bill Green and Constance A. Morella; Senators Alan Cranston, Bob Packwood,
Howard Metzenbaum, John Chafee, Timothy E. ... (NO. 91-744, 91-902) " HN: 1,4
(S.Ct.)
3556 PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA, et al., Petitioners, v.
Robert P. CASEY, et al., Respondents. Robert P. Casey, et al., Petitioners, v. Planned Parenthood
of Southeastern Pennsylvania, et al., Respondents., 1992 WL 12006401, *12006401 (Appellate
Brief) (U.S. Mar 06, 1992) Brief Of Amici Curiae of the NAACP Legal Defense and Educa-
tional Fund, Inc., and Other Organizations,* in Support of Planned Parenthood of South-
eastern Pennsylvania (NO. 91-744, 91-902) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
3557 PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA, et al., Petitioners, v.
Robert P. CASEY, et al., Respondents. Robert P. Casey, et al., Petitioners, v. Planned Parenthood
of Southeastern Pennsylvania, et al., Respondents., 1992 WL 12006403, *12006403+ (Appellate
Brief) (U.S. Mar 06, 1992) Brief of 250 American Historians as Amici Curiae in Support of
Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania (NO. 91-744, 91-902) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
3558 PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA, et al., Petitioners and
Cross-Respondents, v. Robert P. CASEY, et al., Respondents and Cross-Petitioners., 1992 WL
12006404, *12006404+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Mar 06, 1992) Brief of the City of New York,
the Association of the Bar of the City of New York, Committees on Sex and Law, Civil
Rights and Medicine and Law, and the New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation ...
(NO. 91-744, 91-902) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
3559 PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA, Reproductive Health
and Counseling Center, Womens Health Services, Inc., Womens Suburban Clinic, Allentown
Womens Center, and Thomas Allen, M.D., on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated,
Petitioners, v. Robert P. CASEY, N. Mark Richards, and Ernest D. Preate, Jr., personally and in
their official capacities, Respondents., 1992 WL 12006406, *12006406+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S.
Mar 06, 1992) Brief of the States of New York, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Illinois,
Iowa, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, North Carolina,
Rhode Island, Texas and Vermont and the ... (NO. 91-744, 91-902)
3560 Bray v. Alexandria Women's Health Clinic, 1991 WL 534030, *534030+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S.
May 13, 1991) BRIEF FOR RESPONDENTS (NO. 90-985) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
3561 Dr. Irving RUST, on behalf of himself, his patients and all others similarly situated, Dr. Melvin
Padawer, on behalf of himself, his patients, and all others similarly situated, Medical and Health
Research Association of New York City, Inc., Planned Parenthood of New York City, Inc.,
Planned Parenthood of Westchester/Rockland, and Health Services of Hudson County, New Jer-
sey, Petitioners, v. Dr. Louis SULLIVAN, or his successor, Secretary of the United, 1990 WL

10012647, *10012647+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jul 27, 1990) Brief of Amici Curiae Now Legal
Defense and Education Fund and 117 Organizations Committed to Women's Equality in
Support of the Petitioners Abortion Rights Mobilization ActionAIDS All Peoples ... (NO.
89-1391, 89-1392) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
3562 METRO BROADCASTING, INC., Petitioner, v. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMIS-
SION, et al., Respondents., 1990 WL 10012803, *10012803+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Mar 06,
1990) Brief Amicus Curiae of Giles Television, Inc. in Support of Respondents (NO. 89-453)
HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
SION, et al., 1990 WL 10012790, *10012790+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Feb 09, 1990) Brief
Amicus Curiae of Associated General Contractors of America, Inc., in Support of Petitioner
(NO. 89-453) " HN: 1,2 (S.Ct.)
3564 Metro Broadcasting, Inc. v. F.C.C., 1990 WL 513122, *513122+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Feb 09,
1990) BRIEF FOR PETITIONER METRO BRoADCASTING, INC. (NO. 89-453)
HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
3565 David HOFFMAN, Commissioner, Department of Community and Regional Affairs, State of
Alaska, Petitioners, v. NATIVE VILLAGE OF NOATAK, et al., Respondents., 1989 WL
1126964, *1126964+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Nov 13, 1989) Brief of Amici, the States of
Alabama Arizona, Arkansas, Colorado, Connecticut, Florida, Hawaii, Idaho, Michigan,
Minnesota, Mississippi, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Mexico, North Dakota, ... (NO.
89-1782) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
3566 METRO BROADCASTING, INC., petitioner, v. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMIS-
SION, et al., 1989 WL 1126975, *1126975+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Oct Term 1989) Brief for
the United States as Amicus Curiae Supporting Petitioner (NO. 89-453) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
SION, et al., Respondents., 1989 WL 1126989, *1126989+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Oct Term
1989) Brief for Petitioner Metro Broadcasting, Inc. (NO. 89-453) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.)
SION, et al., Respondents., 1989 WL 1127005, *1127005+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Oct Term
1989) Brief Amicus Curiae of American Women in Radio and Television, Inc. in Support of
Respondents (NO. 89-453) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
3569 INTERNATIONAL UNION, United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Work-
ers of America, et al., Petitioners, v. JOHNSON CONTROLS, INC., Respondent., 1989 WL
1128208, *1128208 (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Oct Term 1989) Brief Amici Curiae of the Associ-
ation of the Bar of the City of New York, the Association of Black Women Attorneys, the
Committee on Women's Rights of the New York County Lawyer's Association, and ... (NO.
89-1215)
3570 William L. WEBSTER, et al., Appellants, v. REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH SERVICES, et al.,
Appellees., 1989 WL 1127689, *1127689+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Mar 30, 1989) Brief of Sev-
enty-Seven Organizations Committed to Women's Equality as Amici Curiae in Support of
Appellees (NO. 88-605) " HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
Appellees., 1989 WL 1127726, *1127726+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Mar 30, 1989) Brief for a

Group of American Law Professors as Amicus Curiae in Support of Appellees (NO. 88-605)
" HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
Appellees., 1989 WL 1127663, *1127663+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Feb 23, 1989) Brief for the
Catholic Lawyers Guild of the Archdiocese of Boston, Inc. as Amicus Curiae Supporting
Appellants (NO. 88-605) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
3573 Price WATERHOUSE, Petitioner, v. Ann B. HOPKINS, Respondent., 1988 WL 1025867,
*1025867+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jun 17, 1988) Brief of Amici Curiae Now Legal Defense
and Education Fund, American Civil Liberties Union, Women's Legal Defense Fund, Amer-
ican Association of University Women, Employment Law Center, Equal Rights ... (NO.
87-1167) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
3574 CALIFORNIA FEDERAL SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION a federally chartered sav-
ings and loan association; Merchants and Manufacturers Association, a non-profit California cor-
poration; and the California Chamber of Commerce, a non-profit California Corporation, Peti-
tioners, v. Mark GUERRA, as Director of the Department of Fair Employment and Housing; De-
partment of Fair Employment and Housing; Cruz F. Sandoval as Chair Commissioner of the Fair
Employment and Housing, 1988 WL 1031914, *1031914+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Apr 04, 1988)
Brief for the Petitioners (NO. 85-494) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
3575 NEW YORK STATE CLUB ASSOCIATION, INC., Appellant, v. THE CITY OF NEW YORK,
The Mayor of the City of New York, The City Human Rights Commission and The Members of
the City Human Rights Commission, Appellees., 1988 WL 1026268, *1026268+ (Appellate
Brief) (U.S. Jan 06, 1988) Brief of the Committees on Civil Rights and Sex and Law of the
Association of the Bar of the City of New York as Amicus Curiae in Support of Appellees,
the City of New York, et al (NO. 86-1836) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
3576 Cynthia A. FORRESTER, Petitioner, v. Judge Howard Lee WHITE, Respondent., 1987 WL
881316, *881316+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Oct 23, 1987) Reply Brief of Petitioner (NO. 86-761)
HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
3577 Richard PENNELL and Tri-County Apartment House Owners Association, Appellants, v. CITY
OF SAN JOSE and CITY COUNCIL OF SAN JOSE, Appellees., 1987 WL 881306, *881306+
(Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jul 31, 1987) Brief for Amicus Curiae National Housing Law Project
in Support of Appellees (NO. 86-753) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
3578 Richard A. LYNG, Secretary of Agriculture, Appellant, v. INTERNATIONAL UNION, United
Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America, UAW, et al., 1987 WL
880427, *880427+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jun 18, 1987) Brief for the Appellant (NO. 86-1471)
" HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
3579 John R. VAN DRASEK, Petitioner, v. John F. LEHMAN, Secretary of the Navy, et al., 1987 WL
880253, *880253+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Mar 18, 1987) Brief for the Respondents (NO.
86-319)
3580 Cpt John R. VAN DRASEK, U.S.M.C. (Ret.), Petitioner, v. John F. LEHMAN, Jr., Secretary of
the Navy, Chapman Cox, Assistant Secretary of the Navy for Manpower and Reserve Affairs,
and The United States of America, Respondents., 1987 WL 880248, *880248+ (Appellate Brief)
(U.S. Feb 03, 1987) Brief for the Petitioner (NO. 86-319) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
3581 John R. VAN DRASEK, Petitioner, v. John F. LEHMAN, Jr., Secretary of the Navy, et al., Re-

spondent., 1987 WL 880245, *880245 (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jan 30, 1987) Brief Amicus Curi-
ae of the American Civil Liberties Union and Vietnam Veterans of America in Support of
the Respondent (NO. 86-319) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
3582 BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL and Rotary District 530, Appel-
lants, v. ROTARY CLUB OF DUARTE, Mary Lou Elliot and Rosemary Freitag., 1987 WL
880559, *880559+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jan 28, 1987) Appellees' Brief (NO. 86-421)
HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
3583 Saint Francis COLLEGE, et al., Petitioners, v. Majid Ghaidan AL-KHAZRAJI, a/k/a Majid Al-
Khazraji Allan, Respondent., 1987 WL 880980, *880980+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jan 23, 1987)
Brief of Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund and Puerto Rican Legal
Defense & Education Fund as Amici Curiae in Support of Respondent (NO. 85-2169) "
HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
3584 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., Petitioners, v. James B. STANLEY., 1987 WL 880383,
*880383+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jan 16, 1987) Brief for the Petitioners (NO. 86-393)
HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
3585 THE CORPORATION OF THE PRESIDING BISHOP OF THE CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST
OF LATTER-DAY SAINTS, et al., Appellants, United States of America, Intervenor-Appellant,
v. Christine J. AMOS, et al., Appellees., 1987 WL 864778, *864778+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jan
05, 1987) Brief Amicus Curiae of the American Association of Presidents of Independent
Colleges and Universities, the American Association of Bible Colleges, the American Associ-
ation of Christian Schools, the ... (NO. NOS. 86-179, 86-401.) "
3586 Paul E. JOHNSON, petitioner, v. TRANSPORTATION AGENCY, Santa Clara County, Califor-
nia, et al., 1986 WL 728148, *728148+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Aug 21, 1986) Brief for the
United States as Amicus Curiae Supporting Petitioner (NO. 85-1129) HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.)
3587 CALIFORNIA FEDERAL SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION, et al., Petitioners, v. Mark
GUERRA, et al., Respondents., 1986 WL 728374, *728374+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jun 12,
1986) Brief of Equal Rights Advocates, the California Teachers Association, the Northwest
Women's Law Center, the San Francisco Women Lawyers Alliance, Amici Curiae (NO.
85-494) " HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
3588 CALIFORNIA FEDERAL SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION, et al., Petitioners, v. Mark
GUERRA, et al., Respondents., 1986 WL 728369, *728369+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Apr 04,
1986) Brief of the American Civil Liberties Union, the League of Women Voters of the
United States, the League of Women Voters of California, the National Women's Political
Caucus, and the Coal Employment ... (NO. 85-494) " HN: 4,5 (S.Ct.)
3589 MERITOR SAVINGS BANK, FSB, Petitioner, v. Mechelle VINSON, et al., Respondents., 1986
WL 728234, *728234+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Feb 11, 1986) Brief of Respondent Mechelle
Vinson (NO. 84-1979) " HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
3590 MERITOR SAVINGS BANK, FSB, Petitioner, v. Mechelle VINSON, et al., Respondents., 1986
WL 728302, *728302+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Feb 1986) Brief of Respondent Mechelle Vin-
son (NO. 84-1979) " HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
3591 Otis R. BOWEN, Secretary of Health and Human Services, et al., Appellants, v. Stephen J. ROY,
et al., 1986 WL 727391, *727391+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jan 06, 1986) Reply Brief for the
Appellants (NO. 84-780) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)

3592 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and
Firearms, appellant, v. Anthony J. GALIOTO, 1986 WL 728208, *728208+ (Appellate Brief)
(U.S. Jan 02, 1986) Brief for the Appellant (NO. 84-1904) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
3593 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and
Firearms, Appellant, v. Anthony J. GALIOTO, Appellee., 1985 WL 669552, *669552+
(Appellate Brief) (U.S. Oct Term 1985) Brief for Appellee (NO. 84-1904) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
3594 Richard THORNBURGH, et al., Appellants, v. AMERICAN COLLEGE OF OBSTETRICIANS
AND GYNECOLOGISTS, et al., Appellees. Eugene F. DIAMOND, et al., Appellants, v. Allan
G. CHARLES, et al., Appellees., 1985 WL 669626, *669626+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Aug 30,
1985) Brief Amici Curiae of the Center for Constitutional Rights, the Committee for Abor-
tion Rights and against Sterilization Abuse, the National Emergency Civil Liberties Com-
mittee, the National Lawyers ... (NO. 84-1379, 84-495) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
3595 Richard THORNBURGH, et al., Appellants, v. AMERICAN COLLEGE OF OBSTETRICIANS
AND GYNECOLOGISTS, et al., Appellees. Eugene F. DIAMOND, et al., Appellants, v. Allan
G. CHARLES, et al., Appellees., 1985 WL 669714, *669714 (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Aug 30,
1985) Brief Amici Curiae of the Center for Constitutional Rights, the Committee for Abor-
tion Rights and Against Sterilization Abuse, the National Emergency Civil Liberties Com-
mittee, the National Lawyers ... (NO. 84-1379, 84-495)
3596 S. Simcha GOLDMAN, Petitioner, v. THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE, et. al., Respondent.,
1985 WL 669066, *669066+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Aug 22, 1985) Brief of the Rutherford In-
stitute, the Rutherford Institute of Alabama, the Rutherford Institute of Georgia, the
Rutherford Institute of Minnesota, the Rutherford Institute of Montana the Rutherford ...
(NO. 84-1097) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
3597 Robert W. JOHNSON, et al., Petitioners, v. MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF BALTIMORE,
et al., Respondents. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Petitioner, v. Mayor and City
Council of Baltimore, et al., Respondents., 1985 WL 668999, *668999+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S.
Apr 01, 1985) Brief of Amicus Curiae State of Vermont (NO. 84-518, 84-710) " HN: 1
(S.Ct.)
3598 Robert W. JOHNSON, et al., Petitioners, v. MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF BALTIMORE,
Respondent. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Petitioner, v. Mayor and City Council
of Baltimore, Respondent., 1985 WL 668992, *668992+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Apr 1985) Brief
of Mayor and City Council of Baltimore (NO. 84-518, 84-710) " HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
3599 CITY OF CLEBURNE, TEXAS, et al., Petitioners, v. CLEBURNE LIVING CENTER, INC., et
al., Respondents., 1985 WL 668980, *668980+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Feb 01, 1985) Brief for
Respondents (NO. 84-468)
al., Respondents., 1985 WL 668983, *668983+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Feb 01, 1985) Amicus
Curiae Brief of the State of Connecticut, Joined by the States of Arkansas, California, Col-
orado, Illinois, Louisiana, North Dakota, Rhode Island, Tennessee and West Virginia in
Support of the ... (NO. 84-468) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
3601 CITY OF CLEBURNE, Texas, et al., Petitioners, v. CLEBURNE LIVING CENTER, INC., et al.,
Respondents., 1985 WL 669784, *669784+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Feb 01, 1985) Motion for
Leave to File Brief Amicus Curiae and Brief of American Association on Mental Deficiency,

the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, American Psychological Association,
American ... (NO. 84-468) HN: 1,2 (S.Ct.)
Respondents., 1985 WL 669785, *669785+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Feb 01, 1985) Brief for Re-
spondents (NO. 84-468)
Respondents., 1985 WL 669786, *669786+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Feb 01, 1985) Amicus Curi-
ae Brief of the State of Connecticut, Joined by the States of Arkansas, California, Colorado,
Illinois, Louisiana, North Dakota, Rhode Island, Tennessee and West Virginia in Support of
the ... (NO. 84-468) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
3604 CITY OF CLEBURNE, TEXAS, et al., Petitioners, v. CLEBURNE LIVING CENTER, et al., Re-
spondents., 1985 WL 668985, *668985 (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jan 29, 1985) Brief on Behalf of
Pennsylvania, Iowa, Michigan, Minnesota, New Hampshire, New Jersey, Ohio and Wiscon-
sin, Amici Curiae (NO. 84-468) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
3605 CITY OF CLEBURNE, Texas, et al., Petitioners, v. CLEBURNE LIVING CENTER, et al., Re-
spondents., 1985 WL 669782, *669782 (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jan 29, 1985) Brief on Behalf of
Pennsylvania, Iowa, Michigan, Minnesota, New Hampshire, New Jersey, Ohio and Wiscon-
sin, Amici Curiae (NO. 84-468) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
3606 CITY OF CLEBURNE, TEXAS, et al., Petitioners, v. CLEBURNE LIVING CENTER, et al.,
1985 WL 668982, *668982+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jan 02, 1985) Brief for the United States
as Amicus Curiae Supporting Reversal (NO. 84-468) " HN: 1,2 (S.Ct.)
3607 CITY OF CLEBURNE, Texas, et al., petitioners, v. CLEBURNE LIVING CENTER, et al., 1985
WL 669781, *669781+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jan 02, 1985) Brief for the United States as
Amicus Curiae Supporting Reversal (NO. 84-468) " HN: 1,2 (S.Ct.)
al., Respondents., 1984 WL 565582, *565582+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Dec 24, 1984) Brief for
Petitioners (NO. 84-468) " HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
Respondents., 1984 WL 565888, *565888+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Dec 24, 1984) Brief for Peti-
tioners (NO. 84-468) " HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
3610 MISSISSIPPI UNIVERSITY FOR WOMEN, et al., Petitioners, v. Joe HOGAN, Respondent.,
1981 WL 389658, *389658+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Dec 16, 1981) Brief for the Petitioners
(NO. 81-406) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
3611 In Re: ALIEN CHILDREN EDUCATION LITIGATION, State of Texas and Texas Education
Agency, Appellants, v. United States, Intervenor-Appellee, Certain Named and Unnamed Undoc-
umented Alien Children, Appellees., 1981 WL 389637, *389637+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Oct 28,
1981) Brief of American Friends Service Committee United Church of Christ Board of
Homeland Ministries The General Board of Church and Society of the United Methodist
Church National Board of Jesuit Social ... (NO. 80-1934) HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
3612 THE NORTH HAVEN BOARD OF EDUCATION, Petitioner, v. Terrel BELL, et al., Respond-
ents. The Trumbull Board of Education, Petitioner, v. United States Department of Education and
Linda Potz, Respondents., 1981 WL 390423, *390423+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Sep 08, 1981)
Brief Amicus Curiae of the Yale Law Women's Association (NO. 80-986) " HN: 4

(S.Ct.)
3613 James PLYLER, Superintendent of the Tyler Independent School District and its Board of Trust-
ees, et al., and State of Texas, Appellants, v. J. and R. DOE, as Guardian Ad Litem for I. Doe. et
al., Appellees. In re: Alien Children Education Litigation State of Texas and Texas Education
Agency, Appellants, v. United States of America, intervenor-appellee, and Certain Named and
Unnamed Undocumented Alien Children, Appellees., 1981 WL 389978, *389978+ (Appellate
Brief) (U.S. Aug 29, 1981) Brief of Federation for American Immigration Reform, Amicus
Curiae. in Support of Appellants (NO. 80-1538, 80-1934) " HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
3614 Lois Mae MILLS, In the Interest of Archie Burton Duncan, A Child, Appellant, v. Dan
HABLUETZEL, Appellee., 1981 WL 389988, *389988+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jul 13, 1981)
Appellant's Brief on the Merits (NO. 80-6298)
3615 Bernard ROSTKER, Director of Selective Service, Appellant, v. Robert L. GOLDBERG, et al.,
1981 WL 390369, *390369+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Mar 02, 1981) Brief for Amicus Curiae
National Organization for Women (NO. 80-251) " HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
Appellees., 1981 WL 390514, *390514+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Feb 28, 1981) Brief for Amici
Curiae Women's Equity Action League Educational and Legal Defense Fund, Women's
Equity Action League, Federally Employed Women, National Women's Student Coalition of
the United States ... (NO. 80-251) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
3617 THE COUNTY OF WASHINGTON and Sheriff Warren Barnes in His Capacity as Sheriff of
Washington County, Petitioners, v. Alberta GUNTHER, Velene M. Vallance, Marion E. Vander
Zanden, and Yvonne M. Hatton, Respondents., 1981 WL 390116, *390116 (Appellate Brief)
(U.S. Jan 28, 1981) Brief of the American Civil Liberties Union, Now Legal Defense and
Education Fund, Women's Legal Defense Fund, League of Women Voters of the United
States, Women Employed, Comparable Worth Project, ... (NO. 80-429) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
3618 Richard John MCCARTY, Appellant, v. Patricia Ann MCCARTY, Appellee., 1981 WL 390155,
*390155 (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jan 09, 1981) Motion of the National Organization for Wo-
men Legal Defense and Education Fund (NOW LDEF), National Center on Women and
Family Law, Women's Legal Defense Fund, Older Women's League, Action for Former ...
(NO. 80-5) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
1981 WL 390367, *390367+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jan 1981) Brief for the Appellant (NO.
80-251) " HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.)
3620 Karl J. KIRCHBERG, Appellant, v. Joan Paillot FEENSTRA, Appellee, v. Edwin W. Edwards
and State of Louisiana., 1980 WL 339781, *339781+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Nov 05, 1980)
Brief for Appellee, Joan Paillot Feenstra (NO. 79-1388) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
3621 Karl J. KIRCHBERG, Appellant, v. Joan Paillot FEENSTRA, Appellee, v. Edwin W. Edwards
and State of Louisiana., 1980 WL 339782, *339782+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Nov 04, 1980) Mo-
tion for Leave to File Brief Amici Curiae and Brief Amici Curiae of Now Legal Defense and
Education Fund, American Civil Liberties Union Women's Rights Project, American Jew-
ish Committee, American ... (NO. 79-1388) " HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
Appellees., 1980 WL 339849, *339849+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Oct Term 1980) Brief for the

Appellees (NO. 80-251) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)

Appellees., 1980 WL 339852, *339852+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Oct Term 1980) Brief of Amici
Curiae, Congressman Lawrence P. McDonald, Congressman Newt Gingrich, Congressman
John M. Ashbrook, Senator Jake Garn, Senator Orrin G. Hatch, and the Washington Legal
Foundation (NO. 80-251) " HN: 4,5 (S.Ct.)
1980 WL 339853, *339853+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Oct Term 1980) Brief of Amicus Curiae
Men's Rights, Inc. Fredric Hayward, Director (NO. 80-251) HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
3625 Patricia R. HARRIS, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Appellant, v. Charles Edward
WILSON, et al., Appellees., 1980 WL 339775, *339775+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Oct 20, 1980)
Brief for the Appellees (NO. 79-1380) " HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.)
WILSON, et al., Appellees., 1980 WL 339779, *339779+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Oct 15, 1980)
Brief for the New York, Pennsylvania, and California Associations of Private Psychiatric
Hospitals as Amici Curiae (NO. 79-1380) "
3627 MICHAEL M., Petitioner, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SONOMA COUNTY, The People of
the State of California., 1980 WL 339752, *339752+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Sep 09, 1980) Brief
for the United States as Amicus Curiae (NO. 79-1344) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
3628 Wayne MINNICK; Henry J. Darden; and California Correctional Officers Association, Petition-
ers, v. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and Jero J. Enomoto, in his official
capacity as Director of the California Department of Corrections, Respondents., 1980 WL
339391, *339391+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Aug 14, 1980) Brief Amicus Curiae of Pacific Legal
Foundation in Support of Petitioners Wayne Minnick, et al (NO. 79-1213) HN: 4
(S.Ct.)
WILSON, et al., 1980 WL 339774, *339774+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Aug 1980) Brief for the
Appellant (NO. 79-1380) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
3630 MICHAEL M., Petitioner, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SONOMA COUNTY, et al., Re-
spondents., 1980 WL 339754, *339754+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jul 30, 1980) Brief of Women's
Legal Defense Fund as Amicus Curiae in Support of Petitioner (NO. 79-1344) HN: 4
(S.Ct.)
3631 MICHAEL M., Petitioner, v. SUPERIOR COURT OF SONOMA COUNTY, et al., Respondents.,
1980 WL 339750, *339750+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jul 28, 1980) Brief of the American Civil
Liberties Union and the American Civil Liberties Union of Northern California, in Support
of Petitioner, Amici Curiae (NO. 79-1344) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
3632 MICHAEL M., Petitioner, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SONOMA COUNTY, The People of
the State of California, Respondents., 1980 WL 339746, *339746+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jul
24, 1980) Brief of the Petitioner (NO. 79-1344) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
3633 Patricia R. HARRIS, Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare, Appellant, v. Cora MCRAE,
Et Al., Appellees. Patricia R. Harris, Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare, Appellant, v.
New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation, Appellee., 1980 WL 339647, *339647+
(Appellate Brief) (U.S. Apr 11, 1980) Reply Brief of Plaintiffs-Appellees (NO. 79-1268)

HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
3634 Patricia HARRIS, Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare, Appellant, v. Cora MCRAE, et
al., Appellees., 1980 WL 339661, *339661 (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Mar 18, 1980) Brief Amici
Curiae of National Organization for Women, Americans for Democratic Action, Coalition
of Labor Union Women, National Abortion Rights Action League. National Council of Jew-
ish Women, ... (NO. 79-1268)
3635 Flynn Noye HICKS, Petitioner, v. THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA, Respondent., 1980 WL
339463, *339463+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jan 31, 1980) Brief of Petitioner (NO. 78-6885)
HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
3636 Hicks v. The State of Oklahoma, 1980 WL 371770, *371770+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jan 31,
1980) Brief of Petitioner (NO. 78-6885) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
3637 Paul J. WENGLER, Appellant, v. DRUGGISTS MUTUAL INSURANCE CO., et al., 1979 WL
199958, *199958+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Dec 21, 1979) Brief for the United States as Amicus
Curiae (NO. 79-381) HN: 4,5 (S.Ct.)
3638 Paul J. WENGLER, Appellant, v. DRUGGISTS MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, and Di-
cus Prescription Drugs, Inc., Appellees., 1979 WL 199959, *199959+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S.
Dec 14, 1979) Brief Amicus Curiae of American Civil Liberties Union, Aclu of Eastern Mis-
souri, Now Legal Defense and Education Fund, Women's Equity Action League, and Wo-
men's Legal Defense Fund (NO. 79-381) " HN: 2,4,5 (S.Ct.)
3639 Paul J. WENGLER, Appellant, v. DRUGGISTS MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, and Di-
cus Prescription Drugs, Inc., Appellees., 1979 WL 199955, *199955+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S.
Dec 10, 1979) Appellant's Brief (NO. 79-381) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
3640 Wayne MINNICK, et al., Petitioners, v. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et
al., Respondents., 1979 WL 199595, *199595+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Oct Term 1979) Brief of
the American Civil Liberties Union, ACLU of Southern California, and ACLU of Northern
California, Amici Curiae (NO. 79-1213) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
3641 Paul J. WENGLER, Appellant, v. DRUGGISTS MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, and Dis-
cus Prescription Drugs, Inc., Appellees., 1979 WL 199956, *199956+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Oct
Term 1979) Brief of Appellees Druggists Mutual Insurance Company, and Discus Prescrip-
tion Drugs, Inc (NO. 79-381) HN: 4,5 (S.Ct.)
3642 United States of America, Appellant, v. Patricia Ilene CLARK, Guardian for Shawn D. Clark and
Tricia D. Clark, Appellee., 1979 WL 199270, *199270+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Aug 02, 1979)
Motion for Leave to File Amicus Curiae and Brief Amicus Curiae of Barbara Jenkins in
Support of Appellee (NO. 78-1513) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
3643 H. Earl FULLILOVE, et al., Petitioners, v. Juanita KREPS, Secretary of Commerce of the United
States of America, et al., Respondents., 1979 WL 199307, *199307+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Aug
1979) Brief for Petitioner, General Building Contractors of New York State, Inc., The New
York State Building Chapter, Associated General Contractors of America, Inc. (NO.
78-1007) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
3644 Pratt v. Westcott, 1979 WL 213490, *213490+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Apr 11, 1979) Reply
Brief for the Appellant (NO. 78-689) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
3645 SOUTHEASTERN COMMUNITY COLLEGE, Petitioner, v. Frances B. DAVIS, Respondent.,

1979 WL 199954, *199954+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Mar 31, 1979) Brief of Amicus Curiae of
the State of California in Support of the Respondent (NO. 78-711) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
3646 Southeastern Community College v. Davis, 1979 WL 213508, *213508+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S.
Mar 31, 1979) Brief of Amicus Curiae of the State of California in Support of the Respond-
ent (NO. 78-711) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
3647 GREAT AMERICAN FEDERAL SAVINGS & LOAN ASSOCIATION, John A. Virostek,
Joseph E. Bugel, John J. Dravecky, Daniel T. Kubasak, Edward J. Lesko, James E. Orris, Joseph
A. Prokopovitsh, John G. Micenko, and Frank J. Vanek, Petitioners, v. John R. NOVOTNY, Re-
spondent., 1979 WL 199979, *199979+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Mar 28, 1979) Brief for Re-
spondent (NO. 78-753) " HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
A. Prokopovitsh, John G. Micenko and Frank J. Vanek, Petitioners, v. John R. NOVOTNY, Re-
spondent., 1979 WL 199982, *199982+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Mar 28, 1979) Brief Amicus
Curiae of the American Civil Liberties Union and the American Civil Liberties Union of
Pennsylvania (NO. 78-753) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
3649 Great American Federal Savings & Loan Association v. Novotny, 1979 WL 213874, *213874+
(Appellate Brief) (U.S. Mar 28, 1979) Brief for Respondent (NO. 78-753) " HN: 1,4
(S.Ct.)
3650 COLUMBUS BOARD OF EDUCATION, et al., Petitioners, v. Gary L. PENICK, et al., Re-
spondents. Dayton Board of Education, et al., Petitioners, v. Mark Brinkman, et al., Respond-
ents., 1979 WL 200111, *200111+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Mar 26, 1979) Brief of the American
Civil Liberties Union and the International Union of Electrical, Radio and Machine Work-
ers Amici Curiae (NO. 78-610, 78-627)
3651 Columbus Board of Education v. Penick, 1979 WL 213451, *213451+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S.
Mar 26, 1979) Brief of the American Civil Liberties Union and the International Union of
Electrical, Radio and Machine Workers Amici Curiae (NO. 78-527, 78-610)
3652 Joseph A. CALIFANO, Jr., Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare, Appellant, v. Cindy
WESTCOTT, et al., Appellees., 1979 WL 199814, *199814+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Mar 20,
1979) Brief of Amici Curiae Cathy Stevens, Rosalie McRoberts and Sonja Smith (NO.
78-437) HN: 4,5 (S.Ct.)
3653 Califano v. Westcott, 1979 WL 213625, *213625+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Mar 20, 1979) Brief
of Amici Curiae Cathy Stevens, Rosalie Meroberts And Sonja Smith (NO. 78-437)
HN: 4,5 (S.Ct.)
3654 Joseph A. CALIFANO, Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare, Appellant, v. Cindy WEST-
COTT, et al., Appellees. No. 78-437 Alexander Sharp, II, Commissioner of the Massachusetts
Department of Public Welfare, Appellant, v. Cindy Westcott, et al. Appellees. No. 78-689, 1979
WL 199808, *199808+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Mar 14, 1979) Brief for the Individual and
Class Appellees (NO. 78-437, 78-689) HN: 4,5 (S.Ct.)
3655 Califano v. Westcott, 1979 WL 213624, *213624+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Mar 14, 1979) Brief
for the Individual and Class Appellees (NO. 78-437, 78-689) HN: 4,5 (S.Ct.)
3656 Great American Federal Savings & Loan Association v. Novotny, 1979 WL 213929, *213929+
(Appellate Brief) (U.S. Feb 26, 1979) Brief for Petitioners (NO. 78-753) HN: 1,4

(S.Ct.)
A. Prokopovitsh, John G. Micenko, and Frank J. Vanek, Petitioners, v. John R. NOVOTNY, Re-
spondent., 1979 WL 199978, *199978+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Feb 1979) Brief for Petitioners
(NO. 78-753) HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
3658 UNITED STEELWORKERS OF AMERICA, AFL-CIO-CLC, Petitioners, v. Brian F. WEBER,
et al., Respondents. Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corporation, Petitioner, v. Brian F. Weber,
Respondent. United States of America and Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Peti-
tioner, v. Brian F. Weber, et al., Respondents., 1979 WL 199756, *199756+ (Appellate Brief)
(U.S. Jan 26, 1979) Brief Amici Curiae of the Hon. Patricia Schroeder, Member of Congress,
and The ACLU Women's Rights Project, Chicana Service Action Center, Creative Employ-
ment Project, Equal Rights Advocates, Inc., ... (NO. 78-432, 78-435, 78-436) " HN: 4
(S.Ct.)
3659 Personnel Administrator of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Feeney, 1979 WL 213577,
*213577+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jan 11, 1979) Brief of the Appellee. (NO. 78-233) "
HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
3660 PERSONNEL ADMINISTRATOR OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, et
al., Appellants, v. Helen B. FEENEY, Appellee., 1979 WL 199824, *199824+ (Appellate Brief)
(U.S. Jan 10, 1979) Brief Amici Curiae of The National Organization for Women, NOW
Legal Defense and Education Fund, The American Jewish Committee, Equal Rights Advoc-
ates, Inc., Federally Employed Women's Legal and ... (NO. 78-233) " HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
3661 Personnel Administrator of Massachusetts v. Feeney, 1979 WL 213578, *213578 (Appellate
Brief) (U.S. 1979) Brief of Amicus Curiae, the Washington Legal Foundation (NO. 78-233)
3662 Griffin B. BELL, et al., Petitioners, v. Louis WOLFISH, et al., Respondents., 1978 WL 207133,
*207133+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Dec 20, 1978) Brief for Respondents (NO. 77-1829)
HN: 3,4 (S.Ct.)
3663 Bell v. Wolfish, 1978 WL 223219, *223219+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Dec 20, 1978) Brief for
Respondents (NO. 77-1829) HN: 3,4,5 (S.Ct.)
3664 John B. GREENHOLTZ, Individually, and as Chairman, Nebraska Boards of Parole; Eugene E.
Neal, Catherine R. Dahlquist, Marshall M. Tate, and Edward M. Rowley, Petitioners, v. IN-
MATES OF THE NEBRASKA PENAL AND CORRECTIONAL COMPLEX, Richard C. Walk-
er, William Randolph, Richard J. Leary, Robert L. Gamron, Frederick L. Grant, Wayne Goham,
and Charles LaPlante, Respondents., 1978 WL 207286, *207286+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Dec
19, 1978) Brief for the Respondents (NO. 78-201)
3665 Greenholtz v. Inmates of the Nebraska Penal and Correctional Complex, 1978 WL 223283,
*223283+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Dec 19, 1978) Brief for the Respondents (NO. 78-201)
3666 Shirley DAVIS, Petitioner, v. Otto E. PASSMAN, Respondent., 1978 WL 207321, *207321+
(Appellate Brief) (U.S. Dec 18, 1978) Brief for Petitioner (NO. 78-5072) " HN: 1
(S.Ct.)
3667 Davis v. Passman, 1978 WL 223685, *223685+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Dec 18, 1978) Brief for
Petitioner (NO. 78-5072) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.)

3668 Shirley DAVIS, Petitioner, v. Otto E. PASSMAN, Respondent., 1978 WL 207325, *207325+
(Appellate Brief) (U.S. Dec 14, 1978) Brief of the Honorable Morris Udall, the Honorable Pa-
tricia Schroeder, the Honorable Charles Rose, Winnie Burrell, Carla Kish, Bruce Krieg-
man, the Honorable Les Aucoin, the Honorable Berkley Bedell, ... (NO. 78-5072)
3669 Davis v. Passman, 1978 WL 223687, *223687+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Dec 14, 1978) Brief of
the Honorable Morris Udall, the Honorable Patricia Schroeder, the Honorable Charles
Rose, Winnie Burrell, Carla Kish, Bruce Kriegman, the Honorable Les Aucoin, the Honor-
able Berkley Bedell, ... (NO. 78-5072)
3670 Griffin B. BELL, et al., petitioners, v. Louis WOLFISH, et al., 1978 WL 207132, *207132+
(Appellate Brief) (U.S. Nov 24, 1978) Brief for the Petitioners (NO. 77-1829) HN: 3
(S.Ct.)
3671 PERSONNEL ADMINISTRATOR OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS et
(U.S. Nov 24, 1978) Brief for the Appellants (NO. 78-233) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
3672 Personnel Administrator of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Feeney, 1978 WL 223034,
*223034+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Nov 24, 1978) Brief for the Appellants. (NO. 78-233)
HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
3673 Bell v. Wolfish, 1978 WL 223218, *223218+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Nov 24, 1978) Brief for
the Petitioners (NO. 77-1829) HN: 3 (S.Ct.)
3674 PERSONNEL ADMINISTRATOR OF MASSACHUSETTS, et al., Petitioners, v. Helen B.
FEENEY, Respondent., 1978 WL 207301, *207301+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Nov 22, 1978)
Brief of Amicus Curiae, the Washington Legal Foundation (NO. 78-233) HN: 1,4
(S.Ct.)
3675 Curtis PARHAM, Appellant, v. Ellis Franklin HUGHES, Appellee., 1978 WL 207316, *207316+
(Appellate Brief) (U.S. Nov 16, 1978) Brief of Appellant (NO. 78-3) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
3676 Parham v. Hughes, 1978 WL 223251, *223251+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Nov 16, 1978) Brief of
3677 PERSONNEL ADMINISTRATOR OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS et
(U.S. Oct Term 1978) Brief for the Appellee (NO. 78-233) " HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
3678 William Herbert ORR, Appellant, v. Lillian M. ORR, Appellee., 1978 WL 206697, *206697+
(Appellate Brief) (U.S. Oct 31, 1978) Reply Brief for Appellant (NO. 77-1119) HN: 1,4
(S.Ct.)
3679 Orr v. Orr, 1978 WL 223399, *223399+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Oct 31, 1978) Reply Brief for
Appellant (NO. 77-1119) HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
3680 NEW YORK CITY TRANSIT AUTHORITY, et al., Petitioners, v. Carl BEAZAR, et al., Re-
spondents., 1978 WL 207118, *207118+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Oct 30, 1978) Brief for the
Amicus Curiae Western Law Center for the Handicapped (NO. 77-1427) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
3681 Califano v. Browne, 1978 WL 223075, *223075+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Oct 10, 1978) Juris-
dictional Statement (NO. 78-603) HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.)
3682 Palmer v. Ticcione, 1978 WL 223038, *223038 (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Sep 26, 1978) Brief in
Opposition (NO. 78-240) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)

3683 Vance v. Bradley, 1978 WL 223576, *223576+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Sep 22, 1978) Motion
for Leave to File as Amici Curiae and Brief Amici Curiae for Hon. Claude Pepper, Hon.
Edward R. Roybal, Hon. Fred B. Rooney, Hon. Mario Biaggi, Hon. John L. Burton, Hon.
John Paul ... (NO. 77-1254) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
3684 Geraldine G. CANNON, Petitioner, v. THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO, et al., Respondents.
Geraldine G. CANNON, Petitioner, v. NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY, et al., Respondents.,
1978 WL 207082, *207082+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Sep 18, 1978) Brief Amici Curiae of Fed-
eration of Organizations for Professional Women, League of Women Voters of the United
States, Center for Law and Education, Inc., National Conference of Puerto Rican Women,
... (NO. 77-926) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
3685 NEW YORK CITY TRANSIT AUTHORITY, et al., Petitioners, v. Carl BEAZER, et al., Re-
spondents., 1978 WL 207108, *207108+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Sep 07, 1978) Brief for Peti-
tioners (NO. 77-1427) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
3686 New York City Transit Authority v. Beazer, 1978 WL 223631, *223631+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S.
Sep 07, 1978) Brief for Petitioners (NO. 77-1427) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
3687 Gordon M. AMBACH, as Commissioner of Education of the State of New York, Vincent Gazz-
etta, as Director of the Division of Teacher Education and Certification of the Education Depart-
ment of the State of New York, and Robert Asher, as Director of the Division of Professional
Conduct of the Education Department of the State of New York, Appellants, v. Susan M. W.
NORWICK, Appellee, Tarja U. K. DACHINGER, Intervenor-Appellee., 1978 WL 206626,
*206626+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Sep 06, 1978) Brief for Appellees (NO. 76-808)
3688 Ambach v. Norwick, 1978 WL 223018, *223018+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Sep 06, 1978) Brief
for Appellees (NO. 76-808)
(Appellate Brief) (U.S. Aug 30, 1978) Brief of Appellee (NO. 77-1119) HN: 4,5 (S.Ct.)
3690 Orr v. Orr, 1978 WL 223398, *223398+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Aug 30, 1978) Brief of Appellee
(NO. 77-1119) HN: 4,5 (S.Ct.)
(Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jul 31, 1978) Motion of American Civil Liberties Union for Leave to
File Brief Amicus Curiae and Brief Amicus Curiae (NO. 77-1119) " HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
3692 Orr v. Orr, 1978 WL 223400, *223400+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jul 31, 1978) Motion of Amer-
ican Civil Liberties Union for Leave to File Brief Amicus Curiae and Brief Amicus Curiae
(NO. 77-1119) " HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
3693 Abdiel CABAN, Appellant, v. Kazim MOHAMMED and Maria Mohammed, Appellees., 1978
WL 207161, *207161+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jul 26, 1978) Brief Amicus Curiae of the New
York State Attorney General in Support of Appellees (NO. 77-6431) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
3694 Caban v. Mohammed, 1978 WL 223245, *223245+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jul 26, 1978) Brief
Amicus Curiae of the New York State Attorney General in Support of Appellees (NO.
77-6431) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
3695 Abdiel CABAN, Appellant, v. Kazim MOHAMMID and Maria Mohammid, Appellees., 1978
WL 207159, *207159+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jun 30, 1978) Brief as Amicus Curiae and Brief
Amicus Curiae of Community Action for Legal Services, Inc. (NO. 77-6431) HN: 4

(S.Ct.)
3696 Caban v. Mohammid, 1978 WL 223246, *223246+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jun 30, 1978) Brief
as Amicus Curiae and Brief Amicus Curiae of Community Action for Legal Services, Inc.
(NO. 77-6431) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
3697 State of Washington v. Confederated Tribes and Bands of the Yakima Indian Nation, 1978 WL
223122, *223122+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jun 02, 1978) Brief of Appellee (NO. 77-388) "
HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
3698 Willard E. ROBERTSON, Petitioner, v. Edward F. WEGMANN, Executor for Clay L. Shaw, et
al., Respondents., 1978 WL 206704, *206704+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Feb 17, 1978) Brief for
the Respondent (NO. 77-178) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
3699 Robertson v. Wegman, 1978 WL 223092, *223092+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Feb 17, 1978) Brief
for the Respondent (NO. 77-178) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
3700 MOORMAN MANUFACTURING COMPANY, Appellant, v. G. D. BAIR, Director of Revenue,
Appellee., 1978 WL 207219, *207219+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jan 30, 1978) Brief Amici Curi-
ae of Iowa Manufacturers Association, Deere & Co., E. I. DuPont DeNemours & Company,
the Maytag Company, Monsanto Company, and Standard Brands Incorporated. (NO.
77-454) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
3701 CITY OF LOS ANGELES, Department of Water and Power, a body corporate and politic; Mem-
bers of the Board of Water and Power Commissioners of the Department of Water and Power,
City of Los Angeles; Members of the Board of Administration of the Department of Water and
Power Employees' Retirement, Disability and Death Benefit Insurance Plan; Henry G. Bodkin,
Jr.; Katherine B. Dunlap; Burton J. Gindler; Michael Glazer; Herbert C. Ward; Louis J. Weidner,
Jr.; Ralph, 1978 WL 206576, *206576+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jan 11, 1978) Petitioners' Reply
Brief. (NO. 76-1810) HN: 2,4 (S.Ct.)
3702 City of Los Angeles v. Manhart, 1978 WL 223019, *223019+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jan 11,
1978) Petitioners' Reply Brief. (NO. 76-1810) HN: 2,4 (S.Ct.)
3703 Cyrus R. VANCE, Secretary of State, et al., appellants, v. Holbrook BRADLEY, et al., 1978 WL
207238, *207238+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. 1978) Motion for Leave to File as Amici Curiae
and Brief Amici Curiae for Hon. Claude Pepper, Hon. Edward R. Roybal, Hon. Fred B.
Rooney, Hon. Mario Biaggi, Hon. John L. Burton, Hon. John Paul ... (NO. 77-1254)
HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
3704 City of Los Angeles v. Manhart, 1977 WL 204829, *204829+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Dec 23,
1977) Brief for Respondents. (NO. 76-1810) HN: 4,5 (S.Ct.)
3705 CITY OF LOS ANGELES, Department of Water and Power, et al., Petitioners, v. Marie MAN-
HART, et al., Respondents., 1977 WL 189206, *189206+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Dec 22, 1977)
Brief for the International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Imple-
ment Workers of America (UAW) and American Federation of Labor and Congress of In-
dustrial Organizations as Amici ... (NO. 76-1810) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
3706 CITY OF LOS ANGELES, Department of Water and Power et al., Petitioners, v. Marie MAN-
HART et al., Respondents., 1977 WL 189207, *189207+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Dec 22, 1977)
Brief for the Association for Women in Mathematics and the Women's Equity Action
League as Amici Curiae (NO. 76-1810) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)

3707 CITY OF LOS ANGELES, Department of Water and Power, et al., Petitioners, v. Marie MAN-
HART, et al., Respondents., 1977 WL 189209, *189209+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Dec 22, 1977)
Brief Amici Curiae of American Civil Liberties Union and American Association of Uni-
versity Professors (NO. 76-1810) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
3708 DUKE POWER COMPANY, Appellant, v. CAROLINA ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY GROUP,
et al., Appellees. UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION, Appellant, v.
CAROLINA ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY GROUP, et al., Appellees., 1977 WL 189428,
*189428 (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Dec 22, 1977) Motion for Leave to File Brief as Amicus Curi-
ae and Brief of Amicus Curiae Pacific Legal Foundaton in Support of Appellant Duke
Power Company (NO. 77-262, 77-375) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
3709 DUKE POWER CO., et al., Appellants, v. CAROLINA ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY GROUP,
et al., Appellees. UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION, Appellant, v.
CAROLINA ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY GROUP, et al., Appellees., 1977 WL 189441,
*189441+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Dec 22, 1977) Brief for the American Hospital Association
and the American Medical Association, Amici Curiae. (NO. 77-262, 77-375) " HN: 1
(S.Ct.)
1977) Brief Amici Curiae of American Civil Liberties Union and American Association of
University Professors (NO. 76-1810) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
3711 Duke Power Company v. Carolina Environmental Study Group, 1977 WL 204974, *204974
(Appellate Brief) (U.S. Dec 22, 1977) Motion for Leave to File Brief as Amicus Curiae and
Brief of Amicus Curiae Pacific Legal Foundaton in Support of Appellant Duke Power Com-
pany (NO. 77-262, 77-375) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
3712 City of Los Angeles, Department of Water and Power v. Manhart, 1977 WL 205318, *205318+
(Appellate Brief) (U.S. Dec 22, 1977) Brief for the Association for Women in Mathematics
and the Women's Equity Action League as Amici Curiae (NO. 76-1810) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
3713 CITY OF LOS ANGELES, Department of Water and Power, etc., et al., Petitioners, v. Marie
MANHART, et al., 1977 WL 189204, *189204+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Dec 21, 1977) Brief
Amicus Curiae of the ACLU Foundation of Southern California in Support of Respondents
(NO. 76-1810) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
1977) Brief Amicus Curiae of the ACLU Foundation of Southern California in Support of
Respondents (NO. 76-1810) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
3715 CITY OF LOS ANGELES, et al., Petitioners, v. Marie MANHART, et al., Respondents., 1977
WL 189197, *189197+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Dec 1977) Brief for Respondents. (NO.
76-1810) HN: 4,5 (S.Ct.)
3716 C.M.C. v. A. P. F., 1977 WL 205244, *205244+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Nov 25, 1977) Jurisdic-
tional Statement and Appendix (NO. 77-749) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
3717 CITY OF LOS ANGELES, Department of Water and Power, a body corporate and politic; Mem-
bers of the Board of Water and Power Commissioners of the Department of Water and Power,
City of Los Angeles; Members of the Board of Administration of the Department of Water and
Power Employes Retirement, Disability and Death Benefit Insurance Plan; Henry G. Bodkin, Jr.;
Katherine B. Dunlap; Burton J. Gindler; Michael Glazer; Herbert C. Ward; Louis J. Weidner, Jr.;

Ralph, 1977 WL 189203, *189203+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Nov 21, 1977) Brief of the State of
Oregon as Amicus Curiae, In Support of Defendants-Petitioners (NO. 76-1810) HN: 4
(S.Ct.)
3718 James Y. CARTER, Public Vehicle License Commissioner of the City of Chicago, Petitioner, v.
Luther MILLER, on his own behalf and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Respondent.,
1977 WL 189664, *189664+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Nov 21, 1977) Reply Brief of Petitioner
(NO. 76-1171) HN: 1,2 (S.Ct.)
3719 City of Los Angeles Department of Water and Power v. Manhart, 1977 WL 204831, *204831+
(Appellate Brief) (U.S. Nov 21, 1977) Brief of the State of Oregon as Amicus Curiae, In Sup-
port of Defendants-Petitioners (NO. 76-1810) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
3720 Carter v. Miller, 1977 WL 205186, *205186+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Nov 21, 1977) Reply Brief
of Petitioner (NO. 76-1171) HN: 1,2 (S.Ct.)
3721 Cleland v. National College of Business, 1977 WL 205241, *205241 (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Nov
18, 1977) Jurisdictional Statement (NO. 77-716) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
3722 Los Angeles County v. Associated General Contractors of California, 1977 WL 205248, *205248
(Appellate Brief) (U.S. Nov 01, 1977) Jurisdictional Statement. (NO. 77-1067)
3723 Santa Clara PUEBLO, et al., petitioners, v. Julia MARTINEZ, et al., 1977 WL 189113,
*189113+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Oct Term 1977) Brief for the United States as Amicus Curi-
ae (NO. 76-682) HN: 2,4 (S.Ct.)
3724 The REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, Petitioner, v. Allan BAKKE, Re-
spondent., 1977 WL 189544, *189544+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Oct Term 1977) Brief for
Amicus Curiae Henry A. Waxman in Support of Respondent (NO. 76-811) HN: 1,2
(S.Ct.)
3725 Billy DUREN, Petitioner, v. State of Missouri, Respondent., 1977 WL 189874, *189874+
(Appellate Brief) (U.S. Oct Term 1977) Brief for Petitioner (NO. 77-6067) " HN: 4
(S.Ct.)
3726 Santa Clara PUEBLO, et al., Petitioners, v. Julia MARTINEZ, et al., Respondents., 1977 WL
189106, *189106+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Aug 27, 1977) Respondents' Brief (NO. 76-682)
3727 Christiansburg Garment Company v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, 1977 WL

205003, *205003+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Aug 18, 1977) Brief for the National Chamber Lit-
igation Center as Amicus Curiae (NO. 76-1383) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
3728 Spencer v. Spencer, 1977 WL 204964, *204964 (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Aug 10, 1977) State-
ment as to Jurisdiction (NO. 77-234)
3729 THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, Petitioner, v. Allan BAKKE, Re-
spondent., 1977 WL 187987, *187987+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Aug 05, 1977) Brief Amicus
Curiae for Pacific Legal Foundation in Support of Respondent (NO. 76-811) HN: 1
(S.Ct.)
spondent., 1977 WL 187996, *187996+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Aug 05, 1977) Brief for Amicus
Curiae Henry A. Waxman in Support of Respondent (NO. 76-811) HN: 1,2 (S.Ct.)

spondent., 1977 WL 188015, *188015+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Aug 05, 1977) Brief of Americ-
an Jewish Committee, American Jewish Congress, Hellenic Bar Association of Illinois, Itali-
an-American Foundation, Polish American Affairs Council, Polish American Educators ...
(NO. 76-811) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
spondent., 1977 WL 189542, *189542+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Aug 05, 1977) Brief Amicus
Curiae for Pacific Legal Foundation in Support of Respondent (NO. 76-811) HN: 1
(S.Ct.)
spondent., 1977 WL 189547, *189547+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Aug 05, 1977) Brief of Americ-
an Jewish Committee, American Jewish Congress, Hellenic Bar Association of Illinois, Itali-
an-American Foundation, Polish American Affairs Council, Polish American Educators ...
(NO. 76-811) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
3734 Regents of the University of California v. Bakke, 1977 WL 204792, *204792+ (Appellate Brief)
(U.S. Aug 05, 1977) Brief of American Subcontractors Association, Amicus Curiae in Sup-
port of Respondent (NO. 76-811) " HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
3735 The Regents of the University of California v. Bakke, 1977 WL 204797, *204797+ (Appellate
Brief) (U.S. Aug 05, 1977) Brief Amicus Curiae for Pacific Legal Foundation In Support of
Respondent (NO. 76-811) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
Brief) (U.S. Aug 05, 1977) Brief of American Jewish Committee, American Jewish Congress,
Hellenic Bar Association of Illinois, Italian-American Foundation, Polish American Affairs
Council, Polish American Educators ... (NO. 76-811) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
3737 CHRISTIANSBURG GARMENT COMPANY, Petitioner, v. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPOR-
TUNITY COMMISSION, Respondent., 1977 WL 189689, *189689+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S.
Aug 1977) Brief for the National Chamber Litigation Center as Amicus Curiae (NO.
76-1383) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
3738 THE FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF BOSTON, New England Merchants National Bank, the Gil-
lette Company, Digital Equipment Corporation, and Wyman-Gordon Company, Appellants, v.
Francis X. BELLOTTI, Attorney General, Appellee., 1977 WL 189650, *189650+ (Appellate
Brief) (U.S. Jul 29, 1977) Brief for the Appellee (NO. 76-1172) HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
3739 Leigh v. State of Oklahoma, 1977 WL 204901, *204901+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jul 11, 1977)
Statement as to Jurisdiction (NO. 77-61) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
3740 REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, Petitioners, v. Allan BAKKE, Respond-
ent., 1977 WL 188006, *188006+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jun 10, 1977) Brief of the American
Bar Association, Amicus Curiae (NO. 76-811)
3741 REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, Petitioners, v. Allan BAKKE, Respond-
ent, 1977 WL 189534, *189534+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jun 10, 1977) Brief of the American
Bar Association, Amicus Curiae (NO. 76-811)
spondent., 1977 WL 187972, *187972+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jun 07, 1977) Brief of the
American Civil Liberties Union, the ACLU of Northern California, the ACLU of Southern

3743 THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, Petitioners, v. Allan BAKKE, Re-
spondent., 1977 WL 187984, *187984+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jun 07, 1977) Brief of Amici
Curiae the Puerto Rican Legal Defense and Education Fund and Aspira of America (NO.
76-811) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
spondent., 1977 WL 187986, *187986+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jun 07, 1977) Brief of the Board
of Governors of Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey, the Rutgers Law School
Alumni Association and the Student Bar Association of the Rutgers School of Law×Newark
Amici ... (NO. 76-811) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
spondent., 1977 WL 188000, *188000+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jun 07, 1977) Brief Amici Curi-
ae for the Bar Association of San Francisco and the Los Angeles County Bar Association in
Support of Petitioner (NO. 76-811) " HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.)
ae (NO. 76-811) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
ae for the Bar Association of San Francisco and the Los Angeles County Bar Association in
Support of Petitioner (NO. 76-811) " HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.)
3748 THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, Petitioners, v. Allan BAKKE, Re-
spondent., 1977 WL 189513, *189513+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jun 07, 1977) Brief of Amici
Curiae The Puerto Rican Legal Defense and Education Fund and Aspira of America (NO.
76-811) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
spondent., 1977 WL 189514, *189514+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jun 07, 1977) Brief of the Board
of Governors of Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey, the Rutgers Law School
Alumni Association and the Student Bar Association of the Rutgers School of Law--Newark
Amici ... (NO. 76-811) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
spondent., 1977 WL 189521, *189521+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jun 07, 1977) Brief of the
American Civil Liberties Union, the ACLU of Northern California, the ACLU of Southern
ae For: National Council of Churches of Christ in the United States of America American
Coalition of Citizens with Disabilities Americans for Democratic Action American Federa-
tion of ... (NO. 76-811) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
Brief) (U.S. Jun 07, 1977) Brief Amici Curiae for the Bar Association of San Francisco and
the Los Angeles County Bar Association in Support of Petitioner (NO. 76-811) " HN:
1,3 (S.Ct.)
3753 Estate of Sallye Lipscomb French John W. KEY, et al., Appellants, v. Michael M. DOYLE, et

al., Appellees., 1977 WL 189588, *189588+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jun 03, 1977) Brief of Ap-
pellee St. Matthews Cathedral (NO. 76-1057) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
3754 Estate of Sallye Libscomb French John W. KEY, et al., Appellants, v. Michael M. DOYLE, et
al., Appellees., 1977 WL 189589, *189589+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jun 03, 1977) Brief for Ap-
pellee Calvary Baptist Church (NO. 76-1057)
3755 Estate of Sallye Libscomb French v. Doyle, 1977 WL 205141, *205141+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S.
Jun 03, 1977) Brief for Appellee Calvary Baptist Church (NO. 76-1057)
3756 Estate of Sallye Lipscomb French John W. KEY, et al., Appellants, v. Michael M. DOYLE, et
al., Appellees., 1977 WL 189587, *189587+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. May 05, 1977) Brief for
John W. Key, et al (NO. 76-1057) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
3757 Estate of Sallye Lipscomb French v. Doyle, 1977 WL 205139, *205139+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S.
May 05, 1977) Brief for John W. Key, et al. (NO. 76-1057) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
3758 Lalli v. Lalli, 1977 WL 205249, *205249+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. May 05, 1977) Brief Amicus
Curiae of the Legal Aid Society of New York City and Legal Services for the Elderly Poor
in Support of Appellant. (NO. 77-1115)
3759 NASHVILLE GAS COMPANY, Petitioner, v. Nora D. SATTY, Respondent., 1977 WL 189752,
*189752 (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Apr 26, 1977) Brief Amici Curiae of American Civil Liberties
Union and Women's Legal Defense Fund (NO. 75-536) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
3760 Nashville Gas Company v. Satty, 1977 WL 204718, *204718 (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Apr 26,
1977) Brief Amici Curiae of American Civil Liberties Union and Women's Legal Defense
Fund (NO. 75-536) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
3761 RICHMOND UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al., Petitioners, v. Sonja Lynn BERG, Individu-
ally and On Behalf of All Other Female Employees of the Richmond Unified School District, Re-
spondent., 1977 WL 189759, *189759 (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Apr 21, 1977) Motion of National
Education Association for Leave to File Brief as Amicus Curiae and Brief for the National
Education Association, Amicus Curiae (NO. 75-1069) " HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
3762 RICHMOND UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, Richmond Board of Education, and W. W. Snod-
grass, Petitioners, v. Sonja Lynn BERG, individually and on behalf of all other similarly situated
female employees of the Richmond Unified School District, Respondent., 1977 WL 189757,
*189757+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Apr 07, 1977) Brief for the Respondent (NO. 75-1069)
HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
3763 E. C. DOTHARD, et al., Appellants, v. Brenda M. MIETH, et al., Appellees., 1977 WL 189482,
*189482+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Mar 29, 1977) State of California Amicus Curiae Brief.
(NO. 76-422) HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.)
3764 Nashville Gas Company v. Satty, 1977 WL 204715, *204715+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Mar 19,
1977) Brief for the Petitioner (NO. 75-536) HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
*189478 (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Feb 24, 1977) Motion of American Civil Liberties Union for
Leave to File and Brief Amicus Curiae (NO. 76-422) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
*189473+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Feb 19, 1977) Brief for the Appellees (NO. 76-422) HN:
4 (S.Ct.)

3767 Vorchheimer v. School District of Philadelphia, 1977 WL 204768, *204768+ (Appellate Brief)
(U.S. Feb 17, 1977) Reply Brief for the Petitioners. (NO. 76-37) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
3768 French v. Doyle, 1977 WL 205142, *205142 (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jan 31, 1977) Jurisdiction-
al Statement (NO. 76-1057) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
*189472+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jan 24, 1977) Brief of Appellants (NO. 76-422) HN: 1
(S.Ct.)
3770 TRANS WORLD AIRLINES, INC., Petitioner, International Association of Machinists and
Aerospace Workers, AFL-CIO, International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers
District 142, and International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers Local Lodge
1650, Petitioners, v. Larry G. HARDISON, Respondent., 1977 WL 189767, *189767+ (Appellate
Brief) (U.S. Jan 15, 1977) Brief for International Association of Machinists and Aerospace
Workers, et al., Petitioners (NO. 75-1126, 75-1385) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
3771 Roundtree v. Berger, 1977 WL 205124, *205124 (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jan 14, 1977) Jurisdic-
tional Statement (NO. 76-976) " HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
3772 Susan Lynn VORCHHEIMER by Her Parents Bert and Carol Vorchheimer Guardians Ad Litem
on Her Own Behalf and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Petitioners, v. SCHOOL DIS-
TRICT OF PHILADELPHIA and Matthew W. Costanzo Superintendent of the School District of
Philadelphia, Respondents., 1977 WL 189424, *189424+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jan 04, 1977)
Brief for the Respondents. (NO. 76-37) HN: 4,5 (S.Ct.)
(U.S. Jan 04, 1977) Brief for the Respondents. (NO. 76-37) HN: 4,5 (S.Ct.)
3774 Stanley BLACKLEDGE, Warden, et al., Petitioners, v. Gary Darrell ALLISON, Respondent.,
1976 WL 181685, *181685+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Dec 27, 1976) Brief for Respondent (NO.
75-1693) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
(U.S. Dec 10, 1976) Motion for Leave to File Brief Amici Curiae and Annexed Brief of the
American Jewish Committee and the N.O.W. Legal Defense and Education Fund (NO.
76-37) HN: 1,2 (S.Ct.)
3776 Ehrlich Anthony COKER, Petitioner, v. STATE OF GEORGIA, Respondent., 1976 WL 181482,
*181482+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Dec 03, 1976) Brief Amici Curiae of the American Civil
Liberties Union, the Center for Constitutional Rights, the National Organization for Wo-
men Legal Defense and Education Fund, the Women's Law Project, the ... (NO. 75-5444) "
HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
3777 Susan Lynn VORCHHEIMER, by her parents Bert and Carol Vorchheimer, guardians ad litem,
on her own behalf and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Petitioners, v. SCHOOL DIS-
TRICT OF PHILADELPHIA and Matthew W. Costanzo, Superintendent of the School District of
Philadelphia, Respondents., 1976 WL 181263, *181263+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Dec 02, 1976)
Brief for the Petitioners (NO. 76-37) " HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
3778 Ramon Martin FIALLO, etc., et al., Appellants, v. Edward H. LEVI, individually and as Attorney
General of the United States, et al., Appellees., 1976 WL 181349, *181349+ (Appellate Brief)
(U.S. Nov 29, 1976) Reply Brief for the Appellants (NO. 75-6297)

3779 Fiallo v. Levi, 1976 WL 194477, *194477+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Nov 29, 1976) Reply Brief
for the Appellants (NO. 75-6297) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)

3780 Gordon M. AMBACH, as Commissioner of Education of the State of New York, Vincent Gazz-
etta, as Director of Teacher Education and Certification of the Education Department of the State
of New York and Robert Asher, as Director of the Division of Professional Conduct of the Edu-
cation Department of the State of New York, Appellants, v. Susan M. W. NORWICK, Appellee,
Tarja U. K. DACHINGER, Intervenor Appellee., 1976 WL 181231, *181231+ (Appellate Brief)
(U.S. Oct Term 1976) Motion and Brief on Behalf of Amici Washington Lawyers' Committee
for Civil Rights Under Law, Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc.,
Asian-American Legal Defense and Education Fund (NO. 76-808)
3781 REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, Petitioner. v. Allan BAKKE, Respond-
ent., 1976 WL 181283, *181283+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Oct Term 1976) Brief of Amercian
Subcontractors Association, Amicus Curiae in Support of Respondent (NO. 76-811) "
HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
3782 NASHVILLE GAS COMPANY, Petitioner, v. Nora D. SATTY, Respondent., 1976 WL 181475,
*181475+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Oct Term 1976) Brief for the Petitioner (NO. 75-536)
HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
3783 Curtis CRAIG, and Carolyn Whitener, d1b1a ""The Honk and Holler,"" Appellants, v. Hon. Dav-
id BOREN, Governor, State of Oklahoma, Hon. Larry Derryberry, Attorney General, State of
Oklahoma, Hon. D. M. Berry, Chairman, Hon. Lawton L. Leininger, Vice-Chairman, Hon. J. L.
Merrill, Secretary-Member, Oklahoma Tax Commission, Hon. Ray Wall, Presiding Judge, Ninth
Judicial District Court, State of Oklahoma, Hon. Charles H. Headrick, District Attorney, Ninth
Judicial, 1976 WL 181332, *181332+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Sep 29, 1976) Reply Brief of Ap-
pellants (NO. 75-628) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
3784 Craig v. Boren, 1976 WL 194245, *194245+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Sep 29, 1976) Reply Brief
of Appellants (NO. 75-628) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
3785 Mathews v. Webster, 1976 WL 194603, *194603+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Sep 29, 1976) Juris-
dictional Statement (NO. 76-457) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
3786 General Electric Company v. Gilbert, 1976 WL 194043, *194043+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Sep
16, 1976) Supplemental Brief for Petitioner, General Electric Company, on Reargument
(NO. 74-1589, 74-1590) HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
3787 Susan Lynn VORCHHEIMER, by her parents Bert and Carol Vorchheimer, guardians ad litem,
on her own behalf and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Petitioners, v. SCHOOL DIS-
TRICT OF PHILADELPHIA and Matthew W. Costanzo, Superintendent of the School District of
Philadelphia, Respondents., 1976 WL 181262, *181262 (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Sep 03, 1976)
Petitioner's Reply Brief (NO. 76-37) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
3788 REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, Petitioner, v. Allan BAKKE, Respond-
ent., 1976 WL 178774, *178774+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Aug 1976) Brief of American Sub-
contractors Association, Amicus Curiae in Support of Respondent (NO. 76-811) "
HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
3789 F. David MATHEWS, Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare, Appellant, v. Leon GOLD-
FARB, Appellee., 1976 WL 181387, *181387+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jul 1976) Brief for Ap-
pellee (NO. 75-699) " HN: 1,4,5 (S.Ct.)

3790 Mathews v. Rheynard, 1976 WL 194456, *194456+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jun 28, 1976) Juris-
dictional Statement (NO. 75-1881) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
3791 Schanefelt v. Paradiso, 1976 WL 194693, *194693+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jun 10, 1976) An-
swer to Appellee's Motion to Dismiss or Affirm (NO. 75-1079) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
3792 F. David MATHEWS, Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare, Appellant, v. Leon GOLD-
FARB., 1976 WL 181385, *181385+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jun 1976) Brief for the Appellant
(NO. 75-699) " HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.)
3793 Deta Mona TRIMBLE and Jessie Trimble, Appellants, v. Joseph Roosevelt GORDON, et al., Ap-
pellees., 1976 WL 181301, *181301+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. May 05, 1976) Brief of the Appel-
lants (NO. 75-5952) HN: 1,2,4 (S.Ct.)
3794 In re Estate of Sherman GORDON, Deceased, Deta Mona TRIMBLE, and Jessie Trimble, Appel-
lants, v. Joseph Roosevelt GORDON, Ethel Mae King, William Gordon, Hellie Mae Gordey, and
Mary Lois Gordon, Appellees., 1976 WL 181304, *181304+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. May 05,
1976) Brief of the American Civil Liberties Union, Amicus Curiae (NO. 75-5952) HN:
1,4 (S.Ct.)
3795 Curtis CRAIG and Carolyn Whitener, d1b1a ""The Honk and Holler,"" Appellants, v. Honorable
David BOREN, Governor, State of Oklahoma, Honorable Larry Derryberry, Attorney General,
State of Oklahoma, Honorable D. M. Berry, Chairman, Honorable Lawton L. Leininger, Vice-
Chairman, Honorable J. L. Merrill, Secretary-Member, Oklahoma Tax Commission, Honorable
Ray Wall, Presiding Judge, Ninth Judicial District Court, State of Oklahoma, Honorable Charles
H., 1976 WL 181330, *181330+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. May 01, 1976) Brief of Appellees (NO.
75-628) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
3796 Craig v. Boren, 1976 WL 194244, *194244+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. May 01, 1976) Brief of Ap-
pellees (NO. 75-628) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
3797 Hadley v. The State of New Hampshire, 1976 WL 194398, *194398+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S.
Mar 29, 1976) Jurisdictional Statement (NO. 75-1386) HN: 1,2 (S.Ct.)
3798 DREW MUNICIPAL SEPARATE SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al., Petitioners, v. Katie Mae AN-
DREWS, et al., Respondents., 1976 WL 181173, *181173+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Feb 26, 1976)
Reply Brief for Petitioners (NO. 74-1318) HN: 4,5 (S.Ct.)
3799 Curtis CRAIG and Carolyn Whitener, d1b1a ""The Honk and Holler,"" Appellants, v. Hon. Dav-
id BOREN, Governor, State of Oklahoma, Hon. Larry Derryberry, Attorney General, State of
Oklahoma, Hon. D. M. Berry, Chairman, Hon. Lawton L. Leininger, Vice-Chairman, Hon. J. L.
Merrill, Secretary-Member, Oklahoma Tax Commission, Hon. Ray Wall, Presiding Judge, Ninth
Judicial District Court, State of Oklahoma, Hon. Charles H. Headrick, District Attorney, Ninth
Judicial, 1976 WL 181333, *181333+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Feb 26, 1976) Motion of Americ-
an Civil Liberties Union for Leave to File Brief Amicus Curiae and Brief Amicus Curiae
(NO. 75-628) " HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
3800 Drew Municipal Separate School v. Andrews, 1976 WL 194021, *194021+ (Appellate Brief)
(U.S. Feb 26, 1976) Reply Brief for Petitioners (NO. 74-1318) HN: 4,5 (S.Ct.)
3801 Craig v. Boren, 1976 WL 194246, *194246+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Feb 26, 1976) Motion of
American Civil Liberties Union for Leave to File Brief Amicus Curiae and Brief Amicus
Curiae (NO. 75-628) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)

3802 Robert BURRELL, et al., Petitioners, v. Milton MCCRAY, et al., Respondents., 1976 WL
181518, *181518+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Feb 13, 1976) Brief of Respondents (NO. 75-44)
HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
3803 Lalli v. Lalli, 1976 WL 194702, *194702+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Feb 12, 1976) Jurisdictional
Statement (NO. 75-1148) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
3804 Ewell SCOTT, etc., Petitioner, v. KENTUCKY PAROLE BOARD, et al., Respondents., 1976
WL 181504, *181504+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jan 29, 1976) Brief for Petitioner (NO. 74-6438)
HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
3805 Scott v. Kentucky Parole Board, 1976 WL 194059, *194059+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jan 29,
1976) Brief for Petitioner (NO. 74-6438) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
3806 Schanefelt v. Paradiso, 1976 WL 194694, *194694+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jan 19, 1976) Juris-
dictional Statement (NO. 75-1079) HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
3807 Drew Municipal Separate School District v. Andrews, 1976 WL 194019, *194019+ (Appellate
Brief) (U.S. Jan 05, 1976) Brief of Respondents (NO. 74-1318) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
3808 DREW MUNICIPAL SEPARATE SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al., Petitioners, v. Katie Mae AN-
DREWS, et al., Respondents., 1976 WL 181171, *181171+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jan 03, 1976)
Motion for Leave to File Brief as Amicus Curiae and Brief Amicus Curiae for the National
Education Association (NO. 74-1318) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
3809 F. David MATHEWS, Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare, Appellant, v. Ruby M. LU-
CAS, et al., Appellees., 1975 WL 173719, *173719+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Dec 29, 1975) Brief
of Appellees (NO. 75-88) HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.)
3810 L.N. MCDONALD and Raymond L. Laird, Petitioners, v. SANTA FE TRAIL TRANSPORTA-
TION COMPANY and Teamsters Freight Tank Line and Automobile Industry Employees, Local
Union No. 988, Respondents., 1975 WL 173861, *173861+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Dec 17,
1975) Motion for Leave to File Brief Amicus Curiae and Annexed Brief of the American
Jewish Committee (NO. 75-260) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
3811 PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF CENTRAL MISSOURI, et al., Appellants, v. John C. DAN-
FORTH, et al., Appellees., 1975 WL 171453, *171453+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Dec 08, 1975)
Brief Amicus Curiae on Behalf of the Center for Constitutional Rights and the Women's
Law Project (NO. 74-1151, 74-1419) " HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
3812 PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF CENTRAL MISSOURI, a Missouri Corporation, David Hall,
M.D., and Michael Freiman, M.D., Appellants, v. John C. DANFORTH, Attorney General of the
State of Missouri, and J. Brendan Ryan, Circuit Attorney of the City of St. Louis, Missouri, Ap-
pellees. (No. 74-1151) John C. Danforth, Attorney General of the State of Missouri, Appellant, v.
Planned Parenthood of Central Missouri, a Missouri Corporation, David Hall, M.D., Michael
Freiman, M.D.,, 1975 WL 171451, *171451+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Dec 05, 1975) Brief for
Planned Parenthood of Central Missouri, a Missouri Corporation, David Hall, M.D., and
Michael Freiman, M.D., Appellants and Cross-Appellees (NO. 74-1151, 74-1419)
3813 EXAMINING BOARD OF ENGINEERS, Architects and Surveyors, et al., Appellants, v. Maria
C. FLORES DE OTERO BOARD OF EXAMINERS OF ENGINEERS, Architects and Survey-
ors, et al., Appellants, v. Sergio Perez NOGUEIRO, 1975 WL 173680, *173680+ (Appellate
Brief) (U.S. Nov 29, 1975) Brief for the United States as Amicus Curiae (NO. 74-1267)

3814 John C. MOE, et al, Appellants, v. THE CONFEDERATED SALISH AND KOOTENAI
TRIBES OF THE FLATHEAD RESERVATION, et al, Appellees. The State of Montana, et al,
Appellants, v. THE CONFEDERATED SALISH AND KOOTENAI TRIBES OF THE FLAT-
HEAD RESERVATION, et al, Appellees. THE CONFEDERATED SALISH AND KOOTENAI
TRIBES OF THE FLATHEAD RESERVATION, et al, Appellants, v. John C. MOE, et al, Ap-
pellees., 1975 WL 173493, *173493+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Nov 19, 1975) Brief for the Ap-
pellants (NO. 74-1656, 75-50) HN: 1,2 (S.Ct.)
3815 Abe LAVINE, individually and in his capacity as Commissioner of the New York State Depart-
ment of Social Services, Appellant, v. Ronald MILNE, Douglas Streeter, Robert C. Lee, Joe
Nathan Beverly, Willie Beverly, Odell Beverly, and John Beverly, by their mother and next
friend, Roberta Beverly, individually and on behalf of all other persons similarly situated, Ap-
pellees., 1975 WL 173880, *173880+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Oct Term 1975) Brief for Ap-
3816 Gregory NORTON, Jr., etc., appellant, v. F. David MATHEWS, Secretary of Health, Education,
and Welfare., 1975 WL 173632, *173632+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Oct 10, 1975) Brief for the
Appellee (NO. 74-6212) HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.)
3817 LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, A Corporation, Petitioner, v. Sandra WETZEL
and Mari Ross, on behalf of Themselves and all others similarly situated, Respondents., 1975 WL
173654, *173654+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Sep 27, 1975) Brief Amici Curiae of Center for
Constitutional Rights, Employment Law Center, Equal Rights Advocates, Inc., National
Organization for Women, Union Wage, Women's Legal Defense Fund, Women Organized
... (NO. 74-1245) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
and Mari Ross, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Respondents., 1975 WL
173653, *173653+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Sep 26, 1975) Brief Amici Curiae of American Civil
Liberties Union and National Education Association (NO. 74-1245) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
3819 James L. BUCKLEY, United States Senator From the State of New York, et al, Appellants, v.
Francis R. VALEO, Secretary, United States Senate, et al, and Center for Public Financing of
Elections, et al, James C. Calaway of Houston, Texas, Appellees., 1975 WL 171456, *171456
(Appellate Brief) (U.S. Sep 22, 1975) Brief of Amicus Curiae of the Socialist Labor Party in
Support of the Appellants Appeal of the Judgments of the United States District Court of
the District of Columbia and the United States Court of ... (NO. 75-436) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
3820 LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, A Corporation, Defendant-Petitioner, v.
Sandra WETZEL and Mari Ross, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated,
Plaintiffs-Respondents., 1975 WL 173656, *173656+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Sep 22, 1975) Brief
Amicus Curiae of Blank Goodman Kelly Rone & Stanley on Behalf of Plaintiffs-Re-
spondents (NO. 74-1245) HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
3821 LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Petitioner, v. Sandra WETZEL and Mari Ross,
on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated, Respondents., 1975 WL 173659,
*173659+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Sep 22, 1975) Brief of Amici Curiae Commonwealths of
Massachusetts and Pennsylvania, States of Florida, Maine, Michigan, Missouri, Wisconsin
and Vermont. (NO. 74-1245) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
3822 COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS BOARD OF RETIREMENT; Robert Q. Crane,

Angelo Amato and J. Joseph Maloney, Jr., as They are Members of the Commonwealth of Mas-
sachusetts Board of Retirement; James W. Callanan, Executive Secretary of the Commonwealth
of Massachusetts Board of Retirement; and John F. Kehoe, Jr., Commissioner of Public Safety of
the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Appellants, v. Robert D. MURGIA, Appellee., 1975 WL
173591, *173591+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Sep 04, 1975) Brief for Legal Services for the Eld-
erly Poor, American Civil Liberties Union, the National Council of Senior Citizens and the
Massachusetts Civil Liberties Union, as Amici Curiae (NO. 74-1044) HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
3823 Gregory B. NORTON, Jr., a minor, by his next friend, Marion B. Chiles, Individually and on Be-
half of all others Similarly Situated, Appellant, v. F. David MATHEWS, Secretary, Department
of Health, Education, and Welfare, Individually and in his official capacity, Appellee., 1975 WL
173634, *173634+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Sep 04, 1975) Brief of Amicus Curiae John J.
Romero, Jr., by Melody Hendricks, his Next Friend, in Support of Appellant Gregory B.
Norton, Jr. (NO. 74-6212) HN: 4,5 (S.Ct.)
3824 Norton v. Mathews, 1975 WL 184937, *184937+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Sep 04, 1975) Brief of
Amicus Curiae John J. Romero, Jr., by Melody Hendricks, His Next Friend, in Support of
Appellant Gregory B. Norton, Jr. (NO. 74-6212) HN: 4,5 (S.Ct.)
3825 Gregory NORTON, Jr., etc., Appellant, v. F. David MATHEWS, Secretary of Health, Education,
and Welfare, Appellee., 1975 WL 173631, *173631+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Sep 03, 1975) Brief
for Appellant (NO. 74-6212) " HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.)
173589, *173589+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Sep 02, 1975) Amicus Curiae Brief of Lieutenant
Lawrence Carter, Captain Raymond M. McGuire and Captain William F. Ready in Sup-
port of Appellee. (NO. 74-1044) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
173588, *173588+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Aug 28, 1975) Brief of Amici Curiae, the American
Association of Retired Persons, the National Retired Teachers Association, and the National
Senior Citizens Law Center. (NO. 74-1044) " HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
3828 John T. DUNLOP, Secretary of the United States Department of Labor, et al., Defendants-Appel-
lants, v. TURNER ELKHORN MINING COMPANY, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees. TURNER
ELKHORN MINING COMPANY, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. John T. DUNLOP, Secretary
of the United States Department of Labor, et al., Defendants-Appellees., 1975 WL 173613,
*173613+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Aug 08, 1975) Consolidated Brief for Turner Elkhorn Min-
ing Company, et al. (NO. 74-1302, 74-1316) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
3829 LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, a Corporation, Petitioner, v. Sandra WETZEL
and Mari Ross, on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated, Respondents., 1975

WL 173651, *173651+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jul 31, 1975) Brief for Petitioner (NO. 74-1245)

and Mari Ross, on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated, Respondents., 1975
WL 173662, *173662+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jul 31, 1975) Brief for General Motors Corpor-
ation As Amicus Curiae (NO. 74-1245) HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
3831 LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Petitioner, v. Sandra WETZEL, and Mari
Ross, on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated, Respondents., 1975 WL
173663, *173663+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jul 31, 1975) Brief of the American Telephone and
Telegraph Company as Amicus Curiae (NO. 74-1245) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
3832 LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, a corporation, Defendant-Petitioner, v. Sandra
WETZEL and Mari Ross, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-
Respondents., 1975 WL 173664, *173664+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jul 31, 1975) Brief of West-
inghouse Electric Corporation as Amicus Curiae in Support of the Position of Petitioner
(NO. 74-1245) HN: 4,5 (S.Ct.)
3833 LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Petitioner, v. Sandra WETZEL, et al., Re-
spondents., 1975 WL 173667, *173667+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jul 28, 1975) Brief Amici Curi-
ae of Owens-Illinois, Inc. and the Sherwin-Williams Company (NO. 74-1245) HN: 4
(S.Ct.)
173586, *173586+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jul 17, 1975) Brief for the Appellants (NO. 74-1044)
HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
3835 Marcel YOUAKIM and Linda Youakim individually and as foster parents, Timothy Robertson, a
minor, by his sister and next friend Linda Youakim, Mary Lou Robertson, a minor, by her sister
and next friend Linda Youakim, Larry Robertson, a minor, by his sister and next friend Linda
Youakim, and Sherry Robertson, a minor, by her sister and next friend Linda Youakim, and all
others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Jerome MILLER individually, 1975 WL
173747, *173747+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jun 11, 1975) Brief for Appellants (NO. 73-6935)
HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
3836 LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, a corporation, Defendant-Petitioner, v. Sandra
WETZEL and Mari Ross, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-
Respondents., 1975 WL 173648, *173648+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Apr 08, 1975) Brief of West-
inghouse Electric Corporation as Amicus Curiae in Support of the Petition for Writ of Cer-
tiorari (NO. 74-1245) HN: 2,4 (S.Ct.)
3837 Robert E. HAMPTON, Chairman of the United States Civil Service Commission, et al., Petition-
ers, v. Mow Sun WONG, et al., Respondents., 1974 WL 175968, *175968+ (Appellate Brief)
(U.S. Dec 31, 1974) Brief for the Respondents (NO. 73-1596) HN: 2,5 (S.Ct.)
3838 Weinberger v. Wiesenfeld, 1974 WL 186058, *186058+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Dec 30, 1974)
Brief for Amicus Curiae Center for Constitutional Rights (NO. 73-1892) " HN: 1,4

(S.Ct.)
3839 Normand v. State of Louisiana, 1974 WL 186217, *186217+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Dec 30,
1974) Brief of Respondent (NO. 74-675) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
3840 Weinberger v. Wiesenfeld, 1974 WL 186056, *186056+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Dec 29, 1974)
Brief for the Appellant (NO. 73-1892) " HN: 2,5 (S.Ct.)
3841 Wiesenfeld v. Wiesenfeld, 1974 WL 186057, *186057+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Dec 20, 1974)
Brief for Appellee (NO. 73-1892) " HN: 1,4,5 (S.Ct.)
3842 Stanton v. Stanton, 1974 WL 187570, *187570+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Dec 06, 1974) Brief for
the Appellant (NO. 73-1461) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
3843 J. William MIDDENDORF, II, et al., etc., Petitioner, v. Daniel Edward HENRY, et al., etc., Re-
spondents., 1974 WL 175945, *175945+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Oct Term 1974) Brief for the
Respondents (NO. 74-175(WITH74-5176)) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
3844 THE CITY OF NEW ORLEANS and Honorable Moon Landrieu, Appellant, v. NANCY DUKES
D1B1A LOUISIANA CONCESSIONS, Appellee., 1974 WL 175972, *175972+ (Appellate
Brief) (U.S. Oct Term 1974) Brief on Behalf of Appellant (NO. 74-775) " HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
3845 Marcel YOUAKIM and Linda Youakim individually and as foster parents, Timothy Robertson, a
minor, by his sister and next friend, Linda Youakim, Mary Lou Robertson, a minor, by her sister
and next friend, Linda Youakim, Larry Robertson, a minor, by his sister and next friend, Linda
Youakim, and Sherry Robertson, a minor, by her sister and next friend, Linda Youakim, and all
others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Jerome MILLER individually, 1974 WL
175973, *175973+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Oct Term 1974) Brief and Argument for Defend-
ants-Appellees (NO. 73-6935) " HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.)
3846 Roe v. Norton, 1974 WL 186124, *186124+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Aug 23, 1974) Brief of the
3847 Schlesinger v. Ballard, 1974 WL 185843, *185843+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Aug 08, 1974) Brief
for the Appellee (NO. 73-776) HN: 4,5 (S.Ct.)
3848 Roe v. Norton, 1974 WL 186122, *186122+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jul 30, 1974) Appellants'
Brief (NO. 73-6033) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
3849 Taylor v. Louisiana, 1974 WL 186110, *186110+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jul 09, 1974) Original
Brief on the Merits on Behalf of the State of Louisiana, Appellee (NO. 73-5744) "
HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.)
3850 Schlesinger v. Ballard, 1974 WL 185842, *185842+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jun 05, 1974) Brief
for the Appellants (NO. 73-776) HN: 4,5 (S.Ct.)
3851 Taylor v. Louisiana, 1974 WL 186109, *186109+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. May 29, 1974) Brief
for Appellant (NO. 73-5744) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
3852 Edwards v. Healy, 1974 WL 185827, *185827+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. May 15, 1974) Brief for
Amicus Curiae Center for Constitutional Rights (NO. 73-759) HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
3853 Edwards v. Healy, 1974 WL 185826, *185826+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. May 03, 1974) Brief of
the American Bar Association, Amicus Curiae (NO. 73-759) " HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
3854 Edwards v. Healy, 1974 WL 185825, *185825+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. May 02, 1974) Brief for
Appellees (NO. 73-759) " HN: 4 (S.Ct.)

3855 Edwards v. Healy, 1974 WL 185824, *185824+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Apr 04, 1974) Brief for
Appellants (NO. 73-759) HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
3856 Geduldig v. Aiello, 1974 WL 185749, *185749+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Mar 22, 1974) Reply
Brief for Appellant (NO. 73-640)
3857 Geduldig v. Aiello, 1974 WL 185756, *185756+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Mar 20, 1974) Brief of
the United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission as Amicus Curiae (NO.
73-640) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
3858 Geduldig v. Aiello, 1974 WL 185751, *185751+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Mar 15, 1974) Brief of
International Union of Electrical, Radio and Machine Workers, AFL-CIO-CLC, as Amicus
Curiae (NO. 73-640)
3859 Geduldig v. Aiello, 1974 WL 185753, *185753+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Mar 15, 1974) Brief
Amici Curiae of the American Civil Liberties Union, the Center for Constitutional Rights
and the National Organization for Women (NO. 73-640) HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
3860 Geduldig v. Aiello, 1974 WL 185752, *185752+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Mar 13, 1974) Brief for
Appellees (NO. 73-640) HN: 1,4,5 (S.Ct.)
3861 Geduldig v. Aiello, 1974 WL 186477, *186477+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Mar 12, 1974) Brief
Amicus Curiae of the Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America in Support of
the Appellant. (NO. 73-640) " HN: 1,4,5 (S.Ct.)
3862 Jimenez v. Weinberger, 1974 WL 185596, *185596+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Mar 11, 1974)
Reply Brief for Appellants (NO. 72-6609) " HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
3863 Jimenez v. Weinberger, 1974 WL 185595, *185595+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Mar 03, 1974) Brief
for the Appellee (NO. 72-6609) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
3864 Geduldig v. Aiello, 1974 WL 185748, *185748+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Feb 11, 1974) Brief of
Merchants and Manufacturers Association, et al., as Amici Curiae. (NO. 73-640)
HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
3865 Geduldig v. Aiello, 1974 WL 185755, *185755+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Feb 11, 1974) Brief for
General Electric Company. as Amicus Curiae (NO. 73-640) HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
3866 Geduldig v. Aiello, 1974 WL 185750, *185750+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Feb 09, 1974) Brief for
Appellant (NO. 73-640) " HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
3867 Kahn v. Shevin, 1974 WL 185606, *185606+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Feb 05, 1974) Reply Brief
for Appellants (NO. 73-78) HN: 4,5 (S.Ct.)
3868 Secretary of the Navy v. Avrech, 1974 WL 185592, *185592+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Feb 01,
1974) Brief for Appellee (NO. 72-1713) HN: 3 (S.Ct.)
3869 DeFunis v. Odegaard, 1974 WL 185619, *185619+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Feb 01, 1974) Brief
Amici Curiae (NO. 73-235) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
3870 DeFunis v. Odegaard, 1974 WL 185631, *185631+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Feb 01, 1974) Brief
of the National Organization for Women Legal Defense and Education Fund, Inc., and the
National Education Association as Amici Curiae (NO. 73-235) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
3871 Jimenez v. Weinberger, 1974 WL 185594, *185594+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jan 30, 1974) Brief
for Appellants (NO. 72-6609) HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.)
3872 Kahn v. Shevin, 1974 WL 185605, *185605+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jan 18, 1974) Brief for

Appellees (NO. 73-78) " HN: 1,4,5 (S.Ct.)

3873 Village of Belle Terre v. Boraas, 1974 WL 187429, *187429+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jan 07,
1974) Brief for Appellees (NO. 73-191) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
175951, *175951+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. 1974) Brief for Appellee (NO. 74-1044) HN:
1,4 (S.Ct.)
3875 Connecticut Com'n on Human Rights and Opportunities v. Veeder-Root Co., 1973 WL 173842,
*173842+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Dec 28, 1973) Amicus Curiae Brief (NO. 73-703) HN:
1,4 (S.Ct.)
3876 Kahn v. Shevin, 1973 WL 172384, *172384+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Dec 18, 1973) Brief for
Appellants (NO. 73-78) HN: 1,4,5 (S.Ct.)
3877 Geduldig v. Aiello, 1973 WL 172741, *172741+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Oct 23, 1973) Brief
Amicus Curiae of the Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America in Support of
the Jurisdictional Statement. (NO. 73-640) " HN: 1,2,4 (S.Ct.)
3878 Johnson v. Robison, 1973 WL 171907, *171907+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Oct 15, 1973) Brief for
3879 Cleveland Bd. of Educ. v. Fleur, 1973 WL 172671, *172671+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Oct 10,
1973) Motion and Brief Amicus Curiae of the Chamber of Commerce of the United States of
America. (NO. 72-1129, 72-777) " HN: 1,2,4 (S.Ct.)
3880 Cleveland Bd. of Educ. v. La Fleur, 1973 WL 173847, *173847+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Oct 02,
1973) Memorandum for the United States as Amicus Curiae (NO. 72-1129, 72-777)
HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
3881 Cleveland Bd. of Educ. v. La Fleur, 1973 WL 173846, *173846+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Aug 10,
1973) Brief of the Attorney General of the State of California, on Behalf of the California
Department of Human Resources Development as Amicus Curiae (NO. 72-1129, 72-777)
HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
3882 Cohen v. Chesterfield County School Bd., 1973 WL 172269, *172269+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S.
Aug 09, 1973) Brief for Respondents (NO. 72-1129) " HN: 1,4,5 (S.Ct.)
3883 Morton v. Ruiz, 1973 WL 172631, *172631+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Aug 07, 1973) Brief for
California Indian Legal Services, Amicus Curiae (NO. 72-1052) HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.)
3884 Cleveland Bd. of Educ. v. Fleur, 1973 WL 172669, *172669+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Aug 06,
1973) Brief for Respondents (NO. 72-777) HN: 1,2,4 (S.Ct.)
3885 Cleveland Bd. of Educ. v. LaFleur, 1973 WL 172672, *172672+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Aug 06,
1973) Motion for Leave to File Brief Amicus Curiae and Brief Amicus Curiae in Support of
Affirmance (NO. 72-777) " HN: 1,2,4 (S.Ct.)
3886 Memorial Hosp. v. Maricopa County, 1973 WL 173858, *173858+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jul
02, 1973) Brief for Memorial Hospital and Henry Evaro (NO. 72-847) " HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
3887 Cleveland Bd. of Educ. v. La Fleur, 1973 WL 173845, *173845+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jun 21,

1973) Brief for Petitioners (NO. 72-777) HN: 1,2,4 (S.Ct.)

3888 Michael B. ELGIN, Aaron Lawson, Henry Tucker and Christon Colby, Plaintiffs - Appellants, v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, United States Department of the Treasury and United States
Department of the Interior, Defendants - Appellees., 2010 WL 3301202, *3301202+ (Appellate
Brief) (1st Cir. May 24, 2010) Brief of the Plaintiffs/Appellants (NO. 10-1302) HN: 5
(S.Ct.)
3889 Thomas COOK, Megan Dresch; Laura Galaburda; Jack Glover; David Hall; Monica Hill, Jenny
Lynn Kopfstein, Jennifer McGinn; Justin Peacock; Derek Sparks; Stacy Vasquez, Plaintiffs-Ap-
pellants, James E. Pietrangelo, II, Plaintiff, v. Donald H. Rumsfeld, Secretary of Defense; Mi-
chael Chertoff, Secretary of Homeland Security; United States of America, Defendants-Ap-
pellees., 2006 WL 4015626, *4015626+ (Appellate Brief) (1st Cir. Nov 15, 2006) Brief of Amici
Curiae Constitutional Law Professors in Support of Appellants (NO. 06-2313, 06-2381)
3890 Thomas COOK; Megan Dresch; Laura Galaburda; Jack Glover; David Hall; Monica Till; Jenny
Lynn Kopfstein; Jennifer McGinn; Justin Peacock; Derek Sparks; Stacy Vasquez, Plaintiffs-Ap-
pellants, James E. Pietrangelo, II, Plaintiff, v. Donald H. RUMSFELD, Secretary of Defense; Mi-
chael Chertoff, Secretary of Homeland Security; United States, Defendants-Appellees., 2006 WL
4035217, *4035217+ (Appellate Brief) (1st Cir. Nov 13, 2006) Brief of Plaintiffs-Appellants in
No. 06-2313 (NO. 06-2313, 06-2381) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
3891 In re: Walter E. PALMER, Debtor. Walter E. Palmer, Debtor-Appellant, v. Estate of Thelma Ru-
bin, Appellee., 2003 WL 25552058, *25552058+ (Appellate Brief) (1st Cir. Dec 09, 2003) Reply
Brief for Debtor-Appellant (NO. 02-1780) HN: 2,5 (S.Ct.)
3892 Susan S. ROCKWELL, Pro se., Appellant, v. ROMAN CATHOLIC ARCHDIOCESE OF BO-
STON MASSACHUSETTS, Roman Catholic Diocese of Manchester New Hampshire, United
States Conference of Catholic Bishops, Charles O. Rossotti, Commissioner of Internal Revenue
Service of the United States, Appellees., 2003 WL 25791421, *25791421+ (Appellate Brief) (1st
Cir. May 14, 2003) Brief of Appellant (NO. 03-1050) HN: 1,2,3 (S.Ct.)
3893 Stephen LARO, Plaintiff-Appellant, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Intervenor, v. State of
New Hampshire, Defendant-Appellee., 2001 WL 36019418, *36019418 (Appellate Brief) (1st
Cir. Mar 19, 2001) Supplemental Brief of Intervenor United States of America (NO. 00-1581)
3894 Walter TUVELL, Appellant/Plaintiff, v. MICROSOFT CORPORATION, Respondent/Defend-

ant., 2000 WL 35564218, *35564218+ (Appellate Brief) (1st Cir. Jun 07, 2000) Brief of Appel-
lant/Plaintiff (With Addendum) (NO. 00-1444) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
3895 Lucas ROSA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PARK WEST BANK AND TRUST COMPANY, Defend-
ant-Appellee., 2000 WL 35571171, *35571171+ (Appellate Brief) (1st Cir. Feb 03, 2000)
Amicus Curiae Brief of Now Legal Defense and Education Fund and Equal Rights Advoc-
ates in Support of Plaintiff-Appellant and in Support of Reversal (NO. 99-2309) HN: 5
(S.Ct.)
3896 James NOLLET, James Carroll, David Merchant, Donald Roine, Richard Scanlon, Earl Sholley,
and The Fatherhood Coalition/CPF, Plaintiffs, v. JUSTICES OF THE TRIAL COURT OF THE
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, Defendants., 2000 WL 35565493, *35565493
(Appellate Brief) (1st Cir. 2000) Brief of Appellant (NO. 00-1242)
3897 Mitchell SWARTZ, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. ORANGE COUNTY (CA), Michael Capizzi, Indi-

vidually and as District Attorney, Jan C. Sturla. Individually and as Deputy Da, Jackie Lesan,
Linda Dow. Robert A. Burton, Charles Smith, Individually and as Supervisor, Jim Silva, Indi-
vidually and as Supervisor, Todd Spitzer, Individually and as Supervisor, William G. Steiner, In-
dividually and as Supervisor, Thomas Wilson, Individually and as Supervisor, Bradley Jacobs,,
1998 WL 34279784, *34279784 (Appellate Brief) (1st Cir. Sep 02, 1998) Reply Brief (NO.
98-1097)
.... Daniel SPLUDE and Ronald Cargill, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINIS-
TRATION COMMISSIONER, Defendant-Appellee. (Appellate Brief) (1st Cir. Aug 1998) Brief
for Appellee (NO. 98-1630) (Text not available on WESTLAW)
3899 Mitchell SWARTZ, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. ORANGE COUNTY (CA), Michael Capizzi, Indi-
vidually and as District Attorney, Jan C. Sturla, Individually and as Deputy Da, Jackie Lesan,
Linda Dow, Robert A. Burton, Charles Smith, Individually and as Supervisor, Jim Silva, Indi-
vidually and as Supervisor, Todd Spitzer, Individually and as Supervisor, William G. Steiner, In-
dividually and as Supervisor, Thomas Wilson, Individually and as Supervisor, Bradley Jacobs,,
1998 WL 34279782, *34279782 (Appellate Brief) (1st Cir. Jul 17, 1998) Appeal Brief (NO.
98-1097) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
.... Daniel SPLUDE & Ronald Cargill, Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINIS-
TRATION COMMISSIONER, Defendant - Appellee. (Appellate Brief) (1st Cir. Jul 09, 1998)
Brief of Plaintiffs - Appellants (NO. 98-1630) (Text not available on WESTLAW)
3901 Flor Maria SOTO, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. Luis CARRASQUILLO et al, Defendants - Appellee.,
1996 WL 33658391, *33658391+ (Appellate Brief) (1st Cir. Mar 19, 1996) Appellant's Brief of
Appeal (NO. 96-1024) HN: 3,4 (S.Ct.)
3902 Amy COHEN et al., Plaintiffs - Appellees, v. BROWN UNIVERSITY, Vartan Gregorian and
David Roach, Defendants - Appellants., 1996 WL 34406453, *34406453+ (Appellate Brief) (1st
Cir. Jan 26, 1996) Brief of Amici Curiae National Women's Law Center American Associ-
ation of University Women/Aauw Legal Advocacy Fund American Civil Liberties Union
Women's Rights Project California Women's Law Center ... (NO. 95-2205) HN: 1,2,3
(S.Ct.)
3903 Amy COHEN, et al., each individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs,
Appellees, v. BROWN UNIVERSITY, et al., Defendants, Appellants., 1996 WL 34419449,
*34419449+ (Appellate Brief) (1st Cir. Jan 26, 1996) Brief of Plaintiffs-Appellees %8BFinal
Form%9B (NO. 95-2205) HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.)
3904 Amy COHEN, et. al, Plaintiffs, Appellees, v. BROWN UNIVERSITY, Vartan Gregorian and
David Roach, Defendants, Appellants., 1995 WL 17829528, *17829528+ (Appellate Brief) (1st
Cir. Dec 11, 1995) Brief of Appellants Brown University, Vartan Gregorian and David
Roach (NO. 95-2205) HN: 1,2 (S.Ct.)
3905 Susan HAYES, Plaintiff, Appellee, v. Maurice C. PARADIS, in his individual capacity, Defend-
ant, Appellant., 1995 WL 17828616, *17828616+ (Appellate Brief) (1st Cir. Sep 25, 1995) Brief
of Appellant (NO. 95-1726)
3906 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee on No. 92-2289; Appellant on No. 92-2069, v. Paul
KIRVAN, Appellant-Defendant on No. 92-2289; Appellee on No. 92-2069., 1993 WL 13625283,
*13625283+ (Appellate Brief) (1st Cir. Mar 04, 1993) Reply Brief for Defendant-Appellant on
No. 92-2289 and Brief for Defendant-Appellee on No. 92-2069 (NO. 92-2069, 92-2289)

HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
3907 Louis J. RODRIGUE, Administrator of the Estate of William J. Rodrigue, Plaintiff - Appellant,
v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant - Appellee., 1992 WL 12575757, *12575757
(Appellate Brief) (1st Cir. 1992) Brief for Plaintiff-Appellant (NO. 92-1009)
3908 Patrica J. CURTO, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. Amy GOLDSTEIN, Brian Parker, Christoherj Burns,
David C Caywood, Debra Bender, Erie County Districts Attorney's Office, Frank Clark, John Zit-
tel, Kelly Vacco, Micheal Metzger, Town of Boston, Town of Boston Justice Court, Wendy
Kummer, Defendants - Appellees., 2006 WL 4392172, *4392172 (Appellate Brief) (2nd Cir. Aug
08, 2006) Brief for Pro-Se Plaintiff-Appellant (NO. 05-2339-CV) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
3909 JANA-ROCK CONSTRUCTION, INC. and Rocco Luiere Jr., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. NEW
YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, Division of Minority &
Women's Business Development and Jorge I. Vidro, as Director of the Devision of Minority &
Women's Business Development, Defendant-Appellees., 2005 WL 4748105, *4748105+
(Appellate Brief) (2nd Cir. Mar 18, 2005) Brief and Special Appendix for Plaintiffs-Appel-
lants (NO. 04-6328-CV) HN: 1,2 (S.Ct.)
Stern, Moshe Herman, Binie Vized, f/k/a Bini Schwartz, Blima Rosenfeld, f/k/a Blima Green,
2005 WL 4680755, *4680755 (Appellate Brief) (2nd Cir. Jan 31, 2005) Appellants' Reply Brief
and Brief for the Cross-Appellees (NO. 04-2589, L)
3911 Kalman WEISS, as Assignee, Hershy Meisels, Yida Weinstock, Chaim M. Rubin, Samuel M.
Stern, Moshe Herman, Binie Vizel, formerly known as Bini Schwartz, Blima Rosenfeld, formerly
known as Blima Green, Herman Freund, Idy Weinberger, formerly known as Idy Samet, Devorah
Herskovits, formerly known as Devorah Mermelstein, Avrum Yitschok Gluck, Ester Ekstein,
formerly known as Ester Zoldan, Mosha Grunfeld, Miriam Klein, formerly known as Miriam Le-
onorovitz, David, 2005 WL 4680756, *4680756+ (Appellate Brief) (2nd Cir. Jan 14, 2005) Brief
for Defendants-Counter-Claimants-Appellees-Cross-Appellants (NO.
04-2589-CV(L)04-2919) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
Stern, Moshe Herman, Binie Vizel, f/k/a Bini Schwartz, Blima Rosenfeld, f/k/a Blima Green,
2004 WL 4947026, *4947026+ (Appellate Brief) (2nd Cir. Nov 17, 2004) Brief for the Appel-
lants (NO. 04-2589, L) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
pellee., 2002 WL 32331979, *32331979 (Appellate Brief) (2nd Cir. Mar 27, 2002) Reply Brief
Part 2 for Pro-Se Plaintiff-Appellant (NO. 01-6209)
pellee., 2002 WL 32331987, *32331987 (Appellate Brief) (2nd Cir. Mar 27, 2002) Reply Brief
Part 2 for Pro-se Plaintiff-Appellant (NO. 01-6209)

3915 Elaine BROWN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. John MARTINEZ, Chairman New York City Housing
Authority, Defendant-Appellee., 2002 WL 32351033, *32351033+ (Appellate Brief) (2nd Cir.
Mar 05, 2002) Brief for Defendant-Appellee (NO. 01-9138) HN: 1,2 (S.Ct.)
3916 Lydia LEWIS, Plaintiff-Appellee, CITY OF NEW YORK, New York City Health & Hospitals
Corporation, Intervenor-Plaintiffs-Appellees, Cesar PERALES, Commissioner of the New York
State Department of Social Services, Defendant-Appellee, v. William GRINKER, Commissioner
of the New York City Department of Social Services, Defendant, Donna SHALALA, Defendant-
Appellant., 2000 WL 33980465, *33980465+ (Appellate Brief) (2nd Cir. Aug 07, 2000) Brief
for Plaintiffs-Appellees, Intervenor-Plaintiff-Appellees, and Defendant-Appellee (NO.
00-6104) " HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
3917 Sonny B. SOUTHERLAND, Sr., et al., Plaintiff - Appellant, v. THE CITY OF NEW YORK, et
al., Defendants - Appellees., 2000 WL 33983238, *33983238 (Appellate Brief) (2nd Cir. Aug 04,
2000) Brief for Sonny B. Southerland, Sr., et al. Pro-Se Plaintiff-Appellant (NO. 00-7410)
3918 Frederick A. LAKE, Petitioner, v. Janet RENO, Respondent., 2000 WL 33977192, *33977192+
(Appellate Brief) (2nd Cir. Mar 21, 2000) Reply Brief for Petitioner Frederick A. Lake (NO.
99-4125)
3919 Frederick A. LAKE, Petitioner, v. Janet RENO, Respondent., 2000 WL 33977899, *33977899+
(Appellate Brief) (2nd Cir. Jan 06, 2000) Brief for Petitioner Frederick A. Lake (NO. 99-4125)
HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
3920 Jennifer L. BOUCHER, Alexis Snader, Cathryn M. Ungermann, Rexanne Johannes, Talya Anter,
Catherine S. Biuso, Maggie Rozycki, Meghan Delehanty, Individually and on Behalf of all Oth-
ers Similarly Situated, Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY, Kenneth Shaw,
Chancellor of Syracuse University, and John J. Crouthamel, Athletic Director of Syracuse Uni-
versity, Defendants - Appellees., 1998 WL 34094077, *34094077+ (Appellate Brief) (2nd Cir.
Jul 24, 1998) Brief for Plaintiffs - Appellants (NO. 98-7678) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
3921 Frank D. JONES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NEW YORK STATE DIVISION OF MILITARY and
Naval Affairs and New York State Army National Guard, Defendants-Appellees., 1997 WL
33484728, *33484728+ (Appellate Brief) (2nd Cir. Aug 29, 1997) Brief of Plaintiff-Appellant
Frank D. Jones (NO. 97-7723)
3922 Mervyn THOMAS, the Minority Livery Owners and Drivers Coalition, Neville Cooper and the
Hispanic Coalition of Base Owners, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. THE CITY OF NEW YORK, Diane
McGrath-McKechnie, as Commissioner of the Taxi and Limousine Commission of the City of
New York, the Taxi and Limousine Commission of the City of New York, and the New York
City Council, Defendants-Appellees., 1997 WL 33621834, *33621834+ (Appellate Brief) (2nd
Cir. 1997) Appellees' Brief (NO. 97-7822) " HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
3923 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. Matthew TAYLOR, Defendant, Darren Nelson,
a/k/a ""Big-D""; Ezra Clarke; Shannon Richards; Angel Alonso, a/k/a A.J.; Ruben Collazo, and
Merton Taylor, a/k/a ""Mert"", Defendants-Appellants., 1995 WL 17201781, *17201781+
(Appellate Brief) (2nd Cir. Oct 30, 1995) Brief of Defendant-Appellant Merton Taylor (NO.
95-1318, 95-1319, 95-1320, 95-1428, 95-1429, 95-1441) " HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
3924 LIEUTENANT COLONEL JANE ABLE, Petty Officer Robert Heigle, First Lieutenant Kenneth
Osborn, Sergeant Steven Spencer, Lieutenant Richard von Wohld, and Seaman Werner Zehr,
Plaintiffs-Appellees/Cross-Appellants, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, William J. Perry,

Secretary of Defense, Federico F. Pena, Secretary of Transportation, Defendants-Appel-

lants/Cross-Appellees., 1995 WL 17203797, *17203797+ (Appellate Brief) (2nd Cir. Oct 16,
1995) Memorandum of Amicus Curiae Servicemembers Legal Defense Network (NO.
95-6111(L)) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
3925 LIEUTENANT COLONEL JANE ABLE, Petty Officer Robert Heigl, First Lieutenant Kenneth
Osborn, Sergeant Steven Spencer, Lieutenant Richard von Wohld and Seaman Werner Zehr,
Plaintiff-Appellees, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and William J. Perry, Secretary of De-
fense, in his official capacity, Defendant-Appellants., 1995 WL 17203799, *17203799+
(Appellate Brief) (2nd Cir. 1995) Amici Curiae Brief of the Human Rights Campaign Fund,
the Union of American Hebrew Congregations, the American Jewish Congress, the United
Church of Christ Office for Church in Society, the Now Legal ... (NO. 95-6111, 95-6141) "
HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.)
3926 Brian D. PROWEL, Appellant, v. WISE BUSINESS FORMS, Appellee., 2008 WL 4005158,
*4005158+ (Appellate Brief) (3rd Cir. Mar 31, 2008) Brief Amici Curiae of Twenty-One Or-
ganizations Committed to Equality for Working Women in Support of Appellant (NO.
07-3997) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
3927 Don ADAMS; Theresa Adams, Appellants, v. TEAMSTERS LOCAL 115; Kevin McNulty; Marc
A. Nardone; Mark Hopkins; Charlie Davis; Heather L. Diocson; Norma Bottomer; Sharon Hop-
kins; Norton Brainard, III; Edward G. Rendell; Lynne M. Abraham; John Doe; Jane Doe Nos.
1-99, Certain Unknown Officials, Employees, and/or Members of the City of Philadelphia May-
or's Office, The District Attorney's Office and/or Teamsters Local 115, and other entities; The
Estate of John P. Morris;, 2004 WL 5485400, *5485400 (Appellate Brief) (3rd Cir. Oct 21, 2004)
Brief of Appellee Edward G. Rendell (NO. 03-3680) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
3928 Don ADAMS; Theresa Adams, Appellants, v. TEAMSTERS LOCAL 115; Kevin McNulty; Marc
A. Nardone; Mark Hopkins; Charlie Davis; Heather L. Diocson; Norma Bottomer; Sharon Hop-
kins; Norton Brainard, III; Edward G. Rendell; Lynne M. Abraham; John Doe; Jane Doe Nos.
1-99; Certain Unknown Officials, Employees, and/or Members of the City of Philadelphia May-
or's Office, The District Attorney's Office and/or Teamsters Local 115, and other entities; The
Estate of John P. Morris;, 2004 WL 5485405, *5485405 (Appellate Brief) (3rd Cir. Oct 18, 2004)
Brief of Appellee Teamsters Local 115 (NO. 03-3680) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
3929 FORUM FOR ACADEMIC AND INSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS, a New Jersey membership cor-
poration; Society of American Law Teachers, a New York corporation; Coalition for Equality, a
Massachusetts association; Rutgers Gay and Lesbian Caucus, a New Jersey association; Pam
Nickisher, a New Jersey resident; Leslie Fischer, a Pennsylvania resident; Michael Blauschild, a
New Jersey resident; Erwin Chemerinsky, a California resident; and Sylvia Law, a New York
resident,, 2004 WL 4996782, *4996782+ (Appellate Brief) (3rd Cir. Mar 05, 2004) Reply Brief
for Appellants (NO. 03-4433) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
3930 FORUM FOR ACADEMIC AND INSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS, a New Jersey membership cor-
poration; Society of American Law Teachers, a New York corporation; Coalition for Equality, a
Massachusetts association; Rutgers Gay and Lesbian Caucus, a New Jersey association; Pam
Nickisher, a New Jersey resident; Leslie Fischer, a Pennsylvania resident; Michael Blauschild, a
New Jersey resident; Erwin Chemerinsky, a California resident; and Sylvia Law, a New York
resident,, 2004 WL 5215238, *5215238+ (Appellate Brief) (3rd Cir. Mar 05, 2004) Reply Brief
for Appellants (NO. 03-4433) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)

3931 Ronald S. JANICKI; Joseph A. Check; Marlened. David Hrubovcak; Peter J. Lafrankie III;
Robert Salzer; Edward Steligo, Appellants, v. ELIZABETH FORWARD SCHOOL DISTRICT,
Appellee., 2002 WL 32819429, *32819429+ (Appellate Brief) (3rd Cir. Nov 13, 2002) Brief for
Appellee Elizabeth Forward School District (NO. 02-2692) HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.)
3932 Thomas E. SCHERER, Intervenor-Appellant, v. THE LAW SCHOOL ADMISSION COUNCIL,
INC., Defendant-Appellee., 2002 WL 32392134, *32392134 (Appellate Brief) (3rd Cir. Jul 10,
2002) Reply Brief of the Appellant as Intervenor (NO. 01-3203, 02-1694)
3933 Catherine PARVENSKY-BARWELL, Appellant, v. COUNTY OF CHESTER; Colin A. Hanna,
Karen L. Martynick, Andrew E. Dinniman, in their official capacity as Commissioners of the
County of Chester; John A. Weer, Appellees., 1999 WL 34844895, *34844895+ (Appellate
Brief) (3rd Cir. Aug 03, 1999) Brief for Appellant (NO. 99-1340)
3934 CHILDREN'S SEASHORE HOUSE, Appellant, v. William WALDMAN, Commissioner of the
New Jersey Department of Human Services; Karen Squarrell, Acting Director, of the New Jersey
Department of Human Services, Division of Medical Assistance., 1999 WL 33617730,
*33617730+ (Appellate Brief) (3rd Cir. Jun 07, 1999) Brief on Behalf of Defendants-Appellees
William Waldman, Commissioner, New Jersey Department of Human Services, and Karen
Squarrell, Acting Director, of the New Jersey Department of Human Services, ... (NO.
99-5024) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
3935 Peddrick M. YOUNG, Sr., Appellee, v. PENNSYLVANIA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES,
Republican Caucus, Appellant., 1998 WL 34085873, *34085873+ (Appellate Brief) (3rd Cir. Sep
11, 1998) Reply Brief of Appellant (NO. 98-7130)
3936 Peddrick M. YOUNG, Sr., Appellee, v. PENNSYL VANIA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES,
Republican Caucus, Appellant., 1998 WL 34085872, *34085872+ (Appellate Brief) (3rd Cir. Jul
20, 1998) Brief of Appellant (NO. 98-7130)
3937 Edwin MALDONADO; Maria Maldonado, individually and as next friends of Ana Maldonado,
Pablo Maldonado, Edwin Maldonado, Rey Maldonado, Yesenia Maldonado, and Jose Maldon-
ado, and on behalf of all others similarly situated; Maria Ortiz; Michael Ortiz, individually and as
next friends of Julie Ortiz, Michael Ortiz, and Angelica Ortiz, and on behalf of all other similarly
situated; Kensington Welfare Rights Union; Philadelphia Welfare Rights Organization, on behalf
of, 1998 WL 34078779, *34078779+ (Appellate Brief) (3rd Cir. Mar 23, 1998) Brief for Appel-
lants (NO. 97-1893) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
3938 Robert W. BRAID; Thomas E. Casmey, Jr.; A. Charles Perkins; Fathers Rights Action Commit-
tee, Appellants, v. CAMDEN COUNTY PROBATION DEPT.; Gene McGrath, Chief Probation
Department; Francis J. Orlando, Hon., Assignment Judge; Burlington County Probation Dept.;
David Young, Chief Probation Department; Howard E. Wells, Hon., Assignment Judge; Donald
Phelan, Clerk, Appellees., 1997 WL 33768380, *33768380+ (Appellate Brief) (3rd Cir. May 12,
1997) Brief on Behalf of Appellees (NO. 96-5671) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
3939 Elizabeth J. Arnold LAKE and Justin Wilson Lake, Husband and Wife, Appellants, v. Frederick
S. ARNOLD, Audrey L. Arnold, Husband and Wife; Daniel M. Friday, M.D.; Tyrone Hospital;
and Ralph W. Crawford, M.D., Appellees., 1996 WL 33649454, *33649454+ (Appellate Brief)
(3rd Cir. 1996) Brief of Appellees Daniel M. Friday, M.D. and Ralph W. Crawford, M.D.
(NO. 96-3412) HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
3940 C.K., on Her Own Behalf and as Guardian Ad Litem for Her Baby S.B. and Her Daughter J.M.;

L.W., on her own behalf and as guardian ad litem for her baby E.W. and her son J.W.; E.P., on
her own behalf and as guardian ad litem for her baby I.P. and her son R.P.; E.M., on her own be-
half and as guardian ad litem for her baby boy B.M. and her daughter C.G.; H.K., on her own be-
half and as guardian ad litem for her babies T.H., D.H. and D.H. and other sons S.H. and J.H.;
E.S. and, 1995 WL 17170796, *17170796+ (Appellate Brief) (3rd Cir. 1995) Brief Amici Curi-
ae on behalf of Appellants C.K., et al, for Women's Legal Defense Fund; Advocates for
Youth; American Association of University Women; Catholics for a Free Choice; Center for
... (NO. 95-5454) HN: 3,4 (S.Ct.)
3941 Mary Anne KRAMER, Appellant, v. THE UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH; The Board of
Trustees of the University of Pittsburgh; John C. Marous, Jr.; Wesley W. Posvar; Donald Hender-
son; Elizabeth U. Baranger; James Adovasio; Leonard Plotnicov; L. Keith Brown; James S.
Boster; Andrew J. Strathern; Jane & John does 1-40, or all others in the Anthropology Depart-
ment and other positions in the University of Pittsburgh who wrongly participated in actions
herein so described; C. Holmes, 1994 WL 16167480, *16167480+ (Appellate Brief) (3rd Cir. Jun
01, 1994) Brief of Appellees (NO. 94-3028) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
3942 Robert SHARPE, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORA-
TION a/k/a Amtrak, Defendant/Appellee., 2007 WL 1231939, *1231939+ (Appellate Brief) (4th
Cir. Apr 16, 2007) Brief of Defendant/Appellee National Railroad Passenger Corporation
(NO. 07-1079) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
3943 Peter BROOKS; David T. Gies; Patricia Clemmer Peters; Robin B. Beatwole; Dry Comal Creek
Vineyards, a Texas Corporation; Hood River Vineyards, an Oregon Sole Proprietorship and
Schneider Liquor Company, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellees/Cross-Appellants, v. Vernon M.
DANIELSEN, Warren E. Barry, and Esther H. Vassar, all in their official capacities as members
of the Virginia Alcoholic Beverage Control Board, Defendant-Appellants/Cross-Appellees, Vir-
ginia Wine, 2005 WL 3742747, *3742747+ (Appellate Brief) (4th Cir. Dec 30, 2005) Brief of
Appellees/Cross-Appellants (NO. 05-1540, 05-1541, 05-1791) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
3944 Peter BROOKS; David T. Gies; Patricia Clemmer Peters; Robin B. Heatwole; Dry Comal Creek
Vineyards, a Texas Corporation; Hood River Vineyards, an Oregon Sole Proprietorship and
Schneider Liquor Company, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellees/Cross-Appellants, v. Vernon M.
DANIELSEN, Warren E. Barry, and Esther H. Vassar, all in their official capacities as members
of the Virginia Alcoholic Beverage Control Board, Defendant-Appellants/Cross-Appellees, Vir-
ginia Wine, 2005 WL 3957413, *3957413+ (Appellate Brief) (4th Cir. Dec 30, 2005) Brief of
Appellees/Cross-Appellants (NO. 05-1540, 05-1541, 05-1791)
3945 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Commonwealth of VIRGINIA, et al.,
Defendants-Appellees., 2005 WL 386882, *386882+ (Appellate Brief) (4th Cir. 2005) Brief for
the United States as Appellant (NO. 91-1690) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
3946 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Garland Bennett GARRETT, Jr., De-
fendant-Appellant., 2003 WL 25453309, *25453309+ (Appellate Brief) (4th Cir. Dec 19, 2003)
Brief of Appellant (NO. 03-4569) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
3947 Clint BOLICK; Robin B. Heatwole; Dry Comal Creek Vineyards, a Texas Corporation;Hood
River Vineyards, an Oregon Sole Proprietorship; Miura Vineyards, a California Limited Liability
Company, Plaintiffs - Appellees, v. Clarence W. ROBERTS, Chairman, Virginia Department of
Alcoholic Beverage Control; Sandra Canada, Commissioner, Virginia Department of Alcoholic

Beverage Control; Clater C. Mottinger, Commissioner, Virginia Department of Alcoholic Bever-

age Control,, 2002 WL 32729984, *32729984+ (Appellate Brief) (4th Cir. Sep 30, 2002) Reply
Brief of Appellants (NO. 02-1367, 02-1368)
3948 Clint BOLICK; Robin B. Heatwole; Dry Comal Creek Vineyards, a Texas Corporation; Hood
River Vineyards, an Oregon Sole Proprietorship; Miura Vineyards, a California Limited Liability
Company, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Clarence W. ROBERTS, Chairman, Virginia Department of
Alcoholic Beverage Control; Sandra Canada, Commissioner, Virginia Department of Alcoholic
Beverage Control; Clater C. Mottinger, Commissioner, Virginia Department of, 2002 WL
32727756, *32727756 (Appellate Brief) (4th Cir. Sep 20, 2002) Brief of Appellees (NO.
02-1367, 02-1368)
3949 Amy SHEPARD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Katrina IRVING, et al., Defendants-Appellees., 2002
WL 32725825, *32725825+ (Appellate Brief) (4th Cir. Aug 16, 2002) Brief of Appellant (NO.
02-1712) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
3950 Richard E. SPENCER, Appellant, v. Lorraine SPENCER, et al, Appellees., 1997 WL 33807778,
*33807778+ (Appellate Brief) (4th Cir. Dec 16, 1997) Brief for Appellant (NO. 77-2016)
HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
3951 James Edward COZART, D/B/A Cozart Tobacco Warehouse, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Bob
BERGLAND, Secretary of Agriculture, et al., Defendants-Appellees., 1997 WL 33804445,
*33804445+ (Appellate Brief) (4th Cir. May 1997) Brief for the Appellees, Bob Bergland Sec-
retary of Agriculture, et al. (NO. 76-2221) HN: 2,5 (S.Ct.)
3952 Ltjg Richard Dirk SELLAND, USN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. William J. PERRY, Secretary of De-
fense, and John H. Dalton, Secretary of the Navy, Defendants-Appellees., 1996 WL 33453477,
*33453477+ (Appellate Brief) (4th Cir. Mar 25, 1996) Reply Brief of Appellant (NO. 95-2982)
HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
3953 Ltjg Richard Dirk SELLAND, USN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. William J. PERRY, Secretary of De-
fense, and John H. Dalton, Secretary of the Navy, Defendants-Appellees., 1996 WL 33453476,
*33453476+ (Appellate Brief) (4th Cir. Feb 07, 1996) Brief of Appellant (NO. 95-2982)
3954 Lt. Paul G. THOMASSON, USN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The Honorable William J. PERRY, Sec-
retary of Defense; and the Honorable John H. Dalton, Secretary of the Navy, Defendants-Ap-
pellees., 1995 WL 17845535, *17845535+ (Appellate Brief) (4th Cir. Sep 07, 1995) Amicus
Curiae Brief of Servicemembers Legal Defense Network in Support of Plaintiff-Appellant
(NO. 95-2185) " HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
.... Lt. Paul G. THOMASSON, Usn, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The Honorable William J. PERRY, Sec-
retary of Defense; and the Honorable John H. Dalton, Secretary of the Navy, Defendants-Ap-
pellees. (Appellate Brief) (4th Cir. Sep 01, 1995) Amicus Curiae Brief of Servicemembers
Legal Defense Network in Support of Plaintiff-Appellant (NO. 95-2185) (Text not avail-
able on WESTLAW)
.... Lt. Paul G. THOMASSON, Usn, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The Honorable William J. PERRY, Sec-
retary of Defense, and the Honorable John H. Dalton Secretary of the Navy, Defendants-Ap-
pellees. (Appellate Brief) (4th Cir. Aug 25, 1995) Reply Brief for Appellant (NO. 95-2185)
(Text not available on WESTLAW)
3957 Lt. Paul G. THOMASSON, USN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The Honorable William J. PERRY, Sec-
retary of Defense, and the Honorable John H. Dalton, Secretary of the Navy, Defendants-Ap-

pellees., 1995 WL 17845538, *17845538+ (Appellate Brief) (4th Cir. Aug 25, 1995) Reply Brief
for Appellant (NO. 95-2185) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
3958 Lieutenant Paul G. THOMASSON, USN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The Honorable William J.
PERRY, Secretary of Defense, and the Honorable John H. Dalton Secretary of the Navy, Defend-
ants-Appellees., 1995 WL 17845534, *17845534 (Appellate Brief) (4th Cir. Aug 22, 1995)
Amici Curiae brief of Iaomai Inc. and Iota Legal Defense Fund in Support of Appellee
United States (NO. 95-2185) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
3959 LT. Paul G. THOMASSON, USN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The Honorable William J. PERRY,
Secretary of Defense, and The Honorable John H. Dalton, Secretary of the Navy, Defendants-Ap-
pellees., 1995 WL 17055724, *17055724+ (Appellate Brief) (4th Cir. Jul 26, 1995) Brief for Ap-
pellant (NO. 95-2185) " HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
3960 Dennis Wayne COCHRAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Intervenor,
v. E.C. MORRIS, Deputy Director, Virginia Department of Corrections, David K. Smith,
Warden, Buckingham Correctional Center, Bobby Soles, Assistant Warden, Buckingham Correc-
tional Center, and C.N. Lewis, Chief of Security, Powhatan Correctional Center, Defendants-Ap-
pellees., 1995 WL 17017979, *17017979 (Appellate Brief) (4th Cir. May 26, 1995) Brief for In-
tervenor United States of America (NO. 94-6014) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
3961 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS, Appellee, v. Delaney Deron HOLMES, Appellant.,
1995 WL 17846694, *17846694+ (Appellate Brief) (4th Cir. Feb 16, 1995) Brief for Appellant
(NO. 94-5546) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
3962 Lt. Paul G. THOMASSON, USN, Appellant, v. The Honorable William J. PERRY and the Hon-
orable John H. Dalton, Appellees., 1995 WL 17845533, *17845533+ (Appellate Brief) (4th Cir.
1995) Amici Curiae Brief of the Union of American Hebrew Congregations, the American
Jewish Congress, the National Organization for Women, the Now Legal Defense and Educa-
tion Fund, the Center for Women ... (NO. 95-2185) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
3963 Shannon Richey FAULKNER, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated,
Plaintiff-Appellee, the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Intervenor, v. James E.
JONES, Jr., et al., Defendants-Appellants, the State of South Carolina, et al., Additional Defend-
ants-Appellants., 1994 WL 16048428, *16048428+ (Appellate Brief) (4th Cir. Nov 09, 1994)
Brief of Amici Curiae National Women's Law Center, American Association of University
Women, California Women's Law Center, Center for Advancement of Public Policy, Center
for Women Policy Studies, ... (NO. 94-1978) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
3964 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. Latoscha Ronice FISHER and Frederick Devon
Fleming, Appellants., 1994 WL 16046957, *16046957+ (Appellate Brief) (4th Cir. Nov 08,
1994) Brief of Appellants (NO. 94-5563, L)
3965 Shannon Richey FAULKNER, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated,
Plaintiff-Appellee, the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Intervenor, v. James E.
JONES, Jr., et al. Defendants-Appellants., 1994 WL 16048430, *16048430+ (Appellate Brief)
(4th Cir. Oct 18, 1994) Brief of Appellee Shannon Richey Faulkner (NO. 94-1978) HN:
5 (S.Ct.)
3966 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Cecelia Denise SHEPAKD, Defendant-
Appellant., 1994 WL 16046648, *16046648+ (Appellate Brief) (4th Cir. Jun 24, 1994) Brief of
Appellant (NO. 94-5307)

3967 MARYLAND TROOPERS ASSOCIATION, Appellant, v. THE COALITION OF BLACK

MARYLAND STATE TROOPERS, INC., et al., Appellees., 1992 WL 12124733, *12124733+
(Appellate Brief) (4th Cir. Nov 09, 1992) Brief of Appellant (NO. 92-2171) " HN: 1,3
(S.Ct.)
3968 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA,
et al., Defendants-Appellees., 1992 WL 12132425, *12132425+ (Appellate Brief) (4th Cir. Jan
03, 1992) Brief of Appellees (NO. 91-1690) HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.)
3969 Barbara AUSTIN, Appellant, v. Sandra BERRYMAN Patrice Johnson Joseph Hayes Ralph
Cantrell, Appellees., 1991 WL 11681504, *11681504+ (Appellate Brief) (4th Cir. Sep 26, 1991)
Brief of the Appellant (NO. 91-1750) " HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
3970 Frank E. WETZEL, Appellee, v. Ralph EDWARDS, Individually and in His Official Capacity as
Director of the North Carolina Division of Prisons; Walter Kautzky, Individually and in His Offi-
cial Capacity as Deputy Director of the North Carolina Division of Prisons; Amos E. Reed, Indi-
vidually and in His Official Capacity as Secretary lf the North Carolina Department of Correc-
tions; and their Agents, Subordinates, and Employees, Appellants., 1980 WL 357537, *357537+
(Appellate Brief) (4th Cir. Feb 29, 1980) Brief of Appellee Frank E. Wetzel (NO. 79-6801)
HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
3971 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. Doyle WILLIAMS, Appellant., 1979 WL
212721, *212721+ (Appellate Brief) (4th Cir. Feb 14, 1979) Brief of Appellant (NO. 79-6009)
HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
3972 Vicki Greene GOLDEN, Appellant, v. STATE BOARD OF LAW EXAMINERS, et al., Ap-
pellees., 1978 WL 221369, *221369+ (Appellate Brief) (4th Cir. Oct 03, 1978) Brief of Ap-
3973 Robert Thomas HALL, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Arthur MCKENZIE, Warden West Virginia
Maximum Security Prison, Respondent-Appellee., 1977 WL 203702, *203702+ (Appellate Brief)
(4th Cir. Nov 01, 1977) Brief of Appellee (NO. 77-2050)
3974 Robert Thomas HALL, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Arthur MCKENZIE, Warden West Virginia
Maximum Security Prison, Respondent - Appellee., 1977 WL 203703, *203703+ (Appellate
Brief) (4th Cir. Oct 03, 1977) Brief of Appellant (77-2050) (NO. 77-2050) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
3975 Frances B. DAVIS, Appellant, v. SOUTHEASTERN COMMUNITY COLLEGE, Appellee.,
1977 WL 203200, *203200+ (Appellate Brief) (4th Cir. Jun 21, 1977) Appellant's Opening
Brief (NO. 77-1237) HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
3976 Karen CONDIT and Mary E. Oravec, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. UNITED AIR LINES, INC., De-
fendant-Appellee., 1977 WL 202905, *202905+ (Appellate Brief) (4th Cir. Mar 07, 1977) Brief
of Appellee (NO. 76-2296) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
3977 Ray MARSHALL Successor to W. J. Usery¨, Secretary of Labor United States Department of
Labor, Appellee, v. CHARLESTON COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT of Charleston County,
South Carolina, et al., Appellants., 1977 WL 202958, *202958+ (Appellate Brief) (4th Cir. Feb
14, 1977) Brief for the Secretary of Labor as Appellee (NO. 76-2340) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
3978 Richard E. SPENCER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Lorraine SPENCER, et al., Defendants-Appellees.,
1977 WL 203828, *203828+ (Appellate Brief) (4th Cir. 1977) Brief for Appellees (NO.
77-2016) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)

3979 Dr. James Albert CRAMER, Appellee, v. VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY, et

al., Appellants., 1976 WL 192834, *192834+ (Appellate Brief) (4th Cir. Nov 12, 1976) Brief on
Behalf of the Appellee (NO. 76-1937) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
3980 George CLIPPER, Appellant, v. NATIONAL PERMANENT SAVINGS and Loan Association, a
Corporation, Takoma Park, Maryland, a Municipal Corporation and Grant Starkey, Appellees.,
1976 WL 191853, *191853+ (Appellate Brief) (4th Cir. Sep 02, 1976) Brief of Appellants (NO.
76-1629) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
3981 Mary Carroll SMITH, Appellant, v. UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL
HILL, et al., Appellees., 1976 WL 192205, *192205+ (Appellate Brief) (4th Cir. Aug 1976)
Brief for Appellant (NO. 76-1852, C-76-362-D) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
3982 Lieutenant Alice C. COOK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Rear Admiral Willard P. ARENTZEN; James
Schlesinger, Secretary of Defense; J. William Middendorf II, Secretary of the Navy; United
States Navy; and United States of America, Defendants -Appellees., 1976 WL 191984, *191984+
(Appellate Brief) (4th Cir. Jun 28, 1976) Brief for Appellees (NO. 76-1359) HN: 1,2,4
(S.Ct.)
3983 Edwin GADBERRY, III, et al., Appellants, v. James R. SCHLESINGER, et al., Appellees., 1976
WL 192657, *192657 (Appellate Brief) (4th Cir. May 15, 1976) Brief for Appellants (NO.
76-2106) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
3984 Lorn L. HINISH, Appellant, v. State of Maryland et. al., Appellee., 1976 WL 192655, *192655+
(Appellate Brief) (4th Cir. 1976) Brief for Appellant (NO. 76-2100) HN: 2,4,5 (S.Ct.)
3985 Jane DOE, on behalf of Jill Doe, on behalf of Joan Doe, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. VERMILION
PARISH SCHOOL BOARD; Randy Schexnayder, Individually and in his official capacity as Su-
perintendent of the Vermilion Parish School Board; Bill Searle, Individually and in his official
capacity as member of the Vermilion Parish School Board; Angela Faulk, Individually and in her
official capacity as member of the Vermilion Parish School Board; Dexter Callahan, Individually
and, 2010 WL 3050270, *3050270+ (Appellate Brief) (5th Cir. Jun 30, 2010) Reply Brief for
Plaintiffs-Appellants (NO. 10-30378) " HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
3986 Jane DOE, as next friend to her minor Daughters, Joan Doe and Jill Doe, Plaintiffs, Appellants,
v. VERMILION PARISH SCHOOL BOARD, Randy Schexnayder, Superintendent, Bill Searle,
District A, Angela Faulk, District B, Dexter Callahan, District C, Ricky Lebouef, District D, An-
thony Fontana, District E, Charles Campbell, District F, Chris Ma Yard, District G, Ricky Brous-
sard, District H, and David Dupuis, Principal, Rene a Rost Middle School, Defendants,, 2010 WL
3050259, *3050259 (Appellate Brief) (5th Cir. Jun 17, 2010) Appellees' Opposition to
Plaintiffs' Appeal Brief (NO. 10-30378) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
3987 Jane DOE, et al., Appellant, v. VERMILION PARISH SCHOOL BOARD, et al., Appellees.,
2010 WL 3050258, *3050258+ (Appellate Brief) (5th Cir. Jun 05, 2010) Brief of Amici Curiae
National Women's Law Center et al., in Support of Plaintiffs-Appellants' Brief Urging Re-
versal (NO. 10-30378) " HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
3988 Jane DOE, as next friend to her minor Daughters, Joan Doe and Jill Doe, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v.
VERMILION PARISH SCHOOL BOARD, et al., Defendants-Appellees., 2010 WL 3050257,
*3050257+ (Appellate Brief) (5th Cir. Jun 04, 2010) Brief for the United States as Amicus
Curiae Supporting Appellants (NO. 10-30378) " HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
3989 MINORITY FARMERS ASSOC. individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated,

Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI, Haley Reese Barbour, Governor, Attorney Gen-

eral Jim Hood, Mississippi State Tax Commission, Commissioner Ed Morgan, Pike County As-
sessor Joseph B. Young, Lance Honea, Jim Duckworth and Terry Boyd, Defendants-Appellees.,
2010 WL 2003897, *2003897 (Appellate Brief) (5th Cir. Feb 11, 2010) Brief of Appellee (NO.
09-60831)
3990 Teodulo CANTU-DELGADILLO, Petitioner, v. Michael MUKASEY, United States Attorney
General, Respondent., 2008 WL 7597117, *7597117+ (Appellate Brief) (5th Cir. Aug 27, 2008)
Reply Brief for Petitioner (NO. 08-60122) HN: 2,5 (S.Ct.)
3991 Alexey KORNEENKOV and Olesya Korneenkov, Petitioners, v. Michael B. MUKASEY, U.S.
Attorney General, Respondent., 2008 WL 7404474, *7404474+ (Appellate Brief) (5th Cir. Feb
20, 2008) Amicus Curiae Brief in Support of Petitioners and Urging Reversal, on Behalf of
the Arc of the United States, the National Disability Rights Network, Advocacy, Inc., the
Advocacy Center, the ... (NO. 07-60712) " HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
3992 Cheryl A. SOMMER, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. LOUISIANA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTA-
TION AND DEVELOPMENT, Defendant-Appellant., 2000 WL 34416502, *34416502+
(Appellate Brief) (5th Cir. Dec 01, 2000) Original Brief of Defendant-Appellant, Louisiana
Department of Transportation and Development (NO. 00-31135) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
3993 Alexis COLON, Estate of Decedent by Personal Representative Peaches Martinez, Luis Colon;
Peaches Martinez and Alexander Martinez, Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. UNITED STATES OF
AMERICA, Waddell, Lt. Colonel, Tyronne S. Leonard, Staff Sergeant, McDonald, Staff Sergeant
Dax Aries, Sergeant, Defendants/Appellees., 1997 WL 33618411, *33618411+ (Appellate Brief)
(5th Cir. Jan 16, 1997) Appellants' Combined Reply Brief (NO. 96-50233) HN: 2,4
(S.Ct.)
3994 Alexis COLON, Estate of Decedent by Personal Representative Peaches Martinez; Peaches Mar-
tinez; Alexander Martinez; Luis Colon, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. UNITED STATES OF AMER-
ICA; Waddell, Lt. Colonel; Tyronne S. Leonard, Staff Sergeant; McDonald, Sergeant, Defend-
ants-Appellees., 1996 WL 33474626, *33474626+ (Appellate Brief) (5th Cir. Dec 24, 1996)
Brief for Appellees the United States of America, Lt. Colonel Waddell, and Staff Sergeant
Leonard (NO. 96-50233) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
3995 Alexis COLON, Estate of Decedent by Personal Representative Peaches Martinez, Luis Colon;
Peaches Martinez and Alexander Martinez, Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. UNITED STATES OF
AMERICA, Waddell, Lt. Colonel, Tyronne S. Leonard, Staff Sergeant, McDonald, Staff Sergeant
Dax Aries, Sergeant, Defendants/Appellees., 1996 WL 33474627, *33474627+ (Appellate Brief)
(5th Cir. Oct 21, 1996) Appellants' Opening Brief (NO. 96-50233) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
3996 Diana E. GARCIA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Marvin T. RUNYON, Jr., Postmaster General, United
States Postal Service, Defendant-Appellee., 1996 WL 33472438, *33472438+ (Appellate Brief)
(5th Cir. Jun 20, 1996) Amicus Brief of Equal Rights Advocates and the Employment Law
Center A Project of the Legal Aid Society of San Francisco in Support of Plaintiff-Appel-
lant (NO. 96-50024) " HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
3997 Diane Lynn HOPPER, Wanda Diane Nash Smith, and Billa Joan Franklin, on behalf of them-
selves and on behalf of all other women similarly situated, Appellants, v. DALLAS COUNTY,
Texas; the Sheriff of Dallas County, Texas; the Commissioners Court of Dallas County, Texas;
Dallas County Community Supervision and Corrections Department; the Texas Department of

Criminal Justice; the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division; the Texas De-
partment, 1996 WL 33473267, *33473267+ (Appellate Brief) (5th Cir. Mar 08, 1996) Appel-
lants' Brief (NO. 95-10104) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
3998 Daniel CURRAN, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. USA, et al., Defendants, Appellees., 1995 WL
17116553, *17116553+ (Appellate Brief) (5th Cir. Sep 05, 1995) Appellant's Brief (NO.
95-10579) HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.)
3999 Joyce HUNT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TEXAS ARMY NATIONAL GUARD, et al., Defendants-
Appellees., 1995 WL 17051305, *17051305+ (Appellate Brief) (5th Cir. 1995) Brief of Ap-
pellees (NO. 95-50053) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
4000 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Andres Marrero GONZALES, Defend-
ant-Appellant., 1994 WL 16066825, *16066825+ (Appellate Brief) (5th Cir. Dec 21, 1994) Brief
of Appellant (NO. 94-40785) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
4001 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Solah Kassem ABOU-KASSEM, De-
fendant-Appellant., 1994 WL 16067164, *16067164+ (Appellate Brief) (5th Cir. 1994) Brief for
the United States of America (NO. 94-11046) HN: 1,2 (S.Ct.)
4002 CITY OF NEW ORLEANS, Plaintiff-Appellant, Richard P. Ieyoub, Attorney General, State of
Louisiana, Intervenor-Plaintiff-Appellant, v. W. R. GRACE & CO-CONN, Defendant-Appellee.,
1992 WL 12129823, *12129823+ (Appellate Brief) (5th Cir. Jul 22, 1992) Brief for Intervenor-
Plaintiff-Appellant (NO. 92-3522) HN: 1,2 (S.Ct.)
4003 Steve CARAMAZZA, Appellant, v. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee., 1990
WL 10534209, *10534209 (Appellate Brief) (5th Cir. Apr 10, 1990) Brief of Appellant (NO.
89-5670)
4004 Matthew DUBAY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Lauren WELLS, an individual, and Saginaw County
Prosecuting Attorney's Office, by and Through, Michael D. Thomas, Prosecutor, prosecutor, De-
fendants, Michael A. Cox, Attorney General of the State of Michigan, Intervening-Defendant,,
2007 WL 2735358, *2735358+ (Appellate Brief) (6th Cir. May 14, 2007) Brief (NO. 06-2107,
106-CV-11016) " HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
4005 Sara LOPEZ, et al., Appellant, v. BUTLER COUNTY JUVENILE REHABILITATION, et al.,
Appellee., 2006 WL 4055649, *4055649+ (Appellate Brief) (6th Cir. Sep 26, 2006) Final Reply
4006 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff- Appellee, v. Juan Jose GAYTAN, Defendant - Ap-
pellant., 2006 WL 5536031, *5536031+ (Appellate Brief) (6th Cir. Mar 08, 2006) Final Brief of
the Appellant Oral Argument Requested (NO. 05-1119) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
4007 Effie STEWART, et al., Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. J. Kenneth BLACKWELL, et al., Defendants/Ap-
pellees., 2005 WL 5027868, *5027868+ (Appellate Brief) (6th Cir. May 23, 2005) Brief of Ap-
pellants (oral argument requested) (NO. 05-3044) " HN: 3 (S.Ct.)
4008 COMMUNITIES FOR EQUITY, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. MICHIGAN HIGH SCHOOL
ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION, Defendant-Appellant., 2003 WL 25650791, *25650791+
(Appellate Brief) (6th Cir. Oct 03, 2003) Appellees' Final Brief (NO. 02-1127) HN: 5
(S.Ct.)
4009 Brewster MCCAULEY, as Special Administrator of the Estate of Mersaides McCauley, Plaintiff-
Appellant, v. CITY OF CHICAGO, et. al., Defendants-Appellees., 2010 WL 1424160,

*1424160+ (Appellate Brief) (7th Cir. Mar 01, 2010) Brief and Required Short Appendix of
Plaintiff-Appellant Brewster McCauley, as Special Administrator of the Estate of Mersaides
McCauley (NO. 09-3561) " HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
4010 Donna L. LEWIS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF CHICAGO POLICE DEPARTMENT, City of
Chicago, and Terrence Williams, Defendants-Appellees., 2006 WL 2617982, *2617982+
(Appellate Brief) (7th Cir. Aug 14, 2006) Brief and Required Short Appendix of Plaintiff-
4011 Tana CUMMINS, Appellant, v. State of Illinois, Appellee., 2006 WL 951818, *951818+
(Appellate Brief) (7th Cir. Mar 31, 2006) Brief of the National Women's Law Center and Pro-
fessors Samuel R. Bagenstos, Erwin Chemerinsky, Samuel Estreicher, Pamela S. Karlan,
Cornelia T.L. Pillard, Robert C. Post, Reva Siegel, and David A. ... (NO. 05-3877) HN:
4 (S.Ct.)
4012 CHRISTIAN LEGAL SOCIETY CHAPTER AT SOUTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY
SCHOOL OF LAW, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. James E. WALKER, in his official capacity as Pres-
ident of Southern Illinois University; Peter C. Alexander, in his official capacity as Dean of
Southern Illinois University School of Law; Jessica J. Davis, in her official capacity as Director
of Law Student Development; Walter V. Wendler, in his official capacity as Chancellor of South-
ern Illinois, 2005 WL 3738596, *3738596+ (Appellate Brief) (7th Cir. Sep 14, 2005) Brief of
Amici Curiae Every Nation Campus Ministries and Family Research Council in Support of
Plaintiff-Appellant and Reversal of The District Court (NO. 05-3239) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
4013 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Eddie Louis DENTON, Jr., Defendant-
Appellant., 2009 WL 1006254, *1006254 (Appellate Brief) (8th Cir. Mar 30, 2009) Appellant's
Pro Se Supplemental Brief (NO. 09-1095)
4014 Willie GAMMON, Appellant, v. Dan FLOWERS, Arkansas Highway Police, et al, Appellees.,
2006 WL 2300681, *2300681+ (Appellate Brief) (8th Cir. Jul 11, 2006) Appellants Corrected
Brief (NO. 06-1829)
4015 MARYBETH DORNHEIM INDIVIDUALLY and on behalf of her infant son Tanner Tibbetts,
Michael Tibbetts, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Michael SHOLES individually and as police officer,
John Packett as Chief of the City of Grand Forks Police Department, The City of Grand Forks
Police Department, Kate Kenna individually and as Administrator, Patricia Sele individually and
as social worker, Rnady Slavens individually and as social worker, Keith Burger as Director
Grand Forks, 2004 WL 5355444, *5355444+ (Appellate Brief) (8th Cir. 2004) (NO. 04-4032) "
HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
4016 Ken LARSEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant-Appellee.,
2001 WL 34105291, *34105291+ (Appellate Brief) (8th Cir. Apr 10, 2001)
Plaintiff's-Appellant's Brief and Appendix (NO. 01-1301) HN: 1,2 (S.Ct.)
2001 WL 34105353, *34105353+ (Appellate Brief) (8th Cir. Apr 10, 2001)
Plaintiff's-Appellant's Brief and Appendix (NO. 01-1301) HN: 1,2 (S.Ct.)
4018 THE COALITION FOR THE FAIR AND EQUITABLE REGULATION OF DOCKS ON THE
LAKE OF THE OZARKS v. THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION and
Union Electric Company, d/b/a AmerenUE., 2001 WL 34091528, *34091528+ (Appellate Brief)
(8th Cir. 2001) Petitioner's/Appellant's Brief (NO. 01-1071) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)


2001 WL 34105292, *34105292+ (Appellate Brief) (8th Cir. 2001) Brief of Appellee United
States of America (NO. 01-1301) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
2001 WL 34105354, *34105354+ (Appellate Brief) (8th Cir. 2001) Brief of Appellee United
States of America (NO. 01-1301) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
4021 Scott BOOTH, Thomas D. Loyd, Frank Solchaga, David Witte, Scott Wyman, Charles Perrin,
Knute Gladen, Michael Seeber, Terry Nyblom, Stephen Blake, Richard Doyle, William J. Hage-
man, Charles W. Hurd, Kyle Knutson, Jim Lovestar, Yves Nadeau, and Pradeep Ramanathan,
Appellants, v. Sheryl Ramstad HVASS, Commissioner of Corrections; Michael O'Keefe, Com-
missioner of Human Services; Charles R. Weaver Jr., Commissioner of Public Safety Christine
Jax,, 2001 WL 34156058, *34156058+ (Appellate Brief) (8th Cir. 2001) Appellants' Brief and
Addendum (NO. 01-3210) HN: 2,4 (S.Ct.)
Knute Gladen, Michael Seeber, Terry Nyblom, Stephen Blake, Richard Doyle, William J. Hage-
man, Charles W. Hurd, Kyle Knutson, Jim Lovestar, Yves Nadeau, and Pradeep Ramanathan,
Appellants, v. Sheryl Ramstad HVASS, Commissioner of Corrections; Michael O'Keefe, Com-
missioner of Human Services; Charles R. Weaver Jr., Commissioner of Public Safety Christine
Jax,, 2001 WL 34156061, *34156061+ (Appellate Brief) (8th Cir. 2001) Appellants' Reply to
Amici Curiae (NO. 01-3210) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
4023 Charlotte KLINGLER, Charles Wehner, and Sheila Brashear on behalf of themselves and all oth-
ers similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Quentin WILSON, Director, Department of Rev-
enue, State of Missouri, Defendant-Appellee., 2000 WL 34004465, *34004465+ (Appellate
Brief) (8th Cir. 2000) Supplemental Brief of Appellants (NO. 00-1597)
.... Kristin PERRY, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Arnold SCHWARZENEGGER, et al., Defendants,
Dennis Hollingsworth, et al., Defendant-Intervenors-Appellants. (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Sep
17, 2010) Defendant-Intervenors-Appellants' Opening Brief (NO. 10-16696) (Text not
available on WESTLAW)
4025 Kristin PERRY, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Arnold SCHWARZENEGGER, et al., Defend-
ants., 2010 WL 3299979, *3299979+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Aug 12, 2010) Emergency Mo-
tion under Circuit Rule 27-3 (NO. 10-16696) "
4026 Mark BARTEAUX, Scott Schmeideke and Bass Lane, LLC, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. RAVALLI
COUNTY, Defendant-Appellee., 2008 WL 5187006, *5187006+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Oct
27, 2008) Brief for the Plaintiffs-Appellants, Mark Barteaux, Scott Schmeideke and Bass
Lane, LLC (NO. 08-35517) " HN: 3 (S.Ct.)
4027 Gabriela VERNOFF, on her own behalf and on behalf of her minor child Brandalynn Vernoff,
Plaintiff/Appellant, v. Michael J. ASTRUE, Commissioner, of Social Security, in his Office Ca-
pacity, and his Employees, Agents and Successor in office, Defendants/Appellees., 2008 WL
4298067, *4298067+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Aug 08, 2008) Opening Brief of Plaintiff/Ap-
pellant Gabriela Vernoff, on her own and on behalf of her minor child Brandalynn Vernoff
(NO. 08-55049) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
4028 Patrick DRUM, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Harold CLARKE, Respondent-Appellee., 2007 WL
2734672, *2734672+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Jul 31, 2007) Brief of Respondent-Appellee

(NO. 07-35379) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)

4029 Shaun Xin XU, Doctor, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MCLAUGHLIN RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOR
BIOMEDICAL SCIENCES, INC., and Dr. George Carlson, individually and in his capacity as
director and senior scientist for the McLaughlin Research Institute for Biomedical Sciences, Inc.,
Defendants -Appellees., 2007 WL 923298, *923298+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. 2007) Appel-
lant's Reply Brief (NO. 06-35329, CV-03-134-GF-CSO) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
4030 Linda K. HADLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HAWAII GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES ASSOCI-
ATION (HGEA), AFSCME, Local 152, AFL-CIO; and State of Hawaii, Department of Human
Services, Defendants-Appellees., 2006 WL 3623244, *3623244+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Oct
16, 2006) Opening Brief of Appellant (NO. 06-15642) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
4031 UNITED STATED OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jason Francisco PORTER, a.k.a. Jason
F. Porter, Defendant-Appellant., 2006 WL 3368630, *3368630+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Oct
10, 2006) Opening Brief of Appellant (NO. 06-35427) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
4032 Mark Steven PRICE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Terry GODDARD, Defendant-Appellee., 2006 WL
2951931, *2951931+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Aug 18, 2006) Replacement Opening Brief of
Plaintiff-Appellant Mark Steven Price (NO. 04-15807) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
4033 LaTrice DIXON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF LONG BEACH, et. al., Defendants-Ap-
pellees., 2006 WL 3097003, *3097003+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. May 30, 2006) Appellant's
Reply Brief (NO. 05-56506) " HN: 1,3,4 (S.Ct.)
4034 Arthur Bruno SMELT and Christopher David Hammer, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. COUNTY OF
ORANGE, California, et al., Defendants-Appellees., 2005 WL 4121256, *4121256+ (Appellate
Brief) (9th Cir. Oct 12, 2005) Appellee's Brief (NO. 05-56040) " HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
4035 Tyler Chase HARPER, A Minor, By and Through His Parents, Ron and Cheryl Harper, Appel-
lant-Plaintiff, v. POWAY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, et. al., Appellees-Defendants., 2005
WL 1789914, *1789914+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Mar 22, 2005) Appellant's Reply Brief
(NO. 04-57037) "
4036 Russell MEANS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Navajo NATION, a federally recognized Indian tribe;
Honorable Ray Gilmore, Judge of the Judicial District of Chinle, Navajo Nation (Arizona), Re-
spondent-Appellee, United States of America, Respondent-Intervenor-Appellee., 2004 WL
4783004, *4783004+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Sep 02, 2004) Answering Brief of the United
States (NO. 01-17489) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
4037 Thomas Lee MORRIS, by and through Elizabeth S. Morris and Roland J. Morris Sr., Plaintiff-
Appellants, v. Judge TANNER, Judge of the Confederated Salish and Kootenai Indian Tribal
Court for the Flathead Reservation, Defendant-Appellee. United States of America, Defendant-
Intervenor-Appellee., 2004 WL 1948948, *1948948+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Jul 30, 2004)
Answering Brief of the United States (NO. 03-35922) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
4038 Stephen SANCHEZ, et al., Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. Grantland JOHNSON, et al., Defendants -
Appellees., 2004 WL 1470406, *1470406 (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. May 24, 2004) Appellants'
Opening Brief (NO. 04-15228)
4039 Stephen SANCHEZ, et al., Plaintiffs -Appellants, v. Grantland JOHNSON, et al., Defendants -
Appellees., 2004 WL 1621383, *1621383 (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. May 24, 2004) Appellants'
Opening Brief (NO. 04-15228)

4040 Ronald PAYNE, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Arnaldo Claudio,
Defendant(s) and Respondent(s)., 2003 WL 22715857, *22715857+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir.
Oct 06, 2003) Appellant's Opening Brief (NO. 03-16499) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
4041 Darlene JESPERSEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HARRAH'S OPERATING COMPANY, INC., De-
fendant-Appellee., 2003 WL 25859577, *25859577+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Jun 25, 2003)
Appellant's Corrected Opening Brief (NO. 03-15045) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
4042 TUCSON WOMAN'S CLINIC; Damon Raphael, M.D.; Old Pueblo Family Planning; Robert H.
Tamis, M.D. P.C.; Simat Corp., dba Abortion Services of Phoenix; and Robert H. Tamis, M.D.,
on behalf of themselves and their patients seeking abortions, Plaintiffs-Appel-
lants/Cross-Appellees, v. Catherine EDEN, in her capacity as the Director of Arizona Department
of Health Services; Janet Napolitano, in her capacity as Attorney General of the State of, 2003
WL 22670260, *22670260+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Feb 20, 2003) Plaintiffs-Appel-
lants/Cross-Appellees' Opening Brief (NO. 02-17375, 02-17381, AND02-17382) HN: 4
(S.Ct.)
4043 FALSTONE, INC., Appellant, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Appellee.,
2002 WL 32156797, *32156797+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Sep 13, 2002) Brief for Appellant
(NO. 02-71785) HN: 2,5 (S.Ct.)
4044 EARL OLD PERSON, Carol Juneau, Joe MacDonald, and Jeannine Padilla, Plaintiffs-Appel-
lants, v. Bob BROWN, Secretary of State for the State of Montana; and Judy Martz, Governor for
the State of Montana, Defendants-Appellees., 2002 WL 32100148, *32100148+ (Appellate Brief)
(9th Cir. Mar 25, 2002) Brief of Appellants (NO. 02-35171) " HN: 3 (S.Ct.)
4045 Jill LANSDALE, Appellant, v. HI-HEALTH SUPERMART CORPORATION, an Arizona Cor-
poration, Appellee., 2001 WL 35963359, *35963359+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Oct 30, 2001)
Appellant's Opening Brief (NO. 01-16017, 97-2555PHXRGS) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
4046 William V. WENGER, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. Paul D. MONROE, Jr., in his official capacity
as Adjutant General of the California National Guard; California National Guard, Defendants and
Appellees., 2001 WL 34094715, *34094715+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Apr 17, 2001) Appel-
lant's Reply Brief (NO. 00-56696) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
4047 William V. WENGER, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. Paul D. MONROE, Jr., in his official capacity
as Adjutant General of the California National Guard; California National Guard, Defendants and
Appellees., 2001 WL 34094714, *34094714+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Mar 09, 2001) Appel-
lant's Opening Brief (NO. 00-56696) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
4048 Ronald G. WILKINS, Appellant and Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; and the
Honorable Richard Danzig, Secretary of the Navy; and Vice Admiral Daniel T. Oliver, Chief of
Naval Personnel; and Rear Admiral Anderson B. Holderby, Jr. Appellees and Defendants., 2001
WL 34093750, *34093750+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Feb 07, 2001) Opening Brief (NO.
00-55117) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
4049 Roger W. KNIGHT, Appellant, v. Norm MALENG, King County Prosecuting Attorney, and
Calving Rapada, Deputy Prosecuting Attorney, Appellee., 2000 WL 33986828, *33986828+
(Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Aug 28, 2000) Brief of Appellant (NO. 00-35625) HN: 5
(S.Ct.)
4050 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Gleb Fyedorsky COLLYMORE, De-
fendant-Appellant., 2000 WL 33999060, *33999060+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Jul 07, 2000)

Appellant Gleb Collymore's Reply Brief (NO. 99-10612) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)

4051 Neal v. The Bd. of Trustees of The California State Un, 1999 WL 33913242, *33913242+
(Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Jul 27, 1999) Appellants' Closing Brief (NO. 99-15316) HN: 4
(S.Ct.)
4052 Enricky L. KENNEDY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SECRETARY OF THE ARMY; Major General
Nancy R. Adams; Captain Cameron Stokes, and John Does 1-25, Defendants-Appellees., 1999
WL 33629664, *33629664+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Mar 11, 1999) Opening Brief of
Plaintiff-Appellant Certificate of Service (NO. 99-15214) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
4053 Michael E. PETERSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Mike LOWRY, et al., Defendants-Appellees.,
1997 WL 33551124, *33551124+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Dec 02, 1997) Brief of Defendants-
Appellees (NO. 97-35795) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
4054 CALIFORNIA ADVOCATES FOR NURSING HOME REFORM, a private non-profit corpora-
tion; Melvin Martin, as successor-in-interest to the estate of Vira Martin, deceased; Virgil Martin,
as successor-in-interest to the estate of Vira Martin, deceased; Wendy Peet, as attorney in facts
for Frances Jehle; Bessie Seday; Mario Varela, as successor-in-interest to the estate of Atilano
Varela; Cora Lucero as successor-in-interest to the estate of Bessie Parks,, 1997 WL 33550224,
*33550224+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Jul 14, 1997) Appellants' Brief (NO. 97-15398) "
HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
4055 COALITION FOR ECONOMIC EQUITY, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Pete WILSON, Gov-
ernor of the State of California, in his official capacity, et al., Defendants-Appellants, Californi-
ans Against Discrimination and Preferences, Inc., Defendant-Intervenor-Appellant., 1997 WL
33487504, *33487504+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Mar 03, 1997) Appellant Defendant-Inter-
venor's Reply Brief (NO. 97-15030, 97-15031) " HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
4056 Derrick CLARK and Ambrose Woods, Individually, and on Behalf of all Others Similarly Situ-
ated, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, California Department of Corrections,
Pete Wilson, Joseph Sandoval, James Gomez, Robin Dezember, Nadim Khoury, M.D., David
Goldberg, M.D., Defendants-Appellants., 1997 WL 33487222, *33487222+ (Appellate Brief)
(9th Cir. Jan 13, 1997) Appellants' Opening Brief (NO. 96-16952) HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
4057 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. Luis SANTIAGO-MARTINEZ, Defendant., 1994
WL 16058116, *16058116+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Dec 14, 1994) Appellant's Opening
Brief (NO. CA94-10350) " HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.)
4058 Keith Elfonca MITCHELL, Defendant-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee., 1994 WL 16139847, *16139847+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Feb 07, 1994)
Opening Brief for Appellant Keith Elfonca Mitchell (NO. 93-30328)
4059 Arthur J. MIER, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. Donald L. OWENS, in his official capacity as Adjutant of
the Arizona State Army National Guard, Michael P.W. Stone, in his official capacity as Secretary
of the Army, Defendants/Appellees., 1994 WL 16133291, *16133291+ (Appellate Brief) (9th
Cir. Jan 20, 1994) Reply Brief of Plaintiff/Appellant (NO. 93-15923) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
4060 Roger W. KNIGHT, appellant, v. UNITED STATES, appellee., 1993 WL 13101249,
*13101249+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Aug 04, 1993) Brief of Appellant (NO. 93-35604)
4061 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff/Appellee, v. Carol Ann HAYS, Defendant/Appel-
lant., 1993 WL 13652883, *13652883+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Jun 30, 1993) Appellant's
Opening Brief (NO. 87-5164) " HN: 2 (S.Ct.)

4062 Eric A. HANSON, Plaintiff/Appellee/Cross-Appellant, v. Major GeneraL Harry M. WYATT, III,

in his official capacity as The Adjutant General, State of Oklahoma, Defendant/Appel-
lant/Cross-Appellee., 2006 WL 2688733, *2688733+ (Appellate Brief) (10th Cir. Aug 15, 2006)
Appellee's Principal and Response Brief (NO. 06-6136, 06-6204)
4063 Jennifer FURAUS, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. CITADEL COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION,
Defendant/Appellee., 2003 WL 25260051, *25260051+ (Appellate Brief) (10th Cir. Dec 16,
2003) Appellant's Brief (NO. 03-2146) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
4064 Ronald B. EDWARDS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Thomas ANDREWS, Defendant-Appellant., 2009
WL 6326344, *6326344+ (Appellate Brief) (11th Cir. Oct 05, 2009) Brief of Appellee Ronald
B. Edwards (NO. 09-13591-HH) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
4065 Yi Qiang YANG, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL, Respondent., 2007
WL 774243, *774243+ (Appellate Brief) (11th Cir. Feb 12, 2007) Petitioner's Brief (NO.
06-15742-H) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
4066 Barry D. BATCHELOR, Appellant, v. SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DIS-
TRICT, Appellee., 2006 WL 3522581, *3522581 (Appellate Brief) (11th Cir. Oct 20, 2006)
Brief of Appellant (NO. 06-14615-G)
4067 David BEVERLY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Jack SAPP, et al., Respondents-Appellees., 2006 WL
5186259, *5186259 (Appellate Brief) (11th Cir. 2006) Appellant's Additional Brief (NO.
06-15161-EE)
4068 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. George Andre AXAM, Defendant-Ap-
pellee., 2003 WL 23356710, *23356710+ (Appellate Brief) (11th Cir. Aug 29, 2003) Brief of
Appellee (NO. 03-11542-FF) HN: 1,2 (S.Ct.)
4069 Sonia YOUNGBLOOD, v. HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY SCHOOL BD., 2003 WL 23723874,
*23723874+ (Appellate Brief) (11th Cir. May 05, 2003) Appellant's Brief (NO. 02-15924-CC) "
HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
4070 WOMEN"S EMERGENCY NETWORK, Joshua Becker and Dawn Jackson, Plaintiffs-Appel-
lants, v. Jeb BUSH, Fred Dickinson, Palm Beach County, and Miami-Dade County, Defendants-
Appellees. v. Patricia Morris, Edwina Booth, JMJ Life Center, and First Care Pregnancy Center,
Defendants-Intervenors-Appellees., 2002 WL 32174297, *32174297+ (Appellate Brief) (11th
Cir. Sep 03, 2002) Brief of Plaintiffs-Appellants (NO. 02-13981-J) " HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
4071 Barbara Jo ROBERTSON, Appellant, v. COOSA COUNTY, Alabama, et al., Appellees., 2002
WL 32162450, *32162450+ (Appellate Brief) (11th Cir. Jun 14, 2002) Reply Brief of Appellant
(NO. 02-11105AA) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
4072 Joanne BYLSMA, Plaintiff-Appellant, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Intervenor-Appellant,
v. Norman B. DAVIS, Jr., in his official capacity as Director of the Alabama Department of Eco-
nomic and Community Affairs (ADECA), and Steve Walkley in his official capacity as Division
Director of the ADECA Workforce Development Division, Defendants-Appellees., 2002 WL
32366217, *32366217+ (Appellate Brief) (11th Cir. Jun 14, 2002) Reply Brief for the United
States as Intervenor-Appellant (NO. 01-16102-AA) " HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
4073 STATE OF ALABAMA, Appellant, v. Luellahj DARSHANON, Appellee., 2001 WL 34316624,
*34316624+ (Appellate Brief) (11th Cir. Apr 17, 2001) Reply Brief of Appellant (NO.
2000-13560-A) " HN: 1,2 (S.Ct.)

4074 Andrew R. CHATMAN, II, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defend-

ant-Appellee., 2000 WL 34023262, *34023262+ (Appellate Brief) (11th Cir. Dec 22, 2000) Ap-
pellant's Brief (NO. 00-15819-JJ)
4075 Marvin K. SPEIGNER, JR., Appellant, v. Willie ALEXANDER, et al., Appellee., 2000 WL
33983071, *33983071+ (Appellate Brief) (11th Cir. Aug 25, 2000) Brief of Appellant, Marvin
K. Speigner, Jr. (NO. 00-13616-GG) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
4076 STATE OF ALABAMA, Appellant, v. Luellahj DARSHANON, Appellee., 2000 WL 34204484,
*34204484+ (Appellate Brief) (11th Cir. Aug 15, 2000) Brief of Appellant (NO. 2000-13560-A)
" HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
4077 THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA, Appellant, v. James D.
DOWNING, Appellee., 2000 WL 34432986, *34432986+ (Appellate Brief) (11th Cir. Jun 01,
2000) Reply Brief of Defendant/Appellant the Board of Trustees of the University of
Alabama (NO. 00-01481-D) HN: 4,5 (S.Ct.)
4078 THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA, Defendant-Appellant. v.
James D. DOWNING, Plaintiff-Appellee,, 2000 WL 34432987, *34432987+ (Appellate Brief)
(11th Cir. May 19, 2000) Brief for Plaintiff-Appellee (NO. 00-01481-D)
4079 Don W. LANE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. G. Ernest TIDWELL, et al, Defendants-Appellees., 1999
WL 33648772, *33648772+ (Appellate Brief) (11th Cir. Nov 05, 1999) Brief for Appellant
(NO. 99-13765) HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
4080 Lynn MORAR-JACOBS, Appellee, v. Jack KNOWLES, Appellant., 1999 WL 33911974,
*33911974+ (Appellate Brief) (11th Cir. Jan 12, 1999) Brief of Appellee Lynn Morar-Jacobs
(NO. 98-09209) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
4081 Don W. LANE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NATIONAL DATA CORPORATION, Defendant-Ap-
pellee., 1998 WL 34184301, *34184301+ (Appellate Brief) (11th Cir. Oct 20, 1998) Brief for
Appellant (NO. 98-8658) " HN: 1,2,3 (S.Ct.)
4082 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. Manuel Enrique SANEZ, Appellant., 1998 WL
34097117, *34097117+ (Appellate Brief) (11th Cir. May 11, 1998) Opening Brief for the Ap-
pellant Manuel Enrique Saenz (NO. 97-4355)
4083 Dr. Frances WINFREY, Appellant, v. THE SCHOOL BOARD OF DADE COUNTY, Florida,
Dr. Tee Greer, and Russell Wheatley, Appellees., 1997 WL 33626535, *33626535+ (Appellate
Brief) (11th Cir. Aug 15, 1997) Initial Brief of Appellant (NO. 96-4532, 96-4753)
4084 Shari L. LYES, Appellant, v. CITY OF RIVIERA BEACH, Florida, and Cinthia Becton, Marge
Confrey, Bruce Guyton, Bertha Orange, and Barbara Rodriguez, in their official capacities as
Members of the Riviera Beach City Council, City of Riviera Beach, Florida, Neil Crilly, in his
official capacity as Executive Director of the City of Riviera Beach Community Redevelopment
Agency, and the City of Riviera Beach Community Redevelopment Agency, Appellees., 1996
WL 33417462, *33417462+ (Appellate Brief) (11th Cir. Oct 28, 1996) Appellant, Shari L.
Lyes' Reply Brief to Arguments of Appellees (NO. 96-4577) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
4085 Bradley W. BARBER, pro Se, APPELLANT, v. Polly CONRADI, Individually and in her Offi-
cial Capacity, as the Circuit Clerk of Jefferson County, Alabama, et Ads, APPELLEES., 1996
WL 33480930, *33480930 (Appellate Brief) (11th Cir. Aug 12, 1996) Appellant's Initial Brief:
Oral Argument Requested (NO. 96-6541) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)

4086 Bradley W. BARBER, pro se, Appellant, v. POLLY CONRADI, Individually and in her Official
Capacity, as the Circuit Clerk of Jefferson County, Alabama, ET ALS. Appellees., 1996 WL
33498523, *33498523 (Appellate Brief) (11th Cir. Aug 12, 1996) Appellant's Initial Brief:
(NO. 96-06451) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
4087 Shari L. LYES, Appellant, v. CITY OF RIVIERA BEACH, Florida, and Cinthia Becton, Marge
Confrey, Bruce Guyton, Bertha Orange, and Barbara Rodriguez, in their official capacities as
Members of the Riviera Beach City Council, City of Riviera Beach, Florida, Neil Crilly, in his
official capacity as Executive Director of the City of Riviera Beach Community Redevelopment
Agency, and the City of Riviera Beach Community Redevelopment Agency, Appellees., 1996
WL 33417461, *33417461+ (Appellate Brief) (11th Cir. Aug 09, 1996) Appellant, Shari L.
Lyes' Brief (NO. 96-4577) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
4088 Robert FREDETTE, Appellant, v. BVP MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATES, Appellee., 1996 WL
33477098, *33477098+ (Appellate Brief) (11th Cir. Feb 27, 1996) Reply Brief (NO. 95-3242)
HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
4089 Katherine BINDER, Appellant, v. Shirley S. CHATER, Commissioner of Social Security, Ap-
pellee., 1995 WL 17115634, *17115634+ (Appellate Brief) (11th Cir. Nov 29, 1995) Initial
Brief of Appellant, Katherine Binder (NO. 95-2570) HN: 2,4 (S.Ct.)
4090 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. George W. BAGWELL, Defendant-Ap-
pellant., 1995 WL 17057692, *17057692+ (Appellate Brief) (11th Cir. Nov 15, 1995) Brief of
Appellant, George W. Bagwell (NO. 95-8645) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
4091 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Robert H. BAGWELL, Defendant-Ap-
pellant., 1995 WL 17057695, *17057695+ (Appellate Brief) (11th Cir. Nov 15, 1995) Brief of
Appellant, Robert H. Bagwell (NO. 95-8646) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
4092 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Stanley BAGWELL, as Executor of the
Estate of Myron Bagwell, deceased, Defendant-Appellant., 1995 WL 17057697, *17057697+
(Appellate Brief) (11th Cir. Nov 15, 1995) Brief of Appellant, Stanley Bagwell (NO. 95-8647)
HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
4093 Mary A. MOORE o/b/o Jerome C. Moore, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. Donna E. SHALALA, Secret-
ary of Health and Human Services, Defendant - Appellee., 1994 WL 16054846, *16054846+
(Appellate Brief) (11th Cir. Nov 02, 1994) Brief for the Appellee (NO. 94-8861) " HN: 2
(S.Ct.)
4094 Mary A. MOORE o/b/o Jerome C. Moore, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. Donna E. SHALALA, Secret-
ary of Health and Human Services, Defendant - Appellee., 1994 WL 16507984, *16507984+
(Appellate Brief) (11th Cir. Nov 02, 1994) Brief for the Appellee (NO. 94-8861) " HN: 2
(S.Ct.)
4095 David ELLIOTT, Jr., et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defend-
ant-Appellant., 1994 WL 16051305, *16051305+ (Appellate Brief) (11th Cir. Oct 1994) En
Banc Reply Brief (NO. 93-8027)
ant-Appellant., 1994 WL 16139120, *16139120+ (Appellate Brief) (11th Cir. Oct 1994) En
Banc Reply Brief (NO. 93-8027)
ant-Appellant., 1994 WL 16051306, *16051306+ (Appellate Brief) (11th Cir. Sep 1994) En

Banc Brief for Appellant (NO. 93-8027)

4098 Dr. Frances WINFREY, Appellant, v. Dr. Tee GREER, and Russell Wheatley, Appellees., 1994
WL 16125165, *16125165+ (Appellate Brief) (11th Cir. Aug 25, 1994) Initial Brief of Appel-
lant (NO. 94-4256) HN: 2,4 (S.Ct.)
4099 Arthur F. MILLARD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Michael P.W. STONE, Secretary of the Army; M.
Wilson, Director, Defense Finance & Accounting Service and the United States, Defendants-Ap-
pellees., 1994 WL 16139350, *16139350+ (Appellate Brief) (11th Cir. Jun 16, 1994) Brief for
Plaintiff-Appellant (NO. 94-8252) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
4100 Arthur F. MILLARD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Michael P.W. STONE, Secretary of the Army; M.
Wilson, Director, Defense Finance & Accounting Service and the United States, Defendants-Ap-
pellees., 1994 WL 16050857, *16050857+ (Appellate Brief) (11th Cir. Jun 06, 1994) Brief for
Plaintiff-Appellant (NO. 94-8252)
4101 Robin Joy SHAHAR, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Michael J. BOWERS, individually and in his capa-
city as Attorney General of the State of Georgia, Defendant-Appellee., 1994 WL 16126194,
*16126194+ (Appellate Brief) (11th Cir. May 13, 1994) Appellant's Opening Brief (NO.
93-9345) " HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
4102 Tommy J. BONDS, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. DOUGLAS COUNTY, Georgia, by and through its
Board of Commissioners, Jack McKay, Chairman, Ron Moon, Commissioner, Laurie Fulton,
Commissioner and Paul Johnson, Individually and as Chief of Douglas County Fire Department,
Defendants/Appellees., 1994 WL 16052045, *16052045+ (Appellate Brief) (11th Cir. May 03,
1994) Corrected Brief of Appellees (NO. 93-9335)
4103 Tommy J. BONDS, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. DOUGLAS COUNTY, Georgia, by and through its
Board of Commissioners, Jack McKay, Chairman, Ron Moon, Commissioner, Laurie Fulton,
Commissioner and Paul Johnson, Individually and as Chief of Douglas County Fire Department,
Defendants/Appellees., 1994 WL 16126187, *16126187+ (Appellate Brief) (11th Cir. May 03,
1994) Corrected Brief of Appellees (NO. 93-9335)
4104 Dr. Frances WINFREY, Appellant, v. Dr. Tee GREER, and Russell Wheatley, Appellees., 1994
WL 16052287, *16052287+ (Appellate Brief) (11th Cir. 1994) Initial Brief of Appellant (NO.
94-4256) HN: 2,4 (S.Ct.)
4105 Clifford HELTON, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee., 1994 WL
16055406, *16055406 (Appellate Brief) (11th Cir. 1994) Appellant's Initial Brief (NO.
93-6970)
4106 Katherine LOWE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ALLIED PRODUCTS CORP., Defendants-Appellees.,
1993 WL 13126430, *13126430+ (Appellate Brief) (11th Cir. Sep 21, 1993) Brief for Plaintiff-
Appellant Corrected Copy (NO. 93-6080) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
4107 Katherine LOWE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ALLIED PRODUCTS CORP., Defendants-Appellees.,
1993 WL 13126432, *13126432+ (Appellate Brief) (11th Cir. Sep 21, 1993) Brief for Plaintiff-
Appellant Corrected Copy (NO. 93-6080) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
4108 Alan PEIGHTAL, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. METROPOLITAN DADE COUNTY, Metropolitan
Fire Department of Dade County, Defendant/Appellee., 1993 WL 13126575, *13126575+
(Appellate Brief) (11th Cir. Jul 26, 1993) Initial Brief of Appellant (NO. 93-4311) HN: 3
(S.Ct.)

4109 Alan PEIGHTAL, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. METROPOLITAN DADE COUNTY, Metropolitan

Fire Department of Dade County, Defendant/Appellee., 1993 WL 13126577, *13126577+
(Appellate Brief) (11th Cir. Jul 26, 1993) Initial Brief of Appellant (NO. 93-4311) HN: 3
(S.Ct.)
4110 William Eltoria DANIELS, Appellant/Petitioner, v. STATE OF ALABAMA, Appellee/Re-
spondent., 1993 WL 13139598, *13139598+ (Appellate Brief) (11th Cir. Jun 29, 1993) Reply
spondent., 1993 WL 13139599, *13139599+ (Appellate Brief) (11th Cir. Jun 29, 1993) Reply
4112 David E. ELLIOTT, Jr., an incapacitated adult by and through his guardian, Barbara V. Elliott,
and Barbara V. Elliott, individually, Plaintiffs/Appellees, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendant/Appellant., 1993 WL 13631179, *13631179+ (Appellate Brief) (11th Cir. May 03,
1993) Brief for Plaintiffs/Appellees David E. Elliott, Jr., an incapacitated adult by and
through his guardian, Barbara V. Elliott, and Barbara V. Elliott, individually (NO. 93-8027)
" HN: 4,5 (S.Ct.)
4113 David E. ELLIOTT, Jr., an incapacitated adult by and through his guardian, Barbara V. Elliott,
and Barbara V. Elliott, individually, Plaintiffs/Appellees, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendant/Appellant., 1993 WL 13631180, *13631180+ (Appellate Brief) (11th Cir. May 03,
1993) Brief for Plaintiffs/Appellees David E. Elliott, Jr., an incapacitated adult by and
through his guardian, Barbara v. Elliott, and Barbara v. Elliott, individually (NO. 93-8027)
HN: 4,5 (S.Ct.)
4114 David ELLIOTT, Jr., ET AL., Plaintiff-Appellees, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defend-
ant-Appellant., 1993 WL 13126886, *13126886+ (Appellate Brief) (11th Cir. Mar 30, 1993)
Brief for Appellant (NO. 93-8027)
spondent., 1993 WL 13139596, *13139596+ (Appellate Brief) (11th Cir. Mar 25, 1993) Brief of
spondent., 1993 WL 13139600, *13139600+ (Appellate Brief) (11th Cir. Mar 25, 1993) Brief of
4117 Angel Cintron RODRIGUEZ, Appellant, v. J.D. LAMER, et al., Respondent., 1993 WL
13138257, *13138257+ (Appellate Brief) (11th Cir. Mar 03, 1993) Appellant's Opening Brief
(NO. 92-3142) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
4118 David ELLIOTT, Jr., et al., Plaintiff-Appellees, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defend-
ant-Appellant., 1993 WL 13125900, *13125900+ (Appellate Brief) (11th Cir. Mar 1993) Brief
for Appellant (NO. 93-8027)
4119 Johny J. BANKS and Isaac Wilson, Sr., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. COMMANDER OF DETACH-
MENT 1, HHC, First Battalion (M) of the 121st Infantry of the Georgia Army National Guard,
Milledgeville, Georgia; Commander of Headquarters Company, First Battalion (M) of the 121st
Infantry of the Georgia Army National Guard, Dublin, Georgia; Commander of the First Bat-
talion (M) of the 121st Infantry of the Georgia Army National Guard, Dublin, Georgia; Com-
mander of the, 1993 WL 13125075, *13125075+ (Appellate Brief) (11th Cir. Feb 01, 1993) Brief

of Appellants (NO. 92-8990) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)

4120 Tom L. BARTON and Tom Bigham, Appellants, v. William Van POYCK, Appellee., 1992 WL
12135742, *12135742 (Appellate Brief) (11th Cir. Feb 24, 1992) Initial Brief of Appellants
(NO. 91-4127) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
4121 SKF USA, INC., Plaintiff-Cross Appellant, v. UNITED STATES CUSTOMS and Border Protec-
tion, Defendant-Appellant, UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION, De-
fendant-Appellant, TIMKEN U.S. CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellant, UNITED STATES,
Robert C. Bonner, Commissioner, United States Customs and Border Protection, and Daniel R.
Pearson, Chairman, United States International Trade Commission, Defendants., 2008 WL
822755, *822755+ (Appellate Brief) (Fed.Cir. Feb 28, 2008) Amicus Curiae Brief of Giorgio
Foods, Inc. And Ps Chez Sidney LLC (NO. 2008-1005, 2008-1006, 2008-1007, 2008-1008)
HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
4122 Eddie J. THOMAS, Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, Respondent., 2000 WL
34252192, *34252192+ (Appellate Brief) (Fed.Cir. Dec 05, 2000) Brief for Petitioner and Peti-
tioner's Appendix (NO. 00-3439) HN: 2,5 (S.Ct.)
4123 William S. HALL, Claimant-Appellant, v. Togo D. WEST, Jr., Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Re-
spondent-Appellee., 1999 WL 33911453, *33911453+ (Appellate Brief) (Fed.Cir. Jul 29, 1999)
Brief for Respondent-Appellee (NO. 99-7070) " HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
4124 Eleanor SEBASTIAN, Lewis Hinson, Robert Lowery, Charles W. Newhouser, Dennis Reynolds,
Herbert Brown, Rudolph Singleton, James K. Rogers, Blane K. Lawson, Louie C. Hinson,
Woody Nesbitt, Marion Pearson, Ronald D'Anella, Walter Ewing, Leonard Bartlette and Coali-
tion of Retired Military Veterans, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. United States, Defendant-Appellee.,
1998 WL 34082311, *34082311+ (Appellate Brief) (Fed.Cir. Sep 11, 1998) Reply Brief of Ap-
pellants Coalition of Retired Military Veterans, et al. (NO. 98-1263) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
4125 UNITED STATES SHOE CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. THE UNITED STATES, De-
fendant-Appellant., 1996 WL 33453131, *33453131+ (Appellate Brief) (Fed.Cir. Aug 22, 1996)
Brief for Plaintiff-Appellee United States Shoe Corporation (NO. 96-1210) " HN: 5
(S.Ct.)
4126 SPRINT NEXTEL CORPORATION, et al., Petitioner, v. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION and the United States of America, Respondents., 2007 WL 2406682, *2406682+
(Appellate Brief) (D.C.Cir. Jun 29, 2007) Brief of Petitioner New Jersey Division of Rate
Counsel (NO. 06-1115, 06-1167, 06-1200)) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
4127 Elizabeth A. MILLER, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY, Appellee., 2006 WL
1908665, *1908665+ (Appellate Brief) (D.C.Cir. Jun 30, 2006) Brief for the Appellant (NO.
05-5343) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
4128 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Dwight W. WATSON, Defendant-Ap-
pellant., 2006 WL 338618, *338618+ (Appellate Brief) (D.C.Cir. Feb 07, 2006) Brief of Appel-
lant (NO. 04-3090) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
4129 CHAPLAINCY OF FULL GOSPEL CHURCHES, et al., Robert H. Adair, et al., Plaintiffs-Ap-
pellants, v. Gordon R. ENGLAND, Secretary of the Navy, et al., Defendants-Appellees., 2005
WL 3446669, *3446669+ (Appellate Brief) (D.C.Cir. Dec 14, 2005) Appellants' Reply Brief
(NO. 05-5143, 05-5144) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
4130 COVAD COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY, et al., Petitioners, v. FEDERAL COMMUNICA-

TIONS COMMISSION and the United States of America, Respondents. New Jersey Division of
the Ratepayer Advocate, Petitioner, v. Federal Communications Commission and the United
States of America, Respondents., 2005 WL 3105352, *3105352+ (Appellate Brief) (D.C.Cir. Nov
14, 2005) Brief of Petitioner New Jersey Division of Ratepayer Advocate (NO. 05-1095,
LEAD) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
4131 John DOE #1, et al., Plaintiffs - Appellees, v. Donald H. RUMSFELD, et al., Defendants - Ap-
pellants., 2005 WL 1848178, *1848178+ (Appellate Brief) (D.C.Cir. Jul 29, 2005) Brief of Ap-
4132 In Re: Gordon R. ENGLAND, Secretary of the Navy, et at., Petitioners. Chaplaincy of Full Gos-
pel Churches, et al., Robert H. Adair, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Gordon R. England, Secret-
ary Of The Navy, et. al., Defendants-Appellants., 2004 WL 349700, *349700+ (Appellate Brief)
(D.C.Cir. Feb 20, 2004) Brief for Respondents/Appellees (NO. 03-5329, 03-5333, 03-5334)
HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
4133 In re: Gordon R. ENGLAND, Secretary of the Navy, et at., Petitioners. Chaplaincy of Full Gos-
pel, Churches, et al., Robert H. Adair, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Gordon R. England, Secret-
ary of the Navy, et al., Defendants-Appellants., 2004 WL 5844421, *5844421+ (Appellate Brief)
(D.C.Cir. Feb 20, 2004) Brief for Respondents/Appellees (NO. 03-5329, 03-5333, 03-5334)
HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
4134 Robert Vinson BRANNUM, Appellant, v. William LAKE, Brig. Gen., USAF, et al., Appellees.,
2002 WL 34244318, *34244318+ (Appellate Brief) (D.C.Cir. Aug 26, 2002) Reply Brief of
Amicus Curiae in Support of Appellant Robert Vinson Brannum (NO. 01-5319, 01-5405)
HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
4135 Robert Vinson BRANNUM, Appellant, v. Zack E. GADDY, et al., Appellees., 2002 WL
34244319, *34244319+ (Appellate Brief) (D.C.Cir. Aug 12, 2002) Brief for Appellee (NO.
01-5319)
4136 Robert Vinson BRANNUM, Appellant, v. William LAKE, Brig. Gen., USAF, et al., Appellees.,
2002 WL 34244320, *34244320+ (Appellate Brief) (D.C.Cir. Jul 12, 2002) Brief of Amicus
Curiae in Support of Appellant Robert Vinson Brannum (NO. 01-5319, 01-5405)
HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
4137 John DOE, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Robert M. GATES, Director of Central Intelligence, Defendant-
Appellant., 1992 WL 12599925, *12599925+ (Appellate Brief) (D.C.Cir. Sep 11, 1992) Brief of
Appellee (NO. 91-5249) " HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
4138 UNITED STATES, Appellee, v. Darrell T. OPPERMANN, Lieutenant Commander (0-4), Nurse
Corps, U.S. Navy, Appellant., 2006 WL 2252346, *2252346+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Armed
Forces Jul 21, 2006) Supplement to Petition for Grant of Review (NO. 06-0731) HN: 5
(S.Ct.)
4139 UNITED STATES, Appellee, v. David A. GAINES, Fireman Controlman Second Class (E-5)
U.S. Navy, Appellant., 2006 WL 913648, *913648+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Armed Forces Feb
03, 2006) Appellant's Supplement to Petition for Grant of Review (NO. 06-0127) HN: 5
(S.Ct.)
4140 UNITED STATES, Appellee, v. Brendan C. FORNEY Lieutenant (junior grade), U.S. Navy Re-
serve, Appellant., 2005 WL 3263682, *3263682+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Armed Forces Aug 29,
2005) Supplement to Petition for Grant of Review (NO. 05-0647) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)

4141 James H. HENDERSON and Roberta Henderson, Appellants, v. Helen Crump WELLS and
Rushton, Stakely, Johnston & Garrett, P.A., Appellees., 2008 WL 6486865, *6486865+
(Appellate Brief) (Ala. Nov 04, 2008) Reply Brief of Appellants James H. Henderson and
Roberta Henderson (NO. 1071478) HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.)
4142 Orlando Samuel MCKEITHEN, Appellant, v. STATE OF ALABAMA, Appellee., 2010 WL
617732, *617732+ (Appellate Brief) (Ala.Crim.App. Jan 07, 2010) Brief of Appellant (NO. CR-
09-0147)
4143 Karen PERDUE, Commissioner, Department of Health and Social Services, and the Department
of Health and Social Services, State of Alaska, Appellants, v. PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF
ALASKA, INC., Jan Whitefield, M.D., and Susan Lemagie, M.D., Appellees., 2000 WL
35515284, *35515284+ (Appellate Brief) (Alaska Mar 13, 2000) Brief of Amicus Curiae Now
Legal Defense and Education Fund (NO. S-09109) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
4144 Leroy K. SMITH and Denny Bynum, Appellants, v. State of Alaska, Department of Corrections,
Susan Humphrey Barnett, Commissioner, Palmer Correctional Center, State Board of Parole,
Sam Director, Board of Parole, David Cooper, Parole Board Member, Donald Bruce, Parole
Board Member, Mike Miller, Parole Board Member, Alonzo Patterson, Parole Board Member,
and Delores Weiler, Parole Board Member, Appellees., 1992 WL 12577287, *12577287+
(Appellate Brief) (Alaska Dec 17, 1992) Brief of the Appellants (NO. S-05336)
4145 State of Arizona, Appellee, v. Lucy Carmen ESCOBEDO, Appellant., 2008 WL 5161317,
*5161317+ (Appellate Brief) (Ariz.App. Div. 1 Oct 30, 2008) Appellee's Answering Brief (NO.
1CA-CR08-0350)
4146 Mark Steven CAMBIANO, Appellant, v. ARKANSAS STATE BOARD OF LAW EXAM-
INERS, Appellee., 2004 WL 1725676, *1725676+ (Appellate Brief) (Ark. Jan 21, 2004) Brief
and Addendum for Appellant (NO. 03-1341) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
4147 Gil N. MILEIKOWSKY, M.D., Plaintiff and respondent, v. WEST HILLS HOSPITAL MEDIC-
AL CENTER, Respondent and appellant., 2008 WL 2863065, *2863065+ (Appellate Brief) (Cal.
Jun 26, 2008) Brief Amicus Curiae of Union of American Physicians and Dentists in Support
of Plaintiff/Respondent (NO. S156986) " HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
4148 In re MARRIAGE CASES., 2007 WL 3307697, *3307697 (Appellate Brief) (Cal. Oct 04, 2007)
Brief of Amicus Curiae Equal Justice Society in Support of Parties Challenging the Mar-
riage Exclusion (NO. S147999)
4149 In re MARRIAGE CASES., 2007 WL 3307727, *3307727+ (Appellate Brief) (Cal. Oct 04, 2007)
Amicus Curiae Brief of Professor William N. Eskridge, Jr. in Support of Parties Challen-
ging the Marriage Exclusion (NO. S147999) HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
4150 Coordination Proceeding Special Title (Rule 1550(b)) In Re MARRIAGE CASES., 2007 WL
2807456, *2807456+ (Appellate Brief) (Cal. Aug 23, 2007) City and County of San Fran-
cisco's Consolidated Reply Brief (NO. S147999) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
4151 In re MARRIAGE CASES., 2007 WL 2085971, *2085971+ (Appellate Brief) (Cal. Jun 20, 2007)
Brief Amicus Curiae of the Knights of Columbus in Support of the State Defendants (NO.
S147999) HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
4152 In re MARRIAGE CASES., 2007 WL 2905413, *2905413+ (Appellate Brief) (Cal. Jun 14, 2007)
Answer Brief of State of California and the Attorney General to Opening Briefs on the Mer-
its (NO. S147999) HN: 1,3,4 (S.Ct.)

4153 COUNTY OF ALAMEDA; Dave Macdonald, in His Official Capacity As Registrar of Voters for
the County of Alameda; and Does 1 Through 20, Inclusive, Appellants, v. AMERICANS FOR
SAFE ACCESS; James Blair, Michael Goodbar; and Donald O. Tolbert, Respondents., 2008 WL
5610619, *5610619+ (Appellate Brief) (Cal.App. 1 Dist. Nov 17, 2008) Respondents' Brief
(NO. A121390)
4154 BIMBO BAKERIES USA, INC., Appellant., v. Yaire LOPEZ., Respondent., 2008 WL 3993572,
*3993572+ (Appellate Brief) (Cal.App. 1 Dist. Jul 16, 2008) Respondent's Brief (NO.
A119263)
4155 Robin TYLER, et al., Respondents, v. State of California, et al., Appellants., 2005 WL 3967318,
*3967318+ (Appellate Brief) (Cal.App. 1 Dist. Nov 21, 2005) Respondent Intervenor Equality
California's Answer Brief (NO. A110450) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
4156 Lancy WOO, et al., Respondents, v. State of California, et al., Appellants., 2005 WL 3967323,
*3967323+ (Appellate Brief) (Cal.App. 1 Dist. Nov 10, 2005) Respondents' Corrected Answer-
ing Brief (NO. A110451) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
4157 Lancy WOO, et al., Respondents, v. State of California, et al., Appellants., 2005 WL 3967320,
*3967320+ (Appellate Brief) (Cal.App. 1 Dist. Nov 09, 2005) Respondents' Answering Brief
(NO. A110451) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
4158 Kristi RIGGS, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Luke BRUGNARA, Defendant and Appellant., 2004
WL 2068725, *2068725+ (Appellate Brief) (Cal.App. 1 Dist. Jun 17, 2004) Appellant's Open-
ing Brief (NO. A103243) " HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
4159 In re the Marriage of Judith and Nelson ENNS. Judith M. Enns, Respondent, v. Nelson ENNS,
Appellant., 2000 WL 34415978, *34415978+ (Appellate Brief) (Cal.App. 1 Dist. May 22, 2000)
Appellant's Opening Brief (NO. A090011) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
4160 Deborah Hermann ANDERSON, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. Curtis ALLEN, Defendant and Re-
spondent. Jason Stevens, Defendant and Appellant., 1999 WL 33905632, *33905632+ (Appellate
Brief) (Cal.App. 1 Dist. Feb 19, 1999) Appellant's Opening Brief (NO. A085614) HN: 4
(S.Ct.)
4161 Mary LARSON, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Luke WALKER, Defendants and Appellants; Luke
Walker, Cross-complainant, v. Mary Larson, Cross-defendants., 1997 WL 33799625,
*33799625+ (Appellate Brief) (Cal.App. 2 Dist. Feb 03, 1997) Appellant's Opening Brief (NO.
B101359)
4162 Mary LARSON, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Luke WALKER, Defendants and Appellants. Luke
Walker, Cross-complainant, v. Mary Larson, Cross-defendants., 1997 WL 34723651,
*34723651+ (Appellate Brief) (Cal.App. 2 Dist. Feb 03, 1997) Appellant's Opening Brief (NO.
B101359)
4163 CAMPAIGN FOR CALIFORNIA FAMILIES, Appellant, v. Arnold SCHWARZENEGGER, in
his official capacity as Governor of the State of California; and Kevin Shelley, in his official ca-
pacity as Secretary of State of the State of California, William J. Jefferds, in his official capacity
as Director of General Services; Geoff Brandt, in his official capacity as acting state printer of
the office of state publishing, and Equality California, Respondeats., 2005 WL 520049, *520049
(Appellate Brief) (Cal.App. 3 Dist. Jan 17, 2005) Opening Brief of Appellant (NO. C048303)
4164 Maj James ESTES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Mg Paul D. MONROE, State of California Military

Department, et. al., Defendant-Appellant., 2003 WL 23155293, *23155293+ (Appellate Brief)

(Cal.App. 3 Dist. Sep 22, 2003) Appellant's Opening Brief (NO. C043878) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
4165 Cindy SAMU, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. CITY OF CATHEDRAL CITY, Defendant and Re-
spondent., 2003 WL 23280924, *23280924+ (Appellate Brief) (Cal.App. 4 Dist. Dec 30, 2003)
Appellant's Opening Brief (NO. E034213) " HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
4166 Ramona L. BROOKE, Petitioner, v. RESTAURANT SERVICES, INC., a Colorado corporation,
and Dean C. Peterson, Respondents., 1994 WL 16057426, *16057426+ (Appellate Brief) (Colo.
Dec 21, 1994) Petitioner's Opening Brief (NO. 94SC312) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
4167 Richard G. EVANS, Angela Romero, Linda Fowler, Paul Brown, Martina Navratilova, Bret Tan-
berg, Priscilla Inkpen, The City and County of Denver, The City of Boulder, The City of Aspen,
and The City Council of Aspen, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Roy ROMER as Governor of the State of
Colorado and Gail Norton as Attorney General of the State of Colorado, and the State of Color-
ado, Defendants-Appellants., 1993 WL 13038132, *13038132+ (Appellate Brief) (Colo. Apr 07,
1993) Brief Amicus Curiae of Colorado for Family Values (NO. 93SA17)
4168 Duc VAN LE, on behalf of himself and the class of persons similarly situated, Petitioners, v.
Irene M. IBARRA, et al., Respondents., 1992 WL 12037095, *12037095+ (Appellate Brief)
(Colo. Jul 20, 1992) Brief Amicus Curiae of the Center for Legal Advocacy, d/b/a the Legal
Center Serving Persons With Disabilities (NO. 91SC189) " HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
4169 Robert F. MCWEENY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF HARTFORD, et al., Defendants-Ap-
pellees., 2007 WL 4997649, *4997649+ (Appellate Brief) (Conn. Oct 26, 2007) Substitute Brief
of Plaintiff-Appellant (NO. 17888) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
4170 Elizabeth KERRIGAN et al., Plaintiff-Appellants, v. COMMISSIONER OF PUBLIC HEALTH
et al., Defendant-Appellees., 2007 WL 4725470, *4725470+ (Appellate Brief) (Conn. Feb 21,
2007) Brief of Defendant-Appellees With Appendix (NO. SC17716) HN: 4,5 (S.Ct.)
4171 Elizabeth KERRIGAN, et al., v. COMMISSIONER OF PUBLIC HEALTH, et al., 2007 WL
4725451, *4725451+ (Appellate Brief) (Conn. Jan 11, 2007) Joint Brief of Amici Curiae (I)
Human Rights Campaign; (Ii) Human Rights Campaign Foundation; (Iii) Equal Justice So-
ciety; (Iv) National Center for Lesbian Rights; (V) National Gay and Lesbian Task ... (NO.
17716) " HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
4172 Elizabeth KERRIGAN, et al., v. COMMISSIONER OF PUBLIC HEALTH, et al., 2006 WL
5247529, *5247529+ (Appellate Brief) (Conn. Nov 22, 2006) Brief of the Plaintiffs-Appellants
With Separate Appendix (NO. SC17716) " HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
4173 Maria RIVNAK, Plaintiff, v. David RIVNAK, Defendant., 2006 WL 4877977, *4877977
(Appellate Brief) (Conn.App. Feb 22, 2006) Brief for Defendant-Appellant (NO. 26838)
4174 STATE OF CONNECTICUT, v. John THOMPSON., 2005 WL 5859979, *5859979+ (Appellate
Brief) (Conn.App. 2005) Brief of the State of Connecticut-Appellee with Attached Appendix
(NO. 25982)
4175 Donald A. TOBKIN, M.D., Esq., Petitioner, v. Kimberly L. JARBOE and Linda Jarboe, Re-
spondents., 1991 WL 11010411, *11010411+ (Appellate Brief) (Fla. 1991) Answer Brief of Re-
spondents (NO. 91236)
4176 John M. CORBOY and Stephen Garo Aghjayan, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Mark J. BENNETT, in
his official capacity as Attorney General, State of Hawaii; the County of Maui; and the County of

Kauai, Defendants-Appellees. Garry P. Smith and Earl F. Arakaki, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Mark

J. Bennett, in his official capacity as Attorney General, State of Hawaii; and the City and County
of Honolulu, Defendants-Appellees. J. William Sanborn,, 2010 WL 1843797, *1843797
(Appellate Brief) (Hawai'i Apr 05, 2010) Answering Brief of Defendants-Appellees State of
Hawaii and Its Attorney General Statement of Related Cases Certificate of Service (NO.
30049) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
4177 Rada MAKSIMOVIC, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. William T. TSOGALIS, William T. Inc., an Illinois
Corporation d/b/a Tiffany's Restaurant, and P.C. Partners, d/b/a Comfort Inn, Defendant/Ap-
pellees., 1996 WL 33437021, *33437021 (Appellate Brief) (Ill. Dec 10, 1996) Brief Amicus
Curiae of the Illinois Trial Lawyers Association (NO. 81493) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
4178 Rada MAKSIMOVIC, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. William T. TSOGALIS, William T. Inc., an Illinois
Corporation d/b/a Tiffany's Restaurant, and P.C. Partners, d/b/a Comfort Inn, Defendant/Ap-
pellees., 1996 WL 33468433, *33468433 (Appellate Brief) (Ill. Dec 10, 1996) Brief Amicus
Curiae of the Illinois Trial Lawyers Association (NO. 81493) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
4179 Cathy SCHWARTZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Judith CORTELLONI, Defendant-Appellee, and
Larry Hamblen, Bridget Schneider and Joe Schneider, Defendants., 1996 WL 33436936,
*33436936+ (Appellate Brief) (Ill. Oct 09, 1996) Reply Brief of Appellant (NO. 80614)
HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
4180 Cathy SCHWARTZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Judith CORTELLONI, Defendant-Appellee, Larry
Hamblen, Bridget Schneider and Joe Schneider, Defendants., 1996 WL 33468355, *33468355+
(Appellate Brief) (Ill. Oct 09, 1996) Reply Brief of Appellant (NO. 80614) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
4181 Cathy SCHWARTZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Judith E. CORTELLONI, Defendant-Appellee, Larry
(Appellate Brief) (Ill. Sep 04, 1996) Brief of Appellee Cross-Relief Requested (NO. 80614)
HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
4182 Cathy SCHWARTZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Judith E. CORTELLONI, Defendant-Appellee, Larry
(Appellate Brief) (Ill. Sep 04, 1996) Brief of Appellee Cross-Relief Requested (NO. 80614) "
HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
4183 Robert J. JOHNSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYMENT
SECURITY, Director of the Illinois Department of Employment Security, Board of Review, and
Chicago Paralegal School, Defendants-Appellees., 1995 WL 17166732, *17166732+ (Appellate
Brief) (Ill.App. 1 Dist. 1995) Brief of State Defendants-Appellees (NO. 1-95-1738) HN: 5
(S.Ct.)
4184 State of Indiana, et al., Appellants (Defendants Below), v. Herbert SMITH, Jr., Charles Zacek,
Appellees (Plaintiffs Below)., 2001 WL 35822634, *35822634+ (Appellate Brief) (Ind. Sep 21,
2001) Amicus Curiae Criminal Defense Section of the Lake County Bar Association's Brief
(NO. 45S00-0102-CV-00105) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
4185 Benny Lee SAYLOR, Appellant (Defendant below), v. State of Indiana, Appellee (Plaintiff be-
low)., 1995 WL 17806217, *17806217+ (Appellate Brief) (Ind. Mar 13, 1995) Appellant's Brief
(NO. 48S00-9301-DP-6) HN: 1,2 (S.Ct.)
4186 State of Indiana, Appellant (Plaintiff Below), v. William P. ALCORN, Appellee (Defendant Be-
low)., 1994 WL 16462155, *16462155+ (Appellate Brief) (Ind. Jan 05, 1994) Brief of Appellee

(NO. 49S00-9305-DP-585) HN: 1,2 (S.Ct.)

4187 Tamara Bowlus MYERS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Donald R. MOYARS, individually, C. Al Lind-
say in his capacity as the Sheriff of Warren County, Indiana, and Randy Brenner, Don Andrews,
and James E. Lanham in their capacity as the Warren County Board of Commissioners, Defend-
ants-Appellees., 1995 WL 17805735, *17805735+ (Appellate Brief) (Ind.App. Dec 26, 1995)
Brief of Appellees (NO. 79A05-9510-CV-424) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
4188 Katherine VARNUM, et al., Plaintiffs/Appellees, v. Timothy J. BRIEN, Polk County Recorder,
Defendant/Appellant., 2008 WL 5156763, *5156763+ (Appellate Brief) (Iowa Jun 10, 2008) Fi-
nal Amended Reply Brief of Defendant-Appellant (NO. 07-1499)
4189 Katherine VARNUM, et al., Plaintiffs - Appellees, v. Timothy J. BRIEN, Polk County Recorder,
Defendant - Appellant., 2008 WL 5156764, *5156764+ (Appellate Brief) (Iowa Jun 02, 2008) Fi-
nal Reply Brief of Plaintiffs-Appellees (NO. 07-1499) " HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
4190 State of Iowa, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michelle Sandra McCool PHILLIPS, Defendant-Appellant.,
1999 WL 34685833, *34685833+ (Appellate Brief) (Iowa Sep 16, 1999) Appellant's Reply
Brief and Argument (NO. 98-2136) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
4191 State of Iowa, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michelle Sandra McCOOL PHILLIPS, Defendant-Appel-
lant., 1999 WL 34685832, *34685832+ (Appellate Brief) (Iowa Aug 27, 1999) Appellant's Brief
and Argument and Request for Oral Argument (NO. 98-2136) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
4192 STATE OF KANSAS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Matthew R. LIMON, Defendant-Appellant., 2004
WL 1646973, *1646973+ (Appellate Brief) (Kan. Jun 24, 2004) Defendant-Appellant's Supple-
mental Brief on Review (NO. 00-85898-S) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
4193 Frances BARRETT, Individually, and on behalf of the heirs-at-law of Robert Alexander Barrett;
and as Administratrix of the Estate of Robert Alexander Barrett, Plaintiff/Appellee, v. UNIFIED
SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 259, a/k/a Wichita Public School System; and Dan Johnson, Defend-
ants/Appellants., 2001 WL 36253261, *36253261 (Appellate Brief) (Kan. Apr 18, 2001) Reply
Brief of Appellants (NO. 00-86022-AS) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
4194 In the Matter of the Estate of Marshall G. GARDINER, Deceased., 2000 WL 35794478,
*35794478+ (Appellate Brief) (Kan.App. Sep 18, 2000) Brief of Appellee Joseph M. Gardiner,
III (NO. 00-85030-A)
4195 Eugene ALBERT, Roy Albert, Donald Albert, Raymond Albert, Individually, and Eugene Albert,
Special Administrator of the Estate of Darlene Albert Groetken, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CATH-
OLIC DIOCESE OF WICHITA, a Kansas Corporation, and Catholic Diocese of Wichita, doing
business as, or as Representative Party Defendant of a Class of Persons, Members, Agencies, In-
strumentalities and Related Corporations of Diocesan Catholic Charities Bureau, Catholic Social,
1997 WL 34602399, *34602399+ (Appellate Brief) (Kan.App. Jun 18, 1997) Brief of Appellant
(NO. 97-78452-A) " HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
4196 Mary BROWN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. THE KANSAS PAROLE BOARD AND RICHARD
KOERNER, Principal Administrator of the Topeka Correctional Facility, Respondents-Ap-
pellees., 1996 WL 34431020, *34431020+ (Appellate Brief) (Kan.App. Dec 12, 1996) Brief of
Appellant (NO. 96-77629-A)
4197 COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY, Kentucky Commission on Human Rights, et al Appel-
lants, v. PENDENNIS CLUB, INC., et al Appellees., 2003 WL 24027135, *24027135+
(Appellate Brief) (Ky. Nov 10, 2003) Appellants' Brief (NO. 2002-SC-00508-D) HN: 5

(S.Ct.)
4198 Michael Kevin DUPONT, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Charles WYZANSKI, Jr., and Commissioner of
Correction, et al., Defendants-Appellants., 2005 WL 4709480, *4709480+ (Appellate Brief)
(Mass. Aug 12, 2005) Brief of Amici Curiae American Civil Liberties Union of Massachu-
setts and Women's Bar Association (NO. SJC-09597) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
4199 Michael Kevin DUPONT, Plaintiff/Appellee, v. Charles WYZANSKI, Jr. and Commissioner of
Correction, et al, Defendants/Appellants., 2005 WL 4705751, *4705751+ (Appellate Brief)
(Mass. Jul 25, 2005) Brief of the Appellee (NO. SJC-09597) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
4200 REQUEST FOR AN ADVISORY OPINION A-107., 2004 WL 433502, *433502+ (Appellate
Brief) (Mass. Jan 12, 2004) Brief of Civil Rights Amici Curiae, United States Representative
John Lewis; The American Civil Liberties Union Foundation; The American Civil Liberties
Union of Massachusetts; The Asian-American ... (NO. SJC-09163) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
4201 BAR COUNSEL, v. Betsey Warren LEBBOS., 1995 WL 17218824, *17218824+ (Appellate
Brief) (Mass. May 01, 1995) Brief and Appendix for Respondent (NO. SJC-06715)
4202 Sylvia Smith BOWMAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. COMMISSIONER OF THE DEPARTMENT OF
PUBLIC WELFARE, et al., Defendant-Appellant., 1994 WL 16198137, *16198137+ (Appellate
Brief) (Mass. Dec 22, 1994) Brief of Amicus Curiae Feminists for Free Expression (NO. SJC-
06726) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
4203 Michael KEVIN Dupont, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Charles WYZANSKI, Jr., and Commissioner of
Correction, et Al., Defendants-Appellants., 2005 WL 2922040, *2922040+ (Appellate Brief)
(Mass.App.Ct. Aug 12, 2005) Brief of Amici Coriae American Civil Liberties Onion of Mas-
sachusetts and Women's Bar Association. (NO. 05-P-35) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
4204 Michael Kevin DUPONT, Plaintiff/Appellee, v. Charles WYZANSKI, Jr. and Commissioner of
Correction, ET AL Defendants/Appellants., 2005 WL 2922039, *2922039+ (Appellate Brief)
(Mass.App.Ct. Aug 03, 2005) Brief of the Appellee (NO. 05-P-35) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
4205 John T. TODD, Plaintiff-Appelliant, v. MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF CORREC-
TIONS, et als., Defendant-Appellees., 1999 WL 33987033, *33987033+ (Appellate Brief)
(Mass.App.Ct. Apr 06, 1999) Brief of the Plaintiff-Appellant (NO. 98-P-2007) " HN: 4
(S.Ct.)
4206 FRANK CONAWAY, et al., Appellants, v. GINTANJALI DEANE & LISA POLYAK, et al.,
Appellees., 2006 WL 3381873, *3381873+ (Appellate Brief) (Md. Oct 27, 2006) Brief Amici
Curiae of Equality Maryland, Inc.; Families with Pride; Gay Fathers Coalition; Gay, Lesbi-
an, Bisexual, and Transgender Community Center of Baltimore and Central Maryland;
Maryland Lesbian ... (NO. 44) " HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
4207 Frank M. CONAWAY, et al., Defendants-Appellants., v. Gitanjali DEANE & Lisa Polyak, et al.,
Plaintiffs-Appellees., 2006 WL 3381871, *3381871+ (Appellate Brief) (Md. Oct 23, 2006) Peti-
tion and Brief Amicus Curiae Naacp Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc. (NO. 44)
4208 FRANK CONAWAY, et al., Appellants, v. Gintanjali DEANE & Lisa Polyak, et al., Appellees.,
2006 WL 3096520, *3096520+ (Appellate Brief) (Md. Oct 19, 2006) Brief Amici Curiae of
Equality Maryland, Inc.; Families with Pride; Gay Fathers Coalition; Gay, Lesbian, Bisexu-
al, and Transgender Community Center of Baltimore and Central Maryland; Maryland
Lesbian ... (NO. 44) " HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)

4209 Frank CONAWAY, et. al., Appellants, v. Gitanjali DEANE, et. al., Appellees., 2006 WL
2725659, *2725659+ (Appellate Brief) (Md. Sep 08, 2006) Brief of Amici Curiae Association
of Maryland Families and Liberty Counsel and Support of Appellants (NO. 44) " HN:
4 (S.Ct.)
4210 SMC LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, Et Al., Appellants, v. CITY OF HYATTSVILLE, Et Al., Ap-
pellees., 2005 WL 5191104, *5191104+ (Appellate Brief) (Md.App. Jun 08, 2005) Brief of Ap-
pellee State of Maryland and Attorney General of the State of Maryland (NO. 02255)
HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
4211 Henry L. JOHNSON, Appellant, v. Chandra McLELLAND-KENNEDY, Appellee., 2002 WL
32590381, *32590381+ (Appellate Brief) (Md.App. Sep 24, 2002) Appellant's Brief (NO. 893)
HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
4212 BALTIMORE POLICE DEPARTMENT, et al., Appellants, v. Eura DAWKINS, Appellee., 2001
WL 36094191, *36094191+ (Appellate Brief) (Md.App. Sep 28, 2001) Brief of Appellee (NO.
98) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
4213 In Re: Estate of James W. MILTENBERGER, Deceased. Susan EIFLER, Personal Representat-
ive of the Estate of James W. Miltenberger, Deceased, Appellee, Sharon MILTENBERGER, Pe-
titioner-Appellee, v. Sandra SWARTZ, Respondent-Appellant., 2008 WL 696194, *696194+
(Appellate Brief) (Mich. Jan 28, 2008) Brief on Appeal - Appellant Sandra Swartz Oral Argu-
ment Requested (NO. 133847) HN: 4,5 (S.Ct.)
4214 In re REQUEST FOR ADVISORY OPINION REGARDING CONSTITUTIONALITY OF 2005
PA 71., 2006 WL 4491405, *4491405+ (Appellate Brief) (Mich. Jul 19, 2006) Brief of Attorney
General Opposing Constitutionality of 2005 PA 71 (NO. 130589) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
4215 Hildegard GORA, the Loving Touch, Inc., Jacqueline Maxwell, Lea M. Perkins, Traci L. Lepro
and Dawn L. Spangler, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. CITY OF FERNDALE, a Municipal body corpor-
ate of the State of Michigan; and Valerie E. Kitchen, in her official Capacity as City Clerk for the
City of Ferndale, Defendants-Appellants., 1997 WL 33757612, *33757612 (Appellate Brief)
(Mich. Dec Term 1997) Brief on Appeal of Appellee, Hildegard Gora, Only (NO. 106783)
HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
4216 PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Andrew John LEARY, De-
fendant-Appellee., 1993 WL 13155223, *13155223+ (Appellate Brief) (Mich. Nov 08, 1993) De-
fendant-Appellee's Brief on Appeal Proof of Service (NO. 96465) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
4217 John Patrick BENAL, Appellant, v. Angela Jean BENAL, Appellee., 2009 WL 5128918,
*5128918+ (Appellate Brief) (Miss. Jun 25, 2009) Brief of Appellant (NO.
2008-CA-01181-COA) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
4218 John Patrick BENAL, Appellant, v. Angela Jean BENAL, Appellee., 2009 WL 5128916,
*5128916 (Appellate Brief) (Miss. Jan 20, 2009) Brief of Appellant (NO. 2008-CA-01181-SCT)
HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
4219 Jessica R. POWERS, Appellant, v. Eric A. TIEBAUER, Jr, Appellee., 2004 WL 3571155,
*3571155+ (Appellate Brief) (Miss. Oct 01, 2004) Brief for Appellant Jessica R. Powers (NO.
03-CP-01877) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
4220 In re the Marriage of Ellen Kohring and Steven Snodgrass, Ellen KOHRING, f/k/a Ellen Snod-
grass, Petitioner/Respondent, v. Steven SNODGRASS, Respondent/Appellant., 1999 WL
33964267, *33964267+ (Appellate Brief) (Mo. Apr 05, 1999) Respondent's Brief (NO.

SC81139) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)

4221 Rachel DICKENS, Appellant, v. Reece Lee GOULD, by his Next Friend, David Ray Gould, and
David Ray Gould Individually, Respondents., 2003 WL 24237590, *24237590+ (Appellate
Brief) (Mo.App. E.D. Dec 18, 2003) Brief of Appellant, Rachel Dickens (NO. ED83187)
HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
4222 Rachel DICKENS, Appellant, v. Reece Lee GOULD, by his Next Friend, David Ray Gould, and
David Ray Gould Individually, Respondents., 2003 WL 24237588, *24237588+ (Appellate
Brief) (Mo.App. E.D. Dec 02, 2003) Brief of Appellant, Rachel Dickens (NO. ED83187)
HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
4223 Robert BAXTER, Steven Stoelb, Stephen Peckart, M.D., C. Paul Loehnen, M.D., Lar Autio,
M.D., George Risi, Jr., M.D., and Compassion & Choices Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. State of
Montana and Steve Bullock, Defendants-Appellants., 2009 WL 1967449, *1967449+ (Appellate
Brief) (Mont. Jun 22, 2009) Amicus Brief of Women's Rights Amici Curiae: Legal Voice, Na-
tional Health Law Program, National Institute for Reproductive Health, Mergerwatch
Project, and Working for Equality & Economic Liberation (NO. 09-051) " HN: 4
(S.Ct.)
4224 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, v. Darrell Winfred ROBERTS., 2009 WL 1701120, *1701120
(Appellate Brief) (N.C.App. Jun 03, 2009) Defendant-Appellant's Brief (NO. COA09-517)
4225 Stephanie SAUBY, individually and on behalf of those similarly situated, Plaintiff/Appellant, v.
CITY OF FARGO, Defendant/Appelle., 2007 WL 3377661, *3377661 (Appellate Brief) (N.D.
Sep 19, 2007) Brief of Defendant/Appellee City of Fargo (NO. 20070202)
4226 Milliard Shawn DAMRON, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. Valerie DAMRON, Defendant and Appel-
lant., 2003 WL 23695771, *23695771+ (Appellate Brief) (N.D. Jun 18, 2003) Opening Brief of
Appellant (NO. 20030135) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
4227 State of New Jersey, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Leslie A. NELSON, Defendant-Appellant., 2002
WL 33836429, *33836429+ (Appellate Brief) (N.J. Feb 21, 2002) Supplemental Brief on Be-
half of the State of New Jersey in Response to Defendant's Pro Se Brief (NO. 51374) "
HN: 1,2 (S.Ct.)
4228 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Leslie A. NELSON, Defendant-Appellant.,
2002 WL 34342653, *34342653+ (Appellate Brief) (N.J. Feb 21, 2002) Reply Brief (NO.
51374) " HN: 1,2 (S.Ct.)
4229 STATE OF NEW MEXICO, Plaintiff-Petitioner, v. Cynthia MARTINEZ, a/k/a Cynthia Navar-
ette, Defendant-Respondent., 2007 WL 5120945, *5120945+ (Appellate Brief) (N.M. Mar 09,
2007) Brief of Amici Curiae American Civil Liberties Union of New Mexico, Planned Par-
enthood of New Mexico, and New Mexico Women's Justice Project In Support of Defend-
ant-Respondent (NO. 29775) " HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
4230 Daniel HERNANDEZ and Nevin Cohen, Lauren Abrams and Donna Freeman-Tweed, Michael
Elsasser and Douglas Robinson, Mary Jo Kennedy and Jo-Ann Shain, and Daniel Reyes and
Curtis Woolbright, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Victor L. ROBLES, in his official capacity as City
Clerk of the City of New York, Defendant-Respondent., 2006 WL 1930142, *1930142+
(Appellate Brief) (N.Y. Apr 30, 2006) Reply Brief for Plaintiffs-Appellants HN: 1 (S.Ct.)

(Appellate Brief) (N.Y. Apr 22, 2006) Amicus Brief of Concerned Women for America and
New York Family Policy Council " HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
4232 Sylvia SAMUELS and Diane Gallagher, Heather McDonnell and Carol Snyder, Amy Tripi and
Jeanne Vitale, Wade Nichols and Harng Shen, Michael Hahn and Paul Muhonen, Daniel J.
O'Donnell and John Banta, Cynthia Bink and Ann Pachner, Kathleen Tuggle and Tonja Alvis,
Regina Cicchetti and Susan Zimmer, Alice J. Muniz and Oneida Garcia, Ellen Dreher and Laura
Collins, John Wessel and William O'Connor, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. THE NEW YORK STATE
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH and the State of, 2006 WL 1930163, *1930163+ (Appellate Brief)
(N.Y. Apr 22, 2006) Amicus Brief of Concerned Women for America and New York Family
Policy Council " HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
(N.Y. Apr 19, 2006) Brief for Amicus Curiae Naacp Legal Defense and Educational Fund,
Inc. In Support of Plaintiffs-Appellants
Clerk of the City of New York, Defendant-Respondent; Sylvia Samuels and Diane Gallagher,
Heather McDonnell and Carol Snyder, Amy Tripi and Jeanne Vitale, Wade Nichols and Harng
Shen, Michael Hahn and Paul Muhonen,, 2006 WL 1930155, *1930155+ (Appellate Brief) (N.Y.
Apr 18, 2006) Brief of Civil Rights Groups Anti-Defamation League, Asian American
Justice Center, Asian American Legal Defense and Education Fund, Asian Equality, Equal-
ity Federation, National Center for Lesbian ... HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
Heather McDonnell and Carol Snyder, Amy Tripi and Jeanne Vitale, Wade Nichols and Haring
Shen, Michael Hahn and Paul, 2006 WL 1930138, *1930138+ (Appellate Brief) (N.Y. Apr 14,
2006) Brief of Amici Curiae Parents, Families & Friends of Lesbians and Gays, Inc., Family
Pride Coalition, Human Rights Campaign, Human Rights Campaign Foundation, and the
New York City Gay & Lesbian ... " HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
4236 Daniel HERNANDEZ and Nevin Cohen, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Victor L. ROBLES, in
his official capacity as City Clerk of the City of New York, Defendant-Respondent; Sylvia
Samuels and Diane Gallagher, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. The New York State Department of
Health and the State of New York, Defendants-Respondents; In the Matter of the Application of
Elissa Kane, et al., Petitioners-Appellants, For a Judgment Pursuant to, 2006 WL 1930143,

*1930143+ (Appellate Brief) (N.Y. Apr 12, 2006) Brief of Amici Curiae new York Law Pro-
fessors Alicia Ouellette, Stephen Clark, Hon. Stewart F. Hancock, Jr., Hon. Howard A. Lev-
ine,%n*%n Burt Neuborne, David D. Siegel, Katheryn D. Katz, Nan D. ... HN: 1,2
(S.Ct.)
Heather McDonnell and Carol Snyder, Amy Tripi and Jeanne Vitale, Wade Nichols and Harng
Shen, Michael Hahn and Paul Muhonen,, 2006 WL 1930146, *1930146+ (Appellate Brief) (N.Y.
Apr 11, 2006) Amici Curiae Brief of Women's Organizations in Support of Plaintiffs-Ap-
pellants " HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
(N.Y. Mar 03, 2006) Brief for Plaintiffs-Appellants " HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
(Appellate Brief) (N.Y. Feb 06, 2006) Brief for Plaintiffs-Appellants HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
4240 ARCHBISHOP WALSH HIGH SCHOOL, Appellant, v. SECTION VI OF THE NEW YORK
STATE PUBLIC HIGH SCHOOL ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION, INC., Respondent., 1995 WL
17050797, *17050797+ (Appellate Brief) (N.Y. Nov 22, 1995) Brief on Behalf of Plaintiff-
Appellant Archbishop Walsh High School (NO. 1995-0600) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
4241 In the Matter of the Application of Diane SPIEGEL, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Cesar A. PERALES,
as Commissioner, New York State Department of Social Services, Respondents-Respondents.,
1994 WL 16044949, *16044949+ (Appellate Brief) (N.Y. Aug 19, 1994) Brief on Behalf of Pe-
titioner-Appellant (NO. 1994-0020) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
4242 In the Matter of the Application of Cathy ALLEN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Elin M. HOWE, as
Commissioner of the Office of Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, New York
State Office of Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, and Oswald D. Heck/Eleanor
Roosevelt Developmental Disabilities Services Office, Respondents-Respondents., 1994 WL
16044915, *16044915+ (Appellate Brief) (N.Y. Jun 27, 1994) Brief on Behalf of Petitioner-Ap-
pellant (NO. 1994-0007) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
4243 Jane HOPE and Jane Moe, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Vicki Alex-
ander, M.D., Solan Chao, M.D., E. Hakim Elahi, M.D., Arnold Roufa, M.D., Frances Thacher,
C.N.M., Reverend Richard S. Gilbert, Reverend Julia Quinlan, Buffalo Gyn Women Services,
Cayuga Family Planning Center, Community Family Planning Council, Erie Medical Center,
Planned Parenthood of New York City, Planned Parenthood of Suffolk County, Planned Parent-

hood of Tompkins County,, 1993 WL 13032829, *13032829+ (Appellate Brief) (N.Y. Nov 29,
1993) Brief of the Now Legal Defense and Education Fund and Fifty-Five National and New
York Organizations Committed to Women's Equality as Amicus Curiae in Support of
Plaintiffs-Respondents (NO. 1994-0130) " HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
4244 JUNK'N DOUGHNUTS INC. d/b/a Schmuck Bros. Of Pennsylvania, Plaintiff-Respondent, v.
DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK, Defendant-Appel-
lant., 2007 WL 6179065, *6179065+ (Appellate Brief) (N.Y.A.D. 1 Dept. Dec 21, 2007) Brief
for Defendant-Appellant (NO. 3186)
4245 In the Matter of the Application of Jesus FIGUEROA, Petitioner-Respondent, v. Thomas P.
MAGUIRE, Jr., as Adjutant General of the New York State Division of Military and Naval Af-
fairs, Michael F. Canders, personally, and Robert J. Dusek, personally, Respondents-Appellants.,
2006 WL 4548637, *4548637+ (Appellate Brief) (N.Y.A.D. 2 Dept. Jul 31, 2006) Reply Brief
for Respondents-Appellants (NO. 2005-11766)
4246 PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. Robert SANTOS, Defendant-Appel-
lant., 1996 WL 34422383, *34422383 (Appellate Brief) (N.Y.A.D. 2 Dept. Oct 30, 1996) Brief
for Defendant-Appellant (NO. 1995-02992) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
4247 Mae R. HANNA, Appellee/Petitioner, v. David C. KESZEI, Appellant/Respondent., 2009 WL
3309066, *3309066 (Appellate Brief) (Ohio Oct 01, 2009) Memorandum in Support of Juris-
diction of Appellant David C. Keszei (NO. 09-1762) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
4248 STATE OF OHIO, Appellee, v. Eric R. THOMPSON, Appellant., 2001 WL 34552378,
*34552378+ (Appellate Brief) (Ohio Jul 31, 2001) Brief on the Merits in Support of Appellant
Eric R. Thompson of Amici Curiae Lambda Legal Defense and Education Fund, Inc., the
Ohio Association of Cro,oma; Defense Lawyers, and the Ohio Human Rights ... (NO.
2001-333)
4249 Richard JOHNSON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Jean HILL, Superintendent, Snake River Correc-
tional Institution, Defendant-Respondent., 2008 WL 6014142, *6014142+ (Appellate Brief)
(Or.App. 2008) Appellant's Pro Se Supplemental Brief (NO. A129029)
4250 Wendy GLOFFKE, Appellant, v. Melvin ROBINSON and Lehigh and Northampton Transporta-
tion Authority a/k/a Lanta a/k/a Lanta-Metro, Appellee., 2003 WL 22849508, *22849508+
(Appellate Brief) (Pa. May 06, 2003) Brief for Appellee (NO. 28MAP2003) HN: 2
(S.Ct.)
4251 Wendy GLOFFKE, Plaintiff Appellant, v. Mel Vin ROBINSON and Lehigh and Northampton
Transportation Authority a/k/a Lanta n/k/a Lanta-Metro, Defendant Appellees., 2003 WL
22849509, *22849509+ (Appellate Brief) (Pa. May 05, 2003) Brief Amicus Curiae of the
Pennsylvania Public Transportation Association (NO. 28MAP2003) " HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
4252 CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, Appellant, v. PHILADELPHIA PARKING AUTHORITY, Joseph
T. Ashdale, Michael A. Cibik; Catherine Marshall, Alfred W. Taubenberger, Russell R. Wagner,
and Karen M. Wrigley, Appellees., 2001 WL 34152479, *34152479+ (Appellate Brief) (Pa. Sep
05, 2001) Brief for the Governor and the Attorney General of Pennsylvania, Appellees (NO.
28EAP2001) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
4253 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Appellant, v. Michael HURD, Appellee., 1998 WL
34113098, *34113098+ (Appellate Brief) (Pa. 1998) Brief for Appellee Michael Hurd (NO.
74MAP1998) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)

4254 PENNSYLVANIA ASSOCIATION OF RURAL AND SMALL SCHOOL DISTRICTS, et al.,

Petitioners, v. Thomas J. RIDGE, Governor of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Eugene
Hickok, Secretary of Education, Respondents, ASSOCIATION OF SCHOOL DISTRICTS IN
SUPPORT OF EXCELLENCE AND EQUITY, et al., Intervenors., 1998 WL 34114285,
*34114285+ (Appellate Brief) (Pa. 1998) Brief for Respondents (NO. 0226MM1998) HN:
2 (S.Ct.)
4255 Cecelia POKOY, Appellant/Petitioner, v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORT-
ATION, Appellee/Respondent., 1997 WL 33840993, *33840993+ (Appellate Brief) (Pa.Cmwlth.
Oct 29, 1997) Brief for Petitioner (NO. 2444CD1997) HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.)
4256 PENNSYLVANIA ASSOCIATION OF RURAL and Small Schools, et al., Petitioners, v.
Thomas J. RIDGE, Governor of the Commonwealth of PA, Eugene W. Hickok, Secretary of Edu-
cation, Respondents, Association of School Districts in Support of Excellence and Equity, et al.,
Intervenors., 1997 WL 33822777, *33822777+ (Appellate Brief) (Pa.Cmwlth. Aug 01, 1997) Re-
spondents' Reply Brief (NO. 0011MD1991) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
4257 Mary Kay SEDLACEK, Executrix of the Estate of Edward Sedlacek, and Mary Kay Sedlacek, in
her own right, Appellant, v. A.O. SMITH CORPORATION, Alcoa Inc., Allied Glove Corpora-
tion, American Optical Corporation, Anchor Packing Company, Argo Packing Company, Atlas
Industries, Inc., B.F. Goodrich Company, Borg-Warner, Cashco, Inc., Certainteed Corporation,
Crane Co., Crown Cork & Seal, Dana Corporation, Dezurik, Inc., Durabla Manufacturing Co.,,
2008 WL 6193834, *6193834+ (Appellate Brief) (Pa.Super. Jul 30, 2008) Brief of Appellee Al-
coa Inc. (NO. 592WDA2008)
4258 Mary Lou CROOKS, Executrix of the Estate of Frank C. Crooks, Deceased, and Mary Lou
Crooks, in her own right, Appellant, v. A.O. SMITH CORPORATION, Alcoa Inc., Allied Glove
Corporation, American Optical Corporation, Anchor Packing Company, Argo Packing Company,
Atlas Industries, Inc., B.F. Goodrich Company, Borg-Warner, Cashco, Inc., Certainteed Corpora-
tion, Crane Co., Crown Cork & Seal, Dana Corporation, Dezurik, Inc., Durabla Manufacturing
Co.,, 2008 WL 6193842, *6193842+ (Appellate Brief) (Pa.Super. Jul 30, 2008) Brief of Ap-
pellee Alcoa Inc. (NO. 612WDA2008)
4259 Marie T. LEDGER, Appellant, v. Thomas W. EASTON, Appellee., 2007 WL 5267262,
*5267262+ (Appellate Brief) (Pa.Super. Dec 17, 2007) Brief of Appellant (NO. 1366MDA2007)
" HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
4260 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Appellee, v. Shawn A. ROSS, Appellant., 2004
WL 2559862, *2559862 (Appellate Brief) (Pa.Super. Sep 20, 2004) Brief for Appellant (NO.
00811MDA04)
4261 Mark KORNFELD and Gary Kornfeld and K.G.K.K., the Partnership, Appellees, v. ATLANTIC
FINANCIAL FEDERAL, now by various assignments, Bankers Trust Company, Appellant.
Rokom, Inc., Appellee, v. Atlantic Financial Federal, now by various assignments, Bankers Trust
Company, Appellant., 2003 WL 23411589, *23411589+ (Appellate Brief) (Pa.Super. Jul 01,
2003) Brief of Appellees (NO. 01833MDA02, 01847MDA02) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
4262 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Appellee, v. Kevin D. SCHMADER, Appellant.,
2001 WL 34388478, *34388478 (Appellate Brief) (Pa.Super. Jun 13, 2001) Brief in Support of
Appellant (NO. 00816WDA01) HN: 1,2 (S.Ct.)
4263 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Appellee, v. Samuel BROWN, Appellant., 1998

WL 34290651, *34290651+ (Appellate Brief) (Pa.Super. Nov 24, 1998) Brief for Appellant
(NO. 04687PHL97)
4264 Rodney COWANS, Appellee, v. SOUTH DAKOTA BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLES,
and Douglas Weber, Warden, Appellants., 2008 WL 6109536, *6109536 (Appellate Brief) (S.D.
Oct 01, 2008) Appellants' Brief (NO. 24963)
4265 Eric M. BOST, Commissioner of Human Services, et al., Petitioners, v. LOW INCOME WO-
MEN OF TEXAS et al., Respondents., 2001 WL 34377702, *34377702+ (Appellate Brief) (Tex.
Aug 07, 2001) Amicus Brief of Senator Don Kennard (NO. 01-0061) " HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
4266 Howard Paul GUIDRY, Appellant, v. The State of Texas, Appellee., 1998 WL 34194569,
*34194569+ (Appellate Brief) (Tex.Crim.App. Apr 01, 1998) Brief for Appellant (NO. 72775)
HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
.... Howard Paul GUIDRY, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee. (Appellate Brief)
(Tex.Crim.App. Apr 01, 1998) Brief for Appellant (NO. 702775) (Text not available on
WESTLAW)
4268 Howard Paul GUIDRY, Appellant, v. The State of Texas, Appellee., 1998 WL 34313256,
*34313256+ (Appellate Brief) (Tex.Crim.App. Apr 01, 1998) Brief for Appellant (NO. 702775,
730267) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
4269 Wilmer Lee COBB, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee., 2007 WL 4471262,
*4471262+ (Appellate Brief) (Tex.App.-Eastland Dec 03, 2007) Brief for Appellee (NO.
11-07-00171-) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
4270 Teressa DILL, Individually and on Behalf of the Estate of her Deceased Husband - David Dill,
and as Parent and Next Friend of Minors Kaylee Dill, David Dill, Jr., and Sarah Dill, and Jennifer
Dill, Appellants, v. Lisa S. FOWLER, M.D., and David E. Wiley, M.D., Appellees., 2007 WL
4340661, *4340661+ (Appellate Brief) (Tex.App.-Eastland Nov 02, 2007) Brief of Appellee
(NO. 11-07-00227-CV) HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
4271 Teressa DILL, Individually and on Behalf of the Estate of her Deceased Husband - David Dill,
and as Parent and Next Friend of Minors Kaylee Dill, David Dill, Jr., and Sarah Dill, and Jennifer
Dill, Appellants, v. Lisa S. FOWLER, M.D., and David E. Wiley, M.D., Appellees., 2007 WL
4340663, *4340663+ (Appellate Brief) (Tex.App.-Eastland Nov 02, 2007) Brief of Appellee
(NO. 11-07-00227-CV) HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
4272 Krystal Y. MILES, Appellant, v. LEE ANDERSON COMPANY d/b/a Quizno's Subs, Appellee.,
2009 WL 5148122, *5148122+ (Appellate Brief) (Tex.App.-Hous. (1 Dist.) Nov 12, 2009) Brief
of Appellee, Lee Anderson Company d/b/a Quizno's Subs (NO. 01-09-00617-CV)
4273 Lynn NICHOLAS, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF UTAH, Defend-
ant/Appellee., 2006 WL 6184464, *6184464+ (Appellate Brief) (Utah Nov 01, 2006) Reply
Brief of Appellant Lynn Nicholas (NO. 20060297) " HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
4274 Nancy L. WRIGHT, Appellant, v. DONELLY & COMPANY and Wayne B. Donelly, Appellees.,
1993 WL 13159547, *13159547+ (Appellate Brief) (Va. Aug 02, 1993) Appellant's Opening
Brief (NO. 93-0205) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
4275 Marie WACKWITZ, Administratrix of the Estate of Byron Henry Wackwitz, Appellant, v. Julia
A. ROY, Executrix of the Estate of Gaston Roy, M.D., et al., Appellees., 1991 WL 11262595,
*11262595+ (Appellate Brief) (Va. Dec 30, 1991) Brief of Appellees (NO. 91-1384) HN: 4

(S.Ct.)
4276 Heather ANDERSEN and Leslie Christian et al., Respondents, v. King COUNTY et al., Appel-
lants., 2005 WL 901992, *901992+ (Appellate Brief) (Wash. Feb 23, 2005) Answer of Respond-
ents Heather Andersen and Leslie Christian Etal. to Briefs of Amici Curiae (NO. 75934-1)
4277 Heather ANDERSEN and Leslie Christian, et al., Respondents, v. KING COUNTY et al., Appel-
lants; Celia Castle and Brenda Bauer et al., Respondents, v. State of Washington, Appellant.,
2005 WL 901985, *901985+ (Appellate Brief) (Wash. Feb 14, 2005) Amic Curiae Brief of Wo-
men's Organizationis in Support of Respondents (NO. 75934-1) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
4278 Gregory K. AMUNRUD, Appellant, v. BOARD OF APPEALS AND DEPARTMENT OF SO-
CIAL and Health Services, State of Washington, Respondents., 2003 WL 24302670, *24302670+
(Appellate Brief) (Wash. Nov 12, 2003) Brief of Respondents (NO. 76590-1) HN: 1
(S.Ct.)
4279 Jeffrey King BEESTON, Sr., Respondent, v. Toni Rae GUARD, Individually and as Personal
Representative of the Estate of Jeffrey K. Beeston, Jr., Plaintiff, John and Cindy Jackson, De-
fendants/Petitioners., 1997 WL 33814594, *33814594+ (Appellate Brief) (Wash. Apr 29, 1997)
Brief Amicus Curiae of the American Civil Liberties Union of Washington Foundation (NO.
64704-6) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
4280 Gregory K. AMUNRUD, Appellant, v. BOARD OF APPEALS AND DEPARTMENT OF SO-
CIAL and Health Services, State of Washington, Respondents., 2003 WL 25719454, *25719454+
(Appellate Brief) (Wash.App. Nov 12, 2003) Brief of Respondents (NO. 52910-2-I) HN: 1
(S.Ct.)
4281 STATE OF WISCONSIN, Plaintiff-Respondent-Petitioner, v. Landray M. HARRIS, Defendant-
Appellant., 2009 WL 3044192, *3044192 (Appellate Brief) (Wis. Sep 14, 2009) National Asso-
ciation for the Advancement of Colored People's Amicus Brief (NO. 2008AP810-CR)
4282 Thomas N. TOMCZAK and Mary Ann Tomczak, Plaintiffs - Respondents, v. Pete L. BAILEY
and American Surveying Company, Inc., Defendants-Appellants-Petitioners, Randolph L. RA-
FALSKI, Interline Surveying Services, Inc., Defendants, Mildred WOHLFARD, Defendant-
Third-Party Plaintiff, v. EQUITABLE/STEFANIAK REALTY, Third-Party Defendant., 1997
WL 33624820, *33624820+ (Appellate Brief) (Wis. May 14, 1997) Supreme Court Brief of De-
fendants - Appellants - Petitioners Pete L. Bailey and American Surveying Company, Inc.
(NO. 95-2733) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
4283 ESTATE OF CHERYL MAKOS, by the Personal Rep. Calvin Makos, and Calvin Makos, Indi-
vidually, Amanda Makos, Cody Makos and Ashley Makos, by Their Guardian AD Litem, Gary
R. Weidner, Esq., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. WISCONSIN MASONS HEALTH CARE FUND, As-
sociates in Pathology, S.C., Dr. Steven E. Bodemer, Wisconsin Patients Compensation Fund, De-
fendants-Respondents, ABC INSURANCE COMPANY and DEF INSURANCE COMPANY,
Defendants., 1996 WL 33476290, *33476290 (Appellate Brief) (Wis. Oct 11, 1996) Defendants-
Respondents' Supreme Court Brief (NO. 96-0174) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
4284 In re the Termination of Parental Rights to Kedar K., A Person Under the Age of Eighteen: State
of Wisconsin, Petitioner-Respondent, v. Emanuel G., Respondent-Appellant., 2005 WL 4883566,
*4883566+ (Appellate Brief) (Wis.App. I Dist. Apr 19, 2005) Brief and Appendix of the
Guardian Ad Litem Supporting the Termination of Parental Rights (NO. 05-0385) HN:

1,3 (S.Ct.)
4285 In re the Termination of Parental Rights to Kedar K., a person under the age of 18. State of Wis-
consin, Petitioner-Respondent, v. Emanuel G., Respondent-Appellant., 2005 WL 4883564,
*4883564+ (Appellate Brief) (Wis.App. I Dist. Apr 04, 2005) Brief and Appendix of Respond-
ent-Appellant (NO. 05-0385) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
4286 THE CHASE MANHATTAN BANK, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Ira R. BANKS, Defendant-Appel-
lant,, 2004 WL 3640613, *3640613+ (Appellate Brief) (Wis.App. I Dist. Apr 23, 2004) Brief of
Defendant-Appellant (NO. 04-0867) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
4287 State of WISCONSIN, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. John M. SETH, Defendant-Appellant., 2002 WL
32311491, *32311491 (Appellate Brief) (Wis.App. II Dist. Aug 12, 2002) Reply Brief of De-
fendant-Appellant (NO. 02-0863-) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
4288 State of WISCONSIN, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. John M. SETH, Defendant-Appellant., 2002 WL
32311490, *32311490+ (Appellate Brief) (Wis.App. II Dist. Jul 26, 2002) Brief and Appendix
of Plaintiff-Respondent (NO. 02-0863-) " HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
4289 Gratz v. Bollinger, 2003 WL 151258, *151258 (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jan 16, 2003) Brief for
the United States as Amicus Curiae Supporting Petitioner (NO. 02-516) " HN: 3 (S.Ct.)
4290 Gratz v. Bollinger, 2003 WL 176629, *176629+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jan 16, 2003) Brief for
the United States as Amicus Curiae Supporting Petitioners (NO. 02-516) " HN: 3
(S.Ct.)
(U.S. Oct 25, 2002) BRIEF OF AMICI CURIAE THE LAWYERS' COMMITTEE FOR
CIVIL RIGHTS UNDER LAW, THE NATIONAL ASIAN PACIFIC AMERICAN LEGAL
CONSORTIUM, AND THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF
COLORED PEOPLE IN ... (NO. 01-1368) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
(U.S. Oct 25, 2002) BRIEF OF THE AMERICAN FEDERATION OF LABOR AND CON-
GRESS OF INDUSTRIAL ORGANIZATIONS AS AMICUS CURIAE IN SUPPORT OF
RESPONDENTS (NO. 01-1368) "
4293 Nevada Dept. of Human Resource v. Hibbs, 2002 WL 31477652, *31477652 (Appellate Brief)
(U.S. Oct 25, 2002) BRIEF OF AMICI CURIAE SENATORS CHRISTOPHER DODD AND
EDWARD M. KENNEDY, AND REPRESENTATIVES PATRICIA SCHROEDER,
MARGE ROUKEMA AND GEORGE MILLER IN SUPPORT OF RESPONDENTS (NO.
01-1368) "
4294 Nguyen v. I.N.S., 2000 WL 1702027, *1702027+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Nov 13, 2000) BRIEF
OF AMICUS CURIAE ASIAN AMERICAN LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATION
FUND, INC. IN SUPPORT OF PETITIONERS (NO. 99-2071) " HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
4295 Apprendi v. New Jersey, 2000 WL 38828, *38828+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jan 13, 2000) BRIEF
AMICUS CURIAE OF THE RUTHERFORD INSTITUTE IN SUPPORT OF PETITION-
ER (NO. 99-478) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
4296 U.S. v. Morrison, 1999 WL 1032805, *1032805+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Nov 12, 1999) BRIEF
OF LAW PROFESSORS AS AMICI CURIAE IN SUPPORT OF PETITIONERS (NO.
99-29, 99-5) " HN: 2,4 (S.Ct.)

4297 Kimel v. Florida Bd. of Regents, 1999 WL 627170, *627170+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Aug 17,
1999) BRIEF OF AMICUS CURIAE PENNSYLVANIA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
REPUBLICAN CAUCUS (NO. 98-791, 98-796) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
Trial Court Documents (U.S.A.)
Trial Pleadings
4298 Ssgt Jason A. ADKINS, Usaf, Plaintiff, v. Donald H. RUMSFELD, Secretary of Defense; James
G. Roche, Secretary of the Air Force; Gen. John W. Handy, Commander Air Mobility Command,
Col. John I. Pray, Jr., 436th Air Wing Commander, in their official capacities, Defendants., 2006
WL 1324016, *1324016+ (Trial Pleading) (D.Del. Mar 15, 2006) Plaintiff's Answering Brief in
Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (NO. ACT04-1453-JJF) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
4299 In The Matter Of: Timothy N JOYNES, Plaintiff, v. Vincent P MECONI Secretary, Delaware
Health and Social Services Charles E Hayward Director, Delaware Division of Child Support En-
forcement The Honorable Martha Sackovich Commissioner, State of Delaware Family Court:
New Castle County, Delaware The Honorable Mary Ann Herlihy Commissioner, State of
Delaware Family Court: New Castle County, Delaware The Honorable Judge Jay H Conner
Judge, State of Delaware Family Court:, 2005 WL 1529893, *1529893 (Trial Pleading) (D.Del.
May 26, 2005) Questions Presented for Review (NO. 05-332) " HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
4300 Joseph A. GIALLANZA, pro se, Plaintiff, v. COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSION-
ERS, Honorable Judges Cynthia A. Ellis, Jay B. Rosman, Franklin G. Baker, Brenda C. Wilson,
Attorney General Robert Butterworth, State of Florida Department of Children and Families,
State of Florida Department of Revenue, DVU Investigator Robert Magiante, Collier County
Court Clerk Amanda Smith, Janet Bruno, M. Jean Rawson, Esquire, Collier County Sheriff Don
Hunter, Collier, 2003 WL 23804531, *23804531+ (Trial Pleading) (M.D.Fla. Mar 07, 2003)
Second Amended Complaint (NO. 202-CV-64-FTM-29DNF)
4301 Amelia COBB and Diana Saly, Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCA-
TION OFFICE FOR CIVIL RIGHTS, Defendant., 2006 WL 3225075, *3225075 (Trial Pleading)
(D.Minn. Sep 29, 2006) amended Complaint of Amelia Cobb and Diana Saly (NO. 05-2439,
MJD/AJB)
4302 THE COALITION OF FREE MEN, INC., a non-profit corporation organized under the laws of
the State of New York, doing business in and under the laws of the State of Minnesota, as such
using the assumed name of the National Coalition of Free Men, Twin Cities Chapter, Plaintiff, v.
Hon. Velma KORBEL, Commissioner of Human Rights for the State of Minnesota, Defendant.,
2006 WL 2312576, *2312576+ (Trial Pleading) (D.Minn. May 26, 2006) Complaint (NO.
06CV02264) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
4303 Arthur H. COBB and George L. Saly, Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDU-
CATION OFFICE FOR CIVIL RIGHTS, Margaret Spellings in her capacity as Secretary of the
United States Department of Education, Algis Tamosiunas in his capacity as Office for Civil
Rights Director Compliance Program, Judith E. Levitt in her capacity as Office for Civil Rights
Senior Civil Rights Counsel and Linda A. McGovern in her capacity as Office for Civil Rights
Director,, 2005 WL 3621849, *3621849 (Trial Pleading) (D.Minn. Oct 13, 2005) Complaint
(NO. CV05-2439RAK/AJB)

4304 William J. HAGEMAN, Charles W. Hurd, Kyle Knutson, Jim Lovestar, Yves Nadeau, Pradeep
Ramanathan, Barbara Starr, and Randy Starr, sponsored by the National Coalition of Free Men,
Twin Cities Chapter; Jean M. Cody, Merrit R. Cody, Knute Gladen Timothy Kinley, Charles R.
Perrin, Theresa Ditter, and Dan Barrett, sponsored by R-KIDS of Minnesota; and Richard Doyle,
sponsored by the Men's Defense Association, in behalf of themselves and all others similarly
situated,, 2003 WL 25257899, *25257899+ (Trial Pleading) (D.Minn. Jun 06, 2003) Complaint
(NO. 06CV02264) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
Warren N. Higgins Jr., Knute Gladen, Michael Seeber, Terry Nyblom, and Stephen Blake form-
ing the R-Kids Legal Action Committee, Richard Doyle of the Men's Defense Association, Willi-
am J. Hageman, Charles W. Hurd, Klye Knutson, Jim Lovestar, Yves Nadeau, and Pradeep
Ramanathan of the National Coalition of Free Men, Twin Cities Chapter, in behalf of themselves
individually, 2000 WL 35427847, *35427847 (Trial Pleading) (D.Minn. Oct 17, 2000) Amended
Complaint (NO. OOCV1672MJD/JGL) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
4306 Elridge DANIEL, Jr., Plaintiff, v. Howard SAFIR, NYPD Thomas Von Essen, FDNY Wayne A.
Corbett, FDNY C. Krug, FDNY Wendell R. Williams, FDNY Denis B. Guardiano, FDNY Walter
McCarthy, FDNY Sergeant Juliano, NYPD John Tumulty, Assistant D.A. Lonnie Mendolia, As-
sistant D.A. Anne Swern, Assistant D. A. Stacey Frigerio, Assistant D.A. Lori Noble, Assistant
D.A John Theodorellis, Assistant D.A. Robert M. Baum, and The Legal Aid Society Michael D.
Hess, Corporation Counsel, 1999 WL 34803073, *34803073+ (Trial Pleading) (E.D.N.Y. Dec 30,
1999) Amended Complaint (NO. 996396, NG)
4307 In the Matter of the Application of PATRICIA ANN COTTAGE PUB, INC. d/b/a Jack Mc-
carthy's Pub, Tobins 2 Pub and Mariella Enterprises, d/b/a Dunton Inn, Petitioners, v. Dr. Linda
MERMELSTEIN, Commissioner of the County of Suffolk Department of Health Services, Re-
spondent., 2004 WL 5531131, *5531131 (Trial Pleading) (N.Y.Sup. Apr 13, 2004) Respondent's
Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Article 78 Proceeding (NO. 2004-05806) HN: 2
(S.Ct.)
Trial Motions, Memoranda and Affidavits

4308 CITY OF BIRMINGHAM, Plaintiff, v. CITIGROUP INC.; Citi Mortgage, Inc.; Citi Financial,
Inc.; Argent Mortgage Company, LLC; Countrywide Mortgage Ventures, LLC; Countrywide KB
Home Loans; Countrywide Financial Corporation, Defendants., 2009 WL 2969031, *2969031
(Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (N.D.Ala. May 13, 2009) Plaintiff's Opposition to
Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (NO. CV-09-BE-467-S)
4309 Tracy COLLINS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Janice K. BREWER, in her official capacity as Governor of
the State of Arizona, et al., Defendants., 2010 WL 2300437, *2300437+ (Trial Motion, Memor-
andum and Affidavit) (D.Ariz. May 27, 2010) Plaintiffs' Reply in Support of Motion for Pre-
liminary Injunction (NO. CV09-2402-PHX-JWS)
andum and Affidavit) (D.Ariz. Apr 01, 2010) Plaintiffs' Motion and Memorandum of Points
and Authorities in Support of Preliminary (NO. CV09-2402-PHX-JWS) " HN: 5
(S.Ct.)

andum and Affidavit) (D.Ariz. Feb 11, 2010) Plaintiffs' Response to Motion to Dismiss (NO.
CV09-2402-PHX-JWS) " HN: 4,5 (S.Ct.)
4312 Jill LANSDALE, a married woman, plaintiff, v. HI-HEALTH SUPERMART CORPORATION,
an Arizona Corporation, defendant., 2000 WL 35521788, *35521788 (Trial Motion, Memor-
andum and Affidavit) (D.Ariz. Sep 05, 2000) Plaintiff's Reply Memorandum in Support of
her Cross-Motion to Declare the Damage Limitations of the Civil Rights Act of 1991 Uncon-
stitutional (NO. 97-2555PHX-RGS)
4313 Willie GAMMON, Plaintiff, v. ARKANSAS HIGHWAY & TRANSPORTATION DEPART-
MENT, et al, Defendant., 2008 WL 2580624, *2580624 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affi-
davit) (E.D.Ark. Feb 25, 2008) Responsive Brief in Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dis-
miss (NO. 207CV00148)
4314 Jimmie L. WILSON, Plaintiff, v. Stark LIGON, et al, Defendants., 2006 WL 5124883, *5124883
(Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (E.D.Ark. Oct 27, 2006) Responsive Brief to Mo-
tion to Dismiss (NO. 206-CV-00189WRW)
4315 Rosunde NICHOLS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. PHILLIPS COUNTY ELECTION COMMISSION, et
al., Defendants., 2006 WL 5111141, *5111141 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit)
(E.D.Ark. Sep 18, 2006) Brief in Response to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (NO.
206CV00158)
4316 Willie GAMMON, Plaintiff, v. Dan FLOWERS, Director of the Ahtd; Ronnie Burks, Chief of
Arkansas Highway Police; Arkansas Highway Transportation, Defendants., 2005 WL 2487561,
*2487561 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (E.D.Ark. Apr 04, 2005) Brief in Support
of Plaintiff's Response to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (NO. 204CV00205JLH)
4317 FRIENDS OF THE LAKEVIEW SCHOOL DISTRICT INCORPORATED NO. 25 OF PHIL-
LIPS COUNTY, et al, Plaintiffs, v. Mike HUCKABEE in his official capacity, as Governor of
the State of Arkansas, Defendants., 2005 WL 3730090, *3730090 (Trial Motion, Memorandum
and Affidavit) (E.D.Ark. Mar 15, 2005) Brief in Support of Plaintiffs' Response to Motion to
Dismiss (NO. 204CV00184GH)
4318 Jimmy WEAVER, Plaintiff, v. TEAMSTERS UNION NO. 878, Defendant., 2005 WL 2487371,
*2487371 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (E.D.Ark. Feb 07, 2005) Brief in Support
of Plaintiff's Response to Defendant's Summary Judgment Motion (NO.
4-03-CV-00602GTE)
4319 Deldrick WITHERS, Plaintiff, v. DILLARD'S, INC., Defendant., 2004 WL 3553294, *3553294
(Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (E.D.Ark. Jan 20, 2004) Plaintiff's Brief in Opposi-
tion to the Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (NO. 402CV00250JMM)
4320 Lawson KEITH Pilgrim, Plaintiff, v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE
COMPANY, State Farm Life Insurance Company, State Farm Fire and Casualty Company, and
State Farm General Insurance Company, Defendants., 2003 WL 24169458, *24169458 (Trial
Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (E.D.Ark. Aug 05, 2003) Plaintiff's Brief in Opposition
of the Defendants' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (NO. 402-CV-00596)
4321 Priscilla LEAKS, Plaintiff, v. CINTAS CORPORATION, Defendant., 2002 WL 32899048,
*32899048 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (E.D.Ark. Jul 12, 2002) Plaintiff's Brief

in Support in Opposition to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (NO.

401CV00618GTE)
4322 Bridget BROWN, Tinika Daniels, Tara Horne, Collett Lewis, Loretta McFadden, Janice Minor,
Jenisa Williams, Angela Moore, Ruby Nichols, Veronica Norris, Erika Whitfield, Irma Nelson,
Plaintiffs, v. DILLARD'S, INC., David Dotson, April Presley, Jevonne Jack, Deborah Abrams,
Mary Windham, Pat Thessing, In His Individual and Official Capacity as a Police Officer for the
North Little Rock Police Department, Michael S. Agnew, In His Individual and Official, 2002
WL 32899613, *32899613 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (E.D.Ark. Jun 27, 2002)
Plaintiffs' Brief and Support in Opposition to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment
(NO. 4-00-CV-0240SWW)
4323 Vivian D. BELL, Plaintiff, v. GARY EUBANKS & ASSOCIATES, P.A., Defendant., 2002 WL
32897992, *32897992 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (E.D.Ark. May 28, 2002)
Plaintiff's Brief in Support (NO. 402-CV-00249SWW)
4324 Teru HOLMES, Plaintiff, v. CENTRAL FORD CENTER, INC., d/b/a Landers Ford, Defendant.,
2002 WL 32899546, *32899546 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (E.D.Ark. May 17,
2002) Plaintiff's Brief in Support (NO. 401CV00542GH)
4325 Dorothy SMITH, Plaintiff, v. THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE ARKANSAS TEACHER
RETIREMENT SYSTEM A Body Politic and Corporate, and William Shirron, In His Individual
and Official Capacity as Director of the Arkansas Teacher Retirement System, and Dr. Angelo
Coppola, In His Individual and Official Capacity as Deputy Director of the Arkansas Teacher Re-
tirement System, Defendants., 2002 WL 32955086, *32955086 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and
Affidavit) (E.D.Ark. Jan 07, 2002) Plaintiff's Brief in Support (NO. 4-01-CV0-0026GH)
4326 Bernard COLEMAN, Plaintiffs, v. HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC., Defendant., 2001 WL
34814921, *34814921 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (E.D.Ark. Nov 07, 2001)
Plaintiff's Brief in Support in Opposition to the Defendant's Motion for Summary Judg-
ment (NO. 400CV00961WRW)
4327 David B. WARREN, Plaintiff, v. L'OREAL USA PRODUCTS, INC., Defendant., 2001 WL
34815476, *34815476 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (E.D.Ark. Sep 25, 2001)
Plaintiff's Brief in Support in Opposition to the Defendant's Motion for Summary Judg-
ment (NO. 400-CV-00940WRW)
4328 Verna J. MCFADDEN, Plaintiff, v. THE UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS FOR MEDICAL SCI-
ENCES and Linda Taylor, Candace Conners, Defendants., 2001 WL 34814519, *34814519 (Trial
Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (E.D.Ark. Jun 21, 2001) Plaintiff's Brief in Support (NO.
499CV000554GH)
4329 Michael COLEMAN, Plaintiff, v. HOLIDAY INN SELECT, Defendant., 2001 WL 34815862,
*34815862 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (E.D.Ark. Jun 05, 2001) Plaintiff's Sup-
plemental Brief in Support in Opposition to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment
(NO. 400CV000309GH)
4330 Verna J. MCFADDEN, Plaintiff, v. THE UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS FOR MEDICAL SCI-
ENCES and Linda Taylor, Candace Conners, Defendants., 2001 WL 34814517, *34814517 (Trial
Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (E.D.Ark. May 17, 2001) Plaintiff's Brief in Support
(NO. 499CV000554GH)
4331 Connie KENDRICK, Plaintiff, v. MCGEORGE CONTRACTING CO., INC., Defendant., 2001

WL 34814891, *34814891 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (E.D.Ark. Mar 26, 2001)
Plaintiff's Brief in Support (NO. 400-CV-00576SMR)
4332 Barbara McCLOYEN, Plaintiff, v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC., Defendant., 2001 WL
34815321, *34815321 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (E.D.Ark. Mar 02, 2001)
Plaintiff's Brief in Opposition to the Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (NO.
400CV00150GTE)
4333 Kevin W. GEE Jr., Plaintiff, v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC., Defendant., 2000 WL
34543614, *34543614 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (E.D.Ark. Oct 31, 2000)
Plaintiff's Amended and Substituted Brief in Opposition to the Defendant's Motion for
Summary Judgment (NO. 499CV00876WRW)
4334 Kevin W. GEE Jr, Plaintiff, v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC., Defendant., 2000 WL
34543613, *34543613 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (E.D.Ark. Oct 30, 2000)
Plaintiff's Brief in Opposition to the Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (NO.
499CV00876WRW)
4335 Winston G. CHANDLER, Plaintiff, v. Secretary of the United States Air Force F. Whitton
PETERS, Raymond H. Weller Chief of Correction Board and Martha Maust Panel Chair, Defend-
ants., 2000 WL 34593112, *34593112 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (E.D.Ark. Oct
04, 2000) Request for Reconsideration on Order Granting Motion to Dismiss (NO.
400CV00572JMM)
4336 Rosie L. MAYWEATHER, Plaintiff, v. AFFILIATED FOODS SOUTHWEST, INC., Defendant.,
2000 WL 34543702, *34543702 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (E.D.Ark. Jun 06,
2000) Plaintiff's Amended and Substituted Brief in Support (NO. 499CV00510SMR)
4337 Rosie L. MAYWEATHER, Plaintiff, v. AFFILIATED FOODS SOUTHWEST, INC., Defendant.,
2000 WL 34543701, *34543701 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (E.D.Ark. Jun 05,
2000) Plaintiff's Brief in Support (NO. 499CV00510SMR)
4338 Arthur SMELT, et al., Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., Defendants, Dennis
Hollingsworth, et al., Defendant-Intervenors., 2009 WL 2251796, *2251796+ (Trial Motion,
Memorandum and Affidavit) (C.D.Cal. Jul 27, 2009) Intervenors' Memorandum of Points And
Authorities in Support of United States of America's Motion to Dismiss (NO. MLGX, SACV-
09-286DOC) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
4339 Marsial LOPEZ, et al., each individually, and as class representatives, Plaintiffs, v. Sheriff
Donny YOUNGBLOOD, et al., Defendants., 2008 WL 7241896, *7241896+ (Trial Motion,
Memorandum and Affidavit) (E.D.Cal. Sep 16, 2008) Plaintiffs' Opposition to Defendants'
Motion for Summary Adjudication; ÝFiled Concurrently with Plaintiffs' Separate State-
ment of Disputed and Undisputed Facts; Objection to the Declaration of Ian ... (NO. CV-
F-07-0474DLB) " HN: 4,5 (S.Ct.)
4340 Kristin M. PERRY, Sandra B. Stier, Paul T. Katami, and Jeffrey J. Zarrillo, Plaintiffs, City and
County of San Francisco, Plaintiff-Intervenor, v. Arnold SCHWARZENEGGER, in his official
capacity as Governor of California; Edmund G. Brown, JR., in his official capacity as Attorney
General of California; Mark B. Horton, in his official capacity as Director of the California De-
partment of Public Health and State Registrar of Vital Statistics; Linette Scott, in her, 2010 WL
2464548, *2464548+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (N.D.Cal. Jun 15, 2010) De-
fendant-Intervenors Dennis Hollingsworth, Gail J. Knight, Martin F. Gutierrez, Mark A.

Jansson, and Protectmarriage.com's Answers to Questions for Closing Arguments (NO.

09-CV-2292VRW)
capacity as Governor of California; Edmund G. Brown, Jr., in his official capacity as Attorney
742342, *742342+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (N.D.Cal. Feb 26, 2010) Defend-
ant-Intervenors' Response to Amicus Submissions (NO. 09-CV-2292VRW) HN: 4
(S.Ct.)
County of San Francisco, Plaintiff-Intervenor, v. ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, in his offi-
cial capacity as Governor of California; Edmund G. Brown, JR., in his official capacity as Attor-
ney General of California; Mark B. Horton, in his official capacity as Director of the California
Department of Public Health and State Registrar of Vital Statistics; Linette Scott, in her, 2010
WL 742343, *742343+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (N.D.Cal. Feb 26, 2010) De-
fendant-Intervenors' Trial Memorandum (Including Citations) (NO. 09-CV-2292VRW) "
HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
4343 Kristin M. PERRY, et al., Plaintiffs, City and County of San Francisco, Plaintiff-Intervenor, v.
Arnold SCHWARZENEGGER, et al., Defendants, Proposition 8 Official Proponents Dennis
Hollingsworth, et al., Defendant-Intervenors., 2010 WL 742344, *742344+ (Trial Motion,
Memorandum and Affidavit) (N.D.Cal. Feb 26, 2010) Plaintiffs' Response to Amicus Curiae
Filings (NO. 09-CV-2292VRW) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
County of San Fran-Cisco, Plaintiff-Intervenor, v. Arnold SCHWARZENEGGER, in his official
474974, *474974+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (N.D.Cal. Feb 03, 2010)
Amended Brief in Support of Plaintiffs By Amici Curiae Asian Law Caucus, Asian Americ-
an Justice Center, Asian Pacific American Bar Association of Los Angeles County, Asian
Pacific American Legal ... (NO. 09-CV-2292VRW) " HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
County of San Fran-Cisco, Plaintiff-Intervenor, v. Arnold SCHWARZENEGGER, in his official
474976, *474976+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (N.D.Cal. Feb 03, 2010) Brief in
Support of Plaintiffs By Amici Curiae Asian Law Caucus, Asian American Justice Center,
Asian Pacific American Bar Association of Los Angeles County, Asian Pacific American
Legal Center, ... (NO. 09-CV-2292VRW) " HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)

4718817, *4718817+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (N.D.Cal. Dec 07, 2009) De-
fendant-Intervenors' Trial Memorandum (NO. 09-CV-2292VRW) " HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
4347 Kristin M. PERRY, Sandra B. Stier, Paul T. Katami, and Jeffrey J. Zarrillo, Plaintiffs, v. Arnold
SCHWARZENEGGER, in his official capacity as Governor of California; Edmund G. Brown,
Jr., in his official capacity as Attorney General of California; Mark B. Horton, in his official ca-
pacity as Director of the California Department of Public Health and State Registrar of Vital Stat-
istics; Linette Scott, in her official capacity as Deputy Director of Health, 2009 WL 3169924,
*3169924+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (N.D.Cal. Sep 23, 2009) Plaintiffs' and
Plaintiff-Intervenor's Joint Opposition to Defendant-Intervenors' Motion for Summary
Judgment (NO. 09-CV-2292VRW) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
*1748381+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (N.D.Cal. Jun 11, 2009) Proposed In-
tervenors' Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Injunction (NO.
09-CV-2292VRW) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
4349 Mikoyan WATSON, an individual; and Herman White, an individual, Plaintiffs, v. DENVER
CAREER SERVICE BOARD; Denver Department of Parks and Recreation; the City and County
of Denver; Dennis Weber; and Daniel Betts, Defendants., 2008 WL 4523335, *4523335 (Trial
Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.Colo. Apr 30, 2008) Opposition to Motion of Defend-
ants Dennis Weber and Daniel Betts to Dismiss, or in the Alternative, for Summary Judg-
ment, on the Eighth Cause of Action (NO. 07-CV-01755-REB-MEH) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
4350 Mikoyan WATSON, an individual; and Herman White, an individual, Plaintiffs, v. DENVER
CAREER SERVICE BOARD; Denver Department of Parks and Recreation; the City and County
of Denver; Dennis Weber; and Daniel Betts, Defendants., 2008 WL 4523333, *4523333 (Trial
Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.Colo. Apr 28, 2008) Opposition to Motion of Defend-
ants Dennis Weber and Daniel Betts to Dismiss, or in the Alternative, for Summary Judg-
ment, on the Eighth Cause of Action (NO. 07-CV-01755-REB-MEH) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
4351 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. FOUR PARCELS OF PROPERTY LOCATED
AT 28-31 BOUTON STREET, NORWALK, CONNECTICUT, with All Appurtenances and Im-
provements Thereon, Defendants., 2003 WL 24836935, *24836935 (Trial Motion, Memorandum
and Affidavit) (D.Conn. Oct 16, 2003) Motion for Protective Order (NO. 301CV-1073(SRU))
HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
4352 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ONE PARCEL OF PROPERTY LOCATED AT
27 LINCOLN AVENUE, NORWALK, CONNECTICUT, with All Appurtenances and Improve-
ments Thereon, Defendants., 2003 WL 24836938, *24836938 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and
Affidavit) (D.Conn. Oct 16, 2003) Motion for Protective Order (NO. 301CV-1086(SRU))
HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
4353 Roland A. JONES, Plaintiff, v. Pete GEREN, Secretary of the Army, et al., Defendants., 2009

WL 5080791, *5080791 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.D.C. Oct 28, 2009)
Plaintiff's Motion to Vacate Res Judicata Dismissal, and to Provide the ""Exceptional Cir-
cumstances'' the Defendants Claim That Plaintiff Did Not Provide (NO. 07-2041, PLF)
HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
4354 Elizabeth A. MILLER, Plaintiff, v. DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY, Defendant., 2008 WL
3049704, *3049704+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.D.C. May 14, 2008)
Plaintiff's Statement of Points and Authorities In Support of Cross-motion for Summary
Judgment and Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgment (NO. 104CV00685)
3049705, *3049705 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.D.C. May 14, 2008)
Plaintiff's Statement of Points and Authorities In Support of Cross-motion for Summary
Judgment and Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgment (NO. 104CV00685)
4356 Kimberly J. DAISHER, Plaintiff, v. Norman Y. MINETA, et al., Defendants., 2005 WL
2095838, *2095838+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.D.C. Jul 15, 2005)
Plaintiff's Opposition to Defendants' Renewed Motion to Dismiss (NO. 101CV-1059, RJL)

3628142, *3628142+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.D.C. Dec 10, 2004)
Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (NO. 04-0685, RMU)
4358 Blakely Martin MAXWELL, Plaintiff, v. Les BROWNLEE, in his official capacity as under Sec-
retary of the Army and Acting Secretary of the Army, and Governor Mike Huckabee, in his offi-
cial capacity as Governor of the State of Arkansas Governor's Office and Major General Donald
Morrow, in his official capacity as the Adjutant General of the Arkansas National Guard, Camp
Robinson, Defendants., 2003 WL 24270190, *24270190 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affi-
davit) (D.D.C. Nov 25, 2003) Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary In-
junction (NO. 103CV02433) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
4359 Kimberly J. DAISHER, Plaintiff, v. Norman MINETA, et al., Defendants., 2001 WL 34806543,
*34806543 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.D.C. 2001) Defendants' Reply
Memorandum in Support of Defendants' Renewed Motion to Dismiss (NO. 01-1059, RJL)
4360 SSgt Jason A. ADKINS, USAF, Plaintiff, v. Donald H. RUMSFELD, Secretary of Defense;
James G. Roche, Secretary of the Air Force; Gen. John W. Handy, Commander Air Mobility
Command, Col. John I. Pray, Jr., 436th Air Wing Commander, in their official capacities, De-
fendants., 2006 WL 2581727, *2581727+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.Del.
Mar 15, 2006) Plaintiff's Answering Brief in Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss
(NO. ACT04-1453-JJF)
4361 SSgt. Jason A. ADKINS, USAF, Plaintiff, v. Donald H. RUMSFELD, Secretary of Defense; Dr.
James G. Roche, Secretary of the Air Force; General John W. Handy, Commander Air Mobility
Command; Col. John I. Pray Jr., 436th Air Wing Commander, all in their official capacities, De-
fendants., 2005 WL 4708709, *4708709+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.Del.
Mar 21, 2005) Plaintiff's Answering Brief in Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss
(NO. 04-1453-JJF) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
4362 Elizabeth BOOK, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF DAYTONA BEACH, FLORIDA, Defendant., 2008 WL
7191513, *7191513+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (M.D.Fla. Nov 29, 2008)

Plaintiff's Response to Defendant's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (NO.

608-CV-1180-ORL-28DA) " HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
4363 Cathy STANTON, Laura Pinfield, Norma Mitchell, Kayla Sosnow, Shirley Mason, T.A. Wyner,
Jamie Hooper, Marilyn S. Hooper, Jan Larson Frandsen, Individually, and as Mother of Her
Minor Child, Athela Frandsen, Plaintiffs, v. COUNTY OF BREVARD, Florida, Defendant., 2004
WL 2036966, *2036966+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (M.D.Fla. Feb 18, 2004)
Plaintiffs' Response to Defendant's Motion to Strike First Amended Complaint or, in the
Alternative, Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint (NO. 603-CV-1279-ORL-19DA)
4364 Paul L. FRIEDMAN and Sandra Z. Friedman, Plaintiffs, v. THE CITY OF RIVIERA BEACH,
Florida; William E. Wilkins, in his individual/personal capacity; and, Clarence D. Williams, in
his individual/personal capacity, Defendants., 2004 WL 2199364, *2199364 (Trial Motion,
Memorandum and Affidavit) (S.D.Fla. May 04, 2004) Defendant Williams' Motion to Dismiss
Plaintiffs' Amended Complaint with Incorporated Memorandum of Law (NO.
03-81120-CIV-MIDDLEB)
4365 Loretta WILSON, Plaintiff, v. B/E AEROSPACE, INC., 2003 WL 23695281, *23695281 (Trial
Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (S.D.Fla. Jun 30, 2003) Plaintiff's Response to Defend-
ant's Motion in Limine to Exclude Evidence of Allegations Previously Stricken by the Court
and Incorporated Memorandum of Law (NO. 01-9107-CIV-MARTINEZ)
4366 In re: Norman BRICKELL, Debtor. Norman Brickell, Plaintiff/Appellee, v. Dorothea Brickell,
Defendant/Appellant., 2002 WL 32755322, *32755322 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affi-
davit) (S.D.Fla. Sep 05, 2002) Defendant/Appellant, Dorothea Brickell's, Motion to Transfer
Appeal to Honorable Aldaberto Jordan (NO. 00-CIV-1372-SH)
4367 WOMEN'S EMERGENCY NETWORK, ET AL., Plaintiffs, v. JEB BUSH, ET AL., Intervenors.,
2002 WL 32671282, *32671282+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (S.D.Fla. Jun 27,
2002) Plaintiffs' Opposition to Defendants'-Intervenors' Motion for Summary Judgment
(NO. 02-20172JUDGEMOORE)
4368 Darlene CHASE, Plaintiff, v. Robert CROWDER, in his official capacity as Sheriff of Martin
County, Florida, William Snyder, in his individual capacity, Sanford (""Grady"") Shirk, in his in-
dividual capacity, Defendants., 2002 WL 32495609, *32495609 (Trial Motion, Memorandum
and Affidavit) (S.D.Fla. Mar 27, 2002) Plaintiff's Memorandum of Law in Opposition to the
Defendant's Motion to Dismiss and Motion for Sanctions (NO. 01-14368-CIV-MOORE)
4369 Darlene CHASE, Plaintiff, v. Robert CROWDER, in his official capacity as Sheriff of Martin
County, Florida, William Snyder, in his individual capacity, Sanford (""Grady"") Shirk, in his in-
dividual capacity, Defendants., 2002 WL 32754888, *32754888 (Trial Motion, Memorandum
and Affidavit) (S.D.Fla. Mar 27, 2002) Plaintiff's Memorandum of Law in Opposition to the
Defendant's Motion to Dismiss and Motion for Sanctions (NO. 01-14368-CIV-MOORE)
4370 WOMEN'S EMERGENCY NETWORK, et Al., Plaintiffs, v. Jeb BUSH, Etal., Defendants., 2002
WL 32672196, *32672196+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (S.D.Fla. 2002)
Plaintiffs' Opposition to the State Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (NO.
02-CV-20172)
4371 Margaret HERRMAN, Plaintiff, v. James LEDBETTER; Thomas C. Meredith, in his official ca-
pacity as Chancellor of the Georgia Board of Regents, Defendants., 2004 WL 3375754,

*3375754 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (M.D.Ga. Apr 16, 2004) Plaintiff's
Memorandum of Law in Response to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (NO.
303-CV-4(CAR))
4372 Lashunda DAVIS & Crystal Collins, Plaintiffs, v. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION, De-
fendant., 2007 WL 4725434, *4725434 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (N.D.Ga. Oct
26, 2007) Reply Memorandum in Support of Notice of Objection and Motion to Strike the
Declaration of Dr. Mark Woods and Motion in Limine to Exclude Documents and Evidence
Not Produced in Discovery and ... (NO. 106-CV-1338-ODE) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
4373 Edna JOHNSON and Cyrus Johnson, husband and wife, Plaintiffs, v. Aoao Makai CLUB, a busi-
ness of unknown status; the Makai Club, a Hawaii nonprofit corporation; Fireman's Fund Insur-
ance Company, a/k/a Fireman's Fund Insurance Company of Hawaii, Inc., an insurance company;
and Does 1 - 10 inclusively, Defendants., 2009 WL 4833305, *4833305 (Trial Motion, Memor-
andum and Affidavit) (D.Hawai'i Jul 23, 2009) Plaintiffs' Memorandum in Opposition to De-
fendant Aoao Makai Club's Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction; De-
claration of Richard Hamlish; Certificate of Service (NO. CV09-00072JMSKSC) HN: 5
(S.Ct.)
4374 Quentin BULLOCK and Jack Reid, individually and on behalf of a class, Plaintiffs, v. Michael F.
SHEAHAN, as the Sheriff of Cook County in his Official Capacity and Cook County, Defend-
ants., 2007 WL 2281815, *2281815 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (N.D.Ill. Jun 19,
2007) Plaintiffs' Response to Defendant Sheriff's Motion to Strike to Bar Expert Testimony
of Donald Henry (NO. 04C1051)
4375 Deborah NUZZI, Plaintiff, v. JANICE BLANCHETTE, PETER DUBRAVEC, et al., Defendant.,
2006 WL 4033392, *4033392+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (N.D.Ill. 2006)
Plaintiff's Response to Defendant Janice Blanchette's and Peter Dubravec's Motion to Dis-
miss Complaint or in the Alternative for a More Definite Statement (NO. 04C4817)
4376 Jane DOE, as next friend to her minor daughters, Joan Doe and Jill Doe, v. VERMILION PAR-
ISH SCHOOL BOARD, Randy Schexnayder, Superintendent, Bill Searle, District A, Angela
Faulk, District B, Dexter Callahan, District C, Ricky Lebouef, District D, Anthony Fontana, Dis-
trict E, Charles Campbell, District F, Chris Mayard, District G, Ricky Broussard, District H, and
David Dupuis, Principal, Rene A rost Middle School., 2009 WL 5058562, *5058562+ (Trial Mo-
tion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (W.D.La. Sep 08, 2009) Memorandum of Law in Support of
Plaintiff's Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction (NO.
09CV01565) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
4377 NANCY GILL & MARCELLE LETOURNEAU, et al., Plaintiffs, v. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL
MANAGEMENT, et al., Defendants., 2010 WL 2826242, *2826242+ (Trial Motion, Memor-
andum and Affidavit) (D.Mass. Feb 16, 2010) Plaintiffs' Reply Memorandum of Law in Sup-
port of Their Motion for Summary Judgment (NO. 109-CV-10309JLT)
4378 NANCY GILL & MARCELLE LETOURNEAU, et al., Plaintiffs, v. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL
MANAGEMENT, et al., Defendants., 2009 WL 5803679, *5803679+ (Trial Motion, Memor-
andum and Affidavit) (D.Mass. Nov 17, 2009) Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Defend-
ants' Motion to Dismiss and in Support of Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment (NO.
109CV10309) "
4379 Elaine JOYCE, Plaintiff, v. TOWN OF DENNIS, Dennis Pines Golf Course, Dennis Highlands,

Robert Canevazzi, Michael Cummings, Dennis Penner, and Russell Champoux, Defendants.,
2009 WL 4642533, *4642533 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.Mass. Aug 17,
2009) Plaintiff's Memorandum in Support of Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (NO.
108CV10277) HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
4380 Michael B. ELGIN, Aaron Lawson, Henry Tucker and Christon Colby on behalf of themselves
and similarly situated men throughout the United States, Plaintiffs, v. George W. BUSH, indi-
vidually and in his official capacity as President of the United States; Henry M. Paulson, Jr., indi-
vidually) and in his official capacity as Secretary of the Treasury; Dirk Kempthorne, individually
and in his official capacity as Secretary of the Interior; United States of, 2008 WL 2148492,
*2148492 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.Mass. Mar 14, 2008) Plaintiffs' Op-
position to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (NO. 07-12391DPW)
4381 Randolph E. GREEN, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, et al.,1, De-
fendants., 2006 WL 5053960, *5053960 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.Mass.
Feb 06, 2006) Defendant's Memorandum in Support of Motion to Dismiss (NO.
05-1197-RWZ)
4382 Thomas COOK; Megan Dresch; Laura Galaburda; Jack Glover; David Hall; Monica Hill; Jenny
Lynn Kopfstein; Jennifer McGinn; Justin Peacock; James E. Pietrangelo II; Derek Sparks; Stacy
Vasquez, Plaintiffs, v. Donald H. RUMSFELD, Secretary of Defense; Michael Chertoff, Secret-
ary of Homeland Security; United States of America, Defendants., 2005 WL 5280901,
*5280901+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.Mass. Mar 28, 2005) Opposition to
Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (NO. 04-12546GAO)
4383 Samuel SCHWARTZ, Douglas Scandrett, Evan Simons, Joseph D. Monty, Jr., and Nicole Foley,
Plaintiffs, v. Lewis C. BRODSKY, Director of the United States Selective Service System, and
Thomas Reilly, Massachusetts Attorney General, Defendants., 2003 WL 23884952, *23884952+
(Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.Mass. 2003) Plaintiff's Opposition to Motions
to Dismiss (NO. 03CV10005-EFH)
4384 In Pro Se Jose F. REUTER, v. WASHINGTON COUNTY SOCIAL SERVICES ET AL., 2006
WL 1451723, *1451723 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.Md. Apr 19, 2006) Ap-
pellan Respose to Defendant Dawn Morales Supplemental Consolidated Response, to
Plaintiff's Motion to Append and Errata and Appellant Response to Down Morales Repl to
Appellant Motion to Dismiss (NO. CCB-06-334)
4385 Matthew DUBAY, Plaintiff, v. Lauren WELLS, an individual, and Saginaw County Prosecuting
Attorney's Office, By and Through, Michael D. Thomas, Prosecutor, prosecutor, Defendants, Mi-
chael A. Cox, Attorney General of the State of Michigan, Intervening-Defendant., 2006 WL
1652468, *1652468+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (E.D.Mich. May 31, 2006) Re-
sponse to Motion to Dismiss and Brief in Opposition to Intervening-Defendant's Motion
(NO. 106-CV-11016)
4386 Matthew DUBAY, Plaintiff, v. Lauren WELLS, an individual, and Saginaw County Prosecuting
Attorney's Office, by and Through, Michael D. Thomas, Prosecutor, prosecutor, Defendants, and
Michael A. Cox, Attorney General of the State of Michigan, Intervening-Defendant., 2006 WL
1735813, *1735813+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (E.D.Mich. May 31, 2006) Re-
sponse to Motion to Dismiss and Brief in Opposition to Intervening-Defendant's Motion
(NO. 106-CV-11016)

4387 Eleanor HEALD, et al, Plaintiffs, v. Jennifer M. GRANHOLM, et at, Defendants, Michigan Beer
& Wine Wholesalers Association, Intervening Defendant., 2005 WL 2915363, *2915363 (Trial
Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (E.D.Mich. Sep 29, 2005) Defendants' Brief in Opposi-
tion to Plaintiffs' Motion for Entry of Judgment and Injunction Oral Argument Requested
(NO. 200-CV-71438-BAF)
4388 Michael Curtis LYONS, Plaintiff, v. THE CITY OF DETROIT, City of Detroit Law Department
Claims Division¨, a Professional Liability Corporation. Kelvin R. Lenton, a Legal Investigator,
Department of Public Transportation, D.O.T Bus Co., and Bruce Sanders, City of Detroit Bus
Driver, Tremayne Scales an Individual, and Progressive Michigan Automobile Insurance Co.,
Detroit Receiving Hospital, Health Care System, Defendants., 2003 WL 24233251, *24233251+
(Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (E.D.Mich. Dec 30, 2003) The Plaintiff General
Reply Supplemental Brief in Support of Counter-Motion for Summary Judgment on Plead-
ing (NO. 03-CV-72634)
4389 Laura LASCOLA, Individually, and as Sole Heir and Next of Norma Dale Massa, deceased,
Plaintiff, v. BARDEN MISSISSIPPI GAMING, LLC, d/b/a Fitzgerald's Casino Hotel Tunica, et
al, Defendants., 2008 WL 3125979, *3125979 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit)
(N.D.Miss. Jun 12, 2008) Memorandum Brief in Support of Tunica County Mississippi and
Tunica County Sheriff's Department's Motion for Summary Judgment (NO. 206CV00080)
4390 Gena DUCKWORTH, et al., Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF ST. LOUIS BOARD OF POLICE COMMIS-
SIONERS, et al., Defendants., 2006 WL 1351716, *1351716 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and
Affidavit) (E.D.Mo. Apr 03, 2006) Reply Suggestions in Support of Defendants' Motion for
Summary Judgment (NO. 403CV01696RWS)
4391 ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. Paul and Sheri BERGE, o/b/o Ashley
Berge, deceased, and Claude and Marlene Streeper, and Mark Streeper, Defendants., 2007 WL
4702060, *4702060+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.N.D. Oct 29, 2007) De-
fendants Claude And Marlene Streeper's Response to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judg-
ment (NO. 106-CV-060)
4392 Darlene JESPERSEN, Plaintiff, v. HARRAH'S OPERATING COMPANY, INC., a Delaware
corporation, Defendant., 2002 WL 32980105, *32980105 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affi-
davit) (D.Nev. Jul 26, 2002) Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgment (NO. CV-
N-01-0401-ECR(VPC)
4393 Sr. M. REGINA Fahy, Rsm, et al., Plaintiffs, v. COMMISSIONER, New Hampshire Dept of
Safety, Defendant., 2006 WL 811811, *811811 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit)
(D.N.H. Feb 06, 2006) Plaintiffs' Memorandum of Law Opposing Defendant's Motion for
Summary Judgment (NO. 05-CV-97-SM)
4394 Sr. M. Regina FAHY, RSM, et al., Plaintiffs, v. COMMISSIONER, NEW HAMPSHIRE DEPT
OF SAFETY, Defendant., 2006 WL 686219, *686219 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affi-
davit) (D.N.H. Jan 05, 2006) Plaintiffs' Memorandum of Law Supporting Motion for Sum-
mary Judgment (NO. 05-CV-97-SM)
4395 Sr. M. Regina FAHY, RSM, Haliyamtu Theo Amani, Sarra Ali, Eva Castillo-Turgeon, and Anna-
greta Swanson, Plaintiffs, v. COMMISSIONER, NEW HAMPSHIRE DEPARTMENT OF
SAFETY, In his Official Capacity, Defendant., 2005 WL 1033405, *1033405 (Trial Motion,

Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.N.H. Mar 23, 2005) MEMORANDUM OF LAW SUPPORT-
ING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION
(NO. 05CV00097)
4396 Anthony Jerome MCKNIGHT, et al., v. Dawn Marie MIDDLETON, et al., 2009 WL 3374631,
*3374631+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (E.D.N.Y. Aug 07, 2009) Anthony
Jerome McKnight's Memorandum of Law In Opposition To Defendant Dawn Marie
Middleton's Motion To Dismiss Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) (NO.
08-CV-3896, SLT) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
4397 BERMUDEZ, v. THE CITY OF NEW YORK et al., 2010 WL 3055733, *3055733+ (Trial Mo-
tion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (S.D.N.Y. Jun 11, 2010) Individual Defendants' Supple-
mental Memorandum of Law in Support of Their Motion for Summary Judgment Based on
Qualified Immunity (NO. 110CV01162)
4398 Lauren CUTLER, Plaintiff, v. THE CITY OF NEW YORK, The New York City Department Of
Education, Defendants., 2009 WL 5000563, *5000563 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affi-
davit) (S.D.N.Y. Oct 19, 2009) Memorandum of Law In Support Of Defendants' Motion To
Dismiss The Complaint (NO. 095335, PKC) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
4399 James BENJAMIN, el al., Plaintiffs, v. William J. FRASER, et al., Defendants., 2001 WL
34766552, *34766552+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (S.D.N.Y. Nov 30, 2001)
Plaintiffs' Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Defendants' Motion for A Stay Pending
Appeal and for Relief Pursuant to Rule 60(b) (NO. 01-7533, 75 CIV. 3073 (HB)) HN: 5
(S.Ct.)
4400 Patricia J. CURTO, Plaintiff, v. BENDER, Kummer, Vacco, Metzer, Town of Boston Justice
Court, Town of Boston, Parker, Goldstein, Clark, Erie County District Attorney's Office, Burns,
Caywood and Zittel sued in their individual and official capacities, Defendants., 2004 WL
3211827, *3211827 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (W.D.N.Y. Dec 08, 2004)
Plaintiff's Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Complaint
(NO. 04-CV-0026(S))
4401 Patricia J. CURTO, Plaintiff, v. BENDER, Kummer, Vacco, Metzer, Town of Boston Justice
Court, Town of Boston, Parker, Goldstein, Clark, Erie County District Attorney's Office, Burns,
Caywood and Zittel sued in their individual and official capacities, Defendants., 2004 WL
3211815, *3211815 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (W.D.N.Y. Mar 21, 2004)
Plaintiff's Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Complaint
(NO. 04-CV-0026S)
4402 Effie STEWART, et al., Plaintiffs, v. J. Kenneth BLACKWELL, et al., Defendants., 2004 WL
3991736, *3991736+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (N.D.Ohio Nov 15, 2004)
Plaintiffs' Post-Trial Brief (NO. 502CV2028) " HN: 3 (S.Ct.)
4403 Effie STEWART, et al., Plaintiffs, v. J. Kenneth BLACKWELL, et al., Defendants., 2004 WL
4000312, *4000312 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (N.D.Ohio Jul 19, 2004)
Plaintiffs' Trial Brief (NO. 502-CV-2028) " HN: 3 (S.Ct.)
4404 Eric A. HANSON, Plaintiff, v. Major General Harry M. WYATT, III, in his official capacity as
the Adjutant General, State of Oklahoma, Defendant., 2006 WL 497561, *497561+ (Trial Mo-
tion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (W.D.Okla. Jan 20, 2006) Response to Plaintiff's Motion for
Summary Judgment (NO. CIV-05-0486-M)

4405 Eric A. HANSON, Plaintiff, v. Major General Harry M. WYATT, III, in his official capacity as
The Adjutant General, State of Oklahoma, Defendant., 2005 WL 4134180, *4134180 (Trial Mo-
tion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (W.D.Okla. Dec 29, 2005) Defendant's Reply to Plaintiff's
Response to Motion to Dismiss (NO. CIV-05-486-M)
4406 (1) Eric A. HANSON, Plaintiff, v. (1) Major General Harry M. WYATT III, in his official capa-
city as The Adjutant General, State of Oklahoma, Defendant., 2005 WL 4134179, *4134179+
(Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (W.D.Okla. Dec 19, 2005) Plaintiff's Response to
Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Complaint as Non-Justiciable and Brief in Support (NO.
CIV-05-486-M)
4407 Eric A. HANSON, Plaintiffs, v. Major General Harry M. WYATT, III, in his official capacity as
the Adjutant General, State of Oklahoma, capacity, Defendant., 2005 WL 4134178, *4134178
(Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (W.D.Okla. Nov 29, 2005) Defendants Motion to
Dismiss Complaint as Non-Justiciable and Brief in Support (NO. CIV-05-0486-M)
4408 Ashley BELLUM, by her next friend, Rick Bellum; Stephanie Franklin, by her next friend, Bar-
bara Franklin; Krystin Jantzer, by her next friend, Gary Jantzer; Katherine Richard, by her next
friend, Jeff Richard; Karyne Sander, by her next friend, Cynthia Sander; Brin Tamblin, by her
next friend, Laura Ann Tamblin; individually and on behalf of all those similarly situated,
Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF GRANTS PASS, Oregon; William Peterson, Grants Pass City, 2002 WL
32833512, *32833512+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.Or. Apr 04, 2002)
Memorandum of Law in Support of Plaintiffs' Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order/
Preliminary Injunction (NO. 02-3026-CO)
4409 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. Gregory LADNER., 2005 WL 5904489, *5904489 (Trial
Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (E.D.Pa. Jul 18, 2005) Defendant's Motion to Dismiss, or
for Judgment of Acquittal or for New Trial Pursuant to Federal Rules of Criminal Proced-
ure 29 & 33 (NO. 05-098)
4410 WINE & SPIRITS RETAILERS, INC., et al, Plaintiffs, v. STATE OF RHODE ISLAND, et al.,
Defendants., 2005 WL 6088395, *6088395 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.R.I.
Feb 03, 2005) Memorandum In Support of Plaintiffs' Motion for a Preliminary Injunction
(NO. 104CV00418) " HN: 3 (S.Ct.)
4411 Abigail Noel FISHER; and Rachel Multer Michalewicz, Plaintiffs, v. State of Texas; University
of Texas at Austin; Mark G. Yudof, Chancellor of the University of Texas System in his Official
Capacity; David B. Pryor, Executive Vice Chancellor for Academic Affairs in his Official Capa-
city; Barry D. Burgdorf, Vice Chancellor and General Counsel in his Official Capacity; William
Powers, Jr., President of the University of Texas at Austin in his Official Capacity; Board of Re-
gents of, 2008 WL 7318505, *7318505+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (W.D.Tex.
Apr 17, 2008) Motion for Preliminary Injunction (NO. 108-CV-00263-SS) " HN: 3
(S.Ct.)
4412 Tommy David STRICKLER, Petitioner, v. J.D. NETHERLAND, Warden, Respondent., 1996
WL 33670419, *33670419 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (E.D.Va. Aug 19, 1996)
Petitioner's Reply Opposing Respondent's Motion to Dismiss (NO. 395CV924)
4413 Esther AVILA, Plaintiff, v. Mike SMITH, Secretary, Human Services Agency; Samantha Haley;
John Dick; Joshua Slen; Stage Coach Transportation Broker; David Palmer; Kelly Wheatley, De-
fendants., 2006 WL 2300294, *2300294 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.Vt. Jun

07, 2006) Motion to Dismiss (NO. 205-CV-309)

4414 Esther AVILA, Plaintiff, v. Mike SMITH, Secretary, Human Services Agency; Samantha Haley;
John Dick; Joshua Slen; Stage Coach Transportation Broker; David Palmer; Kelly Wheatley; De-
fendants., 2006 WL 1203226, *1203226 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.Vt. Mar
13, 2006) Motion to Dismiss (NO. 205-CV-309)
4415 Stephen James CAPUTI, Petitioner, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respond-
ent., 2004 WL 3091803, *3091803+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (U.S.Tax Ct. Jul
29, 2004) Opening Brief for Respondent (NO. 18859-03) HN: 1,3,4 (S.Ct.)
4416 Jack HOLGUIN, Plaintiff, v. Jose FLORES, M/H Transport, and Does 1 to 60, Defendants., 2003
WL 25718611, *25718611+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (Cal.Superior Jun 02,
2003) Plaintiff's Opposition to Defendants' Demurrer; Memorandum of Points and Author-
ities (NO. KC041438) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
4417 Elizabeth KERRIGAN, et. al., v. State of Connecticut, et. al., 2005 WL 6225564, *6225564
(Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (Conn.Super. Nov 23, 2005) Memorandum in Sup-
port of Motion for Summary Judgment by Defendants State of Connecticut, Department of
Public Health, and J. Robert Galvin and in Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary
Judgment (NO. CV-04-4001813-S)
4418 Elizabeth KERRIGAN & Joanne Mock, Janet Peck & Carol Conklin, Geraldine Artis & Suzanne
Artis, Jeffrey Busch & Stephen Davis, J.E. Martin & Denise Howard, John Anderson & Garrett
Stack, Barbara Levine-Ritterman & Robin Levine-Ritterman, Damaris Navarro & Gloria Searson,
v. State of Connecticut, Department: of Public Health, J. Robert Galvin, in his/her official capa-
city as Commissioner of the Department Of Public Health, and Dorothy C. Bean, in, 2005 WL
6225562, *6225562+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (Conn.Super. Jul 28, 2005)
Memorandum of Law in Support of Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment (NO. NNH-
CV04-4001813) HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
4419 Harry R. JACKSON, Jr.; et al., Petitioners, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA BOARD OF ELEC-
TIONS AND ETHICS, Respondent, District of Columbia, Respondent-Intervenor., 2004 WL
5822564, *5822564+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.C.Super. Jan 10, 2004) Pe-
titioners' Reply Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Motion for Summary
Judgment and in Opposition to Motion to Dismiss (NO. 2009CA008613B)
4420 Katherine VARNUM, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Timothy J. BRIEN, in his official capacities as the Polk
County Recorder and Polk County Registrar, Defendant., 2007 WL 2461129, *2461129 (Trial
Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (Iowa Dist. Apr 24, 2007) Reply in Support of All
Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment (NO. CV5965)
4421 Katherine VARNUM, Patricia Hyde; Dawn Barbouroske, Jennifer Barbouroske; Jason Morgan,
Charles Swaggerty; David Twombley, Lawrence Hoch; William M. Musser, Otter Dreaming; In-
grid Olson and Reva Evans, Plaintiffs, v. Timothy J. BRIEN, in his official capacities as the Polk
County Recorder and Polk County Registrar, Defendant., 2007 WL 2809774, *2809774 (Trial
Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (Iowa Dist. Mar 30, 2007) Reply Brief in Support of Mo-
tion for Summary Judgment and Defendant's Resistance to Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary
Judgment (NO. CV5965)
4422 Katherine VARNUM, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Timothy J. BRIEN, in his official capacities as the Polk
County Recorder and Polk County Registrar, Defendant., 2007 WL 2461128, *2461128+ (Trial

Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (Iowa Dist. Jan 30, 2007) Memorandum of Authorities in
Support of All Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment and in Support of All Plaintiffs'
Resistance to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (NO. CV5965) " HN: 1,4
(S.Ct.)
4423 KENTUCKY COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS, Petitioner, v. PENDENNIS CLUB, INC.
Idle Hour Country Club Louisville Country Club, Respondents/Cross Claimants, Priscilla John-
son, in her capacity as Chairperson of the Kentucky Commission on Human Rights et al, Addi-
tional Defendants., 2000 WL 34592234, *34592234 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit)
(Ky.Cir.Ct. Apr 24, 2000) Petitioner and Additional Defendants' Cross-Motion for Partial
Summary Judgment (NO. 99-CI-07653)
4424 Hillary GOODRIDGE and Julie Goodridge, David Wilson and Robert Compton, Michael Horgan
and Edward Balmelli, Maureen Brodoff and Ellen Wade, Gary Chalmers and Richard Linnell,
Heidi Norton and Gina Smith, and Gloria Bailey and Linda Davies, Plaintiffs, v. DEPARTMENT
OF PUBLIC HEALTH, and Dr. Howard Koh, in his official capacity as Commissioner of the De-
partment of Public Health, Defendants., 2002 WL 32910990, *32910990 (Trial Motion, Memor-
andum and Affidavit) (Mass.Super. Mar 04, 2002) Memorandum in Opposition to Defendants'
Cross Motion for Summary Judgment and Reply (NO. 01-1647-A) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
partment of Public Health, Defendants., 2002 WL 34094266, *34094266 (Trial Motion, Memor-
andum and Affidavit) (Mass.Super. Mar 04, 2002) Memorandum in Opposition to Defendants'
Cross Motion for Summary Judgment and Reply (NO. 01-1647-A) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
partment of Public Health, Defendants., 2001 WL 34825136, *34825136+ (Trial Motion,
Memorandum and Affidavit) (Mass.Super. Aug 20, 2001) Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary
Judgment (NO. 01-1647-A) HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
partment of Public Health, Defendants., 2001 WL 35920961, *35920961+ (Trial Motion,
Memorandum and Affidavit) (Mass.Super. Aug 20, 2001) Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary
Judgment (NO. 01-1647-A) HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.)
4428 Eura DAWKINS, Plaintiff, v. BALTIMORE POLICE DEPARTMENT, et al., Defendants., 2004
WL 5392782, *5392782 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (Md.Cir.Ct. Apr 12, 2004)
Plaintiff's Response to Motion for Summary Judgment of Defendants Thomas C. Frazier,
Baltimore Police Department, and Unidentified Police Office, Affidavit of Defense not
Available and Request for ... (NO. 24-C-00-001471) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)

4429 GITANJALI DEANE & LISA POLYAK; Alvin Williams & Nigel Simon; Takia Foskey &
Joanne Rabb; Jodi Kelber-kaye & Stacey Kargman-kaye; Donna Myers & Maria Barquero; John
Lestitian; Charles Blackburn & Glen Dehn; Steven Palmer & Ryan Killough; Patrick Wojahn &
David Kolesar; and Mikkole Mozelle & Phelicia Kebreau, Plaintiffs, v. Frank CONAWAY, in his
official capacity as Baltimore City Circuit Court Clerk; Osalyn Pugh, in her official capacity as
Prince George's County, 2004 WL 5623269, *5623269 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affi-
davit) (Md.Cir.Ct. 2004) Plaintiffs' Opposition to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judg-
ment (NO. 24-C-04-005390)
4430 Bernadette SETSER, Petitioner, v. William SNODGRASS, Warden CCA/New Mexico Women's
Correctional Facility, Respondent., 2007 WL 5064263, *5064263 (Trial Motion, Memorandum
and Affidavit) (N.M. Dist. Sep 18, 2007) Respondent's Responsive Brief (NO. SD-94-42)
HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
4431 Mary LI and Rebecca Kennedy; Stephen Knox, M.D., and Eric Warshaw, M.D.; Kelly Burke and
Dolores Doyle; Donna Potter and Pamela Moen; Dominick Vetri and Douglas Dewitt; Sally
Sheklow and Enid Lefton; Irene Farrera and Nina Korican; Walter Frankel and Curtis Kiefer; Ju-
lie Williams and Coleen Belisle; Basic Rights Oregon, an Oregon not-for-profit corporation; and
American Civil Liberties Union of Oregon, an Oregon not-for-profit corporation, Plaintiffs,, 2004
WL 3764118, *3764118+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (Or.Cir. Apr 12, 2004) In-
tervenor-Defendant Defense of Marriage Coalition's Response to Plaintiffs' and Intervenor-
Plaintiffs' Motions for Partial Summary Judgment (NO. 0403-03057)
4432 Mary LI and Rebecca Kennedy; Stephen Knox, M.D., and Eric Warshaw, M.D.; Kelly Burke and
Dolores Doyle; Donna Potter and Pamela Moen; Dominick Vetri and Douglas Dewitt; Sally
Sheklow and Enid Lefton; Irene Farrera and Nina Korican; Walter Frankel and Curtis Kiefer; Ju-
lie Williams and Coleen Belisle; Basic Rights Oregon; and American Civil Liberties Union of
Oregon, Plaintiffs, Multnomah County, Intervenor-Plaintiff, v. STATE OF OREGON; Theodore,
2004 WL 3764112, *3764112+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (Or.Cir. Apr 09,
2004) Brief Amicus Curiae of Family Research Council in Support of Intervenors-Defend-
ants (NO. 0403-03057)
4433 Pitmann A. BUCK, Jr., Plaintiff, v. TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY, and Thomas
Davis, Defendants., 2001 WL 34764456, *34764456 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit)
(Tex.Dist. Dec 03, 2001) Plaintiff's Reply to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment
and Plaintiff's Cross Motion for Summary Judgment (NO. CAUSE99-14428)
4434 Heather ANDERSEN and Leslie Christian; et al., Plaintiffs, v. KING COUNTY; et al., Defend-
ants and third-Party plaintiffs, v. STATE OF WASHINGTON, Third party defendant, Senator
Val STEVENS, et al., Intervenor defendants., 2004 WL 5577858, *5577858+ (Trial Motion,
Memorandum and Affidavit) (Wash.Super. Jul 12, 2004) Plaintiffs' Reply On Their Motion for
Summary Judgment (NO. 04-2-04964-4SEA)
4435 Gregory K. AMUNRUD, Petitioner, v. BOARD OF APPEALS AND THE DEPARTMENT OF
SOCIAL AND HEALTH SERVICES, State of Washington, Defendants., 2003 WL 25756217,
*25756217 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (Wash.Super. Jun 27, 2003) Respondent
Dshs' Trial Brief (NO. 02-2-35060-7SEA) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
Trial Filings

*2588310 (Trial Filing) (N.D.Cal. Aug 17, 2009) Defendants-Intervenors Proposition 8 Pro-
ponents and Projectmarriage.com's Supplemental Case Management Statement (NO.
09-CV-2292VRW) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
Positive Cases (Australia)
Referred to by
4437 X v Commonwealth, 1999 WL 33123007, 200 CLR 177, 167 ALR 529, 74 ALJR 176, 59 ALD
321, [1999] HCA 63 (HCA Dec 02, 1999) (NO. B53/1998)
Secondary Sources (Australia)

4438 Open Chambers: High Court Associates and Supreme Court Clerks Compared, 31 Melbourne
University Law Review 646 (2007)
Positive & Neutral Cases (Canada)
Considered in
4439 Andrews v. Law Society (British Columbia), 56 D.L.R. (4th) 1, [1989] 2 W.W.R. 289, [1989] 1
S.C.R. 143, 34 B.C.L.R. (2d) 273, 25 C.C.E.L. 255, 91 N.R. 255, 1989 CarswellBC 16, 1989
CarswellBC 701, 10 C.H.R.R. D/5719, 36 C.R.R. 193, J.E. 89-259, [1989] S.C.J. No. 6, EYB
1989-66977 (S.C.C. Feb 02, 1989)
Secondary Sources (Canada)

4440 PRIVATISING HUMAN RIGHTS AND THE ABUSE OF POWER, 13 Canadian Journal of Law
and Jurisprudence 103 (2000)
4441 3 R.F.L. (2d) 367 Changing Children's Names — A Comparative Review of Recent Develop-
ments, 3 R.F.L. (2d) 367 (1978)

Frontiero v. Richardson

Hochgeladen von

Dokumentinformationen

Originalbeschreibung:

Copyright

Verfügbare Formate

Dieses Dokument teilen

Dokument teilen oder einbetten

Freigabeoptionen

Stufen Sie dieses Dokument als nützlich ein?

Sind diese Inhalte unangemessen?

Copyright:

Verfügbare Formate

Frontiero v. Richardson

Hochgeladen von

Copyright:

Verfügbare Formate

Westlaw Delivery Summary Report for BERMUDEZTEJERO,A

Date/Time of Request: Monday, October 4, 2010 04:29 Central

Justice Blackmun joined.

© 2010 Thomson Reuters. No Claim to Orig. US Gov. Works.

With respect to strict judicial scrutiny of a legislat- (Formerly 92k278.4(5), 92k318(2))

© 2010 Thomson Reuters. No Claim to Orig. US Gov. Works.

‘(1) his spouse;

© 2010 Thomson Reuters. No Claim to Orig. US Gov. Works.

© 2010 Thomson Reuters. No Claim to Orig. US Gov. Works.

© 2010 Thomson Reuters. No Claim to Orig. US Gov. Works.

© 2010 Thomson Reuters. No Claim to Orig. US Gov. Works.

© 2010 Thomson Reuters. No Claim to Orig. US Gov. Works.

© 2010 Thomson Reuters. No Claim to Orig. US Gov. Works.

© 2010 Thomson Reuters. No Claim to Orig. US Gov. Works.

© 2010 Thomson Reuters. No Claim to Orig. US Gov. Works.

which normally should be resolved by the elected

© 2010 Thomson Reuters. No Claim to Orig. US Gov. Works.

Date/Time of Request: Monday, October 4, 2010 04:30 Central

Date of Printing: Oct 04, 2010

Negative Citing References (U.S.A.)

Called into Doubt by

© 2010 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved.

Appellate Court Documents (U.S.A.)

U.S. Appellate Briefs

© 2010 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved.

Date/Time of Request: Monday, October 4, 2010 04:30 Central

Date of Printing: Oct 04, 2010

© 2010 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved.

Date/Time of Request: Monday, October 4, 2010 04:30 Central

Date of Printing: Oct 04, 2010

Negative Cases (U.S.A.)

Called into Doubt by

© 2010 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved.

Limitation of Holding Recognized by

Positive Cases (U.S.A.)

© 2010 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved.

© 2010 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved.

73-640) " HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.)

© 2010 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved.

83-2581) " HN: 4 (S.Ct.)

© 2010 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved.

73-20-K) " HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.)

© 2010 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved.

© 2010 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved.

© 2010 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved.

© 2010 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved.

© 2010 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved.

© 2010 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved.

© 2010 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved.

© 2010 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved.

© 2010 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved.

© 2010 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved.

© 2010 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved.

© 2010 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved.

© 2010 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved.

© 2010 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved.

© 2010 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved.

© 2010 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved.

© 2010 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved.

85-CV-389 (JBW)) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)

© 2010 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved.

© 2010 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved.

© 2010 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved.